1
Essentially Flyertalk / Re: $100
« on: February 26, 2021, 09:02:58 AM »Get a decent steak dinner, and a decent scotch if I was being selfish with it.
You'd be hard pressed to get both.
I said decent, not nice
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Get a decent steak dinner, and a decent scotch if I was being selfish with it.
You'd be hard pressed to get both.
thune must be older than he looks.
Jesus. We really are going to recreate the roaring speculating 20’s and the subsequent unfortunate 30’s, aren’t we.
yeah, might even have a dust bowl while we're at it.
https://www.npr.org/2021/02/24/967376880/new-evidence-shows-fertile-soil-gone-from-midwestern-farms
but in the meantime,![]()
The Good Place did a great job getting a number of seasons in what was a seemingly shallow premise. The last line of the show kills me every time.
He's had problems with pain meds before. Easy to jump to that conclusion, given his recent surgery.
Hope he recovers ok, and gets help if he needs it. Glad nobody else was hurt.
I probably have 6 episodes left, and like normal I have a hard time "ending" a show, it's just something I don't like doing. I know it's just a story, and everything has to end but I really milk it.
I’m the same way. Ted Lasso is going to be really hard to end after just 3 seasons.
I recently went though the same with The Good Place, but they nailed the last few episodes so it wasn’t so bad.
I think Schitt's Creek tried to pass off as american or at least not be explicitly Canadian.
And just spitballing but I bet a major reason they shoot in the summer in both of those shows because the weather is more predictable and consistent (and the schedules of the cast)
Trailer Park Boys is the same way.
And yes I agree with rusty that Schitt’s Creek kept the actual location of Schitt’s Creek fairly vague. I don’t know that Canada was referenced at all throughout the series.
BTW, I concluded Schitt's Creek last night. That was a good television show, which is unsurprising given Eugene Levy, Catherine O'Hara, and Chris Elliot. The younger cast was also very good.
I’m ok with smoking it from time to time, it’s the Colorado edibles that knock me on my ass. I had a panick attack in Breckenridge this year while riding a gondola with my family. It didn’t help I was hungover either. It was embarrassing. Mrs. Wacky had issues too.Marijuana freaks me out. I can't even imagine some of these other hipster drugs out there.
Finally tried it at the tender age of 32 a few weeks ago, granted it was a small hit and didn't take or huge draw, and probably held it in for 3 seconds, but it was enough to make me feeling something, eventually, but it didn't really overly change anything after, I was maybe more relaxed but it was already a Saturday night.
I did have though a pretty crazy dream that night about going on a run with Mahomes and then I had a rat chase me and try and chew my feet and hands though, but that was probably the only downside. Was an odd dream, very vivid, usually don't have those often.
Marijuana freaks me out. I can't even imagine some of these other hipster drugs out there.
This is why I think that nothing should be done on the loan issue until the figure out the long term function and how that will change.
College has just become too damn expensive. I have heard a lot of arguments about it becoming so due to the fact that cheap loans and subsidies are a thing. That partly makes sense to me, but I can also see how turning that tap off could be worse than having expensive college.
I don't think he should make a move on it unless they need to bolster the economy immediately, or until they figure out what will happen regarding loans, cost, or subsidies next.
there was maybe a semi-justifiable economic (leaving the constitution out of it) argument for debt forgiveness as the only viable path or any stimulus if mcconnell controlled the senate, but with dems controlling the senate calendar, and already slating trillions in covid relief and stimulus and additional trillions for infrastructure there is absolutely none.
I'm sympathetic to the arguments about college dropouts and debt (I'm guessing that's where Bidens 10k is coming from and push for CC/trade school, as in not everyone needs to party at a 4 yr uni), but at the same time I get the counterpoint that these were personal choices as well with risk/responsibility attached.
Seems somewhat contradictory to say the loan program is terrible yet still want free college access because it's a public good. What I mean is the loan program would still likely provide a public service if it's allowing cheaper access but maybe the argument is more about price control through rationing really cheap/free from the supply side vs price inflation if the market can just grow through loans and push costs those onto attendees.
The mistake in this case was a colossal one, but the solution seems incredibly simple. Texas just needs to enact and actually enforce regulations that require power producers to take precautions far beyond what might seem necessary (kind of like making sure an elevator can handle 4000 pounds and then saying the max is 2000 or something).Uhhhh ast not sure about that postAst getting all huffy about Texas having four million people without power overnight and comparing it to the great plains doing 20-60 minute pauses is very texasy
Not huffy at all. I was told Texas was having blackouts because Texas.
