goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Jerome Tang Coaches Kansas State Basketball => Topic started by: Shooter Jones on April 02, 2019, 08:54:58 AM

Title: Blue Bloods
Post by: Shooter Jones on April 02, 2019, 08:54:58 AM
Another year down, so it's time to discuss who the blue bloods are again.

Obvious choices?
UCLA: 11 titles
Kentucky: 8 titles
North Carolina: 6 titles
Duke: 5 titles

On the edge?
Villanova: 3 titles, 2 in the last 5 years.
UCONN: 4 titles in the last 20 years.
Indiana: 5 titles, 0 in the last 25 years.

Not close, but could be taken seriously if they can win 1 or 2 titles soon:
Louisville: 3 nattys, 1 in the last 25 years.
Kansas: 3 nattys, 1 in the last 30 years.

Thoughts?
Title: Blue Bloods
Post by: 8manpick on April 02, 2019, 09:09:08 AM
Michigan State has been to 5 of the last 15 Final Fours, Duke has only been to 2. I think Sparty is in.
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: pissclams on April 02, 2019, 09:18:53 AM
i disagree.  playing to play in the national championship shouldn't qualify you as elite. 
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: HerrSonntag on April 02, 2019, 09:31:20 AM
i disagree.  playing to play in the national championship shouldn't qualify you as elite.
I disagree with your disagreeing

Sent from my LG-US998 using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: kslim on April 02, 2019, 09:56:00 AM
I dont think you can base this metric off of titles alone or you would have some random teams on this list, i think its more about consistently being in the running year in and year out. I mean San Fransisco, Oklahoma a&m, and Cincinnati have as many titles as KU but obviously you cant put them in the same argument. I would say the true 5 blue bloods are

Duke
Kentucky
Kansas
UCLA
North Carolina

HM
Indiana
Uconn
Villanova
Michigan State
Florida
Louisville (before the titles are vacated)
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: meow meow on April 02, 2019, 10:19:55 AM
in this thread, kslim makes a huge ass out of himself
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: WildcatNkilt on April 02, 2019, 10:59:34 AM
Redo the statistics to incorporate the last 30 years and lets see how it looks. 
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: kslim on April 02, 2019, 11:24:46 AM
Redo the statistics to incorporate the last 30 years and lets see how it looks.
top 5 are
duke with 5
UNC with 4
UK with 3
Uconn with 3
florida with 2

bunch of teams with 1
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: nicname on April 02, 2019, 12:55:49 PM
Bluest aka True Bluebloods and will always be bluebloods
Kansas
Kentucky
North Carolina

Duke: Currently =/> the top group but without the historical significance

UCLA/Indiana: historical significance, but current has beens

UCONN, L’Ville, Michigan St, Cuse, Ohio State, Michigan: a rung below for one reason or another
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: MakeItRain on April 02, 2019, 01:01:05 PM
LOL at UCLA
(https://media.tenor.com/images/4ebf022af3f110de48bcab7c642b08c1/tenor.gif)
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: Spracne on April 02, 2019, 01:24:22 PM
Redo the statistics to incorporate the last 30 years and lets see how it looks.
Interesting decision on that 30 years.
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: WildcatNkilt on April 02, 2019, 01:34:13 PM
Redo the statistics to incorporate the last 30 years and lets see how it looks.
Interesting decision on that 30 years.

My 30-year comment was random, but I now see your concern.  Lets to 40 years for Spracs. 
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: MakeItRain on April 02, 2019, 01:35:54 PM
Redo the statistics to incorporate the last 30 years and lets see how it looks.
Interesting decision on that 30 years.

Pretty transparent but really who gives a crap about 1988? When having discussions of this nature, anything beyond the current generation isn't particularly relevant.
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: meow meow on April 02, 2019, 01:36:31 PM
yes, nothing is more relevant than short shorts/no 3 point line era basketball
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: Spracne on April 02, 2019, 01:46:50 PM
Yeah, I'm not really trying to inject myself in the conversation, for obvious reasons. But I do join MIR's opinion regarding UCLA.
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: Brock Landers on April 02, 2019, 02:10:54 PM
Yeah you're both right about UCLA, they might as well have 1 title instead of 11 since most of the world's population has died of old age since the end of their 60's-70's run.
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: Shooter Jones on April 02, 2019, 03:31:23 PM
Kentucky only won 1 title over like a 30-some year stretch before being good off and on over the last 20 or so years.

UCLA only needs to win another one and they're the bluest of blues and it's not close. 2 and they're light years ahead of everyone. If Indiana can win 1 or 2 more, they're up there too.

Obviously their programs are in no position to do that, but the right coaching hire can make it happen quickly (appears neither will make the needed hire, though)

To me, there are currently 3 True Blue Bloods, I'll categorize the others.

