goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: leroylulu on May 14, 2010, 12:23:43 PM

Title: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: leroylulu on May 14, 2010, 12:23:43 PM
Once the smoke clears and Mizzou realizes they were just a pawn to lure Notre Dame, how do we treat them?  Do we say no harm no foul and welcome them back with open arms or do we hold a grudge or what?  There has to be some repurcussions for their extended amount of flirting and just overall trashy behavior.   :users:   
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: bakerman on May 14, 2010, 12:58:23 PM
I think we mourn that we still have to put up with their dumb ass...
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: Ghost of Stan Parrish on May 14, 2010, 01:07:19 PM
Think we need more girls on the board to advise on catty behavior towards a girl who whores herself out like that.
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: CNS on May 14, 2010, 01:20:38 PM
Can't fault them for wanting to get what they can, when they can, how they can.

Never understood the negative stance toward whores. 

Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: MadCat on May 14, 2010, 01:55:19 PM
Whatever ukans does, we should do the opposite.
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: CNS on May 14, 2010, 02:24:54 PM
Whatever ukans does, we should do the opposite.

Lew is talking crap about the deal.

Maybe we should be helping them pack? :dunno:
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: sonofdaxjones on May 14, 2010, 02:43:56 PM
 :facepalm: :facepalm: to some of you.

Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: deputy dawg on May 14, 2010, 04:43:15 PM
I'm sympathetic to Mizzou, according to some of their alum, the Big 10 has conference-wide participation in some non-major sports that are only partially fielded in the Big 12, like wrestling and some other sports that are too boring to follow.  I take that back, wrestling is not boring, but the other 3 or 4 sports are so boring I was too unexcited to even remember them.

Plus all that extra money.

What would you do if you could leave a moronic rival like ku behind in a broken conference?
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: Iceberg on May 14, 2010, 04:50:49 PM
What it all comes down to is that we are acting pissed and jealous like a bunch of little girls because we wish that we were wanted by another conference, instead of the leftovers.
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: ChiComCat on May 14, 2010, 06:58:23 PM
I'm sympathetic to Mizzou, according to some of their alum, the Big 10 has conference-wide participation in some non-major sports that are only partially fielded in the Big 12, like wrestling and some other sports that are too boring to follow.  I take that back, wrestling is not boring, but the other 3 or 4 sports are so boring I was too unexcited to even remember them.

Plus all that extra money.

What would you do if you could leave a moronic rival like ku behind in a broken conference?

You sound like you want us to start a wrestling team.  I for one, couldn't be more in.  Imagine the Undertaker in all purple
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fartfiles.art.com%2F5%2Fp%2FLRG%2F10%2F1065%2FAMTL000Z%2Fthe-undertaker-118--doing-vintage-undertaker-%25C2%25A9photofile.jpg&hash=ab3a07431a69a5187bb73f1fb3a7e8c3615f3906)

 :love:

Mods, please make a wrestling board and move this there so me and Deputy Dawg can lead a discussion about it, TIA
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: Dugout DickStone on May 14, 2010, 07:12:33 PM
I fully support a wrestling board sponsored by Iowa.
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: kcchiefdav on May 15, 2010, 06:37:40 AM
What it all comes down to is that we are acting pissed and jealous like a bunch of little girls because we wish that we were wanted by another conference, instead of the leftovers.


I don't think we're acting jealous of Mizzou. I think we were all worried about UT leaving and being relegated to the MVC or MWC. Now that such a scenario seems unlikely, I say we treat Mizzou like every MoFo who tries to stab you in the back and run off to the Caribbean...BANG HIS WIFE.
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: Kat Kid on May 15, 2010, 08:24:40 AM
I have talked to exactly one mizzou fan about this.  '

He 1) mentioned that it "made more sense academically" and 2) was a complete idiot.

I don't know that this helps me make a conclusion on how to respond.  I think it merely confirms my earlier categorical response to all things mizzou, bemused indifference.
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: Pexikan on May 15, 2010, 08:38:45 AM
I kinda like ChiCats idea...
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: deputy dawg on May 15, 2010, 09:00:14 AM
Women's wrestling?