Apparently Kansas is having blackouts because Kansas.
Apples and oranges in scale.
And in case anyone was wondering, KY and KS are connected, all of the Eastern US, and a ton of Canada connected together.
And all of Western US connected together.
Not connected: Eastern US, Western US, and Texas,
Hence why Texas has 4 mill out, KS after dealing with this for 2 weeks decides "well we'll occasionally have outages every so often and not for everyone and only for like 3 hours a day for some people" Texas after it's exhausted all it's resources after 2 days: welp that's it isn't it but the power for emergency sources". That's the difference. That and natural gas for everyone (lol) is just poof, CO2 right now. And here I was told fossil fuels were the reliable ones.
Resiliency and grid reliability comes in numbers (for the most part).
And I was not trying to pick on you obv, you can't do anything about it, it's just really funny (to me) to have "we can do this on our own we're our own goddamn country" Texas brought to it's knees over a little cold in 48 hours time.
And that's with all the oil a Texan can shake at. At least it took KS 2 weeks to succumb to (occasionally) having to have (some) people go out (for 30-60 minutes). And most of that succumbing is due to Texas falling down at it's fat face sucking all the natural gas for itself as it huddles for warmth around the burnt out embers of it's pride cause it can't handle it.
I am glad you talked about apples & oranges in scale. It is a great point.
Roughly the same number as or more people were out of power in Texas than the entire population of Kansas. Maybe that brings to light the scale difference in how many people the Texas grid is providing power too. To go even further, it looks like ERCOT services most likely twice as many people as SPP.
The infrastructure and houses are not built with this cold of weather in consideration. Why? Because historically there is not a need for it. So when this type of event happens, there becomes way more demand per person/household than our northern counterparts.
This is in no way a post white-knighting ERCOT and it is becoming pretty apparent as this event unfolds they are a mumped ip group. Several of its board members do not even live in Texas. So this does not appear to be a Texas only mindset as has been implied heavily. The chair and vice-chair live in Michigan and Germany so this is apparently not Texas only thinking.
For the record, going off of the little information that is available on their actions at this point, I hope that ERCOT is severely overhauled or even dismantled after the investigation into this event.
But to say you are comparing apples to apples in referring to the blackout in Kansas and Texas is just as disingenuous on your end.
All of your post is fair, the bold is really the crux of my issues of the "Texas being Texas." They decided to create their own grid, on their own, and play by their own rules. It is well and good, but, and as unfortunate as you all have to live with said consequences, you are seeing that. I get CEOs and others can live wherever to do whatever, but Texas still decided to go in it alone. And you are right, they should be investigated and dismantled for thinking they knew what they were doing. After all, it birthed the ability for companies like Enron to go around and selectively blackout people because of economics, instead of thinking of the welfare of their compatriots.
Where did Texas touch you? Show it to us on a doll. We won’t tell.
Wow, we hating on South Park now too? I am fine with the post. It is probably pretty much inline with kicking people while they are down about a situation that they pretty much have no control over.
I really think you're confusing my disdain with Texas with anything having to do with you. I'm kicking the idea of Texas down, not you. We are literally having a meeting how Texas totally deemphasized the need to "be online" with making money in my company right now. Yes, you have nothing to do it, and you are learning about how behind the times your state is in the worst ways, lash out at me all you want. Nature just messed with Texas and won in 48 hours.
I guess I did forget my Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, for "How can you expect a man who's warm to understand one who's cold?"
It’s not being on its own grid that caused the problem here (although obviously being on a larger grid would have helped). It’s the fact that each producer was pretty much left to their best judgment as far as what was needed to survive harsh conditions, and (as private businesses tend to do) many balanced preparedness with profit.
Uhhhh ast not sure about that postAst getting all huffy about Texas having four million people without power overnight and comparing it to the great plains doing 20-60 minute pauses is very texasy
Not huffy at all. I was told Texas was having blackouts because Texas.
Apparently Kansas is having blackouts because Kansas.
Apples and oranges in scale.
And in case anyone was wondering, KY and KS are connected, all of the Eastern US, and a ton of Canada connected together.
And all of Western US connected together.
Not connected: Eastern US, Western US, and Texas,
Hence why Texas has 4 mill out, KS after dealing with this for 2 weeks decides "well we'll occasionally have outages every so often and not for everyone and only for like 3 hours a day for some people" Texas after it's exhausted all it's resources after 2 days: welp that's it isn't it but the power for emergency sources". That's the difference. That and natural gas for everyone (lol) is just poof, CO2 right now. And here I was told fossil fuels were the reliable ones.
