goemaw.com
General Discussion => The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit => Topic started by: star seed 7 on May 13, 2019, 02:45:33 PM
-
https://twitter.com/Conflicts/status/1127966054679031808
-
Bolton's mustache is tingling
-
Nearly 3 years in and no new countries getting bombed. NeoCon Nation on both side of the aisle have to be getting pretty twitchy by now.
President Clinton would have already hollowed out Tehran . . .
-
Drill baby drill?
-
Nearly 3 years in and no new countries getting bombed. NeoCon Nation on both side of the aisle have to be getting pretty twitchy by now.
President Clinton would have already hollowed out Tehran . . .
Now that you mention it, Trump does kinda seem like a really, really slow Hillary.
-
Nearly 3 years in and no new countries getting bombed. NeoCon Nation on both side of the aisle have to be getting pretty twitchy by now.
President Clinton would have already hollowed out Tehran . . .
Now that you mention it, Trump does kinda seem like a really, really slow Hillary.
Trump is like Reagan and that's why so many NeoCons hated Reagan, all that military build up and you just bomb Libya (once) and make sure the Cubans don't take over Grenada? Pfft . . . (NeoCon Pfft)
-
Yeah, I'm sure the acting SoD, a former Boeing exec, really doesn't want us involved in military conflict :rolleyes:
-
we handled iran in the last 2 proxy wars pretty well, i dont think they want another taste
-
It's not necessarily their choice
-
https://twitter.com/ThePlumLineGS/status/1128607664722841602
-
wtf
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Dax is frothing
-
Sincerely hope this administration stays out of the regime change business unlike Bush I, LibDerp Hero Bill Clinton, Bush II and LibDerp Mega Icon Barrack Obama.
-
Only way to get reelected if you are looking at his approval rates
-
I think he would finally lose his nitwit MAGA crowd
-
jfc
-
I think he would finally lose his nitwit MAGA crowd
:lol: no
-
I mean, wait until they have to send their kids to go slug it out in that crap hole. I can't even fathom how gross that fight would be
-
https://twitter.com/BrianKarem/status/1129051912731582464
-
Bolton has got to go.
Hey DJT, no "We came, we saw, he died" stuff on your watch.
-
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/141604554855825408
-
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/141604554855825408
goddam that is chilling
-
You can tell Useful Idiot LibDerp Nation Media is chomping at the bit for war, the Pentagon apparently isn't having a 24/7/365 marathon of pressers to explain the Iranian situation and that's really triggering UILDN Media.
-
You can tell Useful Idiot LibDerp Nation Media is chomping at the bit for war, the Pentagon apparently isn't having a 24/7/365 marathon of pressers to explain the Iranian situation and that's really triggering UILDN Media.
Thanks for voting for the guy getting us into conflicts on multiple continents dax. Really appreciate it.
-
You can tell Useful Idiot LibDerp Nation Media is chomping at the bit for war, the Pentagon apparently isn't having a 24/7/365 marathon of pressers to explain the Iranian situation and that's really triggering UILDN Media.
Thanks for voting for the guy getting us into conflicts on multiple continents dax. Really appreciate it.
Sadly for the New NeoCon, not a lot of regime change yet, but I know you guys are just chomping on the bit to get back into that game. Your guy loved it, and so did you.
-
These are all on your hands. Just own it.
-
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/141604554855825408
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/255784560904773633
-
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/141604554855825408
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/255784560904773633
Spot on about Libya, "We came, we saw, he died" and Brownshirt Useful Idiot LibDerp Nation never asked a single question and never demanded any explanation on Libya and the Obama administration never gave any real explanation besides MQ: Bad. Then they started shipping Libyan military arms to Syria while recruiting "freedom fighters" from all places . . . Benghazi. That's when YouTube rose up and killed the U.S. Ambassador (surrounded by CIA field operators), why YouTube/Google has never been convicted for that assassination I'll never know.
-
Yeah, it was impressive that Trump managed to predict Benghazi a month after it happened.
-
Yeah, it was impressive that Trump managed to predict Benghazi a month after it happened.
Trump didn't say anything about Benghazi, only I did.
-
oh man i can't wait to see the Dax pivot to explain the regime change being pursued by this admin in not one but two petrol states
going to be epic
-
Obama forced his hand obviously
-
As I keep saying, when JSOC (or regular boots) are on the ground directing F-15 strikes and drones (or more) you guys will have a point.
Right now, it's all just posturing.
-
oh man i can't wait to see the Dax pivot to explain the regime change being pursued by this admin in not one but two petrol states
going to be epic
The amount of flailing around trying to justify it will be awesome
-
You can tell Useful Idiot LibDerp Nation Media is chomping at the bit for war, the Pentagon apparently isn't having a 24/7/365 marathon of pressers to explain the Iranian situation and that's really triggering UILDN Media.
FYP
-
As I keep saying, when JSOC (or regular boots) are on the ground directing F-15 strikes and drones (or more) you guys will have a point.
Right now, it's all just posturing.
Bringing in conservative hero Bolton is pretty big posturing
-
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/16/world/middleeast/iran-war-donald-trump.html
after all the sanctions, rhetoric, and military posturing you are now looking for ways to defuse the tension?
coherent policy
-
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/16/world/middleeast/iran-war-donald-trump.html
after all the sanctions, rhetoric, and military posturing you are now looking for ways to defuse the tension?
coherent policy
Admittedly it does fall short of the unilateral decision to dump billions of dollars on the tarmac in Tehran methodology.
-
I don’t think we are going to war with Iran
-
I don’t think we are going to war with Iran
It's the one toy Trump hasn't got to play with yet.
-
What a ridiculous war this would be.
The photographs presented a different kind of threat than previously seen from Iran, said the three officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to talk about it publicly. Taken with the other intelligence, the photographs could indicate that Iran is preparing to attack United States forces. That is the view of John R. Bolton, President Trump’s hard-line national security adviser, and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.
But other officials — including Europeans, Iraqis, members of both parties in Congress and some senior officials within the Trump administration — said Iran’s moves might mostly be defensive against what Tehran believes are provocative acts by Washington.
-
What a ridiculous war this would be.
The photographs presented a different kind of threat than previously seen from Iran, said the three officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to talk about it publicly. Taken with the other intelligence, the photographs could indicate that Iran is preparing to attack United States forces. That is the view of John R. Bolton, President Trump’s hard-line national security adviser, and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.
But other officials — including Europeans, Iraqis, members of both parties in Congress and some senior officials within the Trump administration — said Iran’s moves might mostly be defensive against what Tehran believes are provocative acts by Washington.
Yeah buddy! When all else fails, agitate, then .... preemptive strike!!!!!
-
https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1130207891049332737?s=21.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Was just coming here to post that. He wants it so badly.
-
:facepalm:
-
You guys are easy marks.
#simpletons
-
You libderps just don't know how Washington works
-
https://twitter.com/mattgertz/status/1130216810853339143?s=21.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
You libderps just don't know how Washington works
Simpletons post simpleton things
-
Imagine thinking Donald Trump is playing 4D chess in any subject.
-
Imagine thinking Donald Trump is playing 4D chess in any subject.
Imagine not thinking that at all.
-
Imagine thinking Donald Trump is playing 4D chess in any subject.
Imagine not thinking that at all.
He can't spell Chief and thinks windmills cause brain cancer.
-
Imagine thinking Donald Trump is playing 4D chess in any subject.
Imagine not thinking that at all.
I think this is where most intelligent people are at dax...
-
we're like three weeks from trump falling in love with whoever the eff he's going to pretend to negotiate with.
-
Trump and co. are too chummy with the Saudis and Israelis to ever meet directly with Iran. He's more likely to try out some tweets like:
"Why is the imam hidden? What is he so scared of? Very suspicious activity that must be brought OUT in the OPEN or the US will have serious consequences!"
-
Imagine thinking Donald Trump is playing 4D chess in any subject.
Imagine not thinking that at all.
He can't spell Chief and thinks windmills cause brain cancer.
The lack of teleprompter reading does hurt him at times, I'll admit that.
-
LibDerp Nation loves a guy who said as a Senator that we should be directly negotiating with the "Axis of Evil" and pretty much everybody else. What changed?
-
I think everyone should take a few minutes and read this (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennium_Challenge_2002) and then compare that to how people like John Bolton and Tom Cotton are talking about a war with Iran.
-
https://twitter.com/RubenGallego/status/1130502995857301510
-
The idiot takes that Iran and Iraq are one in the same are quite humorous.
BTW, I don't war.
-
https://twitter.com/ChrisMurphyCT/status/1131270487538098176
-
Hilarious
Mr. President, the Iranians are targeting our ships in International waters.
The President: Let's take this to Congress!
-
and here we go
https://twitter.com/AP/status/1131952591527710720
-
1,500 troops! :runaway:
-
1,500 troops! :runaway:
They could be building a wall!0
-
1,500 troops! :runaway:
They could be building a wall!0
Contractors build walls
-
Not according to the prez
https://www.usnews.com/news/national-news/articles/2018-12-19/trump-says-military-will-build-wall
-
Not according to the prez
https://www.usnews.com/news/national-news/articles/2018-12-19/trump-says-military-will-build-wall
The military hires lots of contractors, Phil.
-
So you are happy to out boots on the ground of another country? Figures
-
So you are happy to out boots on the ground of another country? Figures
Happy? But it's good to know that you're suddenly very attuned to boots on the ground in foreign lands, weird timing (as usual). Glad to see you guys become so woke around late fall 2016'ish, or thereabouts.
-
https://twitter.com/NBCNews/status/1139991494092365824
-
The Iran threat stuff plays to the dumbest 20% exclusively. Why even waste time with that?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Even Dax will post in this thread that the Iran threat bullshit is absolute bullshit.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Well...that’s actually a flip of a coin, at best.
-
Gonna go ahead and believe that when I see it
-
Even Dax will post in this thread that the Iran threat bullshit is absolute bullshit.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
While dax probably does know it's bullshit, I think he'd focus his posting efforts more on deflecting to something that Obama or Clinton or the other Clinton did
-
Domestic LibDerp Nation who never-ever-ever accepts the false flag scenario . . . is now starting to get fully on board with the false flag scenario when it comes to Iran. :lol: :lol:
LibDerp Nation: It's not a conspiracy until we say it is . . .
Adding to the List:
Mueller Report Truthers
Iran False Flag
-
Hmm, maybe dax DOESN'T know the iran threat bullshit is bullshit :Wha:
-
Hmm, maybe dax DOESN'T know the iran threat bullshit is bullshit :Wha:
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Just call it a false flag and cut the . . . bullshit, Parody Poster LibDerp7.
-
Good grief
https://twitter.com/ABC/status/1140816673492090881
-
Doesn’t hurt to ask
-
Can you believe that these guys are backing out of there end of the deal we backed out of?
The nerve.
-
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1141711064305983488
-
his war boner is going crazy. I am sickened.
-
Oof
-
very cool sir
https://twitter.com/NBCNews/status/1141741292008943618
-
Pretty obvious he and he alone is making this decision. Guess we will see his true colors
-
I don't want war . . . but . . .
But the Go Iran bent of the American Left is :lol: . . . particularly :lol: :lol: as the majority of the American Left outside of a very far fringe (just like with immigration prior to January 2017) were :excited: :excited: as their guy took out the Libyan government.
-
Agreed with dax that Trump is a huge idiot
-
I do not want a war with Iran. Glad we are all on the same page here.
-
Which one of you Libderp’s are on the Go Iran bent? I will fight all of you.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Agreed with dax that Trump is a huge idiot
It's not quite on the same level of "you took over our embassy and hold American's hostage so here's your reward (as pallets of cash roll off the back of the plane)" like the previous administration pulled off, or an utterly meaningless nuclear treaty which at most did nothing but kick the can down the road to a point when Iran had honed their weapons delivery prowess exponentially . . . but it's sorta close.
The :lol: :lol: was the LibDerp Nation collective "Well technically it was their money ya see . . . "
-
Hilary would have whipped Iran by now, just sayin.
-
I think dax is melting down about the Iran hostage crisis from 700 years ago.
I always thought dax was 65 or so, not 80+
-
I think dax is melting down about the Iran hostage crisis from 700 years ago.
I always thought dax was 65 or so, not 80+
Not the least bit surprising you don't understand the reasons why LibDerp Nation defended their guy dumping billions of dollars on the Tarmac in Tehran.
Dug . . . perpetually 4 laps down
-
Dax, an old man religiously defending a stupid man
-
Dax, an old man religiously defending a stupid man
Just admit that you didn't know . . . just like always.
-
I've studied it like a Pelosi speech, Methuselah
-
lol @ Trump being upset over Iran not following through on the utterly useless treaty that he backed out of first
-
Vlad told Trump to take his medicine. And he did. So that’s probably the first time Trump has done what Vlad told him to and it’s actually been a positive for us.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Vlad told Trump to take his medicine. And he did. So that’s probably the first time Trump has done what Vlad told him to and it’s actually been a positive for us.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It is awesome that Trump got to bored to invade Venezuela and Bolton and Pompeo had to look for a new target, here's hoping that same thing happens again. Or alternatively, finally Trump gets a sit down with the mullahs and we see the true genius deal making begin.
-
I've studied it like a Pelosi speech, Methuselah
It's okay to admit that you don't really understand.
We all know that anyway.
-
Agreed with dax that Trump is a huge idiot
It's not quite on the same level of "you took over our embassy and hold American's hostage so here's your reward (as pallets of cash roll off the back of the plane)" like the previous administration pulled off, or an utterly meaningless nuclear treaty which at most did nothing but kick the can down the road to a point when Iran had honed their weapons delivery prowess exponentially . . . but it's sorta close.
The :lol: :lol: was the LibDerp Nation collective "Well technically it was their money ya see . . . "
explain how the money did not represent the unfreezing of Iranian assets
-
Vlad told Trump to take his medicine. And he did. So that’s probably the first time Trump has done what Vlad told him to and it’s actually been a positive for us.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
looking like this is right
-
nice job not being shitty for once senate
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/20/us/politics/saudi-arms-sales.html
-
nice job not being shitty for once senate
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/20/us/politics/saudi-arms-sales.html
Not enough votes to override a veto.
-
Agreed with dax that Trump is a huge idiot
It's not quite on the same level of "you took over our embassy and hold American's hostage so here's your reward (as pallets of cash roll off the back of the plane)" like the previous administration pulled off, or an utterly meaningless nuclear treaty which at most did nothing but kick the can down the road to a point when Iran had honed their weapons delivery prowess exponentially . . . but it's sorta close.
The :lol: :lol: was the LibDerp Nation collective "Well technically it was their money ya see . . . "
explain how the money did not represent the unfreezing of Iranian assets
You get your assets kept when you invade another countries sovereign territory and hold their citizens hostage.
