goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: bshea85 on August 07, 2016, 12:55:23 PM

Title: Big XII: What could have been Edition
Post by: bshea85 on August 07, 2016, 12:55:23 PM
The year is 1996 and the Big 8 is looking to expand.  What would you do if you could do it all again?  Would you merge with SWC, poach other schools?  Expand to 10 or go to 12 teams?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Big XII: What could have been Edition
Post by: SkinnyBenny on August 07, 2016, 01:30:29 PM
Dunno if pig aggy left before the SWC disbanded or not (I think they did), but they belong in the Big XII.
Title: Re: Big XII: What could have been Edition
Post by: SkinnyBenny on August 07, 2016, 01:30:56 PM
And obviously baylor can get mumped.
Title: Re: Big XII: What could have been Edition
Post by: scottwildcat on August 07, 2016, 02:12:38 PM
Nothing could have been done. The outcome we ended up with was the only visable option with the political climate in Texas at the time.
Title: Re: Big XII: What could have been Edition
Post by: Cartierfor3 on August 07, 2016, 02:35:36 PM
I would've gone independent
Title: Re: Big XII: What could have been Edition
Post by: jtksu on August 08, 2016, 03:35:43 AM
Dunno if pig aggy left before the SWC disbanded or not (I think they did), but they belong in the Big XII.

They left five years prior.
Title: Re: Big XII: What could have been Edition
Post by: Steffy08 on August 08, 2016, 09:08:38 AM
Don't expand.  Stay at 8.  KSU, NU, and CU continue to top the polls, while recruiting the hell out of Texas.  Our TV deals will be just fine, considering that 3/8 out of the eight teams in our league are top 5/10 mainstays.  Eventually OU gets it turned around as well, making the Big 8 even more of a monster.  The Big 8 wins 9 straight national championships:

1996:  NU
1997:  NU
1998:  KSU
1999:  NU
2000:  OU
2001:  CU
2002:  KSU
2003:  OU
2004:  OU

Title: Re: Big XII: What could have been Edition
Post by: Super PurpleCat on August 09, 2016, 03:32:56 PM
Pining for the old Big 8 is very Nebraska-ey.
Title: Re: Big XII: What could have been Edition
Post by: bshea85 on August 10, 2016, 09:39:05 PM
Pining for the old Big 8 is very Nebraska-ey.

Well your haircut is bad and you should feel bad.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Big XII: What could have been Edition
Post by: Kat Kid on August 10, 2016, 11:12:53 PM
Pining for the old Big 8 is very Nebraska-ey.

nu logo big 12 has made roided up suns out / bacne out work out tank and bike shorts loving huskers. 
Title: Re: Big XII: What could have been Edition
Post by: bshea85 on August 13, 2016, 04:53:40 PM
So I'm thinking that I would've liked to pick up CSU.  They were a good team then and were usually ranked by the end of the season.  They already have an awesome rivalry with in-state CU.  That would bring the conference up to 9, but I'm not sure what to do with a 10 spot, if it was needed.  The desire to merge with SWC would still be strong, though, seeing how OU has a rivalry with UT, but with UT comes all of their politics and bullshit.
Title: Re: Big XII: What could have been Edition
Post by: sleepy on August 14, 2016, 09:22:04 PM
BigXII is a dead man walking.  Once Texas and OK flee the coop it's over.

"How Nebraska, Colorado, Mizzou, and most of all, Texas A&M killed the Big 12...."

http://texags.com/forums/6/topics/2770127/1
Title: Re: Big XII: What could have been Edition
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on August 15, 2016, 11:58:05 AM
So I'm thinking that I would've liked to pick up CSU.  They were a good team then and were usually ranked by the end of the season.  They already have an awesome rivalry with in-state CU.  That would bring the conference up to 9, but I'm not sure what to do with a 10 spot, if it was needed.  The desire to merge with SWC would still be strong, though, seeing how OU has a rivalry with UT, but with UT comes all of their politics and bullshit.

You wouldn't need to add a team to go from 9 to 10. You play a round robin either way. The best thing about having CSU in a Big 9 is that we would have been able to keep Baylor out. A 13 team conference wouldn't work.
Title: Re: Big XII: What could have been Edition
Post by: bshea85 on August 15, 2016, 02:24:34 PM
I like that.  The Big IX. 

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FPzfF91w.png&hash=d5a2746d139f59766bcddd1f4c395deaafd526d1)
Title: Re: Big XII: What could have been Edition
Post by: KITNfury on August 15, 2016, 08:02:41 PM
BigXII is a dead man walking.  Once Texas and OK flee the coop it's over.

"How Nebraska, Colorado, Mizzou, and most of all, Texas A&M killed the Big 12...."

http://texags.com/forums/6/topics/2770127/1
I'm not reading that but if nobody except aTm left, nobody would really give a eff. The aggies are so below Texas it kills them.
Title: Re: Big XII: What could have been Edition
Post by: sleepy on August 15, 2016, 10:41:16 PM
BigXII is a dead man walking.  Once Texas and OK flee the coop it's over.

