51
Jerome Tang Coaches Kansas State Basketball / Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« on: March 14, 2014, 01:59:17 PM »
We might be the lowest, or tied for lowest, seeded Big 12 team.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
i'm not entirely sure that _fan has ever picked against the cats and that's just one of the many things that i like about him.
I want the 8/9 if they put us in the Midwest, if they don't
Yup. Not to insult WSU but they are going to be the easiest second round opponent of anyone with a 7-10 seed.
I don't think that at all, that scenario has the highest fun quotient
Yeah I don't know how anyone would know that other than they are pretending they know that to be edgy on a message board. For all I know they would beat us by 40 but oh well it's just sports and fun.
Fun definitely. I didn't say we would beat WSU, just that I would like our odds better than any other teams ranked in the top ten.
We have 6 players (Gip, Hurt, DJamer, Bolden, Nino, recruit) for 2 spots in our frontcourt next year. We have six players (Jevon, Nigel, Foster, Harris, Wes, Edwards) for 3 spots in our backcourt, and I think Harris will probably redshirt. So, why do people want to move Wes to the 4????
Maybe point forward that some have alluded to earlier. Shane 2.0? I don't think it would be as much of moving him to the 4, but maybe oscar would want some lineup that has Nigel/Jevon and Edwards and Foster on the court at the same time.
It's possible that it could be used in certain situations, but I don't think it will be a lineup you see very often at all. There's a reason that oscar is still recruiting another power forward.
We have 6 players (Gip, Hurt, DJamer, Bolden, Nino, recruit) for 2 spots in our frontcourt next year. We have six players (Jevon, Nigel, Foster, Harris, Wes, Edwards) for 3 spots in our backcourt, and I think Harris will probably redshirt. So, why do people want to move Wes to the 4????
Someone speak slowly and explain exactly why a 10 seed is functionally worse than an 8/9. It seems to be better in nearly every way.Depends if you want a better shot at winning one game or two. Beating a 8 or 9 is easier then beating a 7. Beating a 7 and a 2 is easier then beating a 8/9 and a 1.
http://www.collegehoopsnet.com/ncaa-tournament-odds-a-seed-advancing-166169
Gawd I wish we had Ejim
Too ugly
5, 10, 15 years down the road, no one remembers if you lost first round or second round, but they certainly will know you made the NCAA's that year. No one cares about winning some exhibition NIT dumpster fire.
^
DUMBASS