Post by: star seed 7 on April 16, 2015, 10:15:11 PM
Quote
Economic score: -4.9
Social score: -6.26
Your score pegs you as economically moderately leftist and socially libertarian.
Moderate economic leftists generally support regulation of free trade and business to assure that workers are fairly treated and prices remain stable.
Social libertarians generally believe that the government should not judge morality, and are generally against the illegalization of things that do not directly affect other people in a negative way. Many strong social libertarians may also be social progressives, favoring legislation to correct what they see as socially backwards governmental regulation, although some simply wish for the government to make little judgment on social matters.
basically says i'm a great human being
Post by: bubbles4ksu on April 16, 2015, 10:50:50 PM
Quote
Economic score: -3.35
Social score: -6.43
Your score pegs you as economically moderately leftist and socially libertarian.
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on April 16, 2015, 11:18:48 PM
Social score: -5.3
Economically centrist and social libertarian
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on April 16, 2015, 11:20:32 PM
Quote
Economic score: +4.65
Social score: -0.87
Your score pegs you as economically moderately capitalist and socially centrist.
Moderate capitalists usually support free trade and low taxes, but take pragmatic stances according to what they believe will be best for business and workers.
Social centrists generally believe in a mix of individual liberties and controls, corresponding to what they see as moral or best for society.
Post by: star seed 7 on April 16, 2015, 11:37:00 PM
Post by: Spracne on April 16, 2015, 11:51:09 PM
Quote
Economic score: +1.94
Social score: -4.7Note your scores and Login to your Atlas Account to Save your Scores
Your score pegs you as economically center-capitalist and socially moderately libertarian.
Center-capitalists often support free trade and low taxes, but take pragmatic stances on economic issues, supporting what they see as the best balance between encouraging business and maintaining free trade.
Moderate social libertarians generally favor a hands-off approach to social legislation. They may believe that the government has no right to enforce morals, but may support certain controls on individual rights to avoid crime, drug use, or similar social ills.
This quiz gets me, omg!
Post by: Stevesie60 on April 17, 2015, 12:14:28 AM
Quote
Economic score: -3.23
Social score: -1.39
Your score pegs you as economically moderately leftist and socially center-libertarian.
Moderate economic leftists generally support regulation of free trade and business to assure that workers are fairly treated and prices remain stable.
Social center-libertarians generally have moderate social views, with a slight lean toward avoiding government intervention. However, they support government intervention in matters that they see as threats to society.
Post by: bubbles4ksu on April 17, 2015, 12:25:41 AM
libliblibliblibliblib, what kind of person am I?good, not great.QuoteEconomic score: -3.23
Social score: -1.39
Your score pegs you as economically moderately leftist and socially center-libertarian.
Moderate economic leftists generally support regulation of free trade and business to assure that workers are fairly treated and prices remain stable.
Social center-libertarians generally have moderate social views, with a slight lean toward avoiding government intervention. However, they support government intervention in matters that they see as threats to society.
Post by: Stevesie60 on April 17, 2015, 12:40:10 AM
Post by: 8manpick on April 17, 2015, 06:30:31 AM
Social score: -6.09
Your score pegs you as economically centristand socially libertarian.
Economic centrists generally support economic policy that they see as fit for specific situations, although they may have different views relating to taxes and regulation.
Social libertarians generally believe that the government should not judge morality, and are generally against the illegalization of things that do not directly affect other people in a negative way. Many strong social libertarians may also be social progressives, favoring legislation to correct what they see as socially backwards governmental regulation, although some simply wish for the government to make little judgment on social matters.
Post by: OK_Cat on April 17, 2015, 06:59:50 AM
Moderate economic leftists generally support regulation of free trade and business to assure that workers are fairly treated and prices remain stable.
Moderate social libertarians generally favor a hands-off approach to social legislation. They may believe that the government has no right to enforce morals, but may support certain controls on individual rights to avoid crime, drug use, or similar social ills.
Post by: slackcat on April 17, 2015, 07:23:47 AM
on the fence
Post by: AppleJack on April 17, 2015, 07:28:18 AM
Quote
Economic score: +1.68
Social score: +1.22
Your score pegs you as economically center-capitalist and socially center-authoritarian.
Center-capitalists often support free trade and low taxes, but take pragmatic stances on economic issues, supporting what they see as the best balance between encouraging business and maintaining free trade.
Social center-authoritarians generally have moderate social views, with a slight lean toward government intervention. They may have moderate cultural and religious views, but on the whole believe that the government should assure that society should stay moral.
Post by: Tobias on April 17, 2015, 07:32:56 AM
Quote
Your score pegs you as a CRL libtard
:dunno:
Post by: Institutional Control on April 17, 2015, 07:39:35 AM
Social score: -5.74Note your scores and Login to your Atlas Account to Save your Scores
Your score pegs you as economically center-leftist and socially libertarian.
Economic center-leftists typically support above average controls on free trade, raising or maintaining the current tax levels, but still support free trade.
Social libertarians generally believe that the government should not judge morality, and are generally against the illegalization of things that do not directly affect other people in a negative way. Many strong social libertarians may also be social progressives, favoring legislation to correct what they see as socially backwards governmental regulation, although some simply wish for the government to make little judgment on social matters.
Post by: renocat on April 17, 2015, 07:48:26 AM
Post by: star seed 7 on April 17, 2015, 07:49:53 AM
QuoteYour score pegs you as a CRL libtard
:dunno:
Another great human!
Post by: star seed 7 on April 17, 2015, 07:51:07 AM
Post by: puniraptor on April 17, 2015, 07:54:12 AM
Social score: -5.57
Your score pegs you as economically centrist and socially libertarian.
Economic centrists generally support economic policy that they see as fit for specific situations, although they may have different views relating to taxes and regulation.
Social libertarians generally believe that the government should not judge morality, and are generally against the illegalization of things that do not directly affect other people in a negative way. Many strong social libertarians may also be social progressives, favoring legislation to correct what they see as socially backwards governmental regulation, although some simply wish for the government to make little judgment on social matters.
Post by: puniraptor on April 17, 2015, 07:55:26 AM
Post by: star seed 7 on April 17, 2015, 07:55:52 AM
Post by: slobber on April 17, 2015, 08:06:54 AM
Dobber:
Stud, yes.
Socially and economically the best person in the world, yes.
Survey, NO!
Post by: puniraptor on April 17, 2015, 08:10:21 AM
:lol: at people who need to take a survey to find out who they are or if their man is stud :lol:
Dobber:
Stud, yes.
Socially and economically the best person in the world, yes.
Survey, NO!
i take it your results were pretty embarrassing
Post by: slobber on April 17, 2015, 08:18:45 AM
No. I am at work and the survey things rarely work through our firewalls, so I didn't even try.:lol: at people who need to take a survey to find out who they are or if their man is stud :lol:
Dobber:
Stud, yes.
Socially and economically the best person in the world, yes.
Survey, NO!
i take it your results were pretty embarrassing
Post by: CHONGS on April 17, 2015, 08:54:36 AM
Quote
Economic score: -1.68
Social score: -4.00
Note your scores and Login to your Atlas Account to Save your Scores
Your score pegs you as economically center-leftist and socially moderately libertarian.
Economic center-leftists typically support above average controls on free trade, raising or maintaining the current tax levels, but still support free trade.
Moderate social libertarians generally favor a hands-off approach to social legislation. They may believe that the government has no right to enforce morals, but may support certain controls on individual rights to avoid crime, drug use, or similar social ills.
Post by: CNS on April 17, 2015, 02:13:34 PM
Quote
Economic score: +0.77
Social score: -6.26
Your score pegs you as economically centrist and socially libertarian.
Economic centrists generally support economic policy that they see as fit for specific situations, although they may have different views relating to taxes and regulation.
Social libertarians generally believe that the government should not judge morality, and are generally against the illegalization of things that do not directly affect other people in a negative way. Many strong social libertarians may also be social progressives, favoring legislation to correct what they see as socially backwards governmental regulation, although some simply wish for the government to make little judgment on social matters.
Post by: 8manpick on April 17, 2015, 03:06:02 PM
Post by: 0.42 on April 17, 2015, 03:08:20 PM
Economic score: -4.13
Social score: -7.65
Moderate economic leftists generally support regulation of free trade and business to assure that workers are fairly treated and prices remain stable.
Social far-leftists generally believe that the government has no business enforcing morality on most matters, instead favoring a government that intervenes only when absolutely necessary to avoid direct harm. Many social far-leftists also look negatively on the government's past attitudes toward groups they view as persecuted, although some simply oppose government intervention on utilitarianist grounds.
Post by: ChiComCat on April 17, 2015, 03:53:38 PM
Post by: AppleJack on April 17, 2015, 03:55:28 PM
Lib, will you rank all of the quiz takers in order of how great a person they are?
I would be last :sdeek:
Post by: CHONGS on April 17, 2015, 04:03:52 PM
Well, my results tell me that I am a Chingon sock. This was a rude awakeningIt was bound to happen someday. I have always wished/dreaded for this day to come.
Post by: 8manpick on April 17, 2015, 04:21:06 PM
:Woohoo:
Economic score: -4.13
Social score: -7.65
Don't move out of Austin
Post by: 0.42 on April 17, 2015, 04:24:39 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on April 17, 2015, 04:36:40 PM
Lib, will you rank all of the quiz takers in order of how great a person they are?
If chicat can extract the raw data into an easily readable format, I will agree to do this
Post by: BringBackEcoKat on April 17, 2015, 07:18:45 PM
Post by: KST8FAN on April 17, 2015, 10:36:53 PM
Social score: +3.83
Your score pegs you as economically center-capitalist and socially moderately authoritarian.
Tom
Post by: Tobias on April 17, 2015, 10:54:14 PM
Post by: MakeItRain on April 18, 2015, 11:58:30 PM
Economic score: -4.65
Social score: -6.43Note your scores and Login to your Atlas Account to Save your Scores
Your score pegs you as economically moderately leftist and socially libertarian.
Moderate economic leftists generally support regulation of free trade and business to assure that workers are fairly treated and prices remain stable.
Social libertarians generally believe that the government should not judge morality, and are generally against the illegalization of things that do not directly affect other people in a negative way. Many strong social libertarians may also be social progressives, favoring legislation to correct what they see as socially backwards governmental regulation, although some simply wish for the government to make little judgment on social matters.
Post by: sys on April 19, 2015, 12:19:51 AM
Quote
Economic score: -0.52
Social score: -7.3
Your score pegs you as economically centrist and socially far-leftist.
Economic centrists generally support economic policy that they see as fit for specific situations, although they may have different views relating to taxes and regulation.