"How Nebraska, Colorado, Mizzou, and most of all, Texas A&M killed the Big 12...."

http://texags.com/forums/6/topics/2770127/1
I'm not reading that but if nobody except aTm left, nobody would really give a eff. The aggies are so below Texas it kills them.

Only the Aggies left?  Lol.  You forget that Nebraska, Colorado, and Mizzou are long gone as well and aint coming back.

Not a good look for a conference trying to remain relevant as the bottom feeders of the P5.  Yeah, right, the BigXII will snatch up Clemson or FSU.  Why not court LSU or Arkansas?  Good luck with that.  Maybe Mississippi State is available.

The Texas Techs, Baylors, KSU's, ISU's, and TCU's of the world are on the verge of finding out they're no more relevant than Houston, Cincy, Memphis, UConn,or UCF to the money driven sports world of college football.  MWC or AAC anyone?   Nothing wrong with divisional rivalries with SMU, Tulsa, New Mexico, or Tulane.


Title: Re: Big XII: What could have been Edition
Post by: millertime on August 16, 2016, 12:01:04 AM
BigXII is a dead man walking.  Once Texas and OK flee the coop it's over.

"How Nebraska, Colorado, Mizzou, and most of all, Texas A&M killed the Big 12...."

http://texags.com/forums/6/topics/2770127/1
I'm not reading that but if nobody except aTm left, nobody would really give a eff. The aggies are so below Texas it kills them.

Only the Aggies left?  Lol.  You forget that Nebraska, Colorado, and Mizzou are long gone as well and aint coming back.

Not a good look for a conference trying to remain relevant as the bottom feeders of the P5.  Yeah, right, the BigXII will snatch up Clemson or FSU.  Why not court LSU or Arkansas?  Good luck with that.  Maybe Mississippi State is available.

The Texas Techs, Baylors, KSU's, ISU's, and TCU's of the world are on the verge of finding out they're no more relevant than Houston, Cincy, Memphis, UConn,or UCF to the money driven sports world of college football.  MWC or AAC anyone?   Nothing wrong with divisional rivalries with SMU, Tulsa, New Mexico, or Tulane.

 :flush:
Title: Re: Big XII: What could have been Edition
Post by: MadCat on August 16, 2016, 08:57:44 AM
BigXII is a dead man walking.  Once Texas and OK flee the coop it's over.

"How Nebraska, Colorado, Mizzou, and most of all, Texas A&M killed the Big 12...."

http://texags.com/forums/6/topics/2770127/1
I'm not reading that but if nobody except aTm left, nobody would really give a eff. The aggies are so below Texas it kills them.

Only the Aggies left?  Lol.  You forget that Nebraska, Colorado, and Mizzou are long gone as well and aint coming back.

Not a good look for a conference trying to remain relevant as the bottom feeders of the P5.  Yeah, right, the BigXII will snatch up Clemson or FSU.  Why not court LSU or Arkansas?  Good luck with that.  Maybe Mississippi State is available.

The Texas Techs, Baylors, KSU's, ISU's, and TCU's of the world are on the verge of finding out they're no more relevant than Houston, Cincy, Memphis, UConn,or UCF to the money driven sports world of college football.  MWC or AAC anyone?   Nothing wrong with divisional rivalries with SMU, Tulsa, New Mexico, or Tulane.
Title: Re: Big XII: What could have been Edition
Post by: deputy dawg on August 16, 2016, 03:09:48 PM
BigXII is a dead man walking.  Once Texas and OK flee the coop it's over.

"How Nebraska, Colorado, Mizzou, and most of all, Texas A&M killed the Big 12...."

http://texags.com/forums/6/topics/2770127/1

The landthieves board talks about how irrelevant if Texas, OU, and KU left, and that made me all  :cry:
Title: Re: Big XII: What could have been Edition
Post by: KITNfury on August 16, 2016, 10:16:53 PM
 :ROFL: @ poor sleepy
Title: Re: Big XII: What could have been Edition
Post by: 0.42 on August 16, 2016, 10:39:08 PM
we got a texags brown here? i mean they're all browns, but how did that happen?
Title: Re: Big XII: What could have been Edition
Post by: Super PurpleCat on August 17, 2016, 12:25:51 AM
we got a texags brown here? i mean they're all browns, but how did that happen?

I'm not sure, but I wish they'd SECede from here.
Title: Re: Big XII: What could have been Edition
Post by: MakeItRain on August 17, 2016, 07:59:57 AM
we got a texags brown here? i mean they're all browns, but how did that happen?

sleepy appears to be a pig aggy
Title: Re: Big XII: What could have been Edition
Post by: Skipper44 on August 17, 2016, 12:00:56 PM
sniff, sniff - I smell corndogs