goemaw.com
TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: Dr.Spaceman on March 29, 2010, 09:59:41 AM
-
http://espn.go.com/blog/ncfnation/post/_/id/20845/qa-kansas-state-coach-bill-snyder
:lynchmob:
-
but I think the fact that there are no hidden secrets. Every youngster out there
NO DIAMONDS IN THE ROUGH!
:runaway:
-
cyberspace
:facepalm:
-
Things are moving too fast for me and my staff. Thank God for transfers.
-
jfc, the only thing that will make this season ok is that it's going to be hilarious.
-
I think offensively we might be ok. Defense is going to be a trainwreck.
-
I think offensively we might be ok. Defense is going to be a trainwreck.
:surprised:
-
At least Snyds isn't a laughing stock like Gill will be
-
Started reading/fell asleep
-
Read the title of thread and thought this was an early April Fool's joke.
-
and here's part two: http://espn.go.com/blog/ncfnation/post/_/id/20849/part-two-qa-with-bill-snyder
-
and here's part two: http://espn.go.com/blog/ncfnation/post/_/id/20849/part-two-qa-with-bill-snyder
on Ducks/Canes series
LHC Bill Snyder: (Laughs) I’m not going to go to those games now, whether they remain scheduled or not. Yeah, that’s just not our philosophy in regards to scheduling. And that doesn’t help. That doesn’t assist our program.
how much money are we going to spend buying out these games?
-
dgp7575 (3/29/2010 at 8:50 AM) LHC Bill Snyder, you my only friend.
:lol:
-
and here's part two: http://espn.go.com/blog/ncfnation/post/_/id/20849/part-two-qa-with-bill-snyder
on Ducks/Canes series
LHC Bill Snyder: (Laughs) I’m not going to go to those games now, whether they remain scheduled or not. Yeah, that’s just not our philosophy in regards to scheduling. And that doesn’t help. That doesn’t assist our program.
how much money are we going to spend buying out these games?
Given I'd like basketball to continue not sucking, I am hoping zero (0) dollars ($).
-
I'd rather watch us get beat on national television to miami than to watch us beat/lose to western kentucky on fsnkc
:zzz: <--- our schedule again, now that Old Ballz is back.
-
We’ve never had at Kansas State, and I don’t think we’re the only team that way, we started this thing with 47 guys on scholarship when you could have 85. And we never, ever caught up to the full 85 during my 17-year tenure here.
:facepalm:
And bill shouldn't be allowed to get out of any games unless it costs us zero dollars.
-
At least Snyds isn't a laughing stock like Gill will be
Critter Christmas!
-
I'd rather watch us get beat on national television to miami than to watch us beat/lose to western kentucky on fsnkc
Really?
-
I'd rather watch us get beat on national television to miami than to watch us beat/lose to western kentucky on fsnkc
Really?
you mean you'd rather watch us play some no-name team in a boring, 10-3 type game? As opposed to a high def ESPN broadcast against an elite team?
We're going to suck for the next several years...I'd hope we all can face that fact. I'd much rather lose on ESPN against a big name school than to lose against a La-La type team on a regional broadcast.
Maybe I'm alone in this, I dunno. :dunno:
-
I'd rather watch us get beat on national television to miami than to watch us beat/lose to western kentucky on fsnkc
Really?
you mean you'd rather watch us play some no-name team in a boring, 10-3 type game? As opposed to a high def ESPN broadcast against an elite team?
We're going to suck for the next several years...I'd hope we all can face that fact. I'd much rather lose on ESPN against a big name school than to lose against a La-La type team on a regional broadcast.
Maybe I'm alone in this, I dunno. :dunno:
I'm with you. The UCLA loss was a billion times more fun than the LaLa loss.
-
I'd rather watch us get beat on national television to miami than to watch us beat/lose to western kentucky on fsnkc
Really?
you mean you'd rather watch us play some no-name team in a boring, 10-3 type game? As opposed to a high def ESPN broadcast against an elite team?
We're going to suck for the next several years...I'd hope we all can face that fact. I'd much rather lose on ESPN against a big name school than to lose against a La-La type team on a regional broadcast.
