goemaw.com
TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Jerome Tang Coaches Kansas State Basketball => Topic started by: Kat Kid on December 21, 2010, 07:12:02 PM
-
Alright. wtf? This eye hernia crap isn't funny any more.
-
Im sorry but on Frank, Hey Frank cut the rough ridin' bullshit your not their parents
-
wut?
-
* Timeline
* @Mentions
* Retweets
* Searches
* Lists
»
Blair Kerkhoff
BlairKerkhoff Blair Kerkhoff
Kelly's status beyond tonight unknown.
1 minute ago Favorite Retweet Reply
»
Jeff Goodman
goodmanonfox Jeff Goodman
Kansas State spokeman Tom Gilbert just confirmed that Jake Pullen and Curtis Kelly won't be playing tonight against UNLV.
1 minute ago Favorite Retweet Reply
»
Blair Kerkhoff
BlairKerkhoff Blair Kerkhoff
Impermissible benefits on the purchase of clothing at a Manhattan dept, store. KState will seek reinstatement. Pullen to miss 3 games.
1 minute ago Favorite Retweet Reply
-
secondary rules violation.
-
Oh jesus rough ridin' christ they got an extra discount on some clothes?
-
this holier than thou attitude has got to stop :chainsaw:
-
are you rough ridin' kidding me? jesus tapdancing christ
-
sneak peak to next year!!!!
so excited I can hardly stand it. :bang:
-
There are some really good deals out there right now.
-
810 had to have known this, could explain the impending revolt comment
-
Son of BITB:
SKietz I can't believe Frank is about to rip off 18k fans by benching these players. This is a joke.
:lol:
-
Cant they count the Florida game as one they didn't play in?
-
Son of BITB:
SKietz I can't believe Frank is about to rip off 18k fans by benching these players. This is a joke.
:lol:
He's freaking Simba, this one.
-
Cant they count the Florida game as one they didn't play in?
lol, nice one
-
Odds are out:
Sears -- 10-to-1
JCPenneys -- 3-to-1
Dillards -- 1-to-1
-
Some discounts on clothes??
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
-
Ballard's used to do it all the time w/ the football team :ck:
-
Would it have been an option to have just sat Jake for 3 games and labeled it 'violation of team rules' or something a little more ambiguous or perhaps a little less embarrassing for your senior guard/school/team/fans/manhattan mall and retailers/willie?
-
Odds are out:
Sears -- 10-to-1
JCPenneys -- 3-to-1
Dillards -- 1-to-1
Odds they got a better deal than Peter Warrick?
-
Would it have been an option to have just sat Jake for 3 games and labeled it 'violation of team rules' or something a little more ambiguous or perhaps a little less embarrassing for your senior guard/school/team/fans/manhattan mall and retailers/willie?
NCAA ruled them ineligible.
-
Would it have been an option to have just sat Jake for 3 games and labeled it 'violation of team rules' or something a little more ambiguous or perhaps a little less embarrassing for your senior guard/school/team/fans/manhattan mall and retailers/willie?
NCAA ruled them ineligible.
We turn ourselves in?
-
Would it have been an option to have just sat Jake for 3 games and labeled it 'violation of team rules' or something a little more ambiguous or perhaps a little less embarrassing for your senior guard/school/team/fans/manhattan mall and retailers/willie?
NCAA ruled them ineligible.
We turn ourselves in?
I know right? Really . . . we turn ourselves in on some department store discounts??
Just goes to show that periods of Near Glory will be few and far between with that mentality.
-
Don't care about what the NCAA says/did. This has got to go on Frank and his shittiness as a coach. Why would he sit our two best players??? WTF! JFC! GTMFOOH! What a rough ridin' idiot! I don't give a crap what the NCAA says/mandates! I'm a total rough ridin' Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) KSU bball fan with zero bball iq and I say Frank is a rough ridin' moron! This crap has to stop!
-
Still football season for another 9 days.
-
Would it have been an option to have just sat Jake for 3 games and labeled it 'violation of team rules' or something a little more ambiguous or perhaps a little less embarrassing for your senior guard/school/team/fans/manhattan mall and retailers/willie?
NCAA ruled them ineligible.
We turn ourselves in?
I know right? Really . . . we turn ourselves in on some department store discounts??
Just goes to show that periods of Near Glory will be few and far between with that mentality.
I'd guess the salesperson got busted by law enforcement and either NCAA got it from there or KSU knew it was impossible to keep public info like that under wraps and went ahead and got it over with.
-
KenPom will go to any lengths to be right.
-
Would it have been an option to have just sat Jake for 3 games and labeled it 'violation of team rules' or something a little more ambiguous or perhaps a little less embarrassing for your senior guard/school/team/fans/manhattan mall and retailers/willie?
NCAA ruled them ineligible.
We turn ourselves in?
I know right? Really . . . we turn ourselves in on some department store discounts??
Just goes to show that periods of Near Glory will be few and far between with that mentality.
I'd guess the salesperson got busted by law enforcement and either NCAA got it from there or KSU knew it was impossible to keep public info like that under wraps and went ahead and got it over with.
Yeah dumbasses . . . computers, they know how to add and subtract, they have tendency to flag strange things at the register in Department Stores.
Low How to Commit NCAA infractions IQ . . . :facepalm:
-
You hear that students? Read the blotter tomorrow. Find out who this guy is.
I'm gonna guess something like Jeffrey Mangold, 19, 1401 Hillcrest Drive.
-
:eek:
-
Very elaborate trap to ensnare the entire KU team?
-
Yeah dumbasses . . . computers, they know how to add and subtract, they have tendency to flag strange things at the register in Department Stores.
Low How to Commit NCAA infractions IQ . . . :facepalm:
Not caught by computer, but still tough to be discreet when trying to be sneaky with one of few 6-8black dudes in town and a guy whose face is literally on shirts everywhere.