Social far-leftists generally believe that the government has no business enforcing morality on most matters, instead favoring a government that intervenes only when absolutely necessary to avoid direct harm. Many social far-leftists also look negatively on the government's past attitudes toward groups they view as persecuted, although some simply oppose government intervention on utilitarianist grounds.
apparently, i group with 8man, puni and cns. although i am happy to note that i am socially more extreme than any of them.
Post by: 8manpick on April 19, 2015, 11:19:52 AM
StudQuoteEconomic score: -0.52
Social score: -7.3
Your score pegs you as economically centrist and socially far-leftist.
Economic centrists generally support economic policy that they see as fit for specific situations, although they may have different views relating to taxes and regulation.
Social far-leftists generally believe that the government has no business enforcing morality on most matters, instead favoring a government that intervenes only when absolutely necessary to avoid direct harm. Many social far-leftists also look negatively on the government's past attitudes toward groups they view as persecuted, although some simply oppose government intervention on utilitarianist grounds.
apparently, i group with 8man, puni and cns. although i am happy to note that i am socially more extreme than any of them.
Post by: CNS on April 19, 2015, 01:18:17 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on April 19, 2015, 01:29:46 PM
Post by: Kat Kid on April 19, 2015, 04:36:18 PM
Social: -6.87
Center-Leftist/Social Libertarian
Post by: Katpappy on April 20, 2015, 11:11:03 PM
No. I am at work and the survey things rarely work through our firewalls, so I didn't even try.:lol: at people who need to take a survey to find out who they are or if their man is stud :lol:Surveys are like jacking off to a pic in a mag. After you jizz, you'll never want to open that page again.
Dobber:
Stud, yes.
Socially and economically the best person in the world, yes.
Survey, NO!
i take it your results were pretty embarrassing
Post by: puniraptor on April 21, 2015, 08:17:44 AM
Post by: slobber on April 21, 2015, 12:38:29 PM
hold on fix that quote!its a hidden Katdaddy no
Gonna win 'em all!
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on April 21, 2015, 12:50:20 PM
Social score: -3.48Note your scores and Login to your Atlas Account to Save your Scores
Your score pegs you as economically center-leftist and socially moderately libertarian.
Post by: 8manpick on April 21, 2015, 12:56:37 PM
Economic score: -1.29Sorry you don't quite qualify for the cool party
Social score: -3.48Note your scores and Login to your Atlas Account to Save your Scores
Your score pegs you as economically center-leftist and socially moderately libertarian.
Post by: BrokenSky1113 on April 21, 2015, 12:58:03 PM
Social score: -8.09
Your score pegs you as economically center-leftist and socially far-leftist.
Economic center-leftists typically support above average controls on free trade, raising or maintaining the current tax levels, but still support free trade.
Social far-leftists generally believe that the government has no business enforcing morality on most matters, instead favoring a government that intervenes only when absolutely necessary to avoid direct harm. Many social far-leftists also look negatively on the government's past attitudes toward groups they view as persecuted, although some simply oppose government intervention on utilitarianist grounds.
:cry: I thought I was a libratarian
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on April 21, 2015, 01:10:16 PM
Economic score: -2.26
Social score: -8.09
Your score pegs you as economically center-leftist and socially far-leftist.
Economic center-leftists typically support above average controls on free trade, raising or maintaining the current tax levels, but still support free trade.
Social far-leftists generally believe that the government has no business enforcing morality on most matters, instead favoring a government that intervenes only when absolutely necessary to avoid direct harm. Many social far-leftists also look negatively on the government's past attitudes toward groups they view as persecuted, although some simply oppose government intervention on utilitarianist grounds.
:cry: I thought I was a libratarian
It's ok. Nobody is actually a libertarian, other than maybe sys.
Post by: MakeItRain on April 21, 2015, 01:11:41 PM
Economic score: -2.26
Social score: -8.09
Your score pegs you as economically center-leftist and socially far-leftist.
Economic center-leftists typically support above average controls on free trade, raising or maintaining the current tax levels, but still support free trade.
Social far-leftists generally believe that the government has no business enforcing morality on most matters, instead favoring a government that intervenes only when absolutely necessary to avoid direct harm. Many social far-leftists also look negatively on the government's past attitudes toward groups they view as persecuted, although some simply oppose government intervention on utilitarianist grounds.
:cry: I thought I was a libratarian
Welcome! Come on over www.gp.org
Post by: sys on April 21, 2015, 03:24:32 PM
Post by: Mrs. Gooch on April 23, 2015, 02:49:24 PM
Social score: -5.22
Your score pegs you as economically center-capitalist and socially libertarian.
Center-capitalists often support free trade and low taxes, but take pragmatic stances on economic issues, supporting what they see as the best balance between encouraging business and maintaining free trade.
Social libertarians generally believe that the government should not judge morality, and are generally against the illegalization of things that do not directly affect other people in a negative way. Many strong social libertarians may also be social progressives, favoring legislation to correct what they see as socially backwards governmental regulation, although some simply wish for the government to make little judgment on social matters.
But I picked neutral on a few of the questions because they were too general.
Post by: Institutional Control on July 13, 2015, 09:14:27 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.celebritytypes.com%2Fpolitical-coordinates%2Fcomparison.png&hash=dffc464cfe1f11ad02e2314c82cfdb6a1c3c19d1)
Post by: Institutional Control on July 13, 2015, 09:15:16 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.celebritytypes.com%2Fgraph.php%3Fn0%3D1%26amp%3Bn1%3D16.7%26amp%3Bn2%3D0%26amp%3Bn3%3D50.0%26amp%3Bn4%3D0&hash=fd2035d9100bc37729317502f9af33de3bfca394)
Post by: star seed 7 on July 13, 2015, 09:23:21 AM
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on July 13, 2015, 09:26:15 AM
Post by: CNS on July 13, 2015, 01:11:14 PM
Post by: 8manpick on July 13, 2015, 01:55:58 PM
http://www.celebritytypes.com/chart.php?n=0&n3=33.3
Post by: SdK on July 13, 2015, 02:01:08 PM
Post by: Institutional Control on July 13, 2015, 02:25:22 PM
http://www.celebritytypes.com/political-coordinates/test.phpI wish WackyCat would do this and post his results.
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.celebritytypes.com%2Fpolitical-coordinates%2Fcomparison.png&hash=dffc464cfe1f11ad02e2314c82cfdb6a1c3c19d1)
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on July 13, 2015, 02:34:14 PM
[attachment deleted by admin]
Post by: Institutional Control on July 13, 2015, 02:40:35 PM
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on July 13, 2015, 02:45:04 PM
Post by: Institutional Control on July 13, 2015, 03:00:23 PM
I'm honestly surprised to see how liberal some of our fan base is. We're 85% hayseeds.
Well, it's not 1955 anymore. I'm honestly surprised when I meet anyone under the age of 35 who is conservative.
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on July 13, 2015, 03:02:54 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on July 13, 2015, 03:08:04 PM
Quote from: ksuw
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.celebritytypes.com%2Fgraph.php%3Fn0%3D1%26amp%3Bn1%3D0%26amp%3Bn2%3D97.2%26amp%3Bn3%3D0%26amp%3Bn4%3D63.9&hash=65b1c0c86f1a759029a706329c0ce7ca0a646e78)
That should swing it back to hayseed
Post by: slobber on July 13, 2015, 04:05:08 PM
!2 squares lower and one to the left.
Gonna win 'em all!
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on July 13, 2015, 04:09:22 PM
:thumbs:!2 squares lower and one to the left.
Gonna win 'em all!
Post by: sys on July 13, 2015, 04:13:51 PM
i thought i'd be more liberal, i must be having an authoritarian day.
Post by: CNS on July 13, 2015, 04:35:02 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.celebritytypes.com%2Fgraph.php%3Fn0%3D1%26amp%3Bn1%3D2.8%26amp%3Bn2%3D0%26amp%3Bn3%3D41.7%26amp%3Bn4%3D0&hash=2956a813a4959e0d7cfd0d7a13e6bb47bdd59104):cheers:
i thought i'd be more liberal, i must be having an authoritarian day.
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
Post by: slobber on July 13, 2015, 04:43:04 PM
Gonna win 'em all!
Post by: Asteriskhead on July 13, 2015, 05:18:24 PM
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on July 13, 2015, 05:26:05 PM
sd keeps retaking the test trying to land in the middle.:lol:
Gonna win 'em all!
Post by: chum1 on July 13, 2015, 05:32:29 PM
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on July 13, 2015, 06:02:07 PM
Post by: slobber on July 13, 2015, 06:52:56 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.celebritytypes.com%2Fgraph.php%3Fn0%3D0%26amp%3Bn1%3D0%26amp%3Bn2%3D0%26amp%3Bn3%3D0%26amp%3Bn4%3D0&hash=1bb69b01d58b02b161d700334e1e4d5fb0bdac70):lol:
Gonna win 'em all!
Post by: 0.42 on July 13, 2015, 07:10:53 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.celebritytypes.com%2Fgraph.php%3Fn0%3D1%26amp%3Bn1%3D41.7%26amp%3Bn2%3D0%26amp%3Bn3%3D66.7%26amp%3Bn4%3D0&hash=d16761e065e00fcbbcbfd46a2707012d603f9c11)
Post by: 8manpick on July 13, 2015, 07:56:39 PM
Post by: Kat Kid on July 13, 2015, 10:02:59 PM
Post by: CNS on July 14, 2015, 08:43:31 AM
Sys, CNS and I...brothers again
:gocho:
Post by: Cire on July 14, 2015, 10:52:27 AM
Economic score: -2.06
Social score: -4.35Note your scores and Login to your Atlas Account to Save your Scores
Your score pegs you as economically center-leftist and socially moderately libertarian.
Economic center-leftists typically support above average controls on free trade, raising or maintaining the current tax levels, but still support free trade.
Moderate social libertarians generally favor a hands-off approach to social legislation. They may believe that the government has no right to enforce morals, but may support certain controls on individual rights to avoid crime, drug use, or similar social ills.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Post by: Mrs. Gooch on July 14, 2015, 12:58:28 PM
Mine.
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.celebritytypes.com%2Fgraph.php%3Fn0%3D1%26amp%3Bn1%3D16.7%26amp%3Bn2%3D0%26amp%3Bn3%3D50.0%26amp%3Bn4%3D0&hash=fd2035d9100bc37729317502f9af33de3bfca394)
This is pretty much what mine looked like.
Post by: Trogdor on July 14, 2015, 01:09:38 PM
Post by: slobber on July 14, 2015, 01:51:10 PM
Gonna win 'em all!
Post by: Kat Kid on July 14, 2015, 02:56:13 PM
What is a communitarian? I think it is a way to make conservative sound more like communism. :shakesfist:
Gonna win 'em all!
communitarian = liberal economically, culturally conservative/interventionist
Post by: Kat Kid on July 14, 2015, 02:57:18 PM
Post by: Institutional Control on July 14, 2015, 03:01:13 PM
This is pretty much what mine looked like.
