goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Jerome Tang Coaches Kansas State Basketball => Topic started by: AppleJack on March 09, 2018, 08:03:07 PM

Title: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: AppleJack on March 09, 2018, 08:03:07 PM
For heavens sakes. He cannot see the floor again this year.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: GregKSU1027 on March 09, 2018, 08:04:24 PM
I hope he transfers

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on March 09, 2018, 08:10:40 PM
He'll be fine, just pressing. If he can return to old form  :love:
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: BackPayne on March 09, 2018, 08:12:47 PM
His ass needs to find a new team. 
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: AppleJack on March 09, 2018, 08:13:45 PM
Oh I want him back next year, but he can't play again this year. McGuirl was far superior tonight.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: BackPayne on March 09, 2018, 08:20:05 PM
https://twitter.com/Cole_Manbeck/status/972293337796497412?s=20
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: EMAWzifried on March 09, 2018, 08:21:45 PM
Doesn't seem as if Sneed is much better.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: HELLHAMMER on March 09, 2018, 08:23:06 PM
He's never been an elite player.  Now that he's been hurt again, he is below replacement level.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: MakeItRain on March 09, 2018, 08:43:22 PM
I hope he transfers

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

Don't be a rough ridin' douche, Greg.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: MakeItRain on March 09, 2018, 08:47:52 PM
Kam had started to play so well before he got hurt, it's sad. He doesn't look like his injury is the reason for Kam's problems right now. I guess it could be if his foot isn't fully healed and he's having trouble jumping on his shot, it doesn't appear that's the case though.

There isn't much oscar can do about it right now, he needs to get some minutes. All we can hope for is that he shakes whatever this is during the summer.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: cat97 on March 09, 2018, 08:54:49 PM
Kam had started to play so well bfore he got hurt, it's sad. He doesn't look like his injury is the reason for Kam's problems right now. I guess it could be if his foot isn't fully healed and he's having trouble jumping on his shot, it doesn't appear that's the case though.

There isn't much oscar can do about it right now, he needs to get some minutes. All we can hope for is that he shakes whatever this is during the summer.
Good post.  Stokes was shooting over 40% from three before his injury.  He needs to keep getting some minutes and taking a few threes to see if he gets his stroke back.  Same with Sneed.  Both need to limit the number of threes they take till they start hitting again.  Lets hope its next week. 
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: kso_FAN on March 09, 2018, 09:31:20 PM
I'm actually fine if he decides to finish his career somewhere else. I hate to say that, but that's where I'm at.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: Powercat Posse on March 09, 2018, 09:37:15 PM
He's been back for 11 games.  I don't think he's 100% by any means but he has a good amount of wide open 3s.  His piss poor shooting is more than just a foot that isn't healthy.

Stokes at the end of last year was shooting a terrible % too.   One issue I have is if he is 2-7 on FGs he seems to do very little else to really help us

* Last 12 games last year- 28% 3pt, 29% 2pt
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: MakeItRain on March 09, 2018, 09:57:44 PM
I'm actually fine if he decides to finish his career somewhere else. I hate to say that, but that's where I'm at.

That's crazy. McGuirl hasn't come close to proving that he's any better and Kam at his best is better than anything Cartier has done.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on March 09, 2018, 10:11:29 PM
Stokes has been one of our best players over the past 3 seasons. Wanting to run him for coming back too soon from injury is insanely short-sighted, even for bbs speak
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: steve dave on March 09, 2018, 10:16:36 PM
Can we recruit over stokes? No


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: wetwillie on March 09, 2018, 10:29:06 PM
Killa Kam was a beast no doubt, I just don’t know if he’s ever coming back.   The mind is a fragile thing.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: GregKSU1027 on March 09, 2018, 10:37:36 PM
I'm actually fine if he decides to finish his career somewhere else. I hate to say that, but that's where I'm at.
Agreed

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: stunted on March 09, 2018, 10:42:17 PM
whats up with diarra as well, he's been mediocre
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: michigancat on March 09, 2018, 10:43:55 PM
I'm actually fine if he decides to finish his career somewhere else. I hate to say that, but that's where I'm at.
Holy cow that's crazy reactionary. I've never been a huge Kam fan but there's no way he's 100% and he has proven over ~2 seasons that he's a competent B12 guard.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: sys on March 09, 2018, 10:57:47 PM
he has proven over ~2 seasons that he's a competent B12 guard.

not really.  i mean he can play in this league, but as a starting pg he's probably 10th out of 10.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: gatoveintisiete on March 09, 2018, 11:01:18 PM
We played our best brand of basketball when Kam went out, we have fallen away from that or haven’t been able to maintain it, but that’s what we should be chasing.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: sys on March 09, 2018, 11:03:58 PM
i'm not agreeing with the idea of recruiting over him.  he's almost certainly better than anyone they can get as a spring replacement.  but if he's starting next year, that's not a good sign for kstate.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: MakeItRain on March 09, 2018, 11:35:52 PM
he has proven over ~2 seasons that he's a competent B12 guard.

not really.  i mean he can play in this league, but as a starting pg he's probably 10th out of 10.

But he's not a starting point guard anymore. What's not being discussed is how his move to the bench may be affecting his game. oscar and Chris has said they moved him to the bench to give the bench more scoring but it's pretty clear he isn't close to his best in this role. If he stays here and continues to be our 6th man he'll be more effective given time to adjust to the role.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: michigancat on March 09, 2018, 11:38:14 PM
he has proven over ~2 seasons that he's a competent B12 guard.

not really.  i mean he can play in this league, but as a starting pg he's probably 10th out of 10.
By what measures?
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: kso_FAN on March 10, 2018, 12:10:32 AM
Yeah, I'm being reactionary and probably unfair. He's just putting up such bad efficiencies, its hard to look at him being a contributor. Of course, he's probably not close to 100%, but I also am unsure of him coming back and accepting being a role player on this team.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: sys on March 10, 2018, 12:30:23 AM
he has proven over ~2 seasons that he's a competent B12 guard.

not really.  i mean he can play in this league, but as a starting pg he's probably 10th out of 10.
By what measures?

he's a poor defender and one dimensional on offense.  and he's not like off the charts in that dimension.  over 3 years, he's 35% from 3.  orating hovering around 100 without being asked to do too much (low 20s % usage).

i don't want to take the time to compare him to every pg in the conference, but honestly it's not even close for most teams.  i guess maybe you could argue texas?  but most teams have 2, 3 or 4 players that could play pg better than him, so i'll stick by the point.  hell, kstate has 2 players that play point better than him.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: sys on March 10, 2018, 12:34:22 AM
But he's not a starting point guard anymore. What's not being discussed is how his move to the bench may be affecting his game. oscar and Chris has said they moved him to the bench to give the bench more scoring but it's pretty clear he isn't close to his best in this role. If he stays here and continues to be our 6th man he'll be more effective given time to adjust to the role.

he'd be useful off the bench.  not sure i'd have him as high as 6th man.  i think they'd probably be better off with wainright as the first guard off the bench.  he's not the shooter stokes is, but kstate has plenty of guys that can score.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: Powercat Posse on March 10, 2018, 01:54:33 AM
I don't want him to and would be disappointed if he left.  He's had good moments here.

