goemaw.com

General Discussion => The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit => Topic started by: gatoveintisiete on September 26, 2016, 06:28:05 PM

Title: Presidential debate final stage (now moderated by an adult!)
Post by: gatoveintisiete on September 26, 2016, 06:28:05 PM
Get in here libbies and mock the mump out of Don before he's your pres-elect, really give him what-for, make fun of Hill too to dust the trail like you don't care who wins.

It's the first round, let's get it on!
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: wetwillie on September 26, 2016, 06:32:01 PM
I doubt anyone even watches this thing.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: SdK on September 26, 2016, 06:36:46 PM
What time and channel?
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: The Big Train on September 26, 2016, 06:40:11 PM
I imagine it's gonna be Goldberg and Stone Cold powering bombing each other for 2 hours, that's how I see it in my head anyways
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 26, 2016, 06:49:42 PM
I think most people care who wins
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: The Big Train on September 26, 2016, 06:57:15 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fuploads.tapatalk-cdn.com%2F20160926%2F5aba068511391c909d7ea50509613de4.jpg&hash=8dfc317d354632c7219f6c2776d724a3e975ef81)
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 26, 2016, 06:58:08 PM
Let's go Hillary!
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: CNS on September 26, 2016, 07:06:18 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fuploads.tapatalk-cdn.com%2F20160926%2F5aba068511391c909d7ea50509613de4.jpg&hash=8dfc317d354632c7219f6c2776d724a3e975ef81)

Lol

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: wetwillie on September 26, 2016, 07:17:08 PM
this event may have more viewership than I originally anticipated
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 26, 2016, 07:18:06 PM
I have a crap load of work that I should be doing tonight but I'm blowing it off so this better be great
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: The Big Train on September 26, 2016, 07:29:15 PM
It's gonna be a great night guys

https://twitter.com/deadspin/status/780562938134487040
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: stunted on September 26, 2016, 07:38:01 PM
 :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: gatoveintisiete on September 26, 2016, 07:48:18 PM
Omg  :love:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: stunted on September 26, 2016, 07:57:23 PM
ivanka has some huge tits
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 26, 2016, 08:00:12 PM
Just got home, picked up some BBQ on the way. I'm so amped rn
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: bones129 on September 26, 2016, 08:02:26 PM
Let's get on with it!
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: wetwillie on September 26, 2016, 08:02:44 PM
Hilary appears to be able to walk to the building under her own power.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: chum1 on September 26, 2016, 08:02:54 PM
This set is rough ridin' tacky.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: spacedog on September 26, 2016, 08:03:52 PM
LET'S DO THIS :weirdrobert:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: The Big Train on September 26, 2016, 08:05:15 PM
This is gonna be good
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: wetwillie on September 26, 2016, 08:05:59 PM
Lock her up!
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: bones129 on September 26, 2016, 08:06:33 PM
Lock him up!
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: puniraptor on September 26, 2016, 08:08:31 PM
hilbot reciting memorized speech

one time I had to memorized the entirety of EAP's The Raven
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: puniraptor on September 26, 2016, 08:09:15 PM
is there a split screen showing both their faces? where at?

live youtube only plz
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 26, 2016, 08:09:32 PM
Ksuw has to be fuming rn with the opening remarks  :lol:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: spacedog on September 26, 2016, 08:09:46 PM
watching splitscreen on NBC now. It's amazing.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 26, 2016, 08:10:30 PM
Splitscreen on Fox news (also Dana perino  :fatty: )
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: wetwillie on September 26, 2016, 08:11:07 PM
They took our jobs!
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: wetwillie on September 26, 2016, 08:11:44 PM
Omg Trumped up trickle down!
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: chum1 on September 26, 2016, 08:12:47 PM
She's trying to get under his skin.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 26, 2016, 08:14:36 PM
He's such an idiot, it's great
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on September 26, 2016, 08:15:18 PM
So far, Trump is speaking specifics. Hillary is speaking platitudes. She has not used one solitary single specific example.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: spacedog on September 26, 2016, 08:15:36 PM
Trump is not doing a good job thus far IMO.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: puniraptor on September 26, 2016, 08:15:53 PM
man he has done some serious Buddhist chill training. maybe on drugs?
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: wetwillie on September 26, 2016, 08:16:53 PM
He is starting to get riled
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on September 26, 2016, 08:17:13 PM
Hillary: "We're on the precipice of having a better economy." :lol:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: chum1 on September 26, 2016, 08:17:34 PM
He's getting antsy. 15 minutes in.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: stunted on September 26, 2016, 08:17:47 PM
clinton is boring me with numbers
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 26, 2016, 08:18:09 PM
Hoax!
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: The Big Train on September 26, 2016, 08:18:51 PM
His tiny little baby hands are shaking every time he takes a drink
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 26, 2016, 08:19:35 PM
Semi-exact  :lol:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: puniraptor on September 26, 2016, 08:19:45 PM
that solydra zing attempt clanked off the rim
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on September 26, 2016, 08:20:10 PM
You've been thinking about this for 30 years! :lol:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: spacedog on September 26, 2016, 08:20:22 PM
This is going to get really good.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on September 26, 2016, 08:21:46 PM
He's killing her with NAFTA.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: wetwillie on September 26, 2016, 08:22:11 PM
Dear god she is flustered
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on September 26, 2016, 08:22:44 PM
Hillary was for NAFTA before she was against it. :lol:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: puniraptor on September 26, 2016, 08:23:16 PM
TPP is killing her

she flopped on it for Bernie, not him tho
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: chum1 on September 26, 2016, 08:23:38 PM
Oh, man. He's yelling.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on September 26, 2016, 08:23:50 PM
Did Hillary just hawk her book at the debate?
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 26, 2016, 08:24:31 PM
Oh, man. He's yelling.

Blood coming out of his... Where ever
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on September 26, 2016, 08:24:39 PM
Oh, man. He's yelling.

Yes but his indignation about NAFTA sounds genuine which is what matters.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: wetwillie on September 26, 2016, 08:25:21 PM
Oh, man. He's yelling.

Blood coming out of his... Where ever

:lol:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: SkinnyBenny on September 26, 2016, 08:25:47 PM
He hates being interrupted and always goes "EXCUSE ME" and now he's interrupting the crap out of her. He's butthurt lolfart


Omg the way he chimed in on the website thing was so pathetic.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: bones129 on September 26, 2016, 08:26:03 PM
Lester is about to lose control of this thing.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 26, 2016, 08:26:14 PM
Oh, man. He's yelling.

Yes but his indignation about NAFTA sounds genuine which is what matters.

Genuinely stupid  :lol:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: stunted on September 26, 2016, 08:26:31 PM
"but at least i"

 :lol:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: CNS on September 26, 2016, 08:27:48 PM
I hope ISIS hits the place this debate is right now.  Sorry Lester, but some gave all.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on September 26, 2016, 08:28:53 PM
Uh oh. He's rambling and getting flustered.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: stunted on September 26, 2016, 08:29:18 PM
hillary's eyes are losing control
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 26, 2016, 08:30:04 PM
He's so angry rn omg
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: puniraptor on September 26, 2016, 08:30:42 PM
this is amazing
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: wetwillie on September 26, 2016, 08:31:06 PM
I think she is smelling blood now, with him rambling.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 26, 2016, 08:33:03 PM
even has to get in how much he makes  :lol:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: chum1 on September 26, 2016, 08:34:31 PM
https://twitter.com/itsjuanlove/status/780579498953674752
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 26, 2016, 08:35:34 PM
 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: wetwillie on September 26, 2016, 08:36:02 PM
Omg that is amazing
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 26, 2016, 08:36:27 PM
he's getting decimated, 90 percent his own undoing
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: stunted on September 26, 2016, 08:36:55 PM
that makes me smart

Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on September 26, 2016, 08:38:13 PM
she's flailing.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: chum1 on September 26, 2016, 08:38:37 PM
He's very anxious talking about his finances.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on September 26, 2016, 08:38:51 PM
Yes he's doing very poorly now. Started good. Now out of control.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: puniraptor on September 26, 2016, 08:39:21 PM
hes getting wrecked on this tax return thing
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: wetwillie on September 26, 2016, 08:39:32 PM
He is on the ropes
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: CNS on September 26, 2016, 08:40:51 PM
Started good?  He is basically reading the tabloid headlines.  Zero detail, zero plans, zero policy.  Just saying over and over how horrible things are.  The closest he has gotten to an actual policy was he wants to raise tariffs then goes on to say that we import so much.  He doesn't understand tariffs very well.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 26, 2016, 08:41:35 PM
people are actually going to vote for that guy  :lol:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: SkinnyBenny on September 26, 2016, 08:41:58 PM
she's flailing.

John dougie post
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on September 26, 2016, 08:42:47 PM
He has allowed himself to become a charicature. Falling on his face.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: HELLHAMMER on September 26, 2016, 08:43:13 PM
He is horrible at lying, she is excellent at it.  They're both slime balls.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: CNS on September 26, 2016, 08:43:21 PM
He caricatured himself, though.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 26, 2016, 08:44:14 PM
OMG RACE TIME
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: puniraptor on September 26, 2016, 08:44:39 PM
the where you land [it] becomes a 3rd world country could have been a great line, but he wasted it that ramble
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: CNS on September 26, 2016, 08:45:25 PM
Everything he says he is strong at is the job of congress, not pres. 

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: puniraptor on September 26, 2016, 08:47:18 PM
you can question her morals, ethics, trustworthiness and especially motives, but anyone who questions hilbot's ability is lying to themselves
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 26, 2016, 08:48:46 PM
 :blah:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: wetwillie on September 26, 2016, 08:49:57 PM
you can question her morals, ethics, trustworthiness and especially motives, but anyone who questions hilbot's ability is lying to themselves

All with advanced stage Alzheimer's to boot
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: puniraptor on September 26, 2016, 08:53:08 PM
hes looking like an idiot fool idiot right now
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: The Big Train on September 26, 2016, 08:54:27 PM
Guys one of these two is gonna be our next president :blank:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: puniraptor on September 26, 2016, 08:55:18 PM
im curious what he thinks he will do as POTUS to enforce this community law and order he hollers about
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: SkinnyBenny on September 26, 2016, 08:58:05 PM
"Nope, yer wrong." *weird smug look*
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: kim carnes on September 26, 2016, 08:58:57 PM
I just watched roughly 3 minutes of this.  They both seem rational, qualified.  I think we're in good hands.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 26, 2016, 08:59:24 PM
he's so rough ridin' petty  :lol:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: wetwillie on September 26, 2016, 09:00:16 PM
This wasn't as good as I had hoped. 
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: mocat on September 26, 2016, 09:03:10 PM
Why is she so bad at this
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: bucket on September 26, 2016, 09:04:24 PM
https://twitter.com/GovGaryJohnson/status/780583472452792321
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: CNS on September 26, 2016, 09:05:01 PM
She would do so much better if she just came out and said that birther  rant was bat crap  crazy, not  coherent, and outright Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!). 

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 26, 2016, 09:06:04 PM
yeah, i fell asleep and forgot what crazy crap he even said
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: wetwillie on September 26, 2016, 09:07:52 PM
Hold the phones we may start taking about putin
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: CNS on September 26, 2016, 09:07:56 PM
Lester is the worst so far

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on September 26, 2016, 09:08:15 PM
Asking hillary about cyber security!  :lol:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 26, 2016, 09:08:32 PM
Lester is the worst so far

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

he's doing great imo
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: chum1 on September 26, 2016, 09:10:27 PM
400 lbs!!!!
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 26, 2016, 09:10:55 PM
i love the way he just calls it  "cyber"  :lol:

 :blah:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: chum1 on September 26, 2016, 09:11:04 PM
He's losing his filter!
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: stunted on September 26, 2016, 09:11:11 PM
someone sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds

 :lol:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 26, 2016, 09:11:22 PM
400 lbs!!!!

 :lol:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: SkinnyBenny on September 26, 2016, 09:11:58 PM
So glad he keeps referring to the cyber.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: The Big Train on September 26, 2016, 09:12:02 PM
:dubious:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: SkinnyBenny on September 26, 2016, 09:12:45 PM
400 lbs!!!!

That was so bizarre
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on September 26, 2016, 09:13:05 PM
I think they are both computer illiterate.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on September 26, 2016, 09:13:16 PM
And Donald completely whiffed. She gave him all the rope to hang her with her emails, and he whiffed. I've never seen such political malpractice in my life.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: CNS on September 26, 2016, 09:13:56 PM
"I have a son, he's 10 and is good with computers, and cyber is so tough....maybe undoable...."

I mean, what?!?!?  Did he rough ridin' blackout and realize he was still talking but had no clue about what?

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 26, 2016, 09:14:58 PM
I think they are both computer illiterate.

absolutely, it's so terrible
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: chum1 on September 26, 2016, 09:15:26 PM
https://twitter.com/GovHowardDean/status/780588448470163456
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on September 26, 2016, 09:15:38 PM
400 lbs!!!!

That was so bizarre

Totally unnecessary but a great visual.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: puniraptor on September 26, 2016, 09:16:11 PM
CYBER

CYBER is coffin and his brain is nails and his mouth is hammer
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 26, 2016, 09:16:31 PM
howard dean is great yaaahhhh
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: CNS on September 26, 2016, 09:16:59 PM
If we would have just completely robbed a country of its sole resource, we would have avoided an angry uprising.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: wetwillie on September 26, 2016, 09:17:16 PM
I think they are both computer illiterate.

I mean they are 70 years old FFS
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 26, 2016, 09:17:26 PM
Hillary sounding like don right now
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: CNS on September 26, 2016, 09:17:58 PM
It's contagious :runaway:

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on September 26, 2016, 09:18:34 PM
https://twitter.com/GovHowardDean/status/780588448470163456

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FxO5Oovp.gif&hash=2f09f7cb4ccc52145758a3a5a29f48eb028be874)
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: wetwillie on September 26, 2016, 09:18:51 PM
https://twitter.com/themattgalloway/status/780590659510083584
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 26, 2016, 09:19:53 PM
I have no idea what either of them are talking about.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 26, 2016, 09:20:30 PM
I have no idea what either of them are talking about.

they don't either
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: chum1 on September 26, 2016, 09:21:26 PM
He's killing himself on this Iraq war stuff.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: CNS on September 26, 2016, 09:21:31 PM
Mainstream media!

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 26, 2016, 09:22:46 PM
He's convinced me he was against Iraq. Not sure why that's part of the debate.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on September 26, 2016, 09:23:06 PM
The crowd is openly mocking him at this point. Stick a fork in him. He's done.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: chum1 on September 26, 2016, 09:23:24 PM
He made it 70 minutes before he totally lost it!
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: CNS on September 26, 2016, 09:23:43 PM
Much better temperament.....holy crap

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on September 26, 2016, 09:24:18 PM
Israel stopped the centrifuges.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: CNS on September 26, 2016, 09:24:37 PM
There's a person with a temperament that's got a problem.

  I bet he thinks The Hill is the absolute best.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 26, 2016, 09:25:15 PM
The crowd is openly mocking him at this point. Stick a fork in him. He's done.

Nobody is following any of this, and if they think they are, they are insane.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 26, 2016, 09:27:00 PM
https://twitter.com/JimNorton/status/780594264334016513
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: SkinnyBenny on September 26, 2016, 09:28:55 PM
It was amazing to watch her watch him when he was going off on that completely nonsensical 5-minute rant about...something.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on September 26, 2016, 09:29:15 PM
Looks like hillary's 90 minute battery has run down.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: puniraptor on September 26, 2016, 09:29:45 PM
NUCLEAR OR CYBER WHAT IS IT DONALD ANSWER THE QUESTION

OR ISLAMIC?
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: CNS on September 26, 2016, 09:30:50 PM
Trump has to hope that either Hill really does have a health issue or that the American ppl are bigger idiots than even he thinks they are.  If neither, he has no shot

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: puniraptor on September 26, 2016, 09:31:31 PM
he knows absolutely nothing about the military or defense. he should steer clear of that subject
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: DQ12 on September 26, 2016, 09:31:46 PM
donald finally has to debate against someone who doesn't substantively agree with most of his policy, and now he's in way way over his head.  he's looked completely foolish tonight, IMO.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 26, 2016, 09:32:38 PM
Hillary has digressed . . .
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 26, 2016, 09:33:28 PM
Trump has politics tourettes
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on September 26, 2016, 09:35:52 PM
This crowd is so stupid. Stfu!
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: puniraptor on September 26, 2016, 09:36:23 PM
aside: LOL at the US in japan for the altruistic motive of defending an ally. that's a side effect of a totally self serving agenda of projecting power in this portion of the globe.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: puniraptor on September 26, 2016, 09:37:40 PM
he missed a great opportunity to accuse Saudi Arabia of orchestrating 9/11
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: SkinnyBenny on September 26, 2016, 09:38:04 PM
"God, this bloviating fart is running for president." --Mrs. SB :love:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: CNS on September 26, 2016, 09:38:21 PM
Totally going to nuke rosie day one

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: stunted on September 26, 2016, 09:40:04 PM
ivanka's tits!
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: stunted on September 26, 2016, 09:40:46 PM
 :driving:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 26, 2016, 09:41:21 PM
bret baier is so sad, i almost feel sorry for the guy :frown:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: gatoveintisiete on September 26, 2016, 09:42:37 PM
Okay so Don goes 1up with two to play, he can close out the match at the next debate.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: CNS on September 26, 2016, 09:43:02 PM
When did cnn get this bad?

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: bucket on September 26, 2016, 09:43:33 PM
https://twitter.com/GovHowardDean/status/780588448470163456

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FxO5Oovp.gif&hash=2f09f7cb4ccc52145758a3a5a29f48eb028be874)

 :lol:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: chum1 on September 26, 2016, 09:43:56 PM
I am satisfied with that TV show!
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 26, 2016, 09:44:08 PM
Per ABC, the two most important issues are 1) who started birther, and 2) iraq war. What in the actual eff?
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: bucket on September 26, 2016, 09:44:15 PM
When did cnn get this bad?

