goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Jerome Tang Coaches Kansas State Basketball => Topic started by: fun muffin on November 07, 2013, 10:55:57 PM

Title: Marcus Foster
Post by: fun muffin on November 07, 2013, 10:55:57 PM
Has "it"
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: puniraptor on November 07, 2013, 11:18:01 PM
probably more of it than those other guys
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Emo EMAW on November 08, 2013, 08:20:25 AM
"legitimate"
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 'taterblast on January 06, 2014, 02:21:03 PM
i feel that maybe we are underappreciating, or not adequately addressing the impact Foster could have with four years here.

guys, he has it all.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fa.espncdn.com%2Fmedia%2Fmotion%2F2014%2F0104%2Fdm_140104_Oklahoma_State_Kansas_State_Highlight%2Fdm_140104_Oklahoma_State_Kansas_State_Highlight.jpg&hash=c0a6bca01a3055a9106feb7a8205e0de59e7835a)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: mocat on January 06, 2014, 02:29:54 PM
jesus he is beautiful
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: puniraptor on January 06, 2014, 02:32:38 PM
love the new do
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on January 06, 2014, 02:33:22 PM
When he chews his gum, the side of his head moves in and out no less than like 10". 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: KITNfury on January 06, 2014, 02:44:09 PM
love the new do
I'm with you, dude.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 'taterblast on January 06, 2014, 02:45:29 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.foxsports.com%2Fcontent%2Ffscom%2Fimg%2F2013%2F12%2F21%2F122113-CBK-KANSAS-STATE-MARCUS-FOSTER-DC-PI_20131221194957661_660_320.JPG&hash=5fbd9abbca1ac7975f06a8bef1d074dd408f5841)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 'taterblast on January 06, 2014, 02:46:08 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.philly.com%2Fimages%2F122113_kansas-state_600.jpg&hash=20f97adaca91c87a81cffcf65b441c55f5be2755)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 'taterblast on January 06, 2014, 02:47:27 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcache2.asset-cache.net%2Fgc%2F458774919-guard-marcus-foster-of-the-kansas-state-gettyimages.jpg%3Fv%3D1%26amp%3Bc%3DIWSAsset%26amp%3Bk%3D2%26amp%3Bd%3DGkZZ8bf5zL1ZiijUmxa7QVhRXkwulZeKRyRtN59Teenw7DilJzbHOufSmXq7Mmnfcs%252FTObR04R4dFuJ2eEedLg%253D%253D&hash=0758c5bce6c08c23ffcb88b2da9b8ddd77c10bda)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kslim on January 06, 2014, 02:57:16 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffuture150.com%2Fimages%2Fmade%2Fimages%2Fmade%2Fimages%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2F2012%2F2013%2520Action%2520Photos%2FMarcus-Foster-committed_634_336_rot270_s_336_634_sha-100_d55cea6faa381163_rot90.jpg&hash=314028c534ba9b46f288b79b08cb9d7e8e51df49)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: slobber on January 06, 2014, 03:21:17 PM
I had no idea how beautiful he is until Saturday. I mean, WOW! :love:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on January 06, 2014, 03:28:48 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.foxsports.com%2Fcontent%2Ffscom%2Fimg%2F2013%2F12%2F21%2F122113-CBK-KANSAS-STATE-MARCUS-FOSTER-DC-PI_20131221194957661_660_320.JPG&hash=5fbd9abbca1ac7975f06a8bef1d074dd408f5841)

Someone needs to add a mic in his hand and some karaoke stuff in the background.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on January 06, 2014, 03:29:23 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.philly.com%2Fimages%2F122113_kansas-state_600.jpg&hash=20f97adaca91c87a81cffcf65b441c55f5be2755)

This one is absolutely great.  Really swoon type stuff here.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: yoga-like_abana on January 06, 2014, 03:30:51 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.foxsports.com%2Fcontent%2Ffscom%2Fimg%2F2013%2F12%2F21%2F122113-CBK-KANSAS-STATE-MARCUS-FOSTER-DC-PI_20131221194957661_660_320.JPG&hash=5fbd9abbca1ac7975f06a8bef1d074dd408f5841)

Someone needs to add a mic in his hand and some karaoke stuff in the background.
mic in hand and willie on the drums and willie on the electric guitar in the background
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: raquetcat on January 06, 2014, 04:50:35 PM
When he chews his gum, the side of his head moves in and out no less than like 10".

oh my yes, I noticed that when he was shooting FTs, is his head just full of muscles or what?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on January 06, 2014, 04:56:35 PM
Jevon says "hi".

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fl2.yimg.com%2Fbt%2Fapi%2Fres%2F1.2%2FhRMg0VciKDmFEIpC_PwA_w--%2FYXBwaWQ9eW5ld3M7Zmk9ZmlsbDtoPTMzMztxPTc1O3c9MzAw%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Fmedia.zenfs.com%2Fen_us%2FSports%2Fap%2F201401041804650632417&hash=79f155537d4c3b39f62b5e9a63e610ee6fa671e0)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: KITNfury on January 06, 2014, 05:03:15 PM
Jevon says "hi".

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fl2.yimg.com%2Fbt%2Fapi%2Fres%2F1.2%2FhRMg0VciKDmFEIpC_PwA_w--%2FYXBwaWQ9eW5ld3M7Zmk9ZmlsbDtoPTMzMztxPTc1O3c9MzAw%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Fmedia.zenfs.com%2Fen_us%2FSports%2Fap%2F201401041804650632417&hash=79f155537d4c3b39f62b5e9a63e610ee6fa671e0)
Just look at those cheekbones. Just look at them!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: hemmy on January 06, 2014, 05:04:47 PM
Wow throw Will and EMAPE out and that is one mighty adorable team.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: mocat on January 06, 2014, 05:46:06 PM
Jevon says "hi".

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fl2.yimg.com%2Fbt%2Fapi%2Fres%2F1.2%2FhRMg0VciKDmFEIpC_PwA_w--%2FYXBwaWQ9eW5ld3M7Zmk9ZmlsbDtoPTMzMztxPTc1O3c9MzAw%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Fmedia.zenfs.com%2Fen_us%2FSports%2Fap%2F201401041804650632417&hash=79f155537d4c3b39f62b5e9a63e610ee6fa671e0)

This photo has Marty's fingerprints (bicepsprints?) all over it
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Winters on January 06, 2014, 08:16:30 PM
Marcus is absolutely wonderful  :emawkid:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Boondock Poonhound on January 06, 2014, 08:21:39 PM
i feel that maybe we are underappreciating, or not adequately addressing the impact Foster could have with four years here.

guys, he has it all.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fa.espncdn.com%2Fmedia%2Fmotion%2F2014%2F0104%2Fdm_140104_Oklahoma_State_Kansas_State_Highlight%2Fdm_140104_Oklahoma_State_Kansas_State_Highlight.jpg&hash=c0a6bca01a3055a9106feb7a8205e0de59e7835a)

McOrebs was one of my favorites. MF is replacing him quite nicely.  :Woot:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trogdor on January 06, 2014, 08:34:05 PM
God our freshman are gorgeous  :love:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on January 06, 2014, 09:03:49 PM
Wow throw Will and EMAPE out and that is one mighty adorable team.

Nino is a mutant
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: puniraptor on January 06, 2014, 09:05:16 PM
Wow throw Will and EMAPE out and that is one mighty adorable team.

Nino is a mutant

No way nino is great
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Stevesie60 on January 06, 2014, 09:25:15 PM
I love Nino. "Crash" is the perfect nickname for him.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dub on January 06, 2014, 10:04:19 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Foi39.tinypic.com%2Frjqmpi.jpg&hash=e95f55153e28872afd00c2db46bb1d149de463a3)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: chum1 on January 06, 2014, 10:09:24 PM
LOL Huggins
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: TownieCat on January 06, 2014, 10:10:04 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Foi39.tinypic.com%2Frjqmpi.jpg&hash=e95f55153e28872afd00c2db46bb1d149de463a3)

 :love:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: raquetcat on January 06, 2014, 10:10:50 PM
That's great!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: mocat on January 07, 2014, 08:07:55 AM
Wow throw Will and EMAPE out and that is one mighty adorable team.

Nino is a mutant

 :sdeek:  :nono:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: slobber on January 07, 2014, 08:18:50 AM
 :love: Dub!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: EMAWmeister on January 07, 2014, 11:03:59 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.foxsports.com%2Fcontent%2Ffscom%2Fimg%2F2013%2F12%2F21%2F122113-CBK-KANSAS-STATE-MARCUS-FOSTER-DC-PI_20131221194957661_660_320.JPG&hash=5fbd9abbca1ac7975f06a8bef1d074dd408f5841)

Someone needs to add a mic in his hand and some karaoke stuff in the background.
mic in hand and willie on the drums and willie on the electric guitar in the background

I added Westicles on snapchat and he sent me a video of Nigel playing Dance Dance Revolution  :love: :love: :love:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sunny_cat on January 07, 2014, 11:06:12 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.foxsports.com%2Fcontent%2Ffscom%2Fimg%2F2013%2F12%2F21%2F122113-CBK-KANSAS-STATE-MARCUS-FOSTER-DC-PI_20131221194957661_660_320.JPG&hash=5fbd9abbca1ac7975f06a8bef1d074dd408f5841)

Someone needs to add a mic in his hand and some karaoke stuff in the background.
mic in hand and willie on the drums and willie on the electric guitar in the background

I added Westicles on snapchat and he sent me a video of Nigel playing Dance Dance Revolution  :love: :love: :love:

People still play DDR? :love:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: EMAWmeister on January 07, 2014, 11:09:51 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.foxsports.com%2Fcontent%2Ffscom%2Fimg%2F2013%2F12%2F21%2F122113-CBK-KANSAS-STATE-MARCUS-FOSTER-DC-PI_20131221194957661_660_320.JPG&hash=5fbd9abbca1ac7975f06a8bef1d074dd408f5841)

Someone needs to add a mic in his hand and some karaoke stuff in the background.
mic in hand and willie on the drums and willie on the electric guitar in the background

I added Westicles on snapchat and he sent me a video of Nigel playing Dance Dance Revolution  :love: :love: :love:

People still play DDR? :love:

I think that was it.  It looked like they were at an arcade
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: WillieWatanabe on January 07, 2014, 11:25:42 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.foxsports.com%2Fcontent%2Ffscom%2Fimg%2F2013%2F12%2F21%2F122113-CBK-KANSAS-STATE-MARCUS-FOSTER-DC-PI_20131221194957661_660_320.JPG&hash=5fbd9abbca1ac7975f06a8bef1d074dd408f5841)

Someone needs to add a mic in his hand and some karaoke stuff in the background.
mic in hand and willie on the drums and willie on the electric guitar in the background

I added Westicles on snapchat and he sent me a video of Nigel playing Dance Dance Revolution  :love: :love: :love:

:O that's awesome.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 'taterblast on January 07, 2014, 11:26:44 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Foi39.tinypic.com%2Frjqmpi.jpg&hash=e95f55153e28872afd00c2db46bb1d149de463a3)

 :excited:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 8manpick on January 07, 2014, 11:35:05 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.foxsports.com%2Fcontent%2Ffscom%2Fimg%2F2013%2F12%2F21%2F122113-CBK-KANSAS-STATE-MARCUS-FOSTER-DC-PI_20131221194957661_660_320.JPG&hash=5fbd9abbca1ac7975f06a8bef1d074dd408f5841)

Someone needs to add a mic in his hand and some karaoke stuff in the background.
mic in hand and willie on the drums and willie on the electric guitar in the background

I added Westicles on snapchat and he sent me a video of Nigel playing Dance Dance Revolution  :love: :love: :love:

People still play DDR? :love:

I think that was it.  It looked like they were at an arcade

There is a DDR machine in the arcade in the basement of the student union.  Story checks out.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Spracne on January 07, 2014, 11:36:55 AM
I'll abide the swoons over Foster.  Heck, Shane and the others, too.  But - Jevon has the countenance of a chick alien.   :sdeek:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 'taterblast on January 07, 2014, 11:37:57 AM
get the eff out, Spracne
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kslim on January 07, 2014, 12:00:47 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.foxsports.com%2Fcontent%2Ffscom%2Fimg%2F2013%2F12%2F21%2F122113-CBK-KANSAS-STATE-MARCUS-FOSTER-DC-PI_20131221194957661_660_320.JPG&hash=5fbd9abbca1ac7975f06a8bef1d074dd408f5841)

Someone needs to add a mic in his hand and some karaoke stuff in the background.
mic in hand and willie on the drums and willie on the electric guitar in the background

I added Westicles on snapchat and he sent me a video of Nigel playing Dance Dance Revolution  :love: :love: :love:

People still play DDR? :love:

I think that was it.  It looked like they were at an arcade
that would be fun to watch
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on January 07, 2014, 12:16:38 PM
Foster: Just nominated CBS Wayman Tisdale National Frosh of the Week.  :gocho:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on January 07, 2014, 01:40:23 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BdZoQq-CQAAsrNe.jpg:large)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trogdor on January 07, 2014, 01:40:48 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BdZoQq-CQAAsrNe.jpg:large)

 :love:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on January 09, 2014, 12:41:46 PM
Pretty good from Kellis: http://www.kansas.com/2014/01/09/3218949/k-states-marcus-foster-plays-beyond.html
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wetwillie on January 09, 2014, 12:43:38 PM
Pretty good from Kellis http://www.kansas.com/2014/01/09/3218949/k-states-marcus-foster-plays-beyond.html

Interesting if true
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: GoodForAnother on January 09, 2014, 12:45:39 PM
so is foster the new jake and thomas the new martavious?  love them
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Emo EMAW on January 09, 2014, 12:48:46 PM
Foster and Thomas are going to be special.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ljmhawk2 on January 09, 2014, 12:50:49 PM
KU-90
KSU-64

wiggins holds foster to 6 points.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sunny_cat on January 09, 2014, 12:51:15 PM
KU-90
KSU-64

wiggins holds foster to 6 points.

Interesting stuff, Tim.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ljmhawk2 on January 09, 2014, 12:52:32 PM
KU-90
KSU-64

wiggins holds foster to 6 points.

Interesting stuff, Tim.

you know it's going to be ugly for ksu.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sunny_cat on January 09, 2014, 12:54:02 PM
KU-90
KSU-64

wiggins holds foster to 6 points.

Interesting stuff, Tim.

you know it's going to be ugly for ksu.

 :frown:

Hope not cause I'll be there.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on January 09, 2014, 12:54:39 PM
so is foster the new jake and thomas the new martavious?  love them

Thomas adn Foster are going to be fun to watch. I really like Westicles, Johnson, and Johnson as well. Solid group of 5 from oscar's first 2 classes.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: I_have_purplewood on January 09, 2014, 12:56:36 PM
KU-90
KSU-64

wiggins holds foster to 6 points.

Interesting stuff, Tim.

you know it's going to be ugly for ksu.

You should make a wager.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: theKSU on January 09, 2014, 01:02:34 PM
KU-90
KSU-64

wiggins holds foster to 6 points.

Yeah Wiggins aka the "Junkyard Hawk" is gonna D up big vs. the guy who's gonna beat him for Freshman of the Year.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Emo EMAW on January 09, 2014, 01:11:28 PM
KU-90
KSU-64

wiggins holds foster to 6 points.

You're giving KSU 26 points, I'll take that bet, $500, with $200 on the over on Foster/6pts. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trogdor on January 09, 2014, 01:20:33 PM
KU-90
KSU-64

wiggins holds foster to 6 points.

90 points on a team that is allowing 53 points in its last 10 games? I guess it makes sense
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 'taterblast on January 09, 2014, 01:21:24 PM
KU-90
KSU-64

wiggins holds foster to 6 points.

You're giving KSU 26 points, I'll take that bet, $500, with $200 on the over on Foster/6pts.

YOU WON'T, ljmhawk2
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: yoman on January 09, 2014, 01:37:38 PM
KU-90
KSU-64

wiggins holds foster to 6 points.

You're giving KSU 26 points, I'll take that bet, $500, with $200 on the over on Foster/6pts.

YOU WON'T, ljmhawk2

I guess we can see if Landon 2.0 pays off his bets.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on January 09, 2014, 02:11:28 PM
I do really love that Shane was telling Foster and the coaches that he had to be more than a role player because he was too good.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kslim on January 09, 2014, 02:14:45 PM
KU-90
KSU-64

wiggins holds foster to 6 points.

You're giving KSU 26 points, I'll take that bet, $500, with $200 on the over on Foster/6pts.

YOU WON'T, ljmhawk2

I guess we can see if Landon 2.0 pays off his bets.
well since the mods cant make crap stick you might as well take this bet landon
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ZmoneyKSU on January 09, 2014, 02:15:52 PM
I do really love that Shane was telling Foster and the coaches that he had to be more than a role player because he was too good.

Yea, I almost had to get some weakness tissues because I was going to pass some eye water.  No seriously, that really changed my perception of Shane. I think I wondered if he was jealous of Marcus because Shane viewed himself as the next Jake/Rod type senior leader. I was wrong about you Shane, I'm sorry.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: manpow5 on January 09, 2014, 02:20:30 PM
KU-90
KSU-64

wiggins holds foster to 6 points.

Interesting stuff, Tim.

you know it's going to be ugly for ksu.

No way it can be ugly out there, we have some of the best looking Freshman out there!  :love: :love:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 09, 2014, 02:21:48 PM
KU-90
KSU-64

wiggins holds foster to 6 points.

Interesting stuff, Tim.

you know it's going to be ugly for ksu.

we should bet, broke ass
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Lucas Scoopsalot on January 09, 2014, 05:27:39 PM
I thought we learned our lessons about betting with KU fans?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Emo EMAW on January 09, 2014, 06:04:21 PM
I just spoke into my Android and this crazy app AutoRap transformed my speech into a sick rap beat: http://khu.sh/autorap_52cf36f04e171&v2

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: scottwildcat on January 09, 2014, 06:10:46 PM
I just spoke into my Android and this crazy app AutoRap transformed my speech into a sick rap beat: http://khu.sh/autorap_52cf36f04e171&v2

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

Virus
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Emo EMAW on January 09, 2014, 06:14:38 PM
Its a virus like being plagued with incredible good looks and fashion sense.

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 'taterblast on January 20, 2014, 12:12:39 PM
15 points in 13 minutes

:gocho:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 75cat on January 20, 2014, 12:53:35 PM
At the start of this thread there are several comments about how GOOD LOOKING Marcus is (I did not know that there were that many women on this board, because if those comments weren't mostly made by females, that is CREEPY!!!). While I am certainly not an expert on the looks, I have thought his facial expressions reflect a level of having fun on the court similar to those that Shane has made over the years.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Stevesie60 on January 20, 2014, 12:55:39 PM
At the start of this thread there are several comments about how GOOD LOOKING Marcus is (I did not know that there were that many women on this board, because if those comments weren't mostly made by females, that is CREEPY!!!). While I am certainly not an expert on the looks, I have thought his facial expressions reflect a level of having fun on the court similar to those that Shane has made over the years.

This board isn't for you, 75yearsoldcat.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ChiComCat on January 20, 2014, 12:55:59 PM
At the start of this thread there are several comments about how GOOD LOOKING Marcus is (I did not know that there were that many women on this board, because if those comments weren't mostly made by females, that is CREEPY!!!). While I am certainly not an expert on the looks, I have thought his facial expressions reflect a level of having fun on the court similar to those that Shane has made over the years.

Its not creepy to admit another man looks good, it doesn't have to mean you want to have sexy time with them.  Pretending that you can't tell the difference between a Mangino and a Shane is weird.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sunny_cat on January 20, 2014, 12:57:17 PM
At the start of this thread there are several comments about how GOOD LOOKING Marcus is (I did not know that there were that many women on this board, because if those comments weren't mostly made by females, that is CREEPY!!!). While I am certainly not an expert on the looks, I have thought his facial expressions reflect a level of having fun on the court similar to those that Shane has made over the years.

 :flush:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on January 20, 2014, 01:04:36 PM
:lol:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: slobber on January 20, 2014, 01:11:04 PM
At the start of this thread there are several comments about how GOOD LOOKING Marcus is (I did not know that there were that many women on this board, because if those comments weren't mostly made by females, that is CREEPY!!!). While I am certainly not an expert on the looks, I have thought his facial expressions reflect a level of having fun on the court similar to those that Shane has made over the years.

Its not creepy to admit another man looks good, it doesn't have to mean you want to have sexy time with them.  Pretending that you can't tell the difference between a Mangino and a Shane is weird.
Seems racist?





(jk)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: yoman on January 20, 2014, 01:34:01 PM
I don't have to see 75cat IRL to know that he most definitely is not a sexy stud.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Emo EMAW on January 20, 2014, 01:35:07 PM
75cat clearly doesn't subscribe to the theory of abundance.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sunny_cat on January 20, 2014, 01:35:54 PM
75cat and ninglu are probably buds.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 'taterblast on January 21, 2014, 01:01:18 PM
 :love:

"easy money"

http://twitpic.com/dsyjve (http://twitpic.com/dsyjve)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Belvis Noland on January 21, 2014, 02:10:06 PM
does MF seem out of shape to anybody else?  relatively speaking, of course. 

some fellow EMAWers and I have all noticed this.  are we the only ones? 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: That_Guy on January 21, 2014, 02:47:33 PM
does MF seem out of shape to anybody else?  relatively speaking, of course. 

some fellow EMAWers and I have all noticed this.  are we the only ones? 

I thought he was just more a, "built," kind of guy. But his mohawk though  :love:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: puniraptor on January 21, 2014, 02:49:36 PM
does MF seem out of shape to anybody else?  relatively speaking, of course. 

some fellow EMAWers and I have all noticed this.  are we the only ones? 

I thought he was just more a, "built," kind of guy. But his mohawk though  :love:

I don't think he's out of shape, especially for a freshman. I do feel like the team conditioning level as a whole is down from the greenie days. Overall just softer and sweatier.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ben ji on January 21, 2014, 02:50:12 PM
does MF seem out of shape to anybody else?  relatively speaking, of course. 

some fellow EMAWers and I have all noticed this.  are we the only ones?

He used to be fat in high school(high school coach used him inside?) and that's why he wasn't a highly regarded recruit.

But no, I don't think he is out of shape.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Skipper44 on January 21, 2014, 02:50:57 PM
does MF seem out of shape to anybody else?  relatively speaking, of course. 

some fellow EMAWers and I have all noticed this.  are we the only ones?
wearing a T as his undershirt is not doing Marcus any favors, imo
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: yoga-like_abana on January 21, 2014, 02:54:00 PM
does MF seem out of shape to anybody else?  relatively speaking, of course. 

some fellow EMAWers and I have all noticed this.  are we the only ones? 

I thought he was just more a, "built," kind of guy. But his mohawk though  :love:

I don't think he's out of shape, especially for a freshman. I do feel like the team conditioning level as a whole is down from the greenie days. Overall just softer and sweatier.
just tears from their fat
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: mocat on January 21, 2014, 03:06:35 PM
yeah overall the team is in worse shape. Gipson has really let the wheels fall off compared to where he was when Greenawalt was still around
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Benja on January 21, 2014, 03:46:32 PM
At the start of this thread there are several comments about how GOOD LOOKING Marcus is (I did not know that there were that many women on this board, because if those comments weren't mostly made by females, that is CREEPY!!!).

Just as a warning 75cat, only people not comfortable with their own sexuality and/or ugly people typically think this way.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sunny_cat on January 21, 2014, 03:48:11 PM
At the start of this thread there are several comments about how GOOD LOOKING Marcus is (I did not know that there were that many women on this board, because if those comments weren't mostly made by females, that is CREEPY!!!).

Just as a warning 75cat, only people not comfortable with their own sexuality and/or ugly people typically think this way.

Yep, which is why I thought he and ninglu are buddies.

75cat and ninglu are probably buds.

Ninglu is always proving how TOTALLY STRAIGHT he is by posted pictures of HOTT BABES.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 'taterblast on January 21, 2014, 03:49:07 PM
not out of shape

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.foxsports.com%2Fcontent%2Ffscom%2Fimg%2F2013%2F12%2F21%2F122113-CBK-KANSAS-STATE-MARCUS-FOSTER-DC-PI_20131221194957661_660_320.JPG&hash=5fbd9abbca1ac7975f06a8bef1d074dd408f5841)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: puniraptor on January 21, 2014, 03:50:18 PM
wonder why he went to the T? armpit chafing? nair rash?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: WillieWatanabe on January 21, 2014, 04:31:33 PM
yeah overall the team is in worse shape. Gipson has really let the wheels fall off compared to where he was when Greenawalt was still around

:thumbs:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 21, 2014, 04:34:24 PM
not out of shape

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.foxsports.com%2Fcontent%2Ffscom%2Fimg%2F2013%2F12%2F21%2F122113-CBK-KANSAS-STATE-MARCUS-FOSTER-DC-PI_20131221194957661_660_320.JPG&hash=5fbd9abbca1ac7975f06a8bef1d074dd408f5841)

Look at Shane in that picture.  He upstages even the sexiest of men
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: puniraptor on January 21, 2014, 04:34:39 PM
yeah overall the team is in worse shape. Gipson has really let the wheels fall off compared to where he was when Greenawalt was still around

:thumbs:

MyFitnessPal
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ShellShock on January 21, 2014, 05:02:40 PM
does MF seem out of shape to anybody else?  relatively speaking, of course. 

some fellow EMAWers and I have all noticed this.  are we the only ones?

I don't care if he's 185 or 350 as long as he keeps the production up. I don't GAF what he looks like as long as he can ball.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: puniraptor on January 21, 2014, 05:03:58 PM
does MF seem out of shape to anybody else?  relatively speaking, of course. 

some fellow EMAWers and I have all noticed this.  are we the only ones?

I don't care if he's 185 or 350 as long as he keeps the production up. I don't GAF what he looks like as long as he can ball.

I wouldn't care if he was ugly, but I absolutely care that he is beautiful.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ShellShock on January 21, 2014, 05:07:59 PM
does MF seem out of shape to anybody else?  relatively speaking, of course. 

some fellow EMAWers and I have all noticed this.  are we the only ones?

I don't care if he's 185 or 350 as long as he keeps the production up. I don't GAF what he looks like as long as he can ball.

I wouldn't care if he was ugly, but I absolutely care that he is beautiful.

+1
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Stevesie60 on January 21, 2014, 09:50:15 PM
I hope he gets better at driving to the hoop very soon. He doesn't draw charges as much as he should, and turns it over more than I would hope. He just seems to choose terrible times to drive it, like when it's him vs. 3 defenders.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: HerrSonntag on January 21, 2014, 09:58:13 PM
I hope he gets better at driving to the hoop very soon. He doesn't draw charges as much as he should, and turns it over more than I would hope. He just seems to choose terrible times to drive it, like when it's him vs. 3 defenders.
He also kinda broadcasts it sometimes.

 "Oh, that lane closed... and that one... and that one.... ahhh eff it"
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Bill Clarahan on January 21, 2014, 10:32:31 PM
This team has been out of shape since the new regime arrived
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Jackstack99EMAW on January 21, 2014, 10:37:04 PM
I hope he gets better at driving to the hoop very soon. He doesn't draw charges as much as he should, and turns it over more than I would hope. He just seems to choose terrible times to drive it, like when it's him vs. 3 defenders.
This, he has a lot of athletic ability and doesn't use it enough.  Jevon drives well, but is not a good finisher, if he starts finishing at the rim and hits the jumper, he could be all b12.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: my troll name ... Koppe22 on January 21, 2014, 11:14:02 PM
 Beast...
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: mocat on January 22, 2014, 08:03:09 AM
This team has been out of shape since the new regime arrived

yes, somebody tell Gipson to lay off the cream filled donuts amirite Bill Clarahan
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on January 22, 2014, 08:04:58 AM
I hope he gets better at driving to the hoop very soon. He doesn't draw charges as much as he should, and turns it over more than I would hope. He just seems to choose terrible times to drive it, like when it's him vs. 3 defenders.

He played mostly inside in high school, he'll get better.

I haven't seen much (any?) evidence to support the comments that this team is more "out of shape" than previous teams. :dunno:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: mocat on January 22, 2014, 08:09:18 AM
I haven't seen much (any?) evidence to support the comments that this team is more "out of shape" than previous teams. :dunno:

There are plus or minus zero players that are fat or out of shape on this year's team. Maybe Omari, but he eats a lot of stuff as we all know.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on January 22, 2014, 08:19:36 AM
I haven't seen much (any?) evidence to support the comments that this team is more "out of shape" than previous teams. :dunno:

There are plus or minus zero players that are fat or out of shape on this year's team. Maybe Omari, but he eats a lot of stuff as we all know.

:lol:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: rollingplains on January 22, 2014, 10:34:45 AM
Did   Coach really tell you , you were as good as Wiggins ??? :Woohoo:

[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: hemmy on January 22, 2014, 11:08:00 AM
My god look at that Nike vs Adidas comparison.  An absolute jersey mismatch right there.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: rollingplains on January 22, 2014, 11:10:28 AM
My god look at that Nike vs Adidas comparison.  An absolute jersey mismatch right there.

 YES THE SAME AS THE SCORE !!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Emo EMAW on January 22, 2014, 11:30:56 AM
I think the KU player has his shorts on backwards.  :ROFL:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: rollingplains on January 22, 2014, 11:33:30 AM
Well after a 26 point beatdown he can wear them anyway he wants to
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on January 22, 2014, 11:55:36 AM
Poor KU, adidas uniforms and Fosterless.  :bawl:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Winters on January 22, 2014, 12:00:56 PM
Well after a 26 point beatdown he can wear them anyway he wants to
lol, this post just screams "I'm lonely".
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: rollingplains on January 22, 2014, 12:28:54 PM
Well after a 26 point beatdown he can wear them anyway he wants to
lol, this post just screams "I'm lonely".
And yours screams , God I wish we had a real basketball team .... and a real coach who had a voice like a man ,, :'bye cruel world:  Oh nice game last night by the way...
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on January 22, 2014, 12:30:55 PM
Did   Coach really tell you , you were as good as Wiggins ??? :Woohoo:
Fact: Wiggins blows goat balls.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: rollingplains on January 22, 2014, 01:05:19 PM
Did   Coach really tell you , you were as good as Wiggins ??? :Woohoo:
Fact: Wiggins blows goat balls.
[/goat balls =$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$  little butthurt goin on here wacky .?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on January 22, 2014, 01:09:04 PM
Did   Coach really tell you , you were as good as Wiggins ??? :Woohoo:
Fact: Wiggins blows goat balls.
[/goat balls =$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$  little butthurt goin on here wacky .?
No. Just sad that Self is destroying this kids NBA future. How many slots will he move down in the draft now?  :frown:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on January 22, 2014, 01:10:26 PM
Quote function gone wrong is always annoying.

Per the thread; Foster will be fine.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Belvis Noland on January 22, 2014, 01:20:05 PM
Quote function gone wrong is always annoying.

Per the thread; Foster will be fine.

What was the story last night?  Obviously, he was off, but Weber's choice to sit him the entire second half was interesting.  Pretty obvious he was having an off night.  Also, pretty obvious we're gonna need him to not have many off nights if we're gonna be a tourney team. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Stevesie60 on January 22, 2014, 01:30:38 PM
oscar learned sitting kids to teach them a lesson from Frank.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on January 22, 2014, 01:30:57 PM
Quote function gone wrong is always annoying.

Per the thread; Foster will be fine.

What was the story last night?  Obviously, he was off, but Weber's choice to sit him the entire second half was interesting.  Pretty obvious he was having an off night.  Also, pretty obvious we're gonna need him to not have many off nights if we're gonna be a tourney team. 

He still played 27 minutes and 11 in the 2nd half. He was taken out with around 7 minutes left and didn't get back in until 11 seconds were left. It was a bit strange that he sat so long, but the line-up of Thomas, Spradling, Southwell, Westicles, and Gip wasn't a bad one. I think Weber just went with the guys that were on the floor, I'm hopeful its that and that Foster didn't aggravate one of his injuries.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Cire on January 22, 2014, 01:55:39 PM
as many stars as KU has, I'm shocked we kept in within 30 there.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pissclams on January 22, 2014, 02:51:51 PM
Quote function gone wrong is always annoying.

Per the thread; Foster will be fine.

What was the story last night?  Obviously, he was off, but Weber's choice to sit him the entire second half was interesting.  Pretty obvious he was having an off night.  Also, pretty obvious we're gonna need him to not have many off nights if we're gonna be a tourney team. 

He still played 27 minutes and 11 in the 2nd half. He was taken out with around 7 minutes left and didn't get back in until 11 seconds were left. It was a bit strange that he sat so long, but the line-up of Thomas, Spradling, Southwell, Westicles, and Gip wasn't a bad one. I think Weber just went with the guys that were on the floor, I'm hopeful its that and that Foster didn't aggravate one of his injuries.

come on man.  there's no defending that.  2 of the 5 on the court could be considered "scorers", sure it's not bad to use that line-up at the 13 minute mark to the 12 minute time out.  but when the game is tied with under 2 mins?  no.  inexcusable. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on January 22, 2014, 02:53:07 PM
come on man.  there's no defending that.  2 of the 5 on the court could be considered "scorers", sure it's not bad to use that line-up at the 13 minute mark to the 12 minute time out.  but when the game is tied with under 2 mins?  no.  inexcusable. 

That's fair.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Winters on January 22, 2014, 03:10:59 PM
Well after a 26 point beatdown he can wear them anyway he wants to
lol, this post just screams "I'm lonely".
And yours screams , God I wish we had a real basketball team .... and a real coach who had a voice like a man ,, :'bye cruel world:  Oh nice game last night by the way...
I'm so angry now. You are too good of a bbs'er for this blogsite.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on January 22, 2014, 03:27:43 PM
Referring to Marcus?

Quote
"We have some moments where we still … can’t let egos get involved and personal matchups and all that stuff,” Weber said. “It has to be about our team to be successful.”
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: hemmy on January 22, 2014, 03:34:45 PM
Referring to himself, IMO.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on January 22, 2014, 03:37:16 PM
Referring to Marcus?

Quote
"We have some moments where we still … can’t let egos get involved and personal matchups and all that stuff,” Weber said. “It has to be about our team to be successful.”

I would guess that or Nino. He only played 7 minutes and it wasn't like Shane had a great night.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on January 22, 2014, 04:05:31 PM
Referring to Marcus?

Quote
"We have some moments where we still … can’t let egos get involved and personal matchups and all that stuff,” Weber said. “It has to be about our team to be successful.”

I would guess that or Nino. He only played 7 minutes and it wasn't like Shane had a great night.
Shane had 6-9 really bad offensive possession and 5-7 defensive ones. Think Foster pressed to much to have a good game.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Emo EMAW on January 22, 2014, 04:07:21 PM
I don't know how the hell we could have Gip AND Nino both sitting with that huge guy they had out there.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: rollingplains on January 22, 2014, 08:57:12 PM
Did   Coach really tell you , you were as good as Wiggins ??? :Woohoo:
Fact: Wiggins blows goat balls.
[/goat balls =$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$  little butthurt goin on here wacky .?
No. Just sad that Self is destroying this kids NBA future. How many slots will he move down in the draft now?  :frown:

 How far will he drop  you ask? , maybe second only because of the job Coach Self has done with Embiid..  Son you would cut one of your little nuts off to have a player like Wiggins, or a real coach for that matter!. We have five guys  riding the pine that would bench every player you have starting. It must suck year after year coach after coach trying to measure up to BIG brother. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: EMAWmeister on January 22, 2014, 09:04:29 PM
FWIW I think Frankamp would possibly challenge Sprads for a spot, but other than that, I just don't see anyone from KU starting for us.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on January 27, 2014, 12:53:59 PM
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1938110-meet-kansas-states-marcus-foster-ncaa-basketballs-most-underrated-freshman
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 'taterblast on January 27, 2014, 01:06:31 PM
 :thumbs:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Stevesie60 on January 27, 2014, 01:07:12 PM
It was said last time a similar story was posted, but Shane is a huge stud for going out of his way to talk to Marcus about setting his goals higher.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on January 27, 2014, 01:19:00 PM
I hadn't heard about the weight gain in high school before. High school coaches can be such dumbasses.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on January 27, 2014, 01:21:16 PM
I hadn't heard about the weight gain in high school before. High school coaches can be such dumbasses.

 :shakesfist:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Cartierfor3 on January 27, 2014, 01:26:12 PM
I hadn't heard about the weight gain in high school before. High school coaches can be such dumbasses.

 :shakesfist:

He said "can be" as in sometimes bud. We all know you're mayor of stud city.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on January 27, 2014, 01:29:55 PM
I hadn't heard about the weight gain in high school before. High school coaches can be such dumbasses.

 :shakesfist:

He said "can be" as in sometimes bud. We all know you're mayor of stud city.

I actually initially had "are" but modified it to "can be", because of this.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on January 27, 2014, 01:33:04 PM
K-State Athletics ?@kstatesports 2m
(VIDEO) See what it's like to be Marcus Foster on a dunk via @googleglass #KStateMBB #DOOM http://instagram.com/p/jrxosHplFO/
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: star seed 7 on January 27, 2014, 09:44:17 PM
K-State Athletics ?@kstatesports 2m
(VIDEO) See what it's like to be Marcus Foster on a dunk via @googleglass #KStateMBB #DOOM http://instagram.com/p/jrxosHplFO/

 :love:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Winters on January 27, 2014, 09:46:18 PM
K-State Athletics ?@kstatesports 2m
(VIDEO) See what it's like to be Marcus Foster on a dunk via @googleglass #KStateMBB #DOOM http://instagram.com/p/jrxosHplFO/
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Frhe7PJa.gif&hash=a60d9a1fa582de7da28059e0895e27f9a4ecc5ba)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Jackstack99EMAW on February 01, 2014, 02:57:38 PM
Why isnt he the one with the ball in his hands in big moments?  He was probably the only player that played above average today and we gave the ball to Shane and gip to run up the court and turn it over after he made a huge layup. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Jackstack99EMAW on February 08, 2014, 02:18:09 PM
Is sitting down at the sewing machine knitting a clownsuit as of now.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kim carnes on February 08, 2014, 02:19:39 PM
remember when u dumbasses agreed with oscar benching him at the end of the texas game @ UT? 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Bookcat on February 08, 2014, 02:31:24 PM
remember when u dumbasses agreed with oscar benching him at the end of the texas game @ UT?

you're on a rip, Kim. Congrats. You've earned it.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kim carnes on February 08, 2014, 02:42:10 PM
remember when u dumbasses agreed with oscar benching him at the end of the texas game @ UT?

you're on a rip, Kim. Congrats. You've earned it.

when you're hot you're hot, book cat
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Spracne on February 08, 2014, 07:26:16 PM
Frickin' Frick, dang Ejim went and stole Foster's thunder.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: steve dave on February 08, 2014, 07:36:36 PM
both studs
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Tobias on February 08, 2014, 09:44:52 PM
both studs

yup, top to bottom studs iyam
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on March 02, 2014, 01:23:43 PM
Foster continues to be 6/7 on ESPN/Goodman's Top 10 FR list.

Quote
7. Marcus Foster, G, Kansas State Wildcats
6-2, 200 pounds

The somewhat anonymous recruit had been huge for oscar Weber and the Wildcats' success this season. Foster had 17 points in a win at Texas Tech on Tuesday, and finished with 11 points in a home victory over Iowa State.

This week: Monday at Oklahoma State; Saturday vs. Baylor

Stats: 15.1 PPG, 3.4 RPG, 39 percent 3-pointers | Previous rank: 6

The list:
1. Parker, Duke
2. Ennis, Syracuse
3. Wiggins, KU
4. Embiid, KU
5. Randle, UK
6. Taylor, UT
7. Foster, K-State
8. Gordon, Arizona
9. Mickey, LSU
10. Vonleh, Indiana
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Powercat Posse on March 02, 2014, 02:02:21 PM
Sorry if it has been talked about before, but.....

Anyone notice that Foster loves to take our first shot or gets a shot off in our first 2 poss.  I love how he tries to get himself going early in the game. 

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Lucas Scoopsalot on March 02, 2014, 02:12:08 PM
Sorry if it has been talked about before, but.....

Anyone notice that Foster loves to take our first shot or gets a shot off in our first 2 poss.  I love how he tries to get himself going early in the game.
Ya I've been noticing this too
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Stevesie60 on March 02, 2014, 02:32:55 PM
I love that Foster has taken that initiative. At least I assume it's him, but it could be planned by oscar. Don't really know how that works.

It can be frustrating because Marcus knows he's the guy, and he is the guy, but when he finally got consistent minutes after being on the bench because of foul trouble, he tried to force some shots that I don't think he should have.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: TownieCat on March 02, 2014, 02:42:11 PM
I love that Foster has taken that initiative. At least I assume it's him, but it could be planned by oscar. Don't really know how that works.

It can be frustrating because Marcus knows he's the guy, and he is the guy, but when he finally got consistent minutes after being on the bench because of foul trouble, he tried to force some shots that I don't think he should have.

I'd be willing to bet that MF taking the first shot is more about him being aggressive than it is about oscar designing plays. Those shots usually come within e offense and not on set plays.

No one complains about his forced shots when he makes them. He's so good sometimes the his definition of being open is much different than everyone else's. His 3 late in the game yesterday wasn't exactly a wide open look...
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Stevesie60 on March 02, 2014, 02:44:40 PM
I get that. I'm not against him taking forced shots. But it was a lot of forced shots in a row, and a few times someone else was wide open.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: TownieCat on March 02, 2014, 02:52:31 PM
I get that. I'm not against him taking forced shots. But it was a lot of forced shots in a row, and a few times someone else was wide open.

He only took 6 shots yesterday - his fewest of the season. Playing only 21 minutes probably had a lot to do with that tho.

I think he has more issues with turnovers when he's trying to force things than he does with taking bad shots.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Stevesie60 on March 02, 2014, 02:55:33 PM
I get that. I'm not against him taking forced shots. But it was a lot of forced shots in a row, and a few times someone else was wide open.

He only took 6 shots yesterday - his fewest of the season. Playing only 21 minutes probably had a lot to do with that tho.

I think he has more issues with turnovers when he's trying to force things than he does with taking bad shots.

Yes, sorry. I meant to include that into my original talking point.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trogdor on March 02, 2014, 03:27:40 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BhvHm0UCYAAHaOI.jpg)

I didnt even think Marcus was averaging that
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kim carnes on March 02, 2014, 03:31:48 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BhvHm0UCYAAHaOI.jpg)

I didnt even think Marcus was averaging that

that is for February FYI
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Powercat Posse on March 02, 2014, 03:38:06 PM
You meant to say that those stats were from "Fosterary."   

Foul trouble did hurt his start of "Marchus"
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trogdor on March 02, 2014, 03:51:19 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BhvHm0UCYAAHaOI.jpg)

I didnt even think Marcus was averaging that

that is for February FYI

I can read, yes. Good job at noticing. Thought I'd be the only one to see that
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Panjandrum on June 26, 2014, 09:47:04 AM
Quote
Rob Dauster
?@RobDauster
Here at the Nike Skills Academy. Marcus Foster is putting on a show right now. Burying threes, hit a pull up, looks really bouncy.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: The1BigWillie on June 26, 2014, 10:30:32 AM
Quote
Rob Dauster
?@RobDauster
Here at the Nike Skills Academy. Marcus Foster is putting on a show right now. Burying threes, hit a pull up, looks really bouncy.

 :gocho:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Pett on June 26, 2014, 10:58:59 AM
He supposedly went off at the NSA. What a stud
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Spracne on June 26, 2014, 01:02:55 PM
He supposedly went off at the NSA. What a stud

Champion for privacy #FosterThePeoplesChamp
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: nicname on July 01, 2014, 01:10:38 AM
Foster continues to be 6/7 on ESPN/Goodman's Top 10 FR list.

Quote
7. Marcus Foster, G, Kansas State Wildcats
6-2, 200 pounds

The somewhat anonymous recruit had been huge for oscar Weber and the Wildcats' success this season. Foster had 17 points in a win at Texas Tech on Tuesday, and finished with 11 points in a home victory over Iowa State.

This week: Monday at Oklahoma State; Saturday vs. Baylor

Stats: 15.1 PPG, 3.4 RPG, 39 percent 3-pointers | Previous rank: 6

The list:
1. Parker, Duke
2. Ennis, Syracuse
3. Wiggins, KU
4. Embiid, KU
5. Randle, UK
6. Taylor, UT
7. Foster, K-State
8. Gordon, Arizona
9. Mickey, LSU
10. Vonleh, Indiana

Marcus could very well be the best returning sophomore in 2014-15. Hell, he could be the best returner in college basketball.

There are a few guys that have an arguement (some pretty weak) to be a better returning player in a major conference. Probably Missing a couple as well.

JayVaughn Pinkston - Villanova (Sr.)
Perry Ellis - Kansas (Jr.)
Wayne Selden - Kansas (So.)
Le'Bryan Nash - Oklahoma State (Sr.)



Yogi Ferrell - Indiana (Jr.)
Branden Dawson - Michigan State (Sr.)
Andre Hollins - Minnesota (Sr.)

D'vauntes Smith-Rivera - Georgetown (Jr.)


Rasheed Sulaimon - Duke (Jr.)
Montrezl Harrell - Louisville (Jr.)
Dez Wells - Maryland (Sr.)

Aaron Harrison - Kentucky (So.)
Andrew Harrison - Kentucky (So.)
Willie Cauley-Stein - Kentucky (Jr.)

Kevin Pangos - Gonzaga (Sr.)
Tyler Haws - BYU (Jr.)
Fred VanVleet - Wichita St. (Jr.)
Ron Baker - Wichita St. (Jr.)

It would be tough to earn AA status as there will be some new one-and-done guys and it seems like AA teams prefer upperclassmen if they aren't supremo freshmen, but it's possible.

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kslim on July 01, 2014, 07:41:14 AM
Le'Bryan Nash - Oklahoma State (Sr.)? get the eff outta here. dudes softer than miracle whip on a pillow
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on July 01, 2014, 09:42:30 AM
Oh man kslim hilarious softness reference.  What if there was a baby bunny on that pillow with a bunch of cotton balls and cotton candy too?  Holy crap that'd be soft!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: PowercatPat on July 01, 2014, 09:44:23 AM
Le'Bryan Nash - Oklahoma State (Sr.)? get the eff outta here. dudes softer than miracle whip on a pillow

Hard to believe he was a McDonald's AA.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kslim on July 01, 2014, 09:47:05 AM
Oh man kslim hilarious softness reference.  What if there was a baby bunny on that pillow with a bunch of cotton balls and cotton candy too?  Holy crap that'd be soft!
really really soft
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on July 01, 2014, 10:17:35 AM
Foster continues to be 6/7 on ESPN/Goodman's Top 10 FR list.

Quote
7. Marcus Foster, G, Kansas State Wildcats
6-2, 200 pounds

The somewhat anonymous recruit had been huge for oscar Weber and the Wildcats' success this season. Foster had 17 points in a win at Texas Tech on Tuesday, and finished with 11 points in a home victory over Iowa State.

This week: Monday at Oklahoma State; Saturday vs. Baylor

Stats: 15.1 PPG, 3.4 RPG, 39 percent 3-pointers | Previous rank: 6

The list:
1. Parker, Duke
2. Ennis, Syracuse
3. Wiggins, KU
4. Embiid, KU
5. Randle, UK
6. Taylor, UT
7. Foster, K-State
8. Gordon, Arizona
9. Mickey, LSU
10. Vonleh, Indiana

Marcus could very well be the best returning sophomore in 2014-15. Hell, he could be the best returner in college basketball.

There are a few guys that have an arguement (some pretty weak) to be a better returning player in a major conference. Probably Missing a couple as well.

JayVaughn Pinkston - Villanova (Sr.)
Perry Ellis - Kansas (Jr.)
Wayne Selden - Kansas (So.)
Le'Bryan Nash - Oklahoma State (Sr.)



Yogi Ferrell - Indiana (Jr.)
Branden Dawson - Michigan State (Sr.)
Andre Hollins - Minnesota (Sr.)

D'vauntes Smith-Rivera - Georgetown (Jr.)


Rasheed Sulaimon - Duke (Jr.)
Montrezl Harrell - Louisville (Jr.)
Dez Wells - Maryland (Sr.)

Aaron Harrison - Kentucky (So.)
Andrew Harrison - Kentucky (So.)
Willie Cauley-Stein - Kentucky (Jr.)

Kevin Pangos - Gonzaga (Sr.)
Tyler Haws - BYU (Jr.)
Fred VanVleet - Wichita St. (Jr.)
Ron Baker - Wichita St. (Jr.)

It would be tough to earn AA status as there will be some new one-and-done guys and it seems like AA teams prefer upperclassmen if they aren't supremo freshmen, but it's possible.

This is an interesting topic.  I would definitely add Kaminsky (Sr.) and Dekker (Jr.) from Wisconsin.  Those two are both very good.  Also Marcus Paige (Jr.) from UNC.

This dood (http://www.sportingnews.com/ncaa-basketball/story/2014-06-17/top-10-shooting-guards-aaron-harrison-ron-baker-wayne-selden-buddy-hield/slide/1 (http://www.sportingnews.com/ncaa-basketball/story/2014-06-17/top-10-shooting-guards-aaron-harrison-ron-baker-wayne-selden-buddy-hield/slide/1)) thinks Foster is only the 10th best shooting guard in the country.  He has Rayvonte Rice from Illinois ahead of Foster.  I like Ray a lot personally.  Hmmm. 

Player           GP   MIN   PPG   RPG   APG   SPG   BPG   TPG   FG%   FT%   3P%
Rayvonte Rice   35   32.7   15.9   6.0   1.5   1.7   0.3   1.6   .430   .731   .295
Marcus Foster   33   29.4   15.5   3.2   2.5   0.6   0.2   2.2   .423   .734   .395
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on July 01, 2014, 10:36:38 AM
Juwan Staten (Sr.)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: _33 on July 01, 2014, 10:43:52 AM
This dood (http://www.sportingnews.com/ncaa-basketball/story/2014-06-17/top-10-shooting-guards-aaron-harrison-ron-baker-wayne-selden-buddy-hield/slide/1 (http://www.sportingnews.com/ncaa-basketball/story/2014-06-17/top-10-shooting-guards-aaron-harrison-ron-baker-wayne-selden-buddy-hield/slide/1)) thinks Foster is only the 10th best shooting guard in the country.  He has Rayvonte Rice from Illinois ahead of Foster.  I like Ray a lot personally.  Hmmm. 

Player           GP   MIN   PPG   RPG   APG   SPG   BPG   TPG   FG%   FT%   3P%
Rayvonte Rice   35   32.7   15.9   6.0   1.5   1.7   0.3   1.6   .430   .731   .295
Marcus Foster   33   29.4   15.5   3.2   2.5   0.6   0.2   2.2   .423   .734   .395

Wow he is terrible at 3's.  3's are like my all time favorite basketball play so I would not be a big Ray fan.  But to each his own.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on July 01, 2014, 11:01:16 AM
This dood (http://www.sportingnews.com/ncaa-basketball/story/2014-06-17/top-10-shooting-guards-aaron-harrison-ron-baker-wayne-selden-buddy-hield/slide/1 (http://www.sportingnews.com/ncaa-basketball/story/2014-06-17/top-10-shooting-guards-aaron-harrison-ron-baker-wayne-selden-buddy-hield/slide/1)) thinks Foster is only the 10th best shooting guard in the country.  He has Rayvonte Rice from Illinois ahead of Foster.  I like Ray a lot personally.  Hmmm. 

Player           GP   MIN   PPG   RPG   APG   SPG   BPG   TPG   FG%   FT%   3P%
Rayvonte Rice   35   32.7   15.9   6.0   1.5   1.7   0.3   1.6   .430   .731   .295
Marcus Foster   33   29.4   15.5   3.2   2.5   0.6   0.2   2.2   .423   .734   .395

Wow he is terrible at 3's.  3's are like my all time favorite basketball play so I would not be a big Ray fan.  But to each his own.

He's very good at everything else, but yes I would like to see him not be so shitty at it.  Part of that is we were fairly shitty a good chunk of last season and he was often our entire offense.  Had to force up bad shots late.  Once we started the two freshmen, Nunn and Hill, we were better on offense.  We also add two transfer guards next year who are good three point shooters in Starks (39.5% in 162 attempts in his last season at Oregon State) and Cosby (40% in 165 attempts his last season with Seton Hall). 

Ray excels at getting to the rim, not jacking up contested threes.  He should have better opportunities to drive and more open looks from three with our other shooters spacing the floor.  Drive finish, drive kick or spot up as the defense rotates to the other shooters.  I expect he'll be much more efficient on offense next season. 

He is also a very bad ass human being and I appreciate that.  Not a whiner or a pussy or a flopper.  He's fun to root for. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on July 01, 2014, 11:08:51 AM
Josh Scott (Jr.) 6-10 C

SEASON   TEAM   MIN   FGM-FGA   FG%      3PM-3PA   3P%   FTM-FTA   FT%   REB   AST   BLK   STL   PF   TO   PTS
2013-14   COLO   31.6   4.5-8.9   .511          0.0-0.1   .000   5.0-6.2   .810   8.4   0.6   1.1   0.8   1.8   1.5   14.1
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on July 01, 2014, 11:10:34 AM
Cameron Ridley (Jr.) 6-9 C

SEASON   TEAM   MIN   FGM-FGA   FG%   3PM-3PA   3P%   FTM-FTA   FT%   REB   AST   BLK   STL   PF   TO   PTS
2013-14   TEX   25.6   3.8-7.0      .545   0.0-0.0   .000          3.5-5.7   .626   8.2   0.4   2.2   0.5   2.9   1.6   11.2
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on July 01, 2014, 11:13:43 AM
Przemek Karnowski (Jr.) 7-1 C

SEASON   TEAM   MIN   FGM-FGA   FG%   3PM-3PA   3P%   FTM-FTA   FT%   REB   AST   BLK   STL   PF   TO   PTS
2013-14   GONZ   25.3   4.0-6.7   .593          0.0-0.0   .000   2.5-5.0   .500   7.1   0.8   1.7   0.3   2.9   1.9   10.4
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on July 01, 2014, 11:17:52 AM
Terran Petteway (Jr.) 6-6 G/F

SEASON   TEAM   MIN   FGM-FGA   FG%   3PM-3PA   3P%   FTM-FTA   FT%   REB   AST   BLK   STL   PF   TO   PTS
2013-14   NEB   31.7   5.7-13.3    .426       1.5-4.6    .327     5.2-6.4    .819   4.8   1.6   0.8   0.9   3.2   2.8   18.1
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on July 01, 2014, 11:18:51 AM
Georges Niang!?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on July 01, 2014, 11:20:40 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fthecatchandshoot.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F11%2Fimg21824508.jpg&hash=6e725354744cc07a461d98cf6d668bbe36aaaa39)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on July 01, 2014, 11:21:12 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.massappealnews.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F03%2FGeorges-Niang.jpg&hash=083f6e228f386428ed5c9c0d0895fa00ce2e1e8b)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on July 01, 2014, 11:21:52 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Famestrib.com%2Fsites%2Famestrib.com%2Ffiles%2Ffield%2Fmedia%2Fweb1_02-27-ISU-BkC-Niange%2C-Georges-reacts_2.jpg&hash=d97a4ffca02c453ac8a852d470f8c8350ad8f269)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kslim on July 01, 2014, 11:28:24 AM
sounds made up
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pissclams on July 01, 2014, 12:13:09 PM
i think that rayvonte rice guy went to drake which automatically makes him disgusting.  drake.  drake?  lmao.  drake.  mo' valley, mo' rayvontes, that's what i always say, sort of my motto.  putting that motto on my crest when i redo my crest. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on July 01, 2014, 01:14:38 PM
I still can believe Illini (sp? Racist?) swapped out oscar for John Gross. What a disaster of an AD.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on July 01, 2014, 01:38:48 PM
i think that rayvonte rice guy went to drake which automatically makes him disgusting.  drake.  drake?  lmao.  drake.  mo' valley, mo' rayvontes, that's what i always say, sort of my motto.  putting that motto on my crest when i redo my crest.

Muy picante again I see.  Trending picante to muy picante. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: EMAWzified on July 01, 2014, 08:16:56 PM
Angel Rodriquez, Miami :bang:
Foster continues to be 6/7 on ESPN/Goodman's Top 10 FR list.

Quote
7. Marcus Foster, G, Kansas State Wildcats
6-2, 200 pounds

The somewhat anonymous recruit had been huge for oscar Weber and the Wildcats' success this season. Foster had 17 points in a win at Texas Tech on Tuesday, and finished with 11 points in a home victory over Iowa State.

This week: Monday at Oklahoma State; Saturday vs. Baylor

Stats: 15.1 PPG, 3.4 RPG, 39 percent 3-pointers | Previous rank: 6

The list:
1. Parker, Duke
2. Ennis, Syracuse
3. Wiggins, KU
4. Embiid, KU
5. Randle, UK
6. Taylor, UT
7. Foster, K-State
8. Gordon, Arizona
9. Mickey, LSU
10. Vonleh, Indiana

Marcus could very well be the best returning sophomore in 2014-15. Hell, he could be the best returner in college basketball.

There are a few guys that have an arguement (some pretty weak) to be a better returning player in a major conference. Probably Missing a couple as well.

JayVaughn Pinkston - Villanova (Sr.)
Perry Ellis - Kansas (Jr.)
Wayne Selden - Kansas (So.)
Le'Bryan Nash - Oklahoma State (Sr.)



Yogi Ferrell - Indiana (Jr.)
Branden Dawson - Michigan State (Sr.)
Andre Hollins - Minnesota (Sr.)

D'vauntes Smith-Rivera - Georgetown (Jr.)


Rasheed Sulaimon - Duke (Jr.)
Montrezl Harrell - Louisville (Jr.)
Dez Wells - Maryland (Sr.)

Aaron Harrison - Kentucky (So.)
Andrew Harrison - Kentucky (So.)
Willie Cauley-Stein - Kentucky (Jr.)

Kevin Pangos - Gonzaga (Sr.)
Tyler Haws - BYU (Jr.)
Fred VanVleet - Wichita St. (Jr.)
Ron Baker - Wichita St. (Jr.)

It would be tough to earn AA status as there will be some new one-and-done guys and it seems like AA teams prefer upperclassmen if they aren't supremo freshmen, but it's possible.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: manpow5 on July 03, 2014, 04:49:43 PM
Sorry if luked but I heard Foster is going to LeBron's camp.

Think LeBron will bring in Marcus Smart to help with teaching the guys how to flop?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Pett on July 03, 2014, 05:44:06 PM
Sorry if luked but I heard Foster is going to LeBron's camp.

Think LeBron will bring in Marcus Smart to help with teaching the guys how to flop?
Top 30 players in CBB :thumbs:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Stevesie60 on July 04, 2014, 02:53:42 AM
Does Lebron actually make an appearance there or nah?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: KITNfury on July 07, 2014, 04:44:05 PM
I hate Niang. I think prolly only because he doesn't jump, like at all, when he shoots 3s/
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ksupamplemousse on July 07, 2014, 10:14:35 PM
I hate Niang. I think prolly only because he doesn't jump, like at all, when he shoots 3s/ ever...because he can't
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: The Big Train on July 08, 2014, 12:56:58 AM
Does Lebron actually make an appearance there or nah?

Apparently that's when he is meeting face to face with execs, kind of a bitch move IMHO but whatever.  I still like LeBron.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: i poo crabs on July 08, 2014, 10:02:37 AM
"If I want to better my future I am going to have to be a point guard," Foster said. "But for me next year I am really going to be more of a combo, because I am still going to have to score the ball a little bit. With the motion offense, I think I will be able to do a little bit of both.

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on July 08, 2014, 10:09:17 AM
Geez... Pullen 2.0
Title: Marcus Foster
Post by: Kat Kid on July 08, 2014, 10:09:56 AM
He will be better than Pullen, but never as loved as Pullen.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on July 08, 2014, 10:26:02 AM
He will be better than Pullen, but never as loved as Pullen.the
He has 2 years to make a run that Pullen never did, Big 12 championship, final four.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on July 08, 2014, 10:45:02 AM
He has three years
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on July 08, 2014, 11:03:29 AM
He will be better than Pullen, but never as loved as Pullen.
That's cause Pullen revived us, Foster is just getting passed the torch.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on July 08, 2014, 11:06:31 AM
I think I will end up liking Foster more than Pullen.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on July 08, 2014, 11:14:14 AM
I think I will end up liking Foster more than Pullen.
The fact that he can shoot and do dunk shots at the same time rises his excitement for me.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Institutional Control on July 08, 2014, 11:16:04 AM
I love Marcus Bananas Foster.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Winters on July 08, 2014, 11:17:43 AM
He has three years
:lol:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: TownieCat on July 08, 2014, 12:03:04 PM
I hope I end up loving MF more because that would mean he did something amazing like win a natty.

 :bball:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Shooter Jones on July 08, 2014, 01:14:22 PM
Does Lebron actually make an appearance there or nah?

isn't this where the crawford kid dunked all over LBJ and he tried to get everyone to delete the videos and he has never been back ever because he's scared it will happen again and especially this year with Foster coming?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: felix rex on July 08, 2014, 01:21:30 PM

Geez... Pullen 2.0

More like Fred Peete 2.0.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: cas4ksu on July 08, 2014, 09:16:38 PM
He will be better than Pullen, but never as loved as Pullen.
That's cause Pullen revived us, Foster is just getting passed the torch.

Pullen has/had a beard. Marcus does not.

Major factor. IMHO.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: uncle clean jeans on July 08, 2014, 09:32:51 PM
He has 2 years to make a run that Pullen never did, Big 12 championship, final four.
He has three years
:lol:
how about as early as the end of next season
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pissclams on July 08, 2014, 09:39:45 PM
k-state brotherhood of basketball.  pullen set the stage for foster, ergo, foster sets the stage for karapetyan.  the chain of the k-state brotherhood of basketball cannot be denied, nor broken.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: SeanSnyder4Prez on July 08, 2014, 11:54:46 PM
Marcus "Jazz Hands" Foster
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: bones129 on July 09, 2014, 12:14:10 AM
I think I will end up liking Foster more than Pullen.

I think I end up liking them equally.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: eastcat on July 09, 2014, 12:22:51 AM
The fact that foster is a freshman is  :love:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: j-dub on July 09, 2014, 12:32:23 AM
i'll never love anyone more than little jake.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on July 09, 2014, 09:02:29 AM
i'll never love anyone more than little jake.
Spoken like a true hopeless romantic who can't stop living in the past.  :frown:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on July 09, 2014, 09:21:57 AM
His presence at feral purple cat U is the difference between oscar being fired or retiring there. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on July 09, 2014, 10:16:40 AM
His presence at feral purple cat U is the difference between oscar being fired or retiring there.

Which is why he will have to exceed the heights Jake took us to if he wants to be equally beloved.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: p1k3 on July 09, 2014, 10:20:33 AM
don't think I could love anyone more than Jake, ever.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: j-dub on July 09, 2014, 10:25:05 AM
i'll never love anyone more than little jake.
Spoken like a true hopeless romantic who can't stop living in the past.  :frown:

lol wrong
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on July 09, 2014, 10:41:51 AM
He has three years
:lol:

I don't understand this post.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: felix rex on July 09, 2014, 10:50:09 AM
Like he's gonna leave early, maybe? :dunno:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: felix rex on July 09, 2014, 10:50:34 AM
Probably another elite Fred Peete reference.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trogdor on July 10, 2014, 10:00:40 AM
Hope Foster grows a killer 'stache or something. Just imagine how much better he could be with some facial hair. Pullz learned, Foster should too
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Shooter Jones on July 10, 2014, 10:36:10 AM
Hope Foster grows a killer 'stache or something. Just imagine how much better he could be with some facial hair. Pullz learned, Foster should too

like Fear the Fu Manchu?

[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: cfbandyman on July 10, 2014, 12:29:53 PM
Hope Foster grows a killer 'stache or something. Just imagine how much better he could be with some facial hair. Pullz learned, Foster should too

like Fear the Fu Manchu?

Need a better, less  :Yuck: facial hair style to ever get me to love Foster as much as I love Jake (and I think I'm going to end up liking Foster a lot).
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on July 10, 2014, 12:34:11 PM
fear the fu!
fear foster!
can't spell foster without fear!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Winters on July 10, 2014, 12:42:35 PM
He has three years
:lol:

I don't understand this post.
I thought it was funny that you made that guy look like an idiot.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Jackstack99EMAW on July 10, 2014, 01:56:24 PM
Miles Simon @milessimon  ·  22m
@MF2_KSU has def added strength and athleticism to his game since end of the season really attacking the rim and finishing strong

Jeff Borzello @jeffborzello  ·  31m
Marcus Foster can flat-out ball. Will be in the mix for Big 12 Player of the Year.