True Blue: PEOPLE KNOW
Kentucky: 8 titles
North Carolina: 6 titles
Duke: 5 titles

Faded Blue: No recent success, need a resurrection
UCLA: 11 titles
Indiana: 5 titles

Sky Blue: Not enough historical or recent success, but you know they're there.
Louisville: 3 nattys, 1 in the last 25 years.
Kansas: 3 nattys, 1 in the last 30 years.
Michigan St: 2 nattys, going for 3rd this year.

Bright Blue: Mostly recent success, high school recruits see them.
Villanova: 3 titles, 2 in the last 4 years.
UCONN: 4 titles in the last 20 years.
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: Shooter Jones on April 02, 2019, 03:49:02 PM
I mean San Fransisco, Oklahoma a&m, and Cincinnati have as many titles as KU but obviously you cant put them in the same argument.

Well, for beginners, that's just not true at all. Those teams all have 2, and KU has 3.

But anyway, there have been what, over 80 tourney's now? Blue Blood means Elite, and teams with 3 or less tourney titles are not what I would consider Elite.

Even without recent success, UCLA has won over 13% of NCAA tourneys. That's crazy to think about.
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: 8manpick on April 02, 2019, 05:08:52 PM
Guys KU has 5 what are you talking about?
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: kslim on April 03, 2019, 07:42:21 AM
I mean San Fransisco, Oklahoma a&m, and Cincinnati have as many titles as KU but obviously you cant put them in the same argument.

Well, for beginners, that's just not true at all. Those teams all have 2, and KU has 3.

But anyway, there have been what, over 80 tourney's now? Blue Blood means Elite, and teams with 3 or less tourney titles are not what I would consider Elite.

Even without recent success, UCLA has won over 13% of NCAA tourneys. That's crazy to think about.
we are obviously using different websites for these stats. point remains and i agree with you for the most part
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: Shooter Jones on April 10, 2020, 08:29:53 AM
Another year down, so it's time to discuss who the blue bloods are again.

Obvious choices?
UCLA: 11 titles
Kentucky: 8 titles
North Carolina: 6 titles
Duke: 5 titles

On the edge?
Villanova: 3 titles, 2 in the last 5 years.
UCONN: 4 titles in the last 20 years.
Indiana: 5 titles, 0 in the last 25 years.

Not close, but could be taken seriously if they can win 1 or 2 titles soon:
Louisville: 3 nattys, 1 in the last 25 years.
Kansas: 3 nattys, 1 in the last 30 years.

Thoughts?
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: ben ji on April 10, 2020, 10:04:43 AM
Blue Bloods -

UK
UNC
DUKE
KU
UCONN

Faded Glory Blue Bloods -

Indiana
UCLA

On the cusp of being a blue blood -

Villanova
Louisville
Michigan State
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: Shooter Jones on April 10, 2020, 11:51:12 AM
Both UCLA and KU have 1 title in the last 30 years.

What makes one so faded, and one a true blue blood?

Hell, Louisville has 3 with one being as recent as 7 tourneys ago.
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: Spracne on April 10, 2020, 12:02:59 PM
Both UCLA and KU have 1 title in the last 30 years.

What makes one so faded, and one a true blue blood?

Hell, Louisville has 3 with one being as recent as 7 tourneys ago.

2 titles, actually. 2008 and 2020. And if you go back 32 years, then that makes 3.
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: Shooter Jones on April 10, 2020, 01:06:21 PM
Both UCLA and KU have 1 title in the last 30 years.

What makes one so faded, and one a true blue blood?

Hell, Louisville has 3 with one being as recent as 7 tourneys ago.

2 titles, actually. 2008 and 2020. And if you go back 32 years, then that makes 3.

(https://img.cinemablend.com/filter:scale/cb/6/c/9/b/3/8/6c9b3813d9f832928aed48d51b2d0e4a0ddeab03feb37d7813cbabd0a6e017e9.jpg?fw=1200)
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: ben ji on April 13, 2020, 10:39:46 PM
Both UCLA and KU have 1 title in the last 30 years.

What makes one so faded, and one a true blue blood?

Hell, Louisville has 3 with one being as recent as 7 tourneys ago.

KU is a contender to win the title every year and has made the elite 8 half of the years Self has been their coach. UCLA/Louisville.....not so much.
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: Shooter Jones on April 14, 2020, 08:08:51 AM
I'd put Gonzaga and KU in the same category. Always contenders going into the tourney, elite eights here and there, but never get titles (between the two of them there have been 160 tourneys and they've won 1.66% of them).

