goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: ksu101 on September 14, 2015, 08:57:20 AM

Title: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: ksu101 on September 14, 2015, 08:57:20 AM
Answer is obviously yes.  I mean can you imagine that deep ball to Lockett on the reg  :love: :love:   
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 14, 2015, 09:06:24 AM
yes :drool:
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: MakeItRain on September 14, 2015, 09:08:00 AM
Oh man :bwpopcorn:
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: Skipper44 on September 14, 2015, 11:44:52 AM
I think we win the same number of games with only the OU game as a possible different outcome
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: kso_FAN on September 14, 2015, 11:45:35 AM
This should be an entertaining blog thread.
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: kslim on September 14, 2015, 11:48:32 AM
@wacky
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: EMAWzified on September 14, 2015, 11:50:00 AM
This has been on my mind, too. Probably cost Lockett hundreds of thousands -- perhaps millions.
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: Panjandrum on September 14, 2015, 11:55:55 AM
Pre-Oklahoma ... probably not.

Post-Oklahoma ... I think you could probably make an argument that he should have started a game or two.
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on September 14, 2015, 11:56:59 AM
@wacky
This thread is a stinky piece of troll meat and I want to have nothing to do with it.  :buh-bye:
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: slobber on September 14, 2015, 12:08:18 PM
Valid thoughts being discussed in this thread.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: Shooter Jones on September 14, 2015, 12:11:20 PM
Pre-Oklahoma ... probably not.

Post-Oklahoma ... I think you could probably make an argument that he should have started a game or two.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F45WW0wy.gif&hash=b3db36958c6bd41aa389bf6c47af8f58b41fa764)
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: #LIFE on September 14, 2015, 01:00:52 PM
This has been on my mind, too. Probably cost Lockett hundreds of thousands -- perhaps millions.

Tyler probably doesn't even get drafted if it wasn't for Waters making him look so much better than he really was last year.  It has been evidenced already that he's going to be an NFL bust and those returns he pulled off in college just aren't going to happen in the NFL.
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: scottwildcat on September 14, 2015, 01:05:20 PM
This has been on my mind, too. Probably cost Lockett hundreds of thousands -- perhaps millions.

Tyler probably doesn't even get drafted if it wasn't for Waters making him look so much better than he really was last year. 

lol k
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: MakeItRain on September 14, 2015, 01:26:37 PM
This has been on my mind, too. Probably cost Lockett hundreds of thousands -- perhaps millions.

Tyler probably doesn't even get drafted if it wasn't for Waters making him look so much better than he really was last year. 

lol k

come on scott
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: The Big Train on September 14, 2015, 01:29:27 PM
i am firmly of the belief he should have started last year.  those deep balls that were dropped in our first game would have been TD's all day long if lockett was that guy.  bazooka joes running ability is leaps and bounds above waters as well, that first down run he had because they basically couldnt tackle him  :love:
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on September 14, 2015, 02:55:50 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-8fpl5xJWGV8%2FUpECGs4fU0I%2FAAAAAAAAVPM%2FzyTyu3igKc8%2Fs1600%2FKState%2B90%2Byarrd%2Bbomb.gif&hash=0831dbe58be02904633d9a1ff340178f1d0103a8)
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: The Big Train on September 14, 2015, 02:58:45 PM
if he threw that same pass this year he overthrows the receiver by 5 yards, fortunate to have lockett's speed running that route.
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on September 14, 2015, 03:24:08 PM
if he threw that same pass this year he overthrows the receiver by 5 yards, fortunate to have lockett's speed running that route.
:lol:
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: MakeItRain on September 14, 2015, 03:32:09 PM
50 yards in the air, not bad, I mean I could do better but that's not bad
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: hemmy on September 14, 2015, 03:37:17 PM
I really can't tell what side anyone in this thread is on. Its all very confusing.
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: CNS on September 14, 2015, 04:00:16 PM
Bazooka has at least as good of an arm, runs like a gazelle compared to waters, and doesn't seem prone to 3 and outs at all.  Also, two games in, he is approx 8 int's better than jake.