He's a boss. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on July 10, 2014, 01:58:30 PM
 :love: He's the best player we've had since Michael Beasley!  :love:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on July 10, 2014, 02:18:43 PM
Apparently Marcus now has a floater.  :gocho:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dugout DickStone on July 10, 2014, 02:20:13 PM
good lord oscar got lucky with this kid
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: uncle clean jeans on July 10, 2014, 02:21:22 PM
oscar needs to pick up another guard ASAP
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Jackstack99EMAW on July 10, 2014, 02:42:02 PM
We are going to be super athletic at guard and wing next yr. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on July 10, 2014, 02:44:26 PM
It does appear the staff main focus in the 2015 class is a combo guard, we stopped going after long wings when we wrapped up Malek Harris.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Jackstack99EMAW on July 10, 2014, 02:45:15 PM
It does appear the staff main focus in the 2015 class is a combo guard, we stopped going after long wings when we wrapped up Malek Harris.
Who is the best realistic target we can land? 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on July 10, 2014, 03:19:03 PM
oscar is watching Admon Glider as I am typing. Plays for Dallas Mustangs, Fosters old club. We have a strong relationship with them.
http://sports.yahoo.com/ncaa/basketball/recruiting/player-Admon-Gilder-147237 (http://sports.yahoo.com/ncaa/basketball/recruiting/player-Admon-Gilder-147237)

Drew Edwards is planning on a visit soon.
https://rivals.yahoo.com/kansasstate/basketball/recruiting/player-Drew-Edwards-136883;_ylt=Au4uTVQg17jAButfdpV9pCDfsJB4 (https://rivals.yahoo.com/kansasstate/basketball/recruiting/player-Drew-Edwards-136883;_ylt=Au4uTVQg17jAButfdpV9pCDfsJB4)

Everybody wants Malik Beasley and we were on him early. (Still under ranked)
https://rivals.yahoo.com/kansasstate/basketball/recruiting/player-Malik-Beasley-151788;_ylt=AjkLP934rx7C8Q.3QGNLAf3fsJB4 (https://rivals.yahoo.com/kansasstate/basketball/recruiting/player-Malik-Beasley-151788;_ylt=AjkLP934rx7C8Q.3QGNLAf3fsJB4)

I really like The Flush and amazed at how overlooked he is. (If we took him now I would be ecstatic)
https://rivals.yahoo.com/kansasstate/basketball/recruiting/player-Barry-Brown-152111;_ylt=AlOJc_VH4CA9qVDpoF8SU9DfsJB4 (https://rivals.yahoo.com/kansasstate/basketball/recruiting/player-Barry-Brown-152111;_ylt=AlOJc_VH4CA9qVDpoF8SU9DfsJB4)

Jimmy Whitt is an option but a tough pull
https://rivals.yahoo.com/kansasstate/basketball/recruiting/player-Jimmy-Whitt-134014;_ylt=AqOBwpgKzMwPqSr_mPtYZzDfsJB4 (https://rivals.yahoo.com/kansasstate/basketball/recruiting/player-Jimmy-Whitt-134014;_ylt=AqOBwpgKzMwPqSr_mPtYZzDfsJB4)

Landry Shamet has already been on campus and has family that has gone to K-State.
https://rivals.yahoo.com/kansasstate/basketball/recruiting/player-Landry-Shamet-163110;_ylt=AirtpDFULs7KurbZDO2iKyPfsJB4 (https://rivals.yahoo.com/kansasstate/basketball/recruiting/player-Landry-Shamet-163110;_ylt=AirtpDFULs7KurbZDO2iKyPfsJB4)

Ty hudson is another name that has came up recently.
https://rivals.yahoo.com/kansasstate/basketball/recruiting/player-Ty-Hudson-145820;_ylt=AmaZFdyT7l7PtQeCI9BaRSffsJB4 (https://rivals.yahoo.com/kansasstate/basketball/recruiting/player-Ty-Hudson-145820;_ylt=AmaZFdyT7l7PtQeCI9BaRSffsJB4)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: yoman on July 10, 2014, 03:20:08 PM
Love Foster, but I really hope he goes back to the shooting sleeve instead of the tee shirt under his uniform. It looked way better. JMO
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on July 10, 2014, 03:24:49 PM
Love Foster, but I really hope he goes back to the shooting sleeve instead of the tee shirt under his uniform. It looked way better. JMO
Whatever makes him shoot better is what I want.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pissclams on July 10, 2014, 07:20:53 PM
good lord oscar got lucky with this kid
very shitty attitude, -1 pizza
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on July 10, 2014, 08:18:58 PM
Fosters: its Australian for "Beard".
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Pett on July 15, 2014, 09:08:36 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi574.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fss189%2FPointguardUcom%2F640%2FLeBron%25202014%2Fc2c%2FIMG_0274.jpg%7Eoriginal&hash=45722e4acdde678815e9ab33745a52247db27555)

:love: :love: :love:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Cire on July 15, 2014, 09:26:01 PM
Too many biscuits
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Spracne on July 15, 2014, 09:28:40 PM
Why is there a Sherron Collins pic in here?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Tobias on July 15, 2014, 09:29:50 PM

Why is there a Sherron Collins pic in here?

beat me to it :curse:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Kat Kid on July 15, 2014, 09:30:03 PM
He looks like a short Antoine Walker.   :sdeek:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on July 15, 2014, 09:36:52 PM
All muscle! :gocho:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: SdK on July 15, 2014, 09:58:23 PM
Fosters: its Australian for "Beard".
:thumbs:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: SdK on July 15, 2014, 09:59:24 PM
He looks like a short Antoine Walker.   :sdeek:
As a fan of the Cardiac Cats, I strongly disagree.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: SdK on July 15, 2014, 10:00:11 PM
He looks like a short Antoine Walker.   :sdeek:
As a fan of the Cardiac Cats, I strongly disagree.
'Toine was skinny with a big head in college.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: SdK on July 15, 2014, 10:00:35 PM
Maybe you meant in hid Celtics career. I still disgree.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: BackPayne on July 15, 2014, 11:02:58 PM
Damn, I didn't even recognize that baller as Foster.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: j-dub on July 15, 2014, 11:28:20 PM
oh no. he needs to join billy butler in his new a.m. workouts  :ohno:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Winters on July 15, 2014, 11:43:45 PM
He looks like a short Antoine Walker.   :sdeek:
:excited:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Emo EMAW on July 16, 2014, 10:22:50 AM
It's the guy behind him that make shim look fat.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: hatingfrancisco on July 16, 2014, 10:30:21 AM
It's the guy behind him that make shim look fat.

And not his double chin.  Got it.   :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mikeyis4dcats on July 16, 2014, 03:12:39 PM
definitely taking tips from Beasley. 

Jonathon Beasley.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: meow meow on July 16, 2014, 03:13:17 PM
thanks unlimited training table
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: signature move on July 16, 2014, 03:18:14 PM
jesus h., marcus.

didn't someone here mention that he used to have has a weight problem he struggles to control?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on July 16, 2014, 03:21:38 PM
Supposedly his past weight prob was due to taking time off for an injury and still eating like he was training.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: stunted on July 16, 2014, 03:33:33 PM
Put him at tight end
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Fedor on July 16, 2014, 03:58:15 PM
Supposedly his past weight prob was due to taking time off for an injury and still eating like he was training.
If you are a high school kid that can't eat anything you want whether you are training or not, you have a weight problem.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: _33 on July 16, 2014, 04:02:43 PM
He doesn't look that big.  Basically looks exactly like during the season.  Are you guys Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) or something?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on July 16, 2014, 04:11:45 PM
Yeah, he's the last guy i'm worried about in this world. He had some solid reviews from the Lebron Camp.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: signature move on July 16, 2014, 05:31:11 PM
He doesn't look that big.  Basically looks exactly like during the season.  Are you guys Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) or something?

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi574.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fss189%2FPointguardUcom%2F640%2FLeBron%25202014%2Fc2c%2FIMG_0274.jpg%7Eoriginal&hash=45722e4acdde678815e9ab33745a52247db27555)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.littleapplepost.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F01%2Ffoster.jpeg&hash=84974297a592debace1d09f5a7fae9988d938da4)

sorry for being so Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!), funny video guy. obviously he's the same lithe marcus now as he ever was.

i'll go back to lurking the bw3 board.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: eastcat on July 16, 2014, 05:59:44 PM
It's because he constantly eats so much Mcdonalds.

Not joking.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: _33 on July 16, 2014, 06:29:08 PM
He doesn't look that big.  Basically looks exactly like during the season.  Are you guys Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) or something?

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi574.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fss189%2FPointguardUcom%2F640%2FLeBron%25202014%2Fc2c%2FIMG_0274.jpg%7Eoriginal&hash=45722e4acdde678815e9ab33745a52247db27555)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.littleapplepost.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F01%2Ffoster.jpeg&hash=84974297a592debace1d09f5a7fae9988d938da4)

sorry for being so Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!), funny video guy. obviously he's the same lithe marcus now as he ever was.

i'll go back to lurking the bw3 board.

No difference. Do you think that guys shorts behind him are part of his butt or something?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: signature move on July 16, 2014, 07:17:51 PM
No difference. Do you think that guys shorts behind him are part of his butt or something?

crap, you know what? i did. still, he's obviously put on a few.

should be fine once he's practicing, working out and playing regularly. amazing to me that after 8 or 9 years at and in illinois, with all the recruiting advantages, oscar snags this kid out of wichita effing falls, texas, and he turns out to be oscar's best-ever recruit. still, i can't help but want that schmuck to do well.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on July 16, 2014, 10:06:47 PM
He doesn't look that big.  Basically looks exactly like during the season.  Are you guys Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) or something?

You are correct. I saw him several times the last weekend of June and he did not look fat or overweight at all. I don't think much changed in 2 weeks.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on July 16, 2014, 10:33:14 PM
He doesn't look that big.  Basically looks exactly like during the season.  Are you guys Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) or something?

You are correct. I saw him several times the last weekend of June and he did not look fat or overweight at all. I don't think much changed in 2 weeks.

yeah. he and i flew on the same mhk aa flight from mhk to ord around that time and i didn't think he looked big. also, guess who sat in seat 1A? hint- it wasn't me.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Asteriskhead on July 17, 2014, 06:51:39 AM
Smart, reasonable posters in this thread just face mushing the eff out of you rubes.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pissclams on July 17, 2014, 07:29:45 AM
marcus foster fat-gate,  one of the more unexpected summertime bbsing topics
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: PIPE on July 17, 2014, 09:22:12 AM
Look at those traps!!  I need to know what trap workout he does and implement that asap!!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Stevesie60 on July 17, 2014, 12:17:21 PM
Are those really the best jerseys that Lebron could afford?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: felix rex on July 17, 2014, 12:33:33 PM
Honestly, I was way more focused on the background zombies with the super tuck.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: mocat on July 17, 2014, 12:35:29 PM
if anything he clearly has gotten a tan
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on July 17, 2014, 12:45:24 PM
Are those really the best jerseys that Lebron could afford?
lol at Lebron spending a penny for that camp.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: KITNfury on July 17, 2014, 12:53:45 PM
He has without question gained weight. Traps give it away, thicker neck. Hard to say what amount was fat or not.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Asteriskhead on July 17, 2014, 12:57:58 PM
He has without question gained weight. Traps give it away, thicker neck. Hard to say what amount was fat or not.

there's a clear difference in posture between the two pictures.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Spracne on July 17, 2014, 01:05:18 PM
He has without question gained weight. Traps give it away, thicker neck. Hard to say what amount was fat or not.

I think you can see it in his face.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Stevesie60 on July 17, 2014, 01:13:48 PM
Hey guys, I bet my neck looks skinnier when I'm looking up than when I'm looking down, too. Anyone else suffer from this?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: KsJoey on July 17, 2014, 02:12:38 PM
Might as well show the others

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi574.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fss189%2FPointguardUcom%2F640%2FLeBron%25202014%2FIMG_0272.jpg&hash=894626f8376069ee0ce4cc152389be00522191c0)

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi574.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fss189%2FPointguardUcom%2F640%2FLeBron%25202014%2FIMG_0367-1.jpg&hash=77a5265745fe2573f57a3d34e5901ff9c292d6a2)

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi574.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fss189%2FPointguardUcom%2F640%2FLeBron%25202014%2FIMG_0353.jpg&hash=722bed0c9af3b245108de3839d203ccfd29811ef)

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi574.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fss189%2FPointguardUcom%2F640%2FLeBron%25202014%2FIMG_0304-1.jpg&hash=c594d5f8af290c2178cb0c3c462d461b50374b36)



Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Stevesie60 on July 17, 2014, 02:24:32 PM
He needs his mohawk back to look skinnier. Much more aerodynamic.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Asteriskhead on July 17, 2014, 02:26:55 PM
 :lol: :lol: :lol: you guys are so dumb.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: _33 on July 17, 2014, 03:06:46 PM
I thought I put an end to this nonsense yesterday. Why is everyone being dumb again?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: puniraptor on July 17, 2014, 03:24:38 PM
wow. i thought he guy behind him was his hips too. he was looking like a nosetackle.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on July 17, 2014, 03:29:24 PM
Mods, plz lock this thread up until the first game. TIA.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: KITNfury on July 17, 2014, 07:12:18 PM
He has without question gained weight. Traps give it away, thicker neck. Hard to say what amount was fat or not.

there's a clear difference in posture between the two pictures.
For real?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trogdor on July 17, 2014, 07:26:10 PM
He has without question gained weight. Traps give it away, thicker neck. Hard to say what amount was fat or not.

there's a clear difference in posture between the two pictures.
For real?

How the eff can you even conclude that. Do you work for the CIA or something?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Belvis Noland on July 17, 2014, 07:49:46 PM
I'm sure I missed something here, but foster said he gained 10 lbs in the off season and that he aims to "trim some body fat" before the season.  He's outed himself as a confirmed fatty. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on July 17, 2014, 08:39:25 PM
http://thebiglead.com/2014/07/17/50-best-players-in-college-basketball-for-2014-2015/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=t.co
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on July 17, 2014, 08:52:17 PM
 :love:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: star seed 7 on July 17, 2014, 08:53:13 PM
i don't remember him having tattoo's last year.  wierd.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Asteriskhead on July 17, 2014, 09:27:26 PM
He has without question gained weight. Traps give it away, thicker neck. Hard to say what amount was fat or not.

there's a clear difference in posture between the two pictures.
For real?

If you don't understand how proper posture effects your appearance, there is nothing I can do to help you. The difference between the pictures is minimal, and can easily be explained by the difference that would appear when comparing a person standing with proper posture vs. slouching.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: KITNfury on July 17, 2014, 09:40:00 PM
He has without question gained weight. Traps give it away, thicker neck. Hard to say what amount was fat or not.

there's a clear difference in posture between the two pictures.
For real?

If you don't understand how proper posture effects your appearance, there is nothing I can do to help you. The difference between the pictures is minimal, and can easily be explained by the difference that would appear when comparing a person standing with proper posture vs. slouching.
I'm man enough to admit when somebody got me good, and you did!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sonofdaxjones on July 17, 2014, 09:52:39 PM
Some people in this thread need to go have the other half of their diet Greek Yogurt and stay the eff off this thread.

My word.

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Asteriskhead on July 17, 2014, 09:54:59 PM
He has without question gained weight. Traps give it away, thicker neck. Hard to say what amount was fat or not.

there's a clear difference in posture between the two pictures.
For real?

If you don't understand how proper posture effects your appearance, there is nothing I can do to help you. The difference between the pictures is minimal, and can easily be explained by the difference that would appear when comparing a person standing with proper posture vs. slouching.
I'm man enough to admit when somebody got me good, and you did!

 :cheers: it's all good. I will admit that his mid-section isn't visible. Males, due to the being testosterone hormone dominant, tend to carry excess fat in their mid section and often times their face. Females, due to being estrogen hormone dominant, tend to carry excess fat in their appendages.

I will admit that the initial picture posted makes him look like he has a softer jaw line and neck than during the season, but I think that can be explained by the mass created by his shoulder blades being drawn together pushing more tissue towards his head, rather than the slack shoulder appearance seen in the free throw picture.

Now I feel creepy, and slightly like Manhatter. "He's got great hips!"
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: mhkpasa on July 17, 2014, 10:10:20 PM
Supposedly his past weight prob was due to taking time off for an injury and still eating like he was training.
If you are a high school kid that can't eat anything you want whether you are training or not, you have a weight problem.

Don't have a link handy but I remember reading he lived with his bro and bro's pregnant wife who ate like a pregnant lady and he inevitably ate with his roomies alot.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: I_have_purplewood on July 17, 2014, 10:12:57 PM
Was so busy trying to weigh (yep) in on Foster's weight gain I almost missed the ginger?  Wisconsin dude?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: The Big Train on July 17, 2014, 10:15:31 PM
Not everyone is fully developed when they are 18, so I'm sure he will and probably has gained some muscle mass and probably will continue to do so.  I mean he just turned 19 like a month ago.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: star seed 7 on July 17, 2014, 10:33:00 PM
It was the double shorts huge ass. First glance got me too
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: EllRobersonisInnocent on July 17, 2014, 11:08:56 PM
I mean, lets just say that Foster basically gets onion rings as a side with his meal and the fried twinkie dessert every single time he comes in to eat at station. This doesn't surprise me one bit.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: star seed 7 on July 17, 2014, 11:14:41 PM
I mean, lets just say that Foster basically gets onion rings as a side with his meal and the fried twinkie dessert every single time he comes in to eat at station. This doesn't surprise me one bit.

Might want to talk to gfa about what to do after you get fired for releasing that information
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on July 18, 2014, 10:14:25 AM
I don't care how much he weights, if he is constantly dunking on future pros.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: SPEmaw on July 18, 2014, 10:16:08 AM
Supposedly his past weight prob was due to taking time off for an injury and still eating like he was training.
If you are a high school kid that can't eat anything you want whether you are training or not, you have a weight problem.

Don't have a link handy but I remember reading he lived with his bro and bro's pregnant wife who ate like a pregnant lady and he inevitably ate with his roomies alot.

Guys, he put on weight in HS because he was forced to play center for his school team, Hersci or whatever. He was only 6'2" and needed to bulk up for his team to stand a chance. Him playing center and putting on weight allowed us to land him. Take it or leave it.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: hatingfrancisco on July 18, 2014, 10:47:00 AM
Supposedly his past weight prob was due to taking time off for an injury and still eating like he was training.
If you are a high school kid that can't eat anything you want whether you are training or not, you have a weight problem.

Don't have a link handy but I remember reading he lived with his bro and bro's pregnant wife who ate like a pregnant lady and he inevitably ate with his roomies alot.

Guys, he put on weight in HS because he was forced to play center for his school team, Hersci or whatever. He was only 6'2" and needed to bulk up for his team to stand a chance. Him playing center and putting on weight allowed us to land him. Take it or leave it.

That's not why he was overweight. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: SPE_khat on July 18, 2014, 01:05:30 PM
You know it's the dog days of summer when we are dissecting Fosters weight gain to this degree.  Any way we can get an exact calorie intake on this guy?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: JohnCurrie is Weird/Gross on July 18, 2014, 01:48:25 PM
http://thebiglead.com/2014/07/17/50-best-players-in-college-basketball-for-2014-2015/

#22  :D
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: mhkpasa on July 18, 2014, 02:01:30 PM
http://thebiglead.com/2014/07/17/50-best-players-in-college-basketball-for-2014-2015/

#22  :D

luke what we have here
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Spracne on July 19, 2014, 08:42:42 AM
What camp is this?(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.tapatalk.com%2Fd%2F14%2F07%2F19%2Fesyvezym.jpg&hash=4ca4f26eb55b7ada16adb8e2dbb59af83465968a)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on July 19, 2014, 10:47:52 AM
Ladder camp.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: SdK on July 19, 2014, 01:12:49 PM
Omg so fat!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kim carnes on July 19, 2014, 02:13:16 PM
What camp is this?(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.tapatalk.com%2Fd%2F14%2F07%2F19%2Fesyvezym.jpg&hash=4ca4f26eb55b7ada16adb8e2dbb59af83465968a)

fat camp  :lol:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: The1BigWillie on July 21, 2014, 09:25:17 AM
Who in the hell is that?  :sdeek:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on July 21, 2014, 09:39:36 AM
Eddie Murphy has really let himself go.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Unruly on July 21, 2014, 12:25:14 PM
Eddie Murphy has really let himself go.

I like the facial hair tho
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: PowercatPat on July 21, 2014, 12:32:11 PM
I saw Marcus over the weekend. He didn't look overweight to me.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: SPEmaw on July 21, 2014, 01:32:28 PM
What camp is this?(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.tapatalk.com%2Fd%2F14%2F07%2F19%2Fesyvezym.jpg&hash=4ca4f26eb55b7ada16adb8e2dbb59af83465968a)

It's @ Cole Aldrich's camp.  :lol:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kslim on July 21, 2014, 01:41:59 PM
AINT NO SWEETS!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kslim on July 21, 2014, 01:42:27 PM
Ladder camp.
also laughed really hard at this
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: puniraptor on July 21, 2014, 02:58:25 PM
i just hope we get all sleeveless marcus and no tshirt marcus
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: mocat on July 21, 2014, 03:15:36 PM
sherron really is fat tho you guys, wow
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep on July 21, 2014, 05:36:20 PM
that guy in the picture is not sherron collins. sherron collins is kinda fat... that guy is super fat.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep on July 21, 2014, 05:36:47 PM
i think thats glen davis.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Pete on July 21, 2014, 07:43:23 PM
Theoretically, a super fat Marcus would be hurting his chances of going pro early, rrrrriiiiigggghhhhttt?????
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on July 21, 2014, 10:21:18 PM
What camp is this?(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.tapatalk.com%2Fd%2F14%2F07%2F19%2Fesyvezym.jpg&hash=4ca4f26eb55b7ada16adb8e2dbb59af83465968a)
I believe that's Sherwin Williams mascot, the Swatch
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Unruly on July 28, 2014, 10:01:17 AM
http://collegebasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/07/25/marcus-foster-still-hasnt-forgotten-or-forgiven-those-pulled-scholarships/
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pissclams on July 28, 2014, 12:03:44 PM
what a great article written by known emaw stud rob dauster.  it would have been nice for de oscar da stud to get some love from dauster for sticking by foster and also for developing him into the stud that he is today.  #TresStuds

now that proven studfinder de oscar has been id'd as true stud detective, makes you wonder who will be de oscar's next stud that he pulls out of his quiver and shocks the college basketball world with on the cover of ksu stud magazine #who?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Pete on July 28, 2014, 12:29:39 PM
what a great article written by known emaw stud rob dauster.  it would have been nice for de oscar da stud to get some love from dauster for sticking by foster and also for developing him into the stud that he is today.  #TresStuds

now that proven studfinder de oscar has been id'd as true stud detective, makes you wonder who will be de oscar's next stud that he pulls out of his quiver and shocks the college basketball world with on the cover of ksu stud magazine #who?

At first, I thought the same thing, clams.  NO respect for Weber.  But, then I reread it, and I think the ol' Dauster Dog knows that EVERYONE KNOWS who coaches the KSU wildcats. 

Quote
“My coach always tells me that if I want to go to the next level I’m going to have to be a point because I’m only 6-foot-2,” Foster said. “It’s something that I have to do. Being a point guard is kind of new to me, but I picked up some point guard things.”

Like what?

“Pick-and-roll stuff, ball-handling stuff, getting the ball up the court [without dribbling], how to split traps, stuff like that.”

Basically, Dauster Dog (aka "The Dog") was thinking "If I type 'oscar Weber' here, it is like pointing out that Mary was the mother of Jesus....duh."  The Dog gets it.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on July 28, 2014, 01:02:45 PM
The article didn't mention our guy Gip. He was fantastic before he hurt his shoulder, we are going to be very salty.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pissclams on July 28, 2014, 01:33:07 PM
what a great article written by known emaw stud rob dauster.  it would have been nice for de oscar da stud to get some love from dauster for sticking by foster and also for developing him into the stud that he is today.  #TresStuds

now that proven studfinder de oscar has been id'd as true stud detective, makes you wonder who will be de oscar's next stud that he pulls out of his quiver and shocks the college basketball world with on the cover of ksu stud magazine #who?

At first, I thought the same thing, clams.  NO respect for Weber.  But, then I reread it, and I think the ol' Dauster Dog knows that EVERYONE KNOWS who coaches the KSU wildcats. 

Quote
“My coach always tells me that if I want to go to the next level I’m going to have to be a point because I’m only 6-foot-2,” Foster said. “It’s something that I have to do. Being a point guard is kind of new to me, but I picked up some point guard things.”

Like what?

“Pick-and-roll stuff, ball-handling stuff, getting the ball up the court [without dribbling], how to split traps, stuff like that.”

Basically, Dauster Dog (aka "The Dog") was thinking "If I type 'oscar Weber' here, it is like pointing out that Mary was the mother of Jesus....duh."  The Dog gets it.

as usual, you analysis is spot on.  pretty studly stuff.  #QuadStuds
sometimes the dog's articles are so cleverly written that you don't get his entire meaning until after several readings and admittedly, i have only read this particular foster article 14 times.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pissclams on July 28, 2014, 01:33:20 PM
thoughts?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Pete on July 28, 2014, 02:01:51 PM
thoughts?

OK, yeah.  I just read it for the 17th time, and this gem finally jumped out at me:

Quote
I’ll be frank: playing Foster at the point would not be ideal for the Wildcats. Regardless of how much he’s worked this offseason, he’s at his best at the college level when he’s playing as a scoring guard. He’s a lethal three-point shooter when he gets into a rhythm and he’s got the strength and explosiveness to overpower defenders when he’s attacking the rim. Regardless of what position he projects as at the next level, Foster is a terrific scoring guard in college.

But with Will Spradling graduating and a pair of unproven point guards — sophomores Nigel Johnson and Jevon Thomas — it’s not a bad thing if Foster becomes an improved playmaker, particularly when you consider that Kansas State has brought in a trio of promising transfers (Hopper, Stephen Hurtt and Brandon Bolden) and returns sophomore wing Westicles, who is expected to have a big sophomore season.

First time I read that, I thought it was straight talk ("honest") basketball analysis of Marcus Foster and his position / usage on the floor.   

But, then around the 8th or 9th time I read this (I spilled coffee on my notes, so the exact re-reading point is blurry, but's definitely greater than 5, and less than 10 because I was eating Cheetos at 10 and noticed the smudges on the paper and it was way before that), I thought "Man, this guy is making a Frank Martin quip."  I mean, "i'll be frank????"  LOL, I read you Dog!  It seemed clear to me that the Dog was saying "If I put myself in the shoes of Frank Martin, how would I break this mother rough rider down?"  Seemed like a very Frank Martin type analysis.

But, then I reread this the 17th time, and I essentially just let my mind go, and spirit journeyed into the Dog's mind's eye.  I had missed the point completely.  The Dog, being what amounts to a current day Merlin the Wizard, is REALLY saying "Hold up, Frank Martin may say THIS, BUT oscar Weber would counter by saying the bit about ' it’s not a bad thing if Foster becomes an improved playmaker'."  Those two paragraphs are the Dog  shape-shifting in and out of the brain of 2 major conference coaches.

Brilliant.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pissclams on July 28, 2014, 02:31:54 PM
crap man i got really busy at work and haven't had time to read it 3 more times but am really pumped to get to the Mind's Eye Level 17.
might have to wait until tonight i don't know.  i do think there's more to this article that we haven't quite gotten to yet, something is telling me that we're only scratch the surface of this seed that the dog has given us.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Pete on July 28, 2014, 02:51:00 PM
What do you think happens at the 20th reading?  I don't even want to speculate on that.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pissclams on July 28, 2014, 03:19:25 PM
i don't know but i'm going to find out tonight.  a little scared to go past level 15 with the dog's writings but i guess the time has come. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ChiComCat on July 28, 2014, 04:45:40 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F2.bp.blogspot.com%2F-aMP641ADCqo%2FTsmW049vcwI%2FAAAAAAAAA1w%2FN7TPS1TJbYI%2Fs1600%2Fdaydreaming.jpeg&hash=0c95ffcbfc0ac146bccb1b1d6812f8cd25409c34)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Emo EMAW on July 29, 2014, 04:28:58 PM
Fitz just said on BITB that Foster is about ten pounds overweight.  Which is like, hey Fitz, glass houses.

Sent using Tapatalk Elite on iPhone 6

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wabash909 on July 29, 2014, 04:35:45 PM
Man, can you imagine how hard it must be to lose ten whole pounds if you're a 19 year old D-1 athlete?  The answer, is pretty hard.

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on July 29, 2014, 04:42:05 PM
Fitz just said on BITB that Foster is about ten pounds overweight.  Which is like, hey Fitz, glass houses.

Sent using Tapatalk Elite on iPhone 6

He read this thread and threw a dart.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: TownieCat on July 29, 2014, 04:59:11 PM
Just because he is 10 lbs heavier does not mean he is 10 lbs overweight.  :Ugh:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Emo EMAW on July 29, 2014, 05:33:28 PM
Just because he is 10 lbs heavier does not mean he is 10 lbs overweight.  :Ugh:
[/quote
 I fully agree but he used the word overweight.

Sent using Tapatalk Elite on iPhone 6

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: star seed 7 on July 29, 2014, 07:53:33 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F2.bp.blogspot.com%2F-aMP641ADCqo%2FTsmW049vcwI%2FAAAAAAAAA1w%2FN7TPS1TJbYI%2Fs1600%2Fdaydreaming.jpeg&hash=0c95ffcbfc0ac146bccb1b1d6812f8cd25409c34)

 :)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on July 29, 2014, 09:04:07 PM
I could lose 10 pounds in 7 days and I'm skinny AF! God damnit, fitz! :shakesfist:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: EllRobersonisInnocent on July 29, 2014, 09:06:12 PM
Wouldn't surprise me if the extra weight caused a knee or ankle injury at some point this season.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on July 29, 2014, 09:08:43 PM
Wouldn't surprise me if the extra weight caused a knee or ankle injury at some point this season.
:dubious:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Asteriskhead on July 29, 2014, 10:17:57 PM
ten pounds of water weight in a week is child's play.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: TownieCat on July 30, 2014, 08:08:12 AM
Wouldn't surprise me if the extra weight caused a knee or ankle injury at some point this season.

Wouldn't surprise me if this dumbass post caused a face or throat injury at some point this season.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on July 30, 2014, 09:25:04 AM
Pretty obvs that MF is gaining weight to fill the Shane stretch 4 shoes.

oscar is a step ahead of you all.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: SdK on July 30, 2014, 09:58:13 AM
Pretty obvs that MF is gaining weight to fill the Shane stretch 4 shoes.

oscar is a step ahead of you all.
Ala Hoskins? :love:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 'taterblast on August 21, 2014, 06:26:18 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BvmVFBpIIAEYPIW.jpg)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: That_Guy on August 22, 2014, 12:43:52 AM

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BvmVFBpIIAEYPIW.jpg)

Adorable


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on August 22, 2014, 01:15:21 PM
Look at those awful grammatical errors.  :peek:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Katpappy on August 22, 2014, 08:54:45 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BvmVFBpIIAEYPIW.jpg)
Your kid blast?  :dunno:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ShellShock on August 24, 2014, 06:33:11 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BvmVFBpIIAEYPIW.jpg)

That kid needs to learn to color inside the lines...we can't have sloppy crayon execution from a young cat. CLEAN IT UP!!!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 'taterblast on August 24, 2014, 07:26:19 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BvmVFBpIIAEYPIW.jpg)
Your kid blast?  :dunno:

no
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: TownieCat on September 12, 2014, 09:39:02 AM
http://instagram.com/p/s0ozbch33E/?modal=true (http://instagram.com/p/s0ozbch33E/?modal=true)

Looks pretty not fat in this vid  :dunno:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ksupamplemousse on September 12, 2014, 09:49:35 AM
http://instagram.com/p/s0ozbch33E/?modal=true (http://instagram.com/p/s0ozbch33E/?modal=true)

Looks pretty not fat in this vid  :dunno:

BUT HE'S SO FAT THOUGH!!!  :runaway:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: chum1 on September 12, 2014, 10:51:22 AM
For all we know, the fatter he is, the better he plays.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Pett on September 12, 2014, 11:53:14 AM
http://instagram.com/p/s0ozbch33E/?modal=true (http://instagram.com/p/s0ozbch33E/?modal=true)

Looks pretty not fat in this vid  :dunno:
So effortless :love:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Asteriskhead on September 12, 2014, 12:45:03 PM
http://instagram.com/p/s0ozbch33E/?modal=true (http://instagram.com/p/s0ozbch33E/?modal=true)

Looks pretty not fat in this vid  :dunno:

:ermahgerd:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: renocat on September 15, 2014, 11:54:50 AM
 BleacherReport lists Marcus Foster as one of the top players opposing fans will hate this upcoming year.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: TownieCat on September 15, 2014, 12:02:51 PM
BleacherReport lists Marcus Foster as one of the top players opposing fans will hate this upcoming year.

Good. Opposing fans typically reserve hate for the players that do the most damage against them.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: star seed 7 on September 17, 2014, 08:46:23 PM
BleacherReport lists Marcus Foster as one of the top players opposing fans will hate this upcoming year.

Good. Opposing fans typically reserve hate for the players that do the most damage against them.

Have never heard this before
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 'taterblast on October 02, 2014, 10:18:18 AM
@KellisRobinett 
Big 12 announces preseason hoops honors: Juwan Staten is POY. Marcus Foster, Georges Niang, Perry Ellis, Buddy Hield join him on the team.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Winters on October 02, 2014, 10:53:05 AM
 :ksu:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pissclams on October 02, 2014, 11:00:07 AM
30 lbs less and he's POY
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on October 02, 2014, 11:05:21 AM
Has anyone discussed the most important Marcus stat for the upcoming year (hair: mohawk thingy, or no?)?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 'taterblast on October 02, 2014, 11:21:25 AM
Has anyone discussed the most important Marcus stat for the upcoming year (hair: mohawk thingy, or no?)?

more important than armwear (single sleeve, under tshirt) ??
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: EMAWzified on October 02, 2014, 12:31:06 PM
A slight, IMO    :shakesfist:

@KellisRobinett 
Big 12 announces preseason hoops honors: Juwan Staten is POY. Marcus Foster, Georges Niang, Perry Ellis, Buddy Hield join him on the team.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep on October 02, 2014, 12:56:28 PM
judging by those 5 players and how they were last year, i think this is going to be a down year for the big 12.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep on October 02, 2014, 01:04:53 PM
for reference...

2013 First Team:

Ben McLemore
Jeff Withey
Rodney McGruder
Romero Osby
Marcus Smart

2014 First Team:

Melvin Ejim
DeAndre Kane
Andrew Wiggins
Marcus Smart
Juwan Staten



Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CHONGS on October 02, 2014, 01:44:03 PM
wow I always figured to see more KU players on a list like that. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on October 02, 2014, 02:58:26 PM
judging by those 5 players and how they were last year, i think this is going to be a down year for the big 12.
The fact no elite freshmen made the list show the depth of talent in the league, IMO.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep on October 02, 2014, 04:21:15 PM
well its hard to make the preseason all big 12 as a freshman. in the past 3 seasons wiggins was the only one. i could look further back than that but i doubt ill find any. i dont even think Beasley would have been...
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on October 02, 2014, 06:13:16 PM
well its hard to make the preseason all big 12 as a freshman. in the past 3 seasons wiggins was the only one. i could look further back than that but i doubt ill find any. i dont even think Beasley would have been...

Really served up M-N hard on that one.  Served him with ice cold not incorrect facts.  #data
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 02, 2014, 09:49:12 PM
Perry Ellis and Buddy Help are not good enough to be on that team.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: renocat on October 03, 2014, 12:12:15 AM
The purple fog of doom rises.  The two headed Manhattan Monster is unleashed.  Slashing to the basket, jamming dunks down the throats of terror stricken Texans, Okies, Iowegians, and Blue-birdies, and raining 3 bombs on the hapless foes, Foster and Edwards will be the Big 12's worst nightmare.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sunny_cat on October 03, 2014, 12:29:34 AM
The purple fog of doom rises.  The two headed Manhattan Monster is unleashed.  Slashing to the basket, jamming dunks down the throats of terror stricken Texans, Okies, Iowegians, and Blue-birdies, and raining 3 bombs on the hapless foes, Foster and Edwards will be the Big 12's worst nightmare.

You're so weird
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on October 03, 2014, 01:17:20 PM
Quote
"We got the Final Four talent, Big 12 championship and all that. We just got to get it together on the defensive end because we can score with anybody." - Marcus Foster
:ksu:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on October 03, 2014, 01:45:14 PM
Quote
"We got the Final Four talent, Big 12 championship and all that. We just got to get it together on the defensive end because we can score with anybody." - Marcus Foster
:ksu:


I hope he's right. Last year we won because good defense overcame pretty mediocre offense most nights.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Cartierfor3 on October 03, 2014, 01:50:51 PM
ksu_FAN it is good to be a fan of the Cats and Royals isn't it?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on October 03, 2014, 01:56:17 PM
I believe our defense is going to be really good. The one thing I believe we have in Spades is ability to guard the ball. Jevon, Nigel should be better defensively then Marcus this year. They both move better laterally. Then you have Wesley and Malek they give you great flexibility. IMO, Malek is the most talent defensive player we have landed since Dom.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on October 03, 2014, 02:01:53 PM
ksu_FAN it is good to be a fan of the Cats and Royals isn't it?

Really, really good.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Headinjun on October 06, 2014, 12:41:43 AM
Marcus Foster  :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Skipper44 on October 07, 2014, 03:22:06 PM
I believe our defense is going to be really good. The one thing I believe we have in Spades is ability to guard the ball. Jevon, Nigel should be better defensively then Marcus this year. They both move better laterally. Then you have Wesley and Malek they give you great flexibility. IMO, Malek is the most talent defensive player we have landed since Dom.
Really?  his vids gave me the feel of more of a player that excels by his combo of skill and length than quickness and athletic ability.  Great news if true, this teram could use a another long wing defender.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on October 07, 2014, 03:45:41 PM
Malek isn't a natural scorer. He is a prototypical defensive tough guy, physical and can rebound. I don't think he ever comes a go to option.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: The Big Train on October 08, 2014, 12:56:22 AM
saw foster on campus the other day, gonna be an even bigger stud this year than last
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Spracne on October 08, 2014, 08:29:50 AM
saw foster on campus the other day, gonna be an even bigger stud this year than last

How much bigger did he look?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 08, 2014, 09:38:52 AM
oscar said he's only 5 lbs overweight fwiw.  :dunno:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 23, 2014, 04:47:52 PM
http://www.foxsports.com/kansas-city/story/k-state-s-marcus-foster-says-snub-from-ku-is-what-fuels-him-to-this-day-102214

'Grats, @Spracne!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on October 23, 2014, 04:59:09 PM
Somebody should tell him to stop saying that crap. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 23, 2014, 05:06:28 PM
Somebody should tell him to stop saying that crap.
Yeah. Pretty embarrassing.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Spracne on October 23, 2014, 05:17:43 PM
http://www.foxsports.com/kansas-city/story/k-state-s-marcus-foster-says-snub-from-ku-is-what-fuels-him-to-this-day-102214

'Grats, @Spracne!

#DreamWheaters
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pissclams on October 23, 2014, 05:22:32 PM
he never said that.  the writer is a KU plant
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 23, 2014, 05:34:20 PM
MF just trolling Phogistan

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: renocat on October 23, 2014, 10:17:32 PM
Foster's comment is a polite way of saying look what you stupid bastards missed out on!!  Eat Cat crap Birdies.  We should even be stronger on defense this year.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Spracne on October 23, 2014, 10:25:29 PM
Foster's comment is a polite way of saying look what you stupid bastards missed out on!!  Eat Cat crap Birdies.  We should even be stronger on defense this year.
I doubt Bill gives a hoot.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 24, 2014, 08:29:20 AM
It's times like these that really brings out the Phogtuck in Spracs.

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on October 24, 2014, 09:07:29 AM
Funny part is that Self wouldn't be very good utilizing Marcus.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dugout DickStone on October 24, 2014, 10:02:28 AM
Foster doesn't drink/hit girls enough to be at KU.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 24, 2014, 10:03:52 AM
 :lol:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: meow meow on October 24, 2014, 03:14:32 PM
i don't think that was a joke
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Spracne on October 24, 2014, 03:20:22 PM
It's times like these that really brings out the Phogtuck in Spracs.

I was confused when I read this.  I thought, "Did dax really think my post belied some type of upset on my part?"  Then I realized, if someone constantly sees rage in other people - especially when it's not there - then the rage is really within oneself.  Sad, really...
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: bballfan on October 24, 2014, 03:39:42 PM
Foster's comment is a polite way of saying look what you stupid bastards missed out on!!  Eat Cat crap Birdies.  We should even be stronger on defense this year.
I doubt Bill gives a hoot.
Lol, I get it. It's because you guys are birds!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Spracne on October 24, 2014, 03:43:31 PM
Foster's comment is a polite way of saying look what you stupid bastards missed out on!!  Eat Cat crap Birdies.  We should even be stronger on defense this year.
I doubt Bill gives a hoot.
Lol, I get it. It's because you guys are birds!

It was a s/o to reno's catchy nickname for Self.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: mocat on October 24, 2014, 03:44:54 PM
Foster's comment is a polite way of saying look what you stupid bastards missed out on!!  Eat Cat crap Birdies.  We should even be stronger on defense this year.
I doubt Bill gives a hoot.
Lol, I get it. It's because you guys are birds!

It was a s/o to reno's catchy nickname for Self.

spracne you're wanted over in combofanning
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 8manpick on October 25, 2014, 11:37:06 AM


It's times like these that really brings out the Phogtuck in Spracs.

I was confused when I read this.  I thought, "Did dax really think my post belied some type of upset on my part?"  Then I realized, if someone constantly sees rage in other people - especially when it's not there - then the rage is really within oneself.  Sad, really...

You should know that it is supposed to be "Sad, really . . ."

(Note the spaces)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: uncle clean jeans on January 03, 2015, 01:18:38 PM
http://youtu.be/bAtpZjxQ9R4?t=6s
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 03, 2015, 01:32:12 PM
If I were Foster, I'd transfer to South Carolina.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on January 03, 2015, 01:34:54 PM
http://youtu.be/bAtpZjxQ9R4?t=6s
LOL
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wetwillie on January 03, 2015, 01:39:29 PM
I guess that scoring record is safe
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on January 03, 2015, 01:48:49 PM
Foster is being a class A loser right now.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on January 03, 2015, 01:55:00 PM
Foster is being a class A loser right now.

Jesus rough ridin' Christ
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on January 03, 2015, 01:56:48 PM
Foster is being a class A loser right now.

Jesus rough ridin' Christ
So he's not acting like a whiny bitch? :confused:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on January 03, 2015, 01:59:11 PM
Foster is being a class A loser right now.

Jesus rough ridin' Christ
So he's not acting like a whiny bitch? :confused:

compared to his coach, the grown up getting paid millions of dollars to be his mentor and make him a better player? nah
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: chum1 on January 03, 2015, 02:00:22 PM
0 for 4 today
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: SdK on January 03, 2015, 02:01:25 PM
I didn't know he played 14 minutes today?

#TheWesIsTheFuture

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on January 03, 2015, 02:02:16 PM
I completely agree the majority of responsibility for this mess with Foster is on oscar and his staff, but I can't absolve Marcus of some responsibility. Its just a sad state of affairs to me as a K-State fan all around.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: uncle clean jeans on January 03, 2015, 02:04:46 PM
The narrative that's unfolding is pretty bad and will only make matters worse. probably could have been avoided entirely if handled differently
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on January 03, 2015, 02:06:19 PM
I completely agree the majority of responsibility for this mess with Foster is on oscar and his staff, but I can't absolve Marcus of some responsibility.

Responsibility for what? The entire team being pretty bad at playing basketball?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on January 03, 2015, 02:08:28 PM
Misses on guys ahead of Trey Harris are hurting us. Not enough good shooters on the team.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on January 03, 2015, 02:08:31 PM

I completely agree the majority of responsibility for this mess with Foster is on oscar and his staff, but I can't absolve Marcus of some responsibility.

Responsibility for what? The entire team being pretty bad at playing basketball?

You think he's been at his best the last week?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: EMAWican on January 03, 2015, 02:10:17 PM
oscar is a genius and a Mensa member. Lose without Foster, Foster is the reason we lost because 14 ppg. Lose with Foster, Foster has an attitude problem and is the reason for the loss. The precedent has been set.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on January 03, 2015, 02:10:59 PM
But yes, ultimately oscar had to fix it.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on January 03, 2015, 02:12:49 PM

I completely agree the majority of responsibility for this mess with Foster is on oscar and his staff, but I can't absolve Marcus of some responsibility.

Responsibility for what? The entire team being pretty bad at playing basketball?

You think he's been at his best the last week?

Oh, no doubt. That's what you're referring to when you said he's responsible? Or the home losses to Texas Southern and Georgia?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on January 03, 2015, 02:13:56 PM


I completely agree the majority of responsibility for this mess with Foster is on oscar and his staff, but I can't absolve Marcus of some responsibility.

Responsibility for what? The entire team being pretty bad at playing basketball?

You think he's been at his best the last week?

Oh, no doubt. That's what you're referring to when you said he's responsible? Or the home losses to Texas Southern and Georgia?

Yes, his own play. The losses are definitely team losses, not on Marcus.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pvegs on January 03, 2015, 02:18:37 PM
Pretty impressive to completely lose your all conference best player and send the team into a death spiral the likes of which the program has almost never seen all in the span of a calendar year.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: slucat on January 03, 2015, 02:20:04 PM
Seems like foster got his ass kissed a bit too much this summer. Now he thinks he is too good to listen to the staff.  His body language says a lot. I'm not putting losses on him or anyone in particular. Just on fans opinion.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on January 03, 2015, 02:21:29 PM
Seems like foster got his ass kissed a bit too much this summer. Now he thinks he is too good to listen to the staff.  His body language says a lot. I'm not putting losses on him or anyone in particular. Just on fans opinion.

I'm fine putting losses on oscar in particular.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on January 03, 2015, 02:22:37 PM
http://youtu.be/bAtpZjxQ9R4?t=6s

The shoe held up relatively well.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on January 03, 2015, 02:39:39 PM
Seems like foster got his ass kissed a bit too much this summer. Now he thinks he is too good to listen to the staff.  His body language says a lot. I'm not putting losses on him or anyone in particular. Just on fans opinion.

He's a high level athlete, he's gotten his ass kissed his entire life. He knows the team isn't playing well, himself included, but now he is being scapegoated. You and oscar are seeing poor play and jumping to conclusion that playing poorly equates to him having a poor attitude. He very well may have had a bad attitude before the 2nd half benching against Georgia. If he did it is up to the staff to get him figured out. I think it was pretty foreseeable that treating one of the best players in the conference like some 8 minute a game player would backfire. Who the hell deals with a frustrated star player by benching him?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 03, 2015, 02:41:34 PM
Seems like foster got his ass kissed a bit too much this summer. Now he thinks he is too good to listen to the staff.  His body language says a lot. I'm not putting losses on him or anyone in particular. Just on fans opinion.

He's a high level athlete, he's gotten his ass kissed his entire life. He knows the team isn't playing well, himself included, but now he is being scapegoated. You and oscar are seeing poor play and jumping to conclusion that playing poorly equates to him having a poor attitude. He very well may have had a bad attitude before the 2nd half benching against Georgia. If he did it is up to the staff to get him figured out. I think it was pretty foreseeable that treating one of the best players in the conference like some 8 minute a game player would backfire. Who the hell deals with a frustrated star player by benching him?

Frank did, but I agree with your post.  A huge part of being a college coach is getting through to young men.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on January 03, 2015, 02:45:41 PM
Seems like foster got his ass kissed a bit too much this summer. Now he thinks he is too good to listen to the staff.  His body language says a lot. I'm not putting losses on him or anyone in particular. Just on fans opinion.

He's a high level athlete, he's gotten his ass kissed his entire life. He knows the team isn't playing well, himself included, but now he is being scapegoated. You and oscar are seeing poor play and jumping to conclusion that playing poorly equates to him having a poor attitude. He very well may have had a bad attitude before the 2nd half benching against Georgia. If he did it is up to the staff to get him figured out. I think it was pretty foreseeable that treating one of the best players in the conference like some 8 minute a game player would backfire. Who the hell deals with a frustrated star player by benching him?

Frank did, but I agree with your post.  A huge part of being a college coach is getting through to young men.

yeah, notably Bill @NU and Pullen @MU. He definitely benched JO at critical times. I can't think of any other time he did it for a "star".
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on January 03, 2015, 02:47:34 PM
But, if Foster's going to sit for not playing hard, he should have been pulled within like a minute and ripped a new one after Foster gave up a corner 3 and then jogged on an OSU fast break that he had a chance to at least challenge. Again, if you really care about him playing harder.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Stevesie60 on January 03, 2015, 02:50:03 PM
Frank benched Angel his freshman year @OU or @OSU. Not a "star" player, but a very good and important player and obviously had the potential to be a star player.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on January 03, 2015, 02:53:45 PM
Frank benched Angel his freshman year @OU or @OSU. Not a "star" player, but a very good and important player and obviously had the potential to be a star player.

oh yeah. angel was a star.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: dal9 on January 03, 2015, 02:53:59 PM
But, if Foster's going to sit for not playing hard, he should have been pulled within like a minute and ripped a new one after Foster gave up a corner 3 and then jogged on an OSU fast break that he had a chance to at least challenge. Again, if you really care about him playing harder.
i'm sure it's not that they want him to play harder, it's that weber personally dislikes foster.
come on, this is too clever by half.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on January 03, 2015, 02:54:37 PM
Obviously both parties suck in this situation. oscar is a dumb eff goof, but Foster acting like a bitch while your team is up and you acting like drama is a bad look. Looks like you're in it for yourself.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on January 03, 2015, 02:59:10 PM
Frank benched Angel his freshman year @OU or @OSU. Not a "star" player, but a very good and important player and obviously had the potential to be a star player.

oh yeah. angel was a star.

Not then he wasn't. The only one of the previous examples that is similar was Bill vs Nebraska, buteven then the circumstances were different. The team wasn't drowning then and Bill wasn't the best player. I am not saying it is never good to bench a player, but this type of circunstance; benching the best player when everyone stinks and the team is sinking, is stupid.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on January 03, 2015, 02:59:34 PM
Frank benched Angel his freshman year @OU or @OSU. Not a "star" player, but a very good and important player and obviously had the potential to be a star player.

oh yeah. angel was a star.

Not then he wasn't. The only one of the previous examples that is similar was Bill vs Nebraska, buteven then the circumstances were different. The team wasn't drowning then and Bill wasn't the best player. I am not saying it is never good to bench a player, but this type of circunstance; benching the best player when everyone stinks and the team is sinking, is stupid.

true
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on January 03, 2015, 03:06:54 PM
Obviously both parties suck in this situation. oscar is a dumb eff goof, but Foster acting like a bitch while your team is up and you acting like drama is a bad look. Looks like you're in it for yourself.

Jesus Christ Wacky, of course he's selfish, all high achievers are. I don't think anyone is better at my job than me. If my board of directors decided that I have to sit and watch someone else do my job I'd be pissed too. I have always felt that people who insist that athletes be humble are low achieving losers, or are liars that lack self-awareness, or think athletes are chattel who should not be allowed to play by the rules set forth by our society.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: catzacker on January 03, 2015, 03:16:59 PM
Obviously both parties suck in this situation. oscar is a dumb eff goof, but Foster acting like a bitch while your team is up and you acting like drama is a bad look. Looks like you're in it for yourself.

Jesus Christ Wacky, of course he's selfish, all high achievers are. I don't think anyone is better at my job than me. If my board of directors decided that I have to sit and watch someone else do my job I'd be pissed too. I have always felt that people who insist that athletes be humble are low achieving losers, or are liars that lack self-awareness, or think athletes are chattel who should not be allowed to play by the rules set forth by our society.

It's kind of weird that we want coaches to be humble (in the sense that we want them to realize quickly what isn't working and change).  Maybe we could ask the same of athletes?  Foster could just not suck.  I mean, that doesn't take being humble.  It takes just not sucking. 

I'm not defending oscar for how he is handling Foster, and I was furious for Frank's stupid rough ridin' proving point games that really didn't do crap.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on January 03, 2015, 03:22:16 PM
Obviously both parties suck in this situation. oscar is a dumb eff goof, but Foster acting like a bitch while your team is up and you acting like drama is a bad look. Looks like you're in it for yourself.

Jesus Christ Wacky, of course he's selfish, all high achievers are. I don't think anyone is better at my job than me. If my board of directors decided that I have to sit and watch someone else do my job I'd be pissed too. I have always felt that people who insist that athletes be humble are low achieving losers, or are liars that lack self-awareness, or think athletes are chattel who should not be allowed to play by the rules set forth by our society.

It's kind of weird that we want coaches to be humble (in the sense that we want them to realize quickly what isn't working and change).  Maybe we could ask the same of athletes?  Foster could just not suck.  I mean, that doesn't take being humble.  It takes just not sucking. 

I'm not defending oscar for how he is handling Foster, and I was furious for Frank's stupid rough ridin' proving point games that really didn't do crap.
I really don't care what is done as long as it gets fixed. I hated Frank's point proving benchings, too, but he never really had a problem with effort on the court. Foster's been sorta benched for three straight halves and looks like he cares even less than he did before.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: SdK on January 03, 2015, 03:24:04 PM
This is a fun read.

#TheWesIsTheFuture

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: EMAWzified on January 03, 2015, 03:25:50 PM
Marcus will have a fine junior and senior year at SMU.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: catzacker on January 03, 2015, 03:27:38 PM
Obviously both parties suck in this situation. oscar is a dumb eff goof, but Foster acting like a bitch while your team is up and you acting like drama is a bad look. Looks like you're in it for yourself.

Jesus Christ Wacky, of course he's selfish, all high achievers are. I don't think anyone is better at my job than me. If my board of directors decided that I have to sit and watch someone else do my job I'd be pissed too. I have always felt that people who insist that athletes be humble are low achieving losers, or are liars that lack self-awareness, or think athletes are chattel who should not be allowed to play by the rules set forth by our society.

It's kind of weird that we want coaches to be humble (in the sense that we want them to realize quickly what isn't working and change).  Maybe we could ask the same of athletes?  Foster could just not suck.  I mean, that doesn't take being humble.  It takes just not sucking. 

I'm not defending oscar for how he is handling Foster, and I was furious for Frank's stupid rough ridin' proving point games that really didn't do crap.
I really don't care what is done as long as it gets fixed. I hated Frank's point proving benchings, too, but he never really had a problem with effort on the court. Foster's been sorta benched for three straight halves and looks like he cares even less than he did before.

I noticed no difference in play from before and after Frank's benchings.  It's stupid.  And i'll state again, the primary problem with this team is not effort, it's talent.  Effort is a component, but they....just...suck. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on January 03, 2015, 03:28:30 PM


Obviously both parties suck in this situation. oscar is a dumb eff goof, but Foster acting like a bitch while your team is up and you acting like drama is a bad look. Looks like you're in it for yourself.

Jesus Christ Wacky, of course he's selfish, all high achievers are. I don't think anyone is better at my job than me. If my board of directors decided that I have to sit and watch someone else do my job I'd be pissed too. I have always felt that people who insist that athletes be humble are low achieving losers, or are liars that lack self-awareness, or think athletes are chattel who should not be allowed to play by the rules set forth by our society.

It's kind of weird that we want coaches to be humble (in the sense that we want them to realize quickly what isn't working and change).  Maybe we could ask the same of athletes?  Foster could just not suck.  I mean, that doesn't take being humble.  It takes just not sucking. 

I'm not defending oscar for how he is handling Foster, and I was furious for Frank's stupid rough ridin' proving point games that really didn't do crap.
I really don't care what is done as long as it gets fixed. I hated Frank's point proving benchings, too, but he never really had a problem with effort on the court. Foster's been sorta benched for three straight halves and looks like he cares even less than he did before.

I noticed no difference in play from before and after Frank's benchings.  It's stupid.  And i'll state again, the primary problem with this team is not effort, it's talent.  Effort is a component, but they....just...suck.

I agree with all of that
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on January 03, 2015, 03:29:39 PM

I really don't care what is done as long as it gets fixed. I hated Frank's point proving benchings, too, but he never really had a problem with effort on the court. Foster's been sorta benched for three straight halves and looks like he cares even less than he did before.

Agree completely. I never got overly concerned with Jake early in his career because I never questioned his effort or whether he cared. I don't like consistently poor body language. Get pissed at your coach and his foolishness off the floor, when you are on it at least play hard the entire time for your teammates. JMHO.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on January 03, 2015, 03:31:06 PM
Obviously both parties suck in this situation. oscar is a dumb eff goof, but Foster acting like a bitch while your team is up and you acting like drama is a bad look. Looks like you're in it for yourself.

Jesus Christ Wacky, of course he's selfish, all high achievers are. I don't think anyone is better at my job than me. If my board of directors decided that I have to sit and watch someone else do my job I'd be pissed too. I have always felt that people who insist that athletes be humble are low achieving losers, or are liars that lack self-awareness, or think athletes are chattel who should not be allowed to play by the rules set forth by our society.

It's kind of weird that we want coaches to be humble (in the sense that we want them to realize quickly what isn't working and change).  Maybe we could ask the same of athletes?  Foster could just not suck.  I mean, that doesn't take being humble.  It takes just not sucking. 

I'm not defending oscar for how he is handling Foster, and I was furious for Frank's stupid rough ridin' proving point games that really didn't do crap.
I really don't care what is done as long as it gets fixed. I hated Frank's point proving benchings, too, but he never really had a problem with effort on the court. Foster's been sorta benched for three straight halves and looks like he cares even less than he did before.

I don't remember what Bill was like when he was benched, although it isn't easy to guess, but I do remember Jake and Angel were not happy when it happened to them. Wanting a player to be cool with being benched is weird and counter-intuitive to what we want our athletes to be.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on January 03, 2015, 03:32:43 PM

Obviously both parties suck in this situation. oscar is a dumb eff goof, but Foster acting like a bitch while your team is up and you acting like drama is a bad look. Looks like you're in it for yourself.

Jesus Christ Wacky, of course he's selfish, all high achievers are. I don't think anyone is better at my job than me. If my board of directors decided that I have to sit and watch someone else do my job I'd be pissed too. I have always felt that people who insist that athletes be humble are low achieving losers, or are liars that lack self-awareness, or think athletes are chattel who should not be allowed to play by the rules set forth by our society.

It's kind of weird that we want coaches to be humble (in the sense that we want them to realize quickly what isn't working and change).  Maybe we could ask the same of athletes?  Foster could just not suck.  I mean, that doesn't take being humble.  It takes just not sucking. 

I'm not defending oscar for how he is handling Foster, and I was furious for Frank's stupid rough ridin' proving point games that really didn't do crap.
I really don't care what is done as long as it gets fixed. I hated Frank's point proving benchings, too, but he never really had a problem with effort on the court. Foster's been sorta benched for three straight halves and looks like he cares even less than he did before.

I noticed no difference in play from before and after Frank's benchings.  It's stupid.  And i'll state again, the primary problem with this team is not effort, it's talent.  Effort is a component, but they....just...suck.

I don't think we're great, but I think effort matters some. I think Frank preached effort as a skill that had to be developed and I think it worked. But yeah, we have glaring weaknesses, especially at point guard.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on January 03, 2015, 03:35:52 PM
Obviously both parties suck in this situation. oscar is a dumb eff goof, but Foster acting like a bitch while your team is up and you acting like drama is a bad look. Looks like you're in it for yourself.

Jesus Christ Wacky, of course he's selfish, all high achievers are. I don't think anyone is better at my job than me. If my board of directors decided that I have to sit and watch someone else do my job I'd be pissed too. I have always felt that people who insist that athletes be humble are low achieving losers, or are liars that lack self-awareness, or think athletes are chattel who should not be allowed to play by the rules set forth by our society.

It's kind of weird that we want coaches to be humble (in the sense that we want them to realize quickly what isn't working and change).  Maybe we could ask the same of athletes?  Foster could just not suck.  I mean, that doesn't take being humble.  It takes just not sucking. 

I'm not defending oscar for how he is handling Foster, and I was furious for Frank's stupid rough ridin' proving point games that really didn't do crap.

I don't want anyone to be humble. Being self-assured and flexible are extremely mutually exclusive. Every good coach or any kind of good manager I can think of is flexible.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on January 03, 2015, 03:43:23 PM
Obviously both parties suck in this situation. oscar is a dumb eff goof, but Foster acting like a bitch while your team is up and you acting like drama is a bad look. Looks like you're in it for yourself.

Jesus Christ Wacky, of course he's selfish, all high achievers are. I don't think anyone is better at my job than me. If my board of directors decided that I have to sit and watch someone else do my job I'd be pissed too. I have always felt that people who insist that athletes be humble are low achieving losers, or are liars that lack self-awareness, or think athletes are chattel who should not be allowed to play by the rules set forth by our society.

It's kind of weird that we want coaches to be humble (in the sense that we want them to realize quickly what isn't working and change).  Maybe we could ask the same of athletes?  Foster could just not suck.  I mean, that doesn't take being humble.  It takes just not sucking. 

I'm not defending oscar for how he is handling Foster, and I was furious for Frank's stupid rough ridin' proving point games that really didn't do crap.
I really don't care what is done as long as it gets fixed. I hated Frank's point proving benchings, too, but he never really had a problem with effort on the court. Foster's been sorta benched for three straight halves and looks like he cares even less than he did before.

I noticed no difference in play from before and after Frank's benchings.  It's stupid.  And i'll state again, the primary problem with this team is not effort, it's talent.  Effort is a component, but they....just...suck.

I don't think, that Frank benched to get better effort, I think his message was more "you're not doing what I asked and I don't rough ridin' need you," which imo is why never did that to best player. oscar is openly telling everyone that Marcus' effort is the reason why he is benched. I don't know how Marcus could get any other message other than "this is your fault."
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Blackcats on January 03, 2015, 03:43:38 PM
Has "it"

Has lost "it".
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: dal9 on January 03, 2015, 03:48:12 PM


I don't think we're great, but I think effort matters some. I think Frank preached effort as a skill that had to be developed and I think it worked. But yeah, we have glaring weaknesses, especially at point guard.
Solution:
Chet+goggles+knee and elbow pads=new walk-on PG
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: TheProdigiousTalent on January 03, 2015, 03:56:33 PM
Seems like foster got his ass kissed a bit too much this summer. Now he thinks he is too good to listen to the staff.  His body language says a lot. I'm not putting losses on him or anyone in particular. Just on fans opinion.

He's a high level athlete, he's gotten his ass kissed his entire life. He knows the team isn't playing well, himself included, but now he is being scapegoated. You and oscar are seeing poor play and jumping to conclusion that playing poorly equates to him having a poor attitude. He very well may have had a bad attitude before the 2nd half benching against Georgia. If he did it is up to the staff to get him figured out. I think it was pretty foreseeable that treating one of the best players in the conference like some 8 minute a game player would backfire. Who the hell deals with a frustrated star player by benching him?
It's safe to assume that oscar has more insight into Foster's attitude/effort than you, me, and slucat, but I am inclined to agree with slucat here that Foster's ego (or at least his perception of his clout in CBB) has grown considerably since last year.  My first clue was Foster flailing his arms and flopping on threes against Arizona and glaring at the refs incredulously when he didn't get Jordan/Lebron calls.  Actually...my first clue might have been in the offseason when he confessed to the media that (paraphrasing) KU was his dream school and that the lack of a KU offer is his biggest source of inspiration.  I mean...who says that?  Weird.

Either way, I'm all for Brucing oscar mid-season if this crapfest sails dank and steamy for another 5 games or so.  It's pretty clear that most of his players don't want to play for him (which I'm not sure I get, frankly), and there's probably no way to fix that.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 'taterblast on January 03, 2015, 04:01:43 PM
Quote
Marcus is at odds not only with the staff, but he is ostricizing himself with his teammates. Other/newer team members are recognizing it and buying in to Gip/Nino leadership, and abandoning Marcus.

Unless he changes, he will see very limited play. Coach has drawn the line in the sand, and either he steps up to it or he will sit.

Sounds like oscar recognizes he was about to have a huge fracture in his team, and is trying to stop the crack.

Source= B+
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on January 03, 2015, 04:03:20 PM


I don't think we're great, but I think effort matters some. I think Frank preached effort as a skill that had to be developed and I think it worked. But yeah, we have glaring weaknesses, especially at point guard.
Solution:
Chet+goggles+knee and elbow pads=new walk-on PG

Solution: dal9 should drink bleach.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: dal9 on January 03, 2015, 04:03:56 PM

It's safe to assume that oscar has more insight into Foster's attitude/effort than you, me, and slucat, but I am inclined to agree with slucat here that Foster's ego (or at least his perception of his clout in CBB) has grown considerably since last year.  My first clue was Foster flailing his arms and flopping on threes against Arizona and glaring at the refs incredulously when he didn't get Jordan/Lebron calls.  Actually...my first clue might have been in the offseason when he confessed to the media that (paraphrasing) KU was his dream school and that the lack of a KU offer is his biggest source of inspiration.  I mean...who says that?  Weird.

Either way, I'm all for Brucing oscar mid-season if this crapfest sails dank and steamy for another 5 games or so.  It's pretty clear that most of his players don't want to play for him (which I'm not sure I get, frankly), and there's probably no way to fix that.
Don't go overboard. Gip has given great effort, M Harris has been a maniac defensively, Westicles and Edwards play hard (especially recently), Nino does too usually. And say what you will about Jevon, he "gives 110%."  I can't tell with Hurt. He could be trying hard, but his game is incredibly soft.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: SdK on January 03, 2015, 04:06:06 PM
Tater and TPT bringing it strong.

#TheWesIsTheFuture

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on January 03, 2015, 04:16:28 PM
Seems like foster got his ass kissed a bit too much this summer. Now he thinks he is too good to listen to the staff.  His body language says a lot. I'm not putting losses on him or anyone in particular. Just on fans opinion.

He's a high level athlete, he's gotten his ass kissed his entire life. He knows the team isn't playing well, himself included, but now he is being scapegoated. You and oscar are seeing poor play and jumping to conclusion that playing poorly equates to him having a poor attitude. He very well may have had a bad attitude before the 2nd half benching against Georgia. If he did it is up to the staff to get him figured out. I think it was pretty foreseeable that treating one of the best players in the conference like some 8 minute a game player would backfire. Who the hell deals with a frustrated star player by benching him?
It's safe to assume that oscar has more insight into Foster's attitude/effort than you, me, and slucat, but I am inclined to agree with slucat here that Foster's ego (or at least his perception of his clout in CBB) has grown considerably since last year.  My first clue was Foster flailing his arms and flopping on threes against Arizona and glaring at the refs incredulously when he didn't get Jordan/Lebron calls.  Actually...my first clue might have been in the offseason when he confessed to the media that (paraphrasing) KU was his dream school and that the lack of a KU offer is his biggest source of inspiration.  I mean...who says that?  Weird.

Either way, I'm all for Brucing oscar mid-season if this crapfest sails dank and steamy for another 5 games or so.  It's pretty clear that most of his players don't want to play for him (which I'm not sure I get, frankly), and there's probably no way to fix that.

Players having an inflated sense of self is not an occurrence at all. How would most 19 year olds react to bring gassed up? oscar has coached for two decades, he's absolutely seen that before. I hire 19 year olds and deal with it every year.

Also not sure why you don't get the players having difficulty playing for oscar, it certainly isn't a new issue. That very issue got him fired from Illinois, Brandon Paul.

Quote
Now, while I don't want to simply pile on Weber because the Illini are suddenly winning again, there was a quote from Brandon Paul in Jon Greenberg's column -- which is good and you should read the entire thing after you're done here -- about John Groce that stood out to me. While Paul doesn't come out and say anything directly, if you read between the lines of what he was saying about John Groce it becomes pretty damning of oscar Weber and the coaching staff last season.

Paul was asked about why this team was able to get back up after being knocked down to the ground this season, unlike last year when it stayed on the mat.

"The coaches never gave up on us," Paul told Greenberg. "They want to see us succeed. They said, we've had this rough stretch but gotta fight through it. No one on the team gave up on each other."
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on January 03, 2015, 04:19:43 PM
Quote
Marcus is at odds not only with the staff, but he is ostricizing himself with his teammates. Other/newer team members are recognizing it and buying in to Gip/Nino leadership, and abandoning Marcus.

Unless he changes, he will see very limited play. Coach has drawn the line in the sand, and either he steps up to it or he will sit.

Sounds like oscar recognizes he was about to have a huge fracture in his team, and is trying to stop the crack.

Source= B+

Why are other players just now looking to the seniors for leadership? If true doesn't this confirm that these issues are far beyond just Marcus?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: catzacker on January 03, 2015, 04:24:08 PM
Quote
Marcus is at odds not only with the staff, but he is ostricizing himself with his teammates. Other/newer team members are recognizing it and buying in to Gip/Nino leadership, and abandoning Marcus.

Unless he changes, he will see very limited play. Coach has drawn the line in the sand, and either he steps up to it or he will sit.

Sounds like oscar recognizes he was about to have a huge fracture in his team, and is trying to stop the crack.

