Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Burisma Burisma BurismaLMAO - What does Burisma have to do with discussion? (Nothing)
This is just one of several topics where you have been showing your entire ass wrong. Like you couldn’t be more demonstrably w r o n g if you tried. At some point Dax, we have to agree to exist on the same planet in the same reality. This topic has been investigated. Thoroughly. There is 0 evidence of criminal activity.
If I choose to go around screaming that the Mets won the World Series in 2021 people are just going to refuse to engage because that’s patently stupid and the only thing keeping that hypothetical narrative alive is my pathetic refusal to accept basic reality
LMAO . . . It’s just fantastic when you declare something is “proven false”. You consistently avoid the primary crux of what I am posting, wander off into parts unknown and then declare that I’ve been “proven false”.It's absolutely amazing.
BAC can't figure out what lane I'm in after my series of posts last night that were essentially a framing hammer to the forehead in terms of indicating what lane I'm in . . . the dude has to have everything explained to him like he's 4 years old.
Worse yet, the try too harder who still doesn't get this board chimes in with his usual
You’re right Dax, you are definitely concise and cogent with your posts.
And when those things upon which you pontificate are empirically proven false, you definitely take the L without deflecting or pivoting or whatabouting
And it definitely doesn’t take you 4 whole ass lines of text to describe someone by a nickname using references only familiar to those residing in the incel omegaverse.
(as usual) today and only want to talk about genitalia and fake elder sex (again):
I'm just here (s)talk and be mad about Dax posting here
I'm just here to (s)talk
So you quoted a post twice, then tbt made a joke about it, then you say tbt doesn't understand the quote function, then you noticed you actually don't understand the quote system, then edited it to the correct quote, and then claim this is somehow related to you not having low self esteem?
Hold on, who was suing who in Bush v Gore? Doesn’t the plaintiff get listed first?Imagine a world where you try to overturn a democratic election and, failing that, organize a crappy coup to "fight like hell" as a last resort to hold onto power ...Imagine a world where #blueanon forgets they sent in squadrons of lawyers to overturn a presidential election. Years later then engage in election outcome: Denialism, delegitimization and ascribe to every insane conspiracy theory imaginable in order to undermine a presidency, with seeds planted by the election outcome denialism and the claim of an illegitimate presidency.
#thumbsup
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Some people who are perpetually enraged because people they don’t like post in this board often lose track and are confused by the quote/reply features.
Certain psychos only want collective groupthink on his blog!!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You really going to leave this up after you had to edit your post?
I believe that discretion would ultimately fall on the shoulders of a jury.At the prodding of a fascistic DOJ using legal selectivism against a perceived political enemy.