goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: KITNfury on October 26, 2013, 02:56:59 PM

Title: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: KITNfury on October 26, 2013, 02:56:59 PM
nm
Title: Re: do we have a eff waters game thread?
Post by: wetwillie on October 26, 2013, 02:57:55 PM
You mean FYBS
Title: Re: do we have a eff waters game thread?
Post by: kslim on October 26, 2013, 02:58:19 PM
So rough ridin' pointless. His scholly is as useful as tates is
Title: Re: do we have a eff waters game thread?
Post by: pvegs on October 26, 2013, 03:19:18 PM
DJamer wally says he's a better qb than Nick Marshall, tho.
Title: Re: do we have a waters does good things once in a while game thread?
Post by: joda on October 26, 2013, 04:20:53 PM
I missed all but the last 6 min of the half. Someone please tell me Sams is hurt so
There's an excuse for the reason all I saw was Waters sucking ass.
Title: Re: do we have a waters does good things once in a while game thread?
Post by: Belvis Noland on October 26, 2013, 05:28:58 PM
Credit where due. He's played a nice 2nd half.  So has Sams. 
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: kso_FAN on October 26, 2013, 05:31:49 PM
Waters says in your face. Haters.
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: bones129 on October 26, 2013, 05:41:14 PM
Waters has been pretty solid this half.
Title: Re: do we have a waters does good things once in a while game thread?
Post by: k-state87 on October 26, 2013, 05:41:44 PM
Credit where due. He's played a nice 2nd half.  So has Sams.

Yes Jake has played a lot better, he looks like he has a little confidence. The coaches need to dial up long passes for Lockett & Thompson when Jake is in there.
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on October 26, 2013, 05:50:21 PM
He had a good half. He has moved up from a soggy crap sandwich to just a crap sandwich.
Title: Re: do we have a waters does good things once in a while game thread?
Post by: stunted on October 26, 2013, 06:00:13 PM
Credit where due. He's played a nice 2nd half.  So has Sams.

Yes Jake has played a lot better, he looks like he has a little confidence. The coaches need to dial up long passes for Lockett & Thompson when Jake is in there.

Jake = big plays

So exciting to see long passes!
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: KSUBrian on October 26, 2013, 06:09:36 PM
Jakey Football strikes..... er... for the 1st time!!  :dunno:
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: Hurricane Cat on October 26, 2013, 06:28:58 PM
nm
   


Pulled the trigger too soon on this thread...:dunno:


Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: GoodForAnother on October 26, 2013, 08:59:33 PM
very nice second half. still mad about his first half but he looked really good in the second.
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: kso_FAN on October 26, 2013, 09:02:43 PM
He was horrible in the first, but came to play in the 2nd. Sams was fine in the 2nd himself, but Waters made really nice throws. Of course Lockett made some really nice catches, but I'm not ready to go the route that Lockett made all those plays on his own, Waters was good. And he had his best rushing day as well.
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: Jackstack99EMAW on October 26, 2013, 09:24:10 PM
I don't get giving Waters every third and long opportunity in the 2nd even though Sams was perfect passing, but it worked, so oh well. 
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: kso_FAN on October 26, 2013, 09:27:21 PM
I don't get giving Waters every third and long opportunity in the 2nd even though Sams was perfect passing, but it worked, so oh well. 

I really like Sams, but you have seen him throw down the field this year, correct?
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: eastcat on October 26, 2013, 10:11:08 PM
Bringing waters in on the 3rd and 8 only to have him scramble for 12 yards and pick up the 1st was pretty awesome  :Woot:
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: KITNfury on October 26, 2013, 10:59:27 PM
nm
   


Pulled the trigger too soon on this thread...:dunno:
I modified the title as necessary as the game went along.
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: Winters on October 27, 2013, 01:21:09 AM
Waters says in your face. Haters.
The more he does that the more happier we will all be
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: ksupamplemousse on October 27, 2013, 01:28:17 AM
Waters says in your face. Haters.
The more he does that the more happier we will all be

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HgQNQEuVKMo (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HgQNQEuVKMo)
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: DQ12 on October 27, 2013, 10:51:22 AM
I made sure to tell Jake how well he played when I saw him at rustys last night.
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: KITNfury on October 27, 2013, 10:59:05 AM
I made sure to tell Jake how well he played when I saw him at rustys last night.
if I was Jake I would have beat you to the punch and told you how well I played.
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: bubbles4ksu on October 27, 2013, 11:12:00 AM
I made sure to tell Jake how well he played when I saw him at rustys last night.
if I was Jake I would have beat you to the punch and told you how well I played.
there was no beating dlew in his mission to compliment jake on his play. dlew was so effusive that he felt the need to track him down in the parking lot behind rusty's and remind him that his fumble broke his heart so that jake would know he was being honest with him.
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: wabash909 on October 27, 2013, 11:13:17 AM
This game was encouraging because both QB's, for the most part, played very well against a marginal opponent.  And the back half of our schedule is full of marginal opponents.


Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: 'taterblast on October 27, 2013, 11:14:37 AM
i thought it was nice of the coaches to finally start letting the fans call the plays.
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: kim carnes on October 27, 2013, 11:16:27 AM
This game was encouraging because both QB's, for the most part, played very well against a marginal opponent.  And the back half of our schedule is full of marginal opponents.

its 60% full of marginal opponents
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: eastcat on October 27, 2013, 11:22:11 AM
We have the fighting flood ags to build up some confidence.  :thumbs:
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 27, 2013, 11:43:06 PM
I just hope this isn't a game that hurts us in the long run. Collin Klein threw for about 300 yards against these guys last year. Sams was a perfect 8/8, and Waters looked great, but we still need to run the ball if we want to have a chance at beating halfway decent teams.
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: kso_FAN on October 28, 2013, 06:36:55 AM
I just hope this isn't a game that hurts us in the long run. Collin Klein threw for about 300 yards against these guys last year. Sams was a perfect 8/8, and Waters looked great, but we still need to run the ball if we want to have a chance at beating halfway decent teams.

Completely different season, I think it's a stretch to make that comparison.

Also, I think getting Stiverson back will be really good in the long run, but I'm sure working him back in yesterday helped create some of the issues just because he hasn't played all year.
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: IHateSQUAWKS on October 28, 2013, 07:03:32 AM
So what we found out is we need to let Jake fling the ball down field to TT and TL often.  Then mix in some Hubert after the defense is spread out.  Tell Jake that when he gets within 5 yards of a defender it is two hands on the ball?

Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: TownieCat on October 28, 2013, 08:31:49 AM
I just hope this isn't a game that hurts us in the long run. Collin Klein threw for about 300 yards against these guys last year. Sams was a perfect 8/8, and Waters looked great, but we still need to run the ball if we want to have a chance at beating halfway decent teams.

We had 43 rushes and 21 passes on Saturday so it's not like we abandoned our usual offense. Waters and Hubert had 29 carries for 141 yards - a pretty solid day for both of them.

WVU has a below average defense that is only good enough to stop one thing. Their coaches probably went into the game thinking that they wouldn't lose because Sams rushed for 200+ yards.
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 28, 2013, 10:43:22 AM
So what we found out is we need to let Jake fling the ball down field to TT and TL often.  Then mix in some Hubert after the defense is spread out.  Tell Jake that when he gets within 5 yards of a defender it is two hands on the ball?

This is exactly what I meant by this game potentially hurting us in the long run. WVU is not good against the pass, so we really shouldn't be taking this game as evidence that those deep balls are going to be open against everybody else. I think we should continue to have that as an option and go to that well a few times per game, but against teams like OU, if the ground game is working, I wouldn't stray from it.
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: kso_FAN on October 28, 2013, 10:47:00 AM
So what we found out is we need to let Jake fling the ball down field to TT and TL often.  Then mix in some Hubert after the defense is spread out.  Tell Jake that when he gets within 5 yards of a defender it is two hands on the ball?

This is exactly what I meant by this game potentially hurting us in the long run. WVU is not good against the pass, so we really shouldn't be taking this game as evidence that those deep balls are going to be open against everybody else. I think we should continue to have that as an option and go to that well a few times per game, but against teams like OU, if the ground game is working, I wouldn't stray from it.

When you play a bad pass defense why wouldn't you exploit it by passing the ball?

Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 28, 2013, 10:49:22 AM
So what we found out is we need to let Jake fling the ball down field to TT and TL often.  Then mix in some Hubert after the defense is spread out.  Tell Jake that when he gets within 5 yards of a defender it is two hands on the ball?