Resiliency and grid reliability comes in numbers (for the most part).
And I was not trying to pick on you obv, you can't do anything about it, it's just really funny (to me) to have "we can do this on our own we're our own goddamn country" Texas brought to it's knees over a little cold in 48 hours time.
And that's with all the oil a Texan can shake at. At least it took KS 2 weeks to succumb to (occasionally) having to have (some) people go out (for 30-60 minutes). And most of that succumbing is due to Texas falling down at it's fat face sucking all the natural gas for itself as it huddles for warmth around the burnt out embers of it's pride cause it can't handle it.
I am glad you talked about apples & oranges in scale. It is a great point.
Roughly the same number as or more people were out of power in Texas than the entire population of Kansas. Maybe that brings to light the scale difference in how many people the Texas grid is providing power too. To go even further, it looks like ERCOT services most likely twice as many people as SPP.
The infrastructure and houses are not built with this cold of weather in consideration. Why? Because historically there is not a need for it. So when this type of event happens, there becomes way more demand per person/household than our northern counterparts.
This is in no way a post white-knighting ERCOT and it is becoming pretty apparent as this event unfolds they are a mumped ip group. Several of its board members do not even live in Texas. So this does not appear to be a Texas only mindset as has been implied heavily. The chair and vice-chair live in Michigan and Germany so this is apparently not Texas only thinking.
For the record, going off of the little information that is available on their actions at this point, I hope that ERCOT is severely overhauled or even dismantled after the investigation into this event.
But to say you are comparing apples to apples in referring to the blackout in Kansas and Texas is just as disingenuous on your end.
All of your post is fair, the bold is really the crux of my issues of the "Texas being Texas." They decided to create their own grid, on their own, and play by their own rules. It is well and good, but, and as unfortunate as you all have to live with said consequences, you are seeing that. I get CEOs and others can live wherever to do whatever, but Texas still decided to go in it alone. And you are right, they should be investigated and dismantled for thinking they knew what they were doing. After all, it birthed the ability for companies like Enron to go around and selectively blackout people because of economics, instead of thinking of the welfare of their compatriots.
Where did Texas touch you? Show it to us on a doll. We won’t tell.
Wow, we hating on South Park now too? I am fine with the post. It is probably pretty much inline with kicking people while they are down about a situation that they pretty much have no control over.
I really think you're confusing my disdain with Texas with anything having to do with you. I'm kicking the idea of Texas down, not you. We are literally having a meeting how Texas totally deemphasized the need to "be online" with making money in my company right now. Yes, you have nothing to do it, and you are learning about how behind the times your state is in the worst ways, lash out at me all you want. Nature just messed with Texas and won in 48 hours.
I guess I did forget my Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, for "How can you expect a man who's warm to understand one who's cold?"
My deepest apologies but it is really hard to separate your disdain with Texas from what I have and am experiencing at this moment. Maybe it is a timing issue. Maybe it is full tone can not be determined over the internet issue.
Kicking “Texas” while it is down feels really a lot like kicking its residents while it is down. Event if we do jot agree with the whole “Texas” mindset.
Sorry I got sideways but the whole conversation started when I was cold and my nerves were quite literally raw while trying to ratio firewood by candlelight without electricity while keeping my wife and baby warm with -15 windchills in a house not built for winter.
Have a good day and sorry for the confusion.
Uhhhh ast not sure about that postAst getting all huffy about Texas having four million people without power overnight and comparing it to the great plains doing 20-60 minute pauses is very texasy
Not huffy at all. I was told Texas was having blackouts because Texas.
Apparently Kansas is having blackouts because Kansas.
Apples and oranges in scale.
And in case anyone was wondering, KY and KS are connected, all of the Eastern US, and a ton of Canada connected together.
And all of Western US connected together.
Not connected: Eastern US, Western US, and Texas,
Hence why Texas has 4 mill out, KS after dealing with this for 2 weeks decides "well we'll occasionally have outages every so often and not for everyone and only for like 3 hours a day for some people" Texas after it's exhausted all it's resources after 2 days: welp that's it isn't it but the power for emergency sources". That's the difference. That and natural gas for everyone (lol) is just poof, CO2 right now. And here I was told fossil fuels were the reliable ones.
Resiliency and grid reliability comes in numbers (for the most part).
And I was not trying to pick on you obv, you can't do anything about it, it's just really funny (to me) to have "we can do this on our own we're our own goddamn country" Texas brought to it's knees over a little cold in 48 hours time.