-
Don't care about what the NCAA says/did. This has got to go on Frank and his shittiness as a coach. Why would he sit our two best players??? WTF! JFC! GTMFOOH! What a rough ridin' idiot! I don't give a crap what the NCAA says/mandates! I'm a total rough ridin' Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) KSU bball fan with zero bball iq and I say Frank is a rough ridin' moron! This crap has to stop!
FMP
-
Yeah dumbasses . . . computers, they know how to add and subtract, they have tendency to flag strange things at the register in Department Stores.
Low How to Commit NCAA infractions IQ . . . :facepalm:
Not caught by computer, but still tough to be discreet when trying to be sneaky with one of few 6-8black dudes in town and a guy whose face is literally on shirts everywhere.
So was it the total sale price of $26.05 for the $457.56 worth of clothes. Hey Jake, you gonna pay cash right?
-
Our season is slipping away.
-
Please tell me this thread is a joke.
-
Just got a clip on espn about it. Elite! Hopefuly this means we see more 95. :pray:
-
Please tell me this thread is a joke.
:pray:
-
just woke up from a nap. Thought i was dreaming when it came across the screen.
-
huh
-
this isn't what I had in mind with MCMW
-
jfc, frank. take the failure of this season like a man. don't freaking do things to the team to make the shirt tucks cream in their pants over you. at least Wooly was man enough to befriend the president of the university, he didn't drag the team into it.
-
smell ya later Curt
-
yep, curt is done. :embarrassed:
-
i didn't even know people bought clothes from manhattan stores.
-
yep, curt is done. :embarrassed:
wut?
-
They should be suspended longer just for shopping at rough ridin' Dillards. Dillards?!?!? Really doods?! :barf:
-
yep, curt is done. :embarrassed:
wut?
are you really suprised? it's his 3rd strike.
-
yep, curt is done. :embarrassed:
wut?
are you really suprised? it's his 3rd strike.
nahh...i just didn't know if i missed something.
-
Wish we had fans of the program that could buy our best players what they want rather than them have to get friendly with the Dillards clerk.
Blame our stinkfest fanbase.
-
yep, curt is done. :embarrassed:
No worries, we've still got Stix.
-
This season just gets more and more comical. We can't even rough ridin' cheat correctly. If we can't get our kids discount clothes, we might as well write off any chance at a decent hoops program.
-
They get plenty of Nike apparel for free.
Just saying. Sounds like Jake and Curt got a little greedy.
-
I imagine curtis doing this when he learned of his suspension :ck:
-
I imagine curtis doing this when he learned of his suspension :ck:
Yeah, but he probably started out :ck: when Jake wanted to go to rough ridin' Dillards. I mean, we're talking about rough ridin' Dillards. Where's our fashion consultant. :ck: @ rough ridin' Dillards.
-
It's not Frank's fault. Curt has proven repeatedly that he is a moron. Jake's latest tweets shed a lot of light on him as well. These guys are dumbasses.
-
goodmanonfox Jeff Goodman
Source told FOXSports.com that Jake Pullen and Curtis Kelly were given clothing at a discount price by woman working at dept. store.
-
BETH!
-
:surprised:
-
Is it a pitty f#$% for clothes type of a thing? Hope she was good cause it cost you. Reminds of an ole saying "pussy can get you 1/2 priced clothes but 1/2 priced clothes can get you suspended." :horrorsurprise:
-
goodmanonfox Jeff Goodman
Source told FOXSports.com that Jake Pullen and Curtis Kelly were given clothing at a discount price by woman working at dept. store.
Inge?
-
I mean, we're talking about rough ridin' Dillards. Where's our fashion consultant. :ck: @ rough ridin' Dillards.
Yeah. Our offensive line is laughing so hard they're snorting milk on their affliction t-shirts.
-
so who blew the whistle??
-
i hear it was the same girl Wally knocked up
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsmileys.on-my-web.com%2Frepository%2FMSN_Emoticons%2FMSN-Emoticon-phone-087.gif&hash=a0615513c9ba89baba00a6cbb87906af7ebfde03)
-
Just curious, do we know it was Dillards... I know its a good general guess, but I see a lot of :cheese: with this one.
-
Just curious, do we know it was Dillards... I know its a good general guess, but I see a lot of :cheese: with this one.
I'm :cheese: with it because it just sounds like something we'd do.
-
comment under ESPN article...
I knew they would get suspended as of last week. They accepted $700 worth of clothes from the Dillards here in Manhattan. My best friend works there and let me know about it last week, they would have showed Martin the security tapes earlier but they were in Florida for there game Saturday.
http://espn.go.com/blog/CollegeBasketballNation/post/_/id/20105/ncaa-suspends-jacob-pullen-curtis-kelly
-
Not sure why people are all :runaway: about Dillards, we forgettin these dudes don't have jobs, and live in Manhattan, and aren't skinny white boys so they can't wear A/F and Hollister? Just hope it wasn't Penny's.
-
comment under ESPN article...
I knew they would get suspended as of last week. They accepted $700 worth of clothes from the Dillards here in Manhattan. My best friend works there and let me know about it last week, they would have showed Martin the security tapes earlier but they were in Florida for there game Saturday.
http://espn.go.com/blog/CollegeBasketballNation/post/_/id/20105/ncaa-suspends-jacob-pullen-curtis-kelly
taking $700 in free merchandise is no where even close to a secondary violation, 97% of the internet is filled with liars and dumbshits
-
long day. haven't been on the board enough to follow if this has been posted. but...
http://www.nytimes.com/1999/10/08/sports/college-football-florida-state-s-warrick-is-suspended-after-an-arrest.html
-
snoop minnis
-
long day. haven't been on the board enough to follow if this has been posted. but...
http://www.nytimes.com/1999/10/08/sports/college-football-florida-state-s-warrick-is-suspended-after-an-arrest.html
ONLY IN AMERICA can two niggers get charged for grand theft for buying clothes at a discount ONLY IN AMERICA
-
long day. haven't been on the board enough to follow if this has been posted. but...
http://www.nytimes.com/1999/10/08/sports/college-football-florida-state-s-warrick-is-suspended-after-an-arrest.html
also should note that it was at dillards. again if this hasn't been posted. if so sorry. if not then kind of funny. or not.