-
oh so the agreement was to unfreeze Iranian assets?
got it
-
oh so the agreement was to unfreeze Iranian assets?
got it
Everyone knew this. Some like to ignore it.
-
https://twitter.com/shearm/status/1141907380982169600
jfc
-
That's interesting
-
oh so the agreement was to unfreeze Iranian assets?
got it
You don’t get assets back after you invade another countries sovereign territory and hold their citizens hostage.
What part of sanctioning bad behavior confuses you?
-
obvs don't want war
But...
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/jacob-wohl-enlist-war-iran
-
obvs don't want war
But...
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/jacob-wohl-enlist-war-iran
lmao
-
:lol:
-
https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1146517318509481984
-
wonder where on the official sd horn-o-meter that puts Bloodthirsty warpig DAX
-
No bombs dropping yet.
Don’t see any “we came - we saw - he died” proclamations for now.
LibDerp Nation: Mad that Trump STILL hasn’t started any new wars. By this time their guy had already wrecked Libya and was moving on to Syria.
-
BUUTTTT HILLLLARRRY!
-
BUUTTTT HILLLLARRRY!
You guys are melting down about a war that hasn’t happened while you never once asked the previous administration to explain their actions. . . and they gladly obliged by never explaining their actions
-
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/461814-graham-implores-trump-to-take-decisive-action-against-iran
-
https://twitter.com/MattLaslo/status/1174334105166766081
Surprise, surprise. A Cheney wants to start a war in the Middle East. :dubious:
-
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/jacob-wohl-enlist-war-iran
:ksu:
still don't want war but...
-
https://www.foxnews.com/world/saudi-oil-attack-act-of-war-iran-pompeo
:frown:
-
Libs are so mad that we're not bombing yet.
-
:Ugh:
not really seing this anywhere
do see Pompeo and Graham gettng all frisky tho
oh and the empty Trump "ultimate option" threat
-
trump needs to invite them to Camp David and iron this all out...
-
Why doesn't SA go to war with Iran? Why do we have to become involved?
-
Why doesn't SA go to war with Iran? Why do we have to become involved?
We just do what they tell us to.
-
Why doesn't SA go to war with Iran? Why do we have to become involved?
because they are going to tell us we need to do it
-
Libs are so mad that we're not bombing yet.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/saudi-arabia-iran-oil-attacks-trump-pompeo
Miller added that President Trump has found himself in a difficult situation, as members of his own party are pushing him to engage the Iranians over this aggression.
"It is the Republicans, Lindsey Graham, General Jack Keane...who really are demanding that something be done...lest we risk even more aggressive action on the part of the Iranians, who at this point may think that they can get away with everything."
:curse: LIBS!!!
-
Lick can't even read this thread . . . smdh.
-
Lick can't even read this thread . . . smdh.
:Ugh:
feel free to quote any posts that support your strawman
-
Lick can't even read this thread . . . smdh.
:Ugh:
feel free to quote any posts that support your strawman
In the other Iranian thread it was quite apparent multiple LibBots were against any Trump oriented Nuclear deal with Iran and by implication felt Don was being pretty weak.
-
Giving up an existing nuclear deal and getting nothing in return was pretty weak, dax.
-
Lick can't even read this thread . . . smdh.
:Ugh:
feel free to quote any posts that support your strawman
In the other Iranian thread it was quite apparent multiple LibBots were against any Trump oriented Nuclear deal with Iran and by implication felt Don was being pretty weak.
:dubious:
-
Daxflection
-
LibBot 1.0 Notes: Still stuck on one word responses, establishing maintenance window for this weekend.
-
Giving up an existing nuclear deal and getting nothing in return was pretty weak, dax.
He would rather do that than have OBAMA :curse: have his name on it.
-
The former nuclear "deal" was basically worthless, and only kicked the can down the road in regards to actual nuke development and did virtually nothing to stop the development of delivery systems. It was akin to leaving everything in place to actually be ready to make bombs while allowing the rapid advancement of nuke delivery systems which at current rate have and would be formidable once the can was no longer being kicked.
Thanks to the Obama TarmacBillions they already have drones and cruise missiles that render U.S. missile systems obsolete, at least the systems as operated by the incompetent Saudi's.
-
Is the idea here that getting $4B of their own money back so substantially affected a country with a $400B+ GDP that they changed all of what they were doing to start building these things?
-
Is the idea here that getting $4B of their own money back so substantially affected a country with a $400B+ GDP that they changed all of what they were doing to start building these things?
Dax? :whistle1: :impatient:
-
bump
-
Dax loves presidents who regime change.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Melania: “Peace on the world”
Trump: “Hold my tall boy”
-
https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/382923478157910016
-
https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/141604554855825408
-
https://twitter.com/sahilkapur/status/1212924802631176192
-
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20200103/66c13a01b19ace6dcb29f18e1ffed21f.jpg)
-
https://twitter.com/spectatorindex/status/1212935857931309056
-
https://twitter.com/riegerreport/status/1212928617518419968
-
https://twitter.com/votevets/status/1212931410048237569
-
Dax has to love that Trump is finally getting to show everyone how much he knows about war with Iran.
-
Predictable
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/iranians-thank-president-trump-for-killing-soleimani-using-hashtag-tnxpotus4soleimani/
-
Predictable
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/iranians-thank-president-trump-for-killing-soleimani-using-hashtag-tnxpotus4soleimani/
None of those twitter accounts are real people.
-
I've long predicted that Trump would not hesitate to start a war if things look dicey when election time approaches.
-
Is this guy a bad guy? He seems bad.
-
Orange man:bad, yes
-
I've long predicted that Trump would not hesitate to start a war if things look dicey when election time approaches.
:jerk: You and a million others.
-
https://twitter.com/noahshachtman/status/1212969604005404672?s=21
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Is this guy a bad guy? He seems bad.
Soleimani? Not anymore, he ded
-
Well this sounds familiar...
https://twitter.com/JoshNBCNews/status/1213090486187155456
-
Is this guy a bad guy? He seems bad.
Soleimani? Not anymore, he ded
:thumbs:
-
Well this sounds familiar...
https://twitter.com/JoshNBCNews/status/1213090486187155456
Now THAT is some regime change that Dax can get behind.
-
kinda gross how most dems are like "well yeah this guy was really bad and we really want to go to war but trump didn't ask us which is bad!"
-
dax bot over heated
-
Weird question I know, but why was an Iranian general in Iraq?
Another fake Twitter account:
https://twitter.com/AsraNomani/status/1212940323841859584?s=20
-
kinda gross how most dems are like "well yeah this guy was really bad and we really want to go to war but trump didn't ask us which is bad!"
I'm a registered Democrat. Most Democrat politicians are rough ridin' idiots.
https://twitter.com/daveweigel/status/1213120839580815360
-
I know it's stupid but I actually thought irl dax would condemn this action.
-
:lol: good one lib
-
I know it's stupid but I actually thought irl dax would condemn this action.
He probably will after we have moved on from Trump.
-
I know it's stupid but I actually thought irl dax would condemn this action.
Zero percent chance of that happening (not exclusive to this action)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Weird but not unexpected responses.
-
Weird but not unexpected responses.
irony
-
If it's not pumping Maverick Missiles into wedding parties, or chomping at the bit for war with Russia I must condemn.
Hate to see that we invaded Iran last night, SMDH.
-
Weird but not unexpected responses.
irony
It’s just incredible.
-
If it's not war with a NATO partner than I must condemn.
-
If it's not war with a NATO partner than I must condemn.
You could condemn any war and political assassination. But you won't because the incel sites tell you to go forth and support
-
Yeah, I'm a big dumb idiot for thinking dax might actually stay consistent. Oh well, guess I'm an optimist
-
John Bolton must be so disappointed he’s not gonna be a part of this.
-
Killing a general commanding terrorists in a non-native country is a political assassination . . . but killing an American Citizen in same way without due process is perfectly fine as long as Barry Obama does it (LiBot Nation)
-
Killing a general commanding terrorists in a non-native country is a political assassination . . . but killing an American Citizen in same way without due process is perfectly fine as long as Barry Obama does it (LiBot Nation)
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20200103/3ea6583a2c294050d3144bd943b7167d.jpg)
-
Killing a general commanding terrorists in a non-native country is a political assassination . . . but killing an American Citizen in same way without due process is perfectly fine as long as Barry Obama does it (LiBot Nation)
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20200103/3ea6583a2c294050d3144bd943b7167d.jpg)
None thinking LibBot Brownshirts need not respond.
Drone strikes are great . . . as long as Democrat is president (LibBot Nation)
-
Drone Strike? We demand that you get congressional approval!! (LibBot Nation)
Overthrow a sovereign nation, no problem, you're a Democrat after all (LibBot Nation)
-
Now we get to the false equivalency portion of the meltdown.
-
Now we get to the false equivalency portion of the meltdown.
Weird, so there's not Congressional Democrats melting down because there wasn't Congressional approval? Yet your guy conducted thousands of drone strikes and I don't recall a single Dem of note demanding that there be Congressional approval for those strikes, let alone approval for overthrowing government(s).
LibBot.9 aka The Constant Tapout
-
Glad to see Dax "we've always been at war with Eastasia not Eurasia" is here to tell us that his boy taking out someone with a drone was justified and thus has lost all shreds of his last bit of credibility on anything and is trying to tell the strawman in his mind "libbot nation" that really what he's been melting down for the better part of a decade with the last president now is assigned to his own.
Also glad to see republicans (TrumpBot Nation) have been noted to not give a damn about any congressional restraint, and seem quite giddy at regime change, hope the party of Trump will take note of that the next time when a democrat is in office and not at any time show any sort of the same treatment ever.
Trumpbotdax FTW
-
Glad to see Dax "we've always been at war with Eastasia not Eurasia" is here to tell us that his boy taking out someone with a drone was justified and thus has lost all shreds of his last bit of credibility on anything and is trying to tell the strawman in his mind "libbot nation" that really what he's been melting down for the better part of a decade with the last president now is assigned to his own.
Also glad to see republicans (TrumpBot Nation) have been noted to not give a damn about any congressional restraint, and seem quite giddy at regime change, hope the party of Trump will take note of that the next time when a democrat is in office and not at any time show any sort of the same treatment ever.
Trumpbotdax FTW
I haven't said whether it was justified or not. I'm :lol: at the usual people doing the usual meltdown knowing they fully supported a continuous onslaught of drone strikes, even on American citizens and the overthrow of sovereign nations without any explanation let alone Congressional approval. Sorry you missed 2008 to 2016 candyman.
-
We are now at the “I’m just :lol: at the libderps” part of the meltdown. Everything has been going according to script so far. The recharge maintenance window is paying off.
-
We are now at the “I’m just :lol: at the libderps” part of the meltdown. Everything has been going according to script so far. The recharge maintenance window is paying off.
Unfortunately LibBot Brownshirts such as yourself bring nothing to the table. Sadly you stood by and applauded as your guy killed, refugee'd, deported millions while overthrowing governments leading to decades long civil wars and the deaths of tens of thousand more . . . with no approval or explanations, but with a joyful legion of people like yourself backing him the whole way.
-
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20200103/bfe5f32170efa167f9a87eaa1f536437.jpg)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Steve Dave dredging the low brow bottom. Sad
It's always bad when we say it is (LibBot Nation)
-
I don't know crap about any of this, but this does not sound encouraging.
https://twitter.com/RepSlotkin/status/1213127824451788807
-
I haven't said whether it was justified or not. I'm :lol: at the usual people doing the usual meltdown knowing they fully supported a continuous onslaught of drone strikes, even on American citizens and the overthrow of sovereign nations without any explanation let alone Congressional approval. Sorry you missed 2008 to 2016 candyman.
Yesssss, now we get to the part of the dax cycle where he acts super vague and takes no (explicit) sides to give himself a loophole out and to avoid having to answer for his insane beliefs.
Dax, a yes or no question: do you think this military action/attack/killing was justified?
-
The Iranian government has been leading chants of Death to America for 4 decades, but now everyone is all angst laden and upset.
Iran is a Russian client state that exporting terrorism all across the Middle East. I would have thought the New McCarthyites would be overjoyed, sad.
-
I haven't said whether it was justified or not. I'm :lol: at the usual people doing the usual meltdown knowing they fully supported a continuous onslaught of drone strikes, even on American citizens and the overthrow of sovereign nations without any explanation let alone Congressional approval. Sorry you missed 2008 to 2016 candyman.
Yesssss, now we get to the part of the dax cycle where he acts super vague and takes no (explicit) sides to give himself a loophole out and to avoid having to answer for his insane beliefs.
Dax, a yes or no question: do you think this military action/attack/killing was justified?
Please follow up with do you think it was wise? Preferably without referencing the previous administration (I know, this will be tough for you).
-
I haven't said whether it was justified or not. I'm :lol: at the usual people doing the usual meltdown knowing they fully supported a continuous onslaught of drone strikes, even on American citizens and the overthrow of sovereign nations without any explanation let alone Congressional approval. Sorry you missed 2008 to 2016 candyman.
Yesssss, now we get to the part of the dax cycle where he acts super vague and takes no (explicit) sides to give himself a loophole out and to avoid having to answer for his insane beliefs.
Dax, a yes or no question: do you think this military action/attack/killing was justified?
Killing an Iranian General in Iraq who planned and is planning attacks on American's? A uniformed soldier operating under the flag of a terror state killed in another country where he was organizing and leading attacks on Americans, and you guys are having a total meltdown. :lol:
Why do you only post on here when I do Skinny??
SkinnyStalker . . . SMDH, sad.
-
I haven't said whether it was justified or not. I'm :lol: at the usual people doing the usual meltdown knowing they fully supported a continuous onslaught of drone strikes, even on American citizens and the overthrow of sovereign nations without any explanation let alone Congressional approval. Sorry you missed 2008 to 2016 candyman.
Yesssss, now we get to the part of the dax cycle where he acts super vague and takes no (explicit) sides to give himself a loophole out and to avoid having to answer for his insane beliefs.
Dax, a yes or no question: do you think this military action/attack/killing was justified?
Please follow up with do you think it was wise? Preferably without referencing the previous administration (I know, this will be tough for you).
I'll leave out the previous administration when people like you finally admit you said nothing, and your leadership said nothing while the guy bombed, refugee'd and overthrew and tried to overthrow governments around the world with little to no explanation, and only a few sad eye'd "probably shouldn't have done that" well after the fact.
-
LOL, fine. Include the Obama administration in your response. Do you think the assassination was wise?
-
LOL, fine. Include the Obama administration in your response. Do you think the assassination was wise?
Why is killing an enemy soldier operating inside a country lead by a U.S. coalition government called an assassination?
-
LOL, fine. Include the Obama administration in your response. Do you think the assassination was wise?
Why is killing an enemy soldier operating inside a country lead by a U.S. coalition government called an assassination?