That doesn't change my mind that he has been Pretty bad post injury and his shooting is crap right now, and he wasn't really a good player the last dozen games last year.   His careless TOs at the end of last year drove me crazy....but he has been better this year in cutting those down.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on March 10, 2018, 10:52:03 AM
Can we recruit over stokes? No


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Lol. Stop.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: EMAWzifried on March 10, 2018, 11:18:49 AM
Can we recruit over stokes? No


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Lol. Stop.
Maybe we have already. Isn't Shaun Williams, 6-3 point guard from St. Louis our only commit?
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on March 10, 2018, 11:28:32 AM
Yes and Mcguirl looks promising. Diarra has literally been recruited over him.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: renocat on March 10, 2018, 12:14:28 PM
Yes and Mcguirl looks promising. Diarra has literally been recruited over him.
Seems McGuirl is a natural point guard and Stokes a better 2 guard.  Wacky, how much will Shaun Williams impact the guard situation?  Do we have a chance at Mark Smith?  You bet on both Stokes and Patrick leaving?
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: MakeItRain on March 10, 2018, 12:34:09 PM
Yes and Mcguirl looks promising. Diarra has literally been recruited over him.

Cartier was not recruited over Kam, wacky. Cartier was recruited when Kam was a freshman. Williams and McGuirl weren't recruited over Kam either. No one will be recruited over Kam. Williams was recruited over Brian Patrick and Trice is being recruited over Sallah.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: pissclams on March 10, 2018, 01:04:24 PM
who had the worse season- alex gordon or kam stokes
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: 8manpick on March 10, 2018, 01:17:41 PM
Gordon was good at defense at least
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: kso_FAN on March 10, 2018, 01:28:15 PM
Gordon was good at defense at least

I like this.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 10, 2018, 01:49:02 PM
I don’t need a turnover machine trying to shoot his way out of a slump in a single elimination tourney
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: stunted on March 10, 2018, 02:03:03 PM
stokes and diarra both average the same turnovers/game but stokes is a turnover machine and diarra isnt.  :jerk:

agree though i dont want us to chance it in the tourney and seems likely he'll still get limited minutes anyways
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: sys on March 10, 2018, 02:48:22 PM
diarra is also a turnover machine, but he can do other stuff too.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: stunted on March 10, 2018, 03:42:35 PM
their turnovers/40 is comparable to any other decent big 12 point guard :jerk:
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: pissclams on March 10, 2018, 03:54:47 PM
their turnovers/40 is comparable to any other decent big 12 point guard :jerk:
strawman

our lack of talent b/w the 4-5 increases the importance of the 2’s on our roster
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: ksupamplemousse on March 10, 2018, 03:56:14 PM
their turnovers/40 is comparable to any other decent big 12 point guard :jerk:

christ, it's like you're illiterate.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: stunted on March 10, 2018, 04:06:26 PM
i may be illiterate but i can read numbers. before the injury, 13ppg, 5apg, 1.5spg, 2to/g, 42% from 3
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: BIG APPLE CAT on March 10, 2018, 08:52:12 PM
There's no doubt that since the injury he's been a diff'rent Stokes.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: TheFormerKCCat on March 10, 2018, 09:03:05 PM
There's no doubt that since the injury he's been a diff'rent Stokes.
(https://manniloccmsp.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/gary-coleman-as-arnold-diffrent-strokes-18022862-640-480.jpg)
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: MakeItRain on March 10, 2018, 09:31:21 PM
There's no doubt that since the injury he's been a diff'rent Stokes.

Good for you, well done
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fgif.mocksession.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F01%2FAUSLAND.gif&hash=ed49b252ffabedf93ca38cb585926f8e9356e8e2)
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: Powercat Posse on March 10, 2018, 10:07:37 PM
Stokes first 13 games he was shooting 45% from 3pt & 2pt range.  Now most of that is not vs Power6 teams. 

I would take 40-41% 3pt and 43-45% 2pt because he would be over 50 on eFG.  In 34 games vs B12 teams last 2 years he is only 38.6% eFG.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: BIG APPLE CAT on March 11, 2018, 03:02:39 PM
There's no doubt that since the injury he's been a diff'rent Stokes.

Good for you, well done
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fgif.mocksession.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F01%2FAUSLAND.gif&hash=ed49b252ffabedf93ca38cb585926f8e9356e8e2)

Yeah yeah, pretty basic low hanging fruit there, I know. I'll see to it that the quality of my future posts are movin on up
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: MakeItRain on March 11, 2018, 05:54:08 PM
There's no doubt that since the injury he's been a diff'rent Stokes.

Good for you, well done
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fgif.mocksession.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F01%2FAUSLAND.gif&hash=ed49b252ffabedf93ca38cb585926f8e9356e8e2)

Yeah yeah, pretty basic low hanging fruit there, I know. I'll see to it that the quality of my future posts are movin on up

 :clap:
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: kstofer on March 12, 2018, 12:12:51 AM
There's no doubt that since the injury he's been a diff'rent Stokes.

Good for you, well done
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fgif.mocksession.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F01%2FAUSLAND.gif&hash=ed49b252ffabedf93ca38cb585926f8e9356e8e2)

Yeah yeah, pretty basic low hanging fruit there, I know. I'll see to it that the quality of my future posts are movin on up
LOW HANGING FRUIT CAT
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: Poster formerly known as jthutch on March 12, 2018, 10:36:28 AM
There's no doubt that since the injury he's been a diff'rent Stokes.