-
$700??? [redacted]!!! Pull your rough ridin' heads out of your asses, CHRIST!
-
3 games is bull sh it
-
long day. haven't been on the board enough to follow if this has been posted. but...
http://www.nytimes.com/1999/10/08/sports/college-football-florida-state-s-warrick-is-suspended-after-an-arrest.html
ONLY IN AMERICA can two n-words get charged for grand theft for buying clothes at a discount ONLY IN AMERICA
$400+ dollars worth of clothes for ~$20? That's not a discount; that's giving the clothes to them for a small handling fee! :nono:
-
long day. haven't been on the board enough to follow if this has been posted. but...
http://www.nytimes.com/1999/10/08/sports/college-football-florida-state-s-warrick-is-suspended-after-an-arrest.html
ONLY IN AMERICA can two n-words get charged for grand theft for buying clothes at a discount ONLY IN AMERICA
$400+ dollars worth of clothes for ~$20? That's not a discount; that's giving the clothes to them for a small handling fee! :nono:
pretty sure his point was that it still isnt GRAND THEFT...
-
I'm just good at pulling things out of context.
Should we call it some sort of embezzlement maybe? Someone know of a better description?
And, here's this, just for kicks.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_theft (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_theft)
Specifics vary widely between states. Some exemptions include: theft of agricultural produce, based on current wholesale value at the time of incident exceeding $250; firearm theft; motor vehicle theft; or bovine animals regardless of value.
Not sure about the validity of this but a quick google search shows that Grand Larceny in Florida is constituted by $300 or more.
I was curious about the legal implications and differences between Larceny and Theft, so I found this.
http://www.proz.com/kudoz/English/law_patents/625295-larceny_vs_theft.html (http://www.proz.com/kudoz/English/law_patents/625295-larceny_vs_theft.html)
Legally speaking, however, larceny is a kind of theft; thus theft is the encompassing concept.
And yes, they did technically pay for the things, but I'm just chasing rabbits and getting caught up in the specifics.
/txtBlock
edit: fixed a punctuation error.
-
I'm just good at pulling things out of context.
Should we call it some sort of embezzlement maybe? Someone know of a better description?
And, here's this, just for kicks.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_theft (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_theft)
Specifics vary widely between states. Some exemptions include: theft of agricultural produce, based on current wholesale value at the time of incident exceeding $250; firearm theft; motor vehicle theft; or bovine animals regardless of value.
Not sure about the validity of this but a quick google search shows that Grand Larceny in Florida is constituted by $300 or more.
I was curious about the legal implications and differences between Larceny and Theft, so I found this.
http://www.proz.com/kudoz/English/law_patents/625295-larceny_vs_theft.html (http://www.proz.com/kudoz/English/law_patents/625295-larceny_vs_theft.html)
Legally speaking, however, larceny is a kind of theft; thus theft is the encompassing concept.
And yes, they did technically pay for the things, but I'm just chasing rabbits and getting caught up in the specifics.
/txtBlock
edit: fixed a punctuation error.
in kansas i know there is a level of theft charge at $250, but there is also another one at $25,000 which is where I would assume it would be considered "grand theft" however my assumption may be incorrect.
-
I'm just good at pulling things out of context.
Should we call it some sort of embezzlement maybe? Someone know of a better description?
And, here's this, just for kicks.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_theft (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_theft)
Specifics vary widely between states. Some exemptions include: theft of agricultural produce, based on current wholesale value at the time of incident exceeding $250; firearm theft; motor vehicle theft; or bovine animals regardless of value.
Not sure about the validity of this but a quick google search shows that Grand Larceny in Florida is constituted by $300 or more.
I was curious about the legal implications and differences between Larceny and Theft, so I found this.
http://www.proz.com/kudoz/English/law_patents/625295-larceny_vs_theft.html (http://www.proz.com/kudoz/English/law_patents/625295-larceny_vs_theft.html)
Legally speaking, however, larceny is a kind of theft; thus theft is the encompassing concept.
And yes, they did technically pay for the things, but I'm just chasing rabbits and getting caught up in the specifics.
/txtBlock
edit: fixed a punctuation error.
in kansas i know there is a level of theft charge at $250, but there is also another one at $25,000 which is where I would assume it would be considered "grand theft" however my assumption may be incorrect.
eh,
http://www.kansas-criminal-defense-law.com/theft.html
-
Wait a minute... I thought this was primarily discussing the Florida case as that was what everyone was referring towards and quoting. That's why I went chasing that one.
-
I'm just good at pulling things out of context.
Should we call it some sort of embezzlement maybe? Someone know of a better description?
And, here's this, just for kicks.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_theft (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_theft)
Specifics vary widely between states. Some exemptions include: theft of agricultural produce, based on current wholesale value at the time of incident exceeding $250; firearm theft; motor vehicle theft; or bovine animals regardless of value.
Not sure about the validity of this but a quick google search shows that Grand Larceny in Florida is constituted by $300 or more.
I was curious about the legal implications and differences between Larceny and Theft, so I found this.
http://www.proz.com/kudoz/English/law_patents/625295-larceny_vs_theft.html (http://www.proz.com/kudoz/English/law_patents/625295-larceny_vs_theft.html)
Legally speaking, however, larceny is a kind of theft; thus theft is the encompassing concept.
And yes, they did technically pay for the things, but I'm just chasing rabbits and getting caught up in the specifics.
/txtBlock
edit: fixed a punctuation error.
