goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Other Sports (Tiger's Back) => Topic started by: Saulbadguy on November 04, 2010, 08:45:44 PM

Title: ksu ladycats
Post by: Saulbadguy on November 04, 2010, 08:45:44 PM
 :D
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: hemmy on November 04, 2010, 08:47:39 PM
Shilly Lenning back as assistant coach. 'parently WNBA doesn't pay much.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Saulbadguy on November 04, 2010, 08:48:58 PM
Shilly Lenning back as assistant coach. 'parently WNBA doesn't pay much.
It doesn't.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Saulbadguy on November 04, 2010, 08:52:42 PM
91-25 KSU LADYCATS
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: hemmy on November 04, 2010, 08:53:43 PM
91-25 KSU LADYCATS

 :bball:

Whats the women's bball hand sign?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: yoga-like_abana on November 04, 2010, 09:10:07 PM
91-25 KSU LADYCATS

 :bball:

Whats the women's bball hand sign?

(http://www.kamloopsthisweek.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Basketball_Logo-FEAT-620x330.jpg)

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/04/Vulva-handsign-Yoni-mudra.svg/497px-Vulva-handsign-Yoni-mudra.svg.png)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: theswo on November 04, 2010, 09:10:52 PM
couldn't hold them under 20  :blank:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Dirty Sanchez on November 04, 2010, 10:36:59 PM
91-25 KSU LADYCATS

 :bball:

Whats the women's bball hand sign?

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/04/Vulva-handsign-Yoni-mudra.svg/497px-Vulva-handsign-Yoni-mudra.svg.png)


 :lol:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: TBL on November 04, 2010, 10:41:10 PM
91-25 KSU LADYCATS

 :bball:

Whats the women's bball hand sign?

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/04/Vulva-handsign-Yoni-mudra.svg/497px-Vulva-handsign-Yoni-mudra.svg.png)


 :lol:


 :lol:  :lol:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MeatSauce on November 05, 2010, 10:23:12 AM
Sensational, YLA.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Pett on November 05, 2010, 10:52:31 AM
Better be good this year girls or we won't give a cac. I mean, just ask volleyball.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Chingon on November 05, 2010, 11:01:19 AM
:lol: because they have vaginas!

:lol:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: T42YS on November 05, 2010, 02:54:16 PM
:lol: because they have vaginas!

:lol:

but what, exactly, is the internet?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: jtksu on November 06, 2010, 12:49:04 AM
WNBA salaries range from a minimum just above 30k and a max of about 100k.  (Chicks can make like another 30k is they're 1st team allstars, the mvp, and win the NC. That crap is sad, really.  Wonder what pro softball chicks make? 
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: yoga-like_abana on November 06, 2010, 08:45:11 AM
WNBA salaries range from a minimum just above 30k and a max of about 100k.  (Chicks can make like another 30k is they're 1st team allstars, the mvp, and win the NC. That crap is sad, really.  Wonder what pro softball chicks make? 
no one gives a crap
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: jtksu on November 06, 2010, 11:22:28 AM
Guess your tard vision missed the discussion about Wnba players not making much money.  Douxhe.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: yoga-like_abana on November 06, 2010, 02:15:12 PM
Shilly Lenning back as assistant coach. 'parently WNBA doesn't pay much.
It doesn't.
quite the discussion jtdumbass
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: jtksu on November 06, 2010, 02:57:47 PM
So, a post needs more than one reply before we are allowed to reply to it?  :dunno:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: KSU_foo on November 06, 2010, 10:55:07 PM
They're just trying to make it look like they deserve half of that practice facility.  I'm not fooled.  :blindfold:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Saulbadguy on November 08, 2010, 09:30:12 PM
 :eek:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: WillieWatanabe on November 08, 2010, 09:46:13 PM
:eek:

details?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Saulbadguy on November 08, 2010, 09:53:51 PM
:eek:

details?
lady cats playing well!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: WillieWatanabe on November 08, 2010, 09:54:30 PM
:eek:

details?
lady cats playing well!

Deb has them dyked up this year? :surprised:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: hemmy on November 14, 2010, 09:07:52 AM
:ksu:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: ednksu on January 04, 2012, 06:05:23 PM
go lady cats against  Baylor's thugs

15-18 9:15 1st
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on January 04, 2012, 10:27:14 PM
go lady cats against  Baylor's thugs

15-18 9:15 1st

Saw on the ticker they won in OT 71-69.  I think that's a really good win, because I think aTm won the NC last season.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on January 05, 2012, 07:11:10 AM
I always loved Megan Mahoney.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Saulbadguy on January 07, 2012, 08:57:32 PM
Yet another victory over their garbage athletic department. I'm not even keeping count now.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kstater on January 07, 2012, 09:07:04 PM
I think it's 18-2.   4-1 on the year.   But it's incredibly difficult to keep track.

FB 1
VB 2
WBB 1
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Saulbadguy on January 07, 2012, 09:20:43 PM
lady cats not bad this year! 2-0!!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 06wildcat on January 08, 2012, 07:57:06 PM
Quote
    HAWKNMO

Like I said, KU has finished ahead of KSU in several sports over the last two years (Track, XC, Golf). Head to head is a terrible measuring stick (unless you're KSU apparently).

 :sdeek:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 08, 2012, 11:23:13 PM
Quote
    HAWKNMO

Like I said, KU has finished ahead of KSU in several sports over the last two years (Track, XC, Golf). Head to head is a terrible measuring stick (unless you're KSU apparently).

 :sdeek:

 :horrorsurprise:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: WillieWatanabe on January 12, 2012, 07:17:24 AM
(http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7164/6682420409_b1a8b8c633.jpg)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on January 12, 2012, 08:06:48 AM
what is that.  the picture you posted?  what?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: WillieWatanabe on January 12, 2012, 08:16:36 AM
apparently mizzou's coach wasn't happy with deb after the game. i just liked the picture.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on January 12, 2012, 09:35:22 AM
i thought she was just saying, "you guys kicked our asses, gj"  :thumbs:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on January 15, 2012, 11:25:59 PM

I got an email that says they beat TTech (ranked #20) and are 4-0 in conf play.   :emawkid:

 :zzz:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: WillieWatanabe on January 16, 2012, 12:52:34 AM
for me, deb is a hard coach to figure out... i dunno why.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on January 16, 2012, 12:29:03 PM
for me, deb is a hard coach to figure out... i dunno why.

What's so hard to figure out about a consistent winner.  Just an advanced warning, I'm a bigger Debite than a Frankite, I'm looking for a fight. :comeatme:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: WillieWatanabe on January 16, 2012, 12:30:25 PM
for me, deb is a hard coach to figure out... i dunno why.

What's so hard to figure out about a consistent winner.  Just an advanced warning, I'm a bigger Debite than a Frankite, I'm looking for a fight. :comeatme:

lol. Why do alotta people hate her?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on January 16, 2012, 12:38:41 PM
for me, deb is a hard coach to figure out... i dunno why.

What's so hard to figure out about a consistent winner.  Just an advanced warning, I'm a bigger Debite than a Frankite, I'm looking for a fight. :comeatme:

lol. Why do alotta people hate her?


1. They hate WBB and she's good enough where its a small focus at KSU and some morons aren't okay with that.
2.  She's a bible thumper
3.  Possibly gay :dunno:
4.  She was mean to some managers once and the KC Star wrote about it
5.  Many people who know anything about KSU basketball only know the Wecker, Ohlde, Koehn years and Deb and Kendra left on bad terms.  As if she's the only coach that didn't get along with some of her players.  Kendra wanted to do what Kendra wanted to do, she didn't get along great with some of her teammates either.  These things happen and neither of them are wrong, but people are stupid and are either hypocritical or don't understand group dynamics, likely both.

Deb is my boo :love:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: WillieWatanabe on January 16, 2012, 12:40:47 PM
fair enough.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 16, 2012, 01:44:13 PM
It's pretty cool the way she torments this conference and beats the schools that care a lot about women's v-ball.com
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on January 16, 2012, 02:19:11 PM
Doesn't beat flood aggie enough.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Saulbadguy on January 16, 2012, 03:15:42 PM
Quote
K-State is one of nine schools with both its men and women in the AP rankings. The other schools are Kentucky, Baylor, Duke, Ohio State, North Carolina, Georgetown, Connecticut and Louisville.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: hemmy on January 16, 2012, 05:14:20 PM
Quote
K-State is one of nine schools with both its men and women in the AP rankings. The other schools are Kentucky, Baylor, Duke, Ohio State, North Carolina, Georgetown, Connecticut and Louisville.

bluest of the blue bloods
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 'taterblast on January 17, 2012, 07:35:11 PM
i mean, go cats, ftb, all of that... but women's basketball is just too hilarious.

i really tried tonight guys.

 :embarrassed:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Dlew12 on January 17, 2012, 09:14:21 PM
i mean, go cats, ftb, all of that... but women's basketball is just too hilarious.

i really tried tonight guys.

 :embarrassed:
I was there.  First game as a student.

Just awful.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 'taterblast on January 17, 2012, 09:22:15 PM
the moment it hit me is when one of our players got about two inches off the ground while shooting, got rejected by an ou player, and their bench absolutely erupted, in the worst of ways. that was it.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kstater on January 17, 2012, 09:38:12 PM
:flush:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on January 18, 2012, 08:13:23 AM
the moment it hit me is when one of our players got about two inches off the ground while shooting, got rejected by an ou player, and their bench absolutely erupted, in the worst of ways. that was it.

i mean, go cats, ftb, all of that... but women's basketball is just too hilarious.

i really tried tonight guys.

 :embarrassed:
I was there.  First game as a student.

Just awful.

you should probably not be a complete dumbass when watching women's basketball by expecting them to play like men. 
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: jtksu on January 18, 2012, 08:55:10 AM
you see what UConn did to UNC?  Yikes.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: ednksu on January 23, 2012, 08:22:58 AM
estroballers took it in the teeth against Baylor
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: gokatgo on January 23, 2012, 09:19:54 AM
estroballers took it in the teeth against Baylor

in their defense, Baylor does have a man playing for them.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: ednksu on January 28, 2012, 01:33:54 PM
well after a skid the lady cats beat OSU in Stillwater.

Cats nearly blow a 26pt lead to win by 11.  OSU was within 6.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on February 06, 2012, 12:13:46 AM
I"m only interested if there are players that I would like to sleep with. Like Megan Mahoney.


(http://a2.twimg.com/profile_images/1523304959/IMG-20110823-00595.jpg)


 :love:

And her birthday is coming up!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Gooch on February 06, 2012, 08:17:01 AM
I think we would need Pete to get to the bottom of her sexual preference first. He has a very unique and subtle touch for this.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Trim on February 12, 2012, 12:47:25 PM
Quote from: TylerDreiling
Argument in the stands between #KState & #KU fans resulted in police, and, wait for it.. Frank Martin getting involved. I love this rivalry.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 12, 2012, 01:43:30 PM
wtf? lol
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on February 12, 2012, 01:59:20 PM

This is painful to watch.  The passing, the dribbling, the shooting.   :barf:

Didn't realize Charlie Dickey's daughter was on the team
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Sandstone Outcropping on February 12, 2012, 04:24:10 PM

This is painful to watch.  The passing, the dribbling, the shooting.   :barf:

Didn't realize Charlie Dickey's daughter was on the team

You mean the MBB team is painful to watch, right?

They need to rename it "The Octagon of Womb"

Our estroballers rule.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on February 12, 2012, 04:38:21 PM

This is painful to watch.  The passing, the dribbling, the shooting.   :barf:

Didn't realize Charlie Dickey's daughter was on the team

You mean the MBB team is painful to watch, right?

They need to rename it "The Octagon of Womb"

Our estroballers rule.

Octagon of Womb

Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Trim on February 12, 2012, 04:41:37 PM
Quit posting about the game and tell me what Frank did.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on February 12, 2012, 08:05:22 PM
From what I understand he was just between the people keeping peace until security came.  This "fight" involved an old lady.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: gokatgo on February 12, 2012, 09:20:41 PM
From what I understand he was just between the people keeping peace until security came.  This "fight" involved an old lady.

Again with this bitch?

(http://media.lawrence.com/img/photos/2012/01/04/ku_bkc_ksu_mlyseqn0004_t960.jpg?b8ea04f16efcb7dc07c41fa674167d6870b19a92)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Trim on February 12, 2012, 09:44:23 PM
From what I understand he was just between the people keeping peace until security came.  This "fight" involved an old lady.

Sounds wonderful.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kim carnes on February 12, 2012, 10:31:02 PM
I"m only interested if there are players that I would like to sleep with. Like Megan Mahoney.


(http://a2.twimg.com/profile_images/1523304959/IMG-20110823-00595.jpg)


 :love:

And her birthday is coming up!

is that really megan mahoney?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on February 12, 2012, 10:32:31 PM
From what I understand he was just between the people keeping peace until security came.  This "fight" involved an old lady.

Sounds wonderful.

BTW there was an amazing screencap oppo with a squawk fan in a football jersey and over the top face paint and ridiculous headwear.  I don't know how to screencap my television and didn't care enough to record it.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on February 12, 2012, 10:32:59 PM
I"m only interested if there are players that I would like to sleep with. Like Megan Mahoney.


(http://a2.twimg.com/profile_images/1523304959/IMG-20110823-00595.jpg)


 :love:

And her birthday is coming up!

is that really megan mahoney?

yeah with a mohawk
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Trim on February 12, 2012, 10:43:05 PM
From what I understand he was just between the people keeping peace until security came.  This "fight" involved an old lady.

Sounds wonderful.

BTW there was an amazing screencap oppo with a squawk fan in a football jersey and over the top face paint and ridiculous headwear.  I don't know how to screencap my television and didn't care enough to record it.

Hit pause, take picture with phone.

It's way easier to do that than when I had to tell your buddy in the Coyotes starter jacket today to stop and turn around so I could capture a good shot.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Fitz Bath on February 15, 2012, 10:47:44 PM
I"m only interested if there are players that I would like to sleep with. Like Megan Mahoney.


(http://a2.twimg.com/profile_images/1523304959/IMG-20110823-00595.jpg)


 :love:

And her birthday is coming up!

I liked her in those Olhde/Wecker years. She didn't get much press but it seemed like she always got 8 points 11 rebounds 8 assists.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: ednksu on February 19, 2012, 02:33:36 PM
estroballers dominate the second leg of the CTR with a 20 point win (65-45).
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Sandstone Outcropping on February 20, 2012, 01:34:25 PM
estroballers dominate the second leg of the CTR with a 20 point win (65-45).

 :bball:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: theswo on February 24, 2012, 01:58:25 AM
I feel like this is the thread for this.
Favorite things that Deb Patterson yells in disgust:
Mamma Mia!
Jeez Louise!
Gosh Darn It!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on February 26, 2012, 08:24:13 PM
I feel like this is the thread for this.
Favorite things that Deb Patterson yells in disgust:
Mamma Mia!
Jeez Louise!
Gosh Darn It!

YES!!! It's hilarious and she always pouts and stomps while doing it.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: ednksu on March 08, 2012, 01:20:15 PM
way to not suck it up in KC ladies
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Cartierfor3 on March 08, 2012, 06:46:17 PM
When I was at the game and they announced the WBB score I was like "oh yeah, we have a women't team.  cool."
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: hemmy on March 09, 2012, 06:53:32 PM
Raped :frown:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kstater on March 12, 2012, 06:40:18 PM
8 Seed vs Princeton

UConn in 2nd round.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kstater on March 19, 2012, 06:06:09 PM
Estroballers about to tipoff at Conneticut.  :runaway:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kstater on March 19, 2012, 06:45:12 PM
:flush:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kstater on March 19, 2012, 06:51:18 PM
We got to 10 points for the half!!!!  :emawkid:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Fitz Bath on March 19, 2012, 06:52:15 PM
Halftime score 38-10.
I know it's Uconn and all, but wow.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sonofdaxjones on March 19, 2012, 06:56:32 PM
Pay Deb!!!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sonofdaxjones on March 19, 2012, 07:31:25 PM
The K-State women's basketball teams spends about $3 million a year, and losses about $2 million a year.   How many women's sports that K-State might actually be able to do something significant in, if they dropped women's basketball and used the money for say:  Softball and women's soccer??
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 'taterblast on March 19, 2012, 07:31:53 PM
women's basketball is so rough ridin' stupid.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: wetwillie on March 19, 2012, 07:37:52 PM
Currie sighting!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 'taterblast on March 19, 2012, 07:41:01 PM
legitimate question.

say one of the girls on the basketball team has a boyfriend (not that deb would allow this, but bear with me) whose family is :kstategrad:, and her birthday was yesterday. at a family dinner in which all of her family attended, the boyfriend's parents gives her a VISA gift card for $200.

would currie be a jackass and suspend the female basketball player??? oh, and call the NCAA about it???

(and before i get the "that's not the same at all" bull crap, go to hell, it's exactly the same.)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Deez Nutz on March 19, 2012, 08:15:42 PM
legitimate question.

say one of the girls on the basketball team has a boyfriend (not that deb would allow this, but bear with me) whose family is :kstategrad:, and her birthday was yesterday. at a family dinner in which all of her family attended, the boyfriend's parents gives her a VISA gift card for $200.

would currie be a jackass and suspend the female basketball player??? oh, and call the NCAA about it???

(and before i get the "that's not the same at all" bull crap, go to hell, it's exactly the same.)

Why wouldn't Deb allow a player to have a boyfriend?  The announcers said that Julianne Chisholm is getting married this summer, so it would be hard to imagine she does not currently have a boyfriend. 
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 'taterblast on March 19, 2012, 08:30:18 PM
was a joke.
Title: ksu ladycats
Post by: Pete on March 19, 2012, 08:43:34 PM
legitimate question.

say one of the girls on the basketball team has a boyfriend (not that deb would allow this, but bear with me) whose family is :kstategrad:, and her birthday was yesterday. at a family dinner in which all of her family attended, the boyfriend's parents gives her a VISA gift card for $200.

would currie be a jackass and suspend the female basketball player??? oh, and call the NCAA about it???

(and before i get the "that's not the same at all" bull crap, go to hell, it's exactly the same.)

Why wouldn't Deb allow a player to have a boyfriend?  The announcers said that Julianne Chisholm is getting married this summer, so it would be hard to imagine she does not currently have a boyfriend.

Or have received wedding shower gifts?  Bachelorette gifts?  Canadian guy I know told me that those "gag" gift ladies toys can get very pricey.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kim carnes on March 19, 2012, 10:40:37 PM
Good showing tonight Deb, you and Frank are two of a kind.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: jtksu on March 20, 2012, 02:35:52 AM
Meh.  UConn does that to people on a regular basis.  I know I'd rather have 2 teams in the 2nd round than the vast majority of the country.  But yeah, KSU totally sucks.  Also, eff kimdax.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: ednksu on March 21, 2012, 09:26:26 PM
***parity in women's basketball taking point***
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sonofdaxjones on March 24, 2012, 01:23:15 PM
Just saw my first interview with Britney Griner . . .  :sdeek:

Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SwiftCat on April 04, 2012, 09:46:01 PM
Just saw my first interview with Britney Griner . . .  :sdeek:

Yeah, her voice is deep.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: jtksu on April 04, 2012, 11:28:48 PM
She looks  and speaks like a very tall teenage boy.  She's rough ridin' great at basketball though.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: hemmy on April 05, 2012, 12:02:38 AM
I love how the Notre Dame coach said of Griner's talent, "its like a boy playing against the girls" :lol:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on April 05, 2012, 01:16:16 AM
Her wingspan is two inches shorter than Anthony Davis'.  She's a junior.  Baylor has the second best point guard in the country who's only a sophomore.  Next year they will have the most dominant season in the history of men's or women's college basketball.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: ednksu on April 05, 2012, 04:08:39 AM
Her wingspan is two inches shorter than Anthony Davis'.  She's a junior.  Baylor has the second best point guard in the country who's only a sophomore.  Next year they will have the most dominant season in the history of men's or women's college basketball.
as suppose to this years 40-0 team  :sdeek:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on April 16, 2012, 02:39:16 AM
Her wingspan is two inches shorter than Anthony Davis'.  She's a junior.  Baylor has the second best point guard in the country who's only a sophomore.  Next year they will have the most dominant season in the history of men's or women's college basketball.
as suppose to this years 40-0 team  :sdeek:

Uh yeah, they return everyone, stands to reason they'll be better.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Trim on August 23, 2012, 04:16:09 AM
http://cjonline.com/sports/2012-08-22/k-state-dismisses-wittman-womens-basketball-team
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on August 23, 2012, 08:19:10 AM
what  is deb doing with that roster? 

10   Heidi Brown   5-11   Guard   SO/1L   Plains, Kan. (Southwestern Heights HS)
11   Chantay Caron   5-11   Guard/Forward   JR/2L   Lawrence, Kan. (Free State)
2   Brittany Chambers   5-8   Guard   SR/3L   Jordan, Minn. (Jordan)
20   Brianna Craig   5-10   Guard   FR/HS   Lincoln, Neb. (Lincoln Northeast HS)
24   Marissa Ellis   5-7   Guard   FR/HS   Kansas City, Mo. (Staley HS)
21   Ashlynn Knoll   5-11   Forward   JR/TR   Canyon, Texas (Seward County (Kan.) CC)
4   Katya Leick   6-1   Forward   JR/2L   Grey Cloud Township, Minn. (Nebraska)
25   Stacey Malone   6-1   Forward   FR/HS   Tyler, Texas (Robert E. Lee HS)
13   Kendra Spresser   5-5   Guard   RS JR/TR   Dresden, Kan. (Seward County (Kan.) CC)
1   Haley Texada   5-7   Guard   SO/1L   Frisco, Texas (Wakeland)
12   Kelly Thomson   5-10   Guard   FR/HS   Riley, Kan. (Riley County HS)
22   Mariah White   5-7   Guard   SR/3L   Midwest City, Okla. (Midwest City)
23   Ashia Woods   5-11   Guard   SO/1L   Wichita, Kan. (Wichita Collegiate)


all guards, sad really  :jerk: :jerk:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Dugout DickStone on August 23, 2012, 09:15:01 AM
Coach Deb needs to recruit Manhattan High much better.  That is the surefire road to success for keeping your job as coach of any insignificant sport at KSU, in perpetuity.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: slobber on August 23, 2012, 09:24:24 AM
Coach Deb needs to recruit Manhattan High much better.  That is the surefire road to success for keeping your job as coach of any insignificant sport at KSU, in perpetuity.
Oh god, this x 1000. They could go 12-19 for 10 years in a row, but if she was throwing two or three Indians on the floor every night, nobody would give a crap. Throw in a sharp shooter from Centralia and there will be 4000 people at every game.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Dugout DickStone on August 23, 2012, 12:09:14 PM
Coach Deb needs to recruit Manhattan High much better.  That is the surefire road to success for keeping your job as coach of any insignificant sport at KSU, in perpetuity.
Oh god, this x 1000. They could go 12-19 for 10 years in a row, but if she was throwing two or three Indians on the floor every night, nobody would give a crap. Throw in a sharp shooter from Centralia and there will be 4000 people at every game.

Beat ku every other year and you are in the Clark.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: ednksu on August 26, 2012, 01:34:03 AM
bitch should get her ass to chapel
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Winters on August 26, 2012, 02:15:43 AM
Pretty sure that girl guard from Riley wants some of "King Winters"
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 8manpick on August 26, 2012, 02:32:40 PM
Pretty sure that girl guard from Riley wants some of "King Winters"

Pretty excited for pak'd winters posts
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Trim on November 01, 2012, 07:25:26 AM
Janssen enjoys associating "Patterson" and "curious."

Quote
PATTERSON `CURIOUS' ABOUT HER TEAM


Nov. 1, 2012


By Mark Janssen


"Curious."

In a word, that's how Kansas State coach Deb Patterson sums up her feelings about her 2012-13 women's basketball team heading into play tonight at 7 against Fort Hays State in an exhibition game slated for Bramlage Coliseum.

"I'm curious as to what I'm going to see with this group," said Patterson of her team that includes seven first-year players. "We've been working hard to establish an understanding of the speed and physicality with which you have to play at this level of basketball."
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 01, 2012, 07:57:19 AM
Coach Deb is well worth the $600K a year K-State pays her.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on November 01, 2012, 09:29:44 AM
curious lol that's primo
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: puniraptor on November 01, 2012, 12:03:09 PM
deb has been franking since before franking was cool. deb is the frank martin of womens basketball, you just can't tell because of her voice and physical appearance.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: mancattanite on November 01, 2012, 09:59:37 PM
Game tonight was kind of ugly.

First off, props to FHSU. They're pretty good, and their tall girl really caused some problems.

However, K-State should have done much better. Shot selection was horrible. I don't have a problem with Brittany Chambers taking 6 threes in a game.  She can shoot. But she needs to pick her shots better.  A lot of shots tonight were forced by our players.

That was my main concern.  My other concern is our lack of height. We are not a tall team. This could cause some problems down the road.
especially against Griner :ohno:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on November 01, 2012, 10:04:09 PM
Game tonight was kind of ugly.

First off, props to FHSU. They're pretty good, and their tall girl really caused some problems.

However, K-State should have done much better. Shot selection was horrible. I don't have a problem with Brittany Chambers taking 6 threes in a game.  She can shoot. But she needs to pick her shots better.  A lot of shots tonight were forced by our players.

That was my main concern.  My other concern is our lack of height. We are not a tall team. This could cause some problems down the road.
especially against Griner :ohno:
All true.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on November 01, 2012, 10:42:17 PM
Game tonight was kind of ugly.

First off, props to FHSU. They're pretty good, and their tall girl really caused some problems.

However, K-State should have done much better. Shot selection was horrible. I don't have a problem with Brittany Chambers taking 6 threes in a game.  She can shoot. But she needs to pick her shots better.  A lot of shots tonight were forced by our players.

That was my main concern.  My other concern is our lack of height. We are not a tall team. This could cause some problems down the road.
especially against Griner :ohno:

protip, we are not very good this year at all.  And Chambers taking 6 threes a game will be a minimum this season, she took 4 in the 10 minute scrimmage.  Spread, drive, kick out is the entirety of the offense this year.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: mancattanite on November 01, 2012, 10:48:04 PM
Game tonight was kind of ugly.

First off, props to FHSU. They're pretty good, and their tall girl really caused some problems.

However, K-State should have done much better. Shot selection was horrible. I don't have a problem with Brittany Chambers taking 6 threes in a game.  She can shoot. But she needs to pick her shots better.  A lot of shots tonight were forced by our players.

That was my main concern.  My other concern is our lack of height. We are not a tall team. This could cause some problems down the road.
especially against Griner :ohno:

protip, we are not very good this year at all.  And Chambers taking 6 threes a game will be a minimum this season, she took 4 in the 10 minute scrimmage.  Spread, drive, kick out is the entirety of the offense this year.

It doesn't look very good for this year. And yeah, that was pretty much the offense tonight.  We didn't have enough size to go down low. We got lucky sometimes and picked up some cheap baskets down there when Fort Hays wasn't looking... but we don't have much of a post game.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kim carnes on November 01, 2012, 10:48:11 PM
good thing we're paying deb 750k
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on November 02, 2012, 12:35:50 PM
she, like oscar, has an aversion to signing bigs
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Saulbadguy on November 02, 2012, 12:46:02 PM
I actually bought womens season tickets this year for no reason. Do they give you priority points for that? They were only $20 per season ticket so I figured what the hell and checked the little boxes. Does anyone want some tickets?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on November 02, 2012, 09:32:20 PM
she, like oscar, has an aversion to signing bigs

She lost two bigs to ACL injuries.  She has also signed two bigs for 2013.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kim carnes on November 02, 2012, 09:53:41 PM
I actually bought womens season tickets this year for no reason. Do they give you priority points for that? They were only $20 per season ticket so I figured what the hell and checked the little boxes. Does anyone want some tickets?

What?   $20 for the whole season?   That can't be right
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on November 03, 2012, 12:07:42 PM
I actually bought womens season tickets this year for no reason. Do they give you priority points for that? They were only $20 per season ticket so I figured what the hell and checked the little boxes. Does anyone want some tickets?

no priority points for that, sorry saul
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Saulbadguy on November 03, 2012, 12:35:23 PM
I actually bought womens season tickets this year for no reason. Do they give you priority points for that? They were only $20 per season ticket so I figured what the hell and checked the little boxes. Does anyone want some tickets?

What?   $20 for the whole season?   That can't be right
Yep. $20 per season ticket.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Saulbadguy on November 03, 2012, 12:36:53 PM
she, like oscar, has an aversion to signing bigs

She lost two bigs to ACL injuries.  She has also signed two bigs for 2013.
Yeah, shame.

I'll be creepy here for a minute but Katya Leick, she is def. a looker. Very good looking. Sad she'll miss another season (transfer then injury)
Title: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on November 21, 2012, 12:01:59 PM
nice tall signing class
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 'taterblast on November 21, 2012, 12:02:29 PM
how tall
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: puniraptor on November 21, 2012, 12:06:14 PM
how tall

got a 6'5"er according to my friend Mark Janssen.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 02, 2013, 09:29:51 PM
 :flush:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on January 03, 2013, 01:09:30 AM
:flush:

Coming in late on this one, but I agree with Limestone.  :flush:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on January 06, 2013, 04:58:51 PM
They've outperformed expectations to this point, better than I'd thought they'd be.  KU is good, should finish second in the league.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kim carnes on January 06, 2013, 05:36:04 PM
Deb should either be let go or take a 60% pay cut.  The money would be better spent elsewhere within the AD.  We can get someone else for much less and get the same mediocre results.  Also, its widely known that she has been romantically involved with some of the players which is incredibly unethical and unprofessional.  Its time for ksu and deb to part ways.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on January 06, 2013, 06:10:54 PM
I thought she was involved with one of the assistants?

Welp, the more you know!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kim carnes on January 06, 2013, 06:23:23 PM
I thought she was involved with one of the assistants?

Welp, the more you know!

she gets around
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on January 06, 2013, 07:17:55 PM
I hope she never touched my high school crush Megan Mahoney  :crossfingers:

If you know she did, please don't tell me.  :cry:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: ednksu on January 23, 2013, 10:47:09 PM
estroballers win!

(or so the email from k-state sports says)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: ednksu on January 23, 2013, 10:48:20 PM
also when is it time for OSU to move on?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: ednksu on February 02, 2013, 07:09:43 PM
Welp, times to crap can the WBB program. 
I guess they didn't spend enough time in chapel praying for a win.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kim carnes on February 02, 2013, 09:58:52 PM
#firedeb
Title: ksu ladycats
Post by: puniraptor on February 02, 2013, 10:52:02 PM
She franks all her good players. It's a wonder they are this competitive.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kim carnes on February 02, 2013, 11:06:28 PM
She franks all her good players. It's a wonder they are this competitive.

she fucks all of her good players.  but you're right, it is a wonder they are this competitive.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on February 03, 2013, 12:25:58 AM

I was at the game today, a few rows behind our bench. Hate to say it, but Deb's behavior was very erratic. I saw players and coaches react in what I thought was very negative fashion.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: ednksu on February 03, 2013, 08:52:26 AM

I was at the game today, a few rows behind our bench. Hate to say it, but Deb's behavior was very erratic. I saw players and coaches react in what I thought was very negative fashion.
lover's quarrel  :surprised:

She franks all her good players. It's a wonder they are this competitive.

she fucks all of her good players.  but you're right, it is a wonder they are this competitive.
I have less of an issue with Frank franking players than franking a player because they don't go to chapel.  Big time  :nono:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on February 03, 2013, 10:47:36 AM
She franks all her good players. It's a wonder they are this competitive.

Either that or she's lost four players to season ending injuries. The truth can be a bitch.

It's a miracle that her team is beating and hanging with these tournament teams.
Title: ksu ladycats
Post by: puniraptor on February 03, 2013, 01:13:04 PM
She franks all her good players. It's a wonder they are this competitive.

Either that or she's lost four players to season ending injuries. The truth can be a bitch.

It's a miracle that her team is beating and hanging with these tournament teams.

I'm aware of the injuries. There is more than one bitch truth here.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on February 13, 2013, 09:29:04 PM

Went to the women's game tonight. In the first half, AD Currie had a big bucket of popcorn and was offering to share it with those around him. No one accepted his offers. Kind of sad, really.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on February 14, 2013, 09:43:56 AM
was there a we own texas chant?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on February 14, 2013, 10:28:04 AM
Its astonishing that this team is winning games
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on February 15, 2013, 12:12:59 AM
was there a we own texas chant?

There was not. Deb doesn't have them there yet. Will she ever?   :dunno:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 19, 2013, 11:53:06 AM
 :sdeek:

(http://blog.ctnews.com/elliott/files/2013/02/GenoMulkey.bmp)

Quote
    “She was staring at my butt and she was commenting on it and I said, ‘Really? How about yours?’ and she went, `Yeah, look at it,’ and I went (slap), I’ll teach you a lesson,’’ Auriemma said, jokingly. `And then she started talking about how she only dated Italians her whole life and that she wanted me to set her up with some Italians and I said `The Italians I send to see you aren’t going to date you.’ We’ve had a long and great relationship since, gosh, she was an assistant at Louisiana Tech. It goes back a long ways.

    “She’s just a big pain in the butt. That’s all there is to it.’’

http://blog.ctnews.com/elliott/2013/02/19/auriemma-mulkey-shared-in-some-pregame-fun-monday-night/
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: puniraptor on February 19, 2013, 12:24:03 PM
clever marketing
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 19, 2013, 02:15:39 PM
At least Deb is an All American in class!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on February 20, 2013, 12:40:08 AM
:sdeek:

(http://blog.ctnews.com/elliott/files/2013/02/GenoMulkey.bmp)

Quote
    “She was staring at my butt and she was commenting on it and I said, ‘Really? How about yours?’ and she went, `Yeah, look at it,’ and I went (slap), I’ll teach you a lesson,’’ Auriemma said, jokingly. `And then she started talking about how she only dated Italians her whole life and that she wanted me to set her up with some Italians and I said `The Italians I send to see you aren’t going to date you.’ We’ve had a long and great relationship since, gosh, she was an assistant at Louisiana Tech. It goes back a long ways.

    “She’s just a big pain in the butt. That’s all there is to it.’’

http://blog.ctnews.com/elliott/2013/02/19/auriemma-mulkey-shared-in-some-pregame-fun-monday-night/

Kim thinks she's hot (she may be right) and flaunts it. I'm OK with that. The leather pants choice was a nice touch, Kim. Does anyone know if Deb has any leather pants?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: fun muffin on March 08, 2013, 07:55:20 PM
just beat texas in the big 12 tourney on a buzzer beater.

play Baylor tomorrow
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on March 08, 2013, 10:22:56 PM
just beat texas in the big 12 tourney on a buzzer beater.

play Baylor tomorrow

Watched this one on the Big 12's website. Video stream wasn't bad. Good win for the Cats, but daunting task against Baylor tomorrow.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on March 18, 2013, 11:42:48 PM
Cats make the WNIT. Home game Thursday against Texas Southern. Game time TBA Tuesday.

Made it as an "automatic qualifier" because the top seven B12 teams were invited to the NCAA tournament. Although we tied for the next best record with Texas, we split the season series with the Horns and beat them in the conference tourney. Another owning of Texas.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on March 21, 2013, 06:46:30 PM
good for the lady cats
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on March 21, 2013, 08:49:29 PM
Cats just won 72-44. Chambers with a school record 42.  Just announced that we'll host the next game Monday, prob against Illinois State. Time TBA.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: hemmy on March 21, 2013, 10:46:21 PM
Was it really necessary for the athletic dept to send a "CATS WIN!" email for a WNIT game?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on March 22, 2013, 08:10:34 AM
Was it really necessary for the athletic dept to send a "CATS WIN!" email for a WNIT game?

 :dubious:

yes
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on March 25, 2013, 08:50:36 PM
They win again, this time 57-48 over Illinois State. Chambers with 28. Cats advance and host Ball State Thursday night.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on March 25, 2013, 08:57:20 PM
lets Win it(WNIT)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Saulbadguy on March 25, 2013, 09:06:45 PM
They win again, this time 57-48 over Illinois State. Chambers with 28. Cats advance and host Ball State Thursday night.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2


man, we are really kicking the crap out of these podunk teams, huh?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Tobias on March 25, 2013, 11:06:08 PM
They win again, this time 57-48 over Illinois State. Chambers with 28. Cats advance and host Ball State Thursday night.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2


man, we are really kicking the crap out of these podunk teams, huh?

ball st sounds pretty pud... does it get more directional than the bottom third of their schedule? :sdeek:

http://ballstatesports.com/SportSelect.dbml?&DB_OEM_ID=14200&SPID=6776&SPSID=62089 (http://ballstatesports.com/SportSelect.dbml?&DB_OEM_ID=14200&SPID=6776&SPSID=62089)

Quote
Thu, Jan 31     Western Michigan *    at Kalamazoo, Mich.      7:00 p.m.    73 - 50 (W)
10-11    6-1   
  Sun, Feb 03     Eastern Michigan *    at Ypsilanti, Mich.      2:00 p.m.    56 - 41 (W)
11-11    7-1   
  Thu, Feb 07     Central Michigan *    Muncie, Ind.      7:00 p.m.    68 - 61 (W)
12-11    8-1   
  Sun, Feb 10     Toledo *    Muncie, Ind.      2:00 p.m.    64 - 68 (L)
12-12    8-2   
  Sat, Feb 16     Akron *    at Akron, Ohio      5 p.m.    52 - 64 (L)
12-13    8-3   
  Wed, Feb 20     Eastern Michigan *    Muncie, Ind.      7:00 p.m.    56 - 34 (W)
13-13    9-3   
  Sat, Feb 23     Northern Illinois *    Muncie, Ind.      2:00 p.m.    64 - 54 (W)
14-13    10-3   
  Thu, Feb 28     Central Michigan *    at Mt. Pleasant, Mich.      7:00 p.m.    67 - 63 (W)
15-13    11-3   
  Sun, Mar 03     Western Michigan *    Muncie, Ind.      2:00 p.m.    60 - 46 (W)
16-13    12-3
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: theswo on March 26, 2013, 12:37:13 AM
I feel like this is the thread for this.
Favorite things that Deb Patterson yells in disgust:
Mamma Mia!
Jeez Louise!
Gosh Darn It!

Deb was upset tonight.
"Watching you is worse than going to the dentist!"
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 26, 2013, 09:12:23 AM
 :D love her so much
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on March 28, 2013, 09:01:52 PM
Cats took down Ball State 60-48 tonight, host Illinois Saturday at 4. Chambers with 23.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Title: ksu ladycats
Post by: puniraptor on March 28, 2013, 09:28:18 PM
rough ridin' BRING IT BREADS
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: ednksu on March 28, 2013, 09:42:51 PM
As MiR has pointed out this team has suffered through a tremendous amount of injuries this year, going this deep, on the back of Chambers has shown there is a lot to this team. 
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: POD Lasalle Edition on March 28, 2013, 09:44:42 PM
As MiR has pointed out this team has suffered through a tremendous amount of injuries this year, going this deep, on the back of Chambers has shown there is a lot to this team.
: :ksu: :drink:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on March 28, 2013, 09:55:43 PM
As MiR has pointed out this team has suffered through a tremendous amount of injuries this year, going this deep, on the back of Chambers has shown there is a lot to this team.

 :thumbs:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: cfbandyman on March 28, 2013, 10:07:32 PM
As MiR has pointed out this team has suffered through a tremendous amount of injuries this year, going this deep, on the back of Chambers has shown there is a lot to this team.

 :thumbs:

That and having no one on the roster taller than 6' 1" makes it even more impressive. God save that poor player that had to guard Griner.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: fun muffin on March 30, 2013, 03:45:02 PM
the game against Illinois at 4 is free on kstatehdtv
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on March 30, 2013, 05:52:34 PM
Cats keep rolling, 66-48 over Illinois, and will host Utah in the semifinals Wednesday at 7.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Title: ksu ladycats
Post by: puniraptor on March 30, 2013, 05:57:21 PM
SUCK IT BREADS KABOOOM
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: slobber on March 31, 2013, 06:41:26 AM
 :emawkid:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: wabash909 on March 31, 2013, 08:33:08 AM
From this point forward, please refer to this fine group of ladies as "The Magnificent Seven".

Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: ednksu on March 31, 2013, 01:27:10 PM
After this coaching performance does Deb get the bigger corner office at the BTF?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on March 31, 2013, 11:11:55 PM
After this coaching performance does Deb get the bigger corner office at the BTF?

Heard today that oscar changed his locks just in case Deb tried to move in.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: jtksu on April 01, 2013, 12:13:03 AM
After this coaching performance does Deb get the bigger corner office at the BTF?

Heard today that oscar changed his locks just in case Deb tried to move in.

You know oscar is just gonna stand there with his arms crossed and some stupid smirk on his face as they're changing the locks and moving his crap into the basement.

(http://www.gannett-cdn.com/media/USATODAY/NG/sports/ncaab/2012/11/22/usp-ncaa-basketball_-north-florida-at-kansas-statee-3_4_r536_c534.jpg?1b79b3da202957124496e3768cfb7b67cdb10c81)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on April 01, 2013, 12:19:54 AM
After this coaching performance does Deb get the bigger corner office at the BTF?

Heard today that oscar changed his locks just in case Deb tried to move in.

You know oscar is just gonna stand there with his arms crossed and some stupid smirk on his face as they're changing the locks and moving his crap into the basement.

(http://www.gannett-cdn.com/media/USATODAY/NG/sports/ncaab/2012/11/22/usp-ncaa-basketball_-north-florida-at-kansas-statee-3_4_r536_c534.jpg?1b79b3da202957124496e3768cfb7b67cdb10c81)

Sad, but true. And he'll never, ever unbutton his jacket.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: ednksu on April 01, 2013, 01:14:41 PM
So how about them Baylor lady bear types?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on April 03, 2013, 10:20:46 PM
Overtime loss in the WNIT semis tonight and the Cats finish 19-18. Nice little run in the tournament.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on April 08, 2013, 10:18:01 AM
Are the Lady Cats going to be good next year? I would guess no but I don't really know?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on April 08, 2013, 02:13:31 PM
Are the Lady Cats going to be good next year? I would guess no but I don't really know?

Losing Chambers will absolutely hurt, her ability to stretch the defense won't be replaced. Just looking at what we're losing I'd be inclined to say we will be worse next season. That being said we will (should) have a full roster next season led by Hailey Tejada who had a much better season in 12-13 than I anticipated. Also Deb has earned the right for her to get credit for being a very good coach. Not accounting for her two conference titles, what she did this season was amazing and if not for an undefeated Baylor she should have and would have been conference COY. This team had no business winning any more than 10 total and 3 conference games.

I'm going to say we will at the very least be as good as we were this season but I would be shocked if we weren't at least 4 games better.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on April 08, 2013, 02:33:02 PM
Are the Lady Cats going to be good next year? I would guess no but I don't really know?

Losing Chambers will absolutely hurt, her ability to stretch the defense won't be replaced. Just looking at what we're losing I'd be inclined to say we will be worse next season. That being said we will (should) have a full roster next season led by Hailey Tejada who had a much better season in 12-13 than I anticipated. Also Deb has earned the right for her to get credit for being a very good coach. Not accounting for her two conference titles, what she did this season was amazing and if not for an undefeated Baylor she should have and would have been conference COY. This team had no business winning any more than 10 total and 3 conference games.

I'm going to say we will at the very least be as good as we were this season but I would be shocked if we weren't at least 4 games better.

So probably an WNIT run again?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on April 08, 2013, 02:36:57 PM
Are the Lady Cats going to be good next year? I would guess no but I don't really know?

Losing Chambers will absolutely hurt, her ability to stretch the defense won't be replaced. Just looking at what we're losing I'd be inclined to say we will be worse next season. That being said we will (should) have a full roster next season led by Hailey Tejada who had a much better season in 12-13 than I anticipated. Also Deb has earned the right for her to get credit for being a very good coach. Not accounting for her two conference titles, what she did this season was amazing and if not for an undefeated Baylor she should have and would have been conference COY. This team had no business winning any more than 10 total and 3 conference games.

I'm going to say we will at the very least be as good as we were this season but I would be shocked if we weren't at least 4 games better.

So probably an WNIT run again?

[redacted] I answered the question. If you have something to say, say it.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on April 08, 2013, 02:48:25 PM
Are the Lady Cats going to be good next year? I would guess no but I don't really know?

Losing Chambers will absolutely hurt, her ability to stretch the defense won't be replaced. Just looking at what we're losing I'd be inclined to say we will be worse next season. That being said we will (should) have a full roster next season led by Hailey Tejada who had a much better season in 12-13 than I anticipated. Also Deb has earned the right for her to get credit for being a very good coach. Not accounting for her two conference titles, what she did this season was amazing and if not for an undefeated Baylor she should have and would have been conference COY. This team had no business winning any more than 10 total and 3 conference games.

I'm going to say we will at the very least be as good as we were this season but I would be shocked if we weren't at least 4 games better.

So probably an WNIT run again?

[redacted] I answered the question. If you have something to say, say it.

 :frown:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on April 08, 2013, 02:58:44 PM
Sorry I thought you were trolling. I think the WNIT should be a minimum expectation if nothing catastrophic goes wrong. At this time last year I would have set the minimum expectation at a NCAA bid, but as it turned out the WNIT was great.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on April 08, 2013, 03:08:59 PM
Nope, was just trying to gauge your way early postseason expectations.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on April 08, 2013, 11:50:14 PM
Are the Lady Cats going to be good next year? I would guess no but I don't really know?

Losing Chambers will absolutely hurt, her ability to stretch the defense won't be replaced. Just looking at what we're losing I'd be inclined to say we will be worse next season. That being said we will (should) have a full roster next season led by Hailey Tejada who had a much better season in 12-13 than I anticipated. Also Deb has earned the right for her to get credit for being a very good coach. Not accounting for her two conference titles, what she did this season was amazing and if not for an undefeated Baylor she should have and would have been conference COY. This team had no business winning any more than 10 total and 3 conference games.

I'm going to say we will at the very least be as good as we were this season but I would be shocked if we weren't at least 4 games better.

I agree with MIR's analysis. The Cats could also be even a bit better if a couple of the frosh recruits develop rapidly and the injured players come back well.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: joda on April 15, 2013, 09:58:33 PM
While you dumbasses fight over whether Greiner could hang with the dudes this went down

10 (22)   Los Angeles Sparks   Brittany Chambers, Kansas State

Also Skylar Diggans :drool: drafted by Tulsa

Edit: just saw the creeper thread on the bball board somewhat mentioned this, still feel this post is warrented.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on April 15, 2013, 10:07:30 PM
While you dumbasses fight over whether Greiner could hang with the dudes this went down

10 (22)   Los Angeles Sparks   Brittany Chambers, Kansas State

Also Skylar Diggans :drool: drafted by Tulsa

Former Cat Jalana Childs invited to the Phoenix camp, also.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on April 16, 2013, 07:13:11 AM
While you dumbasses fight over whether Greiner could hang with the dudes this went down

10 (22)   Los Angeles Sparks   Brittany Chambers, Kansas State

Also Skylar Diggans :drool: drafted by Tulsa

Former Cat Jalana Childs invited to the Phoenix camp, also.

