goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Jerome Tang Coaches Kansas State Basketball => Topic started by: kstatefreak42 on February 12, 2010, 08:57:14 AM

Title: #2 seed
Post by: kstatefreak42 on February 12, 2010, 08:57:14 AM
http://collegebasketball.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=1051359
Title: Re: #2 seed
Post by: kstatefreak42 on February 12, 2010, 08:59:26 AM
Butler could pose a challenge, then syracuse eventually.
Title: Re: #2 seed
Post by: kso_FAN on February 12, 2010, 09:00:03 AM
Rematch with the Catamounts!  D-Hos!

The way I see it right now we are a 3-seed.  And we can play our way out of that to a 4 (or worse) with 3 (or more) losses (before KC) and we can play our way into a 2 seed it with only 1 loss and a win in KC.

Title: Re: #2 seed
Post by: pissclams on February 12, 2010, 09:01:01 AM
Butler could pose a challenge, then syracuse eventually.
any team in the tournamen could pose a challenge, just an fyi for future threads on this topic.
Title: Re: #2 seed
Post by: pissclams on February 12, 2010, 09:02:06 AM
Rematch with the Catamounts!  D-Hos!

The way I see it right now we are a 3-seed.  And we can play our way out of that to a 4 (or worse) with 3 (or more) losses (before KC) and we can play our way into a 2 seed it with only 1 loss and a win in KC.


lunardi said the same thing today on 810.  has us at a 3 right now with room to move both ways.  has WV in our 2 spot right now.
Title: Re: #2 seed
Post by: EllToPay on February 12, 2010, 09:02:17 AM
Butler could pose a challenge, then syracuse eventually.
any team in the tournamen could pose a challenge, just an fyi for future threads on this topic.

thanks, coach.
Title: Re: #2 seed
Post by: catzacker on February 12, 2010, 09:05:57 AM
Here's how I see it for the rest of the way:

1 more loss in conference, 1 or 0 conf tourney win = 2 seed
2 more losses in conference, 1 or 0 conf tourney win = 3 seed
3 more losses in conference, 1 conf tourney win = 3 seed
3 more losses in conference, 0 conf tourney win = 4 seed
anything more than 3 losses the rest of the way in conference and just pray for a 5 seed.  
Title: Re: #2 seed
Post by: EllToPay on February 12, 2010, 09:07:09 AM
Here's how I see it for the rest of the way:

1 more loss in conference, 1 or 0 conf tourney win = 2 seed
2 more losses in conference, 1 or 0 conf tourney win = 3 seed
3 more losses in conference, 1 conf tourney win = 3 seed
3 more losses in conference, 0 conf tourney win = 4 seed
anything more than 3 losses the rest of the way in conference and just pray for a 5 seed.  

what about one more loss and two conf tourney wins? or conf tourney champs?

A ONE SEED!?
Title: Re: #2 seed
Post by: catzacker on February 12, 2010, 09:08:19 AM
I think our ceiling is a 2 seed. 
Title: Re: #2 seed
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 12, 2010, 09:09:07 AM
I'm OK with a 2 or 3. A 4 seed would be a disappointment imo.
Title: Re: #2 seed
Post by: kso_FAN on February 12, 2010, 09:10:12 AM
I think our ceiling is a 2 seed. 

This.  1 seed is probably not going to happen unless several teams at the top fall apart down the stretch.
Title: Re: #2 seed
Post by: CHONGS on February 12, 2010, 09:11:38 AM
jfc take that bracket and run
Title: Re: #2 seed
Post by: EllToPay on February 12, 2010, 09:12:08 AM
I think our ceiling is a 2 seed. 

This.  1 seed is probably not going to happen unless several teams at the top fall apart down the stretch.

agreed, but as tardish as this sounds, the possibility for a one seed is there. win out minus ku and win the conf tourney, which is somewhat realistic, and we're a one.
Title: Re: #2 seed
Post by: kso_FAN on February 12, 2010, 09:14:13 AM
jfc take that bracket and run

Chings, when the real bracket comes out, I fully expect you to run some ridiculously cool log/kenpom based statistical breakdown of the bracket and our %-ages on making the Sweet 16, Elite 8, Final 4, etc.  
Title: Re: #2 seed
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 12, 2010, 09:15:19 AM
Has anyone wrapped their head around how awesome it will be when the CBS goes live to Frank's house where the whole team has gathered to watch the selection show?

Just amazing.
Title: Re: #2 seed
Post by: steve dave on February 12, 2010, 09:16:15 AM
Has anyone wrapped their head around how awesome it will be when the CBS goes live to Frank's house where the whole team has gathered to watch the selection show?

Just amazing.

OMG!  :kstatriot:
Title: Re: #2 seed
Post by: WildcatNkilt on February 12, 2010, 09:17:21 AM
Has anyone wrapped their head around how awesome it will be when the CBS goes live to Frank's house where the whole team has gathered to watch the selection show?

Just amazing.