We should call it getting a deal that someone offered. Who the eff decides when a good deal is too good of a deal. If they got 75% off would that be good enough? Laws can't be arbitrary. So if I know that some white person got $700 more off of a car because they were white can I call the cops and ask that the buyer and seller be charged with larceny?
Last year Directv was in a carriage dispute with Versus. Myself and thousands of others nationwide called directv and oversold how much we would miss Versus to get lots of free crap. I got the NHL and College Basketball packages for free. I have first hand knowledge of people getting crap like free HD DVRs and they never watched Versus. I don't think anyone would be knocking on my door even if I called the district attorney on myself.
You are out of your goddamn mind if you think crap like this doesn't happen in every single retail store in America to regular j_rake people. And you know what people get caught every day by their bosses giving people discounts they shouldn't. I am willing to bet that .6794% of these end up with the person receiving the discount getting cuffed and charged with larceny.
-
We should call it getting a deal that someone offered. Who the eff decides when a good deal is too good of a deal. If they got 75% off would that be good enough? Laws can't be arbitrary. So if I know that some white person got $700 more off of a car because they were white can I call the cops and ask that the buyer and seller be charged with larceny?
Last year Directv was in a carriage dispute with Versus. Myself and thousands of others nationwide called directv and oversold how much we would miss Versus to get lots of free cac. I got the NHL and College Basketball packages for free. I have first hand knowledge of people getting cac like free HD DVRs and they never watched Versus. I don't think anyone would be knocking on my door even if I called the district attorney on myself.
You are out of your goddamn mind if you think cac like this doesn't happen in every single retail store in America to regular j_rake people. And you know what people get caught every day by their bosses giving people discounts they shouldn't. I am willing to bet that .6794% of these end up with the person receiving the discount getting cuffed and charged with larceny.
While agree with most of what you say here, I'm curious what kind of discount is 95% off.
Your car comparison doesn't hold it's salt. A better comparison? Me walking away with a 2011 5.0 'Stang for $1,500.
Regardless, it's still against the rules to use a private/family/employee/'whatever' discount for a third party. Whether or not they get away with it, the rule/law is still in place.
edit: typo
edit2: Let me get off my soapbox. Heck, I take advantage of a few of my friends employee discounts. The Florida incident was big big money though.
-
We should call it getting a deal that someone offered. Who the eff decides when a good deal is too good of a deal. If they got 75% off would that be good enough? Laws can't be arbitrary. So if I know that some white person got $700 more off of a car because they were white can I call the cops and ask that the buyer and seller be charged with larceny?
Last year Directv was in a carriage dispute with Versus. Myself and thousands of others nationwide called directv and oversold how much we would miss Versus to get lots of free cac. I got the NHL and College Basketball packages for free. I have first hand knowledge of people getting cac like free HD DVRs and they never watched Versus. I don't think anyone would be knocking on my door even if I called the district attorney on myself.
You are out of your goddamn mind if you think cac like this doesn't happen in every single retail store in America to regular j_rake people. And you know what people get caught every day by their bosses giving people discounts they shouldn't. I am willing to bet that .6794% of these end up with the person receiving the discount getting cuffed and charged with larceny.
While agree with most of what you say here, I'm curious what kind of discount is 95% off.
Your car comparison doesn't hold it's salt. A better comparison? Me walking away with a 2011 5.0 'Stang for $1,500.
Regardless, it's still against the rules to use a private/family/employee/whatever, for a third party. Whether or not they get away with it, the rule/law is still in place.
Have you ever purchased something for 95% off, I have. What's the threshold? Who determines this threshold? Is 85% okay and 95% not? Should I stop using Groupon for fear that the feds are going to raid my house?
I'm intentionally being obtuse, but the point is if you charge someone for grand larceny for something like this you should just go ahead and say that you as a district attorney supports gross inequities when enforcing law. The DA in that case should have just said in whatever press release I'm sure they had, "yeah this appears incredibly racist, I don't give a eff." I'm willing to bet that the charges against the football players were dropped or pleaded waaayyy down.
The people who offer the discounts should be the ones that should be targeted.
-
I agree that the people who offered the discounts should be the ones held responsible. 100%
Who could resist? Blame the instigator not the aftermath.
edit after reading more carefully: No, I don't blame your argument. I absolutely love playing devil's advocate. Gets people fired up and defending what they believe in. I commend you for doing the same to me which I've done to so many others. Beware, I've angered many friends by being too quick to light a debate. Guess that's what happens when I'm so defensive.
-
lrb5032
Almost on scholarship
Post #232
MyFanPage
Add Buddy
Hope the FUBU gear looks good :horrorsurprise: Reply
What a bunch of idiots. I hope Jake and Curt are reading this. You have to use your heads when you are under a microscope like you are. What a dissappointment to donor's like me. Frank you have got to get control of your team. This is flat out embarrasing. Leadership and selfishness are to blame. Classless.
Posted on 12/21 10:56 PM | IP: Logged
:opcat: :powerespect: :opcat:
-
i know law enforcement officers get discounts at convenience stores, fast food restaurants, etc... why shouldnt they be held accountable?
-
Because they have guns.
-
This is "Amateur" athletics.
-
i know law enforcement officers get discounts at convenience stores, fast food restaurants, etc... why shouldnt they be held accountable?
They should be held accountable. Just watch the new Batman movies.
Cops start out with discounts and soon they're stealing straight cash from the local falafel vendor! :eek:
-
i know law enforcement officers get discounts at convenience stores, fast food restaurants, etc... why shouldnt they be held accountable?
They should be held accountable. Just watch the new Batman movies.
Cops start out with discounts and soon they're stealing straight cash from the local falafel vendor! :eek:
you are right, except batman has been doing his thing for YEARS...
-
Not sure what your point is.
I'm just referring to a specific instance in the latest duo of Batman movies.
And, yes, I am aware of the older Batman movies and have seen a majority of them.