'grats lady cats!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: salcat on October 28, 2013, 09:25:26 PM
bump
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on October 28, 2013, 10:16:02 PM
 :emawkid:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on October 29, 2013, 10:05:21 PM
 :ksu:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on November 01, 2013, 10:54:49 PM
Romero

:love:

BALLERRRRRRRRRRR
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on November 01, 2013, 10:58:30 PM
Not having Chambers is going to be pretty great. Also having more than 7 players. Also having a player over 6 foot...
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on November 02, 2013, 12:04:56 AM
Not having Chambers is going to be pretty great. Also having more than 7 players. Also having a player over 6 foot...

We actually won the opening tip tonight. Good sign. We have some inside height and some speed.  :driving:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on November 02, 2013, 11:46:38 PM
Not having Chambers is going to be pretty great.

 :confused:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: EllRobersonisInnocent on November 05, 2013, 10:16:02 AM
What in the eff?

K-State Athletics [email protected]  1m 
This Friday at the #KStateWBB game we've got FREE BACON for students starting at 4:45! Free admission w/ student ID.


(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BYUfiJOCIAAikKR.jpg:large)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on November 05, 2013, 10:22:27 AM
Sounds gross AF. I mean, I like bacon, but I don't want free bacon at a college basketball game.

Quote
Daniel #LiFE Sams [email protected] 31s
@kstatesports only bacon? Lol.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: The Big Train on November 05, 2013, 10:35:00 AM
I may be going to my first ever lady wild wildcats basketball game this Friday now.   :bball:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Pett on November 05, 2013, 11:02:25 AM
The bacon should at least be dyed purple to make some sense
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on November 05, 2013, 11:03:30 AM
The bacon should at least be dyed purple to make some sense

 :Yuck:

Doesn't need to make sense.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 'taterblast on November 06, 2013, 10:18:48 AM
someone youtube this moment please

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BYZlqawCUAA0yqo.jpg)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: TownieCat on November 06, 2013, 10:22:54 AM
someone youtube this moment please

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BYZlqawCUAA0yqo.jpg)

4300+ RTs on @SportsCenter. Best thing to happen to the Lady Cats since....?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Tobias on November 06, 2013, 10:26:30 AM
#viral
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: owl borland on November 06, 2013, 10:28:16 AM
Quote
K-State Athletics [email protected] 16m
Tune into the @dpshow to hear about @kstatesports "Free Bacon" on Friday at #KStateWBB. Available in MHK on 1350 KMAN b/w 2-4 today.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 'taterblast on November 06, 2013, 10:32:09 AM
Quote
@darrenrovell
Kansas St says that social media activity has led them to triple the amount of free bacon at Friday’s women’s basketball game to 300 lbs
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kso_FAN on November 06, 2013, 10:32:35 AM
Quote
@darrenrovell
Kansas St says that social media activity has led them to triple the amount of free bacon at Friday’s women’s basketball game to 300 lbs

 :surprised:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: yoga-like_abana on November 06, 2013, 10:42:23 AM
Quote
@darrenrovell
Kansas St says that social media activity has led them to triple the amount of free bacon at Friday’s women’s basketball game to 300 lbs
if its turkey bacon I will lose my crap
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on November 06, 2013, 10:46:30 AM
Quote
@darrenrovell
Kansas St says that social media activity has led them to triple the amount of free bacon at Friday’s women’s basketball game to 300 lbs
if its turkey bacon I will lose my crap

 :lol:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: WildcatNkilt on November 06, 2013, 01:37:56 PM
Quote
@darrenrovell
Kansas St says that social media activity has led them to triple the amount of free bacon at Friday’s women’s basketball game to 300 lbs
if its turkey bacon I will lose my crap

As you should.

BTW, experts say turkey bacon is not as healthy as regular bacon.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on November 06, 2013, 01:41:03 PM
Quote
@darrenrovell
Kansas St says that social media activity has led them to triple the amount of free bacon at Friday’s women’s basketball game to 300 lbs
if its turkey bacon I will lose my crap

As you should.

BTW, experts say turkey bacon is not as healthy as regular bacon.

(http://076dd0a50e0c1255009e-bd4b8aabaca29897bc751dfaf75b290c.r40.cf1.rackcdn.com/images/files/000/006/087/original/original.0)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Lucas Scoopsalot on November 06, 2013, 02:19:12 PM
How embarrassing would this be if we did this for a men's game??
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: yoga-like_abana on November 06, 2013, 02:20:51 PM
How embarrassing would this be if we did this for a men's game??
not at all.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on November 06, 2013, 02:55:04 PM
How embarrassing would this be if we did this for a men's game??

we should do it at every sporting event

"hey, want to go check out a cats game?"
"aren't they the guys who give out free bacon?"
"yup"
"yup"
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: slobber on November 06, 2013, 03:18:20 PM
How embarrassing would this be if we did this for a men's game??

we should do it at every sporting event

"hey, want to go check out a cats game?"
"aren't they the guys who give out free bacon?"
"yup"
"yup"
One of our wealthy hog farmer donors on GPC could donate a dozen hogs for each game and he could be the "Pork King" and have a special commercial promoting pork.

This thing has legs. Just need to add the zeal.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep on November 06, 2013, 05:06:18 PM
BACON!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 06, 2013, 05:23:11 PM
Pretty much fully vindacted in my "outrage" in the "poorly" run hot dog deal.

:snapscollar

Oh yeah

Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kso_FAN on November 06, 2013, 05:29:33 PM
300 lbs is a lot of bacon.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: puniraptor on November 06, 2013, 06:56:15 PM

300 lbs is a lot of bacon.

Cooked or uncooked?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: nicname on November 07, 2013, 02:36:57 AM
How embarrassing would this be if we did this for a men's game??

we should do it at every sporting event

"hey, want to go check out a cats game?"
"aren't they the guys who give out free bacon?"
"yup"
"yup"
One of our wealthy hog farmer donors on GPC could donate a dozen hogs for each game and he could be the "Pork King" and have a special commercial promoting pork.

This thing has legs. Just need to add the zeal.

Wyatt: It's a Kansas-Land mid-second quarter sideline report brought to you by the pork king, Don Griest and the Mid-Kansas pork cooperative....
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: ednksu on November 07, 2013, 03:32:37 AM
when will the meat goats get their night?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: TownieCat on November 07, 2013, 09:04:48 AM
Classy move by Olbermann here by calling out the grad assistant in the AD who came up with the idea.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CU6KqfQMbE0&feature=youtu.be (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CU6KqfQMbE0&feature=youtu.be)

 :blah:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 'taterblast on November 07, 2013, 09:07:25 AM
Quote from: lots of cat fans probably
if Olbermann doesn't like it then i automatically love it!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kso_FAN on November 07, 2013, 09:08:18 AM
Classy move by Olbermann here by calling out the grad assistant in the AD who came up with the idea.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CU6KqfQMbE0&feature=youtu.be (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CU6KqfQMbE0&feature=youtu.be)

 :blah:

Coming up with a bacon promo is a lot like inventing the atomic bomb. I can see the parallels there.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: TownieCat on November 07, 2013, 09:15:47 AM
Classy move by Olbermann here by calling out the grad assistant in the AD who came up with the idea.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CU6KqfQMbE0&feature=youtu.be (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CU6KqfQMbE0&feature=youtu.be)

 :blah:

Coming up with a bacon promo is a lot like inventing the atomic bomb. I can see the parallels there.

And blatant racism.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: steve dave on November 07, 2013, 12:44:02 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/nn4X0K6.png)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: puniraptor on November 07, 2013, 12:47:26 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/nn4X0K6.png)

i cant figure out how harvard beat us for worlds smartest school
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: AbeFroman on November 07, 2013, 12:54:24 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/nn4X0K6.png)

No surprise here, America loves us and the K-State marketing department knows their audience(all 300 million of them).
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Fedor on November 07, 2013, 01:17:35 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/nn4X0K6.png)
Has someone shoved this in Olbermann's smarmy face yet?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: nicname on November 10, 2013, 10:19:11 PM
Leti Romero is very good.  She may be the best ever by the time she is through here. 
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: The Big Train on November 10, 2013, 10:27:28 PM
Leti Romero is very good.  She may be the best ever by the time she is through here.

Was at the game Friday, thought sorta the same then.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on November 10, 2013, 10:35:36 PM
Leti Romero is very good.  She may be the best ever by the time she is through here.

Was at the game Friday, thought sorta the same then.

25 points, 8 rebounds, 3 assists. And just a freshman.   :excited:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on November 10, 2013, 10:51:50 PM
Leti Romero is very good.  She may be the best ever by the time she is through here.

Can confirm.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on November 10, 2013, 11:30:30 PM
Leti Romero is very good.  She may be the best ever by the time she is through here.

:bball:
:emawkid:
:ksu:

I can't wait to attend the jersey retirement ceremony in March of 2017.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on November 10, 2013, 11:31:52 PM
Leti Romero is very good.  She may be the best ever by the time she is through here.

:bball:
:emawkid:
:ksu:

I can't wait to attend the jersey retirement ceremony in March of 2017.

I suspect that will happen.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: nicname on November 11, 2013, 12:06:27 AM
Leti Romero is very good.  She may be the best ever by the time she is through here.

:bball:
:emawkid:
:ksu:

I can't wait to attend the jersey retirement ceremony in March of 2017.

I suspect that will happen.

I was going to make a joke about her jersey getting retired before Jake or Beas, but I decided to let you guys swing away at that one. 
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on November 11, 2013, 04:31:09 AM
Leti Romero is very good.  She may be the best ever by the time she is through here.

:bball:
:emawkid:
:ksu:

I can't wait to attend the jersey retirement ceremony in March of 2017.

I suspect that will happen.

I was going to make a joke about her jersey getting retired before Jake or Beas, but I decided to let you guys swing away at that one.

Uh, I wasn't kidding at all. Frank is dumb for not retiring Jake's jersey either on his senior night or the season immediately after, although I'm sure Currie wouldn't have allowed it. It makes no logical sense to wait for some moronic arbitrary time period to retire a deserving jersey or number. Tomorrow isn't guaranteed to anyone.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on November 11, 2013, 08:27:36 AM
Leti Romero is very good.  She may be the best ever by the time she is through here.

:bball:
:emawkid:
:ksu:

I can't wait to attend the jersey retirement ceremony in March of 2017.

I suspect that will happen.

I was going to make a joke about her jersey getting retired before Jake or Beas, but I decided to let you guys swing away at that one.

Uh, I wasn't kidding at all. Frank is dumb for not retiring Jake's jersey either on his senior night or the season immediately after, although I'm sure Currie wouldn't have allowed it. It makes no logical sense to wait for some moronic arbitrary time period to retire a deserving jersey or number. Tomorrow isn't guaranteed to anyone.

I'm with ya, MIR.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on November 20, 2013, 08:14:45 PM
wu shock absolutely destroying this sad excuse of a kstate team in bramlage
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on November 20, 2013, 09:20:47 PM
That was unbelievable. Fire Deb. Burn it down.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on November 20, 2013, 09:24:29 PM
Two demolitions in a row.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Tobias on November 20, 2013, 09:30:17 PM
that was not fun to watch :frown:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on November 20, 2013, 09:31:17 PM
that was not fun to watch :frown:

Did you make it out to the Bram tonight, Tobias?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Tobias on November 20, 2013, 09:32:52 PM
that was not fun to watch :frown:

Did you make it out to the Bram tonight, Tobias?

no, watched on cox 2022 in salina kansas :frown: (or :D ?)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on November 20, 2013, 09:33:54 PM
that was not fun to watch :frown:

Did you make it out to the Bram tonight, Tobias?

no, watched on cox 2022 in salina kansas :frown: (or :D ?)

Yeah... I was there. :frown:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Tobias on November 20, 2013, 09:35:05 PM

Yeah... I was there. :frown:

T's & P's
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on November 20, 2013, 09:36:25 PM
They should tell Romero to create her own shot and rough ridin' shoot every possession. I'm tired of jacking 3's every time they get somewhat open when the team can't shoot much better than 30%.  :angry:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on November 20, 2013, 10:24:32 PM
it's time for deb to kick rocks
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: h8ku on November 20, 2013, 11:02:54 PM
Too resourceful/ don't care quite enough to do this.
Anyone? :dunno:

[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on November 21, 2013, 12:38:57 AM
Too resourceful/ don't care quite enough to do this.
Anyone? :dunno:

eat a bag of dicks, tuck
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: wabash909 on November 21, 2013, 06:08:09 AM
Bob Strawn.   :sdeek:

Quote
tmcats

Post #11953
manhappiness
MyFanPage
Add Buddy
Ignore   
Re: Women getting killed by WSU   Reply
deb getting embalmed alive.  she needs to hang it up.  game is way beyond her. 
11/20 8:36 PM | IP: Logged
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on November 21, 2013, 01:31:31 PM
MiR - am i wrong in thinking you are a deb supporter?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kso_FAN on November 21, 2013, 01:36:37 PM
MiR - am i wrong in thinking you are a deb supporter?

I think the correct term is Debite. Or maybe Debbite.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 21, 2013, 01:40:50 PM
It seems like I've heard, "man are we gonna be good in a year or two" for like the past 5 years.   Then it seems like Deb invariably runs someone off or they quit or whatevs.

Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on November 21, 2013, 01:43:48 PM
how many years does it take to build a program?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on November 21, 2013, 11:39:05 PM
It seems like I've heard, "man are we gonna be good in a year or two" for like the past 5 years.

From who?

how many years does it take to build a program?

Every weekend I walk by the BTF I see 3 Big 12 trophies. Someone want to tell me the last kstate coach in any sport with more than 2 conference championships. Certainly not within the last 30 years, right?


Real talk though, any athletic director outside of Stanford, UCONN, and Tennessee that has a WBB coach with 2 conference titles, no embarrassing scandals, and most importantly regularly in the top 25 nationally in attendance would love the hell out of that coach. The standard for non-revenue coaches is rightfully different. Any AD who fires a women's coach with 2 conference titles, a .620 winning percentage and took teams to the post season 14 out of 17 seasons should find new work. Snyder has missed the post season as many times in his last 7 seasonss than Deb has in 17, and half of the wbb teams aren't invited to play beyond the regular season.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on November 21, 2013, 11:44:19 PM
It seems like I've heard, "man are we gonna be good in a year or two" for like the past 5 years.

From who?

how many years does it take to build a program?

Every weekend I walk by the BTF I see 3 Big 12 trophies. Someone want to tell me the last kstate coach in any sport with more than 2 conference championships. Certainly not within the last 30 years, right?


Real talk though, any athletic director outside of Stanford, UCONN, and Tennessee that has a WBB coach with 2 conference titles, no embarrassing scandals, and most importantly regularly in the top 25 nationally in attendance would love the hell out of that coach. The standard for non-revenue coaches is rightfully different. Any AD who fires a women's coach with 2 conference titles, a .620 winning percentage and took teams to the post season 14 out of 17 seasons should find new work. Snyder has missed the post season as many times in his last 7 seasonss than Deb has in 17, and half of the wbb teams aren't invited to play beyond the regular season.

Damned good post.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 22, 2013, 08:49:17 AM
Not you. 


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk (http://tapatalk.com/m?id=1)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on November 24, 2013, 12:51:02 PM
another coach at k-state has a .676 winning percentage, 5 conference championships, 5 coach of the year awards, and 20 NCAA tournament appearances
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on November 24, 2013, 02:12:36 PM
another coach at k-state has a .676 winning percentage, 5 conference championships, 5 coach of the year awards, and 20 NCAA tournament appearances

All that at K-State? Amazing, I imagine that coach is universally beloved.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on November 24, 2013, 03:06:58 PM
her best days are behind her
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 24, 2013, 03:45:50 PM
Woman's basketball is awful, just about the worst thing ever, but I watched a few minutes of the ladycats bumblefuck around against Wichita State and was astounded at how horrible the team is.  Deb hasn't won anything in a long time and obviously is coasting on whatever success she had with that one really good group of small town girls.  She needs to be shown the door.  I'd expect a biddy ball team to have more of a clue than the crap show she ran out there.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: wetwillie on November 24, 2013, 05:36:59 PM
she had a good run.  maybe she can take a few years off in a tense uncomfortable forced retirement and be brought back for a 2nd go round of slightly above average.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kim carnes on November 24, 2013, 05:38:28 PM
k-state has given deb way more than she has given us.  its time for her to go.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on January 08, 2014, 11:21:15 AM
They have a rough ridin' losing record. Not sure if they'll win a conference game. I'll believe it when I see it.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: LilSmokyMcIntyre on January 08, 2014, 01:14:16 PM
I guess given my avi, I should post in this thread but WGAF. Deb and her asstnt/wife Kammie or whatever used to have lover's quarrels in front of the whole team during practice. Fire her and replace with the MHS coach, whoever he/she is.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: slobber on January 08, 2014, 02:44:44 PM
I guess given my avi personal experiences as a KSU Ladycat, I should post in this thread but WGAF. Deb and her asstnt/wife Kammie or whatever used to have lover's quarrels in front of the whole team during practice. Fire her and replace with the MHS coach, whoever he/she is.
FYP
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: LilSmokyMcIntyre on January 08, 2014, 04:15:49 PM
I guess given my avi personal experiences as a KSU Ladycat, I should post in this thread but WGAF. Deb and her asstnt/wife Kammie or whatever used to have lover's quarrels in front of the whole team during practice. Fire her and replace with the MHS coach, whoever he/she is.
FYP
:horrorsurprise:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: puniraptor on January 08, 2014, 04:17:56 PM
I guess given my avi personal experiences as a KSU Ladycat, I should post in this thread but WGAF. Deb and her asstnt/wife Kammie or whatever used to have lover's quarrels in front of the whole team during practice. Fire her and replace with the MHS coach, whoever he/she is.
FYP
:horrorsurprise:

i've always preferred to believe that you were the real twiggy.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: LilSmokyMcIntyre on January 08, 2014, 04:26:45 PM
I guess given my avi personal experiences as a KSU Ladycat, I should post in this thread but WGAF. Deb and her asstnt/wife Kammie or whatever used to have lover's quarrels in front of the whole team during practice. Fire her and replace with the MHS coach, whoever he/she is.
FYP
:horrorsurprise:

i've always preferred to believe that you were the real twiggy.

I think you're gonna be disappointed
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on January 09, 2014, 06:03:40 PM
I guess given my avi, I should post in this thread but WGAF. Deb and her asstnt/wife Kammie or whatever used to have lover's quarrels in front of the whole team during practice. Fire her and replace with the MHS coach, whoever he/she is.

 :dubious: good call because it's completely unheard of for a head coach and the lead assistant to have disagreements.  Are you going to tell us next that some players don't like each other. Oh the horror  :horrorsurprise:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: LilSmokyMcIntyre on January 10, 2014, 08:26:20 AM
I guess given my avi, I should post in this thread but WGAF. Deb and her asstnt/wife Kammie or whatever used to have lover's quarrels in front of the whole team during practice. Fire her and replace with the MHS coach, whoever he/she is.

 :dubious: good call because it's completely unheard of for a head coach and the lead assistant to have disagreements.  Are you going to tell us next that some players don't like each other. Oh the horror  :horrorsurprise:

It's tough to explain bec I don't know what the argument was really about but it was clearly not about basketball. The whole team looked at each other and it got super awkward.  Kammie had the look of "oh crap wish this laundry was being cleaned behind closed doors".  I'm sure all college coaches lose their minds at times but this left the realm of basketball. I don't know maybe this happens everywhere?  :curtiskelly:  When Frank threatens Spracnes family in a fiery death I'm sure he does it a non personal matter.   :nono:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: slobber on January 10, 2014, 11:17:11 AM
I guess given my avi personal experiences as a KSU Ladycat, I should post in this thread but WGAF. Deb and her asstnt/wife Kammie or whatever used to have lover's quarrels in front of the whole team during practice. Fire her and replace with the MHS coach, whoever he/she is.
FYP
:horrorsurprise:

i've always preferred to believe that you were the real twiggy.

I think you're gonna be disappointed
Lets just forget that last few posts so puni and I (along with several others is my guess) can continue to believe what we want to believe.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on January 15, 2014, 10:31:53 PM
what now motherfuckers
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on January 15, 2014, 10:46:34 PM
what now motherfuckers
What happened?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kim carnes on January 15, 2014, 10:54:21 PM
what now motherfuckers

Fire deb?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on January 15, 2014, 11:14:52 PM
what now motherfuckers
What happened?

I think they won a game. They're like 7-9 now. Impressive stuff, Deb.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on January 15, 2014, 11:22:34 PM
Nice. Go get'em gals!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on January 15, 2014, 11:28:17 PM
I think they'll win more games next year than this year. A lot of freshmen playing major roles. Next year is the make-or-break year for Deb.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on January 15, 2014, 11:29:47 PM
There's no question Romero's a stud. The team just isn't very good. Ashia Woods is fun to watch.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on January 15, 2014, 11:31:50 PM
There's no question Romero's a stud. The team just isn't very good. Ashia Woods is fun to watch.

And Romero is getting better every game. Woods has been a pleasant surprise and should get even better. We need to improve the inside game, as always.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: LilSmokyMcIntyre on January 17, 2014, 12:46:54 PM
There's no question Romero's a stud. The team just isn't very good. Ashia Woods is fun to watch.

And Romero is getting better every game. Woods has been a pleasant surprise and should get even better. We need to improve the inside game, as always.

"Make or break"? Just fire her and replace with cheapest option possible. WGAF.  Her salary (greater than bare minimum) should go to something that has value.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 18, 2014, 04:29:03 PM
Pretty much down with taking the nearly $2 million we lose every year on women's b-ball and using it to support other women's sports.

Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Trogdor on January 18, 2014, 07:49:49 PM
Apparently Stomp Master Suh from the Lions is at the game tonight
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: resident LibBot dick holder on January 18, 2014, 08:12:37 PM
Pretty much down with taking the nearly $2 million we lose every year on women's b-ball and using it to support other women's sports.

use that 2million to sue the ncaa (or america or whoever) to get rid of title 9 so we don't have to support non-revenue making sports.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: resident LibBot dick holder on January 18, 2014, 08:13:44 PM
oh, for those listening to this game tonight, how's the color guy on the radio?  heard he's a total stud baller.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on January 18, 2014, 08:58:56 PM
oh, for those listening to this game tonight, how's the color guy on the radio?  heard he's a total stud baller.

Can you imagine the stygma associated with being the guy who listens to women's bball on the radio???

 :sdeek:

Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on January 18, 2014, 11:46:11 PM
Women played a great game tonight without Texada (Deb says Haley may be out 4-6 weeeks). Beating a top 15 team like ISU is a big win for this young team. 
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on January 19, 2014, 12:23:05 AM
Was there. They almost pissed it away towards the end. Glad they snuck it out.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on January 19, 2014, 12:29:27 AM
Was also there. KSU had a few big leads they lost when ISU went on 3-point binges late in the game. Going forward, Deb needs to find a rotation that will keep her best players from having to play 35-40 minutes like they did tonight. Toward the end, they were wearing down.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on January 19, 2014, 03:19:43 AM
Hey was talking to Deb earlier and she asked me to share a couple of things with the dumbass hatin ass morons in this thread

(http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view2/1614306/hulk-hogan-6th-o.gif)

(http://i48.tinypic.com/29vzdzr.gif)

(http://www.reactiongifs.us/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/go_fuck_yourself.gif)

Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on January 19, 2014, 02:01:57 PM
Apparently Stomp Master Suh from the Lions is at the game tonight

Friends with/dating? Katya Leick.
Title: ksu ladycats
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 20, 2014, 04:34:49 PM



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on January 22, 2014, 07:57:04 PM
Quote
K-State Gameday [email protected]_gameday 57s
Halftime: #KStateWBB 13, Baylor 52. Baylor ends half on 29-0 run. Wildcats 0-of-7 during run w/ 11 TOs. Wildcats w/ 12 fouls, Baylor 3.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kso_FAN on January 22, 2014, 08:37:21 PM
I had to check.

Baylor had 1.54 points per possession in the first half.

Fighting Debs had .38.

Ouch.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on January 22, 2014, 08:39:35 PM
holy. crap.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: puniraptor on January 22, 2014, 10:07:59 PM
I had to check.

Baylor had 1.54 points per possession in the first half.

Fighting Debs had .38.

Ouch.

haha, nice MIR troll, _FAN  :thumbs:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on January 22, 2014, 11:36:15 PM
Quote
K-State Gameday [email protected]_gameday 57s
Halftime: #KStateWBB 13, Baylor 52. Baylor ends half on 29-0 run. Wildcats 0-of-7 during run w/ 11 TOs. Wildcats w/ 12 fouls, Baylor 3.

Man. I've never heard of a 29-0 run.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on January 23, 2014, 02:03:21 AM
I had to check.

Baylor had 1.54 points per possession in the first half.

Fighting Debs had .38.

Ouch.

haha, nice MIR troll, _FAN  :thumbs:

 :zzz: it's Baylor I knew we'd get our asses kicked
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on January 23, 2014, 10:11:29 AM
29-0 run tho :surprised:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: #LIFE on January 23, 2014, 01:07:42 PM
A BCS conference team should never get outscored 29-0 unless they are playing the Heat or something.  But it's women's hoops so, meh
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 'taterblast on January 23, 2014, 01:33:08 PM
totally forgot we made the tourney two years ago.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on January 29, 2014, 09:11:05 PM
Women just upset Oklahoma 86-78.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on January 29, 2014, 09:27:06 PM
Move the ladies games to MHS
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Tobias on January 29, 2014, 09:29:42 PM
Women just upset Oklahoma 86-78.

+13 in the second half - nice :thumbs:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kso_FAN on January 29, 2014, 09:37:53 PM
God job Deb and team.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on January 29, 2014, 09:41:21 PM
Fire Deb, discontinue men's and women's golf and throw all that money at Geno.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on January 29, 2014, 09:49:48 PM
Was a pretty fun game. OMG Romero :love:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 09, 2014, 09:30:53 PM
Men's coach loses by 40....total meltdown.   Deb gets stomped....nobody cares .    Best job in the country. 


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on February 09, 2014, 09:55:16 PM
Yep :emawkid:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on February 09, 2014, 09:56:21 PM
lol
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: fun muffin on February 09, 2014, 09:56:47 PM
I can't recall a single season with this many absolute beatdowns. 

Why is this happening?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kim carnes on February 09, 2014, 10:00:30 PM
its time to go, deb
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on February 09, 2014, 10:53:31 PM
Good grief Deb.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 10, 2014, 04:16:32 AM
This is the last year of Deb's Contract.  She'll get paid $600K.

27-36 in Big 12 play going from now back to the 2010-2011 season.

$1.725 million in base pay compensation over that time frame.

Women's Basketball Operating Loss:
(approx)
2012-13:  $3 million
2011-12:  $2.45 million
2010-11:  $2.35 million


Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 10, 2014, 12:33:22 PM
K-State's women's basketball program total expenses, including game travel/game hosting etc. etc.   

Could have covered the entire budget of OU's National Champion Women's Softball team, and WVU's 2 time Big 12 Champion Women's Soccer team with approx: $300K left over, based on 2013 EADA filings; that includes all game day and travel expenses.  Based on my at-a-glance calculations.








Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on February 10, 2014, 02:39:11 PM
Dax WBB will always operate at a loss and you know that. That is a stupid argument as to whether or not you keep a non revenue coach. If you are making the decision as purely a fiscal one you should keep Deb until Shalee is ready. People like you who are so vocal for Deb to get fired isn't spending a dime on wbb. There are more of me, people whip are fine with Deb and spend money on supporting the program, than people who won't support the program while deb is still here. Let them do something like bringing in a Louisville assistant and then have that coach lose, what will happen to that revenue then?

Deb is fine, our wbb revenue and attendance is decent, she doesn't have much time left coaching anyway. Barring a total collapse I'm good with her having 3-5 more years and then handing it over to Shalee who will certainly give attendance a shot in the arm.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on February 10, 2014, 02:42:49 PM
K-State's women's basketball program total expenses, including game travel/game hosting etc. etc.   

Could have covered the entire budget of OU's National Champion Women's Softball team, and WVU's 2 time Big 12 Champion Women's Soccer team with approx: $300K left over, based on 2013 EADA filings; that includes all game day and travel expenses.  Based on my at-a-glance calculations.

Such a bullshit post, there are like three people reading this thread, your numbers magic tricks aren't going to work, I read equity in athletics reports too & I know exactly why you didn't compare basketball program with other basketball programs.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: puniraptor on February 10, 2014, 02:56:03 PM
dax, are you proposing we nix wbb and replace it with softball and w. futbol?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on February 10, 2014, 02:58:23 PM
dax, are you proposing we nix wbb and replace it with softball and w. futbol?

Would take so hard.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 10, 2014, 03:11:12 PM
K-State's women's basketball program total expenses, including game travel/game hosting etc. etc.   

Could have covered the entire budget of OU's National Champion Women's Softball team, and WVU's 2 time Big 12 Champion Women's Soccer team with approx: $300K left over, based on 2013 EADA filings; that includes all game day and travel expenses.  Based on my at-a-glance calculations.

Such a bullshit post, there are like three people reading this thread, your numbers magic tricks aren't going to work, I read equity in athletics reports too & I know exactly why you didn't compare basketball program with other basketball programs.

What would you like to compare, the fact that OU women's basketball makes almost 7x's the amount of revenue than K-State WBB (for example).

All women's sports operates at a loss, that's news to no one.   

Why spend all that money to finish at the bottom? 

When you start paying a WBB's coach $600K a year and you build her facilities that are exactly equal to the men's team in every way, you have to expect more than swirling around at the bottom of the conference and getting blown off the floor.   
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on February 10, 2014, 04:26:56 PM
K-State's women's basketball program total expenses, including game travel/game hosting etc. etc.   

Could have covered the entire budget of OU's National Champion Women's Softball team, and WVU's 2 time Big 12 Champion Women's Soccer team with approx: $300K left over, based on 2013 EADA filings; that includes all game day and travel expenses.  Based on my at-a-glance calculations.

Such a bullshit post, there are like three people reading this thread, your numbers magic tricks aren't going to work, I read equity in athletics reports too & I know exactly why you didn't compare basketball program with other basketball programs.

What would you like to compare, the fact that OU women's basketball makes almost 7x's the amount of revenue than K-State WBB (for example).

All women's sports operates at a loss, that's news to no one.   

Why spend all that money to finish at the bottom? 

When you start paying a WBB's coach $600K a year and you build her facilities that are exactly equal to the men's team in every way, you have to expect more than swirling around at the bottom of the conference and getting blown off the floor.

If you're going to keep being intellectually dishonest then we might as well stop the conversation. You were talking about expenditures not revenue. You used softball and soccer to compare to K-State's women's basketball expenditures because actually comparing them to their peers wouldn't prove your point. I call you out on that and then you jump to revenue but again not comparing us to a peer school. I'm sure you compare K-State football revenues to OU revenues all of the time.

Also the athletic department hasn't brought Deb anything, donors built the BTF and women had to get space for title nine requirements. Our women's basketball team doesn't have better facilities than anyone else in this conference. Your point about spending money to be at the bottom would be valid if our women's program was perennially there, we aren't, she doesn't get a lifetime exemption but she hasn't done nearly enough wrong to get fired.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 10, 2014, 04:44:32 PM
K-State's women's basketball program total expenses, including game travel/game hosting etc. etc.   

Could have covered the entire budget of OU's National Champion Women's Softball team, and WVU's 2 time Big 12 Champion Women's Soccer team with approx: $300K left over, based on 2013 EADA filings; that includes all game day and travel expenses.  Based on my at-a-glance calculations.

Such a bullshit post, there are like three people reading this thread, your numbers magic tricks aren't going to work, I read equity in athletics reports too & I know exactly why you didn't compare basketball program with other basketball programs.

What would you like to compare, the fact that OU women's basketball makes almost 7x's the amount of revenue than K-State WBB (for example).

All women's sports operates at a loss, that's news to no one.   

Why spend all that money to finish at the bottom? 

When you start paying a WBB's coach $600K a year and you build her facilities that are exactly equal to the men's team in every way, you have to expect more than swirling around at the bottom of the conference and getting blown off the floor.

If you're going to keep being intellectually dishonest then we might as well stop the conversation. You were talking about expenditures not revenue. You used softball and soccer to compare to K-State's women's basketball expenditures because actually comparing them to their peers wouldn't prove your point. I call you out on that and then you jump to revenue but again not comparing us to a peer school. I'm sure you compare K-State football revenues to OU revenues all of the time.

Also the athletic department hasn't brought Deb anything, donors built the BTF and women had to get space for title nine requirements. Our women's basketball team doesn't have better facilities than anyone else in this conference. Your point about spending money to be at the bottom would be valid if our women's program was perennially there, we aren't, she doesn't get a lifetime exemption but she hasn't done nearly enough wrong to get fired.

Yes I was talking about expenditures, then you brought up revenue.  MIR wrote: Deb is fine, our wbb revenue and attendance is decent 

No, our revenues are not decent, they are horrible, per the KSU 2013 NCAA Financial Report, WBB produced just $348K in revenue, on $3.114 million in expenses (not quite the same format as the EADA). 

The collective of our WBB facilities are better than other programs on the major conference D1 level.   Other programs don't have their very own practice court, sure, some do, some don't.   The BTF puts K-State WBB in the mix for the best facilities collectively and exactly equal in every way to the men's program at K-State. 

I don't like Deb, never have, probably never will, and when she's losing by 40 and headed to another bottom of the conference finish and K-State is losing millions . . there's plenty there to question.

Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on February 10, 2014, 05:20:21 PM
Again dax there is a reason that you aren't comparing our revenue and expenditures to our true peer schools, I know why that is so we can drop the charade.

Our practice facility isn't better than most of our peers, its newer. Just like the men we were way behind when the BTF was built, that facility, and it is a beautiful facility, caught us up. We did nothing that makes anyone else in our conference say, "damn K-State just rendered our facility obsolete, we have to start over." I don't know for sure but I'm fairly confident that I've seen more of these facilities than you or pretty much anyone else posting on this board.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 10, 2014, 11:16:20 PM
Again dax there is a reason that you aren't comparing our revenue and expenditures to our true peer schools, I know why that is so we can drop the charade.

Our practice facility isn't better than most of our peers, its newer. Just like the men we were way behind when the BTF was built, that facility, and it is a beautiful facility, caught us up. We did nothing that makes anyone else in our conference say, "damn K-State just rendered our facility obsolete, we have to start over." I don't know for sure but I'm fairly confident that I've seen more of these facilities than you or pretty much anyone else posting on this board.

Our total AD operating revenue was nearly $70 million dollars (and that didn't include nearly $20 million in capital giving and revenue from the sale of investment vehicles).   You sound absolutely stupid, I have never said K-State has rendered any rivals facility obsolete.    I've been in K-State's facility, I've seen NC State's facility, I've seen Virginia Tech's facility, and I've been in East Carolina's brand new facility.   There's very little difference. 

You're just angry (as usual) that someone is calling out Deb for the lousy job she's doing running our WBB program. 
2013:
KU Total Expenses:  $3.391 million
K-State Total Expenses: $3.359 million
Oklahoma State Total Expenses: $2.25 million
Iowa State Total Expenses: $3.164 million
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on February 11, 2014, 12:33:36 AM
 :popcorn:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: wazucat on February 11, 2014, 03:53:42 PM
Deb just needs to stop the KU loss trend, then most people will be content to wait 5 years for Shalee to take the reins, I hope MIR is right on his time frame, I see some real young talent and height on this years team that gives me hope the 5 year window will be OK.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on February 11, 2014, 05:01:31 PM
:popcorn:

You can put the popcorn away. There is certainly a conversation to be had about Deb but dax isn't equipped to have it. The only thing he knows about the program is what he sees on box scores. He can't articulate why Deb isn't right for the program so he's doing what he does to dumb KU fans by pretending financial numbers mean something differently than what they say, as if I can't read.

The conversation is over because dax refuses to have a two sided conversation without being intellectually dishonest.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: michigancat on February 11, 2014, 05:11:59 PM
This probably has the worst tapatalk image. Who the eff thought it was a good idea to post this?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: michigancat on February 11, 2014, 05:12:33 PM
91-25 KSU LADYCATS

 :bball:

Whats the women's bball hand sign?

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/04/Vulva-handsign-Yoni-mudra.svg/497px-Vulva-handsign-Yoni-mudra.svg.png)

good grief

at least you got a good laugh out of Dirty Sanchez
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 11, 2014, 08:54:53 PM
:popcorn:

You can put the popcorn away. There is certainly a conversation to be had about Deb but dax isn't equipped to have it. The only thing he knows about the program is what he sees on box scores. He can't articulate why Deb isn't right for the program so he's doing what he does to dumb KU fans by pretending financial numbers mean something differently than what they say, as if I can't read.

The conversation is over because dax refuses to have a two sided conversation without being intellectually dishonest.

You keep bringing up the talking points, I provide the data, you then revert back to the same shtick.   Next thing you know you'll say ISU, OSU, and KU aren't "peers". 

The "right fit" is pure subjectivity, at some point objectivity has to kick in, and that starts with the results in the box score, and the standings, the trendline is down.



Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on February 12, 2014, 10:36:12 AM
deb sucks in the ncaa tournament
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: puniraptor on February 12, 2014, 10:37:35 AM
i've always been kinda freaked out by her ruthless franking
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: yoga-like_abana on February 12, 2014, 11:27:03 AM

91-25 KSU LADYCATS

 :bball:

Whats the women's bball hand sign?

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/04/Vulva-handsign-Yoni-mudra.svg/497px-Vulva-handsign-Yoni-mudra.svg.png)

good grief

at least you got a good laugh out of Dirty Sanchez
were you reading this thread from the beginning? Nerd alert


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 12, 2014, 09:06:34 PM
Isn't there a salary ceiling for a women's coach not named Pat or Geno?

Just like any biz, perform and your salary goes up.  Stop performing and it's not going to stay high, it will be reduced or eliminated.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: h8ku on February 12, 2014, 09:28:53 PM
Too resourceful/ don't care quite enough to do this.
Anyone? :dunno:
:impatient:


[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on February 13, 2014, 12:00:56 AM
Lost again tonight, although they stayed very close to Texas. Not a bad effort considering the fact our Cats had no inside game at all. None at all.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on February 13, 2014, 12:05:13 AM
The fat girl on Texas was really good.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on February 13, 2014, 12:12:40 AM
The fat girl on Texas was really good.

Although she is big, she moves well, has good basketball sense, moves laterally quite well, knows how to block out...and shoots pretty well, also.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on February 13, 2014, 08:10:27 PM
deb sucks in the ncaa tournament

horrible, only one sweet 16 :Yuck: unacceptable
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 8manpick on February 14, 2014, 12:06:38 AM
deb sucks in the ncaa tournament

horrible, only one sweet 16 :Yuck: unacceptable

IT'S A TRAP! :runaway:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on February 15, 2014, 01:42:32 PM
The kstatehd.tv thing is being shown on FCS Pacific.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on February 15, 2014, 03:11:05 PM
Down 2 to the only winless team in the league, Tech, in Manhattan.  :'bye cruel world:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on February 15, 2014, 09:16:41 PM
Down 2 to the only winless team in the league, Tech, in Manhattan.  :'bye cruel world:

We won, tho
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on February 15, 2014, 09:17:25 PM
Down 2 to the only winless team in the league, Tech, in Manhattan.  :'bye cruel world:

We won, tho

Oh, I stopped paying attention.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on February 15, 2014, 09:20:24 PM
Down 2 to the only winless team in the league, Tech, in Manhattan.  :'bye cruel world:

We won, tho

Oh, I stopped paying attention.

I understand. The way things were going until late would have made losing interest pretty easy. This team has a terrible time, game after game, getting open for decent shots.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on February 19, 2014, 07:49:08 PM
bid
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Spaces on February 19, 2014, 11:11:40 PM
I saw Olga Firsova on campus yesterday. Legend.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on February 20, 2014, 12:01:33 AM
I saw Olga Firsova on campus yesterday. Legend.

She remains a big fan. Sits behind the KSU bench every game.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: nicname on February 21, 2014, 06:55:25 AM
How did Deb whiff on Kaylee and Lanie Page of Wamego? Complete studette/ bosses and top-50 type 'cruits.

Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 21, 2014, 09:01:42 AM
MIR, do we have a lot of injuries this year?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on February 21, 2014, 09:03:22 AM
MIR, do we have a lot of injuries this year?

Texada has been injured for a few weeks.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 21, 2014, 12:30:42 PM
MIR, do we have a lot of injuries this year?

Texada has been injured for a few weeks.

umm yeah...   :Chirp:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on February 21, 2014, 01:39:06 PM
MIR, do we have a lot of injuries this year?

Texada has been injured for a few weeks.

umm yeah...   :Chirp:

our second best player, undersized guard. her absence shouldn't and isn't making the team as horrendous as they are right now. The starting 5 is fine but everyone else is not getting it done. Not gonna lie, we're in real trouble here.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on February 21, 2014, 01:55:33 PM
Ashia is arguably better than Haley imo.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: PIPE on February 21, 2014, 03:21:18 PM
How did Deb whiff on Kaylee and Lanie Page of Wamego? Complete studette/ bosses and top-50 type 'cruits.

I saw them play a few weeks back, and I was not impressed.  Tall, but skinny and wanted to hang around the 3 point line a lot. Couldn't understand how they were so highly coveted, but I am not a scout.....


Also, someone on I think the scout board posted stat's on the women's program the last 10 years, and I was amazed how god awful it was.......like one winning record in conference play....
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: resident LibBot dick holder on February 21, 2014, 03:36:57 PM
i had a very nice conversation with texada at bullchicks one evening.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on February 21, 2014, 04:59:32 PM
How did Deb whiff on Kaylee and Lanie Page of Wamego? Complete studette/ bosses and top-50 type 'cruits.

I saw them play a few weeks back, and I was not impressed.  Tall, but skinny and wanted to hang around the 3 point line a lot. Couldn't understand how they were so highly coveted, but I am not a scout.....


sounds like the type of player that Deb values though
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 21, 2014, 06:15:29 PM
MIR, do we have a lot of injuries this year?

Texada has been injured for a few weeks.

umm yeah...   :Chirp:

our second best player, undersized guard. her absence shouldn't and isn't making the team as horrendous as they are right now. The starting 5 is fine but everyone else is not getting it done. Not gonna lie, we're in real trouble here.

2nd best player? dang.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on February 21, 2014, 10:12:36 PM
West Virginia coming in tomorrow. It won't be pretty. More of the same.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: HELLHAMMER on February 22, 2014, 10:19:18 AM
So does Deb need crap canned?  I don't follow gal sports so I don't have a dog in this fight.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on February 22, 2014, 11:27:20 AM
I don't follow gal sports

no need to start now, get bent
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: HELLHAMMER on February 22, 2014, 07:57:53 PM
Well never mind.  I'll specify to only use my annual donation on specific sports.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on February 22, 2014, 11:32:11 PM
good
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on February 26, 2014, 08:45:37 AM
our average conference score, 70-59.  brutal.  we saw this coming but i guess i was hoping to be wrong. 
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on February 26, 2014, 04:58:14 PM
no excuses from me man
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on February 26, 2014, 07:13:17 PM
Quote
K-State Gameday [email protected]_gameday  5s
What a start for #KStateWBB!! K-State 13, KU 0 w/ 16:18 to play in 1st H. Romero w/ 6 pts. Wildcats are 6-of-6 from the field.

 :eek:

Love ya Deb!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Trogdor on February 26, 2014, 08:16:36 PM
Ladycats: 37, KU: 24
Half

Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on February 26, 2014, 08:27:15 PM
Ladycats shitting the bed. Not shocking

“@kstate_gameday: #KStateWBB 49, KU 45 w/ 11:42 to play in 2nd H. K-State w/ 5 turnovers this half.”
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on February 26, 2014, 08:28:23 PM
FFS they were up 21-0.  :facepalm:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on February 26, 2014, 08:29:54 PM
Heads need to roll
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on February 26, 2014, 09:02:48 PM
We beat KU! Someone get Deb a raise!  :emawkid:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on February 26, 2014, 09:05:19 PM


 :emawkid:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on February 26, 2014, 09:32:34 PM
Heads still need to roll
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on February 26, 2014, 09:54:38 PM
you guys and your KU obsession is so tucky, its adorable
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on February 26, 2014, 09:55:52 PM

you guys and your KU obsession is so tucky, its adorable

It didn't change my heads need to roll stance
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on February 26, 2014, 09:57:56 PM
you guys and your KU obsession is so tucky, its adorable

Lol I was joking.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on February 26, 2014, 09:58:12 PM
#firedeb
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: PIPE on February 27, 2014, 09:45:19 AM
That one girl in the above video looks like she is doing the potty dance!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Trogdor on February 27, 2014, 09:47:03 AM
That one girl in the above video looks like she is doing the potty dance!

Probably does did. I'd pee myself after winning in AFH. Just look at that tough home crowd
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kso_FAN on February 27, 2014, 09:49:38 AM
you guys and your KU obsession is so tucky, its adorable


If enjoying a win over KU is wrong, I don't want to be right. :D
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Trogdor on February 27, 2014, 09:51:37 AM
K-state has won 23 of the last 27 over KU. 5 of 6 of the last in AFH. So the next time Ku fans say they're better at basketball, put them in their place.  :gocho:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on February 27, 2014, 11:31:18 AM
you guys and your KU obsession is so tucky, its adorable


If enjoying a win over KU is wrong, I don't want to be right. :D

It's not that, its the wild emotional swings based on the result of that opponent, the last time we had a big bump in this thread is when we lost to KU earlier this season, not the 30+ point drubbings or the surprise upset wins, KU moves the needle nothing else.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on February 27, 2014, 11:53:18 AM
you guys and your KU obsession is so tucky, its adorable


If enjoying a win over KU is wrong, I don't want to be right. :D

It's not that, its the wild emotional swings based on the result of that opponent, the last time we had a big bump in this thread is when we lost to KU earlier this season, not the 30+ point drubbings or the surprise upset wins, KU moves the needle nothing else.

It has gotten bumped way more often than you're admitting. Not just for KU. Surely you realize I was being sarcastic about loving Deb now, right?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: wazucat on February 28, 2014, 04:40:47 PM
Tuck I am, not gonna lie, just like Snyder "a win against KU is always sweet".
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on February 28, 2014, 08:00:15 PM
In my head all of the fans of the KSU ladycats are tucks. Based on people that I know irl that attend games.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Trogdor on March 03, 2014, 09:08:18 AM
Senior night tonight for the ladycats. Considering attending
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on March 03, 2014, 09:18:48 AM
Attending for the first half pre-big Monday for the men.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on March 03, 2014, 10:51:00 AM
Who do we play?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Trogdor on March 03, 2014, 11:16:40 AM
[ Invalid YouTube link ]t=41

Romero is going to be great
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 03, 2014, 02:34:02 PM
[ Invalid YouTube link ]t=41

Romero is going to be great

Mahoney just say eff it, I'm not coming back? She's the only reason I ever watched a ladycats game.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Trogdor on March 03, 2014, 02:41:46 PM
[ Invalid YouTube link ]t=41

Romero is going to be great

Mahoney just say eff it, I'm not coming back? She's the only reason I ever watched a ladycats game.

