25951
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
There isn't a Snyder 2.0 quarterback that I've been less hopeful about after one game than Ertz. Not Waters, Hubener, Sams, Klein, Coffman, or Gregory. Ertz often looked completely clueless. And sometimes looked like his legs aren't fully functional.
Wacky, good grief. Have some objectivity. WVU beating a terrible team from the SEC East and a few blowout wins against terrible FCS schools is not good by any measure. Oklahoma needed to win that game and TCU needed to handle SDSU because they are the top two teams and have the best shot at the playoff. Like it or not a conference is judged by its best teams and our best teams didn't show anything this week. If Texas wins tonight we can reevaluate, but as it stands right now the conference looks like dog crap.
https://twitter.com/ByJoeDavis/status/772456222758805504
OU was the best shot the big 12 had at the playoff is what I think people were trying to say. Someone else could run the table but that doesn't seem likely.
Big 12 will be fine. Good grief.
Pat Hill really was BITB
Is Houston too good for the Big 12?Word on the street is the SEC would love them
Our kicker is still good
Uh.
There is no way Delton running around doing random crap could be worse. Thompson could also not be worse.
Isn't it a bit premature to be talking about the 2017 offense?
PJ Fleck about to get a big road win @northwestern
His quarterback rating was 36. Not a good sign.
Not sure what rating you saw but the official stats had his rating as 102.02, Hubener at 57.49, Burns 168.91, and Chryst at 192.40
http://www.espn.com/college-football/boxscore?gameId=400869094
I can't post a link but the ratings I posted are from the K-State app, I'm assuming you can get to them from kstatesports.com or stanford.com on a desktop or laptop.
I believe you, I don't know how there could be that big of a discrepancy though. Isn't their rating like a pretty standardized thing?
His quarterback rating was 36. Not a good sign.
Not sure what rating you saw but the official stats had his rating as 102.02, Hubener at 57.49, Burns 168.91, and Chryst at 192.40
http://www.espn.com/college-football/boxscore?gameId=400869094
He made Hubener look good
His quarterback rating was 36. Not a good sign.