OMG!  :kstatriot:

I see a block party in the future.
Title: Re: #2 seed
Post by: pissclams on February 12, 2010, 09:18:49 AM
I think our ceiling is a 2 seed. 

This.  1 seed is probably not going to happen unless several teams at the top fall apart down the stretch.

agreed, but as tardish as this sounds, the possibility for a one seed is there. win out minus ku and win the conf tourney, which is somewhat realistic, and we're a one.
no, the possibility for a one seed isn't there.  this is your coach speaking.  get a grip [redacted], your heart is pumping piss.
Title: Re: #2 seed
Post by: Bookcat on February 12, 2010, 09:20:05 AM
I'll take a two seed if we're paired with Richmond, UNLV, and Vermont.  That has sweet sixteen written all over it.


but I could see us falling to a 3 seed and then having to face Baylor, BYU or some ringer of a 6 seed and falling in the second round. shazbot!!
Title: Re: #2 seed
Post by: kso_FAN on February 12, 2010, 09:20:46 AM
I'll take a two seed if we're paired with Richmond, UNLV, and Vermont.  That has sweet sixteen written all over it.


but I could see us falling to a 3 seed and then having to face Baylor, BYU or some ringer of a 6 seed and falling in the second round. shazbot!!

Baylor in the 2nd round can't happen.
Title: Re: #2 seed
Post by: EllToPay on February 12, 2010, 09:21:15 AM
No, piss.

My heart is pumping EMAW, and it's flowing freely.

:kstatriot:
Title: Re: #2 seed
Post by: WildcatNkilt on February 12, 2010, 09:30:00 AM
I love the thought of being disappointed in a 4-seed.  Never gets old.
Title: Re: #2 seed
Post by: mcmwcat on February 12, 2010, 09:30:08 AM
Butler could pose a challenge, then syracuse eventually.

we'd destroy Butler
Title: Re: #2 seed
Post by: pissclams on February 12, 2010, 09:30:58 AM
Butler could pose a challenge, then syracuse eventually.

we'd destroy Butler
similar to how I would destroy mcmwcat if he were ever to challenge me in Gran Turismo
Title: Re: #2 seed
Post by: sys on February 12, 2010, 09:32:10 AM
jfc take that bracket and run

love this phrase.  i say it in my head all the time, in a wide variety of situations.  make me think of saul, too.
Title: Re: #2 seed
Post by: mcmwcat on February 12, 2010, 09:35:25 AM
Butler could pose a challenge, then syracuse eventually.

we'd destroy Butler
similar to how I would destroy mcmwcat if he were ever to challenge me in Gran Turismo

thought that movie was a little overrated.  typical Eastwood though.
Title: Re: #2 seed
Post by: mcmwcat on February 12, 2010, 09:42:40 AM
ku getting tenn/mich st in sweet 16 would be tough when compared to us getting temple/butler.
Title: Re: #2 seed
Post by: Bookcat on February 12, 2010, 09:52:40 AM
I'll take a two seed if we're paired with Richmond, UNLV, and Vermont.  That has sweet sixteen written all over it.


but I could see us falling to a 3 seed and then having to face Baylor, BYU or some ringer of a 6 seed and falling in the second round. shazbot!!

Baylor in the 2nd round can't happen.

If we're a 3 seed and win.....and the 6th wins against 11th.?
Title: Re: #2 seed
Post by: kso_FAN on February 12, 2010, 09:54:48 AM
I'll take a two seed if we're paired with Richmond, UNLV, and Vermont.  That has sweet sixteen written all over it.


but I could see us falling to a 3 seed and then having to face Baylor, BYU or some ringer of a 6 seed and falling in the second round. shazbot!!

Baylor in the 2nd round can't happen.

If we're a 3 seed and win.....and the 6th wins against 11th.?

Very unlikely 2 teams from the same league will match up in the first weekend, maybe even impossible.
Title: Re: #2 seed
Post by: mcmwcat on February 12, 2010, 09:56:43 AM
I'll take a two seed if we're paired with Richmond, UNLV, and Vermont.  That has sweet sixteen written all over it.


but I could see us falling to a 3 seed and then having to face Baylor, BYU or some ringer of a 6 seed and falling in the second round. shazbot!!

Baylor in the 2nd round can't happen.

If we're a 3 seed and win.....and the 6th wins against 11th.?

 :facepalm:
Title: Re: #2 seed
Post by: kcchiefdav on February 12, 2010, 09:59:51 AM
I'll take a two seed if we're paired with Richmond, UNLV, and Vermont.  That has sweet sixteen written all over it.


but I could see us falling to a 3 seed and then having to face Baylor, BYU or some ringer of a 6 seed and falling in the second round. shazbot!!

Baylor in the 2nd round can't happen.


If we're a 3 seed and win.....and the 6th wins against 11th.?

 :facepalm:


By rule, you can't play a team from your league until the sweet 16.