This is exactly what I meant by this game potentially hurting us in the long run. WVU is not good against the pass, so we really shouldn't be taking this game as evidence that those deep balls are going to be open against everybody else. I think we should continue to have that as an option and go to that well a few times per game, but against teams like OU, if the ground game is working, I wouldn't stray from it.

When you play a bad pass defense why wouldn't you exploit it by passing the ball?

You would and we did. I just hope we don't start believing that passing the ball is one of our strengths in future games when it really has not been in most of our games.
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: kso_FAN on October 28, 2013, 11:05:33 AM
You would and we did. I just hope we don't start believing that passing the ball is one of our strengths in future games when it really has not been in most of our games.

I think our passing game is getting better. We actually have the 2nd best passing game rating in the league, complete 66% of our throws, and average over 9 yards per attempt. The key is cleaning up the silly INTs, I think Waters is doing that and I think Sams will. IMHO our numbers are solid enough through 7 games to not just think its a fluke.
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: CNS on October 28, 2013, 11:09:32 AM
Mistakes haven't really been discussed enough this year imo.  It has been remarkable how many stupid mistakes we make between Rooks on the line and all the damn interceptions and fumbles.  I don't believe I have seen such a large quantity of drive killing(for us) penatiesby Bill's teams before(excludes delay of game because that is just how bill rolls.). 
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 28, 2013, 11:27:33 AM
Mistakes haven't really been discussed enough this year imo.  It has been remarkable how many stupid mistakes we make between Rooks on the line and all the damn interceptions and fumbles.  I don't believe I have seen such a large quantity of drive killing(for us) penatiesby Bill's teams before(excludes delay of game because that is just how bill rolls.).

Yeah. If at all possible, I would like to avoid passing the ball just because we have been so bad at protecting the football. Also, Gronk needs to get better or just sit the rest of this year out. We could just use Hubert as the lead blocker when Sams is in the game. He's a better blocker than Gronk, is a much better threat to actually run the ball, and he doesn't jump offsides. A FB should never jump offsides. It's ridiculous.
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: EMAWmeister on October 28, 2013, 11:52:38 AM
I like how people use the WVU game to argue that Waters should have played more in the OSU/BU games when all of his big plays involved guys who weren't available for OSU/BU.  I'm not saying he deserves no credit for those plays, I'm saying Curry Sexton and Kyle Klein trying to make those plays would be nightmarish.
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: CNS on October 28, 2013, 11:52:59 AM
Yeah, the Gronk sucking point cannot be overstated.
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: Asteriskhead on October 28, 2013, 11:56:46 AM
Yeah, the Gronk sucking point cannot be overstated.

he's a rough ridin' redshirt freshman. he'll get better. shut up.
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: CNS on October 28, 2013, 12:00:41 PM
Yeah, the Gronk sucking point cannot be overstated.

he's a rough ridin' redshirt freshman. he'll get better. shut up.

That is fine, but do we not have someone else that could split time with him that is better for long yardage down blocking or something?  I am fine with getting youth experience, but playing him that much seems extreme given his struggles. 
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 28, 2013, 12:00:50 PM
Yeah, the Gronk sucking point cannot be overstated.

he's a rough ridin' redshirt freshman. he'll get better. shut up.

He can get better in practice.
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: kso_FAN on October 28, 2013, 12:02:06 PM
I like how people use the WVU game to argue that Waters should have played more in the OSU/BU games when all of his big plays involved guys who weren't available for OSU/BU.  I'm not saying he deserves no credit for those plays, I'm saying Curry Sexton and Kyle Klein trying to make those plays would be nightmarish.

Again, we (and almost every program) have dumb fans.

Waters clearly has a nice connection with Lockett; Lockett talked after the game about how he and Waters often stay after practice and work on routes together. If Lockett (and Thompson) are healthy, it makes sense to play Waters more. And when Sams is struggling to run the ball, that's even more the case.

However, a big part of me still wishes that Snyder would just pick one and play him, I think the lack of rhythm the offense has at times is in large part due to the QB rotation.

Yeah, the Gronk sucking point cannot be overstated.

he's a rough ridin' redshirt freshman. he'll get better. shut up.

That is fine, but do we not have someone else that could split time with him that is better for long yardage down blocking or something?  I am fine with getting youth experience, but playing him that much seems extreme given his struggles. 

