goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: eastcat on September 29, 2019, 01:43:12 PM

Title: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: eastcat on September 29, 2019, 01:43:12 PM
Iowa State wash up.  :Ugh:
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: catbacker 73 on September 30, 2019, 03:08:06 AM
Quote
eastcat
Courtney Messingham is a proven loser

Iowa State wash up.  :Ugh:

I totally agree, eastcat. Those two National Championships coupled with beating Ms St on the road, 1st times K-State has done that, Just no good.

And then........ then you throw in the fact that the K-State running game is off the fastest start after 3 games in the last Seventy Years.     

Time for Mess to go. :ksu: 

 BTW, I promise that I'll never ask you to cover my back on a street at noon on a very sunny day, much less in a tight jam.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: eastcat on October 03, 2019, 09:02:35 PM
Quote
eastcat
Courtney Messingham is a proven loser

Iowa State wash up.  :Ugh:

I totally agree, eastcat. Those two National Championships coupled with beating Ms St on the road, 1st times K-State has done that, Just no good.

And then........ then you throw in the fact that the K-State running game is off the fastest start after 3 games in the last Seventy Years.     

Time for Mess to go. :ksu: 

 BTW, I promise that I'll never ask you to cover my back on a street at noon on a very sunny day, much less in a tight jam.

Refresh my mind. How good is our run game?
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: catbacker 73 on October 05, 2019, 04:32:03 AM
 
Quote
And then........ then you throw in the fact that the K-State running game is off the fastest start after 3 games in the last Seventy Years.
[/b][/i][/u]

Sneer if you choose, not a good look though for a K-State fan. Since it's better than HOFHCBS did.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: nicname on October 05, 2019, 02:55:18 PM
He’s def pissing me off last game and start of this one.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: steve dave on October 05, 2019, 04:00:36 PM
Bring back proven winner Dana Dimel imo


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: I_have_purplewood on October 05, 2019, 04:02:19 PM
He should start watching UTEP game film..
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on October 05, 2019, 04:41:16 PM
Flood Aggie stench
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: nicname on October 05, 2019, 05:46:58 PM
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20191005/13e3d1ee2f0448268bdb333cce4f0238.jpg)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on October 05, 2019, 05:47:30 PM
LOL
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Dugout DickStone on October 09, 2019, 11:46:58 AM
have we discussed how much this guy sucks at his job and canned ham face should fire him?
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wetwillie on October 09, 2019, 12:17:26 PM
They are best friends from childhood in Iowa.  His seat is colder than the frozen tundra of North Dakota.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Kid In the Hall on October 09, 2019, 12:25:20 PM
Imagine how much it took for Proud Paul to fire The Mess.

Now, increase that by a factor of 1,000 and that's what it would take for Klieman to fire his college roommate.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: nicname on October 09, 2019, 01:19:59 PM
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20191005/13e3d1ee2f0448268bdb333cce4f0238.jpg)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

After rewatching the Baylor game, I think I was way too hard on Mess with this. The play calls were pretty decent for the most part. Mistakes by players or just generally getting owned by BU’s talented d-line were more typical culprits.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: meow meow on October 09, 2019, 01:36:17 PM
why would you rewatch that?
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: nicname on October 09, 2019, 02:51:46 PM
why would you rewatch that?

Kinda fun to try to dissect a game sometimes for me.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: KITNfury on October 09, 2019, 07:26:52 PM
I don't think play calling is even a top 5 problem.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wetwillie on October 09, 2019, 07:36:45 PM
I don't think play calling is even a top 5 problem.

Alright let’s hear the top 5 buddy!
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on October 09, 2019, 08:01:15 PM
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20191005/13e3d1ee2f0448268bdb333cce4f0238.jpg)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

After rewatching the Baylor game, I think I was way too hard on Mess with this. The play calls were pretty decent for the most part. Mistakes by players or just generally getting owned by BU’s talented d-line were more typical culprits.

Baylor also put 683 people in the box, and pressed the corners, knowing our quarterback wasn't going to complete anything beyond 3 yards down the field
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Katpappy on October 09, 2019, 08:28:56 PM
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20191005/13e3d1ee2f0448268bdb333cce4f0238.jpg)
 :thumbsup:
Nice pig snout.  :love:
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: KITNfury on October 09, 2019, 08:45:29 PM
I don't think play calling is even a top 5 problem.

Alright let’s hear the top 5 buddy!
They basically all equate to talent, but no returning running backs, no real receivers coming back, losing Dickey and elite OL talent (as a whole, OL is primary reason for the offensive crap show), etc. No time to pass, can't run...you can't just play call around that. Mess might suck, but how would you even know with what he has to work with.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Shooter Jones on October 09, 2019, 08:59:44 PM
#1 problem: We laid an absolute rough ridin' egg in the beautiful white lids and pants, so our fanbase will always relate that type of performance to them.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: meow meow on October 10, 2019, 08:21:02 AM
yeah those old guys on twitter were right, Cats script makes us suck crap
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: 'taterblast on October 10, 2019, 09:06:14 AM
this doesn't even really need to be said at this point, but who the OC is doesn't matter until we get better talent. FIRE DIMEL became FIRE COLEMAN became FIRE MESSINGHAM. it's a constant cycle of crap because we roll out Dalton Gruntley and a rough ridin' Weber as two of the main options to throw to.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: catastrophe on October 10, 2019, 09:32:20 AM
Yes we were embarrassingly thin at WR talent even when we had Knowles and Rison. Sky can’t really even throw up a 50/50 ball if he wanted. It would be more like 35/65 at best.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: catbacker 73 on October 13, 2019, 03:32:30 PM
Quote
  this doesn't even really need to be said at this point, but who the OC is doesn't matter until we get better talent. FIRE DIMEL became FIRE COLEMAN became FIRE MESSINGHAM. it's a constant cycle of crap because we roll out Dalton Gruntley and a rough ridin' Weber as two of the main options to throw to.

Just so. After 3-4 years of HCCK putting his people in, there's where the difference will come.

Quote
Chris Klieman’s attempt to carry over LHC Bill Snyder’s physical and disciplined approach to football has a chance to be a shock to the Big 12 and put the Wildcats back in contention, but it’s going to come down to recruiting. Not whether Klieman can recruit Texas or the south for skill athletes like the other programs around the league, but whether he can find the same kinds of big framed, physical bullies that he built the Bison dynasty around. If he can, the skill athletes from the JUCOs, Oklahoma, Texas, and Missouri are going to flock to Manhattan.

https://www.footballstudyhall.com/2018/12/11/18135990/can-chris-klieman-duplicate-bison-dominance-at-kansas-state-north-dakota-state
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: nicname on November 26, 2021, 01:54:04 PM
CAN HIS ASS.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Winters on November 26, 2021, 01:56:38 PM
Needs to be fired immediately.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wiley on November 26, 2021, 01:59:56 PM
Needs to be fired immediately.
I’ll be his contract is renewed for another 2 or 3 years.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: PurpleOil on November 26, 2021, 02:44:55 PM
He's complete trash and should never be employed at this University again
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: BIG APPLE CAT on November 26, 2021, 03:42:07 PM
I wonder if mangino is taking calls
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on November 26, 2021, 04:16:54 PM
Man even Matt Walters, who is employed by K-State athletics to be a propagandist, is killing mess in the post game show and referencing Klieman cooking him in his comments.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: steve dave on November 26, 2021, 04:18:08 PM
When you’ve lost chili dog you’ve lost
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: nicname on November 26, 2021, 04:21:26 PM
All of this is good news


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: muqluk on November 26, 2021, 05:57:29 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FFJram6WYAEO3aL?format=jpg&name=medium)
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on November 26, 2021, 09:04:48 PM
Holy crap :ROFL: he's definitely hit his expiration date for any one school. We can't be like forever losers Iowa State and keep him here for 5 years.

Man, don't hire your friends for jobs. This is going to change his friendship with Klieman forever. Either they ride this out eventually ending with both of them getting fired when Gene retires or Klieman fires him to salvage his program.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: outofstate on November 26, 2021, 09:31:31 PM
are there any coaches on the offense worth keeping? Riley? Anderson?
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: muqluk on November 26, 2021, 09:32:51 PM
Too lazy to actually look for myself but I do wonder what his overall record as an OC looks like.

Then what it looks like subtracting NDSU
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on November 26, 2021, 09:57:54 PM
are there any coaches on the offense worth keeping? Riley? Anderson?

I'm fine with anyone other than the person calling plays. Our offense isn't great to watch, or recruit to, it lessens the margin of error, and the play calling is schizophrenic.

The position coaches need to recruit and develop. Both of these things need to improve but in both cases it's too early to hit three reset button. A program like ours needs to develop continuity and consistency
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Kid In the Hall on November 26, 2021, 10:02:02 PM
are there any coaches on the offense worth keeping? Riley? Anderson?

I'm fine with anyone other than the person calling plays. Our offense isn't great to watch, or recruit to, it lessens the margin of error, and the play calling is schizophrenic.

The position coaches need to recruit and develop. Both of these things need to improve but in both cases it's too early to hit three reset button. A program like ours needs to develop continuity and consistency

Aside from Messingham, Ray would be a top target for a pink slip. Gundy fired him after 2 years as WR coach at OSU and then he toiled in FCS until being picked up off the scrap heap. The fact that he was essentially demoted for this year (from WR coach to TE/FB coach) isn't a great sign...
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on November 26, 2021, 10:52:06 PM
https://twitter.com/kstated/status/1464415328759332865
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: catastrophe on November 26, 2021, 10:52:14 PM
My faith in the KSU FB program would be restored if we hired a new outside OC. It’s sad I’m skeptical that will happen even though it’s objectively the right call.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: tdaver on November 27, 2021, 01:05:01 AM
https://twitter.com/cole_manbeck/status/1464456900792225795?s=21
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Houstoncat93 on November 27, 2021, 08:06:53 AM
https://twitter.com/cole_manbeck/status/1464456900792225795?s=21


15 avg yards per drive
4.3 yards per play
2.4 yards per play when you take out the KU 75 yarder
1.27 points per drive
0 turnovers  :ksu: (had to find something positive in that stinking pile of rancid crap)


Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: PurpleOil on November 27, 2021, 08:23:29 AM
It's 8:23am and Courtney Messingham is still somehow employed
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wetwillie on November 27, 2021, 08:35:37 AM
It's 8:23am and Courtney Messingham is still somehow employed

He’s going to retire. They will give him that dignity.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Houstoncat93 on November 27, 2021, 09:48:28 AM
2020 was almost as bad.



https://twitter.com/Cole_Manbeck/status/1464615030092177419?s=20



https://twitter.com/Cole_Manbeck/status/1464620658927747073?s=20
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: outofstate on November 27, 2021, 11:00:54 AM
are there any coaches on the offense worth keeping? Riley? Anderson?

I'm fine with anyone other than the person calling plays. Our offense isn't great to watch, or recruit to, it lessens the margin of error, and the play calling is schizophrenic.

The position coaches need to recruit and develop. Both of these things need to improve but in both cases it's too early to hit three reset button. A program like ours needs to develop continuity and consistency

I agree that isn't time to blow it up, but Ray was demoted after last year and I don't think he has done enough to retain him, especially if you can upgrade. No doubt CM needs to go whether he is fired, moves on or retires. just needs to  :buh-bye:
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Purple Derpathy on November 27, 2021, 11:05:52 AM
Other than our RB and OLine coach, they can let them all go. Not sure on Colin K......could go either way
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Cire on November 27, 2021, 11:10:57 AM
crap don’t give Anderson a pass

He’s had 3 years to make jacardia ready and he’s unplayable apparently


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wetwillie on November 27, 2021, 11:17:03 AM
crap don’t give Anderson a pass

He’s had 3 years to make jacardia ready and he’s unplayable apparently


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You really do play your part well, I’ll give you that.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on November 27, 2021, 12:13:51 PM
Only Jake can calm these Waters.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on November 27, 2021, 12:42:10 PM
crap don’t give Anderson a pass

He’s had 3 years to make jacardia ready and he’s unplayable apparently


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What the eff? You're serious?
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: stunted on November 27, 2021, 12:46:43 PM
Only Jake can calm these Waters.

Remember his bombs?  :love: :love: :love:
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on November 27, 2021, 12:49:43 PM
K-State Twitter is still incredibly angry, I haven't seen the fan base this united against a coach since Tim Tibesar and even that wasn't like this because Tibesar didn't have a solitary game that saw everyone quickly turn against him.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on November 27, 2021, 12:51:52 PM
K-State Twitter is still incredibly angry, I haven't seen the fan base this united against a coach since Tim Tibesar and even that wasn't like this because Tibesar didn't have a solitary game that saw everyone quickly turn against him.
IMO it's a bit over the top
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wetwillie on November 27, 2021, 12:54:44 PM
K-State Twitter is still incredibly angry, I haven't seen the fan base this united against a coach since Tim Tibesar and even that wasn't like this because Tibesar didn't have a solitary game that saw everyone quickly turn against him.
IMO it's a bit over the top

Let’s see some of the better excerpts!
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on November 27, 2021, 01:03:34 PM
K-State Twitter can get super whiny and weird at times. Super uncomfortable coltish KSO members taking their game to the social media streets in unison.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: pissclams on November 27, 2021, 01:10:45 PM
based upon every other program at k-state that gene oversees, there’s no reason to believe that any of these coaches are expected to be anything other than mediocre.  messingham will coach here as long as he wants to.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wetwillie on November 27, 2021, 01:19:50 PM
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matt_Wells_(American_football_coach) (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matt_Wells_(American_football_coach))
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Cire on November 27, 2021, 03:14:13 PM
Mess only is still coaching d1 football because he’s friends with ck.

His resume is complete ass.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on November 27, 2021, 04:39:50 PM
K-State Twitter is still incredibly angry, I haven't seen the fan base this united against a coach since Tim Tibesar and even that wasn't like this because Tibesar didn't have a solitary game that saw everyone quickly turn against him.
IMO it's a bit over the top

Let’s see some of the better excerpts!

It's literally just people still mad, no one threatening violence, no boycotts, no doxxing just lots of tweets calling for him to be fired and pointing out things happening in other games when the OC doesn't crap himself.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: muqluk on November 27, 2021, 05:09:10 PM
K-State Twitter is still incredibly angry, I haven't seen the fan base this united against a coach since Tim Tibesar and even that wasn't like this because Tibesar didn't have a solitary game that saw everyone quickly turn against him.
IMO it's a bit over the top

Let’s see some of the better excerpts!

It's literally just people still mad, no one threatening violence, no boycotts, no doxxing just lots of tweets calling for him to be fired and pointing out things happening in other games when the OC doesn't crap himself.
So people being generally reasonably outraged then
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wetwillie on November 27, 2021, 05:59:44 PM
Sounds like mich is being over the top then
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Winters on November 27, 2021, 07:28:52 PM
K-State Twitter is still incredibly angry, I haven't seen the fan base this united against a coach since Tim Tibesar and even that wasn't like this because Tibesar didn't have a solitary game that saw everyone quickly turn against him.
IMO it's a bit over the top

Let’s see some of the better excerpts!

It's literally just people still mad, no one threatening violence, no boycotts, no doxxing just lots of tweets calling for him to be fired and pointing out things happening in other games when the OC doesn't crap himself.
So people being generally reasonably outraged then
God forbid being passionate and doing it within reason because they want to do better. As long as there isn't violence being threatened or family members brought up it's justified in this case. Im with the mob.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Trim on November 27, 2021, 07:31:41 PM
Messingham does suck, but it's kind of lol pathetic that what we're mad about is him not adapting well to having a qb only competent at running adequately fast in a straight line most times.  And that KSU has a history of being in that situation and thus has a fanbase that thinks/knows there's a simple way to work around that.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on November 27, 2021, 07:50:45 PM
Messingham does suck, but it's kind of lol pathetic that what we're mad about is him not adapting well to having a qb only competent at running adequately fast in a straight line most times.  And that KSU has a history of being in that situation and thus has a fanbase that thinks/knows there's a simple way to work around that.
Yeah tbh with better players he'd be amazing. An OC change won't fix much unless they can recruit a QB with a second skill (plus OL and WR)
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on November 27, 2021, 07:54:54 PM
Like those fourth and short play calls weren't great but the OL should be able to get a yard regardless of play call and if they can't there aren't a ton of surefire plays there
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on November 27, 2021, 09:33:28 PM
Messingham does suck, but it's kind of lol pathetic that what we're mad about is him not adapting well to having a qb only competent at running adequately fast in a straight line most times.  And that KSU has a history of being in that situation and thus has a fanbase that thinks/knows there's a simple way to work around that.