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

NBC's moderator. What are you talking about?
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: bucket on September 26, 2016, 09:46:00 PM
Per ABC, the two most important issues are 1) who started birther, and 2) iraq war. What in the actual eff?

He completely blew the Iraq War question so I get that one. The birther question he got out of quickly. Which was smart on his part.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: SkinnyBenny on September 26, 2016, 09:46:38 PM
Okay so Don goes 1up with two to play, he can close out the match at the next debate.


LLLLLLOLLLLLLLL

Even Brit Hume is saying right now that gE user gatoveintisiete is full of crap
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: CNS on September 26, 2016, 09:47:07 PM
After the fact reporters.  Specifically the lady who looks like someone photo shopped the head of a much larger person onto her body.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: DQ12 on September 26, 2016, 09:47:46 PM
Okay so Don goes 1up with two to play, he can close out the match at the next debate.
you must be kidding.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 26, 2016, 09:48:00 PM
Per ABC, the two most important issues are 1) who started birther, and 2) iraq war. What in the actual eff?

He completely blew the Iraq War question so I get that one. The birther question he got out of quickly. Which was smart on his part.

How are those issues AT ALL? And, didnt she vote for it as a senator?
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 26, 2016, 09:48:57 PM
Okay so Don goes 1up with two to play, he can close out the match at the next debate.
you must be kidding.

Per ABC, which is obviously psychotic, don won the first 45.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: gatoveintisiete on September 26, 2016, 09:50:22 PM
She only won tabloid topics, nothing of consequence
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: bucket on September 26, 2016, 09:52:07 PM
Per ABC, the two most important issues are 1) who started birther, and 2) iraq war. What in the actual eff?

He completely blew the Iraq War question so I get that one. The birther question he got out of quickly. Which was smart on his part.

How are those issues AT ALL? And, didnt she vote for it as a senator?

Because he got a lay up for the Iraq War question from Matt Lauer and, apparently, expected to not get called on that tonight. He then proceeded to use a Sean Hannity phone call as an alibi. Good luck convincing the jury on that one.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 26, 2016, 09:53:50 PM
I think I'm starting to understand how people support these people, thx bucket
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: bones129 on September 26, 2016, 09:53:55 PM
Better Call Sean. lol
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: DQ12 on September 26, 2016, 09:54:11 PM
Huh.  i thought donald sounded dumber than ever.  Which is really saying something.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: gatoveintisiete on September 26, 2016, 09:54:46 PM
Nobody gives an eff about his taxes, his stance on the war she voted for, his 1973 racial disc charge, his 4 out 10,000 llcs going bankrupt, blah blah blah,     It's all jobs and border security these days boys.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Tobias on September 26, 2016, 09:55:33 PM
gato has convinced me, don crushed it
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: bucket on September 26, 2016, 09:58:09 PM
I think I'm starting to understand how people support these people, thx bucket

I don't believe the Republican nominee when he says that he was against the war and we should ask Sean Hannity if we don't want to believe what's on the record.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: treysolid on September 26, 2016, 09:58:33 PM
Nobody gives an eff about his taxes, his stance on the war she voted for, his 1973 racial disc charge, his 4 out 10,000 llcs going bankrupt, blah blah blah,     It's all jobs and border security these days boys.

i think you meant "tits up", not "1up".
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 26, 2016, 10:02:08 PM
I think I'm starting to understand how people support these people, thx bucket

I don't believe the Republican nominee when he says that he was against the war and we should ask Sean Hannity if we don't want to believe what's on the record.

Who gives a eff? One has repeatedly lied under oath, the othet so inarticulate it's hard to tell what he's trying to say. THERE IS ACTUAL IMPORTANT STUFF TO TALK ABOUT
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: gatoveintisiete on September 26, 2016, 10:02:44 PM
I did miss the parts where Lester brought up Hill bringing in Syrian refugees, Benghazi, emails, pay for play, obamacare, etc. HOW DID SHE DO ON THOSE?
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: renocat on September 26, 2016, 10:03:07 PM
I think in traditional terms Hillary won because she is perceived as the torchbearer for the Adorable establishment.  But a large segment of eligible voters, primarily people who have not voted in a long time, are madder than whizzed on hornets.  These are the votes that Trump is bringing into the process.  Hillary attacked Trump personally.  He attacked her failed policies.  How is questioning a person's citizenship racist?  Why is any attack on Obama's policies racist?  How is pointing out the historical failed.policies of Hillary misogynistic?  Lester, gets a bronzed turd for his performance.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: gatoveintisiete on September 26, 2016, 10:07:06 PM
Don should make copies of all the checks he's wrote to the US Treasury and mush her dissembling ass.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 26, 2016, 10:09:26 PM
charles cryptkeeper says it was a draw slightly in favor of trump  :lol:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: wetwillie on September 26, 2016, 10:09:55 PM
I would expect her polling to get a nice bounce by Thursday, she will finish him in the second debate.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: _33 on September 26, 2016, 10:10:07 PM
_33's BOLD PREDICTION OF THE NIGHT  --brought to you by new Doritos© Jacked: Bold Crunch, Bold Flavor, Go Bold--

Trump supporters will say Trump won.
Hillary supporters will say Hillary won.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: pvegs on September 26, 2016, 10:10:34 PM
tonight was an unmitigated disaster for trump.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: renocat on September 26, 2016, 10:11:05 PM
_33's BOLD PREDICTION OF THE NIGHT  --brought to you by new Doritos© Jacked: Bold Crunch, Bold Flavor, Go Bold--

Trump supporters will say Trump won.
Hillary supporters will say Hillary won.
Agree
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on September 26, 2016, 10:12:10 PM
charles cryptkeeper says it was a draw slightly in favor of trump  :lol:

And he hates Trump...
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 26, 2016, 10:16:38 PM
he knows who pays his checks
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Panjandrum on September 26, 2016, 10:19:09 PM
charles cryptkeeper says it was a draw slightly in favor of trump  :lol:

And he hates Trump...

In no way shape or form did he win.

Simply invoking Rosie O'Donnell means you lose.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: catastrophe on September 26, 2016, 10:20:03 PM
Anyone who is even remotely likeable and measured would have destroyed Trump tonight.  But that didn't happen.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: puniraptor on September 26, 2016, 10:20:18 PM
"half off all the horrible things I said about women, I sad about rosie odonnell, which I think everyone would agree with" :ROFL:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: gatoveintisiete on September 26, 2016, 10:23:14 PM
Important topics

Economy  Trump
Jobs.        Trump
Trade.       Trump
Ethics.      Trump
Isis.          Trump
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on September 26, 2016, 10:23:49 PM
"half off all the horrible things I said about women, I sad about rosie odonnell, which I think everyone would agree with" :ROFL:

So true.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: chum1 on September 26, 2016, 10:24:06 PM
David Axelrod suggestion: Don't get peevish on the topic of your good temperament.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Panjandrum on September 26, 2016, 10:25:39 PM
Important topics

Economy  Trump
Jobs.        Trump
Trade.       Trump
Ethics.      Trump
Isis.          Trump

Obviously.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on September 26, 2016, 10:26:43 PM
This debate really came down to one moment. Lester Holt completely set up Hillary to hang herself on the cybersecurity question. She did a marvelous job tying her own noose for two minutes. And then Trump proceeded to completely let her off the hook by talking about China and Russia instead of slamming her with her own negligent bahavior with her emails.

It's as if your team steals the basketball with five seconds to play, down one, and not only misses the slam dunk, but slugs the ref in the face and takes a crap on the floor.

Trump could have knocked her out tonight. He failed, and he has most likely lost this election.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: gatoveintisiete on September 26, 2016, 10:28:26 PM
This debate really came down to one moment. Lester Holt completely set up Hillary to hang herself on the cybersecurity question. She did a marvelous job tying her own noose for two minutes. And then Trump proceeded to completely let her off the hook by talking about China and Russia instead of slamming her with her own negligent bahavior with her emails.

It's as if your team steals the basketball with five seconds to play, down one, and not only misses the slam dunk, but slugs the ref in the face and takes a crap on the floor.

Trump could have knocked her out tonight. He failed, and he has most likely lost this election.

Agree he missed a crushing uppercut there, but he will win.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: The Big Train on September 26, 2016, 10:29:28 PM
320+ million people in this country and we pick these two :flush:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: puniraptor on September 26, 2016, 10:33:51 PM
"half off all the horrible things I said about women, I said about rosie odonnell, which, I think, everyone would agree with" :ROFL:

So true.

edited for more trump commas
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: puniraptor on September 26, 2016, 10:34:30 PM
320+ million people in this country and we pick these two :flush:

small applicant pool. very few people want this crap job
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: _33 on September 26, 2016, 10:35:03 PM
Are there really people who will watch the debate in order to decide whether to vote for Trump or Clinton?  That boggles my mind.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: bucket on September 26, 2016, 10:35:21 PM
This debate really came down to one moment. Lester Holt completely set up Hillary to hang herself on the cybersecurity question. She did a marvelous job tying her own noose for two minutes. And then Trump proceeded to completely let her off the hook by talking about China and Russia instead of slamming her with her own negligent bahavior with her emails.

It's as if your team steals the basketball with five seconds to play, down one, and not only misses the slam dunk, but slugs the ref in the face and takes a crap on the floor.

Trump could have knocked her out tonight. He failed, and he has most likely lost this election.

Agree he missed a crushing uppercut there, but he will win.

Same could be said about Hillz on "Stop and Frisk." I couldn't believe how long Donald talked about it.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: wetwillie on September 26, 2016, 10:35:59 PM
She did that super weird head bob thing again tonight after he said something especially weird and stupid
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: stunted on September 26, 2016, 10:36:15 PM
_33's BOLD PREDICTION OF THE NIGHT  --brought to you by new Doritos© Jacked: Bold Crunch, Bold Flavor, Go Bold--

Trump supporters will say Trump won.
Hillary supporters will say Hillary won.

 :lol: spot on

The real winner we can all agree on:

(https://pmchollywoodlife.files.wordpress.com/2016/09/ivanka-trump-dazzles-pink-dress-presidential-debate-lead-1.jpg?quality=80&strip=all)
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on September 26, 2016, 10:40:38 PM
Silver lining is I thought Trump got his ass kicked in the primaries, too. But I'm still pretty sure tonight's performance is going to cost him badly.

Clinton wasn't exactly good, but she at least gave the workmanlike performance of a professional politician. She looked good by comparison to Trump's rambling incoherence.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: SkinnyBenny on September 26, 2016, 10:42:04 PM
This debate really came down to one moment. Lester Holt completely set up Hillary to hang herself on the cybersecurity question. She did a marvelous job tying her own noose for two minutes. And then Trump proceeded to completely let her off the hook by talking about China and Russia instead of slamming her with her own negligent bahavior with her emails.

It's as if your team steals the basketball with five seconds to play, down one, and not only misses the slam dunk, but slugs the ref in the face and takes a crap on the floor.

Trump could have knocked her out tonight. He failed, and he has most likely lost this election.

Agree he missed a crushing uppercut there, but he will win.

Same could be said about Hillz on "Stop and Frisk." I couldn't believe how long Donald talked about it.

No. It was amazing. She simply let him ramble on and on, basically arguing himself into a figure 8, because she knew that someone will tweet an exact transcript of the entire incoherent speech. And then SkinnyBenny will post it on goEMAW.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: bucket on September 26, 2016, 10:42:45 PM
Silver lining is I thought Trump got his ass kicked in the primaries, too. But I'm still pretty sure tonight's performance is going to cost him badly.

Clinton wasn't exactly good, but she at least gave the workmanlike performance of a professional politician. She looked good by comparison to Trump's rambling incoherence.

True, plus there's this....

https://twitter.com/Nate_Cohn/status/780611927894528001
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: gatoveintisiete on September 26, 2016, 10:43:48 PM
Time magazine debate poll. Trump 58- Hill 42  :Woot:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: stunted on September 26, 2016, 10:47:36 PM
Silver lining is I thought Trump got his ass kicked in the primaries, too. But I'm still pretty sure tonight's performance is going to cost him badly.

Clinton wasn't exactly good, but she at least gave the workmanlike performance of a professional politician. She looked good by comparison to Trump's rambling incoherence.

True, plus there's this....

https://twitter.com/Nate_Cohn/status/780611927894528001

I should counter with an infowars poll
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: bucket on September 26, 2016, 10:49:27 PM
Guise, Mittens lost the election. Hence the poll I posted. Trump can come back from this!
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: stunted on September 26, 2016, 10:49:37 PM
(https://i.redd.it/2erlsswc7znx.jpg)

ruffled a few feathers
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Panjandrum on September 26, 2016, 10:49:51 PM
Time magazine debate poll. Trump 58- Hill 42  :Woot:

A statistically irrelevant online poll.  Good reference.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: gatoveintisiete on September 26, 2016, 10:51:55 PM
It's a tsunami kid, take cover
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: catastrophe on September 26, 2016, 10:53:21 PM
Are any "who won the debate" polls statistically relevant?
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Panjandrum on September 26, 2016, 10:54:02 PM
It's a tsunami kid, take cover

Or a lot of bored Breitbart readers.

Was Duck Dynasty not on tonight?  Some Trump supporters may have had some spare time.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on September 26, 2016, 10:55:11 PM
None of those instant reaction online polls mean anything.

I am surprised that Krauthammer said it was a draw. He's very smart, but I don't feel like I was watching the same debate.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 26, 2016, 10:58:19 PM
Both candidates lost that debate, the way any rational human being would handicap it.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: SkinnyBenny on September 26, 2016, 11:05:22 PM
:lol: Sean Hannity just led into his show with, "Well, it was a very good night for Donald Trump!..."
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: bones129 on September 26, 2016, 11:23:26 PM
 :ROFL:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Trim on September 26, 2016, 11:42:45 PM
ivanka's tits!

:lol:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Trim on September 26, 2016, 11:43:43 PM
100% this has never been the actual donald trump legitimately running for president.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: bones129 on September 27, 2016, 12:53:04 AM
Dan Rather knows.

https://www.facebook.com/theDanRather/posts/10157478224025716
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: MakeItRain on September 27, 2016, 01:00:24 AM
Per ABC, the two most important issues are 1) who started birther, and 2) iraq war. What in the actual eff?

These debates don't matter as far as substance goes but for me his best moment was when he accused her campaign of starting the birther movement and she didn't at all deny it. I just watched the debate DVRed on CNN and they all say she won the birther issue, bullshit. He harpooned her on that but the media seems to be covering her ass.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: MakeItRain on September 27, 2016, 01:09:46 AM
tonight was an unmitigated disaster for trump.

How? He stayed on his message, there was nothing that happened tonight that will turn supporters away from him. I think he played himself at the very beginning when he was trying to justify Hilrod's accusation that he hasn't paid taxes, "THAT'S SMART!" wtf? His moronic ass supporters won't give two shits that he hasn't paid taxes when 99.999% of them has mumbled at some time something about their taxes going to food stamps and Obama Phones.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: MakeItRain on September 27, 2016, 01:12:41 AM
Anyone who is even remotely likeable and measured would have destroyed Trump tonight.  But that didn't happen.

She seemed just as disinterested in being there as she did for all but the very last Democratic debate.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: MakeItRain on September 27, 2016, 01:28:49 AM
Well well well, Hillary surrogates on CNN straight lying about her people starting the birther movement. crap head and bigoted idiot, Jeffery Lord just 100% busted them on the lie and Hillrod fanboi, Van Jones, said "so what." Of course because Donald Trump is a stupid, lazy, liar, he got the story wrong too so the media does not have to confront the facts of this, only the bogus story he told on stage.

eff Hillary and her army of equivocators; I wouldn't vote for her if I had five votes.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: stunted on September 27, 2016, 01:34:51 AM
Polls from opposite parties should be considered though...

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/780644145492877312

 :driving:

I thought clitler kept it together well. Robotic and creepy smiles, but she was OK. Im pessimistic cause I expected Trump to really crap on her face. But good to see I'm wrong and Trump did well. I watched with my good friend who hates Trump (I'm so tolerant and open minded) and he thought Trump won too!
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: MakeItRain on September 27, 2016, 01:46:36 AM
Tell your good friend he's a stupid eff. The only thing Donald popped her on was trade but he's too stupid to say something of actual substance that would actually stick. As someone who despises both of these deplorables; I feel real comfortable categorizing anyone who thinks Trump won this debate as a brain dead moron unfit for breeding humans.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: stunted on September 27, 2016, 02:08:32 AM
Take a chill pill brah. You should learn some meditation.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: MakeItRain on September 27, 2016, 02:43:48 AM
https://twitter.com/michaeldeangelo/status/780597333650239488
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: CNS on September 27, 2016, 05:28:30 AM
(https://i.redd.it/2erlsswc7znx.jpg)

ruffled a few feathers

This is why trump can still win.  Ppl are this stupid.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: slackcat on September 27, 2016, 05:47:32 AM
I've read Costa Rica is nice.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 27, 2016, 05:48:33 AM
It's truly sad that R's couldn't nominate someone decent.   Literally at every phase of this debate Hillary's track record should have been rolled out and used to destroy her.   

I mean even the leader of her own party, Barrack Obama and his wife (BFF with George Bush) hate Hillary with the power of a 1000 suns. 

A centrist, thoughtful Republican would win this election in a landslide. 

Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: chum1 on September 27, 2016, 06:07:00 AM
I agree that the Republican party might not suck if it wasn't the Republican party.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: steve dave on September 27, 2016, 06:44:22 AM
Did not watch
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: chum1 on September 27, 2016, 07:06:44 AM
Trump just now provided justification for his Miss Piggy position on FOX by clarifying that she had indeed gained a lot of weight.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: catastrophe on September 27, 2016, 07:25:18 AM
Dan Rather knows.

https://www.facebook.com/theDanRather/posts/10157478224025716

Dan Rather bugs the crap out of me now because he acts like he's still a journalist even though he's very obviously a democratic spokesman.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: catastrophe on September 27, 2016, 07:27:06 AM
On the Today show they asked Tim Kaine about Trump's point that Hillary's emails weren't just a mistake because of all the staffers taking the Fifth since Hillary ignored it. Kaine ignored it.
Title: Presidential debate first round
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 27, 2016, 08:01:00 AM
I agree that the Republican party might not suck if it wasn't the Republican party.