Maybe I'm alone in this, I dunno. :dunno:
I'd rather win enough games to be bowl eligible. Besides, you said "I'd rather watch us get beat on national television to miami than to watch us beat/lose to western kentucky"
Much rather watch us beat a WKU than lose to anyone in the non-con. Football non-cons are entirely different from bball non-cons. Bad teams (and even mediocre/above average teams) in BCS conferences should just get their four non-con wins and get out. Bowl eligibility and the extra month of practice trump "national exposure" games.
Replace Auburn, Fresno and UL with some WKUs during the Prince tenure, and even a trainwreck program suddenly finds four extra wins and three consecutive bowl eligible seasons (not to mention three extra months of practice in a sport that tightly restricts practice time).
Until we can play Miamis/Oregons or USCs again, it's pointless and unnecessarily self-defeating to even have them on the schedule.
-
I'd rather watch us get beat on national television to miami than to watch us beat/lose to western kentucky on fsnkc
Really?
you mean you'd rather watch us play some no-name team in a boring, 10-3 type game? As opposed to a high def ESPN broadcast against an elite team?
We're going to suck for the next several years...I'd hope we all can face that fact. I'd much rather lose on ESPN against a big name school than to lose against a La-La type team on a regional broadcast.
Maybe I'm alone in this, I dunno. :dunno:
I'd rather win enough games to be bowl eligible. Besides, you said "I'd rather watch us get beat on national television to miami than to watch us beat/lose to western kentucky"
Much rather watch us beat a WKU than lose to anyone in the non-con. Football non-cons are entirely different from bball non-cons. Bad teams (and even mediocre/above average teams) in BCS conferences should just get their four non-con wins and get out. Bowl eligibility and the extra month of practice trump "national exposure" games.
Replace Auburn, Fresno and UL with some WKUs during the Prince tenure, and even a trainwreck program suddenly finds four extra wins and three consecutive bowl eligible seasons (not to mention three extra months of practice in a sport that tightly restricts practice time).
Until we can play Miamis/Oregons or USCs again, it's pointless and unnecessarily self-defeating to even have them on the schedule.
The problem with your theory is the part where you assumed we would beat WKU.
-
I'm just talking about the fun level. I'd rather watch Miami play than Western Kentucky.
I don't give a crap about the well-being of the program. We're going to suck for the next several years, or at least until Old Ballz goes away.
-
For a program that didn't play in a bowl last year and plays in a relatively easy division, to volunteer to go on the road and be someone else's decent non-con win is so moronic I don't see how anyone can defend it. Bowl eligibility should be the goal. Not flying coast to coast to play a close game against a name team that also pretty much sucks (Miami, UCLA)
"Oh yay, we are getting drilled by Miami in high def. I had all my friends over and our wives hung out in the kitchen while me and my buddies drank a couple beers a piece and played Texas Hold 'em. What a great weekend. I am going to post pics on Facebook!"
Sometimes our fans are idiots.
-
For a program that didn't play in a bowl last year and plays in a relatively easy division, to volunteer to go on the road and be someone else's decent non-con win is so moronic I don't see how anyone can defend it. Bowl eligibility should be the goal. Not flying coast to coast to play a close game against a name team that also pretty much sucks (Miami, UCLA)
"Oh yay, we are getting drilled by Miami in high def. I had all my friends over and our wives hung out in the kitchen while me and my buddies drank a couple beers a piece and played Texas Hold 'em. What a great weekend. I am going to post pics on Facebook!"
Sometimes our fans are idiots.
Being in a bowl kicks the snot out of being 5-6. If we were a 2-9 kind of team, I'd totally get the love for playing Miami. Likewise if we were a 9-2 kind of team. Unfortunately, we are neither of those things. Bring on the cupcakes!
