goemaw.com
General Discussion => The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit => Topic started by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on June 22, 2015, 10:18:12 PM
-
It's fascinating that, at a time when republicans have more power in government, at every level of government, than anytime in the last 80 years, lib7 can be so confident is his political convictions. Is he delusional and/or ignorant? Probably a lot of both.
-
sane people, please disregard fsd shitting all over the carpet, i'm still interested in your input.
-
Anyone who bases their politics on "social" policy is an unadulterated moron without a modicum of understanding as to what a government is or what it should do.
Respectfully, FSD, the protection of life is a very appropriate function of government.
Just curious KSUW...how do you personally feel about the refusal of many GOP lawmakers to grant exceptions for rape/incest/health of the mother?
There aren't that many of those, but how do I feel about them? They are morally consistent but not politically pragmatic. From a logical and moral standpoint, a child of rape is just as innocent as any other child, and no more deserving of being ripped apart in the womb. It is the rapist who should be executed - not the child. However, I take the more pragmatic approach. I would much rather compromise by allowing such exceptions if it meant outlawing most abortion. Similarly, I support OTC morning after pills because they further reduce the need or justification for later term abortion.
-
sane people, please disregard fsd shitting all over the carpet, i'm still interested in your input.
Are you seriously going to pretend you didn't set up this whole thread just to call me insane???
:lol:
-
Anyone who bases their politics on "social" policy is an unadulterated moron without a modicum of understanding as to what a government is or what it should do.
Respectfully, FSD, the protection of life is a very appropriate function of government.
Just curious KSUW...how do you personally feel about the refusal of many GOP lawmakers to grant exceptions for rape/incest/health of the mother?
There aren't that many of those, but how do I feel about them? They are morally consistent but not politically pragmatic. From a logical and moral standpoint, a child of rape is just as innocent as any other child, and no more deserving of being ripped apart in the womb. It is the rapist who should be executed - not the child. However, I take the more pragmatic approach. I would much rather compromise by allowing such exceptions if it meant outlawing most abortion. Similarly, I support OTC morning after pills because they further reduce the need or justification for later term abortion.
Morning after pills aren't even abortion, unless you believe that life begins at orgasm.
-
Since this thread has made a delightful turn into the lighthearted topic of abortion, I have a question for the outspoken super minority, the libtard?
Please review what is involved with a late term abortion and explain how you equivocate it with any rational concept of morality or humanity. You can warm up with explaining why it isn't criminal.
-
until the thing is born, i don't consider it a person. late term is fine with me, but i also am fairly ambivalent to them if restrictions were put in place in the name of compromise. partial birth abortion (assuming it's actually what anti-abortion propagandists say it is) is not ok, imo.
-
Anyone who bases their politics on "social" policy is an unadulterated moron without a modicum of understanding as to what a government is or what it should do.
Respectfully, FSD, the protection of life is a very appropriate function of government.
Just curious KSUW...how do you personally feel about the refusal of many GOP lawmakers to grant exceptions for rape/incest/health of the mother?
There aren't that many of those, but how do I feel about them? They are morally consistent but not politically pragmatic. From a logical and moral standpoint, a child of rape is just as innocent as any other child, and no more deserving of being ripped apart in the womb. It is the rapist who should be executed - not the child. However, I take the more pragmatic approach. I would much rather compromise by allowing such exceptions if it meant outlawing most abortion. Similarly, I support OTC morning after pills because they further reduce the need or justification for later term abortion.
Morning after pills aren't even abortion, unless you believe that life begins at orgasm.
I didn't say they were as typically used, though they can cause abortion. I was simply pointing out that I support some things other conservatives don't because I believe that reducing abortion trumps other considerations.
-
until the thing is born, i don't consider it a person. late term is fine with me, but i also am fairly ambivalent to them if restrictions were put in place in the name of compromise. partial birth abortion (assuming it's actually what anti-abortion propagandists say it is) is not ok, imo.
It's really revealing how casually you can say something so monstrous, and ironic that you asked the "wackos" to not participate in this thread. Good grief, seven.
-
It is the rapist who should be executed
who are you to question his biological imperative to reproduce?