Twinsies.
I knew you were cool, @mrsgooch.
Post by: sys on July 14, 2015, 03:09:33 PM
What is a communitarian? I think it is a way to make conservative sound more like communism. :shakesfist:
Gonna win 'em all!
it was defined on the link. basically, considers society to be more important that the individual.
Post by: Asteriskhead on July 14, 2015, 03:17:39 PM
Post by: Winters on July 14, 2015, 04:25:07 PM
Social score: -2.43
Your score pegs you as economically centrist and socially center-libertarian.
Economic centrists generally support economic policy that they see as fit for specific situations, although they may have different views relating to taxes and regulation.
Social center-libertarians generally have moderate social views, with a slight lean toward avoiding government intervention. However, they support government intervention in matters that they see as threats to society.
Post by: slobber on July 14, 2015, 04:34:33 PM
Isn't that a liberal?What is a communitarian? I think it is a way to make conservative sound more like communism. :shakesfist:
Gonna win 'em all!
it was defined on the link. basically, considers society to be more important that the individual.
Gonna win 'em all!
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on July 14, 2015, 05:04:08 PM
Post by: slobber on July 14, 2015, 05:16:19 PM
I'm starting to think I might be the only fiscally conservative, socially liberal poster on this site.that is kind of what I thought I was.
Gonna win 'em all!
Post by: Asteriskhead on July 14, 2015, 05:27:04 PM
Isn't that a liberal?What is a communitarian? I think it is a way to make conservative sound more like communism. :shakesfist:
Gonna win 'em all!
it was defined on the link. basically, considers society to be more important that the individual.
Gonna win 'em all!
if you use the popular, incorrect definition, yes, but that's also true of the popular, incorrect definition of conservative.
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on July 15, 2015, 08:23:29 AM
I'm starting to think I might be the only fiscally conservative, socially liberal poster on this site.that is kind of what I thought I was.
Gonna win 'em all!
It's what almost everyone says they are. Did you answer the questions pro-trade/anti-tariff? What about immigration? I took a strong pro-immigration stance. Great for the market and socially liberal at the same time there.
Post by: BringBackEcoKat on July 20, 2015, 08:31:35 AM
Post by: 0.42 on July 20, 2015, 01:32:44 PM
Post by: OK_Cat on July 20, 2015, 01:43:59 PM
t's n p's to the king
He is basically seeing Sam Brownback
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on July 20, 2015, 01:53:10 PM
I'm so far right that I'm almost falling off the chart...
liberal or communitarian?
Post by: Yard Dog on July 21, 2015, 09:35:49 AM
Social score: -0.17
Your score pegs you as economically extremely capitalist and socially centrist.
Extreme capitalists generally believe that the free market should be unregulated and laissez-faire in nature, with government either only intervening in extreme cases or never intervening at all. They also believe in significant reductions of government services. Many extreme capitalists believe that it is not the government's responsibility to assure welfare for the poor, but rather that the poor should fend for themselves or receive welfare through some form of private charity.
Social centrists generally believe in a mix of individual liberties and controls, corresponding to what they see as moral or best for society.
Post by: star seed 7 on July 21, 2015, 09:37:26 AM
Post by: Mrs. Gooch on July 27, 2015, 09:08:55 AM
http://www.playbuzz.com/felixstablum10/the-definitive-political-orientation-test?fb_ref=207_SNR
Post by: 0.42 on July 27, 2015, 09:14:36 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.playbuzz.com%2Fcdn%2Fe9920e89-b1dd-4c21-8bc6-8c82fcbeb99a%2F05371a7b-7e18-453f-83ab-790c91fd4947.jpg&hash=98cb5c7c466bb57150ef6d5268b00be56013f3d7)
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on July 27, 2015, 09:19:32 AM
Post by: 0.42 on July 27, 2015, 09:20:15 AM
Post by: Mrs. Gooch on July 27, 2015, 09:22:20 AM
has anyone checked to see if we are really just clones of LibBot 7.0? :surprised:
Did you guys take the quiz or just copy my picture?
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on July 27, 2015, 09:23:12 AM
Post by: 0.42 on July 27, 2015, 09:23:49 AM
I took the quiz.
same
we are hivemind
Post by: Institutional Control on July 27, 2015, 09:36:55 AM
Post by: sys on July 27, 2015, 09:53:43 AM
i wanted to be an extremist someone who makes me uncomfortable. :cry:
Post by: star seed 7 on July 27, 2015, 12:08:43 PM
Post by: ChiComCat on July 27, 2015, 12:19:34 PM
Post by: GregKSU1027 on July 27, 2015, 12:49:04 PM
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
Post by: Mrs. Gooch on July 27, 2015, 12:59:18 PM
We are all the same
There might be a slight flaw in that survey?
Post by: sys on July 27, 2015, 01:06:02 PM
We are all the same
There might be a slight flaw in that survey?
using a combination of random and the opposite of what my real answer would be i got this: i think there are only four positions on that grid where responses are placed.
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.playbuzz.com%2Fcdn%2Fe9920e89-b1dd-4c21-8bc6-8c82fcbeb99a%2F39347caf-3cdb-480b-81e7-7e2dcffc3f00.jpg&hash=a6cf6063f2e4bd3d98a09fbdca418afceca07ea6)
Post by: Mrs. Gooch on July 27, 2015, 01:09:42 PM
https://www.isidewith.com/political-quiz
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
It says I should vote for Bernie Sanders (Hillary second).
Post by: CNS on July 27, 2015, 01:21:30 PM
Welp
Post by: brandochav on July 27, 2015, 01:21:42 PM
https://www.isidewith.com/political-quiz
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
It says I should vote for Bernie Sanders (Hillary second).
Bernie all the way! :Woohoo:
Post by: CNS on July 27, 2015, 01:58:46 PM
Clinton 76%
Rand 73%
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on July 27, 2015, 02:03:47 PM
Santorum-92%
Paul-90%
Cruz-88%
Bush-82%
Post by: puniraptor on July 27, 2015, 02:06:30 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.playbuzz.com%2Fcdn%2Fe9920e89-b1dd-4c21-8bc6-8c82fcbeb99a%2F05371a7b-7e18-453f-83ab-790c91fd4947.jpg&hash=98cb5c7c466bb57150ef6d5268b00be56013f3d7)
Post by: Mrs. Gooch on July 27, 2015, 02:12:56 PM
i dont think this is a very high resolution test and i dont think it tries very hard
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.playbuzz.com%2Fcdn%2Fe9920e89-b1dd-4c21-8bc6-8c82fcbeb99a%2F05371a7b-7e18-453f-83ab-790c91fd4947.jpg&hash=98cb5c7c466bb57150ef6d5268b00be56013f3d7)
Yeah they really shouldn't have all those grid lines on there when there are only 4 possible outcomes.
Post by: chum1 on July 27, 2015, 02:19:14 PM
73%Bernie Sanders
Bernie Sanders Democrat
on immigration, social, and foreign policy issues.
compare answers
63%Hillary Clinton
Hillary Clinton Democrat
on immigration, social, education, and foreign policy issues.
compare answers
55%Martin O'Malley
Martin O'Malley Democrat
on immigration issues.
compare answers
30%Bobby Jindal
Bobby Jindal Republican
on immigration issues.
compare answers
25%Rand Paul
Rand Paul Republican
no major issues.
compare answers
20%Jeb Bush
Jeb Bush Republican
no major issues.
compare answers
17%Carly Fiorina
Carly Fiorina Republican
no major issues.
compare answers
17%Marco Rubio
Marco Rubio Republican
no major issues.
compare answers
13%Donald Trump
Donald Trump Republican
no major issues.
compare answers
13%Rick Santorum
Rick Santorum Republican
no major issues.
compare answers
10%Ben Carson
Ben Carson Republican
no major issues.
compare answers
10%Chris Christie
Chris Christie Republican
no major issues.
compare answers
10%Lindsey Graham
Lindsey Graham Republican
no major issues.
compare answers
10%Mike Huckabee
Mike Huckabee Republican
no major issues.
compare answers
9%Ted Cruz
Ted Cruz Republican
no major issues.
compare answers
9%Rick Perry
Rick Perry Republican
no major issues.
compare answers
7%Scott Walker
Scott Walker Republican
no major issues.
compare answers
5%John Kasich
John Kasich Republican
no major issues.
compare answers
Post by: michigancat on July 27, 2015, 02:41:47 PM
Post by: Mrs. Gooch on July 27, 2015, 02:42:36 PM
bernie 96%! :fatty:
Wow
Post by: sys on July 27, 2015, 02:43:02 PM
Quote
Candidates you side with...
89% Bernie Sanders - on domestic policy, immigration, foreign policy, environmental, economic, healthcare, and social issues.
75% Rand Paul - on domestic policy, healthcare, and education issues.
72% Hillary Clinton - on foreign policy, environmental, healthcare, and social issues.
61% Martin O'Malley - on immigration and healthcare issues.
51% Donald Trump - on education issues.
44% Jeb Bush - on education issues.
41% Ben Carson - no major issues.
39% Scott Walker - on environmental issues.
30% Ted Cruz - on education issues.
Quote
Candidates you side with by issue...
More important to me - Immigration. I side with Martin O'Malley on most immigration issues
More important to me - Domestic Policy. I side with Rand Paul on most domestic policy issues
More important to me - the Environment. I side with Mike Huckabee on most environmental issues
Somewhat important to me - Foreign Policy. I side with Hillary Clinton on most foreign policy issues
Somewhat important to me - Healthcare. I side with Bernie Sanders on most healthcare issues
Somewhat important to me - Education. I side with Rick Santorum on most education issues
Somewhat important to me - the Economy. I side with Bernie Sanders on most economic issues
Less important to me - Social. I side with Bernie Sanders on most social issues
Post by: CNS on July 27, 2015, 02:43:12 PM
Post by: CNS on July 27, 2015, 02:43:50 PM
Post by: sys on July 27, 2015, 02:48:00 PM
Big shocker that Sys basically copied off me on yet another political quiz. :gocho:
can't wait to see the 8man scores. :excited:
Post by: michigancat on July 27, 2015, 02:51:48 PM
More important to me
I side with Bernie Sanders on most foreign policy issues
More important to me
I side with Bernie Sanders on most social issues
More important to me
I side with Bernie Sanders on most domestic policy issues
Somewhat important to me
I side with Scott Walker on most environmental issues
:Wha:
Somewhat important to me
I side with Martin O'Malley on most immigration issues
Somewhat important to me
I side with Hillary Clinton on most education issues
Somewhat important to me
I side with Bernie Sanders on most economic issues
Somewhat important to me
I side with Bernie Sanders on most healthcare issues
Post by: CNS on July 27, 2015, 02:58:54 PM
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
Post by: Yard Dog on July 27, 2015, 03:09:13 PM
84% Rick Santorum
84% Marco Rubio
81% Scott Walker
80% Rand Paul
65% Jeb Bush
59% Ben Carson
58% Donald Trump
46% Hillary Clinton
23% Bernie Sanders
Post by: michigancat on July 27, 2015, 03:10:00 PM
Post by: puniraptor on July 27, 2015, 03:10:10 PM
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on July 27, 2015, 03:10:32 PM
88% Ted Cruz
84% Rick Santorum
84% Marco Rubio
81% Scott Walker
80% Rand Paul
65% Jeb Bush
59% Ben Carson
58% Donald Trump
46% Hillary Clinton
23% Bernie Sanders
This is what big government looks like.