Source= B+

lol.  Buy in or Quit.  Let's see if oscar gets the same results.  Our fans will scapegoat the crap out of Marcus and give oscar more time to fix problems he created instead of holding him accountable for the problems.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on January 03, 2015, 04:25:11 PM
@Swaggy2_: When you face a little adversity it's fun to look at the situation and see who really with you! S/o to those people who are still here
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on January 03, 2015, 04:37:21 PM
If you can't stand the heat... http://www.bringonthecats.com/2015/1/3/7486853/k-state-marcus-foster-is-at-a-breaking-point
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: steve dave on January 03, 2015, 04:37:41 PM
I'm here Marcus
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on January 03, 2015, 04:40:04 PM
If you can't stand the heat... http://www.bringonthecats.com/2015/1/3/7486853/k-state-marcus-foster-is-at-a-breaking-point

:lol:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: catzacker on January 03, 2015, 04:48:29 PM
KSU Basketball 2014/2015:  It's all Foster's fault
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wetwillie on January 03, 2015, 04:49:59 PM
I hope marcus keeps acting the same
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Pete on January 03, 2015, 04:59:15 PM
Marcus should transfer to Wichita State.  That way, many of our fans could still watch him, and he'd get to win and stuff.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wetwillie on January 03, 2015, 05:01:17 PM
If you can't stand the heat... http://www.bringonthecats.com/2015/1/3/7486853/k-state-marcus-foster-is-at-a-breaking-point


No way he believes half of what he typed.  It's like a poor mans chum1. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: bones129 on January 03, 2015, 05:05:13 PM
Guy's probably oscar's biographer.   :flush:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: slucat on January 03, 2015, 05:06:36 PM
It is a team game, and if acting like a little bitch is your shtick, playing time seems unlikely. Not giving 100 percent and acting up is childish and not only hurts the team, but the perception others have of you as well.

I'm just glad I'm so close to my due date that I won't feel guilty skipping out on all the home games; either waiting for the baby to show up or being homebound with a newborn. But I'll watch the dumpster fire on tv.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: catzacker on January 03, 2015, 05:08:06 PM
Marcus should transfer to Wichita State.  That way, many of our fans could still watch him, and he'd get to win and stuff.

I agree with this. But he will go to SMU.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Kat Kid on January 03, 2015, 05:13:35 PM
Hold on a minute.  HOLD ON!  I think I've seen all this before.....Its almost like this exact same thing happened with Shane Southwell!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on January 03, 2015, 05:17:09 PM
It is a team game, and if acting like a little bitch is your shtick, playing time seems unlikely. Not giving 100 percent and acting up is childish and not only hurts the team, but the perception others have of you as well.

I'm just glad I'm so close to my due date that I won't feel guilty skipping out on all the home games; either waiting for the baby to show up or being homebound with a newborn. But I'll watch the dumpster fire on tv.

You're kind of hard ?eaded
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on January 03, 2015, 05:25:03 PM
It is a team game, and if acting like a little bitch is your shtick, playing time seems unlikely. Not giving 100 percent and acting up is childish and not only hurts the team, but the perception others have of you as well.

What do you do when the coach is acting like a "little bitch"?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pvegs on January 03, 2015, 05:32:58 PM
It is a team game, and if acting like a little bitch is your shtick, playing time seems unlikely. Not giving 100 percent and acting up is childish and not only hurts the team, but the perception others have of you as well.

What do you do when the coach is acting like a "little bitch"?

THIS. Benching Foster bc his poor effort has fractured team chemistry is fine. Benching him 6 wks too late and then throwing him under the bus is a BruceWeberIsAnUnconfidentLoserWhoCantRecruit move. Weber has recruited and developed a team that doesn't have talent and doesn't play hard. And his reaction is to take zero personal responsibility and blame them. Definition of a bitch move. It's why he got fired at Illinois and why he'll get fired here.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wetwillie on January 03, 2015, 06:13:41 PM
Hold on a minute.  HOLD ON!  I think I've seen all this before.....Its almost like this exact same thing happened with Shane Southwell!

And that one tall guy with a hyphenated last name the year before!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: slucat on January 03, 2015, 07:41:05 PM
I am not saying anything about weber...however if you can't listen to your coaches and exhibit poor effort,lack of leadership, and body language even those outside of the Ksu fanbase/media acknowledge, then maybe some of it is on you.  If you hate the situation and want to transfer, which would be the downfall of oscar, imo. You'd think he'd get his crap together so he doesn't look like a tc, fp to other teams and coaches.

As far as how oscar is handling it, i don't think I've made any point on it.

You guys are so wishy washy. One second you hate a player, with various insults and say they steal scollies and its ok for coaches to say they are going to burn down their houses.  The next, it's he's an 18yo kid. ..
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Pete on January 03, 2015, 07:50:06 PM

I am not saying anything about weber...however if you can't listen to your coaches and exhibit poor effort,lack of leadership, and body language even those outside of the Ksu fanbase/media acknowledge, then maybe some of it is on you.  If you hate the situation and want to transfer, which would be the downfall of oscar, imo. You'd think he'd get his crap together so he doesn't look like a tc, fp to other teams and coaches.

As far as how oscar is handling it, i don't think I've made any point on it.

You guys are so wishy washy. One second you hate a player, with various insults and say they steal scollies and its ok for coaches to say they are going to burn down their houses.  The next, it's he's an 18yo kid. ..

Pregnant ladies, am I right guys? 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on January 03, 2015, 07:53:24 PM
I am not saying anything about weber...however if you can't listen to your coaches and exhibit poor effort,lack of leadership, and body language even those outside of the Ksu fanbase/media acknowledge, then maybe some of it is on you.  If you hate the situation and want to transfer, which would be the downfall of oscar, imo. You'd think he'd get his crap together so he doesn't look like a tc, fp to other teams and coaches.

As far as how oscar is handling it, i don't think I've made any point on it.

You guys are so wishy washy. One second you hate a player, with various insults and say they steal scollies and its ok for coaches to say they are going to burn down their houses.  The next, it's he's an 18yo kid. ..

I don't think anyone disagreeing with you falls into what you are talking about with your last point, as a matter of fact I'm sure of it.

As for your first point, why is it so hard for to see that most people who exceptional something won't handle it well when it's taken from them? The fact that he is a sophomore in college absolutely matters, foolish suggest otherwise. Neither of these concepts are hard to grasp and are pretty close common sense. That's why I called you hard headed, because it's clear you just want to call Marcus names despite what a reasonable should be telling you.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Skipper44 on January 03, 2015, 07:53:25 PM
Ya, they pretty much wrote the book on "being a little bitch"
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: DOD Take 2 on January 04, 2015, 12:14:02 AM
I don't think it's fair to say we don't have talent. Obviously Hurt has been a bust, but our roster has talent. oscar has just failed to develop any of our sophomores past where they were last year and he has no idea how to coach them. Javon is shooting far better than last year but has become a much worse player. Wes is worthless offensively. He's alienated Foster. Nigel looked like he was improving  late last year and instead has regressed. Besides not motivating his team at all he can't coach them to do simple things like not making dumb turnovers. If another coach came in next year he could still develop the entire sophomore class into good big 12 players.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: The Big Train on January 04, 2015, 12:20:08 AM
I don't think it's fair to say we don't have talent. Obviously Hurt has been a bust, but our roster has talent. oscar has just failed to develop any of our sophomores past where they were last year and he has no idea how to coach them. Javon is shooting far better than last year but has become a much worse player. Wes is worthless offensively. He's alienated Foster. Nigel looked like he was improving  late last year and instead has regressed. Besides not motivating his team at all he can't coach them to do simple things like not making dumb turnovers. If another coach came in next year he could still develop the entire sophomore class into good big 12 players.

quit reading here after already knowing this was going to be a crap post, wait to post until you actually know how to spell our players names
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: DOD Take 2 on January 04, 2015, 12:22:02 AM
If the team is really fractured and Foster is losing his teammates then why did all the young guys seem to be supporting him on the bench today? I think that report is bullshit. I don't see any leadership from Gip, Nino, or Foster for teammates to be taking a side. Based on what I see on the court the team looks to be #TeamFoster vs #TeamBruce
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: DOD Take 2 on January 04, 2015, 12:22:53 AM
I don't think it's fair to say we don't have talent. Obviously Hurt has been a bust, but our roster has talent. oscar has just failed to develop any of our sophomores past where they were last year and he has no idea how to coach them. Javon is shooting far better than last year but has become a much worse player. Wes is worthless offensively. He's alienated Foster. Nigel looked like he was improving  late last year and instead has regressed. Besides not motivating his team at all he can't coach them to do simple things like not making dumb turnovers. If another coach came in next year he could still develop the entire sophomore class into good big 12 players.

quit reading here after already knowing this was going to be a crap post, wait to post until you actually know how to spell our players names

It was a typo. I hope we can still be friends
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sys on January 04, 2015, 06:54:39 AM
a coach has to be willing and able to limit playing time.  it's really the only weapon they have.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on January 04, 2015, 10:44:24 AM
a coach has to be willing and able to limit playing time.  it's really the only weapon they have.
The ideal weapon is never letting it get to that point.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sys on January 04, 2015, 03:32:38 PM
The ideal weapon is never letting it get to that point.

i agree.  it's ridiculous that a coach is benching his quote/unquote best player (twice!) for not playing hard in the middle of the season.  on the other hand, given that they are where they are, it looks to me like that's exactly what he should be doing.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on January 04, 2015, 04:13:50 PM
The ideal weapon is never letting it get to that point.

i agree.  it's ridiculous that a coach is benching his quote/unquote best player (twice!) for not playing hard in the middle of the season.  on the other hand, given that they are where they are, it looks to me like that's exactly what he should be doing.
You could maybe let Foster run the point some. Inmates running the asylum or whatever
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sys on January 04, 2015, 04:42:49 PM
You could maybe let Foster run the point some.

i'd be more inclined to move him to the 3.  his handles are crap.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on January 04, 2015, 04:45:01 PM
You could maybe let Foster run the point some.

i'd be more inclined to move him to the 3.  his handles are crap.
At the one he'd probably be happier and play harder
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: BWebbs0 on January 04, 2015, 04:47:00 PM
It's one thing to bench him in the non-con. But to do so during league play?

Eff oscar!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on January 04, 2015, 04:51:20 PM
You could maybe let Foster run the point some.

i'd be more inclined to move him to the 3.  his handles are crap.

He can't play the point, he isn't capable.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: brandochav on January 04, 2015, 04:58:07 PM
It's one thing to bench him in the non-con. But to do so during league play?

Eff oscar!

 :flush:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: brandochav on January 04, 2015, 05:03:43 PM
Obviously both parties suck in this situation. oscar is a dumb eff goof, but Foster acting like a bitch while your team is up and you acting like drama is a bad look. Looks like you're in it for yourself.

Jesus Christ Wacky, of course he's selfish, all high achievers are. I don't think anyone is better at my job than me. If my board of directors decided that I have to sit and watch someone else do my job I'd be pissed too. I have always felt that people who insist that athletes be humble are low achieving losers, or are liars that lack self-awareness, or think athletes are chattel who should not be allowed to play by the rules set forth by our society.
Except when that high-achiever thinks s/he is so much better than everyone else. Then they just stop getting better and are average real quick. That's humility, to some degree, fosters excellence...must always get better.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Lucas Scoopsalot on January 04, 2015, 06:21:09 PM
I literally hate this team. I'm a student and I'll be watching the rest of these games from home.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on January 04, 2015, 09:12:48 PM
You could maybe let Foster run the point some.

i'd be more inclined to move him to the 3.  his handles are crap.
At the one he'd probably be happier and play harder
I mean why not at this point, it's not like this team is doing anything or going anywhere
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 05, 2015, 12:44:48 AM
a coach has to be willing and able to limit playing time.  it's really the only weapon they have.
The ideal weapon is never letting it get to that point.

A better coach (Frank) would have just benched him during the Ft. Hays State game and gotten all of this Mickey Mouse crap out of the way before the losing started.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on January 05, 2015, 12:50:19 PM
I'm hearing "buy in" wasn't chosen.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on January 05, 2015, 12:51:49 PM
I'm hearing "buy in" wasn't chosen.

Wednesday's gonna be must-watch!  What a change from just 2 weeks ago!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on January 05, 2015, 12:53:20 PM
well, sounds like we'll still have oscar in 2017
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ksupamplemousse on January 05, 2015, 12:53:36 PM
Is this what soap operas are like? Maybe I should start watching soap operas, because this crap is entertaining.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on January 05, 2015, 01:28:14 PM
I'm hearing "buy in" wasn't chosen.

oh man
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Kat Kid on January 05, 2015, 01:46:45 PM
ricky d-  you in for wednesday?  might be a historic night.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: WildcatNation on January 05, 2015, 02:22:14 PM
Rumblings Marcus is leaving.   :Crybaby:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on January 05, 2015, 02:24:54 PM
ricky d-  you in for wednesday? 

yes, i think so!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 'taterblast on January 05, 2015, 02:25:04 PM
Grumblings Marcus is leaving.   :Crybaby:



Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Bookcat on January 05, 2015, 02:48:51 PM
Rumblings Marcus is leaving.   :Crybaby:

Heard it was a bumbling....
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Skipper44 on January 05, 2015, 02:52:20 PM
Would Marcus have any incentive to leave before classes start for the 2nd semester?  It doesn't seem like it
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: DOD Take 2 on January 05, 2015, 02:53:20 PM
It takes a real dipshit to runoff an All-Big 12 team player, especially when their team sucks
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 05, 2015, 02:56:01 PM
Would Marcus have any incentive to leave before classes start for the 2nd semester?  It doesn't seem like it

Not having to ever see oscar Weber's face ever again is probably all the incentive he needs.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pissclams on January 05, 2015, 02:56:35 PM
Would Marcus have any incentive to leave before classes start for the 2nd semester?  It doesn't seem like it

ya i think he would.  eligibility wise, i think he leaves before starting classes here and lands somewhere and gets enrolled there, he'd be eligible at his new homes 2nd semester, a year from now
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Skipper44 on January 05, 2015, 02:58:16 PM
Would Marcus have any incentive to leave before classes start for the 2nd semester?  It doesn't seem like it

Not having to ever see oscar Weber's face ever again is probably all the incentive he needs.
I would put never having to listen to him talk at the top of the Peggy Pos list but I am curious if there might be a reason for him to move on now
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pissclams on January 05, 2015, 03:00:44 PM
Would Marcus have any incentive to leave before classes start for the 2nd semester?  It doesn't seem like it

ya i think he would.  eligibility wise, i think he leaves before starting classes here and lands somewhere and gets enrolled there, he'd be eligible at his new homes 2nd semester, a year from now

like frankamp now has to wait until 2nd semester next year at wsu b/c he waited until 1st semester classes started before leaving ku's program
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Skipper44 on January 05, 2015, 03:03:28 PM
doesn't that leave guys with "extra" semester they don't use?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: WildcatNation on January 05, 2015, 03:05:43 PM
I would imagine if they transferred before the next semester started that that second semester would go towards the year they have to sit out. Which would mean they could play for their new team at the beginning of the next year.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Pete on January 05, 2015, 03:08:50 PM
So this is a real thing that is happening now?  Foster is leaving?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Panjandrum on January 05, 2015, 03:17:28 PM
So this is a real thing that is happening now?  Foster is leaving?

That's impressive, even for oscar.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on January 05, 2015, 03:21:47 PM
doesn't that leave guys with "extra" semester they don't use?

he is a sophomore this year and is using his sophomore year of eligibility regardless of whether he plays one semester or two. if he transfers and plays spring semester somewhere next year, that will be his junior year and then he will have his senior year. he'll lose two semesters (this spring and next fall) if he transfers somewhere right now and plays somewhere next spring.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on January 05, 2015, 03:23:09 PM
So this is a real thing that is happening now?  Foster is leaving?

i put it at 50/50 just based on what _fan said. he wouldn't put that out there unless he heard something legitimate.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Panjandrum on January 05, 2015, 03:24:43 PM
doesn't that leave guys with "extra" semester they don't use?

he is a sophomore this year and is using his sophomore year of eligibility regardless of whether he plays one semester or two. if he transfers and plays spring semester somewhere next year, that will be his junior year and then he will have his senior year. he'll lose two semesters (this spring and next fall) if he transfers somewhere right now and plays somewhere next spring.

If he leaves now, he can essentially be recruited like a Spring signee, though, right?  That may be beneficial because he may have more options before everyone fills up in the spring signing period.

I mean there's really no reason for him to stay if oscar is going to screw with him.  The longer he stays, and sits, it just hurts him.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Kat Kid on January 05, 2015, 03:26:19 PM
BITB threw out that he thinks Foster is gone by next year.  He seems to think that most of this is Foster's fault and who can please a guy with that attitude/Kids these days.

In keeping with the tradition of things leaking out to spin/justify what is about to happen from the bball program post-Frank I fully believe Foster is gone at some point in the near future.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: chum1 on January 05, 2015, 03:41:26 PM
Bruced
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Lucas Scoopsalot on January 05, 2015, 03:48:27 PM
BITB threw out that he thinks Foster is gone by next year.  He seems to think that most of this is Foster's fault and who can please a guy with that attitude/Kids these days.

In keeping with the tradition of things leaking out to spin/justify what is about to happen from the bball program post-Frank I fully believe Foster is gone at some point in the near future.
I was also listening to this. They are giving oscar a ton of credit though, way more than he deserves.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on January 05, 2015, 04:01:12 PM
BITB threw out that he thinks Foster is gone by next year.  He seems to think that most of this is Foster's fault and who can please a guy with that attitude/Kids these days.

In keeping with the tradition of things leaking out to spin/justify what is about to happen from the bball program post-Frank I fully believe Foster is gone at some point in the near future.
"Kids haven't changed, we've changed...."
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: uncle clean jeans on January 05, 2015, 04:01:57 PM
any rumblings about crappy players leaving too or will it just be all the good ones
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 05, 2015, 04:03:21 PM
any rumblings about crappy players leaving too or will it just be all the good ones

Crappy players never leave by choice. I guess it almost happened when Frank was coaching.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on January 05, 2015, 04:03:44 PM
It is a pretty big talent to take a kid not many others wanted, give him the freedom and support to allow him to become somebody anyone would take, then alienate him to the poimt where he no longer wants to be around.

Being Franked had its own meaning. Bruc'ing now has its own meaning, I guess.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on January 05, 2015, 04:05:29 PM
Also, Marcus is a TX AAU kid, so it's pretty great we are possibly burning that bridge. 

1. DC: check
2 TX: check
Who's eye should we spit in next?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Skipper44 on January 05, 2015, 04:13:18 PM
but thank god we got rid of that Frank meanie and kept the mokan pipeline open
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 'taterblast on January 05, 2015, 04:20:59 PM
http://www.foxsports.com/kansas-city/story/aau-coach-says-foster-s-k-state-spat-will-blow-over-though-it-might-just-blow-up-010515 (http://www.foxsports.com/kansas-city/story/aau-coach-says-foster-s-k-state-spat-will-blow-over-though-it-might-just-blow-up-010515)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep on January 05, 2015, 04:24:28 PM
would love to watch him go for 35 or 40 wednesday but would also take 10 and be happy.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on January 05, 2015, 04:27:51 PM
Want to see minutes and smiles.  :Woohoo:  Also how dare people questions Marcus faith and toughness.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 05, 2015, 04:28:37 PM
_FAN basically told us all that he quit the team, though.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on January 05, 2015, 04:28:58 PM
Tucks will read that and, since his AAU coach sat him for one game once, will say this is a personality trait, not a misunderstanding, and that Foster and oscar are both exactly who tucks want them to be.
Title: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on January 05, 2015, 04:37:13 PM
_FAN basically told us all that he quit the team, though.

My source wasn't 100%. I'd trust the AAU Coach more.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pissclams on January 05, 2015, 04:49:51 PM
too bad we can't bench oscar to see what he's made of
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: bones129 on January 05, 2015, 04:50:57 PM
too bad we can't bench oscar to see what he's made of

Yes.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Stellarcat on January 05, 2015, 05:06:43 PM
This is what sucks about Weber.  You have to form relationships based on mutual respect for this type of "punishment" to work.  I used to teach 5th grade, and another teacher on my team was a complete bitch.  She had no interest in her students, made no effort to interact with them, and then was shocked when they would just roll their eyes or ignore her when she would punish them.  On the other hand, I invested a lot of time bonding with the students.  They respected me, because they knew that I respected them.  Sure, they got pissed off at me, but they also responded in a way that the bitchy teacher could never get out of them.



Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Winters on January 05, 2015, 05:10:25 PM
This is what sucks about Weber.  You have to form relationships based on mutual respect for this type of "punishment" to work.  I used to teach 5th grade, and another teacher on my team was a complete bitch.  She had no interest in her students, made no effort to interact with them, and then was shocked when they would just roll their eyes or ignore her when she would punish them.  On the other hand, I invested a lot of time bonding with the students.  They respected me, because they knew that I respected them.  Sure, they got pissed off at me, but they also responded in a way that the bitchy teacher could never get out of them.
:Chirp:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Stellarcat on January 05, 2015, 05:24:51 PM

 :Chirp:

Weber doesn't respect/know/like his players.

Foster doesn't respect Weber.

Foster doesn't give a crap what Weber says, because it is easier to blame the situation on Weber being a POS than to look at his contribution to the problem.

Sorry that I bored the crap out of you with my little anecdote about teaching...as I likely just bored you again with this response.  Good thing I don't respect/know/like you and don't give a crap.

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: SdK on January 05, 2015, 09:10:25 PM
I like Stellarcat.

#TheWesIsTheFuture

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on January 05, 2015, 10:57:24 PM
BITB threw out that he thinks Foster is gone by next year.  He seems to think that most of this is Foster's fault and who can please a guy with that attitude/Kids these days.

In keeping with the tradition of things leaking out to spin/justify what is about to happen from the bball program post-Frank I fully believe Foster is gone at some point in the near future.

Didn't hear his comments today, but in regards to Foster his comments are slightly tainted. He's been calling Foster a punk since the very first game this year and with Kietzman never ever ever being wrong, any slight thing to confirm that bias will be jumped on.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 'taterblast on January 07, 2015, 08:31:39 PM
we still look pretty bad but marcus seems motivated!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on January 07, 2015, 08:34:41 PM
Playing for second round of recruiting?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on January 07, 2015, 09:00:58 PM
BITB threw out that he thinks Foster is gone by next year.  He seems to think that most of this is Foster's fault and who can please a guy with that attitude/Kids these days.

In keeping with the tradition of things leaking out to spin/justify what is about to happen from the bball program post-Frank I fully believe Foster is gone at some point in the near future.

Didn't hear his comments today, but in regards to Foster his comments are slightly tainted. He's been calling Foster a punk since the very first game this year and with Kietzman never ever ever being wrong, any slight thing to confirm that bias will be jumped on.
He's probably a racist.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ksupamplemousse on January 07, 2015, 10:03:01 PM
BITB threw out that he thinks Foster is gone by next year.  He seems to think that most of this is Foster's fault and who can please a guy with that attitude/Kids these days.

In keeping with the tradition of things leaking out to spin/justify what is about to happen from the bball program post-Frank I fully believe Foster is gone at some point in the near future.

Didn't hear his comments today, but in regards to Foster his comments are slightly tainted. He's been calling Foster a punk since the very first game this year and with Kietzman never ever ever being wrong, any slight thing to confirm that bias will be jumped on.
He's probably a racist.

I know you're referencing the twitter spat you two are currently having, but Kevin Keitzman is definitely a racist.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on January 07, 2015, 10:13:15 PM
I'm 95% sure MIR is too. He probably reminds his wife daily about the past.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on January 07, 2015, 10:25:33 PM
He's back!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on January 07, 2015, 10:27:56 PM
 :facepalm: @ pamplemousse
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ksupamplemousse on January 07, 2015, 10:58:12 PM
:facepalm: @ pamplemousse

Whatever, the guy's a rough ridin' racist.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on January 07, 2015, 11:10:33 PM
I'm 95% sure MIR is too. He probably reminds his wife daily about the past.

This is your last motherfucking warning Heath. Mention my personal life again and I will rough ridin' unleash on you. I don't know why you feel the need to do this but I'm tired of warning you about it.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on January 07, 2015, 11:15:47 PM

:facepalm: @ pamplemousse

Whatever, the guy's a rough ridin' racist.

Is he bias, racist or racially bias. Us white folk are incapable of understanding the difference
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: nicname on January 08, 2015, 02:52:35 AM
I'm 95% sure MIR is too. He probably reminds his wife daily about the past.

WTF, Fanning?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: SdK on January 08, 2015, 06:47:51 AM
Don't back yourself into the SdK corner Wacky.

#TheWesIsTheFuture

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: PoetWarrior on January 08, 2015, 08:05:56 AM
I'm 95% sure MIR is too. He probably reminds his wife daily about the past.

This is your last motherfucking warning Heath. Mention my personal life again and I will rough ridin' unleash on you. I don't know why you feel the need to do this but I'm tired of warning you about it.

Oh brother...
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on January 08, 2015, 08:40:42 AM
 :lol:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kslim on January 08, 2015, 10:00:56 AM
Quote
"We got the Final Four talent, Big 12 championship and all that. We just got to get it together on the defensive end because we can score with anybody." - Marcus Foster
:ksu:

/thread ?

:lol:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pissclams on January 08, 2015, 01:03:25 PM
petro and kirkoff couldn't figure out, for the life of them, why foster wants to play the 1.
"you think 9 assists a game are going to get you in the league?  are you serious? go out and score 23 a night, that's your ticket to a 2nd round pick in the draft.  do you need to have the ball in your hands all of the time??  are you joakim noah? no."

great stuff as always, soren, great stuff as always

(https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/234821374/PetroHeadShot_400x400.jpg)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sunny_cat on January 08, 2015, 01:04:54 PM
lol
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Winters on January 09, 2015, 10:36:15 AM

 :Chirp:

Weber doesn't respect/know/like his players.

Foster doesn't respect Weber.

Foster doesn't give a crap what Weber says, because it is easier to blame the situation on Weber being a POS than to look at his contribution to the problem.

Sorry that I bored the crap out of you with my little anecdote about teaching...as I likely just bored you again with this response.  Good thing I don't respect/know/like you and don't give a crap.
lol, more zeal next time
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: renocat on January 09, 2015, 11:17:41 PM
The Man is back and spreading is macho magic to the other Cats  It is team Marcus.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: chum1 on January 10, 2015, 08:12:46 PM
Holy crap, dude.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: IPA4Me on January 10, 2015, 08:13:20 PM
Well that was nice to see.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on January 10, 2015, 08:13:28 PM
:eek:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on January 10, 2015, 08:13:41 PM
I love him guys. So fun tonight.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wetwillie on January 10, 2015, 08:14:01 PM
oscar finally got through to him
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: bones129 on January 10, 2015, 08:14:12 PM
 :emawkid:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: catzacker on January 10, 2015, 08:14:32 PM
It's amazing how many game winning or tying shots he can hit when he is in the game.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on January 10, 2015, 08:14:58 PM
STONE rough ridin' COLD!!!!!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Paul Moscow on January 10, 2015, 08:15:20 PM
that was just incredible
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: catzacker on January 10, 2015, 08:16:38 PM
LOL at motion offense.  I mean, just give marcus the goddamn ball.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Pete on January 10, 2015, 08:16:39 PM
Well, I missed it.  But, this Disney movie we watched was probably less fun.  :(
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on January 10, 2015, 08:17:12 PM
amazing what happens when you let the one guy we have that can make shots, make shots. Both of those scores were outside of the framework of the offense.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 8manpick on January 10, 2015, 08:17:13 PM
oscar really is a master motivator
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ben ji on January 10, 2015, 08:19:02 PM
 :love: :love: :love:

Foster man, cold blooded.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on January 10, 2015, 08:20:30 PM
Yes, oscar needs to incorporate flat sets where Marcus can make plays.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: SoonerHoopsfan on January 10, 2015, 08:21:09 PM
Hahahahaahha
Oklahoma was dumb enough to back off of Marcus Foster and ended up signing that Booker scrub instead.
AHahahaahahhahahaha

Go Cats
Go Foster
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: catzacker on January 10, 2015, 08:24:36 PM
The only good thing oscar did was resist the urge to call a timeout before marcus hit that 3.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on January 10, 2015, 08:27:19 PM
Stud!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on January 10, 2015, 08:29:05 PM
The only good thing oscar did was resist the urge to call a timeout before marcus hit that 3.

yep
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on January 10, 2015, 08:30:44 PM
Not having a timeout at the end of regulation was such a blessing
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wetwillie on January 10, 2015, 08:31:52 PM
Not having a timeout at the end of regulation was such a blessing

Had one at end of OT and didn't use it, wouldn't have in reg either
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: catzacker on January 10, 2015, 08:35:26 PM
Not having a timeout at the end of regulation was such a blessing

Had one at end of OT and didn't use it, wouldn't have in reg either

did you watch him?  he motioned to call one and then didn't.  oscar's guardian angel must've whispered in his ear to just let his best player make a play.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on January 10, 2015, 08:39:41 PM
oscar is innovating.   Creating The Closer position in college BB.   
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Buttons on January 10, 2015, 08:40:52 PM
Marcus was so much fun tonight!

 :love: :love: :love:

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on January 10, 2015, 08:49:09 PM
The only good thing oscar did was resist the urge to call a timeout before marcus hit that 3.

yep

Would have gotten a T, because we didn't have any
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on January 10, 2015, 08:53:48 PM
The only good thing oscar did was resist the urge to call a timeout before marcus hit that 3.

yep

Would have gotten a T, because we didn't have any

we had a timeout there, dumbass, we didn't have one at the end of regulation
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on January 10, 2015, 09:00:12 PM
I'd like to hear sys's thoughts on Marcus
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on January 10, 2015, 09:14:03 PM
The only good thing oscar did was resist the urge to call a timeout before marcus hit that 3.

yep

Would have gotten a T, because we didn't have any

we had a timeout there, dumbass, we didn't have one at the end of regulation

Why so cranky? I mean, didnt the womens win?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: mocat on January 10, 2015, 10:10:21 PM
The only good thing oscar did was resist the urge to call a timeout before marcus hit that 3.

yep

Would have gotten a T, because we didn't have any

we had a timeout there, dumbass, we didn't have one at the end of regulation

Why so cranky? I mean, didnt the womens win?

Your permanent avi sig thing, tho
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 10, 2015, 10:13:24 PM
Not having a timeout at the end of regulation was such a blessing

Had one at end of OT and didn't use it, wouldn't have in reg either

did you watch him?  he motioned to call one and then didn't.  oscar's guardian angel must've whispered in his ear to just let his best player make a play.

oscar is learning, adapting....he's becoming self aware  :horrorsurprise:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wetwillie on January 10, 2015, 10:21:19 PM
oscar knew to use all his timeouts before the end of the game to avoid self sabotage.  Or maybe lowery did it. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Emo EMAW on January 10, 2015, 10:29:39 PM
So is Foster still transferring?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Emo EMAW on January 10, 2015, 10:30:26 PM
Also, a lot of you have forgotten about Angel/La Salle.  Of course I haven't read much.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Steffy08 on January 10, 2015, 10:59:43 PM
amazing what happens when you let the one guy we have that can make shots, make shots. Both of those scores were outside of the framework of the offense.

If Weber gets blamed when the players play poorly (rightly so), he should also get credit when the players play well and get a big-time win.

Just go ahead and jump on board for this season and enjoy the ride, Make It Rain.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sys on January 10, 2015, 10:59:58 PM
I'd like to hear sys's thoughts on Marcus

he's a great shooter.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: The Big Train on January 10, 2015, 11:01:56 PM
amazing what happens when you let the one guy we have that can make shots, make shots. Both of those scores were outside of the framework of the offense.

If Weber gets blamed when the players play poorly (rightly so), he should also get credit when the players play well and get a big-time win.

Just go ahead and jump on board for this season and enjoy the ride, Make It Rain.

 :jerk:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Steffy08 on January 10, 2015, 11:05:31 PM
Foster was huge down the stretch, but overall I didn't think he had a great game.  Bad d, foul trouble, and no rebounding.  That is where his focus needs to be moving forward.  He needs to keep grinding, and Weber needs to stay on him to push him in these areas.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Steffy08 on January 10, 2015, 11:08:14 PM
amazing what happens when you let the one guy we have that can make shots, make shots. Both of those scores were outside of the framework of the offense.

If Weber gets blamed when the players play poorly (rightly so), he should also get credit when the players play well and get a big-time win.

Just go ahead and jump on board for this season and enjoy the ride, Make It Rain.

 :jerk:

Or, we could blame Weber when things go bad and give no credit when things go well.  Suit yourself, but doesn't seem logical to me.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: The Big Train on January 10, 2015, 11:13:57 PM
amazing what happens when you let the one guy we have that can make shots, make shots. Both of those scores were outside of the framework of the offense.

If Weber gets blamed when the players play poorly (rightly so), he should also get credit when the players play well and get a big-time win.

Just go ahead and jump on board for this season and enjoy the ride, Make It Rain.

 :jerk:

Or, we could blame Weber when things go bad and give no credit when things go well.  Suit yourself, but doesn't seem logical to me.

call the alumni center tomorrow and pledge $500 towards oscar's next contract then

or

recognize this as foster taking over and making a play, in this 1 game
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on January 10, 2015, 11:16:18 PM
So is Foster still transferring?

Yes. Do you really think the drama with this team is over?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: #LIFE on January 11, 2015, 12:02:13 AM
Foster was huge down the stretch, but overall I didn't think he had a great game.  Bad d, foul trouble, and no rebounding.  That is where his focus needs to be moving forward.  He needs to keep grinding, and Weber needs to stay on him to push him in these areas.

Eat crap
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Steffy08 on January 11, 2015, 07:57:39 AM
amazing what happens when you let the one guy we have that can make shots, make shots. Both of those scores were outside of the framework of the offense.

If Weber gets blamed when the players play poorly (rightly so), he should also get credit when the players play well and get a big-time win.

Just go ahead and jump on board for this season and enjoy the ride, Make It Rain.

 :jerk:

Or, we could blame Weber when things go bad and give no credit when things go well.  Suit yourself, but doesn't seem logical to me.

call the alumni center tomorrow and pledge $500 towards oscar's next contract then

or

recognize this as foster taking over and making a play, in this 1 game

No, I'm not saying that Weber deserves contract extension.

I am saying that Weber recruited Foster, so Weber deserves credit Foster's good play.  This board was sure blaming Weber for Foster's previous poor play. 

It works both ways is what I am saying.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: TownieCat on January 11, 2015, 08:57:24 AM
Also, a lot of you have forgotten about Angel/La Salle.  Of course I haven't read much.
The last play in regulation was almost identical to the end of the LaSalle game, only Marcus did a much better job of making the shot than Angel did.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Emo EMAW on January 11, 2015, 01:05:51 PM

So is Foster still transferring?

Yes. Do you really think the drama with this team is over?

Did I say I think it's over? 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on January 11, 2015, 01:08:19 PM

So is Foster still transferring?

Yes. Do you really think the drama with this team is over?

Did I say I think it's over? 

My thought:

Someone will probably transfer.

It probably won't be Marcus.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: star seed 7 on January 11, 2015, 01:12:05 PM
I don't think Marcus will transfer either
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on January 11, 2015, 01:16:23 PM
I think he's here at least one more season after this one. If he finishes strong this year and has another great year next year he absolutely should at least test the waters.

If he indeed stays all 4 years he will contend for all time scoring and oscar will probably have at least 1 sweet 16. (yes, I really believe that)

If Marcus is good, K-State basketball and oscar will be good.

Yes, its just one game, but last night gave me hope again. I still have plenty of questions about oscar, but really good players make coaches look good and Marcus is a really good player when he does things like he did last night. I think he'll continue to do those things more often than not the rest of the Big 12; it might not be enough to make it to the NCAAs because of the terrible start, but this team will likely finish better than it started.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on January 11, 2015, 02:32:57 PM

So is Foster still transferring?

Yes. Do you really think the drama with this team is over?

Did I say I think it's over? 

My thought:

Someone will probably transfer.

It probably won't be Marcus.

My money would be on Nigel. Maybe Tre, but I think he knows what his roles is and wants to stay within a P5 confrence. I don't know how many DC assault connections are left in college b-ball, talk about falling off a mountain.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ednksu on January 11, 2015, 04:13:54 PM
amazing what happens when you let the one guy we have that can make shots, make shots. Both of those scores were outside of the framework of the offense.

If Weber gets blamed when the players play poorly (rightly so), he should also get credit when the players play well and get a big-time win.

Just go ahead and jump on board for this season and enjoy the ride, Make It Rain.

 :jerk:

Or, we could blame Weber when things go bad and give no credit when things go well.  Suit yourself, but doesn't seem logical to me.

call the alumni center tomorrow and pledge $500 towards oscar's next contract then

or

recognize this as foster taking over and making a play, in this 1 game

No, I'm not saying that Weber deserves contract extension.

I am saying that Weber recruited Foster, so Weber deserves credit Foster's good play.  This board was sure blaming Weber for Foster's previous poor play. 

It works both ways is what I am saying.
I think most people here excuse an underclassmen having an off game or two.  They don't excuse a coach tossing him under the bus when he doesn't play well. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: bones129 on January 11, 2015, 04:19:54 PM
amazing what happens when you let the one guy we have that can make shots, make shots. Both of those scores were outside of the framework of the offense.

If Weber gets blamed when the players play poorly (rightly so), he should also get credit when the players play well and get a big-time win.

Just go ahead and jump on board for this season and enjoy the ride, Make It Rain.

 :jerk:

Or, we could blame Weber when things go bad and give no credit when things go well.  Suit yourself, but doesn't seem logical to me.

call the alumni center tomorrow and pledge $500 towards oscar's next contract then

or

recognize this as foster taking over and making a play, in this 1 game

No, I'm not saying that Weber deserves contract extension.

I am saying that Weber recruited Foster, so Weber deserves credit Foster's good play.  This board was sure blaming Weber for Foster's previous poor play. 

It works both ways is what I am saying.
I think most people here excuse an underclassmen having an off game or two.  They don't excuse a coach tossing him under the bus when he doesn't play well.

I think ednksu is correct.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Emo EMAW on January 11, 2015, 07:37:58 PM
Rumor around the student union is Foster and oscar aren't getting along and Foster is going to transfer. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kstatefan11 on January 11, 2015, 08:59:04 PM
Wyatt set oscar up to say nice things about Marcus' performance and he noticeably didn't take the bait. He was more positive later on to other media, but he seems pretty reluctant to offer much praise.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 11, 2015, 09:28:25 PM
Seems like last night was kind of tough on a few people round here.

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on January 12, 2015, 10:26:54 AM
POW!

http://www.big12sports.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=10410&ATCLID=209845818
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on January 12, 2015, 10:55:06 AM
The end of the OU game was as aggressive as I have ever seen Marcus. Still think there is a corner to turn. He hasn't had one of his signature scoring flurries this year yet. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: AppleJack on January 12, 2015, 11:02:18 AM
end of the Tennessee game?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 12, 2015, 11:26:37 AM
I think steffy made some good points in this thread. We should all give oscar a lot of credit for deciding to give one of the 10 best basketball players to ever suit up for Kansas State University significant minutes in Norman.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 'taterblast on January 12, 2015, 11:35:58 AM
what a difference a week makes
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on January 12, 2015, 11:40:44 AM
Foster still played pretty shitty/lazy defense the last two games.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sys on January 12, 2015, 11:43:39 AM
We should all give oscar a lot of credit for deciding to give one of the 10 best basketball players to ever suit up for Kansas State University significant minutes in Norman.

wait, what?  what in the eff?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sys on January 12, 2015, 11:44:20 AM
Foster still played pretty shitty/lazy defense the last two games.

i hope his minutes are limited in the tech game.  everyone has to play defense.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on January 12, 2015, 11:45:58 AM
Foster still played pretty shitty/lazy defense the last two games.

i hope his minutes are limited in the tech game.  everyone has to play defense.

I'd rather he just play better defense but maybe that's just me.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Skipper44 on January 12, 2015, 11:49:23 AM
Foster still played pretty shitty/lazy defense the last two games.

i hope his minutes are limited in the tech game.  everyone has to play defense.

I'd rather he just play better defense but maybe that's just me.
avoid fouls > staying fresh for end of game heroics > playing good defense > defensive rebounding
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on January 12, 2015, 12:24:31 PM
LOL @ the frankites criticizing weber for punitively benching a player.

LAUGH OUT LOUD
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on January 12, 2015, 12:40:22 PM
Marcus needs to score. Even though his minutes were limited against Georgia and Oklahoma State he also went 1-9 from the field and 0-5 from 3. After that just play decent defense and get a few rebounds. Honestly, I'm fairly confident that he'll do that consistently because he already has most his short career.

IMO the key for the rest of the season isn't so much Marcus as it is the other guys. I think his little deal is mostly over and we pretty much know what we're going to get. However, we don't always know what we'll get from Jevon, Hurt, and Westicles. Nino and Gip have been fairly consistent, but those other guys haven't. We've just got to have the majority playing well at the same time like we did in Norman and this team will win plenty more games. The question is how consistent that will happen.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Emo EMAW on January 12, 2015, 01:07:43 PM

LOL @ the frankites criticizing weber for punitively benching a player.

LAUGH OUT LOUD

While this is a good point, I think a lot of Frankites didn't like him doing that either.  You can like someone and not like everything they do.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sys on January 12, 2015, 02:40:46 PM
Foster still played pretty shitty/lazy defense the last two games.

i hope his minutes are limited in the tech game.  everyone has to play defense.

I'd rather he just play better defense but maybe that's just me.

it'd be great to hyperloop between la and sf.  but for now we still have to just drive along on the highway.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 'taterblast on February 05, 2015, 12:19:26 AM
http://www.bringonthecats.com/2015/2/4/7982905/kansas-states-marcus-foster-getting-what-he-wanted (http://www.bringonthecats.com/2015/2/4/7982905/kansas-states-marcus-foster-getting-what-he-wanted)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on February 05, 2015, 12:24:27 AM
:lol:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on February 05, 2015, 04:38:25 AM
http://www.bringonthecats.com/2015/2/4/7982905/kansas-states-marcus-foster-getting-what-he-wanted (http://www.bringonthecats.com/2015/2/4/7982905/kansas-states-marcus-foster-getting-what-he-wanted)

Goddamnit panjandrum, your guy Curtis is a special kind of piece of crap. He embarrasses BOTC, he embarrasses humanity. I hope he has accidents in the next three days that removes his handw ahe , his sound ovgggggggggggggggggggggggck                                                -===========================================-================================================================================oooo//////////////////////////////////////////////////0k=
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: puniraptor on February 05, 2015, 06:42:58 AM
It's like the oscar-tuck Unabomber manifesto.

Also can I get a wellness check on MIR?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 05, 2015, 06:46:17 AM
My apathy is turning to anger which feels good.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: uncle clean jeans on February 05, 2015, 06:48:39 AM
http://www.bringonthecats.com/2015/2/4/7982905/kansas-states-marcus-foster-getting-what-he-wanted (http://www.bringonthecats.com/2015/2/4/7982905/kansas-states-marcus-foster-getting-what-he-wanted)

writing like this has to be one of the most embarrassing aspects of being a cats fan (that collegian article also comes to mind). reading this was much worse than watching a loss to tech
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: chum1 on February 05, 2015, 07:00:22 AM
 :flush:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on February 05, 2015, 07:11:15 AM
You guys just can't stand the heat I guess.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on February 05, 2015, 07:17:11 AM
oscar On The Cats
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: steve dave on February 05, 2015, 07:18:13 AM
Quote
This is what you envisioned, huh Marcus?


 :lol:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Cire on February 05, 2015, 07:24:23 AM
Pffft
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on February 05, 2015, 07:49:01 AM
He really gave Marcus a stern dressing down right to his face.  We'll see how Marcus responds I guess.  There's a gauntlet on the ground, Marcus.  You going to pick it up, huh?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 05, 2015, 07:56:41 AM
While I as a K-State fan am not happy with how Weber is handling the program overall, it takes a real kind of hater to just flat out say that Foster hasn't contributed to some of the issues.   You cannot just lay this entirely on the feet of, "Weber doesn't know how to relate to the players" . . . part of relating to the players is allowing them to excel, I think oscar Weber has given Marcus Foster a massive opportunity to excel.   

You could tell from the very beginning of the season that Foster's attitude was that he was the $hit, and from the outset I've believed that it was "his people" fueling it . . . and no coach is going to put up with that.   From my observation, the whole Lebron camp thing etc. etc. has gone straight to Foster's head. 





Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pissclams on February 05, 2015, 08:04:06 AM
While I as a K-State fan am not happy with how Weber is handling the program overall, it takes a real kind of hater to just flat out say that Foster hasn't contributed to some of the issues.   You cannot just lay this entirely on the feet of, "Weber doesn't know how to relate to the players" . . . part of relating to the players is allowing them to excel, I think oscar Weber has given Marcus Foster a massive opportunity to excel.   

You could tell from the very beginning of the season that Foster's attitude was that he was the $hit, and from the outset I've believed that it was "his people" fueling it . . . and no coach is going to put up with that.   From my observation, the whole Lebron camp thing etc. etc. has gone straight to Foster's head. 






it's oscar's job to manage his players and ensure that the best player he'll ever have at k-state/meal ticket is happy and plays by the rules.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ShellShock on February 05, 2015, 08:08:43 AM
While I as a K-State fan am not happy with how Weber is handling the program overall, it takes a real kind of hater to just flat out say that Foster hasn't contributed to some of the issues.   You cannot just lay this entirely on the feet of, "Weber doesn't know how to relate to the players" . . . part of relating to the players is allowing them to excel, I think oscar Weber has given Marcus Foster a massive opportunity to excel.   

You could tell from the very beginning of the season that Foster's attitude was that he was the $hit, and from the outset I've believed that it was "his people" fueling it . . . and no coach is going to put up with that.   From my observation, the whole Lebron camp thing etc. etc. has gone straight to Foster's head. 






it's oscar's job to manage his players and ensure that the best player he'll ever have at k-state/meal ticket is happy and plays by the rules.

Bingo. Whenever I hear people defending oscar and saying all of this seasons trouble is on Foster, I think about how Bob Knight/Coach K/Boeheim would handle these types of situations. They'd cut the head off the snake and move forward. oscar has to be the long dick of the law and figure it out as he's ultimately responsible for the team and the season. I'd rather lose games figuring it out with the rest of the team playing hard than lose games dealing and being distracted with a headcase bringing down the team. You think any respectable coach would put up with this crap? The answer is no.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on February 05, 2015, 08:08:57 AM
We Obvsly need to weed out the potential leBron camp invitees. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on February 05, 2015, 08:09:26 AM
While I as a K-State fan am not happy with how Weber is handling the program overall, it takes a real kind of hater to just flat out say that Foster hasn't contributed to some of the issues.   You cannot just lay this entirely on the feet of, "Weber doesn't know how to relate to the players" . . . part of relating to the players is allowing them to excel, I think oscar Weber has given Marcus Foster a massive opportunity to excel.   

You could tell from the very beginning of the season that Foster's attitude was that he was the $hit, and from the outset I've believed that it was "his people" fueling it . . . and no coach is going to put up with that.   From my observation, the whole Lebron camp thing etc. etc. has gone straight to Foster's head. 






it's oscar's job to manage his players and ensure that the best player he'll ever have at k-state/meal ticket is happy and plays by the rules.

Of course it is, but I don't think dax is saying that here. Kitchen's blog or whatever is dumb, but Marcus has some responsibility in this as well. My biggest frustration with this blog at times is that if "we" like the player its never their fault, but if "we" don't the player is a complete piece of trash (see Jake Waters). Its dumb.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: steve dave on February 05, 2015, 08:10:05 AM
yeah, frank had tons of this stuff as well. he just got through it. he ran off a shitload of people. had dillards on our asses. had pat bosco save the day for CK. bill obviously didn't want to be here but he got him to play as well as could be expected. he managed michael beasley which is something no NBA coach has been able to do. can you guys imagine oscar weber trying to deal with michael beasley, jamar samuels, et al? can you imagine him getting after bill walker about his poor showing on the play hard chart?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 05, 2015, 08:10:15 AM
While I as a K-State fan am not happy with how Weber is handling the program overall, it takes a real kind of hater to just flat out say that Foster hasn't contributed to some of the issues.   You cannot just lay this entirely on the feet of, "Weber doesn't know how to relate to the players" . . . part of relating to the players is allowing them to excel, I think oscar Weber has given Marcus Foster a massive opportunity to excel.   

You could tell from the very beginning of the season that Foster's attitude was that he was the $hit, and from the outset I've believed that it was "his people" fueling it . . . and no coach is going to put up with that.   From my observation, the whole Lebron camp thing etc. etc. has gone straight to Foster's head. 






it's oscar's job to manage his players and ensure that the best player he'll ever have at k-state/meal ticket is happy and plays by the rules.

So what if Foster doesn't play by the rules?  What if Foster is just being an amazing a$$hole?

Weber would be an even bigger idiot by allowing a kid who was just being, well, just being a complete dick (if that is indeed the case) to continue to infect the team with his a$$holishness.   

That issue is mutually exclusive from the fact that Weber has clearly recruited inferior guards, and can't seem to get Wes to "get it".   Those things are almost as big of issues as Foster.   If we had some real mumping point guards and if Wes would ever "get it" we probably win that rough ridin game last night.

CNS . . . don't be a strawman rough ridin dick.   That's not what I said.

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ShellShock on February 05, 2015, 08:10:47 AM
We Obvsly need to weed out the potential leBron camp invitees.

I sense the sarcasm, but this is not really any different than Coach K dumping Sulaimon after "violating team rules" at Duke. At some point we have to say enough is enough.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ShellShock on February 05, 2015, 08:11:59 AM
yeah, frank had tons of this stuff as well. he just got through it. he ran off a shitload of people. had dillards on our asses. had pat bosco save the day for CK. bill obviously didn't want to be here but he got him to play as well as could be expected. he managed michael beasley which is something no NBA coach has been able to do. can you guys imagine oscar weber trying to deal with michael beasley, jamar samuels, et al? can you imagine him getting after bill walker about his poor showing on the play hard chart?

Bingo
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: steve dave on February 05, 2015, 08:13:18 AM
While I as a K-State fan am not happy with how Weber is handling the program overall, it takes a real kind of hater to just flat out say that Foster hasn't contributed to some of the issues.   You cannot just lay this entirely on the feet of, "Weber doesn't know how to relate to the players" . . . part of relating to the players is allowing them to excel, I think oscar Weber has given Marcus Foster a massive opportunity to excel.   

You could tell from the very beginning of the season that Foster's attitude was that he was the $hit, and from the outset I've believed that it was "his people" fueling it . . . and no coach is going to put up with that.   From my observation, the whole Lebron camp thing etc. etc. has gone straight to Foster's head. 






it's oscar's job to manage his players and ensure that the best player he'll ever have at k-state/meal ticket is happy and plays by the rules.

Of course it is, but I don't think dax is saying that here. Kitchen's blog or whatever is dumb, but Marcus has some responsibility in this as well. My biggest frustration with this blog at times is that if "we" like the player its never their fault, but if "we" don't the player is a complete piece of trash (see Jake Waters). Its dumb.

there is no "we". there are plenty of people on here who dislike marcus or at least how he's been playing/acting. there are also a TON of people on here that were and are huge jake waters fans. you are just getting mad at the other side for having better arguments/rhetoric which doesn't make it "we".
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on February 05, 2015, 08:13:39 AM
That issue is mutually exclusive from the fact that Weber has clearly recruited inferior guards, and can't seem to get Wes to "get it".   Those things are almost as big of issues as faster.   If we had some real mumping point guards and if Wes would ever "get it" we probably win that rough ridin game last night.

Yeah, oscar provides us with plenty of legitimate stuff to be upset about like this.

Besides Marcus, the roster oscar has put together is absolutely terrible. I joked about his Salukruiting, but that is pretty much what we have. I had hope in his attempt at transfers, but Bolden is simply not a major college player and Edwards is extremely inconsistent. Then you have the entire Jevon/Nigel mess. And Hurt. And the regression of Westicles.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on February 05, 2015, 08:14:19 AM
there is no "we". there are plenty of people on here who dislike marcus or at least how he's been playing/acting. there are also a TON of people on here that were and are huge jake waters fans. you are just getting mad at the other side for having better arguments/rhetoric which doesn't make it "we".

Fair.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ShellShock on February 05, 2015, 08:16:38 AM
That issue is mutually exclusive from the fact that Weber has clearly recruited inferior guards, and can't seem to get Wes to "get it".   Those things are almost as big of issues as faster.   If we had some real mumping point guards and if Wes would ever "get it" we probably win that rough ridin game last night.

Yeah, oscar provides us with plenty of legitimate stuff to be upset about like this.

Besides Marcus, the roster oscar has put together is absolutely terrible. I joked about his Salukruiting, but that is pretty much what we have. I had hope in his attempt at transfers, but Bolden is simply not a major college player and Edwards is extremely inconsistent. Then you have the entire Jevon/Nigel mess. And Hurt. And the regression of Westicles.

I'm not giving up hope on Edwards and Hurt yet, but Bolden and Nigel absolutely have to go. I'm willing to take a flyer on Jevon purely because we have some good guards coming in.

I think the thing that i'm most upset about is the regression of Wes. He looked like a freaking stud in the Kentucky game and at the end of last season and it seems like he just lost all of that drive and motivation in the off season. I'm praying for it to be just a soph slump and he'll come out and have a great Junior campaign.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: WavetheWheat on February 05, 2015, 08:17:17 AM
When did Curtis Kitchen turn into such a dick?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 05, 2015, 08:22:20 AM
The Frank comparo's . . . it's like some people just forget all the Frankings, and the fact that some guys couldn't even breath incorrectly without either getting benched, or just plain being forgotten about entirely.

Don't talk about "handling" Jamar, Jamar would sulk and pout and it would wreck his game for huge periods of time, if "handling" Jamar was Jamar going out and sucking a$$ for multiple games at a time, than you need to reassess just what "handling" is.








Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CHONGS on February 05, 2015, 08:23:23 AM
When you need "things to go just right" in order to beat a team like Tech you might as well just admit its over.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on February 05, 2015, 08:25:35 AM
When did Curtis Kitchen turn into such a dick?

Its his way of coping with K-State being bad again. Its just not good coping.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: mocat on February 05, 2015, 08:26:01 AM
Hey dax, Jamar was integral to our best season ever.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 05, 2015, 08:26:43 AM
Hey dax, Jamar was integral to our best season ever.

When did I say he wasn't?  Stupid

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Cire on February 05, 2015, 08:33:16 AM
It's oscar's fault for A: not brucing him

B: recruiting himself into a situation that you are one guy a way from being the worst team in the conference
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: mocat on February 05, 2015, 08:34:16 AM
You are using it as an excuse for oscar to destroy our program, wich I don't like
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on February 05, 2015, 08:35:15 AM
there is no "we". there are plenty of people on here who dislike marcus or at least how he's been playing/acting. there are also a TON of people on here that were and are huge jake waters fans. you are just getting mad at the other side for having better arguments/rhetoric which doesn't make it "we".

Fair.

I mean, I do think at times the narrative is driven one direction over another, but you are correct. If you can't bring a legitimate point or argument in the debate you (I) should really just shut up.

It's oscar's fault for A: not brucing him

B: recruiting himself into a situation that you are one guy a way from being the worst team in the conference

Yes, this. We are pretty bad after Marcus, and that's with Gip and Nino.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 05, 2015, 08:36:38 AM
You are using it as an excuse for oscar to destroy our program, wich I don't like

 :facepalm:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Winters on February 05, 2015, 08:37:07 AM
oscar Weber=Cancer
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: #LIFE on February 05, 2015, 08:39:27 AM
oscar Weber=Cancer

Not really, there is a chance to survive cancer
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: EMAWmeister on February 05, 2015, 08:47:30 AM
So maybe Foster is a really big problem. But we knew at the beginning of the season that this was going to be an issue. We literally all saw it coming. If oscar gets his program and his star player under control in November and December, we're not having this issue today. Bench him for a game like Arizona, let us take an unholy ass beating in Maui and then move forward.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pissclams on February 05, 2015, 08:48:03 AM
While I as a K-State fan am not happy with how Weber is handling the program overall, it takes a real kind of hater to just flat out say that Foster hasn't contributed to some of the issues.   You cannot just lay this entirely on the feet of, "Weber doesn't know how to relate to the players" . . . part of relating to the players is allowing them to excel, I think oscar Weber has given Marcus Foster a massive opportunity to excel.   

You could tell from the very beginning of the season that Foster's attitude was that he was the $hit, and from the outset I've believed that it was "his people" fueling it . . . and no coach is going to put up with that.   From my observation, the whole Lebron camp thing etc. etc. has gone straight to Foster's head. 






it's oscar's job to manage his players and ensure that the best player he'll ever have at k-state/meal ticket is happy and plays by the rules.

So what if Foster doesn't play by the rules?  What if Foster is just being an amazing a$$hole?

Weber would be an even bigger idiot by allowing a kid who was just being, well, just being a complete dick (if that is indeed the case) to continue to infect the team with his a$$holishness.   

again, the fact that it's gotten to this point falls on oscar.  yes, the player shares in responsibility, but it's oscar's job to grow these kids on and off of the court.
a failure of the kid is a failure of the coach.

and jake waters didn't have these problems.  people didn't like him because his name wasn't daniel sams.  poor comparison. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on February 05, 2015, 08:50:20 AM
again, the fact that it's gotten to this point falls on oscar.  yes, the player shares in responsibility, but it's oscar's job to grow these kids on and off of the court.
a failure of the kid is a failure of the coach.

and jake waters didn't have these problems.  people didn't like him because his name wasn't daniel sams.  poor comparison. 

I agree with all of that clams.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on February 05, 2015, 08:52:33 AM
again, the fact that it's gotten to this point falls on oscar.  yes, the player shares in responsibility, but it's oscar's job to grow these kids on and off of the court.
a failure of the kid is a failure of the coach.

and jake waters didn't have these problems.  people didn't like him because his name wasn't daniel sams.  poor comparison. 

I agree with all of that clams.
I didn't like Jake Waters' attitude or stupid face. I have no problem acknowledging that's not fair.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on February 05, 2015, 08:52:56 AM
And really, I'm about the only person that truly dislikes him.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 05, 2015, 08:55:56 AM
oscar Weber=Cancer

Not really, there is a chance to survive cancer

Yeah, by cutting out the cancer.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: OK_Cat on February 05, 2015, 08:56:45 AM
I dislike curtis kitchen because he is bad at what he does
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on February 05, 2015, 09:14:14 AM
It's like the oscar-tuck Unabomber manifesto.

Also can I get a wellness check on MIR?

Ironic you replied because I literally passed out posting that, like fell asleep on the laptop, but I'm good now thanks :Woot:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: puniraptor on February 05, 2015, 09:16:56 AM
It's like the oscar-tuck Unabomber manifesto.

Also can I get a wellness check on MIR?

Ironic you replied because I literally passed out posting that, like fell asleep on the laptop, but I'm good now thanks :Woot:

 :lol:

it looked from this end like an an aneurysm
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on February 05, 2015, 09:20:06 AM
And I just read Kicthen's article. Or at least the start of it. My God, what an awful person.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: mocat on February 05, 2015, 09:23:10 AM
Goddamnit panjandrum, your guy Curtis is a special kind of piece of crap. He embarrasses BOTC, he embarrasses humanity. I hope he has accidents in the next three days that removes his handw ahe , his sound ovgggggggggggggggggggggggck                                                -===========================================-================================================================================oooo//////////////////////////////////////////////////0k=

this is your brain. ASLEEP.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on February 05, 2015, 09:24:15 AM
Don't talk about "handling" Jamar, Jamar would sulk and pout and it would wreck his game for huge periods of time, if "handling" Jamar was Jamar going out and sucking a$$ for multiple games at a time, than you need to reassess just what "handling" is.

This is my favorite dax device; using alternative history to strengthen a current point. Some of you people not liking his body language with referees has now become him sulking and it having a negative affect for multiple game stretches, that's just precious.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep on February 05, 2015, 09:25:54 AM
that curtis kitchen article is v. dumb.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on February 05, 2015, 09:26:10 AM
Goddamnit panjandrum, your guy Curtis is a special kind of piece of crap. He embarrasses BOTC, he embarrasses humanity. I hope he has accidents in the next three days that removes his handw ahe , his sound ovgggggggggggggggggggggggck                                                -===========================================-================================================================================oooo//////////////////////////////////////////////////0k=

this is your brain. ASLEEP.

at some point I hit the edit button and then fell asleep again because I woke up to the edit post page on the screen
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on February 05, 2015, 09:27:08 AM
yeah, frank had tons of this stuff as well. he just got through it. he ran off a shitload of people. had dillards on our asses. had pat bosco save the day for CK. bill obviously didn't want to be here but he got him to play as well as could be expected. he managed michael beasley which is something no NBA coach has been able to do. can you guys imagine oscar weber trying to deal with michael beasley, jamar samuels, et al? can you imagine him getting after bill walker about his poor showing on the play hard chart?

:lol:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on February 05, 2015, 09:29:12 AM
So what if Foster doesn't play by the rules?  What if Foster is just being an amazing a$$hole?

Weber would be an even bigger idiot by allowing a kid who was just being, well, just being a complete dick (if that is indeed the case) to continue to infect the team with his a$$holishness.   

Dax PM'd me not long ago asking why I was being such a dickhead.  That's how you handle a situation head-on.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on February 05, 2015, 09:29:36 AM
Jamar got into his own head on offense some times, but he was always turnt on d.  He was so much of what was right about our JYCs.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on February 05, 2015, 09:30:56 AM
Goddamnit panjandrum, your guy Curtis is a special kind of piece of crap. He embarrasses BOTC, he embarrasses humanity. I hope he has accidents in the next three days that removes his handw ahe , his sound ovgggggggggggggggggggggggck                                                -===========================================-================================================================================oooo//////////////////////////////////////////////////0k=

this is your brain. ASLEEP.

at some point I hit the edit button and then fell asleep again because I woke up to the edit post page on the screen

:lol:

Don't edit the original, but now finish the post you passed out in.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on February 05, 2015, 09:33:30 AM
Goddamnit panjandrum, your guy Curtis is a special kind of piece of crap. He embarrasses BOTC, he embarrasses humanity. I hope he has accidents in the next three days that removes his handw ahe , his sound ovgggggggggggggggggggggggck                                                -===========================================-================================================================================oooo//////////////////////////////////////////////////0k=

this is your brain. ASLEEP.

at some point I hit the edit button and then fell asleep again because I woke up to the edit post page on the screen

:lol:

Don't edit the original, but now finish the post you passed out in.

I won't edit it, but it was just going to be mean stuff that makes it impossible for him to write for public consumption ever again. Can't fitz just hire him and put his bullshit behind a paywall?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on February 05, 2015, 09:54:41 AM
Goddamnit panjandrum, your guy Curtis is a special kind of piece of crap. He embarrasses BOTC, he embarrasses humanity. I hope he has accidents in the next three days that removes his handw ahe , his sound ovgggggggggggggggggggggggck                                                -===========================================-================================================================================oooo//////////////////////////////////////////////////0k=

this is your brain. ASLEEP.

at some point I hit the edit button and then fell asleep again because I woke up to the edit post page on the screen

:lol:

Don't edit the original, but now finish the post you passed out in.

I won't edit it, but it was just going to be mean stuff that makes it impossible for him to write for public consumption ever again. Can't fitz just hire him and put his bullshit behind a paywall?

As is, your original post could be promoted as what happens when one reads Kitchen.

Remember when he donated $10?  :lol:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: nicname on February 05, 2015, 10:53:22 AM
http://www.bringonthecats.com/2015/2/4/7982905/kansas-states-marcus-foster-getting-what-he-wanted (http://www.bringonthecats.com/2015/2/4/7982905/kansas-states-marcus-foster-getting-what-he-wanted)

writing like this has to be one of the most embarrassing aspects of being a cats fan (that collegian article also comes to mind). reading this was much worse than watching a loss to tech

I'm sure every school has its similar stories.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Spracne on February 05, 2015, 10:59:22 AM
K-State's season is a fine mess, thanks in many ways to the player wearing deuce on his back.

Does Scatcat doo headlines for him?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Ghost of Stan Parrish on February 05, 2015, 11:07:04 AM
K-State's season is a fine mess, thanks in many ways to the player wearing deuce on his back.

Does Scatcat doo headlines for him?

 :D
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: nicname on February 05, 2015, 11:09:48 AM
Another, more entertaining article on the topic.

http://www.foxsports.com/kansas-city/story/foster-s-antics-have-put-k-state-s-season-on-the-brink-and-his-coach-on-the-hot-seat-020515
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: _33 on February 05, 2015, 11:20:33 AM
The worst part of all of this is that it gives oscar a scapegoat.  I'm sure that's already been talked about but it is the worst part.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: nicname on February 05, 2015, 11:26:16 AM
I'm sure oscar realizes his failures with regard to Foster. His other failures — as some here have pointed out — the ones that have left the roster so tied to the production of one player, are hard to sweep under the rug as well.

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ksupamplemousse on February 05, 2015, 11:28:01 AM
It's oscar's fault for A: not brucing him

B: recruiting himself into a situation that you are one guy a way from being the worst team in the conference

This is really the bottom line. If oscar had recruited more than one good basketball player in the three years that he has been here, then this wouldn't be that big of a deal. People who are saying, "Well, wait a minute now, this might actually be Marcus' fault. Don't go throwing oscar under the bus, he's doing the best he can with this spoiled prima donna." I could give not one flying eff whose "fault" this is. If both sides can't come to an agreement that allows the player to thrive and be a productive part of the team, then you damn well better have enough talent for it not to sink your entire season. oscar has put himself in a terrible position, and he needs to rough ridin' own it, because the product on the floor IS his fault.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kslim on February 05, 2015, 11:29:30 AM
The worst part of all of this is that it gives oscar a scapegoat.  I'm sure that's already been talked about but it is the worst part.
fought all morning with a tuck over this point. I rough ridin' give up
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on February 05, 2015, 11:30:48 AM
It's oscar's fault for A: not brucing him

B: recruiting himself into a situation that you are one guy a way from being the worst team in the conference

This is really the bottom line. If oscar had recruited more than one good basketball player in the three years that he has been here, then this wouldn't be that big of a deal. People who are saying, "Well, wait a minute now, this might actually be Marcus' fault. Don't go throwing oscar under the bus, he's doing the best he can with this spoiled prima donna." I could give not one flying eff whose "fault" this is. If both sides can't come to an agreement that allows the player to thrive and be a productive part of the team, then you damn well better have enough talent for it not to sink your entire season. oscar has put himself in a terrible position, and he needs to rough ridin' own it, because the product on the floor IS his fault.

I'm sure oscar realizes his failures with regard to Foster. His other failures — as some here have pointed out — the ones that have left the roster so tied to the production of one player, are hard to sweep under the rug as well.

Yes, that's the real issue for me. Watching this team sans Foster was pretty pathetic last night, especially the way we finished that game. Especially with 2 decent seniors out there.