Well a UN official has already said it violates international human rights (https://nypost.com/2020/01/03/us-airstrike-that-killed-qassim-soleimani-of-iran-violates-human-rights-law-un-official-says/). But quit splitting hairs here and answer the question.
-
LOL, fine. Include the Obama administration in your response. Do you think the assassination was wise?
Why is killing an enemy soldier operating inside a country lead by a U.S. coalition government called an assassination?
Well a UN official has already said it violates international human rights (https://nypost.com/2020/01/03/us-airstrike-that-killed-qassim-soleimani-of-iran-violates-human-rights-law-un-official-says/). But quit splitting hairs here and answer the question.
Stating an absolute fact relative to the rank and status of this individual is not anywhere close to splitting hairs waks, FFS.
All of these people chiming in now saying that killing this guy is unwise are essentially admitting that they were (apparently) perfectly fine with allowing Iran to, in all matter of speaking, station one of their highest ranking military officers in another country so that officer could plan and carry out attacks against a U.S. coalition government and U.S. personal. . . they are either categorically insane or utterly inept, if not both.
But they should have tried to capture the guy first, before trying to kill him.
-
Bloodthirsty dax having a good new year's!
-
The only good drone strike is a Democrat lead drone strike
-
LOL, fine. Include the Obama administration in your response. Do you think the assassination was wise?
Why is killing an enemy soldier operating inside a country lead by a U.S. coalition government called an assassination?
Well a UN official has already said it violates international human rights (https://nypost.com/2020/01/03/us-airstrike-that-killed-qassim-soleimani-of-iran-violates-human-rights-law-un-official-says/). But quit splitting hairs here and answer the question.
Stating an absolute fact relative to the rank and status of this individual is not anywhere close to splitting hairs waks, FFS.
All of these people chiming in now saying that killing this guy is unwise are essentially admitting that they were (apparently) perfectly fine with allowing Iran to, in all matter of speaking, station one of their highest ranking military officers in another country so that officer could plan and carry out attacks against a U.S. coalition government and U.S. personal. . . they are either categorically insane or utterly inept, if not both.
But they should have tried to capture the guy first, before trying to kill him.
Dodging a yes or no question repeatedly because you object to the wording of the question is splitting hairs. Thank you for finally (kind of) answering the question. Do you think this will lead to war with Iran and if it does are you still totally cool with the action? Do you think Trump has actually thought this out and that there is a plan in place if and when Iran retaliates?
-
Trump has had so much success with North Korea, why doesn't he try a similar diplomatic approach with Iran?
-
LOL, fine. Include the Obama administration in your response. Do you think the assassination was wise?
Why is killing an enemy soldier operating inside a country lead by a U.S. coalition government called an assassination?
Well a UN official has already said it violates international human rights (https://nypost.com/2020/01/03/us-airstrike-that-killed-qassim-soleimani-of-iran-violates-human-rights-law-un-official-says/). But quit splitting hairs here and answer the question.
Stating an absolute fact relative to the rank and status of this individual is not anywhere close to splitting hairs waks, FFS.
All of these people chiming in now saying that killing this guy is unwise are essentially admitting that they were (apparently) perfectly fine with allowing Iran to, in all matter of speaking, station one of their highest ranking military officers in another country so that officer could plan and carry out attacks against a U.S. coalition government and U.S. personal. . . they are either categorically insane or utterly inept, if not both.
But they should have tried to capture the guy first, before trying to kill him.
Dodging a yes or no question repeatedly because you object to the wording of the question is splitting hairs. Thank you for finally (kind of) answering the question. Do you think this will lead to war with Iran and if it does are you still totally cool with the action? Do you think Trump has actually thought this out and that there is a plan in place if and when Iran retaliates?
First, of all, was this guy a uniformed officer of a nation state's military conducting/leading military operations against U.S. personnel, U.S. interests and U.S. partner government(s) from inside the borders of a sovereign nation (and not from inside his own nation), Yes or No?
Once you admit that this guy was Iranian military officer conducting a war against the United States and its partners we can go on from there.
-
LOL, fine. Include the Obama administration in your response. Do you think the assassination was wise?
Why is killing an enemy soldier operating inside a country lead by a U.S. coalition government called an assassination?
Well a UN official has already said it violates international human rights (https://nypost.com/2020/01/03/us-airstrike-that-killed-qassim-soleimani-of-iran-violates-human-rights-law-un-official-says/). But quit splitting hairs here and answer the question.
Stating an absolute fact relative to the rank and status of this individual is not anywhere close to splitting hairs waks, FFS.
All of these people chiming in now saying that killing this guy is unwise are essentially admitting that they were (apparently) perfectly fine with allowing Iran to, in all matter of speaking, station one of their highest ranking military officers in another country so that officer could plan and carry out attacks against a U.S. coalition government and U.S. personal. . . they are either categorically insane or utterly inept, if not both.
But they should have tried to capture the guy first, before trying to kill him.
Dodging a yes or no question repeatedly because you object to the wording of the question is splitting hairs. Thank you for finally (kind of) answering the question. Do you think this will lead to war with Iran and if it does are you still totally cool with the action? Do you think Trump has actually thought this out and that there is a plan in place if and when Iran retaliates?
First, of all, was this guy a uniformed officer of a nation state's military conducting/leading military operations against U.S. personnel, U.S. interests and U.S. partner government(s) from inside the borders of a sovereign nation (and not from inside his own nation), Yes or No?
Once you admit that this guy was Iranian military officer conducting a war against the United States and its partners we can go on from there.
Dax. He was a bad guy. We all can agree on that. Nobody is shedding tears over his death. This whole time haven't you been against the United States even being in these conflicts in Iraq and Syria? It just perplexes me that suddenly you are totally fine with the escalation of this conflict. We're sending 3000 more troops to Kuwait. I just wish you were more consistent in your positions is all.
-
Dax only supports military actions when a republican is in the White House.
You have to remember, he was mad when OBL was killed.
-
Dax only supports military actions when a republican is in the White House.
You have to remember, he was mad when OBL was killed.
I thought I remembered that but I didn't want to waste my time trying to find it.
-
LOL, fine. Include the Obama administration in your response. Do you think the assassination was wise?
Why is killing an enemy soldier operating inside a country lead by a U.S. coalition government called an assassination?
Well a UN official has already said it violates international human rights (https://nypost.com/2020/01/03/us-airstrike-that-killed-qassim-soleimani-of-iran-violates-human-rights-law-un-official-says/). But quit splitting hairs here and answer the question.
Stating an absolute fact relative to the rank and status of this individual is not anywhere close to splitting hairs waks, FFS.
All of these people chiming in now saying that killing this guy is unwise are essentially admitting that they were (apparently) perfectly fine with allowing Iran to, in all matter of speaking, station one of their highest ranking military officers in another country so that officer could plan and carry out attacks against a U.S. coalition government and U.S. personal. . . they are either categorically insane or utterly inept, if not both.
But they should have tried to capture the guy first, before trying to kill him.
Dodging a yes or no question repeatedly because you object to the wording of the question is splitting hairs. Thank you for finally (kind of) answering the question. Do you think this will lead to war with Iran and if it does are you still totally cool with the action? Do you think Trump has actually thought this out and that there is a plan in place if and when Iran retaliates?
First, of all, was this guy a uniformed officer of a nation state's military conducting/leading military operations against U.S. personnel, U.S. interests and U.S. partner government(s) from inside the borders of a sovereign nation (and not from inside his own nation), Yes or No?
Once you admit that this guy was Iranian military officer conducting a war against the United States and its partners we can go on from there.
Dax. He was a bad guy. We all can agree on that. Nobody is shedding tears over his death. This whole time haven't you been against the United States even being in these conflicts in Iraq and Syria? It just perplexes me that suddenly you are totally fine with the escalation of this conflict. We're sending 3000 more troops to Kuwait. I just wish you were more consistent in your positions is all.
It's to late in Iraq. But at minimum the U.S. has spent billions trying to rebuild Iraq and prop up some semblance of a government that sorta reflects the fringes of Democracy. The previous administration was purely burn it down to the ground and let the worst of the worst fight it out from there. Which is why Libya is still going and going with no end in sight, and Syria is still a mess. Remember, there were multiple offers to negotiate Assad stepping down and the U.S. (Obama) rejected them all.
I do not consider taking out a senior military officer of a foreign entity leading attacks against U.S. partners and U.S. interests inside Iraq an escalation, only idiots think that. Again, what they're really admitting is that they were (apparently) fine with allowing Iran to sit in Iraq and attack (repeatedly) and the U.S. do nothing about it.
-
Dax only supports military actions when a republican is in the White House.
You have to remember, he was mad when OBL was killed.
Oh Chinstalker :lol:
-
LOL, fine. Include the Obama administration in your response. Do you think the assassination was wise?
Why is killing an enemy soldier operating inside a country lead by a U.S. coalition government called an assassination?
Well a UN official has already said it violates international human rights (https://nypost.com/2020/01/03/us-airstrike-that-killed-qassim-soleimani-of-iran-violates-human-rights-law-un-official-says/). But quit splitting hairs here and answer the question.
Stating an absolute fact relative to the rank and status of this individual is not anywhere close to splitting hairs waks, FFS.
All of these people chiming in now saying that killing this guy is unwise are essentially admitting that they were (apparently) perfectly fine with allowing Iran to, in all matter of speaking, station one of their highest ranking military officers in another country so that officer could plan and carry out attacks against a U.S. coalition government and U.S. personal. . . they are either categorically insane or utterly inept, if not both.
But they should have tried to capture the guy first, before trying to kill him.
Dodging a yes or no question repeatedly because you object to the wording of the question is splitting hairs. Thank you for finally (kind of) answering the question. Do you think this will lead to war with Iran and if it does are you still totally cool with the action? Do you think Trump has actually thought this out and that there is a plan in place if and when Iran retaliates?
First, of all, was this guy a uniformed officer of a nation state's military conducting/leading military operations against U.S. personnel, U.S. interests and U.S. partner government(s) from inside the borders of a sovereign nation (and not from inside his own nation), Yes or No?
Once you admit that this guy was Iranian military officer conducting a war against the United States and its partners we can go on from there.
Dax. He was a bad guy. We all can agree on that. Nobody is shedding tears over his death. This whole time haven't you been against the United States even being in these conflicts in Iraq and Syria? It just perplexes me that suddenly you are totally fine with the escalation of this conflict. We're sending 3000 more troops to Kuwait. I just wish you were more consistent in your positions is all.
I do not consider taking out a senior military officer of a foreign entity leading attacks against U.S. partners and U.S. interests inside Iraq an escalation, only idiots think that. Again, what they're really admitting is that they were (apparently) fine with allowing Iran to sit in Iraq and attack (repeatedly) and the U.S. do nothing about it.
Taking out the highest ranking military officer of a country (who is allied with China and Russia) we are not actively at war (shadow war not withstanding) with isn't an escalation? Ok, we can call it good. This is futile.
-
LOL, fine. Include the Obama administration in your response. Do you think the assassination was wise?
Why is killing an enemy soldier operating inside a country lead by a U.S. coalition government called an assassination?
Well a UN official has already said it violates international human rights (https://nypost.com/2020/01/03/us-airstrike-that-killed-qassim-soleimani-of-iran-violates-human-rights-law-un-official-says/). But quit splitting hairs here and answer the question.
Stating an absolute fact relative to the rank and status of this individual is not anywhere close to splitting hairs waks, FFS.
All of these people chiming in now saying that killing this guy is unwise are essentially admitting that they were (apparently) perfectly fine with allowing Iran to, in all matter of speaking, station one of their highest ranking military officers in another country so that officer could plan and carry out attacks against a U.S. coalition government and U.S. personal. . . they are either categorically insane or utterly inept, if not both.
But they should have tried to capture the guy first, before trying to kill him.
Dodging a yes or no question repeatedly because you object to the wording of the question is splitting hairs. Thank you for finally (kind of) answering the question. Do you think this will lead to war with Iran and if it does are you still totally cool with the action? Do you think Trump has actually thought this out and that there is a plan in place if and when Iran retaliates?
First, of all, was this guy a uniformed officer of a nation state's military conducting/leading military operations against U.S. personnel, U.S. interests and U.S. partner government(s) from inside the borders of a sovereign nation (and not from inside his own nation), Yes or No?
Once you admit that this guy was Iranian military officer conducting a war against the United States and its partners we can go on from there.
Dax. He was a bad guy. We all can agree on that. Nobody is shedding tears over his death. This whole time haven't you been against the United States even being in these conflicts in Iraq and Syria? It just perplexes me that suddenly you are totally fine with the escalation of this conflict. We're sending 3000 more troops to Kuwait. I just wish you were more consistent in your positions is all.
I do not consider taking out a senior military officer of a foreign entity leading attacks against U.S. partners and U.S. interests inside Iraq an escalation, only idiots think that. Again, what they're really admitting is that they were (apparently) fine with allowing Iran to sit in Iraq and attack (repeatedly) and the U.S. do nothing about it.
Taking out the highest ranking military officer of a country (who is allied with China and Russia) we are not actively at war (shadow war not withstanding) with isn't an escalation? Ok, we can call it good. This is futile.
I agree, it's futile to talk with someone who clearly believes the U.S. should have done nothing (likely because OrangeMan bad) and just allowed this guy and his staff to literally operate against U.S. interests from right inside Iraq.
-
Would the U.S. be fighting Iranians in Iraq if the U.S. hadn't invaded Iraq??
-
Would the U.S. be fighting Iranians in Iraq if the U.S. hadn't invaded Iraq??
It depends.
What if Saddam had stepped down (for example) and the Iraqi government was a U.S. ally?
-
Could you please point to me to non U.S./non NATO sources that clarify that indeed U.S. forces are fighting directly against Iranian's supported directly by the Iranian government?
-
Hbd, Dax.
(https://thesweetsathome.files.wordpress.com/2015/07/iran_cake.jpg)
-
Could you please point to me to non U.S./non NATO sources that clarify that indeed U.S. forces are fighting directly against Iranian's supported directly by the Iranian government?
FFS Chin, didn't you know that non official sources and/or non pre approved sources are not allowed here.
-
Hbd, Dax.
(https://thesweetsathome.files.wordpress.com/2015/07/iran_cake.jpg)
I love cake and Iranians, except for the Jihadists.
-
BLOODTHIRSTYWARPIG DAX IS BACK!!!
:ksu:
-
Actually, if you think about it, if they go after Iran, there's pretty much going to be a huge mess. But rest assured if they do, the average Trumper is going to be there to defend it every step of the way.
-
Actually, if you think about it, if they go after Iran, there's pretty much going to be a huge mess. But rest assured if they do, the average Trumper is going to be there to defend it every step of the way.