-
there was nothing monstrous about my statement
-
Are we talking legitimate or illegitimate rape here?
-
so a thread where fsd and ksuw are specifically asked to stay out and they are so immature and self centered that they can't help themselves? classic. :lol:
-
so a thread where fsd and ksuw are specifically asked to stay out and they are so immature and self centered that they can't help themselves? classic. :lol:
maybe chingon can set up a safezone for sane republicans
-
Anyone who bases their politics on "social" policy is an unadulterated moron without a modicum of understanding as to what a government is or what it should do.
Respectfully, FSD, the protection of life is a very appropriate function of government.
Just curious KSUW...how do you personally feel about the refusal of many GOP lawmakers to grant exceptions for rape/incest/health of the mother?
There aren't that many of those, but how do I feel about them? They are morally consistent but not politically pragmatic. From a logical and moral standpoint, a child of rape is just as innocent as any other child, and no more deserving of being ripped apart in the womb. It is the rapist who should be executed - not the child. However, I take the more pragmatic approach. I would much rather compromise by allowing such exceptions if it meant outlawing most abortion. Similarly, I support OTC morning after pills because they further reduce the need or justification for later term abortion.
I guess it's to each their own. For me, personally, the scenario of surving being raped and all the physical and psychological damage that comes with it, followed by being forced to have a very real daily reminder of that rape growing inside you for the next 9 months, then the hazards associated with child birth, (which, I hope you have good insurance bc the state is not going to pick up the tab for your hospital stay) and finally the gut wrenching choice that comes from the conflicting feelings of this is still my baby I'll keep it and continue to have that daily reminder of being raped for at least the next 18 years so as I raise this kid as (probably) a single parent, or give it up for adoption. All that bc the state says yeah, sorry dems da breaks. For me I'm not sure I could imagine a more vivid hell, but hey that's just me.
-
Anyone who bases their politics on "social" policy is an unadulterated moron without a modicum of understanding as to what a government is or what it should do.
Respectfully, FSD, the protection of life is a very appropriate function of government.
Just curious KSUW...how do you personally feel about the refusal of many GOP lawmakers to grant exceptions for rape/incest/health of the mother?
There aren't that many of those, but how do I feel about them? They are morally consistent but not politically pragmatic. From a logical and moral standpoint, a child of rape is just as innocent as any other child, and no more deserving of being ripped apart in the womb. It is the rapist who should be executed - not the child. However, I take the more pragmatic approach. I would much rather compromise by allowing such exceptions if it meant outlawing most abortion. Similarly, I support OTC morning after pills because they further reduce the need or justification for later term abortion.
I guess it's to each their own. For me, personally, the scenario of surving being raped and all the physical and psychological damage that comes with it, followed by being forced to have a very real daily reminder of that rape growing inside you for the next 9 months, then the hazards associated with child birth, (which, I hope you have good insurance bc the state is not going to pick up the tab for your hospital stay) and finally the gut wrenching choice that comes from the conflicting feelings of this is still my baby I'll keep it and continue to have that daily reminder of being raped for at least the next 18 years so as I raise this kid as (probably) a single parent, or give it up for adoption. All that bc the state says yeah, sorry dems da breaks. For me I'm not sure I could imagine a more vivid hell, but hey that's just me.
Yeah, that does sound pretty bad. Almost as bad as if you're the baby... But let's explore your hypo a bit further. If a woman is raped, they can go to a hospital and receive emergency contraception. No pregnancy. So how often do you think your scenario really happens?
-
also the body has ways of, you know, shutting that down
-
there was nothing monstrous about my statement
Seven thinks it's fine to kill a perfectly viable baby at nine months for any reason but, like, he wouldn't really care if it was restricted. Show of hands: who's on team seven?
-
Yeah, that does sound pretty bad. Almost as bad as if you're the baby... But let's explore your hypo a bit further. If a woman is raped, they can go to a hospital and receive emergency contraception. No pregnancy. So how often do you think your scenario really happens?
i've known probably 5 or 6 women that have gotten an abortion (all very early on) and i can guarantee you that those potential babies and the women who made the choice are better because of it.