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg510.imageshack.us%2Fimg510%2F9199%2Fpersephonevsprincesssuglv5.jpg&hash=827c962ef568109d41b4aa5c3e114ee89703f963)
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on May 15, 2010, 01:58:49 PM

Never understood the negative stance toward whores. 


I would love to hear Tannoudji's take on this.
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: Dirty Sanchez on May 15, 2010, 05:13:14 PM
If big televen doesn't get dame and takes Rutgers/Pitt/etc, treat them like a bitch.

If them being toyed with forces lame into a conference, treat them like a bitch that at least had the decency to swallow.

If them being toyed with forces texass to give up some of their toys and make the conference more equally, treat them like a bitch that had the decency to swallow and let you pee in her butt.
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: kcnut on May 17, 2010, 08:34:48 AM
eff mizzou. :flush:
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: SuperG on May 17, 2010, 11:49:11 AM
What it all comes down to is that we are acting pissed and jealous like a bunch of little girls because we wish that we were wanted by another conference, instead of the leftovers.


I don't think we're acting jealous of Mizzou. I think we were all worried about UT leaving and being relegated to the MVC or MWC. Now that such a scenario seems unlikely, I say we treat Mizzou like every MoFo who tries to stab you in the back and run off to the Caribbean...BANG HIS WIFE.

Kind of along these lines... We should break off communication with Missouri altogether. Do whatever it take to retain Nub and do whatever it takes get Notre Dame in the Big XII. Can you imagine how pissed off the Big 10 would be? Not to mention the entire state of Missouri. eff'em!
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: mizzouksu on May 17, 2010, 01:34:34 PM
I went to K-State and Missouri, so my feelings about this are very confused. (The only thing I know for sure is that I still hate KU.)
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: MadCat on May 17, 2010, 01:48:21 PM
I went to K-State and Missouri, so my feelings about this are very confused. (The only thing I know for sure is that I still hate KU.)

This guy went to K-State...maybe he can help you: Link (http://twitter.com/MIZZOUHOOPSSID)
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: Dugout DickStone on May 17, 2010, 04:12:44 PM
I have found that if you mention recruiting in Texas they get very mad.  They insist Pinkel will continue to recruit Texas as good as Mack does.
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: MadCat on May 17, 2010, 04:55:08 PM
I have found that if you mention recruiting in Texas they get very mad.  They insist Pinkel will continue to recruit Texas as good as Mack does.

I heard some national radio pundit claim that adding Missouri and Nebraska to the Big Ten would open up that entire conference to the recruiting hotbeds of Texas and the lower Mississippi valley. :dunno:
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on May 17, 2010, 07:00:11 PM
I have found that if you mention recruiting in Texas they get very mad.  They insist Pinkel will continue to recruit Texas as good as Mack does.

I heard some national radio pundit claim that adding Missouri and Nebraska to the Big Ten would open up that entire conference to the recruiting hotbeds of Texas and the lower Mississippi valley. :dunno:

It would probably just close off Texas and the lower Mississippi Valley to Nebraska and Mizzou. Not many Big 10 games are televised there.
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: jtksu on May 18, 2010, 10:27:01 AM
I would probably treat Mizzou with heavy doses of antibiotics and methadone. :dunno:
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: MadCat on May 19, 2010, 09:40:48 AM
Ouch: Missouri can't hold its own in the Big 12  (http://www.tulsaworld.com/sportsextra/OU/article.aspx?subjectid=92&articleid=20100519_202_B1_ANYONE178350)

Quote
Since the Big 12 started competition in 1996, Missouri has won or shared four regular-season championships and eight titles overall when you include postseason Big 12 tournaments.

No, I'm not talking about just football or men's and women's basketball championships. That is the combined number of titles the 18 men's and women's teams have won for Mizzou over the past 14 years!

...