Hopefully we'll get an explanation, and it won't be one of those "we came we saw he died" kind of deals with zero explanations and tens of millions of LibBots not caring - (D) approved
-
Yet your a dude who wants to argue and refute the current administrations massive role in stirring the pot in many of these problems.
-
Yet your a dude who wants to argue and refute the current administrations massive role in stirring the pot in many of these problems.
Stir the pot? Defined as not going full cuck on Iran.
-
This probably won't start a major war. Only like a 1/3 chance of that happening, imo. With those odds, who can blame Trump for not wanting to look like a cuck?
-
I, too, am hoping the administration that does nothing but lie 24/7 gives us a good explanation.
-
Yet your a dude who wants to argue and refute the current administrations massive role in stirring the pot in many of these problems.
Stir the pot? Defined as not going full cuck on Iran.
So Dax you would be for pre-emptive war in order to stop Iran from "cuckolding" us??
But again, it hasn't been officially established on any level that Iran is behind some of these attacks.
But it's good to see you'll willingly swallow the propaganda as long as a Republican is President.
Sad how ideologically driven most Americans are.
-
Yet your a dude who wants to argue and refute the current administrations massive role in stirring the pot in many of these problems.
Stir the pot? Defined as not going full cuck on Iran.
So Dax you would be for pre-emptive war in order to stop Iran from "cuckolding" us??
But again, it hasn't been officially established on any level that Iran is behind some of these attacks.
But it's good to see you'll willingly swallow the propaganda as long as a Republican is President.
Sad how ideologically driven most Americans are.
Ah no, not for pre-emptive war.
But I get it completely. You guys get to pick and choose when the government is to be believed and when it all needs to be questioned. Anything OrangeMan bad is not to be questioned, until it needs to be questioned (like right now). Check-Got it.
-
i think extrajudicial killing is bad
regardless of who is president
-
My word!
https://twitter.com/CoNWW3/status/1213030476992196608?s=20
-
i think extrajudicial killing is bad
regardless of who is president
Oh, so no more unilateral declaration of "enemy combatant"? :lol:
An actual guy in the military of a nation-state waging war aganist U.S. interests . . . not an enemy combatant because OrangeMan bad. :lol:
-
Oh no
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20200103/919aafe092a565b9467cd8efc77357d3.jpg)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Turkey: Hosting 3.7 million Syrian Refugees due in large part because of the previous administration (400K plus dead in Syria)
Egypt: Previous Administration attempted to install Muslim Brotherhood
Libya: 30K killed in a month because of the previous administration, and ongoing civil war carries on to nearly a decade with thousands more dead
One really bad guy dies . . . total LibBot Meltdown
Sad
-
I know we use this too often but there isn’t a single thing on earth Trump could do that Dax wouldn’t defend and in the same breathe blame Obama for something.
-
I’m ok with killing this POS for the record and would also like to LOL at the same time how rough ridin' over dramatic ppl are being about it online. Not a fan of war (there won’t be one), but definitely a fan of POS terriosts dying. Happy Friday, everyone!
-
I’m not even sure why Dax is having such a tantrum. Unless it’s because he can’t accuse Barry of being bloodthirsty anymore because trump just copied Obama
-
Just short by a few hundred thousand Dug.
-
I know we use this too often but there isn’t a single thing on earth Trump could do that Dax wouldn’t defend and in the same breathe blame Obama for something.
You’ve never taken ownership of the hundreds of thousands your guy killed and the millions he refugee’d, but you’re losing your crap over a guy who not only killed Americans, but thousands of people in Iran who are against the regime.
Sad But LibBot Jackboot gonna LibBot Jackboot.
-
Assassinating their #2 doesn't really accomplish anything. Somebody else will replace him and carry out the same orders Soleimani would have carried out. Trump should have murdered Rouhani instead. That might have accomplished something.
-
A lot of puppets on social media right now parroting that this will cause WWIII because they follow some crazed Anti Trumper crap. Everybody has lost their collective minds/crap since 2016. I remember when killing terriosts was a good thing for America.
-
A lot of puppets on social media right now parroting that this will cause WWIII because they follow some crazed Anti Trumper crap. Everybody has lost their collective minds/crap since 2016. I remember when killing terriosts was a good thing for America.
Well, it is within the realm of possibility. Neither country has stable leadership.
-
Just short by a few hundred thousand Dug.
Trump has always fallen pretty far short of Barry
-
hold up, this guy is a terrorist because he killed uniformed soldiers in a war zone? That seems like a bad standard to set.
-
I know we use this too often but there isn’t a single thing on earth Trump could do that Dax wouldn’t defend and in the same breathe blame Obama for something.
You’ve never taken ownership of the hundreds of thousands your guy killed and the millions he refugee’d, but you’re losing your crap over a guy who not only killed Americans, but thousands of people in Iran who are against the regime.
Sad But LibBot Jackboot gonna LibBot Jackboot.
That’s a lot of ownership to take on. Even if I took ownership of something Obama did(maybe the tan suit? that was a pretty big deal to you), you still wouldn’t take ownership of any dumb/stupid Trump crap. You would just continue on high step saluting.
Also killing bad guys is good but when your strategy is probably nothing more than posting an American flag on twitter and then winging it from there, it’s probably a pretty stupid move.
-
I know we use this too often but there isn’t a single thing on earth Trump could do that Dax wouldn’t defend and in the same breathe blame Obama for something.
You’ve never taken ownership of the hundreds of thousands your guy killed and the millions he refugee’d, but you’re losing your crap over a guy who not only killed Americans, but thousands of people in Iran who are against the regime.
Sad But LibBot Jackboot gonna LibBot Jackboot.
Barry was certainly not my guy. I think that trump committed a war crime yesterday. Now defend Trump's actions to me.
-
Only Turkey is allowed to cuck us
-
I know we use this too often but there isn’t a single thing on earth Trump could do that Dax wouldn’t defend and in the same breathe blame Obama for something.
You’ve never taken ownership of the hundreds of thousands your guy killed and the millions he refugee’d, but you’re losing your crap over a guy who not only killed Americans, but thousands of people in Iran who are against the regime.
Sad But LibBot Jackboot gonna LibBot Jackboot.
Barry was certainly not my guy. I think that trump committed a war crime yesterday. Now defend Trump's actions to me.
every single American president in my life has been a war criminal. now defend why this wasn't a war crime.
-
Only Turkey is allowed to cuck us
:Keke:
-
hold up, this guy is a terrorist because he killed uniformed soldiers in a war zone? That seems like a bad standard to set.
Interesting, so enemy combatant and okay to kill because shadow war has no end or beginning?
I think the main issue is no one thinks Trump is capable of having any type if long term strategic plan that advances some semblance of a foreign policy. So therefore don't plz don't kill ppl with the efficacy of the US military.
Well this certainly has a lot to do with it for me.
-
Maybe terriost was too harsh. Just a another POS who tries to eat his own ppl and others for his political gain. Can we call him a mass murderer, who terrorized his own ppl and others? Is this politically correct?
-
Maybe terriost was too harsh. Just a another POS who tries to eat his own ppl and others for his political gain. Can we call him a mass murderer, who terrorized his own ppl and others? Is this politically correct?
Terrorist isn't too harsh.
-
hold up, this guy is a terrorist because he killed uniformed soldiers in a war zone? That seems like a bad standard to set.
Interesting, so enemy combatant and okay to kill because shadow war has no end or beginning?
I think the main issue is no one thinks Trump is capable of having any type if long term strategic plan that advances some semblance of a foreign policy. So therefore don't plz don't kill ppl with the efficacy of the US military.
Well this certainly has a lot to do with it for me.
The problem is, all the grown ups that let people in the room to talk about this to begin with have been fired. Why? Because they don’t kiss the feet of Dax’s dear leader and actually explain reality.
-
Maybe terriost was too harsh. Just a another POS who tries to eat his own ppl and others for his political gain. Can we call him a mass murderer, who terrorized his own ppl and others? Is this politically correct?
Terrorist isn't too harsh.
I know this.
-
Maybe terriost was too harsh. Just a another POS who tries to eat his own ppl and others for his political gain. Can we call him a mass murderer, who terrorized his own ppl and others? Is this politically correct?
Terrorist isn't too harsh.
I know this.
Winning?
-
Not trying to. Seems like KK came in hot on that term. Just happy another POS on this planet, which was up to no good, is gone. Go cats, ‘merica, and world!
-
Not trying to. Seems like KK came in hot on that term. Just happy another POS on this planet, which was up to no good, is gone. Go cats, ‘merica, and world!
Sames. It's Friday :cheers: No new wars
-
Not trying to. Seems like KK came in hot on that term. Just happy another POS on this planet, which was up to no good, is gone. Go cats, ‘merica, and world!
Sames. It's Friday :cheers: No new wars
Only yesterday :Woot:
-
:cheers: brothers!
-
I filled up on gas though today.
-
I filled up on gas though today.
Dude after shopping at my local Hy-Vee today I have I have over a dollar off! I mean that’s a pretty big rough ridin' deal with premium on a 1000000000000000000000000000000 tank
-
Jesus, what an amazing day for all of us! :love:
-
:cheers: winning
-
This is where burning up 3 years of your adminstration with lies and no discernable strategy comes back to bite you when you need the public to believe why you made this move.
-
This is where burning up 3 years of your adminstration with lies and no discernable strategy comes back to bite you when you need the public to believe why you made this move.
This and impeachment
-
The president of the United States of America.
https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1213593975732527112
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
:love:
-
https://twitter.com/saletan/status/1213654733107421186
-
When you do it mark the fist punching with "IRAN"
https://twitter.com/BNONews/status/1213631435573284864
-
cool, cool
https://twitter.com/farnazfassihi/status/1213833015199182850
-
on the bright side our big wet president may have improved relations between iran and iraq.
-
On Meet the Press I’ve got Jeh Johnson telling me there is no question that this strike was legal and Pat McRory telling me the nation needs to speak with one voice and that Democrats are weakening America.
Good to know nothing has changed since 2004.
-
Pompeo on Fox News Sunday says he fully expects that Iraq will welcome US to stay despite the vote and PM quotes otherwise.
Pompeo says “any reasonable person who saw the full intelligence would agree there would be more risk with inaction. We want to share but we have to protect Americans who are out there collecting intelligence.”
Pompeo says “we made clear this cost will be brought home. We will impose costs on the decision makers.”
Chris Wallace “are you saying to the supreme leader, you are not off limits?”
Pompeo “we will do whatever it takes” (paraphrase)
Pompeo is a psycho.
-
Chris Wallace is really good.
-
Has World War III started yet?
I’m just enjoying former members of previous administrations who bombed, overthrew, invaded, droned and refugee’d a collective of millions talking about the great “restraint” they had in not taking out a real bad guy.
Best to just take it hard and deep on the defenseless, true heroes one and all.
-
This administration needs to hire lyin Susie Rice, she sold a YouTube video taking out an ambassador to millions of useful idiot LibBots. She shouldn’t have any problem selling taking out an officially sanctioned terrorist operating under the flag of a nation state.
-
:cool:
https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1213689342272659456
-
LibBot Nation: Oh my lawd (clutches pearls) he’s just shooting from the hip.
Numerous stories: Planning for various options against Iran underway for months.
LibBot Nation: Only we can take out terrorists.
-
Holy crap :sdeek:
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/iran-offers-80million-bounty-donald-21219180
-
Holy crap :sdeek:
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/iran-offers-80million-bounty-donald-21219180
Here’s your chance Da Big Dummy. Spread the wealth once you collect.
-
Holy crap :sdeek:
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/iran-offers-80million-bounty-donald-21219180
Here’s your chance Da Big Dummy. Spread the wealth once you collect.
:sdeek:
-
LibBot Nation: Oh my lawd (clutches pearls) he’s just shooting from the hip.
Numerous stories: Planning for various options against Iran underway for months.
LibBot Nation: Only we can take out terrorists.
Let’s be clear, all the centrist dems making process arguments are bad too.
-
Lol, dax going straight to the SOCIALISM!!! well
-
:Woot:
https://twitter.com/joyce_karam/status/1213885625423859713
-
These posts are getting more and more dictatorish and Dax is out there high step saluting it.
https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1213919480574812160
-
https://twitter.com/amiraminimd/status/1213828930458804224
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
These posts are getting more and more dictatorish and Dax is out there high step saluting it.
https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1213919480574812160
(https://media.tenor.com/images/3177f80b319a47483942568d796969c0/tenor.gif)
-
These posts are getting more and more dictatorish and Dax is out there high step saluting it.
https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1213919480574812160
Weird, you never seemed the slightest bit concerned when your guy was overthrowing or trying to overthrow multiple governments with quite literally no explanation to anyone or approval from anyone.
-
Oh my gosh Iranians are gathered chanting bad things about America.
No point of context LibBots: (clutching pearls) I’ve just never seen anything like this before!!
-
It's rare for Dax to meltdown on a weekend. Enjoy your day off, buddy.
-
All you have to know is that if Obama was president he would be posting the exact opposite things.
Perpetual War, only OK if a Pub is in office.
-
https://twitter.com/amiraminimd/status/1213828930458804224
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Clearly this guy didn't see Trump's inauguration photo
-
Lol, you guys clutch your pearls all weekend long and I’m melting down. Never stop resident LibDerps.
Oh, and ChinStalker, when Trump burns a country down for no reason at all, then you can spew that line.
-
On Meet the Press I’ve got Jeh Johnson telling me there is no question that this strike was legal
Man, what in the eff.
https://twitter.com/JuddLegum/status/1213906520359997440
-
Previous administration: Nearly 1000 drone strikes, killing thousands, zero congressional authorizations, zero approvals sought.
The majority of those strikes were done against administration unilaterally declared targets of interest, many of which were extremely suspect.
LibDerp Collective: Crickets
In this case, a dossier 12 feet thick, known terrorist/military activity across much of the Middle East, including numerous attacks on Americans.
LibDerp Collective: Total Meltdown
Only we can kill terrorists and take credit for it (LibDerp Nation).
-
dax and cat27 = Mike Pompeo today on Meet the Press
Chuck Todd = The rest of goEMAW.com today
-
@sonofdaxjones why does everything always have to be a comparo between their guy and your guy? I mean, doing bad/stupid crap is doing bad/stupid crap.
-
https://twitter.com/ryanafournier/status/1213903712609017858?s=21
I normally wouldn’t bother with something this dumb, but it is the official position of the US that the following are all true
1) killing Soleimani was justified, legal, and not an act of war
2) the act made the US, it’s allies in the region, and Americans in the region safer
3) this action was part of our maximum pressure campaign, but was also a de-escalation
4) if Iran responds in any way, we will respond without proportionality and have a list of 52 targets including political leaders and cultural sites
Have not got a real clear strategic goal which now seems to be that Iran is supposed to look at all this and then come back to the table and negotiate another nuclear deal? But Pompeo and others seem to be pretty openly suggesting that they don’t want to deal with the “theocrats and kleptocrats” in Tehran and that this will probably lead to a popular uprising.
