goemaw.com
General Discussion => The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit => Topic started by: star seed 7 on May 18, 2013, 04:33:13 AM
-
Legitimate answers only please.
-
First, can you give me your definition of neocon? That term seems to used pretty loosely around here.
-
Legitimate answers only please.
Oregon Hawk?
-
Legitimate answers only please.
remember when "neo-cons" had control of the WH, and they were reaping billions of $ in oil profit? Yeah, dumbasses!
remember when Joe Biden drafted a bill that would become known as the Patriot Act, but liberals boo-hoo'd that Bush was a Nazi? Remember when Obama signed NDAA into law, expanding the PA? Yeah, dumbasses!
Dumbass!
-
3 good examples of dumbassadry so far.
-
3 good examples of dumbassadry so far.
:excited:
-
this (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IPTfwW89UIY) is seven...
-
this (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IPTfwW89UIY) is seven...
No it's not.
-
Neocon propaganda is targeted at uneducated, blue collar white people.
They know their demographic.
-
Neocon propaganda is targeted at uneducated, blue collar white people.
They know their demographic.
To be fair their just trying to pick off the democrat constituency, much like the democrats try and target the rich and educated.
-
Neocon propaganda is targeted at uneducated, blue collar white people.
They know their demographic.
To be fair their just trying to pick off the democrat constituency, much like the democrats try and target the rich and educated.
Sounds pretty educated?
-
Neocon propaganda is targeted at uneducated, blue collar white people.
They know their demographic.
To be fair their just trying to pick off the democrat constituency, much like the democrats try and target the rich and educated.
You proved my point.
-
Remember the few smart liberals who knew what Project for a New American Century was? Then proceeded to whine, bitch, and complain about them? Only to discover that the current administration was executing the desires of PNAC even better than the previous administration?
I do give credit to a very small group of liberals who recognized from the start that two of the biggest proponents of the Iraq War are our current Vice President, and our last SOS.
-
I do give credit to a very small group of liberals who recognized from the start that two of the biggest proponents of the Iraq War are our current Vice President, and our last SOS.
and don't for get the Patriot Act! hehehe
Why does a majority of the left live in denial? Perhaps, they rationalize it as ignorance... and ignorance is bliss :dunno:
-
I do give credit to a very small group of liberals who recognized from the start that two of the biggest proponents of the Iraq War are our current Vice President, and our last SOS.
and don't for get the Patriot Act! hehehe
Why does a majority of the left live in denial? Perhaps, they rationalize it as ignorance... and ignorance is bliss :dunno:
Your inability to spell the word forget correctly really drives home the point.
-
I do give credit to a very small group of liberals who recognized from the start that two of the biggest proponents of the Iraq War are our current Vice President, and our last SOS.
and don't for get the Patriot Act! hehehe
Why does a majority of the left live in denial? Perhaps, they rationalize it as ignorance... and ignorance is bliss :dunno:
Your inability to spell the word forget correctly really drives home the point.
oh boy... You hit it out of the park on that one! Totally discredited me! I'm gonna go curl up in the corner now!
-
here ya go, GCtard... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dlkK65y_-T4
-
here ya go, GCtard... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dlkK65y_-T4
That is pretty bad too. I actually wasn't trying to disprove you, I just found the obvious spelling error amusing in the context of your post. I do appreciate the elementary school response of calling my GCtard. Props for originality.
-
Threads like this make actual civil political discussion impossible around here. 'Grats seven.
-
Threads like this make actual civil political discussion impossible around here. 'Grats seven.
Civil discussion is impossible when one intentionally dismisses facts to save face. I love bringing up the Biden fact because it is incredibly under-reported, and therefore leads to ignorance among his supporting population.
For years, it was Bush/Patriot Act = Hitler/Nazis. A great example of a dumbass voting populace.
-
http://www.cnn.com/2013/05/20/us/oklahoma-tornado-developments/?hpt=hp_t1 (http://www.cnn.com/2013/05/20/us/oklahoma-tornado-developments/?hpt=hp_t1)
from the comments:
Theodore Chism • 8 minutes ago
?
Once we finish with the required platitudes of concern towards the effected, does anyone think the devastation might prompt real policy shift in regards to climate change? Or will this be much as Newtown was towards guns; uproar with little to show for it?
And this thread has been disproved.
-
http://www.cnn.com/2013/05/20/us/oklahoma-tornado-developments/?hpt=hp_t1 (http://www.cnn.com/2013/05/20/us/oklahoma-tornado-developments/?hpt=hp_t1)
from the comments:
Theodore Chism • 8 minutes ago
?
Once we finish with the required platitudes of concern towards the effected, does anyone think the devastation might prompt real policy shift in regards to climate change? Or will this be much as Newtown was towards guns; uproar with little to show for it?
And this thread has been disproved.
Liberals need to start naming tornadoes. Makes them more personal and special.
-
So now we're going to get another reversal on Tornados from the warmists.
First it was going to be devestation city, then we were going to have fewer tornados, now I sense another 180 coming on.
Tornado impacts: More people, more urban sprawl, more eyes on the sky, more sophisticated radar systems. The list is endless, but doesn't include "climate change".
-
Threads like this make actual civil political discussion impossible around here. 'Grats seven.
:gocho:
-
Tornado impacts: More people, more urban sprawl, more eyes on the sky, more sophisticated radar systems. The list is endless, but doesn't include "climate change".
Literally the only reason for more severe weather you'd feel safe in ruling out is climate change... :blindfold:
-
Tornado impacts: More people, more urban sprawl, more eyes on the sky, more sophisticated radar systems. The list is endless, but doesn't include "climate change".
Literally the only reason for more severe weather you'd feel safe in ruling out is climate change... :blindfold:
"More" severe weather? Really. Just a few days before these storms, weather people were talking about the relative dearth in severe storms, and there's been a number of news articles in the past year talking about how "climate change" is causing a severe storm "drought".
So really, we're going to blame a Tornado, even a major one, in Oklahoma, in May, as being caused by "climate change"??
-
Tornado impacts: More people, more urban sprawl, more eyes on the sky, more sophisticated radar systems. The list is endless, but doesn't include "climate change".
Literally the only reason for more severe weather you'd feel safe in ruling out is climate change... :blindfold:
it appears his list DOES have an end.
-
Yeah, I wouldn't rule out climate change as the cause for actual changes in weather patterns, but tornadoes in Oklahoma are just a sign of the climate being what it is.
-
Impacts, Tornado Impacts and detection, and analysis post event . . . not cause.
Come on people.