-
Yeah, that does sound pretty bad. Almost as bad as if you're the baby... But let's explore your hypo a bit further. If a woman is raped, they can go to a hospital and receive emergency contraception. No pregnancy. So how often do you think your scenario really happens?
i've known probably 5 or 6 women that have gotten an abortion (all very early on) and i can guarantee you that those potential babies and the women who made the choice are better because of it.
imagine they had those kids and let Stevesie60 and mrs Stevesie60 raise them
-
Yeah, that does sound pretty bad. Almost as bad as if you're the baby... But let's explore your hypo a bit further. If a woman is raped, they can go to a hospital and receive emergency contraception. No pregnancy. So how often do you think your scenario really happens?
i've known probably 5 or 6 women that have gotten an abortion (all very early on) and i can guarantee you that those potential babies and the women who made the choice are better because of it.
imagine they had those kids and let Stevesie60 and mrs Stevesie60 raise them
that would be great too, but i'm not going to force someone to do that.
and there isn't a shortage of kids looking to get adopted (that i'm aware of)
-
Yeah, that does sound pretty bad. Almost as bad as if you're the baby... But let's explore your hypo a bit further. If a woman is raped, they can go to a hospital and receive emergency contraception. No pregnancy. So how often do you think your scenario really happens?
i've known probably 5 or 6 women that have gotten an abortion (all very early on) and i can guarantee you that those potential babies and the women who made the choice are better because of it.
Seven, you are the only wacko here. Please stop posting in this thread.
-
i'm not sure you know what wacko is ksuw. you're wacko blind.
-
it's like someone made a thread and said nobody named jim can post in it and then you have two guys named jim just posting their balls off all over the thread completely oblivious to what is going on and how rude they are being.
-
i'm not sure you know what wacko is ksuw. you're wacko blind.
"I'm cool with killing viable babies at nine months for any reason - and you're a wacko!"
-
Anyone who bases their politics on "social" policy is an unadulterated moron without a modicum of understanding as to what a government is or what it should do.
Respectfully, FSD, the protection of life is a very appropriate function of government.
Just curious KSUW...how do you personally feel about the refusal of many GOP lawmakers to grant exceptions for rape/incest/health of the mother?
There aren't that many of those, but how do I feel about them? They are morally consistent but not politically pragmatic. From a logical and moral standpoint, a child of rape is just as innocent as any other child, and no more deserving of being ripped apart in the womb. It is the rapist who should be executed - not the child. However, I take the more pragmatic approach. I would much rather compromise by allowing such exceptions if it meant outlawing most abortion. Similarly, I support OTC morning after pills because they further reduce the need or justification for later term abortion.
I guess it's to each their own. For me, personally, the scenario of surving being raped and all the physical and psychological damage that comes with it, followed by being forced to have a very real daily reminder of that rape growing inside you for the next 9 months, then the hazards associated with child birth, (which, I hope you have good insurance bc the state is not going to pick up the tab for your hospital stay) and finally the gut wrenching choice that comes from the conflicting feelings of this is still my baby I'll keep it and continue to have that daily reminder of being raped for at least the next 18 years so as I raise this kid as (probably) a single parent, or give it up for adoption. All that bc the state says yeah, sorry dems da breaks. For me I'm not sure I could imagine a more vivid hell, but hey that's just me.
Yeah, that does sound pretty bad. Almost as bad as if you're the baby... But let's explore your hypo a bit further. If a woman is raped, they can go to a hospital and receive emergency contraception. No pregnancy. So how often do you think your scenario really happens?
Fair point! I guess there are a few assumptions need be made here. First, let's assume what you're saying is accurate, that should a woman go to a hospital the day after being raped that the hospital staff can and will provide her with emergency contraception. Let us then assume that immediately following the rape, the woman manages to be of sound mind to have the wherewithal to go to the hospital for said treatment, instead of being in a paralyzed state of fear, shame, confusion, guilt, shock, etc. ok ok ok so this treatment exists and aside from the rape thing she's feeling okay, so it's off to the hospital we go! Oh, right...yes, let us also assume that she can afford it...both in the sense that she has the money and/or her insurance, if she has it, would cover such treatment, and also that she can afford it in the sense that she can afford to miss work to go to the hospital. And finally, let us assume she's not in a place like say...Texas, where 39 of 45 facilities equipped to perform an abortion were shut down bc they did not adhere to the criteria of an Ambulatory Service Center. In some cases, the burden placed on a woman seeking such treatment would result in a nearly 650 mile round trip just to see the doctor.