Good for you, well done
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fgif.mocksession.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F01%2FAUSLAND.gif&hash=ed49b252ffabedf93ca38cb585926f8e9356e8e2)

Yeah yeah, pretty basic low hanging fruit there, I know. I'll see to it that the quality of my future posts are movin on up
  Hey BIG APPLE CAT  You take the good, you take the bad, you take them both and there you have the facts of life.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: Clevey 2 Times on March 13, 2018, 04:00:04 PM
Diarra should start. Kam seems either less than healthy or mentally wrong. I still don't want him to leave though. Has some value that I'm not sure can be replaced in the short term, mostly his experience.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: MakeItRain on March 16, 2018, 08:30:04 PM
Y'all still trying to take my guy's scholarship, or no?
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: GregKSU1027 on March 16, 2018, 08:31:31 PM
STOKES CAN STAY

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: sys on March 16, 2018, 09:21:57 PM
Y'all still trying to take my guy's scholarship, or no?

with the mcguirl guard showing some promise, the concept of running him off makes more sense.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: MakeItRain on March 16, 2018, 09:46:49 PM
Y'all still trying to take my guy's scholarship, or no?

with the mcguirl guard showing some promise, the concept of running him off makes more sense.

They seemed to play well together tonight. McGuirl isn't a point. Cardi has had a pretty awful last month of the season, he's clearly hit the wall which is understandable given this is his first year of CBB and he's coming off of a torn ACL.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: sys on March 16, 2018, 09:50:07 PM
he's more of a point than any other guard they have (except maybe brown). 
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: MakeItRain on March 16, 2018, 09:53:55 PM
Oh, okay. Thanks Coach Wooden.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: sys on March 16, 2018, 09:58:42 PM
you're really an bad person, mir.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: hatingfrancisco on March 16, 2018, 10:00:21 PM
you're really an bad person, mir.
I'll allow it.

Sent from my SM-G928V using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: MakeItRain on March 16, 2018, 11:09:06 PM
you're really an bad person, mir.

That's rich considering the current conversation. Coach Wooden is telling us that a guy who hasn't played one second of point guard is the first or second best point guard on the roster, along with another guy who doesn't play the point, and I'm the bad person for mocking such dumbfuckedry. Whatever, I'll be that.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: ksupamplemousse on March 16, 2018, 11:11:34 PM
I mean, sys is right. I don't know if MiR is being any more curt than normal, but McGuirl has shown more feel for the floor in two games than Kam has his entire career. I honestly don't think that's super controversial. Like, it seems obvious. Is it not obvious?
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: hatingfrancisco on March 16, 2018, 11:20:26 PM
I mean, sys is right. I don't know if MiR is being any more curt than normal, but McGuirl has shown more feel for the floor in two games than Kam has his entire career. I honestly don't think that's super controversial. Like, it seems obvious. Is it not obvious?
I'm looking forward to the day where one of your posts contains an actual fact.

Sent from my SM-G928V using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: sys on March 16, 2018, 11:22:01 PM
i wouldn't stake my life on mcguirl being a better pg than stokes, but only because i've only seen him play like 20 minutes or so.  i would on brown.  brown is a better pg than stokes, he's a better combo than stokes, he's a better wing than stokes and he's a better big than stokes.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: ksupamplemousse on March 16, 2018, 11:27:08 PM
i wouldn't stake my life on mcguirl being a better pg than stokes, but only because i've only seen him play like 20 minutes or so.  i would on brown.  brown is a better pg than stokes, he's a better combo than stokes, he's a better wing than stokes and he's a better big than stokes.

The entry pass over the top tonight was really the only thing I needed to see. Kam has never made that pass and will never make that pass, because he can't. Pretty good shooter when he's going right, but a point guard he is not.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: MakeItRain on March 16, 2018, 11:27:26 PM
I mean, sys is right. I don't know if MiR is being any more curt than normal, but McGuirl has shown more feel for the floor in two games than Kam has his entire career. I honestly don't think that's super controversial. Like, it seems obvious. Is it not obvious?

They aren't serving anything remotely close to the same role, are you guys trolling? Not only isn't McGuirl the primary ball handler, he isn't being asked to handle the ball at all.

McGuirl asserting himself making Stokes more expendable seems to ridiculous to be an actual thing for anyone watching the games. Nearly all of McGuirl's minutes have come with Kam on the floor, handling the damn ball, he played 38 minutes. Am I missing something here?
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: sys on March 16, 2018, 11:31:17 PM
he was recruited as a pg, right?  he can probably bring the ball up the court.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: ksupamplemousse on March 16, 2018, 11:34:34 PM
I mean, sys is right. I don't know if MiR is being any more curt than normal, but McGuirl has shown more feel for the floor in two games than Kam has his entire career. I honestly don't think that's super controversial. Like, it seems obvious. Is it not obvious?

They aren't serving anything remotely close to the same role, are you guys trolling? Not only isn't McGuirl the primary ball handler, he isn't being asked to handle the ball at all.

McGuirl asserting himself making Stokes more expendable seems to ridiculous to be an actual thing for anyone watching the games. Nearly all of McGuirl's minutes have come with Kam on the floor, handling the damn ball, he played 38 minutes. Am I missing something here?

I don't think it makes him more expendable. We have eight good basketball players on our team, plenty of minutes to go around, but Stokes should play less PG because of McGuirl. Stokes pounds the ball because he doesn't see the floor well, not a real great natural feel for how an offense flows. Early signs that McGuirl does have that natural sense of how things are supposed to flow.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: ksupamplemousse on March 16, 2018, 11:42:58 PM
I think it could be really fun watching Diarra and McGuirl both run lead guard, ala Denis and Jake, once Brown and Stokes move on. I really like their size and athleticism, and they both seem to have a really good feel for our offense at an early stage.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: cat97 on March 16, 2018, 11:53:12 PM
Stokes with 11 points on 5 for 9.  Three assists, four rebounds and a steal in 38 minutes.  I didn't see anybody score on him unless you count Fosters three at the end when Diarra did not give enough help on the screen. And we won. I need to find out what pounding the ball means as it seemed to work  pretty good tonight. 

Comment from Diarra about Stokes game tonight:
On how much confidence teammate Deathbite can take from his performance
“It is going to be great. He needed to see a couple of shots fall and he has seen that. Hopefully, that
pushes him and he makes more shots next game and just keeps moving forward. He is a huge threat.
Before he got hurt, he was averaging 15 [points]. He is very capable. He has been in a little shooting
slump, but tonight it seemed like he was getting out of it, so we are really happy with that.”
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: MakeItRain on March 16, 2018, 11:55:57 PM
I don't think it makes him more expendable.

Am I drunk? This is exactly what sys was saying
Y'all still trying to take my guy's scholarship, or no?

with the mcguirl guard showing some promise, the concept of running him off makes more sense.

you replied by saying this:

I mean, sys is right. I don't know if MiR is being any more curt than normal, but McGuirl has shown more feel for the floor in two games than Kam has his entire career. I honestly don't think that's super controversial. Like, it seems obvious. Is it not obvious?

Do you agree with him or not?