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 05, 2015, 11:46:00 AM
That play hard chart is going to go down in infamy
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Sandstone Outcropping on February 05, 2015, 11:46:35 AM
Another, more entertaining article on the topic.

http://www.foxsports.com/kansas-city/story/foster-s-antics-have-put-k-state-s-season-on-the-brink-and-his-coach-on-the-hot-seat-020515
Quote
The Anti-oscar corner of K-State fandom -- which accepts victories begrudgingly and demands alum Brad Underwood (record at Stephen F. Austin: 50-6 since the fall of 2013) be hired about 2.6 seconds after every Weber loss -- is starting to fear a similar straw threatening to break the back of Foster, and the program itself.
:surprised:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ksupamplemousse on February 05, 2015, 11:50:57 AM
Another, more entertaining article on the topic.

http://www.foxsports.com/kansas-city/story/foster-s-antics-have-put-k-state-s-season-on-the-brink-and-his-coach-on-the-hot-seat-020515

I stopped a couple of sentences in when he referred to Malek as a rim protector. I'm just going to assume the guy is as dumb as that statement makes him sound.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Sandstone Outcropping on February 05, 2015, 11:56:39 AM
Another, more entertaining article on the topic.

http://www.foxsports.com/kansas-city/story/foster-s-antics-have-put-k-state-s-season-on-the-brink-and-his-coach-on-the-hot-seat-020515

I stopped a couple of sentences in when he referred to Malek as a rim protector. I'm just going to assume the guy is as dumb as that statement makes him sound.
Does Malek have the makings of a JYC? I think Brad could turn Malek into a bonafide JYC.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 05, 2015, 12:31:58 PM
Don't talk about "handling" Jamar, Jamar would sulk and pout and it would wreck his game for huge periods of time, if "handling" Jamar was Jamar going out and sucking a$$ for multiple games at a time, than you need to reassess just what "handling" is.

This is my favorite dax device; using alternative history to strengthen a current point. Some of you people not liking his body language with referees has now become him sulking and it having a negative affect for multiple game stretches, that's just precious.

Yeah, it was just the refs.   :jerk: :rolleyes:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: star seed 7 on February 05, 2015, 12:36:26 PM
And really, I'm about the only person that truly dislikes him.

Nope, I dislike him very much for the same reasons
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on February 05, 2015, 12:39:20 PM
And really, I'm about the only person that truly dislikes him.

Nope, I dislike him very much for the same reasons

Also, regarding Waters, I think the program would be in better shape today if he had never set foot on campus. but he got some records and stuff.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Gooch on February 05, 2015, 12:40:48 PM
And really, I'm about the only person that truly dislikes him.

Nope, I dislike him very much for the same reasons

Also, regarding Waters, I think the program would be in better shape today if he had never set foot on campus. but he got some records and stuff.
He potentially made a lot of $$ for Lockett. But yes KSU fball would be in better shape.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on February 05, 2015, 12:41:29 PM
And really, I'm about the only person that truly dislikes him.

Nope, I dislike him very much for the same reasons

Also, regarding Waters, I think the program would be in better shape today if he had never set foot on campus. but he got some records and stuff.
He potentially made a lot of $$ for Lockett. But yes KSU fball would be in better shape.

eh, Lockett made himself a lot of money.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on February 05, 2015, 12:43:46 PM
Also, regarding Waters, I think the program would be in better shape today if he had never set foot on campus.

This should be a christmas movie, but ending with confirmation that yes the program would be in better shape if he'd never set foot on campus or been born.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: DOD Take 2 on February 05, 2015, 12:45:53 PM
I feel like oscar actually brought in decent/good players, but has ruined them with his coaching. They showed promise last year and then spent the summer with oscar and look like dogshit.  :th_twocents:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: catastrophe on February 05, 2015, 01:04:53 PM
I feel like oscar actually brought in decent/good players, but has ruined them with his coaching. They showed promise last year and then spent the summer with oscar and look like dogshit.  :th_twocents:

I'll wager you could find this exact comment on some Illinois message board from 3-5 years ago.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Panjandrum on February 05, 2015, 01:16:40 PM
oscar On The Cats

I am a lone voice of dissent.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Panjandrum on February 05, 2015, 01:19:18 PM
And I just read Kicthen's article. Or at least the start of it. My God, what an awful person.

He's really not.  We've had some lengthy conversations about oscar/Marcus.

We don't see eye to eye on either.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 05, 2015, 01:21:26 PM
And I just read Kicthen's article. Or at least the start of it. My God, what an awful person.

He's really not.  We've had some lengthy conversations about oscar/Marcus.

We don't see eye to eye on either.

Well, he's either an awful person or a very poor writer, because the article he just wrote trying to shame a 19 year old kid makes him look pretty awful.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on February 05, 2015, 01:23:06 PM
Someone dig up some of Andy Katz's early work.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on February 05, 2015, 01:30:08 PM
And I just read Kicthen's article. Or at least the start of it. My God, what an awful person.

He's really not.  We've had some lengthy conversations about oscar/Marcus.

We don't see eye to eye on either.

Well, he's either an awful person or a very poor writer, because the article he just wrote trying to shame a 19 year old kid makes him look pretty awful.

Writing something as if you are speaking directly to a person who doesn't know you exist and saying things you would never say to their face is the hallmark of a good man. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CHONGS on February 05, 2015, 01:36:35 PM
Wow, I just read that article.  Kitchen is a complete and total hack.  I don't care if its a piece critical of a player, you can certainly write that piece, but this was just crap sports "journalism".  No sources, just complete supposition and whatever KC imagines is happening in his mind. This is the worst of this wave of phony sports hackery that persists out there now. 

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on February 05, 2015, 01:38:27 PM
This is pretty much Todd Stewart writing about Manny Dies recycled.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CHONGS on February 05, 2015, 01:38:35 PM
Honestly KC should just give up trying to get into sports journalism after that. But then again I suppose if you are writing articles for the garbage that is Bring on the Cats you have given up.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on February 05, 2015, 01:42:10 PM
Quote
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FNMruqoaNrLs%2F0.jpg&hash=ba5d1b3c306173529dc61284cdf55e66bb0c80e1)

Andy Katz Talking Debut

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Panjandrum on February 05, 2015, 01:44:20 PM
Honestly KC should just give up trying to get into sports journalism after that. But then again I suppose if you are writing articles for the garbage that is Bring on the Cats you have given up.

He's not trying to get into journalism any longer.

Appreciate your thoughts on the site, though.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 05, 2015, 01:44:49 PM
This is mostly oscar's fault. Kitchen may be driving the bus, but oscar pushed Marcus in front of it.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CHONGS on February 05, 2015, 01:48:34 PM
Honestly KC should just give up trying to get into sports journalism after that. But then again I suppose if you are writing articles for the garbage that is Bring on the Cats you have given up.

He's not trying to get into journalism any longer.

Appreciate your thoughts on the site, though.
Glad to see I was right. 

I await his next piece on how he can tell LeBron just isn't trying as hard this year based on the TNT broadcasts he's watched this year.  Front page news!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Panjandrum on February 05, 2015, 01:51:04 PM
Honestly KC should just give up trying to get into sports journalism after that. But then again I suppose if you are writing articles for the garbage that is Bring on the Cats you have given up.

He's not trying to get into journalism any longer.

Appreciate your thoughts on the site, though.
Glad to see I was right. 

I await his next piece on how he can tell LeBron just isn't trying as hard this year based on the TNT broadcasts he's watched this year.  Front page news!

I didn't agree with the piece, so I'm not going to defend it.  We'll discuss it the next time we talk.

However, I feel like the second comment was a direct shot at me, so I do somewhat take offense.  But you are entitled to your opinion.  I can't say much because I'm not very involved any longer.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CHONGS on February 05, 2015, 01:56:32 PM
Honestly KC should just give up trying to get into sports journalism after that. But then again I suppose if you are writing articles for the garbage that is Bring on the Cats you have given up.

He's not trying to get into journalism any longer.

Appreciate your thoughts on the site, though.
Glad to see I was right. 

I await his next piece on how he can tell LeBron just isn't trying as hard this year based on the TNT broadcasts he's watched this year.  Front page news!

I didn't agree with the piece, so I'm not going to defend it.  We'll discuss it the next time we talk.

However, I feel like the second comment was a direct shot at me, so I do somewhat take offense.  But you are entitled to your opinion.  I can't say much because I'm not very involved any longer.
100% honest it was not a direct shot at you personally, but at everyone associated with that site. Yes, I know you are associated, but I am not singling you out in particular.  I seriously doubt that makes you feel better though.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Panjandrum on February 05, 2015, 02:03:46 PM
100% honest it was not a direct shot at you personally, but at everyone associated with that site. Yes, I know you are associated, but I am not singling you out in particular.  I seriously doubt that makes you feel better though.

Well, I appreciate the honesty.

Those that run the site and provide direction can't please everyone, and I really have no say in anything any longer.  So, I can't take offense.  I apologize.

I'm not going to defend what Curtis wrote.  I don't agree with it, and we'll discuss that at a later time.  My main objection is the same objection that you alluded to, and that's that we don't know what Marcus said/did to earn the suspension.  From my perspective, on the court, he's been a very solid player and good teammate since the OSU game.  I can't be critical of someone if I don't know what's going on behind the scenes.  God knows that if I played for oscar I'd have visible attitude issues, personally.  Not saying Marcus does, but I most definitely would.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 05, 2015, 02:10:39 PM
Could you imagine if somebody wrote a piece like this about one of Mike Gundy's football players?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pissclams on February 05, 2015, 02:13:04 PM
curtis kitchen may be k-state's only t-shirt fan.  this fact alone should garner him some respect around here, damn it.  just damn it all.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on February 05, 2015, 02:15:37 PM
100% honest it was not a direct shot at you personally, but at everyone associated with that site. Yes, I know you are associated, but I am not singling you out in particular.  I seriously doubt that makes you feel better though.

Well, I appreciate the honesty.

Those that run the site and provide direction can't please everyone, and I really have no say in anything any longer.  So, I can't take offense.  I apologize.

I'm not going to defend what Curtis wrote.  I don't agree with it, and we'll discuss that at a later time.  My main objection is the same objection that you alluded to, and that's that we don't know what Marcus said/did to earn the suspension.  From my perspective, on the court, he's been a very solid player and good teammate since the OSU game.  I can't be critical of someone if I don't know what's going on behind the scenes.  God knows that if I played for oscar I'd have visible attitude issues, personally.  Not saying Marcus does, but I most definitely would.

He is not playing better than last year and that is disappointing. Memory tells me he was way better defensively last year when we had him on the ball.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on February 05, 2015, 02:51:02 PM
This is pretty much Todd Stewart writing about Manny Dies recycled.
Big difference is that was funny. I mean, he didn't really think Manny Dies was the worst basketball player in the world.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: steve dave on February 05, 2015, 02:52:08 PM
yeah, an article claiming any person is the worst basketball player in the world has my support no matter who it's about
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 05, 2015, 03:03:59 PM
Is there a link to this Manny Dies article? I mean, I know it was written before the internet but maybe someone somewhere scanned a copy?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: nicname on February 05, 2015, 03:04:29 PM
All of the "is that what you want, Marcus?" Is really childish and lame.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on February 05, 2015, 03:06:13 PM
Is there a link to this Manny Dies article? I mean, I know it was written before the internet but maybe someone somewhere scanned a copy?

Nope, just ramifications of the article: http://cjonline.com/stories/050997/dies.html
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 05, 2015, 03:11:20 PM
oh my goodness that is wonderfully amazing.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: SleepFighter on February 05, 2015, 03:15:35 PM
FTS!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: nicname on February 05, 2015, 03:16:02 PM
Is there a link to this Manny Dies article? I mean, I know it was written before the internet but maybe someone somewhere scanned a copy?

Nope, just ramifications of the article: http://cjonline.com/stories/050997/dies.html

What a great account of a breathtaking event.

Also,

Quote
Dies and Vasiljevic were accused of assaulting Kansas State Collegian columnist Todd Stewart in May 1997. Stewart1s Jan. 27, 1997, column described Dies as the "worst" college basketball player ever.

"Now bear in mind I am not saying K-State basketball, or NCAA I-A basketball but college basketball history," he wrote. "He is the worst."



I wonder if Todd Stewart or Jeremy Kelley read the board.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on February 05, 2015, 03:18:03 PM
Surely the original's on microfilm or something that someone could get from campus.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: meow meow on February 05, 2015, 03:20:32 PM
All of the "is that what you want, Marcus?" Is really childish and lame.

He uses, Marcus, a lot in his article.  It's like he has set the young man down, and is giving, Marcus, a stern talking to.  What a hack.

Also, what is Bring on the Cats?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on February 05, 2015, 03:23:34 PM
https://twitter.com/sethonhoops/status/563447529279619073
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: nicname on February 05, 2015, 03:23:56 PM
All of the "is that what you want, Marcus?" Is really childish and lame.

He uses, Marcus, a lot in his article.  It's like he has set the young man down, and is giving, Marcus, a stern talking to.  What a hack.

Also, what is Bring on the Cats?

Yes, I don't like it.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: EMAWmeister on February 05, 2015, 03:26:11 PM
We should really be PI'ing kitchen way more for this. He has a history of writing articles that expose 19 year old kids (parrot14 being one of them) to harassment.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: nicname on February 05, 2015, 03:26:59 PM
We should really be PI'ing kitchen way more for this. He has a history of writing articles that expose 19 year old kids (parrot14 being one of them) to harassment.

More info, please.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on February 05, 2015, 03:27:09 PM
https://twitter.com/CurtKellz7/status/563447715221090304
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: steve dave on February 05, 2015, 03:28:20 PM
http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=18610.0
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: steve dave on February 05, 2015, 03:29:00 PM
https://twitter.com/CurtKellz7/status/563447715221090304

MARIJUANA!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: EMAWmeister on February 05, 2015, 03:33:27 PM
We should really be PI'ing kitchen way more for this. He has a history of writing articles that expose 19 year old kids (parrot14 being one of them) to harassment.

More info, please.

Known hero Parrot14 texted Michael Dixon the morning before the mizzou game after the Cotton Bowl and was giving him crap about something. Dixon tweeted his number and said "this k-state fan is messing with me give him a call" and CK googled it and saw it was linked to his position on campus. So CK writes an article exposing his name and other info. Then stuff about him, his gf and his parents was being talked about on the phog, tigerboard and other places.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: star seed 7 on February 05, 2015, 03:35:32 PM
I'm not sure I feel that bad for a guy that gets harassed for harassing someone
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on February 05, 2015, 03:37:30 PM
I'm not sure I feel that bad for a guy that gets harassed for harassing someone

yeah not at all.  parrot14 sounds like a bitchface. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: nicname on February 05, 2015, 03:41:17 PM
We should really be PI'ing kitchen way more for this. He has a history of writing articles that expose 19 year old kids (parrot14 being one of them) to harassment.

More info, please.

Known hero Parrot14 texted Michael Dixon the morning before the mizzou game after the Cotton Bowl and was giving him crap about something. Dixon tweeted his number and said "this k-state fan is messing with me give him a call" and CK googled it and saw it was linked to his position on campus. So CK writes an article exposing his name and other info. Then stuff about him, his gf and his parents was being talked about on the phog, tigerboard and other places.

http://kcsportsnation.com/2012/01/octagon-of-doom-mu-kstate-bball-preview-links-k-state-mike-dixon-twitter-war/

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: EMAWmeister on February 05, 2015, 03:45:49 PM
We should really be PI'ing kitchen way more for this. He has a history of writing articles that expose 19 year old kids (parrot14 being one of them) to harassment.

More info, please.

Known hero Parrot14 texted Michael Dixon the morning before the mizzou game after the Cotton Bowl and was giving him crap about something. Dixon tweeted his number and said "this k-state fan is messing with me give him a call" and CK googled it and saw it was linked to his position on campus. So CK writes an article exposing his name and other info. Then stuff about him, his gf and his parents was being talked about on the phog, tigerboard and other places.

http://kcsportsnation.com/2012/01/octagon-of-doom-mu-kstate-bball-preview-links-k-state-mike-dixon-twitter-war/

He edited that one. There was one titled "Parrot14, K-State Fraternity Rush Chair, wants to recruit Mike Dixon" or something
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ksupamplemousse on February 05, 2015, 03:52:32 PM
Sports media personalities are some of the worst human beings on the planet. Their fake sense of moral superiority over a bunch of teenagers is disgusting. Especially guys like Curtis Kitchen, who don't really have anything to gain by doing this, except the thrill of denigrating a person he perceives as inferior to himself. You're a big man Curt, sorry life didn't turn out how you thought it would, why don't you talk crap on some more teenagers...that'll probably make you feel better  :jerk:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CHONGS on February 05, 2015, 03:56:19 PM
Listen guys, I am sure Kitchen is well connected into the program and knows more about what is going on than what he saw on TV.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CHONGS on February 05, 2015, 03:57:40 PM
I mean he must have a "man on the ground" who knew that Marcus was sulking last night right?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ChiComCat on February 05, 2015, 04:00:37 PM
 :D

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fs21.postimg.org%2F5amckhg7b%2FManny_Dies.jpg&hash=14dcd609fb4415befc118556d7bc0f637d4668b1)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: nicname on February 05, 2015, 04:06:20 PM
:D

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fs21.postimg.org%2F5amckhg7b%2FManny_Dies.jpg&hash=14dcd609fb4415befc118556d7bc0f637d4668b1)

Todd really had some gusto.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep on February 05, 2015, 04:08:39 PM
I'm not sure I feel that bad for a guy that gets harassed for harassing someone

yeah not at all.  parrot14 sounds like a bitchface.

cant argue here.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ChiComCat on February 05, 2015, 04:09:32 PM
Somebody should shoot Todd an email and see if we can get him to post his detailed account here
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on February 05, 2015, 04:09:53 PM
Mad about a blogger doing what bloggers do? Should just have an issue with blogging.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: steve dave on February 05, 2015, 04:14:22 PM

Mad about a blogger doing what bloggers do? Should just have an issue with blogging.

Bullet proof logic here gang
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CHONGS on February 05, 2015, 04:17:21 PM
http://www.bringonthecats.com/community-guidelines
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep on February 05, 2015, 04:35:47 PM
how many people actually post there? seems so foreign to me.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: bones129 on February 05, 2015, 04:52:44 PM
Who do they think they are?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pissclams on February 05, 2015, 05:41:02 PM
i worked camps that summer w/ pero vasiljevic and manny.  impossible to describe how incredibly great those two were.  kind of like comic book characters. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on February 05, 2015, 05:41:24 PM
Listen guys, I am sure Kitchen is well connected into the program and knows more about what is going on than what he saw on TV.

You don't know that Kitchen wasn't wearing a tie while watching the game.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on February 05, 2015, 07:08:18 PM
And I just read Kicthen's article. Or at least the start of it. My God, what an awful person.

He's really not.  We've had some lengthy conversations about oscar/Marcus.

We don't see eye to eye on either.

Panjan, put this on
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mommycouturedesigns.com%2Fimages%2Fpersonalized-pink-cape.jpg&hash=2c2b4357ecef255d3356ddb724a86e08b286ce63)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on February 05, 2015, 07:12:53 PM
Somebody should shoot Todd an email and see if we can get him to post his detailed account here

:peek:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on February 05, 2015, 07:26:18 PM
A Stewart vs Dies game of one on one or even horse would make a great feature at fattyfest.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Stevesie60 on February 05, 2015, 07:31:27 PM
So we're saying Kitchen is bad at his job by getting a bunch of hits on his article for him?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: steve dave on February 05, 2015, 07:33:11 PM
lol at you thinking he's getting paid for that
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 05, 2015, 07:33:30 PM
Good meltdown everybody  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Panjandrum on February 05, 2015, 08:34:23 PM
And I just read Kicthen's article. Or at least the start of it. My God, what an awful person.

He's really not.  We've had some lengthy conversations about oscar/Marcus.

We don't see eye to eye on either.

Panjan, put this on
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mommycouturedesigns.com%2Fimages%2Fpersonalized-pink-cape.jpg&hash=2c2b4357ecef255d3356ddb724a86e08b286ce63)

This is obviously over my head. I honestly don't get it.

Is it because I'm not raging against a good friend of mine for something he wrote?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Panjandrum on February 05, 2015, 08:36:36 PM
lol at you thinking he's getting paid for that

Some guys get a stipend. I'm not sure if he does.

They offered me one to write an article a week. I declined because I'm lazy and don't really like to write much any more.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on February 05, 2015, 08:54:18 PM
Jug of Snyder offered me $5 a pop and he never paid. Big time!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wetwillie on February 05, 2015, 08:55:51 PM
Has marcus foster played his last game in a kstate uniform?  I think he might have.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on February 05, 2015, 09:00:04 PM
I don't think so.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: uncle clean jeans on February 05, 2015, 09:01:08 PM
i heard marcus and malek gave oscar a contact high, were blowing pot smoke in his ears like he was a goddamn abused animal or something
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Spracne on February 05, 2015, 09:13:24 PM
Personally more of a renocat fan.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: nicname on February 05, 2015, 09:17:05 PM
Somebody should shoot Todd an email and see if we can get him to post his detailed account here

:peek:

Podcast.

What if we got Manny and Pero.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: nicname on February 05, 2015, 09:17:31 PM
A Stewart vs Dies game of one on one or even horse would make a great feature at fattyfest.

Yes!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Missouriscribe on February 05, 2015, 09:52:54 PM
i worked camps that summer w/ pero vasiljevic and manny.  impossible to describe how incredibly great those two were.  kind of like comic book characters.
were you a student manager for the team?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Cire on February 05, 2015, 10:19:04 PM
A Stewart vs Dies game of one on one or even horse would make a great feature at fattyfest.

Yes!
Horse would take too long
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: slobber on February 06, 2015, 05:43:07 AM
A Stewart vs Dies game of one on one or even horse would make a great feature at fattyfest.

Yes!
Horse would take too long
Just spitballing here, but what if, while the game of horse was going on, Trim was wearing a neck brace and continually reading the article that Stewart wrote, while using the oscar voice. You know, trying to tie it all together.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pissclams on February 06, 2015, 08:12:25 AM
i worked camps that summer w/ pero vasiljevic and manny.  impossible to describe how incredibly great those two were.  kind of like comic book characters.
were you a student manager for the team?

God no.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pissclams on February 06, 2015, 08:13:07 AM
i worked camps that summer w/ pero vasiljevic and manny.  impossible to describe how incredibly great those two were.  kind of like comic book characters.
were you a student manager for the team?

God no.

although captain kurt was and he's doing pretty well
http://www.gogriffons.com/staff.aspx?staff=1
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Missouriscribe on February 06, 2015, 09:12:11 AM
i worked camps that summer w/ pero vasiljevic and manny.  impossible to describe how incredibly great those two were.  kind of like comic book characters.
were you a student manager for the team?

God no.

although captain kurt was and he's doing pretty well
http://www.gogriffons.com/staff.aspx?staff=1

ok. I lived across the hall from Pero, Ty Sims, Adam Lopez and Charles Dinkins for a time.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Shooter Jones on February 06, 2015, 11:20:49 AM
Good meltdown everybody  :thumbsup:

hi dad, can you maybe spend more time with us over here in the hoops story blog, and less time in the birther pit? thanks.

love,
grandsonofdaxjones*
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Bill Clarahan on February 06, 2015, 12:03:03 PM
i worked camps that summer w/ pero vasiljevic and manny.  impossible to describe how incredibly great those two were.  kind of like comic book characters.
were you a student manager for the team?

God no.

although captain kurt was and he's doing pretty well
http://www.gogriffons.com/staff.aspx?staff=1

Was Kurt old when he graduated in '96, because he looks about 60 in his profile picture :eek:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pissclams on February 06, 2015, 12:08:11 PM
i don't think so, but living in st joe will age a man
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Bill Clarahan on February 06, 2015, 12:19:15 PM
i don't think so, but living in st joe will age a man

Amen to St. Joe livin :sdeek:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: deputy dawg on February 06, 2015, 02:29:03 PM
i don't think so, but living in st joe will age a man

Amen to St. Joe livin :sdeek:

Isn't there like a school for carnival barkers in St. Joe?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ChiComCat on February 06, 2015, 02:33:12 PM
Somebody should shoot Todd an email and see if we can get him to post his detailed account here

:peek:

Podcast.

What if we got Manny and Pero.

If someone can track these people down, I will take a stab at making a podcast of it
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Brock Landers on February 06, 2015, 02:50:20 PM
The Todd Stewart - Manny Dies saga was one of my favorite moments while attending KSU.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on February 06, 2015, 03:08:36 PM

Weber on Malek and Marcus,  "No. We have to make a decision. We're going to meet and talk with them after practice, and then talk with Mr. Currie, and then make a decision. We'll see what happens."
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on February 06, 2015, 05:14:44 PM

Weber on Malek and Marcus,  "No. We have to make a decision. We're going to meet and talk with them after practice, and then talk with Mr. Currie, and then make a decision. We'll see what happens."

This kinda debunks the weed theory.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Missouriscribe on February 06, 2015, 05:20:26 PM
Somebody should shoot Todd an email and see if we can get him to post his detailed account here

:peek:

Podcast.

What if we got Manny and Pero.

If someone can track these people down, I will take a stab at making a podcast of it
Last I heard, Pero was a minor star in australia's pro league. Haven't seen Manny since I watched his Monte Carlo tear down Claflin.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on February 06, 2015, 05:21:25 PM

Weber on Malek and Marcus,  "No. We have to make a decision. We're going to meet and talk with them after practice, and then talk with Mr. Currie, and then make a decision. We'll see what happens."

This kinda debunks the weed theory.

Tom Izzo's a liar.  Maybe oscar can be one too, but like coaching, much shittier at it.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on February 06, 2015, 05:21:49 PM
Marcus was also the first person at practice today and that is a good sign.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on February 06, 2015, 05:23:14 PM
Marcus was also the first person at practice today and that is a good sign.

Uh, why?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on February 06, 2015, 05:25:31 PM
Marcus was also the first person at practice today and that is a good sign.

Uh, why?
It is not a bad thing. Think is shows some level of commitment.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on February 06, 2015, 05:31:16 PM
Marcus was also the first person at practice today and that is a good sign.

Uh, why?
It is not a bad thing. Think is shows some level of commitment.

um, okay
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sys on February 06, 2015, 05:37:10 PM

Weber on Malek and Marcus,  "No. We have to make a decision. We're going to meet and talk with them after practice, and then talk with Mr. Currie, and then make a decision. We'll see what happens."

This kinda debunks the weed theory.

if true, it does.  the gpc reporter sounds pretty adamant that it is weber's decision.  but i have no idea if he is the type to mindlessly parrot whatever weber and the a.d. put out or if he has evaluated the situation and drawn an independent conclusion that he is reporting.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Kat Kid on February 06, 2015, 06:40:50 PM
http://www.kansas.com/sports/college/big-12/kansas-state/article9466313.html (http://www.kansas.com/sports/college/big-12/kansas-state/article9466313.html)

nope.  Weed.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wetwillie on February 06, 2015, 06:48:30 PM
http://www.kansas.com/sports/college/big-12/kansas-state/article9466313.html (http://www.kansas.com/sports/college/big-12/kansas-state/article9466313.html)

nope.  Weed.

Because oscar is being passive aggressive and saying it's not up to him?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on February 06, 2015, 06:56:34 PM
I don't remember if it was in the postgame #oscar or in a subsequent article but I remember him saying that he knew ahead of time they were suspended for tech but brought them and waited to release the info to not tip off tech.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on February 06, 2015, 07:01:43 PM
Smart guy
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Kat Kid on February 06, 2015, 07:18:18 PM

I don't remember if it was in the postgame #oscar or in a subsequent article but I remember him saying that he knew ahead of time they were suspended for tech but brought them and waited to release the info to not tip off tech.

Also the "meeting with Mr. Currie" nonsense seems similarly contrived.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on February 06, 2015, 07:49:23 PM

I don't remember if it was in the postgame #oscar or in a subsequent article but I remember him saying that he knew ahead of time they were suspended for tech but brought them and waited to release the info to not tip off tech.

Also the "meeting with Mr. Currie" nonsense seems similarly contrived.

Maybe we should delete every hoops thread since Tuesday to avoid spoiling the ruse.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Kat Kid on February 06, 2015, 08:14:00 PM
Let's not discount the possibility that oscar thought he could Eddie Haskell his way past Currie to salvage the season.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sys on February 06, 2015, 08:22:53 PM
http://www.kansas.com/sports/college/big-12/kansas-state/article9466313.html (http://www.kansas.com/sports/college/big-12/kansas-state/article9466313.html)

nope.  Weed.

i wonder if the gpc reporters get tired of the a.d. shitting all over them, or if they just consider it part of the job.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CHONGS on February 06, 2015, 08:28:06 PM
But what about what mixed nuts said about being early to practice?   Who can I trust?!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CHONGS on February 06, 2015, 08:31:49 PM
So maybe it's not Marcus's "commitment level" that is the problem? I AM SHOCKED.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: steve dave on February 06, 2015, 08:35:39 PM
IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED MARCUS, HUH? HUH? YOU WANT THIS, HUH?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CHONGS on February 06, 2015, 08:38:29 PM
Gotta say, oscar being all coy about this and spinning this into something else is pretty shitty IMO. 

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CHONGS on February 06, 2015, 08:40:30 PM
What I can't figure out is how ultra-connected basketball insider Curtis Kitchen didn't just say it was weed.  I wonder if that didn't fit into his preconceived narrative or something?  Nah couldn't be.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on February 06, 2015, 08:49:49 PM
What I can't figure out is how ultra-connected basketball insider Curtis Kitchen didn't just say it was weed.  I wonder if that didn't fit into his preconceived narrative or something?  Nah couldn't be.
Maybe Marcus's handlers supplied him with the weed
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Skipper44 on February 06, 2015, 08:51:55 PM
Let's not discount the possibility that oscar thought he could Eddie Haskell his way past Currie to salvage the season.
or he didn't know Bosco is #BID
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: steve dave on February 06, 2015, 09:03:10 PM
well, this is what you asked for marcus so this is what you get, huh?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wetwillie on February 06, 2015, 09:44:38 PM
Poor malek is really the victim in all this.  Marcus probably forced him to inhale. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on February 07, 2015, 12:00:36 AM
http://www.kansas.com/sports/college/big-12/kansas-state/article9466313.html (http://www.kansas.com/sports/college/big-12/kansas-state/article9466313.html)

nope.  Weed.

Because oscar is being passive aggressive and saying it's not up to him?

No because of the 3 games. Second positive test for recreational drugs results in a suspension of 10% of the regular season; athletic department policy used by most d1 schools
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: slackcat on February 07, 2015, 06:08:57 AM
pffffft!!   :bong:  Just cats being cats. :bball:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Pete on February 07, 2015, 07:21:17 AM

http://www.kansas.com/sports/college/big-12/kansas-state/article9466313.html (http://www.kansas.com/sports/college/big-12/kansas-state/article9466313.html)

nope.  Weed.


That Nino quote bugged me.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 07, 2015, 07:56:09 AM
There's policy and then there's "policy" you know what I'm saying fellas?

I mean, there's what's there in that ol' handbook and then there's the functional, factual and necessary realities of the world.   Well the realities of the world dictate that Marcus Foster is out there on the court so we can win rough ridin basketball games.

You know, I know, and we all know that many college kids and hoops players have a season pass to the Ganja train . . . You think Bill Self and Cheyenne Zulu are going to suspend anybody for weed in the only sport that keeps ku athletics financially solvent?   The most profitable What-a-burger franchise in history is just waiting to be built next to that den-of-inequity they're constructing for the basketball program over there on the campus of our TSC friends and partners, ku.   





Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: star seed 7 on February 07, 2015, 07:59:44 AM
They should build a whataburger next to my house
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on February 07, 2015, 08:49:01 AM

http://www.kansas.com/sports/college/big-12/kansas-state/article9466313.html (http://www.kansas.com/sports/college/big-12/kansas-state/article9466313.html)

nope.  Weed.

That Nino quote bugged me.

Both his and Gip's quotes bummed me out. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 8manpick on February 07, 2015, 08:53:24 AM
Our basketball team is bumming out people who are fans of other schools
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on February 07, 2015, 09:32:00 AM
I mean it's their last year and they should have been good and now they have to say crap like that to the media.  :frown:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 07, 2015, 09:54:54 AM
I love dax's basketball posts
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: renocat on February 07, 2015, 10:00:54 AM
Everyone is dog piling on Marcus and nothing about Malek who was suspended in HS for some reason that was serious.  Weed would explain how a good kid last year has changed.  Did Malek corrupt him?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 07, 2015, 10:04:57 AM
Well renocat who ever the best player is that is in trouble gets the headlines. Everyone remembers Shoeless Joe Jackson, but who remembers Fred McMullin, who was also banned with the Black Sox scandal.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 07, 2015, 10:09:30 AM
I remember Fred McMullin all the gd time
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 07, 2015, 10:12:35 AM
I remember Fred McMullin all the gd time

Well you probably remember Malek in this scenario too because you're a detail oriented Cat.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Pete on February 07, 2015, 11:19:53 AM

I remember Fred McMullin all the gd time

Well you probably remember Malek in this scenario too because you're a detail oriented Cat.

Great points by both of you.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: UCHADBRO on February 07, 2015, 11:26:35 AM
I heard Marcus left the hotel and got caught bringing girls back at 7:30 in the morning....
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: dal9 on February 07, 2015, 11:45:29 AM
^mustve heard wrong...there are no girls up to MF2's standards that locate in Lubbock, especially in the light of day...
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wetwillie on February 07, 2015, 12:02:22 PM
^mustve heard wrong...there are no girls up to MF2's standards that locate in Lubbock, especially in the light of day...

Do you even groupie bro?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 07, 2015, 01:03:08 PM
Seriously though are we the most drug tested team in America?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on February 07, 2015, 01:07:21 PM
https://twitter.com/kwchdani/status/564066597963182080
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on February 07, 2015, 01:18:41 PM
Seriously though are we the most drug tested team in America?

Nope.  The breads had two starters out with injury and when they were scheduled to be back they both got suspended 3 more games for smoking doobies. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on February 07, 2015, 01:23:12 PM
I mean drug testing injured players? wtf
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wetwillie on February 07, 2015, 01:24:05 PM
https://twitter.com/kwchdani/status/564066597963182080

i guess the meeting with mr currie didnt go so well
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: slobber on February 07, 2015, 01:30:58 PM
I know we are all thinking it, but how stupid is that he calls him Mr. Currie? On a scale of 1-7, 5? It's pretty odd, isn't it?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Spracne on February 07, 2015, 01:35:44 PM
I know we are all thinking it, but how stupid is that he calls him Mr. Currie? On a scale of 1-7, 5? It's pretty odd, isn't it?

Yeah, it is weird.  Sounds contrived.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on February 07, 2015, 01:42:23 PM
Meh, Weber does/says lots of weird things.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: steve dave on February 07, 2015, 05:40:58 PM
Because he's a huge weirdo who also happens to suck complete ass at basketball coaching
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Pete on February 07, 2015, 06:05:04 PM

Because he's a huge weirdo who also happens to suck complete ass at basketball coaching

Very accurate description
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: bballfan on February 07, 2015, 06:13:17 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi48.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Ff224%2Fmvoss156%2FMobile%2520Uploads%2F20150207_164049_zpsurgxkwsy.jpg&hash=f049e1fb220b35adbd393b1fcba60504dd79370c)

So is it normal to Photoshop players out of promotionals when they are suspended?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sunny_cat on February 07, 2015, 06:13:52 PM
Whoa nice catch, bballfan!!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on February 07, 2015, 06:15:20 PM
Team.  JFC. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Jabeez on February 07, 2015, 06:18:12 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi48.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Ff224%2Fmvoss156%2FMobile%2520Uploads%2F20150207_164049_zpsurgxkwsy.jpg&hash=f049e1fb220b35adbd393b1fcba60504dd79370c)

So is it normal to Photoshop players out of promotionals when they are suspended?
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ftapatalk.imageshack.com%2Fv2%2F15%2F02%2F07%2F3d94b1a66459a5452302ff7ec68f5b45.jpg&hash=c656de26c69af154ba60f4d7328cd84dd2ff73ad)

No mens bball poster
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on February 07, 2015, 06:19:31 PM
What did the original look like?  Post it.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on February 07, 2015, 06:19:47 PM
Someone shame ksusports  and currie  on twitter with that.  This mumped  up.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sunny_cat on February 07, 2015, 06:21:41 PM
What did the original look like?  Post it.

same thing but with Marcus dunking instead of Nigel
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wetwillie on February 07, 2015, 06:34:06 PM
If I were Marcus I would go latrell spreewell on oscar
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on February 07, 2015, 06:35:13 PM
https://twitter.com/rynjrgr/status/564175112945926144

https://twitter.com/rynjrgr/status/564176852311236609
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Rabid Cow on February 07, 2015, 06:54:24 PM

http://www.kansas.com/sports/college/big-12/kansas-state/article9466313.html (http://www.kansas.com/sports/college/big-12/kansas-state/article9466313.html)

nope.  Weed.

That's our senior leadership right there... :facepalm:

That Nino quote bugged me.

Both his and Gip's quotes bummed me out.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on February 07, 2015, 11:53:29 PM
One of you heroes should remix kitchen's entire piece and make it something along the lines of "is this what you wanted, John Currie?"
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: bones129 on February 07, 2015, 11:59:26 PM
One of you heroes should remix kitchen's entire piece and make it something along the lines of "is this what you wanted, John Currie?"

 :thumbs:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on February 09, 2015, 11:21:08 AM
https://twitter.com/brettregan/status/564831278609227776
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on February 09, 2015, 11:26:05 AM
oscar is getting all up inside west virginia's heads.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on February 09, 2015, 11:29:08 AM
oscar is getting all up inside west virginia's heads.

I'm sure Huggins has no idea what he's going to do Wednesday with this new information.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on February 09, 2015, 11:30:00 AM
very snyder-injury-report-esque
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on February 09, 2015, 11:31:26 AM
Unfortunately, some KSU insiders are starting to break this thing wide open.

https://twitter.com/RealMikeT/status/564831562814865408

https://twitter.com/Turnksu/status/564835539073761280
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on February 09, 2015, 11:33:40 AM
Sleuths.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: dal9 on February 09, 2015, 11:48:06 AM
SShhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on February 09, 2015, 11:50:11 AM
Pretty amazed neither went on to shame anyone regarding character issues.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: nicname on February 09, 2015, 11:53:57 AM
Unfortunately, some KSU insiders are starting to break this thing wide open.

https://twitter.com/RealMikeT/status/564831562814865408

https://twitter.com/Turnksu/status/564835539073761280

RealMikeT blocked me. I don't have any clue as to why.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pissclams on February 09, 2015, 12:37:11 PM
i'm pretty happy we have realmiket to read b/w the lines for us
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on February 09, 2015, 12:41:15 PM
Unfortunately, some KSU insiders are starting to break this thing wide open.

https://twitter.com/RealMikeT/status/564831562814865408

https://twitter.com/Turnksu/status/564835539073761280

RealMikeT blocked me. I don't have any clue as to why.
I'm just spitballing here, but it might have something to do with hating anyone who's affiliated with gE. From what he told me one time: "Message boards are for children. The ppl who get on there are weirdos. "
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: HerrSonntag on February 09, 2015, 12:44:57 PM
Why are there no KSUHeros providing our guys with clean urine?  I mean, I don't have any, but i'm sure one of you all do!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: PowercatPat on February 09, 2015, 01:09:56 PM
I've heard that Marcus and Malek were out past curfew in Lubbock drinking and/or smoking and did not make it back to the hotel unnoticed.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 09, 2015, 01:45:38 PM
Unfortunately, some KSU insiders are starting to break this thing wide open.

https://twitter.com/RealMikeT/status/564831562814865408

https://twitter.com/Turnksu/status/564835539073761280

RealMikeT blocked me. I don't have any clue as to why.

yeah he isn't real thrilled with anyone or anything GE.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Kat Kid on February 09, 2015, 01:58:56 PM
Could you ask RealMikeT why he doesn't deal with constructive criticism very well?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Panjandrum on February 09, 2015, 02:10:01 PM
I don't think I've ever heard of RealMikeT.

Should I know him?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: EMAWmeister on February 09, 2015, 03:52:14 PM
I've heard that Marcus and Malek were out past curfew in Lubbock drinking and/or smoking and did not make it back to the hotel unnoticed.

This seems more likely. If it was a failed drug test, neither would have traveled.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sunny_cat on February 09, 2015, 03:54:03 PM
I've heard that Marcus and Malek were out past curfew in Lubbock drinking and/or smoking and did not make it back to the hotel unnoticed.

This seems more likely. If it was a failed drug test, neither would have traveled.

uchadbro said something like this

I heard Marcus left the hotel and got caught bringing girls back at 7:30 in the morning....
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 'taterblast on February 09, 2015, 03:55:01 PM
maybe foster had some high school friends at TTU he wanted to hang out with :dunno:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: EMAWmeister on February 09, 2015, 03:59:57 PM
maybe foster had some high school friends at TTU he wanted to hang out with :dunno:

Kinda what I was thinking. Definitely stupid, but not something to be publicly shamed for. But, we are who we are. Never change, K-State.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 'taterblast on February 09, 2015, 04:01:33 PM
andre mcdonald got suspended for the ou game in '09 for basically the same thing, not that he would have played much anyway.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CHONGS on February 09, 2015, 04:03:50 PM
Sounds like Marcus was fostering some inappropriate relationships

2 for 2
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on February 09, 2015, 04:05:45 PM
Sounds like Marcus was fostering some inappropriate relationships

2 for 2

I wonder if "handlers" were involved. :fatty:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Yard Dog on February 09, 2015, 04:07:39 PM
Be warned, the following opinion might be slightly tuckish / not "cool"

In fairness this suspension shouldn't be held against the coach. What you can blame Weber for is not coaching these guys to want to play hard and be responsible adults. It frustrates me because Marcus is really talented but I don't how to feel about his obvious complete disregard for the behavior expected of a scholarship athlete. Foster's MO is that he was super talented but overlooked. That he came to K-State to prove all the doubters wrong. I remember how excited he was to have the BTF because he could go shoot whenever he wanted and train really hard. Now he is going to piss that away to do dumb crap with his friends? That is fine if you are just some guy getting his art degree over the course of six years (guilty right here) but for someone who is the face of a program at a university that loves integrity. . . it is not appropriate whatsoever.

I can only think if Brad were here he would have straightened him out at the first sign of trouble. And inspired him to want to be something better. 
 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sunny_cat on February 09, 2015, 04:11:09 PM
dnr but you don't have to preface your posts with "slightly tuckish" ydarg.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CHONGS on February 09, 2015, 04:12:21 PM
Does our university love integrity?  Really?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on February 09, 2015, 04:13:32 PM
yard dog trolling is very tedious.  #yarddogging 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on February 09, 2015, 04:14:16 PM
I thought it was a very cool post, yard dog.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Yard Dog on February 09, 2015, 04:15:13 PM
Does our university love integrity?  Really?

You are right. I should have worded it that our university thrives on the appearance of integrity as a core value.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Yard Dog on February 09, 2015, 04:20:11 PM
I thought it was a very cool post, yard dog.

I appreciate it. :cheers:

As someone who loved playing sports but who would have barely made the roster at Bethel, it always gets under my skin when extremely talented kids piss away the opportunity to do something really special at the next level. And my extremely high monthly student loan payments means it gets under my skin that they are willing to throw away that full ride and meals at the Training Table. Kids will be kids, but it is EMAW not EBAW.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on February 09, 2015, 04:20:56 PM
Like prairie dogging but with words on a bbs.  He keeps on sticking that turd out there and yanking it back until he gets a response.  #yarddogging
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 'taterblast on February 09, 2015, 04:25:59 PM
i didn't read Yard Dog's post but yeah, if that's true then they absolutely deserved to be suspended because they're rough ridin' idiots.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: HerrSonntag on February 09, 2015, 04:34:47 PM
I'm a little torn on this kinda thing.

On the one hand, if you think KSU has never had student athletes pull this kinda stuff, you're crazy.   On the other hand I had do watch a very hungover Josh Freeman mump up and lose a home game to KU because Prince let him do whatever he wanted.

Frank woulda just made him run lotsa stairs... is oscar anti-stairs?  Bottom line is oscar is a pussy and no one respects him. 

You can get mad at Marcus all you want, talk about what a waste of talent he is, but Marcus doesn't make a seven figure salary to be there, oscar is.  It's Bruces job to get this crap figured out not piss away the season in the process.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on February 09, 2015, 04:40:08 PM
i didn't read Yard Dog's post but yeah, if that's true then they absolutely deserved to be suspended because they're rough ridin' idiots.

For trying to party on the dl?  They are college kids in addition to being oscar's indentured servants.  You should probably scream at them for having erections next.  Weirdo. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Kat Kid on February 09, 2015, 04:44:59 PM
Hey everyone wouldnt it be weird that both Marcus and Malek got suspended 3 games which just happens to be the # of games people are suspended for a failed drug test?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Yard Dog on February 09, 2015, 04:46:18 PM
i didn't read Yard Dog's post but yeah, if that's true then they absolutely deserved to be suspended because they're rough ridin' idiots.

For trying to party on the dl?  They are college kids in addition to being oscar's indentured servants.  You should probably scream at them for having erections next.  Weirdo.

There is a vast difference from partying on the dl in mhk on a random night and sneaking out to party from the team hotel at an away game.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sys on February 09, 2015, 05:08:44 PM
why wouldn't the players travel with the team when suspended?  if i were the coach i'd certainly want them as connected to the team as possible during their suspensions.  and i'd also want them to not miss practice (i don't believe they have to miss practice, dunno).

iirc correctly, the martin players that sat out their three games were on the bench.  it's weird to me that that the current players aren't on the bench.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on February 09, 2015, 05:09:46 PM
why wouldn't the players travel with the team when suspended?  if i were the coach i'd certainly want them as connected to the team as possible during their suspensions.  and i'd also want them to not miss practice (i don't believe they have to miss practice, dunno).

iirc correctly, the martin players that sat out their three games were on the bench.  it's weird to me that that the current players aren't on the bench.
Were in the locker room.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sys on February 09, 2015, 05:10:04 PM
Hey everyone wouldnt it be weird that both Marcus and Malek got suspended 3 games which just happens to be the # of games people are suspended for a failed drug test?

kstaters, kk.  you just can't save them from themselves.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sys on February 09, 2015, 05:11:05 PM
Were in the locker room.

right.  that's weird.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on February 09, 2015, 05:27:21 PM
Were in the locker room.

right.  that's weird.

Very.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 'taterblast on February 09, 2015, 05:27:45 PM
i didn't read Yard Dog's post but yeah, if that's true then they absolutely deserved to be suspended because they're rough ridin' idiots.

For trying to party on the dl?  They are college kids in addition to being oscar's indentured servants.  You should probably scream at them for having erections next.  Weirdo.

yes, to your question. they are idiots if they snuck out and "tried to party" the night before a game on the road.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 'taterblast on February 09, 2015, 05:28:59 PM
Hey everyone wouldnt it be weird that both Marcus and Malek got suspended 3 games which just happens to be the # of games people are suspended for a failed drug test?

there may be other things that 'require' 3 game suspensions, but i do agree with what you're saying.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on February 09, 2015, 05:34:22 PM
Here's what I know of KSU hoops road trips under oscar:

Dave & Busters (KCK) when in KC.
That rough ridin' awful "steakhouse" in Ames.
McDonald's in Brazil.

That said, obviously it's a 3-game drug suspension that had nothing to do with Lubbock.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on February 09, 2015, 05:41:13 PM
i didn't read Yard Dog's post but yeah, if that's true then they absolutely deserved to be suspended because they're rough ridin' idiots.

For trying to party on the dl?  They are college kids in addition to being oscar's indentured servants.  You should probably scream at them for having erections next.  Weirdo.

yes, to your question. they are idiots if they snuck out and "tried to party" the night before a game on the road.

Look sneaking out doesn't mean they got shitty drunk and came stumbling back in no condition to play the next day, so #leanback on your snarky quotation marks.  Having a curfew in college isn't common for the overwheming majority of students.  It's not surprising that they might try to break it on occasion. 

I get that they're just supposed to suck oscar's crap because the system says so, but I don't think that makes them rough ridin' idiots.  I could envision a scenario where if oscar Weber were telling me what to do in college I might have issues with it even if it ran counter to my best interests.  I would imagine that the urge to say eff your crap oscar is pretty overwhelming at times.  You're quite the judgy sonofabitch on this. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on February 09, 2015, 05:41:39 PM
Here's what I know of KSU hoops road trips under oscar:

Dave & Busters (KCK) when in KC.
That rough ridin' awful "steakhouse" in Ames.
McDonald's in Brazil.

That said, obviously it's a 3-game drug suspension that had nothing to do with Lubbock.

Yes.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on February 09, 2015, 05:43:10 PM
Also:

You guys get boners? WTF you rough ridin' loser idiots!!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Cire on February 09, 2015, 05:43:41 PM
I keep waiting for FERPA
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 'taterblast on February 09, 2015, 05:49:30 PM
i didn't read Yard Dog's post but yeah, if that's true then they absolutely deserved to be suspended because they're rough ridin' idiots.

For trying to party on the dl?  They are college kids in addition to being oscar's indentured servants.  You should probably scream at them for having erections next.  Weirdo.

yes, to your question. they are idiots if they snuck out and "tried to party" the night before a game on the road.

Look sneaking out doesn't mean they got shitty drunk and came stumbling back in no condition to play the next day, so #leanback on your snarky quotation marks.  Having a curfew in college isn't common for the overwheming majority of students.  It's not surprising that they might try to break it on occasion. 

I get that they're just supposed to suck oscar's crap because the system says so, but I don't think that makes them rough ridin' idiots.  I could envision a scenario where if oscar Weber were telling me what to do in college I might have issues with it even if it ran counter to my best interests.  I would imagine that the urge to say eff your crap oscar is pretty overwhelming at times.  You're quite the judgy sonofabitch on this.

it has nothing to do with oscar, and i don't care if they were getting wasted or not. it's a pretty standard night-before-game curfew, every team in the world has one. it is stupid to break that. if they did that, that means they did a stupid thing, so i get to call them idiots.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 'taterblast on February 09, 2015, 05:54:01 PM
Also:

You guys get boners? WTF you rough ridin' loser idiots!!

well this is a weird post
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Pete on February 09, 2015, 06:03:14 PM
That real miket guy banned me too!  My random, infrequent, awesome tweets aren't his cup of tea I guess.  Oh well, he snoozes he loses. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on February 09, 2015, 06:08:37 PM
That real miket guy banned me too!  My random, infrequent, awesome tweets aren't his cup of tea I guess.  Oh well, he snoozes he loses. 

Joke's on you, Pete.  It was YOU that was missing out on HIS between-the-lines insight, at least until that premium tweet got posted here, resulting in you being a few minutes behind on knowing M&M's suspension would run through the WV game.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Pete on February 09, 2015, 06:10:32 PM
I feel shame.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on February 09, 2015, 08:01:59 PM
Also:

You guys get boners? WTF you rough ridin' loser idiots!!

well this is a weird post

The logical extension of your ivory tower judgments.  :dunno:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 'taterblast on February 09, 2015, 08:10:04 PM
Also:

You guys get boners? WTF you rough ridin' loser idiots!!

well this is a weird post

The logical extension of your ivory tower judgments.  :dunno:

if they got boners while breaking curfew the night before a d1 basketball game then yeah, they were idiots while getting those boners.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 09, 2015, 09:36:29 PM
I'm a little torn on this kinda thing.

On the one hand, if you think KSU has never had student athletes pull this kinda stuff, you're crazy.   On the other hand I had do watch a very hungover Josh Freeman mump up and lose a home game to KU because Prince let him do whatever he wanted.

Frank woulda just made him run lotsa stairs... is oscar anti-stairs?  Bottom line is oscar is a pussy and no one respects him. 

You can get mad at Marcus all you want, talk about what a waste of talent he is, but Marcus doesn't make a seven figure salary to be there, oscar is.  It's Bruces job to get this crap figured out not piss away the season in the process.

Never knew that. Short sighted on Josh's end because it was an 11 AM kick.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: BackPayne on February 09, 2015, 09:48:02 PM
So when do we hear of Marcus transferring?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: bones129 on February 09, 2015, 09:50:01 PM
So when do we hear of Marcus transferring?

Soon after the season ends would be my guess.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: HerrSonntag on February 09, 2015, 09:50:18 PM
I'm a little torn on this kinda thing.

On the one hand, if you think KSU has never had student athletes pull this kinda stuff, you're crazy.   On the other hand I had do watch a very hungover Josh Freeman mump up and lose a home game to KU because Prince let him do whatever he wanted.

Frank woulda just made him run lotsa stairs... is oscar anti-stairs?  Bottom line is oscar is a pussy and no one respects him. 

You can get mad at Marcus all you want, talk about what a waste of talent he is, but Marcus doesn't make a seven figure salary to be there, oscar is.  It's Bruces job to get this crap figured out not piss away the season in the process.

Never knew that. Short sighted on Josh's end because it was an 11 AM kick.
My thoughts exactly
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on February 10, 2015, 07:29:19 AM
Freeman threw for over 300 yards that game.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kslim on February 10, 2015, 07:33:52 AM
Freeman threw for over 300 yards that game.
he also threw three picks and had two fumbles
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on February 10, 2015, 07:48:08 AM
Yeah, he struggled with turnovers all season. To me, if you can throw for 300 yards against a very good team, it's hard to blame a loss on an alleged hangover.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 10, 2015, 08:08:24 AM
Yeah, he struggled with turnovers all season. To me, if you can throw for 300 yards against a very good team, it's hard to blame a loss on an alleged hangover.

Except for when you also turn the ball over 5 times. Then it's pretty easy.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on February 10, 2015, 08:19:25 AM
Yeah, he struggled with turnovers all season. To me, if you can throw for 300 yards against a very good team, it's hard to blame a loss on an alleged hangover.

Except for when you also turn the ball over 5 times. Then it's pretty easy.
Freeman didn't turn it over five times, so...
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kslim on February 10, 2015, 08:32:19 AM
Yeah, he struggled with turnovers all season. To me, if you can throw for 300 yards against a very good team, it's hard to blame a loss on an alleged hangover.

Except for when you also turn the ball over 5 times. Then it's pretty easy.
Freeman didn't turn it over five times, so...
no, he didnt. he turned it over three times (at the worst times) I couldnt care less about him being hungover, my point was he didnt play that well.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on February 10, 2015, 08:44:32 AM
Yeah, he struggled with turnovers all season. To me, if you can throw for 300 yards against a very good team, it's hard to blame a loss on an alleged hangover.

Except for when you also turn the ball over 5 times. Then it's pretty easy.
Freeman didn't turn it over five times, so...
no, he didnt. he turned it over three times (at the worst times) I couldnt care less about him being hungover, my point was he didnt play that well.
And my point is that the 305 yards wouldn't have been possible if he wasn't functioning at a reasonably high level, with or without crucial mistakes.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kslim on February 10, 2015, 08:45:38 AM
Yeah, he struggled with turnovers all season. To me, if you can throw for 300 yards against a very good team, it's hard to blame a loss on an alleged hangover.

Except for when you also turn the ball over 5 times. Then it's pretty easy.
Freeman didn't turn it over five times, so...
no, he didnt. he turned it over three times (at the worst times) I couldnt care less about him being hungover, my point was he didnt play that well.
And my point is that the 305 yards wouldn't have been possible if he wasn't functioning at a reasonably high level, with or without crucial mistakes.
yes. im sure his hangover was gone by warm ups anyway
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 10, 2015, 08:50:48 AM
I'm pretty sure Jordy burned Talib for nearly 1/3 of those yards. :D
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Yard Dog on February 10, 2015, 09:44:04 AM
So when do we hear of Marcus transferring?

Soon after the season ends would be my guess.

Should we start an official thread discussing where he will go be a stud when he gets to play again in two years? It would be lol if it was Miami.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on February 10, 2015, 10:25:58 AM
SMU is ranked and Larry could get him to the league if anyone could.   :dunno:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: IPA4Me on February 10, 2015, 04:19:52 PM
Unfortunately, some KSU insiders are starting to break this thing wide open.

https://twitter.com/RealMikeT/status/564831562814865408

https://twitter.com/Turnksu/status/564835539073761280

RealMikeT blocked me. I don't have any clue as to why.

yeah he isn't real thrilled with anyone or anything GE.
Someone acting in the name of gE, decided to aggressively real life PI Mike in an Aggieville bar. Guilt by association at this point. He really hates this place and a handful of members.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Skipper44 on February 10, 2015, 04:25:13 PM
Unfortunately, some KSU insiders are starting to break this thing wide open.

https://twitter.com/RealMikeT/status/564831562814865408

https://twitter.com/Turnksu/status/564835539073761280

RealMikeT blocked me. I don't have any clue as to why.

yeah he isn't real thrilled with anyone or anything GE.
Someone acting in the name of gE, decided to aggressively real life PI Mike in an Aggieville bar. Guilt by association at this point. He really hates this place and a handful of members.
i would like to know what this means
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: PoetWarrior on February 10, 2015, 06:41:56 PM
I've really liked Foster the majority of the time.

Do you remember when some people thought that Thomas was the best recruit in the class?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: IPA4Me on February 10, 2015, 06:53:24 PM
Unfortunately, some KSU insiders are starting to break this thing wide open.

https://twitter.com/RealMikeT/status/564831562814865408

https://twitter.com/Turnksu/status/564835539073761280

RealMikeT blocked me. I don't have any clue as to why.

yeah he isn't real thrilled with anyone or anything GE.
Someone acting in the name of gE, decided to aggressively real life PI Mike in an Aggieville bar. Guilt by association at this point. He really hates this place and a handful of members.
i would like to know what this means
Which part? gE members being drunk dicks or Mike not liking it?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pissclams on February 10, 2015, 06:56:07 PM
DRUNK DICKS
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on February 10, 2015, 07:06:23 PM
The notion of an intoxicated penis appeals to my pathologically sexually violent sense of humor and good brain.  Like a stumble-drunk wien bebopping around a bar bullying Mike Tuckfano. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on February 10, 2015, 07:08:45 PM
I can confirm that a lot of gE'rs were sitting together on a random weekend, while mike was at the bar and filly's former best friend was there too sitting next to him. He just continued to stare at us like he wanted to eat our brains and the ex friend already hated me for how things went down with filly. I'm sure that conversation between the two of them was lovely.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: IPA4Me on February 10, 2015, 07:38:19 PM
Somebody put gE members on his PTK list at some point. He's pretty angry.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on February 10, 2015, 07:42:06 PM
Somebody put gE members on his PTK list at some point. He's pretty angry.
What's that?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: IPA4Me on February 10, 2015, 07:44:59 PM
People To Kill
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on February 10, 2015, 07:45:43 PM
 :lol:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: IPA4Me on February 10, 2015, 07:51:34 PM
http://youtu.be/jMo_HcRBnUY
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: XocolateThundarr on February 11, 2015, 09:44:52 AM
Somebody put gE members on his PTK list at some point. He's pretty angry.

He is an idiot and I dislike him greatly.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on February 11, 2015, 10:02:30 PM
https://twitter.com/Jpullz0/status/565719873935142912
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on February 11, 2015, 11:03:19 PM
SMU is ranked and Larry could get him to the league if anyone could.   :dunno:

They're going on probation, already, and still play in the wgaf conference in a high school gymnasium.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Lucas Scoopsalot on February 11, 2015, 11:07:16 PM
https://twitter.com/Jpullz0/status/565719873935142912
:love:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wetwillie on February 11, 2015, 11:08:42 PM
Looks like he may have to get his tony Mitchell on and soar with eagles.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on February 12, 2015, 04:05:38 AM
Looks like he may have to get his tony Mitchell on and soar with eagles.

LOL at Marcus Foster playing in the Sun Belt. He will be at a power six school or one of the big 3 mid majors
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: TownieCat on February 12, 2015, 08:37:55 AM
So the belief is that he will be back on Saturday, correct?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pissclams on February 12, 2015, 09:01:41 AM
i hope adversity doesn't destroy @Swaggy2_
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 12, 2015, 09:07:13 AM

Someone acting in the name of gE, decided to aggressively real life PI Mike in an Aggieville bar.


not me. #intp
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on February 12, 2015, 11:18:38 AM
Jesus christ!

Quote
Odds on Foster getting booed Saturday? Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
While I will never boo a college kid (I'm old), I gotta think between the students and alums paying for his everything, there has to be a pretty good chance he gets it, and quite frankly probably deserves it.2/11 9:55 PM | IP: Logged
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sys on February 12, 2015, 11:20:56 AM
Jesus christ!

Quote
Odds on Foster getting booed Saturday? Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
While I will never boo a college kid (I'm old), I gotta think between the students and alums paying for his everything, there has to be a pretty good chance he gets it, and quite frankly probably deserves it.2/11 9:55 PM | IP: Logged

don't tell that guy, but i still haven't sent in my foster payment for this year.  now that he doesn't deserve it, i may never pay him.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kslim on February 13, 2015, 03:09:15 PM
oscar Weber still coy on whether or not Foster will be back tomorrow. "We'll see."
0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: #LIFE on February 13, 2015, 03:34:02 PM
What if they are done for the year and Currie is just keeping mum to salvage a few more bodies showing up to the fOOD?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Yard Dog on February 13, 2015, 03:45:13 PM
What if they are done for the year and Currie is just keeping mum to salvage a few more bodies showing up to the fOOD?

Kiss the NIT goodbye. :frown:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: That_Guy on February 13, 2015, 04:24:08 PM

What if they are done for the year and Currie is just keeping mum to salvage a few more bodies showing up to the fOOD?

Kiss the NIT goodbye. :frown:

CBI**


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: yoman on February 13, 2015, 05:33:45 PM
 :Carl:
What if they are done for the year and Currie is just keeping mum to salvage a few more bodies showing up to the fOOD?

Kiss the NIT goodbye. :frown:

I really have no idea why so many of our fans think we should be in the NIT. There's like a .05% we finish at .500, if that.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on February 13, 2015, 05:48:04 PM
:Carl:
What if they are done for the year and Currie is just keeping mum to salvage a few more bodies showing up to the fOOD?

Kiss the NIT goodbye. :frown:

I really have no idea why so many of our fans think we should be in the NIT. There's like a .05% we finish at .500, if that.

I don't think people want to face the fact that this could very easily be our worst season since 2003. It most likely will in terms of straight wins and losses, and it has a chance in most ranking systems.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on February 13, 2015, 06:37:54 PM

I don't think people want to face the fact that this could very easily be our worst season since 2003. It most likely will in terms of straight wins and losses, and it has a chance in most ranking systems.

I've been trying to educate this point. Unless we have like 3 upsets it will be.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on February 13, 2015, 06:41:06 PM

I don't think people want to face the fact that this could very easily be our worst season since 2003. It most likely will in terms of straight wins and losses, and it has a chance in most ranking systems.

I've been trying to educate this point. Unless we have like 3 upsets it will be.
I have a hard time think a single wooly team would beat this team is a series.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on February 13, 2015, 06:44:27 PM


I don't think people want to face the fact that this could very easily be our worst season since 2003. It most likely will in terms of straight wins and losses, and it has a chance in most ranking systems.

I've been trying to educate this point. Unless we have like 3 upsets it will be.
I have a hard time think a single wooly team would beat this team is a series.

Wooly's last two teams with Cartier would be very close in a series, if not win.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on February 13, 2015, 06:48:24 PM


I don't think people want to face the fact that this could very easily be our worst season since 2003. It most likely will in terms of straight wins and losses, and it has a chance in most ranking systems.

I've been trying to educate this point. Unless we have like 3 upsets it will be.
I have a hard time think a single wooly team would beat this team is a series.

Wooly's last two teams with Cartier would be very close in a series, if not win.

and his third to last team had Massey, Martin, Ellis, Lance Harris, Dez, Marques Hayden, and Jarret Hart.

Ellis, Hart, Martin, and Dez all shot over 34% from three. :blank:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ChiComCat on February 13, 2015, 06:56:30 PM
Massey was so fun
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on February 13, 2015, 07:02:48 PM


I don't think people want to face the fact that this could very easily be our worst season since 2003. It most likely will in terms of straight wins and losses, and it has a chance in most ranking systems.

I've been trying to educate this point. Unless we have like 3 upsets it will be.
I have a hard time think a single wooly team would beat this team is a series.

Wooly's last two teams with Cartier would be very close in a series, if not win.

Are we assuming Marcus is playing?   We have lost 20 ranking in Kenpom since Marcus suspension. Without the suspension I think their is a good chance we would have continued to trend up. But I think it goes back to this team just being a mess.

Wooly's last team is so hard to judge, played way too many close games. I think it is important not overate to close games. But it comes an issues with the human eye and IMO mathematically if that is what you do.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wetwillie on February 13, 2015, 07:03:53 PM
Matt siebrandt vs Thomas Gipson.   1 on 1 for wooly vs oscar superiority
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Kat Kid on February 13, 2015, 07:06:39 PM

Matt siebrandt vs Thomas Gipson.   1 on 1 for wooly vs oscar superiority

Would pay to watch.  A rare lefty on lefty big challenge!  O/U on charges taken is set at 5 in a standard by 1s game to 21.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: meow meow on February 13, 2015, 07:24:36 PM

Matt siebrandt vs Thomas Gipson.   1 on 1 for wooly vs oscar superiority

Would pay to watch.  A rare lefty on lefty big challenge!  O/U on charges taken is set at 5 in a standard by 1s game to 21.

Wasn't Siebrandt actually a righty that just had a great left handed hook shot?  He shot free throws right handed if I recall.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on February 13, 2015, 07:26:30 PM
Guys :facepalm:

Wooly's teams never won a road game and lost to E. Illinois and crap. It's bad, but it's not that bad. Wooly's best team ever didn't make the nit. This team has like 5 top 25 wins.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wetwillie on February 13, 2015, 07:30:37 PM
If the neck brace fits....
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on February 13, 2015, 07:38:58 PM
Guys :facepalm:

Wooly's teams never won a road game and lost to E. Illinois and crap. It's bad, but it's not that bad. Wooly's best team ever didn't make the nit. This team has like 5 top 25 wins.

FSD has HBBIQ.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on February 13, 2015, 07:49:03 PM

Guys :facepalm:

Wooly's teams never won a road game and lost to E. Illinois and crap. It's bad, but it's not that bad. Wooly's best team ever didn't make the nit. This team has like 5 top 25 wins.

FSD has HBBIQ.

That's the sad thing. This team has decent wins Wooly teams didn't have, it's all the crappy losses that make this season so bad.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on February 13, 2015, 07:50:21 PM

Guys :facepalm:

Wooly's teams never won a road game and lost to E. Illinois and crap. It's bad, but it's not that bad. Wooly's best team ever didn't make the nit. This team has like 5 top 25 wins.

FSD has HBBIQ.

That's the sad thing. This team has decent wins Wooly teams didn't have, it's all the crappy losses that make this season so bad.
They have been a head in every big 12 game in the 2nd half but two. KU and Tech where we closed it to one point than melted down. It is so weird. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wetwillie on February 13, 2015, 07:52:21 PM
_fan can you shop a neckbrace on oscar, just to see how it looks? 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on February 13, 2015, 07:56:21 PM
You can come up with all kinds of stats to make this team to compare favorably to Wooly's last few teams.

Unfortunately wins and losses and kenpom rankings aren't one of them. :frown:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on February 13, 2015, 07:57:09 PM

Guys :facepalm:

Wooly's teams never won a road game and lost to E. Illinois and crap. It's bad, but it's not that bad. Wooly's best team ever didn't make the nit. This team has like 5 top 25 wins.