The Democratic Party:  Making people think we don't love war, we aren't really racisty, and that we actually care about people for a long time.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: steve dave on September 27, 2016, 08:13:08 AM
BBC radio had a thing about different countries and who they say won the debate. This may shock some people but Russians think Trump both won the debate AND the debate was rigged against him.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 27, 2016, 08:13:45 AM
#russians :anger
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 27, 2016, 08:14:41 AM
Libs the new War Hawks on Russia.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on September 27, 2016, 08:15:19 AM
Tell your good friend he's a stupid eff. The only thing Donald popped her on was trade but he's too stupid to say something of actual substance that would actually stick. As someone who despises both of these deplorables; I feel real comfortable categorizing anyone who thinks Trump won this debate as a brain dead moron unfit for breeding humans.
Wow! So relaxed. So calm. Loves life. Doesn't have the problems of us other peasants on this board. We're all witnesses.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: chum1 on September 27, 2016, 08:24:29 AM
Quote
"I know that person. That person was a Miss Universe person," Trump told the Fox News morning show. "And she was the worst we ever had, the worst, the absolute worst, she was impossible," he said. "She gained a massive amount of weight, and it was a real problem. We had a real problem. Not only that, her attitude."

http://www.npr.org/2016/09/27/495611105/in-post-debate-interview-trump-again-criticizes-pageant-winners-weight
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on September 27, 2016, 08:42:27 AM
tonight was an unmitigated disaster for trump.

How? He stayed on his message, there was nothing that happened tonight that will turn supporters away from him. I think he played himself at the very beginning when he was trying to justify Hilrod's accusation that he hasn't paid taxes, "THAT'S SMART!" wtf? His moronic ass supporters won't give two shits that he hasn't paid taxes when 99.999% of them has mumbled at some time something about their taxes going to food stamps and Obama Phones.

I'm really glad you and hillary pay more taxes than legally obligated. It's good for the country.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: catastrophe on September 27, 2016, 08:48:04 AM
Yea, I'm surprised this taxes thing is supposedly such a big deal. Now if year after year the IRS came back and said, you have to pay those taxes it's different. Otherwise people just need to stop being pissed at Trump and ask WTF is wrong with our tax code (answer: a lot).
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: CNS on September 27, 2016, 09:07:07 AM
BBC radio had a thing about different countries and who they say won the debate. This may shock some people but Russians think Trump both won the debate AND the debate was rigged against him.

 :love:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: treysolid on September 27, 2016, 09:12:40 AM
barron knows so much about computers, you guys. we should totally make him secretary of CYBER.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 27, 2016, 09:15:24 AM
Is Dan Rather the idiot who did an expose about W not actually serving in the military based entirely upon obviously fraudulent and manufactured documents? Like the docs were prepared on microsoft word but dated in the 60's when we only had typewriters.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: MakeItRain on September 27, 2016, 09:44:22 AM
I agree that the Republican party might not suck if it wasn't the Republican party.

The Democratic Party:  Making people think we don't love war, we aren't really racisty, and that we actually care about people for a long time.

Don't deflect, the Democratic party being a crap show has nothing to do with the Republican party being its own worst enemy. It also helps that it's apparent that the Republican party can't identify the weakness of the Democratic party without using hyperbole that alienates the people they need to help them grow. The fact is that there are thousands of people like me to be had if the Republican party had any interest in expanding its base.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 27, 2016, 09:45:13 AM
I agree that the Republican party might not suck if it wasn't the Republican party.

The Democratic Party:  Making people think we don't love war, we aren't really racisty, and that we actually care about people for a long time.

Don't deflect, the Democratic party being a crap show has nothing to do with the Republican party being its own worst enemy. It also helps that it's apparent that the Republican party can't identify the weakness of the Democratic party without using hyperbole that alienates the people they need to help them grow. The fact is that there are thousands of people like me to be had if the Republican party had any interest in expanding its base.


I think I already covered that, but thanks.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: CNS on September 27, 2016, 09:53:35 AM
Ppl that would be killing Hill right now if nominated by their dumbass party:
1. Marco
2. Jeb
3. Kasich(SP?)
4. Cruz


I am pretty confident about 1-3 but feel pretty good about #4 too.  I mean, Cruz is batshit crazy, and I think he would be doing pretty well against hill.

All 4 would be doing a better job of highlighting her fuckups rather than playing look at me/but don't check into what I say.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 27, 2016, 09:58:01 AM
I think she might beat cruz. You underestimate how much he makes people outside of texas hate him
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: MakeItRain on September 27, 2016, 09:58:24 AM
Tell your good friend he's a stupid eff. The only thing Donald popped her on was trade but he's too stupid to say something of actual substance that would actually stick. As someone who despises both of these deplorables; I feel real comfortable categorizing anyone who thinks Trump won this debate as a brain dead moron unfit for breeding humans.
Wow! So relaxed. So calm. Loves life. Doesn't have the problems of us other peasants on this board. We're all witnesses.

Asking this may be dangerous but please explain to me how stunted having an idiot friend have any impact on me at all?
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: treysolid on September 27, 2016, 09:59:18 AM
Ppl that would be killing Hill right now if nominated by their dumbass party:
1. Marco
2. Jeb
3. Kasich(SP?)
4. Cruz


I am pretty confident about 1-3 but feel pretty good about #4 too.  I mean, Cruz is batshit crazy, and I think he would be doing pretty well against hill.

All 4 would be doing a better job of highlighting her fuckups rather than playing look at me/but don't check into what I say.

Specifically when it comes to debating, only Cruz would have a chance. 1-3 would have to get mopped up off the floor.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on September 27, 2016, 10:02:55 AM
Tell your good friend he's a stupid eff. The only thing Donald popped her on was trade but he's too stupid to say something of actual substance that would actually stick. As someone who despises both of these deplorables; I feel real comfortable categorizing anyone who thinks Trump won this debate as a brain dead moron unfit for breeding humans.
Wow! So relaxed. So calm. Loves life. Doesn't have the problems of us other peasants on this board. We're all witnesses.

Asking this may be dangerous but please explain to me how stunted having an idiot friend have any impact on me at all?
I mean the other day you stated how cool, calm, and collect you are and how you don't take the internet too seriously like the rest of us dumbasses. I just find it entertaining how irritable you get at times, on matters that don't even effect you. Enjoy your Tuesday, MIR. Go cats!
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: MakeItRain on September 27, 2016, 10:04:55 AM
tonight was an unmitigated disaster for trump.

How? He stayed on his message, there was nothing that happened tonight that will turn supporters away from him. I think he played himself at the very beginning when he was trying to justify Hilrod's accusation that he hasn't paid taxes, "THAT'S SMART!" wtf? His moronic ass supporters won't give two shits that he hasn't paid taxes when 99.999% of them has mumbled at some time something about their taxes going to food stamps and Obama Phones.

I'm really glad you and hillary pay more taxes than legally obligated. It's good for the country.

You think he's hiding income to meet his legal obligation?
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on September 27, 2016, 10:05:19 AM
Well it's okay because I know you were just trolling for a reaction, I know you don't really think that because you have told us lots of times that you have black friends.

Thing is though is I'm not a completely unhinged lunatic who has self esteem issues and places a high value on the thoughts of people on the internet. I will not fight with you, that's your thing, along with following around people who haven't interacted with you for three years. Grow up and stop having weekly personal beefs on the internet, it will make your life better.
Please take your own advice is all i'm saying.  :dunno:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: MakeItRain on September 27, 2016, 10:05:45 AM
I agree that the Republican party might not suck if it wasn't the Republican party.

The Democratic Party:  Making people think we don't love war, we aren't really racisty, and that we actually care about people for a long time.

Don't deflect, the Democratic party being a crap show has nothing to do with the Republican party being its own worst enemy. It also helps that it's apparent that the Republican party can't identify the weakness of the Democratic party without using hyperbole that alienates the people they need to help them grow. The fact is that there are thousands of people like me to be had if the Republican party had any interest in expanding its base.


I think I already covered that, but thanks.

You did? Where? When?
Title: Presidential debate first round
Post by: catastrophe on September 27, 2016, 10:10:57 AM
Ppl that would be killing Hill right now if nominated by their dumbass party:
1. Marco
2. Jeb
3. Kasich(SP?)
4. Cruz


I am pretty confident about 1-3 but feel pretty good about #4 too.  I mean, Cruz is batshit crazy, and I think he would be doing pretty well against hill.

All 4 would be doing a better job of highlighting her fuckups rather than playing look at me/but don't check into what I say.

Specifically when it comes to debating, only Cruz would have a chance. 1-3 would have to get mopped up off the floor.

I mean, it's really not hard to debate Hillary. Just set out some coherent policy argument of your own and then put her on the defensive with any of the dozens of high profile ethical issues that she hasn't been able to escape ever since this time last year.

Trump totally blew #1 (although he started out alright on trade) and even managed to mess up #2 when given huge openings.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: CNS on September 27, 2016, 10:12:36 AM
Exactly.  Hill didn't look great last night and she was debating someone who can't even string together a sentence without three different attempts and an eventual retraction.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 27, 2016, 10:13:52 AM
It's truly sad that R's couldn't nominate someone decent.   Literally at every phase of this debate Hillary's track record should have been rolled out and used to destroy her.   

I mean even the leader of her own party, Barrack Obama and his wife (BFF with George Bush) hate Hillary with the power of a 1000 suns. 

A centrist, thoughtful Republican would win this election in a landslide.

For MIR
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: _33 on September 27, 2016, 10:43:15 AM
A while back sys posted something like "why hasn't it occurred to either side to nominate a decent candidate and coast to an easy win?"  I couldn't find the exact quote or I would have posted it but I was thinking about it last night during the debate.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 27, 2016, 10:54:51 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Foha5Dtj.jpg&hash=49c531233531db60aa24cc8b0bd977b99bc5bcce)

Mexican rapists  :curse:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: CNS on September 27, 2016, 10:55:07 AM
Reasonable ppl don't survive primaries as of late, unfortunately. 
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: stunted on September 27, 2016, 10:58:57 AM
Tell your good friend he's a stupid eff. The only thing Donald popped her on was trade but he's too stupid to say something of actual substance that would actually stick. As someone who despises both of these deplorables; I feel real comfortable categorizing anyone who thinks Trump won this debate as a brain dead moron unfit for breeding humans.
Wow! So relaxed. So calm. Loves life. Doesn't have the problems of us other peasants on this board. We're all witnesses.

idiot friend

lol

So close-minded...you absolutely cannot fathom anyone having a different (and very reasonable) opinion than yours, and something as little as a "meh I think x" can launch you into a fury of hate, name-calling, and anger. How do you react to actual adversity irl?

I really recommend meditating. Once you get rid of your emotional and neurotic thinking, you'll have a clear mind and see the world as the beautiful place that it is. The world isnt out to get you. Check out this video when you're ready to free your mind.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=fmA6BqvC0xs
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: MakeItRain on September 27, 2016, 10:59:34 AM
Tell your good friend he's a stupid eff. The only thing Donald popped her on was trade but he's too stupid to say something of actual substance that would actually stick. As someone who despises both of these deplorables; I feel real comfortable categorizing anyone who thinks Trump won this debate as a brain dead moron unfit for breeding humans.
Wow! So relaxed. So calm. Loves life. Doesn't have the problems of us other peasants on this board. We're all witnesses.

Asking this may be dangerous but please explain to me how stunted having an idiot friend have any impact on me at all?
I mean the other day you stated how cool, calm, and collect you are and how you don't take the internet too seriously like the rest of us dumbasses. I just find it entertaining how irritable you get at times, on matters that don't even effect you. Enjoy your Tuesday, MIR. Go cats!

Again, I'll ask. How does observing stunted's dumbass friend have any effect on my life? Does it strain you to make observations?
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: stunted on September 27, 2016, 11:03:10 AM
My friend is an actual Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!), plz be nice
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on September 27, 2016, 11:04:37 AM
I honestly don't care about the issue at hand, MIR. I was just clearly stating how hypocritical you are at times on the do's/don'ts of bbs'ing on this board. You apparently think you've got it down, while slapping other peoples hands during the process.

That kinda comes off as an unhinged lunatic who has self esteem/control issues. Also lol at you saying I look out to fight people on here, but you don't. T's & P's.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: stunted on September 27, 2016, 11:05:44 AM
Like, the type with the weird hands
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: MakeItRain on September 27, 2016, 11:05:58 AM
Tell your good friend he's a stupid eff. The only thing Donald popped her on was trade but he's too stupid to say something of actual substance that would actually stick. As someone who despises both of these deplorables; I feel real comfortable categorizing anyone who thinks Trump won this debate as a brain dead moron unfit for breeding humans.
Wow! So relaxed. So calm. Loves life. Doesn't have the problems of us other peasants on this board. We're all witnesses.

idiot friend

lol

So close-minded...you absolutely cannot fathom anyone having a different (and very reasonable) opinion than yours, and something as little as a "meh I think x" can launch you into a fury of hate, name-calling, and anger. How do you react to actual adversity irl?

I really recommend meditating. Once you get rid of your emotional and neurotic thinking, you'll have a clear mind and see the world as the beautiful place that it is. The world isnt out to get you. Check out this video when you're ready to free your mind.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=fmA6BqvC0xs

Opinions can be very stupid and open to ridicule. Thinking that Donald Trump won that debate is stupid because it cannot be reasonably justified.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: stunted on September 27, 2016, 11:10:37 AM
Anything can be justified. Everyone is irrational. After you check out Zen 4 poon, you can read more about it on Scott Adams blog.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Trim on September 27, 2016, 11:11:55 AM
:lol:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: MakeItRain on September 27, 2016, 11:13:20 AM
I honestly don't care about the issue at hand, MIR. I was just clearly stating how hypocritical you are at times on the do's/don'ts of bbs'ing on this board. You apparently think you've got it down, while slapping other peoples hands during the process.

That kinda comes off as an unhinged lunatic who has self esteem/control issues. An lol at you saying I look out to fight people on here, but you don't. T's & P's.

I didn't ask you about the issue at hand, I asked you how observing a person had a stupid opinion effects my life in a negative manner. I keep having to ask because you keep saying it but not answering the question. I'll ask a different way, maybe it will stick this time; how does observing a stupid opinion espoused on a message board negatively effects me or makes my observation of you hypocritical? Did I say you shouldn't use the message board to share your observations?

Also who am I having a fight with on here?
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: MakeItRain on September 27, 2016, 11:14:05 AM
Anything can be justified. Everyone is irrational. After you check out Zen 4 poon, you can read more about it on Scott Adams blog.

wow,.okay bud, thank you.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: stunted on September 27, 2016, 11:15:14 AM
Namaste
Title: Presidential debate first round
Post by: catastrophe on September 27, 2016, 11:17:24 AM
I honestly don't care about the issue at hand, MIR. I was just clearly stating how hypocritical you are at times on the do's/don'ts of bbs'ing on this board. You apparently think you've got it down, while slapping other peoples hands during the process.

That kinda comes off as an unhinged lunatic who has self esteem/control issues. An lol at you saying I look out to fight people on here, but you don't. T's & P's.

I didn't ask you about the issue at hand, I asked you how observing a person had a stupid opinion effects my life in a negative manner. I keep having to ask because you keep saying it but not answering the question. I'll ask a different way, maybe it will stick this time; how does observing a stupid opinion espoused on a message board negatively effects me or makes my observation of you hypocritical? Did I say you shouldn't use the message board to share your observations?

Also who am I having a fight with on here?

I think WC might be referencing stuff like this:
Quote
Tell me who you're voting for and why you're doing so and I can tell you why that's stupid, its incredibly distasteful to do so though.

But that's none of my business.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on September 27, 2016, 11:22:52 AM
tonight was an unmitigated disaster for trump.

How? He stayed on his message, there was nothing that happened tonight that will turn supporters away from him. I think he played himself at the very beginning when he was trying to justify Hilrod's accusation that he hasn't paid taxes, "THAT'S SMART!" wtf? His moronic ass supporters won't give two shits that he hasn't paid taxes when 99.999% of them has mumbled at some time something about their taxes going to food stamps and Obama Phones.

I'm really glad you and hillary pay more taxes than legally obligated. It's good for the country.

You think he's hiding income to meet his legal obligation?

What are you talking about? I assume he isn't under IRS investigation or Hills would have brought that up. The constant audits obviously can't find anything wrong with his returns. It's interesting that she does bring up questions about his returns that nobody outside the IRS should have access to.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 27, 2016, 11:25:59 AM
She should ask Russia to hack them
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: MakeItRain on September 27, 2016, 11:33:43 AM
I honestly don't care about the issue at hand, MIR. I was just clearly stating how hypocritical you are at times on the do's/don'ts of bbs'ing on this board. You apparently think you've got it down, while slapping other peoples hands during the process.

That kinda comes off as an unhinged lunatic who has self esteem/control issues. An lol at you saying I look out to fight people on here, but you don't. T's & P's.

I didn't ask you about the issue at hand, I asked you how observing a person had a stupid opinion effects my life in a negative manner. I keep having to ask because you keep saying it but not answering the question. I'll ask a different way, maybe it will stick this time; how does observing a stupid opinion espoused on a message board negatively effects me or makes my observation of you hypocritical? Did I say you shouldn't use the message board to share your observations?

Also who am I having a fight with on here?

I think WC might be referencing stuff like this:
Quote
Tell me who you're voting for and why you're doing so and I can tell you why that's stupid, its incredibly distasteful to do so though.