Even though MU's budget ranks ahead of Texas Tech, Kansas State, Colorado, Iowa State and Baylor, the Tigers are dead last in the Big 12 when it comes to overall team championships.

Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: WillieWatanabe on May 19, 2010, 09:51:09 AM
Ouch: Missouri can't hold its own in the Big 12  (http://www.tulsaworld.com/sportsextra/OU/article.aspx?subjectid=92&articleid=20100519_202_B1_ANYONE178350)

Quote
Since the Big 12 started competition in 1996, Missouri has won or shared four regular-season championships and eight titles overall when you include postseason Big 12 tournaments.

No, I'm not talking about just football or men's and women's basketball championships. That is the combined number of titles the 18 men's and women's teams have won for Mizzou over the past 14 years!

...

Even though MU's budget ranks ahead of Texas Tech, Kansas State, Colorado, Iowa State and Baylor, the Tigers are dead last in the Big 12 when it comes to overall team championships.



Look at this smug bastard....he LOVED writing that article...

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tulsaworld.com%2Farticleimages%2F2010%2F20100519_B1_sittler-dave.jpg&hash=38d3bcaeae9f7600d05be9139988777cae0f806b)
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: wELLsculptedbrows on May 19, 2010, 09:52:12 AM
http://www.kansascity.com/2010/05/18/1955399/big-ten-widens-expansion-speculation.html (http://www.kansascity.com/2010/05/18/1955399/big-ten-widens-expansion-speculation.html)

Oh, boy. This could be fun. Can't wait to indulge my relatively newly found disdain for all things Mizzou.
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: WavetheWheat on May 19, 2010, 10:44:53 AM
Ouch: Missouri can't hold its own in the Big 12  (http://www.tulsaworld.com/sportsextra/OU/article.aspx?subjectid=92&articleid=20100519_202_B1_ANYONE178350)

Quote
Since the Big 12 started competition in 1996, Missouri has won or shared four regular-season championships and eight titles overall when you include postseason Big 12 tournaments.

No, I'm not talking about just football or men's and women's basketball championships. That is the combined number of titles the 18 men's and women's teams have won for Mizzou over the past 14 years!

...

Even though MU's budget ranks ahead of Texas Tech, Kansas State, Colorado, Iowa State and Baylor, the Tigers are dead last in the Big 12 when it comes to overall team championships.



Look at this smug bastard....he LOVED writing that article...

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tulsaworld.com%2Farticleimages%2F2010%2F20100519_B1_sittler-dave.jpg&hash=38d3bcaeae9f7600d05be9139988777cae0f806b)
Awesome.  He absolutely destroyed Mizzou.
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: bakerman on May 19, 2010, 11:19:09 AM
Ouch: Missouri can't hold its own in the Big 12  (http://www.tulsaworld.com/sportsextra/OU/article.aspx?subjectid=92&articleid=20100519_202_B1_ANYONE178350)

Quote
Since the Big 12 started competition in 1996, Missouri has won or shared four regular-season championships and eight titles overall when you include postseason Big 12 tournaments.

No, I'm not talking about just football or men's and women's basketball championships. That is the combined number of titles the 18 men's and women's teams have won for Mizzou over the past 14 years!

...

Even though MU's budget ranks ahead of Texas Tech, Kansas State, Colorado, Iowa State and Baylor, the Tigers are dead last in the Big 12 when it comes to overall team championships.




