goemaw.com
TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: kim carnes on October 15, 2016, 11:08:29 AM
-
...
-
Perine is shifty
-
Napped right through that first drive.
-
Should've kept napping. Meh.
-
Our QB is awful
-
prepare your anuses for 55-0
-
When was the last time we didn't get off to a slow start on the road against a good team?
-
Our QB is awful
That's an understatement.
-
I really hate Sean.
-
Sure looks like the best defense in the big 12
-
Lmao
-
BOOMER
-
Looking out the window, I see some yard work that needs tending to this morning. Looks like a good time to get started.
-
jfc this is awful on an entirely new level
-
Looking out the window, I see some yard work that needs tending to this morning. Looks like a good time to get started.
Think I'll run some plumbing in the new bathroom. Need to update the handiness thread.
-
A team finally realized that they can consistently exploit the DBs playing 10+ yards off the line of scrimmage
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
-
I like it when the announcers poke fun at our nepotism
-
Does our offensive line hate Hubes, or does Hubes hate us?
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
-
we f'ing suck
-
Finally my prayers are answered with Ertz getting injured and they bring in Hubener. How infuriating.
-
This is so infuriating. :bang: :curse:
-
This game is over. Why play Hubener? Get effin' Delton some game experience.
-
Delton needs to turn in his pads, if he can't play for this team he sucks
-
What happened to our secondary that was supposed to be amazing? Is it a scheme thing? From a LSFBIQ standpoint, they look terrible and seem to be exposed in every game.
-
bb gun joe is wearing eye black on just one eye, interesting
-
least athletic team in the b12
just terrible, the entire program sucks crap. thanks snyder, get over yourself you scrub
-
4th and 6, in fg range, and stoops goes for it. That is the level of respect our performance demands.
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
-
We are not good u guys
-
We are not good u guys
i just said that (but using more emotional emotions)
-
I'm regretting booking those AA reward tix for TCU. :(
-
Good grief please let this be the last year of Snyder.
-
If snyder has to get to 200, we may have a couple seasons yet
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
-
Defense had a good 2nd half. Offense is bad. We'll still win 6-7 games.
-
Defense is mediocre.
-
Defense had a good 2nd half. Offense is bad. We'll still win 6-7 games.
yup nice and not very good
-
Apparently we didn't make it to the post season last year
-
Our defense looked better because OU wasn't trying as hard to score.
-
Our defense looked better because OU wasn't trying as hard to score.
No. Any time Stoops has a chance to put 50+ on Bill he does it. Our defense played well in the 2nd until that last big play. Offense was inept though so it didn't matter.
-
What was worse, the game or Twitter right now? :sdeek:
-
We have a good plan: get destroyed on defense in the first half and then play less shitty in the second = crow about adjustments.
Maybe a good defense plays well the whole game?
-
We have a good plan: get destroyed on defense in the first half and then play less shitty in the second = crow about adjustments.
Maybe a good defense plays well the whole game?
Fair.
I still think the offense is a bigger issue in today's version of college football.
-
I really hate Sean.
:confused:
-
I really hate Sean.
:confused:
I really hate his approach to kickoffs. Our coverage typically doesn't net us any gain versus kicking it to the endzone.
-
Our defense looked better because OU wasn't trying as hard to score.
No. Any time Stoops has a chance to put 50+ on Bill he does it. Our defense played well in the 2nd until that last big play. Offense was inept though so it didn't matter.
Might have to agree to disagree. I still regularly saw our DBs getting burnt, still saw them unable to tackle, and saw a deceased tempo and type of play from OU. He might have been playing tight to preserve the win and run clock versus some altruistic don't score on Old Ballz as your took it.
-
I really hate Sean.
:confused:
I really hate his approach to kickoffs. Our coverage typically doesn't net us any gain versus kicking it to the endzone.
Did you not hear the broadcasters talk about the wind issues? We had multiple touchbacks last week. OU didn't have any touchbacks either.
-
I really hate Sean.
:confused:
I really hate his approach to kickoffs. Our coverage typically doesn't net us any gain versus kicking it to the endzone.
Did you not hear the broadcasters talk about the wind issues? We had multiple touchbacks last week. OU didn't have any touchbacks either.
Actually incorrect as the first and last drives we had started with touchbacks.
http://www.espn.com/college-football/playbyplay?gameId=400869608
And the announcers were pretty clear that wind should matter that much.
But point is that this has been a consistent issue where his schemes out do what we can actually do on field.
-
I really hate Sean.
:confused:
I really hate his approach to kickoffs. Our coverage typically doesn't net us any gain versus kicking it to the endzone.
Did you not hear the broadcasters talk about the wind issues? We had multiple touchbacks last week. OU didn't have any touchbacks either.
Actually incorrect as the first and last drives we had started with touchbacks.
http://www.espn.com/college-football/playbyplay?gameId=400869608
And the announcers were pretty clear that wind should matter that much.
But point is that this has been a consistent issue where his schemes out do what we can actually do on field.
When they were talking about the wind not mattering they were specifically referring to two consecutive over throws that Ertz had it wasn't in relation to kicking.
No the point is that when the kicker is able to kick the ball in the endzone he can. He benched Patterson because he wasn't able to get touchbacks, now the kicker gets them when he can, I'm not sure what more you expect from a position coach.
I'm also 80% confident that if you averaged the defensive field position on non touchback kicks it would be near or inside the 25 but its whatever I'm sure you would find some loophole to avoid saying you were actually wrong.
-
It was pretty damn windy there today. The flags were moving the whole time and the north end zone goal posts were swaying. The wind absolutely had an impact on the kicks today.
-
I really hate Sean.
:confused:
I really hate his approach to kickoffs. Our coverage typically doesn't net us any gain versus kicking it to the endzone.