Did you even watch the game, familiar with Texas? The rough ridin' work around was to hand the ball to the all American in the backfield who averaged six yards a rush, SIX. He had 24 carries, not nearly enough. I don't know if I pointed it out here or on twitter but only Iowa State had less rushes in conference play. If you have a quarterback who is as bad as you make him out to be, you take the rough ridin' ball out of his hands.

You can't make fun of Howard then act like the fans are irrational because the offensive coordinator thought it was a good idea to run the rough ridin' option with him on a fourth down. I defy anyone to come up with a worse play call than that option call on the last fourth down. Will Howard threw 13 passes for 65 yards and was given the chance to run a speed option on the last play of the game. What the eff are we even talking about here?
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on November 27, 2021, 09:39:34 PM
To be fair they tried giving deuce the ball on three straight one-yard-to-gain plays and all three had failed. Granted two of them were in the wildcat but it wasn't like they didn't give Deuce a chance
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: muqluk on November 27, 2021, 09:44:52 PM
To be fair they tried giving deuce the ball on three straight one-yard-to-gain plays and all three had failed. Granted two of them were in the wildcat but it wasn't like they didn't give Deuce a chance

That's not giving him a chance

That's incompetence at such a level of mastery that it's impossible to differentiate between that and willfully throwing the game.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on November 27, 2021, 09:46:19 PM
To be fair they tried giving deuce the ball on three straight one-yard-to-gain plays and all three had failed. Granted two of them were in the wildcat but it wasn't like they didn't give Deuce a chance

That's not giving him a chance

That's incompetence at such a level of mastery that it's impossible to differentiate between that and willfully throwing the game.

I think it says more about the quality of the OL than anything
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on November 27, 2021, 09:51:19 PM
Like, I'm ok if Mess is gone but we're not gonna see dominant offense until there's a dominating OL (and a decent QB)
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on November 27, 2021, 09:52:24 PM
Like those fourth and short play calls weren't great but the OL should be able to get a yard regardless of play call and if they can't there aren't a ton of surefire plays there

The wildcat play by Deuce and that stupid option call both require the ball carrier to make proper reads. The option also requires the wide receiver to make the block.

Deuce had 4 carries for no gain or a loss. One of those was the first play of the game, the second, third, & fourth were when he ran the wildcat. That wasn't on the o line, they did a great job, that was stubborn play calling.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on November 27, 2021, 09:54:36 PM
Like those fourth and short play calls weren't great but the OL should be able to get a yard regardless of play call and if they can't there aren't a ton of surefire plays there

The wildcat play by Deuce and that stupid option call both require the ball carrier to make proper reads. The option also requires the wide receiver to make the block.

Deuce had 4 carries for no gain or a loss. One of those was the first play of the game, the second, third, & fourth were when he ran the wildcat. That wasn't on the o line, they did a great job, that was stubborn play calling.
The third and short for no gain was a handoff...
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: muqluk on November 27, 2021, 09:54:53 PM
To be fair they tried giving deuce the ball on three straight one-yard-to-gain plays and all three had failed. Granted two of them were in the wildcat but it wasn't like they didn't give Deuce a chance

That's not giving him a chance

That's incompetence at such a level of mastery that it's impossible to differentiate between that and willfully throwing the game.

I think it says more about the quality of the OL than anything

If it really were the OL then it would still be an indictment of the OC and the play calls themselves - for being criminally stupid enough to call a play the OL cannot block for (mutltiple times!)
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on November 27, 2021, 09:56:05 PM
Like, I'm ok if Mess is gone but we're not gonna see dominant offense until there's a dominating OL (and a decent QB)

We definitely need an entire new crop of quarterbacks. If Rubley is a miss, then not having a QB in this class makes the miss 100x worse. You can't have a running back in college as productive as Deuce behind a bad line, they've been good.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on November 27, 2021, 10:04:14 PM


You can't have a running back in college as productive as Deuce behind a bad line, they've been good.

They got beaten up on the plays people are losing their minds over. I think they were a better unit overall last year.

To be fair they tried giving deuce the ball on three straight one-yard-to-gain plays and all three had failed. Granted two of them were in the wildcat but it wasn't like they didn't give Deuce a chance

That's not giving him a chance

That's incompetence at such a level of mastery that it's impossible to differentiate between that and willfully throwing the game.

I think it says more about the quality of the OL than anything

If it really were the OL then it would still be an indictment of the OC and the play calls themselves - for being criminally stupid enough to call a play the OL cannot block for (mutltiple times!)

They tried three different plays in four of the short plays people are losing their minds over.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: muqluk on November 27, 2021, 10:06:22 PM


You can't have a running back in college as productive as Deuce behind a bad line, they've been good.

They got beaten up on the plays people are losing their minds over. I think they were a better unit overall last year.

To be fair they tried giving deuce the ball on three straight one-yard-to-gain plays and all three had failed. Granted two of them were in the wildcat but it wasn't like they didn't give Deuce a chance

That's not giving him a chance

That's incompetence at such a level of mastery that it's impossible to differentiate between that and willfully throwing the game.

I think it says more about the quality of the OL than anything

If it really were the OL then it would still be an indictment of the OC and the play calls themselves - for being criminally stupid enough to call a play the OL cannot block for (mutltiple times!)

They tried three different plays in four of the short plays people are losing their minds over.

If you think that's all people are upset about then I don't know what to tell you  :dunno:

The ineptitude on display in such a blatant fashion on those plays just happened to be the straw(s) that broke the camel's back.

But that's besides the point - you're changing the topic.

Address the original please.  How is it on the OL at all?
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Trim on November 27, 2021, 10:07:56 PM
Messingham does suck, but it's kind of lol pathetic that what we're mad about is him not adapting well to having a qb only competent at running adequately fast in a straight line most times.  And that KSU has a history of being in that situation and thus has a fanbase that thinks/knows there's a simple way to work around that.

Did you even watch the game, familiar with Texas? The rough ridin' work around was to hand the ball to the all American in the backfield who averaged six yards a rush, SIX. He had 24 carries, not nearly enough. I don't know if I pointed it out here or on twitter but only Iowa State had less rushes in conference play. If you have a quarterback who is as bad as you make him out to be, you take the rough ridin' ball out of his hands.

You can't make fun of Howard then act like the fans are irrational because the offensive coordinator thought it was a good idea to run the rough ridin' option with him on a fourth down. I defy anyone to come up with a worse play call than that option call on the last fourth down. Will Howard threw 13 passes for 65 yards and was given the chance to run a speed option on the last play of the game. What the eff are we even talking about here?

I'm not sure what you're talking about here.  I was the one advocating for us to not even have a QB and if that's too outrageous, to have him involved with anything as little as possible.

So yes, the workaround was obvious and Messingham sucks for not doing it.

That said, it's mumped up that we're accustomed to needing it.  And that predates the entire Fh era.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wiley on November 27, 2021, 10:13:02 PM
I don’t know why they didn’t call a timeout on the 4th and 1 from our 30 and reassess.  This defensive front had this play stuffed before the ball was snapped.

(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20211128/707b81bcdd407bb1a7113dfa685e8fa2.jpg)
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on November 27, 2021, 10:15:44 PM
Rusty, those wildcat plays and particularly the speed option don't play to the strengths of our line, as evidenced by the fact we didn't do those things other than yesterday. They aren't pros, they're not going to blow the defense off the ball on every play, particularly those they don't block for often. Even with those awful three plays, the team averaged 6.5 rushes for the entire game. It's ridiculous to place any blame on the line when the team ran 35 times for 288 yards. They were hugely successful running single back and full back sets between the tackles. If mess stuck to what was working, he was making the calls, he should have known, no one is calling for his job, his coach wouldn't have called him out in the post game, and you wouldn't have to be reaching to blame anyone other than the dude paid to put the college athletes in the position to be most successful.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on November 27, 2021, 10:19:00 PM


Rusty, those wildcat plays and particularly the speed option don't play to the strengths of our line, as evidenced by the fact we didn't do those things other than yesterday. They aren't pros, they're not going to blow the defense off the ball on every play, particularly those they don't block for often. Even with those awful three plays, the team averaged 6.5 rushes for the entire game. It's ridiculous to place any blame on the line when the team ran 35 times for 288 yards. They were hugely successful running single back and full back sets between the tackles. If mess stuck to what was working, he was making the calls, he should have known, no one is calling for his job, his coach wouldn't have called him out in the post game, and you wouldn't have to be reaching to blame anyone other than the dude paid to put the college athletes in the position to be most successful.

Very fair! Again, the first third and short was a fullback lead, it wasn't an automatic first down. Also the run before the second third and short looked like a terrible spot and should have been a first down and then it probably wouldn't have mattered!
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on November 27, 2021, 10:21:25 PM
I don’t know why they didn’t call a timeout on the 4th and 1 from our 30 and reassess.  This defensive front had this play stuffed before the ball was snapped.

(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20211128/707b81bcdd407bb1a7113dfa685e8fa2.jpg)

They also should have called time out on that play where Deuce lost his shoe and then we ran some bullshit with Will. Both of these situations are on Klieman.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on November 27, 2021, 10:22:28 PM


Rusty, those wildcat plays and particularly the speed option don't play to the strengths of our line, as evidenced by the fact we didn't do those things other than yesterday. They aren't pros, they're not going to blow the defense off the ball on every play, particularly those they don't block for often. Even with those awful three plays, the team averaged 6.5 rushes for the entire game. It's ridiculous to place any blame on the line when the team ran 35 times for 288 yards. They were hugely successful running single back and full back sets between the tackles. If mess stuck to what was working, he was making the calls, he should have known, no one is calling for his job, his coach wouldn't have called him out in the post game, and you wouldn't have to be reaching to blame anyone other than the dude paid to put the college athletes in the position to be most successful.

Very fair! Again, the first third and short was a fullback lead, it wasn't an automatic first down. Also the run before the second third and short looked like a terrible spot and should have been a first down and then it probably wouldn't have mattered!

Back to back bad spots that were very frustrating.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wiley on November 27, 2021, 10:23:54 PM
I don’t know why they didn’t call a timeout on the 4th and 1 from our 30 and reassess.  This defensive front had this play stuffed before the ball was snapped.

(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20211128/707b81bcdd407bb1a7113dfa685e8fa2.jpg)

They also should have called time out on that play where Deuce lost his shoe and then we ran some bullshit with Will. Both of these situations are on Klieman.
Agreed.  I didn’t get to see much of the game but caught that one as well oddly enough.

With the game on the line, i was also surprised that the play went to the right side of the oline.  But the interior was blown up, (on that play) so that may not have been the design.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: catastrophe on November 27, 2021, 10:41:01 PM
I think it’s fair (although so obvious it’s practically pointless) to say that a change at OC might not fix anything, but I think it’s beyond argument that Mess has done nothing to make a case for keeping his job.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: DQ12 on November 28, 2021, 11:10:09 AM
I've been a pretty big Mess apologist, mostly because I agree with the general philosophy: Pro style with elements of QB run mixed in.  Personnel has hamstrung us a bit during Mess's tenure -- OL has been pretty good, not great (the offense requires a great OL, and I think we're on our way there); inconsistent QB play (both with and without Skylar, but especially without); and a below average WR corp.

That said, the Baylor and Texas games were pretty unforgiveable in my eyes.  Totally, 100% lost because the offense was terrible. 
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: EMAWzifried on November 28, 2021, 11:46:48 AM
Can we dream the new OC would be a crackerjack recruiter?
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on November 28, 2021, 11:52:16 AM
Can we dream the new OC would be a crackerjack recruiter?
I think we should throw the bank and a promotion at Nathan Scheelhaase
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wetwillie on November 28, 2021, 11:56:56 AM
Can we dream the new OC would be a crackerjack recruiter?
I think we should throw the bank and a promotion at Nathan Scheelhaase


About a year too late for that I’m afraid
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on November 28, 2021, 11:58:06 AM
Can we dream the new OC would be a crackerjack recruiter?
I think we should throw the bank and a promotion at Nathan Scheelhaase


About a year too late for that I’m afraid
Why?
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wetwillie on November 28, 2021, 12:01:15 PM
He’s likely going to get an offer to be a big programs OC for 1M+ or he will be the OC at ISU if Campbell leaves.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: stunted on November 28, 2021, 12:04:53 PM
how hard is it to draw up good pass plays? the field is so big
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on November 28, 2021, 12:06:09 PM
He’s likely going to get an offer to be a big programs OC for 1M+ or he will be the OC at ISU if Campbell leaves.
Who is going to pay him $1 million when he hasn't been an OC? I can see him getting promoted or following Campbell though
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on November 28, 2021, 01:30:59 PM
He’s likely going to get an offer to be a big programs OC for 1M+ or he will be the OC at ISU if Campbell leaves.
Who is going to pay him $1 million when he hasn't been an OC? I can see him getting promoted or following Campbell though

He's probably close to a million already and he's staying with Campbell. When Campbell got his latest extension he got a ton of money for his assistants so they don't get poached.

That being said I wouldn't want him anyway. He and that program haven't recruited better than this staff enough to garner that much reverence. They got Hall largely because they were first. They run a better offense than we do, they don't seem to be all that more talented though. Hall is slightly better than Deuce, despite him being careless, I do think Purdy is slightly better than Skylar. Other than that, I don't see any recruits they've landed better than anyone we have here.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wetwillie on November 28, 2021, 01:44:29 PM
He’s likely going to get an offer to be a big programs OC for 1M+ or he will be the OC at ISU if Campbell leaves.
Who is going to pay him $1 million when he hasn't been an OC? I can see him getting promoted or following Campbell though

He's probably close to a million already and he's staying with Campbell. When Campbell got his latest extension he got a ton of money for his assistants so they don't get poached.

That being said I wouldn't want him anyway. He and that program haven't recruited better than this staff enough to garner that much reverence. They got Hall largely because they were first. They run a better offense than we do, they don't seem to be all that more talented though. Hall is slightly better than Deuce, despite him being careless, I do think Purdy is slightly better than Skylar. Other than that, I don't see any recruits they've landed better than anyone we have here.

Jaylin Noel and Gregory Gaines come to mind
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on November 28, 2021, 01:45:17 PM
Scheelhaase's public salary is $500k.

https://247sports.com/Article/Iowa-State-football-assistant-coach-salaries-revealed-Matt-Campbell-Jon-Heacock-Tom-Manning-166867261/Amp/

They seem to have a decent class this year
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on November 28, 2021, 01:49:01 PM
But I am open to other names too
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wetwillie on November 28, 2021, 01:52:46 PM
You’ll get Wells and you’ll like it
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: nicname on November 28, 2021, 01:54:37 PM
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20211128/8c08dbbf0d72c98efa9ad2b423a4f02c.jpg)

My boy Ricky Rahne is currently getting paid ~750k/yr as HC at ODU. He’s showing early success in his rebuild there.

Not sure we’d be able to give him the kind of raise he’d want tho. My be too big a fish.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on November 28, 2021, 04:52:22 PM
Bruh, he's a first year fbs head coach he isn't going to be anyone's coordinator.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on November 28, 2021, 04:57:24 PM
A lot of P5 OCs got crap canned today.

If in fact Klieman is targeting Wells, we'll probably need to wait for the carousel to slow down to see if we can get him. Wells will almost certainly try to get a G5 job.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wetwillie on November 28, 2021, 05:01:43 PM
A lot of P5 OCs got crap canned today.

If in fact Klieman is targeting Wells, we'll probably need to wait for the carousel to slow down to see if we can get him. Wells will almost certainly try to get a G5 job.

Yea this is not ideal environment for the Wells to KSU contingent.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on November 28, 2021, 05:10:21 PM
A lot of P5 OCs got crap canned today.