Sounds like this is all very well thought out and going great.
-
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/killing-of-soleimani-follows-long-push-from-pompeo-for-aggressive-action-against-iran-but-airstrike-brings-serious-risks/2020/01/05/092a8e00-2f7d-11ea-be79-83e793dbcaef_story.html?arc404=true (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/killing-of-soleimani-follows-long-push-from-pompeo-for-aggressive-action-against-iran-but-airstrike-brings-serious-risks/2020/01/05/092a8e00-2f7d-11ea-be79-83e793dbcaef_story.html?arc404=true)
Also, as anyone with a brain knew watching him today, Pompeo has been lying his ass off on the justification.
-
Quite a pickle for LibDerps. Lyin Susie Rice sells a YouTube video to useful idiot LibDerp Nation.
Trump killed the likely mastermind of the Benghazi Attack.
Also the guy pretty much responsible for the decimation of Lebanon via proxy (among other things) and the constant attacks on Israel (the last secular Democracy in the Middle East).
-
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/killing-of-soleimani-follows-long-push-from-pompeo-for-aggressive-action-against-iran-but-airstrike-brings-serious-risks/2020/01/05/092a8e00-2f7d-11ea-be79-83e793dbcaef_story.html?arc404=true (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/killing-of-soleimani-follows-long-push-from-pompeo-for-aggressive-action-against-iran-but-airstrike-brings-serious-risks/2020/01/05/092a8e00-2f7d-11ea-be79-83e793dbcaef_story.html?arc404=true)
Also, as anyone with a brain knew watching him today, Pompeo has been lying his ass off on the justification.
Why was he in Iraq?
-
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/killing-of-soleimani-follows-long-push-from-pompeo-for-aggressive-action-against-iran-but-airstrike-brings-serious-risks/2020/01/05/092a8e00-2f7d-11ea-be79-83e793dbcaef_story.html?arc404=true (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/killing-of-soleimani-follows-long-push-from-pompeo-for-aggressive-action-against-iran-but-airstrike-brings-serious-risks/2020/01/05/092a8e00-2f7d-11ea-be79-83e793dbcaef_story.html?arc404=true)
Also, as anyone with a brain knew watching him today, Pompeo has been lying his ass off on the justification.
Why was he in Iraq?
Iraqi PM says he was there on a diplomatic mission. I don’t know, Do you have the answer?
-
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.iranreview.org%2Ffile%2Fcms%2Ffiles%2FScreen-Shot-2013-01-22-at-5_38_11-PM.png&hash=cfe97670927210e31e302b2aee9f14cf37ca900f)
-
Do the 52 targets extend into the upper red area?
-
https://twitter.com/maggienyt/status/1213978867683209216
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/killing-of-soleimani-follows-long-push-from-pompeo-for-aggressive-action-against-iran-but-airstrike-brings-serious-risks/2020/01/05/092a8e00-2f7d-11ea-be79-83e793dbcaef_story.html?arc404=true (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/killing-of-soleimani-follows-long-push-from-pompeo-for-aggressive-action-against-iran-but-airstrike-brings-serious-risks/2020/01/05/092a8e00-2f7d-11ea-be79-83e793dbcaef_story.html?arc404=true)
Also, as anyone with a brain knew watching him today, Pompeo has been lying his ass off on the justification.
Why was he in Iraq?
Iraqi PM says he was there on a diplomatic mission. I don’t know, Do you have the answer?
No, but the old “diplomatic mission” is humorous.
-
Is the underlying claim here that it is noteworthy that the Leader of the Qods forces that has proxies throughout the Middle East was in Iraq meeting with a militia leader and political leaders?
Trump already gave up on pretending this was to stop an imminent attack.
-
Is the underlying claim here that it is noteworthy that the Leader of the Qods forces that has proxies throughout the Middle East was in Iraq meeting with a militia leader and political leaders?
Trump already gave up on pretending this was to stop an imminent attack.
Well there had already been numerous attacks.
The fact that people like you are trying to paint this as the same thing as some dude on the CIA payroll handing over some dubious intelligence to get a personal enemy taken out by a drone strike is both telling and hilarious. The file on this dude was massive.
-
Is the underlying claim here that it is noteworthy that the Leader of the Qods forces that has proxies throughout the Middle East was in Iraq meeting with a militia leader and political leaders?
Trump already gave up on pretending this was to stop an imminent attack.
Well there had already been numerous attacks.
The fact that people like you are trying to paint this as the same thing as some dude on the CIA payroll handing over some dubious intelligence to get a personal enemy taken out by a drone strike is both telling and hilarious. The file on this dude was massive.
He was most recently killing ISIS for us in Iraq. Working with scummy people (like the saudis for instance) is nothing new so what’s the real reason? Is there an strategy here?
-
https://twitter.com/maggienyt/status/1213978867683209216
He's going to create so many brand new terrorists.
-
Is the underlying claim here that it is noteworthy that the Leader of the Qods forces that has proxies throughout the Middle East was in Iraq meeting with a militia leader and political leaders?
Trump already gave up on pretending this was to stop an imminent attack.
Well there had already been numerous attacks.
The fact that people like you are trying to paint this as the same thing as some dude on the CIA payroll handing over some dubious intelligence to get a personal enemy taken out by a drone strike is both telling and hilarious. The file on this dude was massive.
He was most recently killing ISIS for us in Iraq. Working with scummy people (like the saudis for instance) is nothing new so what’s the real reason? Is there an strategy here?
:lol: Is there a strategy here ? :lol:
-
LibBot Nation: Oh my lawd (clutches pearls) he’s just shooting from the hip.
Numerous stories: Planning for various options against Iran underway for months.
LibBot Nation: Only we can take out terrorists.
Let’s be clear, all the centrist dems making process arguments are bad too.
(https://media.tenor.com/images/1a1020ee74a7320124376cd8e389e6df/tenor.gif)
-
On Meet the Press I’ve got Jeh Johnson telling me there is no question that this strike was legal
Man, what in the eff.
https://twitter.com/JuddLegum/status/1213906520359997440
Just another sellout, nothing to see here. Washington insider only cares about :kstategrad:
-
@sonofdaxjones why does everything always have to be a comparo between their guy and your guy? I mean, doing bad/stupid crap is doing bad/stupid crap.
He's not going to answer you nic, just like he didn't answer when I pointed out that most liberals actually hated obomber for killing innocent brown people. Chingon got it right though, dax isn't even a trumper, he's still mad a n-word was president for 8 years, and that anger informs all of his opinions, it's why he can't stop talking about him.
-
johnson has always been a giant eff off.
80 million is simultaneously very tempting and way too low.
-
Like, this is exactly how dax's brain works.
[Obama does something bad.] "Geez, Obama is bad."
[Trump does something bad.] "Geez, Obama is bad."
-
LibBot Nation: Oh my lawd (clutches pearls) he’s just shooting from the hip.
Numerous stories: Planning for various options against Iran underway for months.
LibBot Nation: Only we can take out terrorists.
Let’s be clear, all the centrist dems making process arguments are bad too.
(https://media.tenor.com/images/1a1020ee74a7320124376cd8e389e6df/tenor.gif)
I thought KK was in favor of curbing the president’s war powers.
I guess you could just keep complaining about Presidents abusing that unchecked authority, but sure makes sense to me to have a discussion about what a President is even constitutionally allowed to do.
-
@sonofdaxjones why does everything always have to be a comparo between their guy and your guy? I mean, doing bad/stupid crap is doing bad/stupid crap.
He's not going to answer you nic, just like he didn't answer when I pointed out that most liberals actually hated obomber for killing innocent brown people. Chingon got it right though, dax isn't even a trumper, he's still mad a n-word was president for 8 years, and that anger informs all of his opinions, it's why he can't stop talking about him.
You’re hilarious. I point out the previous administration because the vast majority of LibDerps didn’t give a eff what the guy did. You keep talking about the LibBots who were mad about the stuff he did, that’s an extremely small, tiny little fraction of the collective LibDerp movement. Everything I’m “mad” about has to do with the unmitigated foreign policy disaster that was the Obama Administration that’s now playing out today.
So, you keep talking about race like a dumbass and I’ll keep talking about policy.
Speaking of shitty Obama policy, nearly a decade later the civil war in Libya rages on, now featuring Turkey. Still waiting on the explanation as to why Libya had to be burned to the ground. Yet the same architects of one disaster after another are the go to named and unnamed sources (mostly figments of partisan “journalists” imaginations) to tell us why Trump is doing it wrong. The collective architects of the deaths of millions and the displacement of millions more are the go to for LibDerp Parrot Boy media.
SMDH
But yeah, it’s all because Obama was black. #jerk #eyeroll
-
johnson has always been a giant eff off.
80 million is simultaneously very tempting and way too low.
I doubt Iran would actually pay the money.
-
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/killing-of-soleimani-follows-long-push-from-pompeo-for-aggressive-action-against-iran-but-airstrike-brings-serious-risks/2020/01/05/092a8e00-2f7d-11ea-be79-83e793dbcaef_story.html?arc404=true (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/killing-of-soleimani-follows-long-push-from-pompeo-for-aggressive-action-against-iran-but-airstrike-brings-serious-risks/2020/01/05/092a8e00-2f7d-11ea-be79-83e793dbcaef_story.html?arc404=true)
Also, as anyone with a brain knew watching him today, Pompeo has been lying his ass off on the justification.
Why was he in Iraq?
Iraqi PM says he was there on a diplomatic mission. I don’t know, Do you have the answer?
Iraqi PM says to discuss deescalating tensions between Iran and the Saudis.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7854971/Soleimani-Iraq-discuss-escalating-tensions-Saudis-killed-PM-says.html
-
LibBot Nation: Oh my lawd (clutches pearls) he’s just shooting from the hip.
Numerous stories: Planning for various options against Iran underway for months.
LibBot Nation: Only we can take out terrorists.
Let’s be clear, all the centrist dems making process arguments are bad too.
(https://media.tenor.com/images/1a1020ee74a7320124376cd8e389e6df/tenor.gif)
I thought KK was in favor of curbing the president’s war powers.
I guess you could just keep complaining about Presidents abusing that unchecked authority, but sure makes sense to me to have a discussion about what a President is even constitutionally allowed to do.
Mayor Pete didn't question the President's authority to do this. Biden didn't. Most of the statements I've seen didn't. If the dems whip votes to reclaim War Powers for Congress I am all for it.
-
This thread is bonkers.
https://twitter.com/rezamarashi/status/1214031169173348352
-
https://twitter.com/mowzdef/status/1213947279645847554
-
Do NOT tell them about Michael Beasley.
-
This thread is bonkers.
https://twitter.com/rezamarashi/status/1214031169173348352
Oh yeah, the "unnamed sources" . . . if real, they're the architects of the killing of hundreds of thousands if not millions of people. So let's listen to them.
All likely holdovers and life long policy wonks from previous administrations.
Next up, the killers and refugee'ers of millions of innocents tells us about the "great restraint" they had in regards to a known a terrorist.
-
what is the benchmark for labeling someone a "terrorist" now? MBS qualify?
-
https://twitter.com/mowzdef/status/1213947279645847554
It really is one of our greatest strengths, and I’m not even joking.
-
what is the benchmark for labeling someone a "terrorist" now? MBS qualify?
MBS?
You can trace this guy all the way back to the Khobar Towers.
BTW, Thanks Obama (and Clinton, and Biden etc. etc. but crickets from 99% of the American LibDerp Left):
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ENipB0DWsAMgHi7?format=jpg&name=large)
-
what is the benchmark for labeling someone a "terrorist" now? MBS qualify?
MBS?
You can trace this guy all the way back to the Khobar Towers.
BTW, Thanks Obama (and Clinton, and Biden etc. etc. but crickets from 99% of the American LibDerp Left):
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ENipB0DWsAMgHi7?format=jpg&name=large)
No bigger exporters of terrorism than the Saudi regime. None. Not even close. So whoever you want to pick. So what are we talking about here?
-
Holy crap dax is brining out the conspiracy theory looking visual aids!
-
Holy crap dax is brining out the conspiracy theory looking visual aids!
When you're clueless, call it a conspiracy theory.
-
Holy crap dax is brining out the conspiracy theory looking visual aids!
When you're clueless, call it a conspiracy theory.
I called it "conspiracy theory looking" precisely because I have no desire not to be clueless on whatever you're talking about, FYI.
-
what can you tell me about southfront?
-
what is the benchmark for labeling someone a "terrorist" now? MBS qualify?
MBS?
You can trace this guy all the way back to the Khobar Towers.
BTW, Thanks Obama (and Clinton, and Biden etc. etc. but crickets from 99% of the American LibDerp Left):
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ENipB0DWsAMgHi7?format=jpg&name=large)
No bigger exporters of terrorism than the Saudi regime. None. Not even close. So whoever you want to pick. So what are we talking about here?
Factions within Saudi Arabia.
What you're essentially proposing is that the U.S. just stand by and allow this guy to continue to attack Americans and the U.S. continue to do nothing. Don't bring the "he was fighting ISIS" BS to this discussion, he was fighting ISIS because they're a threat to Iranian power within the region and that's the only reason. This guy reported directly to the top of Iranian leadership, he had no civilian overseer's, so his actions were the desires of the very top aka an Islamic Fundamentalist regime that just today defended their executions of LBGTQ people. It's pretty simple, don't plan and lead attacks on U.S. embassies (an act of war) and don't die. All this obfuscation about how it could have been other entities is BS, they had this guy pegged 24/7 and have for years, he thought he was untouchable. He wasn't in Iraq to be a diplomat, he was in Iraq to plan other attacks with Iranian backed factions.
The other real pickle here for LibBots, is that on one hand your legion of whackjobs will lose your freaking minds when you understand that if the U.S. really does pull out of Iraq that helps both Iran and . . . . The Russians, and remember, the majority of whackjob LibBot Nations hates Russia now (because OrangeMan Bad). So, it's either the secret longing to get the U.S. out of the Middle East or NOT helping those got damn Russians (because OrangeMan Bad). :lol:
-
why should we care why he was fighting ISIS? the point is he was beating the crap out of them.
-
https://twitter.com/irannewspaper/status/1214043509247877120
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Adorable :lol:
-
johnson has always been a giant eff off.
80 million is simultaneously very tempting and way too low.
80 million is essentially 80 billion wherever you'd have to live to avoid jail.
-
https://twitter.com/mowzdef/status/1213947279645847554
It really is one of our greatest strengths, and I’m not even joking.
Wut? There's roughly 20% of American adults who would crawl over a mile of broken glass to toss trumps salad. We might not like it, but he's a hero that elicits irrational idolatry.
-
johnson has always been a giant eff off.
80 million is simultaneously very tempting and way too low.