FSD has HBBIQ.

That's the sad thing. This team has decent wins Wooly teams didn't have, it's all the crappy losses that make this season so bad.
Wooly's last team won at Kansas
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on February 13, 2015, 07:59:23 PM

You can come up with all kinds of stats to make this team to compare favorably to Wooly's last few teams.

Unfortunately wins and losses and kenpom rankings aren't one of them. :frown:

Yeah.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ftapatalk.imageshack.com%2Fv2%2F15%2F02%2F13%2Fc695f26b849a6ddf7cebb83ec8f87e5d.jpg&hash=48fdd6f109a93af416f99c1e8efa14806624a9f5)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on February 13, 2015, 08:01:41 PM
I am a proud fan that went to school during the Wooly years. I suffered, immensely.

So don't rough ridin' sit here and tell me this team is equivalent to a Wooly team. That's bullshit. I stormed the court when we beat UT 51-43 in 0-whatever. I know what hopeless crap looks like. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on February 13, 2015, 08:03:38 PM
I am a proud fan that went to school during the Wooly years. I suffered, immensely.

So don't rough ridin' sit here and tell me this team is equivalent to a Wooly team. That's bullshit. I stormed the court when we beat UT 51-43 in 0-whatever. I know what hopeless crap looks like.
Me too
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on February 13, 2015, 08:06:17 PM
I am a proud fan that went to school during the Wooly years. I suffered, immensely.

So don't rough ridin' sit here and tell me this team is equivalent to a Wooly team. That's bullshit. I stormed the court when we beat UT 51-43 in 0-whatever. I know what hopeless crap looks like.
Me too

Internet High-5
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on February 13, 2015, 08:07:01 PM
I skipped the Texas game but went to the Northwestern home loss over thanksgiving break
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wetwillie on February 13, 2015, 08:07:07 PM
I am a proud fan that went to school during the Wooly years. I suffered, immensely.

So don't rough ridin' sit here and tell me this team is equivalent to a Wooly team. That's bullshit. I stormed the court when we beat UT 51-43 in 0-whatever. I know what hopeless crap looks like. 

It's got enough of franks leftovers to be slightly better than wooly.  next year will be a mirror image of a wooly team. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on February 13, 2015, 08:08:29 PM
Saw Phineas Atchison hit an and 1 to beat TJ ford so don't ever lecture me again
Title: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on February 13, 2015, 08:11:19 PM
I waa at everyone of those games. The Tony Atchinson game winner was during a blizzard. Fantastic.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 13, 2015, 08:14:51 PM
I remember being super pumped when we won a road game in Lincoln. The Wooly years were fun but if we're going to lose like that I a more likable team/coach.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 13, 2015, 08:15:39 PM
You guys remember when Tim Ellis nailed a 3 to tie OU and send it to OT? Man. I went absolutely bonkers. All 7k of my bram buds were partying for a minute
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: meow meow on February 13, 2015, 08:17:14 PM

Matt siebrandt vs Thomas Gipson.   1 on 1 for wooly vs oscar superiority

Would pay to watch.  A rare lefty on lefty big challenge!  O/U on charges taken is set at 5 in a standard by 1s game to 21.

Wasn't Siebrandt actually a righty that just had a great left handed hook shot?  He shot free throws right handed if I recall.

Fan?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wetwillie on February 13, 2015, 08:18:39 PM

Matt siebrandt vs Thomas Gipson.   1 on 1 for wooly vs oscar superiority

Would pay to watch.  A rare lefty on lefty big challenge!  O/U on charges taken is set at 5 in a standard by 1s game to 21.

Wasn't Siebrandt actually a righty that just had a great left handed hook shot?  He shot free throws right handed if I recall.

Fan?

He's busy shopping a neck brace on oscar for me, hang on.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on February 13, 2015, 08:28:38 PM
The home loss to Okie State over winter break in front of 3500 fans after leading by double digits with minutes left was Wooly hell.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: meow meow on February 13, 2015, 08:29:51 PM

Matt siebrandt vs Thomas Gipson.   1 on 1 for wooly vs oscar superiority

Would pay to watch.  A rare lefty on lefty big challenge!  O/U on charges taken is set at 5 in a standard by 1s game to 21.

Wasn't Siebrandt actually a righty that just had a great left handed hook shot?  He shot free throws right handed if I recall.

Fan?

He's busy shopping a neck brace on oscar for me, hang on.

No hurry, I'll just sit here and wait.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on February 13, 2015, 08:31:44 PM
I drove two hours to watch us get smoked byt a guy named doobie who played for an atrocious Rutgers team. For God's sake, stop it
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on February 13, 2015, 08:33:49 PM
You guys remember when Tim Ellis nailed a 3 to tie OU and send it to OT? Man. I went absolutely bonkers. All 7k of my bram buds were partying for a minute

Tim had a dunk at CU late that helped us win one of our 4 con roadies
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 13, 2015, 08:40:49 PM

Guys :facepalm:

Wooly's teams never won a road game and lost to E. Illinois and crap. It's bad, but it's not that bad. Wooly's best team ever didn't make the nit. This team has like 5 top 25 wins.

FSD has HBBIQ.

That's the sad thing. This team has decent wins Wooly teams didn't have, it's all the crappy losses that make this season so bad.
They have been a head in every big 12 game in the 2nd half but two. KU and Tech where we closed it to one point than melted down. It is so weird.

it is so weird
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: SdK on February 13, 2015, 09:44:13 PM
I am a proud fan that went to school during the Wooly years. I suffered, immensely.

So don't rough ridin' sit here and tell me this team is equivalent to a Wooly team. That's bullshit. I stormed the court when we beat UT 51-43 in 0-whatever. I know what hopeless crap looks like.
I was working at the Bram that day. I took off my polo and stormed too!

#TheWesIsTheFuture

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Headinjun on February 14, 2015, 05:05:04 AM
I went to school in the Wooly years and never attended a single game.  I even bought season tickets. 

We were awful.    Nobody gave a f*ck either. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Cire on February 14, 2015, 08:10:34 AM
I was at just about every home game from 00-04 :(  those teams sucked.  Massey's teams were fun to watch though
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 14, 2015, 10:57:54 AM
I went to school in the Wooly years and never attended a single game.  I even bought season tickets. 

We were awful.    Nobody gave a f*ck either.

I cared.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ChiComCat on February 14, 2015, 11:00:49 AM
2005 drew lavender layup  :angry:

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ednksu on February 14, 2015, 11:09:17 PM
2005 drew lavender layup  :angry:
pfff come at me with Bookout goal tending to win.   :lol:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ednksu on February 14, 2015, 11:10:18 PM
Sooooo 3 games.....

I'm just glad Marcus is in a supporting, caring, environment. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: bballfan on February 15, 2015, 12:37:14 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi48.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Ff224%2Fmvoss156%2FMobile%2520Uploads%2F20150214_192439_zpskilecias.jpg&hash=401d07bd82aeefbe226f9b11d61893cada6ae74e)

Well, it looks like they added him back in for this game...
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: bones129 on February 15, 2015, 12:40:12 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi48.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Ff224%2Fmvoss156%2FMobile%2520Uploads%2F20150214_192439_zpskilecias.jpg&hash=401d07bd82aeefbe226f9b11d61893cada6ae74e)

Well, it looks like they added him back in for this game...

Back to normal. Whatever that means in the world of Bruceketball.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: The Big Train on February 15, 2015, 12:49:16 AM
that literally took checking 1 box, pretty intensive work for that media person  :rolleyes:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: nicname on February 15, 2015, 02:00:15 AM
that literally took checking 1 box, pretty intensive work for that media person  :rolleyes:

and a ridiculously petty move by kstate
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: dal9 on February 15, 2015, 09:16:19 AM
you know, I thought it might be so that they don't falsely advertise MF2's presence at the game being promoted. 
But then, that's DJamer in the lower right?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on February 15, 2015, 10:04:47 AM
that literally took checking 1 box, pretty intensive work for that media person  :rolleyes:

and a ridiculously petty move by kstate

Sent from my KFTT using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on February 15, 2015, 10:30:04 AM
so weird that it was a three game suspension
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ksupamplemousse on February 15, 2015, 10:47:25 AM
so weird that it was a three game suspension

I like how oscar pretended that he may not let Foster play last night (because this was totally his call all along), but obviously played him because he could see his job security quickly slipping from his fingertips, so the guy he's been throwing under the bus all year long could save his ass.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 15, 2015, 10:57:56 AM
so weird that it was a three game suspension

I like how oscar pretended that he may not let Foster play last night (because this was totally his call all along), but obviously played him because he could see his job security quickly slipping from his fingertips, so the guy he's been throwing under the bus all year long could save his ass.

It was pretty lol
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wabash909 on February 15, 2015, 01:43:35 PM
I wonder where will Marcus will transfer to next year.  I'm guessing SMU or something.

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sys on February 15, 2015, 02:37:30 PM
why would he transfer?  i don't understand the people that think he's likely to transfer.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Asteriskhead on February 15, 2015, 02:38:28 PM
he deserves better.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on February 15, 2015, 02:38:43 PM

why would he transfer?  i don't understand the people that think he's likely to transfer.

Yeah, I don't see it either. I don't think he's upset at oscar and staff.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sys on February 15, 2015, 02:41:27 PM
he deserves better.

no he doesn't.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Asteriskhead on February 15, 2015, 02:42:23 PM
he deserves better.

no he doesn't.

yes he does, but i don't think he'll transfer.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sys on February 15, 2015, 02:44:21 PM
yes he does, but i don't think he'll transfer.

kstate is a very good opportunity for foster.  it fits him perfectly.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Asteriskhead on February 15, 2015, 02:49:36 PM
yes he does, but i don't think he'll transfer.

kstate is a very good opportunity for foster.  it fits him perfectly.

you're not grasping my point. he doesn't deserve the way he has been treated this season. yes, he excels here as the one-man show on offense, but he could do better for himself elsewhere in just about every facet of his life related to college basketball.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on February 15, 2015, 02:53:53 PM
If he leaves, it will be something like Fred Peete leaving to play PG
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sys on February 15, 2015, 02:56:09 PM
you're not grasping my point. he doesn't deserve the way he has been treated this season. yes, he excels here as the one-man show on offense, but he could do better for himself elsewhere in just about every facet of his life related to college basketball.

i'm not missing it, i'm disagreeing with it.  he's been treated appropriately.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sys on February 15, 2015, 02:57:27 PM
If he leaves, it will be something like Fred Peete leaving to play PG

there cannot possibly be another school at this level with more of a need for a pg.  if he has any ability to play pg, his best chance to do so is at kstate.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on February 15, 2015, 03:00:02 PM
If he leaves, it will be something like Fred Peete leaving to play PG

there cannot possibly be another school at this level with more of a need for a pg.  if he has any ability to play pg, his best chance to do so is at kstate.
I'm saying he could go to a lower level
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Asteriskhead on February 15, 2015, 03:01:51 PM

i'm not missing it, i'm disagreeing with it.  he's been treated appropriately.

okay
Title: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on February 15, 2015, 03:18:14 PM
Treated? We do all agree that the 3 game suspension wasn't from oscar, right?

And yes, Marcus best place to showcase his game is at K-State. He's still the player oscar goes to most and has the most freedom on offense. That will only grow.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Asteriskhead on February 15, 2015, 03:20:09 PM
Treated? We do all agree that the 3 game suspension wasn't from oscar, right?

And yes, Marcus best place to showcase his game is at K-State. He's still the player oscar goes to most and had the most freedom on offense. That will only grow.

i don't think anyone is taking issue with the suspension, just the way that shithead Weber has talked about Marcus with the media this season.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wetwillie on February 15, 2015, 05:52:13 PM
19 year olds usually do the most logical thing.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on February 15, 2015, 06:27:05 PM
I think he'll transfer because playing here, point guard or otherwise, is detrimental to him showcasing himself. I don't think his frustrations are born out of the benching and suspensions but out of this amazingly restrictive offense and that he's been told that he needs to do even more to fit the system.

You can be of the opinion that he's overrated all you like but if he decided to transfer he would likely be the most sought after transfer this season, even more than Sulimon because of the amount of eligibility left.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Fldermaus on February 15, 2015, 11:00:11 PM
Sys gives me hope. That's all I'm asking for.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: catzacker on February 16, 2015, 08:58:43 AM
I think he'll transfer because playing here, point guard or otherwise, is detrimental to him showcasing himself. I don't think his frustrations are born out of the benching and suspensions but out of this amazingly restrictive offense and that he's been told that he needs to do even more to fit the system.

You can be of the opinion that he's overrated all you like but if he decided to transfer he would likely be the most sought after transfer this season, even more than Sulimon because of the amount of eligibility left.

I do enjoy the "this is the best place for marcus" point.  As if a million other places would not be better.  And also as if it mattered. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Pete on February 16, 2015, 09:06:46 AM

that literally took checking 1 box, pretty intensive work for that media person  :rolleyes:

and a ridiculously petty move by kstate

Sent from my KFTT using Tapatalk

+1
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 16, 2015, 09:35:56 AM
Marcus should go someplace where the coach lets the players do whatever they want to on offense.

Can we start a list of schools:  Coach lets you free lance 100% of the time

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: SdK on February 16, 2015, 09:38:21 AM
Marcus should go someplace where the coach lets the players do whatever they want to on offense.

Can we start a list of schools:  Coach lets you free lance 100% of the time
NBA?

#TheWesIsTheFuture

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on February 16, 2015, 10:25:28 AM
Marcus should go someplace where the coach lets the players do whatever they want to on offense.

Can we start a list of schools:  Coach lets you free lance 100% of the time

K-State without timeouts.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Stevesie60 on February 16, 2015, 12:23:27 PM
Marcus should go someplace where the coach lets the players do whatever they want to on offense.

Can we start a list of schools:  Coach lets you free lance 100% of the time

K-State without timeouts.

:lol:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Prince McJunkins on February 16, 2015, 01:36:33 PM
For wetwillie
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi13.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa276%2Fperl5000%2FMobile%2520Uploads%2Fimage.jpg&hash=bb4d72ddec58f4f1eaafa30ca82b4e50bc3173b9)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on February 16, 2015, 01:54:42 PM
Marcus should go someplace where the coach lets the players do whatever they want to on offense.

Can we start a list of schools:  Coach lets you free lance 100% of the time

Your inability to grasp onto even a sliver of nuance is a glaring sign of stupidity. You're going for clever but fell 10 feet short.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 16, 2015, 03:01:21 PM
No more stupid than the concept of Marcus Foster somehow being in a "restrictive" offense at K-State when the eye test says that most of the time Marcus pretty much does whatever he wants, whenever he wants.

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ChiComCat on February 16, 2015, 03:05:20 PM
No more stupid than the concept of Marcus Foster somehow being in a "restrictive" offense at K-State when the eye test says that most of the time Marcus pretty much does whatever he wants, whenever he wants.

Agreed - the second he gets pulled that offense turns into a well oiled machine
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ksupamplemousse on February 16, 2015, 03:05:50 PM
No more stupid than the concept of Marcus Foster somehow being in a "restrictive" offense at K-State when the eye test says that most of the time Marcus pretty much does whatever he wants, whenever he wants.

With the offense we have, if Marcus was doing what he wanted whenever he wanted, then he'd be taking all but maybe 10-15 shots a game. He touches the ball on every possession but is unselfish to the detriment of the team. If there's a favorable matchup, then Gipson and Nino can score a little bit, but for the most part he is our only decent offensive option and he's absolutely being asked to defer to a bunch of much shittier basketball players.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on February 16, 2015, 03:29:05 PM
Marcus is shooting less frequently when he's on the court than he was last year.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on February 16, 2015, 03:34:25 PM
Marcus is shooting less frequently when he's on the court than he was last year.
Slightly. Also think he isn't get as many good looks. Think he has done a better job this year hitting harder shots. I do think part of Foster success last year had to do with howl well he fitted in to our schemes. This year he is making more plays with raw ability.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 16, 2015, 03:55:25 PM
First off, where I did say Marcus was doing anything bad or that K-State offense was a well oiled machine with or without Marcus in the game?  Strawmen.

In oscar's first season, Rodney shot the ball 139 more times than anyone else. Last year Marcus shot the ball 169 more times than anyone else, this year, even after missing 3 games, he still has way more shot attempts than anyone else.   It would appear that Bruceketball is offense that needs the McGruder and Foster's of the world to shoot a lot, or when it breaks down (which is a lot) for them to create and/or shoot.   

Maybe Foster isn't getting as many shots this year because of many things, like $hitty PG's, but another factor is, he isn't doing the things in games within the structure of the offense where his teammates would anticipate him being open and thus getting the ball to him. 

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep on February 16, 2015, 03:57:43 PM
i enjoy him hitting 3 pointers to win the game but i would like to see him be more aggressive and try to get something other than an NBA range 3.

also, in case you were wondering, my dad thinks he shouldnt have turned around and show boated after he hit the 3 because the other team could have scored with the 3.4 seconds or whatever was left.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Sandstone Outcropping on February 16, 2015, 04:22:06 PM
i enjoy him hitting 3 pointers to win the game but i would like to see him be more aggressive and try to get something other than an NBA range 3.

also, in case you were wondering, my dad thinks he shouldnt have turned around and show boated after he hit the 3 because the other team could have scored with the 3.4 seconds or whatever was left.

He was just trolling the 'tucks there.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on February 16, 2015, 05:53:57 PM
I love when Foster gets to go right and get to his spot.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wetwillie on February 16, 2015, 06:19:04 PM
For wetwillie
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi13.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa276%2Fperl5000%2FMobile%2520Uploads%2Fimage.jpg&hash=bb4d72ddec58f4f1eaafa30ca82b4e50bc3173b9)

Someone make this man poster of the month! It looks exactly how I envisioned it. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on February 16, 2015, 06:54:09 PM
No more stupid than the concept of Marcus Foster somehow being in a "restrictive" offense at K-State when the eye test says that most of the time Marcus pretty much does whatever he wants, whenever he wants.

Oh you weren't attempting to be cute, you just don't know what you're talking about. I apologize.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: The Big Train on February 16, 2015, 07:18:54 PM
For wetwillie
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi13.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa276%2Fperl5000%2FMobile%2520Uploads%2Fimage.jpg&hash=bb4d72ddec58f4f1eaafa30ca82b4e50bc3173b9)

Someone make this man poster of the month! It looks exactly how I envisioned it.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1346.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fp684%2FThe_Big_Train%2FBruceSunglasses_zpsrno2ecjt.gif&hash=f8e90f89f0b6b34ce015819610f28b273afe5b67)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on February 16, 2015, 10:20:01 PM
Sometimes it's hard to tell what you guise are fighting about
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on February 18, 2015, 09:04:18 PM
No more stupid than the concept of Marcus Foster somehow being in a "restrictive" offense at K-State when the eye test says that most of the time Marcus pretty much does whatever he wants, whenever he wants.

Playing limited minutes behind a walkon in literally the slowest offense in Kansas State history, livin the dream :excited:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 19, 2015, 05:20:33 AM
 :lol:


Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on February 19, 2015, 06:50:56 AM
I feel like we're watching what would have happened between Wooly and Nick Williams if he had stayed for his sophomore season.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on February 19, 2015, 08:44:39 AM
I feel like we're watching what would have happened between Wooly and Nick Williams if he had stayed for his sophomore season.
Nick would have played with better talent.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Panjandrum on February 19, 2015, 09:16:52 AM
I feel like we're watching what would have happened between Wooly and Nick Williams if he had stayed for his sophomore season.

That's a very good way of looking at it.

I'm personally going to be a fan of his wherever he goes.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: nicname on February 19, 2015, 10:13:57 AM
I was crushed when Nick Williams left. I couldn't understand it.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on February 19, 2015, 10:29:43 AM
I was crushed when Nick Williams left. I couldn't understand it.
It brought me to message boards
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on February 19, 2015, 10:32:07 AM
I was crushed when Nick Williams left. I couldn't understand it.
It brought me to message boards

Was he good?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: EMAWzified on February 19, 2015, 10:36:49 AM
Had a good freshman year for us. So-so at Cincy, but was called on to play point guard some. Shot well from the outside at K-State, but not later.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Lucas Scoopsalot on February 19, 2015, 10:38:58 AM
I'm to the point that I'm sure this will happen. Marcus is transferring and I don't think there is much we can do about it.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 19, 2015, 10:40:27 AM
I'm to the point that I'm sure this will happen. Marcus is transferring and I don't think there is much we can do about it.

We can fire oscar.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Lucas Scoopsalot on February 19, 2015, 10:41:50 AM
I'm to the point that I'm sure this will happen. Marcus is transferring and I don't think there is much we can do about it.

We can fire oscar.
I just don't see Currie doing this. There is no way he fires his guy after one bad year. I know it's been beat to death on this blog, but it is true.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on February 19, 2015, 10:42:31 AM
I'm to the point that I'm sure this will happen. Marcus is transferring and I don't think there is much we can do about it.

Well after that crap last night, I would be disappointed in him if he didn't.  oscar practically dared him to transfer.  Though maybe oscar knows Mr. Currie won't let him. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Panjandrum on February 19, 2015, 10:54:38 AM
I'm to the point that I'm sure this will happen. Marcus is transferring and I don't think there is much we can do about it.

Well after that crap last night, I would be disappointed in him if he didn't.  oscar practically dared him to transfer.  Though maybe oscar knows Mr. Currie won't let him.

With the stunt of pulling Marcus out of the promotional stuff, I'm not sure the AD is really going to go to bat for Marcus.

I'm just going to assume the whole AD has bought into oscar's narrative.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sys on February 19, 2015, 10:59:39 AM
maybe oscar knows Mr. Currie won't let him.

With the stunt of pulling Marcus out of the promotional stuff, I'm not sure the AD is really going to go to bat for Marcus.

i'm not sure romero would describe her ordeal as having had the a.d. go to bat for her.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on February 19, 2015, 11:20:29 AM
maybe oscar knows Mr. Currie won't let him.

With the stunt of pulling Marcus out of the promotional stuff, I'm not sure the AD is really going to go to bat for Marcus.

i'm not sure romero would describe her ordeal as having had the a.d. go to bat for her.

Yes, dax didn't even try that take. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on February 19, 2015, 11:23:39 AM
I'm to the point that I'm sure this will happen. Marcus is transferring and I don't think there is much we can do about it.

Well after that crap last night, I would be disappointed in him if he didn't.  oscar practically dared him to transfer.  Though maybe oscar knows Mr. Currie won't let him.

With the stunt of pulling Marcus out of the promotional stuff, I'm not sure the AD is really going to go to bat for Marcus.

I'm just going to assume the whole AD has bought into oscar's narrative.

I was saying Marcus would try to leave and Currie would block him because he is good at basketball like Leti and Angel.  Not that Currie wouldn't let oscar oscar Marcus if oscar were so inclined.  If oscar wants him gone he's gone.  oscar doesn't want that.  He wants Marcus to stay and do as oscar says to do. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ksupamplemousse on February 19, 2015, 11:27:36 AM
I was crushed when Nick Williams left. I couldn't understand it.
It brought me to message boards

Was he good?

He was no Cortez Groves, that's for sure.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 19, 2015, 11:29:04 AM
I was crushed when Nick Williams left. I couldn't understand it.
It brought me to message boards

Was he good?

he could dribble with both hands and was fairly athletic with a decent looking shot, so yeah for kstate at the time he looked pretty amazing.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Panjandrum on February 19, 2015, 11:42:28 AM
I'm to the point that I'm sure this will happen. Marcus is transferring and I don't think there is much we can do about it.

Well after that crap last night, I would be disappointed in him if he didn't.  oscar practically dared him to transfer.  Though maybe oscar knows Mr. Currie won't let him.

With the stunt of pulling Marcus out of the promotional stuff, I'm not sure the AD is really going to go to bat for Marcus.

I'm just going to assume the whole AD has bought into oscar's narrative.

I was saying Marcus would try to leave and Currie would block him because he is good at basketball like Leti and Angel.  Not that Currie wouldn't let oscar oscar Marcus if oscar were so inclined.  If oscar wants him gone he's gone.  oscar doesn't want that.  He wants Marcus to stay and do as oscar says to do.

Well, that's a very good point.  I didn't really think about the Leti and Angel scenarios and the precedents those set.

So, thank you, Bread and sys.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: deputy dawg on February 19, 2015, 11:46:14 AM
Has anyone considered the possibility that Foster is a team cancer?  I know this thesis is GPC-worthy, but....

Remember last year when everyone was amazed at the find Weber had in the "overlooked" Marcus Foster?  Could it be that other teams passed on him because of his personal issues, including negative influence in the locker room, and learned that by doing their homework?

Could be that oscar didn't do his homework, or knowingly took on a player that would have a team cancer effect? 

Consider it tuckish if you like, but you'd have to be pretty narrow-minded to discount the possibility.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on February 19, 2015, 11:47:06 AM
For some reason (probably because statsheet is crap) I can't get freshman Marcus Foster to work. Still, SO Foster compared to FR Nick Williams is interesting.

http://statsheet.com/mcb/players/compare?add=nick-williams&i=1&nick-williams=2001-2002&p1=marcus-foster
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pissclams on February 19, 2015, 11:56:08 AM
Has anyone considered the possibility that Foster is a team cancer?  I know this thesis is GPC-worthy, but....

Remember last year when everyone was amazed at the find Weber had in the "overlooked" Marcus Foster?  Could it be that other teams passed on him because of his personal issues, including negative influence in the locker room, and learned that by doing their homework?

Could be that oscar didn't do his homework, or knowingly took on a player that would have a team cancer effect? 

Consider it tuckish if you like, but you'd have to be pretty narrow-minded to discount the possibility.

i'm sure a collection of downgrade mongloids has considered that possibilty
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ednksu on February 19, 2015, 11:56:19 AM
maybe Foster will transfer to Washburn and then get run out of there
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: EMAWzified on February 19, 2015, 11:59:51 AM
Has anyone considered the possibility that Foster is a team cancer?  I know this thesis is GPC-worthy, but....

Remember last year when everyone was amazed at the find Weber had in the "overlooked" Marcus Foster?  Could it be that other teams passed on him because of his personal issues, including negative influence in the locker room, and learned that by doing their homework?

Could be that oscar didn't do his homework, or knowingly took on a player that would have a team cancer effect? 

Consider it tuckish if you like, but you'd have to be pretty narrow-minded to discount the possibility.

Doesn't this kind of thing get brought up on recruiting sites. You can read a lot of negative stuff about high school recruits. Also, his high school coach always praised him.
I just think it's Weber a. selfishly not wanting a star to take away all his luster, or b. marginalizing his best player to deflect blame for a  crappy season.

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CHONGS on February 19, 2015, 12:02:48 PM
It's people projecting. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on February 19, 2015, 12:07:47 PM
Has anyone considered the possibility that Foster is a team cancer?  I know this thesis is GPC-worthy, but....

Remember last year when everyone was amazed at the find Weber had in the "overlooked" Marcus Foster?  Could it be that other teams passed on him because of his personal issues, including negative influence in the locker room, and learned that by doing their homework?

Could be that oscar didn't do his homework, or knowingly took on a player that would have a team cancer effect? 

Consider it tuckish if you like, but you'd have to be pretty narrow-minded to discount the possibility.

Other teams passed on him because he was hurt and then he was fat mostly I think.  Everyone, save maybe some bluebloods, will want him this time around.  There probably isn't a single high major coach out there right now that doesn't earnestly believe that they can reach and relate to players better than oscar Weber.  No one will be deterred because oscar failed.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pissclams on February 19, 2015, 12:10:29 PM
hopefully he was on the phone with smu last night, larry brown would love to have marcus and he'd be closer to home
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on February 19, 2015, 12:24:14 PM
Marcus would be amazing on a team with a decent point guard and or forward.  Amazing. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 19, 2015, 01:57:43 PM
While I don't want oscar around anymore . . . I'll never quite get why this board appears to, with great regularity, always think it's the coach.   

I didn't get to watch and only got to listen to the game for a bit last night, but Wyattvision and Stan didn't paint a good picture of Foster's effort.  Maybe their just part of the narrative that the athletic department wants to get out there about Foster.    :dunno:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on February 19, 2015, 01:59:08 PM
While I don't want oscar around anymore . . . I'll never quite get why this board appears to, with great regularity, always think it's the coach.   

I didn't get to watch and only got to listen to the game for a bit last night, but Wyattvision and Stan didn't paint a good picture of Foster's effort.  Maybe their just part of the narrative that the athletic department wants to get out there about Foster.    :dunno:
Effort is a skill that can be taught.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 19, 2015, 02:02:02 PM
While I don't want oscar around anymore . . . I'll never quite get why this board appears to, with great regularity, always think it's the coach.   

I didn't get to watch and only got to listen to the game for a bit last night, but Wyattvision and Stan didn't paint a good picture of Foster's effort.  Maybe their just part of the narrative that the athletic department wants to get out there about Foster.    :dunno:

It's because the coach recruits his players and gets paid millions of dollars per year to manage talent, while the players are just trying to get an education and maybe get to play basketball for a living after college.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on February 19, 2015, 02:04:12 PM
The thing too is that if you actually respect your boss you feel bad if you let them down, so you are less apt to do so.  So instead of just fear of punishment you have guilt as a motivator.  Can be a big one.  #pastriesforthought
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: nicname on February 19, 2015, 02:05:56 PM
hopefully he was on the phone with smu last night, larry brown would love to have marcus and he'd be closer to home

Would be great for both Marcus and Larry.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: nicname on February 19, 2015, 02:08:02 PM
While I don't want oscar around anymore . . . I'll never quite get why this board appears to, with great regularity, always think it's the coach.   

I didn't get to watch and only got to listen to the game for a bit last night, but Wyattvision and Stan didn't paint a good picture of Foster's effort.  Maybe their just part of the narrative that the athletic department wants to get out there about Foster.    :dunno:

My guess.

I wouldn't say that this board always thinks it's the coach. I think it depends on whether or not the board likes either the coach or player in question, and how much.

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on February 19, 2015, 02:09:13 PM
This board is a thing with unified opinions
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Tobias on February 19, 2015, 02:13:37 PM
This board is a thing with unified opinions

there is The Board, and then there is The Board^(-1) [wackydax]
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: catzacker on February 19, 2015, 02:32:06 PM
oscar chooses to bench marcus for rholeder but lets jevon eff up all over the court and stay in.  Foster is becoming a convenient scapegoat for oscar.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on February 19, 2015, 02:34:04 PM
Jevon tries hard in practice I bet. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on February 19, 2015, 03:31:33 PM
oscar chooses to bench marcus for rholeder but lets jevon eff up all over the court and stay in.  Foster is becoming a convenient scapegoat for oscar.

Jevons tries. It is bullshit oscar can't get the whole team to try constantly. Bullshit that the roster only has one player that can penetrate.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: deputy dawg on February 19, 2015, 03:39:38 PM
Has anyone considered the possibility that Foster is a team cancer?  I know this thesis is GPC-worthy, but....

Remember last year when everyone was amazed at the find Weber had in the "overlooked" Marcus Foster?  Could it be that other teams passed on him because of his personal issues, including negative influence in the locker room, and learned that by doing their homework?

Could be that oscar didn't do his homework, or knowingly took on a player that would have a team cancer effect? 

Consider it tuckish if you like, but you'd have to be pretty narrow-minded to discount the possibility.

i'm sure a collection of downgrade mongloids has considered that possibilty

'clams, the clinical term is Downs Syndrome, if you don't mind.  And I'm mid-grade FWIW.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pissclams on February 19, 2015, 03:43:33 PM
the finger wasn't pointed at you, OBVIOUSLY
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ChiComCat on February 19, 2015, 04:07:21 PM
If teams backed off of him after doing homework, oscar didn't and so it is now his job to get his best player to buy in. 

For me to say Foster is a team cancer, I would have to think the team would be better without him.  I really don't know how anybody could make that argument the way this season has gone.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: deputy dawg on February 19, 2015, 04:32:36 PM
Mr. Bread, did oscar lose his teams at Illinois as badly as he's losing this one?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Stevesie60 on February 19, 2015, 04:44:29 PM
Mr. Bread, did oscar lose his teams at Illinois as badly as he's losing this one?

Is this the first time you've been on goEMAW?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: #LIFE on February 19, 2015, 04:52:54 PM
Kitchen on 610 just basically called MF a FP,TC and that he is bringing the team down.  Says we might be better with him gone. Did he watch the games when he was suspended?  Good grief, I can't wrap my mind how these dumbasses think like this  :facepalm:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CHONGS on February 19, 2015, 04:54:32 PM
Why would anyone even interview him?  I guess he's back to pretending to be a sports journo again?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on February 19, 2015, 05:18:14 PM
While I don't want oscar around anymore . . . I'll never quite get why this board appears to, with great regularity, always think it's the coach.   

I didn't get to watch and only got to listen to the game for a bit last night, but Wyattvision and Stan didn't paint a good picture of Foster's effort.  Maybe their just part of the narrative that the athletic department wants to get out there about Foster.    :dunno:

I would say that their analysis is clouded a bit from what they are fed by oscar. Specific to last night, I didn't see an effort issue with anyone. Sure Rohedler played harder than everyone else, but duh he's a walkon. Last night the problem was skill and execution, not effort. Now generally I can't speak for everyone but I am not sure anyone completely absolves Marcus of responsibility. There is certainly shared responsibility and in a case like that oscar is going to, and should, take the flak. His style does not endear players to want to play hard for him. He has this soft strength and conditioning program, slow offense, squeaky voice, throws players under the bus and makes excuses. In addition to that oscar has a history of this happening, his last season at Illinois he speculated that the entire team quit on the season.

oscar didn't force Marcus to smoke weed and oscar didn't make Marcus a pouty mess at OSU. However, it is oscar has done all of the things I mentioned in the previous paragraph and none of that motivates anyone to want to do anything for you. As Rage Against the McKee said, oscar is the one being paid millions of dollars to fix this and as 'zacker pointed out he is obviously scapegoating Marcus so no one should feel bad for oscar, he's doing this to himself.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wazucat on February 19, 2015, 08:27:33 PM
Just a rando thought I can not get out of my mind today,  Rodney McGruder was and is a Saint.  Now back to the topic, oscar is absolutely with out doubt scape goating Marcus,  and with great effect for much of our fan base.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Cire on February 19, 2015, 09:04:44 PM
I'm sure marcus has been a pain in the ass at times, isn't a great leader right now etc but for Christ sakes oscar and co.have had a long time to figure the buttons out.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: nicname on February 19, 2015, 09:06:17 PM
The thing too is that if you actually respect your boss you feel bad if you let them down, so you are less apt to do so.  So instead of just fear of punishment you have guilt as a motivator.  Can be a big one.  #pastriesforthought

Absolutely.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: HELLHAMMER on February 19, 2015, 09:58:46 PM
Shane always grinning and trying to enjoy playing basketball last year ruined Marcus. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wetwillie on February 19, 2015, 10:03:47 PM
Buy in or quit. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Bqqkie Pimp on February 20, 2015, 09:52:27 AM
hopefully he was on the phone with smu last night, larry brown would love to have marcus and he'd be closer to home

Would be great for both Marcus and Larry.

Foster ain't goin' nowhere.  We ended up in a convo with a guy at the HS gym TCU plays in that is part of the staff of the AAU team Foster played on in Texas and my bro flat out asked him if Foster was looking to get out.

The guy basically said that Marcus is a momma's boy and there ain't no way momma is having any part of that.

 :buh-bye:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Fldermaus on February 20, 2015, 09:58:09 AM
Kitchen on 610 just basically called MF a FP,TC and that he is bringing the team down.  Says we might be better with him gone. Did he watch the games when he was suspended?  Good grief, I can't wrap my mind how these dumbasses think like this  :facepalm:

I guess they think that the rest of the roster would look better and play with more confidence if they didn't have to deal with the specter of a guy who has above average skill at playing basketball?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Lucas Scoopsalot on February 20, 2015, 10:00:15 AM
Hopefully we don't Maurice Clarrett him. How awful would that be?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on February 20, 2015, 10:01:33 AM
hopefully he was on the phone with smu last night, larry brown would love to have marcus and he'd be closer to home

Would be great for both Marcus and Larry.

Foster ain't goin' nowhere.  We ended up in a convo with a guy at the HS gym TCU plays in that is part of the staff of the AAU team Foster played on in Texas and my bro flat out asked him if Foster was looking to get out.

The guy basically said that Marcus is a momma's boy and there ain't no way momma is having any part of that.

 :buh-bye:

Mommas like seeing their baby boys play and being treated correctly.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on February 20, 2015, 10:38:00 AM
His mom must be the "people" Heidrick was referring to
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Yard Dog on February 20, 2015, 10:41:51 AM
hopefully he was on the phone with smu last night, larry brown would love to have marcus and he'd be closer to home

Would be great for both Marcus and Larry.

Foster ain't goin' nowhere.  We ended up in a convo with a guy at the HS gym TCU plays in that is part of the staff of the AAU team Foster played on in Texas and my bro flat out asked him if Foster was looking to get out.

The guy basically said that Marcus is a momma's boy and there ain't no way momma is having any part of that.

 :buh-bye:

Mommas like seeing their baby boys play and being treated correctly.

Depends on the momma. Mommas sometimes like their boys to grow up and act like men so they would prefer their boy stuck a hard situation out. I often wonder how often that weighs into things like this. No way his mother is out of the loop on all the media covering Marcus' attitude problems. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on February 20, 2015, 10:46:04 AM
Mom surely sees this as career prep.  You don't get that unless you.play.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on February 20, 2015, 10:49:27 AM
There are lots of factors at play here. If Mom truly trusts oscar and his staff with her son and is even to a point even willing to be loyal to them because they signed him when no one else really wanted him, its extremely logical to assume that she will want him to stick it out at K-State. A few bad experiences here and a losing season won't change that, even if it makes many of us fans not like oscar. I'm sure the staff has probably been in pretty good contact with her (probably Brooks) while all of this has been going on because I'm sure the staff knows that a good Marcus staying around helps their careers. I think this staff is making lots of mistakes right now, but I don't think they are stupid and they will be as patient with Marcus as possible.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on February 20, 2015, 10:53:24 AM
There are lots of factors at play here. If Mom truly trusts oscar and his staff with her son and is even to a point even willing to be loyal to them because they signed him when no one else really wanted him, its extremely logical to assume that she will want him to stick it out at K-State. A few bad experiences here and a losing season won't change that, even if it makes many of us fans not like oscar. I'm sure the staff has probably been in pretty good contact with her (probably Brooks) while all of this has been going on because I'm sure the staff knows that a good Marcus staying around helps their careers. I think this staff is making lots of mistakes right now, but I don't think they are stupid and they will be as patient with Marcus as possible.

I agree w/ everything except I think they're kinda stupid
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on February 20, 2015, 10:56:01 AM
There are lots of factors at play here. If Mom truly trusts oscar and his staff with her son and is even to a point even willing to be loyal to them because they signed him when no one else really wanted him, its extremely logical to assume that she will want him to stick it out at K-State. A few bad experiences here and a losing season won't change that, even if it makes many of us fans not like oscar. I'm sure the staff has probably been in pretty good contact with her (probably Brooks) while all of this has been going on because I'm sure the staff knows that a good Marcus staying around helps their careers. I think this staff is making lots of mistakes right now, but I don't think they are stupid and they will be as patient with Marcus as possible.

I agree w/ everything except I think they're kinda stupid

I meant that I don't think they are stupid behind the scenes with Marcus. oscar is saying dumb stuff, but I'm pretty sure they will do everything they can to keep him. They've got to know they aren't winning a lot next year without him and therefore will be well on the road to be fired.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sys on February 20, 2015, 11:21:01 AM
They've got to know they aren't winning a lot next year without him and therefore will be well on the road to be fired.

just to devil's advocate - if weber keeps foster, he owns him.  if he cuts him (and maybe one other soph/fr), he's got a reasonable case to take to currie and say "either fire me now or i get two years, minimum, because the only way to fix this is to get worse (maybe not actually worse, because that'd be hard, but figuratively) next year."
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on February 20, 2015, 11:22:07 AM
They've got to know they aren't winning a lot next year without him and therefore will be well on the road to be fired.

just to devil's advocate - if weber keeps foster, he owns him.  if he cuts him (and maybe one other soph/fr), he's got a reasonable case to take to currie and say "either fire me now or i get two years, minimum, because the only way to fix this is to get worse (maybe not actually worse, because that'd be hard, but figuratively) next year."

Reasonable.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on February 20, 2015, 11:24:04 AM
They've got to know they aren't winning a lot next year without him and therefore will be well on the road to be fired.

just to devil's advocate - if weber keeps foster, he owns him.  if he cuts him (and maybe one other soph/fr), he's got a reasonable case to take to currie and say "either fire me now or i get two years, minimum, because the only way to fix this is to get worse (maybe not actually worse, because that'd be hard, but figuratively) next year."

I'll add that I didn't think there was any way oscar would get fired but the way he's acting kinda makes me wonder.

(I'd still put the odds pretty low, but whatever)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CHONGS on February 20, 2015, 11:28:32 AM
oscar has this on cruise control
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ksupamplemousse on February 20, 2015, 11:30:45 AM
They've got to know they aren't winning a lot next year without him and therefore will be well on the road to be fired.

just to devil's advocate - if weber keeps foster, he owns him.  if he cuts him (and maybe one other soph/fr), he's got a reasonable case to take to currie and say "either fire me now or i get two years, minimum, because the only way to fix this is to get worse (maybe not actually worse, because that'd be hard, but figuratively) next year."

I'll add that I didn't think there was any way oscar would get fired but the way he's acting kinda makes me wonder.

(I'd still put the odds pretty low, but whatever)

He's definitely acting desperate. His substitution patterns were beyond weird against TCU. Seemed like he spent the entire second half punishing Wes and foster, but then turned to them to try and save the game at the end. Then his remarks after the game were just totally nuts. Pretty sure I've never heard a coach question whether multiple members of his basketball team need to transfer in a post-game press conference.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: catzacker on February 20, 2015, 11:31:40 AM
They've got to know they aren't winning a lot next year without him and therefore will be well on the road to be fired.

just to devil's advocate - if weber keeps foster, he owns him.  if he cuts him (and maybe one other soph/fr), he's got a reasonable case to take to currie and say "either fire me now or i get two years, minimum, because the only way to fix this is to get worse (maybe not actually worse, because that'd be hard, but figuratively) next year."

I tend to agree with this. However I don't underestimate oscar's ability to play the victim.  Keep Foster...it doesn't "work" next year and oscar can say "I gave him a chance..." and use Foster as a scapegoat again.  If there is an available cross, oscar will climb up on it.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 0.42 on February 20, 2015, 11:59:48 AM
This board is a thing with unified opinions

there is The Board, and then there is The Board^(-1) [wackydax]

tobias, i appreciated this
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on February 20, 2015, 12:57:24 PM
Hopefully the staff guy keeping in touch is not corn.  I mean, how much of his wife's skin product pyramid scheme stuff does he push on player families?   I can just see the Facebook invites after big wins. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 20, 2015, 01:57:20 PM
Besides some player defections, how many coaches are trying to leave?    Being on this Weber staff can't be a real resume builder
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CHONGS on February 20, 2015, 02:03:23 PM
Why? They've already seen that failing can get you a pretty sweet gig.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on February 20, 2015, 02:07:37 PM
Lowery was just fired and this is chester's first job and Brooks was at something like Sam Houston State? They should all be tickled pink to have their jobs.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 20, 2015, 02:14:42 PM
Lowery was just fired and this is chester's first job and Brooks was at something like Sam Houston State? They should all be tickled pink to have their jobs.

true.  Assembling an all star cast of losers ensures they will stay content
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sys on February 20, 2015, 02:28:38 PM
His mom must be the "people" Heidrick was referring to

you're not discussing your own mother, michigancat.  the correct term for a black athlete's mother is "momma".
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sys on February 20, 2015, 02:29:46 PM
Lowery was just fired and this is chester's first job and Brooks was at something like Sam Houston State? They should all be tickled pink to have their jobs.

if i were brooks, i'd be trying to leave.  and i think he'd have opportunities.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on February 20, 2015, 02:35:42 PM
His mom must be the "people" Heidrick was referring to

you're not discussing your own mother, michigancat.  the correct term for a black athlete's mother is "momma".

Thank you for pointing that out, it drives me rough ridin' crazy but I didn't want to derail the conversation.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 8manpick on February 20, 2015, 02:41:30 PM
His mom must be the "people" Heidrick was referring to

you're not discussing your own mother, michigancat.  the correct term for a black athlete's mother is "momma".

Thank you for pointing that out, it drives me rough ridin' crazy but I didn't want to derail the conversation.
Tupac's was "Mama" :ck:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on February 20, 2015, 02:48:25 PM
Lowery was just fired and this is chester's first job and Brooks was at something like Sam Houston State? They should all be tickled pink to have their jobs.

if i were brooks, i'd be trying to leave.  and i think he'd have opportunities.
Agreed
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: SdK on February 20, 2015, 02:50:33 PM
My mom is mum.

#TheWesIsTheFuture

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: SdK on February 20, 2015, 02:50:52 PM
His mom must be the "people" Heidrick was referring to

you're not discussing your own mother, michigancat.  the correct term for a black athlete's mother is "momma".

Thank you for pointing that out, it drives me rough ridin' crazy but I didn't want to derail the conversation.
Tupac's was "Mama" :ck:
Dear Mama was such a good jam.

#TheWesIsTheFuture

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: SdK on February 20, 2015, 02:51:20 PM
His mom must be the "people" Heidrick was referring to

you're not discussing your own mother, michigancat.  the correct term for a black athlete's mother is "momma".

Thank you for pointing that out, it drives me rough ridin' crazy but I didn't want to derail the conversation.
Tupac's was "Mama" :ck:
Dear Mama was such a good jam.

#TheWesIsTheFuture
Speaking of which, I used to style my hair with "Let's Jam"

#TheWesIsTheFuture

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: nicname on February 28, 2015, 04:36:11 PM
It's infuriating how little he plays.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wetwillie on February 28, 2015, 04:41:59 PM
It's infuriating how little he plays.

This is Nigel's team now bruh
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: dal9 on February 28, 2015, 04:43:49 PM
he's made two shots, has two turnovers, and doesn't have a rebound, assist, steal, or block so far.  and he's not here for his lockdown defense exactly.  sometimes it's just not your day.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mikeyis4dcats on February 28, 2015, 05:03:35 PM
he's made two shots, has two turnovers, and doesn't have a rebound, assist, steal, or block so far.  and he's not here for his lockdown defense exactly.  sometimes it's just not your day month.

FTFY
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: dean_ksu on February 28, 2015, 05:05:18 PM
If he played more today, there's no way we beat the Cyclones.   oscar made the right move turning him into a role player.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on February 28, 2015, 05:09:43 PM
It's infuriating how little he plays.

After he made his shot, he played like crap. Sitting him was the right thing and I truly don't think we win if he plays down the stretch. I feel bad for him, I hope he and Weber get it figured out, but come man. He hasn't been good at all in February, 4-26 from 3 just being one indicator.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: nicname on February 28, 2015, 05:13:43 PM
I just figure if a player is good, which I think Foster is, that eventually they will produce. I could be wrong. Maybe he's just not a good player now.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on February 28, 2015, 05:15:44 PM
I just figure if a player is good, which I think Foster is, that eventually they will produce. I could be wrong. Maybe he's just not a good player now.

I think his mind is really messed up. His shooting is just really bad right now and when he doesn't play with energy he hurts this team. I thought the make would energize him, but then the next several trips he was calling for the ball and a heat check and I thought when he didn't get it he let it carry over to other things. A final pathetic closeout and 3 point make over his late defense was it for him.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: nicname on February 28, 2015, 05:20:44 PM
It's true. His shooting seems awkward.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on February 28, 2015, 05:23:37 PM
After this one I'm leaning to him not being back. I hope I'm wrong and he goes off for 25 in Austin, but that doesn't seem to be coming.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: HELLHAMMER on February 28, 2015, 05:25:08 PM
A tuck told me "All Foster wants to do is smoke pot".
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sys on February 28, 2015, 05:25:43 PM
he's just taking bad shots.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on February 28, 2015, 05:27:19 PM

he's just taking bad shots.

It's a lot of bad shots at this point. He's now 25% in Big 12 games.  4-26 in February is really bad.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: nicname on February 28, 2015, 05:27:34 PM
Don't say he won't be back. Don't scare me _Fan.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sys on February 28, 2015, 05:28:21 PM

he's just taking bad shots.

It's a lot of bad shots at this point. He's now 25% in Big 12 games.  4-26 in February is really bad.

yes.  lots of them.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on February 28, 2015, 05:29:34 PM

Don't say he won't be back. Don't scare me _Fan.

I want him back. I hope I'm wrong. I know nothing either, I'm just guessing.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on February 28, 2015, 05:46:02 PM

he's just taking bad shots.

It's a lot of bad shots at this point. He's now 25% in Big 12 games.  4-26 in February is really bad.

yes.  lots of them.

The layup was the only good shot he took today, completely forcing things outside of the framework of the offense. It's definitely a chicken/egg situation; he's forcing shots because he hasn't been getting as many minutes and he's trying to make plays, he isn't getting minutes because the ball stops in his hands and he kills offensive rhythm.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on February 28, 2015, 05:47:51 PM
When need to send him backdoor. Everyone is over playing him to prevent against the 3
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: SdK on February 28, 2015, 06:23:02 PM
When need to send him backdoor. Everyone is over playing him to prevent against the 3
We just need to be more free on offense in general

#TheWesIsTheFuture

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on February 28, 2015, 06:29:00 PM
When need to send him backdoor. Everyone is over playing him to prevent against the 3

He would be fine if he ran the offense and let the ball move from side to side.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Bill Clarahan on February 28, 2015, 06:32:08 PM
When need to send him backdoor. Everyone is over playing him to prevent against the 3

oscar knows nothing of the back door, he's strictly a missionary man, by that I mean he can't change.  Marcus's problem is
oscar not being able to bend him to fit in a more productive way.

Marcus would be better off with a coach that doesn't have his head up his ass.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trogdor on February 28, 2015, 06:39:16 PM
First to run off the court halfway through the players going around hi-fiveing people. Have a feeling that was his last game in OOD
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Belvis Noland on February 28, 2015, 06:41:27 PM
Seems like he doesn't want to play hard for his coach.  He's taking bad shots, true.  But it just seems like he doesn't want to be involved in the game. 

He's gone. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on February 28, 2015, 06:55:49 PM
I've now gone the other way and I don't think he will transfer.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sunny_cat on February 28, 2015, 06:56:12 PM
I've now gone the other way and I don't think he will transfer.

confidence rising
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on February 28, 2015, 06:57:24 PM
Seems like he is in a real funk, effective the rest of his game.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trogdor on February 28, 2015, 07:23:56 PM
I've now gone the other way and I don't think he will transfer.

You heard it here folks!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CyberToothCat on February 28, 2015, 07:24:39 PM
Unless we upset Texas and manage to squeak into the NIT, I think today was Foster's last game in Bramlage.

The win was fun, but his performance sure was a dud.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wetwillie on February 28, 2015, 07:31:18 PM
Unless we upset Texas and manage to squeak into the NIT, I think today was Foster's last game in Bramlage.

The win was fun, but his performance sure was a dud.

Texas will be a shell of themselves when we roll into town after Baylor hands them another loss.  We are going to beat that ass.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ljmhawk2 on February 28, 2015, 08:43:50 PM
idk what has happened to Foster but watching Kstate, I believe they are a much better team when he's on the bench.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CyberToothCat on February 28, 2015, 09:17:30 PM
Unless we upset Texas and manage to squeak into the NIT, I think today was Foster's last game in Bramlage.

The win was fun, but his performance sure was a dud.

Texas will be a shell of themselves when we roll into town after Baylor hands them another loss.  We are going to beat that ass.

Well, good. I hope you're right. I don't care how it happens, I'll take a win any way I can get it.

I still think Foster has played his last, or nearly his last, game in Bram.

Q: did Foster go all the way around the arena to high five fans after the game with the rest of the team?
A: no, he went past the student section, then cut out and jogged back to the locker room while the team went on without him.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: dal9 on March 01, 2015, 12:21:14 AM

oscar knows nothing of the back door, he's strictly a missionary man, by that I mean he can't change.  Marcus's problem is
oscar not being able to bend him to fit in a more productive way.
You didnt see the move he put on Self at the scorer's table?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 01, 2015, 07:58:06 AM
Jesus Christ we are not a better team with Foster on the bench.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Belvis Noland on March 01, 2015, 08:08:58 AM
Jesus Christ we are not a better team with Foster on the bench.

We were yesterday. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: chum1 on March 01, 2015, 08:09:20 AM
What was the scoring differential for when Foster was in the game vs. out? Seems like he was in the game for more of the first half defecit and mostly on the bench for the second half comeback.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 01, 2015, 08:09:26 AM
not really
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pissclams on March 01, 2015, 08:09:57 AM
foster chose dope over KAT hoops, he doesn't deserve to wear the purple and white
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: catzacker on March 01, 2015, 08:48:33 AM
Jesus Christ we are not a better team with Foster on the bench.

whatever. 

sincerely,
OU
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: chum1 on March 01, 2015, 09:13:16 AM
This isn't even close. When Foster was in, we were outscored by 22.

SUB OUT: Foster, Marcus  15:53  2-10  -8
SUB IN : Foster, Marcus  12:06  12-10 +10
SUB OUT: Foster, Marcus  05:58  21-29 -10
SUB IN : Foster, Marcus  12:52  45-53 0
SUB OUT: Foster, Marcus  10:36  48-60 -4
0:00  70-69 +13
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: chum1 on March 01, 2015, 09:15:12 AM
That's nearly a 50 point swing due to one dumb player.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: The Whale on March 01, 2015, 09:17:26 AM
Prior to the last two games, defenses keyed on Foster and Gipson without the Cats having any other threats.  If Nigel and Edwards and to a lesser extent Westicles had been playing the way they have the last few games, Foster wouldn't have had to force as many things leading to this point.

But now we get to look forward to tucks selling The Flush as the next Foster and rooting for Foster to leave.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on March 01, 2015, 09:21:54 AM
Why don't you guys stop worrying about what tucks think. I know I don't give a crap.

K? Thx
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 01, 2015, 10:27:35 AM


This isn't even close. When Foster was in, we were outscored by 22.

SUB OUT: Foster, Marcus  15:53  2-10  -8
SUB IN : Foster, Marcus  12:06  12-10 +10
SUB OUT: Foster, Marcus  05:58  21-29 -10
SUB IN : Foster, Marcus  12:52  45-53 0
SUB OUT: Foster, Marcus  10:36  48-60 -4
0:00  70-69 +13

The team definitely had better stretches of play with him off the court, but they're still a better team with him on the court.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: yoman on March 01, 2015, 10:31:14 AM
Prior to the last two games, defenses keyed on Foster and Gipson without the Cats having any other threats.  If Nigel and Edwards and to a lesser extent Westicles had been playing the way they have the last few games, Foster wouldn't have had to force as many things leading to this point.

But now we get to look forward to tucks selling The Flush as the next Foster and rooting for Foster to leave.

Which has always been strange to me. "Hey we have this guy who could be awesome and a guy who has been awesome but has slumped lately." "eff the second guy, get him out." "But we can have both with absolutely no repercussions." "Nope, eff him, he needs to leave."
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: chum1 on March 01, 2015, 10:33:39 AM


This isn't even close. When Foster was in, we were outscored by 22.

SUB OUT: Foster, Marcus  15:53  2-10  -8
SUB IN : Foster, Marcus  12:06  12-10 +10
SUB OUT: Foster, Marcus  05:58  21-29 -10
SUB IN : Foster, Marcus  12:52  45-53 0
SUB OUT: Foster, Marcus  10:36  48-60 -4
0:00  70-69 +13

The team definitely had better stretches of play with him off the court, but they're still a better team with him on the court.

Should he have played more yesterday?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on March 01, 2015, 10:37:07 AM
I agree that we are better if Foster is here. Yesterday it was the right move to sit him down the stretch in the 2nd half, but hopefully he and the staff get things figured out for next year (and next week). Really, I hope we can keep everyone, but it looks like someone will have to leave now.

I still contend Nigel is better off the ball, though he can be a combo.

They want Jevon to be a "true" point (at least this season) and it sounds like Stokes is being brought in either to replace him or give him legit competition at the PG spot.

Either way, it will be an interesting offseason.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: chum1 on March 01, 2015, 10:45:17 AM
We're not better off with Foster if he's going to play like crap.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Pete on March 01, 2015, 10:51:16 AM
Any team is worse when they play any player who is playing like poop, aren't they?  The high school football coach at my high school used to make everyone where shirts that said "The team/chain is only as strong as it's weakest link."  But, he would get really upset with me when I would ask him to name who the weakest link was.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on March 01, 2015, 10:54:16 AM
You should have gotten a shirt that said "I am not the weak link".
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: catzacker on March 01, 2015, 10:54:57 AM
man, I remember when Beasley only scored 5 points against Xavier.  Frank prolly should have sat his ass the rest of the season. I mean, when you look at that one game, it should give you enough data to extrapolate.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: chum1 on March 01, 2015, 10:56:36 AM
man, I remember when Beasley only scored 5 points against Xavier.  Frank prolly should have sat his ass the rest of the season. I mean, when you look at that one game, it should give you enough data to extrapolate.

No one is suggesting that.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on March 01, 2015, 10:58:23 AM
Marcus is still our best player and I obviously want him to stay, but one of the biggest reasons he was so much better than everyone else is that he was the only guard willing to be a threat. We spent 90% of the season with Nigel, Wes, and Justin completely unwilling to step up. I'll assume that part of that reason is that Marcus is so ball dominant, but those guys can't get a pass for not doing anything. We had a stretch where Jevon was our #2 guard scoring threat.

Marcus' suspension and subsequent reduction in playing time has put these guys in a position to be more assertive and it's working for them. There has been a couple of changes in roles that has seemed to help Justin and Nigel but hurt Marcus. I'd like all of these guys to stay and I'd like to see what the offense looks like with multiple guards willing to be assertive, maybe the coaches would be confident enough to pick up the pace.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: catzacker on March 01, 2015, 11:00:27 AM
man, I remember when Beasley only scored 5 points against Xavier.  Frank prolly should have sat his ass the rest of the season. I mean, when you look at that one game, it should give you enough data to extrapolate.

No one is suggesting that.

We're not better off with Foster if he's going to play like crap.

seems like it.  i mean, Jevon can play like crap, but play him.  Wes has sucked something rough ridin' awful for like the entire damn season, he's in.  Edwards hasn't even looked like he knew he was playing basketball for the entire rough ridin' season, he's in.  nigel, according to oscar, doesn't even know we have scouting reports, he's in.

but for god's rough ridin' sake, don't play marcus.  don't.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Pete on March 01, 2015, 11:04:27 AM
You should have gotten a shirt that said "I am not the weak link".

Oh, I didn't play.  I just pestered the coach constantly.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: chum1 on March 01, 2015, 11:08:00 AM
man, I remember when Beasley only scored 5 points against Xavier.  Frank prolly should have sat his ass the rest of the season. I mean, when you look at that one game, it should give you enough data to extrapolate.

No one is suggesting that.

We're not better off with Foster if he's going to play like crap.

seems like it.  i mean, Jevon can play like crap, but play him.  Wes has sucked something rough ridin' awful for like the entire damn season, he's in.  Edwards hasn't even looked like he knew he was playing basketball for the entire rough ridin' season, he's in.  nigel, according to oscar, doesn't even know we have scouting reports, he's in.

but for god's rough ridin' sake, don't play marcus.  don't.

I wouldn't make a blanket statement that the team is always better when Foster is in. It was at one point, but maybe he decided to transfer and quit trying or something. Things change.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on March 01, 2015, 11:08:24 AM
man, I remember when Beasley only scored 5 points against Xavier.  Frank prolly should have sat his ass the rest of the season. I mean, when you look at that one game, it should give you enough data to extrapolate.

No one is suggesting that.

We're not better off with Foster if he's going to play like crap.

seems like it.  i mean, Jevon can play like crap, but play him.  Wes has sucked something rough ridin' awful for like the entire damn season, he's in.  Edwards hasn't even looked like he knew he was playing basketball for the entire rough ridin' season, he's in.  nigel, according to oscar, doesn't even know we have scouting reports, he's in.

but for god's rough ridin' sake, don't play marcus.  don't.

Zacker, what are you arguing? It seems pretty obvious that chum isn't advocating for a permanent benching of Marcus but in situations like yesterday when it was pretty obvious he didn't have it and the offense worked better when he was out, there's nothing controversial about that.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on March 01, 2015, 11:49:31 AM
Marcus has still played 70% of the minutes available this season. He's in a funk since his suspension that he can't seem to get out of. Hopefully this next week it will happen.

It seemed this past week that the guys finally decided they could win without Marcus playing well. Of course, this wasn't some conscious thing, but clearly from Nino's comment of "We live and die by Marcus, he always takes the big shots for us" there was a belief that they couldn't win without him playing well. It took other guys like Nigel stepping up and finally finishing games to do it (playing at home helped), but its nice to see that barrier broken. If things can get figured out with Foster and he's back next year with most of the other players, then this team "could" be better off for it.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Cire on March 01, 2015, 11:56:16 AM
Rodney and jake used to constantly be running around screens to get looks.  Marcus is either in terrible shape and can't do that or isn't willing to
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on March 01, 2015, 12:43:22 PM
Rodney and jake used to constantly be running around screens to get looks.  Marcus is either in terrible shape and can't do that or isn't willing to

There's some truth to all of that but our offense doesn't set off ball screens to get shots for guards.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 01, 2015, 01:57:41 PM


This isn't even close. When Foster was in, we were outscored by 22.

SUB OUT: Foster, Marcus  15:53  2-10  -8
SUB IN : Foster, Marcus  12:06  12-10 +10
SUB OUT: Foster, Marcus  05:58  21-29 -10
SUB IN : Foster, Marcus  12:52  45-53 0
SUB OUT: Foster, Marcus  10:36  48-60 -4
0:00  70-69 +13

The team definitely had better stretches of play with him off the court, but they're still a better team with him on the court.

Should he have played more yesterday?
Yes
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on March 01, 2015, 02:11:49 PM
Foster played well against KU for the most part. He didn't hit shots and forced some up. But played well.

Edwards probably had is best half as a wildcat yesterday. I think that has a little to do with Foster not playing in the second half.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sys on March 01, 2015, 02:22:49 PM
Rodney and jake used to constantly be running around screens to get looks.  Marcus is either in terrible shape and can't do that or isn't willing to

mcgruder and pullen could catch, change momentum and shoot.  foster is not great at that.  he's better with his momentum going towards the basket or stationary.  he has an amazingly fast release and good elevation, so he also doesn't really need to be running the baseline past a double pick to get open.

i'm sure there are lots of things that could be done to get foster more good shots and lots he could do to help that.  but i don't think having him in constant motion looking for a catch and shoot off a ton of picks is the right option for him.

and yeah, he also doesn't have great endurance.  another reason the above wouldn't help.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Panjandrum on March 01, 2015, 02:28:40 PM
and yeah, he also doesn't have great endurance.  another reason the above wouldn't help.

Does anyone on this team have great endurance? I'm not sure how to evaluate strength and conditioning outside of subjective visual judgements, but it feels like the team, as a whole, lacks conditioning.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Missouriscribe on March 01, 2015, 03:53:02 PM
and yeah, he also doesn't have great endurance.  another reason the above wouldn't help.

Does anyone on this team have great endurance? I'm not sure how to evaluate strength and conditioning outside of subjective visual judgements, but it feels like the team, as a whole, lacks conditioning.

Right you are, right you are
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Asteriskhead on March 01, 2015, 04:07:31 PM
and yeah, he also doesn't have great endurance.  another reason the above wouldn't help.

Does anyone on this team have great endurance? I'm not sure how to evaluate strength and conditioning outside of subjective visual judgements, but it feels like the team, as a whole, lacks conditioning.

they're ridiculously soft.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: chum1 on March 01, 2015, 05:44:57 PM


This isn't even close. When Foster was in, we were outscored by 22.

SUB OUT: Foster, Marcus  15:53  2-10  -8
SUB IN : Foster, Marcus  12:06  12-10 +10
SUB OUT: Foster, Marcus  05:58  21-29 -10
SUB IN : Foster, Marcus  12:52  45-53 0
SUB OUT: Foster, Marcus  10:36  48-60 -4
0:00  70-69 +13

The team definitely had better stretches of play with him off the court, but they're still a better team with him on the court.

Should he have played more yesterday?
Yes

I may have, too, if there were like 1000 games in a season. Even then, though, things happen. Maybe a player gets injured for the first time in his career, for example, and he looks like he can run and jump, yet has stat line is full of zeros. I wouldn't leave him in the lineup just because his season or career stats are the best.

It's interesting, I think, that not only did the team have better stretches when Foster was out, and not only was the overall scoring differential 45 (!) points, but all negative scoring differentials came only when Foster was in. Coincidence or red flag?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 01, 2015, 05:50:29 PM


This isn't even close. When Foster was in, we were outscored by 22.

SUB OUT: Foster, Marcus  15:53  2-10  -8
SUB IN : Foster, Marcus  12:06  12-10 +10
SUB OUT: Foster, Marcus  05:58  21-29 -10
SUB IN : Foster, Marcus  12:52  45-53 0
SUB OUT: Foster, Marcus  10:36  48-60 -4
0:00  70-69 +13

The team definitely had better stretches of play with him off the court, but they're still a better team with him on the court.

Should he have played more yesterday?
Yes

I may have, too, if there were like 1000 games in a season. Even then, though, things happen. Maybe a player gets injured for the first time in his career, for example, and he looks like he can run and jump, yet has stat line is full of zeros. I wouldn't leave him in the lineup just because his season or career stats are the best.

It's interesting, I think, that not only did the team have better stretches when Foster was out, and not only was the overall scoring differential 45 (!) points, but all negative scoring differentials came only when Foster was in. Coincidence or red flag?

It's not particularly interesting or meaningful.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on March 01, 2015, 06:01:03 PM
It's definitely meaningful. I suppose some people might not find it interesting.
Foster was dogshit against ku and isu. It's good that Edwards and Nigel have stepped up.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: chum1 on March 01, 2015, 06:02:26 PM
If it's just a coincidence, it's a pretty interesting one.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: chum1 on March 01, 2015, 06:05:28 PM
Raises questions like: is oscar sabotaging Foster so he can get the tucks on his side!?!?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 01, 2015, 06:15:51 PM
If it's just a coincidence, it's a pretty interesting one.
Is it?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wetwillie on March 01, 2015, 06:33:45 PM
Raises questions like: is oscar sabotaging Foster so he can get Chum1 on his side!?!?


yes, yes I do believe he is.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on March 01, 2015, 06:37:51 PM
and yeah, he also doesn't have great endurance.  another reason the above wouldn't help.

Does anyone on this team have great endurance? I'm not sure how to evaluate strength and conditioning outside of subjective visual judgements, but it feels like the team, as a whole, lacks conditioning.

they're ridiculously soft.

Yeah, Nigel puking and cramping during a game in February is a sign that it's time for a new strength coach.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: catzacker on March 01, 2015, 06:42:54 PM
If it's just a coincidence, it's a pretty interesting one.
Is it?