I don't even see how this is a discussion.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: HerrSonntag on September 14, 2015, 04:01:47 PM
Also, think how improved overall team moral would have been having one fewer Iowan starting.
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: The Big Train on September 14, 2015, 04:12:34 PM
if he threw that same pass this year he overthrows the receiver by 5 yards, fortunate to have lockett's speed running that route.
:lol:

I'm dead serious. Who else in the country outruns that secondary? Have you seen what Lockett has already done in the NFL, he covered up so many flaws Jake had it's silly.

which is why 'zooka joe should have gotten the reps last year, would have given him more time to grow.  his ceiling is much higher than the guy that got cut by the jags and didn't play a snap with Seattle.
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 14, 2015, 04:14:53 PM
Joe would have waved his hand forward twice, yelled "go deeper" and then threw the ball so that Tyler would have caught a laser beam around the 20 yard line, no defenders within 10 yards for an even easier touchdown. Then TLBL would have had to go to the sideline and put his hands into an ice bucket to relieve the sting.
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: Shooter Jones on September 14, 2015, 04:14:59 PM
Bazooka has at least as good of an arm, runs like a gazelle compared to waters, and doesn't seem prone to 3 and outs at all.  Also, two games in, he is approx 8 int's better than jake.

I don't even see how this is a discussion.

It's not hard to look like a gazelle when compared to a fainting goat.

Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on September 14, 2015, 04:17:01 PM
if he threw that same pass this year he overthrows the receiver by 5 yards, fortunate to have lockett's speed running that route.
:lol:

I'm dead serious. Who else in the country outruns that secondary? Have you seen what Lockett has already done in the NFL, he covered up so many flaws Jake had it's silly.

which is why 'zooka joe should have gotten the reps last year, would have given him more time to grow.  his ceiling is much higher than the guy that got cut by the jags and didn't play a snap with Seattle.
You mean the all time single season passing leader at Kansas State University?!
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: The Big Train on September 14, 2015, 04:19:20 PM
if he threw that same pass this year he overthrows the receiver by 5 yards, fortunate to have lockett's speed running that route.
:lol:

I'm dead serious. Who else in the country outruns that secondary? Have you seen what Lockett has already done in the NFL, he covered up so many flaws Jake had it's silly.

which is why 'zooka joe should have gotten the reps last year, would have given him more time to grow.  his ceiling is much higher than the guy that got cut by the jags and didn't play a snap with Seattle.
You mean the all time single season passing leader at Kansas State University?!

which pro team does he play for now?  if he was so good shouldn't he be playing on Sunday's?

That's right, the player who gifted him that record does play on Sunday's, and is quite good.
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 14, 2015, 04:22:23 PM
I think Joe Hubener has some of the tools NFL GMs crave. He's hard-working, taller than his pants, and he loves the deep ball. That's a multi-million dollar recipe.
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on September 14, 2015, 04:23:41 PM
if he threw that same pass this year he overthrows the receiver by 5 yards, fortunate to have lockett's speed running that route.
:lol:

I'm dead serious. Who else in the country outruns that secondary? Have you seen what Lockett has already done in the NFL, he covered up so many flaws Jake had it's silly.

which is why 'zooka joe should have gotten the reps last year, would have given him more time to grow.  his ceiling is much higher than the guy that got cut by the jags and didn't play a snap with Seattle.
You mean the all time single season passing leader at Kansas State University?!

which pro team does he play for now?  if he was so good shouldn't he be playing on Sunday's?

That's right, the player who gifted him that record does play on Sunday's, and is quite good.
You can't be this simplistic, can you?! Good grief! Just because he didn't make an NFL roster doesn't mean he was shitty. It was pretty impressive that he got some looks. I think he made it longer in camp than Ell.
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: The Big Train on September 14, 2015, 04:27:04 PM
if he threw that same pass this year he overthrows the receiver by 5 yards, fortunate to have lockett's speed running that route.
:lol:

I'm dead serious. Who else in the country outruns that secondary? Have you seen what Lockett has already done in the NFL, he covered up so many flaws Jake had it's silly.

which is why 'zooka joe should have gotten the reps last year, would have given him more time to grow.  his ceiling is much higher than the guy that got cut by the jags and didn't play a snap with Seattle.
You mean the all time single season passing leader at Kansas State University?!

which pro team does he play for now?  if he was so good shouldn't he be playing on Sunday's?

That's right, the player who gifted him that record does play on Sunday's, and is quite good.
You can't be this simplistic, can you?! Good grief! Just because he didn't make an NFL roster doesn't mean he was shitty. It was pretty impressive that he got some looks. I think he made it longer in camp than Ell.