Sorry, that was a lot of assumptions there, but all that notwithstanding yeah you make a valid point, I can't argue with that.
-
g'night pit. sleep tight. don't let the wackos bite.
-
g'night pit. sleep tight. don't let the wackos bite.
:ohno:
luckily fsd is passed out drunk and everyone is asleep in ksuw's house so he can finally slink away and crank one out to lena dunam
-
K-S-U, what do you think the penalty for getting an abortion should be?
-
Dems are masters of the soft bigotry of low expectations towards women and minorities.
Sorry lib7 and RD but I'd like ksuw to elaborate this
-
Oh look at that, the mods are the free speech police! Cute.
-
So, you can make threads that certain people aren't aloow3d to post in now? How goE-y. Is Fitz or Dr J moderating on here now?
-
So, you can make threads that certain people aren't aloow3d to post in now? How goE-y. Is Fitz or Dr J moderating on here now?
It's because you are white.
-
lol at pit only posters just seeing a thread merge or split for the first time. gE is the king of message boards at thread merge/splits.
-
Abortion tolerance is reflective of the morals of our country. In this case the value of life. Too bad the unborn can't vote, the liberal democrats would be against abortion. Unfortunately the don't understand biology. A concieved human if the biological process is left alone will become a person who can contribute and vote. If abortion services would have been available would Obama have been born? I cannot see any logic in allowing an unborn baby being turned into meat loaf.
-
Abortion tolerance is reflective of the morals of our country. In this case the value of life. Too bad the unborn can't vote, the liberal democrats would be against abortion. Unfortunately the don't understand biology. A concieved human if the biological process is left alone will become a person who can contribute and vote. If abortion services would have been available would Obama have been born? I cannot see any logic in allowing an unborn baby being turned into meat loaf.
you should read freakonomics.
-
It's crazy that the abortion debate is driven so hard by many of the same ppl who would prefer that we just "turn the middle east to glass" with a couple nukes. Not speaking of KSUW or FSD, or really ppl on this blog, but definitely see it in the far right locals I encounter.
-
lol at pit only posters just seeing a thread merge or split for the first time. gE is the king of message boards at thread merge/splits.
I don't have a problem with mods modding irrelevant content into different threads. That's not what you did. My posts about the republican pro-life position were entirely relevant to the discussion. I also pointed out the irony of a poster (a) starting a thread complaining about "wackos" and then (b) saying he's ok with killing a viable baby at nine months just before birth because "until the thing is born, i don't consider it a person." When somebody says something like that, I'm going to call them on it, and it shouldn't have to be in a separate thread titled "KSUw talks about abortion" - this is an important difference between some republicans and at least some democrats (the whole point of the original thread).
-
lol at pit only posters just seeing a thread merge or split for the first time. gE is the king of message boards at thread merge/splits.
I don't have a problem with mods modding irrelevant content into different threads. That's not what you did. My posts about the republican pro-life position were entirely relevant to the discussion. I also pointed out the irony of a poster (a) starting a thread complaining about "wackos" and then (b) saying he's ok with killing a viable baby at nine months just before birth because "until the thing is born, i don't consider it a person." When somebody says something like that, I'm going to call them on it, and it shouldn't have to be in a separate thread titled "KSUw talks about abortion" - this is an important difference between some republicans and at least some democrats (the whole point of the original thread).
you will notice that posters posts are also included in this new abortion master thread
-
Abortion tolerance is reflective of the morals of our country. In this case the value of life. Too bad the unborn can't vote, the liberal democrats would be against abortion. Unfortunately the don't understand biology. A concieved human if the biological process is left alone will become a person who can contribute and vote. If abortion services would have been available would Obama have been born? I cannot see any logic in allowing an unborn baby being turned into meat loaf.
you should read freakonomics.
i've been listening to some of the podcasts lately. it's 95% dubner but he occasionally has levitt on for something and i'm always like yep levitt just nailed it again. he is pretty great.