I just found this from another source and was going to post it. Glad I checked first. I find it  :lol: that they are the only B12 team with single digit championships.
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: WavetheWheat on May 19, 2010, 12:46:17 PM
=== Big 12 Conference titles by school === (Its on Wikipedia it must true)

*Texas - 106
*Nebraska - 68
*Texas A&M - 43
*Oklahoma - 38
*Baylor - 36
*Oklahoma State - 35
*Colorado - 27
*Kansas - 22
*Iowa State - 11
*Texas Tech - 10
*Kansas State - 7
*Missouri - 6
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: steve dave on May 19, 2010, 12:46:49 PM
=== Big 12 Conference titles by school ===

*Texas - 106
*Nebraska - 68
*Texas A&M - 43
*Oklahoma - 38
*Baylor - 36
*Oklahoma State - 35
*Colorado - 27
*Kansas - 22
*Iowa State - 11
*Texas Tech - 10
*Kansas State - 7
*Missouri - 6

LMAO at Mizzou, what a bunch of losers  :lol:
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: WavetheWheat on May 19, 2010, 12:55:28 PM
=== Big 12 Conference titles by school ===

*Texas - 106
*Nebraska - 68
*Texas A&M - 43
*Oklahoma - 38
*Baylor - 36
*Oklahoma State - 35
*Colorado - 27
*Kansas - 22
*Iowa State - 11
*Texas Tech - 10
*Kansas State - 7
*Missouri - 6

LMAO at Mizzou, what a bunch of losers  :lol:
Agreed...they suck.

Big 12 North sans Nebraska looks pretty putrid.
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: pissclams on May 19, 2010, 12:58:46 PM
=== Big 12 Conference titles by school ===

*Texas - 106
*Nebraska - 68
*Texas A&M - 43
*Oklahoma - 38
*Baylor - 36
*Oklahoma State - 35
*Colorado - 27
*Kansas - 22
*Iowa State - 11
*Texas Tech - 10
*Kansas State - 7
*Missouri - 6

LMAO at Mizzou, what a bunch of losers  :lol:
Agreed...they suck.

Big 12 North sans Nebraska looks pretty putrid.
=== Big 12 Conference titles by school === (Its on Wikipedia it must true)

*Texas - 106
*Nebraska - 68
*Texas A&M - 43
*Oklahoma - 38
*Baylor - 36
*Oklahoma State - 35
*Colorado - 27
*Kansas - 22
*Iowa State - 11
*Texas Tech - 10
*Kansas State - 7
*Missouri - 6
boil the numbers down to exclude all non-revenue sports
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: pissclams on May 19, 2010, 01:02:29 PM
i'll help-
Kansas State - 1 

 :ksu:
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: Pete on May 19, 2010, 01:08:20 PM
i'll help-
Kansas State - 1 

 :ksu:

Still ahead of Mizzou.   :gocho:
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: yosh on May 19, 2010, 01:11:28 PM
i'll help-
Kansas State - 1 

 :ksu:

Kansas wins in a landslide. 
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: Pete on May 19, 2010, 01:20:04 PM
i'll help-
Kansas State - 1 

 :ksu:

Kansas wins in a landslide. 

Do you count the tournament wins or the regular season wins?  'Cause mizzou has a tourney win.
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: pissclams on May 19, 2010, 01:26:24 PM
i'd choose regular season over tourney
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: WavetheWheat on May 19, 2010, 01:27:40 PM
boil the numbers down to exclude all non-revenue sports

Revenue Sports + baseball
Kansas - 17
OU -11
Texas - 10
Nebraska - 6
OSU - 4
ISU - 3
Texas A&M - 2
KSU - 1
Colorado - 1
Texas Tech - 1
Mizzou - 1
Baylor - 0

Revenue Sports (Football/Basketball)
Kansas - 16
OU - 10
Texas - 6
OSU - 3
ISU - 3
Nebraska - 2
KSU - 1
Colorado - 1
Texas A&M - 1
Mizzou - 1
Baylor - 0
Texas Tech - 0


*This is silly for 2 reasons.  1 there is 2x better chance to win something in hoops as there is a reg and tourney champ.  And this makes a basketball conference champ the same as football which isn't true.  Fball is easily worth 2x more.

Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: bakerman on May 19, 2010, 02:09:13 PM
=== Big 12 Conference titles by school === (Its on Wikipedia it must true)

*Texas - 106
*Nebraska - 68
*Texas A&M - 43
*Oklahoma - 38
*Baylor - 36
*Oklahoma State - 35
*Colorado - 27
*Kansas - 22
*Iowa State - 11
*Texas Tech - 10
*Kansas State - 7
*Missouri - 6


Someone should tell this to the guy that wrote that article. JFC at the very least you check wikipedia before you publish an article...
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on May 19, 2010, 02:14:06 PM
=== Big 12 Conference titles by school === (Its on Wikipedia it must true)

*Texas - 106
*Nebraska - 68
*Texas A&M - 43
*Oklahoma - 38
*Baylor - 36
*Oklahoma State - 35
*Colorado - 27
*Kansas - 22
*Iowa State - 11
*Texas Tech - 10
*Kansas State - 7
*Missouri - 6


Someone should tell this to the guy that wrote that article. JFC at the very least you check wikipedia before you publish an article...

He probably doesn't realize that KU and K-State are different schools, and that their championships should be counted separately.
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: yosh on May 19, 2010, 02:24:12 PM
Thank god for Title 9 or we'd have really low numbers.   :facepalm:
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: WavetheWheat on May 19, 2010, 03:03:32 PM
=== Big 12 Conference titles by school === (Its on Wikipedia it must true)

*Texas - 106
*Nebraska - 68
*Texas A&M - 43
*Oklahoma - 38
*Baylor - 36
*Oklahoma State - 35
*Colorado - 27
*Kansas - 22
*Iowa State - 11
*Texas Tech - 10
*Kansas State - 7
*Missouri - 6


Someone should tell this to the guy that wrote that article. JFC at the very least you check wikipedia before you publish an article...
He was counting divisional championships in football....Cats would have 3 more if you count this way.
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: bakerman on May 19, 2010, 03:12:48 PM
=== Big 12 Conference titles by school === (Its on Wikipedia it must true)

*Texas - 106
*Nebraska - 68
*Texas A&M - 43
*Oklahoma - 38
*Baylor - 36
*Oklahoma State - 35
*Colorado - 27
*Kansas - 22
*Iowa State - 11
*Texas Tech - 10
*Kansas State - 7
*Missouri - 6


Someone should tell this to the guy that wrote that article. JFC at the very least you check wikipedia before you publish an article...
He was counting divisional championships in football....Cats would have 3 more if you count this way.

touche`   
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: pissclams on May 19, 2010, 04:00:11 PM
boil the numbers down to exclude all non-revenue sports

Revenue Sports + baseball
Kansas - 17
OU -11
Texas - 10
Nebraska - 6
OSU - 4
ISU - 3
Texas A&M - 2
KSU - 1
Colorado - 1
Texas Tech - 1
Mizzou - 1
Baylor - 0

Revenue Sports (Football/Basketball)
Kansas - 16
OU - 10
Texas - 6
OSU - 3
ISU - 3
Nebraska - 2
KSU - 1
Colorado - 1
Texas A&M - 1
Mizzou - 1
Baylor - 0
Texas Tech - 0


*This is silly for 2 reasons.  1 there is 2x better chance to win something in hoops as there is a reg and tourney champ.  And this makes a basketball conference champ the same as football which isn't true.  Fball is easily worth 2x more.


revenue sports are all that matters though.  pick a bball champ (regular season makes the most sense to me) and only count them, don't count both the tourney and the reg season...imo.

Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: WavetheWheat on May 19, 2010, 04:07:40 PM
boil the numbers down to exclude all non-revenue sports

Revenue Sports + baseball
Kansas - 17
OU -11
Texas - 10
Nebraska - 6
OSU - 4
ISU - 3
Texas A&M - 2
KSU - 1
Colorado - 1
Texas Tech - 1
Mizzou - 1
Baylor - 0

Revenue Sports (Football/Basketball)
Kansas - 16
OU - 10
Texas - 6
OSU - 3
ISU - 3
Nebraska - 2
KSU - 1
Colorado - 1
Texas A&M - 1
Mizzou - 1
Baylor - 0
Texas Tech - 0


*This is silly for 2 reasons.  1 there is 2x better chance to win something in hoops as there is a reg and tourney champ.  And this makes a basketball conference champ the same as football which isn't true.  Fball is easily worth 2x more.


revenue sports are all that matters though.  pick a bball champ (regular season makes the most sense to me) and only count them, don't count both the tourney and the reg season...imo.



