goemaw.com
General Discussion => The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit => Topic started by: Dirty Sanchez on May 02, 2010, 09:13:02 PM
-
Then what do you suppose this means (re: the attempted attack in Times Square) considering the expansion of the war into Pakistan by the messiah?
According to the AP, an unidentified speaker on the tape also says the attack comes in response to American "interference and terrorism in Muslim Countries, especially in Pakistan."
:popcorn: :bwpopcorn:
-
Wasnt even a bomb http://www.infowars.com/feds-characterize-smoldering-car-in-times-square-as-potential-terrorist-attack/
-
Wasnt even a bomb http://www.infowars.com/feds-characterize-smoldering-car-in-times-square-as-potential-terrorist-attack/
:runaway:
-
This is some classic stuff.
When Neo-Liberal Bush was running things, the Democrats ran around yelling and screaming about "blow back", but now that Obama has expanded the war into Pakistan and is running an illegal contractor/cia state sanctioned assassination operation via drones. We don't hear a peep about it.
The duplicity and hypocrisy is astounding.
-
Seems like the terrorists are getting more incompetent. Good thing for us I'd say.
-
Then what do you suppose this means (re: the attempted attack in Times Square) considering the expansion of the war into Pakistan by the messiah?
According to the AP, an unidentified speaker on the tape also says the attack comes in response to American "interference and terrorism in Muslim Countries, especially in Pakistan."
:popcorn: :bwpopcorn:
Firstly, go are going to rot in rough ridin' hell for taking the messiah's name in vain. I've read the 10 commandments, and it's the third one, right after "no faggots" and "no coloreds."
It means we need to get out of both wars right now, and put all that money toward the debt. I guess we agree on that then? Is that the point here? :dunno:
-
This is some classic stuff.
When Neo-Liberal Bush was running things, the Democrats ran around yelling and screaming about "blow back", but now that Obama has expanded the war into Pakistan and is running an illegal contractor/cia state sanctioned assassination operation via drones. We don't hear a peep about it.
The duplicity and hypocrisy is astounding.
Actually, Bush was a neo-conservative.
-
This is some classic stuff.
When Neo-Liberal Bush was running things, the Democrats ran around yelling and screaming about "blow back", but now that Obama has expanded the war into Pakistan and is running an illegal contractor/cia state sanctioned assassination operation via drones. We don't hear a peep about it.
The duplicity and hypocrisy is astounding.
It's incredible. You know people like KK and BMW would be whining and crying if Bush was doing all this, but instead it's their Messiah
Then what do you suppose this means (re: the attempted attack in Times Square) considering the expansion of the war into Pakistan by the messiah?
According to the AP, an unidentified speaker on the tape also says the attack comes in response to American "interference and terrorism in Muslim Countries, especially in Pakistan."
:popcorn: :bwpopcorn:
Firstly, go are going to rot in fracking hell for taking the messiah's name in vain. I've read the 10 commandments, and it's the third one, right after "no froggots" and "no coloreds."
It means we need to get out of both wars right now, and put all that money toward the debt. I guess we agree on that then? Is that the point here? :dunno:
qft
-
Then what do you suppose this means (re: the attempted attack in Times Square) considering the expansion of the war into Pakistan by the messiah?
According to the AP, an unidentified speaker on the tape also says the attack comes in response to American "interference and terrorism in Muslim Countries, especially in Pakistan."
:popcorn: :bwpopcorn:
It means that the US military actions in Pakistan probably triggered the attack. :dunno:
-
Seems like the terrorists are getting more incompetent. Good thing for us I'd say.
Thank you President Bush!
-
This is some classic stuff.
When Neo-Liberal Bush was running things, the Democrats ran around yelling and screaming about "blow back", but now that Obama has expanded the war into Pakistan and is running an illegal contractor/cia state sanctioned assassination operation via drones. We don't hear a peep about it.
The duplicity and hypocrisy is astounding.
look, I want us out and home. I think Obama is severely misguided if he thinks that he can somehow "fix" Afghanistan/Pakistan. It is hubris. A writer for Harper's wrote a piece that included a thought experiment: if Obama was proposing an invasion of Mexico to solve their drug trafficking problems, fix their schools, solve Chiapas and ensure that women had equal rights would people not laugh? By how many magnitudes worse is Afghanistan's plight?