I guess I value tourney titles for blue blood status.
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: MakeItRain on April 14, 2020, 07:19:32 PM
If you're going to be in an elite club, especially in a sport with no parity, at all, you gotta have ships. Butler has recent back to back elite 8s, that can't be a blue blood metric.
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: Shooter Jones on April 03, 2023, 11:26:56 PM
Locked In:
UCLA: 11 titles
Kentucky: 8 titles
North Carolina: 6 titles
Duke: 5 titles
UCONN: 5 titles

Kind of forgotten, but close?:
Indiana: 5 titles, 0 in the last 25 years.
Kansas: 4 titles, 2 in the last 35 years.
Villanova: 3 titles, 2 recently.
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: Shooter Jones on April 03, 2023, 11:27:48 PM
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20230404/4985c97d767676c0878854bd9edfa127.jpg)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: Spracne on April 03, 2023, 11:37:05 PM
Locked In:
UCLA: 11 titles
Kentucky: 8 titles
North Carolina: 6 titles
Duke: 5 titles
UCONN: 5 titles

Kind of forgotten, but close?:
Indiana: 5 titles, 0 in the last 25 years.
Kansas: 4 titles, 2 in the last 35 years.
Villanova: 3 titles, 2 recently.

Point of personal privilege, but Kansas has 3 in the last 35 years.
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: Shooter Jones on April 03, 2023, 11:42:14 PM
I should’ve waited 25 hours.
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: Sandstone Outcropping on April 04, 2023, 08:36:43 AM
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20230404/4985c97d767676c0878854bd9edfa127.jpg)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Pretty crazy that UCONN has won as many nattys as Duke and Indiana now.

Vilanova's 2018 team sticks out in my mind as one of the greatest ever. So many weapons on that team. How far back do you have to go to find another team on that level?
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: DaBigTrain on April 04, 2023, 09:22:27 AM
Best school of the century by far.
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: deputy dawg on April 04, 2023, 09:44:36 AM
Don't lose track, KU has a couple of Helms titles in there too.
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: DaBigTrain on April 04, 2023, 10:04:36 AM
Don't lose track, KU has a couple of Helms titles in there too.

KU also has a participation title for the 2020 season that they claim since they totally would have won if not for COVID.
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: kim carnes on April 04, 2023, 05:10:23 PM
Ucla and especially indiana can gtfo of the conversation, blue bloods don’t go 25+ years without winning a title.  They’re has beens.
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: michigancat on April 04, 2023, 05:37:31 PM
Ucla and especially indiana can gtfo of the conversation, blue bloods don’t go 25+ years without winning a title.  They’re has beens.

Indiana hasn't even been to an Elite Eight since 2002 under Mike Davis. And that was their only Elite Eight since 1993. At least UCLA has been to a few final fours over the last few years
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: kim carnes on April 04, 2023, 05:49:39 PM
Another knock on ucla is they’ve won only one title outside of their 12 year stretch of domination from 1964-75.
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: kim carnes on April 04, 2023, 05:54:54 PM
There’s really only one blue blood left in college basketball… uconn
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: mocat on April 04, 2023, 06:28:37 PM
Ucla and especially indiana can gtfo of the conversation, blue bloods don’t go 25+ years without winning a title.  They’re has beens.

Indiana hasn't even been to an Elite Eight since 2002 under Mike Davis. And that was their only Elite Eight since 1993. At least UCLA has been to a few final fours over the last few years
Holy moly
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: passranch on April 05, 2023, 03:06:48 PM
Phog.net is having several very pointed conversations about this topic RN.
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: star seed 7 on April 05, 2023, 03:16:25 PM
It's hilarious that anyone cares who is or isn't a blueblood
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: Spracne on April 05, 2023, 03:19:03 PM
Phog.net is having several very pointed conversations about this topic RN.

Do NOT read the Phog Hoops Board (unless for trolling purposes only). It will make you more stupider.
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: Shooter Jones on April 05, 2023, 03:20:31 PM
There’s really only one blue blood left in college basketball… uconn

In the 32 years I've been alive, UCONN/Duke/UNC/Kentucky have won 53% of the National Championships.
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: ChiComCat on April 05, 2023, 03:31:28 PM
On twitter, some Phoggies were wanting to be very clear that UCLA's titles are too old and UConn's are too new.  You can have fewer titles, as long as they're spread out appropriately.
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: deputy dawg on April 05, 2023, 03:46:54 PM
Phog.net is having several very pointed conversations about this topic RN.

Do NOT read the Phog Hoops Board (unless for trolling purposes only). It will make you more stupider.

Syntax and grammar, Spracne, mastering it will earn you a lot more respect.
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: Spracne on April 05, 2023, 03:48:23 PM
Phog.net is having several very pointed conversations about this topic RN.

Do NOT read the Phog Hoops Board (unless for trolling purposes only). It will make you more stupider.

Syntax and grammar, Spracne, mastering it will earn you a lot more respect.

Like Mozart, a Maestro is free to break the supposed rules for intentional effect.
Title: Re: Blue Bloods
Post by: star seed 7 on April 05, 2023, 04:40:47 PM
Good grief, this topic was even on the local non-sports talk radio this afternoon.