It doesn't matter, Kam will be a senior next year and Cardi is a sophomore. Mike will continue to play off of the ball for at least one more season.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: ksupamplemousse on March 17, 2018, 12:04:04 AM
I just agreed that I think he shows more promise as a point guard than Kam, sorry, I can see how that was confusing. I also agree that he'll play off the ball for another year, but I don't think that's the right move. Not grooming him as a lead guard next year would be a waste, especially if it comes because of some misplaced loyalty to playing Kam at the pg spot. Dude still isn't even quite at 2:1 a/to ratio as a junior in college. His only chance to play ball at the next level is at point, but that shouldn't determine how we use him on the floor. He would be a very good shooting guard off the bench.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: michigancat on March 17, 2018, 12:10:15 AM
IMO it's absurd to say McGuirl is or isn't anything when he's played like 40 minutes all season
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: sys on March 17, 2018, 12:23:20 AM
the one who isn't a pg is diarra.  he's a nice wing.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on March 17, 2018, 08:54:49 AM
WTF are you dweebs arguing about???
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: MakeItRain on March 17, 2018, 10:28:23 AM
IMO it's absurd to say McGuirl is or isn't anything when he's played like 40 minutes all season

It's factual that he hasn't spent a single second as our primary ball handler this season.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: Powercat Posse on March 17, 2018, 10:38:17 AM
I've been very hard on Stokes the past 6 weeks.  He had a really nice game.  Scoring our first 7 points was big, but his 2 driving layups in the 2nd half also were hoops we needed. Nice to see #3 play well. Hope it's not a 1 game thing
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on March 17, 2018, 12:15:35 PM
That lob pass Diarra sent to Wainright from 60' was incredible
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: wetwillie on March 17, 2018, 12:27:13 PM
JO would have no fewer than 10 dunks per game playing with diarra and mcguirl
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: MakeItRain on March 17, 2018, 03:35:45 PM
Kam threw a beautiful oop after Cartier packed that dudes crap
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: michigancat on March 17, 2018, 03:40:05 PM
IMO it's absurd to say McGuirl is or isn't anything when he's played like 40 minutes all season

It's factual that he hasn't spent a single second as our primary ball handler this season.
Even if that's true it doesn't mean that he can't or won't ever be the primary ball handler over the course of his career. He's barely played.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: MakeItRain on March 17, 2018, 11:30:54 PM
IMO it's absurd to say McGuirl is or isn't anything when he's played like 40 minutes all season

It's factual that he hasn't spent a single second as our primary ball handler this season.
Even if that's true it doesn't mean that he can't or won't ever be the primary ball handler over the course of his career. He's barely played.

no one contended that
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: dal9 on March 18, 2018, 08:13:53 PM
Y'all still trying to take my guy's scholarship, or no?
so hard to decide sometimes

edit: and this posted before he hit the side of the backboard on the corner 3 (granted, not a great pass by Diarra)
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: mocat on March 18, 2018, 08:52:03 PM
Haven't seen a double dribble in a good while :love:
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: pissclams on March 18, 2018, 08:54:29 PM
not his fault
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: Steffy08 on March 18, 2018, 08:55:20 PM
 Why did our coach tackle stokes when he was coming off the floor?
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: michigancat on March 18, 2018, 08:57:14 PM
Why did our coach tackle stokes when he was coming off the floor?
Hopefully because he declined to take the wide open corner three
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: mocat on March 18, 2018, 08:57:20 PM
Why did our coach tackle stokes when he was coming off the floor?
"That dub drib was hilarious and it's been way too long since ive seen one so part of me enjoyed it, but it was not your fault"
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: michigancat on March 18, 2018, 08:57:58 PM
Was it a negative or positive tackle?
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: michigancat on March 18, 2018, 08:58:52 PM
eff, sitting Brown???
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: EMAWzifried on March 18, 2018, 09:26:24 PM
Stokes drove me to curse tonight.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: sys on March 18, 2018, 09:28:21 PM
maybe his best game as a wildcat on the biggest stage imaginable.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: michigancat on March 18, 2018, 09:34:58 PM
Honestly what pissed me off most about Stokes was his complete fear of attacking the basket in any way. No matter what, every catch started with a nice second and a half hesitation before looking to pass away from the basket. Ugh
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: MakeItRain on March 18, 2018, 10:59:42 PM
Honestly what pissed me off most about Stokes was his complete fear of attacking the basket in any way. No matter what, every catch started with a nice second and a half hesitation before looking to pass away from the basket. Ugh

qft, what the hell is he scared of?
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: cfbandyman on March 18, 2018, 11:44:38 PM
Honestly what pissed me off most about Stokes was his complete fear of attacking the basket in any way. No matter what, every catch started with a nice second and a half hesitation before looking to pass away from the basket. Ugh

qft, what the hell is he scared of?

That an a decent amount of this team during this game, except when we finally turned in around late in the first half, it was like we pretended their defense was an impenetrable fortress and attacking the rim was forbidden or something.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: EMAWzifried on March 18, 2018, 11:51:40 PM
Honestly what pissed me off most about Stokes was his complete fear of attacking the basket in any way. No matter what, every catch started with a nice second and a half hesitation before looking to pass away from the basket. Ugh

qft, what the hell is he scared of?

That an a decent amount of this team during this game, except when we finally turned in around late in the first half, it was like we pretended their defense was an impenetrable fortress and attacking the rim was forbidden or something.

I kept yelling attack the rim. I have no idea why Oscar went slow ball against an inferior team.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: michigancat on March 18, 2018, 11:53:57 PM
Honestly what pissed me off most about Stokes was his complete fear of attacking the basket in any way. No matter what, every catch started with a nice second and a half hesitation before looking to pass away from the basket. Ugh

qft, what the hell is he scared of?

That an a decent amount of this team during this game, except when we finally turned in around late in the first half, it was like we pretended their defense was an impenetrable fortress and attacking the rim was forbidden or something.

I kept yelling attack the rim. I have no idea why Oscar went slow ball against an inferior team.
An inferior team that also had a thinner bench than us and was exhausted from their previous game
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: GregKSU1027 on March 18, 2018, 11:54:00 PM
Honestly what pissed me off most about Stokes was his complete fear of attacking the basket in any way. No matter what, every catch started with a nice second and a half hesitation before looking to pass away from the basket. Ugh

qft, what the hell is he scared of?

That an a decent amount of this team during this game, except when we finally turned in around late in the first half, it was like we pretended their defense was an impenetrable fortress and attacking the rim was forbidden or something.