Here you go (Football Championship+Basketball reg season champs)

Kansas - 10
OU - 7
Texas - 5
ISU - 2
Nebraska - 2
KSU - 1
OSU - 1
Colorado - 1
Texas A&M - 1
Mizzou - 0
Baylor - 0
Texas Tech - 0
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: OregonSmock on May 19, 2010, 06:10:12 PM
Wow... KU owns the Big 12. 
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: pissclams on May 19, 2010, 07:01:57 PM
Wow... KU owns the Big 12. 
has there been any doubt specific to basketball?  :dunno: 
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: MadCat on May 19, 2010, 09:03:26 PM
Wow... KU owns the Big 12. 
Like Al Davis owns the Raiders?
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: deputy dawg on May 21, 2010, 01:47:12 PM
boil the numbers down to exclude all non-revenue sports

Revenue Sports + baseball
Kansas - 17
OU -11
Texas - 10
Nebraska - 6
OSU - 4
ISU - 3
Texas A&M - 2
KSU - 1
Colorado - 1
Texas Tech - 1
Mizzou - 1
Baylor - 0

Revenue Sports (Football/Basketball)
Kansas - 16
OU - 10
Texas - 6
OSU - 3
ISU - 3
Nebraska - 2
KSU - 1
Colorado - 1
Texas A&M - 1
Mizzou - 1
Baylor - 0
Texas Tech - 0


*This is silly for 2 reasons.  1 there is 2x better chance to win something in hoops as there is a reg and tourney champ.  And this makes a basketball conference champ the same as football which isn't true.  Fball is easily worth 2x more.


revenue sports are all that matters though.  pick a bball champ (regular season makes the most sense to me) and only count them, don't count both the tourney and the reg season...imo.



Here you go (Football Championship+Basketball reg season champs)

Kansas - 10
OU - 7
Texas - 5
ISU - 2
Nebraska - 2
KSU - 1
OSU - 1
Colorado - 1
Texas A&M - 1
Mizzou - 0
Baylor - 0
Texas Tech - 0
I like the way it's written to only include conference and not divisional championships.  Since ku has neither in football, it's no big deal, but it IS a great way to ignore 3 of K-State's championships.  Nice.
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: deputy dawg on May 21, 2010, 01:49:36 PM
http://blogs.pitch.com/plog/2010/05/missouri_youll_have_to_wait_to.php

Looks like the Big 10 may be stringing Mizzou along.....

Is there some way to deflect that self-important conference from setting the terms of conference realignment, or any conference realignment at all?
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: steve dave on May 21, 2010, 01:50:04 PM
I like the way it's written to only include conference and not divisional championships.  Since ku has neither in football, it's no big deal, but it IS a great way to ignore 3 of K-State's championships.  Nice.

 :flush:
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: OK_Cat on May 21, 2010, 02:55:38 PM
Cheerleader:  Hey, wanna come over to my house later?

Dorky kid:  Yeah! 

Dorky kid brags about it to other dorky kids/some of the cool kids

Cheerleader:  Just kiddin!



 :curse:
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: Dugout DickStone on May 21, 2010, 04:59:35 PM
Did you guys see that Family Guy epi where Meg was invited to Connie DeMico's birthday party and then got picked for 7 minutes in heaven game with that guy but when they opened the closet door she was kissing a pig?

Missouri is Meg.
Title: Re: How to treat Mizzou
Post by: ChiComCat on May 23, 2010, 12:01:23 PM
Did you guys see that Family Guy epi where Meg was invited to Connie DeMico's birthday party and then got picked for 7 minutes in heaven game with that guy but when they opened the closet door she was kissing a pig?

Missouri is Meg.

Solid analogy