Also, here's a look at pretty much ever bracket on the internet...

http://bracketproject.50webs.com/matrix.htm
Title: Re: #2 seed
Post by: canadian_breeze on February 12, 2010, 10:25:26 AM
I'll take a two seed if we're paired with Richmond, UNLV, and Vermont.  That has sweet sixteen written all over it.


but I could see us falling to a 3 seed and then having to face Baylor, BYU or some ringer of a 6 seed and falling in the second round. shazbot!!

Baylor in the 2nd round can't happen.


If we're a 3 seed and win.....and the 6th wins against 11th.?

 :facepalm:


By rule, you can't play a team from your league until the sweet 16.

Also, here's a look at pretty much ever bracket on the internet...

http://bracketproject.50webs.com/matrix.htm
http://featurepresentationonline.com/ this homo site is the only one that gave us a 4 seed  :curse:
Title: Re: #2 seed
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 12, 2010, 10:36:28 AM
Has anyone wrapped their head around how awesome it will be when the CBS goes live to Frank's house where the whole team has gathered to watch the selection show?

Just amazing.

OMG!  :kstatriot:

Jake and Denis in the front row, wearing elite Purple warmups.  JamSam listening to new music on some big head phones, nodding cooly, Frank in the background with his beautiful wife and kids, 'te in a $20,000 suit flashing a billion dollar smile for all the 'cruits watching. 

 :bball:
Title: Re: #2 seed
Post by: Kat Kid on February 12, 2010, 12:05:35 PM
Odds that Martavious Irving does his dance in the background while Frank sits in the recliner with his rug rats on his lap?

I'll start it at 15-1, solid play.
Title: Re: #2 seed
Post by: CatsFan_58 on February 12, 2010, 03:22:19 PM
Odds that Martavious Irving does his dance in the background while Frank sits in the recliner with his rug rats on his lap?

I'll start it at 15-1, solid play.
would be a fantastic image.
Title: Re: #2 seed
Post by: pissclams on February 12, 2010, 04:44:42 PM
i thought this thread was about seeds and that opcat started it  :cheese:
Title: Re: #2 seed
Post by: deputy dawg on February 12, 2010, 06:16:27 PM
I think our ceiling is a 2 seed. 

This.  1 seed is probably not going to happen unless several teams at the top fall apart down the stretch.

agreed, but as tardish as this sounds, the possibility for a one seed is there. win out minus ku and win the conf tourney, which is somewhat realistic, and we're a one.

We are going to win in Lawrence.  Don't know if we'll win in Norman.
Title: Re: #2 seed
Post by: sir spankalot on February 12, 2010, 06:18:51 PM
I think our ceiling is a 2 seed. 

This.  1 seed is probably not going to happen unless several teams at the top fall apart down the stretch.

agreed, but as tardish as this sounds, the possibility for a one seed is there. win out minus ku and win the conf tourney, which is somewhat realistic, and we're a one.

No sh1t?  +1

We are going to win in Lawrence.  Don't know if we'll win in Norman.
Title: Re: #2 seed
Post by: A-Lishious on February 12, 2010, 07:49:47 PM
I'll take a two seed if we're paired with Richmond, UNLV, and Vermont.  That has sweet sixteen written all over it.


but I could see us falling to a 3 seed and then having to face Baylor, BYU or some ringer of a 6 seed and falling in the second round. shazbot!!

Baylor in the 2nd round can't happen.

If we're a 3 seed and win.....and the 6th wins against 11th.?

 :facepalm:


Some of you guys are kinda new to how this whole NCAA tourney thing happens huh?  :dunno:

Its all bueno... rep the BigXII - im all for an all BigXII final4.
Title: Re: #2 seed
Post by: Kat Kid on February 12, 2010, 08:23:10 PM
I think our ceiling is a 2 seed. 

This.  1 seed is probably not going to happen unless several teams at the top fall apart down the stretch.

agreed, but as tardish as this sounds, the possibility for a one seed is there. win out minus ku and win the conf tourney, which is somewhat realistic, and we're a one.

No sh1t?  +1

We are going to win in Lawrence.  Don't know if we'll win in Norman.

 :facepalm:  do we need a FAQ about how to not eff up the quote function?
Title: Re: #2 seed
Post by: sir spankalot on February 12, 2010, 09:47:20 PM
I think our ceiling is a 2 seed. 

This.  1 seed is probably not going to happen unless several teams at the top fall apart down the stretch.

agreed, but as tardish as this sounds, the possibility for a one seed is there. win out minus ku and win the conf tourney, which is somewhat realistic, and we're a one.

No sh1t?  +1

We are going to win in Lawrence.  Don't know if we'll win in Norman.

Yes.

 :facepalm:  do we need a FAQ about how to not shazbot! up the quote function?
Title: Re: #2 seed
Post by: hemmy on February 13, 2010, 09:29:47 AM
Hubert Davis:

K-State could unseat one of the current #1 seeds  :cool:

There it is folks, we are validated.