I kept yelling attack the rim. I have no idea why Oscar went slow ball against an inferior team.
Cause Barry was tired AF and carti has butterfingers so I would have much rather play at that super slow pace rather than the speed of light

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: cfbandyman on March 19, 2018, 12:11:01 AM
Honestly what pissed me off most about Stokes was his complete fear of attacking the basket in any way. No matter what, every catch started with a nice second and a half hesitation before looking to pass away from the basket. Ugh

qft, what the hell is he scared of?

That an a decent amount of this team during this game, except when we finally turned in around late in the first half, it was like we pretended their defense was an impenetrable fortress and attacking the rim was forbidden or something.

I kept yelling attack the rim. I have no idea why Oscar went slow ball against an inferior team.
Cause Barry was tired AF and carti has butterfingers so I would have much rather play at that super slow pace rather than the speed of light

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

Even at a slow pace we are prone to fumbling the ball over.

Overall I feel like vs. Creighton, we played to win and with gusto, we weren't perfect but we did really well, probably in the top 3 games we played in terms of being efficient, smart, and making good plays. Vs. UMBC, we played like we were scared to be the 2nd team to lose to a 16 seed, and didn't know how to handle them and the situation. Though, given how I heard that UMBC didn't even really scout us, I bet we didn't even think to do so against them either, so it was like throwing two teams into a contest they knew nothing about each other and see WTF happens. Moral of the story though is, we should've attacked the rim like we were here to collect some outstanding loans.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: The Whale on March 19, 2018, 07:35:13 AM
It seemed like the cats tried to drive early and after a couple of trips gerting grabbed / hacked with no call they backed off.

It was about the time oscar was livid (relatively, for him anyway) and was yelling "You're going to have to win it with defense guys"

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: michigancat on March 19, 2018, 07:44:24 AM


It seemed like the cats tried to drive early and after a couple of trips gerting grabbed / hacked with no call they backed off.

It was about the time oscar was livid (relatively, for him anyway) and was yelling "You're going to have to win it with defense guys"

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

What a moron, if true
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: hatingfrancisco on March 19, 2018, 08:12:13 AM


It seemed like the cats tried to drive early and after a couple of trips gerting grabbed / hacked with no call they backed off.

It was about the time oscar was livid (relatively, for him anyway) and was yelling "You're going to have to win it with defense guys"

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

What a moron, if true

I mean.  He was right.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: Stupid Fitz on March 19, 2018, 08:16:33 AM


It seemed like the cats tried to drive early and after a couple of trips gerting grabbed / hacked with no call they backed off.

It was about the time oscar was livid (relatively, for him anyway) and was yelling "You're going to have to win it with defense guys"

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

What a moron, if true

This was my fav part of the game. You could hear him yell it several times. “We’re going to have to win it with defense guys”. “I’m all out of ideas on the other side of the ball”.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: The Whale on March 19, 2018, 09:42:23 AM
I guess they driving tried again early in the 2nd half, picked up a couple of charge fouls, Diarra shot a layup over the backboard, then gave up again. 
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: michigancat on March 19, 2018, 09:51:43 AM
I more wanted them to increase tempo, not necessarily drive more.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: 'taterblast on March 19, 2018, 09:57:39 AM
he scored the first 7 points vs creighton, idiots
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: kso_FAN on March 19, 2018, 09:58:14 AM
I more wanted them to increase tempo, not necessarily drive more.

It is weird they thought of UMBC as a fast paced team. I suppose oscar was scared of losing people in transition for 3s, which UMBC does like, but they didn't play particularly fast on offense, just a little bit faster than us on average.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: michigancat on March 19, 2018, 10:04:14 AM
I more wanted them to increase tempo, not necessarily drive more.

It is weird they thought of UMBC as a fast paced team. I suppose oscar was scared of losing people in transition for 3s, which UMBC does like, but they didn't play particularly fast on offense, just a little bit faster than us on average.

they definitely TRY to play fast, if the initial transition opportunity isn't there they back it out and run clock. However, trying to push tempo on offense doesn't necessarily mean you are going to consequently give up transition buckets.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: kso_FAN on March 19, 2018, 10:07:45 AM
I more wanted them to increase tempo, not necessarily drive more.

It is weird they thought of UMBC as a fast paced team. I suppose oscar was scared of losing people in transition for 3s, which UMBC does like, but they didn't play particularly fast on offense, just a little bit faster than us on average.

they definitely TRY to play fast, if the initial transition opportunity isn't there they back it out and run clock. However, trying to push tempo on offense doesn't necessarily mean you are going to consequently give up transition buckets.

I agree. But with us playing smaller, I'm sure the staff feared even worse rebounding and thus giving up some stuff in transition. Also, when Barry was struggling to finish on the break I was okay with slowing it down a bit. No one else on our team is really good in transition unless Sneed is dunking it.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: michigancat on March 19, 2018, 10:20:08 AM
I more wanted them to increase tempo, not necessarily drive more.

It is weird they thought of UMBC as a fast paced team. I suppose oscar was scared of losing people in transition for 3s, which UMBC does like, but they didn't play particularly fast on offense, just a little bit faster than us on average.

they definitely TRY to play fast, if the initial transition opportunity isn't there they back it out and run clock. However, trying to push tempo on offense doesn't necessarily mean you are going to consequently give up transition buckets.

I agree. But with us playing smaller, I'm sure the staff feared even worse rebounding and thus giving up some stuff in transition. Also, when Barry was struggling to finish on the break I was okay with slowing it down a bit. No one else on our team is really good in transition unless Sneed is dunking it.

I'm not thinking of transition offense as just fast break layups, it's just trying to create better opportunities than you'd get in a half court set. Like the worst one was late in the second half when Myles was on the floor from a missed layup, we had a clear 5 on 4, then just walked it to the wing and let Myles recover, but there were several like that. Plus we should have been less fatigued than them and running from the start could have led to a blowout, even if we try to push every possession but pull back if it isn't there like UMBC did against UVA.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: kso_FAN on March 19, 2018, 10:33:19 AM
I more wanted them to increase tempo, not necessarily drive more.

It is weird they thought of UMBC as a fast paced team. I suppose oscar was scared of losing people in transition for 3s, which UMBC does like, but they didn't play particularly fast on offense, just a little bit faster than us on average.

they definitely TRY to play fast, if the initial transition opportunity isn't there they back it out and run clock. However, trying to push tempo on offense doesn't necessarily mean you are going to consequently give up transition buckets.

I agree. But with us playing smaller, I'm sure the staff feared even worse rebounding and thus giving up some stuff in transition. Also, when Barry was struggling to finish on the break I was okay with slowing it down a bit. No one else on our team is really good in transition unless Sneed is dunking it.