Would definitely watch a Shalin Spani-Klein game  :love:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on March 03, 2014, 10:32:44 PM
Another loss. Played decent defense but the Cats' inability to figure out how to play against a zone defense is depressing. They were lost against it.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sonofdaxjones on March 04, 2014, 05:33:51 AM
K-State Women's Hoops is 34-52 in Big 12 play over the last 5 years.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Gooch on March 04, 2014, 03:00:04 PM
K-State Women's Hoops is 34-52 in Big 12 play over the last 5 years.
FIRE DEB!!!*

























*if i gave a crap about lady sports
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on March 04, 2014, 03:15:53 PM
Fire Deb give SL 200k and let her try to figure it out.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: WildcatNkilt on March 04, 2014, 03:24:10 PM
Deb has the dream job.  How many coaches can go 5 years with only winning (shy of) 40% of conference games and not get fired?  Her graph has been trending down for awhile. 
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on March 04, 2014, 03:33:09 PM
Fire Deb give SL 200k and let her try to figure it out.

Yes
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kso_FAN on March 04, 2014, 03:38:27 PM
Deb has the dream job.  How many coaches can go 5 years with only winning (shy of) 40% of conference games and not get fired?  Her graph has been trending down for awhile.

3 NCAAs, 1 WNIT in that span. I'm guessing that's absolutely fine for 90% of WCB. And would be fine for 70% of MCB.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: michigancat on March 04, 2014, 03:39:43 PM
I went to a Cal Women's game last Saturday. it was fun and i would go to another.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: WildcatNkilt on March 04, 2014, 04:08:48 PM
Deb has the dream job.  How many coaches can go 5 years with only winning (shy of) 40% of conference games and not get fired?  Her graph has been trending down for awhile.

3 NCAAs, 1 WNIT in that span. I'm guessing that's absolutely fine for 90% of WCB. And would be fine for 70% of MCB.

Interesting if true.  Last year and this year just really shitty huh?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kso_FAN on March 04, 2014, 06:31:02 PM
Deb has the dream job.  How many coaches can go 5 years with only winning (shy of) 40% of conference games and not get fired?  Her graph has been trending down for awhile.

3 NCAAs, 1 WNIT in that span. I'm guessing that's absolutely fine for 90% of WCB. And would be fine for 70% of MCB.

Interesting if true.  Last year and this year just really shitty huh?

I guess I included 5 years previous to this one, so yes, 2 pretty poor years in a row.

But the best player she's had since ??? with the girl from Spain. :dunno:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: wazucat on March 04, 2014, 07:34:48 PM
I don't know if she is as unstable as Dax thinks but it is a fact that she has Franked a good number of players over the last few years for reasons unknown.  Those players have moved to other teams with good to great success so the Franking was not for a good cause IMO.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on March 04, 2014, 09:55:08 PM
Fire Deb give SL 200k and let her try to figure it out.

Yes

scott may be on to something here.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on March 04, 2014, 10:00:20 PM
Fire Deb give SL 200k and let her try to figure it out.

Yes

scott may be on to something here.

(my idea)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on March 04, 2014, 10:06:54 PM
Fire Deb give SL 200k and let her try to figure it out.

Yes

scott may be on to something here.

(my idea)

You, also, may be on to something here.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on March 04, 2014, 10:33:13 PM

Fire Deb give SL 200k and let her try to figure it out.

Yes

scott may be on to something here.

(my idea)

Lol @ sunny for trying to take credit for my idea.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: puniraptor on March 04, 2014, 10:37:50 PM
My idea is CC and 150k. It's totally original.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on March 04, 2014, 10:45:00 PM

My idea is CC and 150k. It's totally original.

Just wrangle up all the great KSUWBB players give them all 100k and tell them win a Dr. Pepper you get an extra 100k. Every tourney win 5k. B12T champs 5k. Beat KU free chicken nuggets. Win a natty 200k bonus but then fire some because then we are paying our WBB staff too much.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on March 04, 2014, 10:51:24 PM

Fire Deb give SL 200k and let her try to figure it out.

Yes

scott may be on to something here.

(my idea)

Lol @ sunny for trying to take credit for my idea.

 :nono:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on March 04, 2014, 11:12:23 PM

My idea is CC and 150k. It's totally original.

Just wrangle up all the great KSUWBB players give them all 100k and tell them win a Dr. Pepper you get an extra 100k. Every tourney win 5k. B12T champs 5k. Beat KU free chicken nuggets. Win a natty 200k bonus but then fire some because then we are paying our WBB staff too much.

I assume this strategic plan is based on SL remaining the HC when the staff cuts occur? (Not that a Dr.P or natty is in our immediate future...just askin')
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on March 04, 2014, 11:14:21 PM


My idea is CC and 150k. It's totally original.

Just wrangle up all the great KSUWBB players give them all 100k and tell them win a Dr. Pepper you get an extra 100k. Every tourney win 5k. B12T champs 5k. Beat KU free chicken nuggets. Win a natty 200k bonus but then fire some because then we are paying our WBB staff too much.

I assume this strategic plan is based on SL remaining the HC when the staff cuts occur? (Not that a Dr.P or natty is in our immediate future...just askin')

Yup SL gets paid $10 more than anyone and has the HC title.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on March 04, 2014, 11:19:03 PM


My idea is CC and 150k. It's totally original.

Just wrangle up all the great KSUWBB players give them all 100k and tell them win a Dr. Pepper you get an extra 100k. Every tourney win 5k. B12T champs 5k. Beat KU free chicken nuggets. Win a natty 200k bonus but then fire some because then we are paying our WBB staff too much.

I assume this strategic plan is based on SL remaining the HC when the staff cuts occur? (Not that a Dr.P or natty is in our immediate future...just askin')

Yup SL gets paid $10 more than anyone and has the HC title.

Think I'd likely pay her a bit more than a 10-spot over everyone else.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 05, 2014, 08:29:36 AM


My idea is CC and 150k. It's totally original.

Just wrangle up all the great KSUWBB players give them all 100k and tell them win a Dr. Pepper you get an extra 100k. Every tourney win 5k. B12T champs 5k. Beat KU free chicken nuggets. Win a natty 200k bonus but then fire some because then we are paying our WBB staff too much.

I assume this strategic plan is based on SL remaining the HC when the staff cuts occur? (Not that a Dr.P or natty is in our immediate future...just askin')

Yup SL gets paid $10 more than anyone and has the HC title.

that's too much, just pay these bitches in tampons, pant suits, and hair dye
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sonofdaxjones on March 05, 2014, 08:50:59 AM
On second thought, just change the dates and put the same contract in front of Deb and carry on.







Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kso_FAN on March 05, 2014, 09:17:21 AM
On second thought, just change the dates and put the same contract in front of Deb and carry on.

Deb will retire here and that's fine. KSU WBB has a nice fan base and decent success over her career. As barely a nominal WBB fan I can live with that.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on March 05, 2014, 09:23:22 AM


My idea is CC and 150k. It's totally original.

Just wrangle up all the great KSUWBB players give them all 100k and tell them win a Dr. Pepper you get an extra 100k. Every tourney win 5k. B12T champs 5k. Beat KU free chicken nuggets. Win a natty 200k bonus but then fire some because then we are paying our WBB staff too much.

I assume this strategic plan is based on SL remaining the HC when the staff cuts occur? (Not that a Dr.P or natty is in our immediate future...just askin')

Yup SL gets paid $10 more than anyone and has the HC title.

that's too much, just pay these bitches in tampons, pant suits, and hair dye

Hey did you see my salary elevation incentives?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on March 05, 2014, 09:56:31 AM
On second thought, just change the dates and put the same contract in front of Deb and carry on.

Deb will retire here and that's fine. KSU WBB has a nice fan base and decent success over her career. As barely a nominal WBB fan I can live with that.

i don't like seeing our cats lose at anything
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on March 05, 2014, 09:57:30 AM
On second thought, just change the dates and put the same contract in front of Deb and carry on.

Deb will retire here and that's fine. KSU WBB has a nice fan base and decent success over her career. As barely a nominal WBB fan I can live with that.

i don't like seeing our cats lose at anything

well we need to put our weight behind firing the women's golf coach, then. worst in the big 12.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on March 05, 2014, 10:02:18 AM
true story, golf isn't a sport.  it's more like a club or something, not sure iirc. i don't know what it is.  regardless, must focus on the stuff we do in d1.  the rest of the stuff is gravy but not too important, smh

i'm sure we have a women's texas hold-'em team too but i don't care if they catch the nuts on the flop. wut?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on March 07, 2014, 08:21:15 PM
11-19

 :flush:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on March 07, 2014, 08:22:14 PM
Glad this season is over crap team, crap coaches crap season.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 07, 2014, 08:35:13 PM
How big of a lead did we blow tonight?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on March 07, 2014, 08:39:27 PM
How big of a lead did we blow tonight?

16
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 07, 2014, 08:43:29 PM
Did we blow that big of a lead to Baylor or another powerhouse?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on March 07, 2014, 09:16:15 PM

Did we blow that big of a lead to Baylor or another powerhouse?

crap program KU
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 07, 2014, 09:50:06 PM
I don't want MIR mad at me but that is crap city.
Title: ksu ladycats
Post by: sonofdaxjones on March 07, 2014, 11:58:20 PM
Status Quo: The way to go.

Pay Deb!!!


Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 08, 2014, 03:10:27 AM
I don't want MIR mad at me but that is crap city.

not mad, it's inexcusable
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kim carnes on March 08, 2014, 10:06:05 AM
Anyone who cares about ladycat basketball should want deb gone.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: slobber on March 08, 2014, 10:19:37 AM
I don't watch the ladycats, and the only news I get about the ladycats I get from gE. My question is, when I hear about losing these big leads, is it because the ladyopponents start pressing us up and down the floor and we have a crap ton of turnovers, ala high school girls basketball? That is what I picture.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: wazucat on March 08, 2014, 03:37:44 PM
Turnovers in the OT were main culprit for this collapse.  Got up by 6 pts. to start OT, statistics say the the team scoring first in OT has a 60% chance of winning - we scored the first six, WTF Deb.  Romero fouling out was the death knell.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: AbeFroman on March 08, 2014, 03:51:47 PM
#FIREDEB
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sonofdaxjones on March 09, 2014, 07:04:55 AM
Status Quo: The Way to Go

Pay Deb!!

Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Shooter Jones on March 09, 2014, 03:01:50 PM
#FIREDEB

There's smoke..
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on March 09, 2014, 03:14:59 PM

#FIREDEB

There's smoke..

Bout damn time
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kso_FAN on March 09, 2014, 03:20:34 PM
@robvoelker: #KState AD John Currie just announced a press conference for this afternoon to discuss the Wildcat women’s basketball program.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Kat Kid on March 09, 2014, 03:24:55 PM
She is gone.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on March 09, 2014, 03:28:48 PM
Thank for some trophies and some good times, Deb. Best of luck to ya
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Stevesie60 on March 09, 2014, 03:52:08 PM
I heard she made a girl play all season after the doctor's told her early in the season she was at risk for a serious injury if she didn't sit out for a while. Source A

I guess I don't know how I feel about that since I feel confident in saying it happens in men's sports all the time, especially football. But good grief, even Massa Seff sat Embiid.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: CNS on March 09, 2014, 03:53:20 PM
Kendra wecker new HC?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on March 09, 2014, 03:55:22 PM

Kendra wecker new HC?

Shalee
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Stevesie60 on March 09, 2014, 03:57:11 PM
This will be interesting. Does being at Tennessee when they were super good at women's basketball make Currie put any stock in this hire? Is he trying to make a splash hire in case he never gets to make a football hire? Does being at Tennessee when they were super good make Currie realize how little upside there is to being good at women's basketball, so he doesn't care at all about this hire?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: CNS on March 09, 2014, 03:59:52 PM

Kendra wecker new HC?

Shalee
Is shalee coaching some where?  Wecker has been at OU for a while, right?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on March 09, 2014, 04:00:41 PM

This will be interesting. Does being at Tennessee when they were super good at women's basketball make Currie put any stock in this hire? Is he trying to make a splash hire in case he never gets to make a football hire? Does being at Tennessee when they were super good make Currie realize how little upside there is to being good at women's basketball, so he doesn't care at all about this hire?

All good points. I see no reason not to through in some effort to make a good effort.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Tobias on March 09, 2014, 04:05:15 PM

Is shalee coaching some where?

she's been an assistant at ksu for like 4 years I think
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Sandstone Outcropping on March 09, 2014, 04:05:21 PM
 :popcorn:

Quote
My husband and I have been watching K-State WBB since Nicole Ohlde days. Coach P has had her ups and downs through the years. This season was pretty tough but there were quite a few freshmen, especially after a few key injuries that sidelined our point guard. I figure next year to be awesome but if we lose a coach and staff...I now wonder. I hope whatever happens, it is the best thing for the team.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: CNS on March 09, 2014, 04:15:07 PM

Is shalee coaching some where?

she's been an assistant at ksu for like 4 years I think

Part of the established prob
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: ednksu on March 09, 2014, 04:17:39 PM
she should have been fired for cause after the Star's piece years ago about her unethical practices surrounding religion and the team
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: catzacker on March 09, 2014, 04:30:41 PM
I hope we hire a hot coach. 
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Shooter Jones on March 09, 2014, 05:07:09 PM
Pat Summit.. convince her how prestigious our program has been, she won't remember any different
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Tobias on March 09, 2014, 05:08:04 PM
:flush:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on March 09, 2014, 05:08:26 PM
:flush:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kso_FAN on March 09, 2014, 05:14:12 PM
This should relieve some (if not all) worries that Currie will be overly patient with oscar Weber (if he ever needs to be). IMHO.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Saulbadguy on March 09, 2014, 05:35:00 PM
Wooly
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 09, 2014, 05:42:49 PM
I heard she made a girl play all season after the doctor's told her early in the season she was at risk for a serious injury if she didn't sit out for a while. Source A

I guess I don't know how I feel about that since I feel confident in saying it happens in men's sports all the time, especially football. But good grief, even Massa Seff sat Embiid.

No I don't think that happens very much, if it were the players choice that's different than the coach deciding that for her.

I wanted Deb to have one more year, but I can't be too mad about this. I'm firmly in the hire Shalee camp, if she doesn't get the job I hope the new coach keeps her. Hiring her as the head coach would energize the fan base, without a doubt.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 09, 2014, 05:51:59 PM

Is shalee coaching some where?

she's been an assistant at ksu for like 4 years I think

Part of the established prob

jesus, shut up. Kendra hasn't coached since 2011, jackass
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 09, 2014, 05:54:21 PM
she should have been fired for cause after the Star's piece years ago about her unethical practices surrounding religion and the team

either you don't remember what Michele Voepel reported or you don't know what the word unethical means
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: EMAWmeister on March 09, 2014, 05:57:37 PM
I have never seen a single women's bball game, but if we don't make a home run hire I'm gonna #BID so hard
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: CNS on March 09, 2014, 06:12:24 PM

Is shalee coaching some where?

she's been an assistant at ksu for like 4 years I think

Part of the established prob

jesus, shut up. Kendra hasn't coached since 2011, jackass

Serious replies only, guys.  This is gE after all.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kso_FAN on March 09, 2014, 06:29:50 PM
Deb will retire here and that's fine. KSU WBB has a nice fan base and decent success over her career. As barely a nominal WBB fan I can live with that.

Man, that was a great post.  :buh-bye:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on March 09, 2014, 06:30:51 PM

Is shalee coaching some where?

she's been an assistant at ksu for like 4 years I think

Part of the established prob

jesus, shut up. Kendra hasn't coached since 2011, jackass

Serious replies only, guys.  This is gE after all.
:lol:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: wazucat on March 09, 2014, 06:38:20 PM
I know this is a WBB thread but I really - really am encouraged by this move by Currie as it may relate to the eventual football coach hiring process.  He could easily have let the situation slide but instead moved boldly, IMO.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: TBL on March 09, 2014, 07:42:32 PM
I hope we hire a hot coach.

And not a carpet muncher. Unless she's really, really hot.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: TBL on March 09, 2014, 07:45:29 PM
Not that there's anything wrong with that.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on March 09, 2014, 07:47:40 PM
 :buh-bye:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: WillieWatanabe on March 09, 2014, 08:24:23 PM
Deb seems very polarizing. Not sure what to believe.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on March 09, 2014, 08:59:44 PM
I heard she made a girl play all season after the doctor's told her early in the season she was at risk for a serious injury if she didn't sit out for a while. Source A

I guess I don't know how I feel about that since I feel confident in saying it happens in men's sports all the time, especially football. But good grief, even Massa Seff sat Embiid.

No I don't think that happens very much, if it were the players choice that's different than the coach deciding that for her.

I wanted Deb to have one more year, but I can't be too mad about this. I'm firmly in the hire Shalee camp, if she doesn't get the job I hope the new coach keeps her. Hiring her as the head coach would energize the fan base, without a doubt.

I agree about Shalee. If anybody in the WBB program bleeds purple, it's her. She would indeed energize the fan base and she's an outstanding recruiter. I'd like to see him roll the dice on her relatively short coaching career and put her in charge.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 09, 2014, 09:01:27 PM
I hope we hire a hot coach.

And not a carpet muncher. Unless she's really, really hot.

can you creepy fucks stay out of this thread
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: [email protected]$! on March 09, 2014, 09:03:36 PM
Doug Gottlieb FTW!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Tobias on March 09, 2014, 09:05:25 PM
add me to the shalee camp as well.  she's fantastic and i'd like to see her get a shot at it
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 09, 2014, 09:09:46 PM
Deb seems very polarizing. Not sure what to believe.

What to believe in what regard? Many of the things people don't like about Deb is born out of the Voepel article, some details of the article aren't exactly accurate, some are sensationalized, and others people don't remember correctly.

The firing is about wins and losses, but if what Stevesie posted is accurate I hope Currie considered that heavily because that isn't right.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: ednksu on March 09, 2014, 09:12:05 PM
she should have been fired for cause after the Star's piece years ago about her unethical practices surrounding religion and the team

either you don't remember what Michele Voepel reported or you don't know what the word unethical means
No I'm pretty sure its on target to say chapel time for playing time is unethical, maybe I should have included illegal and immoral as well?.  Maybe we can ask Mechelle* on twitter and find out if my one sentence summary is sufficient because the KC Star has scrubbed her work from their servers it seems. 
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Havs on March 09, 2014, 10:07:33 PM
You guys better not hire someone who takes the spotlight off of Sherri Coale.

 :shakesfist:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: WillieWatanabe on March 09, 2014, 10:10:04 PM
Deb seems very polarizing. Not sure what to believe.

What to believe in what regard? Many of the things people don't like about Deb is born out of the Voepel article, some details of the article aren't exactly accurate, some are sensationalized, and others people don't remember correctly.

The firing is about wins and losses, but if what Stevesie posted is accurate I hope Currie considered that heavily because that isn't right.

whether to believe she should have been fired.  There wasn't a big push to get her canned, was there? Kinda aggressive by Currie. I'm fine with it, fwiw.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Havs on March 09, 2014, 10:18:26 PM
Deb seems very polarizing. Not sure what to believe.

What to believe in what regard? Many of the things people don't like about Deb is born out of the Voepel article, some details of the article aren't exactly accurate, some are sensationalized, and others people don't remember correctly.

The firing is about wins and losses, but if what Stevesie posted is accurate I hope Currie considered that heavily because that isn't right.

whether to believe she should have been fired.  There wasn't a big push to get her canned, was there? Kinda aggressive by Currie. I'm fine with it, fwiw.

I was shocked he was this aggressive with it. There HAS to be something else behind it because Womens Basketball isn't going to make huge dollars anyway.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: ednksu on March 09, 2014, 10:18:44 PM
Deb seems very polarizing. Not sure what to believe.

What to believe in what regard? Many of the things people don't like about Deb is born out of the Voepel article, some details of the article aren't exactly accurate, some are sensationalized, and others people don't remember correctly.

The firing is about wins and losses, but if what Stevesie posted is accurate I hope Currie considered that heavily because that isn't right.
This is the same kind of BS you tried to pull last year.  You were wrong then and wrong now. 
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Pete on March 09, 2014, 10:43:46 PM
I wish all of you women's basketball fans the best.  I have zero interest in the sport, but most of you seem like good people, so I hope you get to enjoy nice things. 
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on March 09, 2014, 10:46:05 PM

Deb seems very polarizing. Not sure what to believe.

What to believe in what regard? Many of the things people don't like about Deb is born out of the Voepel article, some details of the article aren't exactly accurate, some are sensationalized, and others people don't remember correctly.

The firing is about wins and losses, but if what Stevesie posted is accurate I hope Currie considered that heavily because that isn't right.

whether to believe she should have been fired.  There wasn't a big push to get her canned, was there? Kinda aggressive by Currie. I'm fine with it, fwiw.

I was shocked he was this aggressive with it. There HAS to be something else behind it because Womens Basketball isn't going to make huge dollars anyway.

Meh, no NCAAs in 3 years. This isn't a second rate athletic department like others. ADJC isn't going to put up with crap. The Ladycats Golf Coach Kristi better watch her back. John already pushed out the men's coach and Deb. She's next.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: AndrewVonLintel on March 09, 2014, 10:48:12 PM
Currie is fixing his dumbass contract that he gave to Deb in 2008.

$600,000 in salary for Deb in 2013-2014     ( for women's basketball)


He does avoid paying out $125,000 in bonus on April 14, 2014.


If we are paying 600,000 for a women's coach, it better be someone cool like Doug Gottlieb.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: eastcat on March 09, 2014, 11:40:06 PM
I hope Currie doesn't lose a bunch of sleep flying around to hotel rooms in major metros to sign knee jerk contracts with historically loser coaches.

That would be really dumb.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on March 09, 2014, 11:49:02 PM
I hope Currie doesn't lose a bunch of sleep flying around to hotel rooms in major metros to sign knee jerk contracts with historically loser coaches.

That would be really dumb.

He could avoid all that by hiring Lehning, even tho he'd be taking a chance on someone with only a few years' coaching experience. But no one says K-State WBB like Shalee.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 10, 2014, 01:42:30 AM
Deb seems very polarizing. Not sure what to believe.

What to believe in what regard? Many of the things people don't like about Deb is born out of the Voepel article, some details of the article aren't exactly accurate, some are sensationalized, and others people don't remember correctly.

The firing is about wins and losses, but if what Stevesie posted is accurate I hope Currie considered that heavily because that isn't right.

whether to believe she should have been fired.  There wasn't a big push to get her canned, was there? Kinda aggressive by Currie. I'm fine with it, fwiw.

I've been on this board all season fighting this but the program wasn't trending well. I wouldn't say there was a big push but there were some unhappy people, couple that with the possibility of potential off the court issues and there you have it.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 10, 2014, 01:47:21 AM
You guys better not hire someone who takes the spotlight off of Sherri Coale.

 :shakesfist:

I first met Sherri Coale when she was the head coach at Norman High School, nice lady
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 10, 2014, 01:52:52 AM
Deb seems very polarizing. Not sure what to believe.

What to believe in what regard? Many of the things people don't like about Deb is born out of the Voepel article, some details of the article aren't exactly accurate, some are sensationalized, and others people don't remember correctly.

The firing is about wins and losses, but if what Stevesie posted is accurate I hope Currie considered that heavily because that isn't right.

whether to believe she should have been fired.  There wasn't a big push to get her canned, was there? Kinda aggressive by Currie. I'm fine with it, fwiw.

I was shocked he was this aggressive with it. There HAS to be something else behind it because Womens Basketball isn't going to make huge dollars anyway.

Being an Iowa State fan I'd hope you understand that women's basketball should be the #3 revenue producer for an athletic department of schools in states that have winter. Women's coaches get fired all of the time, they are expected to win too. KUs all-time winningest women's coach was also fired, if Fennely goes 10-26 in conference in a two year stretch he could get gassed too.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 10, 2014, 02:00:39 AM
Currie is fixing his dumbass contract that he gave to Deb in 2008.

$600,000 in salary for Deb in 2013-2014     ( for women's basketball)


He does avoid paying out $125,000 in bonus on April 14, 2014.


If we are paying 600,000 for a women's coach, it better be someone cool like Doug Gottlieb.

Pick your knuckles up off of the ground, sexist clown. People that throw Deb's salary around need to take like 10 rough ridin' minutes of reading and research to gather some actual context of her salary. She isn't close to being overpaid when you consider the other coaches in the conference and other high major coaches that have been at one place as long as she had. Thankfully Currie is smarter than you rough ridin' idiots and he understands its a pretty good idea to pay your coaches market value.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: ednksu on March 10, 2014, 02:14:52 AM
Baylor            16-2   
West Virginia    16-2   
Texas                    11-7   
Oklahoma State    11-7   
Iowa State        9-9   
Oklahoma            9-9   
TCU                8-10   
Kansas            5-13   
Kansas State    5-13   
Texas Tech      0-18


Hadn't check the standings in a long while.  Not sure where most people want this program to compete at.  Baylor is obviously the toast of the conference.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 10, 2014, 02:30:42 AM
Deb seems very polarizing. Not sure what to believe.

What to believe in what regard? Many of the things people don't like about Deb is born out of the Voepel article, some details of the article aren't exactly accurate, some are sensationalized, and others people don't remember correctly.

The firing is about wins and losses, but if what Stevesie posted is accurate I hope Currie considered that heavily because that isn't right.
This is the same kind of BS you tried to pull last year.  You were wrong then and wrong now.

I'm not sure what is happening here but you are doing your thing where you become unreasonably unhinged so I'm gonna keep walking and not look you in the eye.

I will tell you that the 7.5 year old article you keep mentioning is still on the web and easy to find, I read an article earlier this evening that linked it. That chapel thing in the context you brought it up is an example of you not remembering the totality of the story. I will give you credit and not accuse you of intentionally lying because after all that article was written in 2006 & the person who spoke on record about it graduated 9 years ago.

If you want to do the song & dance about this, that's fine but I was very very close to the program back then close enough to know most of that stuff in the article before it was published. If you want to ignore all of that and just base everything off of an article written 7 years ago about stuff that happened between 8-12 years ago I'll leave you with this.

Quote
They had that option this year, that chapel is at a different time than pregame meal," Wecker said. "But at the same time, if you don't go, then what happens?"

What happened is that people who didn't want to go were told by coach not to go and they weren't kicked off of the team, a few of them stood with Wecker at the championship team reunion last month.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: ednksu on March 10, 2014, 03:25:13 AM
Deb seems very polarizing. Not sure what to believe.

What to believe in what regard? Many of the things people don't like about Deb is born out of the Voepel article, some details of the article aren't exactly accurate, some are sensationalized, and others people don't remember correctly.

The firing is about wins and losses, but if what Stevesie posted is accurate I hope Currie considered that heavily because that isn't right.
This is the same kind of BS you tried to pull last year.  You were wrong then and wrong now.

I'm not sure what is happening here but you are doing your thing where you become unreasonably unhinged so I'm gonna keep walking and not look you in the eye.

I will tell you that the 7.5 year old article you keep mentioning is still on the web and easy to find, I read an article earlier this evening that linked it. That chapel thing in the context you brought it up is an example of you not remembering the totality of the story. I will give you credit and not accuse you of intentionally lying because after all that article was written in 2006 & the person who spoke on record about it graduated 9 years ago.

If you want to do the song & dance about this, that's fine but I was very very close to the program back then close enough to know most of that stuff in the article before it was published. If you want to ignore all of that and just base everything off of an article written 7 years ago about stuff that happened between 8-12 years ago I'll leave you with this.

Quote
They had that option this year, that chapel is at a different time than pregame meal," Wecker said. "But at the same time, if you don't go, then what happens?"

What happened is that people who didn't want to go were told by coach not to go and they weren't kicked off of the team, a few of them stood with Wecker at the championship team reunion last month.
funny projection about posters who have a consistent history of becoming unhinged.

And once again you underplay a quality story because it has totally destroyed your position on Deb which you've constructed for years.  She has been a liability for a long time, its just sad that K-State is doing something about it now that the Ws and Ls aren't in the correct amounts.  It doesn't matter how long ago the story was written if the piece withstands scrutiny and shows a consistent issue with a coach.  But nice attempt at a cheap shot, which you're a great artist of, by feinting the lying charge.  The point I had made still stands though, K-State had an opportunity to wash their hands of Deb for cause and should have acted to protect the university. You poorly constructed attempt to attack credibility betrays your failure to make coherent points.  Deb had ethics issues then and probably still has them now. I'd love to know how close you were to the program because you make no points and sound like a tuck with that kind of line.  You can either lay out an argument or fall further into tuck talking points as a defense.  You don't make that kind of piece, put it on a reputable Sunday paper without having your story locked down.  The fact you put that quote from Wecker in your defense shows that clearly miss the context and that you clearly have no idea why Deb should have been immediately fired for the potential harm she placed the university in. 

Quite frankly I don't give a crap if they article was from years ago, that wasn't my point main in this thread.  The point was a) I wish she was gone sooner, when it would have been a cleaner break, and b) she has been in a downward trend for a few years with no major accomplishments to speak of after having many great resources at her disposal. She arguably should have been gone last year.  I listed to your points about injuries to the front court/key players and a few other issues and reconsidered my position to "the one more year" camp.  Instead we are treated with another awful year building a trend which oscillates between mediocrity and terrible.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: _33 on March 10, 2014, 07:01:21 AM
Weird to think that there are people who really follow K-State women's basketball in depth.  Like they know the players, watch the games, yell at the refs, and are really mad when we lose.  I'm not saying it's wrong at all.  Just funny to think about.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Havs on March 10, 2014, 08:32:32 AM
Deb seems very polarizing. Not sure what to believe.

What to believe in what regard? Many of the things people don't like about Deb is born out of the Voepel article, some details of the article aren't exactly accurate, some are sensationalized, and others people don't remember correctly.

The firing is about wins and losses, but if what Stevesie posted is accurate I hope Currie considered that heavily because that isn't right.

whether to believe she should have been fired.  There wasn't a big push to get her canned, was there? Kinda aggressive by Currie. I'm fine with it, fwiw.

I was shocked he was this aggressive with it. There HAS to be something else behind it because Womens Basketball isn't going to make huge dollars anyway.

Being an Iowa State fan I'd hope you understand that women's basketball should be the #3 revenue producer for an athletic department of schools in states that have winter. Women's coaches get fired all of the time, they are expected to win too. KUs all-time winningest women's coach was also fired, if Fennely goes 10-26 in conference in a two year stretch he could get gassed too.

Yea, I agree completely. Based upon the postseason accolades, I'd have given her one more season as an athletic director, simply out of respect for the program she built. Maybe John Currie gave her an ultimatum at this time last year as well, but only those two would know that.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: raquetcat on March 10, 2014, 08:59:51 AM
What would people who follow the program closely say Deb's biggest problem was? X's and O's, recruiting, getting effort out of players?

I personally kind of always thought she recruited too many Kansas girls and that she hit the lottery with oldhe, wecker, and kanhe and then kind of stuck with that local recruiting strategy, but that's just from looking at the roster and not knowing the girls they are actually pursuing. Thoughts?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: joda on March 10, 2014, 09:25:21 AM
What would people who follow the program closely say Deb's biggest problem was? X's and O's, recruiting, getting effort out of players?

I personally kind of always thought she recruited too many Kansas girls and that she hit the lottery with oldhe, wecker, and kanhe and then kind of stuck with that local recruiting strategy, but that's just from looking at the roster and not knowing the girls they are actually pursuing. Thoughts?

Just personal opinion here, and as someone who hasn't really paid close attention since I was in school take this for what it's worth, but that's almost the opposite of the truth. I think one of the biggest problems has been not getting enough of the good Kansas players. There's been more than enough quality womens bball players come out of this state to create at least a solid backbone for a team. Obviously some will leave but it seems like for every Shalee she got there was at least 1 Tiffany Bias who got away.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: POWL on March 10, 2014, 10:33:28 AM
What would people who follow the program closely say Deb's biggest problem was? X's and O's, recruiting, getting effort out of players?

I personally kind of always thought she recruited too many Kansas girls and that she hit the lottery with oldhe, wecker, and kanhe and then kind of stuck with that local recruiting strategy, but that's just from looking at the roster and not knowing the girls they are actually pursuing. Thoughts?

her assistant (Cammie something ?) is a defensive stud and is a match-up wizard

.......Deb's offense is weird and dumb..........they constantly have nothing good happening with 5 on the shot clock
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: slobber on March 10, 2014, 10:48:19 AM
A lot of people typing a lot of words in this thread....
Go CATS!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Sandstone Outcropping on March 10, 2014, 10:48:54 AM
A lot of people typing a lot of words in this thread....
Go CATS!
:thumbs:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: PIPE on March 10, 2014, 11:36:34 AM
Deb's problem, IMO, has been recruiting.  The last 3 or so years she has missed out big time.  There is no way you should field a team in the Big 12 w/out a girl over 6'0.  When Childs and Brown were Jr's (both were listed at 6'2"), they should have had recruited girls over 6'0", but got none.  Then we they were Sr's, Deb got none.  Well, guess what...they both graduated and you still had no girls on the roster 6'0".  That is full-out recruiting fail! 3 full recruiting classes w/ out a girl with height.

Now this year they landed 3 over 6'3".  I would prolly give that credit to Lehning, but I don't know.  But one of those girls never played, the other hardly played, and the Lewis girl will have a good future. A little late. So, the talking heads about giving her another year cause she has all of these frosh, well, that is just cause they didin't recruit w/ a squat the last 3 years.

You do roll the dice w/ this firing though, as I think a number of the recruits were very close to Lehning, including our best player, the point guard from Spain.  Lose her, and things will not get much better--short term...
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Asteriskhead on March 10, 2014, 11:52:47 AM
The Stud/ Boss just smacked some dude around on facebook for antagonizing Chambers over one of her fb statuses.

I've never been much of a women's hoops follower, but it has been kind of disheartening to see all of our former players sad on social media.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: WillieWatanabe on March 10, 2014, 12:05:52 PM
The Stud/ Boss just smacked some dude around on facebook for antagonizing Chambers over one of her fb statuses.

I've never been much of a women's hoops follower, but it has been kind of disheartening to see all of our former players sad on social media.

really got him with this zinger at the end.

Quote
But what she, and I, and many other athletes are done with, are internet trolls that pretend to be fans and "love and support" us and the school. Thanks
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 10, 2014, 01:45:20 PM
What would people who follow the program closely say Deb's biggest problem was? X's and O's, recruiting, getting effort out of players?

I personally kind of always thought she recruited too many Kansas girls and that she hit the lottery with oldhe, wecker, and kanhe and then kind of stuck with that local recruiting strategy, but that's just from looking at the roster and not knowing the girls they are actually pursuing. Thoughts?

ironically enough, recruiting; ironic because this freshman class is the best one she's had in over a decade. She actually doesn't take an abnormal amount of Kansas kids, I mean non revenue sports have to take more local kids than men's basketball because of budgets
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sonofdaxjones on March 10, 2014, 01:58:43 PM
$1.1 million spent on WBB coaching staff compensation in FY 2013.   That number likely went up this year.   

A $5 million dollar operating loss for WBB FY 2012/13 combined.

Currie probably thinks he needs to shrink that gap and didn't think that Deb would provide the neccessary energy to do that.

My take:  Status Quo was the way to go.







Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 10, 2014, 02:00:21 PM
Deb seems very polarizing. Not sure what to believe.

What to believe in what regard? Many of the things people don't like about Deb is born out of the Voepel article, some details of the article aren't exactly accurate, some are sensationalized, and others people don't remember correctly.

The firing is about wins and losses, but if what Stevesie posted is accurate I hope Currie considered that heavily because that isn't right.
This is the same kind of BS you tried to pull last year.  You were wrong then and wrong now.

I'm not sure what is happening here but you are doing your thing where you become unreasonably unhinged so I'm gonna keep walking and not look you in the eye.

I will tell you that the 7.5 year old article you keep mentioning is still on the web and easy to find, I read an article earlier this evening that linked it. That chapel thing in the context you brought it up is an example of you not remembering the totality of the story. I will give you credit and not accuse you of intentionally lying because after all that article was written in 2006 & the person who spoke on record about it graduated 9 years ago.

If you want to do the song & dance about this, that's fine but I was very very close to the program back then close enough to know most of that stuff in the article before it was published. If you want to ignore all of that and just base everything off of an article written 7 years ago about stuff that happened between 8-12 years ago I'll leave you with this.

Quote
They had that option this year, that chapel is at a different time than pregame meal," Wecker said. "But at the same time, if you don't go, then what happens?"

What happened is that people who didn't want to go were told by coach not to go and they weren't kicked off of the team, a few of them stood with Wecker at the championship team reunion last month.
funny projection about posters who have a consistent history of becoming unhinged.

And once again you underplay a quality story because it has totally destroyed your position on Deb which you've constructed for years.  She has been a liability for a long time, its just sad that K-State is doing something about it now that the Ws and Ls aren't in the correct amounts.  It doesn't matter how long ago the story was written if the piece withstands scrutiny and shows a consistent issue with a coach.  But nice attempt at a cheap shot, which you're a great artist of, by feinting the lying charge.  The point I had made still stands though, K-State had an opportunity to wash their hands of Deb for cause and should have acted to protect the university. You poorly constructed attempt to attack credibility betrays your failure to make coherent points.  Deb had ethics issues then and probably still has them now. I'd love to know how close you were to the program because you make no points and sound like a tuck with that kind of line.  You can either lay out an argument or fall further into tuck talking points as a defense.  You don't make that kind of piece, put it on a reputable Sunday paper without having your story locked down.  The fact you put that quote from Wecker in your defense shows that clearly miss the context and that you clearly have no idea why Deb should have been immediately fired for the potential harm she placed the university in. 

Quite frankly I don't give a crap if they article was from years ago, that wasn't my point main in this thread.  The point was a) I wish she was gone sooner, when it would have been a cleaner break, and b) she has been in a downward trend for a few years with no major accomplishments to speak of after having many great resources at her disposal. She arguably should have been gone last year.  I listed to your points about injuries to the front court/key players and a few other issues and reconsidered my position to "the one more year" camp.  Instead we are treated with another awful year building a trend which oscillates between mediocrity and terrible.

Stop being so dramatic man, the university was in no jeopardy with the chapel issue. Why are you so mad, dude? Someone, Kendra, turned Deb in to what is basically the ACLU for having chapel essentially at the same time as team meals. They told Weiser, he told Deb not to do that, she stopped, the end.

I'll give you two more facts about this; at the time women's basketball was not the only program that walked the line or crossed the line of "mandatory" chapel, there were multiple coaches asked to stop, some of these sports shared the same Chaplin. Also if you think that we were in any danger, whatever that means, the group that went to Weiser said they do this with other schools and public entities about 10 times a year, it isn't rare & like I said she wasn't the only coach at K-State doing it.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 10, 2014, 02:05:40 PM
What would people who follow the program closely say Deb's biggest problem was? X's and O's, recruiting, getting effort out of players?

I personally kind of always thought she recruited too many Kansas girls and that she hit the lottery with oldhe, wecker, and kanhe and then kind of stuck with that local recruiting strategy, but that's just from looking at the roster and not knowing the girls they are actually pursuing. Thoughts?

her assistant (Cammie something ?) is a defensive stud and is a match-up wizard

.......Deb's offense is weird and dumb..........they constantly have nothing good happening with 5 on the shot clock

Deb's offense was fine, this was a talent issue. I've said this about the men and it holds true for the women too. Coaches aren't inventing offenses, it's all been done by someone else; done well by good players done poorly by bad players. This mythology about coaches inventing plays in the dirt is maddening.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Benja on March 10, 2014, 02:31:17 PM
Hmmm. I know virtually nothing about WBB. But I want the ksu cats to be good at everything, so I vote we get a coach that makes us good.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on March 10, 2014, 02:32:06 PM
Hmmm. I know virtually nothing about WBB. But I want the ksu cats to be good at everything, so I vote we get a coach that makes us good.

Then you want Shalee.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Benja on March 10, 2014, 02:38:42 PM
Hmmm. I know virtually nothing about WBB. But I want the ksu cats to be good at everything, so I vote we get a coach that makes us good.

Then you want Shalee.

Alright.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 10, 2014, 02:46:53 PM
Pat Summit
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Winters on March 10, 2014, 02:59:05 PM
Pat Summit
I forgot about her (http://i.ytimg.com/vi/6zXDo4dL7SU/0.jpg)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Stevesie60 on March 10, 2014, 03:05:01 PM
Throw a ton of money at Geno.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: EllRobersonisInnocent on March 10, 2014, 03:06:09 PM
I really hate Deb for the religious pressure she put on players. She should have been fired years ago.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: _33 on March 10, 2014, 03:19:11 PM
I really hate Deb for the religious pressure she put on players. She should have been fired years ago.

What an incredibly stupid thing to hate someone for.  To each his own though imo.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: EllRobersonisInnocent on March 10, 2014, 03:23:26 PM
I really hate Deb for the religious pressure she put on players. She should have been fired years ago.

What an incredibly stupid thing to hate someone for.  To each his own though imo.

Uhhh not really. Hating her for being gay would be incredibly stupid.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: wazucat on March 10, 2014, 03:36:15 PM
If we lose Romero and Shalee, not sure it will have been worth it, if they stick around, I am good with Curries move.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Winters on March 10, 2014, 03:48:45 PM
If we lose Romero and Shalee, not sure it will have been worth it, if they stick around, I am good with Curries move.
Let's just say they don't like Currie.  :ohno:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 10, 2014, 04:02:07 PM
If we lose Romero and Shalee, not sure it will have been worth it, if they stick around, I am good with Curries move.
Let's just say they don't like Currie.  :ohno:

Shalee would love him if he offered her the job. If Shalee doesn't get the job I hope Deb gets a job elsewhere & takes Shalee with her so she can come home in a few years.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sonofdaxjones on March 10, 2014, 04:09:42 PM
Patterson's last contract was retroactive to before the start of the 2009 season, so technically it covered 2009-14 seasons:

2009-10: 14-18/5-11

2010-11: 21-11/10-6

2011-12: 20-14/9-9

2012-13: 19-18/5-13

2013-14: 11-19/5-13

             71-62/29-41







Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 10, 2014, 04:38:46 PM
dax, buddy, its over. We appreciate your dogged research but she's gone, her office is already cleaned out. Not sure why you feel the need to convince us that a fired person should be fired. Who do you like for candidates, may need to go a little deeper than just looking at schedule & results though.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: puniraptor on March 10, 2014, 04:45:40 PM
would shalee reject the job based off loyalty to deb? probably not. but maybe?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: ChiCat on March 10, 2014, 04:48:05 PM
What is Shalee, like 28ish?  Are there many head coaches in WBB that age?

By all means though, I am for giving it a shot.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 10, 2014, 05:00:35 PM
would shalee reject the job based off loyalty to deb? probably not. but maybe?

a major college job with top 30 attendance? I would hope she would set Deb on fire for this job.

What is Shalee, like 28ish?  Are there many head coaches in WBB that age?

By all means though, I am for giving it a shot.

She's young no doubt but it isn't highly unusual for young coaches to get a shot, Dawn Staley started coaching at Temple while she was in the WNBA, I believe Jen Rizzoti did the same. Sherri Coale was 31 and her only coaching experience was 6 years at Norman High before she got the job at OU.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: _33 on March 10, 2014, 05:15:16 PM
I really hate Deb for the religious pressure she put on players. She should have been fired years ago.

What an incredibly stupid thing to hate someone for.  To each his own though imo.

Uhhh not really. Hating her for being gay would be incredibly stupid.

Okie Doke.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on March 10, 2014, 05:15:42 PM
Hmmm. I know virtually nothing about WBB. But I want the ksu cats to be good at everything, so I vote we get a coach that makes us good.

Then you want Shalee.

 :thumbs:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sonofdaxjones on March 10, 2014, 05:27:34 PM
dax, buddy, its over. We appreciate your dogged research but she's gone, her office is already cleaned out. Not sure why you feel the need to convince us that a fired person should be fired. Who do you like for candidates, may need to go a little deeper than just looking at schedule & results though.

Lenning.  I've seen people toss around the WSU coach. 
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 10, 2014, 06:27:58 PM
dax, buddy, its over. We appreciate your dogged research but she's gone, her office is already cleaned out. Not sure why you feel the need to convince us that a fired person should be fired. Who do you like for candidates, may need to go a little deeper than just looking at schedule & results though.

Lenning.  I've seen people toss around the WSU coach.

Sorry for the snark, friends?

Jody Adams would be okay. She played for Pat Summit, won a natty. At WSU she won their first Valley championship for them and took them to their first NCAA tournament. I caution you all though about two things. First, she's very polarizing within the WSU athletic department, she's very tough and she has no problem getting rid of players. Honestly, she's like a non bible thumping Deb. Secondly, for people who didn't like Deb's salary, we would have to pay Jody nearly as much as we paid Deb, if not more.

I want Shalee but Jody would be better than an assistant coach from Maryland or Louisville.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: AndrewVonLintel on March 10, 2014, 06:35:38 PM
Currie is fixing his dumbass contract that he gave to Deb in 2008.

$600,000 in salary for Deb in 2013-2014     ( for women's basketball)


He does avoid paying out $125,000 in bonus on April 14, 2014.


If we are paying 600,000 for a women's coach, it better be someone cool like Doug Gottlieb.

Pick your knuckles up off of the ground, sexist clown. People that throw Deb's salary around need to take like 10 rough ridin' minutes of reading and research to gather some actual context of her salary. She isn't close to being overpaid when you consider the other coaches in the conference and other high major coaches that have been at one place as long as she had. Thankfully Currie is smarter than you rough ridin' idiots and he understands its a pretty good idea to pay your coaches market value.


 Henrickson $401,000   
http://www2.kusports.com/coaching_contracts/

Fennelly     $888,000
http://www.cyclones.com/ViewArticle.dbml?ATCLID=832566

Littell       $300,000
http://espn.go.com/womens-college-basketball/story/_/id/7485444/oklahoma-state-cowgirls-coach-jim-littell-earn-nearly-300000

Coale    $1.101 million
http://newsok.com/oklahoma-womens-basketball-sherri-coale-is-more-than-a-coach-shes-an-icon-for-ou/article/3940609

There is the 10 minutes of research.

I would calculate that 13,500 seats * $50/year= $675,000  in attendance revenue / year. 
I bet that is probably high considering how they try to sell Women's Basketball Season packages for $20 with a Men's season ticket.
In general, College Basketball Coaches are overpaid and only survive due to Football. In women's hoops it is an even worse situation than the men.