But that's none of my business.

Not what he's talking about, this is more appropriate for what stunted is talking about. I never said stunted and his friend are morons for potentially voting for trump, they're morons for thinking he won that debate. I'm guessing you can see the difference.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: gatoveintisiete on September 27, 2016, 11:33:49 AM
Take it out to the thoroughfare you hoopleheads, get the eff out of the Gem!!!!
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: catastrophe on September 27, 2016, 11:37:19 AM

Not what he's talking about, this is more appropriate for what stunted is talking about. I never said stunted and his friend are morons for potentially voting for trump, they're morons for thinking he won that debate. I'm guessing you can see the difference.

I'm actually not trying to argue. I legitimately thought that is the point he was trying to make.  Personally I agree all's fair in the Pit.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: MakeItRain on September 27, 2016, 11:41:12 AM
tonight was an unmitigated disaster for trump.

How? He stayed on his message, there was nothing that happened tonight that will turn supporters away from him. I think he played himself at the very beginning when he was trying to justify Hilrod's accusation that he hasn't paid taxes, "THAT'S SMART!" wtf? His moronic ass supporters won't give two shits that he hasn't paid taxes when 99.999% of them has mumbled at some time something about their taxes going to food stamps and Obama Phones.

I'm really glad you and hillary pay more taxes than legally obligated. It's good for the country.

You think he's hiding income to meet his legal obligation?

What are you talking about? I assume he isn't under IRS investigation or Hills would have brought that up. The constant audits obviously can't find anything wrong with his returns. It's interesting that she does bring up questions about his returns that nobody outside the IRS should have access to.

I didn't say anything about IRS investigation. He said that his revenue was $600+ million. Maybe I'm wrong but to not pay any income tax on that much income requires some creative accounting that doesn't mesh with his message or constituency.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on September 27, 2016, 12:16:00 PM
tonight was an unmitigated disaster for trump.

How? He stayed on his message, there was nothing that happened tonight that will turn supporters away from him. I think he played himself at the very beginning when he was trying to justify Hilrod's accusation that he hasn't paid taxes, "THAT'S SMART!" wtf? His moronic ass supporters won't give two shits that he hasn't paid taxes when 99.999% of them has mumbled at some time something about their taxes going to food stamps and Obama Phones.

I'm really glad you and hillary pay more taxes than legally obligated. It's good for the country.

You think he's hiding income to meet his legal obligation?

What are you talking about? I assume he isn't under IRS investigation or Hills would have brought that up. The constant audits obviously can't find anything wrong with his returns. It's interesting that she does bring up questions about his returns that nobody outside the IRS should have access to.

I didn't say anything about IRS investigation. He said that his revenue was $600+ million. Maybe I'm wrong but to not pay any income tax on that much income requires some creative accounting that doesn't mesh with his message or constituency.

The IRS doesn't allow "creative accounting" during audits. I'm sure his accountants are very good and know the relevant tax codes well. Income doesn't necessarily mean that money goes into your pocket if your a business owner. You can sink 100% back into your company(s) if you want.

I understand you believe 100% of his constituency are complete morons and don't understand this, but most successful business owners should be a very large part of that constituency, and they get it.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: renocat on September 27, 2016, 12:20:10 PM
If you like Beautiful Politicians, then Hillary won handily.  If you want an ugly mean bastard that will knock the heads of prissy bureaucrats and politicians together o get something done, then you liked peeved Trump.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 27, 2016, 12:40:16 PM
It's refreshing to know that the three most important things to Democrats right now are 1) nuclear war, 2) russia, and 3) who called who a mean name. 1&2 haven't been relevent since the Berlin Wall fell, and 3 is best reserved for resolution by primary school teacher. These people are adolescent and delusional sheep, doing what they're told. #thinkprogress
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: SdK on September 27, 2016, 12:50:29 PM
I have a friend from Moscow.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: SdK on September 27, 2016, 12:50:44 PM
She's cool.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 27, 2016, 12:52:27 PM
It's refreshing to know that the three most important things to Democrats right now are 1) nuclear war, 2) russia, and 3) who called who a mean name. 1&2 haven't been relevent since the Berlin Wall fell, and 3 is best reserved for resolution by primary school teacher. These people are adolescent and delusional sheep, doing what they're told. #thinkprogress

Is this some sort of commentary on how Trump is actually a democrat?
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on September 27, 2016, 01:29:32 PM
Dammit, I came here to whine about what a crap show Trump was, and the last two pages are MIR bitching about something nobody gives a crap about. For effs sake, enough.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 27, 2016, 01:30:37 PM
They're just so angry, right?
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: MakeItRain on September 27, 2016, 01:45:18 PM
Dammit, I came here to whine about what a crap show Trump was, and the last two pages are MIR bitching about something nobody gives a crap about. For effs sake, enough.

I took him and Hillrod out, you chose not to talk about it
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: MakeItRain on September 27, 2016, 01:56:44 PM
tonight was an unmitigated disaster for trump.

How? He stayed on his message, there was nothing that happened tonight that will turn supporters away from him. I think he played himself at the very beginning when he was trying to justify Hilrod's accusation that he hasn't paid taxes, "THAT'S SMART!" wtf? His moronic ass supporters won't give two shits that he hasn't paid taxes when 99.999% of them has mumbled at some time something about their taxes going to food stamps and Obama Phones.

I'm really glad you and hillary pay more taxes than legally obligated. It's good for the country.

You think he's hiding income to meet his legal obligation?

What are you talking about? I assume he isn't under IRS investigation or Hills would have brought that up. The constant audits obviously can't find anything wrong with his returns. It's interesting that she does bring up questions about his returns that nobody outside the IRS should have access to.

I didn't say anything about IRS investigation. He said that his revenue was $600+ million. Maybe I'm wrong but to not pay any income tax on that much income requires some creative accounting that doesn't mesh with his message or constituency.

The IRS doesn't allow "creative accounting" during audits. I'm sure his accountants are very good and know the relevant tax codes well. Income doesn't necessarily mean that money goes into your pocket if your a business owner. You can sink 100% back into your company(s) if you want.

I understand you believe 100% of his constituency are complete morons and don't understand this, but most successful business owners should be a very large part of that constituency, and they get it.

Stop lecturing me about the IRS and audits. You are intentionally dodging the larger point. What percentage of Trump voters, including Trump himself, would pitch a crap fit if any other politician not only didn't pay income tax but brag about not paying income tax?
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 27, 2016, 02:10:34 PM
tonight was an unmitigated disaster for trump.

How? He stayed on his message, there was nothing that happened tonight that will turn supporters away from him. I think he played himself at the very beginning when he was trying to justify Hilrod's accusation that he hasn't paid taxes, "THAT'S SMART!" wtf? His moronic ass supporters won't give two shits that he hasn't paid taxes when 99.999% of them has mumbled at some time something about their taxes going to food stamps and Obama Phones.

I'm really glad you and hillary pay more taxes than legally obligated. It's good for the country.

You think he's hiding income to meet his legal obligation?

What are you talking about? I assume he isn't under IRS investigation or Hills would have brought that up. The constant audits obviously can't find anything wrong with his returns. It's interesting that she does bring up questions about his returns that nobody outside the IRS should have access to.

I didn't say anything about IRS investigation. He said that his revenue was $600+ million. Maybe I'm wrong but to not pay any income tax on that much income requires some creative accounting that doesn't mesh with his message or constituency.

The IRS doesn't allow "creative accounting" during audits. I'm sure his accountants are very good and know the relevant tax codes well. Income doesn't necessarily mean that money goes into your pocket if your a business owner. You can sink 100% back into your company(s) if you want.

I understand you believe 100% of his constituency are complete morons and don't understand this, but most successful business owners should be a very large part of that constituency, and they get it.

Stop lecturing me about the IRS and audits. You are intentionally dodging the larger point. What percentage of Trump voters, including Trump himself, would pitch a crap fit if any other politician not only didn't pay income tax but brag about not paying income tax?

I don't know, do they employ thousands of people, do the own properties that collect millions in tack on usage taxes for local municipalities, do they own properties that they have to pay six and seven figure property taxes on?   Or, do they just run around hiding their ridiculous earnings in dubious foundations? 
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: sys on September 27, 2016, 02:28:30 PM
Or, do they just run around hiding their ridiculous earnings in dubious foundations? 


it's funny, because trump is accused of doing exactly that, in addition to using his foundation to pay personal and business expenses, while the clinton foundation is independently judged as well-run and effective by charity judging organizations.

but weirdo clintonophobes like dax, mir and cns never let their ignorance get in the way of what they want to believe.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Trim on September 27, 2016, 02:34:30 PM
I was surprised Trump allowed her to paint him as rich guy with no way of relating to the common man and herself as Jane Everywoman.  She's never wanted for anything and I'd be pretty surprised if she doesn't have plenty of tax pros doing whatever they can for her.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: sys on September 27, 2016, 02:37:00 PM
I'd be pretty surprised if she doesn't have plenty of tax pros doing whatever they can for her.

the clintons have pretty much paid the maximum tax they possibly can.  they, you know, have been releasing these things for a while now.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: MakeItRain on September 27, 2016, 02:43:42 PM
Or, do they just run around hiding their ridiculous earnings in dubious foundations? 


it's funny, because trump is accused of doing exactly that, in addition to using his foundation to pay personal and business expenses, while the clinton foundation is independently judged as well-run and effective by charity judging organizations.

but weirdo clintonophobes like dax, mir and cns never let their ignorance get in the way of what they want to believe.

Wait, what? How did I get in that group, I've never been critical of the Clinton Foundation?
Title: Presidential debate first round
Post by: catastrophe on September 27, 2016, 02:44:05 PM
I'm honestly not sure what to think of someone who pays the maximum amount of taxes they possibly can. I'm actually not even sure what that means.

Like, do they take the standard deduction?
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 27, 2016, 02:44:16 PM
Or, do they just run around hiding their ridiculous earnings in dubious foundations? 


it's funny, because trump is accused of doing exactly that, in addition to using his foundation to pay personal and business expenses, while the clinton foundation is independently judged as well-run and effective by charity judging organizations.

but weirdo clintonophobes like dax, mir and cns never let their ignorance get in the way of what they want to believe.

Sysbot (closeted Hillbot) is falling back on the obfuscation and re-direction Clintonites have employed recently in regards to to the Clinton Foundation.    For a number of years, entities like Charity Navigator could (would not) not rate the Clinton Foundation because of the lack of transparency in financial reporting, and because the CF was consistently engaged in a shell game (albeit the nice folks at entities like Charity Navigator would never use those words) of creating and then folding various sub charitable organizations under the umbrella of the Clinton Foundation.     The Clinton Foundation finally bought enough time to get its books cleaned up enough to look sparkling in the eyes of Charity ratings organizations.   
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Trim on September 27, 2016, 02:44:38 PM
I'd be pretty surprised if she doesn't have plenty of tax pros doing whatever they can for her.

the clintons have pretty much paid the maximum tax they possibly can.  they, you know, have been releasing these things for a while now.

Well, I'm surprised.  Is that a point they make when campaigning?
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: catastrophe on September 27, 2016, 02:47:23 PM
I'd be pretty surprised if she doesn't have plenty of tax pros doing whatever they can for her.

the clintons have pretty much paid the maximum tax they possibly can.  they, you know, have been releasing these things for a while now.

Well, I'm surprised.  Is that a point they make when campaigning?

I admit I haven't looked at the returns, but there is pretty much no way this is a factual statement.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 27, 2016, 03:05:09 PM
Remember when trump said china should invade north korea?  :lol:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: XocolateThundarr on September 27, 2016, 03:06:51 PM
I have zero issues with people not paying any more taxes than they are legally obligated to.  If you pay more than you have to, well, then you are indeed a dumbass.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 27, 2016, 03:09:45 PM
China really should take over North Korea. No negative consequences.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: catastrophe on September 27, 2016, 03:12:08 PM
Except WTF do you do with it?
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: catastrophe on September 27, 2016, 03:12:54 PM
Take over a country with no economy and a bunch of starving people...
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 27, 2016, 03:18:05 PM
You feed them, duh.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: CNS on September 27, 2016, 03:27:16 PM
I have zero problem with not paying taxes as long as it is in line with the law.  I mean, whoever has a problem with this needs to take it up with Congress, not the folks figuring crap out better than other ppl.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: sys on September 27, 2016, 03:29:28 PM
Wait, what? How did I get in that group, I've never been critical of the Clinton Foundation?

you're a weirdo clintonophobe, believing things about her that have no basis in fact.  last night, for example, you were irate that cnn used the complete lack of evidence that clinton had ever engaged in birtherism to excuse her of having been a birther.  goddamn mainstream media.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: sys on September 27, 2016, 03:34:33 PM
I'm honestly not sure what to think of someone who pays the maximum amount of taxes they possibly can. I'm actually not even sure what that means.

Like, do they take the standard deduction?


it means when they had their taxes done, they didn't use any means of deferring, sheltering or redirecting income on which taxes would be due that might look even slightly unsavory to voters who don't have the amount or types of income that would make those vehicles useful to them.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: ChiComCat on September 27, 2016, 03:37:41 PM
There has been more dirt documented in 1 year of investigating Trump's charity than the decade investigating the Clinton foundation.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: XocolateThundarr on September 27, 2016, 03:39:06 PM
I'm honestly not sure what to think of someone who pays the maximum amount of taxes they possibly can. I'm actually not even sure what that means.

Like, do they take the standard deduction?


it means when they had their taxes done, they didn't use any means of deferring, sheltering or redirecting income on which taxes would be due that might look even slightly unsavory to voters who don't have the amount or types of income that would make those vehicles useful to them.

As long as those vehicles are legal, it shouldn't matter.
Title: Presidential debate first round
Post by: catastrophe on September 27, 2016, 03:39:47 PM
Ok, wanted to make sure you weren't saying the Clintons did weird things like itemize their taxes and then not take any deductions. Or only investing in regular stocks instead of tax deferred vehicles for retirement.

Still, based on the sources of their income, are you sure those structures were even available to them? Or are you really just saying they're not doing anything on a return unless 10/10 tax attorneys say it's kosher?
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: sys on September 27, 2016, 03:49:41 PM
As long as those vehicles are legal, it shouldn't matter.

it matters to some voters.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: CNS on September 27, 2016, 03:50:02 PM
@Sys, I assume I am in that group simply due to our money discussion?  I mean, I dislike her greatly, but I think it is for decent, non-ignorant reasons.   My only shot at the Clinton Foundation was based on an actual article I read and not on my general dislike of Hill. 
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: sys on September 27, 2016, 03:54:21 PM
Ok, wanted to make sure you weren't saying the Clintons did weird things like itemize their taxes and then not take any deductions. Or only investing in regular stocks instead of tax deferred vehicles for retirement.

Still, based on the sources of their income, are you sure those structures were even available to them? Or are you really just saying they're not doing anything on a return unless 10/10 tax attorneys say it's kosher?

i'm saying the clintons paid a very high effective tax rate.  i have heard tax attorneys/accountants talking on the television and the radio saying that it is basically impossible to pay that high of a rate without actively trying to.  and yes, they could shelter much of their income if they wished.  i'm no tax expert, but i know that much.

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/08/12/clinton-releases-latest-tax-returns-paid-rate-of-43.html
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: XocolateThundarr on September 27, 2016, 03:54:37 PM
As long as those vehicles are legal, it shouldn't matter.

it matters to some voters.

I have zero issues with people not paying any more taxes than they are legally obligated to.  If you pay more than you have to, well, then you are indeed a dumbass.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: sys on September 27, 2016, 03:57:11 PM
@Sys, I assume I am in that group simply due to our money discussion?  I mean, I dislike her greatly, but I think it is for decent, non-ignorant reasons.   My only shot at the Clinton Foundation was based on an actual article I read and not on my general dislike of Hill.

i've seen you make irrationally negative and/or erroneous comments about clinton, which along with your outsized hatred of her marks your clintonophibia.  i don't have an example at hand, but i'll try to flag the next one i notice.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: sys on September 27, 2016, 03:59:11 PM
I have zero issues with people not paying any more taxes than they are legally obligated to.  If you pay more than you have to, well, then you are indeed a dumbass.

a candidate's tax rate isn't high on my list of issues either, but people can pick their own issues, you know?  i don't agree that a candidate forgoing some income to make themselves marginally more electable is stupid.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Trim on September 27, 2016, 04:01:35 PM
The Clintons should do a better job of marketing this thing.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: CNS on September 27, 2016, 04:02:20 PM
I think one can dislike her and not have to rely on ignorance to do so.   :dunno:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: CNS on September 27, 2016, 04:04:04 PM
It will be interesting to see if Don is going to come better prepared for the next debate.  I would love it if he actually discussed some policy.  It would be interesting to see him mention an actual detail and see how his folks react.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: chum1 on September 27, 2016, 04:09:21 PM
It will be interesting to see if Don is going to come better prepared for the next debate.  I would love it if he actually discussed some policy.  It would be interesting to see him mention an actual detail and see how his folks react.

He's incapable. Honestly.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: catastrophe on September 27, 2016, 04:19:06 PM
It will be interesting to see if Don is going to come better prepared for the next debate.  I would love it if he actually discussed some policy.  It would be interesting to see him mention an actual detail and see how his folks react.

He tried it and sounded moderately competent on trade (Hillary wasn't any more specific). I think there are just very low limits as to how much he can keep that up.

Trump seems like a genius the way he's able to appeal to crowds and generate free publicity, but I just think he's a natural at it and otherwise really stupid.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 27, 2016, 04:28:31 PM
I wish one of the candidates were more pro-trade. Hillary was better before Bernie dragged her so far left.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: _33 on September 27, 2016, 04:28:45 PM
I dislike Hillary Clinton but it has nothing to do with policy, taxes, or that stuff.  She just seems like a terrible, mean-spirited person.  Same for Donald.  I prefer nice people, and these two appear to be total dicks most of the time.  Does this make me a Clintonophobe or a Donaldophobe? Maybe. But I prefer to think of myself self as a dickophobe.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: sys on September 27, 2016, 04:29:46 PM
I wish one of the candidates were more pro-trade. Hillary was better before Bernie dragged her so far left.

yep.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on September 27, 2016, 04:37:35 PM
tonight was an unmitigated disaster for trump.