-
We should call it getting a deal that someone offered. Who the eff decides when a good deal is too good of a deal. If they got 75% off would that be good enough? Laws can't be arbitrary. So if I know that some white person got $700 more off of a car because they were white can I call the cops and ask that the buyer and seller be charged with larceny?
Last year Directv was in a carriage dispute with Versus. Myself and thousands of others nationwide called directv and oversold how much we would miss Versus to get lots of free cac. I got the NHL and College Basketball packages for free. I have first hand knowledge of people getting cac like free HD DVRs and they never watched Versus. I don't think anyone would be knocking on my door even if I called the district attorney on myself.
You are out of your goddamn mind if you think cac like this doesn't happen in every single retail store in America to regular j_rake people. And you know what people get caught every day by their bosses giving people discounts they shouldn't. I am willing to bet that .6794% of these end up with the person receiving the discount getting cuffed and charged with larceny.
While agree with most of what you say here, I'm curious what kind of discount is 95% off.
Your car comparison doesn't hold it's salt. A better comparison? Me walking away with a 2011 5.0 'Stang for $1,500.
Regardless, it's still against the rules to use a private/family/employee/whatever, for a third party. Whether or not they get away with it, the rule/law is still in place.
Have you ever purchased something for 95% off, I have. What's the threshold? Who determines this threshold? Is 85% okay and 95% not? Should I stop using Groupon for fear that the feds are going to raid my house?
I'm intentionally being obtuse, but the point is if you charge someone for grand larceny for something like this you should just go ahead and say that you as a district attorney supports gross inequities when enforcing law. The DA in that case should have just said in whatever press release I'm sure they had, "yeah this appears incredibly racist, I don't give a eff." I'm willing to bet that the charges against the football players were dropped or pleaded waaayyy down.
The people who offer the discounts should be the ones that should be targeted.
why are you bringing race into this? seems weird. also, are you talking about the fsu stuff or the ksu stuff or both?
-
wtf. this crap is so low-end that we won't even be able to get funny/entertaining signs from opposing Big 12 fanbases about this. if we're gonna eff up, then go out in rough ridin' flames, goddammit.
-
'86 showed up and took it's U back............knew it was coming.
-
EMAW...Every Man Acquires a Wardrobe!
-
We should call it getting a deal that someone offered.
i am
-
what's the deal w/ Kelly being suspended indefinitely?
-
Warrick also did not appear to anticipate the charges. ''It's not like I killed the President,'' he said Tuesday.
Would love to see Curt and Jake go with something in this direction.
-
lrb5032
Almost on scholarship
Post #232
MyFanPage
Add Buddy
Hope the FUBU gear looks good :horrorsurprise: Reply
What a bunch of idiots. I hope Jake and Curt are reading this. You have to use your heads when you are under a microscope like you are. What a dissappointment to donor's like me. Frank you have got to get control of your team. This is flat out embarrasing. Leadership and selfishness are to blame. Classless.
Posted on 12/21 10:56 PM | IP: Logged
:opcat: :powerespect: :opcat:
LOL, I rough ridin' hate our fans.
-
This has nothing to do with legal or the amount of the discount. The fact is that discount was not a store promotion so Jake recieved something for nothing. When I was running Cross Country at KSU we would go out and run 10k's and 5k's. We were not allowed to accept the prize money no matter how little it was, because it would be a violation of NCAA rules. While I know this is not the same thing it is pretty serious in the eyes of the NCAA.
Most of the time the people running the races would then put all the winners names in a raffle and give the money to the winner of the raffle, don't know if the violates any rules (I'm sure it does) but we thought we were pretty clever.
-
E*MAW!
*all of God's children
-
So ShirtTuckVille reporting that it was "10 Polo Shirts" . . . so was it 10 Polo style shirts, or 10 Ralph Lauren Polo shirts??
-
We should call it getting a deal that someone offered. Who the eff decides when a good deal is too good of a deal. If they got 75% off would that be good enough? Laws can't be arbitrary. So if I know that some white person got $700 more off of a car because they were white can I call the cops and ask that the buyer and seller be charged with larceny?
Last year Directv was in a carriage dispute with Versus. Myself and thousands of others nationwide called directv and oversold how much we would miss Versus to get lots of free cac. I got the NHL and College Basketball packages for free. I have first hand knowledge of people getting cac like free HD DVRs and they never watched Versus. I don't think anyone would be knocking on my door even if I called the district attorney on myself.
You are out of your goddamn mind if you think cac like this doesn't happen in every single retail store in America to regular j_rake people. And you know what people get caught every day by their bosses giving people discounts they shouldn't. I am willing to bet that .6794% of these end up with the person receiving the discount getting cuffed and charged with larceny.
While agree with most of what you say here, I'm curious what kind of discount is 95% off.
Your car comparison doesn't hold it's salt. A better comparison? Me walking away with a 2011 5.0 'Stang for $1,500.
Regardless, it's still against the rules to use a private/family/employee/whatever, for a third party. Whether or not they get away with it, the rule/law is still in place.
Have you ever purchased something for 95% off, I have. What's the threshold? Who determines this threshold? Is 85% okay and 95% not? Should I stop using Groupon for fear that the feds are going to raid my house?
I'm intentionally being obtuse, but the point is if you charge someone for grand larceny for something like this you should just go ahead and say that you as a district attorney supports gross inequities when enforcing law. The DA in that case should have just said in whatever press release I'm sure they had, "yeah this appears incredibly racist, I don't give a eff." I'm willing to bet that the charges against the football players were dropped or pleaded waaayyy down.
The people who offer the discounts should be the ones that should be targeted.
why are you bringing race into this? seems weird. also, are you talking about the fsu stuff or the ksu stuff or both?