Post by: star seed 7 on July 27, 2015, 03:14:44 PM
bernie 96%! :fatty:
97‰ :gocho:
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on July 27, 2015, 03:20:31 PM
83% Hillary Clinton
68% Jeb Bush
Post by: Yard Dog on July 27, 2015, 03:22:34 PM
88% Ted Cruz
84% Rick Santorum
84% Marco Rubio
81% Scott Walker
80% Rand Paul
65% Jeb Bush
59% Ben Carson
58% Donald Trump
46% Hillary Clinton
23% Bernie Sanders
This is what big government looks like.
I think you are confused about what big government means. Bernie Sanders is 100% big government. The top of this list is people who support small government. Less regulation, less control federally.
Sanders' socialist ideals mean complete control federally and as big a government as you can get without going full fascist.
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on July 27, 2015, 03:23:56 PM
88% Ted Cruz
84% Rick Santorum
84% Marco Rubio
81% Scott Walker
80% Rand Paul
65% Jeb Bush
59% Ben Carson
58% Donald Trump
46% Hillary Clinton
23% Bernie Sanders
This is what big government looks like.
I think you are confused about what big government means. Bernie Sanders is 100% big government. The top of this list is people who support small government. Less regulation, less control federally.
Sanders' socialist ideals mean complete control federally and as big a government as you can get without going full fascist.
Your list supports less regulation of business, but more regulation of individuals.
Post by: michigancat on July 27, 2015, 03:25:23 PM
88% Ted Cruz
84% Rick Santorum
84% Marco Rubio
81% Scott Walker
80% Rand Paul
65% Jeb Bush
59% Ben Carson
58% Donald Trump
46% Hillary Clinton
23% Bernie Sanders
This is what big government looks like.
I think you are confused about what big government means. Bernie Sanders is 100% big government. The top of this list is people who support small government. Less regulation, less control federally.
Sanders' socialist ideals mean complete control federally and as big a government as you can get without going full fascist.
Your list supports less regulation of business, but more regulation of individuals.
+bigger military
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on July 27, 2015, 03:26:31 PM
88% Ted Cruz
84% Rick Santorum
84% Marco Rubio
81% Scott Walker
80% Rand Paul
65% Jeb Bush
59% Ben Carson
58% Donald Trump
46% Hillary Clinton
23% Bernie Sanders
This is what big government looks like.
I think you are confused about what big government means. Bernie Sanders is 100% big government. The top of this list is people who support small government. Less regulation, less control federally.
Sanders' socialist ideals mean complete control federally and as big a government as you can get without going full fascist.
Your list supports less regulation of business, but more regulation of individuals.
+bigger military
Yeah, I support us having the best military in the world, but I don't think we need to spend more on it than the rest of the world does combined like those people do. Also, surveillance. My God, the money they support spending to make you 0.001% safer.
Post by: star seed 7 on July 27, 2015, 03:49:31 PM
Post by: Yard Dog on July 27, 2015, 03:53:08 PM
88% Ted Cruz
84% Rick Santorum
84% Marco Rubio
81% Scott Walker
80% Rand Paul
65% Jeb Bush
59% Ben Carson
58% Donald Trump
46% Hillary Clinton
23% Bernie Sanders
This is what big government looks like.
I think you are confused about what big government means. Bernie Sanders is 100% big government. The top of this list is people who support small government. Less regulation, less control federally.
Sanders' socialist ideals mean complete control federally and as big a government as you can get without going full fascist.
Your list supports less regulation of business, but more regulation of individuals.
I tend to disagree, I don't see how they would be adding more regulation on individuals. Top most being my boy Ted Cruz, but the top of that list are for less federal regulation all together. It is there thought, and my own, that the federal government should only protect individual property and rights, protect national security, and enforce rule of law.
What regulations do you think they would be putting on individuals?
Post by: CNS on July 27, 2015, 03:54:28 PM
Agreed. Big part of our defense is due to trying to force stability on places we don't belong simply to maintain access to resources. If we spent more money subsidizing the science of alternative power and storage, we wouldn't need need as much defense.88% Ted Cruz
84% Rick Santorum
84% Marco Rubio
81% Scott Walker
80% Rand Paul
65% Jeb Bush
59% Ben Carson
58% Donald Trump
46% Hillary Clinton
23% Bernie Sanders
This is what big government looks like.
I think you are confused about what big government means. Bernie Sanders is 100% big government. The top of this list is people who support small government. Less regulation, less control federally.
Sanders' socialist ideals mean complete control federally and as big a government as you can get without going full fascist.
Your list supports less regulation of business, but more regulation of individuals.
+bigger military
Yeah, I support us having the best military in the world, but I don't think we need to spend more on it than the rest of the world does combined like those people do. Also, surveillance. My God, the money they support spending to make you 0.001% safer.
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on July 27, 2015, 03:57:31 PM
It's also a huge queer bashing klanGood grief.
Post by: star seed 7 on July 27, 2015, 04:00:20 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on July 27, 2015, 04:02:28 PM
It's also a huge queer bashing klanGood grief.
Pretty disgusting, I agree, but you're the one identifying with them
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on July 27, 2015, 04:05:28 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on July 27, 2015, 04:08:56 PM
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on July 27, 2015, 04:31:49 PM
88% Ted Cruz
84% Rick Santorum
84% Marco Rubio
81% Scott Walker
80% Rand Paul
65% Jeb Bush
59% Ben Carson
58% Donald Trump
46% Hillary Clinton
23% Bernie Sanders
This is what big government looks like.
I think you are confused about what big government means. Bernie Sanders is 100% big government. The top of this list is people who support small government. Less regulation, less control federally.
Sanders' socialist ideals mean complete control federally and as big a government as you can get without going full fascist.
Your list supports less regulation of business, but more regulation of individuals.
I tend to disagree, I don't see how they would be adding more regulation on individuals. Top most being my boy Ted Cruz, but the top of that list are for less federal regulation all together. It is there thought, and my own, that the federal government should only protect individual property and rights, protect national security, and enforce rule of law.
What regulations do you think they would be putting on individuals?
Regulations on which drugs you can and cannot use and under what conditions, regulations on who you are able to marry, regulations on who is allowed to be in the country and under what conditions, etc.
Post by: sys on July 27, 2015, 04:41:39 PM
Post by: CNS on July 27, 2015, 05:38:30 PM
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on July 27, 2015, 06:28:35 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.playbuzz.com%2Fcdn%2Fe9920e89-b1dd-4c21-8bc6-8c82fcbeb99a%2F05371a7b-7e18-453f-83ab-790c91fd4947.jpg&hash=98cb5c7c466bb57150ef6d5268b00be56013f3d7)
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on July 27, 2015, 06:32:27 PM
Post by: puniraptor on July 27, 2015, 06:43:42 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on July 27, 2015, 07:02:13 PM
Post by: Asteriskhead on July 27, 2015, 10:03:49 PM
Post by: Yard Dog on July 28, 2015, 09:24:29 AM
88% Ted Cruz
84% Rick Santorum
84% Marco Rubio
81% Scott Walker
80% Rand Paul
65% Jeb Bush
59% Ben Carson
58% Donald Trump
46% Hillary Clinton
23% Bernie Sanders
This is what big government looks like.
I think you are confused about what big government means. Bernie Sanders is 100% big government. The top of this list is people who support small government. Less regulation, less control federally.
Sanders' socialist ideals mean complete control federally and as big a government as you can get without going full fascist.
Your list supports less regulation of business, but more regulation of individuals.
I tend to disagree, I don't see how they would be adding more regulation on individuals. Top most being my boy Ted Cruz, but the top of that list are for less federal regulation all together. It is there thought, and my own, that the federal government should only protect individual property and rights, protect national security, and enforce rule of law.
What regulations do you think they would be putting on individuals?
Regulations on which drugs you can and cannot use and under what conditions, regulations on who you are able to marry, regulations on who is allowed to be in the country and under what conditions, etc.
To be fair the more libertarian candidates on that list are more open to letting drug regulations drop. Though I still struggle with letting hard drugs just be legal. I don't think that is a positive thing. I support reducing penalties for non-violent drug crimes, you'd be surprised to find that several of the GOP candidates are on board with that as well.
The marriage thing is ludicrous. I have many friends who are batting for the other team and think that needing the word "marriage" attached to their unions is completely unnecessary. They just want the same rights. If you proposed a situation where it was a legal union but not called marriage you'd be just fine and everyone would be getting what they want. From my understanding it is only the loud majority that are desperate for the word marriage.
And on your final point, the actual desire has nothing to do with building a wall. Trump is placating to a select few with that nonsense. It is much more along the lines of making the immigration process less difficult, but not telling people who came here illegally that they are ok. It might not be fair right now, but illegal immigration is still that. Illegal.
Post by: 8manpick on July 28, 2015, 09:29:14 AM
88% Ted Cruz
84% Rick Santorum
84% Marco Rubio
81% Scott Walker
80% Rand Paul
65% Jeb Bush
59% Ben Carson
58% Donald Trump
46% Hillary Clinton
23% Bernie Sanders
This is what big government looks like.
I think you are confused about what big government means. Bernie Sanders is 100% big government. The top of this list is people who support small government. Less regulation, less control federally.
Sanders' socialist ideals mean complete control federally and as big a government as you can get without going full fascist.
Your list supports less regulation of business, but more regulation of individuals.
I tend to disagree, I don't see how they would be adding more regulation on individuals. Top most being my boy Ted Cruz, but the top of that list are for less federal regulation all together. It is there thought, and my own, that the federal government should only protect individual property and rights, protect national security, and enforce rule of law.
What regulations do you think they would be putting on individuals?
Regulations on which drugs you can and cannot use and under what conditions, regulations on who you are able to marry, regulations on who is allowed to be in the country and under what conditions, etc.