I think Currie made the right decision to move on from a Head Coach that had only been to the Sweet Sixteen once in 18 years. Get someone fresh and save a $1,000,000 over the next 4 years. 

In my opinion, we should be paying our Women's Hoops Coach Brad Hill or Suzie Fritz type money.



Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on March 10, 2014, 08:34:21 PM
i wonder if we could get candice jackson away from coach p at duke 
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Asteriskhead on March 10, 2014, 08:56:18 PM
I really hate Deb for the religious pressure she put on players. She should have been fired years ago.

What an incredibly stupid thing to hate someone for.  To each his own though imo.

Uhhh not really. Hating her for being gay would be incredibly stupid.

Okie Doke.

Hate isn't the right word, but I do agree with ERiI. Religion, and how it is practiced, should be a personal choice. I don't want to pit this up, though. I'm all for hiring Shalee.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 10, 2014, 10:07:08 PM
Currie is fixing his dumbass contract that he gave to Deb in 2008.

$600,000 in salary for Deb in 2013-2014     ( for women's basketball)


He does avoid paying out $125,000 in bonus on April 14, 2014.


If we are paying 600,000 for a women's coach, it better be someone cool like Doug Gottlieb.

Pick your knuckles up off of the ground, sexist clown. People that throw Deb's salary around need to take like 10 rough ridin' minutes of reading and research to gather some actual context of her salary. She isn't close to being overpaid when you consider the other coaches in the conference and other high major coaches that have been at one place as long as she had. Thankfully Currie is smarter than you rough ridin' idiots and he understands its a pretty good idea to pay your coaches market value.


 Henrickson $401,000   
http://www2.kusports.com/coaching_contracts/

Fennelly     $888,000
http://www.cyclones.com/ViewArticle.dbml?ATCLID=832566

Littell       $300,000
http://espn.go.com/womens-college-basketball/story/_/id/7485444/oklahoma-state-cowgirls-coach-jim-littell-earn-nearly-300000

Coale    $1.101 million
http://newsok.com/oklahoma-womens-basketball-sherri-coale-is-more-than-a-coach-shes-an-icon-for-ou/article/3940609

There is the 10 minutes of research.

I would calculate that 13,500 seats * $50/year= $675,000  in attendance revenue / year. 
I bet that is probably high considering how they try to sell Women's Basketball Season packages for $20 with a Men's season ticket.
In general, College Basketball Coaches are overpaid and only survive due to Football. In women's hoops it is an even worse situation than the men.

I think Currie made the right decision to move on from a Head Coach that had only been to the Sweet Sixteen once in 18 years. Get someone fresh and save a $1,000,000 over the next 4 years. 

In my opinion, we should be paying our Women's Hoops Coach Brad Hill or Suzie Fritz type money.

So you did the research but you're too rough ridin' stupid to understand market value, jesus christ. Why in the hell would we pay "our Women's Hoops Coach Brad Hill or Suzie Fritz type money?" Brad Hill and Suzie Fritz aren't Big 12 women's basketball coaches, goddamned moron. Your research shows that she isn't overpaid, clown. The next coach is likely to make similar money to Deb.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on March 10, 2014, 10:12:05 PM
Currie is fixing his dumbass contract that he gave to Deb in 2008.

$600,000 in salary for Deb in 2013-2014     ( for women's basketball)


He does avoid paying out $125,000 in bonus on April 14, 2014.


If we are paying 600,000 for a women's coach, it better be someone cool like Doug Gottlieb.

Pick your knuckles up off of the ground, sexist clown. People that throw Deb's salary around need to take like 10 rough ridin' minutes of reading and research to gather some actual context of her salary. She isn't close to being overpaid when you consider the other coaches in the conference and other high major coaches that have been at one place as long as she had. Thankfully Currie is smarter than you rough ridin' idiots and he understands its a pretty good idea to pay your coaches market value.


 Henrickson $401,000   
http://www2.kusports.com/coaching_contracts/

Fennelly     $888,000
http://www.cyclones.com/ViewArticle.dbml?ATCLID=832566

Littell       $300,000
http://espn.go.com/womens-college-basketball/story/_/id/7485444/oklahoma-state-cowgirls-coach-jim-littell-earn-nearly-300000

Coale    $1.101 million
http://newsok.com/oklahoma-womens-basketball-sherri-coale-is-more-than-a-coach-shes-an-icon-for-ou/article/3940609

There is the 10 minutes of research.

I would calculate that 13,500 seats * $50/year= $675,000  in attendance revenue / year. 
I bet that is probably high considering how they try to sell Women's Basketball Season packages for $20 with a Men's season ticket.
In general, College Basketball Coaches are overpaid and only survive due to Football. In women's hoops it is an even worse situation than the men.

I think Currie made the right decision to move on from a Head Coach that had only been to the Sweet Sixteen once in 18 years. Get someone fresh and save a $1,000,000 over the next 4 years. 

In my opinion, we should be paying our Women's Hoops Coach Brad Hill or Suzie Fritz type money.

So you did the research but you're too rough ridin' stupid to understand market value, jesus christ. Why in the hell would we pay "our Women's Hoops Coach Brad Hill or Suzie Fritz type money?" Brad Hill and Suzie Fritz aren't Big 12 women's basketball coaches, goddamned moron. Your research shows that she isn't overpaid, clown. The next coach is likely to make similar money to Deb.

BOOM YOU GOT MIRed
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on March 10, 2014, 10:13:25 PM
BOOM YOU GOT MIRed

^ Has happened to me several times. :shy:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 10, 2014, 10:16:27 PM
i wonder if we could get candice jackson away from coach p at duke

great name 'sclams. I don't know why you wouldn't just hire Shalee if you would hire Jackson though, she doesn't have enough of an experience edge over Shalee to combat the people who would be pissed and call this a Ron Prince type hire. This needs to be a hire that instantly sells tickets and the only assistant who would do that is already here.

They call Joanne P. Mcallie Coach P? I thought that it was weird that whenever someone says her name, they say the P, calling her Coach P is bizarre.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: yoga-like_abana on March 10, 2014, 10:28:41 PM
how much money does ksu womens bball actually bring in?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 10, 2014, 10:44:33 PM
2012-13 season

Expenditures $3.3 million
Revenue      $366,000

That may seem crazy but, for comparison, the numbers for all of the other sports combined, not counting football and mens & womens basketball

Expenditures $8.7 million
Revenues     $469,000
You can for the most part split the revenues into baseball and volleyball because it's reported by gender and those are really the only two other sports that generate any revenue at all.
Baseball revenues for 12-13 were approximately $292,422 and volleyball was $177,386

So baseball having its best year ever, by far had a revenue of nearly 33% of women's basketball that had a 5-13 conference record. Volleyball made the NCAA tournament in 2012 and brought in nearly 66% less than women's basketball.

This, andrew von dumbass, is why you don't pay a women's basketball coach like you pay a baseball or volleyball coach.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on March 10, 2014, 11:03:14 PM
MIR is MIRing all over your faces!!!!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 10, 2014, 11:28:36 PM
got a little carried away with the percentages at the end there, but the larger point still holds
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: AndrewVonLintel on March 10, 2014, 11:58:03 PM
Option A:

Pay a new Women's Basketball Coach $600,000 as part of a 3.3 million dollar budget. If we are lucky this improves revenue from 300,000 to 600,000.   Net we lose $2.7 million  on the operation.

Option B: Pay a new Women's Basketball Coach $200,000. Lets say that revenue stays the same and we bring in $300,000. The New Women's Basketball Budget is 2.9 million because you saved $400,000 on head coach salary.  Net we lose $2.6 million dollars

Option C: Pay a new Women's Basketball Coach $200,000. Budget is 2.9 million again but this time you get an increase in revenue from 300,000 to 600,000.   Net we lose $2.3 million.

I think it is much better to try for option C and accidentally get B.  The only way it makes sense to spend a lot of money is if we hire away a coach from a big time program. Otherwise you are starting out with an unproven assistant type or upgrading a lower level head coach and why should we pay more for that?

Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on March 11, 2014, 12:00:06 AM

 :popcorn:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on March 11, 2014, 12:00:32 AM

 :popcorn:

This is gonna be good. :cheers:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: EllRobersonisInnocent on March 11, 2014, 12:00:40 AM
Personally, I'd like to see Bill Laimbeer coach the Lady Cats.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sonofdaxjones on March 11, 2014, 12:02:32 AM
Last year Baseball had $218K in Revenue.  WBB $348K.  Baseball's expenses were half of WBB expenses.   

Source-KSU 2013 NCAA Revenue and Expense Report.

Baseball could produce more if they consistently make the post season and finish towards the top of conference standings.

If current trend holds, TFS probably needs to be expanded.    Baseball also has a ton of exposure potential.  Make the NCAA postseason and stay awhile means lots of ESPN air time.





Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 11, 2014, 12:11:27 AM
Otherwise you are starting out with an unproven assistant type or upgrading a lower level head coach and why should we pay more for that?

Because you need to hire coaches, for any sport, at the going rate. Why do you continue to ignore what the market rate for coaches is? Honest question, are you grasping the concept of paying what the market dictates? Do you really want K-State to be known as the school who low balls coaches over $200,000 on a $60 million dollar budget?

Also what your projections conveniently ignore is what happens if the revenues plummet because the athletic director hires a coach for $200,000 because some of his fans don't understand basic economics. Does, you get what you pay for mean anything to you? We're hiring a coach that needs to produce revenues for the 3rd highest revenue producing sport on campus, we aren't shopping for canned goods at Aldi. Sheesh.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: resident LibBot dick holder on March 11, 2014, 12:17:39 AM
love this great back and forth about who loses less money
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: resident LibBot dick holder on March 11, 2014, 12:22:31 AM
market value or not, paying a head coach twice the potential revenue is really ridiculous.  why are women's basketball (and i'm sure other non-revenue sports) head coaching salaries so inflated?  seems like a $60-80k job at most
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 11, 2014, 12:24:14 AM
Last year Baseball had $218K in Revenue.  WBB $348K.  Baseball's expenses were half of WBB expenses.   

Source-KSU 2013 NCAA Revenue and Expense Report.

Baseball could produce more if they consistently make the post season and finish towards the top of conference standings.

If current trend holds, TFS probably needs to be expanded.    Baseball also has a ton of exposure potential.  Make the NCAA postseason and stay awhile means lots of ESPN air time.

I'm sure you're aware that wbb expenditures can't be cut and baseball expenditures will increase with increases in revenue. Obviously we both would love for both to produce more money. If they both sports produce maximum revenue women's basketball will still out perform baseball for all schools outside of the SEC and ACC; see Nebraska where their wbb team had the same amount of revenue than all of their non football/basketball mens sports.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 11, 2014, 12:25:55 AM
market value or not, paying a head coach twice the potential revenue is really ridiculous.  why are women's basketball (and i'm sure other non-revenue sports) head coaching salaries so inflated?  seems like a $60-80k job at most

Honestly, why would you dumb down this conversation even more than it already is? Do you actually want an answer to this question, certainly you're smarter than that? Right?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 11, 2014, 12:31:49 AM
There's no way this is accurate but Wichita State reports their revenue as follows

Men's Basketball $5.3 million
Women's Basketball $1.7 million
Baseball approx. $4 million
Volleyball approx. $3 million

They're clearly hiding men's basketball and baseball revenues and expenditures within their women's numbers.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: resident LibBot dick holder on March 11, 2014, 12:33:37 AM
market value or not, paying a head coach twice the potential revenue is really ridiculous.  why are women's basketball (and i'm sure other non-revenue sports) head coaching salaries so inflated?  seems like a $60-80k job at most

Honestly, why would you dumb down this conversation even more than it already is? Do you actually want an answer to this question, certainly you're smarter than that? Right?

i'm serious.  i understand the value of having non-revenue sports, and the opportunities it creates for many young people and expanding the brand of the university.  i'm ok with that trade off (even though i make joke about dropping everything but fb and mbb).  but a head coach of those sports should have a salary somewhat equal to your average teacher/professor at that university.

getting paid 600k and only bringing in 366k is just irresponsible though, use that extra 500k and spend it on the athletes.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 11, 2014, 01:05:43 AM
market value or not, paying a head coach twice the potential revenue is really ridiculous.  why are women's basketball (and i'm sure other non-revenue sports) head coaching salaries so inflated?  seems like a $60-80k job at most

Honestly, why would you dumb down this conversation even more than it already is? Do you actually want an answer to this question, certainly you're smarter than that? Right?

i'm serious.  i understand the value of having non-revenue sports, and the opportunities it creates for many young people and expanding the brand of the university.  i'm ok with that trade off (even though i make joke about dropping everything but fb and mbb).  but a head coach of those sports should have a salary somewhat equal to your average teacher/professor at that university.

getting paid 600k and only bringing in 366k is just irresponsible though, use that extra 500k and spend it on the athletes.

Again it isn't what you or anyone else thinks what they should be making, the market dictates the value. An individual athletic director cannot lower the value of the contract. You want non revenue coaches to make $85,000, you better make a pact between all athletic directors to keep the salaries that low. However, I'm sure you're aware COLUSION is very illegal. There is a free market so people who want the best coaches will pay them truckloads of money so that money trickles down to everyone. Are you advocating that we ditch capitalism for womens basketball coaches?

The logic that wbb coaches should be paid like professors is asinine. Even at $300,000, there aren't professors bringing that amount of money into the university. Did you see what I listed for the revenues of some of the other programs? Find me the professor that brings in $1 million a year into the university.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: resident LibBot dick holder on March 11, 2014, 01:21:50 AM
i had a part typed out that since market values is what it is, that we should pay that, but figured you were smart enough to know i was talking about the system as a whole and not ksu specifically so i deleted it.

i'm not talking about COLUSION or anything, calm down.  i'm saying my market value view of these coaches is around 100k.  if you started coaching the basketball team tomorrow for 100k, it doesn't even matter how much revenue drops off because the school already saved more than the team was "worth" in the first place.  the animal makes like $350k right?  do you think a women's basketball coach is worth twice the value of the university president?  that's absurd.

football and mbb salaries are inflated too (in my opinion), but at least they bring huge amounts of value.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sys on March 11, 2014, 01:46:49 AM
The logic that wbb coaches should be paid like professors is asinine. Even at $300,000, there aren't professors bringing that amount of money into the university.

tons of professors bring in that kind of money in annual grants.  i don't have data in front of me, but i'd say it's closer to the truth that a prof at a serious research university (in the sciences) that isn't bringing in at least that is likely not going to receive tenure (same thing as being fired).
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: TownieCat on March 11, 2014, 08:26:02 AM
I'll be curious to see the 13-14 revenues/expenses for baseball and WBB. Baseball was coming off of a pretty down year in 2012, so season ticket sales, hype, etc. were not very high. I bet that gap closed considerably this year...

Also, there are only a couple of baseball programs that break even each year. There are not a lot of WBB who manage this (43 in 2012), but there several more than baseball.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Chingon on March 11, 2014, 08:53:00 AM
The logic that wbb coaches should be paid like professors is asinine. Even at $300,000, there aren't professors bringing that amount of money into the university.

tons of professors bring in that kind of money in annual grants.  i don't have data in front of me, but i'd say it's closer to the truth that a prof at a serious research university (in the sciences) that isn't bringing in at least that is likely not going to receive tenure (same thing as being fired).

Yup
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Chingon on March 11, 2014, 08:55:57 AM
I'll be curious to see the 13-14 revenues/expenses for baseball and WBB. Baseball was coming off of a pretty down year in 2012, so season ticket sales, hype, etc. were not very high. I bet that gap closed considerably this year...

Also, there are only a couple of baseball programs that break even each year. There are not a lot of WBB who manage this (43 in 2012), but there several more than baseball.
http://grfx.cstv.com/photos/schools/ksu/genrel/auto_pdf/2013-14/misc_non_event/FY13AuditorReportFinancials.pdf
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Daddy Claxton on March 11, 2014, 09:23:24 AM
http://m.okstate.com/m/sports/w-baskbl/mtt/annan_bill00.html

I assume this guy will submit a resume' to currie. Had some really good high school teams and now he has some decent college experience.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: TownieCat on March 11, 2014, 09:24:55 AM
I'll be curious to see the 13-14 revenues/expenses for baseball and WBB. Baseball was coming off of a pretty down year in 2012, so season ticket sales, hype, etc. were not very high. I bet that gap closed considerably this year...

Also, there are only a couple of baseball programs that break even each year. There are not a lot of WBB who manage this (43 in 2012), but there several more than baseball.
http://grfx.cstv.com/photos/schools/ksu/genrel/auto_pdf/2013-14/misc_non_event/FY13AuditorReportFinancials.pdf

That is for FY12-13. I'm referring to FY13-14 that doesn't end until June 30.

Either way, those sheets suggest the difference in revenue produced by WBB and BSB last year is the $43K WBB charged for parking...
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on March 11, 2014, 09:28:25 AM

http://m.okstate.com/m/sports/w-baskbl/mtt/annan_bill00.html

I assume this guy will submit a resume' to currie. Had some really good high school teams and now he has some decent college experience.

He coaches at my high school the first two years I was there before he left for Oklahoma State. Won state 2 or 3 times dominated Centennial league. He bleeds purple deep down. Great guy.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 11, 2014, 09:31:17 AM
market value or not, paying a head coach twice the potential revenue is really ridiculous.  why are women's basketball (and i'm sure other non-revenue sports) head coaching salaries so inflated?  seems like a $60-80k job at most

Honestly, why would you dumb down this conversation even more than it already is? Do you actually want an answer to this question, certainly you're smarter than that? Right?

i'm serious.  i understand the value of having non-revenue sports, and the opportunities it creates for many young people and expanding the brand of the university.  i'm ok with that trade off (even though i make joke about dropping everything but fb and mbb).  but a head coach of those sports should have a salary somewhat equal to your average teacher/professor at that university.

getting paid 600k and only bringing in 366k is just irresponsible though, use that extra 500k and spend it on the athletes.

Again it isn't what you or anyone else thinks what they should be making, the market dictates the value. An individual athletic director cannot lower the value of the contract. You want non revenue coaches to make $85,000, you better make a pact between all athletic directors to keep the salaries that low. However, I'm sure you're aware COLUSION is very illegal. There is a free market so people who want the best coaches will pay them truckloads of money so that money trickles down to everyone. Are you advocating that we ditch capitalism for womens basketball coaches?

The logic that wbb coaches should be paid like professors is asinine. Even at $300,000, there aren't professors bringing that amount of money into the university. Did you see what I listed for the revenues of some of the other programs? Find me the professor that brings in $1 million a year into the university.

Do you think Deb's salary played a role in her termination?  I think it got too high and she wasn't winning enough to justify it.

If she had been sitting at 200k i think she is still coaching at KSU.  But, to your point, 2 time conference champs demand more.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 11, 2014, 09:33:34 AM
The logic that wbb coaches should be paid like professors is asinine. Even at $300,000, there aren't professors bringing that amount of money into the university.

tons of professors bring in that kind of money in annual grants.  i don't have data in front of me, but i'd say it's closer to the truth that a prof at a serious research university (in the sciences) that isn't bringing in at least that is likely not going to receive tenure (same thing as being fired).

Yup

I take issue with "tons" but yes professors bring in grants to their departments and the university. Point is an average women's basketball coach has the potential to and should bring more attention and money to a university than a professor. Comparing their financial impact is silly.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 11, 2014, 09:36:15 AM
http://m.okstate.com/m/sports/w-baskbl/mtt/annan_bill00.html

I assume this guy will submit a resume' to currie. Had some really good high school teams and now he has some decent college experience.

Texas Tech hired another assistant off of that staff last spring. I don't think that hire would be what the program needs in the short term.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 11, 2014, 09:40:54 AM
I'll be curious to see the 13-14 revenues/expenses for baseball and WBB. Baseball was coming off of a pretty down year in 2012, so season ticket sales, hype, etc. were not very high. I bet that gap closed considerably this year...

Also, there are only a couple of baseball programs that break even each year. There are not a lot of WBB who manage this (43 in 2012), but there several more than baseball.
http://grfx.cstv.com/photos/schools/ksu/genrel/auto_pdf/2013-14/misc_non_event/FY13AuditorReportFinancials.pdf

That is for FY12-13. I'm referring to FY13-14 that doesn't end until June 30.

Either way, those sheets suggest the difference in revenue produced by WBB and BSB last year is the $43K WBB charged for parking...

I'd guess that baseball and women's basketball revenues will be nearly identical if not more for baseball when the 13-14 numbers are released. The season ticket revenue for baseball, I'd guess is at a record high but wbb ticket revenue is essentially at its floor.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 11, 2014, 09:45:50 AM
market value or not, paying a head coach twice the potential revenue is really ridiculous.  why are women's basketball (and i'm sure other non-revenue sports) head coaching salaries so inflated?  seems like a $60-80k job at most

Honestly, why would you dumb down this conversation even more than it already is? Do you actually want an answer to this question, certainly you're smarter than that? Right?

i'm serious.  i understand the value of having non-revenue sports, and the opportunities it creates for many young people and expanding the brand of the university.  i'm ok with that trade off (even though i make joke about dropping everything but fb and mbb).  but a head coach of those sports should have a salary somewhat equal to your average teacher/professor at that university.

getting paid 600k and only bringing in 366k is just irresponsible though, use that extra 500k and spend it on the athletes.

Again it isn't what you or anyone else thinks what they should be making, the market dictates the value. An individual athletic director cannot lower the value of the contract. You want non revenue coaches to make $85,000, you better make a pact between all athletic directors to keep the salaries that low. However, I'm sure you're aware COLUSION is very illegal. There is a free market so people who want the best coaches will pay them truckloads of money so that money trickles down to everyone. Are you advocating that we ditch capitalism for womens basketball coaches?

The logic that wbb coaches should be paid like professors is asinine. Even at $300,000, there aren't professors bringing that amount of money into the university. Did you see what I listed for the revenues of some of the other programs? Find me the professor that brings in $1 million a year into the university.

Do you think Deb's salary played a role in her termination?  I think it got too high and she wasn't winning enough to justify it.

If she had been sitting at 200k i think she is still coaching at KSU.  But, to your point, 2 time conference champs demand more.

No I don't think her salary played a role at all, even if she made $30,000 the revenues are still plummeting. We can't afford to keep bleeding revenue. If Deb would have come back for 14-15 I think the team would be much better but season ticket sales would drop again.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Daddy Claxton on March 11, 2014, 09:52:32 AM
http://m.okstate.com/m/sports/w-baskbl/mtt/annan_bill00.html

I assume this guy will submit a resume' to currie. Had some really good high school teams and now he has some decent college experience.

Texas Tech hired another assistant off of that staff last spring. I don't think that hire would be what the program needs in the short term.

I don't disagree, but what does the program need in the short term that Annan wouldn't bring?  I have no idea what Annan brings, but on the surface he looks like someone the KSU wbb crowd would get behind.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 11, 2014, 10:21:42 AM
market value or not, paying a head coach twice the potential revenue is really ridiculous.  why are women's basketball (and i'm sure other non-revenue sports) head coaching salaries so inflated?  seems like a $60-80k job at most

Honestly, why would you dumb down this conversation even more than it already is? Do you actually want an answer to this question, certainly you're smarter than that? Right?

i'm serious.  i understand the value of having non-revenue sports, and the opportunities it creates for many young people and expanding the brand of the university.  i'm ok with that trade off (even though i make joke about dropping everything but fb and mbb).  but a head coach of those sports should have a salary somewhat equal to your average teacher/professor at that university.

getting paid 600k and only bringing in 366k is just irresponsible though, use that extra 500k and spend it on the athletes.

Again it isn't what you or anyone else thinks what they should be making, the market dictates the value. An individual athletic director cannot lower the value of the contract. You want non revenue coaches to make $85,000, you better make a pact between all athletic directors to keep the salaries that low. However, I'm sure you're aware COLUSION is very illegal. There is a free market so people who want the best coaches will pay them truckloads of money so that money trickles down to everyone. Are you advocating that we ditch capitalism for womens basketball coaches?

The logic that wbb coaches should be paid like professors is asinine. Even at $300,000, there aren't professors bringing that amount of money into the university. Did you see what I listed for the revenues of some of the other programs? Find me the professor that brings in $1 million a year into the university.

Do you think Deb's salary played a role in her termination?  I think it got too high and she wasn't winning enough to justify it.

If she had been sitting at 200k i think she is still coaching at KSU.  But, to your point, 2 time conference champs demand more.

No I don't think her salary played a role at all, even if she made $30,000 the revenues are still plummeting. We can't afford to keep bleeding revenue. If Deb would have come back for 14-15 I think the team would be much better but season ticket sales would drop again.

So, no difference between paying $30k and $600k.   :dubious:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: PIPE on March 11, 2014, 10:26:15 AM
http://m.okstate.com/m/sports/w-baskbl/mtt/annan_bill00.html

I assume this guy will submit a resume' to currie. Had some really good high school teams and now he has some decent college experience.

Texas Tech hired another assistant off of that staff last spring. I don't think that hire would be what the program needs in the short term.

I don't disagree, but what does the program need in the short term that Annan wouldn't bring?  I have no idea what Annan brings, but on the surface he looks like someone the KSU wbb crowd would get behind.

Bill Annan was my typing teacher at Seaman High School and the boys assistant coach.  You won't find a nicer guy.  I remember like 2 years ago I was watching the girls play and they were playing OSu, and they showed the bench and I saw Bill, and I screamed at the wife, hey that was my typing teaching in HS.  I had no idea he had entered the college ranks. 
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 11, 2014, 10:49:22 AM
http://m.okstate.com/m/sports/w-baskbl/mtt/annan_bill00.html

I assume this guy will submit a resume' to currie. Had some really good high school teams and now he has some decent college experience.

Texas Tech hired another assistant off of that staff last spring. I don't think that hire would be what the program needs in the short term.

I don't disagree, but what does the program need in the short term that Annan wouldn't bring?  I have no idea what Annan brings, but on the surface he looks like someone the KSU wbb crowd would get behind.

Take that he was at Seman out of the equation, because like 7 people care about that, what about his resume would excite you or indicate that he's ready for this job? Shalee has more experience as a college assistant than Annan does.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on March 11, 2014, 10:58:28 AM
http://m.okstate.com/m/sports/w-baskbl/mtt/annan_bill00.html

I assume this guy will submit a resume' to currie. Had some really good high school teams and now he has some decent college experience.

Texas Tech hired another assistant off of that staff last spring. I don't think that hire would be what the program needs in the short term.

I don't disagree, but what does the program need in the short term that Annan wouldn't bring?  I have no idea what Annan brings, but on the surface he looks like someone the KSU wbb crowd would get behind.

Take that he was at Seman out of the equation, because like 7 people care about that, what about his resume would excite you or indicate that he's ready for this job? Shalee has more experience as a college assistant than Annan does.

He made his name at Washburn Rural
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Daddy Claxton on March 11, 2014, 11:06:14 AM

Take that he was at Seman out of the equation, because like 7 people care about that, what about his resume would excite you or indicate that he's ready for this job? Shalee has more experience as a college assistant than Annan does.

All I can tell from his resume is that he has steadily moved up in program that has been going in the right direction since he got there. His accomplishments at hs level are also solid. I have no reason to believe he would be better or worse than Lehning. I know little to nothing valuable about either one. I thought you were referring to something specific that the KSU program needed. I was just curious what that was.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on March 11, 2014, 11:08:00 AM
i wonder if we could get candice jackson away from coach p at duke

great name 'sclams. I don't know why you wouldn't just hire Shalee if you would hire Jackson though, she doesn't have enough of an experience edge over Shalee to combat the people who would be pissed and call this a Ron Prince type hire. This needs to be a hire that instantly sells tickets and the only assistant who would do that is already here.

They call Joanne P. Mcallie Coach P? I thought that it was weird that whenever someone says her name, they say the P, calling her Coach P is bizarre.

ya the p is for her maiden name palombo

the lineage jackson brings in is tough to beat + shalee might be too young and too connected to deb in currie's eyes...just speculating
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 11, 2014, 11:17:17 AM

Take that he was at Seman out of the equation, because like 7 people care about that, what about his resume would excite you or indicate that he's ready for this job? Shalee has more experience as a college assistant than Annan does.

All I can tell from his resume is that he has steadily moved up in program that has been going in the right direction since he got there. His accomplishments at hs level are also solid. I have no reason to believe he would be better or worse than Lehning. I know little to nothing valuable about either one. I thought you were referring to something specific that the KSU program needed. I was just curious what that was.

The program needs someone who will come in here and sell tickets, energize the fan base. For women's basketball making money is more important than winning, in the long term they go hand in hand. I don't think we can rebuild with a high school coach. I don't think his resume indicates that he is ready for this job yet. Shalee is in the same boat but we'd sell a lot of tickets and the fans would give her a lot of room to grow within the job.

Now I'm all in with Shalee or Jody Adams.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Daddy Claxton on March 11, 2014, 11:44:09 AM

Take that he was at Seman out of the equation, because like 7 people care about that, what about his resume would excite you or indicate that he's ready for this job? Shalee has more experience as a college assistant than Annan does.

All I can tell from his resume is that he has steadily moved up in program that has been going in the right direction since he got there. His accomplishments at hs level are also solid. I have no reason to believe he would be better or worse than Lehning. I know little to nothing valuable about either one. I thought you were referring to something specific that the KSU program needed. I was just curious what that was.

The program needs someone who will come in here and sell tickets, energize the fan base. For women's basketball making money is more important than winning, in the long term they go hand in hand. I don't think we can rebuild with a high school coach. I don't think his resume indicates that he is ready for this job yet. Shalee is in the same boat but we'd sell a lot of tickets and the fans would give her a lot of room to grow within the job.

Now I'm all in with Shalee or Jody Adams.

I'd consider Annan more than a high school coach. He's Assoc
Head Coach of a top 20 team. Otherwise I fully agree with you. Adams seems like the best possibility. I wouldn't be upset with either Lehning or Annan.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: joda on March 11, 2014, 12:04:12 PM
It seems like we've had this conversation before, just switch out Shalee, Annan, and Adams for Underwood, Gottlieb, and Marshall
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on March 11, 2014, 12:24:49 PM

It seems like we've had this conversation before, just switch out Shalee, Annan, and Adams for Underwood, Gottlieb, and Marshall

Annan is a cool dude but don't compare him with Gottlieb.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: joda on March 11, 2014, 12:32:56 PM

It seems like we've had this conversation before, just switch out Shalee, Annan, and Adams for Underwood, Gottlieb, and Marshall

Annan is a cool dude but don't compare him with Gottlieb.

I actually kind of merge Shalee/Annon and Underwood/Gottlieb rather than a direct switch but the point remains the same.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: puniraptor on March 11, 2014, 01:23:01 PM
Mir, are you willing to break a sink if they dont hire Shalee?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on March 11, 2014, 01:30:10 PM
Mir, are you willing to break a sink if they dont hire Shalee?

i am so honored to be apart of the one and only sink destruction in BID and OOD history.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 11, 2014, 01:33:12 PM
Mir, are you willing to break a sink if they dont hire Shalee?

lol. I don't agree with joda with the thinking that this is a similar conversation but I'll play along.

I'd be willing to organize a multi-city rally in support of Shalee but I'd break a sink and #bid if they hired Annan.

Currie isn't from here so I don't really have to worry about him hiring this dude because he's from Topeka, that seems like a Weiser thing to do.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: PIPE on March 11, 2014, 02:00:59 PM
MIR, first learn how to spell Seaman right, not  :jerk:

2nd, I did not say I wanted him, just he is a nice guy and a hell of a typing teacher, as I am somewhat decent at typing and I owe it to him.....

3rd, a Shalee hire would be risky.  She has only been on staff for a short while, but has proven to be a heck of a recruiter.  I would love her to stay on staff, even as an assistant, to "keep the peace" and continue bringing girls in.  JDK if she is ready for the HC gig.  But, since most of this thread has turned into dollars and revenue's, then I guess we could get her cheap.....
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Benja on March 11, 2014, 02:20:01 PM
We hire a coach yet?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Asteriskhead on March 11, 2014, 02:24:21 PM
We hire a coach yet?

Currie is locked in a hotel room in Oklahoma City right now.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: EllRobersonisInnocent on March 11, 2014, 02:35:27 PM
I'm going to write an email to Currie requesting that we burn down the WBB program in order to bring men's soccer to K-State.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: TownieCat on March 11, 2014, 02:46:31 PM
I'm going to write an email to Currie requesting that we burn down the WBB program in order to bring men's soccer to K-State.

Great idea. Let's bring in another sport for me to not follow.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Asteriskhead on March 11, 2014, 02:49:10 PM
I'm going to write an email to Currie requesting that we burn down the WBB program in order to bring men's soccer to K-State.

Great idea. Let's bring in another sport for me to not follow.

If we're just going ignore to Title IX, I'd rather see wrestling come back.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Benja on March 11, 2014, 02:57:04 PM
I vote we try to compete at the ncaa level in lacross or rugby. Both are pretty awesome.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: CNS on March 11, 2014, 03:29:48 PM
I'm going to write an email to Currie requesting that we burn down the WBB program in order to bring men's soccer to K-State.

Great idea. Let's bring in another sport for me to not follow.

What is the market rate for a soccer coach?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on March 11, 2014, 04:22:04 PM
I vote we try to compete at the ncaa level in lacross or rugby. Both are pretty awesome.

Agreed (although I don't know crap about either) but would prefer women's soccer.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on March 11, 2014, 05:36:43 PM
K-State will never add sports unless we are mandated too you fools.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on March 11, 2014, 05:41:06 PM
K-State will never add sports unless we are mandated too you fools.

Neither of us were serious
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: AndrewVonLintel on March 11, 2014, 05:42:23 PM
More Financial talk about our three candidates that Currie will ignore.

1. Adams original 2008 contract had a base salary of $160,000 which was then upgraded to $175,000 in 2010. lot of little bonuses were added that I don't care about.

http://media.kansas.com/smedia/2013/03/15/15/09/153kYf.So.80.pdf

If Adams were to be hired away from Wichita State, I would be comfortable paying her $250,000 (with $30,000 bonus for every NCAA tournament win)

2.  If we were to hire an Assistant as the new head coach (Shalee Lehning), I would prefer $150,000 (with $30,000 bonus for every NCAA tournament win).

Would Shalee take the job for that?  I bet she would. The true Women's basketball fans would be happy and ticket sales would go up based on name recognition and Deb Patterson Fatigue wearing off.

3.  If we were to hire Geno Auriemma, I would be comfortable paying $2,000,000.  I realize that it would be worth it in publicity to steal a hall of fame coach away from someone and we would recoup some of the cash in tickets and TV money. Essentially it would be an expensive but fantastic commercial for K-State.

Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on March 11, 2014, 05:45:39 PM
Wait, people actually think we have a shot at Auriemma?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on March 11, 2014, 05:46:56 PM
3.  If we were to hire Geno Auriemma, I would be comfortable paying $2,000,000.  I realize that it would be worth it in publicity to steal a hall of fame coach away from someone and we would recoup some of the cash in tickets and TV money. Essentially it would be an expensive but fantastic commercial for K-State.

would be all in for this

Wait, people actually think we have a shot at Auriemma?

no, it will not happen.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sonofdaxjones on March 11, 2014, 09:14:54 PM
Deb is going to ride off into the Sunset with another $150K in her pocket.  She's going get her longevity bonus and $25K severance.



Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: wetwillie on March 11, 2014, 09:30:09 PM
Deb is going to ride off into the Sunset with another $150K in her pocket.  She's going get her longevity bonus and $25K



Quote from:  Deb
You should never feel sorry for someone who makes as much money as me
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: AndrewVonLintel on March 11, 2014, 09:32:42 PM
We gave her another $150,000 ...........  :sdeek: :flush:

I actually gained some respect for Currie until he did that.

What an awful contract this was......
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on March 11, 2014, 09:57:19 PM
If we spend the cost of airfare on this coaching search it will be money down the drain.  Hire the hot chick and then reanimate tex winter, put his brain in a pants suit and make it assistant coach.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: The Big Train on March 11, 2014, 10:50:06 PM
K-State will never add sports unless we are mandated too you fools.

We need softball, like now, that way my future wife can get recruited/and or transfer and then I make her my wife.

Also, soccer is stupid and I hope we never add that.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on March 11, 2014, 10:54:44 PM

K-State will never add sports unless we are mandated too you fools.

We need softball, like now, that way my future wife can get recruited/and or transfer and then I make her my wife.

Also, soccer is stupid and I hope we never add that.

You and #life are the two worst posters on this site.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: The Big Train on March 11, 2014, 10:56:10 PM

K-State will never add sports unless we are mandated too you fools.

We need softball, like now, that way my future wife can get recruited/and or transfer and then I make her my wife.

Also, soccer is stupid and I hope we never add that.

You and #life are the two worst posters on this site.

 :lol: only half of that is true, and you know the half that is true
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 11, 2014, 11:00:04 PM
More Financial talk about our three candidates that Currie will ignore.

1. Adams original 2008 contract had a base salary of $160,000 which was then upgraded to $175,000 in 2010. lot of little bonuses were added that I don't care about.

http://media.kansas.com/smedia/2013/03/15/15/09/153kYf.So.80.pdf

If Adams were to be hired away from Wichita State, I would be comfortable paying her $250,000 (with $30,000 bonus for every NCAA tournament win)

2.  If we were to hire an Assistant as the new head coach (Shalee Lehning), I would prefer $150,000 (with $30,000 bonus for every NCAA tournament win).

Would Shalee take the job for that?  I bet she would. The true Women's basketball fans would be happy and ticket sales would go up based on name recognition and Deb Patterson Fatigue wearing off.

3.  If we were to hire Geno Auriemma, I would be comfortable paying $2,000,000.  I realize that it would be worth it in publicity to steal a hall of fame coach away from someone and we would recoup some of the cash in tickets and TV money. Essentially it would be an expensive but fantastic commercial for K-State.

Who the eff cares what you would feel comfortable paying someone?

Also all this talk of who should be making what is very overtly sexist and extremely offensive.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: eastcat on March 12, 2014, 12:38:25 AM

K-State will never add sports unless we are mandated too you fools.

We need softball, like now, that way my future wife can get recruited/and or transfer and then I make her my wife.

Also, soccer is stupid and I hope we never add that.

You and #life are the two worst posters on this site.

agreed  :thumbs:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on March 12, 2014, 01:02:31 AM
I guess some people just don't like soccer. Me? I'm OK with it.

 
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: The Big Train on March 12, 2014, 07:09:43 AM
This is probably the first time eastcat hasn't been lumped into a "worst posters" post, I can see why he's happy
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: TownieCat on March 12, 2014, 08:19:32 AM
I bet we pay the new coach at least $400K. We are K-State. We can afford it.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on March 12, 2014, 08:41:03 AM
This is probably the first time eastcat hasn't been lumped into a "worst posters" post, I can see why he's happy

Ha, I thought the same thing.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: eastcat on March 12, 2014, 11:49:45 AM
This is probably the first time eastcat hasn't been lumped into a "worst posters" post, I can see why he's happy

Ha, I thought the same thing.

Shut your Jacob Pullen hating, worst poster mouths.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on March 12, 2014, 11:50:42 AM
This is probably the first time eastcat hasn't been lumped into a "worst posters" post, I can see why he's happy

Ha, I thought the same thing.

Shut your Jacob Pullen hating, worst poster mouths.

 :ROFL:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: emawmason on March 12, 2014, 01:16:31 PM
If anyone lives in the Hutchinson area or follows NJCAA teams in the state of Kansas, Hutchinson Community College coach John Ontjes should be at least interviewed for the job. He has an undefeated #3 team right now. He played college basketball at Oklahoma and averaged 10.5 ppg in 2 years there. Also with a good team this year, could set up a better recruiting class for the women at least for the next two years.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: ChiCat on March 12, 2014, 01:19:32 PM
I'm going to go out on a limb and say Geno Auriemma is not an option.  Call me crazy if you want.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 12, 2014, 01:28:13 PM
If anyone lives in the Hutchinson area or follows NJCAA teams in the state of Kansas, Hutchinson Community College coach John Ontjes should be at least interviewed for the job. He has an undefeated #3 team right now. He played college basketball at Oklahoma and averaged 10.5 ppg in 2 years there. Also with a good team this year, could set up a better recruiting class for the women at least for the next two years.

Is this a damn joke? JFC, why do you guys keep advocating for these terrible candidates? Would you want the men to hire a freaking community college coach? Let WSU hire him after we take Jodi Adams. From the Jayhawk Conference to a high major college basketball program with a devoted fan following and very good history, I mean sheesh guys.  Let's hire Troy Morrill or whatever to replace LHC Bill Snyder too.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: EllRobersonisInnocent on March 12, 2014, 01:29:13 PM
Does Mr. Mall still coach the MHS girls team? He'd be a good hire.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Asteriskhead on March 12, 2014, 01:54:07 PM
let's hire the girls bball coach from my junior high. they won a few games. he's retired now, but he has a ksu connection (he was a place kicker and punter here).
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: puniraptor on March 12, 2014, 01:56:08 PM
i think that a lady should get to be the ladyball coach. there are enough glass ceilings as it is, they dont need to compete with a bunch of toupees.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Asteriskhead on March 12, 2014, 01:58:03 PM
i think that a lady should get to be the ladyball coach. there are enough glass ceilings as it is, they dont need to compete with a bunch of toupees.

The majority of us are being facetious and want Shalee.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: puniraptor on March 12, 2014, 01:59:10 PM
i think that a lady should get to be the ladyball coach. there are enough glass ceilings as it is, they dont need to compete with a bunch of toupees.

The majority of us are being facetious and want Shalee.

there are a bunch of dude ladyball coaches and my message was for any of them that may be thinking about appying for this opening.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: PIPE on March 12, 2014, 02:00:12 PM
I hope the new coach is decent looking (Shalee) :whistle1: :whistle1: :fatty: :love:

I hope it's not the Jodi Adams gal....... :horrorsurprise:

Sorry MIR
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: EllRobersonisInnocent on March 12, 2014, 02:01:04 PM
Claire Coggins
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Asteriskhead on March 12, 2014, 02:06:26 PM
I hope the new coach is decent looking (Shalee) :whistle1: :whistle1: :fatty: :love:

I hope it's not the Jodi Adams gal....... :horrorsurprise:

Sorry MIR

Good grief. Get better or stop posting.

Claire Coggins

I don't think she has enough experience yet. I'd like Shalee to get hired and retain her, though.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on March 12, 2014, 02:36:48 PM
what about hiring ben ji's dog?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Winters on March 12, 2014, 03:17:16 PM
what about hiring ben ji's dog?
Can he recruit?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Asteriskhead on March 12, 2014, 03:18:53 PM
what about hiring ben ji's dog?
Can she recruit?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 12, 2014, 03:22:55 PM
I hope the new coach is decent looking (Shalee) :whistle1: :whistle1: :fatty: :love:

I hope it's not the Jodi Adams gal....... :horrorsurprise:

Sorry MIR

I hope you're the first person to ever die of face herpes


sorry PIPE
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Winters on March 12, 2014, 04:27:04 PM
what about hiring ben ji's dog?
Can she recruit?
thanks, dude  :shy:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: slobber on March 12, 2014, 04:49:39 PM
Does Mr. Mall still coach the MHS girls team? He'd be a good hire.
He also has some Nemaha Valley in his bloodlines. Would be a great get.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: AndrewVonLintel on March 12, 2014, 04:59:31 PM
I'm going to go out on a limb and say Geno Auriemma is not an option.  Call me crazy if you want.

This is so sexist.   The next thing you are going to tell me is that K-State's mens  and women's basketball coaches should make different amounts of money. :shakesfist:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on March 13, 2014, 12:18:12 AM
Take this to the bank. Brian Agler will not be rehired.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 13, 2014, 03:00:29 AM
Take this to the bank. Brian Agler will not be rehired.

that rough ridin' guy, I can't believe he was successful in the WNBA
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Daddy Claxton on March 13, 2014, 08:53:34 AM
If anyone lives in the Hutchinson area or follows NJCAA teams in the state of Kansas, Hutchinson Community College coach John Ontjes should be at least interviewed for the job. He has an undefeated #3 team right now. He played college basketball at Oklahoma and averaged 10.5 ppg in 2 years there. Also with a good team this year, could set up a better recruiting class for the women at least for the next two years.

Is this a damn joke? JFC, why do you guys keep advocating for these terrible candidates? Would you want the men to hire a freaking community college coach? Let WSU hire him after we take Jodi Adams. From the Jayhawk Conference to a high major college basketball program with a devoted fan following and very good history, I mean sheesh guys.  Let's hire Troy Morrill or whatever to replace LHC LHC Bill Snyder too.

Uh, you're the one wanting to organize a rally to hire a 27 year old who's only experience beyond moonlighting between wnba seasons is like 2 years as the second assistant on a losing team.

I don't mean to say that Lehning would be a bad hire or that anyone else should be hired. I'd be pissed if Troy Morill was hired to replace Snyder. I'd also be pissed if Blake Seiler were hired to replace Snyder, which would be equivalent to Lehning IMO. 
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: The Whale on March 13, 2014, 09:26:41 AM
#Pearl4KSU
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 14, 2014, 09:40:37 AM
Granted it depends on the way it is phrased, I don't think there is anything sexist about wanting a good looking coach. To imply that as a guy I can't want a good looking female coach is absurd. Talking about how dreamy our men's players are is nbd, but if you want an attractive female coach you are a sexist pig? give me a rough ridin' break. I want everyone associated with KSU to be good looking.

Sorry MIR
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 14, 2014, 05:34:36 PM
 :Wha: sundance¥kid wants LHC Bill Snyder fired and wants to hire Rick Neuheisel
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 14, 2014, 05:56:44 PM
:Wha: sundance¥kid wants LHC Bill Snyder fired and wants to hire Rick Neuheisel


Hahahah no not at all. I just think it is possible to want us to have an attractive head coach for the women's basketball team and it not be sexist. If Gottleib looked like Weber, he wouldn't have gotten a rally outside of Bramlage. I think women have come far enough to not be treated with kid gloves. That it is possible to appreciate a woman for her beauty and also respect her ability to be badass at what she does. Yes, you will have your fans that are in the stands solely to fantasize about the players, coaches, (just as their are female fans of men's sports that find the players attractive, desirable, worth fantasizing over) making crap ass remarks and they should be rebuked for doing so fore they are gross and sexist. It is human nature to gravitate towards beauty, I don't think that is inherently wrong or shameful to recognize and admit that.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: nicname on March 15, 2014, 04:14:20 PM
Wecker.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: CNS on March 15, 2014, 05:20:02 PM
Wecker.

Oh man
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: wetwillie on March 15, 2014, 05:45:42 PM
Wecker.

Oh man

Can someone give a recap of exactly what went down with her?  I didn't follow it closely back then and only really know that a kc star reporter basically said that deb would hold pre meal chapel and the players felt obligated to attend.  Also that wecker was cutoff from the program after she left. 
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 'taterblast on March 15, 2014, 07:30:59 PM
from currie's letter...