I'm not thinking of transition offense as just fast break layups, it's just trying to create better opportunities than you'd get in a half court set. Like the worst one was late in the second half when Myles was on the floor from a missed layup, we had a clear 5 on 4, then just walked it to the wing and let Myles recover, but there were several like that. Plus we should have been less fatigued than them and running from the start could have led to a blowout, even if we try to push every possession but pull back if it isn't there like UMBC did against UVA.

Yeah, oscar has never been a big early offense guy, at least at K-State. Our late shot clock ball screen and let Barry drive it didn't do a whole lot, especially with Barry missing more than normal on his crazy lay ups.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: Clevey 2 Times on March 19, 2018, 02:22:49 PM
Kamau is thinking too much offensively. You can see his hesitation. He wasn't always this way. He belongs on this team, I'm kind of surprised how quickly people have reacted against him. That being said, he is playing awful basketball right now.

As far as the game, we didn't make 3s, probably why we didn't win handily. You could argue that not getting to the rim and scoring prevented us from getting decent looks from 3, but I felt like we were getting looks from deep, just not making them. I think the pace of play was largely due to limited scouting time, as people have noted, plus both teams are fairly slow pace of play anyways.

Kentucky has athletes and are probably playing their best ball of the season. They'll have significant time to prepare for us. We desperately need Deanwolf to be the best player on the floor Thursday in Atlanta. Will Mawien guard Knox? Or Dean?
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: pissclams on March 19, 2018, 02:33:39 PM
Kamau is thinking too much offensively. You can see his hesitation. He wasn't always this way. He belongs on this team, I'm kind of surprised how quickly people have reacted against him. That being said, he is playing awful basketball right now.

As far as the game, we didn't make 3s, probably why we didn't win handily. You could argue that not getting to the rim and scoring prevented us from getting decent looks from 3, but I felt like we were getting looks from deep, just not making them. I think the pace of play was largely due to limited scouting time, as people have noted, plus both teams are fairly slow pace of play anyways.

Kentucky has athletes and are probably playing their best ball of the season. They'll have significant time to prepare for us. We desperately need Deanwolf to be the best player on the floor Thursday in Atlanta. Will Mawien guard Knox? Or Dean?

several players are getting bruced this year, if i'm kam, i'm pulling my head out of my ass before i'm on the list
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: MakeItRain on March 19, 2018, 03:04:29 PM


It seemed like the cats tried to drive early and after a couple of trips gerting grabbed / hacked with no call they backed off.

It was about the time oscar was livid (relatively, for him anyway) and was yelling "You're going to have to win it with defense guys"

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

What a moron, if true

Did you not see this, the camera was directly in his face when he said it, I'm not sure the characterization of the context is fair because we have no idea what he said before that. I didn't interpret the context the same way the whale did.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: michigancat on March 19, 2018, 03:05:44 PM


It seemed like the cats tried to drive early and after a couple of trips gerting grabbed / hacked with no call they backed off.

It was about the time oscar was livid (relatively, for him anyway) and was yelling "You're going to have to win it with defense guys"

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

What a moron, if true

Did you not see this, the camera was directly in his face when he said it, I'm not sure the characterization of the context is fair because we have no idea what he said before that. I didn't interpret the context the same way the whale did.

I didn't see it
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: kslim on March 19, 2018, 03:22:09 PM
no, eff kam but id like to talk more about magic mike and how much of a bad ass he is
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: Clevey 2 Times on March 20, 2018, 10:51:34 AM
Kamau is thinking too much offensively. You can see his hesitation. He wasn't always this way. He belongs on this team, I'm kind of surprised how quickly people have reacted against him. That being said, he is playing awful basketball right now.

As far as the game, we didn't make 3s, probably why we didn't win handily. You could argue that not getting to the rim and scoring prevented us from getting decent looks from 3, but I felt like we were getting looks from deep, just not making them. I think the pace of play was largely due to limited scouting time, as people have noted, plus both teams are fairly slow pace of play anyways.

Kentucky has athletes and are probably playing their best ball of the season. They'll have significant time to prepare for us. We desperately need Deanwolf to be the best player on the floor Thursday in Atlanta. Will Mawien guard Knox? Or Dean?

several players are getting bruced this year, if i'm kam, i'm pulling my head out of my ass before i'm on the list

Who do you expect to get bruced?
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on March 20, 2018, 10:54:53 AM
I think Patrick and Sallah are pretty handsome contenders.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: kso_FAN on March 20, 2018, 12:01:38 PM
Kam's jumper at the 7 minute mark right after he nearly turned it over was a pretty big shot.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: ksupamplemousse on March 20, 2018, 12:39:44 PM
I think Patrick and Sallah are pretty handsome contenders.

Yeah, and I think Shadd or Love hits the bricks as well.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: michigancat on March 20, 2018, 01:07:04 PM
Kam's jumper at the 7 minute mark right after he nearly turned it over was a pretty big shot.
Every made shot on a game where you score 0.75 PPP is a big shot
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: Kat Kid on March 20, 2018, 08:02:37 PM
I want us to create more fast break chances too,  ur we were atrocious in transition. We had fast breaks end in zero points a lot.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: BIG APPLE CAT on March 20, 2018, 10:04:11 PM
I want us to create more fast break chances too,  ur we were atrocious in transition. We had fast breaks end in zero points a lot.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

We had fast breaks end in charges a lot
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: michigancat on March 20, 2018, 10:05:27 PM
We had half court sets end in zero points a lot
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: IPA4Me on March 21, 2018, 04:30:28 AM
I thought this was the Stokes thread.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: cat97 on March 21, 2018, 08:41:23 AM
I thought this was the Stokes thread.
  My bad.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: Clevey 2 Times on March 21, 2018, 11:35:32 AM
I want us to create more fast break chances too,  ur we were atrocious in transition. We had fast breaks end in zero points a lot.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I second this, but at least against UMBC our transition D was good, they didn't get much in the fast break either.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: stunted on March 21, 2018, 05:23:55 PM
if he's not 100% now, what was he when he came back, 30%? him coming back too soon worked out poorly for everyone involved
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: cat97 on March 21, 2018, 08:21:33 PM
if he's not 100% now, what was he when he came back, 30%? him coming back too soon worked out poorly for everyone involved
It didn't work out too bad.  We're in the sweet 16.

After reading about a Jones fracture, I am surprised Stokes has been able to play.
This is from a medical site on the web so it has to be correct:  A person who has had surgery to repair a Jones fracture can expect a return to all activity, including sports, 3-4 months after surgery. However, the doctor may recommend a period of physical therapy to recondition the injured area.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: nitrocat on March 21, 2018, 11:49:48 PM
if he's not 100% now, what was he when he came back, 30%? him coming back too soon worked out poorly for everyone involved
It didn't work out too bad.  We're in the sweet 16.