This specific conversion you are quoting refers specifically to FSU. I am not going to comment on the KSU case, there's been no facts reported at all. As far as race, let's be real about how this law is enforced. How many times do you think the DA in Tallahassee has prosecuted a 47 year old housewife for getting a discount from her 18 year old daughter at Maurices?
-
We should call it getting a deal that someone offered. Who the eff decides when a good deal is too good of a deal. If they got 75% off would that be good enough? Laws can't be arbitrary. So if I know that some white person got $700 more off of a car because they were white can I call the cops and ask that the buyer and seller be charged with larceny?
Last year Directv was in a carriage dispute with Versus. Myself and thousands of others nationwide called directv and oversold how much we would miss Versus to get lots of free cac. I got the NHL and College Basketball packages for free. I have first hand knowledge of people getting cac like free HD DVRs and they never watched Versus. I don't think anyone would be knocking on my door even if I called the district attorney on myself.
You are out of your goddamn mind if you think cac like this doesn't happen in every single retail store in America to regular j_rake people. And you know what people get caught every day by their bosses giving people discounts they shouldn't. I am willing to bet that .6794% of these end up with the person receiving the discount getting cuffed and charged with larceny.
While agree with most of what you say here, I'm curious what kind of discount is 95% off.
Your car comparison doesn't hold it's salt. A better comparison? Me walking away with a 2011 5.0 'Stang for $1,500.
Regardless, it's still against the rules to use a private/family/employee/whatever, for a third party. Whether or not they get away with it, the rule/law is still in place.
Have you ever purchased something for 95% off, I have. What's the threshold? Who determines this threshold? Is 85% okay and 95% not? Should I stop using Groupon for fear that the feds are going to raid my house?
I'm intentionally being obtuse, but the point is if you charge someone for grand larceny for something like this you should just go ahead and say that you as a district attorney supports gross inequities when enforcing law. The DA in that case should have just said in whatever press release I'm sure they had, "yeah this appears incredibly racist, I don't give a eff." I'm willing to bet that the charges against the football players were dropped or pleaded waaayyy down.
The people who offer the discounts should be the ones that should be targeted.
why are you bringing race into this? seems weird. also, are you talking about the fsu stuff or the ksu stuff or both?
This specific conversion you are quoting refers specifically to FSU. I am not going to comment on the KSU case, there's been no facts reported at all. As far as race, let's be real about how this law is enforced. How many times do you think the DA in Tallahassee has prosecuted a 47 year old housewife for getting a discount from her 18 year old daughter at Maurices?
i think the same thing happens if you substitute chris weinke for charlie ward. jmo.
-
Wish we had fans of the program that could buy our best players what they want rather than them have to get friendly with the Dillards clerk.
Blame our stinkfest fanbase.
Bingo. ku/mu fans are laughing at us
-
So ShirtTuckVille reporting that it was "10 Polo Shirts" . . . so was it 10 Polo style shirts, or 10 Ralph Lauren Polo shirts??
http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=9362.0 (http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=9362.0)
I'm going to trust Joe Pullen, whoever he is, over those mouthbreathers
-
So if I read that right, we're talking $16 dollars here . . . $16 bucks??
:lol: 3 game suspension for $16 bucks?? :lol:
eff our compliance people if that's the case for even bothering to turn it in.
-
"A source said a sales clerk who knew Pullen and Kelly allowed them to take more clothing from the store than they paid for. When the store manager found out, K-State officials were contacted.
The clothing Pullen and Kelly took from the store exceeded the value of the merchandise paid for. The difference in value is the impermissible benefit. Because Pullen's suspension was specific and is known, Kansas State has learned the value of his benefit. Kelly's is larger and is still being determined."
Per USA Today:"A statement by the school said the impermissible benefits had to do with clothing at a local store. The Kansas City Star reported that clothing Pullen and Kelly got at the store exceeded the value of the merchandise paid for, and the difference in value is the impermissible benefit. The NCAA suspened Pullen for three games. Kelly is sitting out until it is determined if he had a role in the violation."
-
You just know Kelly grabbed a sweet Fossil watch and a Roundtree & York robe.
:ck: <---- likes watches
-
"A source said a sales clerk who knew Pullen and Kelly allowed them to take more clothing from the store than they paid for. When the store manager found out, K-State officials were contacted.
The clothing Pullen and Kelly took from the store exceeded the value of the merchandise paid for. The difference in value is the impermissible benefit. Because Pullen's suspension was specific and is known, Kansas State has learned the value of his benefit. Kelly's is larger and is still being determined."
Per USA Today:"A statement by the school said the impermissible benefits had to do with clothing at a local store. The Kansas City Star reported that clothing Pullen and Kelly got at the store exceeded the value of the merchandise paid for, and the difference in value is the impermissible benefit. The NCAA suspened Pullen for three games. Kelly is sitting out until it is determined if he had a role in the violation."
So trying to translate all this, the value of the benefit according to Puls or someone is . . . $16 bucks. :ck:
-
It's times like these I hate being a K-State fan.
-
Because they have guns.
Because it is legal and the NCAA is not involved :facepalm:
-
Because they have guns.
Because it is legal and the NCAA is not involved :facepalm:
yeah you missed the point of that conversation, it has absolutely nothing to do with the NCAA sit this out
-
So the Dillards store manager is a POS KU fan? Got it.
-
So the Dillards store manager is a POS KU fan? Got it.
If you're K-State you can't mess with a snitch. If he/she is willing to call the athletic department who's to say they would stop there if not satisfied with the results of said snitching.
-
Heard the girl that sold the stuff works at Rusty's...... :chainsaw:
-
What's her name
-
Rumblings there was a R&Y scarf spotted. :ohno:
-
Tards saying Curt is gonzo. Anyone actually hear anything?
-
Tards saying Curt is gonzo. Anyone actually hear anything?
i asked the same question on the premium board and haven't had a response. :dunno:
-
Premium
:cry:
-
Tards saying Curt is gonzo. Anyone actually hear anything?
i asked the same question on the premium board and haven't had a response. :dunno:
Even the superpremium insidery board has nothing, really hush hush.