Quote
including ranking as one of the top-15 winningest programs in women’s basketball history,

is this true?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: BKCat on March 15, 2014, 07:55:16 PM
from currie's letter...

Quote
including ranking as one of the top-15 winningest programs in women’s basketball history,

is this true?

http://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/stats/w_basketball_RB/2012/DI.pdf (http://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/stats/w_basketball_RB/2012/DI.pdf)

bottom left of page 28 (3rd column is number of wins), this is through the 2011 season:

 1. Tennessee ..........................................................1903 58 1,164 256 .819
 2. Louisiana Tech ....................................................1975 37 1,000 212 .825
 3. Old Dominion .......................................................1970 42 929 325 .741
 4. James Madison ....................................................1921 89 906 488 .650
 5. Stephen F. Austin ................................................1969 43 904 375 .707
 6. Texas ................................................................1977 35 867 295 .746
 7. Ohio St. .............................................................1966 46 860 363 .703
 8. Tennessee Tech ..................................................1971 41 837 414 .669
 9. Stanford..............................................................1977 35 831 275 .751
 10. Georgia .............................................................1974 38 810 344 .702
 11. Penn St.............................................................1965 47 805 373 .683
 12. Kansas St. .........................................................1969 43 803 478 .627
 13. Long Beach St.....................................................1964 48 801 453 .639
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 'taterblast on March 15, 2014, 07:58:41 PM
well i'll be
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 15, 2014, 10:30:50 PM
Wecker.

uh for what?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: wabash909 on March 16, 2014, 05:40:21 AM
Ok, Shalee can be the head coach and Coggins and Wecker can be the assistants.  I would be able to get behind this.

Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: michigancat on March 16, 2014, 10:50:39 AM
I definitely don't want a male coach. Males already have plenty of opportunities to coach.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: gokatgo on March 16, 2014, 11:36:09 AM
http://www.uconnhuskies.com/sports/w-baskbl/mtt/ralph_shea00.html

 :love:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on March 16, 2014, 11:51:25 AM
Not hearing encouraging things for the prospects of our gal Shalee getting the job.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: hemmy on March 16, 2014, 12:00:00 PM
from currie's letter...

Quote
including ranking as one of the top-15 winningest programs in women’s basketball history,

is this true?

http://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/stats/w_basketball_RB/2012/DI.pdf (http://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/stats/w_basketball_RB/2012/DI.pdf)

bottom left of page 28 (3rd column is number of wins), this is through the 2011 season:

 1. Tennessee ..........................................................1903 58 1,164 256 .819
 2. Louisiana Tech ....................................................1975 37 1,000 212 .825
 3. Old Dominion .......................................................1970 42 929 325 .741
 4. James Madison ....................................................1921 89 906 488 .650
 5. Stephen F. Austin ................................................1969 43 904 375 .707
 6. Texas ................................................................1977 35 867 295 .746
 7. Ohio St. .............................................................1966 46 860 363 .703
 8. Tennessee Tech ..................................................1971 41 837 414 .669
 9. Stanford..............................................................1977 35 831 275 .751
 10. Georgia .............................................................1974 38 810 344 .702
 11. Penn St.............................................................1965 47 805 373 .683
 12. Kansas St. .........................................................1969 43 803 478 .627
 13. Long Beach St.....................................................1964 48 801 453 .639

Suck it, UCONN. I bet once Geno sees this list he will want to coach for a true blueblood.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 'taterblast on March 16, 2014, 12:00:55 PM
from currie's letter...

Quote
including ranking as one of the top-15 winningest programs in women’s basketball history,

is this true?

uconn's like, 6 wins away from passing us

http://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/stats/w_basketball_RB/2012/DI.pdf (http://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/stats/w_basketball_RB/2012/DI.pdf)

bottom left of page 28 (3rd column is number of wins), this is through the 2011 season:

 1. Tennessee ..........................................................1903 58 1,164 256 .819
 2. Louisiana Tech ....................................................1975 37 1,000 212 .825
 3. Old Dominion .......................................................1970 42 929 325 .741
 4. James Madison ....................................................1921 89 906 488 .650
 5. Stephen F. Austin ................................................1969 43 904 375 .707
 6. Texas ................................................................1977 35 867 295 .746
 7. Ohio St. .............................................................1966 46 860 363 .703
 8. Tennessee Tech ..................................................1971 41 837 414 .669
 9. Stanford..............................................................1977 35 831 275 .751
 10. Georgia .............................................................1974 38 810 344 .702
 11. Penn St.............................................................1965 47 805 373 .683
 12. Kansas St. .........................................................1969 43 803 478 .627
 13. Long Beach St.....................................................1964 48 801 453 .639

Suck it, UCONN. I bet once Geno sees this list he will want to coach for a true blueblood.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 16, 2014, 02:48:01 PM
http://www.uconnhuskies.com/sports/w-baskbl/mtt/ralph_shea00.html

 :love:

I liked her as a player but :flush: for this job

Not hearing encouraging things for the prospects of our gal Shalee getting the job.

Not surprising. If we don't hire her though we better not hire another assistant from somewhere else.
Title: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on March 16, 2014, 03:18:05 PM
Not hearing encouraging things for the prospects of our gal Shalee getting the job.

Not surprising. If we don't hire her though we better not hire another assistant from somewhere else.

Hearing from people back at the old high school that Bill Annan has had an interview.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: ednksu on March 16, 2014, 03:19:38 PM
can we get a top 5 list from people.  we obviously have some people here who know the coaching landscape.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: joda on March 16, 2014, 03:41:37 PM
I'm #teamshalee but I think we should at least check in on what it would take to get Jody Adams. WSUs women's program was pretty terrible when she took over and now looking like back to back tourney appearances.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 16, 2014, 07:05:30 PM
If it's an assistant and not Shalee I'm likely to be upset, if it's a hc and not Jody Adams I'm likely to be upset.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 17, 2014, 01:29:30 PM
Why not pull an assistant from a big time stud program?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 17, 2014, 01:30:09 PM
BTW, does Mrs. Gene Keady have an opinion?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: ednksu on March 17, 2014, 03:12:41 PM
BTW, does Mrs. Gene Keady have an opinion?
(http://i1176.photobucket.com/albums/x340/D0C70RF4U57/clap.gif)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Gooch on March 17, 2014, 03:17:29 PM
BTW, does Mrs. Gene Keady have an opinion?
:lol:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 17, 2014, 05:47:59 PM
Why not pull an assistant from a big time stud program?

If you think this was at least partly a financial decision, and you've made it pretty clear where you stand there, hiring an assistant from somewhere else won't generate any revenue at.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: CatMission on March 18, 2014, 02:05:27 PM

#Pearl4KSU
Foiled again!  Damn you Auburn.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: WillieWatanabe on March 18, 2014, 02:48:53 PM
so Jeff Mittie, huh.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: CatMission on March 18, 2014, 02:49:05 PM
Jeff Mittie? Anyone?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: EllRobersonisInnocent on March 18, 2014, 02:50:25 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BjCL5kgCEAEq9Bl.jpg:large)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on March 18, 2014, 02:50:57 PM
Who is this?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: CatMission on March 18, 2014, 02:51:30 PM
TCU coach. An intra-conference steal. Give ADJC some props for the balls to pull that off.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: EllRobersonisInnocent on March 18, 2014, 02:51:45 PM
Who is this?

That's Jeff Mittie.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: ednksu on March 18, 2014, 02:51:51 PM
for cereal?
http://gofrogs.cstv.com/sports/w-baskbl/mtt/jeff_mittie_83013.html
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: ednksu on March 18, 2014, 02:52:44 PM
TCU coach. An intra-conference steal. Give ADJC some props for the balls to pull that off.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I'm kinda hesitant to poach inside the conference like this
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on March 18, 2014, 02:53:00 PM
Hmm okay.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: WillieWatanabe on March 18, 2014, 02:53:11 PM
not good at twitter.

https://twitter.com/FrogCoachMittie
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on March 18, 2014, 02:53:33 PM
so Jeff Mittie, huh.

wtf
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: EllRobersonisInnocent on March 18, 2014, 02:53:48 PM
Probably the best we could have done. I like it.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: CatMission on March 18, 2014, 02:54:58 PM

not good at twitter.

https://twitter.com/FrogCoachMittie
Apparently follows Jennifer Aniston. Good enough for me.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on March 18, 2014, 02:55:26 PM
alright eff it guys, I'M IN!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: WillieWatanabe on March 18, 2014, 02:56:31 PM
how's our ass taste, tcu? get some.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: puniraptor on March 18, 2014, 02:56:48 PM
someone get MIR his SINK SMASHING BOOTS


     I"M rough ridin' PISSED! (too)


 :curse: :curse: :curse:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: WillieWatanabe on March 18, 2014, 03:00:19 PM
27-35 in 2 years in Big 12
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Asteriskhead on March 18, 2014, 03:01:35 PM
#BID
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: hatingfrancisco on March 18, 2014, 03:01:56 PM
Hey guys.  Mittie and Patterson are best bros.   :excited:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: EllRobersonisInnocent on March 18, 2014, 03:02:06 PM
27-35 in 2 years in Big 12

at TCU tho, we're a top 15 all-time program. He'll do wonders here.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on March 18, 2014, 03:02:06 PM
“@KellisRobinett: K-State will pay Jeff Mittie $375,000 and increase his salary $25,000 annually on a 5 year contract, plus a $140,000 signing bonus.”
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on March 18, 2014, 03:02:25 PM

27-35 in 2 years in Big 12

Ouch
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: ednksu on March 18, 2014, 03:04:05 PM
27-35 in 2 years in Big 12

 :sdeek:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: puniraptor on March 18, 2014, 03:05:34 PM
after more research:

I hope he was rough ridin' cheap.

Shoulda hired a lady.

Got a DUI in Newton, KS, so he knows how to party.

Awful hire. How the eff to we hire away a coach from within the conference that is already producing losing conference records. Pretty laughable, John.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: WillieWatanabe on March 18, 2014, 03:06:46 PM
TCU fans seems disappointed.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: puniraptor on March 18, 2014, 03:06:55 PM
This is way worse than hiring oscar.

This guy is a known loser with less success AND CHARACTER ISSUES
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: ednksu on March 18, 2014, 03:07:02 PM
John seems like he is cleaning the AD with random hires.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Asteriskhead on March 18, 2014, 03:07:07 PM
Are Lehning and Coggins staying on? This is what matters.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 'taterblast on March 18, 2014, 03:07:39 PM
total boozehound

Quote
Mittie, 37, was detained in the Harvey County Detention Center for investigation of DUI early Wednesday morning and was released on a $1,000 bond, Harvey County deputy Keith Blackwood said Wednesday.

The coach's Mitsubishi sports-utility rental was stopped when a Newton, Kan., police officer saw Mittie swerving and turning his headlights on and off while heading south on Interstate 135. He was arrested at 3:50 a.m. and released at 10:10 a.m.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: puniraptor on March 18, 2014, 03:08:17 PM
Are Lehning and Coggins staying on? This is what matters.

they will probably lose half the fanbase instantly if lehning leaves.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: WillieWatanabe on March 18, 2014, 03:08:55 PM
Quote
Mechelle Voepel [email protected] 2m

Jeff Mittie's wife, Shanna, is from Junction City, Kan., which is very close to Manhattan, Kan.

I had always thought if Jeff Mittie had the right opportunity to return to the Midwest, he would.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Stevesie60 on March 18, 2014, 03:10:32 PM
To be fair, we have a great track record when hiring coaches with ties to Junction City.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: nicname on March 18, 2014, 03:11:03 PM
27-35 in 2 years in Big 12

Trajectory tho:

2012-13: 2-16
2013-14: 8-10


Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: puniraptor on March 18, 2014, 03:11:42 PM
To be fair, we have a great track record when hiring coaches with ties to Junction City.

JEFF MITTIE STOMP!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on March 18, 2014, 03:13:27 PM

27-35 in 2 years in Big 12

Trajectory tho:

2012-13: 2-16
2013-14: 8-10

The people I know are excited about the hire.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Belvis Noland on March 18, 2014, 03:17:45 PM
Quote
Mechelle Voepel [email protected] 2m

Jeff Mittie's wife, Shanna, is from Junction City, Kan., which is very close to Manhattan, Kan.

I had always thought if Jeff Mittie had the right opportunity to return to the Midwest, he would.

Welcome home Jeff Mittie's wife! 
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Tobias on March 18, 2014, 03:18:00 PM
what the eff
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Asteriskhead on March 18, 2014, 03:18:28 PM

27-35 in 2 years in Big 12

Trajectory tho:

2012-13: 2-16
2013-14: 8-10

The people I know are excited about the hire.

What are your people saying about Shalee and Claire?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: ChiCat on March 18, 2014, 03:19:30 PM
He can keep all his purple ties!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: wabash909 on March 18, 2014, 03:20:54 PM
To Mittie!   :cheers: 
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Gooch on March 18, 2014, 03:21:55 PM
YAWN
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: puniraptor on March 18, 2014, 03:22:38 PM
what is the United States Sports Academy and how do I get a masters there?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 0.42 on March 18, 2014, 03:23:46 PM
yeah, not impressed.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Tobias on March 18, 2014, 03:28:40 PM
can we get a sink check?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Tobias on March 18, 2014, 03:31:47 PM
what is the United States Sports Academy and how do I get a masters there?

fanning, 'splain
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on March 18, 2014, 03:34:24 PM


27-35 in 2 years in Big 12

Trajectory tho:

2012-13: 2-16
2013-14: 8-10

The people I know are excited about the hire.

What are your people saying about Shalee and Claire?

"Staff will be built over the next few weeks. Could see one or two holdovers from Deb's staff"
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: wazucat on March 18, 2014, 03:34:55 PM
 :crossfingers:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: puniraptor on March 18, 2014, 03:45:06 PM
What's his stance on lawnmowing?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: #LIFE on March 18, 2014, 03:50:56 PM
*joke about Deb's lawn maintenance*

 :buh-bye:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: raquetcat on March 18, 2014, 03:58:07 PM
I thought Currie might take a risk on an unproven assistant coach, nope. This does not bode well for the football hire whenever that may be.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: puniraptor on March 18, 2014, 04:00:55 PM
I thought Currie might take a risk on an unproven assistant coach, nope. This does not bode well for the football hire whenever that may be.

looks like a practice run for hiring gary patterson

which is also why he fired deb

didnt want too many pattersons making the paperwork difficult
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: hatingfrancisco on March 18, 2014, 04:12:27 PM
Well, I, for one am going to reserve judgment on this Mittie fellow until Puni weighs in. 
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Asteriskhead on March 18, 2014, 04:15:05 PM
if you want your brain to melt go check out the facebook comments on the k-state sports page.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: puniraptor on March 18, 2014, 04:15:15 PM
Well, I, for one am going to reserve judgment on this Mittie fellow until Puni weighs in.

:users:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sonofdaxjones on March 18, 2014, 04:15:28 PM
What in the world.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: PorkChop Express on March 18, 2014, 04:16:20 PM
SLTH
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: puniraptor on March 18, 2014, 04:17:07 PM
it's interesting that he is 47 and has been a head coach for 22 years
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: resident LibBot dick holder on March 18, 2014, 04:17:26 PM
never heard of this guy
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: meow meow on March 18, 2014, 04:21:27 PM
Welcome to Mittieville fuckers  :emawkid:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Tobias on March 18, 2014, 04:23:14 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/S1rPHff.jpg)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Ghost of Stan Parrish on March 18, 2014, 04:50:03 PM
"The Secret Life of..."

(http://derekwinnert.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/277.jpg)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 18, 2014, 05:04:48 PM
"I am very proud to be a part of this program associated with greats like Kendra Wacker and Nicole Olpe"
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: GoodForAnother on March 18, 2014, 05:12:23 PM
I've never heard of him, but I've never heard of most womens basketball coaches, so w/e
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Tobias on March 18, 2014, 05:13:04 PM

"I am very proud to be a part of this program associated with greats like Kendra Wacker and Nicole Olpe"

omg :lol:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Bill Clarahan on March 18, 2014, 05:30:41 PM
total boozehound

Quote
Mittie, 37, was detained in the Harvey County Detention Center for investigation of DUI early Wednesday morning and was released on a $1,000 bond, Harvey County deputy Keith Blackwood said Wednesday.

The coach's Mitsubishi sports-utility rental was stopped when a Newton, Kan., police officer saw Mittie swerving and turning his headlights on and off while heading south on Interstate 135. He was arrested at 3:50 a.m. and released at 10:10 a.m.


Sounds like a suicide DUI, who in the hell swerves and flashes their lights when drunk at 3 in the mornin.  This guy should get a house with 'te
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 18, 2014, 05:46:47 PM
JFC, Currie tries so damn hard with these out of the box hires. I never thought of him, I'm not sure who did. I don't think it's ever a good look to hire a coach from a major conference that isn't playing in the postseason. I'm going to assume that Jody Adams said no, although I have no idea why she would.

The in conference hire is interesting, whomever TCU hires better not kick our ass. If TCU hires Jody Adams and she beats us I'd encourage everyone to do something drastic.

I don't get what Currie is doing with his hiring. At the time of hire Weber and Mittie were both relatively high risk and low reward but the floor for these guys aren't very low either, it's like trying very hard to accomplish meh.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 18, 2014, 05:48:11 PM
"I am very proud to be a part of this program associated with greats like Kendra Wacker and Nicole Olpe"

This is an amazing post that can't possibly get too much love
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Belvis Noland on March 18, 2014, 05:54:26 PM
Is it possible that Currie, like 99.9% of humans, just doesn't give a crap about women's basketball and this hire reflects it? 
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MeatGeeKSU on March 18, 2014, 06:05:03 PM
He's been a pretty decent ball coach.  The rough transition to the Big 12 was more because all he had at hand was tools to compete at the Mountain West level.  Now he has the tools to compete at a Big 12 and National Level with an elite basketball facility to play with.  It's a solid hire.  I mean the Wichita State ball coach would've maybe generated more excitement, but this guy has has a winning pedigree.  Besides Geno is the best women's coach of all time(no, not Pat Summit lulz), and he's obviously a dude.  Get Shalee to stick around it remains a very good hire.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 18, 2014, 06:06:50 PM
Is it possible that Currie, like 99.9% of humans, just doesn't give a crap about women's basketball and this hire reflects it?

If you don't care get the eff out, no one solicited your opinion. I've never understood why certain guys feel the need to tell people they don't like women's basketball without being asked, what are you trying to prove? Even people that don't like women's basketball wouldn't find this post particularly edgy or funny, why, most people don't like women's basketball.

I think I'm going to spend the rest of my life telling strangers, unsolicited, that I don't like formula one racing. I'm quite sure many people will care, a lot.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: wetwillie on March 18, 2014, 06:09:55 PM
Wasn't the recruiting class coming in pretty good?  Hopefully he can keep it together.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Benja on March 18, 2014, 06:21:48 PM
SUCK IT, TCU
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: resident LibBot dick holder on March 18, 2014, 06:26:41 PM
"I am very proud to be a part of this program associated with greats like Kendra Wacker and Nicole Olpe"

This is why 'stone is my favorite mod  :lol:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 18, 2014, 06:31:07 PM
He's been a pretty decent ball coach. The rough transition to the Big 12 was more because all he had at hand was tools to compete at the Mountain West level.  Now he has the tools to compete at a Big 12 and National Level with an elite basketball facility to play with.  It's a solid hire.  I mean the Wichita State ball coach would've maybe generated more excitement, but this guy has has a winning pedigree.  Besides Geno is the best women's coach of all time(no, not Pat Summit lulz), and he's obviously a dude.  Get Shalee to stick around it remains a very good hire.

exactly, pretty decent, meh :blank: I will say after looking at his resume it appears that he was TCU's Jody Adams, I am a little troubled by him seeming as if he's plateaued. His post season resume is very similar to Deb's, don't be fooled by that dumb post season stat that K-State is throwing out there. TCU has more than a few NITs in that run and very few NCAA wins. His best team was his 04-05 team. TCU had Michael Irvin's niece on that team she's like 6'7" and was just a couple of blocks from breaking the NCAA single season record. That team won 1 game in the tournament and they played that pod at home. At least Deb went to the sweet 16.

I also wholeheartedly reject that point about them transitioning from the Mountain West. As we know TCU played in like 39 conferences in 7 years, but they were not dominant at all, ever. Jody and WSU were 30-6 against the valley the last 2 seasons with 4 titles.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: wazucat on March 18, 2014, 06:41:16 PM
Wasn't the recruiting class coming in pretty good?  Hopefully he can keep it together.

No.  IMO it is/was another mediocre class. 

Debs class from last year is the only decent class in the last 5 years, the key for him is to keep that class in place and get some popular assistants to stick around.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Belvis Noland on March 18, 2014, 07:30:11 PM
Why is MIR always so angry? 
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on March 18, 2014, 07:38:57 PM

Why is MIR always so angry?

He's not at Sporting KC games.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kim carnes on March 18, 2014, 07:40:53 PM
good hire imo

edit: the reason i say its a good hire is that i trust currie's opinion 100x more than any of yours b/c he is a proven stud
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: meow meow on March 18, 2014, 08:35:08 PM
Take me down to paradise, Mittie, where the basketball's great and the fans are butthurt.  oh won't you please take me down!?!?!?  Yeah!!!  :Woohoo: :excited: :emawkid: :ksu:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: wabash909 on March 18, 2014, 08:36:56 PM
What would have been a "splash hire" for our women's bball program?

I like this guy.  He seems to be a real man's man.  A real roll up your sleeves and coach some basketball and then polish off a hard day of coaching with a good stiff drink kind of guy.  I like that.



Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MeatGeeKSU on March 18, 2014, 09:08:55 PM
He's been a pretty decent ball coach. The rough transition to the Big 12 was more because all he had at hand was tools to compete at the Mountain West level.  Now he has the tools to compete at a Big 12 and National Level with an elite basketball facility to play with.  It's a solid hire.  I mean the Wichita State ball coach would've maybe generated more excitement, but this guy has has a winning pedigree.  Besides Geno is the best women's coach of all time(no, not Pat Summit lulz), and he's obviously a dude.  Get Shalee to stick around it remains a very good hire.

exactly, pretty decent, meh :blank: I will say after looking at his resume it appears that he was TCU's Jody Adams, I am a little troubled by him seeming as if he's plateaued. His post season resume is very similar to Deb's, don't be fooled by that dumb post season stat that K-State is throwing out there. TCU has more than a few NITs in that run and very few NCAA wins. His best team was his 04-05 team. TCU had Michael Irvin's niece on that team she's like 6'7" and was just a couple of blocks from breaking the NCAA single season record. That team won 1 game in the tournament and they played that pod at home. At least Deb went to the sweet 16.

I also wholeheartedly reject that point about them transitioning from the Mountain West. As we know TCU played in like 39 conferences in 7 years, but they were not dominant at all, ever. Jody and WSU were 30-6 against the valley the last 2 seasons with 4 titles.

Eh, I still think it will work out well.  All of those other conferences were all pretty Mountain Westy too, so the fact that he moved from a lesser conference where you usually are going to draw lesser recruits to a Big 12 environment is still there.  Maybe they weren't ever dominant, but when has Deb ever been truly dominant with this Cats team? She's had some nice seasons, but nothing truly remarkable. He went to 9 NCAA tourneys in 15 years at TCU, a school where it is verifiably, much harder to get into the dance than it is in the Big 12 just based on the smaller selection those conferences usually get.  That's a pretty good track record and the development from a horrid inaugural Big 12 campaign to this season shows he can go at this level.  He keeps girls from transferring out and keeps Shalee around then it will work out pretty well.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: AndrewVonLintel on March 18, 2014, 10:05:05 PM
He's been a pretty decent ball coach. The rough transition to the Big 12 was more because all he had at hand was tools to compete at the Mountain West level.  Now he has the tools to compete at a Big 12 and National Level with an elite basketball facility to play with.  It's a solid hire.  I mean the Wichita State ball coach would've maybe generated more excitement, but this guy has has a winning pedigree.  Besides Geno is the best women's coach of all time(no, not Pat Summit lulz), and he's obviously a dude.  Get Shalee to stick around it remains a very good hire.

exactly, pretty decent, meh :blank: I will say after looking at his resume it appears that he was TCU's Jody Adams, I am a little troubled by him seeming as if he's plateaued. His post season resume is very similar to Deb's, don't be fooled by that dumb post season stat that K-State is throwing out there. TCU has more than a few NITs in that run and very few NCAA wins. His best team was his 04-05 team. TCU had Michael Irvin's niece on that team she's like 6'7" and was just a couple of blocks from breaking the NCAA single season record. That team won 1 game in the tournament and they played that pod at home. At least Deb went to the sweet 16.

I also wholeheartedly reject that point about them transitioning from the Mountain West. As we know TCU played in like 39 conferences in 7 years, but they were not dominant at all, ever. Jody and WSU were 30-6 against the valley the last 2 seasons with 4 titles.


Agree with MIR.
Fired Deb and hired someone with a similar resume. 
The biggest upgrade is that the new regime is much cheaper than the old one.



Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Panjandrum on March 18, 2014, 11:21:48 PM
He's been a pretty decent ball coach. The rough transition to the Big 12 was more because all he had at hand was tools to compete at the Mountain West level.  Now he has the tools to compete at a Big 12 and National Level with an elite basketball facility to play with.  It's a solid hire.  I mean the Wichita State ball coach would've maybe generated more excitement, but this guy has has a winning pedigree.  Besides Geno is the best women's coach of all time(no, not Pat Summit lulz), and he's obviously a dude.  Get Shalee to stick around it remains a very good hire.

exactly, pretty decent, meh :blank: I will say after looking at his resume it appears that he was TCU's Jody Adams, I am a little troubled by him seeming as if he's plateaued. His post season resume is very similar to Deb's, don't be fooled by that dumb post season stat that K-State is throwing out there. TCU has more than a few NITs in that run and very few NCAA wins. His best team was his 04-05 team. TCU had Michael Irvin's niece on that team she's like 6'7" and was just a couple of blocks from breaking the NCAA single season record. That team won 1 game in the tournament and they played that pod at home. At least Deb went to the sweet 16.

I also wholeheartedly reject that point about them transitioning from the Mountain West. As we know TCU played in like 39 conferences in 7 years, but they were not dominant at all, ever. Jody and WSU were 30-6 against the valley the last 2 seasons with 4 titles.


Agree with MIR.
Fired Deb and hired someone with a similar resume. 
The biggest upgrade is that the new regime is much cheaper than the old one.

Money shouldn't be the issue here.  I'm not very knowledgeable about WBB, but given the fact that it's probably tied with baseball as the most popular non-revenue sport, you can afford to put the money out there even if you're going to operate at a loss.  I mean, don't operate at a gigantic loss, but do your best to field a winning team like you do in every other sport.  I mean, hell, we built a state-of-the-art practice facility where every single thing is equal between the women and men, so you're already pot committed.  Dropping $500k plus isn't crazy, especially if you're a Top 15 program, historically.

When we fired Deb, I texted a friend and said that Currie was probably thinking he could get the same results for half the price.  Looks like, on paper, I was probably dead on in how Currie was thinking.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Asteriskhead on March 18, 2014, 11:24:25 PM
Money shouldn't be the issue here.  I'm not very knowledgeable about WBB, but given the fact that it's probably tied with baseball as the most popular non-revenue sport, you can afford to put the money out there even if you're going to operate at a loss.  I mean, don't operate at a gigantic loss, but do your best to field a winning team like you do in every other sport.  I mean, hell, we built a state-of-the-art practice facility where every single thing is equal between the women and men, so you're already pot committed.  Dropping $500k plus isn't crazy, especially if you're a Top 15 program, historically.

When we fired Deb, I texted a friend and said that Currie was probably thinking he could get the same results for half the price.  Looks like, on paper, I was probably dead on in how Currie was thinking.

That's how I feel about this hire too. I'm still livid.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 19, 2014, 07:37:14 AM
If he had $ in mind when he fired Deb I'd sincerely hope he would heavily weigh revenue producing impact over the coaches salary. This hire makes me think he wasn't thinking about money because this certainly won't make a massive splash with season ticket sales in the short term.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: michigancat on March 19, 2014, 08:04:27 AM
You'd think we could have found a female SOMEWHERE
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Belvis Noland on March 19, 2014, 09:30:29 AM
If he had $ in mind when he fired Deb I'd sincerely hope he would heavily weigh revenue producing impact over the coaches salary. This hire makes me think he wasn't thinking about money because this certainly won't make a massive splash with season ticket sales in the short term.

How is "massive splash" defined in terms of women's basketball? 
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: OK_Cat on March 19, 2014, 09:39:10 AM

If he had $ in mind when he fired Deb I'd sincerely hope he would heavily weigh revenue producing impact over the coaches salary. This hire makes me think he wasn't thinking about money because this certainly won't make a massive splash with season ticket sales in the short term.

How is "massive splash" defined in terms of women's basketball?

15 people
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: captaincrap on March 19, 2014, 09:45:25 AM
If he had $ in mind when he fired Deb I'd sincerely hope he would heavily weigh revenue producing impact over the coaches salary. This hire makes me think he wasn't thinking about money because this certainly won't make a massive splash with season ticket sales in the short term.

There will be an increase in season tickets just from having Deb no longer being the head coach. Nearly every season ticket holder who gave up their tickets listed Deb as main reason why.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: puniraptor on March 19, 2014, 09:46:41 AM
If he had $ in mind when he fired Deb I'd sincerely hope he would heavily weigh revenue producing impact over the coaches salary. This hire makes me think he wasn't thinking about money because this certainly won't make a massive splash with season ticket sales in the short term.

There will be an increase in season tickets just from having Deb no longer being the head coach. Nearly every season ticket holder who gave up their tickets listed Deb as main reason why.

interesting, if, true,
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on March 19, 2014, 09:46:55 AM
 :surprised:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: puniraptor on March 19, 2014, 09:50:43 AM
the resident debites are not going to take that very well
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Tobias on March 19, 2014, 09:51:45 AM
the resident debites are not going to take that very well

@HotForDebDeb is furious
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: puniraptor on March 19, 2014, 09:52:47 AM
the resident debites are not going to take that very well

@HotForDebDeb is furious

 :lol:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: PIPE on March 19, 2014, 11:05:41 AM
MIR, you need to relax.....

on paper, he may have the same credentials as Deb, but at a savings of 40%........so, that seems like a good business move to me. His first couple of years in the big twelve has been an adjustment, but that should be expected coming into a major WBB conference.  Lets see, Deb has been in the big 8/12 for 18 years, and how has her last 2 years been?

I hope he keeps Shalee on board though

 
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on March 19, 2014, 11:59:19 AM
If he had $ in mind when he fired Deb I'd sincerely hope he would heavily weigh revenue producing impact over the coaches salary. This hire makes me think he wasn't thinking about money because this certainly won't make a massive splash with season ticket sales in the short term.

There will be an increase in season tickets just from having Deb no longer being the head coach. Nearly every season ticket holder who gave up their tickets listed Deb as main reason why.

what was the reason season ticket holders gave for giving up their tickets when Frank left?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on March 19, 2014, 12:12:46 PM
i still think kstate and ku got together five years ago and made an actual binding agreement w/ a notary and all, that stated ku had to start sucking in fball and kstate had to start sucking in bb. or at least not trying hard or something similar. like the gov was like ok dorks, you get bball and you get fball and whatever happens w/ the rest happens.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Panjandrum on March 19, 2014, 01:04:13 PM
MIR, you need to relax.....

on paper, he may have the same credentials as Deb, but at a savings of 40%........so, that seems like a good business move to me. His first couple of years in the big twelve has been an adjustment, but that should be expected coming into a major WBB conference.  Lets see, Deb has been in the big 8/12 for 18 years, and how has her last 2 years been?

I hope he keeps Shalee on board though

 

I don't know what Deb's escalations were, but Mittie is getting a $25k bump every year.  That 40% savings you speak of may decrease.  So, he will be at $500k at the end of the deal.

Now that I've read a little more, this doesn't feel like money as much as Currie using the Weber method of hiring guy that will have similar success for a similar price.  The difference is that the guy fits more of what Currie wants and has as his vision of a model intercollegiate whatever.

I don't have an issue with Mittie.  He seems like the aw shucks kind of guy our fans will eat up.  My observation is that WBB fans are more local than national, so hiring a guy from Blue Springs with a wife from Junk Town fits that mold of a coach that will be able to sell that connection to the local base.

I don't know how I feel about hiring a guy instead of a woman.  Men can get coaching jobs coaching MBB, but that isn't true for women.  I'd rather women coach WBB for that reason, as it feels like men steal their opportunities there, but that's a preference and not a strong opinion.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: meow meow on March 19, 2014, 01:04:32 PM
Mittie Mittie bang bang, we love you
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sonofdaxjones on March 19, 2014, 01:54:24 PM
All things remaining the same, looks like we just went from a $2.7 million dollar a year loss from WBB, to about a $2.4 million dollar loss.

Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: WillieWatanabe on March 19, 2014, 02:22:28 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BjHOycXCQAA16Fs.jpg:large)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: meow meow on March 19, 2014, 02:51:14 PM
Come jump in my arms Mitt!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: puniraptor on March 19, 2014, 02:55:14 PM
Mitties Mosh Pittie!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Belvis Noland on March 19, 2014, 03:10:28 PM
All things remaining the same, looks like we just went from a $2.7 million dollar a year loss from WBB, to about a $2.4 million dollar loss.

oh man, MIR is gonna give it to you.   :popcorn:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: wabash909 on March 19, 2014, 03:56:04 PM
If he had $ in mind when he fired Deb I'd sincerely hope he would heavily weigh revenue producing impact over the coaches salary. This hire makes me think he wasn't thinking about money because this certainly won't make a massive splash with season ticket sales in the short term.

There will be an increase in season tickets just from having Deb no longer being the head coach. Nearly every season ticket holder who gave up their tickets listed Deb as main reason why.

And boom goes the dynamite!


Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Belvis Noland on March 19, 2014, 04:57:24 PM
I wonder how much money we'd save by canning Sue Fritz? 
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 19, 2014, 06:48:24 PM
If he had $ in mind when he fired Deb I'd sincerely hope he would heavily weigh revenue producing impact over the coaches salary. This hire makes me think he wasn't thinking about money because this certainly won't make a massive splash with season ticket sales in the short term.

There will be an increase in season tickets just from having Deb no longer being the head coach. Nearly every season ticket holder who gave up their tickets listed Deb as main reason why.

Well yeah, that isn't surprising at all. There are people who also have tickets who were very upset at Deb being fired. There is no guarantee the people who have up their tickets will come back just as it's entirely possible that people will drop because Deb was fired or Mittie was hired.

My point is that if this was revenue driven, it clearly wasn't, there are available candidates that would have sold a hell of a lot more tickets for the '14-'15 season. It isn't a very controversial or earth shattering stance at all.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 19, 2014, 06:52:08 PM
MIR, you need to relax.....

on paper, he may have the same credentials as Deb, but at a savings of 40%........so, that seems like a good business move to me. His first couple of years in the big twelve has been an adjustment, but that should be expected coming into a major WBB conference.  Lets see, Deb has been in the big 8/12 for 18 years, and how has her last 2 years been?

I hope he keeps Shalee on board though

 

shut up, just shut up, damnit SHUT UP. Do people say stupid crap just to test my patience?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 19, 2014, 06:54:44 PM
All things remaining the same, looks like we just went from a $2.7 million dollar a year loss from WBB, to about a $2.4 million dollar loss.

oh man, MIR is gonna give it to you.   :popcorn:

we agree on this you hunchedback mouthbreather
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Trogdor on March 19, 2014, 07:58:34 PM
All things remaining the same, looks like we just went from a $2.7 million dollar a year loss from WBB, to about a $2.4 million dollar loss.

Title IX  :Woot:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Asteriskhead on March 19, 2014, 10:32:17 PM
All things remaining the same, looks like we just went from a $2.7 million dollar a year loss from WBB, to about a $2.4 million dollar loss.

Title IX  :Woot:

shut up.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: meow meow on March 20, 2014, 08:49:26 AM
HEY, must be the Mitt-AY!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: wabash909 on March 20, 2014, 11:45:36 AM
Guys, is it just me or does does Jeff Mittie remind anyone else of a United States President?  He just has that "look" about him.

(http://i.imgur.com/rWMMhPG.jpg)

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10152276060454455&id=85579369454&refsrc=http%3A%2F%2Fkansasstate.rivals.com%2Fshowmsg.asp&_rdr (https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10152276060454455&id=85579369454&refsrc=http%3A%2F%2Fkansasstate.rivals.com%2Fshowmsg.asp&_rdr)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Gooch on March 20, 2014, 02:24:13 PM
If he had $ in mind when he fired Deb I'd sincerely hope he would heavily weigh revenue producing impact over the coaches salary. This hire makes me think he wasn't thinking about money because this certainly won't make a massive splash with season ticket sales in the short term.

There will be an increase in season tickets just from having Deb no longer being the head coach. Nearly every season ticket holder who gave up their tickets listed Deb as main reason why.
Now do this for the men's tickets that we are hemorrhaging.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: PIPE on March 20, 2014, 04:09:49 PM
Catfan28 is reporting on 2 other boards that Shalee is not staying :shakesfist:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: puniraptor on March 20, 2014, 04:13:38 PM
Catfan28 is reporting on 2 other boards that Shalee is not staying :shakesfist:

Not suprised. She is probably the world's #1 debite
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: meow meow on March 20, 2014, 04:55:05 PM
gtfo Shalee, that's what i always say
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 'taterblast on March 20, 2014, 05:02:30 PM
why are so many people obsessed with shalee staying? didn't she graduate like two years ago?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 20, 2014, 05:22:57 PM
why are so many people obsessed with shalee staying? didn't she graduate like two years ago?

she's been an assistant for five years, she isn't a dobo or some video assistant
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on March 20, 2014, 05:30:20 PM
i would put it

fball
---
mens bball
---
---
womens bball
baseball
---
volleyball


womens bball is kind of important and i'm not sure that i like this hire at all, although i'll admit i don't know much about it. seems very oscar webery to me. overall rick daris thumbs down.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 20, 2014, 05:35:28 PM
i would put it

fball
---
mens bball
---
---
womens bball
baseball
---
volleyball


womens bball is kind of important and i'm not sure that i like this hire at all, although i'll admit i don't know much about it. seems very oscar webery to me. overall rick daris thumbs down.

this is why this guy is the smartest 5-0 in northeast Kansas
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 'taterblast on March 20, 2014, 05:50:14 PM
why are so many people obsessed with shalee staying? didn't she graduate like two years ago?

she's been an assistant for five years, she isn't a dobo or some video assistant

she's been out of college for 5 years? jesus time flies.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: meow meow on March 20, 2014, 10:12:59 PM
why are so many people obsessed with shalee staying? didn't she graduate like two years ago?

she's been an assistant for five years, she isn't a dobo or some video assistant

she's been out of college for 5 years? jesus time flies.

I had the same reaction, except mine was more "who is Shalee?"
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Stevesie60 on March 21, 2014, 11:30:36 AM
So when Snyder retires Currie is going to hire someone who has had past success but kind of fallen off as of late, right? Tuberville? Leach? Patterson pt 2?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Kat Kid on March 21, 2014, 11:33:38 AM
So when Snyder retires Currie is going to hire someone who has had past success but kind of fallen off as of late, right? Tuberville? Leach? Patterson pt 2?

Tuberville would be a hilarious hire.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: cfbandyman on March 21, 2014, 12:22:28 PM
So when Snyder retires Currie is going to hire someone who has had past success but kind of fallen off as of late, right? Tuberville? Leach? Patterson pt 2?

Would take Leach.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: raquetcat on March 21, 2014, 12:49:43 PM
So when Snyder retires Currie is going to hire someone who has had past success but kind of fallen off as of late, right? Tuberville? Leach? Patterson pt 2?
That's his thing, low risk, medium reward, white middle aged males. Wait, Sean Snyder. . . .
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sonofdaxjones on March 21, 2014, 01:09:23 PM
Pretty had to think that having a really good baseball program that goes deep into the post season isn't worth more notoriety than a WBB program.

Baseball postseason is nearly a months worth of exposure on ESPN.  Most of the time in prime time during a period when the MLB is heading into the summer death march and hockey and the NBA are ending or done by the CWS.

WBB postseason is an afterthought for most.  WBB on the national stage is dominated by 4 to 6 programs, and the top 1 or 2 teams regularly destroy teams that are ranked in the Top 15.

Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 21, 2014, 09:00:09 PM
Pretty had to think that having a really good baseball program that goes deep into the post season isn't worth more notoriety than a WBB program.

Baseball postseason is nearly a months worth of exposure on ESPN.  Most of the time in prime time during a period when the MLB is heading into the summer death march and hockey and the NBA are ending or done by the CWS.

WBB postseason is an afterthought for most.  WBB on the national stage is dominated by 4 to 6 programs, and the top 1 or 2 teams regularly destroy teams that are ranked in the Top 15.

regional and super regional games rate the same as regular season women's basketball neither are good
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Gooch on March 24, 2014, 01:32:25 PM
Jeff Mittie just called to tell me how great of a fit he and his family will be at KSU. I really wish oscar would call me i actually have some crap to discuss with him.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kslim on March 24, 2014, 02:02:45 PM
HEY, must be the Mitt-AY!

best one, good job on that last page meow meow

as far as the hire, pretty meh but ill root for him to succeed. I was definately a debite tho, kinda sad she is gone
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 24, 2014, 06:20:44 PM
Jeff Mittie just called to tell me how great of a fit he and his family will be at KSU. I really wish oscar would call me i actually have some crap to discuss with him.

wtf?  :curse:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on March 26, 2014, 07:44:54 AM
“@John_Currie: #KStateWBB asst @claire_ksuhoops hitting recruiting trail early out of #MHK on our nonstop AA flight to #ORD #GoCats /photo/1”
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: joda on March 26, 2014, 08:46:30 AM
“@John_Currie: #KStateWBB asst @claire_ksuhoops hitting recruiting trail early out of #MHK on our nonstop AA flight to #ORD #GoCats /photo/1”

Guess that's a pretty good sign she's staying
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 'taterblast on March 26, 2014, 08:47:08 AM
“@John_Currie: #KStateWBB asst @claire_ksuhoops hitting recruiting trail early out of #MHK on our nonstop AA flight to #ORD #GoCats /photo/1”

Guess that's a pretty good sign she's staying

also when kstate announced she was staying as director of ops
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Stevesie60 on March 27, 2014, 09:28:23 PM
Lehning is gone. Sounds like she may be taking time off of basketball. :dunno:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: p1k3 on March 28, 2014, 10:08:43 AM
the new coach guy had a patty melt at tanners. Appeared to be drinking a Dr. Pepper too. What does this mean?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: EMAWforever on March 28, 2014, 01:03:52 PM
the new coach guy had a patty melt at tanners. Appeared to be drinking a Dr. Pepper too. What does this mean?
That he has no care for his health just like me. 
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on March 28, 2014, 01:10:35 PM
“@John_Currie: #KStateWBB asst @claire_ksuhoops hitting recruiting trail early out of #MHK on our nonstop AA flight to #ORD #GoCats /photo/1”

Guess that's a pretty good sign she's staying

also when kstate announced she was staying as director of ops

alright now! who has that claire pic! @gpc
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: jtksu on March 28, 2014, 11:36:47 PM
why are so many people obsessed with shalee staying? didn't she graduate like two years ago?

she's been an assistant for five years, she isn't a dobo or some video assistant

Hasn't the team sucked during those same five years?   Serious question.   I really have no idea why or why not we would want her retained.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: WillieWatanabe on March 30, 2014, 09:39:06 PM
Arkansas hired Jimmy Dykes
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kim carnes on March 30, 2014, 09:56:31 PM
Arkansas hired Jimmy Dykes

 :lol:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: fun muffin on March 30, 2014, 10:04:25 PM
Arkansas hired Jimmy Dykes

 :lol:

looks like a terrific women's basketball hire to me.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on March 30, 2014, 11:08:51 PM
Arkansas hired Jimmy Dykes

 :lol:

looks like a terrific women's basketball hire to me.

This ought to be interesting. Saw some stuff on the 'net earier today where Arkansas was bragging up how many games Dykes has called and watched, and even how many practices at different schools he's watched, in the many years since he last coached.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 31, 2014, 06:44:05 PM
Arkansas hired Jimmy Dykes

When I saw this on Saturday, I immediately thought of Kim English
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: WillieWatanabe on March 31, 2014, 06:48:44 PM
Arkansas hired Jimmy Dykes

When I saw this on Saturday, I immediately thought of Kim English

surprised he didn't have much to say.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on April 03, 2014, 12:26:18 AM
Are Deb or any of her assistants (other than Claire and Tasha, who are staying at KSU) in the mix for other jobs? Searched the 'net a bit ago with no results.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sonofdaxjones on April 06, 2014, 06:24:05 PM
We'll look at that.  While the men's NCAA Tourney and obviously the MF4 features one nip/tuck game after another.   The first game of WFF features one team up 17 at half. 

But by all means let's keep spending millions on this sport. 



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on April 07, 2014, 12:06:13 AM
We'll look at that.  While the men's NCAA Tourney and obviously the MF4 features one nip/tuck game after another.   The first game of WFF features one team up 17 at half. 

But by all means let's keep spending millions on this sport. 



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I've been waiting for this grooved fastball for seemingly a decade, gonna feel great to smash this one 520 ft.


The women's NCAA tournament is 32 years old. At that point in men's tournament history, 1972, the NCAA was less competitive than the women's is now. You were like 30 years old in '72 which may account for the poor memory. In 1972 UCLA were in the processing of winning 7 straight NCAA Championships and 10 out of 12, and they started their 88 game winning streak. Thankfully in 1972 we didn't have a vocal group of sexists oddly wanting to kill a sport because it wasn't as competitive as they like even though they had the option of oh...not watch something they don't like.

Women's college basketball isn't going anywhere, there are federal laws ensuring this. I'm going to be so happy to see this sport continue to grow, I love it. I'll maintain my sanity to continuing to not watch or care about sports I don't like. You should try it, it feels great to be unburdened by worrying about why rugby gets to be on tv.



Thanks for that dax, that was a great birthday present to me, it felt much better than I thought it would.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sonofdaxjones on April 07, 2014, 06:50:55 AM
We'll look at that.  While the men's NCAA Tourney and obviously the MF4 features one nip/tuck game after another.   The first game of WFF features one team up 17 at half. 

But by all means let's keep spending millions on this sport. 



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I've been waiting for this grooved fastball for seemingly a decade, gonna feel great to smash this one 520 ft.


The women's NCAA tournament is 32 years old. At that point in men's tournament history, 1972, the NCAA was less competitive than the women's is now. You were like 30 years old in '72 which may account for the poor memory. In 1972 UCLA were in the processing of winning 7 straight NCAA Championships and 10 out of 12, and they started their 88 game winning streak. Thankfully in 1972 we didn't have a vocal group of sexists oddly wanting to kill a sport because it wasn't as competitive as they like even though they had the option of oh...not watch something they don't like.