After reading about a Jones fracture, I am surprised Stokes has been able to play.
This is from a medical site on the web so it has to be correct:  A person who has had surgery to repair a Jones fracture can expect a return to all activity, including sports, 3-4 months after surgery. However, the doctor may recommend a period of physical therapy to recondition the injured area.

Most Jones fractures don't require surgery.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: cat97 on March 23, 2018, 02:40:23 PM

Stokes played 39 minutes last night.  Four steals, five rebounds, three assists and two turnovers.  Six points on 2 for 7 although at least two of his shots were taken with the shot clock about to expire.

His defense was very disruptive to Kentucky.  I hope that most posters are now looking forward to him being back next year and competing to start and for playing time with Diarra, McQuirl and Williams.  He is a valuable player for us and showed that last night.   
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: catastrophe on March 23, 2018, 02:41:53 PM
Good analysis, Maiwen.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: Sandstone Outcropping on March 23, 2018, 02:52:05 PM

Stokes played 39 minutes last night.  Four steals, five rebounds, three assists and two turnovers.  Six points on 2 for 7 although at least two of his shots were taken with the shot clock about to expire.

His defense was very disruptive to Kentucky.  I hope that most posters are now looking forward to him being back next year and competing to start and for playing time with Diarra, McQuirl and Williams.  He is a valuable player for us and showed that last night.
Totally agree, Mak.

The guard situation is shaping up to be an embarrassment of riches in 2018-19.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: MakeItRain on March 23, 2018, 03:15:30 PM
 :lol: you guys calling the homie cat97 Mawien is too much
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: 8manpick on March 23, 2018, 04:53:02 PM
Mawien should be resting and watching film, not posting in this thread.  If he is ready to go he should dominate tomorrow.  Look at this goober he is up against:

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.daily-chronicle.com%2F_internal%2Fcimg%210%2Fh0dhfd6ehrmqu1ctrhceb8sz0smv121&hash=87c972c260426d8417a4ae14eb6a752aac578668)

I'm betting on this guy:
(https://media.gettyimages.com/photos/makol-mawien-of-the-kansas-state-wildcats-dunks-on-the-umbc-during-picture-id933797406)
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: mocat on March 23, 2018, 04:58:29 PM
That dude looks like kroger brand mungo jerry
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: schreds21 on February 27, 2023, 07:39:10 PM
Kam says we would have won the champy with DWade healthy.  Also says those two oscar teams would have mopped the floor with the Tang Gang.
https://amp.kansascity.com/sports/college/big-12/kansas-state/article272614114.html


Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: OK_Cat on February 27, 2023, 07:40:31 PM
Lol


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: wetwillie on February 27, 2023, 08:52:25 PM
No way I’m clicking that link but no way Killa Kam said they would mop the floor with the 2022 squad
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: Kat Kid on February 27, 2023, 09:03:14 PM
Well Kam said they would have won back to back NCAA titles with a healthy Claws so not sure why you would think the 2022 cats would be better than that.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: wetwillie on February 27, 2023, 09:08:50 PM
Damnit, he went full lunatic


Quote

Deathbite, who played point guard for those teams, is happy to provide an answer.

“We definitely would have won the NCAA Tournament,” Stokes said during a wide-ranging interview that you can hear on today’s episode of The Star’s SportsBeat KC podcast. “For sure. Absolutely, no question.”

Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on February 27, 2023, 09:36:10 PM
Pfffft... one player was the difference between a national championship and a first round loss to UC Irvine.... :love: :flush:
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: MakeItRain on February 28, 2023, 12:41:13 AM
I think it's fair to give them the final four. I don't know which team is better, it'd be a hell of a game though.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: OK_Cat on February 28, 2023, 08:51:52 AM
i legit don't even remember which guy he is
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: wetwillie on February 28, 2023, 08:59:37 AM
He was a poor man’s Nowell on the two national championship teams we had under oscar
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: cfbandyman on February 28, 2023, 10:35:47 AM
I think it's fair to give them the final four. I don't know which team is better, it'd be a hell of a game though.

Where I sit, we would've/could've had a FF vs Loyola with a healthy Dean. Just as we would've/could've had a FF with a rested non-double OT game vs Xavier when we played Butler, but both didn't happen.

But it's all mute, would be a legit good game, and I love Kam, but also no, most likely not won any Natty's with a healthy Dean.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: Sandstone Outcropping on February 28, 2023, 10:45:48 AM
I think it's fair to give them the final four. I don't know which team is better, it'd be a hell of a game though.

Where I sit, we would've/could've had a FF vs Loyola with a healthy Dean. Just as we would've/could've had a FF with a rested non-double OT game vs Xavier when we played Butler, but both didn't happen.

But it's all mute, would be a legit good game, and I love Kam, but also no, most likely not won any Natty's with a healthy Dean.
I want a Final 4 so bad. The Ghost of Pontiac continues to haunt me.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: ChiComCat on February 28, 2023, 10:55:34 AM
Kam says we would have won the champy with DWade healthy.  Also says those two oscar teams would have mopped the floor with the Tang Gang.
https://amp.kansascity.com/sports/college/big-12/kansas-state/article272614114.html


Shooters gonna shoot
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: OK_Cat on February 28, 2023, 11:13:37 AM
I think it's fair to give them the final four. I don't know which team is better, it'd be a hell of a game though.

Where I sit, we would've/could've had a FF vs Loyola with a healthy Dean. Just as we would've/could've had a FF with a rested non-double OT game vs Xavier when we played Butler, but both didn't happen.

But it's all mute, would be a legit good game, and I love Kam, but also no, most likely not won any Natty's with a healthy Dean.

 :D
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: yoga-like_abana on February 28, 2023, 01:45:21 PM
Sounds like something that someone who was coached under oscar would say.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: KSNimrod on February 28, 2023, 03:25:44 PM
Sounds like something that someone who was coached under oscar would say.

It's sad really.  To think that if only a few more of those guys would have scored higher on the play hard chart... Dean wouldn't have been robbed of so much glory and we'd have 2 Natty banners in the OOD.   :Crybaby:
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 28, 2023, 03:33:15 PM
Well, different stokes for different folks.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: cfbandyman on February 28, 2023, 05:45:42 PM
I think it's fair to give them the final four. I don't know which team is better, it'd be a hell of a game though.