The marriage thing is ludicrous. I have many friends who are batting for the other team and think that needing the word "marriage" attached to their unions is completely unnecessary. They just want the same rights. If you proposed a situation where it was a legal union but not called marriage you'd be just fine and everyone would be getting what they want. From my understanding it is only the loud majority that are desperate for the word marriage.
Your understanding is not remotely correct.
Post by: star seed 7 on July 28, 2015, 09:33:24 AM
Post by: Yard Dog on July 28, 2015, 09:39:03 AM
88% Ted Cruz
84% Rick Santorum
84% Marco Rubio
81% Scott Walker
80% Rand Paul
65% Jeb Bush
59% Ben Carson
58% Donald Trump
46% Hillary Clinton
23% Bernie Sanders
This is what big government looks like.
I think you are confused about what big government means. Bernie Sanders is 100% big government. The top of this list is people who support small government. Less regulation, less control federally.
Sanders' socialist ideals mean complete control federally and as big a government as you can get without going full fascist.
Your list supports less regulation of business, but more regulation of individuals.
I tend to disagree, I don't see how they would be adding more regulation on individuals. Top most being my boy Ted Cruz, but the top of that list are for less federal regulation all together. It is there thought, and my own, that the federal government should only protect individual property and rights, protect national security, and enforce rule of law.
What regulations do you think they would be putting on individuals?
Regulations on which drugs you can and cannot use and under what conditions, regulations on who you are able to marry, regulations on who is allowed to be in the country and under what conditions, etc.
The marriage thing is ludicrous. I have many friends who are batting for the other team and think that needing the word "marriage" attached to their unions is completely unnecessary. They just want the same rights. If you proposed a situation where it was a legal union but not called marriage you'd be just fine and everyone would be getting what they want. From my understanding it is only the loud majority that are desperate for the word marriage.
Your understanding is not remotely correct.
Please enlighten me.
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on July 28, 2015, 09:45:26 AM
Post by: 0.42 on July 28, 2015, 09:49:16 AM
Hmmmmmmm.....
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.playbuzz.com%2Fcdn%2Fe9920e89-b1dd-4c21-8bc6-8c82fcbeb99a%2F05371a7b-7e18-453f-83ab-790c91fd4947.jpg&hash=98cb5c7c466bb57150ef6d5268b00be56013f3d7)
:love:
Post by: 8manpick on July 28, 2015, 09:51:56 AM
88% Ted Cruz
84% Rick Santorum
84% Marco Rubio
81% Scott Walker
80% Rand Paul
65% Jeb Bush
59% Ben Carson
58% Donald Trump
46% Hillary Clinton
23% Bernie Sanders
This is what big government looks like.
I think you are confused about what big government means. Bernie Sanders is 100% big government. The top of this list is people who support small government. Less regulation, less control federally.
Sanders' socialist ideals mean complete control federally and as big a government as you can get without going full fascist.
Your list supports less regulation of business, but more regulation of individuals.
I tend to disagree, I don't see how they would be adding more regulation on individuals. Top most being my boy Ted Cruz, but the top of that list are for less federal regulation all together. It is there thought, and my own, that the federal government should only protect individual property and rights, protect national security, and enforce rule of law.
What regulations do you think they would be putting on individuals?
Regulations on which drugs you can and cannot use and under what conditions, regulations on who you are able to marry, regulations on who is allowed to be in the country and under what conditions, etc.
The marriage thing is ludicrous. I have many friends who are batting for the other team and think that needing the word "marriage" attached to their unions is completely unnecessary. They just want the same rights. If you proposed a situation where it was a legal union but not called marriage you'd be just fine and everyone would be getting what they want. From my understanding it is only the loud majority that are desperate for the word marriage.
Your understanding is not remotely correct.
Please enlighten me.
Homosexuals, or as you say, "people batting for the other team", would like to be treated equally. This includes, but is not limited to, calling their legal union "marriage" just like heterosexuals ("teammates" in your lexicon).
Post by: Yard Dog on July 28, 2015, 09:59:43 AM
88% Ted Cruz
84% Rick Santorum
84% Marco Rubio
81% Scott Walker
80% Rand Paul
65% Jeb Bush
59% Ben Carson
58% Donald Trump
46% Hillary Clinton
23% Bernie Sanders
This is what big government looks like.
I think you are confused about what big government means. Bernie Sanders is 100% big government. The top of this list is people who support small government. Less regulation, less control federally.
Sanders' socialist ideals mean complete control federally and as big a government as you can get without going full fascist.
Your list supports less regulation of business, but more regulation of individuals.
I tend to disagree, I don't see how they would be adding more regulation on individuals. Top most being my boy Ted Cruz, but the top of that list are for less federal regulation all together. It is there thought, and my own, that the federal government should only protect individual property and rights, protect national security, and enforce rule of law.
What regulations do you think they would be putting on individuals?
Regulations on which drugs you can and cannot use and under what conditions, regulations on who you are able to marry, regulations on who is allowed to be in the country and under what conditions, etc.
The marriage thing is ludicrous. I have many friends who are batting for the other team and think that needing the word "marriage" attached to their unions is completely unnecessary. They just want the same rights. If you proposed a situation where it was a legal union but not called marriage you'd be just fine and everyone would be getting what they want. From my understanding it is only the loud majority that are desperate for the word marriage.
Your understanding is not remotely correct.
Please enlighten me.
Homosexuals, or as you say, "people batting for the other team", would like to be treated equally. This includes, but is not limited to, calling their legal union "marriage" just like heterosexuals ("teammates" in your lexicon).
"treated equally" means what do you think? To me it means that both sides are found to be in a situation that allows them to continue to live their lives free. Would that be correct for you? It would also be fair that the government's responsibility are civic. The founding fathers were not after a government that could tell people what they could and could not believe.
The word "marriage" is arbitrary. If the word marriage is sacred to a christian who in turn things it is between a man and a woman that make his view point different from yours sure. What true equality is gained for both sides (definition of equal) by forcing people to change their moral beliefs? That is not what was intended by government power. That is why all the government should be able to do is change its civil structure. This would allow all the same rights to civil unions whether they be between people of differing or the same gender.
Post by: 8manpick on July 28, 2015, 10:00:53 AM
Post by: Yard Dog on July 28, 2015, 10:04:15 AM
Marriage isn't Christian you dolt, it's legal
the word "marriage" is arbitrary. What possible benefit could causing controversy have to the situation? I dont care if everyone can "get married" but at any point in time that our religious freedoms are being limited we should be just as outraged as if it was any other freedoms.
This country was built on the idea that the government could not tell us what to believe.
Post by: 8manpick on July 28, 2015, 10:05:46 AM
Post by: star seed 7 on July 28, 2015, 10:07:09 AM
Post by: 8manpick on July 28, 2015, 10:08:14 AM
Post by: Yard Dog on July 28, 2015, 10:13:48 AM
Whose religious freedom is being limited?
Anyone that would rather not provide a service to a homosexual couple because it goes against their beliefs. This situation might not be black and white so it in turn shouldn't be discussed that way. I don't support discrimination, but I also do not support a bakery having to close its doors because they didn't want to make a cake for someone.
A private business owner should have the right to refuse business to anyone. In a truly free market, if they are refusing business on a discriminatory standard than it will hurt their business and a competitor can arise to take that business and be successful.
You have absolutely no idea what you are saying yard dog
I know plenty about what I am saying. And, true to point, the liberals would rather attack me than have an open conversation. I have never understood this strategy. Growth comes from debate and discussion.
Post by: Yard Dog on July 28, 2015, 10:16:19 AM
This is the wrong thread and isn't worth the effort
Truer words have never been spoken. Until there is a place where opposing sides can have a real conversation, it is a complete waste of time. I respect your viewpoints are different from mine. But I am still flabbergasted that someone thinks that Ted Cruz is big government. (that's what started this whole thing)
Ted Cruz 2016!! WOOT
Post by: 8manpick on July 28, 2015, 10:16:23 AM
Whose religious freedom is being limited?
Anyone that would rather not provide a service to a homosexual couple because it goes against their beliefs. This situation might not be black and white so it in turn shouldn't be discussed that way. I don't support discrimination, but I also do not support a bakery having to close its doors because they didn't want to make a cake for someone.
A private business owner should have the right to refuse business to anyone. In a truly free market, if they are refusing business on a discriminatory standard than it will hurt their business and a competitor can arise to take that business and be successful.You have absolutely no idea what you are saying yard dog
I know plenty about what I am saying. And, true to point, the liberals would rather attack me than have an open conversation. I have never understood this strategy. Growth comes from debate and discussion.
We were talking about marriage, and for some reason you are talking about bakeries and businesses.
Post by: star seed 7 on July 28, 2015, 10:17:45 AM
Post by: Yard Dog on July 28, 2015, 10:20:31 AM
Whose religious freedom is being limited?
Anyone that would rather not provide a service to a homosexual couple because it goes against their beliefs. This situation might not be black and white so it in turn shouldn't be discussed that way. I don't support discrimination, but I also do not support a bakery having to close its doors because they didn't want to make a cake for someone.
A private business owner should have the right to refuse business to anyone. In a truly free market, if they are refusing business on a discriminatory standard than it will hurt their business and a competitor can arise to take that business and be successful.You have absolutely no idea what you are saying yard dog
I know plenty about what I am saying. And, true to point, the liberals would rather attack me than have an open conversation. I have never understood this strategy. Growth comes from debate and discussion.
We were talking about marriage, and for some reason you are talking about bakeries and businesses.
Those are direct correlations. You might not agree that the word marriage has a religious connection ( I think that it probably does, and those offended are not bigots). But you can agree that the change in that law is directly hurting religious freedoms due to its ripple effects (the business closures and discrimination lawsuits).
Post by: Yard Dog on July 28, 2015, 10:21:43 AM
You having no idea what you're talking about isn't an attack, I'm trying to motivate you into not having no idea what you're talking about
But it is easy to say "you're wrong" "you're a dolt" "you have no idea what you are talking about" (attacks) vs saying "this is my opposing view point and why I think that you might be misguided...."
Post by: 8manpick on July 28, 2015, 10:32:10 AM
We were talking about marriage, and for some reason you are talking about bakeries and businesses.
Those are direct correlations. You might not agree that the word marriage has a religious connection ( I think that it probably does, and those offended are not bigots). But you can agree that the change in that law is directly hurting religious freedoms due to its ripple effects (the business closures and discrimination lawsuits).
Sexual orientation is a protected class in those states irrespective of marriage. Those businesses are not allowed to deny service based on sexual orientation. The marriage is not the issue.
Also, I don't believe the courts of the justice system closed any of those businesses, the free market court of public opinion may have.