Women's college basketball isn't going anywhere, there are federal laws ensuring this. I'm going to be so happy to see this sport continue to grow, I love it. I'll maintain my sanity to continuing to not watch or care about sports I don't like. You should try it, it feels great to be unburdened by worrying about why rugby gets to be on tv.



Thanks for that dax, that was a great birthday present to me, it felt much better than I thought it would.

I knew that's exactly what you were going to say, so pathetically typical.  Sad. 

It might literally be the biggest strawman ever relative to college athletic discussion to compare the current period of college athletics to anything in college athletics 30 or 40 years ago and beyond.   

When John Wooden started winning his championships at UCLA there were literally schools that didn't allow African-American players to be on their basketball team, in some cases, they barely even allowed African Americans and other people of color into their institutions.   

The money spent on athletics, that being the ENTIRE athletic department at the vast majority of schools . . . well let's just say that would have looked upon what a school like K-State spent on women's basketball last year in absolute awe (and for the 10 plus years before that).   John Wooden probably barely made a million dollars from UCLA over the course of 3 plus decades of coaching there.   Deb Patterson for example was paid over $3 million in her last 5 years. 

The NCAA Women's Tournament was propelled into venues, coverage and notoriety on a rocket ship, literally riding the coat tails of the modern men's National Tourney.    It took decades for the men's national tournament to get to the level the women's tourney is now and has been for well over a decade.  Back during in the 50's, 60's and 70's, college basketball and the national tourney were niche sport that was propelled forward by the growing number of people who attended college, but still dwarfed by college football and pro sports.   During that time there was a competing national tournament that was on some levels even bigger than the NCAA men's tourney. 

The differences between then and now make a list a mile long . . . but leave it to MIR. 

I didn't say drop the sport at K-State or anywhere, so why the eff you would even bring up the idiotic throw away of federal law?  Thanks Captain Obvious.   

It's just time to explore other sports opportunities for women at K-State, and increase the budgets for the other existing women's sports at the expense of women's basketball at K-State.   Hopefully the $300K that K-State is saving on the new basketball coaches salary is going to be promptly moved to volleyball and women's track. 

Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on April 07, 2014, 08:34:32 AM
Your argument is essentially more money is spent on women's college basketball now than was spent on men's basketball in 1972. My reply is, no crap. I'm not sure what how much money is spent on has to do with giving the sport time to develop. The premise of your first post was a ridiculous, flimsy mess to start with. Why even try to make a larger point about a team having a 17 point lead at halftime at the final four; as if there are never blow outs at the men's final four? Also not sure what the final four has to do with what K-State spends on basketball and volleyball. I'm interested in this Dax scale of spending as it relates to your enjoyment though and how it works as far as sports are funded. If Notre Dame and UConn play a game that's decided by a buzzer beater will you call ESPN and request a bonus for those girls playing a men's sport?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sonofdaxjones on April 07, 2014, 08:59:16 AM
Your argument is essentially more money is spent on women's college basketball now than was spent on men's basketball in 1972. My reply is, no crap. I'm not sure what how much money is spent on has to do with giving the sport time to develop. The premise of your first post was a ridiculous, flimsy mess to start with. Why even try to make a larger point about a team having a 17 point lead at halftime at the final four; as if there are never blow outs at the men's final four? Also not sure what the final four has to do with what K-State spends on basketball and volleyball. I'm interested in this Dax scale of spending as it relates to your enjoyment though and how it works as far as sports are funded. If Notre Dame and UConn play a game that's decided by a buzzer beater will you call ESPN and request a bonus for those girls playing a men's sport?

It's hard to discuss this topic with someone who actually tries to compare college athletics from around 1995 and beyond with college athletics from the 60's and 70's.  I brought up money as being one of many huge differences, did you not see where I said the list of differences from then to now is substantial??  (of course you didn't)

I look at it from a perspective of what's more likely to get K-State that elusive national title and I see a better opportunity to do that coming from several other women's sports.  It's not going to happen with WBB.    Again, taking the $300K saved from Deb's ridiculous contract and moving it to other women's sports is an excellent start, they can use it.   But that's probably not going to happen.   It's going to take less to move the needle substantially in other sports than it is with women's hoops. 











Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: PIPE on April 07, 2014, 03:54:25 PM
Man, watching MIR and dax argue over woman's bball is better than watching...........woman's bball


I just hope someone other than Uconn wins it though, this is absurd...plus Uconn's players are woof

Bring back Skyler Diggins :blush:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on April 07, 2014, 04:11:34 PM
I didn't say a damn thing about the 50s or 60s. You listed two differences and the other difference was absurd so I chose to ignore it. In 1972 there were not major college basketball schools that didn't allow black players. It also speaks to my point about college basketball at the time still developing. Do you have any more differences?

Also the other women's sports you speak of have less parity than women's basketball. Volleyball? You serious? Volleyball is far and away my favorite women's sport but we don't have a better shot at winning a volleyball championship than basketball, that's preposterous.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on April 07, 2014, 04:14:53 PM
Man, watching MIR and dax argue over woman's bball is better than watching...........woman's bball


I just hope someone other than Uconn wins it though, this is absurd...plus Uconn's players are woof

Bring back Skyler Diggins :blush:

Notre Dame won't win, their best player tore her ACL, I'm shocked they beat Stanford.


Stop being creepy
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sonofdaxjones on April 07, 2014, 04:48:05 PM
I didn't say a damn thing about the 50s or 60s. You listed two differences and the other difference was absurd so I chose to ignore it. In 1972 there were not major college basketball schools that didn't allow black players. It also speaks to my point about college basketball at the time still developing. Do you have any more differences?

Also the other women's sports you speak of have less parity than women's basketball. Volleyball? You serious? Volleyball is far and away my favorite women's sport but we don't have a better shot at winning a volleyball championship than basketball, that's preposterous.

Give volleyball the Women's b-ball budget and I'll take my chances.

Look, you're just pissed that women's college basketball, despite having a meteoric rise in terms of notoriety on the coat tails of the expansion of proliferation of the men's game is still pretty much solely dominated by about 2 to 4 programs.   

There wasn't a hell of a lot of difference between 1972 and the mid to late 60's, so get real.   You used poor examples from a by gone era when everyone with a clue (so that would exclude perpetually angry MIR) knows that there's been a massive series of paradigm shifts in college athletics that makes comparisons of the current era we're in, to those days idiotic and absurd.






Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Kid In the Hall on April 07, 2014, 07:53:09 PM
Give volleyball equestrian the Women's b-ball budget and I'll take my chances K-State becomes the UConn of equestrian!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kim carnes on April 07, 2014, 08:21:42 PM
Man, watching MIR and dax argue over woman's bball is better than watching...........woman's bball


I just hope someone other than Uconn wins it though, this is absurd...plus Uconn's players are woof

Bring back Skyler Diggins :blush:

Notre Dame won't win, their best player tore her ACL, I'm shocked they beat Stanford.


Stop being creepy

they didn't beat stanford, they beat maryland
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on April 07, 2014, 10:00:09 PM
I didn't say a damn thing about the 50s or 60s. You listed two differences and the other difference was absurd so I chose to ignore it. In 1972 there were not major college basketball schools that didn't allow black players. It also speaks to my point about college basketball at the time still developing. Do you have any more differences?

Also the other women's sports you speak of have less parity than women's basketball. Volleyball? You serious? Volleyball is far and away my favorite women's sport but we don't have a better shot at winning a volleyball championship than basketball, that's preposterous.

Give volleyball the Women's b-ball budget and I'll take my chances.

Look, you're just pissed that women's college basketball, despite having a meteoric rise in terms of notoriety on the coat tails of the expansion of proliferation of the men's game is still pretty much solely dominated by about 2 to 4 programs.   

There wasn't a hell of a lot of difference between 1972 and the mid to late 60's, so get real.   You used poor examples from a by gone era when everyone with a clue (so that would exclude perpetually angry MIR) knows that there's been a massive series of paradigm shifts in college athletics that makes comparisons of the current era we're in, to those days idiotic and absurd.

I'm pissed? Okay if you insist. Not sure why I would be pissed about it considering it was my point. Also not sure why you keep talking about the amount of money that is in college basketball, what does that have to do with how the game is being developed? You were the one that compared a sport to another sport that is twice as old, I simply pointed out that it's silly to compare those two on that basis. I mean don't you have kids older than NCAA women's basketball? In the early 90s there were places in Oklahoma and Iowa that still played 6 on 6 girls basketball in high school. If course there is going to be an inequity of talent distribution. I'm sitting here watching UConn and Kentucky playing in the men's championship game the men's tournament is 76 years old and the same damn 5 teams seem to be the only schools who win, why are we pouring so much money into men's basketball for this?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on April 07, 2014, 10:02:32 PM
Man, watching MIR and dax argue over woman's bball is better than watching...........woman's bball


I just hope someone other than Uconn wins it though, this is absurd...plus Uconn's players are woof

Bring back Skyler Diggins :blush:

Notre Dame won't win, their best player tore her ACL, I'm shocked they beat Stanford.


Stop being creepy

they didn't beat stanford, they beat maryland

Yep them too, sorry about that, good correction kc
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sonofdaxjones on April 08, 2014, 07:42:56 AM
I didn't say a damn thing about the 50s or 60s. You listed two differences and the other difference was absurd so I chose to ignore it. In 1972 there were not major college basketball schools that didn't allow black players. It also speaks to my point about college basketball at the time still developing. Do you have any more differences?

Also the other women's sports you speak of have less parity than women's basketball. Volleyball? You serious? Volleyball is far and away my favorite women's sport but we don't have a better shot at winning a volleyball championship than basketball, that's preposterous.

Give volleyball the Women's b-ball budget and I'll take my chances.

Look, you're just pissed that women's college basketball, despite having a meteoric rise in terms of notoriety on the coat tails of the expansion of proliferation of the men's game is still pretty much solely dominated by about 2 to 4 programs.   

There wasn't a hell of a lot of difference between 1972 and the mid to late 60's, so get real.   You used poor examples from a by gone era when everyone with a clue (so that would exclude perpetually angry MIR) knows that there's been a massive series of paradigm shifts in college athletics that makes comparisons of the current era we're in, to those days idiotic and absurd.

I'm pissed? Okay if you insist. Not sure why I would be pissed about it considering it was my point. Also not sure why you keep talking about the amount of money that is in college basketball, what does that have to do with how the game is being developed? You were the one that compared a sport to another sport that is twice as old, I simply pointed out that it's silly to compare those two on that basis. I mean don't you have kids older than NCAA women's basketball? In the early 90s there were places in Oklahoma and Iowa that still played 6 on 6 girls basketball in high school. If course there is going to be an inequity of talent distribution. I'm sitting here watching UConn and Kentucky playing in the men's championship game the men's tournament is 76 years old and the same damn 5 teams seem to be the only schools who win, why are we pouring so much money into men's basketball for this?

The difference is that unlike many games on the women's side, most of the men's games go down to the wire.   

LOL, at having kids older tham NCAA women's basketball, I'm not that much older than many of the people who post on this board.   I'll pull a reverse MIR here and claim age bigotry, never expected that from you MIR, kind of shocked. 

Time to have a paradigm shift at K-State,  de-emphasize funding of women's basketball and move the money to other women's sports and make a run at national prominence with them.   It's not going to happen in women's hoops at K-State.  Just my opinion.   

Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on April 08, 2014, 03:24:39 PM
The difference is that unlike many games on the women's side, most of the men's games go down to the wire.   

LOL, at having kids older tham NCAA women's basketball, I'm not that much older than many of the people who post on this board.   I'll pull a reverse MIR here and claim age bigotry, never expected that from you MIR, kind of shocked. 

Time to have a paradigm shift at K-State,  de-emphasize funding of women's basketball and move the money to other women's sports and make a run at national prominence with them.   It's not going to happen in women's hoops at K-State.  Just my opinion.

First of all, link? I think the men's margin of victory is lower too, I have not once claimed otherwise. That being said, I'm not sure the difference is large enough where you can claim that most men's games go to the wire and women don't. That's a factual statement that has not been vetted.

The problem with your redistributing wbb money to say volleyball, is that volleyball does not come close to have the revenue producing power that basketball does, it also won't give us a significantly higher chance at winning a nc.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: resident LibBot dick holder on April 08, 2014, 03:29:37 PM
football has the highest potential for revenue, and we came pretty close to winning a nc in that.  maybe we should just put all our money into football  :dunno:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on April 08, 2014, 03:59:15 PM
football has the highest potential for revenue, and we came pretty close to winning a nc in that.  maybe we should just put all our money into football  :dunno:

Brilliant, why didn't anyone think of this before?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: wazucat on April 08, 2014, 08:50:30 PM
I don't know what Curries agenda ( or if there is an agenda) is regarding Deb or WBB in general;  but it seems hard to imagine he canned her for cost savings alone when the department he runs is showing surplus "earnings".  I WOULD LOVE TO HAVE ONE NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP but how does one identify which Olympic sport to feed that might have such a result?  Track maybe  :dunno: seems KU won the championship a year ago with basically one outstanding world class runner and a nice supporting cast.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sonofdaxjones on April 09, 2014, 08:29:28 AM
30 plus years into the women's National Tourney, 2 undefeated teams and a  :zzz: .   

All women's sports lose money hand over fist.   For example, I went back and looked at the 2010-11 season when the K-State women finished third in the conference.   They still posted a net loss of nearly $2 million.   Their revenue was only about $40-$50K more than the last couple of years when they finished at the bottom.

Let's go back to '07-'08 a Big 12 Championship Season.  Women's hoops at K-State posted a net loss of nearly $1.4 million.   

Women's hoops at K-State is likely always going to post multi-million dollar losses, time to re-shift the focus and go for the trophies in another women's sport.   Saying the other sports aren't going to do any better and aren't going to generate as much revenue is utterly irrelevant to me because the women's sports at K-State will lose millions no matter how good they are.  WBB @ K-State losses millions during the very best of times.   

Time to give another women's sport a better shot, and for one that has always had the opportunity to take bigger steps on the national stage but couldn't because of lack of funding.   That will likely require a more aggressive recruiting process, or a new coach.   The current coach is quite good at coaching, but not so good at recruiting.







Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: nicname on April 15, 2014, 01:43:47 PM
Romero seeks transfer from K-State
(http://peachstatebasketball.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Leticia-Romero.jpg)(http://media.kansas.com/smedia/2013/08/29/11/45/1pwUWg.SlMa.80.jpeg)
Athletic Department says, 'No Way!'

Quote
“I think I have the right to transfer, if (K-State) has the right to change what I came for — the coaching staff,” said Romero, who led the Wildcats in points (14.2), rebounds (5.8) and assists (5.0) per game last season.

Romero’s transfer, however, won’t be easy. According to Romero, K-State rejected her initial request for a release, which would have allowed her to transfer to another school and sit out a year while under a new scholarship.

It is K-State’s athletic department policy to not grant release requests, “except for the most compelling of circumstances which place an undue burden on the student athlete.”
- See more at: http://themercury.com/articles/romero-seeks-transfer-from-k-state#sthash.FT9w6l1e.dpuf

http://themercury.com/articles/romero-seeks-transfer-from-k-state
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: PIPE on April 15, 2014, 01:59:51 PM
welp, any chance for improvement just took a drastic crap......
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Tobias on April 15, 2014, 02:21:28 PM
feels bad
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Stevesie60 on April 15, 2014, 02:29:12 PM
We are really bad at keeping our best returners on our basketball teams.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: raquetcat on April 15, 2014, 03:19:07 PM
Do you really want a player on your team who doesn't want to be there? Seems like it's just making everybody's life harder than it needs to be
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: nicname on April 15, 2014, 03:36:08 PM
Do you really want a player on your team who doesn't want to be there? Seems like it's just making everybody's life harder than it needs to be

Gotta squeeze every last bit of juice out of that orange unless that orange is a senior leader who's playing in his final NCAA tournament.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on April 15, 2014, 04:47:12 PM
Man eff John Currie, what a piece of crap.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on April 15, 2014, 04:54:01 PM
Just threw a twitter molotov cocktail at the sack of crap athletic director of Kansas State, felt good. Now I'm going after the president.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 'taterblast on April 15, 2014, 07:34:57 PM
yeah that seems weird. they let angel do it, did they let him just because of the 'closer to home' thing?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: TheHamburglar on April 15, 2014, 07:37:15 PM
yeah that seems weird. they let angel do it, did they let him just because of the 'closer to home' thing?

She said they gave her the same option they gave Angel.  Stick around one year then if you still want to leave they'll grant the release. 
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 'taterblast on April 15, 2014, 07:38:29 PM
yeah that seems weird. they let angel do it, did they let him just because of the 'closer to home' thing?

She said they gave her the same option they gave Angel.  Stick around one year then if you still want to leave they'll grant the release.

oh. guess i didn't realize angel played an entire year while he hated us. :frown:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: wetwillie on April 15, 2014, 07:49:37 PM
yeah that seems weird. they let angel do it, did they let him just because of the 'closer to home' thing?

She said they gave her the same option they gave Angel.  Stick around one year then if you still want to leave they'll grant the release.

oh. guess i didn't realize angel played an entire year while he hated us. :frown:

Yea, I didn't realize that we strong armed him to stay. Damn John is a monster.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: nicname on April 15, 2014, 07:54:30 PM
Man, Erica Young and Breanna Lewis clearly upset at Romero on Twitter.

https://twitter.com/Newyork_next

https://twitter.com/BeeJayyElle
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on April 15, 2014, 08:25:07 PM
Man, Erica Young and Breanna Lewis clearly upset at Romero on Twitter.

https://twitter.com/Newyork_next

https://twitter.com/BeeJayyElle

Quote
REALITY [email protected]  1h
If my "friend" can lie to my face that's never my friend all friendship ties are OVER! @LeticiaRomero95

Quote
REALITY [email protected]  51m
When you realize a persons true colors. pic.twitter.com/oFYLZh4WLj(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BlOxsmSIUAAZEog.jpg)

 :sdeek:
Erica's tweets have a whole bunch of emojis and don't make sense without them.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on April 15, 2014, 09:06:45 PM
WTF? Why is Erica so mad? I don't feel like Breanna is mad at Leti. Some other rando took a shot at Leti and Breanna mushed her. Is Breanna reacting to Erica's reaction?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on April 15, 2014, 09:09:17 PM
yeah that seems weird. they let angel do it, did they let him just because of the 'closer to home' thing?

She said they gave her the same option they gave Angel.  Stick around one year then if you still want to leave they'll grant the release.

oh. guess i didn't realize angel played an entire year while he hated us. :frown:

That can't possibly be accurate. If it were true oscar is a really convincing liar and I don't think oscar is a liar.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Trogdor on April 15, 2014, 11:06:04 PM
Had a feeling this was going to happen when they fired Deb.

Oh well, shes not the smartest of players if she committed solely on the coaching staff. Its a big no-no  :nono:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on April 15, 2014, 11:20:04 PM
Had a feeling this was going to happen when they fired Deb.

Oh well, shes not the smartest of players if she committed solely on the coaching staff. Its a big no-no  :nono:

I like you as a poster but man, you have to stop dumbing down these threads. Like literally every player ever commits to the coach, that's why coaches do the recruiting. The provost, deans, and professors don't recruit athletes.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on April 15, 2014, 11:33:00 PM
Had a feeling this was going to happen when they fired Deb.

Oh well, shes not the smartest of players if she committed solely on the coaching staff. Its a big no-no  :nono:

I like you as a poster but man, you have to stop dumbing down these threads. Like literally every player ever commits to the coach, that's why coaches do the recruiting. The provost, deans, and professors don't recruit athletes.

Agreed, MIR, about these commitments. Players gravitate almost exclusively to the coaches. (Rudy Ruettiger is the exception to the rule--he would have walked on at ND (yes, no scholarship) even if Ron Prince was the coach. And I suspect that Shalee would have come to KSU without regard to who the coaches were).
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Trogdor on April 15, 2014, 11:34:40 PM
Had a feeling this was going to happen when they fired Deb.

Oh well, shes not the smartest of players if she committed solely on the coaching staff. Its a big no-no  :nono:

I like you as a poster but man, you have to stop dumbing down these threads. Like literally every player ever commits to the coach, that's why coaches do the recruiting. The provost, deans, and professors don't recruit athletes.

That's my personal problem with a majority of student athletes.

When I was being recruited for football (SPOILER, true story), I was having a conversation with some players on the team. Nice guys, they asked me how I liked the visit. I responded with the obvious "Like the campus, the people" and what not. Then I mentioned how I liked the coaching staff. Dude said that I shouldn't commit to play based no that because  you don't know whose going to be there next year, or the year after that. And if changes come, then your either going to be stuck in the same situation as Romero, or you are going miserable playing somewhere you don't want to.

Basically, someone should commit based on things that wont change or that can only improve, i.e. facilities, the fans, etc.

I think a lot of athletes are dumb imo. Crap like this happens.

P.S you're a real bro btw, MIR
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on April 15, 2014, 11:44:07 PM
Had a feeling this was going to happen when they fired Deb.

Oh well, shes not the smartest of players if she committed solely on the coaching staff. Its a big no-no  :nono:

I like you as a poster but man, you have to stop dumbing down these threads. Like literally every player ever commits to the coach, that's why coaches do the recruiting. The provost, deans, and professors don't recruit athletes.

That's my personal problem with a majority of student athletes.

When I was being recruited for football (SPOILER, true story), I was having a conversation with some players on the team. Nice guys, they asked me how I liked the visit. I responded with the obvious "Like the campus, the people" and what not. Then I mentioned how I liked the coaching staff. Dude said that I shouldn't commit to play based no that because  you don't know whose going to be there next year, or the year after that. And if changes come, then your either going to be stuck in the same situation as Romero, or you are going miserable playing somewhere you don't want to.

Basically, someone should commit based on things that wont change or that can only improve, i.e. facilities, the fans, etc.

I think a lot of athletes are dumb imo. Crap like this happens.

P.S you're a real bro btw, MIR

How could they not commit to these coaches when it is the coaches who develop relationships with the players and the player's patents? The entire system and process is designed for the players to first and foremost consider the coaches who recruit them.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Trogdor on April 15, 2014, 11:47:45 PM
Had a feeling this was going to happen when they fired Deb.

Oh well, shes not the smartest of players if she committed solely on the coaching staff. Its a big no-no  :nono:

I like you as a poster but man, you have to stop dumbing down these threads. Like literally every player ever commits to the coach, that's why coaches do the recruiting. The provost, deans, and professors don't recruit athletes.

That's my personal problem with a majority of student athletes.

When I was being recruited for football (SPOILER, true story), I was having a conversation with some players on the team. Nice guys, they asked me how I liked the visit. I responded with the obvious "Like the campus, the people" and what not. Then I mentioned how I liked the coaching staff. Dude said that I shouldn't commit to play based no that because  you don't know whose going to be there next year, or the year after that. And if changes come, then your either going to be stuck in the same situation as Romero, or you are going miserable playing somewhere you don't want to.

Basically, someone should commit based on things that wont change or that can only improve, i.e. facilities, the fans, etc.

I think a lot of athletes are dumb imo. Crap like this happens.

P.S you're a real bro btw, MIR

How could they not commit to these coaches when it is the coaches who develop relationships with the players and the player's patents? The entire system and process is designed for the players to first and foremost consider the coaches who recruit them.

I'm not saying it should be totally brushed off. People make the difference. Im saying you should weigh all other aspects too, and not solely lean on the coaches. Now she is wanting to go rebuild in a new setting, with new people, coaches, and teammates.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: raquetcat on April 16, 2014, 10:12:35 AM
Romero has an appeal hearing today, I'm not sure who hears her case or when they make the decision, but at least there is another avenue for to get a release (I'm still in the Currie should have just let her go when she asked camp though)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on April 16, 2014, 02:34:26 PM
Had a feeling this was going to happen when they fired Deb.

Oh well, shes not the smartest of players if she committed solely on the coaching staff. Its a big no-no  :nono:

I like you as a poster but man, you have to stop dumbing down these threads. Like literally every player ever commits to the coach, that's why coaches do the recruiting. The provost, deans, and professors don't recruit athletes.

That's my personal problem with a majority of student athletes.

When I was being recruited for football (SPOILER, true story), I was having a conversation with some players on the team. Nice guys, they asked me how I liked the visit. I responded with the obvious "Like the campus, the people" and what not. Then I mentioned how I liked the coaching staff. Dude said that I shouldn't commit to play based no that because  you don't know whose going to be there next year, or the year after that. And if changes come, then your either going to be stuck in the same situation as Romero, or you are going miserable playing somewhere you don't want to.

Basically, someone should commit based on things that wont change or that can only improve, i.e. facilities, the fans, etc.

I think a lot of athletes are dumb imo. Crap like this happens.

P.S you're a real bro btw, MIR

How could they not commit to these coaches when it is the coaches who develop relationships with the players and the player's patents? The entire system and process is designed for the players to first and foremost consider the coaches who recruit them.

I'm not saying it should be totally brushed off. People make the difference. Im saying you should weigh all other aspects too, and not solely lean on the coaches. Now she is wanting to go rebuild in a new setting, with new people, coaches, and teammates.

Agreed
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on April 18, 2014, 08:00:30 PM
Appeal denied.

http://themercury.com/articles/k-state-rejects-romeros-appeal-for-release
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SPE_khat on April 18, 2014, 09:47:35 PM


  :surprised:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: KCFDcat on April 22, 2014, 10:54:00 PM
yeah bilas is losing his crap over this. it's like ksu ran over his dog or something.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on April 23, 2014, 07:59:15 AM
yeah bilas is losing his crap over this. it's like ksu ran over his dog or something.

who better to pick on than k-state
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on April 28, 2014, 06:02:30 PM
Kamie gets a new job.

http://www.denverpost.com/colleges/ci_25653502/kamie-ethridge-announced-new-unc-bears-womens-basketball
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on April 28, 2014, 08:22:37 PM
That's excellent, I'm happy for her :Woohoo:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: joda on April 28, 2014, 09:15:33 PM
That's excellent, I'm happy for her :Woohoo:

Had no problem with Kamie. Figured she'd get a minor HC gig or good assistant gig. She probably should have read the signs and got out a year or 2 ago though.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: puniraptor on May 05, 2014, 12:48:47 PM
coggins officially promoted to Assistant Coach

gratz, claire!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on May 05, 2014, 01:40:30 PM
coggins officially promoted to Assistant Coach

gratz, claire!

 :thumbs:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on May 12, 2014, 11:17:07 PM
So...it's now officially official that Kamie has put the band back together at Northern Colorado, with Shalee as her Associate Head Coach and Moylan and Patterson as assistants. Deb will now be subordinate in rank to two coaches who worked for her. Should make for an interesting workplace dynamic.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on May 13, 2014, 12:39:37 AM

So...it's now officially official that Kamie has put the band back together at Northern Colorado, with Shalee as her Associate Head Coach and Moylan and Patterson as assistants. Deb will now be subordinate in rank to two coaches who worked for her. Should make for an interesting workplace dynamic.

That is going to eventually blow up.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on May 13, 2014, 01:03:09 AM

So...it's now officially official that Kamie has put the band back together at Northern Colorado, with Shalee as her Associate Head Coach and Moylan and Patterson as assistants. Deb will now be subordinate in rank to two coaches who worked for her. Should make for an interesting workplace dynamic.

That is going to eventually blow up.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Likely. Very likely.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on May 13, 2014, 09:16:09 AM
What a weird love parallelogram.  One psychopath and three Stockholm syndrome victims. No doubt Deb will puppet master that outfit.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on May 14, 2014, 12:43:07 AM

So...it's now officially official that Kamie has put the band back together at Northern Colorado, with Shalee as her Associate Head Coach and Moylan and Patterson as assistants. Deb will now be subordinate in rank to two coaches who worked for her. Should make for an interesting workplace dynamic.

That is going to eventually blow up.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Likely. Very likely.

I think this situation would be difficult for anyone in any walk of life. It could be that Deb is tired of running the show so in her mind this is okay because she can be around the game without wearing all of the pressure, but I'm highly skeptical. Pretty surprising that all four coaches and the AD agreed to this.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: WillieWatanabe on May 14, 2014, 08:25:14 AM
I'm guessing she'll get a head coaching job pretty quick.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Ghost of Stan Parrish on May 14, 2014, 12:44:47 PM
Um, Kamie and Deb are never going to be at different schools.  I thought everyone knew this (and why).
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: ksupamplemousse on May 14, 2014, 01:03:45 PM
Um, Kamie and Deb are never going to be at different schools.  I thought everyone knew this (and why).

If you've ever lived in Manhattan or been a K-State fan, then I'd think it'd be pretty hard to miss the dynamic there.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on May 14, 2014, 01:30:06 PM
Um, Kamie and Deb are never going to be at different schools.  I thought everyone knew this (and why).

Yeah. I thought everyone knew this as well. :) Will the new dynamic affect that though? (I hope not, but may?)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on May 16, 2014, 03:28:19 AM
Um, Kamie and Deb are never going to be at different schools.  I thought everyone knew this (and why).

What exactly does this speculation have to do with what we're talking about? The issue at hand is someone who has been a head coach for 18 seasons then suddenly working behind two people that have worked for her. I don't think suspected living arrangements would make this transition any easier.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on May 16, 2014, 09:25:06 AM
Um, Kamie and Deb are never going to be at different schools.  I thought everyone knew this (and why).

What exactly does this speculation have to do with what we're talking about? The issue at hand is someone who has been a head coach for 18 seasons then suddenly working behind two people that have worked for her. I don't think suspected living arrangements would make this transition any easier.

It's not speculation. Deb didn't get the nod to be a head coach anymore, her girlfriend did. Deb is lucky to have a job based solely upon the fact that her girlfriend found a gig.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on May 16, 2014, 10:11:36 AM
Or to phrase it in a way that you may not be so angry about

A minority woman got a job solely because she is a part of the minority.

You're welcome. You can take the blood pressure cuff off now. Aneurysm averted.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on May 16, 2014, 08:19:59 PM
Dude, seek help.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: EMAWesome on May 21, 2014, 03:28:04 PM
ESPN is desperately trying to make a story out of this Romero SNAFU

http://espn.go.com/womens-college-basketball/story/_/id/10963806/women-college-basketball-kansas-state-wildcats-decisions-blame-messy-situation (http://espn.go.com/womens-college-basketball/story/_/id/10963806/women-college-basketball-kansas-state-wildcats-decisions-blame-messy-situation)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: nicname on May 21, 2014, 10:10:10 PM
ESPN is desperately trying to make a story out of this Romero SNAFU

http://espn.go.com/womens-college-basketball/story/_/id/10963806/women-college-basketball-kansas-state-wildcats-decisions-blame-messy-situation (http://espn.go.com/womens-college-basketball/story/_/id/10963806/women-college-basketball-kansas-state-wildcats-decisions-blame-messy-situation)

Weird that they went to Riley County High School so she could shoot baskets and stuff for the video.

Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: raquetcat on May 22, 2014, 10:12:08 AM

So...it's now officially official that Kamie has put the band back together at Northern Colorado, with Shalee as her Associate Head Coach and Moylan and Patterson as assistants. Deb will now be subordinate in rank to two coaches who worked for her. Should make for an interesting workplace dynamic.

That is going to eventually blow up.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Likely. Very likely.

I think this situation would be difficult for anyone in any walk of life. It could be that Deb is tired of running the show so in her mind this is okay because she can be around the game without wearing all of the pressure, but I'm highly skeptical. Pretty surprising that all four coaches and the AD agreed to this.
Deb and kim aside, I'm a little surprised everyone else went there too. You would have thought shalee could have at least gotten an assistant job at a bigger school :dunno:
it's almost like they all agreed "ok whoever gets a head coaching job first has to hire everybody else on as assistants"

I wonder what Deb and co.'s reputation is like in the coaching brother/sister hood?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: raquetcat on May 22, 2014, 10:15:46 AM
ESPN is desperately trying to make a story out of this Romero SNAFU

http://espn.go.com/womens-college-basketball/story/_/id/10963806/women-college-basketball-kansas-state-wildcats-decisions-blame-messy-situation (http://espn.go.com/womens-college-basketball/story/_/id/10963806/women-college-basketball-kansas-state-wildcats-decisions-blame-messy-situation)

Weird that they went to Riley County High School so she could shoot baskets and stuff for the video.
I'm sure K-state told them no and mhs has too many k-state ties (and didn't want to deal with the hassle) next closest gym is prolly RCHS
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 'taterblast on June 07, 2014, 11:30:11 AM
Quote
@JeffMittie
Fox News is on 10 hours straight in living room can only mean one thing.#relativesintown

 :D
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on June 19, 2014, 12:09:41 AM
I have a date with a KSU basketball player. She is beautiful, sweet, and competitive. I'm excited. :D

Royals. USA. A KSU date.  :Woot: :Woohoo:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on June 19, 2014, 12:26:30 AM
I have a date with a KSU basketball player. She is beautiful, sweet, and competitive. I'm excited. :D

Royals. USA. A KSU date.  :Woot: :Woohoo:

 :emawkid:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on June 24, 2014, 04:25:20 AM
Apparently Deb and Kamie aren't a couple.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on July 16, 2014, 11:42:49 PM
Nice read about Claire. Glad she stayed.

http://cjonline.com/sports/2014-07-15/k-states-claire-coggins-excited-new-role-team
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: ksupamplemousse on July 21, 2014, 11:15:46 PM
http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2014/jul/21/caks-anna-hammaker-cheyenne-hooper-commit-to/ (http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2014/jul/21/caks-anna-hammaker-cheyenne-hooper-commit-to/)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on July 21, 2014, 11:24:44 PM
http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2014/jul/21/caks-anna-hammaker-cheyenne-hooper-commit-to/ (http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2014/jul/21/caks-anna-hammaker-cheyenne-hooper-commit-to/)

 :thumbs:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on July 22, 2014, 07:47:48 AM
chick prob looked at our new coach's system and said, that's the system for me.  of course, she's an american and not some spanish weasel. 
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Asteriskhead on July 22, 2014, 10:50:18 AM
http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2014/jul/21/caks-anna-hammaker-cheyenne-hooper-commit-to/ (http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2014/jul/21/caks-anna-hammaker-cheyenne-hooper-commit-to/)

Sounds like two good pickups.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 'taterblast on September 25, 2014, 11:24:42 AM
Quote
@JeffMittie  10m
Trying to eat healthy in airport with yogurt parfait. Bad idea granola everywhere!! Shoulda stuck with my  ribs and fries.  #easychoice

this guy, i tell you what
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on September 25, 2014, 11:39:16 AM
He's great
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Tobias on September 25, 2014, 12:27:29 PM
He's great

actually bought his own ticket to stonestreet, which dax should appreciate
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on November 03, 2014, 05:43:00 PM
season starts tonight!

also if any gE'r wants a free GA ticket to any game this season PM me, I have season tickets ($20 a seat, got them to boost my AF points) and won't be able to make it to many games. I can send them to you.

GO LADYCATS!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on November 03, 2014, 07:55:57 PM
We rough ridin' suck
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on November 03, 2014, 07:58:57 PM
Pretty ragged tonight.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Prince McJunkins on November 03, 2014, 09:00:08 PM
Score?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on November 03, 2014, 09:04:07 PM
Score?

Won. 54-50
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on November 04, 2014, 01:57:43 AM
We rough ridin' suck

No we don't. Also there is that old adage about when you hire a new coach you hire their opposite, well I'm not sure we did that Mittie may be even more relentless than Deb was in practice. He seems like a good dude but he has a permanent case of the redass on the court during practice.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: wazucat on November 04, 2014, 01:03:13 PM
First game jitters  :dunno: hope MIR is correct.  When Leti said "no way" figured we would be pretty sad this season.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on November 04, 2014, 01:05:27 PM
We have lots of players who should end up making us okay. We weren't okay last night.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kso_FAN on November 04, 2014, 01:12:04 PM
We rough ridin' suck

No we don't. Also there is that old adage about when you hire a new coach you hire their opposite, well I'm not sure we did that Mittie may be even more relentless than Deb was in practice. He seems like a good dude but he has a permanent case of the redass on the court during practice.

MIR, I trust your opinion on this; what are your thoughts on Mittie so far? Good/decent hire?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: ksupamplemousse on November 04, 2014, 01:18:11 PM
We rough ridin' suck

No we don't. Also there is that old adage about when you hire a new coach you hire their opposite, well I'm not sure we did that Mittie may be even more relentless than Deb was in practice. He seems like a good dude but he has a permanent case of the redass on the court during practice.

This may be my favorite phrase of all time. I don't know why, but it always makes me laugh.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on November 04, 2014, 01:21:41 PM
I heard the exact opposite MIR from a player. She said there wasn't even running in practice. Maybe things changed?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: PIPE on November 04, 2014, 02:05:46 PM
Is MIR our woman's bball insider?

I was suprised to see the frosh make a start, I thought we had more depth than that.....unless our bench is more poopier than I thought


Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on November 04, 2014, 09:17:18 PM
We rough ridin' suck

No we don't. Also there is that old adage about when you hire a new coach you hire their opposite, well I'm not sure we did that Mittie may be even more relentless than Deb was in practice. He seems like a good dude but he has a permanent case of the redass on the court during practice.

MIR, I trust your opinion on this; what are your thoughts on Mittie so far? Good/decent hire?

I was unhappy with Deb getting canned but Mittie appears to be a very good hire. He's been a consistent winner, that has to count for something.

I heard the exact opposite MIR from a player. She said there wasn't even running in practice. Maybe things changed?

I don't know about all of that. I do know that he seems nutso about details, minor tiny details. Its great for an insider but I wonder how much it grates on players during the long haul.

Is MIR our woman's bball insider?

I was suprised to see the frosh make a start, I thought we had more depth than that.....unless our bench is more poopier than I thought

We're not very deep, but that's womens college basketball. Martin appears to be very good, she's a versatile player with good size.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Playboy X on November 05, 2014, 10:15:39 AM
martin appears to be very good, she's a versatile player with good size.

that's weird b/c i consider myself a versatile player with good size too  :cool:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on November 05, 2014, 01:29:57 PM
Oh ok. The player just thought conditioning would be lacking. That's all the info I have though.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: PIPE on November 07, 2014, 08:48:36 AM
got a new commit from TX, I guess
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on November 10, 2014, 07:21:06 PM
We rough ridin' suck
Look much better tonight :thumbs:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on November 11, 2014, 12:09:15 AM
Nice game tonight. Real season begins Friday.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: WillieWatanabe on November 11, 2014, 03:30:35 AM
go cats.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Mrs. Gooch on November 13, 2014, 03:37:47 PM
Any student going to the game on Tuesday and want to get me whatever the Hunger Games thing is?
TIA

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpa1/v/t1.0-9/10538458_10152888140014455_1252085022162074455_n.jpg?oh=292209ee9bbc7ce954cbaab57fa47965&oe=551E2C0B&__gda__=1424909341_0e642fe189fdd589191d20b04e5d89b4)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on November 13, 2014, 03:39:53 PM
I bet it's a mockingjay pin :lol:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: puniraptor on November 13, 2014, 03:48:46 PM
what in the rough ridin' earth?

are they going to force freshmen to kill each other at halftime?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Mrs. Gooch on November 13, 2014, 03:52:48 PM
what in the rough ridin' earth?

are they going to force freshmen to kill each other at halftime?

Well if the giveaway is dead freshmen, then I will pass.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: puniraptor on November 13, 2014, 03:54:24 PM
i'm glad to see bacon night is back for round 2
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Lucas Scoopsalot on November 13, 2014, 06:52:30 PM
i'm glad to see bacon night is back for round 2
it's too bad they don't also do it for men's games
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on November 14, 2014, 10:46:17 AM
i'm glad to see bacon night is back for round 2
it's too bad they don't also do it for men's games

I think you're missing the point
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: The Big Train on November 14, 2014, 06:50:34 PM
we are playing pretty good so far, we must be super fast and athletic this year, 15 steals with 15 min left in the 2nd half
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 'taterblast on November 14, 2014, 09:04:25 PM
did we win?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on November 14, 2014, 10:47:44 PM
yeah looking better and better tater
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on November 14, 2014, 11:06:24 PM
yeah looking better and better tater

 :thumbs:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on November 25, 2014, 09:29:40 PM
Has anyone heard the term "bacon strips" in reference to certain anatomy? I find this offensive.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on November 26, 2014, 12:12:05 AM
Cats blew out UTEP tonight. 72-43. I'm liking this team.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: fun muffin on November 27, 2014, 06:32:35 PM
facilities conflict

 :dunno:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: nicname on November 28, 2014, 05:27:42 AM
Any student going to the game on Tuesday and want to get me whatever the Hunger Games thing is?
TIA

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpa1/v/t1.0-9/10538458_10152888140014455_1252085022162074455_n.jpg?oh=292209ee9bbc7ce954cbaab57fa47965&oe=551E2C0B&__gda__=1424909341_0e642fe189fdd589191d20b04e5d89b4)

Ha! I was at this game and almost forgot about this. During timeouts they would drop those Hunger Games packages from the rafters. During a particular timeout, again, they dropped some packages. Well, one of them caught a draft of wind and began floating slowly towards the court as play resumed. It was probably 35 feet above the court as play moved to the opposite basket with the 'chute drifting over the court and coming down. Then it took a nose-dive, again during play, and some woman in the front row tried to grab it and then chased it onto the court. She tried to grab it, but couldn't as play started coming back to the near-side goal.

The woman freaked out and scampered across the court and some manager or assistant coach darted out and grabbed the thing just before it hit the ground and the players came back down court. Mittie was red as hell when all of this was going on.

Very  :lol:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on December 04, 2014, 09:22:51 PM
5-0
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on December 04, 2014, 09:40:29 PM
facilities conflict

 :dunno:

Just saw that. Only in Mexico. Probably a scam
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on December 04, 2014, 09:51:37 PM
Any student going to the game on Tuesday and want to get me whatever the Hunger Games thing is?
TIA

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpa1/v/t1.0-9/10538458_10152888140014455_1252085022162074455_n.jpg?oh=292209ee9bbc7ce954cbaab57fa47965&oe=551E2C0B&__gda__=1424909341_0e642fe189fdd589191d20b04e5d89b4)

Ha! I was at this game and almost forgot about this. During timeouts they would drop those Hunger Games packages from the rafters. During a particular timeout, again, they dropped some packages. Well, one of them caught a draft of wind and began floating slowly towards the court as play resumed. It was probably 35 feet above the court as play moved to the opposite basket with the 'chute drifting over the court and coming down. Then it took a nose-dive, again during play, and some woman in the front row tried to grab it and then chased it onto the court. She tried to grab it, but couldn't as play started coming back to the near-side goal.

The woman freaked out and scampered across the court and some manager or assistant coach darted out and grabbed the thing just before it hit the ground and the players came back down court. Mittie was red as hell when all of this was going on.

Very  :lol:

ha. that's great.  :thumbs:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: resident LibBot dick holder on December 04, 2014, 10:10:14 PM
We have very creative promotions people
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on December 05, 2014, 08:28:45 AM
Should I care about this? Are we good again? How does Deb look?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on December 05, 2014, 08:33:02 AM
Idk if we're good but we don't suck as was previously posted by someone (won't name names).
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: fun muffin on December 05, 2014, 08:39:49 AM
it's to early to tell, we haven't played anyone with a pulse.  but it appears they will at the very least be competitive in big 12 play. 

Probably an nit team.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: PIPE on December 05, 2014, 11:09:16 AM
Got to watch the 2nd half last night.  If there was ever a game where both teams are given a loss, this was it.

Garbage at it's best :Yuck:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: slobber on December 05, 2014, 11:26:35 AM

it's to early to tell, we haven't played anyone with a pulse.  but it appears they will at the very least be competitive in big 12 play. 

Probably an nit team.
at least we're beating dead people!


Gonna win 'em all!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: fun muffin on December 06, 2014, 01:00:19 AM
nation's top scoring defense  :gocho:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on December 06, 2014, 01:22:09 AM
nation's top scoring defense  :gocho:

 :thumbs:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Stevesie60 on December 07, 2014, 11:24:37 PM
Well at least I have one basketball team I can support.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on December 07, 2014, 11:42:30 PM
Well at least I have one basketball team I can support.

Could Mittie coach both KSU BB teams?   :excited:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Ghost of Stan Parrish on December 10, 2014, 04:47:47 PM
Are we going to get these 5-star recruits now?     :emawkid:

http://www.omaha.com/huskers/blogs/women-s-basketball-kaylee-page-leaves-program/article_7840eccc-800e-11e4-b3e8-c3b58b008ed5.html (http://www.omaha.com/huskers/blogs/women-s-basketball-kaylee-page-leaves-program/article_7840eccc-800e-11e4-b3e8-c3b58b008ed5.html)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: fun muffin on December 12, 2014, 07:20:49 PM
Ladycats are playing at Wichita State right now.  It's on espn 3. 

Mittie ball plays amazing defense.  This is my first game to actually watch. 

Cats up 6-2.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Tobias on December 12, 2014, 07:24:11 PM
thanks for the heads up
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Tobias on December 12, 2014, 08:49:13 PM
fantastic rally.  almost gave up earlier.  let's close it out
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on December 12, 2014, 09:05:34 PM
I like this team. Almost pulled it off.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Fedor on December 12, 2014, 09:14:17 PM
Welp


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on December 14, 2014, 03:17:08 PM
Great comeback win today.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: nicname on December 14, 2014, 03:57:38 PM
uggo offense. defensive coach. like the defense. need more drive and kicks to shooters. Martin is good. I like Antionette Taylor's game.

How can they be this horrible at FTs?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on December 14, 2014, 04:01:34 PM
uggo offense. defensive coach. like the defense. need more drive and kicks to shooters. Martin is good. I like Antionette Taylor's game.

How can they be this horrible at FTs?

yes love her. I think they call her Nini or something.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Ghost of Stan Parrish on December 15, 2014, 12:11:16 PM
Are we going to get these 5-star recruits now?     :emawkid:

http://www.omaha.com/huskers/blogs/women-s-basketball-kaylee-page-leaves-program/article_7840eccc-800e-11e4-b3e8-c3b58b008ed5.html (http://www.omaha.com/huskers/blogs/women-s-basketball-kaylee-page-leaves-program/article_7840eccc-800e-11e4-b3e8-c3b58b008ed5.html)

This was a serious question.  Anyone know anything on this?     :don'tcare:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on December 15, 2014, 03:12:02 PM
Both sisters were at the cats' game yesterday in cat gear.  Sat behind the bench.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Ghost of Stan Parrish on December 15, 2014, 04:30:02 PM
Well that sounds promising!  :thumbs:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: nicname on December 19, 2014, 04:07:23 PM
Both sisters were at the cats' game yesterday in cat gear.  Sat behind the bench.