And that's with all the oil a Texan can shake at. At least it took KS 2 weeks to succumb to (occasionally) having to have (some) people go out (for 30-60 minutes). And most of that succumbing is due to Texas falling down at it's fat face sucking all the natural gas for itself as it huddles for warmth around the burnt out embers of it's pride cause it can't handle it.
I am glad you talked about apples & oranges in scale. It is a great point.
Roughly the same number as or more people were out of power in Texas than the entire population of Kansas. Maybe that brings to light the scale difference in how many people the Texas grid is providing power too. To go even further, it looks like ERCOT services most likely twice as many people as SPP.
The infrastructure and houses are not built with this cold of weather in consideration. Why? Because historically there is not a need for it. So when this type of event happens, there becomes way more demand per person/household than our northern counterparts.
This is in no way a post white-knighting ERCOT and it is becoming pretty apparent as this event unfolds they are a mumped ip group. Several of its board members do not even live in Texas. So this does not appear to be a Texas only mindset as has been implied heavily. The chair and vice-chair live in Michigan and Germany so this is apparently not Texas only thinking.
For the record, going off of the little information that is available on their actions at this point, I hope that ERCOT is severely overhauled or even dismantled after the investigation into this event.
But to say you are comparing apples to apples in referring to the blackout in Kansas and Texas is just as disingenuous on your end.
All of your post is fair, the bold is really the crux of my issues of the "Texas being Texas." They decided to create their own grid, on their own, and play by their own rules. It is well and good, but, and as unfortunate as you all have to live with said consequences, you are seeing that. I get CEOs and others can live wherever to do whatever, but Texas still decided to go in it alone. And you are right, they should be investigated and dismantled for thinking they knew what they were doing. After all, it birthed the ability for companies like Enron to go around and selectively blackout people because of economics, instead of thinking of the welfare of their compatriots.
Where did Texas touch you? Show it to us on a doll. We won’t tell.
Wow, we hating on South Park now too? I am fine with the post. It is probably pretty much inline with kicking people while they are down about a situation that they pretty much have no control over.
Ast getting all huffy about Texas having four million people without power overnight and comparing it to the great plains doing 20-60 minute pauses is very texasy
Not huffy at all. I was told Texas was having blackouts because Texas.
Apparently Kansas is having blackouts because Kansas.
Apples and oranges in scale.
And in case anyone was wondering, KY and KS are connected, all of the Eastern US, and a ton of Canada connected together.
And all of Western US connected together.
Not connected: Eastern US, Western US, and Texas,
Hence why Texas has 4 mill out, KS after dealing with this for 2 weeks decides "well we'll occasionally have outages every so often and not for everyone and only for like 3 hours a day for some people" Texas after it's exhausted all it's resources after 2 days: welp that's it isn't it but the power for emergency sources". That's the difference. That and natural gas for everyone (lol) is just poof, CO2 right now. And here I was told fossil fuels were the reliable ones.
Resiliency and grid reliability comes in numbers (for the most part).
And I was not trying to pick on you obv, you can't do anything about it, it's just really funny (to me) to have "we can do this on our own we're our own goddamn country" Texas brought to it's knees over a little cold in 48 hours time.
And that's with all the oil a Texan can shake at. At least it took KS 2 weeks to succumb to (occasionally) having to have (some) people go out (for 30-60 minutes). And most of that succumbing is due to Texas falling down at it's fat face sucking all the natural gas for itself as it huddles for warmth around the burnt out embers of it's pride cause it can't handle it.
I am glad you talked about apples & oranges in scale. It is a great point.
Roughly the same number as or more people were out of power in Texas than the entire population of Kansas. Maybe that brings to light the scale difference in how many people the Texas grid is providing power too. To go even further, it looks like ERCOT services most likely twice as many people as SPP.
The infrastructure and houses are not built with this cold of weather in consideration. Why? Because historically there is not a need for it. So when this type of event happens, there becomes way more demand per person/household than our northern counterparts.
This is in no way a post white-knighting ERCOT and it is becoming pretty apparent as this event unfolds they are a mumped ip group. Several of its board members do not even live in Texas. So this does not appear to be a Texas only mindset as has been implied heavily. The chair and vice-chair live in Michigan and Germany so this is apparently not Texas only thinking.
For the record, going off of the little information that is available on their actions at this point, I hope that ERCOT is severely overhauled or even dismantled after the investigation into this event.
But to say you are comparing apples to apples in referring to the blackout in Kansas and Texas is just as disingenuous on your end.