If in fact Klieman is targeting Wells, we'll probably need to wait for the carousel to slow down to see if we can get him. Wells will almost certainly try to get a G5 job.

Yea this is not ideal environment for the Wells to KSU contingent.

I'm confused as to why Steve Addazio hasn't been fired yet, probably coming and there's going to be a lot of G5 openings.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Katpappy on November 28, 2021, 07:57:48 PM
I don't think a 4-10 record will get a new coach fired.  Also the team loves him, and he is a two time BCS champion.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: tdaver on November 28, 2021, 08:15:58 PM
A lot of P5 OCs got crap canned today.

If in fact Klieman is targeting Wells, we'll probably need to wait for the carousel to slow down to see if we can get him. Wells will almost certainly try to get a G5 job.

Yea this is not ideal environment for the Wells to KSU contingent.

I'm confused as to why Steve Addazio hasn't been fired yet, probably coming and there's going to be a lot of G5 openings.

His buyout drops $2MM (from 5 to 3) on Thursday
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on November 28, 2021, 10:52:21 PM
I don't think a 4-10 record will get a new coach fired.  Also the team loves him, and he is a two time BCS champion.

Are you talking about Addazio? LOL, everyone there hates him. He's been an abject disaster on the field and he got ejected from their game this weekend. A football coach, ejected. tdaver laid it out, he'll be gone on Thursday.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: DQ12 on November 28, 2021, 11:06:17 PM
I’d hire Anthony Tucker out of Utah State.  Been around the block a bit.  Has coordinated some pretty good offenses at UCF and Utah State.  Fairly similar conceptually to what we’ve been trying to do.  Certainly a guy we could get.

That would be my target if I was trying to replace Mess.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on November 29, 2021, 07:49:45 AM
I’d hire Anthony Tucker out of Utah State.  Been around the block a bit.  Has coordinated some pretty good offenses at UCF and Utah State.  Fairly similar conceptually to what we’ve been trying to do.  Certainly a guy we could get.

That would be my target if I was trying to replace Mess.
He'd only been co-OC for one year at UCF and the other co-OC followed Heupel to Tennessee.

Intriguing but I don't see it happening unless he's like co-OC with Klein (who probably wouldn't like that, either). It's definitely not a clear upgrade
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: DQ12 on November 29, 2021, 08:18:12 AM
Well we’re either going to have to take a chance on someone kind of green or we’re going to get some guy who is proven to be mediocre, imo.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: DQ12 on November 29, 2021, 08:21:49 AM
Also I take it back, Utah State’s offense wasn’t very good.  I was looking at some outdated numbers. 
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on November 29, 2021, 08:48:37 AM
Well we’re either going to have to take a chance on someone kind of green or we’re going to get some guy who is proven to be mediocre, imo.

I agree, which is why I like the idea of Scheelhaase (plus he adds recruiting cred, which might be more important!). But I think we can get someone with a little more G5 coordinator experience as well. (or maybe not).
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: DQ12 on November 29, 2021, 10:55:06 AM
Well we’re either going to have to take a chance on someone kind of green or we’re going to get some guy who is proven to be mediocre, imo.

I agree, which is why I like the idea of Scheelhaase (plus he adds recruiting cred, which might be more important!). But I think we can get someone with a little more G5 coordinator experience as well. (or maybe not).
Yeah, the problem is that a lot of those G5 coordinators don't stay G5 coordinators for long if their offense is anything to write home about.

I'm all for Scheelhaase btw, I just think he'd be a tough one to nab, money-wise.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Katpappy on November 29, 2021, 11:12:36 AM
I don't think a 4-10 record will get a new coach fired.  Also the team loves him, and he is a two time BCS champion.

Are you talking about Addazio? LOL, everyone there hates him. He's been an abject disaster on the field and he got ejected from their game this weekend. A football coach, ejected. tdaver laid it out, he'll be gone on Thursday.

Here are a few quotes from his players.What They Are Saying:

"Coach Addazio is an outstanding coach and an incredible person. He helped shape my brother and I into the men we are today. I would not be where I am today without Coach Addazio. He brings out the best in everyone he interacts with. He loves his players and we love him."
- Atlanta Falcons 2019 1st Round Draft Selection and former BC Eagle offensive lineman Chris Lindstrom
 
"I am so happy for Colorado State University! The Rams got a great man and great football coach in Steve Addazio. I wouldn't be the man I am today without him! Not only did he help me become the football player I am today, he was also was a father figure to me and my brother, Maurkice, while away from our family at the University of Florida. He turned two young kids from Lakeland, Fla. into men. I am now a Colorado State fan!"
 - Former Florida offensive lineman and 1st round draft pick, current Los Angles Charger, Mike Pouncey
 
"When I think of football, I think of Steve Addazio. He is a great leader of men, and his knowledge of the game is like none other! Coach Addazio has always been another father figure to my brother and I. We love you coach, and good luck on your new journey!"
- Former Florida offensive lineman and 1st round draft pick, current Pittsburgh Steeler, Maurkice Pouncey

"Steve Addazio has all of the qualities you want in a head football coach. Coach Addazio and I have a long-standing relationship through coaching, including winning two national championships together at Florida, and I have seen first-hand how passionate he is about the game of football, the players he coaches, and the programs he leads. He is one of the nation's top recruiters and will represent Colorado State well. I am excited to see the Rams develop under his leadership."
- National Championship-winning head coach Urban Meyer

"Steve Addazio is a great recruiter, a better coach, an even better leader, and most importantly a better person. I am very excited for the Colorado State family and the future of Ram football."
– Former Boston College Athletic Director Brad Bates
 
"Steve Addazio is an outstanding coach, mentor, father and husband. He is passionate, a relentless recruiter and a creative football mind. Congratulations to Colorado State for hiring such a great coach and role model who will inspire students, alumni and fans."
– North Carolina Athletic Director Bubba Cunningham
Footer

Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on November 29, 2021, 11:15:48 AM
Highly recommend tracking down all his "Dude" vines

https://youtube.com/shorts/YzSVmsrJEzk?feature=share
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: ChiComCat on November 29, 2021, 11:19:03 AM
I'm worried that co-coordinator with Klein has a lot less appeal than being the lone guy.  Additionally, Messingham catches all the crap for the offense but the fans give Klein a pass.  Those would be pretty big negatives to me if I'm a coordinator with other P5 interest.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on November 29, 2021, 11:22:03 AM
I'm worried that co-coordinator with Klein has a lot less appeal than being the lone guy.  Additionally, Messingham catches all the crap for the offense but the fans give Klein a pass.  Those would be pretty big negatives to me if I'm a coordinator with other P5 interest.
I know MiR disagrees that CK was a factor but IMO Skylar did not develop well over his six years. Obviously injuries hurt but still.

Also Klein is not co-OC any more.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on November 29, 2021, 11:23:29 AM
Well we’re either going to have to take a chance on someone kind of green or we’re going to get some guy who is proven to be mediocre, imo.

I agree, which is why I like the idea of Scheelhaase (plus he adds recruiting cred, which might be more important!). But I think we can get someone with a little more G5 coordinator experience as well. (or maybe not).
Yeah, the problem is that a lot of those G5 coordinators don't stay G5 coordinators for long if their offense is anything to write home about.

I'm all for Scheelhaase btw, I just think he'd be a tough one to nab, money-wise.
He makes less than Mess. And I assume we'll need a decent increase for whoever replaces Mess
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wetwillie on November 29, 2021, 11:26:03 AM
What would you guys think about David Beaty on this offensive staff.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on November 29, 2021, 11:27:49 AM
What would you guys think about David Beaty on this offensive staff.
I like it quite a bit because I think he's a decent recruiter
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Shooter Jones on November 29, 2021, 11:28:47 AM
Graham Harrell isn't staying at USC w/ Lincoln. Pretty decent chance he gets a G5 head gig. If not, pay him whatever it takes to come on for a year
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on November 29, 2021, 11:32:53 AM
Are there rumors out there that Mess is done or are we all assuming? Seeing rando vague tweets about it.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Cire on November 29, 2021, 11:58:53 AM
zero rumors that he is done
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wetwillie on November 29, 2021, 12:09:00 PM
What would you guys think about David Beaty on this offensive staff.
I like it quite a bit because I think he's a decent recruiter

My wetwillie trifecta would be Wells, Beaty, Held to replace Mess, Klein, and Ray.   
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Houstoncat93 on November 29, 2021, 12:12:43 PM
zero rumors that he is done

Aren't the rumors exactly the opposite? (ie team was told he is staying)
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Shooter Jones on November 29, 2021, 12:16:59 PM
Are there rumors out there that Mess is done or are we all assuming? Seeing rando vague tweets about it.

Just assuming at this point, similarly to the conversations that took place after each shitty season during Snyder's time. This is the style of play for Klieman (Snyder then), and skilled guys/WR's will not want to be apart of it. Especially if Howard is your plan moving forward.

I would assume if Mess feels pressure and ends of retiring or leaves, CK will just bring in someone very similar to him, because that's almost all he's ever known.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: ChiComCat on November 29, 2021, 12:20:14 PM
I'm worried that co-coordinator with Klein has a lot less appeal than being the lone guy.  Additionally, Messingham catches all the crap for the offense but the fans give Klein a pass.  Those would be pretty big negatives to me if I'm a coordinator with other P5 interest.
I know MiR disagrees that CK was a factor but IMO Skylar did not develop well over his six years. Obviously injuries hurt but still.

Also Klein is not co-OC any more.

I didn't realize that he wasn't co-OC.  That makes me feel better.  I agree on Skylar.  I don't think he ever went through progressions well and was as bad at it as ever against Baylor.  The worst part about it against Baylor is that he was too injured to try to cover for it by running.  On the plus side, I think Klein has recruited Colorado pretty well.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on November 29, 2021, 12:31:16 PM
What would you guys think about David Beaty on this offensive staff.
I like it quite a bit because I think he's a decent recruiter

My wetwillie trifecta would be Wells, Beaty, Held to replace Mess, Klein, and Ray.   

tbh I'd prefer 2 of the 3 be young hotshot recruiters (of which we seem to have none) if we replace three.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: catastrophe on November 29, 2021, 12:32:01 PM
I trust Kleiman to make the right choice on where to put Klein. I don’t trust him to do the same with Mess.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: chum1 on November 29, 2021, 01:10:47 PM
I don't pretend to know anything about any of it, but I look at a guy like Klein and think he wouldn't have much to contribute to coaching beyond saying what he would do, which basically just amounts to being huge and fast.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wetwillie on November 29, 2021, 01:20:31 PM
What would you guys think about David Beaty on this offensive staff.
I like it quite a bit because I think he's a decent recruiter

My wetwillie trifecta would be Wells, Beaty, Held to replace Mess, Klein, and Ray.   

tbh I'd prefer 2 of the 3 be young hotshot recruiters (of which we seem to have none) if we replace three.

Held definitely fits the criteria.  Beaty riding on his hover board probably still wouldn’t earn him a young hot shot tag tho.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on November 29, 2021, 01:26:09 PM
What would you guys think about David Beaty on this offensive staff.
I like it quite a bit because I think he's a decent recruiter

My wetwillie trifecta would be Wells, Beaty, Held to replace Mess, Klein, and Ray.   

tbh I'd prefer 2 of the 3 be young hotshot recruiters (of which we seem to have none) if we replace three.

Held definitely fits the criteria.  Beaty riding on his hover board probably still wouldn’t earn him a young hot shot tag tho.

he's definitely not what I'd consider "young" but he's relatively new to D1. Why did he get fired? just to clean out the offensive staff?
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on November 29, 2021, 01:29:05 PM
I trust Kleiman to make the right choice on where to put Klein. I don’t trust him to do the same with Mess.

I assume every D1 football coach would fire his mother if they thought it would help win football games
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: catastrophe on November 29, 2021, 01:50:36 PM
My concern is with his judgment in that department, not his ethics.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on November 29, 2021, 01:51:57 PM
My concern is with his judgment in that department, not his ethics.

if he can judge klein he can judge mess
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wetwillie on November 29, 2021, 01:53:25 PM
What would you guys think about David Beaty on this offensive staff.
I like it quite a bit because I think he's a decent recruiter

My wetwillie trifecta would be Wells, Beaty, Held to replace Mess, Klein, and Ray.   

tbh I'd prefer 2 of the 3 be young hotshot recruiters (of which we seem to have none) if we replace three.

Held definitely fits the criteria.  Beaty riding on his hover board probably still wouldn’t earn him a young hot shot tag tho.

he's definitely not what I'd consider "young" but he's relatively new to D1. Why did he get fired? just to clean out the offensive staff?

Yea you are right older than I thought, but yes the Nebraska AD forced Scott to fire his offensive assistants since that side of the ball had been lacking.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Trim on November 29, 2021, 02:20:05 PM
I trust Kleiman to make the right choice on where to put Klein. I don’t trust him to do the same with Mess.

I assume every D1 football coach would fire his mother if they thought it would help win football games

This will make for a good data point on the d1/d2 thing.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: yoga-like_abana on November 29, 2021, 02:20:52 PM
Would take Beaty in a hot second
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on November 29, 2021, 02:29:47 PM
I'm worried that co-coordinator with Klein has a lot less appeal than being the lone guy.  Additionally, Messingham catches all the crap for the offense but the fans give Klein a pass.  Those would be pretty big negatives to me if I'm a coordinator with other P5 interest.
I know MiR disagrees that CK was a factor but IMO Skylar did not develop well over his six years. Obviously injuries hurt but still.

Also Klein is not co-OC any more.

I mean it's ludicrous that Skylar didn't develop, just a preposterous notion. Let's just forget about the fact that under Snyder he couldn't win the job from Alex Delton. He had a month to know he was going to be the starter for that Cactus Bowl game and was 3-7 for 27 yards, 1 interception, and 5 carries for 4 yards. Just a complete horror show. So I'm going to not include the his numbers from his two Snyder years.

Here are his numbers in 2019:
177/297 60%
2315 yds
12 tds
5 ints
Passer rating of 135.0
178 yards per game
13.0 yards per completion
7.7 yards per attempt
 
After he came back from his injury he was praised across the board for how different he looks, a complete passer, here are those numbers since his injury
129/187 69%
1614 yards
9 tds
2 ints
Passer rating of 155.8
230.5 ypg
12.5 ypc
8.6 ypa

He's miles and miles and miles better now than when he got here. The notion that he now would have trouble beating Alex Delton out is silly.

Furthermore, the notion that a quarterback coach's role is to simply show linear improvement for each and every quarterback on the roster seems absurd to me. These guys don't start at the same place. Asking a QB coach to get Will Howard to even in the same neighborhood as Blake Shapen is dumb. I'd assume the larger role of the QB coach is with regard to the gameplan and the helping the QBs to understand the playbook.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on November 29, 2021, 02:34:49 PM
What would you guys think about David Beaty on this offensive staff.
I like it quite a bit because I think he's a decent recruiter

How do you figure? Did he land some big fishes at A&M that I'm unaware of.

I think it would be silly to give a wide receivers coach who hasn't worked in three years the keys to a P5 offense.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on November 29, 2021, 02:42:21 PM
My concern is with his judgment in that department, not his ethics.

if he can judge klein he can judge mess

He was college roommates with mess, it's significantly different. Not saying that he wouldn't fire his buddy, but he's known mess for 35 years, he's worked with Klein for 3.

Also I know I said this but if mess leaves, he isn't retiring, he's only 55.

I also contend that there is no way that Klieman told the team that mess is coming back, it makes no sense. The need to tell the team he's coming back indicates that he definitely shouldn't be coming back and telling the team as such would just make whatever reason he needs to tell them, even worse.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wetwillie on November 29, 2021, 02:56:48 PM
What would you guys think about David Beaty on this offensive staff.
I like it quite a bit because I think he's a decent recruiter

How do you figure? Did he land some big fishes at A&M that I'm unaware of.

I think it would be silly to give a wide receivers coach who hasn't worked in three years the keys to a P5 offense.

I don’t think making him the WR coach is exactly handing him the keys
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: stunted on November 29, 2021, 03:05:35 PM
if he doesn't have it in him to fire mess, it's over for him. but ksu embraced the culture of hiring their best buds, so we kind of deserve it.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on November 29, 2021, 03:14:55 PM
What would you guys think about David Beaty on this offensive staff.
I like it quite a bit because I think he's a decent recruiter

How do you figure? Did he land some big fishes at A&M that I'm unaware of.