80 million is essentially 80 billion wherever you'd have to live to avoid jail.
It would really only be appealing if you were already terminally ill or something. Sort of a Walter White scenario.
-
https://twitter.com/KFILE/status/1214281536817782785
-
Shot, chaser
https://twitter.com/frankluntz/status/1214280189196132352
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
https://twitter.com/mowzdef/status/1213947279645847554
It really is one of our greatest strengths, and I’m not even joking.
Wut? There's roughly 20% of American adults who would crawl over a mile of broken glass to toss trumps salad. We might not like it, but he's a hero that elicits irrational idolatry.
at least 40% maybe 45%
-
Shot, chaser
https://twitter.com/frankluntz/status/1214280189196132352
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Our President is getting posterized :frown:
-
https://twitter.com/amiraminimd/status/1213828930458804224
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Do people irl not know that Iran is not a free country or are we just ignoring this because stave posts ignorant crap all the time?
-
https://twitter.com/mowzdef/status/1213947279645847554
It really is one of our greatest strengths, and I’m not even joking.
Wut? There's roughly 20% of American adults who would crawl over a mile of broken glass to toss trumps salad. We might not like it, but he's a hero that elicits irrational idolatry.
To own the libs, at least.
You might be right, but after watching folks go from “haha Trump is a crazy idiot but it’s fun to watch” during the primary to hanging on his every word, I’m skeptical his following will last much longer than his presidency.
Still, my main thought was that we don’t really have that many targets here whose death would completely disrupt operations. I think the vast majority of Americans would rally around any death of a US official, though.
-
Good to see the perpetual war New NeoCons popping into this thread . . . didn't hear much from that group when their guy was pulling out of Iraq, but New NeoCon gonna New NeoCon because OrangeMan Bad.
-
lmao
https://twitter.com/halbritz/status/1214296869322579970
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Only the best.
-
Going to fascinating watching useful idiot LibBots turned New NeoCons who demanded that Bush leave Iraq in 2008 :curse: :curse: were :curse: :curse: when Bush vetoed the bill to leave Iraq. Then who were :excited: when Obama left Iraq, and then were :blank: when Obama went back into Iraq . . . try to spin the eventual withdrawal out of Iraq as some sort of "loss" because OrangeMan Bad.
-
Those people are going to be so owned
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
You are not an orange man bad guy are you stave?
-
I am amazed at dax's ability to have literally every single post, in every single subject be some version of a false equivalency or whataboutism.
-
I am amazed at dax's ability to have literally every single post, in every single subject be some version of a false equivalency or whataboutism.
It’s a gift.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
So dax has staked a 100% position that withdrawing from Iraq right now is a brilliant idea. Until Trump doesn't actually withdraw and dax has to then change to the position that staying engaged there is the right call.
-
I am constantly amazed that resident LibBots think every post I make is about them specifically.
I mean, we've got CNN out there now lamenting the fact that U.S. spent trillions to "remake" the middle east and now Trump may have done all that effort in with one drone strike. :lol: :lol:
Never mind all the slaughter before now . . . it's like all the people we've supposedly pissed off by bombing them into rubble just forgot about it, but oh man, that drone strike.
That's not a false equivalency that's the the reality of the whack jobs you people listen to.
-
I think there's some nuance to withdrawing and being kicked out.
You're gonna have to turn the "U.S. out of Iraq Now" sign around before you post that kind of stuff.
-
I think there's some nuance to withdrawing and being kicked out.
You're gonna have to turn the "U.S. out of Iraq Now" sign around before you post that kind of stuff.
I know this is getting hard for you to do...but not your best effort . Keep stiving! :thumbsup:
I thought it was pretty good, actually.
-
Note to LibDorks, this is an opinion piece.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/01/06/dont-believe-iranian-propaganda-about-mourning-soleimani/
-
https://twitter.com/KFILE/status/1214281536817782785
https://twitter.com/DrPaulGosar/status/1214286573669359618
-
Congressman Gossar sounds an awful lot like Dax...
-
shares fake photos, blames people for calling them fake, probably bitches about "fake news"
what an asshat
-
What a complete dipshit. He's probably the 1 out of 5 dentists who doesn't recommend Crest.
-
posting shopped photos you want people to think are real then flipping your lid when it gets called out is very maga.
-
https://twitter.com/mowzdef/status/1213947279645847554
https://twitter.com/jkass99/status/1214304991113924609
-
Congressman Gossar sounds an awful lot like Dax...
Nah man, but you’re trying.
D- for content, but always a solid B for effort.
-
Haha that guy really does sound like dax
-
https://twitter.com/Mustafa_salimb/status/1214583616778461185
-
https://twitter.com/juliaioffe/status/1214580250325213185
-
The propaganda led march to war is only beginning to intensify. It will only get more disgusting.
Today I see Fox News on tv screen at the YMCA. The super reads “(Intel) warns Iranian attack on Americans was imminent; days away”
-
Yeah, that attack that was all planned out totally would have happened if we hadn't killed this one man.
-
The really bad part is that Iran had never even thought about hitting the United States hard until now.
The 40 years of death to America, their build up of missiles, expansion of terror to other nearby countries, the emboldening of Hezbollah and Hamas etc. etc. was just a big put on, now they're super serious.
-
dax wants this war so bad he cant even stand up
-
If we would have killed Bin Laden on September 8, those planes wouldn't have been hijacked.
-
One drone strike and the New NeoCons jump straight to World War III . . . smdh, so bloodthirsty
-
Timely post as iran attacks one of our air bases
-
I was told there would be no war
-
So Iran attacks Americans yet again?
A real pickle for you guys. Torn between the desire to take out a Russian client state, and the strong urge to continue to cheer for Iran cus OrangeMan bad.
-
I don’t want a war with Iran.
-
dax I want us to thoroughly once and for all kick their ass. Why not?
-
I don’t want a war with Iran.
Iran wants no part of a real war with the US so you are good
-
dax I want us to thoroughly once and for all kick their ass. Why not?
It’s not worth it.
Let them just flail around. They’re trying to get the US to leave entirely. Albeit the US needs to reposition to our real ally countries, fight ISIS, keep Iran in check, but no new wars.
-
dax I want us to thoroughly once and for all kick their ass. Why not?
It’s not worth it.
Let them just flail around. They’re trying to get the US to leave entirely. Albeit the US needs to reposition to our real ally countries, fight ISIS, keep Iran in check, but no new wars.
Ok but you don't mind if Don bombs the bejeezus out of them if any of their bullshit kills Americans though right? I don't care if we ever step foot in Iran but I think its very important for them to know that we are not to be effed with.
-
https://twitter.com/ranjalaaldin/status/1214712464509689857
-
dax I want us to thoroughly once and for all kick their ass. Why not?
It’s not worth it.
Let them just flail around. They’re trying to get the US to leave entirely. Albeit the US needs to reposition to our real ally countries, fight ISIS, keep Iran in check, but no new wars.
Ok but you don't mind if Don bombs the bejeezus out of them if any of their bullshit kills Americans though right? I don't care if we ever step foot in Iran but I think its very important for them to know that we are not to be effed with.
It’s a pickle. But they’re flailing, also they hit places where their proxies are not located. They’re trying to intimidate our allies.
-
Dubai is like wtf?
https://twitter.com/aliarouzi/status/1214716105396228096
-
https://twitter.com/HotlineJosh/status/1214693426274480129
-
https://twitter.com/mattgertz/status/1214723175638024192
-
Question for my friend dax, who definitely answers questions in a straightforward manner, how are you hoping trump responds? How do you think he'll respond (if different)?
-
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1214739853025394693
Nobody freak out!
-
That was a pretty measured tweet on the trump scale. I wonder if Pence started having the White House chef slip some Xanax in his food.
-
lmao, Dax is a rough ridin' idiot :frown:
-
So Trump takes out the #2 man in Iran, and iran shoots air-missiles into Iraq and kills nobody. :lol:
-
Not a good look cat 27 on the word choice there.
-
https://twitter.com/spectatorindex/status/1214757806777044994
-
https://twitter.com/HotlineJosh/status/1214693426274480129
Btw, DC basically shut down this afternoon for what amounted to snow flurries and some rain. Never dropped below 37 while it was precipitating.
-
Very good if there are no American casualties, hopefully trump takes the out.
-
Very good if there are no American casualties, hopefully trump takes the out.
I think he will (for now). Very pragmatic, measured response from Iran, iyam (for now).
-
Very good if there are no American casualties, hopefully trump takes the out.
I think he will (for now). Very pragmatic, measured response from Iran, iyam (for now).
They appear to be willing to play the long game and wait until we elect another bitch as President to test us.
-
lmao, Dax is a rough ridin' idiot :frown:
Waks, all rage all the time.
Hopefully Trump doesn’t try to Failed State Iran like your guy did to Libya and tried to do to Syria, and helped do in Yemen.
-
Question for my friend dax, who definitely answers questions in a straightforward manner, how are you hoping trump responds? How do you think he'll respond (if different)?
You can’t read this thread?
-
lmao, Dax is a rough ridin' idiot :frown:
Waks, all rage all the time.
Hopefully Trump doesn’t try to Failed State Iran like your guy did to Libya and tried to do to Syria, and helped do in Yemen.
Wouldn't hold my breath, homie.
-
Agree with Spracs. This is ultimately a great time for everyone to hit pause. Let Iran say they got us back. Maybe Fox or someone points out they suck at missles and missed anything we give a crap about and Trump just stays quiet so as to not require IRan to try and save face.
-
Trump is so uninterested in giving this statement and keeps running out of breath.
-
Well it's probably from the sedatives. Sedated Trump is the most boring version of Trump but it was absolutely necessary for today.
-
Glad to hear we have hyprasonic weapons now. So much better than hypersonic.
-
I can't imagine how much money I would have to make to be one of those sorry bastards that have to stand behind and pretend to be listening with great interest and respect. Barf.
-
The 3 second pause before any multisyllabic word is pretty :frown: (teleprompter :curse:)
-
Why are you dorks not listening to sports radio right now? The Chiefs host a Divisional Game this week, fellas. :love:
-
Not enough ah's, uh's and stammering for me .
-
I care about not going to war with Iran more than sports. Kind of a bigger deal. Especially when you have an idiot driving the bus.
-
Well lucky for you dax there was plenty of deep nose breaths and mispronunciations so it wasn't a total loss.
-
Also the added drama of whether or not his dentures were gonna fly out of his mouth.
-
No offense 420seriouscat69, my irl friend, but sports talk radio is for poindexters
-
:thumbs: :D I just want to win playoff tickets again.
-
No offense 420seriouscat69, my irl friend, but sports talk radio is for poindexters
What does Nate say about the matchup though?
-
heard he was panting like an overweight
-
No offense 420seriouscat69, my irl friend, but sports talk radio is for poindexters
What does Nate say about the matchup though?
Apparently his son has a soccer game or something during the game and they were trying to see how they could get through the game, without knowing what was going on and watching it later. Like a bunch of doofuses wouldn't be ear holing him about the game there. :rolleyes:
-
Unwinnable situation for Nate. T&Ps
-
Man, sorry this isn’t going the way you want New NeoCons.
Negotiations, de-escalation.
I know after years of marching in lockstep with a regime that collectively killed, injured and refugee’d millions on two continents while appeasing those that also terrorized nations across the ME. This is unchartered territory.
-
I'll give Trump credit, he could have easily said Iran's actions last night were unacceptable and began full scale bombing while having the full support of his base. But it appears he's going to accept Iran's attack for what it was, a symbolic gesture with no intent.
Now he's taken out a very important enemy in Soleimani without any harm to the US. It might be Trump's best moment as president.
-
Not enough ah's, uh's and stammering for me .
This is my absolute favorite talking point from you. It completely exposes you for the shill that you are.
-
I'll give Trump credit, he could have easily said Iran's actions last night were unacceptable and began full scale bombing while having the full support of his base. But it appears he's going to accept Iran's attack for what it was, a symbolic gesture with no intent.
Now he's taken out a very important enemy in Soleimani without any harm to the US. It might be Trump's best moment as president.
Completely agree if the escalation stops here (I'm still very skeptical). Still, Iran no longer limiting their uranium enrichment and the US basically ceding all of our influence to Iran in Iraq is a negative.
-
I'll give Trump credit, he could have easily said Iran's actions last night were unacceptable and began full scale bombing while having the full support of his base. But it appears he's going to accept Iran's attack for what it was, a symbolic gesture with no intent.
Now he's taken out a very important enemy in Soleimani without any harm to the US. It might be Trump's best moment as president.
I think this will rank right up there with the de-nuclearization of N. Korea and openness to legalize marijuana as among Trump’s greatest achievements.
-
Not enough ah's, uh's and stammering for me .
This is my absolute favorite talking point from you. It completely exposes you for the shill that you are.
This "talking point" is employed for a specific purpose and dare I say . . . mission accomplished (banner on command deck unfurled)
-
I'll give Trump credit, he could have easily said Iran's actions last night were unacceptable and began full scale bombing while having the full support of his base. But it appears he's going to accept Iran's attack for what it was, a symbolic gesture with no intent.
Now he's taken out a very important enemy in Soleimani without any harm to the US. It might be Trump's best moment as president.
Actually agree. This worked about as well as it could have if you want that dude dead.
Now, if he keeps mocking Iran they may go crazy but for right now, well done Trump.
-
Appears the world has figured out to just ignore what our president says.
-
Appears the world has figured out to just ignore what our president says.
thank god
-
I'll give Trump credit, he could have easily said Iran's actions last night were unacceptable and began full scale bombing while having the full support of his base. But it appears he's going to accept Iran's attack for what it was, a symbolic gesture with no intent.
Now he's taken out a very important enemy in Soleimani without any harm to the US. It might be Trump's best moment as president.
Completely agree if the escalation stops here (I'm still very skeptical). Still, Iran no longer limiting their uranium enrichment and the US basically ceding all of our influence to Iran in Iraq is a negative.
Yea, still curious how the US goes about Iraq now, they voted for the US to go, so what is that going to look like?
I would bet they quickly vote for us to stay. The vacuum of US withdrawal would throw their crap back into the fire. Also, they like our $$
-
Sorry World War III didn't happen guys. :frown:
-
I am glad that this looks like it is over.
-
Sorry World War III didn't happen guys. :frown:
Let's out those fuckers on gE who wanted WWIII! You and me, Karate Kid style.
You, a very confused Mr. Myagi who knows absolutely zero karate
me a more buff, blue-eyed Daniel LaRusso who crane kicks all the WWIII lovers
-
https://twitter.com/ThePlumLineGS/status/1128607664722841602
-
wtf
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/141604554855825408
goddam that is chilling
-
This is where burning up 3 years of your adminstration with lies and no discernable strategy comes back to bite you when you need the public to believe why you made this move.
this was a good one
-
What exactly do you think you've quoted there?