I'm really surprised Nemechek hasn't played more.
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 28, 2013, 12:05:52 PM
I think that teams are going to continue to have the ability to shut down Sams' run game as long as Snyder continues to use the 2 QB system. It's fine when it works, but at some point, we are going to have to find a way to take advantage of defenses loading the box against Sams.
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: kso_FAN on October 28, 2013, 12:07:09 PM
I think that teams are going to continue to have the ability to shut down Sams' run game as long as Snyder continues to use the 2 QB system. It's fine when it works, but at some point, we are going to have to find a way to take advantage of defenses loading the box against Sams.

He's got to complete some down the field throws to Lockett and/or Thompson.
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: kitten_mittons on October 28, 2013, 12:10:48 PM
On the 1st TD that Waters threw to Lockett, I didn't see that Waters had entered the game* and was all "What a throw, Sams!"  Then I saw it was Waters and wasn't as happy, but it was a great throw.

*I was watching at a bar with some friends. . . I hate watching games at bars with friends because it's hard to pay attention to the game.  Anyone else have this problem?
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: CNS on October 28, 2013, 12:13:03 PM
I think that teams are going to continue to have the ability to shut down Sams' run game as long as Snyder continues to use the 2 QB system. It's fine when it works, but at some point, we are going to have to find a way to take advantage of defenses loading the box against Sams.

It seems like we could revert to a lot of last year's play calling and do fine?   :dunno:

I think that teams are going to continue to have the ability to shut down Sams' run game as long as Snyder continues to use the 2 QB system. It's fine when it works, but at some point, we are going to have to find a way to take advantage of defenses loading the box against Sams.

He's got to complete some down the field throws to Lockett and/or Thompson.

Yeah, but they don't have to be 40yrd bombs.  I mean, Bill could set up some mid distance stuff and accomplish the same relief.
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: ChiComCat on October 28, 2013, 12:15:36 PM
I think that teams are going to continue to have the ability to shut down Sams' run game as long as Snyder continues to use the 2 QB system. It's fine when it works, but at some point, we are going to have to find a way to take advantage of defenses loading the box against Sams.

He's got to complete some down the field throws to Lockett and/or Thompson.

Agreed.  I think if Sams does what he does well, he will get the occasional wide open deep ball.  Anything resembling coverage on those, he should avoid like the plague.  He's clearly tried to force it too much so far.
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: Asteriskhead on October 28, 2013, 12:20:56 PM
the only way things are going to click for Gronk is with experience. he has the most upside. leave him in. let him grow.
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: Katpappy on October 28, 2013, 12:22:02 PM
I like how people use the WVU game to argue that Waters should have played more in the OSU/BU games when all of his big plays involved guys who weren't available for OSU/BU.  I'm not saying he deserves no credit for those plays, I'm saying Curry Sexton and Kyle Klein trying to make those plays would be nightmarish.

WTF do you have against Curry Sexton.  The kid had the most receiving yards in the game.  By the way, he was a "walk on" true freshman last year.  He played well enought to have his red shirt pulled.  So again what the eff do you have against
Sexton; is because he's white and that's not cool on this board to like the way a he plays.  :facepalm:
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: Gooch on October 28, 2013, 12:26:49 PM
I like how people use the WVU game to argue that Waters should have played more in the OSU/BU games when all of his big plays involved guys who weren't available for OSU/BU.  I'm not saying he deserves no credit for those plays, I'm saying Curry Sexton and Kyle Klein trying to make those plays would be nightmarish.

WTF do you have against Curry Sexton.  The kid had the most receiving yards in the game.  By the way, he was a "walk on" true freshman last year.  He played well enought to have his red shirt pulled.  So again what the eff do you have against
Sexton; is because he's white and that's not cool on this board to like the way a he plays.  :facepalm:
Katdaddy post
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: kso_FAN on October 28, 2013, 12:27:21 PM
Yeah, but they don't have to be 40yrd bombs.  I mean, Bill could set up some mid distance stuff and accomplish the same relief.

IMHO at some point he's got to complete a vertical throw, not just an intermediate route with a nice YAC.
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: Katpappy on October 28, 2013, 12:28:02 PM
I like how people use the WVU game to argue that Waters should have played more in the OSU/BU games when all of his big plays involved guys who weren't available for OSU/BU.  I'm not saying he deserves no credit for those plays, I'm saying Curry Sexton and Kyle Klein trying to make those plays would be nightmarish.