I think it would be silly to give a wide receivers coach who hasn't worked in three years the keys to a P5 offense.

I don’t think making him the WR coach is exactly handing him the keys

Ah, I thought y'all were talking about the OC. Is he accomplished enough as a recruiter to be excited to hire a 51 year old WR coach who hasn't worked in 3 years?
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: yoga-like_abana on November 29, 2021, 03:16:36 PM
if he doesn't have it in him to fire mess, it's over for him. but ksu embraced the culture of hiring their best buds, so we kind of deserve it.
Yep. And Gene doesn't have the stones to tell him Mess has to go
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: stunted on November 29, 2021, 03:17:20 PM
if he doesn't have it in him to fire mess, it's over for him. but ksu embraced the culture of hiring their best buds, so we kind of deserve it.
Yep. And Gene doesn't have the stones to tell him Mess has to go

FAMILY
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wetwillie on November 29, 2021, 03:21:08 PM
What would you guys think about David Beaty on this offensive staff.
I like it quite a bit because I think he's a decent recruiter

How do you figure? Did he land some big fishes at A&M that I'm unaware of.

I think it would be silly to give a wide receivers coach who hasn't worked in three years the keys to a P5 offense.

I don’t think making him the WR coach is exactly handing him the keys

Ah, I thought y'all were talking about the OC. Is he accomplished enough as a recruiter to be excited to hire a 51 year old WR coach who hasn't worked in 3 years?

I think he worked in some capacity at Texas in 2019.  Would think his Texas HS recruiting ties are still decent as well.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on November 29, 2021, 03:22:44 PM
if he doesn't have it in him to fire mess, it's over for him. but ksu embraced the culture of hiring their best buds, so we kind of deserve it.
Yep. And Gene doesn't have the stones to tell him Mess has to go

gene fired the most legendary coach in KSU history
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Shooter Jones on November 29, 2021, 03:24:47 PM
What would you guys think about David Beaty on this offensive staff.
I like it quite a bit because I think he's a decent recruiter

How do you figure? Did he land some big fishes at A&M that I'm unaware of.

A couple, yeah.

(https://www.cleveland.com/resizer/TqzoqcsAJjRN_MhByohgAgaPipA=/arc-anglerfish-arc2-prod-advancelocal/public/4YHBYNE2NZCLFIOVVKRLDYN2ZI.JPG)
(https://www.elevenwarriors.com/sites/default/files/styles/904x490/public/c/2015/05/53907_h.png)
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on November 29, 2021, 03:29:38 PM
What would you guys think about David Beaty on this offensive staff.
I like it quite a bit because I think he's a decent recruiter

How do you figure? Did he land some big fishes at A&M that I'm unaware of.

I think it would be silly to give a wide receivers coach who hasn't worked in three years the keys to a P5 offense.

I don’t think making him the WR coach is exactly handing him the keys

Ah, I thought y'all were talking about the OC. Is he accomplished enough as a recruiter to be excited to hire a 51 year old WR coach who hasn't worked in 3 years?

I think he worked in some capacity at Texas in 2019.  Would think his Texas HS recruiting ties are still decent as well.

He had that analyst job for like 2 days, KU messing that up became part of the lawsuit.
https://www.hookem.com/2020/04/15/report-kansas-ad-cautioned-texas-hiring-former-football-coach-david-beaty/
https://footballscoop.com/news/david-beaty-jeff-long-kept-me-from-getting-hired-at-texas
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on November 29, 2021, 03:32:22 PM
What would you guys think about David Beaty on this offensive staff.
I like it quite a bit because I think he's a decent recruiter

How do you figure? Did he land some big fishes at A&M that I'm unaware of.

A couple, yeah.

(https://www.cleveland.com/resizer/TqzoqcsAJjRN_MhByohgAgaPipA=/arc-anglerfish-arc2-prod-advancelocal/public/4YHBYNE2NZCLFIOVVKRLDYN2ZI.JPG)
(https://www.elevenwarriors.com/sites/default/files/styles/904x490/public/c/2015/05/53907_h.png)

Nice!
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: yoga-like_abana on November 29, 2021, 03:34:58 PM
if he doesn't have it in him to fire mess, it's over for him. but ksu embraced the culture of hiring their best buds, so we kind of deserve it.
Yep. And Gene doesn't have the stones to tell him Mess has to go

FAMILY
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20211129/6ec6d539eab15d3e979fb13370808244.jpg)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: PurpleOil on November 29, 2021, 04:41:33 PM
if he doesn't have it in him to fire mess, it's over for him. but ksu embraced the culture of hiring their best buds, so we kind of deserve it.
Yep. And Gene doesn't have the stones to tell him Mess has to go

My worst fear is that this is true and ends up happening. If so, might as well give up on KSU football.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on November 29, 2021, 04:42:42 PM
if he doesn't have it in him to fire mess, it's over for him. but ksu embraced the culture of hiring their best buds, so we kind of deserve it.
Yep. And Gene doesn't have the stones to tell him Mess has to go

My worst fear is that this is true and ends up happening. If so, might as well give up on KSU football.

if that's all it takes you should just give it up now
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: PurpleOil on November 29, 2021, 04:47:21 PM
https://gfycat.com/apprehensivecompetentconure
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: DQ12 on November 29, 2021, 10:13:54 PM
Howard being our second best option at QB this year is a problem.  Whether Mess or Klein is responsible for that, I don’t know.  But I think blame probably falls on one/both of them.

I think we could probably upgrade both. 
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: ELL3 on November 29, 2021, 10:57:57 PM
Why is a coach who is 19 and 16, with a losing conference record allowed to further let this program go into the dumpster? Oh yes, he was lost 10 of his last 17 games. If Kleeman does not want to fire Courtney then he too should lose his job.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: chum1 on November 29, 2021, 11:08:12 PM
Lol

Quote
Offensive coordinator and quarterbacks coach Courtney Messingham and running backs coach Kenith Pope have been relieved of their duties, Rhoads announced in a school release Sunday afternoon.
...
The Cyclones quarterbacks were inconsistent throughout much of the year. Quarterback Sam Richardson did not progress as expected during his sophomore season

https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/10064660/iowa-state-cyclones-fire-offensive-coordinator-courtney-messingham-running-backs-coach-kenith-pope
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wetwillie on November 29, 2021, 11:23:50 PM
I think we will see Messingham “retire”, Klein take a job at another school, and Ray get fired. 
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on November 30, 2021, 12:09:38 AM
Why is a coach who is 19 and 16, with a losing conference record allowed to further let this program go into the dumpster? Oh yes, he was lost 10 of his last 17 games. If Kleeman does not want to fire Courtney then he too should lose his job.

lol, be more dramatic, Jesus Christ.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wiley on November 30, 2021, 12:12:48 AM
I think we will see Messingham “retire”, Klein take a job at another school, and Ray get fired.
Retiring in your mid 50’s sounds amazing.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: catastrophe on November 30, 2021, 09:55:08 AM
Step away for health related reasons is the move
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wetwillie on November 30, 2021, 10:43:17 AM
Spending more time with family etc…
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: schreds21 on November 30, 2021, 08:16:34 PM
Don't we need to keep Klein around in some capacity so that we are a lock for his expected progeny?
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wiley on November 30, 2021, 08:36:06 PM
Spending more time with family etc…
Opening up a spot for ol Tim Polasek to come in and run the offense?
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: muqluk on December 01, 2021, 11:04:10 AM
Don't we need to keep Klein around in some capacity so that we are a lock for his expected progeny?

And now I'm wondering just exactly what the progeny of an M1 Abrams cross bred with a Lamborghini Countach 'would' look like...
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: PurpleOil on December 01, 2021, 11:12:37 AM
Don't we need to keep Klein around in some capacity so that we are a lock for his expected progeny?

And now I'm wondering just exactly what the progeny of an M1 Abrams cross bred with a Lamborghini Countach 'would' look like...

I'm betting it looks like the dude in the Twisted Metal video game that had wheels for arms.



(https://i.ibb.co/85HKQ4G/dbfws1g-91aa2db3-e9c1-487a-8b40-03277211ffe5.jpg) (https://ibb.co/C7f1Ss4)
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wetwillie on December 01, 2021, 11:45:23 AM
Probably should start getting familiar with Tim Polasek as future OC.  I think the Wells ship has sailed.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on December 01, 2021, 11:56:26 AM
Probably should start getting familiar with Tim Polasek as future OC.  I think the Wells ship has sailed.

I don't think Wells was a clear upgrade but Tim Polasek definitely isn't a clear upgrade
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wiley on December 01, 2021, 11:58:03 AM
Probably should start getting familiar with Tim Polasek as future OC.  I think the Wells ship has sailed.
Dont do this to me
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wetwillie on December 01, 2021, 11:58:28 AM
Probably should start getting familiar with Tim Polasek as future OC.  I think the Wells ship has sailed.

I don't think Wells was a clear upgrade but Tim Polasek definitely isn't a clear upgrade

Won’t get an argument out of me on that one, not a name that gets me excited.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: ChiComCat on December 01, 2021, 12:02:18 PM
I'd be particularly concerned if we fire the initial NDSU OC to hire a new NDSU coach.  I would think the Gene/CK would avoid that.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Shooter Jones on December 01, 2021, 12:03:11 PM
I'd be particularly concerned if we fire the initial NDSU OC to hire a new NDSU coach.  I would think the Gene/CK would avoid that.

Lol
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Dugout DickStone on December 01, 2021, 12:17:56 PM
I'd be particularly concerned if we fire the initial NDSU OC to hire a new NDSU coach.  I would think the Gene/CK would avoid that.

Lol

pffffft.  The mole is going to hand out KSU money to his loser friends as long as he is here.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: stunted on December 01, 2021, 02:44:06 PM
He’s not going to do it is he? Just reading that they were not only just guys that happened to be on the same staff at NDSU, but they were even little league teammates  :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wetwillie on December 01, 2021, 02:51:39 PM
He’s not going to do it is he? Just reading that they were not only just guys that happened to be on the same staff at NDSU, but they were even little league teammates  :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

They will let him retire with some kind of dignity i think.  He won’t be on the staff next year though.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: outofstate on December 01, 2021, 03:04:47 PM
Eagle has an article about assistant contracts expiring in February.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: bucket on December 01, 2021, 03:08:43 PM
Eagle has an article about assistant contracts expiring in February.

That was pretty much the extent of the article. All coaches, except Kli and the strength and conditioning coach, have their contracts run out in February. 
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wiley on December 01, 2021, 03:19:13 PM
Eagle has an article about assistant contracts expiring in February.

That was pretty much the extent of the article. All coaches, except Kli and the strength and conditioning coach, have their contracts run out in February.
More surprising (although it shouldn’t be), it’s Messingham at 600k+, Connor Riley 400k+, then everyone else essentially in the 300k range.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: yoga-like_abana on December 01, 2021, 03:23:57 PM
If he's not gone by now do we assume he won't be gone? Or wait until bowl game or what?
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: ChiComCat on December 01, 2021, 03:32:40 PM
If he's not gone by now do we assume he won't be gone? Or wait until bowl game or what?

There are too many changes/staffs taking shape that if we don't do it soon, we're going to likely be stuck with someone just as bad.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: outofstate on December 01, 2021, 03:38:04 PM
If he's not gone by now do we assume he won't be gone? Or wait until bowl game or what?
I'm guessing CK is deleting the reminder to renew Mess' contract in February or at least turning off the alert.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on December 01, 2021, 03:43:17 PM
If he's not gone by now do we assume he won't be gone? Or wait until bowl game or what?

There are too many changes/staffs taking shape that if we don't do it soon, we're going to likely be stuck with someone just as bad.

I mean, I don't think Mess is as bad as everyone thinks, but we hired Hazelton after signing day.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: yoga-like_abana on December 01, 2021, 03:44:09 PM
Do we have any hot recruits we'd actually be worried about leaving is Mess was gone?
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: ChiComCat on December 01, 2021, 03:59:00 PM
If he's not gone by now do we assume he won't be gone? Or wait until bowl game or what?

There are too many changes/staffs taking shape that if we don't do it soon, we're going to likely be stuck with someone just as bad.

I mean, I don't think Mess is as bad as everyone thinks, but we hired Hazelton after signing day.

I was on the fence but the last two games pushed me towards wanting him gone.  To come up empty in the second half against UT with the field position we had is unforgivable.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on December 01, 2021, 04:10:21 PM
If he's not gone by now do we assume he won't be gone? Or wait until bowl game or what?

There are too many changes/staffs taking shape that if we don't do it soon, we're going to likely be stuck with someone just as bad.

I mean, I don't think Mess is as bad as everyone thinks, but we hired Hazelton after signing day.

I was on the fence but the last two games pushed me towards wanting him gone.  To come up empty in the second half against UT with the field position we had is unforgivable.

I'll forgive it based on the overall body of work. I'd also be OK with replacing him, but people are acting like Klieman's career would be destroyed if Mess comes back, which I think is just a tad extreme.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: PurpleOil on December 01, 2021, 04:13:54 PM
If he's not gone by now do we assume he won't be gone? Or wait until bowl game or what?

There are too many changes/staffs taking shape that if we don't do it soon, we're going to likely be stuck with someone just as bad.

I mean, I don't think Mess is as bad as everyone thinks, but we hired Hazelton after signing day.

I was on the fence but the last two games pushed me towards wanting him gone.  To come up empty in the second half against UT with the field position we had is unforgivable.

I'll forgive it based on the overall body of work. I'd also be OK with replacing him, but people are acting like Klieman's career would be destroyed if Mess comes back, which I think is just a tad extreme.

I don't. Messingham is a proven loser. Keeping proven losers on your coaching staff means you're a loser as well.

I want CK to do so well that a school throws stupid money at him to try and poach him. Do you think anyone's going to try and steal a marginally better than .500 coach who keeps his besties on his staff with him wherever he goes?
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on December 01, 2021, 04:31:51 PM
I want CK to do so well that a school throws stupid money at him to try and poach him. Do you think anyone's going to try and steal a marginally better than .500 coach who keeps his besties on his staff with him wherever he goes?

I think it's pretty naive to think not replacing the OC is all that's preventing CK from achieving significantly more than he is now.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: muqluk on December 01, 2021, 04:58:04 PM
Don't we need to keep Klein around in some capacity so that we are a lock for his expected progeny?

And now I'm wondering just exactly what the progeny of an M1 Abrams cross bred with a Lamborghini Countach 'would' look like...

I'm betting it looks like the dude in the Twisted Metal video game that had wheels for arms.



(https://i.ibb.co/85HKQ4G/dbfws1g-91aa2db3-e9c1-487a-8b40-03277211ffe5.jpg) (https://ibb.co/C7f1Ss4)

I’ll accept that
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: stunted on December 01, 2021, 06:01:29 PM
One thing for sure is the offense is not over performing their talent level while the defense is.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on December 01, 2021, 06:12:34 PM
One thing for sure is the offense is not over performing their talent level while the defense is.

Is that really for sure?
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wetwillie on December 01, 2021, 06:24:32 PM
One thing for sure is the offense is not over performing their talent level while the defense is.

Is that really for sure?

pace adjusted defensive stats had us as the second best defense this year in the big 12

https://www.teamrankings.com/college-football/stat/opponent-points-per-play (https://www.teamrankings.com/college-football/stat/opponent-points-per-play)
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on December 01, 2021, 06:28:25 PM
One thing for sure is the offense is not over performing their talent level while the defense is.

Is that really for sure?

pace adjusted defensive stats had us as the second best defense this year in the big 12

https://www.teamrankings.com/college-football/stat/opponent-points-per-play (https://www.teamrankings.com/college-football/stat/opponent-points-per-play)
Defense was really good! Offense was fifth in the same metric? Not too bad considering who got a ton of snaps at QB
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Spracne on December 01, 2021, 06:31:12 PM
One thing for sure is the offense is not over performing their talent level while the defense is.