-
For a program that didn't play in a bowl last year and plays in a relatively easy division, to volunteer to go on the road and be someone else's decent non-con win is so moronic I don't see how anyone can defend it. Bowl eligibility should be the goal. Not flying coast to coast to play a close game against a name team that also pretty much sucks (Miami, UCLA)
We can't just pay sh*tty teams to come play us any more. We're going to have to go on the road to play (and lose) to f*cking Sun Belt teams. Bottom line, WE'RE GOING TO LOSE EITHER WAY.
-
bowl games are for gheys
-
Kinda doubt a game vs WKU is goin g to help wiith recruiting in any way. At least the national exposure helps, especially if that game ends in a win vs a big name program in a fertile recruitng state. Seems like games vs a relatively weak UCLA or Miami is not a bad thing. Florida or USC, not so much.
-
Kinda doubt a game vs WKU is goin g to help wiith recruiting in any way. At least the national exposure helps, especially if that game ends in a win vs a big name program in a fertile recruitng state. Seems like games vs a relatively weak UCLA or Miami is not a bad thing. Florida or USC, not so much.
You think that loss to UCLA last year was better for recruiting than a bowl trip?
-
And michcat, you and OK should 100% behind beating enough shitty teams to get bowl eligible a few years in a row. You know what that would do?
"Calm the waters", that's what.
When you're program-building, you should always play teams a little/lot worse than you whenever you can control it. I mean, name the four non-con teams that Alabama rolled over last year? How'd that help their recruiting?
-
And michcat, you and OK should 100% behind beating enough shitty teams to get bowl eligible a few years in a row. You know what that would do?
"Calm the waters", that's what.
When you're program-building, you should always play teams a little/lot worse than you whenever you can control it. I mean, name the four non-con teams that Alabama rolled over last year? How'd that help their recruiting?
Virginia Tech?
And you keep ignoring what I'm saying. WE CAN'T BEAT ENOUGH SHITTY TEAMS TO GET BOWL ELIGIBLE.
-
Quit treating LaLa like it was anything but an aberration. We would have beat them fairly easily by the end of the year.
-
All I'm saying is that we're a shitty team so we should be allowed to enjoy watching big name schools kick our ass. Feels better than little schools kicking our ass.
Also, scheduling small schools doesn't = winning/getting better
Recruiting/smart coaching = winning/getting better
So really, until our retirement village of a coaching staff leaves, it doesn't matter who we play, we're going to lose.
-
Kinda doubt a game vs WKU is goin g to help wiith recruiting in any way. At least the national exposure helps, especially if that game ends in a win vs a big name program in a fertile recruitng state. Seems like games vs a relatively weak UCLA or Miami is not a bad thing. Florida or USC, not so much.
You think that loss to UCLA last year was better for recruiting than a bowl trip?
I think having crappy assistants hurts our recruiting. Good Assistants = Good Recruits = We don't worry about stupid things like bowl games and whether or not the LaLa game is on TV.
I mean, jfc, would the NIT have really helped Wooly? No. We’re arguing over the better band aid for the massive head wound the program has. we f'ing suck.
-
All I'm saying is that we're a shitty team so we should be allowed to enjoy watching big name schools kick our ass. Feels better than little schools kicking our ass.
Also, scheduling small schools doesn't = winning/getting better
Recruiting/smart coaching = winning/getting better
So really, until our retirement village of a coaching staff leaves, it doesn't matter who we play, we're going to lose.
Do you enjoy watching big name schools kick our ass? :dunno:
Am I forgetting another loss to a small school last year? JFC, ULL's kicker hit a career-long FG in the rain to beat us at the last second with rough ridin' Carson Coffman at QB. It's not like we're regularly getting trounced by Sun Belt teams.
Scheduling smaller schools does equal winning, and winning equals bowl trips and bowl trips equal better recruiting and a more stable program.
I don't understand the mindset of "We'll never win with Snyder here so I'd rather lose a lot to awesome teams until he leaves."
We still get ISU, CU and KU in the north. Throw in four non-con creampuffs, and we're winning 7-8 games a year and going to bowls. WTF is wrong with that?
-
We need to keep North Texas on the schedule to get that "Greek guy" to comeback and post.