How? He stayed on his message, there was nothing that happened tonight that will turn supporters away from him. I think he played himself at the very beginning when he was trying to justify Hilrod's accusation that he hasn't paid taxes, "THAT'S SMART!" wtf? His moronic ass supporters won't give two shits that he hasn't paid taxes when 99.999% of them has mumbled at some time something about their taxes going to food stamps and Obama Phones.

I'm really glad you and hillary pay more taxes than legally obligated. It's good for the country.

You think he's hiding income to meet his legal obligation?

What are you talking about? I assume he isn't under IRS investigation or Hills would have brought that up. The constant audits obviously can't find anything wrong with his returns. It's interesting that she does bring up questions about his returns that nobody outside the IRS should have access to.

I didn't say anything about IRS investigation. He said that his revenue was $600+ million. Maybe I'm wrong but to not pay any income tax on that much income requires some creative accounting that doesn't mesh with his message or constituency.

The IRS doesn't allow "creative accounting" during audits. I'm sure his accountants are very good and know the relevant tax codes well. Income doesn't necessarily mean that money goes into your pocket if your a business owner. You can sink 100% back into your company(s) if you want.

I understand you believe 100% of his constituency are complete morons and don't understand this, but most successful business owners should be a very large part of that constituency, and they get it.

Stop lecturing me about the IRS and audits. You are intentionally dodging the larger point. What percentage of Trump voters, including Trump himself, would pitch a crap fit if any other politician not only didn't pay income tax but brag about not paying income tax?

I honestly don't believe him when he insinuates that he didn't pay any taxes, of course he has, just toying with hillary's conjecture. And, to answer your question, I don't think it matters to any of his supporters one bit about his taxes because he isn't a politician getting rich off his position in government. He actually contributes to the economy by making things and employing people. As much as his personality grates on my soul, you can't deny his business acumen.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: sys on September 27, 2016, 04:42:00 PM
As much as his personality grates on my soul, you can't deny his business acumen.

it's very easy to, actually.  he lies about his personal wealth, but even generous estimates of his holdings are well short of what he'd have if he'd have just invested his inheritance in the stock market and let better businessmen generate returns on his capital.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 27, 2016, 04:51:18 PM
I know I have tons of respect for developers that refuse to pay contractors. Also respect the hell out of businessmen that are blacklisted from American banks because he doesn't pay back loans.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: sys on September 27, 2016, 04:53:17 PM
It will be interesting to see if Don is going to come better prepared for the next debate.  I would love it if he actually discussed some policy.  It would be interesting to see him mention an actual detail and see how his folks react.

He's incapable. Honestly.

he might do better in a shorter debate.  he doesn't have stamina to participate in these longer ones.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 27, 2016, 05:23:59 PM
I dislike both, but based on the "does/says" factor element of national policy, Hillary is pure evil, and it's not even close. 
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 27, 2016, 05:26:26 PM
Maybe I'm conflating the Clinton Foundation with some other shady psuedo-charitable Clinton deal, but didnt the NYT write a rather scathing expose linking foreign arms deals with unsavory characters and donations to the foundation? Also, didn't the Clintons accept absurd speaking fees from the Foundation (like $500k a pop)?

Seems pretty rough ridin' shady to me, particularly given her role as SoS. 

I've actually not seen anything on trump other than the rent he's charging his campaign, which is egregious but a microfraction of the dollars the Clintons have taken from their foundation.


Title: Presidential debate first round
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 27, 2016, 05:31:07 PM
Maybe I'm conflating the Clinton Foundation with some other shady psuedo-charitable Clinton deal, but didnt the NYT write a rather scathing expose linking foreign arms deals with unsavory characters and donations to the foundation? Also, didn't the Clintons accept absurd speaking fees from the Foundation (like $500k a pop)?

Seems pretty rough ridin' shady to me, particularly given her role as SoS. 

I've actually not seen anything on trump other than the rent he's charging his campaign, which is egregious but a microfraction of the dollars the Clintons have taken from their foundation.


All you need to know is that the Clinton's and the CF took money from and owe political favors to the worst people on the planet.   

There's a reason why the FBI tried to investigate the CF 3 times.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: MakeItRain on September 27, 2016, 05:42:50 PM
Wait, what? How did I get in that group, I've never been critical of the Clinton Foundation?

you're a weirdo clintonophobe, believing things about her that have no basis in fact.  last night, for example, you were irate that cnn used the complete lack of evidence that clinton had ever engaged in birtherism to excuse her of having been a birther.  goddamn mainstream media.

No. She had surrogates that absolutely questioned Barack Obama's citizenship status, or his "otherness." That is a fact, confirmed by Reggie Love. The Hillary spokesperson on CNN denied Trump's false claim that "Hillary started the birther movement."
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: chum1 on September 27, 2016, 05:46:23 PM
It will be interesting to see if Don is going to come better prepared for the next debate.  I would love it if he actually discussed some policy.  It would be interesting to see him mention an actual detail and see how his folks react.

He's incapable. Honestly.

he might do better in a shorter debate.  he doesn't have stamina to participate in these longer ones.

I think the first 30 minutes of the debate are as good as it gets for him. Let's grant that he can do a sufficient job of staying on message and avoiding all of his bad personality traits. He still doesn't retain very much info, has poor recall of the info he does learn, often doesn't make his meaning clear, skips logical steps, and erratically jumps from one topic to another.

But, yeah, it was pretty hilarious how he delivered his canned stamina charge against her a while after he had OBVIOUSLY hit the wall himself.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: sys on September 27, 2016, 06:00:25 PM
No. She had surrogates that absolutely questioned Barack Obama's citizenship status, or his "otherness." That is a fact, confirmed by Reggie Love. The Hillary spokesperson on CNN denied Trump's false claim that "Hillary started the birther movement."

it's just a shame there was no media around eight years ago to document clinton's or the clinton campaign's birtherism.  oth, if we had had a media back then perhaps the message would have disseminated and clinton might have won that primary.  kind of a double-edge alternate history, i guess.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: _33 on September 27, 2016, 06:10:44 PM
I think it would go a long way to unify the board and usher in a new era of bipartisanship if everyone admits that they are both total dickholes.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: chum1 on September 27, 2016, 06:14:00 PM
Trump campaign tried to identify opportunities for improvement from the primary debates.

https://twitter.com/alivitali/status/779335274404786177
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on September 27, 2016, 06:35:01 PM
As much as his personality grates on my soul, you can't deny his business acumen.

it's very easy to, actually.  he lies about his personal wealth, but even generous estimates of his holdings are well short of what he'd have if he'd have just invested his inheritance in the stock market and let better businessmen generate returns on his capital.

I have respect for those that risk their money making things and hiring people. Nothing against pure wall street investors, but they're more like leaches than business people.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on September 27, 2016, 06:36:45 PM
I know I have tons of respect for developers that refuse to pay contractors. Also respect the hell out of businessmen that are blacklisted from American banks because he doesn't pay back loans.

This crap happens every day and there is always more to the story.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: chum1 on September 27, 2016, 06:42:22 PM
As much as his personality grates on my soul, you can't deny his business acumen.

it's very easy to, actually.  he lies about his personal wealth, but even generous estimates of his holdings are well short of what he'd have if he'd have just invested his inheritance in the stock market and let better businessmen generate returns on his capital.

I have respect for those that risk their money making things and hiring people. Nothing against pure wall street investors, but they're more like leaches than business people.

Great! But the issue wasn't who JD repects. It was how good of a businessman is Trump. And he's pretty dreadful.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 27, 2016, 07:16:50 PM
I know I have tons of respect for developers that refuse to pay contractors. Also respect the hell out of businessmen that are blacklisted from American banks because he doesn't pay back loans.

This crap happens every day and there is always more to the story.

Happens everyday to pieces of human garbage
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on September 27, 2016, 07:37:09 PM
I know I have tons of respect for developers that refuse to pay contractors. Also respect the hell out of businessmen that are blacklisted from American banks because he doesn't pay back loans.

To be fair, when you're a developer, you're going to come across a LOT of shitty contractors. You're going to get in disputes with contractors who either do a crap job or otherwise try to screw you over. There's a lot of things to criticize Trump for. The anecdotes about him not paying so and so on a golf course project shouldn't even make the list.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 27, 2016, 07:39:59 PM
real stand up guy that donald trump is, fights for the little guy while refusing to pay them.   :thumbs:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Spracne on September 27, 2016, 07:43:59 PM
I mean, these types of disputes happen all the time. We'd really need to hear the facts and examine the contract in order to know if Trump's group is culpable here. I'm guessing probably not, since this contractor had a legal remedy available and chose not to pursue it. Bald assertions by an angry party to a dispute are no proof of wrongdoing.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: gatoveintisiete on September 27, 2016, 07:45:48 PM
If my boy showed you four checks he wrote last year totaling 8 digits to the federal gov for income tax, would that put the tax return hub bub to bed?
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 27, 2016, 07:46:56 PM
and clinton has been investigated heavily for the last two decades with no proof of wrongdoing, she must be a great person too  :thumbs:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Spracne on September 27, 2016, 07:54:42 PM
At least with Clinton there is an existing record for each of those matters that reasonable people can examine and from which they can draw their own conclusions. This contractor business is meaningless without the actual facts, and a willingness to draw conclusions in the absence of such facts both betrays your credibility and exposes bias. Either that, or stupidity.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 27, 2016, 07:59:25 PM
i will admit a bias against people who refuse to pay people that do work for them.  guilty  :frown:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: gatoveintisiete on September 27, 2016, 08:00:31 PM
At least with Clinton there is an existing record for each of those matters that reasonable people can examine and from which they can draw their own conclusions. This contractor business is meaningless without the actual facts, and a willingness to draw conclusions in the absence of such facts both betrays your credibility and exposes bias. Either that, or stupidity.

Well said
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 27, 2016, 08:30:59 PM
At least with Clinton there is an existing record for each of those matters that reasonable people can examine and from which they can draw their own conclusions. This contractor business is meaningless without the actual facts, and a willingness to draw conclusions in the absence of such facts both betrays your credibility and exposes bias. Either that, or stupidity.

These are the same people denying trump has been succesful in business, so yeah, lots of bias and stupidity. Dare we call them Trumpophobes? :ohno:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 27, 2016, 08:37:05 PM
It's refreshing to know that the three most important things to Democrats right now are 1) nuclear war, 2) russia, and 3) who called who a mean name. 1&2 haven't been relevent since the Berlin Wall fell, and 3 is best reserved for resolution by primary school teacher. These people are adolescent and delusional sheep, doing what they're told. #thinkprogress

Is this some sort of commentary on how Trump is actually a democrat?

Donald Trump would launch nukes all over the world and is conspiring with russia to out the sham dnc and called a fat lady miss piggy, therefore i should be president
- hillary rough ridin' clinton
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: sys on September 27, 2016, 08:45:01 PM
I have respect for those that risk their money making things and hiring people. Nothing against pure wall street investors, but they're more like leaches than business people.

it sounds like what you respect is his attraction to risky behavior then, rather than his business acumen.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: The Big Train on September 27, 2016, 08:51:37 PM
This thread is just like the debate last night :flush:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: steve dave on September 27, 2016, 08:58:03 PM
This thread is just like the debate last night :flush:

Haha
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: MakeItRain on September 27, 2016, 09:10:42 PM
No. She had surrogates that absolutely questioned Barack Obama's citizenship status, or his "otherness." That is a fact, confirmed by Reggie Love. The Hillary spokesperson on CNN denied Trump's false claim that "Hillary started the birther movement."

it's just a shame there was no media around eight years ago to document clinton's or the clinton campaign's birtherism.  oth, if we had had a media back then perhaps the message would have disseminated and clinton might have won that primary.  kind of a double-edge alternate history, i guess.

You're changing the goalposts, I never accused Hillary and/or Bill Clinton of being birthers, Trump did that and I said he lied about that. There's plenty of documentation about Hillary supporters/surrogates questioning Obama's citizenship or how American he is. I'm not sure if your memory is bad or your inability to google is but claiming that this wasn't documented at the time is laughably false.

My issue with the Clinton campaign is that at the time, was the tone towards Obama, it led me to stop being a Hillary supporter. They weren't saying these things but they were out there, it is worth noting that Bill Clinton called the Obama campaign a joke and a farce. Hillary stayed out of the talk, didn't question his otherness, didn't stand up for him either. John McCain did do very publicly, Hillary didn't though. And now when Trump brings this up her campaign can play stupid, and have plausible deniability because she never did it. If she had any shred of integrity about her she'd say something to the effect of "while I take exception to your claim that I started the birther movement, I do regret the tone that surrounded the campaigns at the time."
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: MakeItRain on September 27, 2016, 09:14:35 PM
http://www.politico.com/story/2011/04/birtherism-where-it-all-began-053563

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2008/08/penn-strategy-memo-march-19-2008/37952/

Substantiated enough or no?
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Trim on September 27, 2016, 09:30:14 PM
This thread is just like the debate last night :flush:

Haha

Debate and company was better.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: treysolid on September 27, 2016, 09:59:29 PM
Trump promoted a 1 million dollar prize for a hole in one during a golf event at one of his courses, and designated in the fine print that the ball had to travel at least 150 yards, knowing full well the hole was much shorter than 150 yards (meaning that no one could actually win the million dollars).

^ you think that guy gives a solitary eff about stiffing contractors who do good work, let alone shitty work?
c'mon. trump is the ultimate snake oil salesman. he has no intentions of doing anything but using the presidency to line his own pockets. he wants to eliminate the federal estate tax so he can give his kids a nice billion $+ gift. he has no intention of putting his assets in a blind trust while should he become president, which is a huge conflict of interest.

there have been hundreds of people and businesses that were not properly compensated for their work, along with 24 (!holy eff!) violations of the fair labor standards act.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/06/09/donald-trump-unpaid-bills-republican-president-laswuits/85297274/ (http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/06/09/donald-trump-unpaid-bills-republican-president-laswuits/85297274/)
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: stunted on September 27, 2016, 10:08:50 PM
That hole in one story is bogus, was Alonzo Mourning's charity event. Just happened to be at one of Trump's courses.

DISHONEST!
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 27, 2016, 10:15:21 PM
That hole in one story is bogus, was Alonzo Mourning's charity event. Just happened to be at one of Trump's courses.

DISHONEST!

then why did he settle a lawsuit over it and then pay the fine with trump foundation money?
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: stunted on September 27, 2016, 10:17:03 PM
That hole in one story is bogus, was Alonzo Mourning's charity event. Just happened to be at one of Trump's courses.

DISHONEST!

then why did he settle a lawsuit over it and then pay the fine with trump foundation money?

Had to cover for a lazy liberal looking for handouts (Alonzo)
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 27, 2016, 10:18:09 PM
that's totally reasonable
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: stunted on September 27, 2016, 10:19:27 PM
4 real tho

http://pagesix.com/2011/02/11/hole-in-one-ace-sues-for-1m/
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: sys on September 27, 2016, 10:19:52 PM
You're changing the goalposts. I never accused Hillary and/or Bill Clinton of being birthers.

Quote
Well well well, Hillary surrogates on CNN straight lying about her people starting the birther movement. crap head and bigoted idiot, Jeffery Lord just 100% busted them on the lie and Hillrod fanboi, Van Jones, said "so what." Of course because Donald Trump is a stupid, lazy, liar, he got the story wrong too so the media does not have to confront the facts of this, only the bogus story he told on stage.

eff Hillary and her army of equivocators; I wouldn't vote for her if I had five votes.

i mean, i guess, if i squint really hard i can forensically recover a train of thought where you make a claim that clinton's campaign and supporters pressing the impression that obama was subtly less american than clinton was responsible in some way for spawning the birther movement.  but you'd be asking readers to put more effort into parsing your thoughts that you seem to have put into outlining them.

There's plenty of documentation about Hillary supporters/surrogates questioning Obama's citizenship or how American he is.

nothing in your links supports that, nor has anything else i've seen.


My issue with the Clinton campaign is that at the time, was the tone towards Obama, it led me to stop being a Hillary supporter. They weren't saying these things but they were out there, it is worth noting that Bill Clinton called the Obama campaign a joke and a farce. Hillary stayed out of the talk, didn't question his otherness, didn't stand up for him either. John McCain did do very publicly, Hillary didn't though. And now when Trump brings this up her campaign can play stupid, and have plausible deniability because she never did it. If she had any shred of integrity about her she'd say something to the effect of "while I take exception to your claim that I started the birther movement, I do regret the tone that surrounded the campaigns at the time."

that's all completely fair (afaik).  it is possible to criticize her based on unexaggerated facts.  it just seems to be very hard for clintonophobes to restrict themselves to that standard.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: bucket on September 27, 2016, 10:26:17 PM
4 real tho

http://pagesix.com/2011/02/11/hole-in-one-ace-sues-for-1m/

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/trump-258k-charity-settle-suits-businesses-article-1.2799475

Quote
Eventually, Trump’s club and Greenberg settled the case, with the company agreeing to donate $158,000 to a charity chosen by Greenberg, which he later decided would be the Martin Greenberg Foundation.

The money given to Greenberg’s charity, however, came from the Donald J. Trump Foundation, tax forms for the mogul’s charity from 2012 show.

Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: renocat on September 27, 2016, 10:27:29 PM
Alicia Machado signed a.Miss Universe contract that had a fat clause.  She broke her contract by eating and gaining.  Hillary doesn't adhere to contracts, rules, or laws.  So holding a woman to a contract is sexist.  Did her can her and change her life forever?  No.  She is now famous.  Was he mean or practicing tough love.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: MakeItRain on September 27, 2016, 10:30:09 PM

nothing in your links supports that, nor has anything else i've seen.


