251
Kansas State Football / Re: KU football is hurting
« on: October 11, 2018, 05:23:58 PM »
Relative Attitudes:
Them - "We can win this!"
Us - "We can't lose this!"
Them - "We can win this!"
Us - "We can't lose this!"
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
https://twitter.com/Acosta/status/1050433402015506432
make Delton a wide receiver.
10-15 years ago, i would have agreed with the statement that the differences between democrats and republicans were relatively small, but that is no longer the case.
what's changed the most?
Operation Red Map happened, The GOP essentially removed swing districts in the redistricting effort of 2010. They removed 24-30 swing districts to create safe GOP seats and pack a strong majority of democrats into a few districts. So there is no incentive for anyone to compromise as if they do it's perceived as weak. That is the key if the GOP wouldn't have rat mumped the maps in 2010 as bad as they did, we'd probably have another 25-45 swing districts and less safe districts to encourage compromise.
I don't think anyone would mistake the two but I took K-S-U to mean Kelly's "look" can't win in Kansas. That look to me is an older lady with short gray hair which has won here before.
That's exactly what he meant. Middle aged white lady is middle aged white lady. K-S-U was hinting that a democrat candidate needs to be young, male, or have some melanin to energize the base. There is no person in America that would energize the democratic base enough to make a democrat gubernatorial candidate viable. Enjoy it.
That's pretty much what the Democrats said in the article he linked.
When similar things happened 30 years ago how long did it take?
I want to hear why Laura Kelly is so great!
Are his shoulder pads sweating?
found it:
[youtube]https://youtu.be/20_VpVGBEaI?t=34m43s[/youtube]
Texas game was like holy crap, did that just happen
it also spends way less on education than it should.QuoteIn 2015-16, California ranked 41st among all states in spending per K-12 student after adjusting for differences in the cost of living in each state (see table below).[2] California schools spent $10,291 per K-12 student in 2015-16, which is about $1,900 less than the $12,252 per student spent by the nation as a whole.[3] California’s spending per student in 2015-16 was about $2,000 higher than it had been in 2012-13, at which point California ranked 50th in the nation.
https://calbudgetcenter.org/resources/californias-support-k-12-education-improving-still-lags-nation/
No capitalism allowed here, boys and girls. This thread is all about the New Face Of The Democratic Party TM.
Let’s start with their deep understanding of economics!
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2018/07/18/ocasio-cortez_unemployment_is_low_because_everyone_has_two_jobs.html
“Unemployment is low because everyone has two jobs.”
That person is legit Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!). Her interview about the Israeli occupation of Palestine was :crazy:
I don't think kids thought of gun violence as a potential solution before Columbine presented itself as one.
At the risk of oversimplifying a complex argument, essentially he argues that each mass shooting lowers the threshold for the next. He argues, we are in the midst of a slow-motion “riot” of mass shootings, with the Columbine shooting in many ways the key triggering event.
Here’s the most ominous part of the Gladwell thesis. The “low threshold” shooters are motivated by “powerful grievances,” but as the riot spreads, the justifications are often manufactured, and the shooters more and more “normal."
In the day of Eric Harris, we could try to console ourselves with the thought that there was nothing we could do, that no law or intervention or restrictions on guns could make a difference in the face of someone so evil. But the riot has now engulfed the boys who were once content to play with chemistry sets in the basement. The problem is not that there is an endless supply of deeply disturbed young men who are willing to contemplate horrific acts. It’s worse. It’s that young men no longer need to be deeply disturbed to contemplate horrific acts.