Is that really for sure?

pace adjusted defensive stats had us as the second best defense this year in the big 12

https://www.teamrankings.com/college-football/stat/opponent-points-per-play (https://www.teamrankings.com/college-football/stat/opponent-points-per-play)
Defense was really good! Offense was fifth in the same metric? Not too bad considering who got a ton of snaps at QB

The Deuce Effect. Imagine if you had a decent to good QB.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wetwillie on December 01, 2021, 06:32:25 PM
One thing for sure is the offense is not over performing their talent level while the defense is.

Is that really for sure?

pace adjusted defensive stats had us as the second best defense this year in the big 12

https://www.teamrankings.com/college-football/stat/opponent-points-per-play (https://www.teamrankings.com/college-football/stat/opponent-points-per-play)
Defense was really good! Offense was fifth in the same metric? Not too bad considering who got a ton of snaps at QB

if sky remains even halfway viable for Texas, we win by two scores and Mess keeps his job.  It's a high stakes job so its hard to feel too bad for Mess but his overall body of work wasn't that bad. 
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: stunted on December 01, 2021, 06:37:28 PM
One thing for sure is the offense is not over performing their talent level while the defense is.

Is that really for sure?

pace adjusted defensive stats had us as the second best defense this year in the big 12

https://www.teamrankings.com/college-football/stat/opponent-points-per-play (https://www.teamrankings.com/college-football/stat/opponent-points-per-play)
Defense was really good! Offense was fifth in the same metric? Not too bad considering who got a ton of snaps at QB

yea maybe i'm just in a BID mode.

i guess it's logical to not know wtf to do when you got will howard leading the way. but somebody has got to figure out the qb situation god damnit!
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: KCFDcat on December 01, 2021, 07:01:55 PM
One thing for sure is the offense is not over performing their talent level while the defense is.

Is that really for sure?

pace adjusted defensive stats had us as the second best defense this year in the big 12

https://www.teamrankings.com/college-football/stat/opponent-points-per-play (https://www.teamrankings.com/college-football/stat/opponent-points-per-play)
Defense was really good! Offense was fifth in the same metric? Not too bad considering who got a ton of snaps at QB

if sky remains even halfway viable for Texas, we win by two scores and Mess keeps his job.  It's a high stakes job so its hard to feel too bad for Mess but his overall body of work wasn't that bad.

True, but if Howard is the qb of the future then we need an OC that knows how to run an offense around him. Mess has shown zero ability to make a game plan around Howard’s skill set.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on December 01, 2021, 07:04:01 PM
One thing for sure is the offense is not over performing their talent level while the defense is.

Is that really for sure?

pace adjusted defensive stats had us as the second best defense this year in the big 12

https://www.teamrankings.com/college-football/stat/opponent-points-per-play (https://www.teamrankings.com/college-football/stat/opponent-points-per-play)
Defense was really good! Offense was fifth in the same metric? Not too bad considering who got a ton of snaps at QB

if sky remains even halfway viable for Texas, we win by two scores and Mess keeps his job.  It's a high stakes job so its hard to feel too bad for Mess but his overall body of work wasn't that bad.
He's been the KSU OC for 35 games. The outcome of the Texas game with Will Howard at quarterback should not be the deciding factor.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on December 01, 2021, 07:07:20 PM
One thing for sure is the offense is not over performing their talent level while the defense is.

Is that really for sure?

pace adjusted defensive stats had us as the second best defense this year in the big 12

https://www.teamrankings.com/college-football/stat/opponent-points-per-play (https://www.teamrankings.com/college-football/stat/opponent-points-per-play)
Defense was really good! Offense was fifth in the same metric? Not too bad considering who got a ton of snaps at QB

if sky remains even halfway viable for Texas, we win by two scores and Mess keeps his job.  It's a high stakes job so its hard to feel too bad for Mess but his overall body of work wasn't that bad.

True, but if Howard is the qb of the future then we need an OC that knows how to run an offense around him. Mess has shown zero ability to make a game plan around Howard’s skill set.
Well, Howard's a fumble prone running QB who can't pass worth a crap. Not sure there's a great way to scheme around that, even though he had a great long run against Texas.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on December 01, 2021, 08:15:50 PM
One thing for sure is the offense is not over performing their talent level while the defense is.

Is that really for sure?

pace adjusted defensive stats had us as the second best defense this year in the big 12

https://www.teamrankings.com/college-football/stat/opponent-points-per-play (https://www.teamrankings.com/college-football/stat/opponent-points-per-play)
Defense was really good! Offense was fifth in the same metric? Not too bad considering who got a ton of snaps at QB

if sky remains even halfway viable for Texas, we win by two scores and Mess keeps his job.  It's a high stakes job so its hard to feel too bad for Mess but his overall body of work wasn't that bad.

I'm not so sure about that. That game really needed us to run the ball roughly a million times. I'm furious about those three play calls at the end of the game, I'm more angry that we didn't run nearly as much as we should have. I thought playing Will should have been an advantage but we didn't do that. I can't imagine how many passes he would have had Skylar throwing. I think he completely bottles the game plan, even worse, with Skylar.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on December 01, 2021, 08:25:09 PM
He’s not going to do it is he? Just reading that they were not only just guys that happened to be on the same staff at NDSU, but they were even little league teammates  :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

They will let him retire with some kind of dignity i think.  He won’t be on the staff next year though.

He was out recruiting yesterday, he's coming back.
https://twitter.com/PHSPantherFB/status/1465821933296041989
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Purple Derpathy on December 01, 2021, 09:05:59 PM
Boy we are going to suck ass next year with Mess and Kleigoober. Poor Deuce......

Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: PurpleOil on December 02, 2021, 08:45:02 AM
I want CK to do so well that a school throws stupid money at him to try and poach him. Do you think anyone's going to try and steal a marginally better than .500 coach who keeps his besties on his staff with him wherever he goes?

I think it's pretty naive to think not replacing the OC is all that's preventing CK from achieving significantly more than he is now.

Let's ask ourselves this question a different way. We had a defense that was good enough to win the conference this year. There were only 3 teams able to score more than 30 points on us all year, and all 3 of those teams spent time in the top 10 rankings. Most opponents struggled just to make it to 20, including current #9 Baylor. Even a marginally above average offense in the Big XII should be able to score 4 touchdowns and a field goal.  Instead, in 12 games, we limped along and constantly struggled to score points in the 2nd half of games despite having a pretty decent 6th year QB and arguably one of the better RBs in program history. Messingham has had questionable play calling follow him his entire career, so the issues are not just isolated to our program, and this season it was on full display in several of our loses.

What is the case for keeping him? How would we NOT improve by replacing him with a better coordinator?
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: ChiComCat on December 02, 2021, 08:47:39 AM
What is the case for keeping him? How would we NOT improve by replacing him with a better coordinator?

Of course we improve by replacing him with a better coordinator.  The argument is that it's not a given that we get a better coordinator
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on December 02, 2021, 08:51:39 AM
I want CK to do so well that a school throws stupid money at him to try and poach him. Do you think anyone's going to try and steal a marginally better than .500 coach who keeps his besties on his staff with him wherever he goes?

I think it's pretty naive to think not replacing the OC is all that's preventing CK from achieving significantly more than he is now.

Let's ask ourselves this question a different way. We had a defense that was good enough to win the conference this year. There were only 3 teams able to score more than 30 points on us all year, and all 3 of those teams spent time in the top 10 rankings. Most opponents struggled just to make it to 20, including current #9 Baylor. Even a marginally above average offense in the Big XII should be able to score 4 touchdowns and a field goal.  Instead, in 12 games, we limped along and constantly struggled to score points in the 2nd half of games despite having a pretty decent 6th year QB and arguably one of the better RBs in program history. Messingham has had questionable play calling follow him his entire career, so the issues are not just isolated to our program, and this season it was on full display in several of our loses.

I don't think our offensive talent was very good outside of Deuce.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: ChiComCat on December 02, 2021, 09:03:26 AM
I want CK to do so well that a school throws stupid money at him to try and poach him. Do you think anyone's going to try and steal a marginally better than .500 coach who keeps his besties on his staff with him wherever he goes?

I think it's pretty naive to think not replacing the OC is all that's preventing CK from achieving significantly more than he is now.

Let's ask ourselves this question a different way. We had a defense that was good enough to win the conference this year. There were only 3 teams able to score more than 30 points on us all year, and all 3 of those teams spent time in the top 10 rankings. Most opponents struggled just to make it to 20, including current #9 Baylor. Even a marginally above average offense in the Big XII should be able to score 4 touchdowns and a field goal.  Instead, in 12 games, we limped along and constantly struggled to score points in the 2nd half of games despite having a pretty decent 6th year QB and arguably one of the better RBs in program history. Messingham has had questionable play calling follow him his entire career, so the issues are not just isolated to our program, and this season it was on full display in several of our loses.

I don't think our offensive talent was very good outside of Deuce.

If that's the case then we should've given him the ball more against Baylor when he was averaging 10+ yards a touch
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on December 02, 2021, 09:06:32 AM
I want CK to do so well that a school throws stupid money at him to try and poach him. Do you think anyone's going to try and steal a marginally better than .500 coach who keeps his besties on his staff with him wherever he goes?

I think it's pretty naive to think not replacing the OC is all that's preventing CK from achieving significantly more than he is now.

Let's ask ourselves this question a different way. We had a defense that was good enough to win the conference this year. There were only 3 teams able to score more than 30 points on us all year, and all 3 of those teams spent time in the top 10 rankings. Most opponents struggled just to make it to 20, including current #9 Baylor. Even a marginally above average offense in the Big XII should be able to score 4 touchdowns and a field goal.  Instead, in 12 games, we limped along and constantly struggled to score points in the 2nd half of games despite having a pretty decent 6th year QB and arguably one of the better RBs in program history. Messingham has had questionable play calling follow him his entire career, so the issues are not just isolated to our program, and this season it was on full display in several of our loses.

I don't think our offensive talent was very good outside of Deuce.

If that's the case then we should've given him the ball more against Baylor when he was averaging 10+ yards a touch

yeah probably
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on December 02, 2021, 09:09:38 AM
I want CK to do so well that a school throws stupid money at him to try and poach him. Do you think anyone's going to try and steal a marginally better than .500 coach who keeps his besties on his staff with him wherever he goes?

I think it's pretty naive to think not replacing the OC is all that's preventing CK from achieving significantly more than he is now.

Let's ask ourselves this question a different way. We had a defense that was good enough to win the conference this year. There were only 3 teams able to score more than 30 points on us all year, and all 3 of those teams spent time in the top 10 rankings. Most opponents struggled just to make it to 20, including current #9 Baylor. Even a marginally above average offense in the Big XII should be able to score 4 touchdowns and a field goal.  Instead, in 12 games, we limped along and constantly struggled to score points in the 2nd half of games despite having a pretty decent 6th year QB and arguably one of the better RBs in program history. Messingham has had questionable play calling follow him his entire career, so the issues are not just isolated to our program, and this season it was on full display in several of our loses.

I don't think our offensive talent was very good outside of Deuce.

If that's the case then we should've given him the ball more against Baylor when he was averaging 10+ yards a touch

That was the problem the last two games and I'll say it again, it's my issue with Mess. He either isn't smart enough to see what works or he's constantly over thinking himself. Maybe when Klieman said he's going to get involved in the game planning that he means exactly this. He's seeing that we aren't using our best player enough when everything else doesn't seem to be working.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: yoga-like_abana on December 02, 2021, 09:14:43 AM
I want CK to do so well that a school throws stupid money at him to try and poach him. Do you think anyone's going to try and steal a marginally better than .500 coach who keeps his besties on his staff with him wherever he goes?

I think it's pretty naive to think not replacing the OC is all that's preventing CK from achieving significantly more than he is now.

Let's ask ourselves this question a different way. We had a defense that was good enough to win the conference this year. There were only 3 teams able to score more than 30 points on us all year, and all 3 of those teams spent time in the top 10 rankings. Most opponents struggled just to make it to 20, including current #9 Baylor. Even a marginally above average offense in the Big XII should be able to score 4 touchdowns and a field goal.  Instead, in 12 games, we limped along and constantly struggled to score points in the 2nd half of games despite having a pretty decent 6th year QB and arguably one of the better RBs in program history. Messingham has had questionable play calling follow him his entire career, so the issues are not just isolated to our program, and this season it was on full display in several of our loses.

I don't think our offensive talent was very good outside of Deuce.

If that's the case then we should've given him the ball more against Baylor when he was averaging 10+ yards a touch

That was the problem the last two games and I'll say it again, it's my issue with Mess. He either isn't smart enough to see what works or he's constantly over thinking himself. Maybe when Klieman said he's going to get involved in the game planning that he means exactly this. He's seeing that we aren't using our best player enough when everything else doesn't seem to be working.
We also have a "pitch count" for deuce I'm sure.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on December 02, 2021, 09:17:25 AM
I want CK to do so well that a school throws stupid money at him to try and poach him. Do you think anyone's going to try and steal a marginally better than .500 coach who keeps his besties on his staff with him wherever he goes?

I think it's pretty naive to think not replacing the OC is all that's preventing CK from achieving significantly more than he is now.

Let's ask ourselves this question a different way. We had a defense that was good enough to win the conference this year. There were only 3 teams able to score more than 30 points on us all year, and all 3 of those teams spent time in the top 10 rankings. Most opponents struggled just to make it to 20, including current #9 Baylor. Even a marginally above average offense in the Big XII should be able to score 4 touchdowns and a field goal.  Instead, in 12 games, we limped along and constantly struggled to score points in the 2nd half of games despite having a pretty decent 6th year QB and arguably one of the better RBs in program history. Messingham has had questionable play calling follow him his entire career, so the issues are not just isolated to our program, and this season it was on full display in several of our loses.

I don't think our offensive talent was very good outside of Deuce.

If that's the case then we should've given him the ball more against Baylor when he was averaging 10+ yards a touch

That was the problem the last two games and I'll say it again, it's my issue with Mess. He either isn't smart enough to see what works or he's constantly over thinking himself. Maybe when Klieman said he's going to get involved in the game planning that he means exactly this. He's seeing that we aren't using our best player enough when everything else doesn't seem to be working.
We also have a "pitch count" for deuce I'm sure.

which is a good idea IMO. I don't think he was really underused at Texas but probably was against Baylor.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Cire on December 02, 2021, 09:30:39 AM
I think the extreme slow pace is the "pitch count so to speak"

I bet if you look at carson wentz easton stick offense, they are probably average/below average pace but that's just spitballing.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on December 02, 2021, 09:37:05 AM
sounds like the pitch count has been around 25 touches/game

Quote
Despite Vaughn's diminutive stature -- he's 5-foot-6, 173 pounds -- Klieman said recently that he might give the running back as many as 25 touches a game this season.

https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/stanford-can-expect-big-doses-of-deuce-vaughn-against-kansas-st/
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: PurpleOil on December 02, 2021, 11:52:42 AM
What is the case for keeping him? How would we NOT improve by replacing him with a better coordinator?

Of course we improve by replacing him with a better coordinator.  The argument is that it's not a given that we get a better coordinator

This is the type of thinking you employ when you've got a Pelini or Gundy winning 10 games a year and you're questioning whether you should push for a coaching change.

It's not what you worry about when you're limping into a 7-5 regular season and needing to inject life and energy into your program.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: ChiComCat on December 02, 2021, 02:32:17 PM
What is the case for keeping him? How would we NOT improve by replacing him with a better coordinator?

Of course we improve by replacing him with a better coordinator.  The argument is that it's not a given that we get a better coordinator

This is the type of thinking you employ when you've got a Pelini or Gundy winning 10 games a year and you're questioning whether you should push for a coaching change.

It's not what you worry about when you're limping into a 7-5 regular season and needing to inject life and energy into your program.

The way you phrased your question was that a better coordinator was a given.  I'm all for making a change but there is still risk worth acknowledging. 
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: stunted on December 02, 2021, 02:42:46 PM
Would another coach in Kleimans shoes fire Messingham in the same circumstances (minus being butt buddies for life)? I think more than 50% would.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: PurpleOil on December 02, 2021, 03:28:15 PM
What is the case for keeping him? How would we NOT improve by replacing him with a better coordinator?