-
Tards saying Curt is gonzo. Anyone actually hear anything?
i asked the same question on the premium board and haven't had a response. :dunno:
Even the superpremium insidery board has nothing, really hush hush.
Pfft.
Premium Busted.
-
if it really was $16, dillards is going to burn.
-
D00d on GPC is saying $102.
-
3 game suspension for $102 bucks . . . wow (if that's correct).
-
3 game suspension for $102 bucks . . . wow (if that's correct).
I don't think you need both the $ and the "bucks". :dunno: just my :twocents: cents.
-
It better be a lot more than $102.
-
3 game suspension for $102 bucks . . . wow (if that's correct).
I don't think you need both the $ and the "bucks". :dunno: just my :twocents: cents.
:ck:
-
It better be a lot more than $102.
Maybe Pullen thought he had earned some Dillards Bucks from his purchase..... :ck:
-
snitches get stitches imo
-
:popcorn:
-
lol
http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/multiple-buckeyes-inked-at-same-tattoo-parlor-29361
-
a girl i'm friends with used to work at dillards. she asked some friends there, and found out that the only person fired recently was a male employee :surprised:
-
a girl i'm friends with used to work at dillards. she asked some friends there, and found out that the only person fired recently was a male employee :surprised:
Guys, we may have a John Amaechi on our hands...
:goodbyecruelworld:
-
a girl i'm friends with used to work at dillards. she asked some friends there, and found out that the only person fired recently was a male employee :surprised:
This makes sense, when a male team gets busted, you punish the female tennis team. If a salesgirl caused a problem, you fire the closest guy.
-
Alright, who's got the pic of Pullen with the bag? Post that crap NOW! :pray:
-
Alright, who's got the pic of Pullen with the bag? Post that crap NOW! :pray:
http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=9355.105 (http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=9355.105)
-
If we can survive to TTech without Kelly and the UNLV game is the only loss we can blame on the absentees this whole thing was pretty meh.
-
Kelly out 6 games.
-
If we can survive to TTech without Kelly and the UNLV game is the only loss we can blame on the absentees this whole thing was pretty meh.
Yeah, but at OSU is never easy.
-
If we can survive to TTech without Kelly and the UNLV game is the only loss we can blame on the absentees this whole thing was pretty meh.
Yeah, but at OSU is never easy.
that's why I put "if"
-
Should we give them a standing ovation when they return?
-
Should we give them a standing ovation when they return?
no...but we will
-
tards are gonna want them to sit at the end of the bench for a while. Pfft. Tards.
-
someone please provide updates on the dillards clothes they wear while sitting on the bench.
-
Should we give them a standing ovation when they return?
absolutely yes
-
someone please provide updates on the dillards clothes they wear while sitting on the bench.
goodmanonfox
@GaryParrishCBS We've all seen your wardrobe. You may wanna call Curtis and Jake. You are in desperate need of a clothing hook-up.
-
Should we give them a standing ovation when they return?
no...but we will
Stateo, why so offended, they didn't do crap to you? Not only will I participate in an ovation but I'd give them more impermissible benefits if I knew I could get away with it. There will be enough holier than thou loser stateos like this scott character to make the ovation a bit award, there may even be a few confrontations in the seats. It will be glorious, I'm hoping for a Stateo vs. Elite civil war.
-
Thanks for nothing K-State Compliance . . . Compliance doesn't sell tickets or win basketball games.
-
Should we give them a standing ovation when they return?
no...but we will
Stateo, why so offended, they didn't do crap to you? Not only will I participate in an ovation but I'd give them more impermissible benefits if I knew I could get away with it. There will be enough holier than thou loser stateos like this scott character to make the ovation a bit award, there may even be a few confrontations in the seats. It will be glorious, I'm hoping for a Stateo vs. Elite civil war.
Day of reckoning. Will be amazing.
-
still waiting for the cops to get involved. I mean, it was stealing!!!!!1
-
still waiting for the cops to get involved. I mean, it was stealing!!!!!1
They don't wanna press charges as long as they pay for product.
-
Here's the scoop about Kelly. Read it if you want and stuff.
http://ksucollegiansports.wordpress.com/2010/12/28/curtis-kelly-will-miss-6-games/
-
K-State press release announces Curtis Kelly suspension will last six games. He can next play against Texas Tech on Jan. 15.
per Smellis.
-
winning @ osu wo kelly would be a miracle game. like when they beat texas & a&m two years ago. get ready to feel like that again.
-
Thanks for being a douche Curt - you bad person.
-
parrish lols @ pullen/kelly. calls them kstateo.
http://www.cbssports.com/collegebasketball/story/14485091/message-to-athletes-theres-no-benefit-in-taking-small-gifts
-
parrish lols @ pullen/kelly. calls them kstateo.
http://www.cbssports.com/collegebasketball/story/14485091/message-to-athletes-theres-no-benefit-in-taking-small-gifts
Comment from a ku fan:
CalHawk
Are you just making sh#t up now, Gary? Are you making up imaginary figures (6000)? Selby didn't "get" a car, he used one. The benefits were over a period of years helping the kid of a poor family get to AAU games. What a disgusting picture you paint, berift of facts and full of vile. This is what happens when you try to compare scenarios, scenarios you don't even seem to have a full grasp on but won't preclude you from writing a bunch drivel. I think I'm tired of your whining, I won't bother with you any more. Disgusting.
-
[
Comment from a ku fan:
CalHawk
Are you just making sh#t up now, Gary? Are you making up imaginary figures (6000)? Selby didn't "get" a car, he used one. The benefits were over a period of years helping the kid of a poor family get to AAU games. What a disgusting picture you paint, berift of facts and full of vile. This is what happens when you try to compare scenarios, scenarios you don't even seem to have a full grasp on but won't preclude you from writing a bunch drivel. I think I'm tired of your whining, I won't bother with you any more. Disgusting.