-
Abortion tolerance is reflective of the morals of our country. In this case the value of life. Too bad the unborn can't vote, the liberal democrats would be against abortion. Unfortunately the don't understand biology. A concieved human if the biological process is left alone will become a person who can contribute and vote. If abortion services would have been available would Obama have been born? I cannot see any logic in allowing an unborn baby being turned into meat loaf.
you should read freakonomics.
i've been listening to some of the podcasts lately. it's 95% dubner but he occasionally has levitt on for something and i'm always like yep levitt just nailed it again. he is pretty great.
Get the book/audiobook. It is really good. I like the podcast ok, but the book was great, imo.
-
Dems are masters of the soft bigotry of low expectations towards women and minorities.
Sorry lib7 and RD but I'd like ksuw to elaborate this
Heeeeellllloooooo anyone home
-
Dems are masters of the soft bigotry of low expectations towards women and minorities.
Sorry lib7 and RD but I'd like ksuw to elaborate this
Heeeeellllloooooo anyone home
They're in the midst of one of the greatest meltdowns in history. (Per capita)
-
Abortion tolerance is reflective of the morals of our country. In this case the value of life. Too bad the unborn can't vote, the liberal democrats would be against abortion. Unfortunately the don't understand biology. A concieved human if the biological process is left alone will become a person who can contribute and vote. If abortion services would have been available would Obama have been born? I cannot see any logic in allowing an unborn baby being turned into meat loaf.
you should read freakonomics.
i've been listening to some of the podcasts lately. it's 95% dubner but he occasionally has levitt on for something and i'm always like yep levitt just nailed it again. he is pretty great.
Get the book/audiobook. It is really good. I like the podcast ok, but the book was great, imo.
yeah i read the book back when it first came out. on a plane of course. in listening to the podcasts, i just figure out how much i like levitt. there was a parenting one recently and levitt was basically like "why would i drag my kid around to piano practice and all that other crap that some parents make their kids do when i could just be home watching tv?"
-
eff i google imaged conjoined teeth and was too grossed out to even deal with copying a link to img post here
-
eff i google imaged conjoined teeth and was too grossed out to even deal with copying a link to img post here
I bit the bullet for you guys. WARNING!!!! DO NOT GOOGLE IT YOURSELF.
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedind.nic.in%2Fjao%2Ft09%2Fi2%2FJIndianSocPedodPrevDent_2009_27_2_108_55336_f2.jpg&hash=5abb60c3979e22a1fe48a469a3a5f6b5a6ad86e0)
-
that thing should have been aborted
-
Dems are masters of the soft bigotry of low expectations towards women and minorities.
Sorry lib7 and RD but I'd like ksuw to elaborate this
Heeeeellllloooooo anyone home
They're in the midst of one of the greatest meltdowns in history. (Per capita)
Yeah sorry, I was busy clown suiting Rusty in another thread. Just now seeing this.
The Soft Bigotry of Low Expectations actually refers to two different but related things. The first are liberal affirmative action policies which are intended to help minorities, but can actually end up hurting them and society at large by not holding them to the same standards as everyone else. So, for example, police departments watering down admission tests in order to yield more black officers. http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/doj-pressured-city-of-dayton-to-lower-testing-standards-for-police-recruits-to-accommodate-minority-candidates/ (http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/doj-pressured-city-of-dayton-to-lower-testing-standards-for-police-recruits-to-accommodate-minority-candidates/) Or the military lowering physical fitness tests to yield more women. Fraudulently adjusting grades and/or lowering testing standards for minority students. Etc.
The second is liberals saying some truly ugly, bigoted things without even realizing it. For example, Harry Reid's amazement at how "articulate" and "clean" Obama is. Or Chris Matthews being so mesmerized by an Obama speech that "for an hour there, I forgot he was black." These liberals expect less of minorities, and are surprised when they meet people who exceed their low expectations.
Both of these issues are the result of liberal victimology, which holds that women and minorities are inherently victims of an oppressive majority, and therefore should not be treated equally and cannot be expected to achieve the same standards without help (from the government, of course).