Did you not hear the broadcasters talk about the wind issues? We had multiple touchbacks last week. OU didn't have any touchbacks either.
Actually incorrect as the first and last drives we had started with touchbacks.
http://www.espn.com/college-football/playbyplay?gameId=400869608
And the announcers were pretty clear that wind should matter that much.
But point is that this has been a consistent issue where his schemes out do what we can actually do on field.
When they were talking about the wind not mattering they were specifically referring to two consecutive over throws that Ertz had it wasn't in relation to kicking.
No the point is that when the kicker is able to kick the ball in the endzone he can. He benched Patterson because he wasn't able to get touchbacks, now the kicker gets them when he can, I'm not sure what more you expect from a position coach.
I'm also 80% confident that if you averaged the defensive field position on non touchback kicks it would be near or inside the 25 but its whatever I'm sure you would find some loophole to avoid saying you were actually wrong.
Yes I'm avoiding it. Or you stuck your foot in your mouth and are now the one obfuscating because you were wrong. Because nothing says loophole like a binary right wrong statement and not paying attention to the game drives. OU has the ability to cover and that is why they didn't use the touchback. I guess McCrane did something different when he got his touchback the one time he was (probably) allowed to.
But I'd welcome someone to show me some stats on the field position advantage.
-
I lol'd at all our missed tackles today.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
I really hate Sean.
:confused:
I really hate his approach to kickoffs. Our coverage typically doesn't net us any gain versus kicking it to the endzone.
Did you not hear the broadcasters talk about the wind issues? We had multiple touchbacks last week. OU didn't have any touchbacks either.
Actually incorrect as the first and last drives we had started with touchbacks.
http://www.espn.com/college-football/playbyplay?gameId=400869608
And the announcers were pretty clear that wind should matter that much.
But point is that this has been a consistent issue where his schemes out do what we can actually do on field.
When they were talking about the wind not mattering they were specifically referring to two consecutive over throws that Ertz had it wasn't in relation to kicking.
No the point is that when the kicker is able to kick the ball in the endzone he can. He benched Patterson because he wasn't able to get touchbacks, now the kicker gets them when he can, I'm not sure what more you expect from a position coach.
I'm also 80% confident that if you averaged the defensive field position on non touchback kicks it would be near or inside the 25 but its whatever I'm sure you would find some loophole to avoid saying you were actually wrong.
Yes I'm avoiding it. Or you stuck your foot in your mouth and are now the one obfuscating because you were wrong. Because nothing says loophole like a binary right wrong statement and not paying attention to the game drives. OU has the ability to cover and that is why they didn't use the touchback. I guess McCrane did something different when he got his touchback the one time he was (probably) allowed to.
But I'd welcome someone to show me some stats on the field position advantage.
36 kickoffs on the season; 12 touchbacks, 2 returns of 20-29 yards, 3 returns of 30-39 yards, 0 returns of 40+
So to recap only 5 out of the 36 kicks returns on the year were for more than 20 yards. None over 39. Also worth noting that three of the five were from a now demoted kicker. Only one of those two 20+ returns resulted in a possession outside of the 30 yard line, so we've had a whole 4 out of 36 kicks that had returns lengthy enough to start the possession on the plus side of the 30.
I'm sure you'll either ignore this or find a way to argue back that you were right, continuing your lengthy streak of never conceding you were wrong about anything.
-
Wow you're a tool bag. It's great that you can't admit you're wrong about anything and continue down this line of blaming everyone else for your errors.
-
Sean h8rs are cute
-
Oh and leaving out the two crap teams, OU averaged out to starting at their 30, Tech was 22.4, WVU was 24 if you include a gift of a holding call. Exclude that and it's 29.33, include the real run back and it becomes 33.75. Stanford was 32.5. Oh and last years Ark was 32.85, OSU 28.75, ISU 25.33, Baylor 28.66, just random teams I picked for no good reason.
So with the exception of Tech game this year we've been giving away yards on what is supposedly the most dangerous set of plays in football (see explanation for moving the kick off). So yeah there isn't any real benefit for kicking it so a team can make a return attempt/our coverage to get there early. More often than not we are giving the other team yards from the games I've looked at. Combine that with the explosive effects of a long runback/TD and it's pretty clear why so many teams go for touchbacks and not returns.
-
You still don't know if we are kicking it short intentionally on every kickoff so this entire argument is moot. The only way you can reasonably blame Sean for this is if you know which kickoffs are being called short and the impending result. The one against OU that apparently led you to post that you hate Sean was fielded on the goal line so you'll have to let me know how you were able to determine that McCrane was instructed to kick it short.
Also I'm not certain how you figured that OU averaged the 30 on their starting field position according to ESPN, OU's drives commencing from kickoffs started on the 37, 23, 25, and 25; that's the 28 yard line.
-
So you still aren't ready to admit you were wrong from before, but lets move past that.
And some basics on stats, you exclude values that don't fit within your data set. So those 2 touchbacks at the 25 you include, you shouldn't have included because they are, wait for it, touchbacks. I'm specifically talking about kicking off for returns versus kicks for touchbacks/unreturnable. You do bring up a valid point that I don't know which are kicked for return. But we can reasonably assume they aren't being kicked for return when they are kicked 9 yards deep or out of the back of the endzone. I for one think McCrane can do that just fine, as he has shown the leg ability in the past. And I guess we'll have to take some common sense approach to this when it's obvious they are kicking for coverage since that is something we've done consistently this year, as 66% of our kickoffs are for coverage, by your numbers. And that pads your touchback numbers with shitty teams and teams that just didn't want to take it out, since as you point out we don't really know Sean's intentions.
I'll await your next post where you blame me again for being right and pointing out your fallacies without admitting you're wrong.
-
OMG, I'm done