-
I'm really enjoying the "no discernible strategy" talking point relative to what we experienced between 2001 and 2016.
-
Maybe he is trying to rescue dax by saying there were people cheeering for WWIII? Wait, none of those quoted posts are even close. They are actually the opposite.
eff, I don't know?
-
What exactly do you think you've quoted there?
fun posts from this thread that look even dumber today than the day they were made.
-
Maybe he is trying to rescue dax by saying there were people cheeering for WWIII? Wait, none of those quoted posts are even close. They are actually the opposite.
eff, I don't know?
Yeah I know that's what he was trying to do but failed badly and just wanted him to explain it so the rest of us can laugh.
-
:lol:
-
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/141604554855825408
goddam that is chilling
LOL at any total idiot who wrongly predicted a sitting president would go to war with Iran to win re-election. Can you imagine how mushy their pudding brain must be?
-
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/141604554855825408
goddam that is chilling
LOL at any total idiot who wrongly predicted a sitting president would go to war with Iran to win re-election. Can you imagine how mushy their pudding brain must be?
Yea, strange victory lap to take.
So the net change from two weeks ago is an Iranian General is dead and Iran announced expediting their Nuclear Program. Another strange victory lap for the Trumpers but you have to take what you can get with this guy.
-
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/141604554855825408
goddam that is chilling
LOL at any total idiot who wrongly predicted a sitting president would go to war with Iran to win re-election. Can you imagine how mushy their pudding brain must be?
Trump tried but chickened out (thankfully).
-
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/141604554855825408
goddam that is chilling
LOL at any total idiot who wrongly predicted a sitting president would go to war with Iran to win re-election. Can you imagine how mushy their pudding brain must be?
Yea, strange victory lap to take.
So the net change from two weeks ago is an Iranian General is dead and Iran announced expediting their Nuclear Program. Another strange victory lap for the Trumpers but you have to take what you can get with this guy.
Also we are leaving Iraq unless we change our minds.
-
I appreciate that these guys point out that Trump has been super dumb for a super long time
-
https://twitter.com/ndrew_lawrence/status/1215023947370110976?s=21
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Just another never trump libderp opinion
-
I say more failed states should be the goal.
Imagine the feeling of power knowing that you could burn whole nations to the ground and LibBot jackboot nation would still think you’re awesome and support you 1000%.
You guys are missing that feeling, don’t lie to yourself or the rest of us.
In that regard, why wouldn’t someone observing Obama make that superficial observation? Where Trump was dumb, was not understanding Barry’s deep affinity for the despotic totalitarian theocratic Iranian regime.
Barry never met a secular leaning regime and/or a secular democracy he didn’t hate, and it was quite obvious.
-
Hell of a performance by Mike Lee. Nomination worthy.
-
https://twitter.com/rachelnpr/status/1215249060522754048
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Lol. Based on Rubio's track record, I find it incredibly easy to imagine.
-
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20200109/a382deed7335c82cb60994329de5693a.jpg)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
I wouldn't tell that merry band of leakers anything.
-
Nobody:
Dax: LIBYA IS A FAILED STATE!
-
Libya isn’t a failed state?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
lmao
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Dax dropping truth bombs in here and y’all lib bots are too scared to engage.
-
I wouldn't tell that merry band of leakers anything.
is that a pee joke? :lol:
-
https://twitter.com/Roman_012/status/1215335999997448195?s=20
-
Yeah they def blasted that sob
-
Yeah they def blasted that sob
for shure
-
:sdeek:
https://twitter.com/CMSeeberger/status/1215646456637480962
-
probably an accident. didn't we accidentally do the same thing in like 1982 or something?
-
probably an accident. didn't we accidentally do the same thing in like 1982 or something?
over LIS I think. that plane ended up in the drink
-
1988
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_Air_Flight_655 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_Air_Flight_655)
-
Russia has a habit of shooting down commercial flights as well
-
Will be interesting to see how this plays out politically in Iran.
Iranian leadership needed something to rally around and Solemani's death seemed to provide that
the military response also allowed them to shoe they wouldn't back down domestically (even if it was a hoolow move)
this accidental? downing of the plane seems to undercut much of that inertia
-
https://twitter.com/shaneharris/status/1215686315922087936
-
WELP!
https://twitter.com/ryanafournier/status/1215761524498870273?s=21
-
Point me to where Omar said that?
-
also, wacky, I know nothing about this person but I can say for 100% certain you would be better off blocking them
(https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1171465484450947076/0RgZ2Kac_400x400.jpg)
-
lmao
-
Wannabe Jacob Wohl
-
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20200111/4f8916d56f4865f79499a86cebd2047e.jpg)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
also, wacky, I know nothing about this person but I can say for 100% certain you would be better off blocking them
(https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1171465484450947076/0RgZ2Kac_400x400.jpg)
:lol: It got bumped on my TL. :dunno: You know how following rural cats goes.
-
I thought “the Mar-a-Lago” was a typo but nope he said it like that twice
-
WELP!
https://twitter.com/ryanafournier/status/1215761524498870273?s=21
Come on wacky, Jesus Christ man, don't let yourself be played like that. I imagine you have more pride than to let these people lie to you like that.
-
Glad you're no longer posting Mike Cernovich, Wacks.
-
WELP!
https://twitter.com/ryanafournier/status/1215761524498870273?s=21
I reported this tweet, I'm sure it won't be taken down. This crap is a very serious issue with social media. It's not outside of the realm of possibility some rough ridin' wacko sees this and tries to kill her or some other unsuspecting Muslim. How does twitter allow this, how is it even legal, he's clearly endangering people by doing this.
-
WELP!
https://twitter.com/ryanafournier/status/1215761524498870273?s=21
I reported this tweet, I'm sure it won't be taken down. This crap is a very serious issue with social media. It's not outside of the realm of possibility some rough ridin' wacko sees this and tries to kill her or some other unsuspecting Muslim. How does twitter allow this, how is it even legal, he's clearly endangering people by doing this.
Let me tell ya about the 2016 election. :lol:
-
WELP!
https://twitter.com/ryanafournier/status/1215761524498870273?s=21
I reported this tweet, I'm sure it won't be taken down. This crap is a very serious issue with social media. It's not outside of the realm of possibility some rough ridin' wacko sees this and tries to kill her or some other unsuspecting Muslim. How does twitter allow this, how is it even legal, he's clearly endangering people by doing this.
Let me tell ya about the 2016 election. :lol:
I'm sure it's because I'm desensitized but I can't remember Trump literally putting someone's name in a tweet telling a lie that big. It's like that guy is literally attempting to get that woman killed, what else is he hoping to accomplish with that whopper of a lie?
-
WELP!
https://twitter.com/ryanafournier/status/1215761524498870273?s=21
I reported this tweet, I'm sure it won't be taken down. This crap is a very serious issue with social media. It's not outside of the realm of possibility some rough ridin' wacko sees this and tries to kill her or some other unsuspecting Muslim. How does twitter allow this, how is it even legal, he's clearly endangering people by doing this.
Let me tell ya about the 2016 election.
I'm sure it's because I'm desensitized but I can't remember Trump literally putting someone's name in a tweet telling a lie that big. It's like that guy is literally attempting to get that woman killed, what else is he hoping to accomplish with that whopper of a lie?
There are a lot of wackycats out there
-
:lol:
-
:lol:
-
Glad you're no longer posting Mike Cernovich, Wacks.
Who’s that?
-
What we already knew.
https://twitter.com/gtconway3d/status/1215993213032550401
-
I'm sure this will be a piece of cake for them.
https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1215981685914918912
-
I guess it wasn't a huge rough ridin' coincidence, after all.
https://twitter.com/Khaaasteh/status/1215944459826925570
-
:lol:
:lol:
this gives me a sad.
-
Jfc am I sad for these 2 or is this funny?
-
:confused:
-
:lol:
:lol:
this gives me a sad.
Someone please translate this for me.
-
I think he is disappointed that you and Dax just laughed at falling for an obvious fake troll job
-
Lol. Reading is hard.
-
So is comprehension
-
The biggest casualty of 2016 is gE Dickstone. RIP old, long, lost, friend. You use to be so much fun. :frown:
-
This is actually the most fun I’ve ever had in the pit
-
Constantly bitching about nothing?
-
Constantly bitching about nothing?
Lol’ing at Trumpers. Check all the lols in the wacks facts thread
-
You think everyone is a trumper who doesn’t bleed 1000 Miles away from the right. You’ve clogged up the term MAGA. Everyone is MAGA to you who doesn’t puppet today’s social media/media takes. It’s sad.
-
Nobody called you a maga; everyone is laughing at you for the tweet you just posted
-
Nobody called you a maga; everyone is laughing at you for the tweet you just posted
Comprehension
-
Libs get 100% of their political content from twitter, yet I’m the doofus. :lol:
-
I’m an independent and I get my news from lots of places outside of twitter.
-
Spoiler alert, bud. You’re not an Independent.
-
(https://media2.giphy.com/media/TL6poLzwbHuF2/giphy.gif)
-
ugh
-
I don't know how people who call themselves moderate or even republican can stand up and support this abortion of a president. I really try and understand I just can't figure it out.
-
I don't know how people who call themselves moderate or even republican can stand up and support this abortion of a president. I really try and understand I just can't figure it out.
Owning the libs is and always has been the only reason
-
I don't know how people who call themselves moderate or even republican can stand up and support this abortion of a president. I really try and understand I just can't figure it out.
Owning the libs is and always has been the only reason
so weird.
-
Please point to those moderates who are. I’d love to laugh at them in the face with you guys as well.
-
Also, lol at the “anything to own the libs” take, as libs are currently worshipping the country of Iran, BECAUSE TRUMP! :curse:
-
Also, lol at the “anything to own the libs” take, as libs are currently worshipping the country of Iran, BECAUSE TRUMP! :curse:
Wacky, please point to the post so we can laugh at them together.
-
Please point to those moderates who are. I’d love to laugh at them in the face with you guys as well.
who are what?
-
Twitter.com
-
The moderates who are Twitter.com
-
sad thread
-
Also, lol at the “anything to own the libs” take, as libs are currently worshipping the country of Iran, BECAUSE TRUMP! :curse:
:Ugh:
:buh-bye:
-
https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1216356280933273600?s=21
-
https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1216356280933273600?s=21
Meanwhile
* US reporters are enemies of the people
* Protests here end in death and there are fine people on both sides
* "Lock her up"
* “We have to talk to them about, maybe in certain areas, closing that internet up in some ways. Somebody will say, 'Oh freedom of speech, freedom of speech.' These are foolish people."
* Net neutrality eliminated
* https://www.cnn.com/2019/08/09/tech/white-house-social-media-executive-order-fcc-ftc/index.html
-
Libs get 100% of their political content from twitter, yet I’m the doofus. :lol:
False. I also get my political content from John Oliver.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Spoiler alert, bud. You’re not an Independent.
You're both wrong. I'm a super lib but I'm an independent. eff the Democrat party. I'm a Democrat for one month every other February.
-
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/judge-andrew-napolitano-deception-soleimani
MSM :shakesfist:
-
The most hilarious thing is that LibDerps are bitching about a president who for the most part spends like a drunk sailor on leave, and who hasn’t gotten the US in any new wars or sought a single regime change by military force. Catch and release is as strong as ever etc etc.
I guess they can’t wait to get one of their own in there so they can get back into the regime change business and repeatedly standing down to Vlad Putin while deporting millions.
-
"Standing down to Putin." lol. Have some awareness dax.
-
"Standing down to Putin." lol. Have some awareness dax.
Where are we standing down. We’re at all time post Cold War low and a new arms race.
President Stand Down got windmilled on repeatedly while cutting defense.
-
"Standing down to Putin." lol. Have some awareness dax.
Where are we standing down. We’re at all time post Cold War low and a new arms race.
President Stand Down got windmilled on repeatedly while cutting defense.
how so?
-
https://twitter.com/gtconway3d/status/1217981197617389568
-
Bro
-
"Standing down to Putin." lol. Have some awareness dax.
Where are we standing down. We’re at all time post Cold War low and a new arms race.
President Stand Down got windmilled on repeatedly while cutting defense.
how so?
Welp, for starters there’s a new arms race, sorry you’re missing the billions being spent. New strategic bombers, hypersonic missiles, ballistic missiles, I mean a real jizzfest for the weapons lover in every family.
Confrontations between vessels on sea and land on the increase. The US has pretty much sanctioned every Russian client state of note, and Angie Merkel and Vlad’s pipeline.
NATO expansion, come on in everybody. Huge military bases being discussed for Poland, Poland buying crap tons of US weapons.
Weaponization of space. End of START
-
https://twitter.com/gtconway3d/status/1217981197617389568
Be honest here folks, who just learned that casualties does not mean deaths? I just did.
-
https://twitter.com/gtconway3d/status/1217981197617389568
Be honest here folks, who just learned that casualties does not mean deaths? I just did.
Have you ever heard of ken burns
-
The term isn’t new to me, but George May still be taking liberties with it since the linked story said they were being treated for concussion like symptoms and were evacuated out of an abundance of caution (sounds like to hopefully rule out TBI).
-
Yes definitely should have let the American people know we had some military personnel in the concussion protocol.
-
https://twitter.com/gtconway3d/status/1217981197617389568
Be honest here folks, who just learned that casualties does not mean deaths? I just did.
Have you ever heard of ken burns
Do I need to watch his baseball series?
-
https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/1221216696108769281
-
https://twitter.com/gtconway3d/status/1217981197617389568
Be honest here folks, who just learned that casualties does not mean deaths? I just did.
Have you ever heard of ken burns
Do I need to watch his baseball series?
I assume he meant either the Civil war or Vietnam series. That said, I checked out from the library and watched all of the baseball series when I was in ~5th grade
-
https://twitter.com/hockeyrobthough/status/1221537777667493890
-
https://twitter.com/LizSly/status/1237867987446534146
-
:bwpopcorn:
-
I even checked OANN to see what the eff you were talking about. I better head over to the epoch times next.
-
I even checked OANN to see what the eff you were talking about. I better head over to the epoch times next.
Well, there's always the NYT's where they're so non partisan and so "just the news" they can't even handle an editorial by a Republican Senator.
Here ya go dummy . . . some of the initial reports were it was an IAF strike
https://twitter.com/HeshmatAlavi/status/1276260741797085185?s=20
https://twitter.com/HeshmatAlavi/status/1276265089570680832?s=20
https://twitter.com/rafsanchez/status/1276269818606424065?s=20
-
@sonofdaxjones
https://twitter.com/i/events/1278079144329265157
-
@sonofdaxjones
https://twitter.com/i/events/1278079144329265157
https://twitter.com/NegarMortazavi/status/1278025460409143297?s=19
Sent from my moto g power using Tapatalk
-
“Initial reports”.