Of course we improve by replacing him with a better coordinator.  The argument is that it's not a given that we get a better coordinator

This is the type of thinking you employ when you've got a Pelini or Gundy winning 10 games a year and you're questioning whether you should push for a coaching change.

It's not what you worry about when you're limping into a 7-5 regular season and needing to inject life and energy into your program.

The way you phrased your question was that a better coordinator was a given.  I'm all for making a change but there is still risk worth acknowledging.

Did you watch the same Texas game the rest of us did? How would a coordinator have called a worse game?

Yes, there is certainly a risk there that things could somehow get even worse, but I think that risk is outweighed by getting rid of the aggravating play calling and frustration of the players/transfers that will be caused by keeping the mess that is Mess.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on December 02, 2021, 03:31:24 PM
What is the case for keeping him? How would we NOT improve by replacing him with a better coordinator?

Of course we improve by replacing him with a better coordinator.  The argument is that it's not a given that we get a better coordinator

This is the type of thinking you employ when you've got a Pelini or Gundy winning 10 games a year and you're questioning whether you should push for a coaching change.

It's not what you worry about when you're limping into a 7-5 regular season and needing to inject life and energy into your program.

The way you phrased your question was that a better coordinator was a given.  I'm all for making a change but there is still risk worth acknowledging.

Did you watch the same Texas game the rest of us did? How would a coordinator have called a worse game?

Could have ran Will more and lost fumbles. Could have given Deuce too many carries and got him hurt. could have had an offensive penalty. Could have not set up Will's long run. Like there's a billion scenarios that could have gone worse. :dunno:
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: muqluk on December 02, 2021, 04:02:02 PM
Puzzling how, after looking at the last ~10-15 years of Messingham’s resume - and the stats for those teams during his tenures, anyone would bother defending him.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: ChiComCat on December 02, 2021, 04:21:07 PM
The second half of the UT game was atrocious.  The Baylor and UT games as a whole were poor.  I don't expect us to win the B12 and compete for championships consistently, but I want it to be possible.  Messingham's terrible games lower the ceiling of the team to beneath that threshold.  Messingham fucks up games so bad on occasion that make it nearly impossible for K-State to win.  K-State's margins will usually be too thin to overcome that.

I can say all of that and know that he was actually around the middle of the pack in the B12 in most advanced stats.  He isn't the worst OC over the course of a season but he's pretty close a couple of times a year.  As I've said, I'm all for making a change and we should do it sooner than later before some of the newer staffs start filling roles.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: tdaver on December 02, 2021, 05:25:05 PM
A lot of P5 OCs got crap canned today.

If in fact Klieman is targeting Wells, we'll probably need to wait for the carousel to slow down to see if we can get him. Wells will almost certainly try to get a G5 job.

Yea this is not ideal environment for the Wells to KSU contingent.

I'm confused as to why Steve Addazio hasn't been fired yet, probably coming and there's going to be a lot of G5 openings.

His buyout drops $2MM (from 5 to 3) on Thursday

https://twitter.com/Brett_McMurphy/status/1466454450642501633?s=20
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on December 02, 2021, 06:07:09 PM
sounds like the pitch count has been around 25 touches/game

Quote
Despite Vaughn's diminutive stature -- he's 5-foot-6, 173 pounds -- Klieman said recently that he might give the running back as many as 25 touches a game this season.

https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/stanford-can-expect-big-doses-of-deuce-vaughn-against-kansas-st/

Then he said later in the year, postgame after Nevada, if memory serves me right, that Deuce doesn't have a cap on his carries.

Capping his carries is dumb unless they have noticed a pattern of his production waning after a certain number of carries, which it isn't.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on December 02, 2021, 06:11:32 PM
Puzzling how, after looking at the last ~10-15 years of Messingham’s resume - and the stats for those teams during his tenures, anyone would bother defending him.

Chi & Rusty, or anyone else for that matter, aren't defending him, they're just saying that we could do worse, which is a statistical fact. No one is advocating for keeping that dude, everyone knows it could also be significantly better.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Purple Derpathy on December 02, 2021, 06:37:59 PM
Why settle for second when middle of the pack is available? - Coach Mess
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Trim on December 02, 2021, 09:08:29 PM
Puzzling how, after looking at the last ~10-15 years of Messingham’s resume - and the stats for those teams during his tenures, anyone would bother defending him.

If true, more puzzling would be that he got hired.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Purple Derpathy on December 02, 2021, 09:35:47 PM
Puzzling how, after looking at the last ~10-15 years of Messingham’s resume - and the stats for those teams during his tenures, anyone would bother defending him.

If true, more puzzling would be that he got hired.

You miss the the last 9 pages of him being best buds with Kleigoober? He wasn't hired for his history of success....
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on December 02, 2021, 10:41:01 PM
Puzzling how, after looking at the last ~10-15 years of Messingham’s resume - and the stats for those teams during his tenures, anyone would bother defending him.

If true, more puzzling would be that he got hired.

You miss the the last 9 pages of him being best buds with Kleigoober? He wasn't hired for his history of success....

I mean he had back to back national championships as an offensive coordinator immediately before taking the job, but I'm sure you knew that.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: DQ12 on December 02, 2021, 10:48:13 PM
Mess needs to GO. 

CLEAN THE MESS
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: stunted on December 02, 2021, 10:54:01 PM
can we stop defending him? he was a questionable hire and given his history with bff kleiman should be looked at with extra scrutiny
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Cire on December 03, 2021, 06:06:00 AM
Yeah. There is nothing in his history that says he should be coordinating a power 5 offense.

He’s here because his buddy threw him a bone at North Dakota state


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Cire on December 03, 2021, 06:06:29 AM
His 30+ year resume is incredibly underwhelming


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: nicname on December 03, 2021, 07:02:20 AM
His 30+ year resume is incredibly underwhelming


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What if I told you that our offense this season was the best he's ever had at the FBS level?
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on December 03, 2021, 07:20:31 AM
Who are some folks that SHOULD be hired based on their resumes?
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wetwillie on December 03, 2021, 07:55:48 AM
It’s an exercise in futility because Klieman appears dead set on running this specific offense and basically no one else runs it.  TCU went and got Garrett Riley, you’d think Scheelhase would be a candidate if we let him run what he wanted to. You start looking at G5 OC’s like Ryan Grubb or QB coach like Jason Beck at Virginia
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on December 03, 2021, 08:00:08 AM
It’s an exercise in futility because Klieman appears dead set on running this specific offense and basically no one else runs it.  TCU went and got Garrett Riley, you’d think Scheelhase would be a candidate if we let him run what he wanted to. You start looking at G5 OC’s like Ryan Grubb or QB coach like Jason Beck at Virginia

Is the offense really THAT unique or is it just designed to limit turnovers and go at a slow pace? I'd probably look at low TO rate offenses, pace is easy to control. I might do that later today.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Cire on December 03, 2021, 08:16:35 AM
I mean JFC

This was almost exactly a year ago!

https://www.heartlandcollegesports.com/2020/12/02/kansas-state-may-have-itself-an-offensive-coordinator-problem/
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Cire on December 03, 2021, 08:19:43 AM
1990 St. Ambrose [Iowa] (Graduate Assistant)
1991-92 St. Ambrose [Iowa] (Offensive Coordinator/QB)
1993-94 Iowa Lakes CC (Offensive Coordinator/QB)
1995-96 Truman State (Running Backs/Tight Ends)
1997-98 Truman State (Offensive Coordinator)
1999 Missouri State (Wide Receivers/Tight Ends)
2000-02 Missouri State (Offensive Coordinator)
2003-04 Upper Iowa (Head Coach)
2005-06 Southern Miss (Wide Receivers)
2007 Southern Miss (Running Backs)
2008 Missouri State (Special Teams Coordinator/WR)
2009-10 Iowa State (Tight Ends)
2011 Iowa State (Wide Receivers)
2012-13 Iowa State (Offensive Coordinator/QB)
2014-15 Indiana (Offensive/Special Teams Quality Control)
2016 Montana State (Offensive Coordinator/QB)
2017-18 North Dakota State (Offensive Coordinator/RB)
2019-20 Kansas State (Offensive Coordinator/TE/FB)
2021 Kansas State (Offensive Coordinator/WR)


The ONLY reason he got hired at NDS was because of his friendship.

He was a failed coach
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: muqluk on December 03, 2021, 08:28:54 AM
Seems like he must be a reasonably good positional coach - just terrible OC

Otherwise he wouldnt have been promoted so many times only to end in short tenures as OC
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Cire on December 03, 2021, 08:49:56 AM
He gets hired as a position coach at awful/failing programs and works his way up to coordinator because everyone else left/got fired.

Truman State and missouri state were both garbage when he was there.

ISU/Rhoades enough said

Indiana he was Stanton Weber

Montana state won like 3 games
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: yoga-like_abana on December 03, 2021, 09:01:53 AM
Seems like he must be a reasonably good positional coach - just terrible OC

Otherwise he wouldnt have been promoted so many times only to end in short tenures as OC
Think it's more because he's nice and well liked by his peers
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Maccat on December 03, 2021, 09:34:53 AM
Seems like he must be a reasonably good positional coach - just terrible OC

Otherwise he wouldnt have been promoted so many times only to end in short tenures as OC
Think it's more because he's nice and well liked by his peers

And hated by the fans.  During the ISU game sat by one of those hayseeds and he was laughing at us that we wouldn't fire Mess.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on December 03, 2021, 09:51:29 AM
It’s an exercise in futility because Klieman appears dead set on running this specific offense and basically no one else runs it.  TCU went and got Garrett Riley, you’d think Scheelhase would be a candidate if we let him run what he wanted to. You start looking at G5 OC’s like Ryan Grubb or QB coach like Jason Beck at Virginia

you know what's also really tough is that Mess led a top 40 offense this year according to most advanced stats. Most teams ahead are P5, and we're not gonna poach a sitting P5 OC unless they are foolishly undervalued..

Like, on the FEI offensive ratings, Fresno's offense was ranked #65 and (121st in turnovers so Grubb would definitely be a no-go).
https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/ncaa/fei/overalloff/2020

This guy would be interesting, low turnovers, runs a run-heavy offense, coached in west texas and at Eastern Illinois:

https://kentstatesports.com/staff-directory/andrew-sowder/309

But I'd probably go harder after this guy - low turnovers the last two seasons, just below KSU in efficiency this year (seems like he will be in demand):

https://goutsa.com/sports/football/roster/coaches/barry-lunney-jr-/1188

Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Cire on December 03, 2021, 09:53:23 AM
Mess did great with deuce and skylar.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on December 03, 2021, 09:57:54 AM
It’s an exercise in futility because Klieman appears dead set on running this specific offense and basically no one else runs it.  TCU went and got Garrett Riley, you’d think Scheelhase would be a candidate if we let him run what he wanted to. You start looking at G5 OC’s like Ryan Grubb or QB coach like Jason Beck at Virginia

you know what's also really tough is that Mess led a top 40 offense this year according to most advanced stats. Most teams ahead are P5, and we're not gonna poach a sitting P5 OC unless they are foolishly undervalued..

Like, on the FEI offensive ratings, Fresno's offense was ranked #65 and (121st in turnovers so Grubb would definitely be a no-go).
https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/ncaa/fei/overalloff/2020


looking at this I would definitely give Mike Bobo a call
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wetwillie on December 03, 2021, 10:03:19 AM
It’s an exercise in futility because Klieman appears dead set on running this specific offense and basically no one else runs it.  TCU went and got Garrett Riley, you’d think Scheelhase would be a candidate if we let him run what he wanted to. You start looking at G5 OC’s like Ryan Grubb or QB coach like Jason Beck at Virginia

you know what's also really tough is that Mess led a top 40 offense this year according to most advanced stats. Most teams ahead are P5, and we're not gonna poach a sitting P5 OC unless they are foolishly undervalued..

Like, on the FEI offensive ratings, Fresno's offense was ranked #65 and (121st in turnovers so Grubb would definitely be a no-go).
https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/ncaa/fei/overalloff/2020


looking at this I would definitely give Mike Bobo a call

I’d kill a drifter for Mike Bobo
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on December 03, 2021, 10:06:37 AM
It’s an exercise in futility because Klieman appears dead set on running this specific offense and basically no one else runs it.  TCU went and got Garrett Riley, you’d think Scheelhase would be a candidate if we let him run what he wanted to. You start looking at G5 OC’s like Ryan Grubb or QB coach like Jason Beck at Virginia

you know what's also really tough is that Mess led a top 40 offense this year according to most advanced stats. Most teams ahead are P5, and we're not gonna poach a sitting P5 OC unless they are foolishly undervalued..

Like, on the FEI offensive ratings, Fresno's offense was ranked #65 and (121st in turnovers so Grubb would definitely be a no-go).
https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/ncaa/fei/overalloff/2020


looking at this I would definitely give Mike Bobo a call

I’d kill a drifter for Mike Bobo

I mean what's his play? be a QC coach for Saban? Position coach for an SEC school? I can't imagine he'd get an OC job in the SEC. Seems like he'd be attainable. :dunno:
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on December 03, 2021, 10:13:09 AM
It’s an exercise in futility because Klieman appears dead set on running this specific offense and basically no one else runs it.  TCU went and got Garrett Riley, you’d think Scheelhase would be a candidate if we let him run what he wanted to. You start looking at G5 OC’s like Ryan Grubb or QB coach like Jason Beck at Virginia

you know what's also really tough is that Mess led a top 40 offense this year according to most advanced stats. Most teams ahead are P5, and we're not gonna poach a sitting P5 OC unless they are foolishly undervalued..

Like, on the FEI offensive ratings, Fresno's offense was ranked #65 and (121st in turnovers so Grubb would definitely be a no-go).
https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/ncaa/fei/overalloff/2020


looking at this I would definitely give Mike Bobo a call

I’d kill a drifter for Mike Bobo

I mean what's his play? be a QC coach for Saban? Position coach for an SEC school? I can't imagine he'd get an OC job in the SEC. Seems like he'd be attainable. :dunno:

He had a 3 year contract for $1.3 million/year. If I were him I'd go do QC for Saban or Kirby until the firing stink wears off. KSU would barely pay him half that.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wetwillie on December 03, 2021, 10:14:43 AM
I bet we could find 900k for Bobo.  We offered Hazelton that to stay.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Purple Derpathy on December 03, 2021, 10:51:58 AM
Puzzling how, after looking at the last ~10-15 years of Messingham’s resume - and the stats for those teams during his tenures, anyone would bother defending him.

If true, more puzzling would be that he got hired.

You miss the the last 9 pages of him being best buds with Kleigoober? He wasn't hired for his history of success....

I mean he had back to back national championships as an offensive coordinator immediately before taking the job, but I'm sure you knew that.

Lol. I suppose you knew they also won 4 national championships in the 5 years before he got there in addition to the one immediately thereafter. Much like any OC/DC at Alabama, you're going to be successful regardless of how bad you suck as an individual. 
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Trim on December 03, 2021, 10:57:43 AM
Puzzling how, after looking at the last ~10-15 years of Messingham’s resume - and the stats for those teams during his tenures, anyone would bother defending him.

If true, more puzzling would be that he got hired.

You miss the the last 9 pages of him being best buds with Kleigoober? He wasn't hired for his history of success....

Then the problem isn’t messingham.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: pissclams on December 03, 2021, 11:23:37 AM
gene demands mediocrity from all of his programs and ham and potatoes face and courtney refuse to let him down as they relentlessly pursue 7 wins each and every year no matter what it takes
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on December 03, 2021, 11:35:39 AM
Puzzling how, after looking at the last ~10-15 years of Messingham’s resume - and the stats for those teams during his tenures, anyone would bother defending him.

If true, more puzzling would be that he got hired.

You miss the the last 9 pages of him being best buds with Kleigoober? He wasn't hired for his history of success....

I mean he had back to back national championships as an offensive coordinator immediately before taking the job, but I'm sure you knew that.

Lol. I suppose you knew they also won 4 national championships in the 5 years before he got there in addition to the one immediately thereafter. Much like any OC/DC at Alabama, you're going to be successful regardless of how bad you suck as an individual.