Pretty huge development. On the negative side, they seem to be pretty Spradling/ Frankamp like with regard to their dad. On the positive side they're both very good. It'll be interesting to see what happens with the lineup if they both come on. Shaelyn Martin, a freshman out of Salina is a point-forward type player as well. Who knows where the minutes will go.

The Page sisters are very skilled and very polished, but I don't think either of them are the athlete that Martin is. Martin is impressive.

I was pretty surprised when Patterson didn't really seem to go after these two, but I've heard something about a falling out between Dad and Deb.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on December 21, 2014, 12:35:57 AM
Another good win today.  I especially liked that Kelly Thomson hit her first shot (a 3) after coming back from her second ACL surgery.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on December 21, 2014, 10:22:04 AM
Still don't think Kelly will get minutes come conference play, do you?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on December 21, 2014, 11:37:23 AM
She won't get many in the conference...not unless we get some pretty big leads, and I don't see a lot of those coming.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on December 22, 2014, 09:52:18 PM
WBB won again tonight
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on December 22, 2014, 10:02:40 PM
They looked pretty good for the most part. This team is far more aggressive and disciplined than the last couple of teams Deb had. They share the ball better instead of relying on a player or two to take all the shots.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on December 22, 2014, 10:04:50 PM
Meeks and Nini Taylor are my fave players
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on December 22, 2014, 10:22:27 PM
Meeks and Nini are definitely good and will only get better. Kendred and Lewis were both serviceable last year, but their improvement this season is outstanding. I like this team a lot.

The Page sisters were at the game and behind the KSU bench again tonight, fwiw. Their dad/coach was with them during the first half, don't know where he went for the second.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: joda on December 23, 2014, 12:54:04 AM
Mittie is is building a monster!







Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: PIPE on December 23, 2014, 08:59:42 AM
I think they have some top commits for next year (or maybe it is 2016?).........don't know where they would find room for the Page sisters though...
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Lucas Scoopsalot on December 23, 2014, 11:46:14 AM
#girlsBasketballSchool
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Spaces on December 27, 2014, 12:25:55 PM
what's our record?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on December 27, 2014, 08:54:25 PM
one loss still I think
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on December 27, 2014, 09:11:03 PM

9-1
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Tobias on December 27, 2014, 09:13:30 PM

Mittie is is building a monster!

i just started typing this and then scrolled up :surprised:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on December 28, 2014, 12:00:05 AM
This will be a good team. Might not turn in to a tourney team this season, but it will next.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on December 28, 2014, 12:08:07 AM
All in for WNIT CHAMPS
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on December 28, 2014, 12:12:19 AM
you guys want to know the worst thing about this team? somebody on gpc suggested the name of mitties titties for the girls squad and i can't get it out of my head. i feel so horrible. like get out of my head you horrible name.  :frown:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Tobias on December 28, 2014, 12:15:40 AM
thank god pete abstained from that in the dibbini thread, my word
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on December 28, 2014, 12:17:48 AM
mitties titties mitties titties mitties titties mitties titties mitties titties. there. now you guys are just as screwed as i am. sorry to do that to you. i seriously feel horrible about it.  :frown:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: joda on December 28, 2014, 12:37:42 AM
Mittie's Monster is already entrenched as my nickname for the team so your attempt to stick me with gpc's deplorable nickname fails
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: slobber on December 28, 2014, 10:18:45 AM
I think it should be Space Jammed up a notch; Mitties Montitties....GODDAMMIT RICK YOU SON OF A BITCH!!!


Gonna win 'em all!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: fun muffin on December 28, 2014, 11:06:37 PM
OMG Daris  :lol:

Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: puniraptor on December 28, 2014, 11:10:42 PM
Now that MBB is dead, Mitt's Tits have my full attention.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on December 28, 2014, 11:29:40 PM
Good team. Good coaches.

Rumor is that Kaylee Page has opened a ksu.edu email account, which suggests she's enrolled. Some saying that sister Lanie will soon sign a LOI with us. We'll see...lots of rumors swirling around these kids.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: The Big Train on December 28, 2014, 11:54:27 PM
Good team. Good coaches.

Rumor is that Kaylee Page has opened a ksu.edu email account, which suggests she's enrolled. Some saying that sister Lanie will soon sign a LOI with us. We'll see...lots of rumors swirling around these kids.

FOIA so just search ksu.edu in the top right search box and it will confirm or deny
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on December 29, 2014, 12:04:53 AM
Just searched it. Can confirm. 
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on December 30, 2014, 09:37:29 PM
Another good win tonight, 61-40. 18 steals. 10-1 going into conference.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Gooch on December 31, 2014, 10:32:31 AM
Could they beat the men? :sdeek:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Dugout DickStone on December 31, 2014, 12:04:41 PM
Could they beat the men? :sdeek:

KATDADDY, NEIN!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: nicname on January 01, 2015, 01:29:01 AM
They're going to be good.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on January 01, 2015, 01:30:01 AM
They're going to be good.

Yes, they are. Especially next year.  :)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on January 04, 2015, 12:10:17 AM
Tough loss at Ames today, 60-55. Cats battled back from a big deficit and came close. This is a pretty good defensive team.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Stevesie60 on January 04, 2015, 12:26:36 PM
So the Page sisters are coming here now?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on January 04, 2015, 12:33:03 PM
So the Page sisters are coming here now?

Kaylee has officially enrolled. NU released Lanie from her LOI.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on January 04, 2015, 04:58:05 PM
:party:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on January 06, 2015, 08:46:50 AM
have we beaten baylor since kim has been their coach?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on January 06, 2015, 07:28:23 PM
have we beaten baylor since kim has been their coach?

YES!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on January 06, 2015, 07:32:19 PM
Baylor on a 23-0 run midway through the 1st. Cats can't hit a thing.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on January 06, 2015, 08:50:28 PM
they cheat
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on January 06, 2015, 08:52:08 PM
they cheat

From time to time
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on January 06, 2015, 09:28:55 PM
So the Page sisters are coming here now?

Some context would be appreciated, I'm locked out of my rivals.com/womens account.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on January 06, 2015, 09:35:43 PM
We played much better after that horrendous start, still defended well tonight. This team is very offensively challenged.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on January 06, 2015, 09:44:08 PM
We played much better after that horrendous start, still defended well tonight. This team is very offensively challenged.

Agree completely. They have more energy than Deb's last couple of teams. Lewis was overmatched for the most part, and the Cats didn't get a lot of great offensive looks. Mulkey has, as usual, a high caliber team.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: slobber on January 07, 2015, 07:32:40 AM
This thread needs scores.


Gonna win 'em all!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on January 07, 2015, 12:03:14 PM
romero would have helped
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on January 07, 2015, 10:25:43 PM
What are the page sisters?!?!?!?!?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kso_FAN on January 07, 2015, 10:41:11 PM
What are the page sisters?!?!?!?!?

The next round of Olde, Wecker, etc. Except sisters from Wamego. Rated high by some thing called HoopGurlz (I'm not making that up).
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on January 07, 2015, 10:53:48 PM
What are the page sisters?!?!?!?!?

The next round of Olde, Wecker, etc. Except sisters from Wamego. Rated high by some thing called HoopGurlz (I'm not making that up).

Just googled it. Kaylee was a  :star: :star: :star: :star: :star: in the class of 14. 45th ranked recruit. Lanie a :star: :star: :star: :star: in the class of 15. 82nd ranked. :surprised:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on January 07, 2015, 10:57:59 PM
What are the page sisters?!?!?!?!?

The next round of Olde, Wecker, etc. Except sisters from Wamego. Rated high by some thing called HoopGurlz (I'm not making that up).

_fan has great posts but this one might be my favorite ever. no lie.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on January 07, 2015, 11:38:24 PM
These sisters are indeed highly rated. Also am hearing they have high opinions of themselves (which can be good or bad). I understand this will be a good test of Mittie's ability to manage egos, and also to manage the expectations and influence of their father (their Wamego high school coach). Rumors out of Nub country imply that Kaylee transferred because she and/or her father felt she wasn't playing enough as a frosh. (Nubs gave her a release and also released Lanie, a WHS senior, from her LOI). Guess we'll wait and see, but I hope for the best.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on January 07, 2015, 11:47:34 PM
What positions are they? 3? 4?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on January 08, 2015, 01:57:34 AM
What positions are they? 3? 4?

Yes they are both forwards who can shoot and are freak athletes. Also don't be too freaked out about Kaylee not playing at Nebraska, they are stacked. In Lanie's class they got 3 top 100 players, 2 from NEKS. At least Deb was a finalist for these girls. Bonnie didn't have a shot, Lanie even had Tech as her 3rd finalist and they just tonight broke a 25 game Big 12 losing streak. Bonnie should have been getting anyone out of this state she wants but she is :flush: There are and always have been good girls players in Kansas and Bonnie has not done well here. If Mittie can do well in Kansas and keep using his Texas ties we'll be fine.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: nicname on January 08, 2015, 02:41:06 AM
These sisters are indeed highly rated. Also am hearing they have high opinions of themselves (which can be good or bad). I understand this will be a good test of Mittie's ability to manage egos, and also to manage the expectations and influence of their father (their Wamego high school coach). Rumors out of Nub country imply that Kaylee transferred because she and/or her father felt she wasn't playing enough as a frosh. (Nubs gave her a release and also released Lanie, a WHS senior, from her LOI). Guess we'll wait and see, but I hope for the best.

Both sisters were at the cats' game yesterday in cat gear.  Sat behind the bench.

Pretty huge development. On the negative side, they seem to be pretty Spradling/ Frankamp like with regard to their dad. On the positive side they're both very good. It'll be interesting to see what happens with the lineup if they both come on. Shaelyn Martin, a freshman out of Salina is a point-forward type player as well. Who knows where the minutes will go.

The Page sisters are very skilled and very polished, but I don't think either of them are the athlete that Martin is. Martin is impressive.

I was pretty surprised when Patterson didn't really seem to go after these two, but I've heard something about a falling out between Dad and Deb.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: nicname on January 08, 2015, 02:46:18 AM
What positions are they? 3? 4?

Yes they are both forwards who can shoot and are freak athletes. Also don't be too freaked out about Kaylee not playing at Nebraska, they are stacked. In Lanie's class they got 3 top 100 players, 2 from NEKS. At least Deb was a finalist for these girls. Bonnie didn't have a shot, Lanie even had Tech as her 3rd finalist and they just tonight broke a 25 game Big 12 losing streak. Bonnie should have been getting anyone out of this state she wants but she is :flush: There are and always have been good girls players in Kansas and Bonnie has not done well here. If Mittie can do well in Kansas and keep using his Texas ties we'll be fine.

I've seen them play quite a bit. They have good handles, and are very skilled, but I didn't see them as outstanding athletes even at the 4A high school level. I'm not trying to under-sell them either. They definitely stood out as players, but compared to people like Ohlde, Wecker and even Anne Weese, from Sacred Heart in Salina who went to Notre Dame, their athleticism didn't wow me. Bishop-Meige blasted them in the title game last year and the athletic difference was palpable.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on January 08, 2015, 08:53:50 AM
i was going to say the same thing about the athletic difference, definitely palpable.  like, 100% palpable.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on January 08, 2015, 03:19:47 PM
What positions are they? 3? 4?

Yes they are both forwards who can shoot and are freak athletes. Also don't be too freaked out about Kaylee not playing at Nebraska, they are stacked. In Lanie's class they got 3 top 100 players, 2 from NEKS. At least Deb was a finalist for these girls. Bonnie didn't have a shot, Lanie even had Tech as her 3rd finalist and they just tonight broke a 25 game Big 12 losing streak. Bonnie should have been getting anyone out of this state she wants but she is :flush: There are and always have been good girls players in Kansas and Bonnie has not done well here. If Mittie can do well in Kansas and keep using his Texas ties we'll be fine.

I've seen them play quite a bit. They have good handles, and are very skilled, but I didn't see them as outstanding athletes even at the 4A high school level. I'm not trying to under-sell them either. They definitely stood out as players, but compared to people like Ohlde, Wecker and even Anne Weese, from Sacred Heart in Salina who went to Notre Dame, their athleticism didn't wow me. Bishop-Meige blasted them in the title game last year and the athletic difference was palpable.

Probably shouldn't do this but when evaluating women's basketball players, especially ones from Kansas I use athleticism as a euphemism for skill and versatility.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: nicname on January 08, 2015, 04:57:43 PM
Makes sense.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: nicname on January 08, 2015, 11:36:43 PM
i was going to say the same thing about the athletic difference, definitely palpable.  like, 100% palpable.

jerk.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on January 08, 2015, 11:39:46 PM
"Palpable" is a great word. Its greatness is palpable. (No knock, nic...you used it well).
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on January 09, 2015, 07:49:42 AM
i was going to say the same thing about the athletic difference, definitely palpable.  like, 100% palpable.

jerk.

I WILL FIGHT YOU.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: nicname on January 09, 2015, 07:42:58 PM
i was going to say the same thing about the athletic difference, definitely palpable.  like, 100% palpable.

jerk.

I WILL FIGHT YOU.

I'm terrible at dishing out punishment, but am pretty good at warding off potential attacks. I'd be terrible in a fight.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 'taterblast on January 11, 2015, 03:11:28 PM
 :ksu:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on January 11, 2015, 03:15:20 PM
Take that, KU.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on January 11, 2015, 04:46:37 PM
I really don't know how KU lost that game. I have never seen a team in a zone give up so much dribble penetration. KU would routinely get to the free throw line on penetration and then do something incredibly stupid with the ball instead of taking a jump shot.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: resident LibBot dick holder on January 11, 2015, 04:51:59 PM
What's the reason there are so many very good female players from KS?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: puniraptor on January 11, 2015, 05:48:01 PM
Farmin'
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on January 12, 2015, 12:18:37 AM
Wholesome, downhome butt kickers who want to win.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on January 12, 2015, 12:38:02 AM
What's the reason there are so many very good female players from KS?

I honestly think its because we've played WCBB and 5 on 5 at the prep level for longer than most. Both KU and KSU have very good histories going way back and I think that has helped develop good girls basketball in the state, similar to volleyball in Nebraska & wrestling in Iowa. Just an incredibly unscientific theory I've long held.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on January 17, 2015, 10:40:17 AM
Debating going to pack the house tonight. Anyone else going?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on January 17, 2015, 06:59:05 PM
(http://tapatalk.imageshack.com/v2/15/01/17/18a4e29ca964332570ba030f647734a3.jpg)

Loving this prime real estate!

#TheWesIsTheFuture

Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on January 17, 2015, 07:41:50 PM
Mittie just got T'd and got his money's worth. :love:

#TheWesIsTheFuture
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: slobber on January 17, 2015, 07:44:43 PM
Did the father of 7 from St. Mary's have time to cover all of his kids' ears?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on January 17, 2015, 07:45:43 PM
Hahahah I hope not.

#TheWesIsTheFuture

Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on January 17, 2015, 07:48:19 PM
Loving this squad. Admittedly this is my first game of the year. But I'll come back for more games. 35-37 ISU at half.

#TheWesIsTheFuture

Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on January 17, 2015, 08:11:51 PM
Boo game is stronger than I expected. :thumbs:

#TheWesIsTheFuture

Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: joda on January 17, 2015, 08:19:00 PM
Are we back to the early 2000s where there was a better crowd for women's games than men's?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on January 17, 2015, 08:23:22 PM
No. I remember those packed houses. Tonight is aided by it being dollar night I feel. I think this team has the potential to get it back there though.

#TheWesIsTheFuture

Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on January 17, 2015, 08:23:51 PM
In the next two years.

#TheWesIsTheFuture

Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on January 17, 2015, 08:32:59 PM
Coach Mittie doesn't know when to leave a zone. Getting slaughtered by 3s. 65-52. 6:35 left.

#TheWesIsTheFuture

Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on January 17, 2015, 10:16:40 PM
MIR,

I liked what I saw out of the team at the game tonight. It IS the only game I've seen all year. Lots of height across the board and youth. I think come senior year this team can really do things. What do you think?

Also, is the staying in a zone when getting murdered by threes a Mittie thing or a wbb thing? ISU had nothing approaching a post game but still we packed it in with a zone. Some quick passing and bam another three. It was disheartening to watch. By my eyes it was a 2-3, but I'm also a dummy.

Thank you for your insight,

SdK.

Also anyone else familiar with the team and what I said, feel free to interject.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on January 17, 2015, 11:14:34 PM
Staying in the zone is a Mittie thing. He plays the 2-3 as a primary defense like the Baylor and Syracuse men. He does not have the team to run it the way he wants though, we aren't long and athletic enough. Skilled teams will kill us. ISU was able to get the ball right in the middle of the zone and that absolutely kills you, especially with a team like ISU who likes to spread you and hit threes. Playing a 3-2 could have helped with that some but its obvious that we have not worked on that. To make matters worse is tha when we finally went man it was obvious we hadn't worked on that either because we had the worst man principles I've ever seen in a D1 game, men or women.

Lewis and Martin are the only players I see fitting in the long term plans of this team. But even with Martin and Lewis I'll be interested in seeing what their role will be when the sisters come. If all four of them start at the 2, 3, 4, and 5 we'll be longer and more athletic than we've been since the big 4. I thought we'd see more of Jones, Sheble, and Young but they really haven't played at all.

Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on January 17, 2015, 11:23:12 PM
Lewis is much improved from last season. Still, throughout this season, she is occasionally too hesitant to go to the hoop when she has good opportunities, and at times gets intimidated under the bucket. Again, however, she's much better than she was last season and will only get better.

Martin shows degrees of savvy and intelligence that freshmen rarely display.

Agreed that we don't have enough players who are a good fit for the 2-3, but Mittie can cure that with recruiting--especially if Lanie Page follows her sis to KSU.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on January 17, 2015, 11:27:31 PM
I want to stick to the 2-3 bit tonight and will comment more on the rest tomorrow. But why the eff are are playing a 2-3 against a team nailing 3 after 3 without the players to do it? Why are we wearing the players out chasing them down? I didn't get it. I loved the first half, but felt we were outcoached in the second half. It seemed Mittie had no plan for what they brought us in the second half. I feel I saw a legitimate core that I had not seen in a while on the court. But they were being misused. Maybe this is part of coach changing pains, but I saw a lot of good that I felt was misused.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on January 18, 2015, 12:04:40 AM
I want to stick to the 2-3 bit tonight and will comment more on the rest tomorrow. But why the eff are are playing a 2-3 against a team nailing 3 after 3 without the players to do it? Why are we wearing the players out chasing them down? I didn't get it. I loved the first half, but felt we were outcoached in the second half. It seemed Mittie had no plan for what they brought us in the second half. I feel I saw a legitimate core that I had not seen in a while on the court. But they were being misused. Maybe this is part of coach changing pains, but I saw a lot of good that I felt was misused.

We stuck with the 2-3 because that's his system. It was very frustrating to see and I was going to come on here and rant against inflexible coaching, then he went man and it was an unmitigated disaster. I understand why he insists on just being a 2-3 team because the young players in the program have to know that this is what we do. It's going to be frustrating against Baylor, OSU, and ISU for a year or two but he has to establish that culture within the program. I don't like going exclusively zone and its highly unusual but if that's what we're doing we have to do it.

The reason why ISU was able to exploit that zone is because we don't have the ability to pressure the ball at the top of the zone so that entry pass to 13 feet out in the lane is very easy to make. Next time you watch Baylor see what they do with the ball up top and then compare that with what we did. We don't take away any passing lanes with our zone.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on January 18, 2015, 12:13:44 AM
Ok. It was just frustrating to watch. Watching them run all around exhausting themselves only to see the ball move faster

#TheWesIsTheFuture
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on January 28, 2015, 08:14:14 PM
Looking pretty good against the Cowgirls
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on January 28, 2015, 08:54:26 PM
Going down to the wire.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on January 28, 2015, 08:59:26 PM
Overtime
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on January 28, 2015, 08:59:53 PM
LFG bones!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on January 28, 2015, 09:01:49 PM
i want this one
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on January 28, 2015, 09:16:29 PM
WOW!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on January 28, 2015, 09:19:38 PM
How close was that shot? I don't live in Kansas so I had to listen on the radio.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on January 28, 2015, 09:25:16 PM
Shot was made but the game clock ran out just before the shot. It was close. VERY close.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on January 28, 2015, 09:26:48 PM
Don't know if posted but Lanie is here on crutches wearing a boot.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on January 28, 2015, 09:33:58 PM
Don't know if posted but Lanie is here on crutches wearing a boot.

 :sdeek: hopefully just a sprain
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on January 28, 2015, 09:44:50 PM
Don't know if posted but Lanie is here on crutches wearing a boot.

Not the Lanie Page I saw. She was fine.

edit:  Oops. Brain spasm. Sunny may be right--I mixed up the sisters' names for a minute. Kaylee was fine, I didn't see  Lanie. 
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on January 28, 2015, 09:46:55 PM
Is this on tv?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on January 28, 2015, 09:51:07 PM
Was. 
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on January 28, 2015, 10:07:45 PM
Lanie was in the tunnel after the game.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: slobber on January 29, 2015, 07:37:31 AM

This thread needs scores.


Gonna win 'em all!
truth


Gonna win 'em all!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on January 29, 2015, 09:47:00 AM
We won last night dobs
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: slobber on January 29, 2015, 11:10:53 AM
Cats, woman.


Gonna win 'em all!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on January 29, 2015, 08:18:42 PM
Was.

Kinda. Only on shitty Cox Cable in state of Kansas
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on January 29, 2015, 08:21:01 PM
Was.

Kinda. Only on shitty Cox Cable in state of Kansas

Cox does have its problems.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on February 01, 2015, 12:24:19 AM
Cox didn't carry it, of course, but the Cats had a great road win today.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kso_FAN on February 03, 2015, 01:09:45 PM
:lol: at Georgetown.


Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on February 03, 2015, 01:10:57 PM
omg no way :lol:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on February 03, 2015, 02:02:58 PM
 :ROFL:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Tobias on February 04, 2015, 07:22:39 AM
see you there @ben ji
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on February 04, 2015, 07:42:57 PM
Kindred is rough ridin' scalding hot tonight guys
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kso_FAN on February 04, 2015, 07:44:15 PM
It's Ski-ish.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on February 04, 2015, 07:48:59 PM
Gonna beat a ranked team
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Tobias on February 04, 2015, 07:52:39 PM
what kind of numbers are we talking here?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kso_FAN on February 04, 2015, 07:53:31 PM

what kind of numbers are we talking here?

8 made threes. Ski-ish was a bit much, but that's still a lot.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Tobias on February 04, 2015, 07:54:13 PM
oh man, that's super hot :thumbs:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on February 04, 2015, 08:10:49 PM
great win for Mittie and The Squad.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on February 05, 2015, 12:02:52 PM
great win for Mittie and The Squad.

to celebrate last night's win i made the entire team honorary K-State Sluts (http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=34435.msg1307910#msg1307910) for the week
@winters
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: The Big Train on February 07, 2015, 09:13:07 PM
wow.  we have some work to do to get to georgetowns level
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on February 11, 2015, 10:28:28 PM
The Cats put on a pretty good show in their win over TCU tonight. This team just keeps getting better.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on February 15, 2015, 02:13:14 PM
Go LadyCats!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on February 15, 2015, 02:17:17 PM
Saw Claire Coggins at the men's game yesterday. I said "Hey Claire, after Megan Mahoney you're my favorite women's player" She didn't hear me. Also had a ring on her finger.  :frown:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on February 15, 2015, 03:50:59 PM
Martin!

#TheWesIsTheFuture

Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on February 16, 2015, 12:59:29 AM
Tough OT loss today, but Mittie has this team winning, and in games, that Deb would not have. He has us headed for a NIT bid absent a collapse over the next few games.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on February 16, 2015, 08:53:54 AM
Martin! Could have had that layup for the win!  Ugh!

#TheWesIsTheFuture

Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: nicname on February 17, 2015, 02:12:54 AM
Get ready for Shannon Spradling on steroids.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on February 17, 2015, 01:05:44 PM
Get ready for Shannon Spradling on steroids.

Page sisters' dad?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: nicname on February 17, 2015, 09:32:17 PM
Get ready for Shannon Spradling on steroids.

Page sisters' dad?

Correct.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on February 17, 2015, 10:32:22 PM
It will be fine if his daughters can play, frankly Kaylee is out of options at the D1 level so the hammer he's swinging isn't quite as heavy.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on February 18, 2015, 12:11:48 AM
I think Mittie will prevail in any dispute with Coach Page, if there is in fact any dispute. (Coach Page seems to be a great Cat booster during the games he attends). The sisters commit together here or they don't. They obviously didn't want to play for Deb...that may be why Kaylee transferred to KSU after the former staff left, and why her sister may come here after Deb's departure. Looking forward to these sisters in our lineup.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: PIPE on February 18, 2015, 10:16:45 AM
So what is going on with this?  There is a thread over on gopowercat I figured something was going on.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on February 18, 2015, 10:26:19 AM
With what? You could always read this thread.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: joda on February 18, 2015, 11:10:54 AM
IMO, there's a big difference between the headache of an overbearing parent/"advisor" to players with the potential to be one of the schools all time greats (see Butler and the Browns for another example) than those of a Will Spradling.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: raquetcat on February 18, 2015, 01:08:12 PM
Page sisters dad is being fired from being the girls head bball coach at wamego after the season is done. I guess 5 varsity players quit, the only senior left is his daughter, that's all I know
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: raquetcat on February 18, 2015, 01:10:32 PM
http://www.wibw.com/home/headlines/Wamego-Girls-Basketball-Coach--292401781.html?device=phone&c=y
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Tobias on February 18, 2015, 01:11:00 PM
sounds like we found oscar's replacement
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: raquetcat on February 18, 2015, 01:11:55 PM
http://www.wibw.com/home/headlines/Wamego-Lady-Raiders-Down-To-One-Senior-After-Others-Quit--292128311.html?device=phone&c=y
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on February 18, 2015, 01:27:20 PM
Whoa
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: TownieCat on February 18, 2015, 01:35:15 PM
A similar situation happened at Manhattan High last year with the boys head coach. Based on the quote it leads me to believe the players who quit cared more about other things that didn't pertain to basketball. That's fine for a 17 year old to do, but it doesn't entirely fall on the coach.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on February 18, 2015, 02:23:18 PM
I think Mittie will prevail in any dispute with Coach Page, if there is in fact any dispute. (Coach Page seems to be a great Cat booster during the games he attends). The sisters commit together here or they don't. They obviously didn't want to play for Deb...that may be why Kaylee transferred to KSU after the former staff left, and why her sister may come here after Deb's departure. Looking forward to these sisters in our lineup.

I don't know about "not wanting to play for Deb." K-State was in the final three schools for both players. Nebraska was simply a better program when Kaylee selected them and I'm not sure but I'd guess Lanie didn't pick K-State because the coaching situation was very unstable.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on February 18, 2015, 02:26:19 PM
I hate opening this thread on tt.

#TheWesIsTheFuture

Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on February 18, 2015, 02:31:53 PM
Page sisters dad is being fired from being the girls head bball coach at wamego after the season is done. I guess 5 varsity players quit, the only senior left is his daughter, that's all I know

I doubt he's going to get fired, they are 14-4. Those four losses are to three teams with a combined record of 65-10 and 20-4 in conference. With those results it's pretty tough to not think the players are being FPs, TCs, etc.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on February 18, 2015, 02:33:08 PM
I hate opening this thread on tt.

#TheWesIsTheFuture

pourquoi?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on February 18, 2015, 02:39:20 PM
I hate opening this thread on tt.

#TheWesIsTheFuture

pourquoi?
I assume because of the image that shows up on TT
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on February 18, 2015, 02:44:41 PM
I hate opening this thread on tt.

#TheWesIsTheFuture

pourquoi?

what is it?
I assume because of the image that shows up on TT
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on February 18, 2015, 02:51:47 PM
Hands making a vagina gesture. At least, that's what it is to me.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: raquetcat on February 18, 2015, 02:53:11 PM
Page sisters dad is being fired from being the girls head bball coach at wamego after the season is done. I guess 5 varsity players quit, the only senior left is his daughter, that's all I know

I doubt he's going to get fired, they are 14-4. Those four losses are to three teams with a combined record of 65-10 and 20-4 in conference. With those results it's pretty tough to not think the players are being FPs, TCs, etc.
The board of education already voted (unanimously) to terminate his contact at the end of the season, check out the first link I posted a few posts ago
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: nicname on February 18, 2015, 04:58:49 PM
I think Mittie will prevail in any dispute with Coach Page, if there is in fact any dispute. (Coach Page seems to be a great Cat booster during the games he attends). The sisters commit together here or they don't. They obviously didn't want to play for Deb...that may be why Kaylee transferred to KSU after the former staff left, and why her sister may come here after Deb's departure. Looking forward to these sisters in our lineup.

From what I've heard it was mutual.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: nicname on February 18, 2015, 05:01:27 PM
Page sisters dad is being fired from being the girls head bball coach at wamego after the season is done. I guess 5 varsity players quit, the only senior left is his daughter, that's all I know

I doubt he's going to get fired, they are 14-4. Those four losses are to three teams with a combined record of 65-10 and 20-4 in conference. With those results it's pretty tough to not think the players are being FPs, TCs, etc.

He has no reason to remain at the school. Fired or not, I highly doubt he'll be around next season. I would believe that he was never long for the Wamego job from the beginning.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on February 19, 2015, 10:05:27 AM
I hate opening this thread on tt.

#TheWesIsTheFuture

pourquoi?
The pic is of the vagina hand signal. Really not a good look. :(

#TheWesIsTheFuture

Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Gooch on February 19, 2015, 04:21:24 PM
So what is going on with this?  There is a thread over on gopowercat I figured something was going on.
Go back and read their thread. Also please just stay there.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on February 20, 2015, 02:52:53 AM
Page sisters dad is being fired from being the girls head bball coach at wamego after the season is done. I guess 5 varsity players quit, the only senior left is his daughter, that's all I know

I doubt he's going to get fired, they are 14-4. Those four losses are to three teams with a combined record of 65-10 and 20-4 in conference. With those results it's pretty tough to not think the players are being FPs, TCs, etc.
The board of education already voted (unanimously) to terminate his contact at the end of the season, check out the first link I posted a few posts ago

 :sdeek:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on February 25, 2015, 09:11:03 PM
OH HELL YEAH!

Ashia Woods :love:
That foul call on Martin towards the end of the game, WTF  :confused: :dunno:

Anyway go cats  :ksu:

Proud Mitite/Jeffite
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on February 25, 2015, 09:17:28 PM
Ashia owned the last two minutes. Fantastic job.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Tobias on February 25, 2015, 09:17:58 PM
:emawkid:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: scottwildcat on February 25, 2015, 09:21:30 PM
Mittie and the Squad! I'm such a proud season ticket holder!  :ksu:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on February 25, 2015, 09:27:05 PM
 :Woot:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: The Big Train on February 25, 2015, 09:34:23 PM
 :ksu: :ksu: :ksu:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: joda on February 25, 2015, 09:55:56 PM
Ashia owned the last two minutes. Fantastic job.

Ashia is probably one of the most underrated 'Cats baller (male or female). Really sad she's a senior.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Ich.Gewinne on February 25, 2015, 11:18:22 PM
Sheble is a bamf - not even joking. Going to be a baller later on fo sho.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on February 25, 2015, 11:24:42 PM
Sheble is a bamf - not even joking. Going to be a baller later on fo sho.

I didn't watch tonight but I'm generally not a fan. She has her moments for sure.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Ich.Gewinne on February 25, 2015, 11:29:29 PM
Sheble is a bamf - not even joking. Going to be a baller later on fo sho.

I didn't watch tonight but I'm generally not a fan. She has her moments for sure.

True true
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on February 26, 2015, 12:28:40 AM
Ashia owned the last two minutes. Fantastic job.

Ashia is probably one of the most underrated 'Cats baller (male or female). Really sad she's a senior.

 :thumbs:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on February 26, 2015, 08:23:15 AM
Sheble is a bamf - not even joking. Going to be a baller later on fo sho.

I didn't watch tonight but I'm generally not a fan. She has her moments for sure.

I didn't think she was very good last night. I don't want to be mean but I would be stunned if she doesn't get recruited over, kinda has already happened.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: slobber on February 26, 2015, 08:26:46 AM
Would it really kill you guys to say, "the lady cats played ______, and won/lost XX/XX"?


Gonna win 'em all!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on February 26, 2015, 11:00:14 AM
Would it really kill you guys to say, "the lady cats played ______, and won/lost XX/XX"?


Gonna win 'em all!

you have twitter for that
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: resident LibBot dick holder on February 26, 2015, 11:14:08 PM
Would it really kill you guys to say, "the lady cats played ______, and won/lost XX/XX"?


Gonna win 'em all!

i agree dobber
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on February 27, 2015, 12:27:53 AM
Dobber. Get an app for your phone. I get updates at the beginning, ht, and end of games. I use yahoo sports. But there are others.

#TheWesIsTheFuture

Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Tobias on February 27, 2015, 12:29:35 AM
i also agree slobber
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on February 27, 2015, 12:36:38 AM
Dobber. Get an app for your phone. I get updates at the beginning, ht, and end of games. I use yahoo sports. But there are others.

#TheWesIsTheFuture

Or just check ESPN, INet or mobile. Their GameCast (or whatever they call it from day to day) gives constant updates, so you don't have to wait for halftime, etc.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: The Big Train on February 27, 2015, 12:38:07 AM
i know slobber is "older" but i think he can handle his app notifications you guys
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: slobber on February 27, 2015, 06:21:40 AM
:lol: you damn kids these days are a bunch of little smart asses.


Gonna win 'em all!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Tobias on March 03, 2015, 08:53:02 PM
:ohno:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on March 03, 2015, 08:53:44 PM
 :emawkid:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Tobias on March 03, 2015, 08:55:08 PM
slobber, we came from behind to beat wvu 59-55
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on March 03, 2015, 08:58:46 PM
Texada took the game over late.  She refused to lose.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on March 03, 2015, 08:59:32 PM
slobber, we came from behind to beat wvu 59-55

lol
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: slobber on March 03, 2015, 10:23:13 PM

slobber, we came from behind to beat wvu 59-55
you are a hero.


Gonna win 'em all!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Tobias on March 06, 2015, 08:09:26 PM
you are a hero.

what if i told you we just beat the squawks 57-49 in the 1st round of the b12 tourney for a full 3x sweep?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on March 06, 2015, 08:54:22 PM
The bad news is we get Baylor next.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: slobber on March 06, 2015, 09:49:25 PM

you are a hero.

what if i told you we just beat the squawks 57-49 in the 1st round of the b12 tourney for a full 3x sweep?
I'd be very happy about that. Very happy for little lady cats everywhere.

Also, you'd reaffirm your hero status.


Gonna win 'em all!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: slobber on March 06, 2015, 09:50:06 PM

The bad news is we get Baylor next.
I look forward to updates ITT.


Gonna win 'em all!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 06, 2015, 09:55:12 PM
For fucks sake, can whoever posted the vag  hand sign delete it? I'm tired of seeing that crap

#TheWesIsTheFuture

Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Tobias on March 06, 2015, 09:58:41 PM
it is the hurting image of this thread
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Prince McJunkins on March 10, 2015, 06:22:16 PM
It seems like Mittie had a pretty decent first year. May have to catch a game if they're hosting Wnit.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on March 13, 2015, 01:20:18 AM
Thinking we'll get a NIT bid.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: POWL on March 13, 2015, 08:41:03 AM
It seems like Mittie had a pretty decent first year. May have to catch a game if they're hosting Wnit.
Deb's best player transfers and he got the leftovers...........he got that group to win 9 more games than Deb's last year......not too shabby

side note : they run the Tex Winter triangle on offense and Syracuse zone on D
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 13, 2015, 01:04:51 PM
I'm excited about the lady cats  next year. Moreso  than the men. :frown:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: wazucat on March 13, 2015, 05:09:55 PM
It seems like Mittie had a pretty decent first year. May have to catch a game if they're hosting Wnit.
Deb's best player transfers and he got the leftovers...........he got that group to win 9 more games than Deb's last year......not too shabby

side note : they run the Tex Winter triangle on offense and Syracuse zone on D

Being serious, isn't the Triangle a difficult offense to learn? 
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 13, 2015, 11:44:01 PM
Someone edit y-la's post for christ sake.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 14, 2015, 01:00:25 AM
It seems like Mittie had a pretty decent first year. May have to catch a game if they're hosting Wnit.
Deb's best player transfers and he got the leftovers...........he got that group to win 9 more games than Deb's last year......not too shabby

side note : they run the Tex Winter triangle on offense and Syracuse zone on D

Being serious, isn't the Triangle a difficult offense to learn?

No it's not any harder than any other offense. Like any other offense the triangle is just a base offense with a series of reads, the more familiar you are with the offense the more reads you can make.

LOL at "Syracuse zone" whatever that means. We, like Syracuse, just run a zone. Syracuse's zone is noteworthy because the players in that zone are long and athletic.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: michigancat on March 14, 2015, 01:09:35 AM
Someone edit y-la's post for christ sake.
It's been edited, but won't go away. IMO it's worth it to delete this thread and start a new one. For the greater good.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 14, 2015, 01:10:22 AM
I agree
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on March 16, 2015, 07:59:11 PM
I've tried to edit it
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on March 16, 2015, 08:00:49 PM
wnit bid for #mittieball
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: slobber on March 16, 2015, 08:01:34 PM
The machines are winning.


Gonna win 'em all!
Title: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on March 16, 2015, 08:07:39 PM
It seems like Mittie had a pretty decent first year. May have to catch a game if they're hosting Wnit.
Deb's best player transfers and he got the leftovers...........he got that group to win 9 more games than Deb's last year......not too shabby

side note : they run the Tex Winter triangle on offense and Syracuse zone on D

Being serious, isn't the Triangle a difficult offense to learn?

No it's not any harder than any other offense. Like any other offense the triangle is just a base offense with a series of reads, the more familiar you are with the offense the more reads you can make.

LOL at "Syracuse zone" whatever that means. We, like Syracuse, just run a zone. Syracuse's zone is noteworthy because the players in that zone are long and athletic.
syracuse's zone is noteworthy because
a) how and when they switch within it and bump down
b) how and when they trap

we definitely aren't running the same zone as the Orange

what was noteworthy about the Bulls offense in the mid-90's?  the players were long and athletic.  really?

I guess what I'm saying is that unless you want to treat Boeheim's genius with the respect that it deserves, it's best you just keep its name outta your mouth

your post disgusted me
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on March 16, 2015, 08:30:31 PM
wnit bid for #mittieball

Bracket out by 10:30 tonight.   :)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on March 16, 2015, 09:25:14 PM
Cats host Akron Thursday. Time announced tomorrow.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: The Big Train on March 16, 2015, 11:25:34 PM
lets rough ridin' take this crap
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on March 17, 2015, 12:48:10 AM
lets rough ridin' take this crap

 :thumbs:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on March 17, 2015, 09:19:37 AM
game at 7pm Thursday
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 17, 2015, 05:16:26 PM
You guys are so mean.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on March 19, 2015, 08:35:49 PM
Women beating the Zips by 24 with 9:10 left.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on March 19, 2015, 09:02:15 PM
Women beating the Zips by 24 with 9:10 left.

Won 86-68. Hosting Mizzou Sunday at 2.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: slobber on March 19, 2015, 09:05:13 PM
Paint it white


Gonna win 'em all!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 19, 2015, 09:05:19 PM
Go Lady Cats
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Prince McJunkins on March 19, 2015, 09:56:01 PM
Women beating the Zips by 24 with 9:10 left.

Won 86-68. Hosting Mizzou Sunday at 2.
Awesome, I'll be in town this weekend. I may have to catch this.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on March 19, 2015, 10:58:44 PM
Akron is a very bad team
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Stevesie60 on March 19, 2015, 11:46:49 PM
Akron is a very bad team

It's the NIT. Every team is a very bad team.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on March 20, 2015, 12:49:08 AM

Perhaps some thread merging is in play here.

http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=7911.1150

Mods?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: fun muffin on March 20, 2015, 01:05:44 AM
Attendance  1704    :shy:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 22, 2015, 09:52:47 AM
Gameday bitches :excited:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 22, 2015, 10:25:01 AM
Airing on K-statehd.tv for free!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on March 22, 2015, 01:01:01 PM
Ashia on crutches. Gotta be done. :frown:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 22, 2015, 01:03:52 PM
Ashia on crutches. Gotta be done. :frown:
:frown:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on March 22, 2015, 01:46:09 PM
Sad ending to a good college career.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 22, 2015, 03:17:38 PM
This feed looks pretty great on the ipad.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: slobber on March 22, 2015, 03:43:56 PM
This thread is worthless without scores.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 22, 2015, 04:43:36 PM
This thread is worthless without scores.
They were down 20 points last I saw.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 22, 2015, 04:44:35 PM
This thread is worthless without scores.
They were down 20 points last I saw.
67-48 Mizzou
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 'taterblast on March 22, 2015, 05:49:30 PM
k-state postseason athletics!  :Woot:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 23, 2015, 05:38:55 PM
Anyone else #teamtigers?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on March 23, 2015, 05:39:52 PM
:peek:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 23, 2015, 05:40:30 PM
Nm. Tapatalk misread
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on March 23, 2015, 05:41:22 PM
Yes I am.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 23, 2015, 05:41:44 PM
Yes I am.
Cheers, mate!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on March 23, 2015, 05:42:44 PM
Not really interested in watching Leti play.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 23, 2015, 05:44:23 PM
Wow. A 10 second call against no press. :eek:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 23, 2015, 05:44:42 PM
Not really interested in watching Leti play.
Forgot all about that lady.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on March 23, 2015, 07:27:55 PM
Not really interested in watching Leti play.

Zero interest here.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: TownieCat on March 29, 2015, 12:31:47 PM
Leti is really fun to watch. Sucks she wanted to leave, but great she is having success at FSU. 
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 31, 2015, 11:11:23 AM
Koehn's record fell last night. Shitty to see it falls to a player who had so many more games to do it.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on April 01, 2015, 03:56:27 PM
Coggins resigned. I assume it's not April Fools
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 'taterblast on April 01, 2015, 04:44:57 PM
Coggins resigned. I assume it's not April Fools

8th grade 'blast is devastated
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on April 01, 2015, 06:41:34 PM
I'll always be a Mahoney guy. Claire is an attractive woman though.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on April 02, 2015, 12:33:06 AM
Here its is. Always liked Claire.

http://www.kstatesports.com/sports/w-baskbl/ksu-w-baskbl-body.html
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on April 02, 2015, 07:40:07 AM
:tear:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: slobber on April 02, 2015, 07:42:05 AM
Glad that it appears to be amicable and on her terms.


Gonna win 'em all!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on April 02, 2015, 07:46:16 AM
I'm curious what she will be moving on to do?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on April 18, 2015, 12:38:46 AM
Looks like Lanie Page has signed with us and we're in on the transfer twins from Vandy. Could get pretty interesting.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: TownieCat on April 18, 2015, 09:23:54 AM
Looks like Lanie Page has signed with us and we're in on the transfer twins from Vandy. Could get pretty interesting.
Will take. They visited last weekend and according to Twitter had a great time in Manhattan  (obviously).

What is our scholarship situation? We only had 3 seniors and by my count the twins would be our 4th and 5th signees if we land them. Who are the walk ons?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: wetwillie on April 18, 2015, 09:49:28 AM
We could offer mens scholarships probably
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on April 18, 2015, 12:09:33 PM
Looks like Lanie Page has signed with us and we're in on the transfer twins from Vandy. Could get pretty interesting.
Will take. They visited last weekend and according to Twitter had a great time in Manhattan  (obviously).

What is our scholarship situation? We only had 3 seniors and by my count the twins would be our 4th and 5th signees if we land them. Who are the walk ons?

Not sure on the numbers, but it looks like Mertz, Meeks and Jones are transferring, and Malone is probably done playing.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: The Big Train on April 19, 2015, 09:13:44 PM
Looks like Lanie Page has signed with us and we're in on the transfer twins from Vandy. Could get pretty interesting.

glad this finally came out
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Stevesie60 on April 19, 2015, 10:26:19 PM
Looks like Lanie Page has signed with us and we're in on the transfer twins from Vandy. Could get pretty interesting.

glad this finally came out

Okay, Fitz.


:peek:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: The Big Train on April 19, 2015, 10:27:55 PM
Looks like Lanie Page has signed with us and we're in on the transfer twins from Vandy. Could get pretty interesting.

glad this finally came out

Okay, Fitz.


:peek:

in this case, basically
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kso_FAN on April 21, 2015, 12:29:25 PM
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: ChiCat on April 21, 2015, 12:32:12 PM

Well why the hell would you do something like that?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on April 21, 2015, 12:32:46 PM
"when your annual ass beating from baylor just isn't enough"
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on April 21, 2015, 12:33:45 PM

 :ohno:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on April 21, 2015, 12:36:36 PM

Well why the hell would you do something like that?

we're not in the basketball game to actually win. we're in it to build things and sell tickets.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on April 21, 2015, 01:05:07 PM

Awesome

Baylor
Stanford
Notre Dame
Maryland
Duke
Penn State

Those are the power 5 road games UCONN has played the last two seasons
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kso_FAN on April 21, 2015, 01:10:33 PM
(http://www.quotehd.com/imagequotes/authors63/adam-vinatieri-quote-to-be-the-best-youve-got-to-beat-the-best-thats.jpg)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: TownieCat on June 08, 2015, 08:34:42 AM
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 'taterblast on June 08, 2015, 09:51:10 AM
a Louisville transfer? is this good?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on June 09, 2015, 05:30:19 PM
a Louisville transfer? is this good?

YES! She played for them too.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: puniraptor on June 11, 2015, 09:56:45 AM
former ladyballer and current local tv news one woman army becomes low-viral sensation after being swarmed by cicadas on fort riley

https://youtu.be/841OAVjn8C0 (https://youtu.be/841OAVjn8C0)

it was on all the morning news shows go cats

http://abcnews.go.com/US/kansas-reporter-bugged-swarming-cicadas/story?id=31673135 (http://abcnews.go.com/US/kansas-reporter-bugged-swarming-cicadas/story?id=31673135)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Trim on June 17, 2015, 05:27:22 PM
Real-life commercial produced this decade: https://youtu.be/goJt6YSCvNg

Also:

(http://i709.photobucket.com/albums/ww92/TommyRoanoke/ladycat%20youtube_zpsw6oeqaok.jpg) (http://s709.photobucket.com/user/TommyRoanoke/media/ladycat%20youtube_zpsw6oeqaok.jpg.html)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: cas4ksu on June 17, 2015, 06:03:12 PM
that was tough to watch.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on June 17, 2015, 06:27:33 PM
My goodness. I feel bad for the ladycats.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on June 17, 2015, 11:51:18 PM
Is that a rough ridin' joke?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on June 17, 2015, 11:51:50 PM
former ladyballer and current local tv news one woman army becomes low-viral sensation after being swarmed by cicadas on fort riley

https://youtu.be/841OAVjn8C0 (https://youtu.be/841OAVjn8C0)

it was on all the morning news shows go cats

http://abcnews.go.com/US/kansas-reporter-bugged-swarming-cicadas/story?id=31673135 (http://abcnews.go.com/US/kansas-reporter-bugged-swarming-cicadas/story?id=31673135)

 :emawkid:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on June 18, 2015, 01:07:09 AM
The :12 second to the :17 second mark is so sad. Hilarious. But sad.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on June 18, 2015, 01:44:17 AM
Katya is going to be a stud journalist.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: nicname on June 18, 2015, 08:36:10 AM
Real-life commercial produced this decade: https://youtu.be/goJt6YSCvNg

Also:

(http://i709.photobucket.com/albums/ww92/TommyRoanoke/ladycat%20youtube_zpsw6oeqaok.jpg) (http://s709.photobucket.com/user/TommyRoanoke/media/ladycat%20youtube_zpsw6oeqaok.jpg.html)

Maybe they should be trying to branch out more, but there is a demographic that goes to women's basketball games, and they were just raining long-range bombs all over it.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 0.42 on June 18, 2015, 04:05:09 PM
it's like kstate0 impregnated itself and had a kstate0 baby
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: cas4ksu on June 18, 2015, 06:08:18 PM
Katya Leick used to date Ndamukong Suh.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: GregKSU1027 on June 24, 2015, 01:36:53 AM
Katya Leick used to date Ndamukong Suh.
BBS'n or nah?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk

Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on June 30, 2015, 01:22:01 AM
Katya Leick used to date Ndamukong Suh.