-
(https://media2.giphy.com/media/pfHBWCCOySoRq/giphy.gif)
-
Who is arguing?
Da Big Sociopath: Dumbest poster on the board
Oh just moving the goalposts, derp (Da Big Sociopath)
-
Da big Derp
-
6/25 vs 6/30
Calendar's are hard.
-
6/25 vs 6/30
Calendar's are hard.
I don't care about what you guys are arguing about but I have to ask...do you subconsciously misuse apostrophes constantly or do you have some weird belief that everyone is using them wrong and you are using them correctly? I know it's a weird hang-up for me to have but I HAVE TO KNOW!
-
6/25 vs 6/30
Calendar's are hard.
I don't care about what you guys are arguing about but I have to ask...do you subconsciously misuse apostrophes constantly or do you have some weird belief that everyone is using them wrong and you are using them correctly? I know it's a weird hang-up for me to have but I HAVE TO KNOW!
:curse: :curse: :curse:
-
One side says . . .
https://www.timesofisrael.com/report-israeli-cyberattack-caused-iran-nuclear-site-fire-f35s-hit-missile-base/
-
6/25 vs 6/30
Calendar's are hard.
I don't care about what you guys are arguing about but I have to ask...do you subconsciously misuse apostrophes constantly or do you have some weird belief that everyone is using them wrong and you are using them correctly? I know it's a weird hang-up for me to have but I HAVE TO KNOW!
:curse: :curse: :curse:
No explanation other than a poor grasp of the English language? :frown:
-
6/25 vs 6/30
Calendar's are hard.
I don't care about what you guys are arguing about but I have to ask...do you subconsciously misuse apostrophes constantly or do you have some weird belief that everyone is using them wrong and you are using them correctly? I know it's a weird hang-up for me to have but I HAVE TO KNOW!
:curse: :curse: :curse:
No explanation other than a poor grasp of the English language? :frown:
Extremely low self esteem on display right here.
:frown:
-
Just tell me when to head to the bunker Dax , TIA.
-
Just tell me when to head to the bunker Dax , TIA.
You'll have to decide for yourself WW.
-
6/25 vs 6/30
Calendar's are hard.
I don't care about what you guys are arguing about but I have to ask...do you subconsciously misuse apostrophes constantly or do you have some weird belief that everyone is using them wrong and you are using them correctly? I know it's a weird hang-up for me to have but I HAVE TO KNOW!
:curse: :curse: :curse:
No explanation other than a poor grasp of the English language? :frown:
Extremely low self esteem on display right here.
:frown:
:lol: :lol: :lol: Sorry, I forgot I was talking to "Super Cool Dax" who is "on Twitter" :lol: :lol: :lol:
-
:lol:
-
:lol:
(https://media1.tenor.com/images/9c336118d4c9909008e57c9d5018bff5/tenor.gif?itemid=5224561)
-
Tweets like this by the dozens today
https://twitter.com/mimoj1/status/1281612263829516288?s=20
-
How far will they go before Trump leaves office?
https://www.businessinsider.com/israel-hoping-iran-confrontation-before-november-election-sources-2020-7
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/security-officials-worry-israel-and-saudi-arabia-may-see-the-end-of-trump-as-their-last-chance-to-go-to-war-with-iran/ar-BB1b68rX
-
July?
-
One is current. One shows attacks were already happening. Try to keep up dax.
Sent from my moto g power using Tapatalk
-
One is current. One shows attacks were already happening. Try to keep up dax.
Sent from my moto g power using Tapatalk
The attacks that already happened are ancient news at this point.
Speaking of keeping up
-
Back to ignore button
Sent from my moto g power using Tapatalk
-
Back to ignore button
Sent from my moto g power using Tapatalk
:lol: :lol:
-
Fire it up!
https://twitter.com/NatashaBertrand/status/1409287179273113601?s=19
Sent from my moto g power using Tapatalk
-
Meh
-
https://twitter.com/IlhanMN/status/1409361044032704515
-
https://twitter.com/dandepetris/status/1409321072474963968?s=21
-
The Iranian proxies have vowed revenge, but I'm still breathing easy because the MSM has not declared that World War III is imminent and Nancy Pelosi has not threatened to launch Congressional hearings on the bombings.
Those are our bombs now (and once again) . . . ProgFascist Nation
-
https://twitter.com/dandepetris/status/1409321072474963968?s=21
First, of all, were these guys uniformed members of a nation state's military conducting/leading military operations against U.S. personnel, U.S. interests and U.S. partner government(s) from inside the borders of a sovereign nation, Yes or No?
Once you admit that these guys were conducting a war against the United States and its partners we can go on from there.
-
https://twitter.com/dandepetris/status/1409321072474963968?s=21
First, of all, were these guys uniformed members of a nation state's military conducting/leading military operations against U.S. personnel, U.S. interests and U.S. partner government(s) from inside the borders of a sovereign nation, Yes or No?
Once you admit that these guys were conducting a war against the United States and its partners we can go on from there.
Are you talking to me or Daniel DePetris?
Regardless, you've once again missed the point entirely. Which is no surprise.
-
The Iranian government has been leading chants of Death to America for 4 decades, but now everyone is all angst laden and upset.
Iran is a Russian client state that has been exporting terrorism all across the Middle East. I would have thought the GOP would be overjoyed.
SAD!
-
First Lick doesn't understand the Tweet, no surprise there.
Then goes off on a rage fest while forgetting it was his fellow ProgFascists and enabling media who had a total meltdown and predicted immediate and definitive Armageddon because Trump put a little smart bomb into one car.
I don't recall saying anything about Republicans being upset. Just pointing that, to no one's surprise, ProgFacist Nation is now fully onboard with bombing the crap out of people (and/or were fully on board with bombing the crap out of anyone Trump was trying to establish relations with)
-
All of these people chiming in now saying that killing these guys is unwise are essentially admitting that they were (apparently) perfectly fine with allowing Iran to, in all matter of speaking, station proxy troops in another country so that they could plan and carry out attacks against the U.S. coalition and U.S. personal. . .
they are either categorically insane or utterly inept, if not both.
But they should have tried to capture these guys first, before trying to kill him...
-
That’s all well and good and thank you for your usual Captain Obvious statements.
But the Tweet I posted outlined how mumped up the situation is. Sorry you are confused . . . again
-
GOP: Oh my lawd (clutches pearls) he’s just shooting from the hip.
Numerous stories: Planning for various options against Iran underway for months.
GOP: Only we can take out terrorists
-
What you're essentially proposing is that the U.S. just stand by and allow these guys to continue to attack Americans and the U.S. continue to do nothing. Don't bring the "they were fighting ISIS" BS to this discussion, they were fighting ISIS because they're a threat to Iranian power within the region and that's the only reason. These guys reportedly took direction straight from Iranian leadership, they had no civilian overseer's, so their actions were the desires of the very top aka an Islamic Fundamentalist regime that recently defended their executions of LBGTQ people. It's pretty simple, don't plan and lead attacks on U.S. assets (an act of war) and don't die.
-
That’s not at all what the Tweet I posted was about.
But thanks again for nailing the obvious.
-
I am constantly amazed that Dax think every post I make is about they/them specifically.
I mean, we've got FOX out there now lamenting the fact that we are taking an aggressive stance towards Iranian militias.
-
One drone strike and Dax jumps straight to World War III talk. . .
so bloodthirsty
-
Just a sad series of tapouts now.
#frown
-
I am constantly amazed that Dax think every post I make is about they/them specifically.
I mean, we've got FOX out there now lamenting the fact that we are taking an aggressive stance towards Iranian militias.
Link?
Just sad to see those that totally melted down when the previous President took on the Iranian threat across the board.
While supporting the cuck who thinks that dropping a few bombs on some guys in the middle of the desert is going to deflect from his total presenting to the Iranian regime.
-
Lol that reminded me that dax fully supported when trump face missiled that Iran general.
That was a republican president tho so it's different.
-
Shockingly (not really) ProgFascist.7 is way way behind
-
SS7 it's futile to talk with someone who clearly believes the U.S. should have done nothing (because a Dem is in office) and just allowed these guys and Iran to literally operate against U.S. interests from right inside Iraq.
-
Yes. That’s what I believe.
#lol
Helluva meltdown, lick
Just sad to think that Licks of the world fought Don Trump every step of the way on Iran.
Now he’s all horned up over a few clay buildings in the sand.
#sad
-
Shockingly (not really) ProgFascist.7 is way way behind
#daxflection
-
Unfortunately some people just can’t keep up.
-
Weird but not unexpected responses.
-
Hate to see Joe deflecting so hard that he sends a couple of billion dollars worth of jets to bomb a wide spot in the road.
Anything to get the ProgFascists chubbed up I suppose
-
https://twitter.com/dandepetris/status/1409321072474963968?s=21
The idiot takes that Iran and Iraq are one in the same are quite humorous.
BTW, I don't war.
-
Man. Simply no clue at all.
Sad
-
None thinking Daxbots need not respond.
Drone strikes are great . . . as long as a Pub is president
-
That really wasn’t what the tweet was about at all.
Man, this is bad Lick, sorry man
-
The most hilarious thing is that Pubs are bitching about a president who for the most part spends like a drunk sailor on leave, and who hasn’t gotten the US in any new wars or sought a single regime change by military force. Catch and release is as strong as ever etc etc.
I guess they can’t wait to get one of their own in there so they can get back into the regime change business and repeatedly standing down to Vlad Putin while deporting millions.
-
Quit copying my posts.
Lick the unoriginal poster: On Brand
-
Actually every post I posted here was one of your posts from this thread.
-
But I agree.
your posts do suck
-
Admitting that you're wholly unoriginal and unable to think for yourself is an extremely solid first couple of steps Lick. I will :pray: :pray: to the FSM for your continued growth and for our beloved university, in hopes that it doesn't get its accreditation pulled.
Join me in :pray: :pray:
-
I think my favorite aspect of this exercise is that even you rarely accept your own logic.
-
I think my favorite aspect of this exercise is that even you rarely accept your own logic.
What logic might that be?
(Can’t wait)
-
lol
-
Lol
-
A pickle.
Joe’s gets the ProgFascists all horned up by bombing some huts in the desert while contemplating lifting sanctions on the Ayatollah.
-
Not really a pickle at all.
Everything I posted yesterday were your posts to defend the Soleimani strike.
If you think these words of those of a guy all "horned up" about bombings then that is on you...
-
:lol: I've never denied defending that strike, dummy.
Your political movement had a total meltdown and your go to media and enablers in Congress ran around claiming that World War III was imminent and Nancy Pelosi was ranting and raving about war powers and needing Congressional hearings, and trying to pass all kinds of legislation to stop that got damn Trump who was going to destroy us all. :runaway: :runaway: (later your movement enjoined at the hip with the NeoCons to stop Trump from getting out of Afghanistan and from removing a small fraction of troops from Germany, and moving some of them even closer to Russia).
Now this has been declared a "good bombing" by the ProgFacist Movement
Goodness
-
Honestly this is my favorite exchange you had with yourself!
https://twitter.com/dandepetris/status/1409321072474963968?s=21
The idiot takes that Iran and Iraq are one in the same are quite humorous.
BTW, I don't war.
Man. Simply no clue at all.
Sad
-
I'm sorry that you don't understand that the Shia Militia are considered a part of the Iraqi Security Forces and that now the U.S. is apparently both training the Shia Militia via training the Iraqi security forces and bombing the Shia militia.
Some people are confused by these things.
-
was this statement true in January of 2020?
-
was this statement true in January of 2020?
Probably!
-
it was!
-
was this statement true in January of 2020?
Iranian General = Shia Militia considered part of Iraqi Security forces (Lick)
Again, sorry you’re confused again
-
So shia militias haven't been part of Iraqi security forces since at least 2014?
Wasn't Soleimani in Iraq coordinating efforts of these very same Shia Militias?
-
The idiot takes that Iran and Iraq are one in the same are quite humorous.
BTW, I don't war.
This is your post.
What has changed since May of 2019?
I am not even arguing either side but what is the logic behind posting this as fact in 2019 and thinking that a person who says this has "no clue at all" in 21?
-
Since you are arguing against yourself we will conduct this exercise using KU spring game rules, where we will count it as a win no matter which version of yourself you argue in favor of.
-
I took me a bit (shame on me) to realize that you were being your wholly unoriginal self and just posting things I said literally years ago now about an unrelated event.
So where do you stand Lick, are you for or against this latest bombing (very simple question)?
Why was your movement having a total meltdown in 2019 but now fully supporting Joe Biden in 2021?
BTW, I haven't said anything about where I stand, that's another thing that, and not unexpectedly, you don't seem to understand (as usual)
-
Yeesh, someone toss dax a pair of flip flops because it's starting to sound like he was for the war before he was against it (because a democrat is president)
-
Other people besides Lick are also easily confused :frown:
-
After spending an afternoon arguing against your own posts you have arrived at the conclusion that everyone else is confused...
:billdance:
-
Lick what exactly have I argued?
Pointing out the expected compliance with all things iPOTUS Joe as compared to the total meltdown about Trump is not an argument.
Goodness, this is just sad.
I am enjoying how you are trying to co-mingle two mutually exclusive events
-
Lick what exactly have I argued?
Pointing out the expected compliance with all things iPOTUS Joe as compared to the total meltdown about Trump is not an argument.
Goodness, this is just sad.
I am enjoying how you are trying to co-mingle two mutually exclusive events
What's sad is conflating Soleimani with some militia.
-
Lick what exactly have I argued?
Pointing out the expected compliance with all things iPOTUS Joe as compared to the total meltdown about Trump is not an argument.
Goodness, this is just sad.
I am enjoying how you are trying to co-mingle two mutually exclusive events
What's sad is conflating Soleimani with some militia.
We already know that you were part of the meltdown squad who was convinced that WWIII was imminent Bucket. No need to continue to point that out.
BTW, these "lowly" militia were (and still are) attacking American's.
-
so Biden got this right?
-
so Biden got this right?
I never said he didn't.
You've weirdly conjured up an argument out of mid-air, very on brand.
Sad to think you're so triggered by someone making fun of the Trump-Soleimani meltdown by your political movement.
-
Biden has Bloodthirsty warpig DAX all horned up
-
There isn't a U.S. fighter, bomber, or drone strike that a ProgFascist won't get behind (ProgFascist Presidents only)
-
Let me rephrase that then; Biden has self identified ProgFascist Bloodthirsty warpig DAX all horned up
-
StarSeed.7 aka ProgFascist.7 is in full deflection mode this morning. A little early in the day, but BAU comes early sometimes.
-
After spending an afternoon arguing against your own posts you have arrived at the conclusion that everyone else is confused...
:billdance:
increds
-
I'm here for the resident ProgFascists definition of arguing.
Sorry you guys are so touchy about how you completely melted down about Trump.