Post by: Asteriskhead on July 28, 2015, 10:52:05 AM
You having no idea what you're talking about isn't an attack, I'm trying to motivate you into not having no idea what you're talking about
But it is easy to say "you're wrong" "you're a dolt" "you have no idea what you are talking about" (attacks) vs saying "this is my opposing view point and why I think that you might be misguided...."
it is because you are wrong. there is no debate here. marriage, as defined by the state is a legal term. it doesn't matter what your definition of the term is. the state has a legal responsibility to offer all citizens the same treatment under the law. if you can't parse that out, you are a mental midget.
Post by: Winters on July 28, 2015, 11:00:56 AM
Quote
I side with Bernie Sanders on 86% of issues in the 2016 Presidential electionyay
Post by: star seed 7 on July 28, 2015, 11:04:28 AM
QuoteI side with Bernie Sanders on 86% of issues in the 2016 Presidential electionyay
:thumbs:
Post by: ChiComCat on July 28, 2015, 11:07:36 AM
Post by: Yard Dog on July 28, 2015, 11:21:55 AM
We were talking about marriage, and for some reason you are talking about bakeries and businesses.
Those are direct correlations. You might not agree that the word marriage has a religious connection ( I think that it probably does, and those offended are not bigots). But you can agree that the change in that law is directly hurting religious freedoms due to its ripple effects (the business closures and discrimination lawsuits).
Sexual orientation is a protected class in those states irrespective of marriage. Those businesses are not allowed to deny service based on sexual orientation. The marriage is not the issue.
That is such an interesting moral grey area. I understand and agree it is great that everyone be able to do whatever they want without fear that something about them will keep them from being allowed to access to what they see as basic human rights. Id be interested to know why a homosexual couple would go to a place that doesn't agree with the practice for the cake vs another that happily supports it. I also believe that baking a cake for a customer doesn't mean you support their lifestyle, but not everyone feels that way. This current situation is a "do these things or we will take what is yours" situation which is scary. If only because of the president it can set.
I'm glad we are doing something to battle discrimination, but in your perfect dream society how long is the list of protected classes? What protection is fair? Should it be that if I decide as a private business owner I don't want to serve KU fans that I should pay any KU fan that walks through my doors and I turn away hundreds of thousands of dollars in damages?
The situation affords us little retrospective knowledge. Time will allow us proper perspective, but in the meantime I would rather protect our civil liberties than thirty years from now be like, "whoops, should have tried to stop that." So I encourage us to think about this stuff instead of just letting it happen.
Quote
Also, I don't believe the courts of the justice system closed any of those businesses, the free market court of public opinion may have.
Nah, they had to close because the discrimination lawsuits granted the other side of the disagreement hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Post by: 8manpick on July 28, 2015, 11:30:15 AM
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on July 28, 2015, 11:35:21 AM
We were talking about marriage, and for some reason you are talking about bakeries and businesses.
Those are direct correlations. You might not agree that the word marriage has a religious connection ( I think that it probably does, and those offended are not bigots). But you can agree that the change in that law is directly hurting religious freedoms due to its ripple effects (the business closures and discrimination lawsuits).
Sexual orientation is a protected class in those states irrespective of marriage. Those businesses are not allowed to deny service based on sexual orientation. The marriage is not the issue.
That is such an interesting moral grey area. I understand and agree it is great that everyone be able to do whatever they want without fear that something about them will keep them from being allowed to access to what they see as basic human rights. Id be interested to know why a homosexual couple would go to a place that doesn't agree with the practice for the cake vs another that happily supports it. I also believe that baking a cake for a customer doesn't mean you support their lifestyle, but not everyone feels that way. This current situation is a "do these things or we will take what is yours" situation which is scary. If only because of the president it can set.
I'm glad we are doing something to battle discrimination, but in your perfect dream society how long is the list of protected classes? What protection is fair? Should it be that if I decide as a private business owner I don't want to serve KU fans that I should pay any KU fan that walks through my doors and I turn away hundreds of thousands of dollars in damages?
The situation affords us little retrospective knowledge. Time will allow us proper perspective, but in the meantime I would rather protect our civil liberties than thirty years from now be like, "whoops, should have tried to stop that." So I encourage us to think about this stuff instead of just letting it happen.
QuoteAlso, I don't believe the courts of the justice system closed any of those businesses, the free market court of public opinion may have.
Nah, they had to close because the discrimination lawsuits granted the other side of the disagreement hundreds of thousands of dollars.
There is no "do these things or we will take what is yours" situation. There is a "treat people like lesser humans because of how they were born and they can choose to sue you" situation.
Post by: star seed 7 on July 28, 2015, 11:48:19 AM
Post by: Yard Dog on July 28, 2015, 11:49:54 AM
Your idea that discrimination is an important civil liberty is strange. What if your religious belief is to not make cake for Muslims? Should they just go to more Muslim friendly stores?
That's the idea. It sounds disturbingly close to civil rights law. I am not pro segregation by any means. That's the downside to large ideas, they often don't have an obvious or immediate implication strategy. Such is the benefit of finding a common ground and encouraging a balance. I still think that private businesses have the right to serve who they want when they want, but not framed in discrimination. This whole situation is a battle of perspective.
Quote from: Rage Against the McKee
There is no "do these things or we will take what is yours" situation. There is a "treat people like lesser humans because of how they were born and they can choose to sue you" situation.
How is not providing them a cake from your private business treating them like lesser humans?
Post by: 8manpick on July 28, 2015, 11:55:27 AM
Post by: CNS on July 28, 2015, 11:55:38 AM
equal = equal. It's not hard. Even for the stupid. Any thing else something else and not the samething.
I could probably find a chart, or further prove it out in equation form if need be, but expecting that will do no good since the above is the simplest way to explain it and some aren't picking that up.
Post by: Yard Dog on July 28, 2015, 12:01:10 PM
DNR most of the last 2 pages of yarddog, but saying equal = free is stupid and a stupid door to what he and his are trying to use as a stupid opening to a stupid set of stupid principals based on stupid beliefs that lead to a stupid argument that isn't even the stupid argument.
equal = equal. It's not hard. Even for the stupid. Any thing else something else and not the samething.
I could probably find a chart, or further prove it out in equation form if need be, but expecting that will do no good since the above is the simplest way to explain it and some aren't picking that up.
I was attempting = to define what equal meant. Perhaps unsuccessfully. It is nice to say equal = equal, but do you mean that everyone should own and have equal things? Should everyone have the equal amount of power and wealth? Should everyone live in an equal house? Should everyone drive an equal car?
Inequality is what drives commerce and capitalism. The drive to raise one's position in life and the world. I think saying everyone should be equal is vague enough to be a dangerous concept.
But, if you define equal as being treated equal under the law of the government. I would agree whole heartedly.
Post by: CNS on July 28, 2015, 12:12:29 PM
DNR most of the last 2 pages of yarddog, but saying equal = free is stupid and a stupid door to what he and his are trying to use as a stupid opening to a stupid set of stupid principals based on stupid beliefs that lead to a stupid argument that isn't even the stupid argument.
equal = equal. It's not hard. Even for the stupid. Any thing else something else and not the samething.
I could probably find a chart, or further prove it out in equation form if need be, but expecting that will do no good since the above is the simplest way to explain it and some aren't picking that up.
I was attempting = to define what equal meant. Perhaps unsuccessfully. It is nice to say equal = equal, but do you mean that everyone should own and have equal things? Should everyone have the equal amount of power and wealth? Should everyone live in an equal house? Should everyone drive an equal car?
Inequality is what drives commerce and capitalism. The drive to raise one's position in life and the world. I think saying everyone should be equal is vague enough to be a dangerous concept.
But, if you define equal as being treated equal under the law of the government. I would agree whole heartedly.
Put it in front of any right you want and you get "equal rights". JFC
What the eff does equal marriage rights have to do with equal wealth? I mean, again, I would show this to you in equation form and prove it out, but it seems like I would be wasting my time. math and all.
Post by: star seed 7 on July 28, 2015, 12:13:27 PM
Post by: Yard Dog on July 28, 2015, 12:19:47 PM
DNR most of the last 2 pages of yarddog, but saying equal = free is stupid and a stupid door to what he and his are trying to use as a stupid opening to a stupid set of stupid principals based on stupid beliefs that lead to a stupid argument that isn't even the stupid argument.
equal = equal. It's not hard. Even for the stupid. Any thing else something else and not the samething.
I could probably find a chart, or further prove it out in equation form if need be, but expecting that will do no good since the above is the simplest way to explain it and some aren't picking that up.
I was attempting = to define what equal meant. Perhaps unsuccessfully. It is nice to say equal = equal, but do you mean that everyone should own and have equal things? Should everyone have the equal amount of power and wealth? Should everyone live in an equal house? Should everyone drive an equal car?
Inequality is what drives commerce and capitalism. The drive to raise one's position in life and the world. I think saying everyone should be equal is vague enough to be a dangerous concept.
But, if you define equal as being treated equal under the law of the government. I would agree whole heartedly.
Put it in front of any right you want and you get "equal rights". JFC
What the eff does equal marriage rights have to do with equal wealth? I mean, again, I would show this to you in equation form and prove it out, but it seems like I would be wasting my time. math and all.
Because you said I didn't understand that equal = equal.
So you are saying that your definition of equal applies to equal marriage only?
Post by: Yard Dog on July 28, 2015, 12:20:50 PM
You don't agree with equal treatment under the law though
I do.
Post by: CNS on July 28, 2015, 12:22:15 PM
DNR most of the last 2 pages of yarddog, but saying equal = free is stupid and a stupid door to what he and his are trying to use as a stupid opening to a stupid set of stupid principals based on stupid beliefs that lead to a stupid argument that isn't even the stupid argument.
equal = equal. It's not hard. Even for the stupid. Any thing else something else and not the samething.
I could probably find a chart, or further prove it out in equation form if need be, but expecting that will do no good since the above is the simplest way to explain it and some aren't picking that up.
I was attempting = to define what equal meant. Perhaps unsuccessfully. It is nice to say equal = equal, but do you mean that everyone should own and have equal things? Should everyone have the equal amount of power and wealth? Should everyone live in an equal house? Should everyone drive an equal car?
Inequality is what drives commerce and capitalism. The drive to raise one's position in life and the world. I think saying everyone should be equal is vague enough to be a dangerous concept.
But, if you define equal as being treated equal under the law of the government. I would agree whole heartedly.
Put it in front of any right you want and you get "equal rights". JFC
What the eff does equal marriage rights have to do with equal wealth? I mean, again, I would show this to you in equation form and prove it out, but it seems like I would be wasting my time. math and all.
Because you said I didn't understand that equal = equal.
So you are saying that your definition of equal applies to equal marriage only?
Nope. All rights that the govt currently allows citizens should be allowed to all citizens. Your example of wealth doesn't work. It's not a right.
