5201
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Always glad when the resident LibBots bring us up to speed on Alex Jones and Sean Hannity.
Dax, so you just happen to have a lot of the same concerns as Hannity?
I’ve said little to nothing about mega corrupt Maxine Waters.
But LibBot rage is real, Bucket. 24/7/365 of LiBBot outage eventually spills into overt acts. Sorry, friend.
Always glad when the resident LibBots bring us up to speed on Alex Jones and Sean Hannity.
Where's the outrage about Hannity? Perhaps, it's best not to speculate about the shooter's motive until all of the information comes out. This has bitten Trump in the ass too, but he and no one else really seem to care.
What’d Hannity say?
Confirmednever been to LotO, never going to go, feels great
Same. I heard your penis will burn off if you drink the water
https://twitter.com/CNNPoltics/status/1012343403697319937
This is maybe the biggest problem with gerrymandering. You get districts that are so lopsided they elect complete nut jobs like Maxine Waters and Sheila Jackson Lee. It's frankly embarrassing.
Research it all day long.
The German protests had similar protests in the United States in the 70's and 80's.
Too try and say that the Political Left in this country hasn't historically and repeatedly fought against and spoke out against U.S. military expansion globally (until about 8 years ago or so), and U.S. military expenditures in general, is intellectually disingenuous or you're just completely unaware, which is both fascinating and scary.
Which makes this New NeoCon bent all the more fascinating to observe. The apparent grave concern by the political left that Trump might try and disengage the United States from it's massive financial obligation to NATO (while some of the biggest NATO partners either barely or do not as of yet meet their 2% of GDP obligation which they committed to do years ago) is from an historical perspective.
The United States spends 3.2% of GDP on NATO, the highest of all NATO partners.
Dax all of your posts are long as crap, and it happens all day, every day. I am genuinely curious and looking for a yes or no answer here: are you retired?
Most of my posts are not that long.
So that’s a yes?
idk where to put this.
https://twitter.com/JeffPassan/status/1012135234656178176
Research it all day long.
The German protests had similar protests in the United States in the 70's and 80's.
Too try and say that the Political Left in this country hasn't historically and repeatedly fought against and spoke out against U.S. military expansion globally (until about 8 years ago or so), and U.S. military expenditures in general, is intellectually disingenuous or you're just completely unaware, which is both fascinating and scary.
Which makes this New NeoCon bent all the more fascinating to observe. The apparent grave concern by the political left that Trump might try and disengage the United States from it's massive financial obligation to NATO (while some of the biggest NATO partners either barely or do not as of yet meet their 2% of GDP obligation which they committed to do years ago) is from an historical perspective.
The United States spends 3.2% of GDP on NATO, the highest of all NATO partners.
What's fascinating is, there was once a time when ProgLibs wanted the U.S. out of NATO. The ProgLib considered NATO to be a tool for U.S. Hegemony (they were right based on what was to happen in the course of future events), the ProgLib considered NATO a direct threat to the Soviet Union, the ProgLib was fully in concert with Soviet propaganda.
One would think the ProgLib would be fully on board with whittling down the (once every component is factored in) the nearly $1 trillion dollars annually the U.S. spends on defense.
Once upon a time the ProgLib lamented and chastised the United States for its nearly ubiquitous military presence across the globe.
The ProgLib . . . a total 180, in one presidency.
Amaze
Can you create a chart with every 180 from both sides during your lifetime(may have to be many charts)? That way we(you) can see the hypocrisy from both sides and get a real kick out of it.
Vis-a-vis NATO there's really only hypocrisy on one side, unless you want to believe in that stupid little head of yours that the people on the streets in Germany (and elsewhere) protesting NATO in general and the possibility of deploying Nuclear tipped Pershing missiles and the possible deployment of the Neutron Bomb in the 70's and 80's weren't ProgLib types?
Or that those that have historically bitched and moaned about U.S. military expenditures in general and the expanding U.S. military presence across the globe etc. etc. were in fact, hardcore conservatives?
Scary
https://twitter.com/realsaavedra/status/1010981944056664064?s=21