Alabama fans will very much not agree with this. Bill O'Brien trends on Twitter every Saturday and it's not because he's being praised. FWIW, they didn't love Lane either.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Dugout DickStone on December 03, 2021, 01:17:40 PM
Friendship > success

Mediocrity is something you can attain while also getting rich with your bros
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: bucket on December 03, 2021, 03:22:44 PM
https://twitter.com/KellisRobinett/status/1466880100775911433
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on December 03, 2021, 03:27:05 PM
Well well well
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Cire on December 03, 2021, 03:28:21 PM
This is not a bad thing


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: DaBigTrain on December 03, 2021, 03:29:03 PM
I did NOT see that coming
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: muqluk on December 03, 2021, 03:29:07 PM
https://twitter.com/KellisRobinett/status/1466880100775911433
:billdance: :billdance: :billdance: :billdance: :billdance:
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: KCFDcat on December 03, 2021, 03:29:29 PM
legitimately surprised about this. Good for Klieman.

I hope ksu ups coordinator pay and we're able to land a good oc and pay klanderman more than 325k/yr
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: CHONGS on December 03, 2021, 03:29:52 PM
Let's go get a hungry young person.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on December 03, 2021, 03:31:43 PM
Let's go get a hungry young person.
Or two!!!
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: IPA4Me on December 03, 2021, 03:31:52 PM
Klieman was legit pissed in the Texas post game presser. Not hard to see this happening.

Sent from my moto g power using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wetwillie on December 03, 2021, 03:33:13 PM
Klein is interim OC for bowl game….
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wiley on December 03, 2021, 03:34:30 PM
Klein is interim OC for bowl game….
Oh man, so this is like as of now.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on December 03, 2021, 03:36:54 PM
Klieman was legit pissed in the Texas post game presser. Not hard to see this happening.

Sent from my moto g power using Tapatalk
That loss cost Klieman an automatic extension. People thought he would accept that because Mess was his bud lol
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: KCFDcat on December 03, 2021, 03:37:08 PM
Kellis saying Polasek is a candidate of interest. Pls god no
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wetwillie on December 03, 2021, 03:38:45 PM
Klieman was legit pissed in the Texas post game presser. Not hard to see this happening.

Sent from my moto g power using Tapatalk
That loss cost Klieman an automatic extension. People thought he would accept that because Mess was his bud lol

Yea it was like 5 million guaranteed or something with the buyout reset and extra year of the contract.  That’s a big fuckup.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: IPA4Me on December 03, 2021, 03:39:59 PM
Klieman was legit pissed in the Texas post game presser. Not hard to see this happening.

Sent from my moto g power using Tapatalk
That loss cost Klieman an automatic extension. People thought he would accept that because Mess was his bud lol

Yea it was like 5 million guaranteed or something with the buyout reset and extra year of the contract.  That’s a big fuckup.
There's not a single person I wouldn't fire over that much money. DON'T MESS WITH MY INCOME!

Sent from my moto g power using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: KCFDcat on December 03, 2021, 03:40:08 PM
Klein is interim OC for bowl game….

Howard is gonna be so sketti brained he won't know what hit him
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: stunted on December 03, 2021, 03:40:43 PM
Respect for Kleiman just went up 10000%
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Stupid Fitz on December 03, 2021, 03:44:20 PM
Respect for Kleiman just went up 10000%

If he hires another one of his shitty pals, it will make it worse though. I'm hoping he learned his lesson. Hire a young "up and comer" that will at least try to recruit. If he hires that guy from Wyoming, I'm going to start posting in the fire Kleinman thread again.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: star seed 7 on December 03, 2021, 03:49:47 PM
 :party:
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: yoga-like_abana on December 03, 2021, 03:52:10 PM
Matt Wells  :driving:
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Spracne on December 03, 2021, 03:53:21 PM
Didn't someone mention it became a whole lot cheaper to fire Mess as of yesterday? This makes sense.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Hurricane Cat on December 03, 2021, 03:56:01 PM
Let's go get a hungry young person.

Yeah, 'make sure that he's hungry, and make sure he's alone'
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: CHONGS on December 03, 2021, 03:59:20 PM
I will also accept anyone out there with 5* QB son they will bring along for the ride.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Winters on December 03, 2021, 04:01:23 PM
 :emawkid: :emawkid: :emawkid:
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: catastrophe on December 03, 2021, 04:03:21 PM
Awesome news. Obviously just as interested in who we get but this gives me a lot of hope for KSUFB.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Shooter Jones on December 03, 2021, 04:07:18 PM
Awesome news. Obviously just as interested in who we get but this gives me a lot of hope for KSUFB.

Agreed.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: ChiComCat on December 03, 2021, 04:08:53 PM
Didn't someone mention it became a whole lot cheaper to fire Mess as of yesterday? This makes sense.

I think his contract may have just been up.  I don't believe it was a money thing but lets him leave without being "fired"
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: KCFDcat on December 03, 2021, 04:09:08 PM
Awesome news. Obviously just as interested in who we get but this gives me a lot of hope for KSUFB.

if he hires someone w an innovative offense from outside the ndsu tree I will be ecstatic. If he hires Polasek or someone like him i=I'll probably be more disengaged than if messingham were kept on.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 03, 2021, 04:11:34 PM
I think we either need to start recruiting about 10x better than we are now or we need to keep using a slow offense that shortens the game.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on December 03, 2021, 04:17:58 PM


Awesome news. Obviously just as interested in who we get but this gives me a lot of hope for KSUFB.

if he hires someone w an innovative offense from outside the ndsu tree I will be ecstatic. If he hires Polasek or someone like him i=I'll probably be more disengaged than if messingham were kept on.

To be fair this was how we got Hazelton
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on December 03, 2021, 04:18:19 PM
I think we either need to start recruiting about 10x better than we are now or we need to keep using a slow offense that shortens the game.

Yep
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: catastrophe on December 03, 2021, 04:21:41 PM
I think we either need to start recruiting about 10x better than we are now or we need to keep using a slow offense that shortens the game.
Slow paced offense doesn’t bother me. 2011-12 were both super fun years to watch. A big part of that is because if we ever needed a yard on third or fourth down we did exactly what everyone thought we were gonna do, with a damn near 100% success rate.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: muqluk on December 03, 2021, 04:22:46 PM
https://twitter.com/GPCwallace/status/1466888897946923009
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: KCFDcat on December 03, 2021, 04:22:51 PM


Awesome news. Obviously just as interested in who we get but this gives me a lot of hope for KSUFB.

if he hires someone w an innovative offense from outside the ndsu tree I will be ecstatic. If he hires Polasek or someone like him i=I'll probably be more disengaged than if messingham were kept on.

To be fair this was how we got Hazelton

this is a good point.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: catastrophe on December 03, 2021, 04:24:01 PM
https://twitter.com/GPCwallace/status/1466888897946923009
A good point to keep in mind for the folks suggesting Mess’s playcalling was limited by his weapons.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: KCFDcat on December 03, 2021, 04:25:30 PM
I think we either need to start recruiting about 10x better than we are now or we need to keep using a slow offense that shortens the game.
Slow paced offense doesn’t bother me. 2011-12 were both super fun years to watch. A big part of that is because if we ever needed a yard on third or fourth down we did exactly what everyone thought we were gonna do, with a damn near 100% success rate.

I think you can be innovative while still taking ball control/pace into mind. I'm not advocating for a no huddle mike leach offense, just something that makes DCs guess every once in awhile. Never felt like we had any sort of identity on offense, seemed like a guy that opened a playbook and blindly pointed to a play.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: PurpleOil on December 03, 2021, 04:28:24 PM
Awesome news. Obviously just as interested in who we get but this gives me a lot of hope for KSUFB.

This is how I'm feeling as well.  :ksu: :ksu: :ksu:
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Shooter Jones on December 03, 2021, 04:39:04 PM


Awesome news. Obviously just as interested in who we get but this gives me a lot of hope for KSUFB.

if he hires someone w an innovative offense from outside the ndsu tree I will be ecstatic. If he hires Polasek or someone like him i=I'll probably be more disengaged than if messingham were kept on.

To be fair this was how we got Hazelton

this is a good point.

The same Hazelton that currently has one of/if not the worst defense in all of D1 football? Like Mess was most likely close to the worst offense at ISU with way less talent.

(I had this typed and wanted to look. It's just dead last in passing defense, 117th in total D for Hazelton)

Either way, not every fit is right. I guess we just need to see where this hiring process goes.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: ben ji on December 03, 2021, 04:44:38 PM
Klein is interim OC for bowl game….

Howard is gonna be so sketti brained he won't know what hit him
Will Howard better write down all his favorite childhood memories before the bowl game.

Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Winters on December 03, 2021, 05:46:27 PM
Messingham and Ray: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfpV5JVv9AY
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on December 03, 2021, 06:36:02 PM
Just watched a little of UTSA and yeah that OC would be a great fit
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wetwillie on December 03, 2021, 06:42:16 PM
Just watched a little of UTSA and yeah that OC would be a great fit

Yea I’d take him in a heartbeat.  I’m trying to figure out why he went from San Jose St OC/QB coach to a high school football coach.  He must have really wanted to move back home to Arkansas.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on December 03, 2021, 06:54:15 PM
Just watched a little of UTSA and yeah that OC would be a great fit

Yea I’d take him in a heartbeat.  I’m trying to figure out why he went from San Jose St OC/QB coach to a high school football coach.  He must have really wanted to move back home to Arkansas.

well SJSU went 5-17 while he was OC (actually co-OC) and the coach was fired at 2004. Still, he wasn't even head coach in Arkansas! he was a high school offensive coordinator!
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wetwillie on December 03, 2021, 06:58:32 PM
Just watched a little of UTSA and yeah that OC would be a great fit

Yea I’d take him in a heartbeat.  I’m trying to figure out why he went from San Jose St OC/QB coach to a high school football coach.  He must have really wanted to move back home to Arkansas.

well SJSU went 5-17 while he was OC (actually co-OC) and the coach was fired at 2004. Still, he wasn't even head coach in Arkansas! he was a high school offensive coordinator!

Lol looks like his dad was the HC at Bentonville High.  I wonder if he is waiting for Briles to get a HC job at vacate that Arkansas OC job.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: jtksu on December 03, 2021, 06:58:43 PM
Klein is interim OC for bowl game….

Howard is gonna be so sketti brained he won't know what hit him
Will Howard better write down all his favorite childhood memories before the bowl game.

 :surprised:
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on December 03, 2021, 07:04:07 PM
Just watched a little of UTSA and yeah that OC would be a great fit

Yea I’d take him in a heartbeat.  I’m trying to figure out why he went from San Jose St OC/QB coach to a high school football coach.  He must have really wanted to move back home to Arkansas.

well SJSU went 5-17 while he was OC (actually co-OC) and the coach was fired at 2004. Still, he wasn't even head coach in Arkansas! he was a high school offensive coordinator!

Lol looks like his dad was the HC at Bentonville High.  I wonder if he is waiting for Briles to get a HC job at vacate that Arkansas OC job.

haha.

I mean Pittman could have kept him as TE coach but he went with this guy instead: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jon_Cooper_(American_football)

And then Pittman fired that guy and hired another Arkansas alumnus: https://arkansasrazorbacks.com/coache/dowell-loggains/
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Cire on December 03, 2021, 08:27:02 PM
Andy Ludwig is back at Utah

Maybe we could hire him again


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: nicname on December 03, 2021, 08:27:14 PM
Klein is interim OC for bowl game….

Howard is gonna be so sketti brained he won't know what hit him

He's going to run 17 times for 127 yards, 1 Td and a scraped elbow.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: cfbandyman on December 03, 2021, 11:52:53 PM
Klein is interim OC for bowl game….

Howard is gonna be so sketti brained he won't know what hit him
Will Howard better write down all his favorite childhood memories before the bowl game.

Man, I have been laughing far, far too much at that. Ashamed how much honestly.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on December 03, 2021, 11:53:27 PM
He's not even going to play, sorry for being a killjoy
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: jtksu on December 04, 2021, 12:54:47 AM
Andy Ludwig is back at Utah

Maybe we could hire him again


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I had totally forgotten that person even existed.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: BW on December 04, 2021, 12:14:35 PM
https://twitter.com/FootballScoop/status/1467193677403590662?t=FZ23G65TG5WOOiOOgihrDA&s=19 (https://twitter.com/FootballScoop/status/1467193677403590662?t=FZ23G65TG5WOOiOOgihrDA&s=19)

Another old friend, if we hurry we can outbid the spiders.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on December 04, 2021, 12:21:00 PM
https://twitter.com/FootballScoop/status/1467193677403590662?t=FZ23G65TG5WOOiOOgihrDA&s=19 (https://twitter.com/FootballScoop/status/1467193677403590662?t=FZ23G65TG5WOOiOOgihrDA&s=19)

Another old friend, if we hurry we can outbid the spiders.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

Holy crap, he isn't even 30 yet. That's a very very very good fcs program. Good for him.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on December 04, 2021, 12:28:20 PM
https://twitter.com/FootballScoop/status/1467193677403590662?t=FZ23G65TG5WOOiOOgihrDA&s=19 (https://twitter.com/FootballScoop/status/1467193677403590662?t=FZ23G65TG5WOOiOOgihrDA&s=19)

Another old friend, if we hurry we can outbid the spiders.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

Holy crap, he isn't even 30 yet. That's a very very very good fcs program. Good for him.

Nepotism is a hell of a career boost
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Kid In the Hall on December 04, 2021, 12:50:32 PM
In case anyone is wondering, Chris Cosh is currently the defensive coordinator at something called Christopher Newport University.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Cire on December 04, 2021, 01:02:26 PM
lol

Also if you want to die inside. Will Howard and Blake shapen were ranked the same by 247


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on December 04, 2021, 01:12:31 PM
https://twitter.com/FootballScoop/status/1467193677403590662?t=FZ23G65TG5WOOiOOgihrDA&s=19 (https://twitter.com/FootballScoop/status/1467193677403590662?t=FZ23G65TG5WOOiOOgihrDA&s=19)

Another old friend, if we hurry we can outbid the spiders.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

Holy crap, he isn't even 30 yet. That's a very very very good fcs program. Good for him.

Nepotism is a hell of a career boost

He's only ever been with his dad, playing or coaching, his redshirt year at K-State.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on December 04, 2021, 01:22:11 PM
https://twitter.com/FootballScoop/status/1467193677403590662?t=FZ23G65TG5WOOiOOgihrDA&s=19 (https://twitter.com/FootballScoop/status/1467193677403590662?t=FZ23G65TG5WOOiOOgihrDA&s=19)

Another old friend, if we hurry we can outbid the spiders.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

Holy crap, he isn't even 30 yet. That's a very very very good fcs program. Good for him.

Nepotism is a hell of a career boost

He's only ever been with his dad, playing or coaching, his redshirt year at K-State.
Nepotism doesn't start and end with fathers hiring sons. I mean look at that Lane Kiffin story you just shared! That was nepotism!
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on December 04, 2021, 01:46:39 PM
Today was the first time I've ever thought of Billy Cosh in a decade, I have no idea what his qualifications are. What I do know is that a lot of players get coaching jobs when their eligibility is done, especially quarterbacks. Marcus Freeman is only 5 years older and he's got one of the 5 best jobs in the entire sport.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on December 04, 2021, 02:00:40 PM
Speaking of Freeman that's a hell of a lot of kids

https://twitter.com/Marcus_Freeman1/status/1463869607337418756
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Skipper44 on December 04, 2021, 02:37:34 PM
true catholics
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on December 04, 2021, 02:38:13 PM
6 kids at 34 years old, sheesh
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wetwillie on December 04, 2021, 02:42:30 PM
Oldest boy looks like he’s gonna be a stud football player
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Winters on December 04, 2021, 03:21:07 PM
true catholics
LOL
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: sys on December 04, 2021, 03:33:41 PM
should we hire the osu o coord when they fire him?
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on December 04, 2021, 03:58:58 PM
should we hire the osu o coord when they fire him?