-
All I'm saying is that we're a shitty team so we should be allowed to enjoy watching big name schools kick our ass. Feels better than little schools kicking our ass.
Also, scheduling small schools doesn't = winning/getting better
Recruiting/smart coaching = winning/getting better
So really, until our retirement village of a coaching staff leaves, it doesn't matter who we play, we're going to lose.
Do you enjoy watching big name schools kick our ass? :dunno:
Am I forgetting another loss to a small school last year? JFC, ULL's kicker hit a career-long FG in the rain to beat us at the last second with fracking Carson Coffman at QB. It's not like we're regularly getting trounced by Sun Belt teams.
Scheduling smaller schools does equal winning, and winning equals bowl trips and bowl trips equal better recruiting and a more stable program.
I don't understand the mindset of "We'll never win with Snyder here so I'd rather lose a lot to awesome teams until he leaves."
We still get ISU, CU and KU in the north. Throw in four non-con creampuffs, and we're winning 7-8 games a year and going to bowls. WTF is wrong with that?
You can't schedule like we did in 98. KSU is doing home-home series with UCF and North Texas and ULL, because we can't afford to pay 4 FBS schools to come in for guarantee games.
Also, if we're good enough to win 8/year, WTF is the harm in playing a non-sh*tty OOC opponent?
-
All I'm saying is that we're a shitty team so we should be allowed to enjoy watching big name schools kick our ass. Feels better than little schools kicking our ass.
That is Ricky Martin-esque gay. Stop saying dumb crap.
-
All I'm saying is that we're a shitty team so we should be allowed to enjoy watching big name schools kick our ass. Feels better than little schools kicking our ass.
Also, scheduling small schools doesn't = winning/getting better
Recruiting/smart coaching = winning/getting better
So really, until our retirement village of a coaching staff leaves, it doesn't matter who we play, we're going to lose.
Do you enjoy watching big name schools kick our ass? :dunno:
Am I forgetting another loss to a small school last year? JFC, ULL's kicker hit a career-long FG in the rain to beat us at the last second with fracking Carson Coffman at QB. It's not like we're regularly getting trounced by Sun Belt teams.
Scheduling smaller schools does equal winning, and winning equals bowl trips and bowl trips equal better recruiting and a more stable program.
I don't understand the mindset of "We'll never win with Snyder here so I'd rather lose a lot to awesome teams until he leaves."
We still get ISU, CU and KU in the north. Throw in four non-con creampuffs, and we're winning 7-8 games a year and going to bowls. WTF is wrong with that?
You can't schedule like we did in 98. KSU is doing home-home series with UCF and North Texas and ULL, because we can't afford to pay 4 FBS schools to come in for guarantee games.
Also, if we're good enough to win 8/year, WTF is the harm in playing a non-sh*tty OOC opponent?
Only because everyone now schedules like we did in 98 and there aren't enough rummies to go around.
This talking point has been proven wrong for 15 years. can we ditch it?
-
All I'm saying is that we're a shitty team so we should be allowed to enjoy watching big name schools kick our ass. Feels better than little schools kicking our ass.
Also, scheduling small schools doesn't = winning/getting better
Recruiting/smart coaching = winning/getting better
So really, until our retirement village of a coaching staff leaves, it doesn't matter who we play, we're going to lose.
Do you enjoy watching big name schools kick our ass? :dunno:
Am I forgetting another loss to a small school last year? JFC, ULL's kicker hit a career-long FG in the rain to beat us at the last second with fracking Carson Coffman at QB. It's not like we're regularly getting trounced by Sun Belt teams.
Scheduling smaller schools does equal winning, and winning equals bowl trips and bowl trips equal better recruiting and a more stable program.
I don't understand the mindset of "We'll never win with Snyder here so I'd rather lose a lot to awesome teams until he leaves."
We still get ISU, CU and KU in the north. Throw in four non-con creampuffs, and we're winning 7-8 games a year and going to bowls. WTF is wrong with that?
You can't schedule like we did in 98. KSU is doing home-home series with UCF and North Texas and ULL, because we can't afford to pay 4 FBS schools to come in for guarantee games.