:jerk:
-
parrish lols @ pullen/kelly. calls them kstateo.
http://www.cbssports.com/collegebasketball/story/14485091/message-to-athletes-theres-no-benefit-in-taking-small-gifts
Comment from a ku fan:
CalHawk
Are you just making sh#t up now, Gary? Are you making up imaginary figures (6000)? Selby didn't "get" a car, he used one. The benefits were over a period of years helping the kid of a poor family get to AAU games. What a disgusting picture you paint, berift of facts and full of vile. This is what happens when you try to compare scenarios, scenarios you don't even seem to have a full grasp on but won't preclude you from writing a bunch drivel. I think I'm tired of your whining, I won't bother with you any more. Disgusting.
that dude totally missed the point of the article.
-
http://www.cbssports.com/collegebasketball/story/14485091/message-to-athletes-theres-no-benefit-in-taking-small-gifts
Stay clean or go big.
-
Little brother isn't even good at cheating. Poor lil' bro. Keep your head up.... you might get there someday.
-
We haven't made it a bedrock institution of our program yet, no.
-
We haven't made it a bedrock institution of our program yet, no.
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nprentertainments.co.uk%2Fbedrock.gif&hash=17294a0092cf69865e64e4195aaae4818107ffc5)
-
That article had nothing to do with KU cheating. Also had nothing to do with KSU cheating.
-
That article had nothing to do with KU cheating. Also had nothing to do with KSU cheating.
Probably right, but I felt like generalizing. The Mario Little case getting pushed back to May is what motivated my rant.
Edit: Went back and re-read my post and realized that I was completely offbase so I deleted it. *sigh*
-
Its funny how mario can attack multiple people so he can savagely beat his gf
-
That article had nothing to do with KU cheating. Also had nothing to do with KSU cheating.
Probably right, but I felt like generalizing. The Mario Little case getting pushed back to May is what motivated my rant.
Edit: Went back and re-read my post and realized that I was completely offbase so I deleted it. *sigh*
Do you have any idea how many pending court cases there are besides Mario Little's? There are a sh*tload of DUI's and stuff in Lawrence, since it's a college town. Most cases take at least 4-5 months before they go to trial.
-
That article had nothing to do with KU cheating. Also had nothing to do with KSU cheating.
Probably right, but I felt like generalizing. The Mario Little case getting pushed back to May is what motivated my rant.
Edit: Went back and re-read my post and realized that I was completely offbase so I deleted it. *sigh*
Do you have any idea how many pending court cases there are besides Mario Little's? There are a sh*tload of DUI's and stuff in Lawrence, since it's a college town. Most cases take at least 4-5 months before they go to trial.
Good legal system insight beems.
-
Congrats Beems!! :pbj: :thumbsup:
-
That article had nothing to do with KU cheating. Also had nothing to do with KSU cheating.
Probably right, but I felt like generalizing. The Mario Little case getting pushed back to May is what motivated my rant.
Edit: Went back and re-read my post and realized that I was completely offbase so I deleted it. *sigh*
Do you have any idea how many pending court cases there are besides Mario Little's?
No, how many?
-
just the rapes and shootings in lawrence are probably keeping them pretty busy.
-
That article had nothing to do with KU cheating. Also had nothing to do with KSU cheating.
Probably right, but I felt like generalizing. The Mario Little case getting pushed back to May is what motivated my rant.
Edit: Went back and re-read my post and realized that I was completely offbase so I deleted it. *sigh*
Do you have any idea how many pending court cases there are besides Mario Little's?
No, how many?
A whole lot buddy.
-
That article had nothing to do with KU cheating. Also had nothing to do with KSU cheating.
Probably right, but I felt like generalizing. The Mario Little case getting pushed back to May is what motivated my rant.
Edit: Went back and re-read my post and realized that I was completely offbase so I deleted it. *sigh*
Do you have any idea how many pending court cases there are besides Mario Little's? There are a sh*tload of DUI's and stuff in Lawrence, since it's a college town. Most cases take at least 4-5 months before they go to trial.
Less than 15% of DUI cases go to trial. I will bet a pretty large amount of money that college students in Lawrence, KS aren't the exception to this.
-
That article had nothing to do with KU cheating. Also had nothing to do with KSU cheating.
Probably right, but I felt like generalizing. The Mario Little case getting pushed back to May is what motivated my rant.
Edit: Went back and re-read my post and realized that I was completely offbase so I deleted it. *sigh*
Do you have any idea how many pending court cases there are besides Mario Little's? There are a sh*tload of DUI's and stuff in Lawrence, since it's a college town. Most cases take at least 4-5 months before they go to trial.
Look you can't blame the delay in prosecuting Little's case on Brady still being on the team/in town.
-
That article had nothing to do with KU cheating. Also had nothing to do with KSU cheating.
Probably right, but I felt like generalizing. The Mario Little case getting pushed back to May is what motivated my rant.
Edit: Went back and re-read my post and realized that I was completely offbase so I deleted it. *sigh*
Do you have any idea how many pending court cases there are besides Mario Little's? There are a sh*tload of DUI's and stuff in Lawrence, since it's a college town. Most cases take at least 4-5 months before they go to trial.
BTW Beems, under the Kansas Constitution Mario the womanbeater has a RIGHT to trial within 90 days, regardless of the huge backlog of DUIs going to a full jury. In otherwords, the only way he avoided a trial within 90 days (by March 16) is if HE requested it be moved, the prosecutor acquiesced (or at least didn't put up much fight) and the judge agreed.
-
understandable with all the draggings, rapes and riots in Lawrentucky to think it would take a while to get processed through the system.
-
eff you John Currie
https://twitter.com/CooleyKellz7/status/1032771155269103616