Post by: star seed 7 on July 28, 2015, 12:25:32 PM
You don't agree with equal treatment under the law though
I do.
Like I said earlier, you have no idea what you're talking about
Post by: Mrs. Gooch on July 28, 2015, 12:43:34 PM
Id be interested to know why a homosexual couple would go to a place that doesn't agree with the practice for the cake vs another that happily supports it.
Similarly, why would a black person want to sit at a lunch counter where they are not wanted when they could clearly go to one that is happy to serve them?
Post by: Yard Dog on July 28, 2015, 02:30:34 PM
Id be interested to know why a homosexual couple would go to a place that doesn't agree with the practice for the cake vs another that happily supports it.
Similarly, why would a black person want to sit at a lunch counter where they are not wanted when they could clearly go to one that is happy to serve them?
My initial reaction is that it seems like that is a different thing all together. I do concur that the similarities are alarming. I would think any person who feels like they are unwelcome somewhere probably wouldn't want to go there, but that isn't saying that not being welcome is right. I think it is fair to say that purely as individuals not one person deserves to be blocked off from the same services as everyone else based on gender, religion, or sexual orientation.
The scary things are the extremes. It's the fear of governmental precedents really. I have nothing but love for my friends that are homosexual. I want them to be happy. I know couples that are better couples than straight couples I know.
That being said there is an interesting new topic coming to light. So, for arguments sake, what about polygamists and pedophiles who claimed to be "born that way". Now we as logical people would say "no one is born a polygamist or a pedophile, that is just some weird thing they should fix in their lives through psychiatric treatment and suppress those desires". Yet, that is the same thing people were saying about homosexuals for a long time. Will we eventually be okay with polygamy and pedophilia?
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jul/1/nathan-collier-sister-wives-polygamist-cites-gay-m/?page=all
http://standupforthetruth.com/2013/07/it-begins-pedophiles-call-for-same-rights-as-homosexuals/
http://www.wnd.com/2014/01/pedophilia-the-next-sexual-rights-revolution/
Both of those things to me are morally reprehensible. But, if it became more and more ok in everyday society, would I be a bigot to stand against it?
Post by: 8manpick on July 28, 2015, 02:33:07 PM
Post by: Institutional Control on July 28, 2015, 02:33:14 PM
There is nothing wrong with consenting adults having multiples spouses.
Post by: Mrs. Gooch on July 28, 2015, 02:41:02 PM
Love those links.
There is nothing wrong with consenting adults having multiples spouses.
I think it is fine to have multiple spouses as long as they know about each other. I know a lady whose husband had another secret family. :sdeek:
Post by: Yard Dog on July 28, 2015, 02:42:49 PM
Pedophilia has a victim when acted upon.
Agreed, but these groups are working at changing what is constituted as a victim.
Post by: 0.42 on July 28, 2015, 02:57:09 PM
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on July 28, 2015, 02:57:59 PM
Pedophilia has a victim when acted upon.
Agreed, but these groups are working at changing what is constituted as a victim.
Which groups? Bilderberg?
Post by: star seed 7 on July 28, 2015, 03:01:36 PM
As far as polygamists, who gives a crap
Post by: CNS on July 28, 2015, 03:24:55 PM
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
Post by: puniraptor on July 28, 2015, 03:59:21 PM
Post by: puniraptor on July 28, 2015, 04:01:06 PM
jesus god yard dog
this is me being incredulous that you forgot to post an article about people fighting for their right to marry their barnyard animals.
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on July 28, 2015, 04:06:34 PM
Post by: puniraptor on July 28, 2015, 04:07:38 PM
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/07/02/ryan-uhler-_n_7717160.html
slippery slope, eh yardog?
Post by: ChiComCat on July 28, 2015, 04:23:53 PM
Post by: Yard Dog on July 29, 2015, 07:50:20 AM
Gay marriage is all about monogamy. Gay people are totally going to do it no matter what anybody says. They just want to be monogamous. The Christian/Conservative war on monogamy is really upsetting to my personal beliefs in it.
So you are saying that marriage is the only way to guarantee monogamy?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/07/02/ryan-uhler-_n_7717160.html
slippery slope, eh yardog?
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FQEywSMz.gif&hash=7478610c5ceb723558a7b6b4132f96e470af67d4)
Post by: SdK on July 29, 2015, 12:28:50 PM
Post by: ChiComCat on July 29, 2015, 12:32:07 PM
Gay marriage is all about monogamy. Gay people are totally going to do it no matter what anybody says. They just want to be monogamous. The Christian/Conservative war on monogamy is really upsetting to my personal beliefs in it.
So you are saying that marriage is the only way to guarantee monogamy?
Marriage itself doesn't guarantee monogamy. It does promote it though.
Post by: star seed 7 on July 29, 2015, 12:49:55 PM
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/07/02/ryan-uhler-_n_7717160.html
Digital marketing specialist :lol:
Post by: michigancat on July 29, 2015, 02:08:43 PM
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/07/02/ryan-uhler-_n_7717160.html
Digital marketing specialist :lol:
Quote
"I was blindsided," he told The Huffington Post. "I didn't think anyone there knew how to use Facebook."
:lol:
Post by: renocat on July 29, 2015, 04:31:51 PM
Post by: Institutional Control on February 04, 2018, 04:28:07 PM
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Post by: Institutional Control on February 04, 2018, 04:28:25 PM
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Post by: gatoveintisiete on February 04, 2018, 06:29:39 PM
Post by: MakeItRain on February 04, 2018, 11:12:20 PM
(https://www.idrlabs.com/graphic/political-left-right?i=12&p=40,60)
Post by: catastrophe on February 05, 2018, 06:38:07 AM
[attachment deleted by admin]
Post by: sys on February 05, 2018, 09:30:15 AM
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 05, 2018, 09:35:19 AM
Post by: catastrophe on February 05, 2018, 10:27:01 AM
55% to the right, maybe cause i don't want to eat monkeys? dunno.
That wasn’t the question. I think you may need to retake it.
Post by: star seed 7 on February 05, 2018, 10:33:32 AM
Keeping it real :gocho:
Post by: LickNeckey on February 05, 2018, 10:34:23 AM
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on February 05, 2018, 10:35:00 AM
Post by: sys on February 05, 2018, 10:35:52 AM
That wasn’t the question. I think you may need to retake it.
i considered other interpretations, but decided that given circumstances sufficiently extreme, i'd eat anything eatable. as this would not distinguish me from other humans, i answered the question they meant to ask.
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on February 05, 2018, 10:40:14 AM
Post by: MakeItRain on February 05, 2018, 11:17:00 AM
Post by: catastrophe on February 05, 2018, 12:25:35 PM
Post by: sys on April 04, 2020, 12:46:21 AM
Economic: -1.23
Social: -6.87
Center-Leftist/Social Libertarian
still a corrupt corporate dem in 2015. hmm.
Post by: sys on April 04, 2020, 01:32:31 AM
QuoteEconomic score: -0.52
Social score: -7.3
Your score pegs you as economically centrist and socially far-leftist.
Economic centrists generally support economic policy that they see as fit for specific situations, although they may have different views relating to taxes and regulation.
Social far-leftists generally believe that the government has no business enforcing morality on most matters, instead favoring a government that intervenes only when absolutely necessary to avoid direct harm. Many social far-leftists also look negatively on the government's past attitudes toward groups they view as persecuted, although some simply oppose government intervention on utilitarianist grounds.
apparently, i group with 8man, puni and cns. although i am happy to note that i am socially more extreme than any of them.
Quote from: 2020 sys
Economic score: -2.39
Social score: -7.39
Your score pegs you as economically center-leftist and socially far-leftist.
Economic center-leftists typically support above average controls on free trade, raising or maintaining the current tax levels, but still support free trade.
Social far-leftists generally believe that the government has no business enforcing morality on most matters, instead favoring a government that intervenes only when absolutely necessary to avoid direct harm. Many social far-leftists also look negatively on the government's past attitudes toward groups they view as persecuted, although some simply oppose government intervention on utilitarianist grounds.
Post by: nicname on April 04, 2020, 02:30:48 AM
Social score: -3.3
Your score pegs you as economically centrist and socially moderately libertarian.
Economic centrists generally support economic policy that they see as fit for specific situations, although they may have different views relating to taxes and regulation.
Moderate social libertarians generally favor a hands-off approach to social legislation. They may believe that the government has no right to enforce morals, but may support certain controls on individual rights to avoid crime, drug use, or similar social ills.
Post by: Spracne on April 04, 2020, 02:36:19 AM
Economic score: -0.39
Social score: -3.3
Your score pegs you as economically centrist and socially moderately libertarian.
Economic centrists generally support economic policy that they see as fit for specific situations, although they may have different views relating to taxes and regulation.
Moderate social libertarians generally favor a hands-off approach to social legislation. They may believe that the government has no right to enforce morals, but may support certain controls on individual rights to avoid crime, drug use, or similar social ills.
I got the sames.
Post by: nicname on April 04, 2020, 02:43:59 AM
Economic score: -0.39
Social score: -3.3
Your score pegs you as economically centrist and socially moderately libertarian.
Economic centrists generally support economic policy that they see as fit for specific situations, although they may have different views relating to taxes and regulation.
Moderate social libertarians generally favor a hands-off approach to social legislation. They may believe that the government has no right to enforce morals, but may support certain controls on individual rights to avoid crime, drug use, or similar social ills.
I got the sames.
I think we're "The hippie"
On the older political compass one, one im border of hippie and progressive. i think i used to be sovereign citizen or border of sovereign citizen/ cowboy. I think that's an improvement. Sovereign citizen looks like a weirdo.
Post by: star seed 7 on April 04, 2020, 03:25:45 PM
bernie 96%! :fatty:
97‰ :gocho:
Oh man lol
Post by: star seed 7 on April 04, 2020, 03:34:18 PM
http://uselectionatlas.org/TOOLS/POLMTX/index.phpQuoteEconomic score: -4.9
Social score: -6.26
Your score pegs you as economically moderately leftist and socially libertarian.
Moderate economic leftists generally support regulation of free trade and business to assure that workers are fairly treated and prices remain stable.
Social libertarians generally believe that the government should not judge morality, and are generally against the illegalization of things that do not directly affect other people in a negative way. Many strong social libertarians may also be social progressives, favoring legislation to correct what they see as socially backwards governmental regulation, although some simply wish for the government to make little judgment on social matters.
basically says i'm a great human being
Quote
Economic score: -5.68
Social score: -6.61Note your scores and Login to your Atlas Account to Save your Scores
Your score pegs you as economically leftist and socially libertarian.
Economic leftists mostly support strict economic controls and programs to assure that the poor are elevated to a higher position in society.