But is Ell the single season passing record holder for Kansas State University?!  No, he is not, so I wouldn't expect him to make a team in the NFL.

But when you are the single season passing record holder for Kansas State University, I expect you to at least make it out of camp.
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on September 14, 2015, 04:27:34 PM
Sorry guys, Klein, Ell, and Bishop sucked huge donkey balls, because they couldn't cut it in the NFL. Better luck next time!
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on September 14, 2015, 04:28:45 PM
if he threw that same pass this year he overthrows the receiver by 5 yards, fortunate to have lockett's speed running that route.
:lol:

I'm dead serious. Who else in the country outruns that secondary? Have you seen what Lockett has already done in the NFL, he covered up so many flaws Jake had it's silly.

which is why 'zooka joe should have gotten the reps last year, would have given him more time to grow.  his ceiling is much higher than the guy that got cut by the jags and didn't play a snap with Seattle.
You mean the all time single season passing leader at Kansas State University?!

which pro team does he play for now?  if he was so good shouldn't he be playing on Sunday's?

That's right, the player who gifted him that record does play on Sunday's, and is quite good.
You can't be this simplistic, can you?! Good grief! Just because he didn't make an NFL roster doesn't mean he was shitty. It was pretty impressive that he got some looks. I think he made it longer in camp than Ell.

But is Ell the single season passing record holder for Kansas State University?!  No, he is not, so I wouldn't expect him to make a team in the NFL.

But when you are the single season passing record holder for Kansas State University, I expect you to at least make it out of camp.
Really? I don't think you understand how hard it is to be an NFL QB. Especially an undrafted one at that. You're trying too, hard.
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: Fedor on September 14, 2015, 04:30:07 PM
if he threw that same pass this year he overthrows the receiver by 5 yards, fortunate to have lockett's speed running that route.
:lol:

I'm dead serious. Who else in the country outruns that secondary? Have you seen what Lockett has already done in the NFL, he covered up so many flaws Jake had it's silly.

which is why 'zooka joe should have gotten the reps last year, would have given him more time to grow.  his ceiling is much higher than the guy that got cut by the jags and didn't play a snap with Seattle.
You mean the all time single season passing leader at Kansas State University?!

which pro team does he play for now?  if he was so good shouldn't he be playing on Sunday's?

That's right, the player who gifted him that record does play on Sunday's, and is quite good.
You can't be this simplistic, can you?! Good grief! Just because he didn't make an NFL roster doesn't mean he was shitty. It was pretty impressive that he got some looks. I think he made it longer in camp than Ell.

But is Ell the single season passing record holder for Kansas State University?!  No, he is not, so I wouldn't expect him to make a team in the NFL.

But when you are the single season passing record holder for Kansas State University, I expect you to at least make it out of camp.
Really? I don't think you understand how hard it is to be an NFL QB. Especially an undrafted one at that. You're trying too, hard.
You are gorging yourself on smelly troll meat, Wacky.
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 14, 2015, 04:32:30 PM
Really? I don't think you understand how hard it is to be an NFL QB. Especially an undrafted one at that. You're trying too, hard.

I'd say it's the equivalent to starting at QB for a P5 school after walking on.
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on September 14, 2015, 04:33:49 PM
Not really. TBT really does hate Waters and he never really has an educated response back, to why he hates him. He just knows he sucks and got cut by the shitty Jags. What a loser!
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on September 14, 2015, 04:35:20 PM
Really? I don't think you understand how hard it is to be an NFL QB. Especially an undrafted one at that. You're trying too, hard.

I'd say it's the equivalent to starting at QB for a P5 school after walking on.
Or like a juco kid who had zero offers coming out of HS and then breaking a bunch of records in juco ball and later at K-State.  :love:
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: The Big Train on September 14, 2015, 04:39:46 PM
all that record breaking has sure translated into great NFL success!
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on September 14, 2015, 04:40:48 PM
 :facepalm: :buh-bye:
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: bunter on September 14, 2015, 05:49:28 PM
I wasn't a gung-ho Jake guy by any means but this thread doesn't seem constructive or fun. To quote Colonel Stonehill, "I do not entertain hypotheticals. The world itself is vexing enough."
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: MakeItRain on September 14, 2015, 06:35:18 PM
Sorry guys, Klein, Ell, and Bishop sucked huge donkey balls, because they couldn't cut it in the NFL. Better luck next time!