I think one data point is always meaningful enough to make decisions/projections. Take oscar's head coaching record for example.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: chum1 on March 01, 2015, 06:52:04 PM
If it's just a coincidence, it's a pretty interesting one.
Is it?
Yep.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ksupamplemousse on March 01, 2015, 06:52:28 PM
This does seem like what chum1 was mocking posters on this board for doing just recently.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on March 01, 2015, 06:57:53 PM
and yeah, he also doesn't have great endurance.  another reason the above wouldn't help.

Does anyone on this team have great endurance? I'm not sure how to evaluate strength and conditioning outside of subjective visual judgements, but it feels like the team, as a whole, lacks conditioning.

they're ridiculously soft.

Yeah, Nigel puking and cramping during a game in February is a sign that it's time for a new strength coach.

Injury prevention is the issue not conditioning. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: chum1 on March 01, 2015, 07:17:53 PM
This does seem like what chum1 was mocking posters on this board for doing just recently.

Yeah, similar. I'm still advocating against overzealous predicting and not doing any predicting myself.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on March 01, 2015, 11:44:03 PM
and yeah, he also doesn't have great endurance.  another reason the above wouldn't help.

Does anyone on this team have great endurance? I'm not sure how to evaluate strength and conditioning outside of subjective visual judgements, but it feels like the team, as a whole, lacks conditioning.

they're ridiculously soft.

Yeah, Nigel puking and cramping during a game in February is a sign that it's time for a new strength coach.

Injury prevention is the issue not conditioning.

What? You seem like you watch a lot of basketball but you say the most inane crap. That sentence you typed is rough ridin' absurd.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on March 01, 2015, 11:54:37 PM
and yeah, he also doesn't have great endurance.  another reason the above wouldn't help.

Does anyone on this team have great endurance? I'm not sure how to evaluate strength and conditioning outside of subjective visual judgements, but it feels like the team, as a whole, lacks conditioning.

they're ridiculously soft.

Yeah, Nigel puking and cramping during a game in February is a sign that it's time for a new strength coach.

Injury prevention is the issue not conditioning.

What? You seem like you watch a lot of basketball but you say the most inane crap. That sentence you typed is rough ridin' absurd.
We have had so many injuries during the Weber tenure. Half the team after the both post season have had post season surgeries. Players always seem banged up. 

Quote
Weber said four players are working to get healthy, and three are having surgery. Both Martavious Irving, a senior, and Nino Williams are having minor knee surgeries, while Rodriguez is having work done to fix torn ligaments in his left wrist. Will Spradling is still recovering from his chest injury.


Last year we had DJamer, Nino and Gip. This year Wes and Malek were hurt coming into the season and Hurt missed extended time.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: star seed 7 on March 01, 2015, 11:59:19 PM
Does conditioning and whatever fall under the practice time rules?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on March 02, 2015, 12:24:45 AM
Does conditioning and whatever fall under the practice time rules?

If coaches are present, yes. But it's pretty standard for players to have things to work on without the staff present, strength and conditioning staff, trainers, managers, and the players themselves can all supervise conditioning.


Mixed Nutz, two things.
1. Injuries occur more often to players and teams not well conditioned, injury management is best handled by a fit squad. It's basketball, conditioning is absolutely the issue.
2. You seem to infer that we should be training to prevent injuries; without getting into a philosophical conversation, there is only so much you can do to prevent injuries in a contact sport. Injuries in contact sports is often a matter of luck I have no idea how you train for injury prevention but that seems like a waste of time. Just get your team as fit as possible to play 40 minutes twice a week for 5 months.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ksupamplemousse on March 02, 2015, 01:40:28 AM
I've never understood how college basketball teams could be out of shape. Like, if your team is obviously more out of shape than other squads, don't you as a coach take it upon yourself to fire the S&C guy? Doesn't seem like it would be difficult to find somebody that could get 18-21 year old kids in good enough shape to play a basketball game. I could understand if the coach maybe didn't want all of his players to get too bulky, in case it affected their basketball skill (I think that's a load of horse crap, at least I would understand it though), but there's absolutely no reason to have a S&C guy who can't get the team in shape.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on March 02, 2015, 01:49:35 AM
I can't be certain that Big Meat isn't Roz from Night Court.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on March 02, 2015, 06:37:24 AM
 :lol:
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.2geekstv.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F10%2FRoz-Russell.jpg&hash=72b8171e6c8b27a82afdc2bb62c6b7ed230ffcf7)

Thanks for sending me into a night court youtube wormhole
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Cire on March 02, 2015, 06:47:19 AM
Ha
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: yoman on March 02, 2015, 09:05:17 AM
and yeah, he also doesn't have great endurance.  another reason the above wouldn't help.

Does anyone on this team have great endurance? I'm not sure how to evaluate strength and conditioning outside of subjective visual judgements, but it feels like the team, as a whole, lacks conditioning.

they're ridiculously soft.

Yeah, Nigel puking and cramping during a game in February is a sign that it's time for a new strength coach.

Injury prevention is the issue not conditioning.

I know MIR called you out previously, but I'm doing it again to inform you just how rough ridin' stupid this talking point is. Along with improving strength and endurance to improve performance, injury prevention is one one of the main purposes of a S&C program.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on March 02, 2015, 09:52:10 AM
Thanks for sending me into a night court youtube wormhole

I avoided that wormhole but I was reminded via wikipedia that Harry's fill-in judge would become the judge central to the combofanning board's MTD craziness.  Wow!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on March 02, 2015, 12:05:19 PM
and yeah, he also doesn't have great endurance.  another reason the above wouldn't help.

Does anyone on this team have great endurance? I'm not sure how to evaluate strength and conditioning outside of subjective visual judgements, but it feels like the team, as a whole, lacks conditioning.

they're ridiculously soft.

Yeah, Nigel puking and cramping during a game in February is a sign that it's time for a new strength coach.

Injury prevention is the issue not conditioning.

I know MIR called you out previously, but I'm doing it again to inform you just how rough ridin' stupid this talking point is. Along with improving strength and endurance to improve performance, injury prevention is one one of the main purposes of a S&C program.
Injury prevention is the main concern for the S&C coach during season and IMO it has been poor. There seems to be a pattern with shoulder injuries. I think that is a huge problem. oscar seems to constantly talk about players not being able to practice because of injury. If you can't practice you are going to have issues with staying in shape. Staying in shape shouldn't be a problem in season, you should just be maintaining.

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Shooter Jones on March 02, 2015, 12:21:37 PM
I think if the cats were doing hot yoga for flexibility during the season that Bolden's forearm would've flexed a little and not snapped into an S shapey type thing.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Panjandrum on March 02, 2015, 12:21:46 PM
I think what everyone is saying, to a certain degree, is that Price sucks and needs to go, right?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on March 02, 2015, 12:34:54 PM
I think what everyone is saying, to a certain degree, is that Price sucks and needs to go, right?
Yes.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on March 03, 2015, 11:08:11 AM
Tucks already are in the mindset that Foster is gone. I wonder if they are going to meltdown if he stays put.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pvegs on March 04, 2015, 11:13:34 PM
Tucks already are in the mindset that Foster is gone. I wonder if they are going to meltdown if he stays put.

Fitz says on the gpc podcast that there's no way Foster will come back and that him rooting for guys on the bench is an act and he's basically a terrible person.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on March 04, 2015, 11:59:52 PM
Tucks already are in the mindset that Foster is gone. I wonder if they are going to meltdown if he stays put.

Fitz says on the gpc podcast that there's no way Foster will come back and that him rooting for guys on the bench is an act and he's basically a terrible person.

Hope that is just super tuck coming through. I listen to the same podcast and read the first 15 pages of this blog.  :bawl: :bawl: :bawl:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: nicname on March 05, 2015, 12:45:09 AM
Tucks already are in the mindset that Foster is gone. I wonder if they are going to meltdown if he stays put.

Fitz says on the gpc podcast that there's no way Foster will come back and that him rooting for guys on the bench is an act and he's basically a terrible person.

That's disappointing.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dub on March 05, 2015, 12:47:13 AM
Tucks already are in the mindset that Foster is gone. I wonder if they are going to meltdown if he stays put.

Fitz says on the gpc podcast that there's no way Foster will come back and that him rooting for guys on the bench is an act and he's basically a terrible person.


Hope that is just super tuck coming through. I listen to the same podcast and read the first 15 pages of this blog.  :bawl: :bawl: :bawl:

Why would a disgruntled player act like he's rooting for players?  That makes no sense.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: bones129 on March 05, 2015, 12:51:34 AM
Tucks already are in the mindset that Foster is gone. I wonder if they are going to meltdown if he stays put.

Fitz says on the gpc podcast that there's no way Foster will come back and that him rooting for guys on the bench is an act and he's basically a terrible person.

Fitz wishes he was Marcus.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: slobber on March 05, 2015, 05:51:36 AM
Over the past month, on multiple occasions,I have heard that Marcus cheering on the sideline shows his character is poor.  Never a good explanation as to why.
#tucklife


Gonna win 'em all!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: catzacker on March 05, 2015, 06:52:17 AM
well, we're a better team without Marcus because at the end of the ISU game he wasn't in there and we won.  so marcus being gone isn't that big of a deal because of that one time.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Pete on March 05, 2015, 07:06:34 AM

well, we're a better team without Marcus because at the end of the ISU game he wasn't in there and we won.  so marcus being gone isn't that big of a deal because of that one time.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ftapatalk.imageshack.com%2Fv2%2F15%2F03%2F05%2Fa083d8d749cb07e3a50dbdbaaa89e66e.jpg&hash=ece2273c92adcff15dbbbf64319df8277e2a3e11)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on March 05, 2015, 08:41:12 AM
We probably win against UT, @TCU and @TTU. Even good players have bad games
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Belvis Noland on March 05, 2015, 09:02:59 AM
well, we're a better team without Marcus because at the end of the ISU game he wasn't in there and we won.  so marcus being gone isn't that big of a deal because of that one time.

We're better when Foster is playing well.  period.  at the same time, he was terrible in the ISU game, and in that particular game, the team was better with him on the bench.  Benching him was the right call. 

To me, this doesn't seem very controversial.  good/great players have off nights.  to beat UT and win a few games in the tourney, we'll need him to play well and play a lot of minutes.     
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on March 05, 2015, 09:05:18 AM

well, we're a better team without Marcus because at the end of the ISU game he wasn't in there and we won.  so marcus being gone isn't that big of a deal because of that one time.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ftapatalk.imageshack.com%2Fv2%2F15%2F03%2F05%2Fa083d8d749cb07e3a50dbdbaaa89e66e.jpg&hash=ece2273c92adcff15dbbbf64319df8277e2a3e11)

:D
that's great
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 05, 2015, 09:49:05 AM


well, we're a better team without Marcus because at the end of the ISU game he wasn't in there and we won.  so marcus being gone isn't that big of a deal because of that one time.

We're better when Foster is playing well.  period.  at the same time, he was terrible in the ISU game, and in that particular game, the team was better with him on the bench.  Benching him was the right call. 

To me, this doesn't seem very controversial.  good/great players have off nights.  to beat UT and win a few games in the tourney, we'll need him to play well and play a lot of minutes.   

The fact that the team was better with him on the bench does not mean benching him was the right call.

Sitting your best player because you think he is "off" is a lot like trying to time the stock market. You might avoid losses by pulling out your money, but you might miss out on even bigger gains.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ksupamplemousse on March 05, 2015, 09:51:12 AM


well, we're a better team without Marcus because at the end of the ISU game he wasn't in there and we won.  so marcus being gone isn't that big of a deal because of that one time.

We're better when Foster is playing well.  period.  at the same time, he was terrible in the ISU game, and in that particular game, the team was better with him on the bench.  Benching him was the right call. 

To me, this doesn't seem very controversial.  good/great players have off nights.  to beat UT and win a few games in the tourney, we'll need him to play well and play a lot of minutes.   

The fact that the team was better with him on the bench does not mean benching him was the right call.

Sitting your best player because you think he is "off" is a lot like trying to time the stock market. You might avoid losses by pulling out your money, but you might miss out on even bigger gains.

That is a very apt analogy.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ArchE_Cat on March 05, 2015, 09:52:27 AM


well, we're a better team without Marcus because at the end of the ISU game he wasn't in there and we won.  so marcus being gone isn't that big of a deal because of that one time.

We're better when Foster is playing well.  period.  at the same time, he was terrible in the ISU game, and in that particular game, the team was better with him on the bench.  Benching him was the right call. 

To me, this doesn't seem very controversial.  good/great players have off nights.  to beat UT and win a few games in the tourney, we'll need him to play well and play a lot of minutes.   

The fact that the team was better with him on the bench does not mean benching him was the right call.

Sitting your best player because you think he is "off" is a lot like trying to time the stock market. You might avoid losses by pulling out your money, but you might miss out on even bigger gains.

exactly. oscar =blind squirrle
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on March 05, 2015, 09:54:33 AM
I will say tho. oscar did a really good job of managing that Iowa State game down the stretch. Hate him all you want, he out coached Hoiberg that day.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on March 05, 2015, 09:57:59 AM
When a player's best trait is making threes and they go nearly a month and a half of the season and aren't even hitting 20% of those shots while shooting over 6 per game, its okay to sit him. And it reaches a point where they probably aren't your "best player" anymore. It doesn't mean they can't be again, but its pretty clear there was an attempt to let Marcus play/shoot through his issues and it simply hasn't happened. Meanwhile, he's a had a few games where did some other nice things (defense, rebounding), but by and large he simply hasn't been very good since before his suspension happened.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on March 05, 2015, 09:59:38 AM
If Marcus is in a funk scoring, he can be a liability on the court at times with his atrocious defense. I think it makes sense to sit him at times.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on March 05, 2015, 10:05:11 AM
Foster's frustration could be leading to some bad defensive effort and forcing shots.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pissclams on March 05, 2015, 10:12:58 AM
marcus foster should play every minute of every game.  it's really fun to watch him play and he is our best player. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on March 05, 2015, 10:13:51 AM
by and large

 :D
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 05, 2015, 10:16:24 AM


When a player's best trait is making threes and they go nearly a month and a half of the season and aren't even hitting 20% of those shots while shooting over 6 per game, its okay to sit him. And it reaches a point where they probably aren't your "best player" anymore. It doesn't mean they can't be again, but its pretty clear there was an attempt to let Marcus play/shoot through his issues and it simply hasn't happened. Meanwhile, he's a had a few games where did some other nice things (defense, rebounding), but by and large he simply hasn't been very good since before his suspension happened.

That's a different argument. If you think he's now a 20% shooter, you probably shouldn't play him at all.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Belvis Noland on March 05, 2015, 10:18:50 AM


When a player's best trait is making threes and they go nearly a month and a half of the season and aren't even hitting 20% of those shots while shooting over 6 per game, its okay to sit him. And it reaches a point where they probably aren't your "best player" anymore. It doesn't mean they can't be again, but its pretty clear there was an attempt to let Marcus play/shoot through his issues and it simply hasn't happened. Meanwhile, he's a had a few games where did some other nice things (defense, rebounding), but by and large he simply hasn't been very good since before his suspension happened.

That's a different argument. If you think he's now a 20% shooter, you probably shouldn't play him at all.

so, really, is there ever an appropriate time to sit your best player?  other than foul trouble or fatigue, of course. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ksupamplemousse on March 05, 2015, 10:19:43 AM
by and large

 :D

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ilpost.it%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2010%2F08%2Fpixar17.jpg&hash=2eea731e94e00fb81471775548e6bd22a2f9d4c9)

Everyone knows that it's "Buy N Large".
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pvegs on March 05, 2015, 10:20:28 AM
Over the past month, on multiple occasions,I have heard that Marcus cheering on the sideline shows his character is poor.  Never a good explanation as to why.
#tucklife


Gonna win 'em all!

Again, this is the gpc podcast, but they just said the cheering is only when there's a big moment and the cameras could be on him and the rest of the time he's checked out on the bench. Also, that he's an ass in the locker room and doesn't play hard in games in which he can't score. Not earth shattering stuff.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sys on March 05, 2015, 10:23:34 AM
Over the past month, on multiple occasions,I have heard that Marcus cheering on the sideline shows his character is poor.  Never a good explanation as to why.

he's cheering sarcastically, like martin used to do.  it's very mean.  "nice shot, jevon.  great decision, jevon.  you really helped the team, jevon."
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: #LIFE on March 05, 2015, 10:32:15 AM
OT but my favorite bench moment was when CK got the Nub crowd to yell right when their player was shooting a FT  :ROFL:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 05, 2015, 10:32:59 AM


When a player's best trait is making threes and they go nearly a month and a half of the season and aren't even hitting 20% of those shots while shooting over 6 per game, its okay to sit him. And it reaches a point where they probably aren't your "best player" anymore. It doesn't mean they can't be again, but its pretty clear there was an attempt to let Marcus play/shoot through his issues and it simply hasn't happened. Meanwhile, he's a had a few games where did some other nice things (defense, rebounding), but by and large he simply hasn't been very good since before his suspension happened.

That's a different argument. If you think he's now a 20% shooter, you probably shouldn't play him at all.

so, really, is there ever an appropriate time to sit your best player?  other than foul trouble or fatigue, of course. 

In theory, no. (Also excluding injury)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: chum1 on March 05, 2015, 10:36:29 AM
KU game: +10 with Foster on the bench, -3 with Foster in the game

SUB OUT: Foster, Marcus  10:01  16-16 +0
SUB IN : Foster, Marcus  08:13  18-20 -2
SUB OUT: Foster, Marcus  12:40  41-47 -4
SUB IN : Foster, Marcus  02:25  64-60 +10
SUB OUT: Foster, Marcus  01:09  66-61 +1
00:00 70-63 +2
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Belvis Noland on March 05, 2015, 10:38:26 AM


When a player's best trait is making threes and they go nearly a month and a half of the season and aren't even hitting 20% of those shots while shooting over 6 per game, its okay to sit him. And it reaches a point where they probably aren't your "best player" anymore. It doesn't mean they can't be again, but its pretty clear there was an attempt to let Marcus play/shoot through his issues and it simply hasn't happened. Meanwhile, he's a had a few games where did some other nice things (defense, rebounding), but by and large he simply hasn't been very good since before his suspension happened.

That's a different argument. If you think he's now a 20% shooter, you probably shouldn't play him at all.

so, really, is there ever an appropriate time to sit your best player?  other than foul trouble or fatigue, of course. 

In theory, no. (Also excluding injury)

I imagine most coaches would disagree with you.  Particularly good coaches.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 05, 2015, 10:40:46 AM


When a player's best trait is making threes and they go nearly a month and a half of the season and aren't even hitting 20% of those shots while shooting over 6 per game, its okay to sit him. And it reaches a point where they probably aren't your "best player" anymore. It doesn't mean they can't be again, but its pretty clear there was an attempt to let Marcus play/shoot through his issues and it simply hasn't happened. Meanwhile, he's a had a few games where did some other nice things (defense, rebounding), but by and large he simply hasn't been very good since before his suspension happened.

That's a different argument. If you think he's now a 20% shooter, you probably shouldn't play him at all.

so, really, is there ever an appropriate time to sit your best player?  other than foul trouble or fatigue, of course. 

In theory, no. (Also excluding injury)

I imagine most coaches would disagree with you.  Particularly good coaches.

I'm sure you're right. But I wonder what their justification would be?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on March 05, 2015, 10:50:29 AM


When a player's best trait is making threes and they go nearly a month and a half of the season and aren't even hitting 20% of those shots while shooting over 6 per game, its okay to sit him. And it reaches a point where they probably aren't your "best player" anymore. It doesn't mean they can't be again, but its pretty clear there was an attempt to let Marcus play/shoot through his issues and it simply hasn't happened. Meanwhile, he's a had a few games where did some other nice things (defense, rebounding), but by and large he simply hasn't been very good since before his suspension happened.

That's a different argument. If you think he's now a 20% shooter, you probably shouldn't play him at all.

As a sophomore, I think you play him as much as possible to work through the obvious funk he is in. I think oscar has done that. I think it reaches a point where you have to put your more productive players on the floor. I think oscar has done that.

I don't think oscar handled Foster perfectly, but those issues probably started last year or even the end of the last season and oscar didn't catch them in time to correct them when they should have been corrected. He's paying the consequences for that now and it might end with him losing potentially best player that he has in the program.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on March 05, 2015, 10:51:21 AM
In the same part pvegs is talking about, fitz also made the common allusion to Foster's summer and how "his people" screwed him up.  I'd meant to get that part to chingon but got interrupted.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pvegs on March 05, 2015, 10:59:43 AM
In the same part pvegs is talking about, fitz also made the common allusion to Foster's summer and how "his people" screwed him up.  I'd meant to get that part to chingon but got interrupted.

Yeah it was weird to hear how angry all the guys were about Foster. Not just saying he hasn't played the same type of game or with the same effort, but also that he is essentially a worse person. It was the ultimate oscar couldn't have seen this coming, Foster ruined the season with his unexpected transformation into a lazy, 3 pt shooting prima donna bad person kind of defense.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ksupamplemousse on March 05, 2015, 11:05:52 AM
If Foster is truly as bad a person as oscar is leading people to believe (I'm assuming that he's at least somewhat responsible for the picture that the media has painted of Marcus), and this "change" happened at the end of last season, then he should have been kicked off the team during the summer or fall practice. oscar would be a dipshit to keep a malcontent around that long, knowing that it would have a good chance of derailing this season.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on March 05, 2015, 11:17:11 AM
I'd like to get Foster to FattyFest before he bounces.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 05, 2015, 11:17:39 AM


When a player's best trait is making threes and they go nearly a month and a half of the season and aren't even hitting 20% of those shots while shooting over 6 per game, its okay to sit him. And it reaches a point where they probably aren't your "best player" anymore. It doesn't mean they can't be again, but its pretty clear there was an attempt to let Marcus play/shoot through his issues and it simply hasn't happened. Meanwhile, he's a had a few games where did some other nice things (defense, rebounding), but by and large he simply hasn't been very good since before his suspension happened.

That's a different argument. If you think he's now a 20% shooter, you probably shouldn't play him at all.

As a sophomore, I think you play him as much as possible to work through the obvious funk he is in. I think oscar has done that. I think it reaches a point where you have to put your more productive players on the floor. I think oscar has done that.

I don't think oscar handled Foster perfectly, but those issues probably started last year or even the end of the last season and oscar didn't catch them in time to correct them when they should have been corrected. He's paying the consequences for that now and it might end with him losing potentially best player that he has in the program.

Is Foster less effective because he just got worse/lazy, or is it a failure of the staff to adjust to how Big 12 teams defended him this year?

Basically, if your best player is no longer your best player, do you change how you use him, or just play him less?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on March 05, 2015, 11:17:48 AM
First off, I love Foster. He's my guy. However, there's been many grumblings that he got a "I'm bigger than life "attitude"" after his freshman year at K-State. The camps he was invited to too, also impacted that ego when he came back in the fall. I can see how some team mates might be like "wtf man!" and how it could have spun into some drama in the locker room. I don't think Foster is a bitch tho and I don't think oscar knows how to handle good players with "attitudes".
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sunny_cat on March 05, 2015, 11:19:03 AM
First off, I love Foster. He's my guy. However, there's been many grumblings that he got a "I'm bigger than life "attitude"" after his freshman year at K-State. The camps he was invited to too, also impacted that ego when he came back in the fall. I can see how some teammates might be like "wtf man!" and how it could have spun into some drama in the locker room. I don't think Foster is a bitch tho and I don't think oscar knows how to handle good players with "attitudes".

really going out on a limb with your opinions there wacky
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on March 05, 2015, 11:19:24 AM
 :lol:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on March 05, 2015, 11:19:58 AM
First off, I love Foster. He's my guy. However, there's been many grumblings that he got a "I'm bigger than life "attitude"" after his freshman year at K-State. The camps he was invited to too, also impacted that ego when he came back in the fall. I can see how some team mates might be like "wtf man!" and how it could have spun into some drama in the locker room. I don't think Foster is a bitch tho and I don't think oscar knows how to handle good players with "attitudes".

Would you say he "went Hollywood"?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sunny_cat on March 05, 2015, 11:20:11 AM
:lol:

 ;)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on March 05, 2015, 11:21:50 AM
I hope Foster stays but during this upcoming summer becomes militant and starts making personal demonstrations during next season's national anthems.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on March 05, 2015, 11:22:32 AM
First off, I love Foster. He's my guy. However, there's been many grumblings that he got a "I'm bigger than life "attitude"" after his freshman year at K-State. The camps he was invited to too, also impacted that ego when he came back in the fall. I can see how some team mates might be like "wtf man!" and how it could have spun into some drama in the locker room. I don't think Foster is a bitch tho and I don't think oscar knows how to handle good players with "attitudes".

Would you say he "went Hollywood"?
Yes. That Nick Wright POS.  :shakesfist:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Skipper44 on March 05, 2015, 11:23:26 AM
I hope Foster stays but during this upcoming summer becomes militant and starts making personal demonstrations during next season's national anthems.
what should he change his name to?  Is Osama Barak Muhammad too over the top?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on March 05, 2015, 11:24:22 AM
I hope Foster stays but during this upcoming summer becomes militant and starts making personal demonstrations during next season's national anthems.
what should he change his name to?  Is Osama Barak Muhammad too over the top?

Barack Hussein Fotswana
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on March 05, 2015, 11:24:36 AM
Is Foster less effective because he just got worse/lazy, or is it a failure of the staff to adjust to how Big 12 teams defended him this year?

Basically, if your best player is no longer your best player, do you change how you use him, or just play him less?

Its a mix of a lot of things and you try to do a little bit of everything to get him back to the best player on your team, because obviously the potential he showed last year and much of this year is still there. I think oscar just reached the point in a couple games (ISU, TCU) where he didn't think Marcus playing 25+ minutes was the best for this team to win.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: The Whale on March 05, 2015, 11:28:38 AM
I'm sure you're right. But I wonder what their justification would be?

The same sort of justification baseball managers use to pinch hit with worse bench players.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: nicname on March 05, 2015, 11:34:03 AM
I hope Foster stays but during this upcoming summer becomes militant and starts making personal demonstrations during next season's national anthems.

Shaved head. Black socks n shoes. Perma-scowl.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on March 05, 2015, 11:36:30 AM
All that stuff said, I am dreaming about Foster going Clemente on the Horns Saturday. It would be fun.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Stevesie60 on March 05, 2015, 11:42:48 AM
All that stuff said, I am dreaming about Foster going Clemente on the Horns Saturday. It would be fun.

He already did that last year.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 05, 2015, 11:44:15 AM
Is Foster less effective because he just got worse/lazy, or is it a failure of the staff to adjust to how Big 12 teams defended him this year?

Basically, if your best player is no longer your best player, do you change how you use him, or just play him less?

Its a mix of a lot of things and you try to do a little bit of everything to get him back to the best player on your team, because obviously the potential he showed last year and much of this year is still there. I think oscar just reached the point in a couple games (ISU, TCU) where he didn't think Marcus playing 25+ minutes was the best for this team to win.

yeah but I haven't seen us do anything new with Marcus all year, other than set fewer ball screens for him after the Pitt disaster and play him less.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on March 05, 2015, 11:48:25 AM
All that stuff said, I am dreaming about Foster going Clemente on the Horns Saturday. It would be fun.

He already did that last year.

I mean, like doing it in Austin, but yeah, Marcus scoring 34 in the OOD was fun.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pvegs on March 05, 2015, 11:59:43 AM
Is Foster less effective because he just got worse/lazy, or is it a failure of the staff to adjust to how Big 12 teams defended him this year?

Basically, if your best player is no longer your best player, do you change how you use him, or just play him less?

Its a mix of a lot of things and you try to do a little bit of everything to get him back to the best player on your team, because obviously the potential he showed last year and much of this year is still there. I think oscar just reached the point in a couple games (ISU, TCU) where he didn't think Marcus playing 25+ minutes was the best for this team to win.

I think a lot of people have also confounded not playing well this year with not playing hard, with Marcus, and with numerous other players as well. There have been a number of games where Marcus played with high intensity but just wasn't that good. Or games where he wasn't that into it but hit key shots. Basically whether it's not playing hard/team chemistry, not coming up with new ways to utilize player talents, or not getting guys to improve season to season, it all goes back to oscar.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pissclams on March 05, 2015, 12:08:37 PM
I hope Foster stays but during this upcoming summer becomes militant and starts making personal demonstrations during next season's national anthems.
what should he change his name to?  Is Osama Barak Muhammad too over the top?

oil can boyd
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on March 05, 2015, 12:13:42 PM
I hope Foster stays but during this upcoming summer becomes militant and starts making personal demonstrations during next season's national anthems.
what should he change his name to?  Is Osama Barak Muhammad too over the top?

oil can boyd

:lol:

Fosz2
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on March 05, 2015, 12:16:36 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.survivinggrady.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F02%2Foilcan.jpg&hash=a67997beec486e8f23b4bd44002aeb9bfb167f04)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on March 05, 2015, 12:17:46 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.survivinggrady.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F02%2Foilcan.jpg&hash=a67997beec486e8f23b4bd44002aeb9bfb167f04)
He ended up playing for the Sioux City Explorers when he flamed out and I met him cause I was a bat boy one game.  :peek:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on March 05, 2015, 12:20:11 PM
When a player's best trait is making threes and they go nearly a month and a half of the season and aren't even hitting 20% of those shots while shooting over 6 per game, its okay to sit him. And it reaches a point where they probably aren't your "best player" anymore. It doesn't mean they can't be again, but its pretty clear there was an attempt to let Marcus play/shoot through his issues and it simply hasn't happened. Meanwhile, he's a had a few games where did some other nice things (defense, rebounding), but by and large he simply hasn't been very good since before his suspension happened.

I agree 100%, but you're betraying the stat psuedo-wonks!!!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on March 05, 2015, 12:20:59 PM
Quote
FORT MYERS, Fla. -- Former Boston Red Sox and Sioux City Explorers pitcher Dennis "Oil Can" Boyd says he probably pitched under the influence of cocaine "at every ballpark" during his 10-year career.

"There wasn't one ballpark that I probably didn't stay up all night, until 4 or 5 in the morning, and the same thing is in your system," Boyd said in an interview with Jon Miller of WBZ radio in Boston. "It ain't like you had time to go and do it while you were in the game, which I have (done) that."
:love:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pissclams on March 05, 2015, 12:24:47 PM
I hope Foster stays but during this upcoming summer becomes militant and starts making personal demonstrations during next season's national anthems.
what should he change his name to?  Is Osama Barak Muhammad too over the top?

oil can boyd

:lol:

Fosz2

i don't go to GPC so i was really hoping i got that one right
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on March 05, 2015, 12:25:21 PM


When a player's best trait is making threes and they go nearly a month and a half of the season and aren't even hitting 20% of those shots while shooting over 6 per game, its okay to sit him. And it reaches a point where they probably aren't your "best player" anymore. It doesn't mean they can't be again, but its pretty clear there was an attempt to let Marcus play/shoot through his issues and it simply hasn't happened. Meanwhile, he's a had a few games where did some other nice things (defense, rebounding), but by and large he simply hasn't been very good since before his suspension happened.

That's a different argument. If you think he's now a 20% shooter, you probably shouldn't play him at all.

As a sophomore, I think you play him as much as possible to work through the obvious funk he is in. I think oscar has done that. I think it reaches a point where you have to put your more productive players on the floor. I think oscar has done that.

I don't think oscar handled Foster perfectly, but those issues probably started last year or even the end of the last season and oscar didn't catch them in time to correct them when they should have been corrected. He's paying the consequences for that now and it might end with him losing potentially best player that he has in the program.

Is Foster less effective because he just got worse/lazy, or is it a failure of the staff to adjust to how Big 12 teams defended him this year?

Basically, if your best player is no longer your best player, do you change how you use him, or just play him less?

Hey socrates, why don't you try and answer your own questions?

K, thx.

P.S.
You'd look like less of a dumbass if you just acknowledged that oscar sitting foster worked out well enough to beat the #8 and #12 ranked teams in the country back-to-back..  Something that good probably happens about none times per year to any team.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 05, 2015, 12:27:23 PM
oscar played Foster 27 minutes against KU. :dunno:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on March 05, 2015, 12:28:26 PM
oscar played Foster 27 minutes against KU. :dunno:

So you didn't even watch the game.  Good grief
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on March 05, 2015, 12:46:14 PM
I hope Foster stays but during this upcoming summer becomes militant and starts making personal demonstrations during next season's national anthems.
what should he change his name to?  Is Osama Barak Muhammad too over the top?

oil can boyd

:lol:

Fosz2

i don't go to GPC so i was really hoping i got that one right

It was imperfectly perfect.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 05, 2015, 12:48:56 PM
oscar played Foster 27 minutes against KU. :dunno:

So you didn't even watch the game.  Good grief
Should he have played less?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on March 05, 2015, 12:56:25 PM
oscar played Foster 27 minutes against KU. :dunno:

So you didn't even watch the game.  Good grief
Should he have played less?

Should he have played MOAR???
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 05, 2015, 01:06:39 PM


oscar played Foster 27 minutes against KU. :dunno:

So you didn't even watch the game.  Good grief
Should he have played less?

Should he have played MOAR???

I think 27 minutes is about right for Foster. I was curious what you thought.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: TheFormerKCCat on March 05, 2015, 02:27:58 PM
So let me see if I got this right:
Marcus got busted for coke and converted to Islam while in jail? Any other details I left out?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on March 05, 2015, 02:35:30 PM
I hope Foster stays but during this upcoming summer becomes militant and starts making personal demonstrations during next season's national anthems.
what should he change his name to?  Is Osama Barak Muhammad too over the top?

oil can boyd

:lol:

Fosz2

i don't go to GPC so i was really hoping i got that one right

Close enough
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on March 05, 2015, 02:38:06 PM
If Foster is truly as bad a person as oscar is leading people to believe (I'm assuming that he's at least somewhat responsible for the picture that the media has painted of Marcus), and this "change" happened at the end of last season, then he should have been kicked off the team during the summer or fall practice. oscar would be a dipshit to keep a malcontent around that long, knowing that it would have a good chance of derailing this season.

100% unfair to put the bullshit Fitz is spewing on oscar. You also shouldn't attribute this garbage to the media, this crap isn't coming from anywhere else from GPC.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pvegs on March 05, 2015, 03:11:36 PM
If Foster is truly as bad a person as oscar is leading people to believe (I'm assuming that he's at least somewhat responsible for the picture that the media has painted of Marcus), and this "change" happened at the end of last season, then he should have been kicked off the team during the summer or fall practice. oscar would be a dipshit to keep a malcontent around that long, knowing that it would have a good chance of derailing this season.

100% unfair to put the bullshit Fitz is spewing on oscar. You also shouldn't attribute this garbage to the media, this crap isn't coming from anywhere else from GPC.

Agree with MIR. Fitz and whoever the other yes men are on the podcast were basing it on their observations from the locker room and interviews, not quoting oscar or specific evidence. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on March 05, 2015, 03:54:09 PM
their observations from the locker room and interviews

and the part of their minds that's working on what would play well to their audience.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ksupamplemousse on March 05, 2015, 04:42:47 PM
If Foster is truly as bad a person as oscar is leading people to believe (I'm assuming that he's at least somewhat responsible for the picture that the media has painted of Marcus), and this "change" happened at the end of last season, then he should have been kicked off the team during the summer or fall practice. oscar would be a dipshit to keep a malcontent around that long, knowing that it would have a good chance of derailing this season.

100% unfair to put the bullshit Fitz is spewing on oscar. You also shouldn't attribute this garbage to the media, this crap isn't coming from anywhere else from GPC.

oscar hasn't done anything to defend Marcus to anybody, all year long. To assume that he's talking glowingly about him off the record is naive, imo. Also, Fitz is not the only person talking about Marcus' "people" and what supposedly happened this summer/late last year. The Lebron camp being some sort of an issue was mentioned during at least a couple television broadcasts this year, and although not nearly as vile as Fitz, the media in general has chosen to put a large part of this season's blame at the feet of Marcus Foster, without having any idea why he was suspended. Several announcers have talked about Marcus' need to grow up, and that if he listens to upstanding citizen oscar Weber, then he will surely find himself on the right path in life. I have a hard time believing oscar had nothing to do with the general attitude people outside the program have toward Marcus Foster.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: chum1 on March 05, 2015, 04:55:06 PM
Fran Fraschilla. At the same time, it's good to acknowledge that Fitz does nothing except talk out of his ass.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ksupamplemousse on March 05, 2015, 04:58:42 PM
Yeah, Fran really threw Marcus under the bus during at least one broadcast this year. Talked about the Lebron camp and how his people were in his ear about playing PG in the league. It sounded exactly like what Fitz is saying. Which makes me think that it's coming from one of the coaches, maybe it's not oscar, but oscar sure hasn't done anything to stop any of the wild speculation.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 05, 2015, 05:25:56 PM
The notion that Foster needs "people" to make him realize that he would have a better chance of making the league as a point guard is pretty insulting by itself. I mean, no crap.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on March 05, 2015, 06:28:37 PM
The notion that Foster needs "people" to make him realize that he would have a better chance of making the league as a point guard is pretty insulting by itself. I mean, no crap.

Fran didn't say anything about people in his ear, he did talk about Marcus playing point guard at the skills camp, Fitz and his customer base decided to take it the step further and bring up shadowy "people" and "handlers."
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 05, 2015, 06:49:37 PM
The notion that Foster needs "people" to make him realize that he would have a better chance of making the league as a point guard is pretty insulting by itself. I mean, no crap.

Fran didn't say anything about people in his ear, he did talk about Marcus playing point guard at the skills camp, Fitz and his customer base decided to take it the step further and bring up shadowy "people" and "handlers."

well, it's still insulting without even getting into the junior-racist "handler" accusations.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on March 05, 2015, 07:24:15 PM
:lol:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 05, 2015, 07:38:51 PM
So am I reading correctly?  Bringing up "handlers" and "his people" in and of itself, is . . . racist? 

I just want to be sure that, well, a facet of the modern game of college/high school/AAU basketball that has been, well, to say the least, been extremely well documented over the course of time . . . to discuss it, is . . . racist?

Mmkay.
I said it was "junior racist".
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 05, 2015, 07:48:33 PM
So, if I say that Mike Beasley had advisors/people/handlers (which he did), I'm a (gulp) a "junior racist"?

almost
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 05, 2015, 07:55:35 PM


So, if I say that Mike Beasley had advisors/people/handlers (which he did), I'm a (gulp) a "junior racist"?

almost

This is kind a cool then, I mean, if ku people talk about Connor Frankamp's (sp?) dad, if they do it in a certain (cRusty doesn't like it) kind of way, we can call them almost junior racists.   Awesome   

Everyone calls Connor Frankamp's dad a "dad". Same with Will Spradling's dad.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ksupamplemousse on March 05, 2015, 08:19:34 PM
White Athlete = Family/Friends
Black Athlete = People/Handlers

How is that not racist?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wetwillie on March 05, 2015, 08:41:47 PM
White Athlete = Family/Friends
Black Athlete = People/Handlers

How is that not racist?

Is Melvin Foster telling his son he needs to play PG to get to the league? I didn't realize we had another Shannon spradling on our hands. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on March 05, 2015, 08:43:24 PM
animals have handlers
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on March 05, 2015, 08:53:25 PM
White Athlete = Family/Friends
Black Athlete = People/Handlers

How is that not racist?

Is Melvin Foster telling his son he needs to play PG to get to the league? I didn't realize we had another Shannon spradling on our hands.

I don't think Marcus has a "family/friends/people/handler" issue. I do believe people this summer told him he needs to develop more as a "point guard" to have a shot at the league. But I don't really think that is an issue either. I don't think the people around Foster will push for a transfer either, I have some hope for him staying around. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 'taterblast on March 05, 2015, 08:59:24 PM
animals have handlers

so do presidents
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pvegs on March 05, 2015, 08:59:44 PM
White Athlete = Family/Friends
Black Athlete = People/Handlers

How is that not racist?

Is Melvin Foster telling his son he needs to play PG to get to the league? I didn't realize we had another Shannon spradling on our hands.

I don't think Marcus has a "family/friends/people/handler" issue. I do believe people this summer told him he needs to develop more as a "point guard" to have a shot at the league. But I don't really think that is an issue either. I don't think the people around Foster will push for a transfer either, I have some hope for him staying around.

His game this season resembles Tre Harris with more shot usage, so maybe we should put to rest the his "parents/handlers/scouts/friends/extended family" encouraged him to become a point guard to make the league narrative.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ksupamplemousse on March 05, 2015, 09:00:48 PM
White Athlete = Family/Friends
Black Athlete = People/Handlers

How is that not racist?

Is Melvin Foster telling his son he needs to play PG to get to the league? I didn't realize we had another Shannon spradling on our hands.

I don't think Marcus has a "family/friends/people/handler" issue. I do believe people this summer told him he needs to develop more as a "point guard" to have a shot at the league. But I don't really think that is an issue either. I don't think the people around Foster will push for a transfer either, I have some hope for him staying around.

Yeah, I think he'll stick around as well. He seems like a pretty good kid getting good advice from family and his high school/AAU coach. Tucks are probably not going to be thrilled when he comes back, and it will be tough for them to give him his due if he plays well next year. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on March 05, 2015, 09:04:29 PM
animals have handlers

so do presidents

 :opcat:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 05, 2015, 09:05:43 PM
animals have handlers

so do presidents
Advisors
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on March 05, 2015, 09:08:36 PM
White Athlete = Family/Friends
Black Athlete = People/Handlers

How is that not racist?

Is Melvin Foster telling his son he needs to play PG to get to the league? I didn't realize we had another Shannon spradling on our hands.

I don't think Marcus has a "family/friends/people/handler" issue. I do believe people this summer told him he needs to develop more as a "point guard" to have a shot at the league. But I don't really think that is an issue either. I don't think the people around Foster will push for a transfer either, I have some hope for him staying around.

Yeah, I think he'll stick around as well. He seems like a pretty good kid getting good advice from family and his high school/AAU coach. Tucks are probably not going to be thrilled when he comes back, and it will be tough for them to give him his due if he plays well next year.

I think he will play well next year if we get out in transition more, I think that has really hurt Fosters game. Foster has shot more threes this year and I don't think there is anything wrong with that. Now, since coming back he has pressed a little bit and had some poor shot selectoin. Big issue is that last year is he attempted 100 more 2fgs this year. 

If Foster didn't have the suspension, I don't think everyone (tucks) would be overreacting to his play.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sonofdaxjones on March 05, 2015, 09:44:34 PM
Fascinating



Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wetwillie on March 05, 2015, 09:59:43 PM
there are no "people".  It's his dad melvin.  He's the problem.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 'taterblast on March 05, 2015, 10:00:54 PM
animals have handlers

so do presidents
Advisors

i mean, you're kidding, but one of my favorite lewis black stand up bits is about george bush's "handlers."
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 05, 2015, 10:06:23 PM
animals have handlers

so do presidents
Advisors

i mean, you're kidding, but one of my favorite lewis black stand up bits is about george bush's "handlers."
This is on the first page of a Google search for "presidential handler"

http://www.theonion.com/articles/vice-presidential-handlers-lure-cheney-into-travel,6526/
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: star seed 7 on March 05, 2015, 10:39:41 PM
Handlers is used a lot in politics, that doesn't detract from larger point
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: stunted on March 05, 2015, 10:40:14 PM
Handlers has a negative connotation but people who assist black athletes are going to be more value-taking than value-giving compared to handlers of white athletes. Also on average going to be less intelligent. Funny how people get so offended by how things are termed and the need for everything to be equal. Stereotypes exist for a reason. It's no coincidence I've been in 3 minor car accidents (barely missing another one).
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: SdK on March 05, 2015, 11:27:43 PM
The eff?

#TheWesIsTheFuture

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 05, 2015, 11:30:12 PM
Handlers has a negative connotation but people who assist black athletes are going to be more value-taking than value-giving compared to handlers of white athletes. Also on average going to be less intelligent. Funny how people get so offended by how things are termed and the need for everything to be equal. Stereotypes exist for a reason. It's no coincidence I've been in 3 minor car accidents (barely missing another one).

 :whistle1:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on March 05, 2015, 11:33:34 PM
Why the eff does Marcus have "people"? What the eff are you guys talking about?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on March 05, 2015, 11:34:53 PM
Curtis Malone, non-family non-friend, but don't you dare call him handler.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on March 05, 2015, 11:40:30 PM
Oh hi, my name is Brian Butler. I am not a handler you rough ridin' jv racist. For legal reasons you may also not refer to me as agent or broker. I'm a non-family, non-friend, mentor-type with a profit motive.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on March 06, 2015, 12:04:22 AM
Handlers has a negative connotation but people who assist black athletes are going to be more value-taking than value-giving compared to handlers of white athletes. Also on average going to be less intelligent. Funny how people get so offended by how things are termed and the need for everything to be equal. Stereotypes exist for a reason. It's no coincidence I've been in 3 minor car accidents (barely missing another one).

I weep for you
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fgifrific.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F04%2Fchipper-jones-headshake.gif&hash=fab81257d4a9e967fd274c904571e6c77e55a6e5)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: stunted on March 06, 2015, 02:35:19 AM
Guess I am wrong

http://qph.is.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-2e888616ece9f59b3ba62e1b349c70a4?convert_to_webp=true

But really, don't hate me because I'm right
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Asteriskhead on March 06, 2015, 05:40:40 AM
 :bang:  :buh-bye:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on March 06, 2015, 07:24:01 AM


oscar played Foster 27 minutes against KU. :dunno:

So you didn't even watch the game.  Good grief
Should he have played less?

Should he have played MOAR???

I think 27 minutes is about right for Foster. I was curious what you thought.

I'm curious as to how you think you can criticize his "benching" one moment and then say he played the right amount (when he sat the last 12 minutes of the game) in another.

Bullshit train coming through, Choo choo
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 06, 2015, 07:30:02 AM


oscar played Foster 27 minutes against KU. :dunno:

So you didn't even watch the game.  Good grief
Should he have played less?

Should he have played MOAR???

I think 27 minutes is about right for Foster. I was curious what you thought.

I'm curious as to how you think you can criticize his "benching" one moment and then say he played the right amount (when he sat the last 12 minutes of the game) in another.

Bullshit train coming through, Choo choo
I was questioning the benching against Iowa State. I don't care what part of the game the minutes come from.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on March 06, 2015, 07:31:56 AM
Yes, we've established you're full of crap. Now answer my question
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 06, 2015, 07:45:22 AM
Yes, we've established you're full of crap. Now answer my question
You didn't ask a question. And do you think Foster should have played less against Kansas? (<-actual question I asked that you wouldn't answer.)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on March 06, 2015, 08:39:38 AM
You're not going to weasel out of this one, pal.

Pretending you don't think it's significant that he sat the last 12 minutes against KU, when we turned a 7 point deficit into a 7 point win, is about as disingenuous of a talking point as we'll see here in bbs land. It's Junior Bullshit.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pvegs on March 06, 2015, 08:52:25 AM
Handlers has a negative connotation but people who assist black athletes are going to be more value-taking than value-giving compared to handlers of white athletes. Also on average going to be less intelligent. Funny how people get so offended by how things are termed and the need for everything to be equal. Stereotypes exist for a reason. It's no coincidence I've been in 3 minor car accidents (barely missing another one).

Just curious, but how is your super racist point related to your car accident anecdote?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Sandstone Outcropping on March 06, 2015, 09:08:04 AM
Handlers has a negative connotation but people who assist black athletes are going to be more value-taking than value-giving compared to handlers of white athletes. Also on average going to be less intelligent. Funny how people get so offended by how things are termed and the need for everything to be equal. Stereotypes exist for a reason. It's no coincidence I've been in 3 minor car accidents (barely missing another one).

Just curious, but how is your super racist point related to your car accident anecdote?
:popcorn:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: dmartin on March 06, 2015, 09:49:20 AM
Handlers has a negative connotation but people who assist black athletes are going to be more value-taking than value-giving compared to handlers of white athletes. Also on average going to be less intelligent. Funny how people get so offended by how things are termed and the need for everything to be equal. Stereotypes exist for a reason. It's no coincidence I've been in 3 minor car accidents (barely missing another one).

Just curious, but how is your super racist point related to your car accident anecdote?

Perhaps he's asian?  stunted = "short"
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: renocat on March 06, 2015, 10:14:13 AM
IMO Foster did not play at the end of ISU game because he was having a bad game.  KSU was going with the hot player.  If Marcus needs help from others to get himself righted, then great.  I hope for his sake humility is setting in and not arrogance.  His willingness to work hard to show doubters he belongs in D1 will be his ticket to a great year next year.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 06, 2015, 10:29:31 AM
You're not going to weasel out of this one, pal.

Pretending you don't think it's significant that he sat the last 12 minutes against KU, when we turned a 7 point deficit into a 7 point win, is about as disingenuous of a talking point as we'll see here in bbs land. It's Junior Bullshit.
Do you think he should have played less?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on March 06, 2015, 10:34:09 AM
The notion that Foster needs "people" to make him realize that he would have a better chance of making the league as a point guard is pretty insulting by itself. I mean, no crap.

Fran didn't say anything about people in his ear, he did talk about Marcus playing point guard at the skills camp, Fitz and his customer base decided to take it the step further and bring up shadowy "people" and "handlers."

I think Fran probably has a good take on what's going on, though to be fair its probably slanted toward a coach's side of things. Unlike most media, he actually attends practices and spends time with coaches. He is hearing their take on it and not only oscar and his staff, but other Big 12 coaches and their staffs. I'm sure the topic of Marcus has come up outside of just his time with K-State coaches because he's a prominent player in this league having a bad season.

Fitz is hearing 2nd/3rd hand info (at best) and I think its been a long time since he had solid connections with either football or basketball.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Panjandrum on March 06, 2015, 10:38:42 AM
The notion that Foster needs "people" to make him realize that he would have a better chance of making the league as a point guard is pretty insulting by itself. I mean, no crap.

Fran didn't say anything about people in his ear, he did talk about Marcus playing point guard at the skills camp, Fitz and his customer base decided to take it the step further and bring up shadowy "people" and "handlers."

I think Fran probably has a good take on what's going on, though to be fair its probably slanted toward a coach's side of things. Unlike most media, he actually attends practices and spends time with coaches. He is hearing their take on it and not only oscar and his staff, but other Big 12 coaches and their staffs. I'm sure the topic of Marcus has come up outside of just his time with K-State coaches because he's a prominent player in this league having a bad season.

Fitz is hearing 2nd/3rd hand info (at best) and I think its been a long time since he had solid connections with either football or basketball.

The fact that the AD has noticeably distanced themselves from him is pretty telling.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on March 06, 2015, 10:41:34 AM
i'm not saying that fran repeats exactly what the coaches tell him to say, but there are times it certainly sounds like it and i love fran.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: #LIFE on March 06, 2015, 10:49:03 AM
i'm not saying that fran repeats exactly what the coaches tell him to say, but there are times it certainly sounds like it and i love fran.

I enjoy him very much. Dan Dakich, on the other hand...I would like to punch his stupid face
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pvegs on March 06, 2015, 10:51:47 AM
The notion that Foster needs "people" to make him realize that he would have a better chance of making the league as a point guard is pretty insulting by itself. I mean, no crap.

Fran didn't say anything about people in his ear, he did talk about Marcus playing point guard at the skills camp, Fitz and his customer base decided to take it the step further and bring up shadowy "people" and "handlers."

I think Fran probably has a good take on what's going on, though to be fair its probably slanted toward a coach's side of things. Unlike most media, he actually attends practices and spends time with coaches. He is hearing their take on it and not only oscar and his staff, but other Big 12 coaches and their staffs. I'm sure the topic of Marcus has come up outside of just his time with K-State coaches because he's a prominent player in this league having a bad season.

Fitz is hearing 2nd/3rd hand info (at best) and I think its been a long time since he had solid connections with either football or basketball.

So I still don't get how the Marcus was told he should play PG to make the NBA narrative figures in our season. Like he came back from those camps and told oscar he wanted to play PG and oscar laughed in his dumb face and Marcus' reaction was to become a 3 pt shooting specialist team cancer?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ksupamplemousse on March 06, 2015, 11:00:25 AM
The notion that Foster needs "people" to make him realize that he would have a better chance of making the league as a point guard is pretty insulting by itself. I mean, no crap.

Fran didn't say anything about people in his ear, he did talk about Marcus playing point guard at the skills camp, Fitz and his customer base decided to take it the step further and bring up shadowy "people" and "handlers."

I think Fran probably has a good take on what's going on, though to be fair its probably slanted toward a coach's side of things. Unlike most media, he actually attends practices and spends time with coaches. He is hearing their take on it and not only oscar and his staff, but other Big 12 coaches and their staffs. I'm sure the topic of Marcus has come up outside of just his time with K-State coaches because he's a prominent player in this league having a bad season.

Fitz is hearing 2nd/3rd hand info (at best) and I think its been a long time since he had solid connections with either football or basketball.

So I still don't get how the Marcus was told he should play PG to make the NBA narrative figures in our season. Like he came back from those camps and told oscar he wanted to play PG and oscar laughed in his dumb face and Marcus' reaction was to become a 3 pt shooting specialist team cancer?

This is what happens when everybody is shitting on one of your players, and you as a coach don't try to put a stop to it or at least provide some context. People make their own rough ridin' narrative, no matter how stupid it or asinine it may be, and as long as there is some form of consensus, then everybody feels justified in running with it.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 06, 2015, 11:25:00 AM
I think the whole "handlers are whispering that he needs to play PG to make it in the league" just creates a narrative that he isn't doing exactly what the coaches want him to do, which maybe explains lazyness? No idea.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: stunted on March 06, 2015, 11:29:26 AM
Handlers has a negative connotation but people who assist black athletes are going to be more value-taking than value-giving compared to handlers of white athletes. Also on average going to be less intelligent. Funny how people get so offended by how things are termed and the need for everything to be equal. Stereotypes exist for a reason. It's no coincidence I've been in 3 minor car accidents (barely missing another one).

Just curious, but how is your super racist point related to your car accident anecdote?

is it super racist if its correct?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ksupamplemousse on March 06, 2015, 11:56:15 AM
Handlers has a negative connotation but people who assist black athletes are going to be more value-taking than value-giving compared to handlers of white athletes. Also on average going to be less intelligent. Funny how people get so offended by how things are termed and the need for everything to be equal. Stereotypes exist for a reason. It's no coincidence I've been in 3 minor car accidents (barely missing another one).

Just curious, but how is your super racist point related to your car accident anecdote?

is it super racist if its correct?

Dude  :facepalm:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Belvis Noland on March 06, 2015, 12:02:32 PM
I think the whole "handlers are whispering that he needs to play PG to make it in the league" just creates a narrative that he isn't doing exactly what the coaches want him to do, which maybe explains lazyness? No idea.

None of us know what's going on.  Suggesting that he has handlers/family driving a wedge between him and the coach/team is as unfounded and ridiculous as arguing that there is no possible way that handlers/family are inter-meddling. 

What we know:  AAU handlers/advisers conflicting with (or working with - in the case of Tim Floyd) college coaches is a real problem.

What we don't know:  whether it's a problem here.     
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 06, 2015, 12:10:56 PM
I think the whole "handlers are whispering that he needs to play PG to make it in the league" just creates a narrative that he isn't doing exactly what the coaches want him to do, which maybe explains lazyness? No idea.

None of us know what's going on.  Suggesting that he has handlers/family driving a wedge between him and the coach/team is as unfounded and ridiculous as arguing that there is no possible way that handlers/family are inter-meddling. 

What we know:  AAU handlers/advisers conflicting with (or working with - in the case of Tim Floyd) college coaches is a real problem.

What we don't know:  whether it's a problem here.     

You think handlers are telling Marcus to play lazier or something? Floyd/Mayo didn't seem to hurt on-court performance much.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Belvis Noland on March 06, 2015, 12:23:39 PM

You think handlers are telling Marcus to play lazier or something? Floyd/Mayo didn't seem to hurt on-court performance much.

No, I don't think this. 

I don't get the sense that he's playing with a lot of effort.  I don't know why that is. 

Floyd/Mayo is literally the polar opposite of what GPC is suggesting here.  Whereas Floyd was in bed with Mayo's handler, GPC is suggesting that oscar and Foster's people are butting heads over Foster's role on the team. 

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 06, 2015, 12:35:15 PM
Floyd/Mayo is literally the polar opposite of what GPC is suggesting here.  Whereas Floyd was in bed with Mayo's handler, GPC is suggesting that oscar and Foster's people are butting heads over Foster's role on the team. 

Yeah, and as many have pointed out, there is nothing on the court that supports this narrative - Foster shoots less and more of his shots are three's this year - which doesn't sound like someone going against his coach's wishes by showcasing PG skills. (This is why it is more ridiculous to suggest outside influences are a problem in this case.)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on March 06, 2015, 12:42:01 PM
I don't buy the pg stuff.

I think Marcus went from being a guy who had a mentality to prove everyone wrong because he was under-recruited to being a guy that was a little too satisfied with where he was at. oscar and staff weren't able to find the right motivation. It happens, he's only a sophomore. He'll mature like most kids and get better. I just hope he does it here.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 06, 2015, 12:43:25 PM
I don't buy the pg stuff.

I think Marcus went from being a guy who had a mentality to prove everyone wrong because he was under-recruited to being a guy that was a little too satisfied with where he was at. oscar and staff weren't able to find the right motivation. It happens, he's only a sophomore. He'll mature like most kids and get better. I just hope he does it here.

I don't like that narrative because it suggests that oscar may be partially at fault.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on March 06, 2015, 12:47:50 PM

I don't buy the pg stuff.

I think Marcus went from being a guy who had a mentality to prove everyone wrong because he was under-recruited to being a guy that was a little too satisfied with where he was at. oscar and staff weren't able to find the right motivation. It happens, he's only a sophomore. He'll mature like most kids and get better. I just hope he does it here.

I don't like that narrative because it suggests that oscar may be partially at fault.

:D

Managing players and egos is part of the job.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: #LIFE on March 06, 2015, 12:53:03 PM
eff you Jamaal Charles for only carrying the ball 6 times you egotistical bad person  :curse:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: HerrSonntag on March 06, 2015, 01:16:14 PM

I don't buy the pg stuff.

I think Marcus went from being a guy who had a mentality to prove everyone wrong because he was under-recruited to being a guy that was a little too satisfied with where he was at. oscar and staff weren't able to find the right motivation. It happens, he's only a sophomore. He'll mature like most kids and get better. I just hope he does it here.

I don't like that narrative because it suggests that oscar may be partially at fault.

:D

Managing players and egos is part of the job.
I'm of an opinion that any problem at any time is the coach's fault.  They're the ones getting paid to be there, not the student athletes.

Blizzard?  Blame oscar!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on March 06, 2015, 01:26:14 PM
You're not going to weasel out of this one, pal.

Pretending you don't think it's significant that he sat the last 12 minutes against KU, when we turned a 7 point deficit into a 7 point win, is about as disingenuous of a talking point as we'll see here in bbs land. It's Junior Bullshit.
Do you think he should have played less?

Okay, then.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Cire on March 06, 2015, 01:28:49 PM
I remember early in the year, non con.  MF getting visibly frustrated with edwards and some of the new guys for turnovers etc.  I think it effected MF's play because they weren't able to get him the ball in the right positions etc.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on March 06, 2015, 01:30:46 PM
Is is saying "handler" okay again?

Is there a PC term for man with nefarious motives who manipulates young basketball players so they can funnel them to certain schools and sports agents?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sys on March 06, 2015, 02:41:25 PM
lol, stunner.  makes me nostalgic for the golden age of messageboarding.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on March 06, 2015, 02:45:54 PM
lol, stunner.  makes me nostalgic for the golden age of messageboarding.

it was like being in second grade and every day was christmas
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: yoman on March 07, 2015, 12:59:04 AM
lol, stunner.  makes me nostalgic for the golden age of messageboarding.

I don't agree with Stun's point even if he's KSUFanning; however, I miss the GRCOAT days.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: GregKSU1027 on March 07, 2015, 12:50:10 PM
Marcus needs to kill it today
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on March 09, 2015, 05:32:04 PM
https://twitter.com/kencorbitt/status/575061217779277824


Growth?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dub on March 09, 2015, 05:35:35 PM
https://twitter.com/kencorbitt/status/575061217779277824


Growth?

Announcing his transfer?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on March 09, 2015, 06:02:30 PM
Hambone!

https://twitter.com/Joel_Jellison/status/575067895480242177
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on March 09, 2015, 06:17:35 PM
"Wants" to doesn't sound the same as "will be"

Sent from my KFTT using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: mocat on March 09, 2015, 06:40:00 PM
Hambone!

https://twitter.com/Joel_Jellison/status/575067895480242177

ok, Joel Jellison  :lol:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on March 09, 2015, 07:25:49 PM
Hambone!

https://twitter.com/Joel_Jellison/status/575067895480242177

I want Marcus to finish a successful college career at K-State. That would make me happy.  :Woohoo:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on March 09, 2015, 07:49:22 PM

Hambone!

https://twitter.com/Joel_Jellison/status/575067895480242177

I want Marcus to finish a successful college career at K-State. That would make me happy.  :Woohoo:

Yeah, I like it. Foster being at K-State is good for K-State.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Sandstone Outcropping on March 09, 2015, 07:59:03 PM

Hambone!

https://twitter.com/Joel_Jellison/status/575067895480242177

I want Marcus to finish a successful college career at K-State. That would make me happy.  :Woohoo:

Yeah, I like it. Foster being at K-State is good for K-State.
K-State good for Foster. Foster good for K-State. K-State is Foster. Foster is K-State

Sounds like a win-win for everyone concerned.

 :bball:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: HerrSonntag on March 09, 2015, 08:30:54 PM

Hambone!

https://twitter.com/Joel_Jellison/status/575067895480242177

I want Marcus to finish a successful college career at K-State. That would make me happy.  :Woohoo:

Yeah, I like it. Foster being at K-State is good for K-State.
K-State good for Foster. Foster good for K-State. K-State is Foster. Foster is K-State

Sounds like a win-win for everyone concerned.

 :bball:
If he stays in spite of the adversity, we don't deserve a player like Foster.  The rough ridin' mother theresa of adversity. (j/k mother theresa was an bad person, but you get my point)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on March 09, 2015, 08:38:40 PM

Hambone!

https://twitter.com/Joel_Jellison/status/575067895480242177

I want Marcus to finish a successful college career at K-State. That would make me happy.  :Woohoo:

Yeah, I like it. Foster being at K-State is good for K-State.
K-State good for Foster. Foster good for K-State. K-State is Foster. Foster is K-State

Sounds like a win-win for everyone concerned.

 :bball:
If he stays in spite of the adversity, we don't deserve a player like Foster.  The rough ridin' mother theresa of adversity. (j/k mother theresa was an bad person, but you get my point)
wut?  :confused:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: #LIFE on March 12, 2015, 10:01:37 AM
 :facepalm: with a touch of  :opcat:

Quote
IMHO Foster is purposely playing badly, (intentionally missing shots, uncharacteristically bad passes and ball handling).  It reminds me of Angel Rodriguez's last shot as a Wildcat vs. LaSalle which I swear he intentionally missed/half-assed.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on March 12, 2015, 10:03:14 AM
:facepalm: with a touch of  :opcat:

Quote
IMHO Foster is purposely playing badly, (intentionally missing shots, uncharacteristically bad passes and ball handling).  It reminds me of Angel Rodriguez's last shot as a Wildcat vs. LaSalle which I swear he intentionally missed/half-assed.

That is incredibly dumb.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 'taterblast on March 25, 2015, 08:26:19 AM
i feel that maybe we are underappreciating, or not adequately addressing the impact Foster could have with four years here.

guys, he has it all.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fa.espncdn.com%2Fmedia%2Fmotion%2F2014%2F0104%2Fdm_140104_Oklahoma_State_Kansas_State_Highlight%2Fdm_140104_Oklahoma_State_Kansas_State_Highlight.jpg&hash=c0a6bca01a3055a9106feb7a8205e0de59e7835a)



 :frown:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Lucas Scoopsalot on March 25, 2015, 09:55:21 AM
I hope he gets on a team that plays us next year and rubs his dick in oscar's face.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on March 25, 2015, 10:13:19 AM
I hope he gets on a team that plays us next year and rubs his dick in oscar's face.

He won't be able to play next year, maybe in 2?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 25, 2015, 10:14:45 AM
I hope he goes to South Carolina
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 'taterblast on March 25, 2015, 10:15:24 AM
south carolina or illinois.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on March 25, 2015, 10:17:10 AM
It's going to be SMU and you all know it.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on March 25, 2015, 10:17:52 AM
#hoiball
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ksupamplemousse on March 25, 2015, 10:31:35 AM
I hope he gets on a team that plays us next year and rubs his dick in oscar's face.

He won't be able to play next year, maybe in 2?

Isn't there an exemption for players that get run off? Seems like this would be the definition of getting run off.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: steve dave on March 25, 2015, 10:32:26 AM
I hope he goes to South Carolina

YES. or SFA.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 25, 2015, 10:36:05 AM
I really want to see him at a school where he will play oscar Weber at least once.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on March 25, 2015, 11:46:53 AM
I bet it's LSU, A&M, or something like that.  He is too big for SMU, imo.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Skipper44 on March 25, 2015, 11:50:15 AM
I bet it's LSU, A&M, or something like that.  He is too big for SMU, imo.
LSU can give us the Josh Gray/Marcus Foster backcourt  we dreamed of
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on March 25, 2015, 11:51:03 AM
Was SMU too small for Semi?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on March 25, 2015, 11:51:54 AM
Was SMU too small for Semi?

1. I have no clue

2. Semi was a kid who saw the bench and wanted out.  Marcus is a rough ridin' all conf star who's coach is a dumbass
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on March 25, 2015, 11:53:08 AM
True, but SMU has really been swinging their dicks these days with stud recruits. I could see LSU too.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on March 25, 2015, 11:56:05 AM
True, but SMU has really been swinging their dicks these days with stud recruits. I could see LSU too.

Yeah, and who wouldn't want to play for Larry.  That said, they are the big fish in a small pond.  If Marcus is the guy that tucks want us to think he is, the kid wants national television and match ups that get discussion before and after.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kslim on March 25, 2015, 12:01:51 PM
heart wants him in the big 12, brain tells me he is going somewhere that he will be the lone star. i think it will be aTm
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wetwillie on March 25, 2015, 12:04:03 PM
Iowa state
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on March 25, 2015, 12:05:04 PM
I am pretty sure he isn't going Big12.  Don't think there is any way he wants to sit two years and I am pretty sure MIR dispelled the thought of him getting some exemption in another thread. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on March 25, 2015, 12:23:05 PM
I am pretty sure he isn't going Big12.  Don't think there is any way he wants to sit two years and I am pretty sure MIR dispelled the thought of him getting some exemption in another thread. 