Also, if we're good enough to win 8/year, WTF is the harm in playing a non-sh*tty OOC opponent?
I didn't say we had to play them all at home. Teams not named Alabama play OOC road games now. And that's 7-8/yr with four shitty OOCs. Do that for a few years, win some bowl games, then throw in something some games against non-shitty teams.
-
would getting to a bowl game make del miller a better recruiter? i mean, I guess it couldn't hurt his recruiting.
and getting 2 for 1's with mid majors instead of getting home/home's from bcs teams is absurdly stupid.
-
All I'm saying is that we're a shitty team so we should be allowed to enjoy watching big name schools kick our ass. Feels better than little schools kicking our ass.
That is Ricky Martin-esque gay. Stop saying dumb crap.
What's so gay about that? We're not a very good team. I'd rather enjoy the game watching a big name team than watch some La-La school beat us. At least we'd be getting paid for it, right? :dunno:
There is absolutely no reason to believe that we'll be an above .500 team this season.
-
For a program that didn't play in a bowl last year and plays in a relatively easy division, to volunteer to go on the road and be someone else's decent non-con win is so moronic I don't see how anyone can defend it. Bowl eligibility should be the goal. Not flying coast to coast to play a close game against a name team that also pretty much sucks (Miami, UCLA)
We can't just pay sh*tty teams to come play us any more. We're going to have to go on the road to play (and lose) to f*cking Sun Belt teams. Bottom line, WE'RE GOING TO LOSE EITHER WAY.
Look at some of the bowl eligible teams last season. And the season before that.
-
All I'm saying is that we're a shitty team so we should be allowed to enjoy watching big name schools kick our ass. Feels better than little schools kicking our ass.
That is Ricky Martin-esque gay. Stop saying dumb crap.
What's so gay about that? We're not a very good team. I'd rather enjoy the game watching a big name team than watch some La-La school beat us. At least we'd be getting paid for it, right? :dunno:
There is absolutely no reason to believe that we'll be an above .500 team this season.
Every sports bar on the entire continent has "big name teams" playing on huge HD televisions every saturday from late August until after New Years. Have at it.
If you are having some "big name team watching" deficiency, the KSU schedule makers cannot help you.
-
There is absolutely no reason to believe that we'll be an above .500 team this season.
Really, you don't think we can squeeze 6 wins out of that schedule?
UCLA
Mizzou State
Iowa State
Central Florida
Nebraska
@KU
@Baylor
Oklahoma State
Texas
@ Mizzou
@Colorado
@North Texas
-
For a program that didn't play in a bowl last year and plays in a relatively easy division, to volunteer to go on the road and be someone else's decent non-con win is so moronic I don't see how anyone can defend it. Bowl eligibility should be the goal. Not flying coast to coast to play a close game against a name team that also pretty much sucks (Miami, UCLA)
We can't just pay sh*tty teams to come play us any more. We're going to have to go on the road to play (and lose) to f*cking Sun Belt teams. Bottom line, WE'RE GOING TO LOSE EITHER WAY.
Look at some of the bowl eligible teams last season. And the season before that.
what should I be looking for? OOC schedules without BCS opponents? Good luck w/ that.
-
There is absolutely no reason to believe that we'll be an above .500 team this season.
Really, you don't think we can squeeze 6 wins out of that schedule?
UCLA
Mizzou State
Iowa State
Central Florida
Nebraska
@KU
@Baylor
Oklahoma State
Texas
@ Mizzou
@Colorado
@North Texas
What are the odds that it does NOT come down to the North Texas game? I say 40%.
-
There is absolutely no reason to believe that we'll be an above .500 team this season.
Really, you don't think we can squeeze 6 wins out of that schedule?
UCLA
Mizzou State
Iowa State
Central Florida
Nebraska
@KU
@Baylor
Oklahoma State
Texas
@ Mizzou
@Colorado
@North Texas
I see 5 road games. To any reasonable person, with the current state of our program, that is 5 losses. LHC Bill Snyder 2.0 hasn't won a true road game yet. I hope to hell we can be competitive at home, but Texas, Nebraska, and OSU are games where we will be 14+ point underdogs.