What? This is some serious staning you're doing. Please spin this
Quote
But he also called Obama "unelectable except perhaps against Attila the Hun," and wrote, "I cannot imagine America electing a president during a time of war who is not at his center fundamentally American in his thinking and in his values." Penn proposed targeting Obama's "lack of American roots."
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: bucket on September 27, 2016, 10:33:38 PM
4 real tho

http://pagesix.com/2011/02/11/hole-in-one-ace-sues-for-1m/

Do you read page six a lot? The top headlines on their website tonight are:

"'Very Drunk' Jimmy Fallon dances to 90's Tunes All Night"  :lol:

and

"Warren Beatty Has Not Slept with 12,775 Women"  :fatty:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: sys on September 27, 2016, 10:34:20 PM
got that sick baby to pull itself up by its own bootstraps too, come to think of it.  either that or it died.  not sure which, actually.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: sys on September 27, 2016, 10:46:41 PM

nothing in your links supports that, nor has anything else i've seen.


What? This is some serious staning you're doing. Please spin this
Quote
But he also called Obama "unelectable except perhaps against Attila the Hun," and wrote, "I cannot imagine America electing a president during a time of war who is not at his center fundamentally American in his thinking and in his values." Penn proposed targeting Obama's "lack of American roots."

that memo does not in any way question obama's citzenship.  it discusses whether there might be political advantage to be gained in highlighting obama's multicultural family and his childhood in indonesia (e.g. factually non-american aspects of his "roots").  this is explicitly identity politics, which i was critical of during the conventions - that what matters is not just the ideas and policies that obama espoused, but his background and group identity, so i'm glad that the memo writer was wrong and that americans chose obama's ideas (or less hopefully, that they simply preferred obama's identity to clinton's).
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: MakeItRain on September 27, 2016, 11:14:16 PM

nothing in your links supports that, nor has anything else i've seen.


What? This is some serious staning you're doing. Please spin this
Quote
But he also called Obama "unelectable except perhaps against Attila the Hun," and wrote, "I cannot imagine America electing a president during a time of war who is not at his center fundamentally American in his thinking and in his values." Penn proposed targeting Obama's "lack of American roots."

that memo does not in any way question obama's citzenship.  it discusses whether there might be political advantage to be gained in highlighting obama's multicultural family and his childhood in indonesia (e.g. factually non-american aspects of his "roots").  this is explicitly identity politics, which i was critical of during the conventions - that what matters is not just the ideas and policies that obama espoused, but his background and group identity, so i'm glad that the memo writer was wrong and that americans chose obama's ideas (or less hopefully, that they simply preferred obama's identity to clinton's).

That's fair but they absolutely knew that opening that door as a strategy meant for the masses would not produce conversation with the nuance that you explored. The birther stuff was started by some loony republicans in the early spring of 2008 and then picked up by Hillary supporters a month later. The birther stuff and the multiculturalism as a potential weakness are cards played from the same deck attempting to do the same thing. Clinton didn't say Obama was born in Kenya but she, like McCain, had plenty of chances to get people to fall back and she didn't because she needed the votes.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on September 27, 2016, 11:29:46 PM
Jesus Christ  :lol:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: gatoveintisiete on September 27, 2016, 11:53:51 PM
The buck stops short of the back of my pantsuit- Hillary Clinton
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: chum1 on September 28, 2016, 09:45:27 AM
There really is a disproportionality between the amount of dislike for Clinton and the amount that her actions would typically warrant. It's like the disproportionality between the amount of dislike for Obama and the amount that his actions would typically warrant. That's no surprise, though. We have plenty of sexism and racism in this country.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 28, 2016, 09:46:23 AM
Cool fantasy. Do GWB now.
Title: Presidential debate first round
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 28, 2016, 10:21:49 AM
The whining about people disliking Hillary is comically superficial.    Then again, most Hillbots lack the intellectual depth to discuss anything about Hillary beyond the most superficial issues. 

Sad
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on September 28, 2016, 10:24:09 AM
http://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/kaepernick-in-danger-of-losing-support-after-debate-comments/ar-BBwJngD?li=BBnb7Kz

Quote
“Both are proven liars and it almost seems like they’re trying to debate who’s less racist.”

 :rolleyes:

Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: MakeItRain on September 28, 2016, 10:47:45 AM
There really is a disproportionality between the amount of dislike for Clinton and the amount that her actions would typically warrant. It's like the disproportionality between the amount of dislike for Obama and the amount that his actions would typically warrant. That's no surprise, though. We have plenty of sexism and racism in this country.

Yeah
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on September 28, 2016, 10:53:09 AM
Nobody hates Hillary because she's a female. They hate her because she's a criminal, a dirty "common named" politician, a liar, and she comes off like an ass hat.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: catastrophe on September 28, 2016, 11:01:52 AM
I think the disproportionate dislike for Hillary is just because she typifies the "establishment" so well, which makes her a lightning rod for people's disgust with politics as it currently is.

I do believe she'd lose to most other republican candidates, but if you put her in against someone like Boehner, you'd see a lot less of the criticisms currently thrown at her because they'd also generally apply to him.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: ChiComCat on September 28, 2016, 11:10:31 AM
Nobody hates Hillary because she's a female. They hate her because she's a criminal, a dirty "common named" politician, a liar, and she comes off like an ass hat.

There are absolutely people that think she is unqualified because she is female.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on September 28, 2016, 11:18:39 AM
Very few dumbasses feel that way, but yeah, there's a lot of dumb reasons why certain ppl vote for other candidates.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on September 28, 2016, 11:21:54 AM
Nobody hates Hillary because she's a female. They hate her because she's a criminal, a dirty "common named" politician, a liar, and she comes off like an ass hat.

There are absolutely people that think she is unqualified because she is female.

Sure, but there are probably just as many if not more people who would vote for her no matter what because she is female. It was the same thing with Obama. Both viewpoints are unfortunate. Even more unfortunate is that this corrupt, contemptible liar, who has somehow skated out of one scandal after another, may very well be rewarded with the presidency because the GOP didn't nominate one of any number of decent, qualified candidates in the primary.

[she] (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.reactiongifs.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F10%2Fpinkman.gif&hash=794da157dd29b3c4c86e0a58ca9c915ddae782f6)
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 28, 2016, 11:38:21 AM
I love ksuw still clinging to Obama only being elected because he's black  :love:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Cartierfor3 on September 28, 2016, 11:42:58 AM
everyone was against Palin because she's a woman  :curse:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: treysolid on September 28, 2016, 11:51:50 AM
in terms of its effect on future society, voting for obama solely because he is black is arguably still the most valid reason for voting for him.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: _33 on September 28, 2016, 11:57:23 AM
There really is a disproportionality between the amount of dislike for Clinton and the amount that her actions would typically warrant. It's like the disproportionality between the amount of dislike for Obama and the amount that his actions would typically warrant. That's no surprise, though. We have plenty of sexism and racism in this country.

Would a man version of Hillary even won the nomination?  I have my doubts.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 28, 2016, 11:59:48 AM
Would a female version of Obama be elected Supreme ruler for life? Possibly
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: DQ12 on September 28, 2016, 12:01:26 PM
everyone was against Palin because she's a woman  :curse:
And Fiorina and Bachman.

I think the fact that Clinton's a woman ranks below her being a Clinton, establishment, democrat, robotic, and unethical, on the "Reasons People Dislike Hillary" list.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 28, 2016, 01:11:32 PM
There really is a disproportionality between the amount of dislike for Clinton and the amount that her actions would typically warrant. It's like the disproportionality between the amount of dislike for Obama and the amount that his actions would typically warrant. That's no surprise, though. We have plenty of sexism and racism in this country.

Would a man version of Hillary even won the nomination?  I have my doubts.

If she were a man, we'd have probably locked him up by now.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 28, 2016, 01:21:34 PM
in terms of its effect on future society, voting for obama solely because he is black is arguably still the most valid reason for voting for him.

Duh, in nearly 8 years as president being born 1/2 black remains his most significant accomplishment.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Mrs. Gooch on September 28, 2016, 01:26:44 PM
everyone was against Palin because she's a woman  :curse:
And Fiorina and Bachman.

I think the fact that Clinton's a woman ranks below her being a Clinton, establishment, democrat, robotic, and unethical, on the "Reasons People Dislike Hillary" list.

I think the perception that she is robotic is mainly due to her being a woman - either because people have a double standard on how men/women should act and/or because of the things she has had to do to overcome the fact that she is a woman in a typical male dominated field.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 28, 2016, 01:29:59 PM
everyone was against Palin because she's a woman  :curse:
And Fiorina and Bachman.

I think the fact that Clinton's a woman ranks below her being a Clinton, establishment, democrat, robotic, and unethical, on the "Reasons People Dislike Hillary" list.

I think the perception that she is robotic is mainly due to her being a woman - either because people have a double standard on how men/women should act and/or because of the things she has had to do to overcome the fact that she is a woman in a typical male dominated field.

Are there other female politicians that get criticized for being robotic? I haven't noticed that, but then again, "robotic" isn't a criticism I hear much regarding Clinton, either.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: chum1 on September 28, 2016, 01:30:26 PM
There really is a disproportionality between the amount of dislike for Clinton and the amount that her actions would typically warrant. It's like the disproportionality between the amount of dislike for Obama and the amount that his actions would typically warrant. That's no surprise, though. We have plenty of sexism and racism in this country.

Would a man version of Hillary even won the nomination?  I have my doubts.

I wasn't really even thinking about voting numbers. And I do understand why people would not have a positive impression of her. I just don't see mountains of justification for such widespread negative views, the second lowest favorability rating of all time.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: chum1 on September 28, 2016, 01:33:04 PM
With Trump, on the other hand, I can completely understand his low favorability rating.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: _33 on September 28, 2016, 01:36:21 PM
She's also a product of the times.  Congress has the lowest favorability rating of all time and it's still dropping.  People's view of politics and politicians in general has never been lower.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Skipper44 on September 28, 2016, 01:42:17 PM
Would a female version of Obama be elected Supreme ruler for life? Possibly
i think Michelle may give us that answer irl
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: treysolid on September 28, 2016, 01:43:26 PM
"011010000110000101101000011000010110100001100001"

 - direct quote from mitt romney upon hearing that hillary clinton is robotic.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: DQ12 on September 28, 2016, 01:44:08 PM
everyone was against Palin because she's a woman  :curse:
And Fiorina and Bachman.

I think the fact that Clinton's a woman ranks below her being a Clinton, establishment, democrat, robotic, and unethical, on the "Reasons People Dislike Hillary" list.

I think the perception that she is robotic is mainly due to her being a woman - either because people have a double standard on how men/women should act and/or because of the things she has had to do to overcome the fact that she is a woman in a typical male dominated field.
I mean, people killed Rubio for being overly scripted too.  And Cruz for being insanely unlikeable.

I stand by my original point that her being a woman is probably not a significant factor among her detractors.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Trim on September 28, 2016, 01:53:50 PM
Would a female version of Obama be elected Supreme ruler for life? Possibly
i think Michelle may give us that answer irl

It'll be funny if Trump wins this year and then Michelle whips his ass in 4 years.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Skipper44 on September 28, 2016, 01:58:31 PM
Would a female version of Obama be elected Supreme ruler for life? Possibly
i think Michelle may give us that answer irl

It'll be funny if Trump wins this year and then Michelle whips his ass in 4 years.
it would likely put both Hills & Bill in the grave. 

Honestly, Michelle will win anytime she decides to run
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: _33 on September 28, 2016, 02:00:44 PM
It would be nice if a woman could be president without her husband being president first
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Skipper44 on September 28, 2016, 02:03:55 PM
That is Sasha's job
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Trim on September 28, 2016, 02:16:57 PM
Honestly, Michelle will win anytime she decides to run

Yep.  It's crazy that the democrats aren't exhausting every option to try to get her plugged in this year.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 28, 2016, 02:53:00 PM
Quote
TRUMP: I do want to say that I was just endorsed — and more are coming next week — it will be over 200 admirals, many of them here — admirals and generals endorsed me to lead this country. That just happened, and many more are coming. And I’m very proud of it.

In addition, I was just endorsed by ICE. They’ve never endorsed anybody before on immigration. I was just endorsed by ICE. I was just recently endorsed — 16,500 Border Patrol agents.

So when Secretary Clinton talks about this, I mean, I’ll take the admirals and I’ll take the generals any day over the political hacks that I see that have led our country so brilliantly over the last 10 years with their knowledge. OK? Because look at the mess that we’re in. Look at the mess that we’re in.

As far as the cyber, I agree to parts of what Secretary Clinton said. We should be better than anybody else, and perhaps we’re not. I don’t think anybody knows it was Russia that broke into the DNC. She’s saying Russia, Russia, Russia, but I don’t — maybe it was. I mean, it could be Russia, but it could also be China. It could also be lots of other people. It also could be somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds, OK?

TRUMP: You don’t know who broke in to DNC.

But what did we learn with DNC? We learned that Bernie Sanders was taken advantage of by your people, by Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Look what happened to her. But Bernie Sanders was taken advantage of. That’s what we learned.

Now, whether that was Russia, whether that was China, whether it was another country, we don’t know, because the truth is, under President Obama we’ve lost control of things that we used to have control over.

We came in with the Internet, we came up with the Internet, and I think Secretary Clinton and myself would agree very much, when you look at what ISIS is doing with the Internet, they’re beating us at our own game. ISIS.

So we have to get very, very tough on cyber and cyber warfare. It is — it is a huge problem. I have a son. He’s 10 years old. He has computers. He is so good with these computers, it’s unbelievable. The security aspect of cyber is very, very tough. And maybe it’s hardly doable.

But I will say, we are not doing the job we should be doing. But that’s true throughout our whole governmental society. We have so many things that we have to do better, Lester, and certainly cyber is one of them.

There is nothing better than Donald talking about cyber.

debate transcript (http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/09/27/us/politics/transcript-debate.html?_r=0&referer=http://m.facebook.com)
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 28, 2016, 03:08:55 PM
everyone was against Palin because she's a woman  :curse:
And Fiorina and Bachman.

I think the fact that Clinton's a woman ranks below her being a Clinton, establishment, democrat, robotic, and unethical, on the "Reasons People Dislike Hillary" list.

I think the perception that she is robotic is mainly due to her being a woman - either because people have a double standard on how men/women should act and/or because of the things she has had to do to overcome the fact that she is a woman in a typical male dominated field.
I mean, people killed Rubio for being overly scripted too.  And Cruz for being insanely unlikeable.

I stand by my original point that her being a woman is probably not a significant factor among her detractors.

I agree
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: MakeItRain on September 28, 2016, 03:56:32 PM
She's also a product of the times.  Congress has the lowest favorability rating of all time and it's still dropping.  People's view of politics and politicians in general has never been lower.

This is the best point made in the thread.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: chum1 on September 28, 2016, 04:04:31 PM
So, maybe it is not the case that anyone other than Trump would beat her. ???
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: catastrophe on September 28, 2016, 04:15:35 PM
An established congressman or cabinet member would have a tougher time, no doubt. I don't think quite the same stigma would apply to Governors or perceived "Washington outsiders" which made up most of the Republican pool this year.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: CNS on September 28, 2016, 04:23:36 PM
Someone equally established with less recent scandal would be skating through quicker than Emo's poisoned water through Emo.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 28, 2016, 06:00:07 PM
If Hillary were honest, trustworthy, exhibited a modicum of competence in prior offices, hadn't serially betrayed her duty of loyalty and fair dealing while in public office, hadn't frequently destroyed evidence of her misconduct, and wasn't taking positions she opposed only a few years ago, she'd be a fabulous candidate 15 years ago.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 28, 2016, 06:44:38 PM
The more the establishment people get voted out, the less congress functions and the lower their approval rating gets.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 28, 2016, 06:52:21 PM
The more the establishment people get voted out, the less congress functions and the lower their approval rating gets.

Essentially voting for "change" and "shake ups" is voting for status quo
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 28, 2016, 06:54:29 PM
Replacing the incumbent is fine as long as you aren't trading him out for a dickweed like Ted Cruz.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: CNS on September 28, 2016, 06:56:26 PM
We need to find moderate Dick weeds, is all.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: treysolid on September 28, 2016, 07:25:34 PM
exactly. look at what happened to congress as soon as all these tea party assholes got voted in.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: MakeItRain on September 28, 2016, 10:34:47 PM
If Hillary were honest, trustworthy, exhibited a modicum of competence in prior offices, hadn't serially betrayed her duty of loyalty and fair dealing while in public office, hadn't frequently destroyed evidence of her misconduct, and wasn't taking positions she opposed only a few years ago, she'd be a fabulous candidate 15 years ago.

Who the eff are you kidding? She could be the mutant second coming of Abe Lincoln, Henry Kissinger, and Thomas Jefferson and you'd still call her every name in the book because of that D next to her name.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: SkinnyBenny on September 28, 2016, 10:40:48 PM
If Hillary were honest, trustworthy, exhibited a modicum of competence in prior offices, hadn't serially betrayed her duty of loyalty and fair dealing while in public office, hadn't frequently destroyed evidence of her misconduct, and wasn't taking positions she opposed only a few years ago, she'd be a fabulous candidate 15 years ago.

And yet, she's still going to break Trump's ankles on a juke and posterize him while he's in the middle of falling. Then she's gonna stand over him and leave the court and moonwalk straight into the White House.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: stunted on September 28, 2016, 11:25:01 PM
so alicia "piggy" machado did a "daniel sams" in the past :surprised:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on September 29, 2016, 08:38:54 AM
If Hillary were honest, trustworthy, exhibited a modicum of competence in prior offices, hadn't serially betrayed her duty of loyalty and fair dealing while in public office, hadn't frequently destroyed evidence of her misconduct, and wasn't taking positions she opposed only a few years ago, she'd be a fabulous candidate 15 years ago.