-
They're also the party of hard bigotry. See:
The Confederate states of America
The ku Klux klan
The virulent opposition to the civil rights act (led by AL Gore Sr)
The beat downs and wage discrimination led by "organized labor"
Woodrow Wilson, Robert Byrd and Joe Kennedy, avid racists
Segregation and George Wallace
-
They're also the party of hard bigotry. See:
The Confederate states of America
The ku Klux klan
The virulent opposition to the civil rights act (led by AL Gore Sr)
The beat downs and wage discrimination led by "organized labor"
Woodrow Wilson, Robert Byrd and Joe Kennedy, avid racists
Segregation and George Wallace
Well yeah, historically. Now they've rebranded. Much more subtle.
-
eff i google imaged conjoined teeth and was too grossed out to even deal with copying a link to img post here
I bit the bullet for you guys. WARNING!!!! DO NOT GOOGLE IT YOURSELF.
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedind.nic.in%2Fjao%2Ft09%2Fi2%2FJIndianSocPedodPrevDent_2009_27_2_108_55336_f2.jpg&hash=5abb60c3979e22a1fe48a469a3a5f6b5a6ad86e0)
Not very representative. There is a whole lot of bad going on in there.
Here is a better picture of conjoined teeth:
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.tapatalk-cdn.com%2F15%2F06%2F25%2F1ea6d2610d77cbdb9cc0bdc54c5ffa0e.jpg&hash=ffb3c4c57d11de0accbba7211cb83cb97b8d1be6)
Gonna win 'em all!
-
eff i google imaged conjoined teeth and was too grossed out to even deal with copying a link to img post here
I bit the bullet for you guys. WARNING!!!! DO NOT GOOGLE IT YOURSELF.
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedind.nic.in%2Fjao%2Ft09%2Fi2%2FJIndianSocPedodPrevDent_2009_27_2_108_55336_f2.jpg&hash=5abb60c3979e22a1fe48a469a3a5f6b5a6ad86e0)
Not very representative. There is a whole lot of bad going on in there.
Here is a better picture of conjoined teeth:
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.tapatalk-cdn.com%2F15%2F06%2F25%2F1ea6d2610d77cbdb9cc0bdc54c5ffa0e.jpg&hash=ffb3c4c57d11de0accbba7211cb83cb97b8d1be6)
Gonna win 'em all!
tom cruise is only a few hundred generations away from evolving into a halibut
-
Tom cruise got the brown stuff floatin on top of the gene pool in his DNA mix
-
:surprised:
http://www.khq.com/story/29403513/the-latest-kansas-judge-finds-state-right-to-abortion (http://www.khq.com/story/29403513/the-latest-kansas-judge-finds-state-right-to-abortion)
-
Dems are masters of the soft bigotry of low expectations towards women and minorities.
Sorry lib7 and RD but I'd like ksuw to elaborate this
Heeeeellllloooooo anyone home
They're in the midst of one of the greatest meltdowns in history. (Per capita)
Yeah sorry, I was busy clown suiting Rusty in another thread. Just now seeing this.
The Soft Bigotry of Low Expectations actually refers to two different but related things. The first are liberal affirmative action policies which are intended to help minorities, but can actually end up hurting them and society at large by not holding them to the same standards as everyone else. So, for example, police departments watering down admission tests in order to yield more black officers. http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/doj-pressured-city-of-dayton-to-lower-testing-standards-for-police-recruits-to-accommodate-minority-candidates/ (http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/doj-pressured-city-of-dayton-to-lower-testing-standards-for-police-recruits-to-accommodate-minority-candidates/) Or the military lowering physical fitness tests to yield more women. Fraudulently adjusting grades and/or lowering testing standards for minority students. Etc.
The second is liberals saying some truly ugly, bigoted things without even realizing it. For example, Harry Reid's amazement at how "articulate" and "clean" Obama is. Or Chris Matthews being so mesmerized by an Obama speech that "for an hour there, I forgot he was black." These liberals expect less of minorities, and are surprised when they meet people who exceed their low expectations.