Wins we should expect (confidence factor 1 = slight favorite, 3 = overwelming favorite)
UCLA (1) [probably being way too much of a homer]
Missouri State (3)
Central Florida (1)
@North Texas (2)
Next years schedule is hard. It could easily be a disaster with only 2 wins.
-
There is absolutely no reason to believe that we'll be an above .500 team this season.
Really, you don't think we can squeeze 6 wins out of that schedule?
UCLA
Mizzou State
Iowa State
Central Florida
Nebraska
@KU
@Baylor
Oklahoma State
Texas
@ Mizzou
@Colorado
@North Texas
What are the odds that it does NOT come down to the North Texas game? I say 40%.
Take those odds and run!
A lot hinges on those first five home/neutral games.
-
Next years schedule is hard. It could easily be a disaster with only 2 wins.
Wish you'd started here so I could have just ignored all the "confidence factor" stuff.
-
There is absolutely no reason to believe that we'll be an above .500 team this season.
Really, you don't think we can squeeze 6 wins out of that schedule?
UCLA L
Mizzou State W
Iowa State Toss up
Central Florida Toss up
Nebraska L
@KU Toss up
@Baylor L
Oklahoma State L
Texas L
@ Mizzou L
@Colorado Toss up
@North Texas Toss up
We could be 6-6, maybe. That's not above .500, like I said, though.
-
Tougher sched than last year, and it took a miracle to get 6 wins.
Is it impossible? No, but an above .500 record would be an over-achievement worthy of Big COY.
-
There is absolutely no reason to believe that we'll be an above .500 team this season.
Really, you don't think we can squeeze 6 wins out of that schedule?
UCLA L
Mizzou State W
Iowa State Toss up
Central Florida Toss up
Nebraska L
@KU Toss up
@Baylor L
Oklahoma State L
Texas L
@ Mizzou L
@Colorado Toss up
@North Texas Toss up
We could be 6-6, maybe. That's not above .500, like I said, though.
You really think Baylor and OSU are losses? Do you realize that OSU lost almost their entire starting lineup from last season?
-
There is absolutely no reason to believe that we'll be an above .500 team this season.
Really, you don't think we can squeeze 6 wins out of that schedule?
UCLA L
Mizzou State W
Iowa State Toss up
Central Florida Toss up
Nebraska L
@KU Toss up
@Baylor L
Oklahoma State L
Texas L
@ Mizzou L
@Colorado Toss up
@North Texas Toss up
We could be 6-6, maybe. That's not above .500, like I said, though.
You really think Baylor and OSU are losses? Do you realize that OSU lost almost their entire starting lineup from last season?
Baylor is on the road.
Okie State will still probably be favored, how could they not?
-
Tougher sched than last year, and it took a miracle to get 6 wins.
Is it impossible? No, but an above .500 record would be an over-achievement worthy of Big COY.
Really? Maybe I'm just not paying attention to other teams, but I don't think anyone (but us) would be that impressed with home wins over a 6-6 UCLA team, a 6-6 Iowa State team, an 8-4 UCF team, a depleted Okie State and Mizzou State.
I mean, I guess we're scared of roadies because of the ULL loss, but what other road game should Snyder v2.0 have won last year? Baylor's "scary" because of Griffith, but went 4-8 (1-7) without him. And calling 2-10 UNT a toss-up is just being willfully pessimistic.
I'm not saying we will win 6+, I'm just saying 6-7 wins wouldn't be all that impressive. :dunno: (would still be :ksu: for me though)
-
6 gets us pinstriping. This must be the goal. Must be.
-
I don't like going on the road to play Sun Belt teams <Pretty sure this isn't the argument everyone else is having but I got tired of reading about our shitty football team
-
6 gets us pinstriping. This must be the goal. Must be.
I'm def on board with this new mantra. Would love an east coast cats game.
-
ULL's kicker hit a career-long FG in the rain to beat us at the last second with fracking Carson Coffman at QB. It's not like we're regularly getting trounced by Sun Belt teams.