Bish played in the NFL tho, he was a cult hero in Boston. People were initially pissed when he was cut for Brady.
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: WildcatNation on September 14, 2015, 06:35:44 PM
So much dumbassery in this thread
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: MakeItRain on September 14, 2015, 06:38:21 PM
Sorry guys, Klein, Ell, and Bishop sucked huge donkey balls, because they couldn't cut it in the NFL. Better luck next time!

Bish played in the NFL tho, he was a cult hero in Boston. People were initially pissed when he was cut for Brady.

Also I couldn't throw the ball farther than Bish could. 98 yards :love:
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: Gooch on September 14, 2015, 07:21:24 PM
50 yards in the air, not bad, I mean I could do better but that's not bad
Confirmed
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: meow meow on September 14, 2015, 08:53:06 PM
Sorry guys, Klein, Ell, and Bishop sucked huge donkey balls, because they couldn't cut it in the NFL. Better luck next time!

Bish played in the NFL tho, he was a cult hero in Boston. People were initially pissed when he was cut for Brady.

Also I couldn't throw the ball farther than Bish could. 98 yards :love:

Lol wut?
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: The Big Train on September 14, 2015, 09:02:29 PM
M^2 just lost the little respect he had after that last post
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: CNS on September 14, 2015, 09:03:36 PM
Bish's arm.... :love:

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: michigancat on September 14, 2015, 09:08:26 PM
I approve of this thread. :love:
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: star seed 7 on September 14, 2015, 09:08:51 PM
 :love:
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: MakeItRain on September 14, 2015, 09:45:15 PM
M^2 just lost the little respect he had after that last post

In fairness m2 might be 15 years old
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: SdK on September 14, 2015, 09:48:51 PM
Yeah. Bish should have played over Bledsoe.
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: pvegs on September 14, 2015, 09:51:41 PM
I think we win the same number of games with only the OU game as a possible different outcome

I say we win the Auburn game with 'Zooka and lose Ou. So same record, setting up for Dr. Pepper runs in '15, '16.
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: slobber on September 15, 2015, 07:29:32 AM

I think we win the same number of games with only the OU game as a possible different outcome

I say we win the Auburn game with 'Zooka and lose Ou. So same record, setting up for Dr. Pepper runs in '15, '16.
Seems reasonable.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: Skipper44 on September 15, 2015, 08:00:39 AM
That trade likely puts TCU in the playoff
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on September 15, 2015, 08:13:42 AM
What if Hubs started over Waters and Sams?!
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: DQ12 on September 15, 2015, 08:33:03 AM
You guys think you know better than LHC Bill Snyder?
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: meow meow on September 15, 2015, 08:34:31 AM
why would he start over Sams, they're basically the same player except Sams was a far better runner
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: Yard Dog on September 15, 2015, 08:37:23 AM
why would he start over Sams, they're basically the same player except Sams was a far better runner

Sams had more turnovers :dunno:
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: SdK on September 16, 2015, 04:19:13 AM
Guys. I don't want Hubener starting anything he can't finish.
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: SdK on September 16, 2015, 04:19:22 AM
Like this season.
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: RickRampus on September 16, 2015, 10:30:58 PM
I think the jury is still out on this one until we see how many butt fumbles 'Zooka has.

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: The Big Train on September 16, 2015, 10:34:53 PM
What if Hubs started over Waters and Sams?!

please quit pushing your personal agenda and let's have a real discussion about this
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: wetwillie on September 16, 2015, 10:46:01 PM
he should have started in 2013 and now we would be in year 3 of bazooka joe
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: Pett on April 12, 2018, 02:47:16 PM
(https://scontent.fmci1-2.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/30708800_1990855871175706_1795487524492148736_o.jpg?_nc_cat=0&oh=952cda86c430c48c9eff8ad4d92ceab4&oe=5B66A194)
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on April 12, 2018, 02:54:11 PM
I just hope his girlfriend adjusted to being one of those CIFL wives.
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: michigancat on April 12, 2018, 03:42:18 PM
the mere thought of Wichita Arena Football makes me kind of cringe and feel bad for everyone involved
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: michigancat on April 12, 2018, 03:51:09 PM
my word this sent me down a wormhole https://youtu.be/w6Saotx7liI?list=PL7m8Ds1pE9K5WO5_xbbrk6SvrIOhreRtj&t=568