Both of these issues are the result of liberal victimology, which holds that women and minorities are inherently victims of an oppressive majority, and therefore should not be treated equally and cannot be expected to achieve the same standards without help (from the government, of course).
I totally forgot about this, sorry. All and all not a terrible post but your bar is pretty low.
viously I don't share your opinion on affirmative action being a byproduct of low expectations but you at least made a salient point.
Your second point was complete crap and you know it, people saying crap like that isn't specific to anyplace on the political spectrum. Let's agree to not go tit-for-tat with racists things said by liberals and conservatives, that's a never-ending game.
-
I laugh every damn time I read this thread title
Gonna win 'em all!
-
eff i google imaged conjoined teeth and was too grossed out to even deal with copying a link to img post here
I bit the bullet for you guys. WARNING!!!! DO NOT GOOGLE IT YOURSELF.
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedind.nic.in%2Fjao%2Ft09%2Fi2%2FJIndianSocPedodPrevDent_2009_27_2_108_55336_f2.jpg&hash=5abb60c3979e22a1fe48a469a3a5f6b5a6ad86e0)
Not very representative. There is a whole lot of bad going on in there.
Here is a better picture of conjoined teeth:
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.tapatalk-cdn.com%2F15%2F06%2F25%2F1ea6d2610d77cbdb9cc0bdc54c5ffa0e.jpg&hash=ffb3c4c57d11de0accbba7211cb83cb97b8d1be6)
Gonna win 'em all!
tom cruise is only a few hundred generations away from evolving into a halibut
Mind blown
-
Oklahoma just made sure the Supreme Court has something to do in a few months:
(CNN)The Oklahoma state legislature has passed a bill that would criminalize abortion procedures in the state. According to the language of the bill, anyone who is found to have performed an abortion -- except in instances to save the life of the mother -- will be found guilty of a felony and can receive up to three years in prison.
-
I think anyone who is extreme over this issue is pretty lol. Like lib^7 has pleaded his case many times that he hates kids, so he obviously wants to kill that think ASAP. Doesn't consider it a living thing yet, a responsibility, etc. Then we've got the guys who are like: "I don't care if she's raped, she should have it." What are wrong with you ppl?!
-
I never said I hate kids. I hope to have some (or maybe one) of my own some day
-
You say yuck to kids a lot in random threads. Maybe the kids thread?
-
I said they are disgusting, which they are. Their hands are always sticky
-
outrage over lack of child bloodlust
-
yea thats a waste of everyone's time since its going to get destroyed in the courts.
-
Oklahoma just made sure the Supreme Court has something to do in a few months:
(CNN)The Oklahoma state legislature has passed a bill that would criminalize abortion procedures in the state. According to the language of the bill, anyone who is found to have performed an abortion -- except in instances to save the life of the mother -- will be found guilty of a felony and can receive up to three years in prison.
If that is a fair characterization of the bill, it will get struck down pretty much immediately.
-
FTR, if Ms. Wacky ended up not wanting to have kids or I shot blanks, I wouldn't be upset. :zip:
-
Wacks, have you not had the talk about wanting/not wanting kids yet? :horrorsurprise:
-
one will be enough, liblib.
-
Wacks, have you not had the talk about wanting/not wanting kids yet? :horrorsurprise:
We have. There's days we're 50/50 on it. Then there's days when she's like "in two years when we start trying" and i'm like "two years? you said three" and then she's like "Sometimes it takes like a year to get pregnant" and then i'm all like :runaway:
-
Somewhere in Topeka there are some KS legislators trying to one up this crazy law.
-
Somewhere in Topeka there are some KS legislators trying to one up this crazy law.
Yes. The only question is if they see this as more important than trans people peeing in the stall next to their daughter or not.
-
one will be enough, liblib.
Yeah probably. As an only child I kind of think I'm a bit weird because I never had a sibling relationship and I'm not sure if that's good or not.
-
Outrage over conjecture over outrage over killing unborn babies.
Yay! Libtards
-
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/satanic-temple-challenges-missouri-s-abortion-law-religious-grounds-n839891
hail satan
-
I reread this thread and, other than me making some amazing points about abortion as per usual, I have no clue how this thread came to be.
-
some people couldn't handle this thread
http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=35516.0