Where I sit, we would've/could've had a FF vs Loyola with a healthy Dean. Just as we would've/could've had a FF with a rested non-double OT game vs Xavier when we played Butler, but both didn't happen.

But it's all mute, would be a legit good game, and I love Kam, but also no, most likely not won any Natty's with a healthy Dean.

 :D

I should stay mute on all things moot
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: MakeItRain on February 28, 2023, 08:26:48 PM
i legit don't even remember which guy he is

We're still doing the ignorance for clout thing?
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: Kat Kid on February 28, 2023, 08:57:48 PM
Kam is not spradling/clent level for me, but i rate him like this

Jacob Pullen
The Flush


Marcus Foster
Denis Clemente

Angel Rodriguez
Kam Stokes
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: michigancat on February 28, 2023, 09:20:05 PM
I don't think that team beats Virginia
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: MakeItRain on February 28, 2023, 10:33:03 PM
I don't think that team beats Virginia

Maybe, maybe not. The beauty of the tournament is that you play the team in front of you. I'm sure not going to be the one saying the only 1 seed to ever lose to a 16 would beat anyone.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: OK_Cat on February 28, 2023, 11:06:04 PM
i legit don't even remember which guy he is

We're still doing the ignorance for clout thing?
No. I’m not sure that anyone in the last ten years is memorable. I’d be in quite a pickle if someone put a gun to my head and asked me to name 5 players from the past decade (not counting this year, obvs)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: michigancat on March 01, 2023, 04:14:20 AM


I don't think that team beats Virginia

Maybe, maybe not. The beauty of the tournament is that you play the team in front of you. I'm sure not going to be the one saying the only 1 seed to ever lose to a 16 would beat anyone.

Well I mean this is all theoretical but Virginia did win the tournament the year I thought we were discussing.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: ChiComCat on March 01, 2023, 08:15:35 AM
He can say what he wants about the E8 team missing Wade but let's hold off on the theoretical championships for the team that lost to UC Irvine.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: MakeItRain on March 01, 2023, 10:47:47 AM
i legit don't even remember which guy he is

We're still doing the ignorance for clout thing?
No. I’m not sure that anyone in the last ten years is memorable. I’d be in quite a pickle if someone put a gun to my head and asked me to name 5 players from the past decade (not counting this year, obvs)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So, yes.

We've won two conference championships and been to three elite 8s in your lifetime. He was the starting point guard for 1 of each of those. He's the only point guard since like the 60s to have a conference championship and an elite 8.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: stunted on March 01, 2023, 11:07:46 AM
i legit don't even remember which guy he is

We're still doing the ignorance for clout thing?

 :lol:
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: Sandstone Outcropping on March 01, 2023, 11:13:51 AM
While Kam's statement could be considered hyperbolic, I think it is cool / admirable that he loved / believed in his team that much.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: Tobias on March 01, 2023, 11:20:43 AM
i legit don't even remember which guy he is

deathbite, iirc
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: OK_Cat on March 01, 2023, 11:58:15 AM
i legit don't even remember which guy he is

We're still doing the ignorance for clout thing?
No. I’m not sure that anyone in the last ten years is memorable. I’d be in quite a pickle if someone put a gun to my head and asked me to name 5 players from the past decade (not counting this year, obvs)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So, yes.

We've won two conference championships and been to three elite 8s in your lifetime. He was the starting point guard for 1 of each of those. He's the only point guard since like the 60s to have a conference championship and an elite 8.
That’s great, I’m happy for you. A lot of us didn’t watch much during the Webber years because it was a boring and loser brand of basketball. I watch sports to be entertained, so when I’m not entertained I don’t watch. Not a ‘look at me’ thing, just making an observation that I do not remember the guy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: nicname on March 01, 2023, 01:52:17 PM
While Kam's statement could be considered hyperbolic, I think it is cool / admirable that he loved / believed in his team that much.

Yeah.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: cfbandyman on March 01, 2023, 02:31:55 PM
i legit don't even remember which guy he is

We're still doing the ignorance for clout thing?
No. I’m not sure that anyone in the last ten years is memorable. I’d be in quite a pickle if someone put a gun to my head and asked me to name 5 players from the past decade (not counting this year, obvs)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So, yes.

We've won two conference championships and been to three elite 8s in your lifetime. He was the starting point guard for 1 of each of those. He's the only point guard since like the 60s to have a conference championship and an elite 8.
That’s great, I’m happy for you. A lot of us didn’t watch much during the Webber years because it was a boring and loser brand of basketball. I watch sports to be entertained, so when I’m not entertained I don’t watch. Not a ‘look at me’ thing, just making an observation that I do not remember the guy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

so edgy
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: MakeItRain on March 01, 2023, 03:14:50 PM
i legit don't even remember which guy he is

We're still doing the ignorance for clout thing?
No. I’m not sure that anyone in the last ten years is memorable. I’d be in quite a pickle if someone put a gun to my head and asked me to name 5 players from the past decade (not counting this year, obvs)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So, yes.

We've won two conference championships and been to three elite 8s in your lifetime. He was the starting point guard for 1 of each of those. He's the only point guard since like the 60s to have a conference championship and an elite 8.
That’s great, I’m happy for you. A lot of us didn’t watch much during the Webber years because it was a boring and loser brand of basketball. I watch sports to be entertained, so when I’m not entertained I don’t watch. Not a ‘look at me’ thing, just making an observation that I do not remember the guy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I don't want to pile on but you were the first person to reply to schreds post of the article link. The article told the reader exactly who Kam Stokes is, so either you didn't read the article you commented on, or you were being ignorant for clout.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: MakeItRain on March 01, 2023, 03:16:28 PM
Pretty robust discussion from the 2018 tournament run on the early pages of this thread. I miss that.
Title: Re: Can we talk Stokes?
Post by: GregKSU1027 on March 01, 2023, 04:22:48 PM
Pretty robust discussion from the 2018 tournament run on the early pages of this thread. I miss that.
I had to go back and look at the trash that I talked that was so damned out of pocket. My how things change

I'm gonna be honest Stokes was one of the most fun players on that team to watch especially when he was on and firing on all cylinders like he was the second half of the 2018 Regular Season. He had one of the nastiest jab step three balls in the league that year and my god was it a thing of beauty. Now that he is back and living in Manhattan full time I think is great to have him and around the younger guys during his offseason.

I don't like to talk theoreticals but I truly believe the guard D that Coach Frazier was able to instill in the guards over their time here was a thing of beauty and to see how they would match up with Tang's Inaugural gang would be so much fun.
I have to take the guys that were in MHK while I was there because that squad means the world to me.
So I have Kam and the gang winning against the Tang Gang.