I was totally agreeing with felix, then I realized that he just came up with a moral victory against Louisiana freaking Lafayette. Not felix's fault at all, but good god. :embarrassed:
-
ULL's kicker hit a career-long FG in the rain to beat us at the last second with fracking Carson Coffman at QB. It's not like we're regularly getting trounced by Sun Belt teams.
I was totally agreeing with felix, then I realized that he just came up with a moral victory against Louisiana freaking Lafayette. Not felix's fault at all, but good god. :embarrassed:
Def not a moral victory. Just saying it's not like we got "trounced." New coach, entirely new offensive strategy and shitty QB in second game of the year. It's just ridiculous to keep pointing to that one game as us getting beat down by Sun Belt teams.
I mean, we'd easily finish in the top third of the Sun Belt...
-
You really think Baylor and OSU are losses? Do you realize that OSU lost almost their entire starting lineup from last season?
I live an hour from Stillwater...they aren't losing much/if anything as far as talent. They might have lost some leadership, but that remains to be seen. Either way, they're still better talent-wise than us.
-
I see 5 road games. To any reasonable person, with the current state of our program, that is 5 losses. LHC Bill Snyder 2.0 hasn't won a true road game yet. I hope to hell we can be competitive at home, but Texas, Nebraska, and OSU are games where we will be 14+ point underdogs.
Wins we should expect (confidence factor 1 = slight favorite, 3 = overwelming favorite)
UCLA (1) [probably being way too much of a homer]
Missouri State (3)
Central Florida (1)
@North Texas (2)
Next years schedule is hard. It could easily be a disaster with only 2 wins.
i'd be pretty surprised if we are 14 pt dogs at home to anyone. thats a lot for a home team even in the worst of circumstances.
-
6 gets us pinstriping. This must be the goal. Must be.
Hey SD, dust off your Tux and warm up the Starwoods points....we are going to the Big Apple! :gocho:
-
You really think Baylor and OSU are losses? Do you realize that OSU lost almost their entire starting lineup from last season?
I live an hour from Stillwater...they aren't losing much/if anything as far as talent. They might have lost some leadership, but that remains to be seen. Either way, they're still better talent-wise than us.
How does this help? :dunno:
-
You really think Baylor and OSU are losses? Do you realize that OSU lost almost their entire starting lineup from last season?
I live an hour from Stillwater...they aren't losing much/if anything as far as talent. They might have lost some leadership, but that remains to be seen. Either way, they're still better talent-wise than us.
Any idea on will be the QB for the Pokes?
-
You really think Baylor and OSU are losses? Do you realize that OSU lost almost their entire starting lineup from last season?
I live an hour from Stillwater...they aren't losing much/if anything as far as talent. They might have lost some leadership, but that remains to be seen. Either way, they're still better talent-wise than us.
How does this help? :dunno:
I know people. stop making it so difficult
Brandon Weeden is their guy. He's got a really good arm.
-
You really think Baylor and OSU are losses? Do you realize that OSU lost almost their entire starting lineup from last season?
I live an hour from Stillwater...they aren't losing much/if anything as far as talent. They might have lost some leadership, but that remains to be seen. Either way, they're still better talent-wise than us.
How does this help? :dunno:
I know people. stop making it so difficult
Brandon Weeden is their guy. He's got a really good arm.
This sounds really convincing. I mean, I admit I was skeptical at first, but I forgot they had a 26-year old Chris Weinke baseball flameout on their team.
-
Was this the guy that came in off the bench to save the CU game?
-
Yep. Not gonna lie. Would be all :love: if he was on the cats.
-
And michcat, you and OK should 100% behind beating enough shitty teams to get bowl eligible a few years in a row. You know what that would do?
"Calm the waters", that's what.
When you're program-building, you should always play teams a little/lot worse than you whenever you can control it. I mean, name the four non-con teams that Alabama rolled over last year? How'd that help their recruiting?
good point.
-
JFC, all of Snyd's interviews are the exact same. He's like a god damn robot or something.