:
-
This is some classic stuff.
When Neo-Liberal Bush was running things, the Democrats ran around yelling and screaming about "blow back", but now that Obama has expanded the war into Pakistan and is running an illegal contractor/cia state sanctioned assassination operation via drones. We don't hear a peep about it.
The duplicity and hypocrisy is astounding.
Actually, Bush was a neo-conservative.
OMG........ do you even know how to define a neo-con? No googling either.
-
This is some classic stuff.
When Neo-Liberal Bush was running things, the Democrats ran around yelling and screaming about "blow back", but now that Obama has expanded the war into Pakistan and is running an illegal contractor/cia state sanctioned assassination operation via drones. We don't hear a peep about it.
The duplicity and hypocrisy is astounding.
look, I want us out and home. I think Obama is severely misguided if he thinks that he can somehow "fix" Afghanistan/Pakistan. It is hubris. A writer for Harper's wrote a piece that included a thought experiment: if Obama was proposing an invasion of Mexico to solve their drug trafficking problems, fix their schools, solve Chiapas and ensure that women had equal rights would people not laugh? By how many magnitudes worse is Afghanistan's plight?
:
I agree. Good analogy to Mexico. We've done nothing except f*ck up that entire region when we really had no business being there in the first place.
-
Pakistan/Afghanistan should have been the main focus since day one. The outrage came when we invaded Iraq simply because Bush wanted revenge on Saddam and an alternative oil reserve in the middle east.
-
Pakistan/Afghanistan should have been the main focus since day one. The outrage came when we invaded Iraq simply because Bush wanted revenge on Saddam and an alternative oil reserve in the middle east.
Looks like a good move in retrospect.
-
Pakistan/Afghanistan should have been the main focus since day one. The outrage came when we invaded Iraq simply because Bush wanted revenge on Saddam and an alternative oil reserve in the middle east.
Looks like a good move in retrospect.
Not really, especially when you consider that the long-term debt from the war in Iraq will cost trillions of dollars. Not to mention the thousands of American soldiers who have died over there for basically nothing.
-
Obama the War Monger taking Drone Wars to Yemen now . . . it just never stops, perpetual war; thy name is Barry W. Obama.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/yemen/7663661/American-drones-deployed-to-target-Yemeni-terrorist.html
Meanwhile as I've said this administration is in love with Prompt Global Strike and those systems will be getting millions and billions of dollars spent on them. The new tool of U.S. Hegemony. Of course what the U.S. media never reports on is the continued encirclement of Russia by NATO.
I have to say the war monger Hillary and her dyke companion Maddie Albright have to feel particularly proud . . . Hubbie Clinton's nearly 80 day onslaught that led to the breakup of Yugoslavia has finally led to both the Serbs and the Croats to begin negotiations with NATO.
Another issue that gets virtually no U.S. media coverage is the growing refugee crisis in AF-PAK due to the NATO-U.S. Surge.
-
'Pad, the Iraq war was a complete diversion from the war on terrorism. I'm not sure why that's so hard for you to understand.
-
I didn't say a freaking thing about Iraq Ben.
Again the war monger Obama continues to propagate perpetual war under the guise of "fighting terrorism" . . . this has NOTHING to do with Iraq.
Hey, any of you Obama lovers know if the administration has now officially backed the United States re-instating direct military support of the Indonesian thug military?? It was on the table about a month ago or so.
-
Pakistan/Afghanistan should have been the main focus since day one. The outrage came when we invaded Iraq simply because Bush wanted revenge on Saddam and an alternative oil reserve in the middle east.
Looks like a good move in retrospect.
Not really, especially when you consider that the long-term debt from the war in Iraq will cost trillions of dollars. Not to mention the thousands of American soldiers who have died over there for basically nothing.
The civilized Iraqi people disagree with you.
-
This is some classic stuff.
When Neo-Liberal Bush was running things, the Democrats ran around yelling and screaming about "blow back", but now that Obama has expanded the war into Pakistan and is running an illegal contractor/cia state sanctioned assassination operation via drones. We don't hear a peep about it.
The duplicity and hypocrisy is astounding.
Actually, Bush was a neo-conservative.
OMG........ do you even know how to define a neo-con? No googling either.
Definition of a neo-con: George W. Bush