The NCAA officially changed the transfer hardship rules last week: http://newsok.com/ncaa-changes-eligibility-rules-for-transfer-athletes-requesting-hardship-waivers-for-immediate-playing-time/article/5402603
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on March 25, 2015, 12:25:52 PM
Looks like it might have worked with the runoff rule, too bad he wasn't cancer'ey enough to be dismissed a couple weeks ago. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Skipper44 on March 25, 2015, 12:30:02 PM
yeah, it would seem like being dismissed from the team would make him a candidate for the run off rule but I can't find any specifics on the rule  :dunno:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on March 25, 2015, 12:44:34 PM
yeah, it would seem like being dismissed from the team would make him a candidate for the run off rule but I can't find any specifics on the rule  :dunno:

that article said no more immediate eligibility, but instead, they would get a 6th yr.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Skipper44 on March 25, 2015, 01:09:57 PM
yeah, it would seem like being dismissed from the team would make him a candidate for the run off rule but I can't find any specifics on the rule  :dunno:

that article said no more immediate eligibility, but instead, they would get a 6th yr.
I took that as they didn't want to have to evaluate how sick grandma was for hardships and I was under the impression that the "run off rule" was created as an answer to oversigning & coaches leaving.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pvegs on March 25, 2015, 01:16:45 PM
Fitz on Wichita radio saying no one liked Foster and he's not in touch with his family or AAU. Also said he's trying to declare for the NBA draft and strong inferences to being on drugs. Oh boy.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Spracne on March 25, 2015, 01:21:03 PM
Ruthless
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on March 25, 2015, 01:21:29 PM
I thought this narrative would probably be coming.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on March 25, 2015, 01:22:08 PM
GPC is known for sitting on info until it is confirmed.   
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 25, 2015, 01:24:05 PM
I thought this narrative would probably be coming.

Oh absolutely.  oscar Weber and the cloud of loser may be the most predictable thing this side of the tides.  This entire script has already played out.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Stevesie60 on March 25, 2015, 01:24:31 PM
The good thing is that with the team cancer gone we should be better next year!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Havs on March 25, 2015, 01:26:58 PM
Iowa State or Texas A&M.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kstate4life on March 25, 2015, 01:27:58 PM
Ironic the team cancer is :bigtoke:, when :bigtoke: is used to treat symptoms of actual cancer.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: HerrSonntag on March 25, 2015, 01:30:10 PM
Iowa State or Texas A&M.
No ISU, unfortunately, he'd have to sit out 2 years to xfer intra-conference.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on March 25, 2015, 01:33:30 PM
Jesus ppl, he's not playing in the Big 12.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Havs on March 25, 2015, 01:36:12 PM
Iowa State or Texas A&M.
No ISU, unfortunately, he'd have to sit out 2 years to xfer intra-conference.

Personally, having him at Texas A&M would be fun to watch. In fact, I'd invite MarcusPAK at my place too. The problem is that Billy Kennedy is oscar McDermott 2.0. Marcus doesn't need any more of this crap.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 25, 2015, 01:44:46 PM
Ironic the team cancer is :bigtoke:, when :bigtoke: is used to treat symptoms of actual cancer.
Ha!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: The Whale on March 25, 2015, 01:49:17 PM
Looks like it might have worked with the runoff rule, too bad he wasn't cancer'ey enough to be dismissed a couple weeks ago.

Instead of kicking him off the team during his suspension, oscar held on to and played Marcus through the final game of the season.  He ended up screwing him the process.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on March 25, 2015, 01:49:49 PM
Fitz on Wichita radio saying no one liked Foster and he's not in touch with his family or AAU. Also said he's trying to declare for the NBA draft and strong inferences to being on drugs. Oh boy.

i like how it's nothing, nothing, nothing, nothing, nothing and then marcus is gone and all of the sudden tim fitzgerald has tons of information about what has been going on the five months with marcus and ksu and it all seems to paint kstate and weber in a good light and the player that's gone in a bad one.

i'm sure he's not done pumping out whatever pro ksu propoganda he's been directed to pump out. can't wait for the upcoming trash foster article or for him to be on w/ keitz sometime soon and pump some ksu sunshine.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 25, 2015, 01:54:04 PM
No one liked Foster? I mean Jesus Christ manage some personalities, oscar.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 25, 2015, 01:56:25 PM
Fitz on Wichita radio saying no one liked Foster and he's not in touch with his family or AAU. Also said he's trying to declare for the NBA draft and strong inferences to being on drugs. Oh boy.

i like how it's nothing, nothing, nothing, nothing, nothing and then marcus is gone and all of the sudden tim fitzgerald has tons of information about what has been going on the five months with marcus and ksu and it all seems to paint kstate and weber in a good light and the player that's gone in a bad one.

i'm sure he's not done pumping out whatever pro ksu propoganda he's been directed to pump out. can't wait for the upcoming trash foster article or for him to be on w/ keitz sometime soon and pump some ksu sunshine.

It's phenomenal in it's logical inconsistency
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: EMAWzified on March 25, 2015, 01:57:24 PM
So when doesn't it become a meme that oscar is unable to relate to 18-22 year old kids/men? It seems pretty obvious it's true.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on March 25, 2015, 02:00:46 PM
Foster loved K-State so much that he refused to transfer when oscar had his talk. He told oscar that the only way he wasn't wearing purple next year is if oscar kicks him off the team, because he's no quitter.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on March 25, 2015, 02:02:10 PM
Foster loved K-State so much that he refused to transfer when oscar had his talk. He told oscar that the only way he wasn't wearing purple next year is if oscar kicks him off the team, because he's no quitter.

Marcus was showing oscar what it meant to be a leader and stick to something, even if it meant having to do things that are tough. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on March 25, 2015, 02:17:18 PM
The only thing Foster is guilty of is loving K-State a little bit too much. He loved K-State more than oscar Weber and rough ridin' oscar couldn't handle that.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on March 25, 2015, 02:23:48 PM
http://themercury.com/articles/why-did-weber-dismiss-foster

Quote
Q: Why did oscar Weber run off Marcus Foster from the basketball team? A: Yeah, that’s the question, isn’t it? There’s been no explanation, but there are clues that point to drugs. - See more at: http://themercury.com/articles/why-did-weber-dismiss-foster#sthash.LohDBEod.dpuf

Quote
On Twitter, Foster said one day last week during K-State’s spring break that he was “lit on the beach” in South Padre Island, Texas. A photo with the tweet showed Foster and Tre Harris (wearing Big 12 logo sunglasses) holding a fake lizard named Randolph. That tweet was removed from Twitter the same day it was posted. “Lit” is generally thought to mean drunk or high on drugs. Not at all clear what the lizard was about. - See more at: http://themercury.com/articles/why-did-weber-dismiss-foster#sthash.LohDBEod.dpuf

 :lol:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 0.42 on March 25, 2015, 02:25:29 PM
Can Randolph play guard?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on March 25, 2015, 02:27:39 PM
"Here's what lit means for you dumbass hayseeds:...." :lol:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CHONGS on March 25, 2015, 02:27:47 PM
I bet he was high on drugs that he smoked liked a cigarette.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on March 25, 2015, 02:28:36 PM
I haven't read the Mercury in years, but when Ned Seaton feels the need to talk sports its still pretty great.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 0.42 on March 25, 2015, 02:28:49 PM
our fanbase is some dad from wamego back in 1992 ranting about the hippity hop music
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Gooch on March 25, 2015, 02:31:22 PM
Can Randolph play guard?
Currie would drug screen the eff out of Randolph to the extent that not even stud Bosco could save his ass.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on March 25, 2015, 02:32:38 PM
Can Randolph play guard?
Currie would drug screen the eff out of Randolph to the extent that not even stud Bosco could save his ass.

Who do you even thing bought the liquor and provided the drugs?  Hopefully the football team avoided Randolf's curse.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 0.42 on March 25, 2015, 02:34:10 PM
Randolph is the stud emaw sports needs but doesn't deserve
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CHONGS on March 25, 2015, 02:36:13 PM
Oh man I remember one night when I was high on drugs (or "lit" in the language of the streets) and I crushed it in a game of Risk. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Stevesie60 on March 25, 2015, 02:43:29 PM
Is this Randolph?

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.t-nation.com%2Fforum_images%2F9%2Fc%2F9c836_ORIG-dooc.jpg&hash=b4fdb586cedf30ad59a9b3980ebfdc2b608df2ff)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kstate4life on March 25, 2015, 02:50:52 PM
Smoking dope has been a huge part of our bball program for years.  It didn't really become an issue until Currie stepped in as AD.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: puniraptor on March 25, 2015, 02:51:39 PM
im getting lit with this claritin right now
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: EMAWzified on March 25, 2015, 02:54:32 PM
Smoking dope has been a huge part of our bball program for years.  It didn't really become an issue until Currie stepped in as AD.
This. The players on Hartman's good late 70s, early 80s teams were weed kings.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kstate4life on March 25, 2015, 02:56:18 PM
Smoking dope has been a huge part of our bball program for years.  It didn't really become an issue until Currie stepped in as AD.
This. The players on Hartman's good late 70s, early 80s teams were weed kings.

Also Beasley, Walker, Pullen, CK, JO... just to name a few.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on March 25, 2015, 02:57:15 PM
Anyone who's played a game of HORSE is a huge pot head. It's pretty much #Science.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Catman2 on March 25, 2015, 03:06:39 PM
Iowa State or Texas A&M.


Where Foster plays will say a lot about his problems, like a mid-major that's desparate.
P5 coaches will know the story.  Foster blew it.  He didn't wet the bed, he $hit the bed.  :flush:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on March 25, 2015, 03:09:27 PM
Iowa State or Texas A&M.


Where Foster plays will say a lot about his problems, like a mid-major that's desparate.
P5 coaches will know the story.  Foster blew it.  He didn't wet the bed, he crap the bed.  :flush:

This is logical IMO. If Foster ends up a P5 program (or good mid major like WSU), it makes oscar look worse. If Foster ends up at a lower tier mid major, it makes him look worse. I think that's fair.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Stevesie60 on March 25, 2015, 03:12:14 PM
I think the best thing for him is to go somewhere that's not doing so great but has a decent coach. Most likely a decent mid-major or even say, Miami, Virginia Tech, hell even South Carolina even without the obvious connection. He could be a star much like his freshman year, or much like Hopper was when there was no other competition when he was at Maine.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 25, 2015, 03:21:14 PM
He won't go anywhere good because Spencer Kietzman and Fitz know all kinds of dirt on him.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: steve dave on March 25, 2015, 03:22:10 PM
I hope Marcus does well wherever he lands
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 25, 2015, 03:22:15 PM
I think the best thing for him is to go somewhere that's not doing so great but has a decent coach. Most likely a decent mid-major or even say, Miami, Virginia Tech, hell even South Carolina even without the obvious connection. He could be a star much like his freshman year, or much like Hopper was when there was no other competition when he was at Maine.

Virginia tech

IIRC Buzz gave him his only other offer
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: SdK on March 25, 2015, 03:22:28 PM
I'm hoping Pullen reaches out and gets him to SC. Just for the drama.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on March 25, 2015, 03:22:55 PM
I think the best thing for him is to go somewhere that's not doing so great but has a decent coach. Most likely a decent mid-major or even say, Miami, Virginia Tech, hell even South Carolina even without the obvious connection. He could be a star much like his freshman year, or much like Hopper was when there was no other competition when he was at Maine.

Virginia tech

IIRC Buzz gave him his only other offer

That would be good for he and Buzz.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 25, 2015, 03:23:03 PM
Iowa State or Texas A&M.


Where Foster plays will say a lot about his problems, like a mid-major that's desparate.
P5 coaches will know the story.  Foster blew it.  He didn't wet the bed, he $hit the bed.  :flush:

Spill it! (pM Steve dave if necessary)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on March 25, 2015, 03:24:18 PM
I hope Marcus does well wherever he lands
Me too. I'm really going to miss him.  :frown:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: nicname on March 25, 2015, 03:30:42 PM
Referring to someone who smokes weed as "on drugs" has always registered as  :lol: worthy to me.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CHONGS on March 25, 2015, 03:31:05 PM
"high on drugs" you mean
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pvegs on March 25, 2015, 03:33:15 PM
GPC gems: He was smoking weed between shootaround and the game vs Tech. He smoked weed in the locker room. The only mistake oscar made was not kicking him off the team early in the season when it first became an issue. Most of the time when a teen's personality changes dramatically it's due to drug use.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: SdK on March 25, 2015, 03:34:28 PM
Smoking in the locker room? Omg.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: nicname on March 25, 2015, 03:35:48 PM
"high on drugs" you mean

I was referencing Fitz's comments on Wichita radio.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 25, 2015, 03:36:11 PM
Smoking in the locker room? Omg.

Spencer and Fitz have been sitting on this
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on March 25, 2015, 03:36:20 PM
You know the only ppl who shoot NBA 3's for the win, are always high on drugs.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 0.42 on March 25, 2015, 03:37:02 PM
Most of the time when a teen's personality changes dramatically it's due to drug use.

 :Wha:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on March 25, 2015, 03:38:24 PM
Serious question? What % of our fanbase do you think has tried Marijuana?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: nicname on March 25, 2015, 03:39:28 PM
Serious question? What % of our fanbase do you think has tried Marijuana?

30 to 40 percent.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 0.42 on March 25, 2015, 03:41:01 PM
Serious question? What % of our fanbase do you think has tried Marijuana?

whatever the gE demographic + some of BOTC adds up to

so, definitely less than 50%
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on March 25, 2015, 03:41:14 PM
Serious question? What % of our fanbase do you think has tried Marijuana?

30 to 40 percent.
And I bet half of those had a bad experience with it, so they think it's the devil.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kstate4life on March 25, 2015, 03:45:41 PM
Serious question? What % of our fanbase do you think has tried Marijuana?

30 to 40 percent.
And I bet half of those had a bad experience with it, so they think it's the devil.

It's probably more than you would think.  I would say > 50%, but most won't admit it because that would be a "liberal" thing to do.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on March 25, 2015, 03:49:48 PM
I've read he and Malek smoking weed set off a fire alarm at Tech. Or before. Something like that.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kstate4life on March 25, 2015, 03:50:55 PM
I've read he and Malek smoking weed set off a fire alarm at Tech. Or before. Something like that.

Sounds like good times... bet smoking with Foster would be great!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sys on March 25, 2015, 04:11:16 PM
i'm glad he's leaving/getting kicked off.  i never liked him.  unfair and irrational, i know, but he just always rubbed me the wrong way.


also, despite chingon's best efforts, i feel there is a reasonable opportunity to get weber gone after next year.  a realistic scenario i can root for, that's all i ask.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: meow meow on March 25, 2015, 04:15:02 PM
i'm glad he's leaving/getting kicked off.  i never liked him.  unfair and irrational, i know, but he just always rubbed me the wrong way.


also, despite chingon's best efforts, i feel there is a reasonable opportunity to get weber gone after next year.  a realistic scenario i can root for, that's all i ask.

On oscar's birthday, get someone close to make him some of those brownies that have marijuana drugs in them.  Top it off with ice cream, let oscar do work on that sumbitch bowl of drug brownie ice cream magic.  Then, when oscar gets all good and "lit", prop Randolph on his shoulder, take a pic and post it to his twitter account.  "Happy Birthday Me, getting lit in the office with my pal Randolph #YOLO"  Currie would have to do something.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Catman2 on March 25, 2015, 04:30:24 PM
I hope Marcus does well wherever he lands

I do, too.  The discipline and hard work that it will take to move past this mess should make Marcus Foster grow up. 
Under the circumstances, maybe this is what's best for him.
Many don't get a wake up call. I'm sure Foster will want to show what he has inside.
He has something to prove. I wish him success.

Reminds me of Bryce Brown. The kid had NFL skills but didn't put in the work. In college sports that will kill the spirit of the team members that do work hard.
Snyder sent him packing.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on March 25, 2015, 04:32:43 PM
I hope Marcus does well wherever he lands

I do, too.  The discipline and hard work that it will take to move past this mess should make Marcus Foster grow up. 
Under the circumstances, maybe this is what's best for him.
Many don't get a wake up call. I'm sure Foster will want to show what he has inside.
He has something to prove. I wish him success.

Reminds me of Bryce Brown. The kid had NFL skills but didn't put in the work. In college sports that will kill the spirit of the team members that do work hard.
Snyder sent him packing.

What is going to make oscar grow up?  I mean, he wants to control his recruits and team but didn't put in the work.  In college coaching, that will kill the spirit of the team.
When will JC send him packing?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Skipper44 on March 25, 2015, 04:33:01 PM
I hope Marcus does well wherever he lands

I do, too.  The discipline and hard work that it will take to move past this mess should make Marcus Foster grow up. 
Under the circumstances, maybe this is what's best for him.
Many don't get a wake up call. I'm sure Foster will want to show what he has inside.
He has something to prove. I wish him success.

Reminds me of Bryce Brown. The kid had NFL skills but didn't put in the work. In college sports that will kill the spirit of the team members that do work hard.
Snyder sent him packing.
lol, no
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on March 25, 2015, 04:35:19 PM
Fitz on Wichita radio saying no one liked Foster and he's not in touch with his family or AAU. Also said he's trying to declare for the NBA draft and strong inferences to being on drugs. Oh boy.

i like how it's nothing, nothing, nothing, nothing, nothing and then marcus is gone and all of the sudden tim fitzgerald has tons of information about what has been going on the five months with marcus and ksu and it all seems to paint kstate and weber in a good light and the player that's gone in a bad one.

i'm sure he's not done pumping out whatever pro ksu propoganda he's been directed to pump out. can't wait for the upcoming trash foster article or for him to be on w/ keitz sometime soon and pump some ksu sunshine.

Fitz has done this with every single player or coach that has left in a controversial manner since he landed at GPC, literally every single one. He doesn't have crap from anyone he clearly does this to drive traffic to his site, again he's done it every single time, even with Leti.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Panjandrum on March 25, 2015, 04:35:46 PM
also, despite chingon's best efforts, i feel there is a reasonable opportunity to get weber gone after next year.  a realistic scenario i can root for, that's all i ask.

We all need something to hold on to, so I feel the same way.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on March 25, 2015, 04:36:03 PM
Yeah, Bryce could have come back and played in the bowl game if he wanted to. Bill would have welcomed him back with open arms at any time. That is just part of what makes Bill a great coach and oscar a hack that can't hold a job.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on March 25, 2015, 04:38:08 PM
Can Randolph play guard?
Currie would drug screen the eff out of Randolph to the extent that not even stud Bosco could save his ass.

Who do you even thing bought the liquor and provided the drugs?  Hopefully the football team avoided Randolf's curse.

We can safely point the finger at oscar and exonerate Currie for Randolph causing problems with the basketball team. Bazooka Joe hung out with Randolph and there's no such issues with the football team.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Skipper44 on March 25, 2015, 04:39:26 PM
Yeah, Bryce could have come back and played in the bowl game if he wanted to. Bill would have welcomed him back with open arms at any time. That is just part of what makes Bill a great coach and oscar a hack that can't hold a job.
People that can't grasp that in our fan base scare me.  I mean, Bill will absolutely bench someone whose talent/prep ratio isn't where he wants it to be but I don't think he has ever "dismissed" a guy that is truly talented.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wetwillie on March 25, 2015, 04:47:27 PM
Yeah, Bryce could have come back and played in the bowl game if he wanted to. Bill would have welcomed him back with open arms at any time. That is just part of what makes Bill a great coach and oscar a hack that can't hold a job.
People that can't grasp that in our fan base scare me.  I mean, Bill will absolutely bench someone whose talent/prep ratio isn't where he wants it to be but I don't think he has ever "dismissed" a guy that is truly talented.

Broderick Smith was pretty talented
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Catman2 on March 25, 2015, 04:48:37 PM
I hope Marcus does well wherever he lands

I do, too.  The discipline and hard work that it will take to move past this mess should make Marcus Foster grow up. 
Under the circumstances, maybe this is what's best for him.
Many don't get a wake up call. I'm sure Foster will want to show what he has inside.
He has something to prove. I wish him success.

Reminds me of Bryce Brown. The kid had NFL skills but didn't put in the work. In college sports that will kill the spirit of the team members that do work hard.
Snyder sent him packing.
lol, no

Uh, yes, Snyder didn't dismiss him. He just left him on the bench til he quit. Same thing. Look it up dummy.  Career at KSU consisted of playing in 2 games - 4 plays.  "Could have played in a bowl game".  That guy is a simp, too.  Wow, stupidity reigns supreme!!!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sunny_cat on March 25, 2015, 04:50:00 PM
LOOK IT UP
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on March 25, 2015, 04:51:12 PM
I hope Marcus does well wherever he lands

I do, too.  The discipline and hard work that it will take to move past this mess should make Marcus Foster grow up. 
Under the circumstances, maybe this is what's best for him.
Many don't get a wake up call. I'm sure Foster will want to show what he has inside.
He has something to prove. I wish him success.

Reminds me of Bryce Brown. The kid had NFL skills but didn't put in the work. In college sports that will kill the spirit of the team members that do work hard.
Snyder sent him packing.
lol, no

Uh, yes, Snyder didn't dismiss him. He just left him on the bench til he quit. Same thing. Look it up dummy.  Career at KSU consisted of playing in 2 games - 4 plays.  "Could have played in a bowl game".  That guy is a simp, too.  Wow, stupidity reigns supreme!!!

look at catman gettin some bass in his voice
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: nicname on March 25, 2015, 04:55:33 PM
I hope Marcus does well wherever he lands

I do, too.  The discipline and hard work that it will take to move past this mess should make Marcus Foster grow up. 
Under the circumstances, maybe this is what's best for him.
Many don't get a wake up call. I'm sure Foster will want to show what he has inside.
He has something to prove. I wish him success.

Reminds me of Bryce Brown. The kid had NFL skills but didn't put in the work. In college sports that will kill the spirit of the team members that do work hard.
Snyder sent him packing.
lol, no

Uh, yes, Snyder didn't dismiss him. He just left him on the bench til he quit. Same thing. Look it up dummy.  Career at KSU consisted of playing in 2 games - 4 plays.  "Could have played in a bowl game".  That guy is a simp, too.  Wow, stupidity reigns supreme!!!

look at catman gettin some bass in his voice

They used to tell me toughen up
Put some bass in your voice
Then they tell me lighten up
Put some Ma$e in your voice

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on March 25, 2015, 04:56:23 PM
Can Randolph play guard?
Currie would drug screen the eff out of Randolph to the extent that not even stud Bosco could save his ass.

Who do you even thing bought the liquor and provided the drugs?  Hopefully the football team avoided Randolf's curse.

We can safely point the finger at oscar and exonerate Currie for Randolph causing problems with the basketball team. Bazooka Joe hung out with Randolph and there's no such issues with the football team.

Hopefully this is it and it isn't just that Bill is smart enough to handle it in house.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Skipper44 on March 25, 2015, 04:58:37 PM
I hope Marcus does well wherever he lands

I do, too.  The discipline and hard work that it will take to move past this mess should make Marcus Foster grow up. 
Under the circumstances, maybe this is what's best for him.
Many don't get a wake up call. I'm sure Foster will want to show what he has inside.
He has something to prove. I wish him success.

Reminds me of Bryce Brown. The kid had NFL skills but didn't put in the work. In college sports that will kill the spirit of the team members that do work hard.
Snyder sent him packing.
lol, no

Uh, yes, Snyder didn't dismiss him. He just left him on the bench til he quit. Same thing. Look it up dummy.  Career at KSU consisted of playing in 2 games - 4 plays.  "Could have played in a bowl game".  That guy is a simp, too.  Wow, stupidity reigns supreme!!!
listen, all Bryce needed to do was string like 4 good practices together and he is getting 20 or 30 snaps.  Hell, Bryce skipped the entire summer program, damn near lost the EKU game with a fumble and yet he still was playing @Miami for one reason and one reason only - he had talent.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pissclams on March 25, 2015, 05:27:19 PM
the smoke alarm rumor is awesome
i'm guessing he's addicted and couldn't wait
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wetwillie on March 25, 2015, 05:32:41 PM
I bet he blew smoke rings in bruces face during half time like every game.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 25, 2015, 05:37:13 PM
the smoke alarm rumor is awesome
i'm guessing he's addicted and couldn't wait

It's pretty amazing, I love it.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Cartierfor3 on March 25, 2015, 05:40:57 PM
Marcus was a punk. Anyone who argues different is being naive. But oscar's job is to manage that punk so he can contribute on the team. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 25, 2015, 05:42:19 PM
Marcus was a punk. Anyone who argues different is being naive. But oscar's job is to manage that punk so he can contribute on the team. 

what made him a punk? (other than smoking so much weed at the Texas Tech locker room that he set off the fire alarm)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Cartierfor3 on March 25, 2015, 05:44:56 PM
Marcus was a punk. Anyone who argues different is being naive. But oscar's job is to manage that punk so he can contribute on the team. 

what made him a punk? (other than smoking so much weed at the Texas Tech locker room that he set off the fire alarm)

his punk rock attitude
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Cartierfor3 on March 25, 2015, 05:46:34 PM
It just seems like he was a kid with a serious chip on the shoulder/bad attitude. He was very talented and I wish he was staying. I'm no fan of oscar but let's not pretend Marcus didn't bring some of this on himself.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 25, 2015, 05:52:39 PM
It just seems like he was a kid with a serious chip on the shoulder/bad attitude. He was very talented and I wish he was staying. I'm no fan of oscar but let's not pretend Marcus didn't bring some of this on himself.

It's amazing how no one thought he had a bad attitude until about January of this year. Maybe sys did.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: catzacker on March 25, 2015, 05:54:19 PM
It just seems like he was a kid with a serious chip on the shoulder/bad attitude. He was very talented and I wish he was staying. I'm no fan of oscar but let's not pretend Marcus didn't bring some of this on himself.

It's amazing how no one thought he had a bad attitude until about January of this year. Maybe sys did.

everyone thought/knew it, they just had to sit on it.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 25, 2015, 05:54:31 PM
It just seems like he was a kid with a serious chip on the shoulder/bad attitude. He was very talented and I wish he was staying. I'm no fan of oscar but let's not pretend Marcus didn't bring some of this on himself.

It's amazing how no one thought he had a bad attitude until about January of this year. Maybe sys did.

:nono:

NOT SO FAST!!!!

BITB thinks Foster needs an attitude adjustment
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: renocat on March 25, 2015, 05:55:38 PM
For a couple of days I was madder than hell at Weber over canning Marcus.  I would go into a back room at home and cuss and gnaw on the woodwork.  Now hearing more about Foster I am saying way to sic 'em oscar.  I was at the doc and talked to a lady whose daughter lives below Foster.  Big parties and all kinds of horse manure going on.  If he was smoking weed at a game site, he has the devil weed brain.  Damn lucky that I wasn't his coach.  I would have put a rocket in his wazzoo and sent him to moon.  We will rise from these dark days - Wade anc Barry will make us forget Mucus, oops Marcus.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 25, 2015, 05:57:27 PM
For a couple of days I was madder than hell at Weber over canning Marcus.  I would go into a back room at home and cuss and gnaw on the woodwork.  Now hearing more about Foster I am saying way to sic 'em oscar.  I was at the doc and talked to a lady whose daughter lives below Foster.  Big parties and all kinds of horse manure going on.  If he was smoking weed at a game site, he has the devil weed brain.  Damn lucky that I wasn't his coach.  I would haveput a rocket in his wazzoo and sent him to moon.  We will rise from these dark days - Wade anc Barry will make us forget Mucus, oops Marcus.

SO MUCH TO LOVE ABOUT THIS POST
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Catman2 on March 25, 2015, 05:58:07 PM
The good thing is that with the team cancer gone we should be better next year!

I agree Stevesie60.
In the working world, if your workforce sees no consequences for workers with bad performance, bad behavior, breaking rules, then your respect as a leader goes down the tubes along with the performance of your good workers. The bullet has to be bitten and action taken. It's not easy, especially if you like the workers and have tried to correct the problems.

This is a defining moment. If the remaining players feel Coach oscar Weber did the right thing, then morale and teamwork should improve.  If not, then...................all is lost.

Note: This about the respect of Weber by his remaining players.  I already know how many of you feel.

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: OK_Cat on March 25, 2015, 06:03:37 PM
If Will Spradling smoked tons of marijuana cigarettes, he would have been embraced in a prayer circle until he was healed
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Kat Kid on March 25, 2015, 06:07:06 PM
the smoke alarm rumor is awesome
i'm guessing he's addicted and couldn't wait

Smoke alarms in hotels sometimes go off when you tamper with them too.   :shy:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on March 25, 2015, 06:11:23 PM
If Will Spradling smoked tons of marijuana cigarettes, he would have been embraced in a prayer circle until he was healed
also the fans would have demanded that a black player be kicked off the team.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 0.42 on March 25, 2015, 06:18:04 PM
For a couple of days I was madder than hell at Weber over canning Marcus.  I would go into a back room at home and cuss and gnaw on the woodwork.  Now hearing more about Foster I am saying way to sic 'em oscar.  I was at the doc and talked to a lady whose daughter lives below Foster.  Big parties and all kinds of horse manure going on.  If he was smoking weed at a game site, he has the devil weed brain.  Damn lucky that I wasn't his coach.  I would haveput a rocket in his wazzoo and sent him to moon.  We will rise from these dark days - Wade anc Barry will make us forget Mucus, oops Marcus.

SO MUCH TO LOVE ABOUT THIS POST

i think The Word should be changed to live updates of the latest renocat posts
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ben ji on March 25, 2015, 06:25:17 PM
My cousin's GF's Brother is a team manager. He said that Marcus and Tre set off the fire alarm ON THE PLANE RIDE TO LUBBOCK. They were trying to "Hot Box" the bathroom or something. 

Being addicted to weed must be terrible.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: chum1 on March 25, 2015, 06:29:12 PM
My cousin's GF's Brother is a team manager. He said that Marcus and Tre set off the fire alarm ON THE PLANE RIDE TO LUBBOCK.

I'd buy it.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pvegs on March 25, 2015, 06:37:54 PM
My cousin's GF's Brother is a team manager. He said that Marcus and Tre set off the fire alarm ON THE PLANE RIDE TO LUBBOCK. They were trying to "Hot Box" the bathroom or something. 

Being addicted to weed must be terrible.

Where does Malek come into play in this version? Also, oscar should have oscar'd them as soon as the plan landed if that was true.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on March 25, 2015, 06:43:34 PM
Guys, Gary Parrish's podcast is great. Today's podcast he said that Marcus did have a family member that was causing problems but it wasn't with being in Marcus' ear but said family member was "a real pain in the ass" to the coaching staff. Gary and the other guys on the podcast also said that he likely won't get a waiver to play next year under the runoff rule but the NCAA sometimes does unpredictable stuff. K-State has to essentially vouch for Marcus for him to even have a chance

He also said that oscar is on the hot seat.

Heard all of that in 2 minutes, and some of you rubes had to listen to Keitz for 90 minutes to get jack crap.

It's far and away the most informative and entertaining cbb podcast and one of the top 3 sports one overall that I listen to:

https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/cbssports.com-eye-on-college/id268800565?mt=2
http://www.stitcher.com/podcast/cbssportscom-eye-on-college-basketball-podcast
http://www.cbssports.com/podcast
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wetwillie on March 25, 2015, 06:50:24 PM
Guys, Gary Parrish's podcast is great. Today's podcast he said that Marcus did have a family member that was causing problems but it wasn't with being in Marcus' ear but said family member was "a real pain in the ass" to the coaching staff. Gary and the other guys on the podcast also said that he likely won't get a waiver to play next year under the runoff rule but the NCAA sometimes does unpredictable stuff. K-State has to essentially vouch for Marcus for him to even have a chance

He also said that oscar is on the hot seat.

Heard all of that in 2 minutes, and some of you rubes had to listen to Keitz for 90 minutes to get jack crap.

It's far and away the most informative and entertaining cbb podcast and one of the top 3 sports one overall that I listen to:

https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/cbssports.com-eye-on-college/id268800565?mt=2
http://www.stitcher.com/podcast/cbssportscom-eye-on-college-basketball-podcast
http://www.cbssports.com/podcast

On who's hot seat?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on March 25, 2015, 07:02:13 PM
the smoke alarm rumor is awesome
i'm guessing he's addicted and couldn't wait

Smoke alarms in hotels sometimes go off when you tamper with them too.   :shy:

I'm going out by myself again.  See you guys tomorrow.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on March 25, 2015, 07:06:25 PM
Guys, Gary Parrish's podcast is great. Today's podcast he said that Marcus did have a family member that was causing problems but it wasn't with being in Marcus' ear but said family member was "a real pain in the ass" to the coaching staff. Gary and the other guys on the podcast also said that he likely won't get a waiver to play next year under the runoff rule but the NCAA sometimes does unpredictable stuff. K-State has to essentially vouch for Marcus for him to even have a chance

He also said that oscar is on the hot seat.

Heard all of that in 2 minutes, and some of you rubes had to listen to Keitz for 90 minutes to get jack crap.

It's far and away the most informative and entertaining cbb podcast and one of the top 3 sports one overall that I listen to:

https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/cbssports.com-eye-on-college/id268800565?mt=2
http://www.stitcher.com/podcast/cbssportscom-eye-on-college-basketball-podcast
http://www.cbssports.com/podcast

On who's hot seat?
He's on the Portland Trailblazers' hot seat, they're tired of his crap.


That added a lot to the conversation, nice work. Christ.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pissclams on March 25, 2015, 07:06:52 PM

My cousin's GF's Brother is a team manager. He said that Marcus and Tre set off the fire alarm ON THE PLANE RIDE TO LUBBOCK. They were trying to "Hot Box" the bathroom or something. 

Being addicted to weed must be terrible.
he should have been made team captain immediately.  the leadership that it takes to pull something like that off was just more than King DeBruce could handle.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 25, 2015, 07:07:57 PM
how do you have time to listen to multiple sports podcasts, mir?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on March 25, 2015, 07:08:08 PM
It just seems like he was a kid with a serious chip on the shoulder/bad attitude. He was very talented and I wish he was staying. I'm no fan of oscar but let's not pretend Marcus didn't bring some of this on himself.

It's amazing how no one thought he had a bad attitude until about January of this year. Maybe sys did.

I put most of it on oscar early on, but then I reached a point where clearly Marcus was at least partially responsible. I'd even say if Marcus was really as bad as some are making it out to be, oscar should have gotten rid of him a long time ago. 

But overall, oscar is proving to be a terrible manager of his roster and recruiting as now only 44% of his high school recruits are still at K-State. I mean, people bring up Frank, but he didn't have this rate and he was getting rid of (mostly) transfers. I think its worse to consistently miss on high school recruits as opposed to transfers/JUCOs.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sys on March 25, 2015, 07:11:02 PM
I think its worse to consistently miss on high school recruits as opposed to transfers/JUCOs.

ethically, i think it's much worse to run off a transfer.  and martin tried to make all his juco recruits burn a rs before they got here, so they were in the same boat.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on March 25, 2015, 07:12:09 PM
I think its worse to consistently miss on high school recruits as opposed to transfers/JUCOs.

ethically, i think it's much worse to run off a transfer.  and martin tried to make all his juco recruits burn a rs before they got here, so they were in the same boat.

I agree, I just think its worse for the program to miss on high school kids.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sys on March 25, 2015, 07:13:07 PM
Where does Malek come into play in this version? Also, oscar should have oscar'd them as soon as the plane landed if that was true.

obviously, either the wrong harris was suspended or kicked off the team.  one more reason to take care of these things as they occur, before memories grow fuzzy.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on March 25, 2015, 07:14:09 PM
Has there been any actual info other than tucks guessing, about anything marcus did that we didn't already know about? 

I have only heard the  Fitz bullshit. 

So far, all we know is that oscar recruits kids, can't coach them, and then runs them.  Even if marcus is a rough ridin' monster this is a pattern that simply getting rid of marcus doesn't resolve.  If we want marcus to share blame, fine, kick him off, but that only solves one side of this equation (and it's the small side).  Doing what has been done, and nothing else, just means we will see this repeat.  If it doesn't repeat, it is because we have become irrelevant and recruiting is horrible.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sys on March 25, 2015, 07:14:47 PM
I just think its worse for the program to miss on high school kids.

yeah, probably.  you only have to be right on a couple a year though.  the real problem is that foster is the only one that it seemed like weber had gotten right.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on March 25, 2015, 07:15:59 PM
Has there been any actual info other than tucks guessing, about anything marcus did that we didn't already know about? 

I have only heard the  Fitz bullshit. 

So far, all we know is that oscar recruits kids, can't coach them, and then runs them.  Even if marcus is a rough ridin' monster this is a pattern that simply getting rid of marcus doesn't resolve.  If we want marcus to share blame, fine, kick him off, but that only solves one side of this equation (and it's the small side).  Doing what has been done, and nothing else, just means we will see this repeat.  If it doesn't repeat, it is because we have become irrelevant and recruiting is horrible.

Yeah, Marcus as an isolated incident isn't as big to me. I mean, yeah, you don't want to lose your best player, but if he's truly a problem so be it. But the consistent misses on high school guys, or even recruiting guys like Orris and Jack in the first place, is a big problem.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wetwillie on March 25, 2015, 07:21:07 PM
how little respect does oscar command from his own team that someone would even consider doing the crap alleged against marcus.  NFW someone on franks team tries any of it.  90% of the elite 8 team probably got HAF on the regular but never in such dumbass circumstances.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on March 25, 2015, 07:23:41 PM
how little respect does oscar command from his own team that someone would even consider doing the crap alleged against marcus.  NFW someone on franks team tries any of it.  90% of the elite 8 team probably got HAF on the regular but never in such dumbass circumstances.
Nothing says idgaf anymore than ht boxing a team plane. :lol:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on March 25, 2015, 07:25:47 PM
how do you have time to listen to multiple sports podcasts, mir?

I don't listen to the radio. I listen to sports podcasts and music that I download. Most radio shows are podcasted, like Keitzman so I don't have to listen to commercials or crap that disinterests me. I'm sitting at my desk right now answering email, making phone calls, reading this meassage board, and listening to the Fitz interview from earlier. I listen to anywhere between 2 and 6 hours of podcasts a day while working or driving.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 25, 2015, 07:27:11 PM
I can't listen to podcasts while I work and pay attention
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sys on March 25, 2015, 07:30:56 PM
tre harris probably dnp'd in three consecutive games at some point during the season, correct?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on March 25, 2015, 07:37:16 PM
tre harris probably dnp'd in three consecutive games at some point during the season, correct?
Easily
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on March 25, 2015, 07:39:48 PM

tre harris probably dnp'd in three consecutive games at some point during the season, correct?

8 actually.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sys on March 25, 2015, 07:42:00 PM
that's good to know.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sys on March 25, 2015, 07:48:08 PM
i mean, i was all over that 3 games = 10% crap when the suspension occurred.  it wouldn't be logically consistent of me not to consider that weber may not have wanted to dismiss these players from team.


oth, foster played in the final game.  what kind of idiot program would test players after the season ended?  no one would do that.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Benja on March 25, 2015, 07:54:58 PM
I can't listen to podcasts while I work and pay attention

Me neither. I would if I could.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: steve dave on March 25, 2015, 08:01:28 PM

the smoke alarm rumor is awesome
i'm guessing he's addicted and couldn't wait

Smoke alarms in hotels sometimes go off when you tamper with them too.   :shy:

lol
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Pete on March 25, 2015, 08:20:35 PM
So I absolutely love the "if you did that in my work place and you worked for me" talking points.

Unless you work in the rough ridin' entertainment biz handling talent, shut the eff up.  Your " mentoring" of the claims adjustment staff does not rough ridin' apply here.  Go fill out your balanced rough ridin' score card, haul in your canned goods, and pitch in on the new associate training program and shut the eff up about the entertainment business.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sunny_cat on March 25, 2015, 09:02:52 PM
So I absolutely love the "if you did that in my work place and you worked for me" talking points.

Unless you work in the rough ridin' entertainment biz handling talent, shut the eff up.  Your " mentoring" of the claims adjustment staff does not rough ridin' apply here.  Go fill out your balanced rough ridin' score card, haul in your canned goods, and pitch in on the new associate training program and shut the eff up about the entertainment business.

don't talk about my dad like that :frown:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Panjandrum on March 25, 2015, 10:58:49 PM
Guys, Gary Parrish's podcast is great. Today's podcast he said that Marcus did have a family member that was causing problems but it wasn't with being in Marcus' ear but said family member was "a real pain in the ass" to the coaching staff. Gary and the other guys on the podcast also said that he likely won't get a waiver to play next year under the runoff rule but the NCAA sometimes does unpredictable stuff. K-State has to essentially vouch for Marcus for him to even have a chance

He also said that oscar is on the hot seat.

Heard all of that in 2 minutes, and some of you rubes had to listen to Keitz for 90 minutes to get jack crap.

It's far and away the most informative and entertaining cbb podcast and one of the top 3 sports one overall that I listen to:

https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/cbssports.com-eye-on-college/id268800565?mt=2
http://www.stitcher.com/podcast/cbssportscom-eye-on-college-basketball-podcast
http://www.cbssports.com/podcast

I now know how much gold could theoretically fit in a Brinks truck, so I've got that going for me.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Stevesie60 on March 26, 2015, 01:33:15 AM
the smoke alarm rumor is awesome
i'm guessing he's addicted and couldn't wait

Smoke alarms in hotels sometimes go off when you tamper with them too.   :shy:

I'm going out by myself again.  See you guys tomorrow.

:lol:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: felix rex on March 26, 2015, 08:11:54 AM

also, despite chingon's best efforts, i feel there is a reasonable opportunity to get weber gone after next year.  a realistic scenario i can root for, that's all i ask.

This will pretty much be the only reason I watch/check scores next year.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Cire on March 26, 2015, 09:14:25 AM
he could be gone next, I doubt it now.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on March 26, 2015, 09:23:07 AM
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xap1/v/t1.0-9/17326_736378719817220_8357680631374319225_n.jpg?oh=69ae26f91b3dcc69a822a7f231e01d58&oe=55AF6CAB&__gda__=1433870534_cfa46c795b901d5565b6d538c8206c0a)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 26, 2015, 09:28:15 AM
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xap1/v/t1.0-9/17326_736378719817220_8357680631374319225_n.jpg?oh=69ae26f91b3dcc69a822a7f231e01d58&oe=55AF6CAB&__gda__=1433870534_cfa46c795b901d5565b6d538c8206c0a)
What a rotten kid
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: stunted on March 26, 2015, 09:31:57 AM
Mhk was so fun he didn't even care how shitty basketball was going.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Catman2 on March 26, 2015, 09:36:57 AM
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xap1/v/t1.0-9/17326_736378719817220_8357680631374319225_n.jpg?oh=69ae26f91b3dcc69a822a7f231e01d58&oe=55AF6CAB&__gda__=1433870534_cfa46c795b901d5565b6d538c8206c0a)
What a rotten kid

Evidently, God just now came up with a plan. He should have talked to God sooner. That messsage is just sad.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 26, 2015, 09:38:44 AM
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xap1/v/t1.0-9/17326_736378719817220_8357680631374319225_n.jpg?oh=69ae26f91b3dcc69a822a7f231e01d58&oe=55AF6CAB&__gda__=1433870534_cfa46c795b901d5565b6d538c8206c0a)
What a rotten kid

Evidently, God just now came up with a plan. He should have talked to God sooner. That messsage is just sad.
Shut up unless you have details to share
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on March 26, 2015, 09:49:00 AM
https://twitter.com/DS4ms/status/581105078821584896
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on March 26, 2015, 09:49:56 AM
PotNa?  Is that saying no to pot and is mispelled?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: mocat on March 26, 2015, 09:55:04 AM
https://twitter.com/DS4ms/status/581105078821584896

and wacky only wanted one of these two saints to succeed after k-state
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 26, 2015, 09:59:24 AM
It's hard to keep track, so I need someone to tell me if Frankite Nation aka the Too Cool for Schoolers have blamed the entire situation with Foster on Weber, or does FN/TCfS lay any culpability at the feet of Foster himself?

Thanks for clearing this up FN/TCfS friends of goEMAW Inc.
no one in the world said Foster was without blame
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ben ji on March 26, 2015, 09:59:40 AM
PotNa?  Is that saying no to pot and is mispelled?

I believe it means "Partner" as in both Marcus and Daniel were incredibly talented players who left The Kansas State University to early.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on March 26, 2015, 10:03:23 AM
FN/TCfS

:love:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: TownieCat on March 26, 2015, 10:09:52 AM
https://twitter.com/DS4ms/status/581105078821584896

and wacky only wanted one of these two saints to succeed after k-state
I think the lesson here is gE should never fall in love with one particular player unless you want him to transfer.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on March 26, 2015, 10:11:53 AM
https://twitter.com/_Iwundu25/status/581111113951154176

https://twitter.com/_Iwundu25/status/581109905706323968
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: KanSt43 on March 26, 2015, 10:19:40 AM
wut

He quickly deleted that tweet...
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: catzacker on March 26, 2015, 10:47:59 AM
It's hard to keep track, so I need someone to tell me if Frankite Nation aka the Too Cool for Schoolers have blamed the entire situation with Foster on Weber, or does FN/TCfS lay any culpability at the feet of Foster himself?

Thanks for clearing this up FN/TCfS friends of goEMAW Inc.

Marcus is responsible for his actions – and he has paid the consequences for them.  oscar is responsible for his team – and should pay the consequences for his team’s performance.  oscar’s shot clock doesn’t get reset (or shouldn’t) because he decided to kick players off the team or have players transfer.  It’s on oscar.  If oscar (and those that love him) want to take credit for years 1-2, then oscar (and those that love him) have to take complete responsibility for years 3-?, without ANY excuses. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on March 26, 2015, 10:49:25 AM
oscar is responsible for his team – and should pay the consequences for his team’s performance.  oscar’s shot clock doesn’t get reset (or shouldn’t) because he decided to kick players off the team or have players transfer.  It’s on oscar.  If oscar (and those that love him) want to take credit for years 1-2, then oscar (and those that love him) have to take complete responsibility for years 3-?, without ANY excuses. 

The word.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: steve dave on March 26, 2015, 10:50:25 AM
It's hard to keep track, so I need someone to tell me if Frankite Nation aka the Too Cool for Schoolers have blamed the entire situation with Foster on Weber, or does FN/TCfS lay any culpability at the feet of Foster himself?

Thanks for clearing this up FN/TCfS friends of goEMAW Inc.

Marcus is responsible for his actions – and he has paid the consequences for them.  oscar is responsible for his team – and should pay the consequences for his team’s performance.  oscar’s shot clock doesn’t get reset (or shouldn’t) because he decided to kick players off the team or have players transfer.  It’s on oscar.  If oscar (and those that love him) want to take credit for years 1-2, then oscar (and those that love him) have to take complete responsibility for years 3-?, without ANY excuses.

'zacker has a way with words. like, even when he's not swearing up a storm he does. but especially when he's swearing up a storm still though.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Catman2 on March 26, 2015, 11:13:00 AM
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xap1/v/t1.0-9/17326_736378719817220_8357680631374319225_n.jpg?oh=69ae26f91b3dcc69a822a7f231e01d58&oe=55AF6CAB&__gda__=1433870534_cfa46c795b901d5565b6d538c8206c0a)
What a rotten kid

Evidently, God just now came up with a plan. He should have talked to God sooner. That messsage is just sad.
Shut up unless you have details to share

right back at you, Douchebag.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wetwillie on March 26, 2015, 11:14:26 AM
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xap1/v/t1.0-9/17326_736378719817220_8357680631374319225_n.jpg?oh=69ae26f91b3dcc69a822a7f231e01d58&oe=55AF6CAB&__gda__=1433870534_cfa46c795b901d5565b6d538c8206c0a)
What a rotten kid

Evidently, God just now came up with a plan. He should have talked to God sooner. That messsage is just sad.
Shut up unless you have details to share

right back at you, Douchebag.

catman just went capital N Nuclear.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Pete on March 26, 2015, 11:22:07 AM
Is Catman2 is a name-calling bully?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: OK_Cat on March 26, 2015, 11:25:59 AM
Catman2, more like jerkstore1
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sunny_cat on March 26, 2015, 11:29:09 AM
Catman, #FAMILY doesn't call one of their own names. That isn't the Wildcat Way.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: star seed 7 on March 26, 2015, 12:13:32 PM
Catman2 wouldn't last very long on a oscar weber basketball team with that kind of attitude
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: steve dave on March 26, 2015, 12:14:56 PM
I'm considering dismissing catman2 from the gE team
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wetwillie on March 26, 2015, 12:17:13 PM
We cant let this kind of cancer infect the board.  Look at what happened with the basketball team and those given second chances.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: meow meow on March 26, 2015, 12:17:27 PM
maybe he'll just transfer to like k-statefans or something
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Catman2 on March 26, 2015, 12:41:08 PM
Is Catman2 is a name-calling bully?

Heat of the moment.
I would very much like to apologize for that error in judgement but that seems to be a sign of weakness on this board.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Catman2 on March 26, 2015, 12:51:23 PM
We cant let this kind of cancer infect the board.  Look at what happened with the basketball team and those given second chances.

C'mon Wetwillie, give me another chance.  Heck, testing positive under K-State's drug testing policy gives you 3 strikes.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wetwillie on March 26, 2015, 01:46:10 PM
your fate is in ok_cat and the poster relations comittee's hands at this point.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Branson Bound on March 26, 2015, 02:21:59 PM
This whole darned thing is so sad. I hate watching a talented young man ruin his life because he turned to hard drugs. Henry at the office was telling me that Marcus was giving his dope to other players and that is why he had to go. I just hope he gets the help he needs. Drugs are horrible.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: meow meow on March 26, 2015, 02:58:11 PM
Branson Bound sounds like he's tango'd with the marijuana dope cigs before.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Gooch on March 26, 2015, 03:00:25 PM
FN/TCfS
Good thing I never got that ridiculous forehead tattoo like clams did. Now I got room for this masterpiece.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on March 26, 2015, 03:10:58 PM
1) Dax, will you be at FattyFest?

2) Who else would want this in purple?  If we ordered a bunch in one shot, we could get some discounts on the price and the shipping.  http://www.spreadshirt.com/too-cool-for-school-C3376A2497603
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ednksu on March 26, 2015, 03:14:22 PM
Its a shame that we didn't send Marcus to Passages Malibu to deal with is addiction issue.  But if there is one thing worse then addiction to marijuana cigarettes its jet lag.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: nicname on March 26, 2015, 03:23:51 PM
Go get 'em Marcus. Wherever you end up. Too bad K-State bball gave up on you. No one deserves to be given up on.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PivWY9wn5ps
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on March 26, 2015, 03:26:49 PM
Its a shame that we didn't send Marcus to Passages Malibu to deal with is addiction issue.  But if there is one thing worse then addiction to marijuana cigarettes its jet lag.

The marijuana use probably started as means of dealing with the jet lag.  I mean, the time table works. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: nicname on March 26, 2015, 03:29:20 PM
Its a shame that we didn't send Marcus to Passages Malibu to deal with is addiction issue.  But if there is one thing worse then addiction to marijuana cigarettes its jet lag.

The marijuana use probably started as means of dealing with the jet lag.  I mean, the time table works.

Not sure how much of this was directly related to weed, but what's really a shame is that people make such a big deal out of weed, especially with regard to athletes.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on March 26, 2015, 03:30:40 PM
Its a shame that we didn't send Marcus to Passages Malibu to deal with is addiction issue.  But if there is one thing worse then addiction to marijuana cigarettes its jet lag.

The marijuana use probably started as means of dealing with the jet lag.  I mean, the time table works.

Not sure how much of this was directly related to weed, but what's really a shame is that people make such a big deal out of weed, especially with regard to athletes.

It makes sense, though, given how it is a guaranteed path to becoming a complete loser of a person simply by inhaling it's magically evil smoke.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on March 26, 2015, 03:34:10 PM
Its a shame that we didn't send Marcus to Passages Malibu to deal with is addiction issue.  But if there is one thing worse then addiction to marijuana cigarettes its jet lag.

The marijuana use probably started as means of dealing with the jet lag.  I mean, the time table works.

Not sure how much of this was directly related to weed, but what's really a shame is that people make such a big deal out of weed, especially with regard to athletes.

I'm guessing because the league, NCAA, and school test for it. I inferred from the Catman guy that Marcus put himself in position to get caught 3 times (for suspension) and then probably got caught again (to get dismissed). Point being, its hard to get "caught" that many times. :dunno:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on March 26, 2015, 03:42:02 PM
What's the rationale for weed being prohibited in athletics, on top of whatever laws apply to the general public?  Competitive balance issue?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on March 26, 2015, 03:44:59 PM
What's the rationale for weed being prohibited in athletics, on top of whatever laws apply to the general public?  Competitive balance issue?

Dumbassery.  I mean, it's illegal for them to drink until they are practically out of school based on age, but we don't test for that nationally. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: nicname on March 26, 2015, 03:45:44 PM

The people I'm referring to are the league, NCAA, school and anyone else who thinks it's such a vile activity. Doesn't mean you're not right. If he got caught that many times it's definitely on him.

The reason I mentioned it was that I saw the ESPN report about the Nebraska LB who tested positive for weed at the draft combine or whatever. He puts out this pretty thoughtful apology, but who knows how much of it he believes. I'm sure he's sincere in his words and will be in his efforts to abstain, because he wants to be a successful pro, but he still might not truly believe it's a problem. If he is sincere, he's now been saddled with a cloak of guilt or remorse over something that he had to be convinced was even a problem in the first place.


Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: nicname on March 26, 2015, 03:46:37 PM
What's the rationale for weed being prohibited in athletics, on top of whatever laws apply to the general public?  Competitive balance issue?

Dumbassery.  I mean, it's illegal for them to drink until they are practically out of school based on age, but we don't test for that nationally.

You convinced me earlier. No need to try to rectify the disgusting hippie behavior.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on March 26, 2015, 03:49:29 PM

The people I'm referring to are the league, NCAA, school and anyone else who thinks it's such a vile activity. Doesn't mean you're not right. If he got caught that many times it's definitely on him.

The reason I mentioned it was that I saw the ESPN report about the Nebraska LB who tested positive for weed at the draft combine or whatever. He puts out this pretty thoughtful apology, but who knows how much of it he believes. I'm sure he's sincere in his words and will be in his efforts to abstain, because he wants to be a successful pro, but he still might not truly believe it's a problem. If he is sincere, he's now been saddled with a cloak of guilt or remorse over something that he had to be convinced was even a problem in the first place.

Isn't this what happened to Justin Houston?  Slipped to round 3 rather than round 1 because he was caught with it a couple times in school?  I think this is right.  Def not going to look it up, though.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: nicname on March 26, 2015, 03:53:43 PM

The people I'm referring to are the league, NCAA, school and anyone else who thinks it's such a vile activity. Doesn't mean you're not right. If he got caught that many times it's definitely on him.

The reason I mentioned it was that I saw the ESPN report about the Nebraska LB who tested positive for weed at the draft combine or whatever. He puts out this pretty thoughtful apology, but who knows how much of it he believes. I'm sure he's sincere in his words and will be in his efforts to abstain, because he wants to be a successful pro, but he still might not truly believe it's a problem. If he is sincere, he's now been saddled with a cloak of guilt or remorse over something that he had to be convinced was even a problem in the first place.

Isn't this what happened to Justin Houston?  Slipped to round 3 rather than round 1 because he was caught with it a couple times in school?  I think this is right.  Def not going to look it up, though.

Yeah.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Skipper44 on March 26, 2015, 03:54:33 PM

The people I'm referring to are the league, NCAA, school and anyone else who thinks it's such a vile activity. Doesn't mean you're not right. If he got caught that many times it's definitely on him.

The reason I mentioned it was that I saw the ESPN report about the Nebraska LB who tested positive for weed at the draft combine or whatever. He puts out this pretty thoughtful apology, but who knows how much of it he believes. I'm sure he's sincere in his words and will be in his efforts to abstain, because he wants to be a successful pro, but he still might not truly believe it's a problem. If he is sincere, he's now been saddled with a cloak of guilt or remorse over something that he had to be convinced was even a problem in the first place.

Isn't this what happened to Justin Houston?  Slipped to round 3 rather than round 1 because he was caught with it a couple times in school?  I think this is right.  Def not going to look it up, though.
I believe Houston tested positive at the combine which is pretty frowned upon because the players no its coming and can't/won't go the the 3 or 4 weeks clean even with $$$ on the line
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: nicname on March 26, 2015, 03:56:41 PM

The people I'm referring to are the league, NCAA, school and anyone else who thinks it's such a vile activity. Doesn't mean you're not right. If he got caught that many times it's definitely on him.

The reason I mentioned it was that I saw the ESPN report about the Nebraska LB who tested positive for weed at the draft combine or whatever. He puts out this pretty thoughtful apology, but who knows how much of it he believes. I'm sure he's sincere in his words and will be in his efforts to abstain, because he wants to be a successful pro, but he still might not truly believe it's a problem. If he is sincere, he's now been saddled with a cloak of guilt or remorse over something that he had to be convinced was even a problem in the first place.

Isn't this what happened to Justin Houston?  Slipped to round 3 rather than round 1 because he was caught with it a couple times in school?  I think this is right.  Def not going to look it up, though.
I believe Houston tested positive at the combine which is pretty frowned upon because the players no its coming and can't/won't go the the 3 or 4 weeks clean even with $$$ on the line

Yeah, very similar to what _Fan said about Foster, but without all the money involved.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sys on March 26, 2015, 03:56:57 PM
I inferred from the Catman guy that Marcus put himself in position to get caught 3 times (for suspension) and then probably got caught again (to get dismissed). Point being, its hard to get "caught" that many times. :dunno:

2x for 10% suspension, 3x for permanent suspension and loss of financial aid.  not sure what permanent suspension means, but it probably means dismissal.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pissclams on March 26, 2015, 03:59:29 PM
i wonder how he administers his dope. 
marijuana cigarettes?
a bong?
spliff?
vaporizer?
edibles?
injections?
dabs?
laced with PCP?

whichever one is the best is the one i bet he does.  sad.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on March 26, 2015, 04:01:46 PM
I inferred from the Catman guy that Marcus put himself in position to get caught 3 times (for suspension) and then probably got caught again (to get dismissed). Point being, its hard to get "caught" that many times. :dunno:

2x for 10% suspension, 3x for permanent suspension and loss of financial aid.  not sure what permanent suspension means, but it probably means dismissal.

Thanks for the correction. This would make sense for what happened. Perhaps Malek is fortunate he wasn't in the "lit" instagram pic with Marcus and Tre.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on March 26, 2015, 04:11:20 PM
I inferred from the Catman guy that Marcus put himself in position to get caught 3 times (for suspension) and then probably got caught again (to get dismissed). Point being, its hard to get "caught" that many times. :dunno:

2x for 10% suspension, 3x for permanent suspension and loss of financial aid.  not sure what permanent suspension means, but it probably means dismissal.

Thanks for the correction. This would make sense for what happened. Perhaps Malek is fortunate he wasn't in the "lit" instagram pic with Marcus and Tre.

1) A third strike can reviewed and removed
2) Why test for a third strike, unless you are ok with the strike. 
3) Players have a pretty good idea when they are going to get tested, they can get their systems flushed out.

It is just total failure.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dub on March 26, 2015, 04:18:17 PM
If Beasley got through without being dismissed, you should be able to get through without being dismissed.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sys on March 26, 2015, 04:20:38 PM
1) A third strike can reviewed and removed
2) Why test for a third strike, unless you are ok with the strike. 
3) Players have a pretty good idea when they are going to get tested, they can get their systems flushed out.

i'm not entirely sure on the process, and may be missing something important, but i can only think of three possibilities.

post big 12 tourney mandatory test.  foster is a complete dumbass or didn't give a eff.
postseason surprise test, weber complicit.  weber wanted foster out, chose the most passive means possible.
postseason surprise test, weber not complicit.  currie's a weirdo, maybe hates kstate, maybe hates weber?

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 26, 2015, 04:21:04 PM
Where are Bob Huggins and Cartier Martin when you need 'em
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: nicname on March 26, 2015, 04:22:16 PM
1) A third strike can reviewed and removed
2) Why test for a third strike, unless you are ok with the strike. 
3) Players have a pretty good idea when they are going to get tested, they can get their systems flushed out.

i'm not entirely sure on the process, and may be missing something important, but i can only think of three possibilities.

post big 12 tourney mandatory test.  foster is a complete dumbass or didn't give a eff.
postseason surprise test, weber complicit.  weber wanted foster out, chose the most passive means possible.
postseason surprise test, weber not complicit.  currie's a weirdo, maybe hates kstate, maybe hates weber?

Did you have a good spring break, Marcus? Step into my office. Have a glass or two of water.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: deputy dawg on March 26, 2015, 04:30:14 PM
1) A third strike can reviewed and removed
2) Why test for a third strike, unless you are ok with the strike. 
3) Players have a pretty good idea when they are going to get tested, they can get their systems flushed out.

i'm not entirely sure on the process, and may be missing something important, but i can only think of three possibilities.

post big 12 tourney mandatory test.  foster is a complete dumbass or didn't give a eff.
postseason surprise test, weber complicit.  weber wanted foster out, chose the most passive means possible.
postseason surprise test, weber not complicit.  currie's a weirdo, maybe hates kstate, maybe hates weber?

Hmmm...lots of drug tests are random-selected subjects only.  Could be that Foster came up on the wrong side of random.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on March 26, 2015, 04:40:56 PM
1) A third strike can reviewed and removed
2) Why test for a third strike, unless you are ok with the strike. 
3) Players have a pretty good idea when they are going to get tested, they can get their systems flushed out.

i'm not entirely sure on the process, and may be missing something important, but i can only think of three possibilities.

post big 12 tourney mandatory test.  foster is a complete dumbass or didn't give a eff.
postseason surprise test, weber complicit.  weber wanted foster out, chose the most passive means possible.
postseason surprise test, weber not complicit.  currie's a weirdo, maybe hates kstate, maybe hates weber?

Hmmm...lots of drug tests are random-selected subjects only.  Could be that Foster came up on the wrong side of random.
If random is code for secretly manipulated, yes.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pissclams on March 26, 2015, 05:08:49 PM
some people choose to help addicts, others turn their backs and kick the victims to the curb. 

cinnamon rolls for thought as to the leaders of young men at our university
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: yoman on March 26, 2015, 05:43:39 PM
What's the rationale for weed being prohibited in athletics, on top of whatever laws apply to the general public?  Competitive balance issue?

Dumbassery.  I mean, it's illegal for them to drink until they are practically out of school based on age, but we don't test for that nationally.

They technically do and alcohol is on the NCAA banned list (can't remember if it's only until 21 or just completely banned). It's absolutely not a big deal though because of how short alcohol is in the body. For the testing (assuming that D1 is the same as smaller schools at this point), the student athlete is told the day before their test, so essentially you just don't have to get drunk before the test and you're good. Caffeine is the same way. IMO, the only reason why drug tests are remotely effective is because of how long THC is in the body and because of how unregulated the supplement industry is (very easy to fail if you use the wrong preworkout).
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: nitrocat on March 26, 2015, 06:03:45 PM
What's the rationale for weed being prohibited in athletics, on top of whatever laws apply to the general public?  Competitive balance issue?

Dumbassery.  I mean, it's illegal for them to drink until they are practically out of school based on age, but we don't test for that nationally.

They technically do and alcohol is on the NCAA banned list (can't remember if it's only until 21 or just completely banned). It's absolutely not a big deal though because of how short alcohol is in the body. For the testing (assuming that D1 is the same as smaller schools at this point), the student athlete is told the day before their test, so essentially you just don't have to get drunk before the test and you're good. Caffeine is the same way. IMO, the only reason why drug tests are remotely effective is because of how long THC is in the body and because of how unregulated the supplement industry is (very easy to fail if you use the wrong preworkout).

Yeah, you're basically told 12 hours before. And it's during the week. To get caught for alcohol you'd literally have to go get drunk after they told you that you were being tested at 6 am the next morning. I sincerely doubt anyone is that dumb.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on March 26, 2015, 06:45:36 PM
you'd have to have pretty solid evidence to convince me that oscar didn't purposefully test them when they got back from spring break and currie was ok w/ it. technically they can appeal to currie or the pat bosco committee thing that curt kelly did. curt went w/ bosco which was the smart move because currie and his strong desire to eff frank and his players.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: nicname on March 26, 2015, 06:51:40 PM
you'd have to have pretty solid evidence to convince me that oscar didn't purposefully test them when they got back from spring break and currie was ok w/ it. technically they can appeal to currie or the pat bosco committee thing that curt kelly did. curt went w/ bosco which was the smart move because currie and his strong desire to eff frank and his players.

Kelly and his coach also wanted him to be here. Not to put words into his mouth, but all things considered, I'm wouldn't bet that Foster truly felt the same way.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: yoman on March 26, 2015, 06:57:58 PM
you'd have to have pretty solid evidence to convince me that oscar didn't purposefully test them when they got back from spring break and currie was ok w/ it. technically they can appeal to currie or the pat bosco committee thing that curt kelly did. curt went w/ bosco which was the smart move because currie and his strong desire to eff frank and his players.

Kelly and his coach also wanted him to be here. Not to put words into his mouth, but all things considered, I'm wouldn't bet that Foster truly felt the same way.

Both of these make sense, and are frustrating if true. Especially considering Weber isn't stupid; he knows that Foster has the potential to be our best in a year that was make or break for him. This scenario would suggest that he is trying to hit a reset button for more time. Unfortunately, we may give it to him. Oddly, Marcus is somewhat a winner for getting away from this, but his name has taken a huge hit, in part due to Weber.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: chum1 on March 26, 2015, 07:16:56 PM
This scenario would suggest that he is trying to hit a reset button for more time.

This is the most realistic scenario, for sure. oscar is sitting around, thinking, "It's an established fact that I can't win with my own players. So, if I want to keep my job, I'm going to have to scheme the yokels. What's the best way to do that? Bust players for drugs and then boot them from the team. I just need to do it before goEMAW blows my cover."
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 26, 2015, 07:46:09 PM
If it was drugs, why not just say it was for drugs? (This is not a oscar specific question, it's just that the speculation is probably worse than reality.)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wetwillie on March 26, 2015, 07:47:47 PM
If it was drugs, why not just say it was for drugs? (This is not a oscar specific question, it's just that the speculation is probably worse than reality.)


I thought they would be violating student privacy or something
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on March 26, 2015, 07:51:01 PM
It seems to be an unwritten rule to not eff someone on their way out the door.  Speculation is better than definitely having a drug issue when it comes to getting on another team, imo.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 26, 2015, 07:56:32 PM
If it was drugs, why not just say it was for drugs? (This is not a oscar specific question, it's just that the speculation is probably worse than reality.)


I thought they would be violating student privacy or something
Nope

http://www.sbnation.com/college-basketball/2014/4/25/5652446/mitch-mcgary-marijuana-suspension-nba-draft-2014
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 26, 2015, 07:56:56 PM
It seems to be an unwritten rule to not eff someone on their way out the door.  Speculation is better than definitely having a drug issue when it comes to getting on another team, imo.
Is it?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Winters on March 26, 2015, 08:03:04 PM
tweet, tweet...
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on March 26, 2015, 08:03:36 PM
I don't think it's a reset. I just don't think Weber could handle Marcus and his personality. It's not a unique thing for his career. Then Marcus helped him out, though I think Weber probably really wanted to keep him. At least after the TCU game.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ednksu on March 26, 2015, 08:07:02 PM
Its a shame that we didn't send Marcus to Passages Malibu to deal with is addiction issue.  But if there is one thing worse then addiction to marijuana cigarettes its jet lag.