WTF do you have against Curry Sexton.  The kid had the most receiving yards in the game.  By the way, he was a "walk on" true freshman last year.  He played well enought to have his red shirt pulled.  So again what the eff do you have against
Sexton; is because he's white and that's not cool on this board to like the way a he plays.  :facepalm:
Katdaddy post
Idiot response.
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: kso_FAN on October 28, 2013, 12:29:02 PM
I like how people use the WVU game to argue that Waters should have played more in the OSU/BU games when all of his big plays involved guys who weren't available for OSU/BU.  I'm not saying he deserves no credit for those plays, I'm saying Curry Sexton and Kyle Klein trying to make those plays would be nightmarish.

WTF do you have against Curry Sexton.  The kid had the most receiving yards in the game.  By the way, he was a "walk on" true freshman last year.  He played well enought to have his red shirt pulled.  So again what the eff do you have against
Sexton; is because he's white and that's not cool on this board to like the way a he plays.  :facepalm:

I don't think he was trying to say Sexton (or Klein) were bad players, but neither are vertical threats in the passing game like Lockett and Thompson. Clearly those 2 are K-State's only true vertical threats this year, that doesn't make the players who aren't bad receivers. Sexton is clearly our 3rd best receiver, he just has a different role.
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: DQ12 on October 28, 2013, 12:31:43 PM
I'm ok sticking waters in on every 3rd and 10+.  If it's an obvious passing down, i don't have an issue putting in the better passer (if he is the better passer, which i think he is).
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: ManBearTurkey on October 28, 2013, 12:36:23 PM
I don't get giving Waters every third and long opportunity in the 2nd even though Sams was perfect passing, but it worked, so oh well. 

I really like Sams, but you have seen him throw down the field this year, correct?

Help me with this, because I feel like I'm losing my mind. Or maybe I am experiencing revisionist history when Sams throws it.

When have we seen him throw it down field? He had two terrible throws in the pocket against OSU. Waters has equally as embarrassing throws.

The INT at the end of the game against Baylor was ill advised considering down and time on the clock, but he was flushed from the pocket and throwing on the run and put a 50/50 ball up to his 6' 5" 240+ TE to make a play on between a DB.

But other than that what have we seen that makes him so terrible that we don't even think about giving him the chance to throw it vertical? Or is it just a combination of well-the-coach's-are-the-ones-at-practice-and-see-him-throw-it-every-day-type situation?

I was at the spring game and I watch him in warm ups, the arm is there to throw 25 yard post routes to TT or TLBL especially if there is no one over the top because the other safety is at the LOS.
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: kso_FAN on October 28, 2013, 12:36:42 PM
I'm ok sticking waters in on every 3rd and 10+.  If it's an obvious passing down, i don't have an issue putting in the better passer (if he is the better passer, which i think he is).

There was a time when this is certain, I think we've passed that time. That said, he's not a bad passer.
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: Katpappy on October 28, 2013, 12:37:32 PM
I like how people use the WVU game to argue that Waters should have played more in the OSU/BU games when all of his big plays involved guys who weren't available for OSU/BU.  I'm not saying he deserves no credit for those plays, I'm saying Curry Sexton and Kyle Klein trying to make those plays would be nightmarish.

WTF do you have against Curry Sexton.  The kid had the most receiving yards in the game.  By the way, he was a "walk on" true freshman last year.  He played well enought to have his red shirt pulled.  So again what the eff do you have against
Sexton; is because he's white and that's not cool on this board to like the way a he plays.  :facepalm:

I don't think he was trying to say Sexton (or Klein) were bad players, but neither are vertical threats in the passing game like Lockett and Thompson. Clearly those 2 are K-State's only true vertical threats this year, that doesn't make the players who aren't bad receivers. Sexton is clearly our 3rd best receiver, he just has a different role.
I agree completely.  It just that some people will make like any player that isn't as talented as Lockett or TT out to be a handicap to the team.  I think it's too early for Sexton to be judged as inferior.
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: bubbles4ksu on October 28, 2013, 12:38:13 PM
does waters always spin the ball in his hands after taking a snap? i'm pretty sure he was doing this during the 4th quarter. i doubt the coaches like it, but it gave me the impression that he was very confident out there. i hadn't noticed it before.
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: DQ12 on October 28, 2013, 12:39:28 PM
I'm ok sticking waters in on every 3rd and 10+.  If it's an obvious passing down, i don't have an issue putting in the better passer (if he is the better passer, which i think he is).