And yet, she's still going to break Trump's ankles on a juke and posterize him while he's in the middle of falling. Then she's gonna stand over him and leave the court and moonwalk straight into the White House.
So then the question remains? Why is it that libs are so mad that people dislike Hillary?
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 29, 2016, 10:29:23 AM
If Hillary were honest, trustworthy, exhibited a modicum of competence in prior offices, hadn't serially betrayed her duty of loyalty and fair dealing while in public office, hadn't frequently destroyed evidence of her misconduct, and wasn't taking positions she opposed only a few years ago, she'd be a fabulous candidate 15 years ago.

Who the eff are you kidding? She could be the mutant second coming of Abe Lincoln, Henry Kissinger, and Thomas Jefferson and you'd still call her every name in the book because of that D next to her name.

You deny these things are true? Or just mad?
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 29, 2016, 10:35:58 AM
If Hillary were honest, trustworthy, exhibited a modicum of competence in prior offices, hadn't serially betrayed her duty of loyalty and fair dealing while in public office, hadn't frequently destroyed evidence of her misconduct, and wasn't taking positions she opposed only a few years ago, she'd be a fabulous candidate 15 years ago.

And yet, she's still going to break Trump's ankles on a juke and posterize him while he's in the middle of falling. Then she's gonna stand over him and leave the court and moonwalk straight into the White House.

Donald Trump does not give a eff about being president, has spent hundreds of millions of dollars less on his campaign, is an absurdly ridiculous candidate, and is polling dead even with her, with a real chance of winning weeks from the election.

It's a stunning indictment of how terrible Hillary is. The RNC blew it by not exercising a modicum of control over its primaries. Running 16 identical candidates out their, while Trump won delegates with 30% of the vote.

John McCain would mop the floor with Hilltard. Ted Cruz would mop the floor with Hilltard. Rick rough ridin' Santorum would mop the floor with Hilltard.  It's obvious.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on September 29, 2016, 11:13:53 AM
Bernie Sanders would be at least 10 points ahead of Trump right now. We have the worst candidate from each party going head to head.  :buh-bye:
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: chum1 on September 29, 2016, 11:44:04 AM
Quote
There's another important factor that will make it hard for Trump to turn things around: The second debate will use the "town hall" format. Questions will be asked by ordinary citizens in the audience. These debates are different from others in a number of ways, none of which work to Trump's advantage.

First, we've seen in prior town hall debates that the questions tend to be more substantive, but less predictable.
...
Second, the presence of those citizens means that viewers will be watching to see how the candidates relate to them
http://theweek.com/articles/651768/why-donald-trump-even-worse-second-debate

Yeah, I think this format will be much harder for him. His best move is attacking Clinton. No way he figures out how to do that while addressing a concerned citizen.

So, there will definitely be a question from a Muslim, right?

Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 29, 2016, 11:51:44 AM
Trump is going to do whatever the ruck he wqnts regardless of format. I don't think substantive unpredictable questions can possibly favor hillary.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: CNS on September 29, 2016, 12:44:12 PM
There should be a requirement that the debates have to take place once the two candidates are both above a certain blood alcohol level. 
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on September 29, 2016, 12:44:40 PM
i would enjoy that CNS
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: sys on September 29, 2016, 02:39:04 PM
as long as the debate is over 30-40 minutes, it favors clinton.  it's an issue of stamina.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: star seed 7 on October 03, 2016, 11:27:14 AM
About that sexist anti-clinton sentiment...

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/298899-giuliani-isnt-a-man-with-this-kind-of-economic-genius


Quote
"Don’t you think a man who has this kind of economic genius is a lot better for the United States than a woman?" Giuliani then asked. The phrasing raised eyebrows, especially given the timing.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: gatoveintisiete on October 09, 2016, 07:56:22 PM
Grabber by the rat Don  :emawkid:
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: MakeItRain on October 09, 2016, 08:06:25 PM
I'm glad she didn't shake his hand
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: sys on October 09, 2016, 08:08:09 PM
I'm glad she didn't shake his hand

yes, good move.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: bones129 on October 09, 2016, 08:10:03 PM
He's sniffing again!
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: star seed 7 on October 09, 2016, 08:10:20 PM
Already sniffing. Drugs?
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: sys on October 09, 2016, 08:11:45 PM
the sniffing is the most exciting thing about either candidates' answers.  i hope we don't have to wait 30 minutes before we get to the crazy this time.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: sys on October 09, 2016, 08:12:49 PM
pivot from pussy grabbing to isis was interesting.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: Kat Kid on October 09, 2016, 08:12:59 PM
Donald is a mess
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: star seed 7 on October 09, 2016, 08:17:01 PM
Donald is a mess

He seriously looks like he's about to cry
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: CNS on October 09, 2016, 08:17:54 PM
He is tired.  Poor stamina

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: gatoveintisiete on October 09, 2016, 08:18:49 PM
Sounds fair, sounds fair.... :lol:
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: sys on October 09, 2016, 08:19:42 PM
did someone coat the top of his mouth with peanut butter?  why aren't his mouth and nose cooperating to talk and breath together?
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: star seed 7 on October 09, 2016, 08:21:40 PM
Can you imagine trying to work out a really terrific deal and having to deal with the sniffing all the time?
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: sys on October 09, 2016, 08:22:14 PM
maybe the mikes are just too sensitive.  i can hear clinton's lips coming together after speaking too (and it's annoying).
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: sys on October 09, 2016, 08:23:05 PM
attacking michelle obama is a very good idea.  what a chessmaster.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: CNS on October 09, 2016, 08:23:25 PM
CNSwife thinks he has dentures and that is why he does weird things with his mouth.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: sys on October 09, 2016, 08:24:18 PM
oh good, we're not going to have to wait 30 minutes.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: gatoveintisiete on October 09, 2016, 08:24:51 PM
No fat shaming Hillary :love:
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: gatoveintisiete on October 09, 2016, 08:25:21 PM
He's kicking her ass
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: sys on October 09, 2016, 08:25:53 PM
clinton should not be responding to this head on.  stupid on her part.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: CNS on October 09, 2016, 08:27:22 PM
Best debate so far, imo

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: sys on October 09, 2016, 08:27:46 PM
why is she doing this?  she handled it so well in the first debate.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: stunted on October 09, 2016, 08:28:07 PM
Wow. Trump is out for blood
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: IPA4Me on October 09, 2016, 08:29:42 PM
Calling out moderators early.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: CNS on October 09, 2016, 08:29:59 PM
I will allow it.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: star seed 7 on October 09, 2016, 08:31:13 PM
 :scary movie:
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: bones129 on October 09, 2016, 08:31:15 PM
"I'm a gentleman."  ROFL
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: sys on October 09, 2016, 08:31:36 PM
wtf is he doing now?  walking around her like some deranged cat.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: star seed 7 on October 09, 2016, 08:32:20 PM
Looking for optimum grabbing position
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: sys on October 09, 2016, 08:33:04 PM
let me position myself so my shoulder is in the shot here, that will be important.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: 8manpick on October 09, 2016, 08:36:40 PM
He's such a rough ridin' clown
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: IPA4Me on October 09, 2016, 08:37:55 PM
If he could just focus on a line of thought, he'd crush her. He jumps from point to point without finishing.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: CNS on October 09, 2016, 08:40:36 PM
"We're going to help ppl who can't afford insurance because we are going to protect them..." 

WTF does that even mean?

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: star seed 7 on October 09, 2016, 08:40:52 PM
If he could just focus on a line of thought, he'd crush her. He jumps from point to point without finishing.


No he wouldn't
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: IPA4Me on October 09, 2016, 08:41:28 PM
If he could just focus on a line of thought, he'd crush her. He jumps from point to point without finishing.


No he wouldn't
Barry did. She's not strong.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 09, 2016, 08:42:21 PM
Anderson Cooper is such a tool and a stooge.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 09, 2016, 08:43:42 PM
Also the moderators seem to be cross examimg him
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 09, 2016, 08:44:48 PM
The russians!!!!!
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: star seed 7 on October 09, 2016, 08:45:26 PM
If he could just focus on a line of thought, he'd crush her. He jumps from point to point without finishing.


No he wouldn't
Barry did. She's not strong.

You just proved my point.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 09, 2016, 08:46:15 PM
Hillary Clinton is a rough ridin' idiot.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: gatoveintisiete on October 09, 2016, 08:47:03 PM
She's really bad at the policy questions
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on October 09, 2016, 08:47:25 PM
"We're going to help ppl who can't afford insurance because we are going to protect them..." 

WTF does that even mean?

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

She basically said the same thing, no specifics.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: sys on October 09, 2016, 08:49:26 PM
this debate is going to knock both of their record low approval rates to new records.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 09, 2016, 08:49:39 PM
Great question: are politicians allowed to be two-faced, mrs clinton

Her retort is so dumb
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: stunted on October 09, 2016, 08:49:53 PM
Lol
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 09, 2016, 08:50:34 PM
Drink everytime she blames her bullshit on russia!
 :lol:
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: CNS on October 09, 2016, 08:51:28 PM
If she wants to provide context, she should release the rest of the speech.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: CNS on October 09, 2016, 08:52:07 PM
The Russia stuff doesn't work unless she tied Putin to don, imo

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: CNS on October 09, 2016, 08:52:46 PM
There it is.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 09, 2016, 08:53:00 PM
OMG! ROFL!

That's the funniest things I've ever seen in a debate. "Honest Abe" "Ridiculous "
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: sys on October 09, 2016, 08:54:28 PM
that was the most add answer imaginable.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: stunted on October 09, 2016, 08:54:34 PM
Where the eff was this the first debate? I know he still won that one but still
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: gatoveintisiete on October 09, 2016, 08:56:37 PM
They should let the clock run in the second half, this is a blowout
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: sys on October 09, 2016, 08:56:48 PM
not that i want these little cinderella voters to eat into the candidates' time, but what is the point of having them there if they're not going to have them ask stuff?
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: stunted on October 09, 2016, 08:59:50 PM
I'm getting bored of everyone talking about how Trump is following the law
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: sys on October 09, 2016, 09:01:09 PM
hey kat kid, trump is admitting that a lot of the 900+ million loss was depreciation.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: bucket on October 09, 2016, 09:05:05 PM
wtf is he doing now?  walking around her like some deranged cat.

 :eek:
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: star seed 7 on October 09, 2016, 09:05:19 PM
hey kat kid, trump is admitting that a lot of the 900+ million loss was depreciation.

And it's great! He loves depreciation!
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: stunted on October 09, 2016, 09:09:19 PM
Why is this blonde bimbo about to cry everytime she speaks?
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: star seed 7 on October 09, 2016, 09:11:56 PM
Why is this blonde bimbo about to cry everytime he speaks?

Take it easy, the Donald has had a rough few days
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: gatoveintisiete on October 09, 2016, 09:14:13 PM
Why is this blonde bimbo about to cry everytime she speaks?

Her candidate is getting her box kicked in

(That's lockeroom talk, I'm embarrassed by it and have never kicked a box in)
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: sys on October 09, 2016, 09:15:07 PM
whining about time is a very strong, very alpha look.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: stunted on October 09, 2016, 09:15:20 PM
Why is this blonde bimbo about to cry everytime he speaks?

Take it easy, the Donald has had a rough few days

 :cheers:
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: star seed 7 on October 09, 2016, 09:17:11 PM
He should start grabbing pussies and show these broads how to speak to a real man
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: gatoveintisiete on October 09, 2016, 09:21:23 PM
I guarantee you he grabs a lot of pussies, a big league amount
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: CNS on October 09, 2016, 09:21:44 PM
I want to know how he plans to do anything for any inner city. 

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: gatoveintisiete on October 09, 2016, 09:22:43 PM
Jobs in, drugs out
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: stunted on October 09, 2016, 09:23:27 PM
Jobs in, drugs out

Do Hillary's plan!
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: gatoveintisiete on October 09, 2016, 09:26:05 PM
Neuter cops, open borders, create new dependant class to vote D
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: CNS on October 09, 2016, 09:27:16 PM
What jobs?  I heard a stat on the radio saying that 80% of the jobs lost in manufacturing since NAFTA signed have been lost to automation.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: star seed 7 on October 09, 2016, 09:28:09 PM
What jobs?  I heard a stat on the radio saying that 80% of the jobs lost in manufacturing since NAFTA signed have been lost to automation.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Librul lies!
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: CNS on October 09, 2016, 09:28:25 PM
Also, what would he do to ramp up the war on drugs that hasn't already been done?  Simplicity for the simple.  Hook, line, and sinker.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: MakeItRain on October 09, 2016, 09:29:11 PM
https://twitter.com/funder/status/785292939647934465
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: gatoveintisiete on October 09, 2016, 09:29:34 PM
Also, what would he do to ramp up the war on drugs that hasn't already been done?  Simplicity for the simple.  Hook, line, and sinker.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Shut down the border
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: sys on October 09, 2016, 09:29:56 PM
that supreme court question was a layup for him and he fumbled it out of bounds.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: CNS on October 09, 2016, 09:30:13 PM
No way

Pence drop out related

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: SkinnyBenny on October 09, 2016, 09:30:36 PM
Ken Bone  :fatty:
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: star seed 7 on October 09, 2016, 09:31:01 PM
https://twitter.com/MichaelSteele/status/785290342807379968
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: Tobias on October 09, 2016, 09:31:03 PM
kenneth bone :love:
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: CNS on October 09, 2016, 09:31:24 PM
Also, what would he do to ramp up the war on drugs that hasn't already been done?  Simplicity for the simple.  Hook, line, and sinker.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Shut down the border

You think drugs only cross one land boarder?  You think they aren't made and grown here? 

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: sys on October 09, 2016, 09:31:43 PM
https://twitter.com/funder/status/785292939647934465

that would be a really stupid move for him (i think).  he's already tainted with trumpism for nevertrumpers, he'd just make himself a judas to trumpites as well.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: MakeItRain on October 09, 2016, 09:32:08 PM
Hillary was awful tonight but its absolutely understandable. He clearly came in ready to scorch the earth, even taking out his running mate, and she had no idea how to handle it, she clearly was rattled.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: stunted on October 09, 2016, 09:33:13 PM
Hillary was awful tonight but its absolutely understandable. He clearly came in ready to scorch the earth, even taking out his running mate, and she had no idea how to handle it, she clearly was rattled.

 :love: :love: :love:
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: gatoveintisiete on October 09, 2016, 09:33:36 PM
Also, what would he do to ramp up the war on drugs that hasn't already been done?  Simplicity for the simple.  Hook, line, and sinker.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Shut down the border

You think drugs only cross one land boarder?  You think they aren't made and grown here? 

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

You have heard of Mexican drug cartels right?
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: Dugout DickStone on October 09, 2016, 09:34:19 PM
his hands are very very small
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: MakeItRain on October 09, 2016, 09:34:41 PM
Ken Bone  :fatty:

Former Washington State basketball coach, 0-2 against the Cats with Klay Thompson.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: stunted on October 09, 2016, 09:35:12 PM
Ivanka holy crap
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: sys on October 09, 2016, 09:35:42 PM
she should stop pushing her website.  no undecided voter is going to her website.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: MakeItRain on October 09, 2016, 09:36:43 PM
Hillary was awful tonight but its absolutely understandable. He clearly came in ready to scorch the earth, even taking out his running mate, and she had no idea how to handle it, she clearly was rattled.

 :love: :love: :love:

Congrats to your guy on reaching a record new low in political discourse lows.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 09, 2016, 09:39:52 PM
Donald whooped her ass
-PBS Newshour
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: sys on October 09, 2016, 09:40:14 PM
his clinton is a fighter answer was his best of the night.  good to go out on a high note.


neither candidate helped themselves, although just surviving the debate is good for trump vs expectations.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: gatoveintisiete on October 09, 2016, 09:42:00 PM
2-0  :Woohoo:
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: stunted on October 09, 2016, 09:43:50 PM
Donald whooped her ass
- NBC
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 09, 2016, 09:46:18 PM
She only really gave one good answer.
-PBS NEWS HOUR
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: MakeItRain on October 09, 2016, 09:47:59 PM
Why was that dude breathing like that, he sounded like he was dying?
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: stunted on October 09, 2016, 09:48:32 PM
I liked her answer when she said the Michelle Obama thing. You go low we go high.

Which Trump proceeded to destroy.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on October 09, 2016, 09:49:37 PM
Why was that dude breathing like that, he sounded like he was dying?

Deviated septum, probably.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 09, 2016, 09:49:45 PM
My favorite part, other than when Hillary blamed her shittiness on abe Lincoln and the russians, was when donald brought up the deplorables and irredeemables and AC interrupted him to make clear hillary only said "some" of them were irredeemable.  :lol:
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 09, 2016, 09:50:34 PM
https://twitter.com/funder/status/785292939647934465

that would be a really stupid move for him (i think).  he's already tainted with trumpism for nevertrumpers, he'd just make himself a judas to trumpites as well.

He has republicans asking him to leave the ticket, telling him Trump would have no choice but to drop out and that he would be the new candidate. Trump would never drop out, though.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: gatoveintisiete on October 09, 2016, 09:50:41 PM
https://twitter.com/funder/status/785292939647934465

that would be a really stupid move for him (i think).  he's already tainted with trumpism for nevertrumpers, he'd just make himself a judas to trumpites as well.

The original post was horsehit sys, disregard
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: stunted on October 09, 2016, 09:50:52 PM
https://twitter.com/mike_pence/status/785310165327151104
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 09, 2016, 09:51:57 PM
Also, when AC asked about don tweeting at 3am, and don talked about how great twitter is and that he's sorry AC doesnt like it.  :lol:
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 09, 2016, 09:53:02 PM
He's not quitting 4 weeks from the election, good grief
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 09, 2016, 09:54:24 PM
It's fun to fantasize about Donald dropping out of the election, though.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: star seed 7 on October 09, 2016, 09:56:40 PM
It's fun to fantasize about Donald dropping out of the election, though.