I don't know if that's a great idea
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2021, 08:56:25 PM
Is there any chance that we get someone who was NOT somehow associated with NDSU at some point?
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Winters on December 04, 2021, 09:02:23 PM
Is there any chance that we get someone who was NOT somehow associated with NDSU at some point?
Nope  :frown:
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: KCFDcat on December 04, 2021, 09:06:45 PM
I think Messingham would be an upgrade for Iowa. Good god that’s hard to watch.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wetwillie on December 04, 2021, 09:09:33 PM
When making your son the OC goes wrong
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on December 04, 2021, 09:36:29 PM
They're also playing the wrong quarterback.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on December 04, 2021, 09:36:46 PM
Is there any chance that we get someone who was NOT somehow associated with NDSU at some point?
The last hire Klieman made (S&C coordinator) was completely unconnected to NDSU. So definitely a decent chance.

And remember most people convinced we'll get an NDSU retread were also convinced Klieman would never fire his lifelong friend.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wetwillie on December 04, 2021, 09:38:04 PM
Some rumblings of a more robust open search to be conducted
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Winters on December 04, 2021, 09:38:50 PM
Some rumblings of a more robust open search to be conducted
  :driving:
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on December 04, 2021, 09:51:06 PM
Some rumblings of a more robust open search to be conducted

As rusty pointed out, it was always going to be this way. He didn't fire Messingham just to family farm the job. He didn't do that with the others hire he made. People are not giving Klieman the benefit of the doubt because they think he's lazy and dumb like most kso posters are.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: catastrophe on December 04, 2021, 09:56:34 PM
Some rumblings of a more robust open search to be conducted
I’m a little embarrassed I’ve never felt the need to look into this before, but does Kleiman need approval to name the new OC? Or would that only be necessary if their pay was greater than Mess?

I’m just a little intrigued by how some updates make this sound similar to a HC search when I really expected it would be like 99% up to Kleiman (in which case I wouldn’t really expect any interim updates).
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on December 04, 2021, 09:58:28 PM
Some rumblings of a more robust open search to be conducted
I’m a little embarrassed I’ve never felt the need to look into this before, but does Kleiman need approval to name the new OC? Or would that only be necessary if their pay was greater than Mess?

I’m just a little intrigued by how some updates make this sound similar to a HC search when I really expected it would be like 99% up to Kleiman (in which case I wouldn’t really expect any interim updates).

All coaching hires have to be approved by Gene, but unless it's a huge salary increase, that approval is a rubber stamp once the background check clears.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Kid In the Hall on December 04, 2021, 10:04:45 PM
Some rumblings of a more robust open search to be conducted

As rusty pointed out, it was always going to be this way. He didn't fire Messingham just to family farm the job. He didn't do that with the others hire he made. People are not giving Klieman the benefit of the doubt because they think he's lazy and dumb like most kso posters are.

To be fair, the guy hired Messingham in the first place. And, Ray for that matter. Both of them had been fired from their only Power 5 jobs before being part of the NDSU reclamation project.

But, it would be absolutely insane for Klieman to go back to the NDSU well at this point.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on December 04, 2021, 10:08:46 PM
Some rumblings of a more robust open search to be conducted

As rusty pointed out, it was always going to be this way. He didn't fire Messingham just to family farm the job. He didn't do that with the others hire he made. People are not giving Klieman the benefit of the doubt because they think he's lazy and dumb like most kso posters are.

To be fair, the guy hired Messingham in the first place. And, Ray for that matter. Both of them had been fired from their only Power 5 jobs before being part of the NDSU reclamation project.

yes but after he hired messingham he fired him which makes me think he might be willing to hire someone that isn't as close to Messingham as it gets.

He might hire two more NDSU guys, but I'd be surprised and the idea that it's a given is just so stupid
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on December 04, 2021, 10:31:36 PM
Some rumblings of a more robust open search to be conducted

As rusty pointed out, it was always going to be this way. He didn't fire Messingham just to family farm the job. He didn't do that with the others hire he made. People are not giving Klieman the benefit of the doubt because they think he's lazy and dumb like most kso posters are.

To be fair, the guy hired Messingham in the first place. And, Ray for that matter. Both of them had been fired from their only Power 5 jobs before being part of the NDSU reclamation project.

But, it would be absolutely insane for Klieman to go back to the NDSU well at this point.

He was keeping a previously successful staff together, this isn't the case anymore.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Kid In the Hall on December 05, 2021, 12:49:11 AM
Some rumblings of a more robust open search to be conducted

As rusty pointed out, it was always going to be this way. He didn't fire Messingham just to family farm the job. He didn't do that with the others hire he made. People are not giving Klieman the benefit of the doubt because they think he's lazy and dumb like most kso posters are.

To be fair, the guy hired Messingham in the first place. And, Ray for that matter. Both of them had been fired from their only Power 5 jobs before being part of the NDSU reclamation project.

But, it would be absolutely insane for Klieman to go back to the NDSU well at this point.

He was keeping a previously successful staff together, this isn't the case anymore.

Klieman had the ammo to have an understanding that Messingham and Ray were not good enough to be quality power 5 level coaches (frankly - either schematically or from a recruiting standpoint - they've both been dogshit in both areas - both before KSU and during their KSU tenures).

To have moved forward with bringing them on board for the sake of continuity is silly (if - and I don't know - that was his reason). If he wanted to throw a bone to his friends, fine, I guess. Messsingham and Ray have been failures at previous coaching stops, so this end result shouldn't be some enormous surprise for anyone.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wetwillie on December 05, 2021, 07:34:57 AM
Some rumblings of a more robust open search to be conducted

As rusty pointed out, it was always going to be this way. He didn't fire Messingham just to family farm the job. He didn't do that with the others hire he made. People are not giving Klieman the benefit of the doubt because they think he's lazy and dumb like most kso posters are.

What other hires?  He had to replace his initial DC that never made it to campus and did it with a former NDSU guy Scottie Hazelton.  When Hazelton left he promoted Klanderman and brought in Stanard(another NDSU guy).  The only replacement he has made outside that tree so far is coach Tru, who I think has been awesome for the program.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: KSUfaithful on December 05, 2021, 07:48:39 AM
Some rumblings of a more robust open search to be conducted

As rusty pointed out, it was always going to be this way. He didn't fire Messingham just to family farm the job. He didn't do that with the others hire he made. People are not giving Klieman the benefit of the doubt because they think he's lazy and dumb like most kso posters are.

To be fair, the guy hired Messingham in the first place. And, Ray for that matter. Both of them had been fired from their only Power 5 jobs before being part of the NDSU reclamation project.

But, it would be absolutely insane for Klieman to go back to the NDSU well at this point.

He was keeping a previously successful staff together, this isn't the case anymore.

Klieman had the ammo to have an understanding that Messingham and Ray were not good enough to be quality power 5 level coaches (frankly - either schematically or from a recruiting standpoint - they've both been dogshit in both areas - both before KSU and during their KSU tenures).

To have moved forward with bringing them on board for the sake of continuity is silly (if - and I don't know - that was his reason). If he wanted to throw a bone to his friends, fine, I guess. Messsingham and Ray have been failures at previous coaching stops, so this end result shouldn't be some enormous surprise for anyone.

This 100%. These hires should really never had been made in the first place. Messingham has been a disaster everywhere he’s been - outside of his recent NDSU experience - where he basically inherited a championship team to work with. Surprisingly he didn’t screw that up. I guess some of the same points can be said for Coach K as well (inheriting a championship team and not falling off)
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wiley on December 05, 2021, 07:57:01 AM
I think Klanderman was promoted due to the situation.  Pandemic, Hazelton leaving when he did, possibly the cheapest power 5 salary.  Mixed results so far though.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on December 05, 2021, 01:09:44 PM
Some rumblings of a more robust open search to be conducted

As rusty pointed out, it was always going to be this way. He didn't fire Messingham just to family farm the job. He didn't do that with the others hire he made. People are not giving Klieman the benefit of the doubt because they think he's lazy and dumb like most kso posters are.

What other hires?  He had to replace his initial DC that never made it to campus and did it with a former NDSU guy Scottie Hazelton.  When Hazelton left he promoted Klanderman and brought in Stanard(another NDSU guy).  The only replacement he has made outside that tree so far is coach Tru, who I think has been awesome for the program.

Rusty pointed out tru and I was agreeing with him.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: outofstate on December 17, 2021, 08:43:28 PM
https://twitter.com/Wildcats_B12C/status/1471994040593920004

Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: PandaXpanda on December 17, 2021, 08:50:05 PM
Is this the cigar dude?

Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wetwillie on December 17, 2021, 08:57:28 PM
Northern Iowa boys
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on December 17, 2021, 09:55:41 PM
https://twitter.com/Wildcats_B12C/status/1471994040593920004
That would be really interesting. I love the idea of hiring someone that was at a program that kicked our ass in recruiting, even if they got fired.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on December 17, 2021, 09:57:05 PM
Probably not for oc though
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wetwillie on December 17, 2021, 10:30:20 PM
That there’s a QB whisperer Rusty
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: bucket on December 17, 2021, 10:31:00 PM
And he looks cool as eff.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on December 17, 2021, 10:39:58 PM
https://twitter.com/Wildcats_B12C/status/1471994040593920004

lol, no way.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on December 17, 2021, 10:46:31 PM
And he looks cool as eff.

https://twitter.com/KCMattKluck/status/1025234711059226624

(https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/X5h7u8UBaYUVMIa6tAZcdOyPV3g=/1400x1400/filters:format(jpeg)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/12314903/verduzco.jpg)
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: DaBigTrain on December 17, 2021, 10:48:05 PM
WELCOME!
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on December 17, 2021, 10:49:25 PM
That there’s a QB whisperer Rusty

Yes, his track record of developing QBs is unparalleled
1977–1986
Soquel HS (CA) (assistant)
1987–1989
Gavilan College (OC/QB/WR)
1990–1991
San Jose State (GA)
1991–1993
De Anza College (assoc. HC / OC / QB / WR)
1994–1995
De Anza College
1996–2000
Rutgers (QB/RC)
2001–2005
Northern Iowa (QB)
2006–2014
Northern Iowa (co-OC/QB)
2015
Missouri State (OC/QB)
2016–2017
UCF (QB)
2018–2021
Nebraska (QB)
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: wetwillie on December 17, 2021, 11:14:15 PM
Affordable:  check
Has Coached with Klieman: check
Spent 4 years with Adrian Martinez: check

He checks all the boxes folks
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: slackcat on December 18, 2021, 06:01:28 AM
(https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/X5h7u8UBaYUVMIa6tAZcdOyPV3g=/1400x1400/filters:format(jpeg)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/12314903/verduzco.jpg)

cigar makes it a yes
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on December 18, 2021, 06:17:36 AM
In all seriousness I'd love for a guy to come in and say "this is how Nebraska has been kicking your ass for recruits and here's how you adjust". Which I suppose Casserole Face could do without hiring the guy
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: TheHamburglar on December 18, 2021, 06:39:56 AM
Maybe don’t bring in Adrian Martinez, then bring in his position coach that turned him into such an inconsistent passer & turnover machine that it gave me schadenfrued watching him struggle as Nebraska QB.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Cire on December 18, 2021, 07:53:58 AM
That guy is the mess of qb coaches. Jfc


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Cire on December 18, 2021, 07:55:06 AM
Like if that is a real thing the program deserves everything it gets


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on December 18, 2021, 09:48:35 AM
Maybe don’t bring in Adrian Martinez, then bring in his position coach that turned him into such an inconsistent passer & turnover machine that it gave me schadenfrued watching him struggle as Nebraska QB.

Exactly
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Dugout DickStone on December 18, 2021, 10:10:39 AM
Maybe don’t bring in Adrian Martinez, then bring in his position coach that turned him into such an inconsistent passer & turnover machine that it gave me schadenfrued watching him struggle as Nebraska QB.

Exactly

Yeah, that band can stay broken up.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: outofstate on December 19, 2021, 09:47:13 PM
https://twitter.com/ChipBrown247/status/1472761181609738245
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Kat Kid on December 19, 2021, 09:57:02 PM
Bring Andre Home!
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: muqluk on December 20, 2021, 12:11:58 AM
Bring Andre Home!

But why?

I may be way off here, but he wasn’t really churning out star receivers in his first round here. Am I doing him dirty?
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: MakeItRain on December 20, 2021, 12:18:52 AM
Bring Andre Home!

But why?

I may be way off here, but he wasn’t really churning out star receivers in his first round here. Am I doing him dirty?

No. I love Andre and I don't hold any LHC Bill Snyder assistant accountable for recruiting issues, they were definitely operating with a huge handicap. However, if you read that article it says that he's on the outs with Sark because of philosophical differences and recruiting misses. If we wanted to bring in a former player, I'm sure there's some young hungry guys coaching at high schools all throughout the Big 12 region who would love to devote 16 hours a day to wooing high school sophomores and juniors.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: nicname on December 20, 2021, 01:55:27 AM
Couldn't even scrape together a photo from UT.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: meow meow on December 20, 2021, 10:25:35 AM
if we hired a WR coach that was just fired everyone would be mad, but when it's a former player/coach under snyder, k-state fans want them to come home!  it's so k-state
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on December 20, 2021, 10:27:04 AM
No one really wants Coleman
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: ChiComCat on December 20, 2021, 10:38:59 AM
if we hired a WR coach that was just fired everyone would be mad, but when it's a former player/coach under snyder, k-state fans want them to come home!  it's so k-state

Meh, fired from an embattled coach at UT deserves an asterisk.  Sark is placing blame and he's going to go after the holdovers from the previous regime before he goes after the guys he brought in.  I'm not saying we should bring him back, but I think there's plenty of context to his firing.  I'm certainly for any good Texas recruiting connections for anyone added to the staff.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: IPA4Me on December 20, 2021, 11:40:36 AM
No one really wants Coleman
Former players wanted him to replace Bill.

Sent from my moto g power using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on December 20, 2021, 11:46:34 AM
No one really wants Coleman
Former players wanted him to replace Bill.

Sent from my moto g power using Tapatalk



lol
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: IPA4Me on December 20, 2021, 12:49:31 PM
No one really wants Coleman
Former players wanted him to replace Bill. (https://emoji.tapatalk-cdn.com/emoji102.png)

Sent from my moto g power using Tapatalk



lol
No joke. I graduated high school with a former Cat coach. Was laughing my ass off when he told me about it. Big push for Dre to coach. Obviously didn't happen but they were pushing nonetheless.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: ChiComCat on December 20, 2021, 12:53:39 PM
Everything I've heard about him is that he's a great guy.  It seems like other coaches, players, and staff all love him.  I don't know that he's a great coach though.
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: KSNimrod on December 20, 2021, 01:37:37 PM
Sark is a fat lump who has done poorly with top shelf talent.  If he fires somebody it could actually be seen as an ENDORSEMENT as to why they should be hired elsewhere?  And if Coleman really was let go due to a difference in philosophy then even better for him.  Not saying he should come here but just that he's better than some lame assistant sucking off the donor's tit while underperforming at a P5 gig...
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: pissclams on December 20, 2021, 05:58:28 PM
No one really wants Coleman
as our WR coach? i’d take him in a minute. 
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: Purple Derpathy on December 20, 2021, 09:45:45 PM
No one really wants Coleman
as our WR coach? i’d take him in a minute.

You mean you haven't been impressed by the WR recruiting or development the past few years?
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: michigancat on January 21, 2022, 11:56:46 AM
https://twitter.com/FootballScoop/status/1467193677403590662?t=FZ23G65TG5WOOiOOgihrDA&s=19 (https://twitter.com/FootballScoop/status/1467193677403590662?t=FZ23G65TG5WOOiOOgihrDA&s=19)

Another old friend, if we hurry we can outbid the spiders.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

Holy crap, he isn't even 30 yet. That's a very very very good fcs program. Good for him.

Nepotism is a hell of a career boost

He's only ever been with his dad, playing or coaching, his redshirt year at K-State.
Nepotism doesn't start and end with fathers hiring sons. I mean look at that Lane Kiffin story you just shared! That was nepotism!

speaking of that lane kiffin nepotism story, he hired Charlie Weis, Jr. and Chris Kiffin to his staff this week
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on January 21, 2022, 12:52:34 PM
(https://i.imgur.com/F376R5h.png)
Title: Re: Courtney Messingham is a proven loser
Post by: 'taterblast on September 27, 2022, 07:36:00 PM
i missed if this was confirmed but he followed Sean to Illinois

https://fightingillini.com/staff-directory/courtney-messingham/1958