There was a time when this is certain, I think we've passed that time. That said, he's not a bad passer.
Yeah, it's not certain, but I still think he's a better passer.  And the coaches seem to also.

If he's the better passer, then I'm OK sticking him in during downs where it's obvious we're going to pass it anyway.
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: Asteriskhead on October 28, 2013, 12:40:53 PM
I like how people use the WVU game to argue that Waters should have played more in the OSU/BU games when all of his big plays involved guys who weren't available for OSU/BU.  I'm not saying he deserves no credit for those plays, I'm saying Curry Sexton and Kyle Klein trying to make those plays would be nightmarish.

WTF do you have against Curry Sexton.  The kid had the most receiving yards in the game.  By the way, he was a "walk on" true freshman last year.  He played well enought to have his red shirt pulled.  So again what the eff do you have against
Sexton; is because he's white and that's not cool on this board to like the way a he plays.  :facepalm:

I don't think he was trying to say Sexton (or Klein) were bad players, but neither are vertical threats in the passing game like Lockett and Thompson. Clearly those 2 are K-State's only true vertical threats this year, that doesn't make the players who aren't bad receivers. Sexton is clearly our 3rd best receiver, he just has a different role.
I agree completely.  It just that some people will make like any player that isn't as talented as Lockett or TT out to be a handicap to the team.  I think it's too early for Sexton to be judged as inferior.

 :dubious:
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: MadCat on October 28, 2013, 12:42:22 PM
does waters always spin the ball in his hands after taking a snap? i'm pretty sure he was doing this during the 4th quarter. i doubt the coaches like it, but it gave me the impression that he was very confident out there. i hadn't noticed it before.
Maybe that's his version of stotting.
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: Katpappy on October 28, 2013, 12:42:31 PM
I'm ok sticking waters in on every 3rd and 10+.  If it's an obvious passing down, i don't have an issue putting in the better passer (if he is the better passer, which i think he is).

There was a time when this is certain, I think we've passed that time. That said, he's not a bad passer.
Yeah, it's not certain, but I still think he's a better passer.  And the coaches seem to also.

If he's the better passer, then I'm OK sticking him in during downs where it's obvious we're going to pass it anyway.
Did anyone notice Waters had more time to pass in this game.  Those extra 2 to 3 seconds makes a world of difference.
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: ChiComCat on October 28, 2013, 12:43:25 PM
I think Sams is just as good within 15 yards.  The deeper ball is the big difference between the two.

If the 3rd down distance is longer than Sams would likely scramble for, I am OK with Waters taking the snap.  3rd and 8ish is where I think they would be about equally effective with Waters for longer and Sams for shorter.
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 28, 2013, 12:45:55 PM
I'm ok sticking waters in on every 3rd and 10+.  If it's an obvious passing down, i don't have an issue putting in the better passer (if he is the better passer, which i think he is).

There was a time when this is certain, I think we've passed that time. That said, he's not a bad passer.
Yeah, it's not certain, but I still think he's a better passer.  And the coaches seem to also.

If he's the better passer, then I'm OK sticking him in during downs where it's obvious we're going to pass it anyway.
Did anyone notice Waters had more time to pass in this game.  Those extra 2 to 3 seconds makes a world of difference.

Sams is not going to have much time as long as the defense is crashing to stop the draw. He will always have wide open receivers, though. He just has to find them.
Title: Re: do we have a waters is a stud once in a while game thread?
Post by: Katpappy on October 28, 2013, 01:12:45 PM
I'm ok sticking waters in on every 3rd and 10+.  If it's an obvious passing down, i don't have an issue putting in the better passer (if he is the better passer, which i think he is).

There was a time when this is certain, I think we've passed that time. That said, he's not a bad passer.
Yeah, it's not certain, but I still think he's a better passer.  And the coaches seem to also.

If he's the better passer, then I'm OK sticking him in during downs where it's obvious we're going to pass it anyway.
Did anyone notice Waters had more time to pass in this game.  Those extra 2 to 3 seconds makes a world of difference.

Sams is not going to have much time as long as the defense is crashing to stop the draw. He will always have wide open receivers, though. He just has to find them.
Waters didn't have as much time (4 to 6 sec) in the previous games.  The line is giving him a pocket to pass out of.  Also the way they stack the box on Sams, his time to throw the ball is very short (2 to 4 sec).