It would be interesting to see what would happen, but I prefer he stays in.

Pence leaving would be great fun tho
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 09, 2016, 09:57:25 PM
Yeah, most sane people secretly wish a homicidal maniac would off both these people at one of these debates.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 09, 2016, 09:58:35 PM
https://twitter.com/funder/status/785292939647934465

that would be a really stupid move for him (i think).  he's already tainted with trumpism for nevertrumpers, he'd just make himself a judas to trumpites as well.

The original post was horsehit sys, disregard

Clearly isis is trying to swing the election to their home girl hilltard
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: stunted on October 09, 2016, 10:10:40 PM
CNN appalled, talking about how Donald said he would jail her, bringing more attention to her corruption.

3D chess folks. Not 2D, unless you're talking about Ivanka's dub deuces :fatty:
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: stunted on October 09, 2016, 10:19:09 PM
https://twitter.com/JNSmall/status/785303140526542852

What a troll  :lol:
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: OK_Cat on October 09, 2016, 10:20:58 PM
We are a month away and I'm still waiting to hear one of trump's policies. Just one. Anyone?
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: star seed 7 on October 09, 2016, 10:22:10 PM
We are a month away and I'm still waiting to hear one of trump's policies. Just one. Anyone?

Sneak attack isis
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: DQ12 on October 09, 2016, 10:23:36 PM
that was great television.  i liked when he said he was going to throw his political opponent in prison.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: stunted on October 09, 2016, 10:24:26 PM
crap, I forgot to set up my scripts to autovote in the online polls :frown:
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: gatoveintisiete on October 09, 2016, 10:27:50 PM
You know Obama was throwin' crap at his tv tonight, if I know Barack he's gonna try to mock Don tomorrow  :lol:
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 09, 2016, 10:29:17 PM
Apparently hillary clinton has a website, and you should go there to read her policies. Assuming these would be the public policies, the ones she uses to trick eff people into voting for her, not the private policies which involve trading government favors for billions of dollars.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: gatoveintisiete on October 09, 2016, 10:33:24 PM
Oh man, if Donald could have made that point on the fly :Fbomb:
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 09, 2016, 10:36:23 PM
The russians should hack her website and replace her policies with hitler's policies. Just in case anyone actually goes to that website.

Donald should keep tweeting his adjective laden policies, and shame anyone who criticizes twitter as a modern day medium of communication
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: stunted on October 09, 2016, 11:06:53 PM
Does anyone believe CNN's poll? Mood on this forum says otherwise
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: star seed 7 on October 09, 2016, 11:22:18 PM
What is the mood?
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: SdK on October 09, 2016, 11:27:18 PM
I only see 3 people posting aggressively
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: SdK on October 09, 2016, 11:27:38 PM
So I guess Trump won?
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: gatoveintisiet on October 09, 2016, 11:28:25 PM
What is the mood?

So adorable
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: OK_Cat on October 09, 2016, 11:39:02 PM
Still waiting on a Trump policy
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: bones129 on October 09, 2016, 11:57:36 PM
Still waiting on a Trump policy

Agreed.   :impatient:
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: stunted on October 10, 2016, 12:16:03 AM
http://blog.dilbert.com/post/144197811771/about-those-trump-policy-details

policies don't win elections, even cuntler has taking a page from the trump book of persuasion. and doing a great job at it. however one is a natural alpha persuader, the other is a robot/lizard with an elite team of people guiding her every move.

more posts with zingers, less about boring policies plz.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: stunted on October 10, 2016, 12:24:46 AM
Does anyone believe CNN's poll? Mood on this forum says otherwise

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqCIub3SmCI

 :lol: :lol: :lol:

cnn has lost all credibility
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: chum1 on October 10, 2016, 12:26:50 AM
Hillary played this perfectly. If she completely takes him down tonight, he drops out, and then she loses the election to Pence. She needed to make him feel like he still has a chance. We missed our opportunity to indict her and now she is going to completely ruin America.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: sys on October 10, 2016, 02:04:35 AM
the huffpo vid is better, but i don't know how to embed it.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/heres-a-supercut-of-trump-lurking-behind-clinton-during-the-debate_us_57fafc38e4b068ecb5df9630?ncid=engmodushpmg00000004

https://twitter.com/CNN/status/785363332685500416
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: sys on October 10, 2016, 02:13:24 AM
https://twitter.com/PaladinCornelia/status/785364865980456960
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: sys on October 10, 2016, 02:17:30 AM
https://twitter.com/MashableNews/status/785316780168404992
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: gatoveintisiete on October 10, 2016, 08:17:02 AM
I'm with her (stage craft)-hillbot
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: steve dave on October 10, 2016, 08:48:50 AM
did not watch
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: Trim on October 10, 2016, 08:53:31 AM
Kind of a letdown.  I liked the CK parts.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: nicname on October 10, 2016, 08:53:56 AM
did not watch

 :thumbs: 

also

will not vote
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: catastrophe on October 10, 2016, 09:24:10 AM
Did not read this thread, but what a disaster of a debate. Hillary obviously won, but probably would have done even better if she said nothing and just let raging dumpster fire Trump meltdown on stage.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 10, 2016, 09:26:26 AM
Did not read this thread, but what a disaster of a debate. Hillary obviously won, but probably would have done even better if she said nothing and just let raging dumpster fire Trump meltdown on stage.

Trump won because he delivered every conservative radio personalty's wet dream. He won't win the election, but he never was going to.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: catastrophe on October 10, 2016, 09:27:54 AM
the huffpo vid is better, but i don't know how to embed it.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/heres-a-supercut-of-trump-lurking-behind-clinton-during-the-debate_us_57fafc38e4b068ecb5df9630?ncid=engmodushpmg00000004

https://twitter.com/CNN/status/785363332685500416

I wonder if these were written by people that had not seen any town hall debates before. Some candidate usually tries something like this to rattle their opponent. I distinctly remember Romney doing it last election. Of course, it was awkward then too.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: Cire on October 10, 2016, 10:18:02 AM
Al gore and George W was the best
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 10, 2016, 10:23:34 AM
Still waiting on a Trump policy

Agreed.   :impatient:

Public, private or both?
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: stunted on October 10, 2016, 10:40:13 AM
when they go low, we go high

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fkpf48sq.png&hash=36b298f13afdfe67040f352e993da4b3390813b2)
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: OK_Cat on October 10, 2016, 10:52:22 AM
Still waiting on a Trump policy

Agreed.   :impatient:

Public, private or both?

So you don't know of any Trump policies, either? Gotcha.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: stunted on October 10, 2016, 11:11:13 AM
is there a more boring, dorky argument than policies? in a debate filled with zingers and fireworks, you come in here with a sparkler and bring up policies :lol:
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: Dugout DickStone on October 10, 2016, 11:20:05 AM
hugely lower taxes
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 10, 2016, 11:20:30 AM
Trump's policies are to build a big concrete wall, at least 40 feet tall, across the entire southern border. He also wants to cut taxes bigly and increase federal spending in pretty much every department. He has no coherent foreign policy and even called Russia "new nuclear" last night.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: CNS on October 10, 2016, 12:25:31 PM
his other policy is that America is absolutely the worst right now.  Just the worst.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: treysolid on October 10, 2016, 01:10:49 PM
hugely lower taxes

yeah. that's his only policy with any details. unfortunately, it's Brownback/Jindal turned up to 11.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: 8manpick on October 10, 2016, 01:25:35 PM
Definitely confirmed that he uses "bigly" as a word yesterday
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on October 10, 2016, 01:59:46 PM
 :'bye cruel world:
Definitely confirmed that he uses "bigly" as a word yesterday

This is like when W used the word "decider" and the libs laughed until they found out it's a proper word.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: CNS on October 10, 2016, 02:07:28 PM
"Fool me once.................................................Fool me once, you caint fool me again!"

 - Silly Libs
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: gatoveintisiete on October 10, 2016, 02:10:26 PM
He says big league anyway.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: Trim on October 10, 2016, 06:06:01 PM
http://www.luckytv.nl/time-of-my-life/
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: stunted on October 10, 2016, 07:26:05 PM
Does anyone believe CNN's poll? Mood on this forum says otherwise

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqCIub3SmCI

 :lol: :lol: :lol:

cnn has lost all credibility

https://twitter.com/TeamTrump/status/785555525559738368

this is all so very gross
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: sys on October 10, 2016, 07:46:05 PM
lol.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: stunted on October 10, 2016, 07:56:01 PM
rough ridin' gross mate!
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 10, 2016, 08:53:21 PM
http://www.luckytv.nl/time-of-my-life/

That's great.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 12, 2016, 07:43:02 AM
Unfucking believable

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/786176282706845697
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: CNS on October 12, 2016, 07:45:09 AM
I always just assume they both get them.  I know they aren't supposed to, but I also know that the two parties control every extreme micro detail of debates...

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: chum1 on October 12, 2016, 07:51:26 AM
These wikileaks really confirm how superior Clinton is to Trump as a politician.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: SdK on October 12, 2016, 07:56:55 AM
These wikileaks really confirm how superior Clinton is to Trump as a politician.
Exactly.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: Dugout DickStone on October 12, 2016, 10:23:08 AM
Why can't he use his negotiating to get the questions? 
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: CNS on October 12, 2016, 10:48:21 AM
Someone made some bad deals. 
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: MakeItRain on October 12, 2016, 11:47:56 AM
You guys read the article? That leak is related to her getting a question during the primary, not the debate last Sunday. Once again this is just confirmation for what was obvious at the time, CNN was in the bag for the Clinton campaign. At the time of this debate and during the entirety of the primary season they had as many as four Clinton operatives as analysts on their panel and no one from the Sanders or O'Malley campaigns. All that being said this has nothing to do with Hillary, she didn't need to ask CNN to cheat.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: chum1 on October 14, 2016, 05:37:25 PM
Quote
Ken Bone Forgot to Delete His Reddit Porn Comments, Said Trayvon Martin Killing Was 'Justified'

http://gizmodo.com/ken-bone-forgot-to-delete-his-porn-comments-1787780939
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: catastrophe on October 14, 2016, 05:44:45 PM
This is why hero worship is so dangerous.

Regardless, they're presenting that all like it's some kind of dirt, but it's all pretty tame stuff.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: star seed 7 on October 14, 2016, 05:49:33 PM
Quote
Ken Bone Forgot to Delete His Reddit Porn Comments, Said Trayvon Martin Killing Was 'Justified'

http://gizmodo.com/ken-bone-forgot-to-delete-his-porn-comments-1787780939

What a shitty clickbait title
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: chum1 on October 14, 2016, 06:04:54 PM
He got busted because he did an AMA and used his actual account.  :)
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: star seed 7 on October 14, 2016, 06:27:10 PM
Yeah, but he didn't say anything outrageous so who gives a turkey
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 15, 2016, 08:39:53 AM
That entire media group is pretty much only read by Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) white men with 150+ hours of 2.0 gpa college credit and no degree.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: CNS on October 15, 2016, 09:56:33 AM
Oddly specific

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: MakeItRain on October 16, 2016, 01:36:03 AM
That entire media group is pretty much only read by Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) white men with 150+ hours of 2.0 gpa college credit and no degree.

I LOLed
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: star seed 7 on October 16, 2016, 01:41:05 AM
Fsd can get in some good zingers
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: Trim on October 17, 2016, 09:58:24 AM
With Wednesday night being in Vegas, what extra crazy crap can we hope for?

What if Trump buys a dozen prostitutes and takes them on stage with him to show he has female supporters?
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: catastrophe on October 17, 2016, 10:04:58 AM
"Now these ladies can tell you what being groped really feels like, ok?"
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: Emo EMAW on October 18, 2016, 10:40:06 AM
Believe me.
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: SdK on October 18, 2016, 11:38:13 AM
Who hasn't groped a lady or two? Prudes, the lot of you.
Title: Re: Presidential debate final stage (now moderated by an adult!)
Post by: gatoveintisiete on October 19, 2016, 11:13:03 PM
I'm gonna watch this for the first time at 12:00 on cnn, who do you think won and why? 
Title: Re: Presidential debate final stage (now moderated by an adult!)
Post by: catastrophe on October 19, 2016, 11:20:38 PM
Hillary won by default. Trump lasted longer than usual before melting down.
Title: Re: Presidential debate final stage (now moderated by an adult!)
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on October 19, 2016, 11:37:38 PM
I'm gonna watch this for the first time at 12:00 on cnn, who do you think won and why?

Just more of a robotic hillary vs human trump. Memorization vs shoot from the hip. Trump wins again because he's a human being.
Title: Re: Presidential debate final stage (now moderated by an adult!)
Post by: Institutional Control on October 20, 2016, 08:26:12 AM
Whatever happened to the moderate jtmhtd?
Title: Re: Presidential debate final stage (now moderated by an adult!)
Post by: star seed 7 on October 20, 2016, 08:30:50 AM
Whatever happened to the moderate jtmhtd?

It's a very very sad tale, believe me.
Title: Re: Presidential debate final stage (now moderated by an adult!)
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 20, 2016, 08:34:08 AM
Whatever happened to the moderate jtmhtd?

He crossed Hillary.
Title: Re: Presidential debate final stage (now moderated by an adult!)
Post by: ChiComCat on October 20, 2016, 08:42:05 AM
I'm gonna watch this for the first time at 12:00 on cnn, who do you think won and why?

Just more of a robotic hillary vs human trump. Memorization vs shoot from the hip. Trump wins again because he's a human being.

I was just thinking we needed a more "shoot from the hip" president
Title: Re: Presidential debate final stage (now moderated by an adult!)
Post by: CNS on October 20, 2016, 09:51:09 AM
Yep.  If there is one thing that would be beneficial to our country and our way of life, it is a guy that doesn't want to deal with the detail and just moves on his first blush.
Title: Re: Presidential debate final stage (now moderated by an adult!)
Post by: star seed 7 on October 20, 2016, 09:58:38 AM
Dax is having a great daxdown on twitter this morning  :lol:
Title: Re: Presidential debate final stage (now moderated by an adult!)
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 20, 2016, 10:18:49 AM
We've done so well with a president who diddles around until we've spawned ISIS.
Title: Re: Presidential debate final stage (now moderated by an adult!)
Post by: Trim on October 20, 2016, 12:47:11 PM
Dax is having a great daxdown on twitter this morning  :lol:

Lol at "this morning."
Title: Re: Presidential debate final stage (now moderated by an adult!)
Post by: CNS on October 20, 2016, 12:54:05 PM
Dax is great.  EMAW and a patriot. 
Title: Re: Presidential debate final stage (now moderated by an adult!)
Post by: MakeItRain on October 20, 2016, 01:50:42 PM
Dax is having a great daxdown on twitter this morning  :lol:

Just read it, lol. Is he still going to come in here and lie about being a Gary Johnson voter? Our guy dax appears to be ALL IN FOR DONALD!
Title: Re: Presidential debate final stage (now moderated by an adult!)
Post by: steve dave on October 20, 2016, 01:51:24 PM
Dax is great.  EMAW and a patriot.

agreed
Title: Re: Presidential debate final stage (now moderated by an adult!)
Post by: stunted on October 20, 2016, 01:59:21 PM
I'm gonna watch this for the first time at 12:00 on cnn, who do you think won and why?

Trump won focus groups, even CNN I hear. So if those have him winning, them he really destroyed her. Haven't had time to look so feel free to fact check.
Title: Re: Presidential debate final stage (now moderated by an adult!)
Post by: MakeItRain on October 20, 2016, 02:04:40 PM
I'm gonna watch this for the first time at 12:00 on cnn, who do you think won and why?

Trump won focus groups, even CNN I hear. So if those have him winning, them he really destroyed her. Haven't had time to look so feel free to fact check.

He didn't win CNN's focus group but I have no doubt he won Frank Luntz's group of "independents."
Title: Re: Presidential debate final stage (now moderated by an adult!)
Post by: stunted on October 20, 2016, 02:50:16 PM
Seems he won 10-5 actually with undecideds. I still don't trust it tbh cause media  :curse:
Title: Re: Presidential debate 2nd round (can Hill come back from down 0-1)
Post by: Canary on October 20, 2016, 02:55:32 PM
Who hasn't groped a lady or two? Prudes, the lot of you.
Yes, your Honor. I am guilty of that with some variation as well. Not proud of all of it, but not prudish for the most part.
Title: Re: Presidential debate final stage (now moderated by an adult!)
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on October 20, 2016, 05:42:40 PM
Whatever happened to the moderate jtmhtd?

I'm on an anti-hillary runaway train right now. I'll be fine after the election.
Title: Re: Presidential debate final stage (now moderated by an adult!)
Post by: sys on October 20, 2016, 05:50:41 PM
Whatever happened to the moderate jtmhtd?

I'm on an anti-hillary runaway train right now. I'll be fine after the election.

a trump candidacy doesn't destroy character, it reveals it.
Title: Re: Presidential debate final stage (now moderated by an adult!)
Post by: Tobias on October 20, 2016, 06:07:09 PM
in trump veritas, as my old man used to say
Title: Re: Presidential debate final stage (now moderated by an adult!)
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on October 20, 2016, 06:13:05 PM
Whatever happened to the moderate jtmhtd?

I'm on an anti-hillary runaway train right now. I'll be fine after the election.

a trump candidacy doesn't destroy character, it reveals it.

Yes. He brings out the worst in her.
Title: Re: Presidential debate final stage (now moderated by an adult!)
Post by: MakeItRain on October 20, 2016, 08:18:12 PM
Seems he won 10-5 actually with undecideds. I still don't trust it tbh cause media  :curse:

You shouldn't trust it because it isn't accurate. The count they took was 11-8 for HRC.
Title: Re: Presidential debate first round
Post by: LickNeckey on June 15, 2017, 11:04:45 PM
It's truly sad that R's couldn't nominate someone decent.

for a moment i was afraid you weren't going to be able to suck it up and pick up the partisan banner for the orange one

ya done good Daxy ya done good