^lol at these commentators and the kicker for Salina vs. Duke City
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on April 12, 2018, 03:57:05 PM
Those Salina jerseys are pretty badass.
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: Pett on April 12, 2018, 04:14:08 PM
(https://scontent.fmci1-2.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/30628983_1991285201132773_2272507014955401216_n.jpg?_nc_cat=0&oh=4440de2b798d5c4cd149ecf80d3a0dc9&oe=5B2D706F)
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: michigancat on April 12, 2018, 05:00:52 PM
(https://scontent.fmci1-2.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/30628983_1991285201132773_2272507014955401216_n.jpg?_nc_cat=0&oh=4440de2b798d5c4cd149ecf80d3a0dc9&oe=5B2D706F)
*cringe*
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: pissclams on April 12, 2018, 08:24:19 PM
that apartment in olathe is pretty badass
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on April 12, 2018, 08:29:56 PM
Pretty solid production
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: michigancat on April 12, 2018, 08:33:43 PM
Do they just auction the jerseys for profit? Or are they for charity? I would guess they can't cover their costs.

I'm sad for everyone involved.
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: michigancat on April 12, 2018, 08:36:04 PM
To be fair, I go to Golden State Warriors games (cause I'm big time :gocho:) and find the production ridiculous and awkward. Can't imagine an attempt to replicate it with four hundred and thirty of my closest friends at Intrust.
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on April 12, 2018, 09:05:12 PM
Nothing says big time more than sitting in a 50+ year old dilapidated arena in oakland, perennial top 10 worst city in america.
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: michigancat on April 12, 2018, 09:16:05 PM
Nothing says big time more than sitting in a 50+ year old dilapidated arena in oakland, perennial top 10 worst city in america.

:gocho:
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: ben ji on April 12, 2018, 10:11:58 PM
Fun fact. Hubener's grandma works at a concession/half bar stand at MCI in the southwest gates. A couple of months ago I was there with a buddy wearing some K-State swag ordering a beer and we started talking, she mentioned her grandson Joe Hubener played QB at K-State. I responded "You know what all the kids called him right?" and she shot back "Bazooka Joe?".

It was great. I make it a point to stop by where she works everytime I'm in MCI now and she gives me an update. Her latest update was "He plays for the arena league team in Wichita but I haven't made it down for a game, its a pretty far drive!"

Just an all around A+ person.
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: wetwillie on April 12, 2018, 10:22:59 PM
pretty reliable source says she posts here as well...FWIW
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on April 13, 2018, 08:56:57 AM
That's a great story Ben Ji
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: Trim on May 24, 2018, 11:01:08 AM
I just hope his girlfriend adjusted to being one of those CIFL wives.

Clearwater Instructor of Former Lives

Quote
Hanging in Joe Hubener's classroom in Clearwater High School are LHC Bill Snyder's 16 Goals for Success, a symbol of the K-State head coach's lasting impact beyond the football field.
 
Hubener recently finished his first year of teaching world history to sophomores. The former K-State quarterback said there was a "whole bunch of trial and error" in his first year by himself in the classroom, but there were also a lot of parallels with how Snyder runs his program — i.e., the 16 Goals.

http://www.kstatesports.com/news/2018/5/22/football-se-snyders-commitment-to-k-state-college-of-education-demonstrates-passion-for-educators.aspx
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: chum1 on May 24, 2018, 11:09:03 AM
Is he QBing the Wichita Force or teaching high school in Florida!?!?!?!?!? Or BOTH???
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: michigancat on May 24, 2018, 12:27:19 PM
wait what!??!??! :lol:
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: Catchacold on May 24, 2018, 02:06:48 PM
http://enewsletters.k-state.edu/educatorsupport/2327-2/
Title: Re: Should we have started Hubener last year?
Post by: chum1 on May 24, 2018, 02:13:32 PM
Is he QBing the Wichita Force or teaching high school in Florida!?!?!?!?!? Or BOTH???

Oh, hey, there's a Clearwater, KANSAS. Yay for Clearwater, Kansas!!