The marijuana use probably started as means of dealing with the jet lag.  I mean, the time table works.

Not sure how much of this was directly related to weed, but what's really a shame is that people make such a big deal out of weed, especially with regard to athletes.

It makes sense, though, given how it is a guaranteed path to becoming a complete loser of a person simply by inhaling it's magically evil smoke.

Joking aside, everyone* knows weed laws are ridiculous.  The fact is though its rough ridin' stupid to sacrifice your scholarship for your Saturday night proclivities. 



*by everyone I mean people with common sense who haven't bought into the bullshit (somewhat racist) drug enforcement policies of the country or who aren't blatant hypocrites about what they did in college, probably under age drinking, which in moderation is just as bad as weed.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on March 26, 2015, 08:07:28 PM
It seems to be an unwritten rule to not eff someone on their way out the door.  Speculation is better than definitely having a drug issue when it comes to getting on another team, imo.
Is it?
Generally, I think it is.  How many times do you hear how shitty of a job a coach did from their AD?  Also, I feel like we would hear a lot more about transfers than "for personal reasons" or "to be closer to family".
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 26, 2015, 08:19:39 PM
It seems to be an unwritten rule to not eff someone on their way out the door.  Speculation is better than definitely having a drug issue when it comes to getting on another team, imo.
Is it?
Generally, I think it is.  How many times do you hear how shitty of a job a coach did from their AD?  Also, I feel like we would hear a lot more about transfers than "for personal reasons" or "to be closer to family".

Then why not just say all three players wanted to transfer? Why announce he was kicked off?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on March 26, 2015, 08:22:06 PM
oscar worried about face, I would guess.  It plays out differently if you report you kicked off your best player rather he is transferring.  It's a power thing, imo.  One looks like you have the control and able to make tough decisions.   The other looks like you are a loser and ppl are bailing.  Perception is super important.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: EMAWmeister on March 26, 2015, 08:26:10 PM
http://www.thesalutepodcast.com/the-power-of-a-question-mark/


 :'bye cruel world:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 26, 2015, 08:32:26 PM
oscar worried about face, I would guess.  It plays out differently if you report you kicked off your best player rather he is transferring.  It's a power thing, imo.  One looks like you have the control and able to make tough decisions.   The other looks like you are a loser and ppl are bailing.  Perception is super important.
In that case, announcing you're kicking him off the team for substance abuse rather than lazyness or some other unknown makes everyone look better. I mean, most coaches would probably deal with weed rather than an FP, TC, etc. And oscar doesn't look bad because every college coach in history had had to deal with weed use on the team.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on March 26, 2015, 08:34:34 PM
Maybe.  Doing what he did accomplishes both.  Allows oscar to save face.  Allows marcus the room to give any other team his side of the story and more likelihood of getting signed.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sunny_cat on March 26, 2015, 08:41:07 PM
http://www.thesalutepodcast.com/the-power-of-a-question-mark/


 :'bye cruel world:

 :bang:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Lucas Scoopsalot on March 26, 2015, 08:42:21 PM
I highly doubt Foster transferred. If oscar reported that he kicked Foster off of the team when he actually transferred, Foster would have gone to twitter or something and called oscar out. I mean, that's what I'd do if I was Foster. I would be protecting my own reputation. I think you guys are looking too far into it. Although, I wouldn't put it past oscar to kick him off the team to buy himself more time.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: j-dub on March 26, 2015, 08:55:21 PM
http://www.thesalutepodcast.com/the-power-of-a-question-mark/


 :'bye cruel world:

 :bang:

what did these dumbasses say
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sunny_cat on March 26, 2015, 08:57:31 PM
it's an article, not a podcast
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on March 26, 2015, 09:05:37 PM
oscar worried about face, I would guess.  It plays out differently if you report you kicked off your best player rather he is transferring.  It's a power thing, imo.  One looks like you have the control and able to make tough decisions.   The other looks like you are a loser and ppl are bailing.  Perception is super important.
In that case, announcing you're kicking him off the team for substance abuse rather than lazyness or some other unknown makes everyone look better. I mean, most coaches would probably deal with weed rather than an FP, TC, etc. And oscar doesn't look bad because every college coach in history had had to deal with weed use on the team.

i'm not really sure that publicly announcing that you are kicking multiple players off of your team for substance abuse makes you or them look better. maybe you are substance abusing? drugs?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: nicname on March 26, 2015, 09:08:47 PM
http://www.thesalutepodcast.com/the-power-of-a-question-mark/


 :'bye cruel world:

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.giphy.com%2Fmedia%2F11gC4odpiRKuha%2Fgiphy.gif&hash=c924e01505bf704b95cfea0920c37c455da16347)

Nope.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 26, 2015, 09:10:52 PM
oscar worried about face, I would guess.  It plays out differently if you report you kicked off your best player rather he is transferring.  It's a power thing, imo.  One looks like you have the control and able to make tough decisions.   The other looks like you are a loser and ppl are bailing.  Perception is super important.
In that case, announcing you're kicking him off the team for substance abuse rather than lazyness or some other unknown makes everyone look better. I mean, most coaches would probably deal with weed rather than an FP, TC, etc. And oscar doesn't look bad because every college coach in history had had to deal with weed use on the team.

i'm not really sure that publicly announcing that you are kicking multiple players off of your team for substance abuse makes you or them look better. maybe you are substance abusing? drugs?
It makes them both look better!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on March 26, 2015, 09:18:23 PM
oscar worried about face, I would guess.  It plays out differently if you report you kicked off your best player rather he is transferring.  It's a power thing, imo.  One looks like you have the control and able to make tough decisions.   The other looks like you are a loser and ppl are bailing.  Perception is super important.
In that case, announcing you're kicking him off the team for substance abuse rather than lazyness or some other unknown makes everyone look better. I mean, most coaches would probably deal with weed rather than an FP, TC, etc. And oscar doesn't look bad because every college coach in history had had to deal with weed use on the team.

i'm not really sure that publicly announcing that you are kicking multiple players off of your team for substance abuse makes you or them look better. maybe you are substance abusing? drugs?
It makes them both look better!

i'm not sure oscar telling kstaters that "drugs" are rampant in his program is a great look for him. better to let kk and fitz cast vague shade. plus you aren't factoring in how much of a passive aggressive bitch oscar is.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on March 26, 2015, 09:22:08 PM
If it was drugs, why not just say it was for drugs? (This is not a oscar specific question, it's just that the speculation is probably worse than reality.)


I thought they would be violating student privacy or something
Nope

http://www.sbnation.com/college-basketball/2014/4/25/5652446/mitch-mcgary-marijuana-suspension-nba-draft-2014

Neither the NCAA nor Michigan released that McGary tested positive for marijuana. There are federal laws preventing universities from doing so, not sure about the NCAA.  Anyway the McGary leak was from either his people or an NBA scout or executive hee interviewed with.

I'm not sure why we're talking so much about weed tests though because it is highly unlikely he was tested since the season ended.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on March 26, 2015, 09:25:03 PM
If it was drugs, why not just say it was for drugs? (This is not a oscar specific question, it's just that the speculation is probably worse than reality.)


I thought they would be violating student privacy or something
Nope

http://www.sbnation.com/college-basketball/2014/4/25/5652446/mitch-mcgary-marijuana-suspension-nba-draft-2014

Neither the NCAA nor Michigan released that McGary tested positive for marijuana. There are federal laws preventing universities from doing so, not sure about the NCAA.  Anyway the McGary leak was from either his people or an NBA scout or executive hee interviewed with.

I'm not sure why we're talking so much about weed tests though because it is highly unlikely he was tested since the season ended.

i mean i think that too kind of, but him and tre and that tweet and then they are gone right after they get back? plus stan said he thought the tweet was the final straw or something. i mean man. seems very possible.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 26, 2015, 09:26:43 PM
If it was drugs, why not just say it was for drugs? (This is not a oscar specific question, it's just that the speculation is probably worse than reality.)


I thought they would be violating student privacy or something
Nope

http://www.sbnation.com/college-basketball/2014/4/25/5652446/mitch-mcgary-marijuana-suspension-nba-draft-2014

Neither the NCAA nor Michigan released that McGary tested positive for marijuana. There are federal laws preventing universities from doing so, not sure about the NCAA.  Anyway the McGary leak was from either his people or an NBA scout or executive hee interviewed with.

I'm not sure why we're talking so much about weed tests though because it is highly unlikely he was tested since the season ended.
Ah
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on March 26, 2015, 09:28:25 PM
If it was drugs, why not just say it was for drugs? (This is not a oscar specific question, it's just that the speculation is probably worse than reality.)


I thought they would be violating student privacy or something
Nope

http://www.sbnation.com/college-basketball/2014/4/25/5652446/mitch-mcgary-marijuana-suspension-nba-draft-2014

Neither the NCAA nor Michigan released that McGary tested positive for marijuana. There are federal laws preventing universities from doing so, not sure about the NCAA.  Anyway the McGary leak was from either his people or an NBA scout or executive hee interviewed with.

I'm not sure why we're talking so much about weed tests though because it is highly unlikely he was tested since the season ended.

i mean i think that too kind of, but him and tre and that tweet and then they are gone right after they get back? plus stan said he thought the tweet was the final straw or something. i mean man. seems very possible.

Yeah, I think they canned him because of the tweet without a test.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on March 26, 2015, 09:33:36 PM
If it was drugs, why not just say it was for drugs? (This is not a oscar specific question, it's just that the speculation is probably worse than reality.)


I thought they would be violating student privacy or something
Nope

http://www.sbnation.com/college-basketball/2014/4/25/5652446/mitch-mcgary-marijuana-suspension-nba-draft-2014

Neither the NCAA nor Michigan released that McGary tested positive for marijuana. There are federal laws preventing universities from doing so, not sure about the NCAA.  Anyway the McGary leak was from either his people or an NBA scout or executive hee interviewed with.

I'm not sure why we're talking so much about weed tests though because it is highly unlikely he was tested since the season ended.

i mean i think that too kind of, but him and tre and that tweet and then they are gone right after they get back? plus stan said he thought the tweet was the final straw or something. i mean man. seems very possible.

Yeah, I think they canned him because of the tweet without a test.

ok. i'll take your guess over mine on this. still what kind of coach is just waiting for a reason to do this? seems weird. i mean a rough ridin' tweet of two guys on a beach and that's your final straw. jesus. make them run two thousand stairs or quit. be an adult and coach a team.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on March 26, 2015, 09:38:30 PM
If it was drugs, why not just say it was for drugs? (This is not a oscar specific question, it's just that the speculation is probably worse than reality.)


I thought they would be violating student privacy or something
Nope

http://www.sbnation.com/college-basketball/2014/4/25/5652446/mitch-mcgary-marijuana-suspension-nba-draft-2014

Neither the NCAA nor Michigan released that McGary tested positive for marijuana. There are federal laws preventing universities from doing so, not sure about the NCAA.  Anyway the McGary leak was from either his people or an NBA scout or executive hee interviewed with.

I'm not sure why we're talking so much about weed tests though because it is highly unlikely he was tested since the season ended.

i mean i think that too kind of, but him and tre and that tweet and then they are gone right after they get back? plus stan said he thought the tweet was the final straw or something. i mean man. seems very possible.

Yeah, I think they canned him because of the tweet without a test.

ok. i'll take your guess over mine on this. still what kind of coach is just waiting for a reason to do this? seems weird. i mean a rough ridin' tweet of two guys on a beach and that's your final straw. jesus. make them run two thousand stairs or quit. be an adult and coach a team.

Bless oscar for sending a message. :whistle1:

Also it's fair to assume that Marcus got a last chance warning of some sort, no?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wetwillie on March 26, 2015, 09:40:06 PM
Jevon finds out he is off the team via Twitter , gets reinstated for the big12 tourney, transfers.    Lol. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on March 26, 2015, 09:41:43 PM
The Jevon transfer is pretty much the only thing that makes sense.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on March 26, 2015, 09:48:48 PM
Jevon finds out he is off the team via Twitter , gets reinstated for the big12 tourney, transfers.    Lol.

he didn't go to padre for spring break.

"kansas state university...where you can lose your scholarship for going to padre and taking a picture of yourself with a bird and a friend"
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on March 26, 2015, 09:49:54 PM
Fake lizard, you mean.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wetwillie on March 26, 2015, 09:50:35 PM
Jevon finds out he is off the team via Twitter , gets reinstated for the big12 tourney, transfers.    Lol.

he didn't go to padre for spring break.

"kansas state university...where you can lose your scholarship for going to padre and taking a picture of yourself with a bird and a friend"

Is the bird some kind of weird metaphor you cooked up?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on March 26, 2015, 09:52:19 PM
Maybe oscar's position is that they weren't supposed to go on spring break at all, because they theoretically should've still been playing.

Dumb to be OK with them going on spring break but then being mad that they drank, smoked, went on a beach, handled a fake lizard, tweet'd pics of it or any combination thereof.  That's the spring break itinerary.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: puniraptor on March 26, 2015, 09:52:31 PM
Lizards = birds #JurassPark
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on March 26, 2015, 09:54:56 PM
Jevon finds out he is off the team via Twitter , gets reinstated for the big12 tourney, transfers.    Lol.

he didn't go to padre for spring break.

"kansas state university...where you can lose your scholarship for going to padre and taking a picture of yourself with a bird and a friend"

Is the bird some kind of weird metaphor you cooked up?

bird=lizard. i'm pretty fostered right now.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on March 26, 2015, 09:56:10 PM
Stoned age facts.  Birds are dinos.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: puniraptor on March 26, 2015, 09:59:28 PM
Terrible lizard. Brush up on that Latin, broe
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on March 26, 2015, 11:19:36 PM
Jevon finds out he is off the team via Twitter , gets reinstated for the big12 tourney, transfers.    Lol.

he didn't go to padre for spring break.

"kansas state university...where you can lose your scholarship for going to padre and taking a picture of yourself with a bird and a friend"

Jevon went to Padre
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Catman2 on March 26, 2015, 11:34:53 PM
If and I say IF weed was the problem it was probably just the straw that broke the camel's back. It does make sense that the 3 game suspension would have been 10% of the season for 2nd failed test.

And what about Malek Harris, he got the same 3 game penalty and wasn't booted. If anyone knows suspension, it is Malek. In high school he was suspended his entire senior basketball season. The infraction/ infractions were never revealed. And Weber still took him. So, it looks like Weber is open to 2nd chances. It is probably the 3rd or 4th where he draws the line.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: slobber on March 27, 2015, 01:06:51 AM
Damnit!!!  This crap is important for real. I'm at a 5.4 and climbing and u can't read 5 pages to catch up. Foster is a stud. If you disagree and need to tell me about it, start a new thread and I can ignore it.


Gonna win 'em all!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Cire on March 27, 2015, 06:44:05 AM
In
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: felix rex on March 27, 2015, 07:15:01 AM
I mean, best of luck to everyone who thinks Weber properly handled his bizness.  I have nothing else to say to those people.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on March 27, 2015, 08:24:18 AM
If it was drugs, why not just say it was for drugs? (This is not a oscar specific question, it's just that the speculation is probably worse than reality.)


I thought they would be violating student privacy or something
Nope

http://www.sbnation.com/college-basketball/2014/4/25/5652446/mitch-mcgary-marijuana-suspension-nba-draft-2014

Neither the NCAA nor Michigan released that McGary tested positive for marijuana. There are federal laws preventing universities from doing so, not sure about the NCAA.  Anyway the McGary leak was from either his people or an NBA scout or executive hee interviewed with.

I'm not sure why we're talking so much about weed tests though because it is highly unlikely he was tested since the season ended.

i mean i think that too kind of, but him and tre and that tweet and then they are gone right after they get back? plus stan said he thought the tweet was the final straw or something. i mean man. seems very possible.

Yeah, I think they canned him because of the tweet without a test.

ok. i'll take your guess over mine on this. still what kind of coach is just waiting for a reason to do this? seems weird. i mean a rough ridin' tweet of two guys on a beach and that's your final straw. jesus. make them run two thousand stairs or quit. be an adult and coach a team.


new information alert. i will now take my guess over yours.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: steve dave on March 27, 2015, 08:25:28 AM
john currie is the principal on ferris bueller
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: steve dave on March 27, 2015, 08:30:10 AM
like, how close do you guys think he was to driving down there and trying to catch them on camera or something? I guarantee he sent texts to bazooka joe trying to get him to narc.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 27, 2015, 08:35:42 AM
Currie is going to start creeping around aggie ville in a trench coat and sunglasses
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: steve dave on March 27, 2015, 08:37:39 AM
Currie is going to start creeping around aggie ville in a trench coat and sunglasses

I bet he grabs every single black guy by the shoulder and says YOUR ASS IS MINE before they turn around and it's like some asian kid who he doesn't know and he gets beer spit in his face over and over.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sonofdaxjones on March 27, 2015, 08:40:49 AM
I just don't even . . .  :blank:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on March 27, 2015, 08:46:35 AM
do you guys think currie and oscar set up at exit 303 with cups and whatnot or do you think they actually let them drive all the way back into manhattan?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Pete on March 27, 2015, 08:56:29 AM
I bet Currie gets some of those flashing "Drug dogs in use" signs and puts them Denison in front of Chester E.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: star seed 7 on March 27, 2015, 09:02:23 AM
Remember when everyone crap on WackyCat08 for saying foster shouldn't send that tweet
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on March 27, 2015, 09:05:13 AM
It's just like when our athletic director told us once before trip to south padre... MEN! 5 of you are leaving on a mission. 2 of you ain't coming back.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdamox.com%2Fentertainment%2Fdazed_and_confused%2Fmr_payne.jpg&hash=5485b4bbba9a0de59032380d9e9aa0896d3c1ad0)

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: catzacker on March 27, 2015, 09:14:59 AM
john currie is the principal on ferris bueller

nine times...
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sundaydumbday.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F07%2FFerris-Buellers-Day-Off-Jeffery-Jones.jpg&hash=fb5ca6654cde0a1d68b1d05b91d9497d18d03d8d)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ksupamplemousse on March 27, 2015, 10:03:02 AM
Remember when everyone crap on WackyCat08 for saying foster shouldn't send that tweet

I was going to eat crow and apologize, but then I remembered what a dickhead Wacky was on the basketball board a couple nights ago.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: SdK on March 27, 2015, 10:14:07 AM
Remember when everyone crap on WackyCat08 for saying foster shouldn't send that tweet

I remember the time. MJ style
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: mocat on March 27, 2015, 10:28:22 AM
everyone made fun of wacky for saying the whataburger was booze
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 27, 2015, 10:32:30 AM
everyone made fun of wacky for saying the whataburger was booze

Did he actually say it was booze? or lean?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on March 27, 2015, 10:57:32 AM
If it was drugs, why not just say it was for drugs? (This is not a oscar specific question, it's just that the speculation is probably worse than reality.)


I thought they would be violating student privacy or something
Nope

http://www.sbnation.com/college-basketball/2014/4/25/5652446/mitch-mcgary-marijuana-suspension-nba-draft-2014

Neither the NCAA nor Michigan released that McGary tested positive for marijuana. There are federal laws preventing universities from doing so, not sure about the NCAA.  Anyway the McGary leak was from either his people or an NBA scout or executive hee interviewed with.

I'm not sure why we're talking so much about weed tests though because it is highly unlikely he was tested since the season ended.

i mean i think that too kind of, but him and tre and that tweet and then they are gone right after they get back? plus stan said he thought the tweet was the final straw or something. i mean man. seems very possible.

Yeah, I think they canned him because of the tweet without a test.

ok. i'll take your guess over mine on this. still what kind of coach is just waiting for a reason to do this? seems weird. i mean a rough ridin' tweet of two guys on a beach and that's your final straw. jesus. make them run two thousand stairs or quit. be an adult and coach a team.


new information alert. i will now take my guess over yours.

rough ridin' ruthless to drug test him two weeks after the season ended and days after returning from spring break. They could have dismissed him without the test.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on March 27, 2015, 11:02:09 AM
Remember when everyone crap on WackyCat08 for saying foster shouldn't send that tweet

I was going to eat crow and apologize, but then I remembered what a dickhead Wacky was on the basketball board a couple nights ago.

Wait, were there people dismissing the possibility that there was more than soda in that cup? I think even now all we know is that was a whataburger cup, not sure anyone that made fun of the wackster contended otherwise.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ksupamplemousse on March 27, 2015, 11:05:07 AM
Remember when everyone crap on WackyCat08 for saying foster shouldn't send that tweet

I was going to eat crow and apologize, but then I remembered what a dickhead Wacky was on the basketball board a couple nights ago.

Wait, were there people dismissing the possibility that there was more than soda in that cup? I think even now all we know is that was a whataburger cup, not sure anyone that made fun of the wackster contended otherwise.

Yeah, I don't think anyone said otherwise, but in retrospect it wasn't a great idea to send that tweet.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on March 27, 2015, 11:08:40 AM
Remember when everyone crap on WackyCat08 for saying foster shouldn't send that tweet

I was going to eat crow and apologize, but then I remembered what a dickhead Wacky was on the basketball board a couple nights ago.

Wait, were there people dismissing the possibility that there was more than soda in that cup? I think even now all we know is that was a whataburger cup, not sure anyone that made fun of the wackster contended otherwise.

Yeah, I don't think anyone said otherwise, but in retrospect it wasn't a great idea to send that tweet.

Maybe the harshest consequence of typing the word lit in the history of the world?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ksupamplemousse on March 27, 2015, 11:10:49 AM
Remember when everyone crap on WackyCat08 for saying foster shouldn't send that tweet

I was going to eat crow and apologize, but then I remembered what a dickhead Wacky was on the basketball board a couple nights ago.

Wait, were there people dismissing the possibility that there was more than soda in that cup? I think even now all we know is that was a whataburger cup, not sure anyone that made fun of the wackster contended otherwise.

Yeah, I don't think anyone said otherwise, but in retrospect it wasn't a great idea to send that tweet.

Maybe the harshest consequence of typing the word lit in the history of the world?

I really won't miss JC's heavy handedness. I've got mixed feelings about the job he's doing, but I'm 100% sure he's a dick.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on March 27, 2015, 11:12:42 AM
He should have just said he was teaching Randolph some English lit. Oh well, live and learn.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Skipper44 on March 27, 2015, 11:13:49 AM
Marcus is his own worst enemy
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ksupamplemousse on March 27, 2015, 11:14:29 AM
 :lol:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on March 27, 2015, 11:19:24 AM
Some of me doesn't feel bad for the players because they were dumb enough to sign up to play here. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: mocat on March 27, 2015, 11:23:50 AM
everyone made fun of wacky for saying the whataburger was booze

Did he actually say it was booze? or lean?

say what now
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: steve dave on March 27, 2015, 11:24:44 AM
I don't recall anyone specified booze/lean/etc
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: slobber on March 27, 2015, 11:39:17 AM

Damnit!!!  This crap is important for real. I'm at a 5.4 and climbing and u can't read 5 pages to catch up. Foster is a stud. If you disagree and need to tell me about it, start a new thread and I can ignore it.


Gonna win 'em all!
wtf? I am at the airport feeling like sd did last week on his way back from Vegas. I open gE to this crap. I hope there aren't any others.


Gonna win 'em all!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: slobber on March 27, 2015, 11:52:20 AM
How many pages of "oscar Weber is a nimrod" are there on gE? Why would anybody come to play for him at this point. It's not like a recruit is going to be oblivious to the extreme levels of doucheyness we have in our head coach.


Gonna win 'em all!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on March 27, 2015, 11:53:03 AM
I did get a lot of "old man" comments for suggesting the tweet wasn't a good idea. @kslim went really heavy too. I really don't care tho. I think it's funny now. Also, sorry ksupamp. You did call me a dumbass several times the other night.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on March 27, 2015, 11:55:45 AM
I want those Big 12 shades. Also, our guys tweeting out pics w/ drinks in their hand who aren't 21. :facepalm:
UMMM who gives a crap
:lol:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 'taterblast on March 27, 2015, 11:57:14 AM
gotta admit it's pretty admirable how wacky stood strong in the face of adversity and came out on top in this one.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ksupamplemousse on March 27, 2015, 11:57:52 AM
I did get a lot of "old man" comments for suggesting the tweet wasn't a good idea. @kslim went really heavy too. I really don't care tho. I think it's funny now. Also, sorry ksupamp. You did call me a dumbass several times the other night.

Didn't call you a dumbass. Apology accepted though.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on March 27, 2015, 11:58:19 AM
I still think it's hilarious that Wacky thought there was something wrong with tweeting out a picture of an athlete holding a What-a-Burger cup.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on March 27, 2015, 11:59:34 AM
I want those Big 12 shades. Also, our guys tweeting out pics w/ drinks in their hand who aren't 21. :facepalm:
UMMM who gives a crap
The athletic department.  :dunno:
you cannot be serious. its spring break and the kids are in college
#blessed :lol:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on March 27, 2015, 12:00:26 PM
I want those Big 12 shades. Also, our guys tweeting out pics w/ drinks in their hand who aren't 21. :facepalm:
UMMM who gives a crap
:lol:

This is splitting hairs but he's still right. As I pointed out to you that whataburger cup didn't get those guys in trouble.  Lit did.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on March 27, 2015, 12:01:08 PM
I still think it's hilarious that Wacky thought there was something wrong with tweeting out a picture of an athlete holding a What-a-Burger cup.
The lit part was more of it than the cup, but yes, I definitely assumed.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 0.42 on March 27, 2015, 01:13:00 PM
Is there any other athletic department in the Big 12 that would act like ours in this situation? TCU maybe?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on March 27, 2015, 01:26:57 PM
Is there any other athletic department in the Big 12 that would act like ours in this situation? TCU maybe?

i don't think there is another p5 school that would've done what we just did, but it's hard to say whether it was the school or oscar that ordered the code red.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: mhkpasa on March 27, 2015, 01:29:21 PM
Marcus is his own worst enemy

 :thumbs: :thumbs: please tell me whyyyyyyyyy
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: renocat on March 27, 2015, 11:06:12 PM
In western Kansas we give chocolate jackrabbits.  Marcus would have done better if Shane would have been here.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: dal9 on March 31, 2015, 11:53:52 AM
http://insider.espn.go.com/blog/jeff-goodman/post/_/id/4899/top-10-transfers-and-complete-transfer-list&ex_cid=InsiderTwitter_GoodmanTransferList2015March

Espn rates him literally worse than a rapist!  Also Number 3 best overall.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Stevesie60 on March 31, 2015, 12:01:23 PM
Barnes watched him put up 34 points against him as a freshman. Wonder if he'd be interested in getting him to Tennessee.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: steve dave on March 31, 2015, 12:15:08 PM
oh man, a Foster to TN with my guy Rick would be incred. second favorite team status assured.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on March 31, 2015, 12:24:58 PM
Foster is going to SMU and you guys all know it.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on March 31, 2015, 12:28:18 PM
Foster is going to SMU and you guys all know it.

While no one would be surprised if he did, no one should be surprised if he doesn't, either. He should have plenty of options and I have no idea what SMU's scholarship situation is like.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on March 31, 2015, 12:39:49 PM
Foster is going to SMU and you guys all know it.

While no one would be surprised if he did, no one should be surprised if he doesn't, either. He should have plenty of options and I have no idea what SMU's scholarship situation is like.
Yeah, good point.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Bqqkie Pimp on March 31, 2015, 01:09:46 PM
Foster is going to SMU and you guys all know it.

While no one would be surprised if he did, no one should be surprised if he doesn't, either. He should have plenty of options and I have no idea what SMU's scholarship situation is like.

SMU is very :kstategrad:

Their scholly sitch is a moot point.

 :dubious:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Panjandrum on March 31, 2015, 01:26:53 PM
Having Foster at off guard and Semi on the wing is downright scary.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on March 31, 2015, 01:29:13 PM
In western Kansas we give chocolate jackrabbits.  Marcus would have done better if Shane would have been here.

We? You're not from western Kansas
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on March 31, 2015, 01:32:04 PM
MU has reached out to Foster.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 0.42 on March 31, 2015, 01:38:09 PM
MU has reached out to Foster.

 :sdeek:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Panjandrum on March 31, 2015, 01:38:54 PM
If he loves oscar, he'll adore Kim Anderson.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Bqqkie Pimp on March 31, 2015, 01:42:50 PM
Having Foster at off guard and Semi on the wing is downright scary.

Not to mention very convenient for me to make the drive to Moody to see our boy Marcus scorch the nets again...

 :emawkid:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on March 31, 2015, 02:09:05 PM
MU has reached out to Foster.

NOOOOOOOOOO!!!O!!O!O!!!!!!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: bones129 on March 31, 2015, 02:13:09 PM

 :runaway:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: #LIFE on March 31, 2015, 02:35:53 PM
Sorry if I missed it earlier, but Marcus doesn't have to sit out a year since he was "dismissed" right?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on March 31, 2015, 02:42:31 PM
The so called run off rule has been modified,  he's likely going to have to sit.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on March 31, 2015, 02:46:31 PM
Also, likely given a 6th yr to be eligible. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on March 31, 2015, 02:52:30 PM
I think there's a "no crap head rule". Similar to why DGB had to sit out.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Skipper44 on March 31, 2015, 02:54:32 PM
I think there's a "no crap head rule". Similar to why DGB had to sit out.
i know you are just wc8'n here but please don't compare what happened to Marcus to what a real life DB like DGB did.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on March 31, 2015, 02:55:49 PM
I think there's a "no crap head rule". Similar to why DGB had to sit out.
i know you are just wc8'n here but please don't compare what happened to Marcus to what a real life DB like DGB did.
Yeah, I'm not, but if there was a "cause", then I think they make you sit.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Skipper44 on March 31, 2015, 02:57:09 PM
The so called run off rule has been modified,  he's likely going to have to sit.
i actually read an official NCAA release and I took it more an elimination of the "hardship" appeal process (dying grandma, etc).  Did the NCAA just apply the hardship appeal as an answer to oversigning and coaching changes or was there an actual "run off" rule?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on March 31, 2015, 03:00:01 PM
There was an article linked in this thread or one of the other Holy-crap-Marcus-Is-Leaving threads that stated that the hardship rule and the run off rule were both no longer going to allow immediate play, but could result in the player getting a 6th year so that they don't waste a year of playing time while sitting out from the move.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Catchacold on April 13, 2015, 11:15:13 AM
https://twitter.com/bluejaybanter/status/587647758045052928
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on April 13, 2015, 11:24:21 AM
Oh, wow!  :love: I'd love to see him with Gonzaga.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ChiComCat on April 13, 2015, 11:29:44 AM
Creighton would be disappointing
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Panjandrum on April 13, 2015, 11:31:18 AM
Creighton would be disappointing

They were his other finalist with us, so it makes sense.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on April 13, 2015, 11:33:25 AM
Good for Marcus. I hope he does well wherever he ends up.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on April 13, 2015, 11:34:12 AM
He made that crazy dunk against Gonzaga and now they want him soooo bad.  :love:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: TownieCat on April 13, 2015, 11:37:09 AM
He made that crazy dunk against Gonzaga and now they want him soooo bad.  :love:

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.bleacherreport.net%2Fsocial_assets%2Fcbb%2F12_21_2013%2Fdavid%2520stockton%2520poster.gif&hash=e47f60f3a347320c280eba3cada25c41fd8738e6)

 :love:


Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: mocat on April 13, 2015, 12:29:28 PM
that gif is very  :frown:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kslim on April 13, 2015, 12:48:51 PM
that gif is very  :frown:
nope, shane is in it
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on April 13, 2015, 01:15:12 PM
Creighton has to be the favorite to land him. I would be surprised if he commits to them after the weekend.

I wonder how are relationship stands with the Dallas Mustangs.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: steve dave on April 13, 2015, 01:16:37 PM
guys, I hate creighton  :frown:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on April 13, 2015, 01:19:34 PM
I hope he ends up at Gonzaga because none of those other schools deserve him.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 8manpick on April 13, 2015, 01:45:23 PM
Creighton has to be the favorite to land him. I would be surprised if he commits to them after the weekend.

I wonder how are relationship stands with the Dallas Mustangs.
Why?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on April 13, 2015, 01:50:33 PM
Creighton has to be the favorite to land him. I would be surprised if he commits to them after the weekend.

I wonder how are relationship stands with the Dallas Mustangs.
Why?

First visit, recruited him the first round.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: DOD Take 2 on April 13, 2015, 01:51:49 PM
I want to see him at LSU. They are going to have a lot of young talent and play exciting basketball.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wetwillie on April 13, 2015, 02:27:35 PM
Me too DOD take 2. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on April 13, 2015, 02:37:24 PM
I am going to assume that if he goes to Creighton, not only did Zags, LSU, and Cincy all take a pass, but so did every other P5 school.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: dal9 on April 13, 2015, 06:18:06 PM
dunk over ACTUAL NBA PLAYER DAVID STOCKTON
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on April 13, 2015, 11:10:32 PM
I am going to assume that if he goes to Creighton, not only did Zags, LSU, and Cincy all take a pass, but so did every other P5 school.

Pretty rough ridin' weird assumption, do you watch college basketball? Creighton is a better program than half of the Big 12, half of the Big 10, and 8/10 of the Pac 12 and the SEC. Cinci is in the AA and Creighton is a better than every program in that conference but one. It would suck playing in front of 17,000 fans every night and competing for conference championships in a program producing NBA draft picks.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 1863 on April 14, 2015, 12:33:34 AM
I am going to assume that if he goes to Creighton, not only did Zags, LSU, and Cincy all take a pass, but so did every other P5 school.

Pretty rough ridin' weird assumption, do you watch college basketball? Creighton is a better program than half of the Big 12, half of the Big 10, and 8/10 of the Pac 12 and the SEC. Cinci is in the AA and Creighton is a better than every program in that conference but one. It would suck playing in front of 17,000 fans every night and competing for conference championships in a program producing NBA draft picks.

Its still Creighton.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dirty Mike on April 14, 2015, 07:28:20 AM
I am going to assume that if he goes to Creighton, not only did Zags, LSU, and Cincy all take a pass, but so did every other P5 school.

Pretty rough ridin' weird assumption, do you watch college basketball? Creighton is a better program than half of the Big 12, half of the Big 10, and 8/10 of the Pac 12 and the SEC. Cinci is in the AA and Creighton is a better than every program in that conference but one. It would suck playing in front of 17,000 fans every night and competing for conference championships in a program producing NBA draft picks.

Where are you getting your information from? Creighton has produced 4 NBA draft picks in the last 15 years. Both Cincy and LSU have produced more. Creighton also now plays in the Big East, and were completely exposed now that Dougie McBuckets graduated to the NBA. (14-19 I think) They have a great fan base in Omaha, but many fair weather fans who were used to seeing their team dominate in the Missouri Valley. I can't argue with better program (McDermott is a pretty darn good coach) but the situation there now is not good.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 8manpick on April 14, 2015, 08:17:21 AM
I am going to assume that if he goes to Creighton, not only did Zags, LSU, and Cincy all take a pass, but so did every other P5 school.

Pretty rough ridin' weird assumption, do you watch college basketball? Creighton is a better program than half of the Big 12, half of the Big 10, and 8/10 of the Pac 12 and the SEC. Cinci is in the AA and Creighton is a better than every program in that conference but one. It would suck playing in front of 17,000 fans every night and competing for conference championships in a program producing NBA draft picks.

Its still Creighton.
MIR makes some decent points, but I think the round goes to 1863
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: TownieCat on April 14, 2015, 08:30:44 AM
There are worse places that Marcus could end up, but out of that list Creighton is the weakest program. Nice try, MIR.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: TownieCat on April 14, 2015, 08:55:33 AM
Quote
3. Marcus Foster, Kansas State -- The undersized 2-guard came out of nowhere and had a terrific freshman season (15.5 ppg) for oscar Weber, but this past year was a roller coaster -- with more downs than ups. Foster was benched and suspended -- but he can still help a team with his ability to score. He averaged 12.5 points this past season.

Considering: Creighton, Gonzaga, Cincinnati, LSU

http://insider.espn.go.com/blog/jeff-goodman/insider/post/_/id/4899/top-10-transfers-and-complete-transfer-list (http://insider.espn.go.com/blog/jeff-goodman/insider/post/_/id/4899/top-10-transfers-and-complete-transfer-list)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on April 14, 2015, 09:30:28 AM
Quote
3. Marcus Foster, Kansas State -- The undersized 2-guard came out of nowhere and had a terrific freshman season (15.5 ppg) for oscar Weber, but this past year was a roller coaster -- with more downs than ups. Foster was benched and suspended -- but he can still help a team with his ability to score. He averaged 12.5 points this past season.

Considering: Creighton, Gonzaga, Cincinnati, LSU

http://insider.espn.go.com/blog/jeff-goodman/insider/post/_/id/4899/top-10-transfers-and-complete-transfer-list (http://insider.espn.go.com/blog/jeff-goodman/insider/post/_/id/4899/top-10-transfers-and-complete-transfer-list)

 :curse: CURRIE!!!!!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on April 14, 2015, 12:05:38 PM
I am going to assume that if he goes to Creighton, not only did Zags, LSU, and Cincy all take a pass, but so did every other P5 school.

Pretty rough ridin' weird assumption, do you watch college basketball? Creighton is a better program than half of the Big 12, half of the Big 10, and 8/10 of the Pac 12 and the SEC. Cinci is in the AA and Creighton is a better than every program in that conference but one. It would suck playing in front of 17,000 fans every night and competing for conference championships in a program producing NBA draft picks.

Where are you getting your information from? Creighton has produced 4 NBA draft picks in the last 15 years. Both Cincy and LSU have produced more. Creighton also now plays in the Big East, and were completely exposed now that Dougie McBuckets graduated to the NBA. (14-19 I think) They have a great fan base in Omaha, but many fair weather fans who were used to seeing their team dominate in the Missouri Valley. I can't argue with better program (McDermott is a pretty darn good coach) but the situation there now is not good.

You do realize that nothing you typed disproved anything in my post right? I didn't say a damn thing about what school produced more NBA picks.

There are worse places that Marcus could end up, but out of that list Creighton is the weakest program. Nice try, MIR.

Sure if we're going the "hur hur Omaha hur hur" otherwise Creighton is inarguably better in every other way. The only one of those programs that has won more recently is Gonzaga but Creighton plays in a bigger, nicer arena in front of nearly 3 times as many fans, yes three damn times. Creighton is also in a better conference and in a better city than Creighton. They are both private Jesuit schools. One was sought after to join the Big East the other begged in and was mushed. I literally can't think of one thing that makes Cincinnati and LSU better than Creighton. crap LSU doesn't even play in a better basketball conference, the Big East has 4 less teams yet managed to get more bids than the SEC, and it's not like that's some freakish anomaly, the Big East is unquestionably a deeper league.

I feel like you guys are either trolling or are really stupid
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: TownieCat on April 14, 2015, 12:17:32 PM
I am going to assume that if he goes to Creighton, not only did Zags, LSU, and Cincy all take a pass, but so did every other P5 school.

Pretty rough ridin' weird assumption, do you watch college basketball? Creighton is a better program than half of the Big 12, half of the Big 10, and 8/10 of the Pac 12 and the SEC. Cinci is in the AA and Creighton is a better than every program in that conference but one. It would suck playing in front of 17,000 fans every night and competing for conference championships in a program producing NBA draft picks.

Where are you getting your information from? Creighton has produced 4 NBA draft picks in the last 15 years. Both Cincy and LSU have produced more. Creighton also now plays in the Big East, and were completely exposed now that Dougie McBuckets graduated to the NBA. (14-19 I think) They have a great fan base in Omaha, but many fair weather fans who were used to seeing their team dominate in the Missouri Valley. I can't argue with better program (McDermott is a pretty darn good coach) but the situation there now is not good.

You do realize that nothing you typed disproved anything in my post right? I didn't say a damn thing about what school produced more NBA picks.

There are worse places that Marcus could end up, but out of that list Creighton is the weakest program. Nice try, MIR.

Sure if we're going the "hur hur Omaha hur hur" otherwise Creighton is inarguably better in every other way. The only one of those programs that has won more recently is Gonzaga but Creighton plays in a bigger, nicer arena in front of nearly 3 times as many fans, yes three damn times. Creighton is also in a better conference and in a better city than Creighton. They are both private Jesuit schools. One was sought after to join the Big East the other begged in and was mushed. I literally can't think of one thing that makes Cincinnati and LSU better than Creighton. crap LSU doesn't even play in a better basketball conference, the Big East has 4 less teams yet managed to get more bids than the SEC, and it's not like that's some freakish anomaly, the Big East is unquestionably a deeper league.

I feel like you guys are either trolling or are really stupid


This has nothing to do with Omaha and everything to do with where each of those 4 basketball programs stand today. LSU, Cincy, and Gonzaga are all coming off of tourney appearances, play a majority of their games on ESPN, and have a richer history of success to lean on. Go ahead and argue about how Creighton plays on FS1 in front of a full house of hayseeds every night while getting pounded by Georgetown and Villanova.

Creighton hasn't been to the Sweet 16 since the 70s, and if you take out regional 3rd place games they've never won multiple games in a tournament ever. Weak.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on April 14, 2015, 12:37:05 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.tumblr.com%2F5a4f3d996c3946c9f611e45a353486bc%2Ftumblr_inline_nmghr2tOeO1rf15hl_500.gif&hash=383f331751c55ba8ba00d7bd5382090ed0d5caf3)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ChiComCat on April 14, 2015, 12:43:11 PM
All of those teams made the NCAA tournament last season except Creighton.  Also, Marcus may not want to get carded every time he makes a purchase
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on April 14, 2015, 12:48:25 PM
If MIR loves omaha so hard why doesn't he have sex with it?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on April 14, 2015, 12:57:01 PM
I think LSU has roughly a billion times more money for sports than Creighton.  Roughly. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ednksu on April 14, 2015, 01:02:50 PM
Sure if we're going the "hur hur Omaha hur hur" otherwise Creighton is inarguably better in every other way. The only one of those programs that has won more recently is Gonzaga but Creighton plays in a bigger, nicer arena in front of nearly 3 times as many fans, yes three damn times. Creighton is also in a better conference and in a better city than Creighton. They are both private Jesuit schools. One was sought after to join the Big East the other begged in and was mushed. I literally can't think of one thing that makes Cincinnati and LSU better than Creighton. crap LSU doesn't even play in a better basketball conference, the Big East has 4 less teams yet managed to get more bids than the SEC, and it's not like that's some freakish anomaly, the Big East is unquestionably a deeper league.

I feel like you guys are either trolling or are really stupid
:D
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: nicname on April 14, 2015, 01:15:19 PM
I'm not bullish on Creighton's future under McNeck. Altman had mondo success there, but it easily could've been a case of him being a good/ the right coach at the right time.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on April 14, 2015, 01:16:47 PM
I'm not bullish on Creighton's future under McNeck. Altman had mondo success there, but it easily could've been a case of him being a good/ the right coach at the right time.

As MIR noted, diff conference. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on April 14, 2015, 01:21:48 PM
Altman built a solid program at Creighton. McNeck benefited from that as well as his own genetics. We'll see how he does post-Doug, getting Marcus would be a big help for his future though.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on April 14, 2015, 01:26:49 PM
Just so I'm clear here, now the measurement, as of this particular argument apparently, of what a better basketball program is what national network your conference has a media deal with (for the record ESPN and ESPN2 are in 97 million homes, FS1 is in 90 million homes, and ESPNU and the SEC Network are in 75 million each; so it's not like were talking about the difference between ESPN and Root Sports Pittsburgh here), how much money your athletic department has but the amount of resources used for basketball is irrelevant, and whether or not you made the tournament this year without regard to what you have done the previous decade.

Guys LSU finished 11-7 in the super hard SEC, lost 3 of their last four to juggernauts names Tennessee, Auburn, and NC State, but they're a kick ass program because they made the tournament for the first time in six seasons. Celebrate good times, come on!!!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ChiComCat on April 14, 2015, 01:30:22 PM
I'm not saying LSU or Cincy is better than Creighton due to one tournament appearance, just that none of those programs are so far beyond the others.  Zags are head and shoulders above the rest.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on April 14, 2015, 01:31:21 PM
In order from how well I think the teams will be that he could transfer to:

1. Gonzaga
2. Cinci
3. LSU
4. Creighton

I mean, if you project what these teams are bringing in and where they were last year, I feel like that's hard to argue. I don't care how good Creighton was when they had their coaches son. All these programs would be a good fit for him tho.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on April 14, 2015, 01:36:44 PM
The bottom line is that it is stupid to think that Marcus, or anyone else for that matter, picking Creighton over LSU, Cincinnati, and Gonzaga means the other offers were pulled or are conditional.

Zags are head and shoulders above the rest.

For a kid from Texas that previously played in the Big 12? I'd put them last. The other schools have landed players similar to Marcus, Gonzaga hasn't. They either don't recruit or don't land players like him.

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: nicname on April 14, 2015, 01:41:28 PM
I'm just glad I had the opportunity to use the term McNeck.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pissclams on April 14, 2015, 01:47:41 PM
this thread is full of some hot & tasty takes
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on April 14, 2015, 02:10:46 PM
Gonzaga has players transfer in all the time. Just in the last couple of years Eric McClellan (booted from Vandy), Kyle Wiltjer (from Kentucky), Byron Wesley (from USC), and Angel Nunez (from Louisville) have transfered to the Zags.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/22/sports/ncaabasketball/recruits-from-across-the-globe-find-a-melting-pot-in-gonzaga.html?_r=0
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on April 14, 2015, 02:27:32 PM
Gonzaga has players transfer in all the time. Just in the last couple of years Eric McClellan (booted from Vandy), Kyle Wiltjer (from Kentucky), Byron Wesley (from USC), and Angel Nunez (from Louisville) have transfered to the Zags.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/22/sports/ncaabasketball/recruits-from-across-the-globe-find-a-melting-pot-in-gonzaga.html?_r=0

I know they have players transfer in, when I mentioned recruiting I was discussing high school recruits. Getting transfers actually fits what they do quite well because I don't think they get a player like Marcus out of high school, they are great at the open box specials.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on April 14, 2015, 03:46:17 PM
Gonzaga has players transfer in all the time. Just in the last couple of years Eric McClellan (booted from Vandy), Kyle Wiltjer (from Kentucky), Byron Wesley (from USC), and Angel Nunez (from Louisville) have transfered to the Zags.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/22/sports/ncaabasketball/recruits-from-across-the-globe-find-a-melting-pot-in-gonzaga.html?_r=0

I know they have players transfer in, when I mentioned recruiting I was discussing high school recruits. Getting transfers actually fits what they do quite well because I don't think they get a player like Marcus out of high school, they are great at the open box specials.

http://247sports.com/Player/Josh-Perkins-22245 (http://247sports.com/Player/Josh-Perkins-22245)
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on April 14, 2015, 03:47:55 PM
Just so I'm clear here, now the measurement, as of this particular argument apparently, of what a better basketball program is what national network your conference has a media deal with (for the record ESPN and ESPN2 are in 97 million homes, FS1 is in 90 million homes, and ESPNU and the SEC Network are in 75 million each; so it's not like were talking about the difference between ESPN and Root Sports Pittsburgh here), how much money your athletic department has but the amount of resources used for basketball is irrelevant, and whether or not you made the tournament this year without regard to what you have done the previous decade.

Guys LSU finished 11-7 in the super hard SEC, lost 3 of their last four to juggernauts names Tennessee, Auburn, and NC State, but they're a kick ass program because they made the tournament for the first time in six seasons. Celebrate good times, come on!!!

LSU has the #1 recruit in the nation coming in next year.  That's pretty good.  Like better than Creighton good. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on April 14, 2015, 03:50:06 PM
Gonzaga has players transfer in all the time. Just in the last couple of years Eric McClellan (booted from Vandy), Kyle Wiltjer (from Kentucky), Byron Wesley (from USC), and Angel Nunez (from Louisville) have transfered to the Zags.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/22/sports/ncaabasketball/recruits-from-across-the-globe-find-a-melting-pot-in-gonzaga.html?_r=0

I know they have players transfer in, when I mentioned recruiting I was discussing high school recruits. Getting transfers actually fits what they do quite well because I don't think they get a player like Marcus out of high school, they are great at the open box specials.

http://247sports.com/Player/Josh-Perkins-22245 (http://247sports.com/Player/Josh-Perkins-22245)

http://sports.yahoo.com/latech/basketball/recruiting/player-Austin-Daye-47870 (http://sports.yahoo.com/latech/basketball/recruiting/player-Austin-Daye-47870)

 :eek:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wazucat on April 14, 2015, 03:59:27 PM
"open box specials"  good one MIR.

  I think all of the speculated destinations could be good for Marcus, hope he finds a home that he can have a great finish to his  career.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Winters on April 14, 2015, 05:55:10 PM
I hope that MF_02 goes to LSU and kicks ass.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on April 14, 2015, 06:15:29 PM
Yeah
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on April 14, 2015, 09:43:39 PM
Just so I'm clear here, now the measurement, as of this particular argument apparently, of what a better basketball program is what national network your conference has a media deal with (for the record ESPN and ESPN2 are in 97 million homes, FS1 is in 90 million homes, and ESPNU and the SEC Network are in 75 million each; so it's not like were talking about the difference between ESPN and Root Sports Pittsburgh here), how much money your athletic department has but the amount of resources used for basketball is irrelevant, and whether or not you made the tournament this year without regard to what you have done the previous decade.

Guys LSU finished 11-7 in the super hard SEC, lost 3 of their last four to juggernauts names Tennessee, Auburn, and NC State, but they're a kick ass program because they made the tournament for the first time in six seasons. Celebrate good times, come on!!!

LSU has the #1 recruit in the nation coming in next year.  That's pretty good.  Like better than Creighton good.

And? I don't think I ever said anything about LSU and their ability to get recruits with relation to Creighton did I? Certainly you aren't contending LSU is a better program because they got a better signing class?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wetwillie on April 14, 2015, 09:46:54 PM
Isnt mcneck a slightly fatter version of oscar?  I cant imagine wanting to play for that guy.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on April 14, 2015, 09:50:57 PM
MIR is right. Creighton is as good or a better program than Cincinnati or lsu. Not godzilla tho
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on April 14, 2015, 09:54:55 PM
Isnt mcneck a slightly fatter version of oscar?  I cant imagine wanting to play for that guy.

They're both white. I don't know much about the dude other than he was crap at ISU, good at Creighton, now possibly crap again. There are lots of crap coaches can't think of another I'd compare to oscar oscar.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Panjandrum on April 14, 2015, 10:25:31 PM
I'm hoping Cincy so I can make a bunch of Nick Williams references.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: RickRampus on April 14, 2015, 10:31:30 PM
#teamzaga
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on April 14, 2015, 10:42:46 PM
#teamzaga

Same. If he gets immediate eligibility, which he won't, Gonzaga will be preseason top 5 with returning Karnowski and Sabonis
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on April 14, 2015, 10:46:40 PM
Good to know MIR has Creighton's back, ride or die for life!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: TownieCat on April 15, 2015, 10:19:36 AM
If Marcus has to sit out a year (which he will) Gonzaga will have a completely different team in 16-17 than what they had this year. Pangos and Bell graduated, and Karnowski and Wiltjer are juniors. If Sabonis has another good year he will likely go to the draft after his soph year.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on April 15, 2015, 10:21:31 AM
Yeah, but they're picking up dimes, so they'll probably still be really good.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on April 15, 2015, 10:23:37 AM
https://rivals.yahoo.com/footballrecruiting/basketball/recruiting/commitments/2014/gonzaga-694

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on April 15, 2015, 10:34:05 AM
He will be on a more successful team if he goes to Gonzaga.

He will have a better chance of being THE star at Creighton.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: That_Guy on April 15, 2015, 11:12:25 AM

He will be on a more successful team if he goes to Gonzaga.

He will have a better chance of being THE star at Creighton.

Bet he goes to Creighton.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on April 16, 2015, 11:05:13 AM
If Marcus has to sit out a year (which he will) Gonzaga will have a completely different team in 16-17 than what they had this year. Pangos and Bell graduated, and Karnowski and Wiltjer are juniors. If Sabonis has another good year he will likely go to the draft after his soph year.

sigh
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: star seed 7 on April 16, 2015, 09:23:20 PM
If Marcus has to sit out a year (which he will) Gonzaga will have a completely different team in 16-17 than what they had this year. Pangos and Bell graduated, and Karnowski and Wiltjer are juniors. If Sabonis has another good year he will likely go to the draft after his soph year.

sigh

what was wrong with this post?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: joda on April 19, 2015, 03:38:51 PM
It's Creighton
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mr Bread on April 19, 2015, 03:39:23 PM
lame.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: joda on April 19, 2015, 03:41:05 PM
Yep
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wetwillie on April 19, 2015, 04:15:09 PM
MIR really clownsuited us all :frown:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: uncle clean jeans on April 19, 2015, 06:02:26 PM
this makes the likelihood of me watching another full game of marcus foster incredibly slim
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on April 19, 2015, 06:54:35 PM
Woof.  For him, for us, for everyone involved except Creighton.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on April 19, 2015, 07:11:44 PM
Woof.  For him, for us, for everyone involved except Creighton.

So dumb
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Reboulet on April 19, 2015, 08:35:24 PM
https://twitter.com/HughesMhughes21/status/589901865552347136
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: TownieCat on April 19, 2015, 09:11:20 PM
Fwiw now Gus can call a few of Marcus' games.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kso_FAN on April 19, 2015, 09:16:20 PM
I hope he does well in Omaha.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: The Big Train on April 19, 2015, 09:17:31 PM
maybe SD should be appointed as our update person
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Bqqkie Pimp on April 20, 2015, 10:15:18 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Purplesage74:
I don't care either. If your a true kstater then Foster no longer exists


interesting, if true.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: felix rex on April 20, 2015, 12:16:06 PM
I am now more likely to watch a Creighton game than a K-State game next year. I literally know the same amount of players on each team. 
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on April 20, 2015, 12:58:20 PM
https://twitter.com/jlkurtz/status/590207006213976064
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: MakeItRain on April 20, 2015, 01:55:48 PM
:surprised:

https://twitter.com/michaeldeangelo/status/551506897954557953
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: kitten_mittons on April 20, 2015, 02:41:43 PM
Quote from: White Omaha Person
Foster bragged in caption that the pair was "lit on the beach.'' The term "lit" often is used to describe intoxication.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: dal9 on April 20, 2015, 05:50:27 PM
Intoxicated by the Reefer!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ksupamplemousse on February 26, 2016, 06:25:55 PM
"Really? oscar Weber is the reason why Marcus Foster turned into an absolute animal?" - Raygun

 :sdeek:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on February 26, 2016, 06:57:39 PM
"Really? oscar Weber is the reason why Marcus Foster turned into an absolute animal?" - Raygun

 :sdeek:
:opcat:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ksupamplemousse on February 26, 2016, 08:40:07 PM
I guess it should be unsurprising that nobody over there thinks it's even remotely racist.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pvegs on February 26, 2016, 09:46:23 PM
it's ok guys bc brent "didn't realize it" and "sorry if you feel that way"
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on February 26, 2016, 10:19:07 PM
it's ok guys bc brent "didn't realize it" and "sorry if you feel that way"

You've been doing some fine work over there lately.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: steve dave on February 26, 2016, 10:24:20 PM
good grief brett
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ksupamplemousse on February 26, 2016, 10:41:18 PM
To be fair, he took his medicine pretty well.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pvegs on February 27, 2016, 09:08:21 AM
it's ok guys bc brent "didn't realize it" and "sorry if you feel that way"

You've been doing some fine work over there lately.

thx trim. i choose my spots. honest question: how does one get banned from gpc? it occurred to me i might be in danger despite my infrequent posting.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: steve dave on February 27, 2016, 09:19:02 AM
it's ok guys bc brent "didn't realize it" and "sorry if you feel that way"

You've been doing some fine work over there lately.

thx trim. i choose my spots. honest question: how does one get banned from gpc? it occurred to me i might be in danger despite my infrequent posting.

be steve dave
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on February 27, 2016, 09:38:13 AM
Just let them know you post here too.  The next post that even remotely criticizes anything you will be gone
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: SkinnyBenny on February 27, 2016, 09:53:02 AM
I used to scour gpc a lot for things to post in the gpc wabash thread. But now my login stopped working. Are you a hero? Pm if yes
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ksupamplemousse on February 29, 2016, 04:00:23 PM
Brett refrained from calling a guy a "beast" today in a thread in a very herp derp kind of way today, saying that he didn't want to be called a racist again. Brett may just be a low/medium. It's possible he just doesn't have the mental capacity to understand racism.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 'taterblast on July 01, 2016, 04:37:00 PM
what's the opposite of BISCUITS

https://twitter.com/JonRothstein/status/748966559805210624
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Cartierfor3 on July 01, 2016, 04:39:10 PM
what's the opposite of BISCUITS

https://twitter.com/JonRothstein/status/748966559805210624

Hard boiled eggs
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: mocat on July 01, 2016, 05:16:53 PM
Frozen winters in the barren Nebraska wasteland
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: steve dave on July 01, 2016, 05:31:22 PM
Stud
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sys on July 01, 2016, 05:42:45 PM
at thanksgiving last year, my littlest said she was most thankful for greg mcdermott saving marcus foster's life.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on July 01, 2016, 06:06:25 PM
at thanksgiving last year, my littlest said she was most thankful for greg mcdermott saving marcus foster's life.

Heartwarming stories like this make me wish I had children. You are a fine father, sys.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sonofdaxjones on July 01, 2016, 09:15:12 PM
No more munchies?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: The Big Train on July 02, 2016, 09:52:41 AM
oscar can't handle good players smdhmdh
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: ksupamplemousse on July 03, 2016, 03:42:42 PM
It's not surprising to me that other schools have players that are in better shape. I think it's been obvious for awhile that our S&C program is probably the worst in the conference.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: steve dave on July 03, 2016, 06:12:29 PM
It's not surprising to me that other schools have players that are in better shape. I think it's been obvious for awhile that our S&C program is probably the worst in the conference.

Well, our recently departed S&C guy had other things on his mind
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: BMWWcat on July 23, 2016, 01:18:09 PM
It's not surprising to me that other schools have players that are in better shape. I think it's been obvious for awhile that our S&C program is probably the worst in the conference.

Well, our recently departed S&C guy had other things on his mind
Please elaborate?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: steve dave on July 23, 2016, 03:02:53 PM
It's not surprising to me that other schools have players that are in better shape. I think it's been obvious for awhile that our S&C program is probably the worst in the conference.

Well, our recently departed S&C guy had other things on his mind
Please elaborate?

can't
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on July 23, 2016, 06:00:29 PM
Maybe he just had other things on his computer. And by other things, I mean kid porn and he was forced to leave in the middle of the night because of it. I mean I'm not saying that's what happened though,  because honestly when you type it out it just sounds absurd.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: The Big Train on July 23, 2016, 06:19:37 PM
Wait, what?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: wetwillie on July 23, 2016, 06:30:09 PM
I hope that's not true. Very penn state if we just hush hushed it.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sys on July 23, 2016, 07:10:31 PM
I hope that's not true. Very penn state if we just hush hushed it.

it's not the sort of thing you parade around, though is it?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on July 23, 2016, 07:18:00 PM
It's the thing you turn a guy in for, though.  I mean, ask subway.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: The Big Train on July 23, 2016, 07:27:27 PM
Jared is getting all the foot longs he wants right now tho
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sys on July 23, 2016, 07:29:40 PM
It's the thing you turn a guy in for, though.  I mean, ask subway.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

that guy did stuff tho, he wasn't just a consumer of media.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: CNS on July 23, 2016, 07:32:19 PM
Yeah, but a big part of why his worker bro was locked up was kid porn.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: sys on July 23, 2016, 07:42:19 PM
i'll admit i don't know the law.  if kstate would have had a legal responsibility to report inappropriate porn, then i think i'm fairly comfortable saying that the rumors are likely false.  i don't see anyone at kstate falling on their sword for a bball staffer, or for the university's repuation.


i guess it could have been reported and if evidence wasn't sufficient to charge, it just never surfaced in the media.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mikeyis4dcats on July 25, 2016, 10:21:54 AM
seems like he's still KSTATEO on the twitters

https://twitter.com/kstatestrength
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Mikeyis4dcats on July 25, 2016, 10:24:01 AM
oh I see, I missed this new guy being hired last month
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on July 25, 2016, 10:44:26 AM
KPORNEO
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on July 25, 2016, 12:19:34 PM
Also and just so it's very clear, I am in no way saying that this is what happened. Just like a million other scenarios are possible, I'm simply saying that this one is as well.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: #LIFE on November 01, 2016, 12:52:04 PM
Quote
I'm not sure how I feel about this, but I'm sure we'll be following Foster's season out of curiosity and "what if's". My inclination is to not wish him well (I know that's petty), but he did some damage to our program, and I'm also an extreme KSU loyalist. Granted, we probably wouldn't have some of our current players had Foster stayed, but his behavior and the affect he had on our last two seasons still stings. What do all of you think. Is this all water under the bridge?

Quote
I hope Marcus is able to stay straight. Coach McDermott is not someone to get crosswise with. He is one large hombre with a short fuse for stupidity.

Quote
I hope the young man matures enough to become a successful and proper citizen on and off the court. I won't, however, be in his cheering section.
While here, he said he really wanted to go to KU, but they didn't come calling. Because of this, he said he really wanted to beat them. I thought it was poor taste for him to admit he wanted to be elsewhere. That might be the case for many recruits, but most refrain from stating it to the press. Weber went after him when many others passed and gave him a shot in a power conference. It paid off big time for Marcus as he gained national attention and an invite to Lebron Jame's camp. After the privilege afforded him by K-State, he decided to loaf and party his second year.
This action, by a star, set our program back, but let me emphasize the real damage done here. Thomas and Nino had to suffer through a senior year without partaking in a post season tournament. These hard working players deserved better than that. Nino was playing on knees that were damaged over his four year stint. Thomas slimmed down and worked his butt off to become a force underneath. For their hard work, they had to watch an underclassmen undermine their effort.

As stated, I hope Marcus learns from his mistakes and finds success. I just won't be standing in his cheering section.

Quote
I won't pay any attention to what Foster does, don't have the time or energy to care. I did find it funny earlier this fall when Foster tweeted how cool it was that he had skipped class only to find out later that the class had been canceled, which drew a return from McDermott about why he skipped in the first place. Didn't sound like he had figured it out at that point.

Quote
I would bet a large amount that Foster will be a cancer no matter where he goes. I think the only chance for Foster would be if something happens that would make him hit rock bottom. I don't think he's there yet. I do hope that he figures things out...but I wouldn't bet that it ever happens. A few of us saw him scrimmaging with the team after he had been dismissed...and I for one wasn't impressed. I wouldn't have let him in the gym.

Quote
- The dunk against Gonzaga in Wichita
- The game winner against OU
- His last game for KSU in The Sprint Center

I cannot remember a student athlete that went from that level of play to horrible

Quote
If there was ever a kid who needed to get rid of social media, it's him.

Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on November 01, 2016, 12:56:03 PM
#LIFE lives on these scout forums. He loves the crap out of them.  :love:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: steve dave on November 01, 2016, 12:57:42 PM
I've always disliked creighton because their fans are all football only HUSKGUYs. but now I will like them a lot.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: michigancat on November 01, 2016, 12:59:06 PM
I've always disliked creighton because their fans are all football only HUSKGUYs. but now I will like them a lot.

I've also had a strong dislike for McNeck, but go Blue Jays now. 100%.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 01, 2016, 04:44:22 PM
I really hope some scenario plays out where we end up hosting Creighton in the NIT.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on November 01, 2016, 04:49:03 PM
That sounds like an awful scenario for both parties involved, whether you're #TeamFoster or #Teamcats. No thanks!
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 01, 2016, 04:53:06 PM
The NIT is an awful scenario for all teams that participate, wacky. It is still probably a better outcome than our Cats will end up getting, though.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on November 01, 2016, 04:59:47 PM
That's why I don't want either Marcus playing in it or the cats.  :Yuck:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 01, 2016, 05:02:35 PM
Marcus playing post-season basketball in Bramlage would be a lot of fun, though.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: pissclams on November 01, 2016, 05:12:16 PM
i just can't support anything associated with fat neck mcneckfat
but not at all surprised by our idiot shitfuck hayseed fanbase being mean to marcus
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: EMAWzifried on November 01, 2016, 08:05:09 PM
If it weren't for Foster, Underwood and Frank, I'd have no reason to follow CBB this year. Well that and hoping everything bad for the Cats so Oscar gets the boot.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on November 01, 2016, 08:16:05 PM
If it weren't for Foster, Underwood and Frank, I'd have no reason to follow CBB this year. Well that and hoping everything bad for the Cats so Oscar gets the boot.
That's extremely dumb. Who roots against their alumni? You can root for the players and ignore oscar in the process. I'm sure you're supper jazzed for a Martin NIT run tho! :excited:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: EMAWzifried on November 01, 2016, 10:43:10 PM
Screw that. There's just too much about Oscar that annoys the crap out of me with losing being but one. The only relief is severing him ASAP from Manhattan, Kansas. Coincidentally, that's also the best thing for the K-State BB program.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on November 01, 2016, 10:51:19 PM
Screw that. There's just too much about Oscar that annoys the crap out of me with losing being but one. The only relief is severing him ASAP from Manhattan, Kansas. Coincidentally, that's also the best thing for the K-State BB program.
But you look forward to watching shitty Frank teams at South Carolina? That's what will get you through another season of basketball? :confused:
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: EMAWzifried on November 02, 2016, 12:24:34 AM
It's more than you have ahead of you
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on November 02, 2016, 12:38:50 AM
Marcus playing post-season basketball in Bramlage would be a lot of fun, though.

A ridiculous scenario but imagine if it was understood in advance that oscar needed at least a win in the first round of the nit, and it was swaggy and the bluejays coming to the fOOD. Marcus would break ski's record.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: bones129 on November 02, 2016, 01:48:52 AM
Marcus playing post-season basketball in Bramlage would be a lot of fun, though.

A ridiculous scenario but imagine if it was understood in advance that oscar needed at least a win in the first round of the nit, and it was swaggy and the bluejays coming to the fOOD. Marcus would break ski's record.

I support Trim's message.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Skipper44 on November 02, 2016, 10:57:03 AM
Marcus playing post-season basketball in Bramlage would be a lot of fun, though.

A ridiculous scenario but imagine if it was understood in advance that oscar needed at least a win in the first round of the nit, and it was swaggy and the bluejays coming to the fOOD. Marcus would break ski's record.
what flag would you be flying?
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Trim on November 02, 2016, 11:05:34 AM
Marcus playing post-season basketball in Bramlage would be a lot of fun, though.

A ridiculous scenario but imagine if it was understood in advance that oscar needed at least a win in the first round of the nit, and it was swaggy and the bluejays coming to the fOOD. Marcus would break ski's record.
what flag would you be flying?

There's a couple bars here that have all the sports channels and would be cool w/putting it on for us.  But it's an absurd premise.  Obviously oscar gets a raise an extension if he can get these 'cats picked to finish 9th in the conference into postseason play, and with a home game at that.
Title: Re: Marcus Foster
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 02, 2016, 03:09:12 PM
Big 12 coaches picked that. Other coaches are giving us votes for the Top 25.