I don't think this happened.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Trim on October 03, 2015, 02:35:13 PM
KSU couldn't find a good pic of AI?

https://youtu.be/U-4J21M-km0?t=2m6s
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: The Big Train on October 04, 2015, 11:49:00 PM
Real-life commercial produced this decade: https://youtu.be/goJt6YSCvNg

i know 2 people from this video
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: The Big Train on October 04, 2015, 11:50:43 PM
also, almost 4 months later it still says 'mens basketball'
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on October 05, 2015, 10:08:44 AM
Katya Leick used to date Ndamukong Suh.

I don't think this happened.

I think you are wrong.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: TownieCat on November 19, 2015, 11:25:17 AM
Mittie just signed a 5* :Wha:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: TownieCat on November 19, 2015, 11:27:56 AM
Mittie just signed a 5* :Wha:

When I first read "#33 player in the nation" I assumed it was Canada, but it's not. :surprised:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on November 19, 2015, 11:36:38 AM
oh my goodness :ksu:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: joda on November 19, 2015, 01:38:42 PM
Mittie's continuing to build a monster
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 'taterblast on November 19, 2015, 04:48:11 PM
wow!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on November 19, 2015, 06:32:32 PM
 :emawkid:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: slobber on November 19, 2015, 06:41:49 PM
Wow!!!!


Gonna win 'em all!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on November 19, 2015, 08:24:31 PM
Feels good to be a Mittite
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: _33 on November 19, 2015, 10:24:41 PM
GIRLCOAT?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on November 19, 2015, 10:46:54 PM
Oof, that was close
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Tobias on November 19, 2015, 10:57:00 PM

Oof, that was close

who was it down to?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on November 20, 2015, 08:36:20 AM
south dakota or us, we won in OT
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: treysolid on November 20, 2015, 02:27:43 PM
GIRLCOAT?

Greatest In Real Life Class of All-Time?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: _33 on November 22, 2015, 10:34:05 AM
GIRLCOAT?

Greatest In Real Life Class of All-Time?

No, just great recruiting class but with girls.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on November 24, 2015, 11:42:54 AM
Sounds like a weird thing to say coming off of a 40 point loss, but this team is legit. We should contend for a NCAA tournament bid.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Prince McJunkins on November 24, 2015, 02:51:59 PM
No shame. UConn drubbed #7 Ohio St in Columbus by a larger margin.

I am encouraged with the recruiting and we seem to have a pretty solid group this year. I will definitely try to make it to some games.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: joda on November 24, 2015, 03:00:02 PM
Aren't you glad we got Jeff instead of Jody?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on November 24, 2015, 03:03:43 PM
I was wrong
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: joda on November 24, 2015, 03:47:24 PM
I was wrong

Me too. I thought Mittie was a WBB oscar.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on November 25, 2015, 12:14:09 AM
I was wrong

Me too. I thought Mittie was a WBB oscar.

Mittie is definitely not oscar.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on December 13, 2015, 11:37:47 PM
Women won by 49 tonight, 102-53. Although FAU is not the greatest of teams, we shot well, rebounded well, and the bench played well. Lots of energy from start to finish. Overall a great game for the Cats. I'm liking this team more and more.  :ksu:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: resident LibBot dick holder on December 14, 2015, 01:39:12 PM
Scoring over 100 is pretty great no matter who you play  :thumbs:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: joda on December 14, 2015, 02:20:56 PM
With all these studettes he's bring in he better make the final 4 soon or suffer the wrath of dax
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: wetwillie on December 14, 2015, 08:17:23 PM
Dax has his sights set on volleyball, mittie is safe for a while.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on December 21, 2015, 12:42:44 AM
Cats can finish the non-con at 10-1 with a win Monday night.   :)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Canary on December 21, 2015, 08:48:49 PM
Cats can finish the non-con at 10-1 with a win Monday night.   :)
I think they won by almost forty points tonight.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Tobias on December 21, 2015, 08:51:42 PM

Cats can finish the non-con at 10-1 with a win Monday night.   :)
I think they won by almost forty points tonight.

@slobber

(http://images.tapatalk-cdn.com/15/12/21/04ae278c5d5fa3b8e684254764665ae4.jpg)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on December 21, 2015, 11:42:12 PM
Cats slowed down a bit in the second half (Jeff emptied his bench in the fourth quarter) but it was a really good win. It's clear Mittie wants the team to start pounding the ball inside to Lewis, and the team recognizes that and Lewis is starting to accept the fact she needs to go to the rim when she gets it inside. Conference games start December 30 here against ISU.  :ksu:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: slobber on December 22, 2015, 06:41:22 AM
Thanks Tobias. You are a great nephew.


Gonna win 'em all! (using Tapatalk)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on December 29, 2015, 01:35:34 AM
We go 1-0 in conference against ISU Wednesday night. Take it to the bank.  :ksu:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on December 31, 2015, 01:29:18 AM
We go 1-0 in conference against ISU Wednesday night. Take it to the bank.  :ksu:

Well, I was wrong. We lost. Cyclones did a good job against Jeff's various zones. Lewis didn't react well to aggressive play in the paint (ISU scored too many baskets against her, and she missed too many inside shots and layups herself--her stats are misleading in this regard because she didn't play all that well), although there were some indications that she wasn't at full speed. Martin's aggressiveness exceeded anything we've seen from her yet--she's a good player and will get even better.

When Lewis becomes more aggressive on both ends, we'll be a much better team.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on January 06, 2016, 09:02:46 PM
Goodness that was horrawful :flush:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Canary on January 06, 2016, 09:10:24 PM
Goodness that was horrawful :flush:
Sounded really bad. That's several games in a row.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on January 06, 2016, 10:26:03 PM
It wasn't pretty. Lewis has to be more aggressive. She tends to sulk when getting pushed around inside. And too many missed layups as a team. Martin continued to play well and took it to the rim more often than I recall seeing in the past. Tough road trip to Norman this weekend.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: ednksu on January 07, 2016, 08:58:13 AM
It wasn't pretty. Lewis has to be more aggressive. She tends to sulk when getting pushed around inside. And too many missed layups as a team. Martin continued to play well and took it to the rim more often than I recall seeing in the past. Tough road trip to Norman this weekend.
that kind of beat down isn't really explained by sulking or a few missed layups.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on January 07, 2016, 12:24:46 PM
It wasn't pretty. Lewis has to be more aggressive. She tends to sulk when getting pushed around inside. And too many missed layups as a team. Martin continued to play well and took it to the rim more often than I recall seeing in the past. Tough road trip to Norman this weekend.
that kind of beat down isn't really explained by sulking or a few missed layups.

 Lewis' play and the missed layups were just part of it.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on January 07, 2016, 12:32:36 PM
the west Virginia women's team was no doubt buoyed by their meal at umi the night before. ladycats had no chance.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on January 10, 2016, 11:44:30 PM
Cats fell 'way behind early today, but fought hard the rest of the way to make it somewhat close. Goth played quite a bit and made a difference by playing out front in the zone at times. Kindred is a good player, but we need a bit more size out front when we play the zone.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Canary on January 13, 2016, 08:55:12 PM
Ladies in a great game with OSU right now.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on January 13, 2016, 09:04:33 PM
Great final few minutes for the win.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Canary on January 13, 2016, 09:09:02 PM
Sounded like it. Good week for cats so far.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Canary on January 13, 2016, 09:10:41 PM
I'm considering the double header this Saturday for both men's and women's games.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on January 13, 2016, 09:33:56 PM
Good idea. Should be a good time.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Tobias on January 16, 2016, 09:10:41 PM
@slobber

(http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160117/d061e57fece7747a6c34a9e2cb2542da.jpg)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: cfbandyman on January 16, 2016, 10:58:33 PM
Glad they got the win. They should keep their winning ownage of ku going next week.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on January 16, 2016, 11:21:46 PM
Glad they got the win. They should keep their winning ownage of ku going next week.

Agreed. KU has lost 8 games in a row. Only one has been close (ORU).
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: slobber on January 17, 2016, 09:34:48 AM

@slobber

(http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160117/d061e57fece7747a6c34a9e2cb2542da.jpg)
thanks for the update!


Gonna win 'em all! (using Tapatalk)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on January 20, 2016, 12:50:31 PM
tonight vs the squawks on fxskc
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: The Big Train on January 20, 2016, 08:18:31 PM
Beating ass right now
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on January 20, 2016, 08:35:12 PM
Pretty dominating.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: cfbandyman on January 20, 2016, 09:48:28 PM
I mean i ku sucks, but Mittie knows to win this game hard.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on January 20, 2016, 09:57:39 PM
I mean i ku sucks, but Mittie knows to win this game hard.
*except for the 4 conf games we lost
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: cfbandyman on January 20, 2016, 10:01:27 PM
I mean i ku sucks, but Mittie knows to win this game hard.
*except for the 4 conf games we lost

I was meaning just this game against ku, like he beats ku like OBz beats ku or Massa beats k-state (usually)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Prince McJunkins on January 25, 2016, 11:01:18 PM
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on January 26, 2016, 12:26:08 AM

What is your point in RT this? (From left to right) Anna Hammaker is new, and Cheyenne Hooper and Lanie Page are injured and out for the season.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: slobber on January 26, 2016, 06:54:21 AM
Tobias?


Gonna win 'em all! (using Tapatalk)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on January 26, 2016, 08:04:48 AM

What is your point in RT this? (From left to right) Anna Hammaker is new, and Cheyenne Hooper and Lanie Page are injured and out for the season.
oh look at this guy who knows who our players are and what their current playing status is (from left to right)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on February 09, 2016, 11:57:20 PM
Great win tonight against a Top 25 team. The Cats were intense, played with a sense of urgency, and drove to the basket more than any time this season. Best game of the year.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: The Big Train on February 10, 2016, 07:10:07 AM
Best time to get a win, warmup for the major KU ass beating on Saturday
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: TownieCat on February 10, 2016, 09:08:13 AM
http://espn.go.com/womens-college-basketball/bracketology

This was posted on Monday, but it has us as First Four Out. Have to think a win over #30 in the RPI helps bump up a few spots.

The MittieCats are currently #49 in the RPI. We will likely beat KU and Tech at home, but lose at OSU and Texas and at home vs Baylor. A bid could hinge on the Iowa State game in two weeks.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on February 14, 2016, 01:33:29 AM
Great win tonight against KU.  :ksu:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on February 14, 2016, 02:33:15 AM
KU rough ridin' sucks
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: The Big Train on February 14, 2016, 08:03:39 AM
I thought about going to the game, I didn't but I'm glad we beat their ass
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: slobber on February 14, 2016, 09:12:12 AM
@Tobias ? Anyone?


Gonna win 'em all! (using Tapatalk)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on February 14, 2016, 09:57:56 AM
@Tobias ? Anyone?


Gonna win 'em all! (using Tapatalk)
We won. Tobias has the score. Idk it.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: cfbandyman on February 14, 2016, 10:06:04 AM
@Tobias ? Anyone?


Gonna win 'em all! (using Tapatalk)
We won. Tobias has the score. Idk it.

81-67 (I know I am not Tobias tho)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: slobber on February 14, 2016, 12:59:34 PM

@Tobias ? Anyone?


Gonna win 'em all! (using Tapatalk)
We won. Tobias has the score. Idk it.

81-67 (I know I am not Tobias tho)
kicked ass- you and KSU lady cats.


Gonna win 'em all! (using Tapatalk)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: resident LibBot dick holder on February 16, 2016, 10:25:20 PM
@Tobias ? Anyone?


Gonna win 'em all! (using Tapatalk)

a guy can't go on vacation?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on February 18, 2016, 12:17:57 AM
Cats played well against a Top 10 team tonight. Great effort, but sadly a seven point loss.

Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: slobber on February 18, 2016, 03:36:34 AM

Cats played well against a Top 10 team tonight. Great effort, but sadly a seven point loss.
That sucks.
So was it like 0-7 or 100-107? Somewhere in between?


Gonna win 'em all! (using Tapatalk)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Tobias on February 18, 2016, 06:37:23 AM
thanks for the assist guys
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sunny_cat on February 18, 2016, 09:53:01 AM

Cats played well against a Top 10 team tonight. Great effort, but sadly a seven point loss.
That sucks.
So was it like 0-7 or 100-107? Somewhere in between?


Gonna win 'em all! (using Tapatalk)
58-51
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: slobber on February 18, 2016, 09:54:44 AM
You guys are great. Thank you SC.


Gonna win 'em all! (using Tapatalk)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: TownieCat on February 22, 2016, 01:03:29 PM
http://espn.go.com/womens-college-basketball/bracketology (http://espn.go.com/womens-college-basketball/bracketology)

Last 4 in and a 9 seed. Probably need to win one of the last 3, plus 1 in OKC.

@ISU
Baylor
@OSU
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: slobber on February 23, 2016, 09:27:11 AM
Good stuff!


Gonna win 'em all! (using Tapatalk)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Prince McJunkins on February 24, 2016, 08:53:25 PM
They beat ISU in Ames tonight. Seems like they've been steadily improving.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Tobias on February 24, 2016, 08:56:02 PM
@slobber

Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on February 24, 2016, 09:07:10 PM
nice win, hope we can make the big dance
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: TownieCat on February 24, 2016, 09:09:17 PM
Huge win for Mittie & Co. Should be enough for a tourney bid.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: cfbandyman on February 24, 2016, 09:25:38 PM
This is what an improving trend looks like. Go Cats
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on February 24, 2016, 10:41:20 PM
This is what an improving trend looks like. Go Cats

ya i'll be honest, was weird to see currie poach mittie from tcu but i'm glad to see the team get progressively better under him
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on February 25, 2016, 12:02:20 AM
This is what an improving trend looks like. Go Cats

ya i'll be honest, was weird to see currie poach mittie from tcu but i'm glad to see the team get progressively better under him

 :thumbs:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Trogdor on March 14, 2016, 06:22:20 PM
Never thought I'd catch myself watching the NCAAW selection show
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 14, 2016, 06:28:23 PM
Why not? Go cats!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on March 14, 2016, 06:30:31 PM
you're going down George Washington, you suck ass!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: cfbandyman on March 14, 2016, 06:44:57 PM
Way to go you fighting Mitties. Back in the tourny, and things looking up next year  :bball:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: TownieCat on March 14, 2016, 06:47:35 PM
Starting to believe that Mittie is a badass. Not kidding.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on March 14, 2016, 07:05:26 PM


^screw you shitty george washington, you suck
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on March 14, 2016, 07:09:28 PM
 :ksu:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: resident LibBot dick holder on March 14, 2016, 08:53:33 PM
can the men's and women's team swap coaches?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on March 14, 2016, 09:08:26 PM
It's hard to get excited when the women's tourney is chalk every year. Barely any upsets, same cast of teams in the final 4 every year.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 14, 2016, 09:45:23 PM
GW is pretty dece, the committee has a tendency to under seed mid majors, even worse than the men's committee. If we win we will finish the season with four games against arguably the nations the best teams and six against the teams in the top 8. It's weird, I haven't seen Mittie talking about toughest schedules.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on March 14, 2016, 11:44:57 PM
can the men's and women's team swap coaches?

Let's just have Mittie coach both teams.   :emawkid:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 14, 2016, 11:46:43 PM
I wish. Hahaha. eff oscar.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Canary on March 18, 2016, 04:37:18 PM
The ladies are in a close game with George Washington.  Lots of turnovers but hanging in.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: wetwillie on March 18, 2016, 04:43:32 PM
man that arena is just completely empty
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Canary on March 18, 2016, 04:46:14 PM
It is.  I probably won't watch much more. The men's games have been fun to watch so far for the most part. Gotta love the upsets and other close calls.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sonofdaxjones on March 18, 2016, 04:54:01 PM
1 for 7 from line so far.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Prince McJunkins on March 18, 2016, 05:22:39 PM
Nice run to tie it up. Probably will still fall short.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Canary on March 18, 2016, 06:09:16 PM
Big free throw opportunity there. Nice.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Prince McJunkins on March 18, 2016, 06:11:16 PM
 :ohno:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Canary on March 18, 2016, 06:17:53 PM
Sweet second half effort.  First postseason win for either men or women for quite a while.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: wetwillie on March 18, 2016, 06:18:17 PM
Nice
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on March 18, 2016, 06:19:00 PM
Excellent!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 18, 2016, 06:54:48 PM
That was fun the second quarter was amazingly painful though.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Canary on March 18, 2016, 07:10:14 PM
That was fun the second quarter was amazingly painful though.
It was brutal. 
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: cfbandyman on March 18, 2016, 07:29:27 PM
 :bball: :ksu:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: The Big Train on March 20, 2016, 09:51:06 AM
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Trim on July 09, 2016, 12:18:08 AM
Invalid Tweet ID
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: slobber on July 09, 2016, 09:02:42 AM
Hawttttt


Royals aren't gonna win 'em all
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: TownieCat on November 10, 2016, 08:24:31 AM
Mittie & Co. cleaned up on early signing day yesterday. Two top 100 players and two 6'4 posts.  :emawkid:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on November 10, 2016, 12:40:24 PM
Mittie & Co. cleaned up on early signing day yesterday. Two top 100 players and two 6'4 posts.  :emawkid:

Townie, we've been promoted, this conversation is on the basketball board. Men's basketball has been relegated, those conversations will now happen here.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: TownieCat on November 10, 2016, 01:45:10 PM
Mittie & Co. cleaned up on early signing day yesterday. Two top 100 players and two 6'4 posts.  :emawkid:

Townie, we've been promoted, this conversation is on the basketball board. Men's basketball has been relegated, those conversations will now happen here.

 :surprised:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Canary on November 10, 2016, 02:02:51 PM
I appreciate the info from both of you. I'm hoping we get wins and lots of them from both men's and women's this year.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on November 11, 2016, 11:48:21 PM
Solid 83-53 win tonight after a slow first quarter start. This team has a lot of potential.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 30, 2016, 07:30:13 AM
Wood shed.   Ouch
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on December 31, 2016, 02:53:09 AM
Wood shed.   Ouch

It was painful. Rebound coming, but probably not against West Virginia.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: cfbandyman on January 01, 2017, 05:20:20 PM
Wood shed.   Ouch

It was painful. Rebound coming, but probably not against West Virginia.

Or rebound against West Virginia by cleaning their clock by 15  :Woohoo:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 01, 2017, 06:03:49 PM
Yes, much better!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on January 01, 2017, 06:38:42 PM
It was a great  performance, the Cats' best of the season.   Glad my pessimism was misplaced.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on January 02, 2017, 01:05:15 AM
This team is all over the placeand will likely continue to be for at least a few weeks. This roster and the playing rotation has been very fluid in Mittie's three seasons.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Sandstone Outcropping on January 02, 2017, 09:58:26 AM
This team is all over the placeand will likely continue to be for at least a few weeks. This roster and the playing rotation has been very fluid in Mittie's three seasons.
WBB n00b here. Is there a reason that #11 started yesterday? I seems that there are several other forwards on the team who are better.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on January 03, 2017, 02:24:32 AM
This team is all over the placeand will likely continue to be for at least a few weeks. This roster and the playing rotation has been very fluid in Mittie's three seasons.
WBB n00b here. Is there a reason that #11 started yesterday? I seems that there are several other forwards on the team who are better.

I'm really not sure what Mittie is looking for out of that other forward position. We seem to have a rotation of four players who play that position and who spell Breanna Lewis when she sits. Those three players are Williams (the #11 you speak of), Willock, Sheble, and Kaylee Page. IMO Page is the best of the four. Willock and Williams are both freshmen though. I think the talent in Willock is apparent but she absolutely makes glaring mistakes. I don't know why Williams seems to be the choice as the starter now but Page gets the most minutes, by far.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Sandstone Outcropping on January 04, 2017, 08:57:16 AM
This team is all over the placeand will likely continue to be for at least a few weeks. This roster and the playing rotation has been very fluid in Mittie's three seasons.
WBB n00b here. Is there a reason that #11 started yesterday? I seems that there are several other forwards on the team who are better.

I'm really not sure what Mittie is looking for out of that other forward position. We seem to have a rotation of four players who play that position and who spell Breanna Lewis when she sits. Those three players are Williams (the #11 you speak of), Willock, Sheble, and Kaylee Page. IMO Page is the best of the four. Willock and Williams are both freshmen though. I think the talent in Willock is apparent but she absolutely makes glaring mistakes. I don't know why Williams seems to be the choice as the starter now but Page gets the most minutes, by far.
I was really impressed w/ Willock and Page. Willock could be really good at the end of four years. Lewis finished almost every time she got the ball in the paint.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 26, 2017, 02:29:34 PM
So it's Baylor and UConn for the Natty?

Baylor really 42 points better than us?

Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kso_FAN on January 26, 2017, 02:37:40 PM
So it's Baylor and UConn for the Natty?

Baylor really 42 points better than us?

It's crazy that a middle of the Big 12, decent team in mbb can be consistently competitive with the top teams in the league, but in wbb they don't seem to belong on the same court.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on January 26, 2017, 02:49:55 PM
Anyone going this Saturday? Not sure where I'm sitting but SdK mom is handing our shirts.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Canary on January 26, 2017, 10:26:54 PM
Anyone going this Saturday? Not sure where I'm sitting but SdK mom is handing our shirts.
Wish I could.  Out of town Saturday. Have a great time.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on January 27, 2017, 01:33:19 AM
So it's Baylor and UConn for the Natty?

Baylor really 42 points better than us?

It's crazy that a middle of the Big 12, decent team in mbb can be consistently competitive with the top teams in the league, but in wbb they don't seem to belong on the same court.

Virginia beat Virginia Tech tonight 76-27, Virginia Tech is ranked, Virginia is not. Yes, you read that right; yes, I typed that right.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kso_FAN on January 27, 2017, 06:33:21 AM
What in the world? How is that possible?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on January 27, 2017, 07:44:08 AM
1991-92 k-state @ osu (men's) 74-34 isn't far off from that
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kso_FAN on January 27, 2017, 07:47:50 AM
1991-92 k-state @ osu (men's) 74-34 isn't far off from that

The top bizarre men's score will always be UMKC.

Back to my point, and perhaps I don't follow WBB closely enough, but it seems like the elite teams are still so much better than even pretty good teams (NCAA caliber). I don't feel like our WBB ever has a chance to beat Baylor right now.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on January 27, 2017, 07:52:37 AM
ya there's absolutely no parity in wbb
i guess there's just less of a talent pool to work with.  i doubt this is the solution but maybe the ncaa limits scholarships further, isn't that what initially broke up the power brokers in cfb?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on January 27, 2017, 09:47:51 AM
Women's basketball looks no differently than mens basketball did at this point in its development. It will take a lot longer for the women to achieve the competitive balance, NOT PARITY, that the men have now.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on January 27, 2017, 10:35:49 AM
Women's basketball looks no differently than mens basketball did at this point in its development. It will take a lot longer for the women to achieve the competitive balance, NOT PARITY, that the men have now.

what's the reason you're splitting hairs?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on January 27, 2017, 12:58:24 PM
Women's basketball looks no differently than mens basketball did at this point in its development. It will take a lot longer for the women to achieve the competitive balance, NOT PARITY, that the men have now.

what's the reason you're splitting hairs?

I don't think parity exists in men's college basketball. It's been over a decade since there's been a first time national champion. There is competitive balance though, nearly all of the teams in the top 8 conferences can beat anyone on any given night. Neither parity nor competitive balance exists in women's college basketball, obviously.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on January 27, 2017, 03:26:06 PM
yeah, i just wondered.  looking at woman's bball from the top down is a bad look.  uconn has like 10 of the last 16 ncaa's.


Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on January 28, 2017, 02:49:55 PM
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20170128/9acf568074d6735e2af82709a560e684.jpg)(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20170128/eb2f457d80bac8b7c678b3097f17a33a.jpg)

Even got to hand out pink tees! Go cats!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Canary on January 28, 2017, 04:05:22 PM
What's happening in the women's game?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on January 28, 2017, 04:10:38 PM
They are playing awful. Middlebrook passing up shots to drive into traffic. Lewis hardly playing at all. Not stopping 54 down low. Poor ball movement. Playing a million players. I came home at half to watch big 12 men's ball. I think they come back and win. OSU isn't good at all. KSU missing layups.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on January 28, 2017, 04:25:32 PM
ftr the record, I posted that before I saw the score. Just looked  :eek: Go Cats!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Canary on January 28, 2017, 04:32:52 PM
Keep me posted on the final school.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on January 28, 2017, 04:35:11 PM
Will do
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on February 18, 2017, 03:05:53 PM
Anyone else watching?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Canary on February 18, 2017, 03:17:10 PM
Anyone else watching?
I am for now.  Need to get outside sometime.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on February 18, 2017, 03:20:38 PM
I made a cat proof door off my balcony stairs and have my apt wide open. Going for a walk and mini work out at have time. Life is good.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on February 18, 2017, 03:21:29 PM
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20170218/6ac68566ed766feb9cbd7074c3f35f07.jpg)

How you like me now, Sasha?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Canary on February 18, 2017, 03:22:00 PM
I made a cat proof door off my balcony stairs and have my apt wide open. Going for a walk and mini work out at have time. Life is good.
I have the house open too.  I think I'm going for a short run at half.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on February 18, 2017, 03:24:48 PM
Good call, brother.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on February 18, 2017, 05:05:39 PM
 :emawkid:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on February 19, 2017, 06:04:02 AM
Lady cats are something to be proud of. Great hire by Currie
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on February 21, 2017, 08:04:51 PM
thoroughly dominating ou tonight, need to hang onto this one
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Powercat Posse on February 21, 2017, 09:09:44 PM
Big win. 20-8 & 10-6.  Got a chance to finish 12-6
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Prince McJunkins on February 21, 2017, 09:12:35 PM
Do you know what they're projected seed-wise?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: BostonPancake on February 21, 2017, 10:26:35 PM
Do you know what they're projected seed-wise?

Latest ESPN projection from earlier today was a 6 seed.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: AndrewVonLintel on February 21, 2017, 10:27:06 PM
They are probably a 5 seed at the moment.  ESPN's Charlie Creme has us at a 6 seed before beating OU (who he has as a 4 seed).

If we beat Texas our chances at a 4 seed would be good and that means home games in the NCAA tournament.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Prince McJunkins on February 21, 2017, 10:57:53 PM
 :thumbs:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on February 22, 2017, 08:42:49 AM
just keep us out of baylor's side of the b12 bracket, don't want to head into the ncaa tournament coming off a 70 point loss
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kso_FAN on February 22, 2017, 10:16:37 AM
Mittie has done a really good job. Very good hire by the AD.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Tobias on February 22, 2017, 10:18:31 AM
:thumbs:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on February 22, 2017, 10:44:16 AM
Mittie has done a really good job. Very good hire by the AD.

this message board is no place to give currie any type of credit
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kso_FAN on February 22, 2017, 11:03:41 AM
Mittie has done a really good job. Very good hire by the AD.

this message board is no place to give currie any type of credit

I know. I always forget that about anyone could raise the money and build the stuff that he has done.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: hatingfrancisco on February 22, 2017, 03:27:45 PM
Mittie has done a really good job. Very good hire by the AD.

this message board is no place to give currie any type of credit

I know. I always forget that about anyone could raise the money and build the stuff that he has done.

Shame on you _Fan.  You know the agenda here...
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on March 05, 2017, 01:57:31 PM
down 6 at half at the end of 1st quarter against baylor.  i hate baylor and their white trash coach.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 05, 2017, 01:59:49 PM
I have a strong dislike for Baylor too. I still hope they destroy UCONN at some point. Geno is the worst.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Shooter Jones on March 13, 2017, 01:50:53 PM
Selection show is at 7pm eastern tonight.

Latest bracketology has them as a 6 seed with a possible second round matchup with Florida State, and yes, they still have Leticia Romero. Would be interesting.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: ednksu on March 13, 2017, 06:38:45 PM
OU as a 6 in Seattle against Zags


Baylor the 1 in the okc region. 
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on March 13, 2017, 06:46:19 PM
7 seed in MHK hosting drake
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: ednksu on March 13, 2017, 06:46:58 PM
KSU Cats! are a 7 in the Lexington region!

Texas is a 3 seed.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: The Big Train on March 13, 2017, 06:48:41 PM
KSU Cats! are a 7 in the Lexington region!

Texas is a 3 seed.

Yeesh lukeksu
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: ednksu on March 13, 2017, 06:49:11 PM
http://www.espn.com/womens-college-basketball/tournament/bracket
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: ednksu on March 13, 2017, 06:49:37 PM
KSU Cats! are a 7 in the Lexington region!

Texas is a 3 seed.

Yeesh lukeksu

yeah yeah yeah....
I blame sling for its delay  :frown:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: cfbandyman on March 13, 2017, 06:53:01 PM
Cool to host, but a 7 seed seems like a bit of a slap to the face. Guess they thought that would make up for it?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 13, 2017, 07:07:19 PM
Super cool to host. Has that happened for the lady cats before?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: kstater on March 13, 2017, 07:12:58 PM
Why are the ladycats hosting?  Every other 1-4 seed hosts.  Why not Stanford ?

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk

Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: ednksu on March 13, 2017, 07:16:31 PM
Why are the ladycats hosting?  Every other 1-4 seed hosts.  Why not Stanford ?

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
Not sure that would work with the "Lexington" bracket?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: ednksu on March 13, 2017, 07:17:14 PM
Super cool to host. Has that happened for the lady cats before?

WNIT champs at home!

But I think they have before.  But MiR or someone would know for sure.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Prince McJunkins on March 13, 2017, 08:33:50 PM
Drake looks like they might be pretty tough. Wouldn't mind getting Mir's take,
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: BostonPancake on March 13, 2017, 08:53:35 PM
They have hosted at least twice before.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: joda on March 13, 2017, 09:51:11 PM
I know for sure they hosted at least once in the Oldhe/Wecker/Koehn years
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 13, 2017, 09:53:34 PM
Was that when they played ND? Canary was just telling me about that.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 13, 2017, 09:53:50 PM
I know for sure they hosted at least once in the Oldhe/Wecker/Koehn years
Mahoney was my fave
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Poster formerly known as jthutch on March 14, 2017, 09:54:29 AM
Was that when they played ND? Canary was just telling me about that.
Yep I went to that game.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Joker on March 14, 2017, 10:26:58 AM
I know for sure they hosted at least once in the Oldhe/Wecker/Koehn years
Mahoney was my fave

Made a jersey for one of the games with her number on it and "Ma-Honey" on the back.  :gocho:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 14, 2017, 12:20:55 PM
Haha love it. A friend of mine that liked me called her Megan Mafloozyhoney
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 15, 2017, 02:01:56 AM
This is the fifth time we've hosted. That Notre Dame game was awful, terrible upset at the time, they won the national championship the next year.

I don't think we're going to make it out of Manhattan this year either. IF we beat Drake, they're very very very good, I don't think we have anything for Stanford.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: joda on March 15, 2017, 07:34:48 AM
This is the fifth time we've hosted. That Notre Dame game was awful, terrible upset at the time, they won the national championship the next year.

I don't think we're going to make it out of Manhattan this year either. IF we beat Drake, they're very very very good, I don't think we have anything for Stanford.

Drake is ok and not an easy win at all, but if the good version of this team shows up it's no contest. The good version of this can also run with Stanford if they come out ready to play. Of course the version of this team that lost to Northern Iowa could show up at any point and either team could run us by 20+
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 15, 2017, 12:28:37 PM
Pretty sure I'll be at the game Saturday!
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Canary on March 18, 2017, 12:44:12 PM
Who's going to be at the game today?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 18, 2017, 01:35:48 PM
Probably all already there scouting Stanford.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Canary on March 18, 2017, 01:38:25 PM
So let's get out asses to the Bram
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 18, 2017, 01:38:50 PM
I'm waiting on my damned ride
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Canary on March 18, 2017, 01:45:14 PM
I am sure he's within five minutes
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 0.42 on March 18, 2017, 06:53:32 PM
did you make it sundance pound sign kid?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 18, 2017, 09:15:07 PM
I did. I didn't know you were around for pound sterling days. Intriguing. Anyway. I was more pissed at the game today than I was about the men. So so so so many turnovers. Last I checked it was 17 in 30 minutes. Anyway. Glad they won. We are super long and play great defense. I think we give Stanford a game if we cut down turnovers and take open shots. Every girl played. This team is very deep.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 18, 2017, 10:00:48 PM
I'm not sure why you were pissed, I tried to tell you guys how good Drake is, that was their first loss since December. I think we're going to get rolled on Monday night.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 0.42 on March 18, 2017, 11:02:04 PM
I did. I didn't know you were around for pound sterling days. Intriguing.

I've been around since 2006.

Anyway. I was more pissed at the game today than I was about the men. So so so so many turnovers. Last I checked it was 17 in 30 minutes. Anyway. Glad they won. We are super long and play great defense. I think we give Stanford a game if we cut down turnovers and take open shots. Every girl played. This team is very deep.

I'm not sure why you were pissed, I tried to tell you guys how good Drake is, that was their first loss since December. I think we're going to get rolled on Monday night.

I'm just happy that Mittie appears to have been a solid hire. Maybe not elite, but he seems to have turned the ship around after Deb went downhill.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 18, 2017, 11:59:44 PM
I'm not sure why you were pissed, I tried to tell you guys how good Drake is, that was their first loss since December. I think we're going to get rolled on Monday night.
We literally passed the ball to them at least 10 times. Drake is good. But KSU should know not to pass to a blue jersey.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 19, 2017, 12:01:50 AM
Unforced turnovers are aggrevating. Did you watch the game MIR? Am I missing something about all the terrible passes right at Drake?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 19, 2017, 12:30:30 AM
They play a very aggressive zone and they bait passes into passing lanes that aren't really open. They averaged 11 steals per game, man. They are long, although not nearly as long as we are. The way you best a zone like that is to move the ball quickly, it's why Baylor beats the hell out of us, much worse than the other good teams in the conference, all of their players could pass the ball. Frankly i was surprised we handled Drake as well as we did, I thought we'd have a lot more turnovers because I thought Hittner would do a better job on Lewis and I thought our guards would turn the ball over more. However, that game seemed never in doubt.

Hittner is only a freshman by the way, she can start nearly everywhere. Drake has done a great job of recruiting the states of Kansas and Missouri. Baranczyk is going to get a great deal to leave Drake, if KU was smart they'd fire that jackass they have now and hire Jenny, she's legit. The only real difference between Drake and K-State is depth.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 19, 2017, 12:57:57 AM
So you watched the game or you didnt?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 19, 2017, 12:59:04 AM
It's not like Drake players were moving into passing lanes. They were standing in place and the ball was sent right into their mitts.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 19, 2017, 01:00:10 AM
Or not lobbing the ball high enough over the defender and them sticking a hand up in the post and running the other way with the ball. It wasn't a scheme that I'm mad about.

If you didn't watch the game as your comments clearly state that you didn't, just butt out. Knowing about a team and reading a stat sheet does not and informed opinion make.


Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 19, 2017, 01:05:49 AM
I did. I didn't know you were around for pound sterling days. Intriguing.

I've been around since 2006.

Anyway. I was more pissed at the game today than I was about the men. So so so so many turnovers. Last I checked it was 17 in 30 minutes. Anyway. Glad they won. We are super long and play great defense. I think we give Stanford a game if we cut down turnovers and take open shots. Every girl played. This team is very deep.

I'm not sure why you were pissed, I tried to tell you guys how good Drake is, that was their first loss since December. I think we're going to get rolled on Monday night.

I'm just happy that Mittie appears to have been a solid hire. Maybe not elite, but he seems to have turned the ship around after Deb went downhill.
Mittie was a solid hire and a treat to watch coach. Im glad KSU has one solid bball coach.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 19, 2017, 02:16:51 AM
Of course I watched the game, SdK, odd that you think I didn't.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 19, 2017, 10:46:53 AM
Your commentary was quite broad. Sorry for being a Trump. Go cats
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 19, 2017, 10:47:26 AM
Hahaha it changed grump to Trump
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 19, 2017, 11:17:28 AM
I'm hoping Drake fans stick around and cheer for the cats. They were quite loud last night. I don't know why they would but if enjoy it.

Heard yesterday that Manhattan was the only site that had two let alone three AP ranked teams.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 19, 2017, 11:28:34 AM
Only site with three.

The attendance was pathetic yesterday.  We were given a gift by the committee and didn't take advantage.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 19, 2017, 11:36:59 AM
I agree. Chairback side was decently full. The view from section 9 of the seating was very bad aside from Drake. At times Drake was much louder than our fans.

Lady behind kept making the most lbbiq comments ever. Why are we fouling? (With fouls to give at the end of the quarter and time winding down) Bree, come on. (After receiving a terrible entry pass) and one time Lewis was blocked out and the lady said you're so much taller, you've gotta get that. To name a few.

I'm hoping fans turn out for the game tomorrow. I saw 2 Stanford fans as I walked the concourse. And I didn't see more than a handful in the stands when they were playing. I saw more Iowa fans than Stanford. I can understand. Stanford is supposed to win this site. No reason to travel.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 19, 2017, 11:41:09 AM
Mittie was a great hire. It was refreshing to see a coach grab a girl coming off the floor and coach her up. Also glad they got Eternati some shorts more to her liking so she doesn't have to tuck them into her spandex anymore.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 19, 2017, 11:43:24 AM
Id be the 10th tallest player on the team at 5'11". Yowza.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: cfbandyman on March 20, 2017, 05:46:30 PM
Let's go ladycats  :emawkid:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: sonofdaxjones on March 20, 2017, 06:12:46 PM
I guess the crowd or lack thereof indicates they anticipated the current result, which is a butt kicking so far.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 20, 2017, 07:19:15 PM
Curtain call for Thomson. I like Mittie a lot. :)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 25, 2017, 03:05:40 PM
Quinnipiac! Amirite?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 25, 2017, 03:22:55 PM
Frown
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 26, 2017, 12:53:48 PM
Stanford vs ND. What a ballgame.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: SdK on March 26, 2017, 08:37:27 PM
Another great game in the Women's tourney
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 'taterblast on March 28, 2017, 05:52:47 PM
LFG

Invalid Tweet ID
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 28, 2017, 08:22:55 PM
I'm going to like her, a whole lot, just in time to fill the void in my heart that Kindred is leaving.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: fun muffin on March 28, 2017, 09:20:27 PM
Would take!!!!  She'd easily be the tallest player we've ever had right?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 28, 2017, 10:22:12 PM
Would take!!!!  She'd easily be the tallest player we've ever had right?

Olga Firsova was said to be 6'8" before she got here but when she got here she was 6'6". Cheyenne Hooper who was on the basketball team last year but then quit basketball to join the volleyball team is also 6'6".

The answer is, if she's actually 6'7", then yes.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: TownieCat on March 31, 2017, 09:54:38 AM
Kindred whooped everyone's ass (women and men) last night in the 3 point contest.  :emawkid:

Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Canary on March 31, 2017, 10:00:07 AM
Kindred whooped everyone's ass (women and men) last night in the 3 point contest.  :emawkid:
It was fun to watch that contest last night. She made an an amazing 3/4 length shot in the team competition as well.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 31, 2017, 11:22:47 PM
YOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 31, 2017, 11:24:06 PM
(https://media.giphy.com/media/r1HGFou3mUwMw/giphy-downsized-large.gif)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 31, 2017, 11:26:12 PM
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: cfbandyman on March 31, 2017, 11:28:51 PM
I mean, I know it's not the natty, but they might as well get to feel like it
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: cfbandyman on March 31, 2017, 11:30:53 PM
I more succinctly mean, winning a natty will probably feel almost a letdown after knocking off a team that had a 111 game winning streak.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: The Big Train on March 31, 2017, 11:43:45 PM
I watched from the start of the 2nd Q on. UCONN should have won, but they had no senior leadership like Miss St had.  Great game
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bones129 on April 01, 2017, 01:45:01 AM
Kindred whooped everyone's ass (women and men) last night in the 3 point contest.  :emawkid:
It was fun to watch that contest last night. She made an an amazing 3/4 length shot in the team competition as well.

 :ksu:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Canary on April 01, 2017, 09:03:07 AM
I watched from the start of the 2nd Q on. UCONN should have won, but they had no senior leadership like Miss St had.  Great game
I thought the same thing. Miss St seemed to be directed on offense. UConn not so much. But when they called the flagrant 1 with under a minute left I thought UConn was going to win.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: TownieCat on April 01, 2017, 09:31:20 AM
The flagrant 1 was one of the worst calls I've seen all season. Glad it didn't decide the game.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Canary on April 01, 2017, 10:05:53 AM
The flagrant 1 was one of the worst calls I've seen all season. Glad it didn't decide the game.
Whether a foul should have been called didn't bother me. It just seemed like the officials felt the need to "help" UConn. I'm glad it didn't decide the game either. The miss st coach can thank his assistants for him not getting a T following that call.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on April 03, 2017, 01:52:45 AM
By the absolute letter of the law, it was a good call. That rule needs to be rewritten. I feel like we have talked about this once every season since its been instituted starting with CK getting a bullshit elbowing flagrant 1 against CU the first year of the rule.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: joda on April 14, 2017, 08:56:33 AM
Bre Lewis was picked in the 2nd round of the WNBA draft. As was Leti
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 'taterblast on September 07, 2017, 12:44:45 PM
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: The Big Train on November 10, 2017, 06:19:41 PM
Game is free on K-StateHD tonight.  Just started watching mid 2nd quarter but apparently we are really young this year.  Playing SFA and ahead by ~10 close to halftime
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: The Big Train on November 10, 2017, 06:24:31 PM
I didn’t know it but Shalin Klein is one of the announcers.  Has she done this for a few years?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on November 14, 2017, 04:56:28 PM
I didn’t know it but Shalin Klein is one of the announcers.  Has she done this for a few years?
maybe a kstatehd thing
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: joda on January 03, 2018, 09:44:26 PM
Ladycats with a nice upset over #12 ranked WVU. No idea if WVU is actually that good but a solid road win anyway
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: GregKSU1027 on January 04, 2018, 05:47:49 PM
We are very young. LadyCats are always great because Jeff Mittie is a stud.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on January 15, 2018, 12:09:28 AM
nice upset over #20 ranked osu’rs on saturday
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: ChiCat on January 15, 2018, 09:22:04 AM
Ladycats have done well to find wins in a brutal league
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on January 28, 2018, 06:00:17 PM
this woman’s game tonight  :love:
those jerseys are extra butter too
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on February 04, 2018, 01:32:14 PM
smdh at yesterday
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Chingon on February 04, 2018, 04:52:33 PM
Looks like tcu got the better end of the deal.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on February 25, 2018, 11:56:35 PM
raged ku’s faces again today
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on March 16, 2018, 02:41:42 PM
won against slu, home game vs utah on sunday at 5
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on March 18, 2018, 05:23:25 PM
not sure utah has ever seen a zone
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on March 18, 2018, 11:50:14 PM
hosting unc davis friday night
 :ksu:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: michigancat on March 18, 2018, 11:55:03 PM
hosting unc davis friday night
 :ksu:
Ag school fight
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on March 19, 2018, 01:44:29 AM
yup they have a great vet school (like us).  hopefully we have the horses to beat them ;)
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: The Big Train on March 23, 2018, 08:20:06 PM
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on March 23, 2018, 09:09:32 PM
2 point home loss to uc davis

MEH
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: fun muffin on September 20, 2018, 03:16:44 PM
Any guesses on the big announcement next week? 
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on September 22, 2018, 09:09:53 PM
what
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: fun muffin on September 26, 2018, 11:52:14 AM
Apparently it was this.  http://www.kstatesports.com/news/2018/9/25/womens-basketball-k-state-wbbl-tip-off-event-to-feature-holly-rowe.aspx (http://www.kstatesports.com/news/2018/9/25/womens-basketball-k-state-wbbl-tip-off-event-to-feature-holly-rowe.aspx)


K-state sports branded this as a "big" announcement on facebook.   :lol:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on September 26, 2018, 02:24:04 PM
charging $35 seems very john currieish
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: pissclams on February 07, 2019, 09:57:33 PM
the girls won in lawrentucky last night in ot, split the series against the hapless squawks
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: cas4ksu on February 08, 2019, 12:09:52 PM
THIS IS OUR STATE
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on March 18, 2019, 02:53:44 PM
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: fun muffin on March 18, 2019, 03:25:48 PM
Mittie is the master of the 8/9 seed.  I think we know what his ceiling is by now. 
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Church Creeper on March 22, 2019, 02:49:06 PM
Well that was an asskicking
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on March 23, 2019, 03:23:37 AM
Well that was an asskicking
That no one saw. Where was this pointed analysis during the winning streak?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: bucket on November 11, 2019, 08:29:16 PM
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: meow meow on November 12, 2019, 09:43:14 AM
Why was he there?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 8manpick on November 12, 2019, 10:54:44 AM
Why was he there?
:fatty:
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: meow meow on November 12, 2019, 11:39:32 AM
thought he had a gf?
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 'taterblast on November 12, 2019, 01:15:33 PM
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: ksuwizard on November 13, 2019, 01:45:52 PM
Why was he there?


Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 'taterblast on November 25, 2019, 12:16:09 PM
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: Kid In the Hall on November 25, 2019, 12:37:22 PM
In their defense, they were down three players with injury and had a fourth coming off strep. Call it a Mittiecuse.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: MakeItRain on November 25, 2019, 05:44:25 PM
Yes, a giant meh.

For being so woke, this board needs to figure out why these women's sports threads seem to only get bumped after losses.
Title: Re: ksu ladycats
Post by: 'taterblast on November 25, 2019, 07:54:34 PM
it would get bumped after big wins too