Social libertarians generally believe that the government should not judge morality, and are generally against the illegalization of things that do not directly affect other people in a negative way. Many strong social libertarians may also be social progressives, favoring legislation to correct what they see as socially backwards governmental regulation, although some simply wish for the government to make little judgment on social matters.
Still a great human but slightly more socialist.
Post by: sys on April 04, 2020, 04:09:49 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on April 04, 2020, 04:16:32 PM
we need to get katkid to talk about how he was radicalized.
It's got to be the several dozen children he spawned
Post by: sys on April 04, 2020, 04:41:29 PM
the ancom should be relabeled the breeder.
Post by: Kat Kid on April 04, 2020, 04:58:38 PM
:gocho:
Post by: 8manpick on April 06, 2020, 01:42:31 PM
Post by: 8manpick on April 06, 2020, 01:43:52 PM
Economic score: -0.52Haven't changed much, which is kind of surprising... Would have guessed I'd slid left
Social score: -6.09
Your score pegs you as economically centristand socially libertarian.
Economic centrists generally support economic policy that they see as fit for specific situations, although they may have different views relating to taxes and regulation.
Social libertarians generally believe that the government should not judge morality, and are generally against the illegalization of things that do not directly affect other people in a negative way. Many strong social libertarians may also be social progressives, favoring legislation to correct what they see as socially backwards governmental regulation, although some simply wish for the government to make little judgment on social matters.
Post by: steve dave on April 06, 2020, 01:48:24 PM
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20200406/44b00e4effe9b7fbfda86ee5b5db1230.jpg)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Post by: steve dave on April 06, 2020, 01:48:54 PM
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Post by: 8manpick on April 06, 2020, 10:52:03 PM
Adding an earlier oneEconomic score: -0.52Haven't changed much, which is kind of surprising... Would have guessed I'd slid left
Social score: -6.09
Your score pegs you as economically centristand socially libertarian.
Economic centrists generally support economic policy that they see as fit for specific situations, although they may have different views relating to taxes and regulation.
Social libertarians generally believe that the government should not judge morality, and are generally against the illegalization of things that do not directly affect other people in a negative way. Many strong social libertarians may also be social progressives, favoring legislation to correct what they see as socially backwards governmental regulation, although some simply wish for the government to make little judgment on social matters.
Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: -0.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.23
Post by: Stevesie60 on April 07, 2020, 09:36:30 AM
Social score: -5.74
Your score pegs you as economically moderately leftist and socially libertarian.
Further left than I thought!
Post by: CHONGS on April 07, 2020, 09:48:05 AM
Economic score: -1.68
Social score: -4.00
Note your scores and Login to your Atlas Account to Save your Scores
Your score pegs you as economically center-leftist and socially moderately libertarian.
Economic center-leftists typically support above average controls on free trade, raising or maintaining the current tax levels, but still support free trade.
Moderate social libertarians generally favor a hands-off approach to social legislation. They may believe that the government has no right to enforce morals, but may support certain controls on individual rights to avoid crime, drug use, or similar social ills.
Economic score: -1.94
Social score: -4.7
Your score pegs you as economically center-leftist and socially moderately libertarian.
Post by: Kat Kid on April 07, 2020, 01:12:18 PM
Post by: sys on April 07, 2020, 05:22:51 PM
Economic score: -1.94
Social score: -4.7
Your score pegs you as economically center-leftist and socially moderately libertarian.
hello, chingon. welcome home.
Post by: DQ12 on April 07, 2020, 05:43:47 PM
Social -3.13
Post by: steve dave on April 07, 2020, 05:56:37 PM
Economic -1.03Good grief libtard
Social -3.13
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Post by: 8manpick on April 07, 2020, 06:44:37 PM
GahhhEconomic -1.03Good grief libtard
Social -3.13
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Post by: CHONGS on April 07, 2020, 07:10:47 PM
I've always been here.Economic score: -1.94
Social score: -4.7
Your score pegs you as economically center-leftist and socially moderately libertarian.
hello, chingon. welcome home.
Post by: sys on April 07, 2020, 07:13:17 PM
Post by: CHONGS on April 07, 2020, 07:21:15 PM
Post by: sys on April 07, 2020, 07:36:29 PM
Post by: steve dave on April 07, 2020, 09:11:17 PM
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Post by: michigancat on April 07, 2020, 09:14:01 PM
Post by: MakeItRain on April 07, 2020, 09:58:16 PM
Post by: sys on April 07, 2020, 11:06:58 PM
LOL sys being an anti populist is as pure a description as it gets
sad to see big pharma kill off this cheap effective home remedy.
https://twitter.com/joshgerstein/status/1247682413687222272
Post by: michigancat on August 14, 2020, 09:38:50 AM
https://twitter.com/GutianGang/status/1294106593299030016
Post by: sonofdaxjones on August 14, 2020, 09:53:19 AM
Social score: -0.17Note your scores and Login to your Atlas Account to Save your Scores
Your score pegs you as economically centrist and socially centrist.
Post by: nicname on August 14, 2020, 03:48:43 PM
what is the thread for these
https://twitter.com/GutianGang/status/1294106593299030016
:ROFL: I’ve transitioned from Time Waster to Doomer. Pretty accurate.
Post by: terrypippa on July 29, 2021, 11:41:24 AM
Post by: nicname on July 29, 2021, 01:18:42 PM
what is the thread for these
https://twitter.com/GutianGang/status/1294106593299030016
:ROFL: I’ve transitioned from Time Waster to Doomer. Pretty accurate.
Back to time waster.
Post by: star seed 7 on December 07, 2021, 07:10:28 PM
Post by: chum1 on December 07, 2021, 07:55:58 PM
Post by: Kat Kid on December 07, 2021, 08:04:48 PM
Post by: michigancat on January 26, 2022, 08:57:02 PM
Post by: Kat Kid on January 26, 2022, 08:58:55 PM
I think a Nixon one would be particularly good.
Post by: nicname on January 26, 2022, 10:17:02 PM
(https://www.surlyhorns.com/board/uploads/monthly_2021_11/Screenshot_20211125-085141.png.596b9624bcc61f2cc09f05e198256342.png)
Amazing
Post by: michigancat on April 14, 2022, 12:27:23 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on April 14, 2022, 12:29:11 PM
Post by: catastrophe on April 14, 2022, 12:59:28 PM
Post by: MakeItRain on February 14, 2023, 01:26:31 AM
https://www.idrlabs.com/jock-nerd-prep-goth/test.php
(https://i.ibb.co/M5mPH1y/Screenshot-20230214-011828.png)
(https://i.ibb.co/j3YD19r/Screenshot-20230214-011915.png)
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 14, 2023, 11:39:31 AM
(https://www.idrlabs.com/misc_pictures/jock-nerd-prep-goth-reference-en.png)
Quote
True Nerds are highly knowledgeable and enthusiastic about particular academic or technical subjects. Nerds are sometimes seen as being more interested in academics, technology, or other "nerdy" pursuits than in popular culture or mainstream social activities. Nerds often spend a lot of time and energy pursuing their interests, to the point where others can regard them as a bit obsessed with their hobbies.
Post by: passranch on February 14, 2023, 04:09:43 PM
Quote
Jock-Nerd/Prep-Goth Test
Result:
You are 26.7% Prep, tied between Jock and Nerd, placing you in the Normie category.
Dangerously close to True Prep category, sheesh.
Post by: CNS on February 14, 2023, 05:00:14 PM
Post by: Stevesie60 on February 14, 2023, 05:05:27 PM
Post by: bucket on February 14, 2023, 05:21:35 PM
Post by: nicname on February 14, 2023, 06:10:48 PM
Post by: Pete on February 14, 2023, 06:15:33 PM
Quote
You are 26.7% Prep, 47.5% Nerd, placing you in the True Nerd category.
True Nerds are highly knowledgeable and enthusiastic about particular academic or technical subjects. Nerds are sometimes seen as being more interested in academics, technology, or other "nerdy" pursuits than in popular culture or mainstream social activities. Nerds often spend a lot of time and energy pursuing their interests, to the point where others can regard them as a bit obsessed with their hobbies.
Post by: CNS on February 14, 2023, 06:16:41 PM
Was at the four corners of goth, punk, jock and normie. Was in the normie square tho.
We are neighbors. I was one block east.
Post by: Spracne on February 14, 2023, 07:41:06 PM
Quote
You are 22.5% Prep, 18.3% Nerd, placing you in the Normie category.
Quote
A Normie is often associated with conventional values, tastes, and interests and is seen as being part of a larger group that is just known for being normal. The term is often used pejoratively by people who see themselves as being outside the mainstream, but it can also be used in a neutral or positive way to describe someone who is well-adjusted and has a healthy sense of what is considered normal and acceptable in society.
Post by: DaBigTrain on February 14, 2023, 07:47:42 PM
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20230215/ef1d7a2b3fa646b4b8295f8305dbed68.jpg)
Post by: Spracne on February 14, 2023, 08:03:19 PM
Post by: DaBigTrain on February 14, 2023, 08:13:07 PM
Really? I was thinking more of a jock as I held your Lego replica of the moon lander in my lap. :cheers:Dude LOL!!!! I completely forgot about that :lol: :lol: :lol:
I have legit tears from crying laughing right now
Post by: dal9 on February 14, 2023, 08:39:47 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4u29MoqY01k
Post by: Tobias on February 15, 2023, 02:01:42 AM
Post by: sys on February 15, 2023, 07:49:39 AM
(https://www.idrlabs.com/jock-nerd-prep-goth/1/18.3/2/22.5/graph.png)QuoteYou are 22.5% Prep, 18.3% Nerd, placing you in the Normie category.
pretty much the same. a fraction more nerd.
Post by: 8manpick on February 15, 2023, 07:59:57 AM
Post by: Kat Kid on February 15, 2023, 10:34:10 AM
Post by: Stevesie60 on February 15, 2023, 10:13:56 PM
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20230215/6c22fbe844673be9e63bf120ce7dbc4e.jpg)
I take back disliking the test. If I'm in the same category as Tobias, then this quiz is fantastic.
Post by: MakeItRain on February 15, 2023, 10:28:36 PM
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20230215/07830feeaf422b3a58ddc5187f45a967.jpg)
No surprise that kat kid and I are neighbors
Post by: nicname on February 15, 2023, 10:42:58 PM
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Post by: michigancat on August 05, 2023, 09:04:12 AM
Post by: Cire on August 05, 2023, 09:25:08 AM
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Post by: Tobias on August 05, 2023, 09:29:49 AM
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20230805/333edd39c27c8dbac3f45e3583e6da80.jpg)
:lol:
Post by: steve dave on August 05, 2023, 01:59:21 PM
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20230805/333edd39c27c8dbac3f45e3583e6da80.jpg)That’s very good
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk