goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: Pete on September 09, 2012, 08:46:15 PM

Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on September 09, 2012, 08:46:15 PM
I have no idea where you fuckers have parked the rankings stuff, so post it here, kaybye.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: EMAW4life-JHL on September 09, 2012, 08:46:34 PM
no 1 in my rough ridin' heart
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on September 09, 2012, 08:47:01 PM
KState is ranked number one by me Pete
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on September 09, 2012, 08:47:25 PM
Nebraska last place
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: GoodForAnother on September 09, 2012, 08:48:01 PM
we're #13 in the tmb top 25

http://www.the-mainboard.com/index.php?threads/tmb-top-25-week-2-september-9-2012.114999/
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: pissclams on September 09, 2012, 08:55:12 PM
also #1 in this pollster's heart
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SdK on September 09, 2012, 08:56:49 PM
I love how some of the voters on TMB just put EMAW for us  :love:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Legit Elite on September 09, 2012, 09:01:46 PM
LE Big 12 Rankings (week 2 w/ defectors):

1. EMAW
2. West Virginia
3. Oklahoma
4. Texas
5. TCU
6. Oklahoma State
7. Baylor
8. Texas Tech
9. Iowa State
Tie 10. Jamaal Lord
Fraudulent Claims
.333 FCS
....
....
....
??? Squwak

Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: hemmy on September 09, 2012, 09:03:10 PM
#4 in Sagarin.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: highway61 on September 09, 2012, 09:12:20 PM
#4 in Sagarin.
9 out of the top 25 teams are from the big 12 in the sagarin.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Cire on September 09, 2012, 09:45:56 PM
#4 in Sagarin.

:love:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on September 12, 2012, 10:42:51 PM
15 in one, 14 in the other.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ben ji on September 12, 2012, 11:17:34 PM
http://totalfratmove.com/1033225

#8 in the Total Frat Move power rankings!!!

They even put our picture at the top

1. Alabama

2. USC

3. LSU

4. Oregon

5. Florida State

6. West Virginia

7. Georgia

8. Kansas State

9. Ohio State

10. Michigan State

11. Oklahoma

12. Clemson

13. Texas

14. South Carolina

15. TCU

16. Virginia Tech

17. Florida

18. Stanford

19. UCLA

20. Tennessee

21. Arkansas

22. Notre Dame

23. Baylor

24. Louisville

25. Mississippi State


Read more at http://totalfratmove.com/1033225#wQJ0Jms2Aevywk17.99
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: DQ12 on September 13, 2012, 12:34:40 AM
http://totalfratmove.com/1033225


Quote
As long as The K-State Mask keeps making knee-slappers like this, I’m on board with the Wildcats. It also doesn’t hurt that they just pistol-whipped Miami by 39. They’re just behind WVU in the Big 12.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 8manpick on September 13, 2012, 07:37:10 AM
we're #13 in the tmb top 25

http://www.the-mainboard.com/index.php?threads/tmb-top-25-week-2-september-9-2012.114999/

How many TMB voters out of the top 25 are also posters on this board or frequenters of EMAW Music?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on September 13, 2012, 07:37:53 AM
GFA, mod that mother rough rider so we are in our rightful place at #1.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: GoodForAnother on September 13, 2012, 03:43:21 PM
we're #13 in the tmb top 25

http://www.the-mainboard.com/index.php?threads/tmb-top-25-week-2-september-9-2012.114999/

How many TMB voters out of the top 25 are also posters on this board or frequenters of EMAW Music?

none as far as I know
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 0.42 on September 13, 2012, 03:44:19 PM
we're #13 in the tmb top 25

http://www.the-mainboard.com/index.php?threads/tmb-top-25-week-2-september-9-2012.114999/

How many TMB voters out of the top 25 are also posters on this board or frequenters of EMAW Music?

none as far as I know

da fuq :sdeek:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: GoodForAnother on September 13, 2012, 03:45:24 PM
we're #13 in the tmb top 25

http://www.the-mainboard.com/index.php?threads/tmb-top-25-week-2-september-9-2012.114999/

How many TMB voters out of the top 25 are also posters on this board or frequenters of EMAW Music?

none as far as I know

da fuq :sdeek:

I don't think there are any emaw voters. Might be some that vote that are regulars in our thread or get on emaw music. The whole board loves us over there.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 0.42 on September 13, 2012, 03:45:49 PM
we're #13 in the tmb top 25

http://www.the-mainboard.com/index.php?threads/tmb-top-25-week-2-september-9-2012.114999/

How many TMB voters out of the top 25 are also posters on this board or frequenters of EMAW Music?

none as far as I know

da fuq :sdeek:

I don't think there are any emaw voters.

 :dubious:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: skycat on September 13, 2012, 06:15:37 PM
http://masseyratings.com/cf/compare.htm

Or is that too obvious
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on September 13, 2012, 06:42:24 PM

http://www.lazindex.com/CFD1A.htm (http://www.lazindex.com/CFD1A.htm)


1    0    Alabama    
2    0    LSU    
3    19    Arizona St    
4    15    Kansas St    
5    0    Southern California    
6    -2    Oregon    
7    0    Notre Dame    
8    2    Baylor    
9    5    Ohio St    
10    3    Texas    
11    7    Stanford    
12    8    South Carolina    
13    -1    Michigan St    
14    9    Georgia    
15    -9    Oklahoma    
16    -1    West Virginia    
17    29    Arizona    
18    -10    Florida St    
19    -10    Nebraska    
20    24    UCLA     
21    20    Texas Tech    
22    6    Brigham Young    
23    6    Clemson    
24    7    Florida    
25    12    Iowa St    
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on September 13, 2012, 06:44:02 PM

http://www.lazindex.com/CFD1A.htm (http://www.lazindex.com/CFD1A.htm)


1    0    Alabama    
2    0    LSU    
3    19    Arizona St    
4    15    Kansas St    
5    0    Southern California    
6    -2    Oregon    
7    0    Notre Dame    
8    2    Baylor    
9    5    Ohio St    
10    3    Texas    
11    7    Stanford    
12    8    South Carolina    
13    -1    Michigan St    
14    9    Georgia    
15    -9    Oklahoma    
16    -1    West Virginia    
17    29    Arizona    
18    -10    Florida St    
19    -10    Nebraska    
20    24    UCLA     
21    20    Texas Tech    
22    6    Brigham Young    
23    6    Clemson    
24    7    Florida    
25    12    Iowa St

lazindex has always been the best imo
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: puniraptor on September 15, 2012, 12:48:30 PM
UPS #4
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on September 15, 2012, 12:53:44 PM
Honorable Mention on the interweb fans list
 :emawkid:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: wetwillie on September 16, 2012, 12:11:06 PM
http://hamptonroads.com/2012/09/va-tech-drops-out-ap-top-25-football-poll (http://hamptonroads.com/2012/09/va-tech-drops-out-ap-top-25-football-poll)

:blank:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: scottwildcat on September 16, 2012, 12:13:30 PM
ya know, I thought we would get jumped by some people, and have some people drop below us, but i did not think we would stay static at 15.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on September 16, 2012, 12:14:35 PM
Notre Dame beats some shitty Big 10 team no one has heard of and they jump us? I guess I don't know what I expected.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: scottwildcat on September 16, 2012, 12:14:54 PM
and only 3 points from actually dropping a spot to 16... :shakesfist:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: scottwildcat on September 16, 2012, 12:19:21 PM
up to 13 in the USA Today Real Poll That Matters Poll  :emawkid:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Panjandrum on September 16, 2012, 02:05:06 PM
Notre Dame beats some shitty Big 10 team no one has heard of and they jump us? I guess I don't know what I expected.

I knew that was going to happen, but I wanted so badly to believe it wouldn't.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kslim on September 16, 2012, 02:09:17 PM
we're #13 in the tmb top 25

http://www.the-mainboard.com/index.php?threads/tmb-top-25-week-2-september-9-2012.114999/

How many TMB voters out of the top 25 are also posters on this board or frequenters of EMAW Music?

none as far as I know

this isnt entirely accurate
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: GoodForAnother on September 16, 2012, 02:13:36 PM
we're #13 in the tmb top 25

http://www.the-mainboard.com/index.php?threads/tmb-top-25-week-2-september-9-2012.114999/

How many TMB voters out of the top 25 are also posters on this board or frequenters of EMAW Music?

none as far as I know

this isnt entirely accurate

whoops heh heh
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: EllToPay on September 18, 2012, 02:02:54 PM
http://aol.sportingnews.com/ncaa-football/story/2012-09-16/college-football-top-25-rankings-sporting-news-analysts-agree-secs-alabama-lsu-t

yawn.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Bookcat on September 18, 2012, 02:13:49 PM
how many can we lose by and still be ranked when KU comes to town?

Like, 17-ish?

Its really important to me that we're ranked when KU comes to town. :lynchmob:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 'taterblast on September 18, 2012, 02:56:57 PM
we would have to get embarrassed to not stay ranked
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: slobber on September 18, 2012, 03:09:04 PM
how many can we lose by and still be ranked when KU comes to town?

Like, 17-ish?

Its really important to me that we're ranked when KU comes to town. :lynchmob:
You can't throw the  :lynchmob: when you are insinuating/expecting our D will give up a crap ton of points. That is as bad as anyone calling our D the Lynchmob anytime from 2004 through 2011. I think it is allowable to throw the  :lynchmob: when you are at the game and get caught up in the moment, but don't refer to a crappy D as the Lynchmob. Also, I don't think you can talk about us getting beat and our D giving up a crap ton of points and then have AB as your avatar. That is pretty weak crap.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SdK on September 18, 2012, 05:29:25 PM
Well played sir.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kstate4life on September 18, 2012, 05:36:35 PM
how many can we lose by and still be ranked when KU comes to town?

Like, 17-ish?

Its really important to me that we're ranked when KU comes to town. :lynchmob:

Real question is what will we be ranked when we win... I say 10.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: DQ12 on September 18, 2012, 06:02:21 PM
how many can we lose by and still be ranked when KU comes to town?

Like, 17-ish?

Its really important to me that we're ranked when KU comes to town. :lynchmob:

Real question is what will we be ranked when we win... I say 10.
We'd be ranked higher than that.  I'd guess 7 or 8.  Maybe even higher.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SabiNation on September 18, 2012, 08:47:52 PM
MAYBE EVEN HIGHER!!!!
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: skycat on September 19, 2012, 01:52:07 AM
http://aol.sportingnews.com/ncaa-football/story/2012-09-18/big-12-power-rankings-week-4-2012-kansas-state-oklahoma-texas-collin-klein-landr

Sporting News believes in us!

Sort of.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: wetwillie on September 22, 2012, 11:34:33 PM
#8?   
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kslim on September 22, 2012, 11:35:17 PM
#6
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: CHONGS on September 22, 2012, 11:38:31 PM
guys we will not jump ND.

I am thinking 10 or 9

(yes its not fair)
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: bigwilliestyle1407 on September 22, 2012, 11:39:05 PM
#6

#8 to #10 IMO
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 0.42 on September 22, 2012, 11:40:09 PM
I'm ranking EMAW #7 in TMB's top 25 poll this week :dance:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: DQ12 on September 22, 2012, 11:40:42 PM
we're going to be 7 or 8.

should be higher.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SwiftCat on September 22, 2012, 11:40:51 PM
We'll be 10. Just where I want to be.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 22, 2012, 11:41:44 PM
I'm ranking EMAW #7 in TMB's top 25 poll this week :dance:

I would go ahead and rank us #1 if I had a vote. What ranked team has bama beaten on the road?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: DQ12 on September 22, 2012, 11:42:17 PM
we have the best resume in the nation right now
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 0.42 on September 22, 2012, 11:44:48 PM
we have the best resume in the nation right now

this is absolutely true.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: HELLHAMMER on September 22, 2012, 11:45:00 PM
guys we will not jump ND.

I am thinking 10 or 9

(yes its not fair)

We would piss pound those sanctimonious twats.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kslim on September 22, 2012, 11:45:34 PM
guys we will not jump ND.

I am thinking 10 or 9

(yes its not fair)
we were 13th in the coaches right? clemson ou and michigan lose. i think 8 is the lowest we will be fsu will jump lsu and ND will be 5-6
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 22, 2012, 11:48:18 PM
guys we will not jump ND.

I am thinking 10 or 9

(yes its not fair)

We would piss pound those sanctimonious twats.

It's a long season and OU will do it for us. eff ND, but they just aren't good enough for this to matter.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Andy on September 23, 2012, 12:06:55 AM
we'll be where we should have been to start the season, which is 8-9.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: That_Guy on September 23, 2012, 01:29:44 AM
Mark May puts us at number 5!!! :gocho: :excited: :love: :lynchmob: :dance:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: michigancat on September 23, 2012, 01:33:17 AM
They shouldn't do preseason polls.  The first polls should be after the last game in September.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 23, 2012, 01:34:08 AM
Mark May puts us at number 5!!! :gocho: :excited: :love: :lynchmob: :dance:

I've always said that he's the only guy ESPN employs who knows jack crap about college football. :dance:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: DQ12 on September 23, 2012, 01:34:35 AM
Mark May puts us at number 5!!! :gocho: :excited: :love: :lynchmob: :dance:
he loves us. 
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: scottwildcat on September 23, 2012, 01:46:51 AM
it will only be #10
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: scottwildcat on September 23, 2012, 01:48:28 AM
it is really going to suck if ND jumps us
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 23, 2012, 01:58:07 AM
it is really going to suck if ND jumps us

They are already ahead of us.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: GoodForAnother on September 23, 2012, 10:54:33 AM
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/football/ncaa/polls/ap/

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi40.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fe211%2FSouthlick%2Fappoll_zpsc18dff54.jpg&hash=8d9bc4fa5e2e20d226fb23ca18c27eca2b8dec61)
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: bubbles4ksu on September 23, 2012, 10:56:00 AM
so elite.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 0.42 on September 23, 2012, 10:56:06 AM
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/football/ncaa/polls/ap/

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi40.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fe211%2FSouthlick%2Fappoll_zpsc18dff54.jpg&hash=8d9bc4fa5e2e20d226fb23ca18c27eca2b8dec61)

 :sdeek: :excited:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kslim on September 23, 2012, 11:00:30 AM
take that you couch burning fuckers. this does not suck at all
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: BackPayne on September 23, 2012, 11:04:18 AM
take that you couch burning fuckers. this does not suck at all


No. Not at all.

Eff you ND!
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 23, 2012, 11:06:20 AM
#7 is just not high enough, media! :shakesfist:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on September 23, 2012, 11:14:10 AM
So elite.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: pc5k on September 23, 2012, 11:27:06 AM
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/football/ncaa/polls/ap/

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi40.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fe211%2FSouthlick%2Fappoll_zpsc18dff54.jpg&hash=8d9bc4fa5e2e20d226fb23ca18c27eca2b8dec61)
4 SEC teams in the top 6- wow
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 8manpick on September 23, 2012, 11:38:04 AM
9 out of 10 big 12 teams receiving votes, 8 receiving more than aTm. Meth-U receiving none.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kslim on September 23, 2012, 11:38:47 AM
#8 in the coaches but dont you worry the best poll in the country will have us top 5, it will be posted later
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on September 23, 2012, 11:47:34 AM

4 SEC teams in the top 6- wow

Only 1 of them can go undefeated. 
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Super PurpleCat on September 23, 2012, 11:56:00 AM
Feels frickin' awesome to be a Top 10 team again.

 :ksu:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: DQ12 on September 23, 2012, 11:57:18 AM
we're going to be 7 or 8.

should be higher.
:gocho:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on September 23, 2012, 11:58:11 AM
I can not believe that we jumped ND.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: michigancat on September 23, 2012, 11:59:33 AM
reaping the benefits of playing a decent OOC opponent.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SwiftCat on September 23, 2012, 12:00:28 PM
The SEC is so overrated. We would piss pound any of those pud losers.

Sent from my One X using Tapatalk 2
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Frankenklein on September 23, 2012, 12:01:10 PM
I can not believe that we jumped ND.
what...no way :dance:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: doom on September 23, 2012, 12:02:08 PM
The SEC is so overrated. We would piss pound any of those pud losers.

Sent from my One X using Tapatalk 2

I'd be worried about vandy maybe.  Franklin has seen the binder.   :ohno:

Otherwise we'd roll.   :emawkid:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Frankenklein on September 23, 2012, 12:08:41 PM
ESPNU Fan Rankings
RK   TEAM
1   Alabama
2   LSU
3   Oregon
4   USC
5   Georgia
6   Florida State
7   South Carolina
8   Oklahoma
9   West Virginia
10   Clemson
11   Ohio State
12   Michigan State
13   Kansas State
14   Texas
15   Virginia Tech
16   TCU
17   Florida
18   Notre Dame
19   Stanford
20   Tennessee
21   Louisville
22   UCLA
23   Michigan
24   Arizona
25   Oregon State
Surely this is pre season rankings :dunno: if not WTF
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ManBearPig on September 23, 2012, 12:11:38 PM
#7?............. oh wow :dance:  :cheers: :dance: :cheers:
Title: Re: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 8manpick on September 23, 2012, 12:13:39 PM
#7?............. oh wow :dance:  :cheers: :dance: :cheers:
No respect
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ManBearPig on September 23, 2012, 12:18:09 PM
#7?............. oh wow :dance:  :cheers: :dance: :cheers:
No respect
That's fine with me. we'll continue to climb through the next few weeks...the fact we jumped those spoiled overrated NotreDameTards is an incredible feat in itself

 
Title: Re: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 8manpick on September 23, 2012, 12:38:03 PM
#7?............. oh wow :dance:  :cheers: :dance: :cheers:
No respect
That's fine with me. we'll continue to climb through the next few weeks...the fact we jumped those spoiled overrated NotreDameTards is an incredible feat in itself

Nope, we'll be #10 next week after the bye. Just wait. No respect.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ManBearPig on September 23, 2012, 12:47:44 PM
There's no way...in order for that to happen #12 Texas, #9 WVU, and #8 Stanford will need to have CONVINCING wins over OKLITE, Baylor, and Washington...respectively. I just don't see that happening. Next weeks slate of games is pretty bad
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: CNS on September 23, 2012, 08:26:18 PM
Louisville is top 20.  Just sayin

Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on September 23, 2012, 09:22:03 PM
Louisville is top 20.  Just sayin

Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2

And FSU's #4.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: GoodForAnother on September 23, 2012, 09:38:58 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1266.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fjj535%2Ftmbtop25%2FScreenShot2012-09-23at82113PM_zpsfca4b194.png&hash=1eb945e66a2425c08b182106e41f1384cc690f61)
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ManBearPig on September 23, 2012, 09:55:02 PM
Louisville is top 20.  Just sayin

Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
:dubious:
Meh...losery big east team.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on September 23, 2012, 10:07:01 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1266.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fjj535%2Ftmbtop25%2FScreenShot2012-09-23at82113PM_zpsfca4b194.png&hash=1eb945e66a2425c08b182106e41f1384cc690f61)

Feels good, man.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ManBearPig on September 27, 2012, 09:31:45 PM
Well Stanford's not jumping us in the rankings this week...up 6-3 in a snoozefest over UW at halftime.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SabiNation on September 27, 2012, 09:53:51 PM
Well Stanford's not jumping us in the rankings this week...up 6-3 in a snoozefest over UW at halftime.

 :zzz:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SabiNation on September 27, 2012, 10:59:15 PM
 :surprised:  17-13 Washington...4:53 to go



Feels so good to be rooting against the #8 team for good reason again.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: scottwildcat on September 30, 2012, 07:04:53 AM
so how far do we fall this week for having a bye? I'm thinking 2 spots? No respect and all. Maybe none at all? Maybe 1? Maybe MORE  :confused:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Boom Roasted on September 30, 2012, 08:43:22 AM
Did any top 25 really have a dominating game this weekend? The ones I watched (Baylor WVU, GA TENN, UT OSU, MSU Ohio) the answer seems to be no. Will be huge disrespect when we drop.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on September 30, 2012, 10:44:55 AM
I will melt down so hard. On the bright side, if we stay where we are we are guaranteed to jump the loser of Scar/UGA after we stomp KU's balls.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on September 30, 2012, 10:51:20 AM
still 8 in coaches
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on September 30, 2012, 10:52:30 AM
Big 12 in at WVU No. 7, KSU No. 8, UT No. 9, TCU No. 13, OU No. 14, TTU No. 24.

half of the conference is in the top 15
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on September 30, 2012, 10:56:24 AM
Baylor is at "31" OSU "40"....Miami at "33"
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on September 30, 2012, 10:57:36 AM
Only KU and ISU not receiving votes
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on September 30, 2012, 11:04:50 AM
Big 12 in at WVU No. 7, KSU No. 8, UT No. 9, TCU No. 13, OU No. 14, TTU No. 24.

half of the conference is in the top 15

jfc, we got passed by a team that gave up 63 points yesterday. 
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on September 30, 2012, 11:06:34 AM
we were already 8th in the coaches. we were ahead of them in the AP though. It should be out any time now.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kim carnes on September 30, 2012, 11:07:01 AM
Big 12 in at WVU No. 7, KSU No. 8, UT No. 9, TCU No. 13, OU No. 14, TTU No. 24.

half of the conference is in the top 15

jfc, we got passed by a team that gave up 63 points yesterday.

who cares?  we play them
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on September 30, 2012, 11:08:13 AM
We stay 7th in AP
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on September 30, 2012, 11:10:00 AM
AP:  KSU 7th, WVU 8th, Texas 11th, TCU 15th(tie), OU 17th, TTech "30", Baylor "33", ISU "38". Only OSU and KU not receiving votes in AP.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on September 30, 2012, 11:11:08 AM
Miami at "37" in AP
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: cas4ksu on September 30, 2012, 11:50:26 AM
miami is looking really good right now. (as a dominant win, not necessarily as a team)
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: buttsbuttsbutts on September 30, 2012, 02:31:50 PM
When do we jump all of these garbage SEC teams?  I thought this would be the week for sure after crap teams like Georgia and South Carolina looked awful against crap teams like Tennessee and Kentucky.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 8manpick on September 30, 2012, 02:33:49 PM
We got more points this week.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: GoodForAnother on October 01, 2012, 11:01:57 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1266.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fjj535%2Ftmbtop25%2FScreenShot2012-09-30at110012PM_zps47fd2277.png&hash=5ecd3e8af915ad198c545848e85ba7e835a12403)
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 0.42 on October 01, 2012, 11:38:06 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1266.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fjj535%2Ftmbtop25%2FScreenShot2012-09-30at110012PM_zps47fd2277.png&hash=5ecd3e8af915ad198c545848e85ba7e835a12403)

What a bunch of studs.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: GoodForAnother on October 01, 2012, 12:37:20 PM
 :bill:
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1266.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fjj535%2Ftmbtop25%2FScreenShot2012-09-30at110012PM_zps47fd2277.png&hash=5ecd3e8af915ad198c545848e85ba7e835a12403)

What a bunch of studs.

we need like 25 more jokewoods. and 50 more 42s. :3
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: yoEMAW on October 03, 2012, 09:59:45 AM
Really hoping to crack the top 5 this weekend. :crossfingers: Saturday is all about style points. :gocho:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 03, 2012, 10:21:45 AM
Really hoping to crack the top 5 this weekend. :crossfingers: Saturday is all about style points. :gocho:

It's not likely because the winner of Texas v WVU will most likely jump us.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: yoEMAW on October 03, 2012, 10:33:43 AM
Really hoping to crack the top 5 this weekend. :crossfingers: Saturday is all about style points. :gocho:

It's not likely because the winner of Texas v WVU will most likely jump us.

 :nono:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ChiComCat on October 03, 2012, 10:39:01 AM
South Carolina/Georgia and is it Florida/LSU?  Potentially Miami/ND.  Those should be interesting.  Top 10 will be much different next week
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: yoEMAW on October 03, 2012, 10:43:24 AM
South Carolina/Georgia and is it Florida/LSU?  Potentially Miami/ND.  Those should be interesting.  Top 10 will be much different next week

It will be. I'll be keeping my eye on Oregon/Washington also.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Winters on October 03, 2012, 10:20:43 PM
Score watching is going to be so much fun this weekend.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: yoEMAW on October 06, 2012, 10:35:25 PM
Alright, 3,4,5 all choke. If we're not in the top 5 next week I will rough ridin' lose it.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: bws on October 06, 2012, 10:38:19 PM
We should be #4 tomorrow.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: CHONGS on October 06, 2012, 10:40:12 PM
Guys wvu and Florida will jump us.   I think we'll be 7
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: BackPayne on October 06, 2012, 10:40:26 PM
I'd bet WV and Florida jump us. 5 or 6 is where I think we will be.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pendergast on October 06, 2012, 10:41:59 PM
WVU yes, if Florida jumps us I will be upset.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: HeinBallz on October 06, 2012, 10:43:23 PM
No way Florida Jumps us.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: bucket on October 06, 2012, 10:44:00 PM
guarantee it
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: bws on October 06, 2012, 10:44:17 PM
I'd bet WV and Florida jump us. 5 or 6 is where I think we will be.

Win in Norman>Austin  wv shouldn't jump us. Either way it will be sorted out in 2 weeks
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: HeinBallz on October 06, 2012, 10:45:52 PM
Texas always loses to ranked teams in Austin.  Nothing to see here.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: bucket on October 06, 2012, 10:46:02 PM
I'd bet WV and Florida jump us. 5 or 6 is where I think we will be.

Win in Norman>Austin  wv shouldn't jump us. Either way it will be sorted out in 2 weeks

win vs. ku < win vs. bevo
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: hemmy on October 06, 2012, 10:48:08 PM
They both jump us. that is a lead pipe lock.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: yoEMAW on October 06, 2012, 10:50:06 PM
So #8 beats #11 by 3 points? Sounds about right. Mountaineers can rough ridin' hang. #top5
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: hemmy on October 06, 2012, 10:52:21 PM
So #8 beats #11 by 3 points? Sounds about right. Mountaineers can rough ridin' hang. #top5

sorry, life isn't fair.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: DQ12 on October 06, 2012, 10:54:29 PM
NOT SAYING I AGREE, but this is what i think will happen:

1   Alabama (60) ok   
2   Oregon ok
3   Florida State TERRIBLE TEAM OUT OF TOP TEN   
4   LSU  TERRIBLE TEAM OUT OF TOP TEN
5   Georgia  TERRIBLE TEAM OUT OF TOP TEN
6   South Carolina ok   
7   Kansas State :)   
8   West Virginia ok   
9   Notre Dame ok   
10   Florida ok
11   Texas    :(
12   Ohio State PROBATION    
13   USC 1 LOSS
14   Oregon State Beems!   
15   Clemson 1 LOSS


1   Alabama
2   Oregon
3   South Carolina
4   Florida
5   West Virginia
6   Kansas State
7   Notre Dame   
8   Ohio State PROBATION
9   USC 1 LOSS
10   Oregon State Beems!
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: yoEMAW on October 06, 2012, 10:55:04 PM
So #8 beats #11 by 3 points? Sounds about right. Mountaineers can rough ridin' hang. #top5

sorry, #life isn't fair.

FIFY
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: BackPayne on October 06, 2012, 10:55:58 PM
So #8 beats #11 by 3 points? Sounds about right. Mountaineers can rough ridin' hang. #top5

sorry, life isn't fair.

As Wildcats we should be used to this reality.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: GoodForAnother on October 06, 2012, 10:56:35 PM
florida shouldn't jump us. I mean the voters are retards, so anything can happen, but the voters had been cooling on lsu and they only won by 8 at home.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: DQ12 on October 06, 2012, 10:59:18 PM
florida shouldn't jump us. I mean the voters are retards, so anything can happen, but the voters had been cooling on lsu and they only won by 8 at home.
I mean, SEC bias and all that, but Florida did have a very good W today.  Plus they won on the road at Aggie. 

They have an argument, and an argument is all it takes for the voters to hate on EMAW.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: hemmy on October 06, 2012, 11:08:37 PM
let it be known: the only ranking I care about is the CHIRP
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: HeinBallz on October 06, 2012, 11:11:30 PM
After looking at everything objectively:

1   Alabama
2   Oregon   
3   South Carolina   
4   West Virginia   
5   Kansas State   
6   Notre Dame   
7   Florida   
8   Ohio State   
9   USC   
10   Oregon State   
13    OU
17    UT
24    ISU
25    TCU
RV    Nubb

Bet Oregon even gets some 1 votes.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: DQ12 on October 06, 2012, 11:15:15 PM
You guys know that Florida just beat #3 LSU, right?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: bucket on October 06, 2012, 11:15:34 PM
After looking at everything objectively:

1   Alabama
2   Oregon   
3   South Carolina   
4   West Virginia   
5   Kansas State   
6   Notre Dame   
7   Florida   
8   Ohio State   
9   USC   
10   Oregon State   
13    OU
17    UT
24    ISU
25    TCU
RV    Nubb

Bet Oregon even gets some 1 votes.

ok so if wv jumps us(based on your rankings). Why wouldn't Florida?
Title: Re: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: raquetcat on October 06, 2012, 11:15:41 PM
florida shouldn't jump us. I mean the voters are retards, so anything can happen, but the voters had been cooling on lsu and they only won by 8 at home.
I mean, SEC bias and all that, but Florida did have a very good W today.  Plus they won on the road at Aggie. 

They have an argument, and an argument is all it takes for the voters to hate on EMAW.

Dlew is right on, hate to say it, but EMAW at 6 is what it's gonna be
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: HeinBallz on October 06, 2012, 11:20:33 PM
You guys know that Florida just beat #3 LSU, right?

You mean the same LSU with no impressive wins outside of a squeaker at Auburn who only has one OT victory over Louisiana Monroe?  That LSU?  Yeah.  I know.

After looking at everything objectively:

1   Alabama
2   Oregon   
3   South Carolina   
4   West Virginia   
5   Kansas State   
6   Notre Dame   
7   Florida   
8   Ohio State   
9   USC   
10   Oregon State   
13    OU
17    UT
24    ISU
25    TCU
RV    Nubb

Bet Oregon even gets some 1 votes.

ok so if wv jumps us(based on your rankings). Why wouldn't Florida?

Because LSU looked like dog crap (just like they have all year) - as did Florida.  Turn-overs & a win off a couple of untouched rushing touchdowns.    A blowout of KU seems more impressive.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: HeinBallz on October 06, 2012, 11:22:17 PM
Does everyone remember that LSU was #2 a couple of weeks ago?  They were losing respect already... a loss to Florida justifies the voters earlier suspicions.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: bucket on October 06, 2012, 11:23:03 PM
Does everyone remember that LSU was #2 a couple of weeks ago?  They were losing respect already... a loss to Florida justifies the voters earlier suspicions.

The voters earlier suspicions were that they were the #3 team in the nation you jack wagon!
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: bucket on October 06, 2012, 11:24:10 PM
You guys know that Florida just beat #3 LSU, right?

You mean the same LSU with no impressive wins outside of a squeaker at Auburn who only has one OT victory over Louisiana Monroe?  That LSU?  Yeah.  I know.

After looking at everything objectively:

1   Alabama
2   Oregon   
3   South Carolina   
4   West Virginia   
5   Kansas State   
6   Notre Dame   
7   Florida   
8   Ohio State   
9   USC   
10   Oregon State   
13    OU
17    UT
24    ISU
25    TCU
RV    Nubb

Bet Oregon even gets some 1 votes.

ok so if wv jumps us(based on your rankings). Why wouldn't Florida?

Because LSU looked like dog crap (just like they have all year) - as did Florida.  Turn-overs & a win off a couple of untouched rushing touchdowns.    A blowout of KU seems more impressive.

think about what you just said. A blowout win against KU seems more impressive than a win against the #3 team in the nation!!!
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: DQ12 on October 06, 2012, 11:24:48 PM
Ok Heinballz, we'll see who who's right tomorrow.  I bet it's me.







i hope it's you.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 0.42 on October 06, 2012, 11:29:00 PM
EMAW will be ranked #4 in my TMB Top 25 poll unless Oregon suffers an historic collapse in the 2nd half.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: mancattanite on October 06, 2012, 11:30:05 PM
I kinda wish that we wouldn't go up at all in the rankings... I don't want us to let our guard down for ISU.  I want  the team to be hungry and feel like they still have to prove themselves.

Heck, it might be good if we move down.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: hemmy on October 06, 2012, 11:31:12 PM
I kinda wish that we wouldn't go up at all in the rankings... I don't want us to let our guard down for ISU.  I want  the team to be hungry and feel like they still have to prove themselves.

Heck, it might be good if we move down.

heres to being unranked :ksu:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: HeinBallz on October 06, 2012, 11:33:11 PM
Ok Heinballz, we'll see who who's right tomorrow.  I bet it's me.







i hope it's you.

You could be right...  I've just thought LSU was over rated since the beginning of the year.  I honestly think your assessment on SEC love could be spot on. But then again - ND hasn't jumped us yet... so we're already getting some pretty serious love that no one here can ignore.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: HeinBallz on October 06, 2012, 11:35:36 PM
You guys know that Florida just beat #3 LSU, right?

You mean the same LSU with no impressive wins outside of a squeaker at Auburn who only has one OT victory over Louisiana Monroe?  That LSU?  Yeah.  I know.

After looking at everything objectively:

1   Alabama
2   Oregon   
3   South Carolina   
4   West Virginia   
5   Kansas State   
6   Notre Dame   
7   Florida   
8   Ohio State   
9   USC   
10   Oregon State   
13    OU
17    UT
24    ISU
25    TCU
RV    Nubb

Bet Oregon even gets some 1 votes.

ok so if wv jumps us(based on your rankings). Why wouldn't Florida?

Because LSU looked like dog crap (just like they have all year) - as did Florida.  Turn-overs & a win off a couple of untouched rushing touchdowns.    A blowout of KU seems more impressive.

think about what you just said. A blowout win against KU seems more impressive than a win against the #3 team in the nation!!!

Have you watched LSU play or looked at who they've beaten?  I could accept an argument that "It's SEC!!!"   but jumping all over "They were #3!!!" and being bad person-ish about it doesn't suit you.   I liked you a lot better when you're weren't a douche bag.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: bucket on October 06, 2012, 11:40:47 PM
You guys know that Florida just beat #3 LSU, right?

You mean the same LSU with no impressive wins outside of a squeaker at Auburn who only has one OT victory over Louisiana Monroe?  That LSU?  Yeah.  I know.

After looking at everything objectively:

1   Alabama
2   Oregon   
3   South Carolina   
4   West Virginia   
5   Kansas State   
6   Notre Dame   
7   Florida   
8   Ohio State   
9   USC   
10   Oregon State   
13    OU
17    UT
24    ISU
25    TCU
RV    Nubb

Bet Oregon even gets some 1 votes.

ok so if wv jumps us(based on your rankings). Why wouldn't Florida?

Because LSU looked like dog crap (just like they have all year) - as did Florida.  Turn-overs & a win off a couple of untouched rushing touchdowns.    A blowout of KU seems more impressive.

think about what you just said. A blowout win against KU seems more impressive than a win against the #3 team in the nation!!!

Have you watched LSU play or looked at who they've beaten?  I could accept an argument that "It's SEC!!!"   but jumping all over "They were #3!!!" and being bad person-ish about it doesn't suit you.   I liked you a lot better when you're weren't a douche bag.

You might have LSU as being overrated, but the fact is the voters have them as the third best team in the nation. They think pretty highly of them. So those same voters who had LSU as the third best team in the nation are probably going to think Florida had a big time win and give them a big bounce.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: DQ12 on October 06, 2012, 11:43:21 PM
Ok Heinballz, we'll see who who's right tomorrow.  I bet it's me.







i hope it's you.

You could be right...  I've just thought LSU was over rated since the beginning of the year.  I honestly think your assessment on SEC love could be spot on. But then again - ND hasn't jumped us yet... so we're already getting some pretty serious love that no one here can ignore.
Yeah, LSU hasn't looked impressive, but still, it's the SEC and people love the SEC because it's the SEC.  Stupid? Yeah, but Florida is going to get credit for beating the #3 team in the country.

ND (probably) isn't going to jump us because their only wins are against middle of the road Big 10 teams and middle of the road (sorry miami) ACC teams.  Voters aren't going to really buy into ND until they beat Stanford at home and OU on the road. 

Because if ND beats OU on the road, only ACC bottom dwellers and USC stand between them and the NC game.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: jtksu on October 06, 2012, 11:45:41 PM
I swear you idiots will meltdown over anything.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: bucket on October 06, 2012, 11:47:27 PM
I swear you idiots will meltdown over anything.

heinballz is ignorant and wrong!!!  :curse:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on October 06, 2012, 11:48:09 PM
Do not care, as long as EITHER K-State or WVU move up.  After the WVU game, I'll know whether to give a crap.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: GoodForAnother on October 06, 2012, 11:48:42 PM
I swear you idiots will meltdown over anything.

yeah, a pre-meltdown over something that probably won't even happen is pretty impressive
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: HeinBallz on October 06, 2012, 11:50:34 PM
Florida's a good team - but I think the best they can do is jump ND.   I'm basically pinning all of this as everyone having some serious love for us; ND love > than SEC Love... I don't think ND did enough to pass us..

keep in mind CK has some serious Tebow like karma surrounding him.   We're not so much america's team as CK is America's QB. 

I could be wrong though :dunno:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: HeinBallz on October 06, 2012, 11:52:19 PM
I swear you idiots will meltdown over anything.

heinballz is ignorant and wrong!!!  :curse:

 :dance:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: bucket on October 06, 2012, 11:53:02 PM
touché guys  :gocho:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: HeinBallz on October 06, 2012, 11:56:47 PM
also... according to AP, LSU was #4.  We're ranked higher in the AP, so naturally, that's what I'm predicting.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: bucket on October 06, 2012, 11:58:49 PM
also... according to AP, LSU was #4.  We're ranked higher in the AP, so naturally, that's what I'm predicting.

grasping at straws heinballz  :ohno:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: HeinBallz on October 07, 2012, 12:10:21 AM
aaaaaaaaaaand......









































 you're still butthurt.


 :dance:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: bucket on October 07, 2012, 12:11:46 AM
aaaaaaaaaaand......









































 you're still butthurt.


 :dance:

at. being. right?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: HeinBallz on October 07, 2012, 12:13:42 AM
I'll come to bed soon honey... someone on the internet is wrong!!!!



 :lol:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: DQ12 on October 07, 2012, 12:15:24 AM
people on tigerboard think we're going to be #3... :lol:

has it been that long since they've been ranked to have any grasp of how it works?

Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: bucket on October 07, 2012, 12:18:59 AM
I'll come to bed soon honey... someone on the internet is wrong!!!!



 :lol:

bachelor, live in LA(it's 10 p.m.), lost $2,000 in vegas last weekend. I have all night
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: hemmy on October 07, 2012, 12:19:01 AM
people on tigerboard think we're going to be #3... :lol:

has it been that long since they've been ranked to have any grasp of how it works?



We did just handily beat ku, biggest rival of MU (they are in the SEC, don't forget)
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: FP TC etc. on October 07, 2012, 01:35:34 AM
I'll come to bed soon honey... someone on the internet is wrong!!!!



 :lol:

bachelor, live in LA(it's 10 p.m.), lost $2,000 in vegas last weekend. I have all night

Do you have 2 first names?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: bucket on October 07, 2012, 01:37:32 AM
I'll come to bed soon honey... someone on the internet is wrong!!!!



 :lol:

bachelor, live in LA(it's 10 p.m.), lost $2,000 in vegas last weekend. I have all night

Do you have 2 first names?

no i do not
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kslim on October 07, 2012, 04:30:43 AM
can't you idiots just drink it in? we will probably be top 5 in at least one poll who gives a crap how it happened, like i said drink it in
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Super PurpleCat on October 07, 2012, 09:03:21 AM
can't you idiots just drink it in? we will probably be top 5 in at least one poll who gives a crap how it happened, like i said drink it in

 :dubious:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TBL on October 07, 2012, 09:08:07 AM
can't you idiots just drink it in? we will probably be top 5 in at least one poll who gives a crap how it happened, like i said drink it in

Are you forgetting who you're talking about?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: HeinBallz on October 07, 2012, 09:49:48 AM
yeah. bucket totally doesn't let things go.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on October 07, 2012, 10:19:41 AM
This rough rider has us at 6, which is where we prolly end up today.

http://blogs.mercurynews.com/collegesports/2012/10/07/my-ap-top-25-football-ballot-alabama-remains-no-1-florida-climbs-oregon-drops/

Quote
* I moved Florida to No. 2 (up five spots) after its victory over Louisiana State. Of course, that meant dropping Oregon one position after its blowout win over Washington.



He has zero respect for the Big 12, will be interesting to see how many agree with this rough rider.

Quote
* LSU slid one spot down the ballot, to No. 7.

My assessment of the Tigers was as simple as this: They lost on the road to what was the No. 7 team (Florida); no reason to drop them any further.

(Florida was No. 10 in the AP poll, so other voters may punish LSU a bit more for the loss than I did.)

* West Virginia only moved up two positions, to No. 11, following its victory at Texas.

Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Duncan on October 07, 2012, 10:31:54 AM
Quote
New AP Top 5: No. 1 Alabama, No. 2 Oregon, No. 3 South carolina, No. 4 Florida, No. 5 West Virginia
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: THE_ED_FROM_VEGAS on October 07, 2012, 10:37:19 AM
ALERT ALERT ALERT !!!

MY NEW TOP 25 IS OUT - AND THE RAW DATA SHULD MAKE U KIDS HAPPY - I DONT BE RIGGIN' THIS STUFF EITHER - HOWEVER IT SHAKES OUT IS HOWEVER IT SHAKES OUT

http://vsusports.tumblr.com/post/33077853362/rankafter-10-6total1alabama187-322kansas

----------------------------------------------------------

YEAR   Rank    AFTER 10-6   TOTAL   SOS    OFF.   DEF.   WIN   LOSS   PCT.   CONFERENCE   C-SOS      OFFENSE   DEFENSE   SOS 2   C-SOS 2   POWER

2012   1   Alabama   187.32   0.583   40.2   7   5   0   1   SEC   0.642      11.48571429   -20   8.745   4.815   27.12

2012   2   Kansas State   186.305   0.686   43.6   15.6   5   0   1   Big 12   0.715      12.45714286   -11.4   10.29   5.3625   
31.305

2012   3   Oregon   185.91   0.565   52.33   20   6   0   1   Pac 12   0.642      14.95142857   -7   8.475   4.815   26.58

2012   4   South Carolina   180.94   0.616   36.33   10.5   6   0   1   SEC   0.642      10.38   -16.5   9.24   4.815   28.11

2012   5   Notre Dame   175.72   0.688   28.8   7.8   5   0   1   Independent   0.472      8.228571429   -19.2   10.32   3.54   27.72

2012   6   West Virginia   174.855   0.671   52   35   5   0   1   Big 12   0.715      14.85714286   8   10.065   
5.3625   30.855

2012   7   Florida   173.43   0.7   27.2   11.4   5   0   1   SEC   0.642      7.771428571   -15.6   10.5   4.815   30.63

2012   8   Mississippi State   173.03   0.52   34.2   13.4   5   0   1   SEC   0.642      9.771428571   -13.6   7.8   4.815   25.23

2012   9   Ohio State   170.665   0.556   38.5   20.5   6   0   1   Big Ten   0.599      11   -6.5   8.34   4.4925   25.665

2012   10   Cincinnati   168.1   0.444   34   13.75   4   0   1   Big East   0.502      9.714285714   -13.25   6.66   3.765   20.85

2012   11   Florida State   167.17   0.521   45.17   12.33   5   1   0.833   ACC   0.56      12.90571429   -14.67   7.815   4.2   24.03

2012   12   Texas A&M   167.1   0.689   44.6   14.8   4   1   0.8   SEC   0.642      12.74285714   -12.2   10.335   4.815   30.3

2012   13   Oregon State   163.41   0.676   23.5   17   4   0   1   Pac 12   0.642      6.714285714   -10   10.14   4.815   29.91

2012   14   Rutgers   160.74   0.387   25.4   10.8   5   0   1   Big East   0.502      7.257142857   -16.2   5.805   3.765   19.14

2012   15   Louisville   159.95   0.434   31   18.6   5   0   1   Big East   0.502      8.857142857   -8.4   6.51   3.765   20.55

2012   16   Texas Tech   159.875   0.665   39   16.8   4   1   0.8   Big 12   0.715      11.14285714   -10.2   9.975   5.3625   
30.675

2012   17   Louisiana State   159.77   0.639   33.5   12.83   5   1   0.833   SEC   0.642      9.571428571   -14.17   9.585   4.815   28.8

2012   18   Texas   159.605   0.716   46.8   26.4   4   1   0.8   Big 12   0.715      13.37142857   -0.6   10.74   5.3625   32.205

2012   19   Louisiana Tech   159.34   0.321   53.2   35.8   5   0   1   WAC   0.354      15.2   8.8   4.815   2.655   14.94

2012   20   Arizona State   158.86   0.581   38.4   13.6   4   1   0.8   Pac 12   0.642      10.97142857   -13.4   8.715   4.815   27.06

2012   21   Texas-San Antonio   157.9   0.113   37.8   15.6   5   0   1   WAC   0.354      10.8   -11.4   1.695   2.655   8.7

2012   22   Oklahoma   156.785   0.727   38.25   16   3   1   0.75   Big 12   0.715      10.92857143   -11   10.905   5.3625   
32.535

2012   23   Texas Christian   155.435   0.697   30   13.2   4   1   0.8   Big 12   0.715      8.571428571   -13.8   10.455   
5.3625   31.635

2012   24   Southern California   152.11   0.696   34   19.4   4   1   0.8   Pac 12   0.642      9.714285714   -7.6   10.44   4.815   30.51

2012   25   Ohio   152.025   0.187   36.83   22.83   6   0   1   MAC   0.361      10.52285714   -4.17   2.805   2.7075   11.025

2012   26   Iowa State   151.645   0.764   26.8   15.8   4   1   0.8   Big 12   0.715      7.657142857   -11.2   11.46   5.3625   33.645
2012   27   Georgia   151.58   0.483   41.33   24.17   5   1   0.833   SEC   0.642      11.80857143   -2.83   7.245   4.815   24.12
2012   28   Clemson   149.26   0.552   41.33   27.33   5   1   0.833   ACC   0.56      11.80857143   0.33   8.28   4.2   24.96
2012   29   Baylor   148.855   0.721   54.25   39.75   3   1   0.75   Big 12   0.715      15.5   12.75   10.815   5.3625   32.355
2012   30   Stanford   147.43   0.7   31.6   21.8   4   1   0.8   Pac 12   0.642      9.028571429   -5.2   10.5   4.815   30.63
2012   31   Duke   146.9   0.518   37.83   25.17   5   1   0.833   ACC   0.56      10.80857143   -1.83   7.77   4.2   23.94
2012   32   Northwestern   143.745   0.51   32.83   23.67   5   1   0.833   Big Ten   0.599      9.38   -3.33   7.65   4.4925   24.285
2012   33   North Carolina   141.89   0.454   44   17.83   4   2   0.667   ACC   0.56      12.57142857   -9.17   6.81   4.2   22.02
2012   34   Nevada   140.865   0.362   40.83   27.17   5   1   0.833   MWC   0.403      11.66571429   0.17   5.43   3.0225   16.905
2012   35   Tulsa   140.46   0.342   42.5   28.33   5   1   0.833   CUSA   0.382      12.14285714   1.33   5.13   2.865   15.99
2012   36   Minnesota   138.445   0.522   26.4   19.6   4   1   0.8   Big Ten   0.599      7.542857143   -7.4   7.83   4.4925   24.645
2012   37   Nebraska   138.125   0.648   43.67   27.67   4   2   0.667   Big Ten   0.599      12.47714286   0.67   9.72   4.4925   28.425
2012   38   San Jose State   136.5   0.373   30.4   17.4   4   1   0.8   WAC   0.354      8.685714286   -9.6   5.595   2.655   16.5
2012   39   Boise State   136.305   0.422   26.2   15.6   4   1   0.8   MWC   0.403      7.485714286   -11.4   6.33   3.0225   18.705
2012   40   Louisiana-Lafayette   136.185   0.33   38   24.4   4   1   0.8   Sun Belt   0.379      10.85714286   -2.6   4.95   2.8425   15.585
2012   41   Oklahoma State   134.525   0.735   55.75   31   2   2   0.5   Big 12   0.715      15.92857143   4   11.025   5.3625   32.775
2012   42   Toledo   134.205   0.322   33.83   25   5   1   0.833   MAC   0.361      9.665714286   -2   4.83   2.7075   15.075
2012   43   Northern Illinois   133.485   0.159   35.5   22.5   5   1   0.833   MAC   0.361      10.14285714   -4.5   2.385   2.7075   10.185
2012   44   Penn State   132.525   0.628   27   16   4   2   0.667   Big Ten   0.599      7.714285714   -11   9.42   4.4925   27.825
2012   45   Western Kentucky   132.265   0.366   29.8   21.2   4   1   0.8   Sun Belt   0.379      8.514285714   -5.8   5.49   2.8425   16.665
2012   46   Brigham Young   131.55   0.459   25.83   8.83   4   2   0.667   Independent   0.472      7.38   -18.17   6.885   3.54   20.85
2012   47   UCLA   130.5   0.589   33.5   24   4   2   0.667   Pac 12   0.642      9.571428571   -3   8.835   4.815   27.3
2012   48   Michigan State   130.375   0.701   21.83   15.17   4   2   0.667   Big Ten   0.599      6.237142857   -11.83   10.515   4.4925   30.015
2012   49   Fresno State   129.325   0.447   39.5   23.33   4   2   0.667   MWC   0.403      11.28571429   -3.67   6.705   3.0225   19.455
2012   50   Michigan   128.065   0.716   31.6   21   3   2   0.6   Big Ten   0.599      9.028571429   -6   10.74   4.4925   30.465
2012   51   Kent   127.905   0.303   32.8   26.4   4   1   0.8   MAC   0.361      9.371428571   -0.6   4.545   2.7075   14.505
2012   52   Tennessee   126.83   0.68   39.4   29.6   3   2   0.6   SEC   0.642      11.25714286   2.6   10.2   4.815   30.03
2012   53   North Carolina State   124.72   0.504   28   20.5   4   2   0.667   ACC   0.56      8   -6.5   7.56   4.2   23.52
2012   54   Wisconsin   124.405   0.563   24   19.17   4   2   0.667   Big Ten   0.599      6.857142857   -7.83   8.445   4.4925   25.875
2012   55   Purdue   123.625   0.548   36.6   25.4   3   2   0.6   Big Ten   0.599      10.45714286   -1.6   8.22   4.4925   25.425
2012   56   Utah State   119.78   0.32   24   12.83   4   2   0.667   WAC   0.354      6.857142857   -14.17   4.8   2.655   14.91
2012   57   Iowa   119.425   0.608   22.6   17.4   3   2   0.6   Big Ten   0.599      6.457142857   -9.6   9.12   4.4925   27.225
2012   58   Miami (Florida)   116.86   0.642   30.17   34.67   4   2   0.667   ACC   0.56      8.62   7.67   9.63   4.2   27.66
2012   59   Louisiana-Monroe   115.225   0.338   39.6   27.2   3   2   0.6   Sun Belt   0.379      11.31428571   0.2   5.07   2.8425   15.825
2012   60   Central Florida   114.5   0.359   32.2   21.2   3   2   0.6   CUSA   0.382      9.2   -5.8   5.385   2.865   16.5
2012   61   Maryland   113.32   0.584   20.8   20.4   3   2   0.6   ACC   0.56      5.942857143   -6.6   8.76   4.2   25.92
2012   62   Washington   112.67   0.648   22.8   26.2   3   2   0.6   Pac 12   0.642      6.514285714   -0.8   9.72   4.815   29.07
2012   63   Missouri   111.42   0.743   25.33   22.83   3   3   0.5   SEC   0.642      7.237142857   -4.17   11.145   4.815   31.92
2012   64   Arizona   111.36   0.68   37   32.67   3   3   0.5   Pac 12   0.642      10.57142857   5.67   10.2   4.815   30.03
2012   65   Virginia Tech   109.17   0.57   29   22.33   3   3   0.5   ACC   0.56      8.285714286   -4.67   8.55   4.2   25.5
2012   66   Mississippi   108.47   0.606   31.33   27.67   3   3   0.5   SEC   0.642      8.951428571   0.67   9.09   4.815   27.81
2012   67   Middle Tennessee State   108.255   0.299   33.2   26.6   3   2   0.6   Sun Belt   0.379      9.485714286   -0.4   4.485   2.8425   14.655
2012   68   Troy   107.315   0.361   26.4   22.6   3   2   0.6   Sun Belt   0.379      7.542857143   -4.4   5.415   2.8425   16.515
2012   69   Temple   104.11   0.486   29.5   24.5   2   2   0.5   Big East   0.502      8.428571429   -2.5   7.29   3.765   22.11
2012   70   San Diego State   103.215   0.361   38.17   28.83   3   3   0.5   MWC   0.403      10.90571429   1.83   5.415   3.0225   16.875
2012   71   Connecticut   102.95   0.492   19.83   16.17   3   3   0.5   Big East   0.502      5.665714286   -10.83   7.38   3.765   22.29
2012   72   Indiana   97.725   0.558   32.8   27.8   2   3   0.4   Big Ten   0.599      9.371428571   0.8   8.37   4.4925   25.725
2012   73   Western Michigan   97.515   0.32   30.17   24.67   3   3   0.5   MAC   0.361      8.62   -2.33   4.8   2.7075   15.015
2012   74   Arkansas State   95.755   0.38   30.5   28.83   3   3   0.5   Sun Belt   0.379      8.714285714   1.83   5.7   2.8425   17.085
2012   75   Vanderbilt   95.59   0.612   21.2   20.6   2   3   0.4   SEC   0.642      6.057142857   -6.4   9.18   4.815   27.99
2012   76   Pittsburgh   94.93   0.52   26   21.2   2   3   0.4   Big East   0.502      7.428571429   -5.8   7.8   3.765   23.13
2012   77   New Mexico   94.765   0.413   28.5   29.17   3   3   0.5   MWC   0.403      8.142857143   2.17   6.195   3.0225   18.435
2012   78   Wake Forest   94.14   0.558   23   31   3   3   0.5   ACC   0.56      6.571428571   4   8.37   4.2   25.14
2012   79   Utah   93.52   0.583   24   24.6   2   3   0.4   Pac 12   0.642      6.857142857   -2.4   8.745   4.815   27.12
2012   80   Georgia Tech   93.43   0.569   37.83   30.17   2   4   0.333   ACC   0.56      10.80857143   3.17   8.535   4.2   25.47
2012   81   Ball State   93.035   0.476   33.67   37.33   3   3   0.5   MAC   0.361      9.62   10.33   7.14   2.7075   19.695
2012   82   California   92.96   0.751   28.5   28   2   4   0.333   Pac 12   0.642      8.142857143   1   11.265   4.815   32.16
2012   83   Syracuse   91.9   0.639   24.4   26.2   2   3   0.4   Big East   0.502      6.971428571   -0.8   9.585   3.765   26.7
2012   84   Bowling Green State   91.625   0.307   20.33   20.33   3   3   0.5   MAC   0.361      5.808571429   -6.67   4.605   2.7075   14.625
2012   85   Air Force   89.095   0.315   34.4   27.8   2   3   0.4   MWC   0.403      9.828571429   0.8   4.725   3.0225   15.495
2012   86   East Carolina   86.58   0.334   20.5   26.67   3   3   0.5   CUSA   0.382      5.857142857   -0.33   5.01   2.865   15.75
2012   87   South Florida   83.86   0.612   25.17   27.5   2   4   0.333   Big East   0.502      7.191428571   0.5   9.18   3.765   25.89
2012   88   Miami (Ohio)   83.315   0.458   24.83   37.67   3   3   0.5   MAC   0.361      7.094285714   10.67   6.87   2.7075   19.155
2012   89   Illinois   81.025   0.63   21.17   28.33   2   4   0.333   Big Ten   0.599      6.048571429   1.33   9.45   4.4925   27.885
2012   90   Southern Methodist   80.09   0.372   22.4   26.2   2   3   0.4   CUSA   0.382      6.4   -0.8   5.58   2.865   16.89
2012   91   Arkansas   80.07   0.727   23.33   35   2   4   0.333   SEC   0.642      6.665714286   8   10.905   4.815   31.44
2012   92   Houston   79.92   0.313   29.4   31.6   2   3   0.4   CUSA   0.382      8.4   4.6   4.695   2.865   15.12
2012   93   Washington State   79.82   0.613   21.83   30.33   2   4   0.333   Pac 12   0.642      6.237142857   3.33   9.195   4.815   28.02
2012   94   Navy   78.68   0.38   17.2   24   2   3   0.4   Independent   0.472      4.914285714   -3   5.7   3.54   18.48
2012   95   Virginia   76.88   0.617   23.67   34   2   4   0.333   ACC   0.56      6.762857143   7   9.255   4.2   26.91
2012   96   Marshall   75.29   0.442   40.5   44.5   2   4   0.333   CUSA   0.382      11.57142857   17.5   6.63   2.865   18.99
2012   97   Boston College   73.59   0.633   28.2   29   1   4   0.2   ACC   0.56      8.057142857   2   9.495   4.2   27.39
2012   98   North Texas   73.515   0.462   19.5   25.83   2   4   0.333   Sun Belt   0.379      5.571428571   -1.17   6.93   2.8425   19.545
2012   99   Texas State   73.16   0.435   23.2   35.4   2   3   0.4   WAC   0.354      6.628571429   8.4   6.525   2.655   18.36
2012   100   Kansas   71.255   0.771   20   29.6   1   4   0.2   Big 12   0.715      5.714285714   2.6   11.565   5.3625   33.855
2012   101   Auburn   68.41   0.666   15.4   23.6   1   4   0.2   SEC   0.642      4.4   -3.4   9.99   4.815   29.61
2012   102   Central Michigan   68.175   0.312   27.2   40.8   2   3   0.4   MAC   0.361      7.771428571   13.8   4.68   2.7075   14.775
2012   103   Kentucky   65.26   0.72   20.5   30.17   1   5   0.167   SEC   0.642      5.857142857   3.17   10.8   4.815   31.23
2012   104   Alabama-Birmingham   61.35   0.454   28.8   33.8   1   4   0.2   CUSA   0.382      8.228571429   6.8   6.81   2.865   19.35
2012   105   Buffalo   60.635   0.474   26.8   32.8   1   4   0.2   MAC   0.361      7.657142857   5.8   7.11   2.7075   19.635
2012   106   Wyoming   60.565   0.444   27.6   33.4   1   4   0.2   MWC   0.403      7.885714286   6.4   6.66   3.0225   19.365
2012   107   Colorado   57.55   0.624   21.6   39.4   1   4   0.2   Pac 12   0.642      6.171428571   12.4   9.36   4.815   28.35
2012   108   Akron   57.365   0.425   33.83   38.33   1   5   0.167   MAC   0.361      9.665714286   11.33   6.375   2.7075   18.165
2012   109   New Mexico State   52.76   0.414   24.5   33.17   1   5   0.167   WAC   0.354      7   6.17   6.21   2.655   17.73
2012   110   Texas-El Paso   52.75   0.444   17   27   1   5   0.167   CUSA   0.382      4.857142857   0   6.66   2.865   19.05
2012   111   Nevada-Las Vegas   52.735   0.433   25   35   1   5   0.167   MWC   0.403      7.142857143   8   6.495   3.0225   19.035
2012   112   South Alabama   52.455   0.399   13.4   25.6   1   4   0.2   Sun Belt   0.379      3.828571429   -1.4   5.985   2.8425   17.655
2012   113   Memphis   52.35   0.294   20.6   29.8   1   4   0.2   CUSA   0.382      5.885714286   2.8   4.41   2.865   14.55
2012   114   Army   51.94   0.362   24.2   37.2   1   4   0.2   Independent   0.472      6.914285714   10.2   5.43   3.54   17.94
2012   115   Florida Atlantic   49.275   0.453   13   30   1   4   0.2   Sun Belt   0.379      3.714285714   3   6.795   2.8425   19.275
2012   116   Rice   48.3   0.357   26.83   38.67   1   5   0.167   CUSA   0.382      7.665714286   11.67   5.355   2.865   16.44
2012   117   Florida International   48.135   0.397   24.67   37.83   1   5   0.167   Sun Belt   0.379      7.048571429   10.83   5.955   2.8425   17.595
2012   118   Colorado State   46.815   0.369   16   30   1   5   0.167   MWC   0.403      4.571428571   3   5.535   3.0225   17.115
2012   119   Hawaii   43.535   0.463   20.4   43.8   1   4   0.2   MWC   0.403      5.828571429   16.8   6.945   3.0225   19.935
2012   120   Idaho   41.63   0.504   15.5   38   1   5   0.167   WAC   0.354      4.428571429   11   7.56   2.655   20.43
2012   121   Southern Mississippi   27.76   0.461   16.4   35.2   0   5   0   CUSA   0.382      4.685714286   8.2   6.915   2.865   19.56
2012   122   Eastern Michigan   25.435   0.494   15.4   37.2   0   5   0   MAC   0.361      4.4   10.2   7.41   2.7075   20.235
2012   123   Massachusetts   16.515   0.459   13.83   43.5   0   6   0   MAC   0.361      3.951428571   16.5   6.885   2.7075   19.185
2012   124   Tulane   11.66   0.411   9   42.4   0   5   0   CUSA   0.382      2.571428571   15.4   6.165   2.865   18.06
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on October 07, 2012, 10:38:50 AM
WILL TAKE!
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on October 07, 2012, 10:40:41 AM
Good thing we all know Ed is a genius and his rankings are 100% right.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 07, 2012, 10:42:07 AM
#6 in AP

1   Alabama (60)   5-0   1,500   1
2   Oregon   6-0   1,435   2
3   South Carolina   6-0   1,359   6
4   Florida   5-0   1,265   10
5   West Virginia   5-0   1,260   8
6   Kansas State   5-0   1,217   7
7   Notre Dame   5-0   1,176   9
8   Ohio State   6-0   1,053   12
9   LSU   5-1   938   4
10   Oregon State   4-0   873   14
11   USC   4-1   812   13
12   Florida State   5-1   800   3
13   Oklahoma   3-1   756   17
14   Georgia   5-1   733   5
15   Texas   4-1   711   11
16   Clemson   5-1   657   15
17   Stanford   4-1   587   18
18   Louisville   5-0   494   19
19   Mississippi State   5-0   450   20
20   Rutgers   5-0   331   22
21   Cincinnati   4-0   205   NR
22   Texas A&M   4-1   153   NR
23   Louisiana Tech   5-0   129   NR
24   Boise State   4-1   114   NR
25   Michigan     3-2   82   NR
Others Receiving Votes: Ohio79, Baylor62, Iowa State54, TCU50, Michigan State49, Arizona State39, Washington39, North Carolina State17, Nebraska5, Arizona4, Duke3, Tennessee3, Texas Tech2, Tulsa2, Northwestern1, Penn State1
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on October 07, 2012, 10:46:10 AM
This son of a bitch!

http://blogs.rgj.com/packblog/2012/10/07/chris-murrays-weekly-top-25-college-football-ballot-2/

Notre Dame leaps us in his ballot after beating Miami.....what the hell..
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: HeinBallz on October 07, 2012, 10:48:32 AM
Will take.

Guess I was wrong -  :dunno:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 07, 2012, 10:49:38 AM
have a few choices for our "good" and "bad" votes. suggest everyone votes Cecil "good" because he's been on us all year and Rob Long "bad" because he's on the bottom of the list and it's easiest.  LET'S GET EM!

http://www.pollspeak.com/component/option,com_psreport/Itemid,3/lang,en/p,46/r,T/s,21/t1,42/v,/w,7/
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 07, 2012, 10:52:43 AM
Lead Good Voter:      Cecil Hurt
Lead Bad Voter:      Rob Long


Great job fellas
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on October 07, 2012, 10:54:58 AM
Lead Good Voter:      Cecil Hurt
Lead Bad Voter:      Rob Long


Great job fellas

Voted
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 69mach351 on October 07, 2012, 11:07:45 AM
Florida got a healthy jump for beating a very over rated LSU team.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: pissclams on October 07, 2012, 11:08:23 AM
rob not long, what a dickhead
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ChiComCat on October 07, 2012, 11:09:18 AM
lol @ our low being 8
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on October 07, 2012, 11:09:31 AM
Florida got a healthy jump for beating a very over rated LSU team.

LSU prolly loses again this week.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 07, 2012, 11:10:33 AM
rob not long, what a dickhead

I called him Rob Dong on twitter. I would imagine he gives us a healthy bump in next week's poll whether we win or lose after that.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on October 07, 2012, 11:11:51 AM
lol @ our low being 8

This is so great.
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: puniraptor on October 07, 2012, 11:12:22 AM
The ED, your raw data is giving me a bone.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: GoodForAnother on October 07, 2012, 11:13:45 AM
well that's pretty Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: THE_ED_FROM_VEGAS on October 07, 2012, 11:13:56 AM
I AM SHOCKED THOSE AP KIDS DIDNT PUT NOTRE DAME IN THE TOP 5...
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 07, 2012, 11:18:20 AM
#5 in coaches  :thumbs:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on October 07, 2012, 11:21:46 AM
Last time we were top 5 in either poll? Anyone?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 07, 2012, 11:22:28 AM
Last time we were top 5 in either poll? Anyone?

were we in 2003 at some point?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Scary Smart on October 07, 2012, 11:24:23 AM
 :billdance:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: yoEMAW on October 07, 2012, 11:25:46 AM
#5 in coaches  :thumbs:

 :gocho: #top5
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 07, 2012, 11:26:38 AM
Quote
Associated Press (media)

5. West Virginia
6. Kansas State
13. Oklahoma
15. Texas

Others receiving votes:

26. Baylor
27. Iowa State
28. TCU
38. Texas Tech

Four teams is the fewest the Big 12 has had all season, but Baylor and TCU will play next week. The winner likely climbs back into the top 25.

USA Today (coaches)

4. West Virginia
5. Kansas State
10. Oklahoma
15. Texas
25. Iowa State

Others receiving votes:

27. Baylor
33. Texas Tech
39. Oklahoma State
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: HeinBallz on October 07, 2012, 11:27:45 AM
also... according to AP, LSU was #4.  We're ranked higher in the AP, so naturally, that's what I'm predicting I'm predicting we'll be #5 in coaches.

IN YOUR FAT FACE BUCKET!!!
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on October 07, 2012, 11:31:21 AM
Last time we were top 5 in either poll? Anyone?

were we in 2003 at some point?

We were #10 when we played Marshall, and I doubt we moved to top 5 after beating OU. #3 when we lost to OU in 2000.....

Edit: We were #5 preseason and still #5 after the first week of 2003. Moved to #6 after that.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: GoodForAnother on October 07, 2012, 11:31:29 AM
#5 in coaches  :thumbs:

have I ever mentioned how great the coaches poll is  :thumbs:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kim carnes on October 07, 2012, 11:33:44 AM
enjoy it guys, because it ends 2 weeks from today
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pendergast on October 07, 2012, 11:38:24 AM
enjoy it guys, because it ends 2 weeks from today

 :nono:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: mancattanite on October 07, 2012, 11:53:40 AM
I love that we're ranked below West Virginia. It will be that much more satisfying when we beat them.  :party:
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: HeinBallz on October 07, 2012, 12:04:33 PM
:putschipbackonshoulder:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kslim on October 07, 2012, 12:11:47 PM
#5 in coaches  :thumbs:
can't you idiots just drink it in? we will probably be top 5 in at least one poll who gives a crap how it happened, like i said drink it in

 :dubious:

 :dance:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: j-dub on October 07, 2012, 12:13:20 PM
Last time we were top 5 in either poll? Anyone?

were we in 2003 at some point?

We were #10 when we played Marshall, and I doubt we moved to top 5 after beating OU. #3 when we lost to OU in 2000.....

Edit: We were #5 preseason and still #5 after the first week of 2003. Moved to #6 after that.

so we were 6th or 10th before Marshall??
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on October 07, 2012, 12:15:43 PM
Last time we were top 5 in either poll? Anyone?

were we in 2003 at some point?

We were #10 when we played Marshall, and I doubt we moved to top 5 after beating OU. #3 when we lost to OU in 2000.....

Edit: We were #5 preseason and still #5 after the first week of 2003. Moved to #6 after that.

so we were 6th or 10th before Marshall??

6th. One of the articles I saw had us at #10, but the ESPN polls show us at #6 in both.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: j-dub on October 07, 2012, 12:18:48 PM
Last time we were top 5 in either poll? Anyone?

were we in 2003 at some point?

We were #10 when we played Marshall, and I doubt we moved to top 5 after beating OU. #3 when we lost to OU in 2000.....

Edit: We were #5 preseason and still #5 after the first week of 2003. Moved to #6 after that.

so we were 6th or 10th before Marshall??

6th. One of the articles I saw had us at #10, but the ESPN polls show us at #6 in both.

feels good to be back  :dance:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Frankenklein on October 07, 2012, 12:20:18 PM
   Is this 2003 ranking before Marshall thing going to tie in with WVU beating Marshall this year?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Cire on October 07, 2012, 01:05:13 PM
we are 7 in Sagarin's ELO Chess and have a better predictor than WVU.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Frankenklein on October 07, 2012, 01:07:38 PM
  I think the first BCS poll comes out tonight,should tell a lot
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on October 07, 2012, 01:10:11 PM
  I think the first BCS poll comes out tonight,should tell a lot

Next week.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Super PurpleCat on October 07, 2012, 01:12:04 PM
Last time we were top 5 in either poll? Anyone?

2000 I think we were #2.  The day Stoops first came to town.   :blank:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Frankenklein on October 07, 2012, 01:14:09 PM
  I think the first BCS poll comes out tonight,should tell a lot

Next week.
your right ...thanks
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: HeinBallz on October 07, 2012, 01:19:58 PM
Sure it's not your left?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Frankenklein on October 07, 2012, 01:24:43 PM
 
Sure it's not your left?
You're clever  :embarrassed:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Super PurpleCat on October 07, 2012, 01:35:27 PM
Quote
25   Michigan   3-2   82

 :curse:

Quote
25   Iowa State   4-1   73

 :runaway:

THE POLLS ARE FRIGHTENING TO ME.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: jtksu on October 07, 2012, 03:37:41 PM
enjoy it guys, because it ends 2 weeks from today

I wish I knew you IRL so I could kick you in the taint.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on October 07, 2012, 03:47:03 PM
enjoy it guys, because it ends 2 weeks from today

I wish I knew you IRL so I could kick you in the taint.
I would watch.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on October 07, 2012, 05:09:10 PM
I don't know if anyone cares, but here is where the BCS ranking stands now with 3 of the 6 computers reporting.  The actual BCS throws out the high and low of the 6, but for this I just used the 3 available.  The 4th and 5th will come out Tues/Wed and the 6th won't be released until after next week.  When the 4th comes out, I'll update using those 4.  When the 5th comes out, I'll update throwing out the biggest "outlier", whether its the highest or lowest.  If you don't like looking at it this way now, ignore this post.

1 Alabama .9636
2 South Carolina .8955
3 Oregon .8826
4 Florida .8241
5 ND .8189
6 WVU .8177
7 KSU .8016
8 LSU .6548
9 Oregon St .5528
10 USC .5475
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Houstoncat93 on October 07, 2012, 05:18:22 PM
I don't know if anyone cares, but here is where the BCS ranking stands now with 3 of the 6 computers reporting.  The actual BCS throws out the high and low of the 6, but for this I just used the 3 available.  The 4th and 5th will come out Tues/Wed and the 6th won't be released until after next week.  When the 4th comes out, I'll update using those 4.  When the 5th comes out, I'll update throwing out the biggest "outlier", whether its the highest or lowest.  If you don't like looking at it this way now, ignore this post.

1 Alabama .9636
2 South Carolina .8955
3 Oregon .8826
4 Florida .8241
5 ND .8189
6 WVU .8177
7 KSU .8016
8 LSU .6548
9 Oregon St .5528
10 USC .5475

Are you using the Harris poll, it just came out with us at 5.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kim carnes on October 07, 2012, 05:20:49 PM
I don't know if anyone cares, but here is where the BCS ranking stands now with 3 of the 6 computers reporting.  The actual BCS throws out the high and low of the 6, but for this I just used the 3 available.  The 4th and 5th will come out Tues/Wed and the 6th won't be released until after next week.  When the 4th comes out, I'll update using those 4.  When the 5th comes out, I'll update throwing out the biggest "outlier", whether its the highest or lowest.  If you don't like looking at it this way now, ignore this post.

1 Alabama .9636
2 South Carolina .8955
3 Oregon .8826
4 Florida .8241
5 ND .8189
6 WVU .8177
7 KSU .8016
8 LSU .6548
9 Oregon St .5528
10 USC .5475

seems like it would be impossible for us to pass an undefeated oregon team
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on October 07, 2012, 06:16:55 PM
Full Harris Poll

http://aol.sportingnews.com/ncaa-football/polls/harris

Quote
Rank   Team (1st Place Votes)   W-L   Votes   Last Week   Next Game
1   Alabama (108)   5-0   2,820   -   @ Missou
2   Oregon (5)   6-0   2,706   -   @ AriSt
3   South Carolina   6-0   2,565   -   @ LSU ( #8)
4   West Virginia   5-0   2,376   -   @ TxTch
5   Kansas State   5-0   2,355   -   @ IaSt ( #25)
6   Florida   5-0   2,305   -   @ Vandy
7   Notre Dame   5-0   2,210   -   Stan ( #16)
8   LSU   5-1   1,901   -   SC ( #3)
9   Florida State   5-1   1,736   -   BC
10   USC   4-1   1,634   -   @ Wash
11   Georgia   5-1   1,532   -   @ Kty
12   Oregon State   4-0   1,516   -   @ BYU
13   Oklahoma   3-1   1,428   -   Tex ( #15)
14   Clemson   5-1   1,410   -   VaTech
15   Texas   4-1   1,287   -   @ Okla ( #13)
16   Stanford   4-1   1,266   -   @ ND ( #7)
17   Mississippi State   5-0   1,093   -   Tenn
18   Louisville   5-0   1,088   -   @ Pitt
19   Rutgers   5-0   785   -   Syr
20   Cincinnati   4-0   552   -   Ford
21   TCU   4-1   384   -   @ Baylor
22   Boise State   4-1   335   -   Fres
23   Texas A&M   4-1   291   -   @ LaTech ( #24)
24   Louisiana Tech   5-0   147   -   TexA&M ( #23)
25   Iowa State   4-1   129   -   KanSt ( #5)
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: jtksu on October 07, 2012, 06:22:53 PM
I don't know if anyone cares, but here is where the BCS ranking stands now with 3 of the 6 computers reporting.  The actual BCS throws out the high and low of the 6, but for this I just used the 3 available.  The 4th and 5th will come out Tues/Wed and the 6th won't be released until after next week.  When the 4th comes out, I'll update using those 4.  When the 5th comes out, I'll update throwing out the biggest "outlier", whether its the highest or lowest.  If you don't like looking at it this way now, ignore this post.

1 Alabama .9636
2 South Carolina .8955
3 Oregon .8826
4 Florida .8241
5 ND .8189
6 WVU .8177
7 KSU .8016
8 LSU .6548
9 Oregon St .5528
10 USC .5475

seems like it would be impossible for us to pass an undefeated oregon team

It will be interesting.  Wins over ISU, TCU, UT, and WVU would really help though.  We really need Oregon to lose to USC though.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ChiComCat on October 07, 2012, 06:32:31 PM
I don't know if anyone cares, but here is where the BCS ranking stands now with 3 of the 6 computers reporting.  The actual BCS throws out the high and low of the 6, but for this I just used the 3 available.  The 4th and 5th will come out Tues/Wed and the 6th won't be released until after next week.  When the 4th comes out, I'll update using those 4.  When the 5th comes out, I'll update throwing out the biggest "outlier", whether its the highest or lowest.  If you don't like looking at it this way now, ignore this post.

1 Alabama .9636
2 South Carolina .8955
3 Oregon .8826
4 Florida .8241
5 ND .8189
6 WVU .8177
7 KSU .8016
8 LSU .6548
9 Oregon St .5528
10 USC .5475

seems like it would be impossible for us to pass an undefeated oregon team

It will be interesting.  Wins over ISU, TCU, UT, and WVU would really help though.  We really need Oregon to lose to USC though.

Now that the Pac 12 has a conference championship game, they should get 2 shots at them
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: jtksu on October 07, 2012, 06:54:25 PM
I don't know if anyone cares, but here is where the BCS ranking stands now with 3 of the 6 computers reporting.  The actual BCS throws out the high and low of the 6, but for this I just used the 3 available.  The 4th and 5th will come out Tues/Wed and the 6th won't be released until after next week.  When the 4th comes out, I'll update using those 4.  When the 5th comes out, I'll update throwing out the biggest "outlier", whether its the highest or lowest.  If you don't like looking at it this way now, ignore this post.

1 Alabama .9636
2 South Carolina .8955
3 Oregon .8826
4 Florida .8241
5 ND .8189
6 WVU .8177
7 KSU .8016
8 LSU .6548
9 Oregon St .5528
10 USC .5475

seems like it would be impossible for us to pass an undefeated oregon team

It will be interesting.  Wins over ISU, TCU, UT, and WVU would really help though.  We really need Oregon to lose to USC though.

Now that the Pac 12 has a conference championship game, they should get 2 shots at them

Oregon has to play @USC and @Oregon State, Stanford at home and then the CCG.  :pray:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Tobias on October 07, 2012, 06:55:43 PM
#2 in this week's ORCHID (behind alabama)
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kslim on October 07, 2012, 06:58:34 PM
I don't know if anyone cares, but here is where the BCS ranking stands now with 3 of the 6 computers reporting.  The actual BCS throws out the high and low of the 6, but for this I just used the 3 available.  The 4th and 5th will come out Tues/Wed and the 6th won't be released until after next week.  When the 4th comes out, I'll update using those 4.  When the 5th comes out, I'll update throwing out the biggest "outlier", whether its the highest or lowest.  If you don't like looking at it this way now, ignore this post.

1 Alabama .9636
2 South Carolina .8955
3 Oregon .8826
4 Florida .8241
5 ND .8189
6 WVU .8177
7 KSU .8016
8 LSU .6548
9 Oregon St .5528
10 USC .5475

seems like it would be impossible for us to pass an undefeated oregon team

It will be interesting.  Wins over ISU, TCU, UT, and WVU would really help though.  We really need Oregon to lose to USC though.

Now that the Pac 12 has a conference championship game, they should get 2 shots at them

Oregon has to play @USC and @Oregon State, Stanford at home and then the CCG.  :pray:

usc almost lost to utah and oregon state??? lmbo. they might lose but it seems like smooth sailing till the ccg
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Trim on October 07, 2012, 06:59:25 PM
#2 in this week's ORCHID (behind alabama)

Same in The Ed's Raw Data rankings, making them a consensus #2 in the legit polls.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on October 07, 2012, 07:30:15 PM
I don't know if anyone cares, but here is where the BCS ranking stands now with 3 of the 6 computers reporting.  The actual BCS throws out the high and low of the 6, but for this I just used the 3 available.  The 4th and 5th will come out Tues/Wed and the 6th won't be released until after next week.  When the 4th comes out, I'll update using those 4.  When the 5th comes out, I'll update throwing out the biggest "outlier", whether its the highest or lowest.  If you don't like looking at it this way now, ignore this post.

1 Alabama .9636
2 South Carolina .8955
3 Oregon .8826
4 Florida .8241
5 ND .8189
6 WVU .8177
7 KSU .8016
8 LSU .6548
9 Oregon St .5528
10 USC .5475

Are you using the Harris poll, it just came out with us at 5.

Yeah.  Harris-5 (.8336), Coaches-5 (.8244), and Computers-Sagarin(7), Billingsly(6), Massey(9) for (.7467)
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: scottwildcat on October 07, 2012, 07:32:58 PM
eff Massey
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: scottwildcat on October 07, 2012, 07:41:17 PM
Kirk just said on National Television that EMAW will NOT go to the Natty if Oregon goes undefeated.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: scottwildcat on October 07, 2012, 07:41:54 PM
NO QUESTION IN HIS MIND none the less
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on October 07, 2012, 07:49:30 PM
NO QUESTION IN HIS MIND none the less

I agree.

If they play and beat USC twice, there is no way that we leap Oregon in the Coaches Poll or Harris Poll. 
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kslim on October 07, 2012, 07:52:12 PM
NO QUESTION IN HIS MIND none the less

I agree.

If they play and beat USC twice, there is no way that we leap Oregon in the Coaches Poll or Harris Poll.
agreed, look what happened with florida against a shitty lsu team that was waaaay overrated... what happens if ND beats stanford and usc and oregon goes undefeated? there is a lot of football to be played win the dr pepper and let everything else sort itself out
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: AbeFroman on October 07, 2012, 08:22:23 PM
 it would really be fitting that in the last years before a playoff KSU would go undefeated but get screwed by undefeated Oregon, 1 loss note dame and 1 loss SEC team. Kick in the nuts like every really good year
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on October 07, 2012, 08:30:42 PM
Need OU to piss pound ND and ND to Skull eff standford and USC, we need the computers to be all over our D.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: p1k3 on October 07, 2012, 08:34:15 PM
it would really be fitting that in the last years before a playoff KSU would go undefeated but get screwed by undefeated Oregon, 1 loss note dame and 1 loss SEC team. Kick in the nuts like every really good year

This is why I don't r4ecognize national champions, ever. The system is rough ridin' stupid and it always has been.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 0.42 on October 07, 2012, 08:40:03 PM
 :gocho:

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1266.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fjj535%2Ftmbtop25%2FScreenShot2012-10-07at91924PM_zps7eba3e7b.png&hash=27a0034cce6f6297dd0893d84cb7b6c2a60c7586)
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 8manpick on October 10, 2012, 01:57:22 PM
:gocho:

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1266.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fjj535%2Ftmbtop25%2FScreenShot2012-10-07at91924PM_zps7eba3e7b.png&hash=27a0034cce6f6297dd0893d84cb7b6c2a60c7586)
:thumbs:

I think it's about time we had a goEMAW top 25 poll.  Maybe like 50 or so posters get a vote?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: mocat on October 10, 2012, 02:04:08 PM
:gocho:

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1266.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fjj535%2Ftmbtop25%2FScreenShot2012-10-07at91924PM_zps7eba3e7b.png&hash=27a0034cce6f6297dd0893d84cb7b6c2a60c7586)
:thumbs:

I think it's about time we had a goEMAW top 25 poll.  Maybe like 50 or so posters get a vote?

This would not be that hard to do :dunno:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MadCat on October 10, 2012, 02:06:16 PM
Looks like 17 people get ballots on TMB...do we really need 50 or are you counting socks?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 8manpick on October 10, 2012, 02:09:05 PM
Looks like 17 people get ballots on TMB...do we really need 50 or are you counting socks?

Yeah just noticed that.  Maybe 25 would be good for a top 25.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: GoodForAnother on October 10, 2012, 02:12:28 PM
I think there are 20 voters or so but some of them usually forget to send in their ballots.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: jtksu on October 10, 2012, 07:43:09 PM
Of the top 15 posters on this board, numbers wise, 12 are socks.  Just saying.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Trim on October 14, 2012, 08:48:00 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F24.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_mbvw5toRmW1r41peoo1_1280.gif&hash=e6e30f843f88c139c97fadd3ce97fd1732580637)
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SdK on October 14, 2012, 10:15:29 AM
Balin   :bill:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on October 14, 2012, 10:18:41 AM
SD found this one

http://blogs.mercurynews.com/collegesports/2012/10/14/my-ap-top-25-football-ballot-alabama-is-no-1-notre-dame-falls-texas-disappears/

Quote
Highlights (this will be quicker than usual because I have to catch a flight home from Chicago)…

* Kansas State jumped to No. 2, a six-spot improvement from last week, after its victory at Iowa State.

That’s not an easy place to win and, combined with the win in Norman last month, gives the Wildcats two impressive road Ws.

(I also took Oklahoma’s performance vs. Texas into account when evaluating K State.)


Also, further proof that the small number of you who were cheering for UT are rough ridin' stupid.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on October 14, 2012, 10:20:24 AM
#4 for this guy

http://blogs.clarionledger.com/msu/2012/10/14/this-weeks-ap-top-25-ballot-6/

Quote
I wrestled with a few teams. Should Stanford remain ranked after losing in overtime to Notre Dame? Does Kansas State deserve to be ranked ahead of Florida?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on October 14, 2012, 10:22:17 AM
Guess this rough rider didn't see our Miami, OU, or ISU games....

http://blogs.rgj.com/packblog/2012/10/14/chris-murrays-weekly-top-25-college-football-ballot-3/

Quote
* We didn’t have any huge gainers this week, but Note Dame did rise to a season high of No. 4 on my ballot. With wins over Michigan, Michigan State and now Stanford, the Irish has been mighty impressive. No. 5 Kansas State and No. 6 Oregon State also hit season highs and No. 24 Texas Tech made its debut.
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 14, 2012, 10:41:30 AM
D Scott currently confused as crap about the AP rankings....
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on October 14, 2012, 10:44:32 AM
D Scott currently confused as crap about the AP rankings....

 :lol:...just tweeted out last week's rankings...then tweeted he didn't understand why what he posted go pulled from where ever he pulled it from. 
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Spaces on October 14, 2012, 10:59:10 AM
#3 

:excited:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Houstoncat93 on October 14, 2012, 11:04:38 AM
Coaches - 3
Sagarin - 3
Colley - 5
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Duncan on October 14, 2012, 11:10:26 AM
AP #4
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SdK on October 14, 2012, 11:12:17 AM
OMG!
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: wetwillie on October 14, 2012, 11:15:25 AM
But but ND is going to jump us in the polls!  We will jump Oregon when we pisspound WVU next week. 
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 'taterblast on October 14, 2012, 11:15:38 AM
what the...
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: That_Guy on October 14, 2012, 11:16:09 AM
I rough ridin' hate everything about Notre Dame
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Domino on October 14, 2012, 11:19:33 AM
But but ND is going to jump us in the polls!  We will jump Oregon when we pisspound WVU next week.

I yield.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on October 14, 2012, 11:20:37 AM
1   Alabama (60)   6-0   1,500   1
2   Oregon   6-0   1,436   2
3   Florida   6-0   1,361   4
4   Kansas State   6-0   1,296   6
5   Notre Dame   6-0   1,283   7
6   LSU   6-1   1,153   9
7   Ohio State   7-0   1,071   8
8   Oregon State   5-0   1,050   10
9   South Carolina   6-1   1,042   3
10   Oklahoma   4-1   994   13
11   USC   5-1   874   11
12   Florida State   6-1   836   12
13   Georgia   5-1   753   14
14   Clemson   5-1   673   16
15   Mississippi State   6-0   591   19
16   Louisville   6-0   574   18
17   West Virginia   5-1   552   5
18   Texas Tech   5-1   444   NR
19   Rutgers   6-0   405   20
20   Texas A&M   5-1   379   22
21   Cincinnati   5-0   294   21
22   Stanford   4-2   242   17
23   Michigan   4-2   177   25
24   Boise State   5-1   133   24
25   Ohio   7-0   104   NR
Others Receiving Votes: Arizona State92, TCU88, Louisiana Tech38, Texas25, North Carolina State11, Northwestern6, Wisconsin6, Washington6, Nebraska4, North Carolina2, Tulsa2, Iowa State1, Penn State1, Arizona1

Read more: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/football/ncaa/polls/ap/#ixzz29I6YrsvP
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Domino on October 14, 2012, 11:23:06 AM
Quote
4   Kansas State   6-0   1,296   6
5   Notre Dame   6-0   1,283   7

I yield by 13 points. My guess is because of Michigan State losing, it really hurt their W over them.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on October 14, 2012, 11:24:19 AM
Frank Solich is in the top 25 and Nubb is not.  :lol:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on October 14, 2012, 11:27:39 AM
Sagarin - 3
Colley - 5

Jumped Oregon, Notre Dame, South Carolina, & Ohio State in the Sagarin.
I don't see the new Colley to see who we jumped, but we moved up 5 spots. 
Impressive.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SPE_khat on October 14, 2012, 11:29:32 AM
Quote
4   Kansas State   6-0   1,296   6
5   Notre Dame   6-0   1,283   7

I yield by 13 points. My guess is because of Michigan State losing, it really hurt their W over them.

not because our OU win now looks all  :billdance: :drool: :drool: :billdance: ?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Domino on October 14, 2012, 11:34:25 AM
Quote
4   Kansas State   6-0   1,296   6
5   Notre Dame   6-0   1,283   7

I yield by 13 points. My guess is because of Michigan State losing, it really hurt their W over them.

not because our OU win now looks all  :billdance: :drool: :drool: :billdance: ?

Combination of both.

Which leads me to - do we want Notre Dame undefeated when they lose to OU? That would make the victory look even better, right?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on October 14, 2012, 11:36:03 AM
you guys are all way over thinking this stuff. if we win out, we'll be playing in the championship game. nothing else matters.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Chico on October 14, 2012, 11:36:25 AM
ND throws all kind of wrenches into the BCS system.  It would be good for them to lose a couple times.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: EMAWesome on October 14, 2012, 11:39:55 AM
you guys are all way over thinking this stuff. if we win out, we'll be playing in the championship game. nothing else matters.

 :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love:
 :ksu: :ksu: :ksu: :ksu: :ksu: :ksu: :ksu:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 0.42 on October 14, 2012, 11:43:31 AM
k-state purple cats university is now #3 in 42's TMB Poll :users:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on October 14, 2012, 11:45:26 AM
ND throws all kind of wrenches into the BCS system.  It would be good for them to lose a couple times.

nd throws no wrenches into any system.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Scary Smart on October 14, 2012, 11:47:03 AM
Frank Solich is in the top 25 and Nubb is not.  :lol:

I really enjoyed this, too.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Chico on October 14, 2012, 11:47:14 AM
ND throws all kind of wrenches into the BCS system.  It would be good for them to lose a couple times.

nd throws no wrenches into any system.

Preferential treatment
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SPE_khat on October 14, 2012, 11:47:33 AM
Two weeks from now, we will be the toast of College football. After dismantling Schlubberville and the Raider rash to move to 8-0, we will get to watch OU pound ND's puss into the ground, and USC take down Oregon in the rose bowl.  SnyderCats will ascend to #2 and Manhattan will be  :emawkid:


Can't wait. :cheers:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Tobias on October 14, 2012, 11:50:00 AM
you guys are all way over thinking this stuff. if we win out, we'll be playing in the championship game. nothing else matters.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on October 14, 2012, 11:54:33 AM
you guys are all way over thinking this stuff. if we win out, we'll be playing in the championship game. nothing else matters.

So if Alabama, KSU, and Notre Dame all win out, who will KSU play in the NC game?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Chico on October 14, 2012, 11:56:21 AM
you guys are all way over thinking this stuff. if we win out, we'll be playing in the championship game. nothing else matters.

So if Alabama, KSU, and Notre Dame all win out, who will KSU play in the NC game?

WRENCH!
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on October 14, 2012, 11:56:45 AM
you guys are all way over thinking this stuff. if we win out, we'll be playing in the championship game. nothing else matters.

So if Alabama, KSU, and Notre Dame all win out, who will KSU play in the NC game?

that isn't going to happen so it doesn't matter.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ChiComCat on October 14, 2012, 11:58:42 AM
ND won't win out
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Bloodfart on October 14, 2012, 12:00:34 PM
you guys are all way over thinking this stuff. if we win out, we'll be playing in the championship game. nothing else matters.

So if Alabama, KSU, and Notre Dame all win out, who will KSU play in the NC game?

that isn't going to happen so it doesn't matter.
It should be KSU vs ND if it happens though. Just my opinion.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: GoodForAnother on October 14, 2012, 12:01:46 PM
I'm not sure we can pass Bama and Oregon if they win out. Would love to be wrong.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on October 14, 2012, 12:02:33 PM
Oregon won't win out. USC twice, and @Oregon State. Oregon State is definitely overrated, but they'll be up for that game.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on October 14, 2012, 12:04:25 PM
I'm not sure we can pass Bama and Oregon if they win out. Would love to be wrong.

well the good news is that the three teams (bama, oregon and ksu) won't all win out.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: GoodForAnother on October 14, 2012, 12:05:24 PM
I'm not sure we can pass Bama and Oregon if they win out. Would love to be wrong.

well the good news is that the three teams (bama, oregon and ksu) won't all win out.

Yeah almost never happens so not sure why I'm worried.
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 14, 2012, 12:05:28 PM
That's a fact Rick Daris
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Tobias on October 14, 2012, 12:06:06 PM
yes, can the battered wives sit this thread out for a while and just enjoy this?  jesus christ :flush:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Super PurpleCat on October 14, 2012, 12:06:07 PM
I just looked at the polls today and passed out on my floor.
Title: Re: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: michigancat on October 14, 2012, 12:15:52 PM
yes, can the battered wives sit this thread out for a while and just enjoy this?  jesus christ :flush:

It almost feels like a goEMAW joke. But I think these people are serious.
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 14, 2012, 12:17:57 PM
A message board is no place for hypothetical situations and prognostication folks.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kim carnes on October 14, 2012, 12:25:27 PM
I'm not sure we can pass Bama and Oregon if they win out. Would love to be wrong.

well the good news is that the three teams (bama, oregon and ksu) won't all win out.

Yeah almost never happens so not sure why I'm worried.

but it has happened and it could very well happen again.  we're not going undefeated though.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Chico on October 14, 2012, 12:29:31 PM
I'm not sure we can pass Bama and Oregon if they win out. Would love to be wrong.

well the good news is that the three teams (bama, oregon and ksu) won't all win out.

Yeah almost never happens so not sure why I'm worried.

but it has happened and it could very well happen again.  we're not going undefeated though.

Shut up Kim.  Nobody likes you.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Bloodfart on October 14, 2012, 12:32:17 PM
Yeah sometimes I wish Kim would take a day off.  I gets tiresome.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kim carnes on October 14, 2012, 12:35:24 PM
OMG, kim thinks we aren't going to go undefeated, god i hate him so much
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Houstoncat93 on October 14, 2012, 12:54:43 PM
you guys are all way over thinking this stuff. if we win out, we'll be playing in the championship game. nothing else matters.

That would only be true if there was only one other undefeated team right now.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Scary Smart on October 14, 2012, 01:07:05 PM
Just quickly looked through some Florida message boards and they are NOT happy that we jumped them in the Coaches poll.  :gocho:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: AbeFroman on October 14, 2012, 01:19:56 PM
Quote
Kansas State takes its best ranking since 2000 to Morgantown, W.Va., where the Mountaineers will be looking to bounce back from a startling 49-14 loss at Texas Tech. Kansas State is the only unbeaten team left in the Big 12, and Wildcats quarterback Collin Klein seems to have taken the Heisman Trophy front-runner status from West Virginia's Geno Smith.
Title: Re: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: michigancat on October 14, 2012, 01:23:04 PM
A message board is no place for hypothetical situations and prognostication folks.

Also not an appropriate place for calling out battered wife dumbass whiners.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on October 14, 2012, 01:24:22 PM
While we are disregarding Steve Dave's prohibition on hypothetical situations and prognostications, I'd like to say that South Carolina beating Florida, then moving on to upset Alabama in the SEC title game sounds hot and sexy.

And because I dislike blue balls, I'll add to that the notion of USC beating Oregon at the Rose Bowl, and top it off with OU beating Notre Dame....and then entire rough ridin' country arguing over who deserves a shot at LHC Bill Snyder's Wildcats in the BCS championship game.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Farrogantass.files.wordpress.com%2F2011%2F09%2Fmeg-ryan-orgasm-face.jpg&hash=d82e176f236549c0c6a9a05f0afbabfe9b447ce4)
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Cartierfor3 on October 14, 2012, 01:26:28 PM
While we are disregarding Steve Dave's prohibition on hypothetical situations and prognostications, I'd like to say that South Carolina beating Florida, then moving on to upset Alabama in the SEC title game sounds hot and sexy.

And because I dislike blue balls, I'll add to that the notion of USC beating Oregon at the Rose Bowl, and top it off with OU beating Notre Dame....and then entire rough ridin' country arguing over who deserves a shot at LHC Bill Snyder's Wildcats in the BCS championship game.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Farrogantass.files.wordpress.com%2F2011%2F09%2Fmeg-ryan-orgasm-face.jpg&hash=d82e176f236549c0c6a9a05f0afbabfe9b447ce4)

When this happens, we won't be faking it.  It will be real.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on October 14, 2012, 01:28:08 PM
I mean, wtf?

http://sagarin.com/sports/cfsend.htm
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Cartierfor3 on October 14, 2012, 01:31:06 PM
I mean, wtf?

http://sagarin.com/sports/cfsend.htm

SLAP IN THE FACE
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Frankenklein on October 14, 2012, 01:32:17 PM
While we are disregarding Steve Dave's prohibition on hypothetical situations and prognostications, I'd like to say that South Carolina beating Florida, then moving on to upset Alabama in the SEC title game sounds hot and sexy.

And because I dislike blue balls, I'll add to that the notion of USC beating Oregon at the Rose Bowl, and top it off with OU beating Notre Dame....and then entire rough ridin' country arguing over who deserves a shot at gets to destroy LHC Bill Snyder's Wildcats in the BCS championship game.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Farrogantass.files.wordpress.com%2F2011%2F09%2Fmeg-ryan-orgasm-face.jpg&hash=d82e176f236549c0c6a9a05f0afbabfe9b447ce4)
fyp
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on October 14, 2012, 01:32:54 PM
I mean, wtf?

http://sagarin.com/sports/cfsend.htm

What about it?  ELO_CHESS is what counts in the BCS, which has us 3.  His others do not take into account wins/losses, only point differential.  In the others we are always going to look bad because all  :bill: cares about is winning, and if milking 8 minutes off the clock to get 3 points is what it takes, so be it.  Bill's style is the absolute worst for Sagarin's other rating systems. 
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Cartierfor3 on October 14, 2012, 01:36:06 PM
Don't be a dumbass Frankenklein
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on October 14, 2012, 01:36:25 PM
I mean, wtf?

http://sagarin.com/sports/cfsend.htm

What about it?  ELO_CHESS is what counts in the BCS, which has us 3.  His others do not take into account wins/losses, only point differential.  In the others we are always going to look bad because all  :bill: cares about is winning, and if milking 8 minutes off the clock to get 3 points is what it takes, so be it.  Bill's style is the absolute worst for Sagarin's other rating systems. 

Did not realize that ELO_CHESS was all that was taken into account for BCS. Good to hear.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on October 14, 2012, 01:40:08 PM
I mean, wtf?

http://sagarin.com/sports/cfsend.htm

What about it?  ELO_CHESS is what counts in the BCS, which has us 3.  His others do not take into account wins/losses, only point differential.  In the others we are always going to look bad because all  :bill: cares about is winning, and if milking 8 minutes off the clock to get 3 points is what it takes, so be it.  Bill's style is the absolute worst for Sagarin's other rating systems. 

Did not realize that ELO_CHESS was all that was taken into account for BCS. Good to hear.

Yeah, Sagarin buries it in the text because he thinks it's bullshit he has to provide ELO_CHESS.  However, in order to get paid, he has to do it.  He posts his rankings in the order of a different system as an eff you to the BCS.  However, the point of football is to win the game, not score as many points as possible while holding your opponents to the least amount of points over the course of the season. 
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on October 14, 2012, 01:40:30 PM
So if I'm seeing this correctly there are 11 ranked and undefeated teams halfway through the season. This seems like a lot. I wonder what the average is.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on October 14, 2012, 01:44:45 PM
I mean, wtf?

http://sagarin.com/sports/cfsend.htm

What about it?  ELO_CHESS is what counts in the BCS, which has us 3.  His others do not take into account wins/losses, only point differential.  In the others we are always going to look bad because all  :bill: cares about is winning, and if milking 8 minutes off the clock to get 3 points is what it takes, so be it.  Bill's style is the absolute worst for Sagarin's other rating systems. 

Did not realize that ELO_CHESS was all that was taken into account for BCS. Good to hear.

Yeah, Sagarin buries it in the text because he thinks it's bullshit he has to provide ELO_CHESS.  However, in order to get paid, he has to do it.  He posts his rankings in the order of a different system as an eff you to the BCS.  However, the point of football is to win the game, not score as many points as possible while holding your opponents to the least amount of points over the course of the season.

What the eff is elo_chess anyway? And why does this nerd get to help dictate the BCS rankings.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on October 14, 2012, 01:51:02 PM
I mean, wtf?

http://sagarin.com/sports/cfsend.htm

What about it?  ELO_CHESS is what counts in the BCS, which has us 3.  His others do not take into account wins/losses, only point differential.  In the others we are always going to look bad because all  :bill: cares about is winning, and if milking 8 minutes off the clock to get 3 points is what it takes, so be it.  Bill's style is the absolute worst for Sagarin's other rating systems. 

Did not realize that ELO_CHESS was all that was taken into account for BCS. Good to hear.

Yeah, Sagarin buries it in the text because he thinks it's bullshit he has to provide ELO_CHESS.  However, in order to get paid, he has to do it.  He posts his rankings in the order of a different system as an eff you to the BCS.  However, the point of football is to win the game, not score as many points as possible while holding your opponents to the least amount of points over the course of the season.

What the eff is elo_chess anyway? And why does this nerd get to help dictate the BCS rankings.

He got in very early as a supplier for computer rankings for the BCS.  After a while, they made a rule change that BCS computers can't take into account margin of victory.  I don't know if he'd already developed ELO_CHESS or did it for the BCS, but he had to start supplying it instead in order to stay part of the BCS because it accounts for W/L, margin of victory.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on October 14, 2012, 01:58:46 PM
#4 in Harris

1. Bama, 2. Oregon, 3. Florida, 4. KSU, 5. ND
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Frankenklein on October 14, 2012, 02:02:36 PM
While we are disregarding Steve Dave's prohibition on hypothetical situations and prognostications, I'd like to say that South Carolina beating Florida, then moving on to upset Alabama in the SEC title game sounds hot and sexy.

And because I dislike blue balls, I'll add to that the notion of USC beating Oregon at the Rose Bowl, and top it off with OU beating Notre Dame....and then entire rough ridin' country arguing over who deserves a shot at gets to destroy LHC Bill Snyder's Wildcats in the BCS championship game.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Farrogantass.files.wordpress.com%2F2011%2F09%2Fmeg-ryan-orgasm-face.jpg&hash=d82e176f236549c0c6a9a05f0afbabfe9b447ce4)
fyp
Don't be a dumbass Frankenklein
Just saying that's how the media will see it  :dunno:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: CHONGS on October 14, 2012, 02:04:33 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elo_rating_system
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Domino on October 14, 2012, 02:06:20 PM
So if I'm seeing this correctly there are 11 ranked and undefeated teams halfway through the season. This seems like a lot. I wonder what the average is.

Aren't 3 of those in the Big East, though? Louisville, Cincinnati, Rutgers. And no one is predicting either of those 3 should even sniff a shot at the NCG.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ednksu on October 14, 2012, 02:18:33 PM
AP: 4
USA: 3
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on October 14, 2012, 02:23:42 PM
BCS Standing using only Harris & Coaches right now:
1. Bama: .9991
2. Oregon: .9590
3. KSU: .8844
4. Florida: .8838
5. ND: .8462

That's a decent margin over ND.  ND & Florida both killed us in the computers last week, but we already made up 4 spots in the Saragin this week, including jumping ND.  The human polls factor in how many voter points you have, not your ranking position.  The computers go straight off ranking positions. 
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Chico on October 14, 2012, 04:30:17 PM
AP: 4
USA: 3

Thanks ednluke  :rolleyes:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ednksu on October 14, 2012, 04:51:57 PM
AP: 4
USA: 3

Thanks ednluke  :rolleyes:
usually don't have nearly 2 pages of movement in a few hours in a thread like this....so....... :dubious:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Frankenklein on October 14, 2012, 05:19:41 PM
AP: 4
USA: 3

Thanks ednluke  :rolleyes:
usually don't have nearly 2 pages of movement in a few hours in a thread like this....so....... :dubious:
Is pretty common on elite teams message boards.Rankings threads for elite teams move along almost as fast as butthurt threads on cyclone fanatic,the phog and other sucky teams boards
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Benja on October 14, 2012, 05:29:53 PM
yes, can the battered wives sit this thread out for a while and just enjoy this?  jesus christ :flush:

What the eff? This isn't GPC, people can express whatever stupid rough ridin' debbie downer opinions they want
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Benja on October 14, 2012, 05:31:15 PM
you guys are all way over thinking this stuff. if we win out, we'll be playing in the championship game. nothing else matters.

So if Alabama, KSU, and Notre Dame all win out, who will KSU play in the NC game?

that isn't going to happen so it doesn't matter.

Yes. The chances of that happening are about the same as getting attacked by a polar bear and a regular bear on the same day.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SdK on October 14, 2012, 05:38:25 PM
you guys are all way over thinking this stuff. if we win out, we'll be playing in the championship game. nothing else matters.

So if Alabama, KSU, and Notre Dame all win out, who will KSU play in the NC game?

that isn't going to happen so it doesn't matter.

Yes. The chances of that happening are about the same as getting attacked by a polar bear and a regular bear on the same day.

What about an albino regular bear and regular regular bear?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Trim on October 14, 2012, 07:37:16 PM
Ask The Ed about Jeff Sagarin.

Hint: Jeff Sagarin's a rough ridin' loser.
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 14, 2012, 07:43:55 PM
lol, not a single big 10 team in the BCS rankings
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kso_FAN on October 14, 2012, 07:47:29 PM
lol, not a single big 10 team in the BCS rankings

Call it the MAC 10 or the Big Mac? :dunno:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Perry on October 14, 2012, 07:55:07 PM
lol, not a single big 10 team in the BCS rankings

Call it the MAC 10 or the Big Mac? :dunno:

MAC plays some good football, probably wouldn't like the association with the big 10
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on October 14, 2012, 07:59:41 PM
Our computer average of the middle 4/6 computer polls, the 4 used in the BCS, is 3rd. 
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: GoodForAnother on October 14, 2012, 08:01:56 PM
florida will be a non factor after saturday
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kso_FAN on October 14, 2012, 08:12:16 PM
http://prwolfe.bol.ucla.edu/cfootball/ratings.htm#first

http://www.andersonsports.com/football/ACF_frnk.html
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Winters on October 14, 2012, 08:13:18 PM
Feels great. So great. Yeah!
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: GoodForAnother on October 14, 2012, 08:14:20 PM
http://prwolfe.bol.ucla.edu/cfootball/ratings.htm#first

http://www.andersonsports.com/football/ACF_frnk.html

Beloit at 729, good for last place. My mom is going to be upset.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MadCat on October 14, 2012, 08:20:35 PM
http://prwolfe.bol.ucla.edu/cfootball/ratings.htm#first

http://www.andersonsports.com/football/ACF_frnk.html

Beloit at 729, good for last place. My mom is going to be upset.

Hey, Bethel only has 28 points for.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Super PurpleCat on October 14, 2012, 08:51:03 PM
yes, can the battered wives sit this thread out for a while and just enjoy this?  jesus christ :flush:

What the eff? This isn't GPC, people can express whatever stupid rough ridin' debbie downer opinions they want

Last time we were ranked this high was 12 years ago.  Go be a debbie downer during the next 11 years.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 0.42 on October 14, 2012, 08:58:22 PM
 :bill:

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1266.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fjj535%2Ftmbtop25%2FScreenShot2012-10-14at84402PM_zps14cdf6f3.png&hash=c83da6a3dbf6dc0df5c0fc4a76e0eb6c4d67072e)
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Super PurpleCat on October 14, 2012, 09:03:05 PM
Remember when we would be undefeated but ranked behind teams with losses?

Yeah, I don't remember either.  But I bet it sucked.   :thumbs:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Legit Elite on October 14, 2012, 09:25:11 PM
Remember when we would be undefeated but ranked behind teams with losses?

Yeah, I don't remember either.  But I bet it sucked.   :thumbs:
This.

In the 1990's it would have been unimaginable to be ranked ahead of undefeated Ohio State, Florida, and Notre Dame halfway through the season.  Jesus Christ  :runaway: :runaway: :runaway:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: JohnCurrie is Weird/Gross on October 14, 2012, 09:55:19 PM
For argument sake using the current BCS rankings, if Oregon runs the table they would have wins over (8)Oregon State (20)Stanford (10)USC twice. If the cats run the table they would have wins over (9)Oklahoma (13)West Virginia (17)Texas Tech (23)TCU (24)Iowa State (25)Texas. Hard to imagine the cats not jumping them, right?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 14, 2012, 10:38:01 PM
For argument sake using the current BCS rankings, if Oregon runs the table they would have wins over (8)Oregon State (20)Stanford (10)USC twice. If the cats run the table they would have wins over (9)Oklahoma (13)West Virginia (17)Texas Tech (23)TCU (24)Iowa State (25)Texas. Hard to imagine the cats not jumping them, right?

It depends on where all of those teams are ranked at the end of the year. Also, Oregon was ranked ahead of us in the preseason polls, so they have that going for them.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SdK on October 14, 2012, 11:06:12 PM
So for the computer average, it assigns a rank to your average and that is what is figured in?

I mean our computer average is 3, but because Bama's average is slightly less than 3, we get a four?

Tell me that our actual average of the computer rankings is what goes in and not our averages rank.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: eastcat on October 14, 2012, 11:56:29 PM
For argument sake using the current BCS rankings, if Oregon runs the table they would have wins over (8)Oregon State (20)Stanford (10)USC twice. If the cats run the table they would have wins over (9)Oklahoma (13)West Virginia (17)Texas Tech (23)TCU (24)Iowa State (25)Texas. Hard to imagine the cats not jumping them, right?

It depends on where all of those teams are ranked at the end of the year. Also, Oregon was ranked ahead of us in the preseason polls, so they have that going for them.

We are 1/100th of a point behind them right now.

With a win over WVU we will jump them. Keep winning and we hold onto it.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: hemmy on October 15, 2012, 12:09:43 AM
So for the computer average, it assigns a rank to your average and that is what is figured in?

I mean our computer average is 3, but because Bama's average is slightly less than 3, we get a four?

Tell me that our actual average of the computer rankings is what goes in and not our averages rank.

Keep in mind they throw out the highest and lowest computer rank.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on October 15, 2012, 12:22:46 AM
So if we beat WVU and Florida loses (very possible) then we'll be number two next week?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Panjandrum on October 15, 2012, 12:50:14 AM
So if we beat WVU and Florida loses (very possible) then we'll be number two next week?

Yeah, probably.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on October 15, 2012, 06:32:07 AM
So for the computer average, it assigns a rank to your average and that is what is figured in?

I mean our computer average is 3, but because Bama's average is slightly less than 3, we get a four?

Tell me that our actual average of the computer rankings is what goes in and not our averages rank.
Our actual average of the computer rankings is what goes in.

You throw out the highest and lowest computer rankings so you are left with 4 rankings. For each of those 4 you get "points" based on your rank. You get 25 points for 1st, 24 points for 2nd, down to 1 point for 25th.  You sum your points and divide by 100 to get you computer score.  Our computer rankings were 1,2,3,3,4,5. Using the middle four we got 92 points for a computer score of .92.  This is the fourth highest computer value. For some reason ESPN is going by that and saying our computer "average" is four, when really our computer average is 3 for the fourth highest.

Also, your Harris poll score is calculated by how many voters points you have divided by 2,875 and your coaches poll score is calculated by how many voter points you have divided by 1,475. These are each the max points in each poll.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: RightMeow on October 15, 2012, 08:12:32 AM
http://blogs.mercurynews.com/collegesports/2012/10/14/my-ap-top-25-football-ballot-alabama-is-no-1-notre-dame-falls-texas-disappears/

This guy drinks the purple koolaid.  :cheers:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: EllToPay on October 15, 2012, 08:46:28 AM
http://blogs.mercurynews.com/collegesports/2012/10/14/my-ap-top-25-football-ballot-alabama-is-no-1-notre-dame-falls-texas-disappears/

This guy drinks the purple koolaid.  :cheers:

Jon Studner
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 'taterblast on October 15, 2012, 08:59:55 AM
http://blogs.mercurynews.com/collegesports/2012/10/14/my-ap-top-25-football-ballot-alabama-is-no-1-notre-dame-falls-texas-disappears/

This guy drinks the purple koolaid.  :cheers:

i thought that was pretty cool too, LukeMeow
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: CatsNShocks on October 15, 2012, 11:55:06 AM
http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/8505938/bcs-standings-alabama-crimson-tide-florida-gators-ranked-1-2

Quote
There are no Big Ten teams in the top 25.

 :lol:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SdK on October 15, 2012, 12:04:46 PM
So for the computer average, it assigns a rank to your average and that is what is figured in?

I mean our computer average is 3, but because Bama's average is slightly less than 3, we get a four?

Tell me that our actual average of the computer rankings is what goes in and not our averages rank.

Keep in mind they throw out the highest and lowest computer rank.

Yeah. 2,4,5,3,3,1. 1, 5. 4+3+3+2 = 12/4 =3.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SdK on October 15, 2012, 12:06:31 PM
Thanks for the breakdown Burg.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MadCat on October 15, 2012, 12:09:32 PM
So for the computer average, it assigns a rank to your average and that is what is figured in?

I mean our computer average is 3, but because Bama's average is slightly less than 3, we get a four?

Tell me that our actual average of the computer rankings is what goes in and not our averages rank.

Keep in mind they throw out the highest and lowest computer rank.

Yeah. 2,4,5,3,3,1. 1, 5. 4+3+3+2 = 12/4 =3.

1=25
2=24
3=23
4=22
5=21

24+23+23+22= 92

Florida = 96
ND = 94
Bama = 93
KSU = 92

Average = 4th place
Cucumbers = Flux Capacitor

It all makes perfect scents.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Duncan on October 15, 2012, 01:50:30 PM
good-smelling math, my favorite.

So for the computer average, it assigns a rank to your average and that is what is figured in?

I mean our computer average is 3, but because Bama's average is slightly less than 3, we get a four?

Tell me that our actual average of the computer rankings is what goes in and not our averages rank.

Keep in mind they throw out the highest and lowest computer rank.

Yeah. 2,4,5,3,3,1. 1, 5. 4+3+3+2 = 12/4 =3.

1=25
2=24
3=23
4=22
5=21

24+23+23+22= 92

Florida = 96
ND = 94
Bama = 93
KSU = 92

Average = 4th place
Cucumbers = Flux Capacitor

It all makes perfect scents.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SdK on October 15, 2012, 02:43:11 PM
I get it MadCat. Burger already explained it. I thank you for reiterating, but I am a KSU fan and member of goEMAW. Once is enough.  :cheers:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MadCat on October 15, 2012, 02:44:09 PM
I get it MadCat. Burger already explained it. I thank you for reiterating, but I am a KSU fan and member of goEMAW. Once is enough.  :cheers:

That was more for my own benefit...external processing.  I didn't mean it as any slight to you.  :cheers:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SdK on October 15, 2012, 02:50:55 PM
I get it MadCat. Burger already explained it. I thank you for reiterating, but I am a KSU fan and member of goEMAW. Once is enough.  :cheers:

That was more for my own benefit...external processing.  I didn't mean it as any slight to you.  :cheers:

 :D
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Ira Hayes on October 16, 2012, 03:31:21 PM
I just got a chance to look at the numbers.  It's pretty clear that if we beat WVU and Florida loses to SC we will pick up plenty of votes in the human polls to jump Oregon in the BCS rankings.

Will that throw the national media into a hissy fit? How can all these media geniuses fail to understand how the math works? It's simple addition and division. They have calculators. This is their job.

They must see it coming and are just waiting to explode with their faux disbelief to stir up ratings. There is no other explanation.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Institutional Control on October 16, 2012, 03:32:38 PM
I get it MadCat. Burger already explained it. I thank you for reiterating, but I am a KSU fan and member of goEMAW. Once is enough.  :cheers:

That was more for my own benefit...external processing.  I didn't mean it as any slight to you.  :cheers:

 :D

Get a room, you two.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on October 16, 2012, 03:57:54 PM
I just got a chance to look at the numbers.  It's pretty clear that if we beat WVU and Florida loses to SC we will pick up plenty of votes in the human polls to jump Oregon in the BCS rankings.

Will that throw the national media into a hissy fit? How can all these media geniuses fail to understand how the math works? It's simple addition and division. They have calculators. This is their job.

They must see it coming and are just waiting to explode with their faux disbelief to stir up ratings. There is no other explanation.
The computers alone will jumps us over Oregon if we beat WVU.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Ira Hayes on October 16, 2012, 04:22:08 PM
I just got a chance to look at the numbers.  It's pretty clear that if we beat WVU and Florida loses to SC we will pick up plenty of votes in the human polls to jump Oregon in the BCS rankings.

Will that throw the national media into a hissy fit? How can all these media geniuses fail to understand how the math works? It's simple addition and division. They have calculators. This is their job.

They must see it coming and are just waiting to explode with their faux disbelief to stir up ratings. There is no other explanation.
The computers alone will jumps us over Oregon if we beat WVU.

Probably not. K State already dominates Oregon in the computers. Very little upside there. We need human votes. And we will get them when Florida and Notre Dame lose. Patience.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: wetwillie on October 20, 2012, 09:41:30 PM
I dare someone to say we won't jump the ducks in the polls tomorrow, I will mush them in their fat rough ridin' face.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: OK_Cat on October 20, 2012, 09:43:20 PM
I dare someone to say we won't jump the ducks in the polls tomorrow, I will mush them in their fat rough ridin' face.

the voters will not put us over the ducks. 
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: wetwillie on October 20, 2012, 09:46:42 PM
I dare someone to say we won't jump the ducks in the polls tomorrow, I will mush them in their fat rough ridin' face.

the voters will not put us over the ducks. 

Stick to making dead people jokes, we are jumping their ass.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 06wildcat on October 20, 2012, 09:47:06 PM
I dare someone to say we won't jump the ducks in the polls tomorrow, I will mush them in their fat rough ridin' face.

the voters will not put us over the ducks.

Computers will in the poll that counts though
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: OK_Cat on October 20, 2012, 09:57:28 PM
I dare someone to say we won't jump the ducks in the polls tomorrow, I will mush them in their fat rough ridin' face.

the voters will not put us over the ducks. 

Stick to making dead people jokes, we are jumping their ass.

you need to pay more attention to how voters think.  oregon is sexy, we're lucky.  that's the perception of most national media types (the people who vote)
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: DQ12 on October 20, 2012, 10:24:36 PM
We're not jumping Oregon.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Katpappy on October 20, 2012, 10:27:32 PM
We're not jumping Oregon.
Not as long as they're undefeated.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: FuzzyWuzzy on October 20, 2012, 10:27:52 PM
We're not jumping Oregon.

all we're gonna hear the rest of the season is how we cancelled our game with the Ducks
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Rams on October 20, 2012, 10:28:15 PM
I dare someone to say we won't jump the ducks in the polls tomorrow, I will mush them in their fat rough ridin' face.

find a different hill to die on. we're not jumping oregon.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 20, 2012, 10:29:04 PM
We're not jumping Oregon.

hmmmmm.......
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: AbeFroman on October 20, 2012, 10:43:11 PM
We were only 0.03 behind Oregon last week. If people like this ass whooping more than Oregon's of ASU we will jump. The computers will definitely see ours as better.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 20, 2012, 10:44:34 PM
yeah, I'm kinda curious where dlew and others got their info. we were neck and neck with oregon in the initial rankings.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: scottwildcat on October 20, 2012, 10:48:04 PM
i think we jump Oregon in the BCS. We were close to them in the BCS rankings, and I think our human rankings will go up. Maybe not jumping anyone in the actual ranking but our points will go up. Some voters who have Notre Dame and Oregon in front of us will move us up in their polls. #3 KSU CATS!
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: DQ12 on October 20, 2012, 11:00:51 PM
I don't think we jump Oregon in the human polls.  Should we?  Probably.  Our resume is much better, especially with OU trucking along.  Oregon's game on thursday was every bit the ass-whooping as ours was tonight. 

Is WVU better than ASU?  Maybe?  But voters aren't going to put us ahead of them, imho.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: scottwildcat on October 20, 2012, 11:07:48 PM
I don't think we jump Oregon in the human polls.  Should we?  Probably.  Our resume is much better, especially with OU trucking along.  Oregon's game on thursday was every bit the ass-whooping as ours was tonight. 

Is WVU better than ASU?  Maybe?  But voters aren't going to put us ahead of them, imho.

its not about all of them putting us in front of them. just as long as we close the gap it will be enough IMO to put us ahead in the BCS rankings
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: scottwildcat on October 20, 2012, 11:10:00 PM
i lied, we are only 10 points ahead of Florida in the Coaches poll...they will jump us in the Coaches poll and might result in us dropping in the BCS...IDK guys lots of stuff to take into account. but peace out I'm going to get wasted.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Katpappy on October 20, 2012, 11:12:31 PM
I don't think we jump Oregon in the human polls.  Should we?  Probably.  Our resume is much better, especially with OU trucking along.  Oregon's game on thursday was every bit the ass-whooping as ours was tonight. 

Is WVU better than ASU?  Maybe?  But voters aren't going to put us ahead of them, imho.
Anybody know who was ranked higher WVU or ASU?  :gocho:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: yoEMAW on October 20, 2012, 11:13:35 PM
Can't wait for OU to male genitals punch BCS computer darling ND next weekend. Ought to be a nice little boost for the fighting wildcats of purple Kansas.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: stunted on October 20, 2012, 11:13:40 PM
Perhaps KSU and UF jump Bama.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on October 21, 2012, 01:30:22 AM
Projected to jump Oregon.  :gocho:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Not Sure on October 21, 2012, 01:52:42 AM
I'm calling it.  We're going to have to change the 4 to a 3 at the top  :gocho:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: DQ12 on October 21, 2012, 01:54:08 AM
Did not realize that we were so close to Oregon in the BCS.  We'll definitely jump them.

Probably not in any human poll.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: mocat on October 21, 2012, 07:38:13 AM
We wouldn't have to debate this if Wv had beaten tech. Then again Wv sucks though I guess
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kslim on October 21, 2012, 07:49:12 AM
we finish with 4/5 ranked teams, we dont really need to worry about other teams right now just the next team on the schedule

just like last year the computers will rank the big 12 as the toughest conference when its all said and done

eye on the prize  :driving:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: XocolateThundarr on October 21, 2012, 08:11:21 AM
Get ready....


:bill:3 :bill:

Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: stunted on October 21, 2012, 08:25:58 AM
Oregon's schedule may be tougher coming in, which is a joke cause Stanford and Oregon State is trash.  Pac-12 championship does adds another ranked team to their schedule.  Colorado and Cal sucking helps.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Bookcat on October 21, 2012, 08:33:34 AM
If we run the slate, we're in....so, I hope everyone can relax for just a second and let that sink in.

Rod Gilmore is about as bitter about this new reality as humanly possible. He could barely look at the camera and utter the words "Kstate is going to probably jump Oregon". Pretty sure he chipped a tooth.

Suck it, Rod.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kso_FAN on October 21, 2012, 08:43:57 AM
Win and we're fine. We still have opponents who are currently 6-2, 4-2, 5-2, 3-3, and 5-2 left. Our league is really good.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: yoEMAW on October 21, 2012, 08:47:21 AM
The new dig against K-State is that we bought out a head to head vs Oregon. Seems to really be ruffling some feathers out in duck country. Look for the quacking to ratchet up a notch after the new BCS rankings are released...
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Super PurpleCat on October 21, 2012, 08:54:48 AM
If we run the slate, we're in....so, I hope everyone can relax for just a second and let that sink in.

Rod Gilmore is about as bitter about this new reality as humanly possible. He could barely look at the camera and utter the words "Kstate is going to probably jump Oregon". Pretty sure he chipped a tooth.

Suck it, Rod.

Yeah, I saw that too.  He nearly soiled himself being put on the spot having to say nice things about Collin Klein. 

Feels good.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Houstoncat93 on October 21, 2012, 09:10:37 AM
Not technically a ranking but still......

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/bowls/predictions
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: yoEMAW on October 21, 2012, 09:11:48 AM
Would take!  :ksu:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: XocolateThundarr on October 21, 2012, 09:20:28 AM
Not technically a ranking but still......

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/bowls/predictions



 :pray:

Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Rams on October 21, 2012, 09:28:30 AM
I dare someone to say we won't jump the ducks in the polls tomorrow, I will mush them in their fat rough ridin' face.

find a different hill to die on. we're not jumping oregon.

for the record, when you say polls, I think coaches and AP.  we may very well jump them in the bcs rankings but I just can't see us jumping them in the polls.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Bookcat on October 21, 2012, 09:39:11 AM
I dare someone to say we won't jump the ducks in the polls tomorrow, I will mush them in their fat rough ridin' face.

find a different hill to die on. we're not jumping oregon.

for the record, when you say polls, I think coaches and AP.  we may very well jump them in the bcs rankings but I just can't see us jumping them in the polls.

the coaches poll will have Oregon at 3, KSU 4....and the computers will have us at 3 because of the schedule.......which will be enough for KState to jump them. Their fans will be irate. Its going to be beautiful.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Bookcat on October 21, 2012, 09:41:00 AM
http://insider.espn.go.com/college-football/blog/_/name/haney_travis/id/8532879/kansas-state-place-elite-week-8-takeaways-ncf



 :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Houstoncat93 on October 21, 2012, 09:53:18 AM
Up 1 spot to #2 in the Sagirn
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Trim on October 21, 2012, 09:56:14 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F25.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_mc8vth8U6N1r41peoo1_1280.gif&hash=cf57099ba2193569f8c01bb601360ee2e5e2d525)
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Bookcat on October 21, 2012, 09:58:03 AM
i would LOVE to beat a #11 TTech team.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: mocat on October 21, 2012, 10:58:40 AM
Unbelievable
http://m.usatoday.com/article/sports/1647187 (http://m.usatoday.com/article/sports/1647187)
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Boondock Poonhound on October 21, 2012, 11:02:26 AM
Florida needs to lose and GTFO. :curse:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: wetwillie on October 21, 2012, 11:02:48 AM
Coaches mushed me right in my fat face :frown:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: yoEMAW on October 21, 2012, 11:04:18 AM
Chip, meet shoulder.  :chainsaw:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on October 21, 2012, 11:04:33 AM
Not shocking.  They beat the #7 team by 33.  In all, the voter point swing was only 13, which is less than I thought it would be.  That equates to a .0029 swing in the BCS.  If that's all we lost in the coaches poll after Florida's win, I'm fine with that.  We'll get all those back and then some when Bama or Florida lose at the end of the season anyway.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: KITNfury on October 21, 2012, 11:09:49 AM
Yea, there is no concern over the SEC. They are getting a team in almost for sure, but they won't get two as long as UO or us stay undefeated.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: jaa1025 on October 21, 2012, 11:10:08 AM
The biggest joke is Oregon ranked number 2. Garbage schedule in a garbage conference.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SwiftCat on October 21, 2012, 11:15:02 AM
Unbelievable
http://m.usatoday.com/article/sports/1647187 (http://m.usatoday.com/article/sports/1647187)

Don't post mobile sites anymore. TIA.
Title: Re: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: mocat on October 21, 2012, 11:17:20 AM
Unbelievable
http://m.usatoday.com/article/sports/1647187 (http://m.usatoday.com/article/sports/1647187)

Don't post mobile sites anymore. TIA.

Man it is super hard to find stuff to bitch about when we are this good
Title: Re: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: jmlynch1 on October 21, 2012, 11:24:36 AM
Unbelievable
http://m.usatoday.com/article/sports/1647187 (http://m.usatoday.com/article/sports/1647187)

Don't post mobile sites anymore. TIA.

Man it is super hard to find stuff to bitch about when we are this good
:lol: :ksu:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ChiComCat on October 21, 2012, 11:25:09 AM
KSU is #1 in my heart
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on October 21, 2012, 11:25:48 AM
The real story in the coaches poll is that we gained 30 voter points, or .0068 in the BCS standings, on Oregon.  Also, Oregon got 50 of the 59 2nd place votes, so unless they start stealing 1st place votes from Bama, they will only be able to gain back at most 13 of those voter points.  They have very, very little opportunity in this poll to grow a lead (or possibly after tonight, gain BCS points) on KSU.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on October 21, 2012, 11:28:22 AM
On ESPNU, they said their early BCS calcs had us behind Bama and UF.  That's in the championship, boys.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Super PurpleCat on October 21, 2012, 11:31:44 AM
On ESPNU, they said their early BCS calcs had us behind Bama and UF.  That's in the championship, boys.

This is really happening.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Duncan on October 21, 2012, 11:35:32 AM
AP_Top25 ?@AP_Top25

New AP Top 25 1. Alabama, 2. Oregon, 3. Florida, 4. K-State. 5. Notre Dame. Florida gets 1 first-place vote.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: EMAWesome on October 21, 2012, 11:36:48 AM
On ESPNU, they said their early BCS calcs had us behind Bama and UF.  That's in the championship, boys.

Biggest SEC threat to Miami PAK...

Florida runs regular season table

LSU Beats Alabama in a close and/or controversial game in the Bayou...LSU then loses another SEC game setting up Bama/FLA Mr Pibb title game.

Bama v FLA in conference title game is won by Bama in a close and/or controversial manner
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Bookcat on October 21, 2012, 11:46:56 AM
Kstate would officially wreck college football if, despite a 12-0 record...a 1 loss team met Alabama in an SEC Title game rematch. Would be way worse than the Oregon snub of 2001.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Chico on October 21, 2012, 11:49:05 AM
On ESPNU, they said their early BCS calcs had us behind Bama and UF.  That's in the championship, boys.

Biggest SEC threat to Miami PAK...

Florida runs regular season table

LSU Beats Alabama in a close and/or controversial game in the Bayou...LSU then loses another SEC game setting up Bama/FLA Mr Pibb title game.

Bama v FLA in conference title game is won by Bama in a close and/or controversial manner

There would be a lot of voters that would put K-State at #2 with the SEC loser at #3 or #4 (see: Ok State last year).  SEC is not a threat.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: stunted on October 21, 2012, 11:50:25 AM
Plus Alabama's schedule will still be weaker, with KSU ahead in the computer polls.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ChiComCat on October 21, 2012, 11:51:31 AM
On ESPNU, they said their early BCS calcs had us behind Bama and UF.  That's in the championship, boys.

Biggest SEC threat to Miami PAK...

Florida runs regular season table

LSU Beats Alabama in a close and/or controversial game in the Bayou...LSU then loses another SEC game setting up Bama/FLA Mr Pibb title game.

Bama v FLA in conference title game is won by Bama in a close and/or controversial manner

I'm not worried about SEC getting 2 in.  I'm worried about Oregon.  Even if we are ahead of them now, they have Oregon St/USCx2/Stanford to gain ground on us. 
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Duncan on October 21, 2012, 11:51:54 AM
we gained some ground on Oregon. WVU still ranked at #25.

1   Alabama (59)   7-0   1499
2   Oregon   7-0   1424
3   Florida (1)   7-0   1380
4   Kansas State   7-0   1333
5   Notre Dame   7-0   1241
6   LSU   7-1   1172
7   Oregon State   6-0   1106
8   Oklahoma   5-1   1065
9   Ohio State   8-0   1028
10   USC   6-1   944
11   Florida State   7-1   872
12   Georgia   6-1   745
13   Mississippi State   7-0   739
14   Clemson   6-1   713
15   Texas Tech   6-1   653
16   Louisville   7-0   620
17   South Carolina   6-2   591
18   Rutgers   7-0   539
19   Stanford   5-2   421
20   Michigan   5-2   300
21   Boise State   6-1   258
22   Texas A&M   5-2   252
23   Ohio   7-0   181
24   Louisiana Tech   6-1   106
25   West Virginia   5-2   76

    Dropped from rankings: Cincinnati 21

    Others receiving votes: Toledo 49, Texas 33, Wisconsin 31, TCU 29, Nebraska 24, Penn State 18, North Carolina State 13, Oklahoma State 12, Arizona 7, UCLA 7, Tulsa 6, Arizona State 5, Northern Illinois 5, Cincinnati 3
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: DQ12 on October 21, 2012, 11:55:26 AM
On ESPNU, they said their early BCS calcs had us behind Bama and UF.  That's in the championship, boys.

Biggest SEC threat to Miami PAK...

Florida runs regular season table

LSU Beats Alabama in a close and/or controversial game in the Bayou...LSU then loses another SEC game setting up Bama/FLA Mr Pibb title game.

Bama v FLA in conference title game is won by Bama in a close and/or controversial manner
Don't be ridiculous.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on October 21, 2012, 11:57:10 AM
On ESPNU, they said their early BCS calcs had us behind Bama and UF.  That's in the championship, boys.

This is really happening.

I've pretty much been a combination of   :excited: and  :runaway: since 6:30 last night...looking at the numbers just increased the intenstity of each a notch.
Title: Re: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: mocat on October 21, 2012, 11:58:24 AM
we gained some ground on Oregon. WVU still ranked at #25.

1   Alabama (59)   7-0   1499
2   Oregon   7-0   1424
3   Florida (1)   7-0   1380
4   Kansas State   7-0   1333
5   Notre Dame   7-0   1241
6   LSU   7-1   1172
7   Oregon State   6-0   1106
8   Oklahoma   5-1   1065
9   Ohio State   8-0   1028
10   USC   6-1   944
11   Florida State   7-1   872
12   Georgia   6-1   745
13   Mississippi State   7-0   739
14   Clemson   6-1   713
15   Texas Tech   6-1   653
16   Louisville   7-0   620
17   South Carolina   6-2   591
18   Rutgers   7-0   539
19   Stanford   5-2   421
20   Michigan   5-2   300
21   Boise State   6-1   258
22   Texas A&M   5-2   252
23   Ohio   7-0   181
24   Louisiana Tech   6-1   106
25   West Virginia   5-2   76

    Dropped from rankings: Cincinnati 21

    Others receiving votes: Toledo 49, Texas 33, Wisconsin 31, TCU 29, Nebraska 24, Penn State 18, North Carolina State 13, Oklahoma State 12, Arizona 7, UCLA 7, Tulsa 6, Arizona State 5, Northern Illinois 5, Cincinnati 3

AP does not matter Duncan
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Duncan on October 21, 2012, 12:07:04 PM
yeah, i know. just thought it was interesting.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: EMAWesome on October 21, 2012, 12:07:43 PM
Insiders article on espn says Oregon would have a hard time ending up #2...in a sign of how ridiculous the computers can be...if they beat usc the 1st time and again in the cc game the fact that usc would then have 3 losses would hurt their computer #s (despite 2 of the losses being to Oregon) and that would hurt them significantly enough that an undefeated ksu should jump them...fwiw

I agree 2 SEC teams is highly unlikely, if not impossible, just spitballing
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: smith1051 on October 21, 2012, 12:11:36 PM
Win out and we are in /thread
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Ira Hayes on October 21, 2012, 12:13:47 PM
We picked up 30 net points on Oregon in the coaches poll (despite falling from 3rd to 4th)

That is a difference of .0068 in the BCS total.

We trailed Oregon by .0030 last week.

Boom.  Roasted duck.

Also gained net 2 spots in Sagarin against Oregon.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: scottwildcat on October 21, 2012, 01:42:17 PM
when does the Harris Poll get released?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: O-town Kat on October 21, 2012, 02:03:41 PM
Ducks have the Buffies at home next week.  The gift that keeps on giving.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on October 21, 2012, 02:07:04 PM
There might be a better thread to post it in, but in the 24 hour window after a big win I doubt anyone cares: How are people not taking the idea of Florida knocking off Bama in the SEC Championship Game more seriously? It wouldn't really affect us, but I'd rather play a head coach going to the NC for the first time than one going for their 19th.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Super PurpleCat on October 21, 2012, 02:09:01 PM
There might be a better thread to post it in, but in the 24 hour window after a big win I doubt anyone cares: How are people not taking the idea of Florida knocking off Bama in the SEC Championship Game more seriously? It wouldn't really affect us, but I'd rather play a head coach going to the NC for the first time than one going for their 19th.

Because ALABAMA
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on October 21, 2012, 02:12:04 PM
when does the Harris Poll get released?

Usually around 4ish on Sunday. 
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Panjandrum on October 21, 2012, 02:14:47 PM
On ESPNU, they said their early BCS calcs had us behind Bama and UF.  That's in the championship, boys.

This is really happening.

You're Goddamn right it is.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Panjandrum on October 21, 2012, 02:16:07 PM
On ESPNU, they said their early BCS calcs had us behind Bama and UF.  That's in the championship, boys.

Biggest SEC threat to Miami PAK...

Florida runs regular season table

LSU Beats Alabama in a close and/or controversial game in the Bayou...LSU then loses another SEC game setting up Bama/FLA Mr Pibb title game.

Bama v FLA in conference title game is won by Bama in a close and/or controversial manner

I'm not worried about SEC getting 2 in.  I'm worried about Oregon.  Even if we are ahead of them now, they have Oregon St/USCx2/Stanford to gain ground on us.

Oregon is the only team we have to worry about.  They need to lose.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Panjandrum on October 21, 2012, 02:18:37 PM
There might be a better thread to post it in, but in the 24 hour window after a big win I doubt anyone cares: How are people not taking the idea of Florida knocking off Bama in the SEC Championship Game more seriously? It wouldn't really affect us, but I'd rather play a head coach going to the NC for the first time than one going for their 19th.

I've watched Florida a few times.  They really aren't that great.  Their offense won't move at all on Alabama, and Bama has an offense good enough to move the chains on UF. 

It will be something like a 9-3 fap match that SEC fans will cream over.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kso_FAN on October 21, 2012, 02:19:44 PM
There might be a better thread to post it in, but in the 24 hour window after a big win I doubt anyone cares: How are people not taking the idea of Florida knocking off Bama in the SEC Championship Game more seriously? It wouldn't really affect us, but I'd rather play a head coach going to the NC for the first time than one going for their 19th.

Good point. Go GatorCats.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on October 21, 2012, 03:15:12 PM
Harris Poll Out:

1. Bama - 2868
2. Oregon - 2727
3. Florida - 2622
4. KSU - 2571
5. ND - 2374
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on October 21, 2012, 03:23:06 PM
That puts us .0355 behind Oregon using only the human polls.  For reference, last week we were .0497 behind Oregon in the human polls (gained .0142) and ahead of them by .0467 in the computers.  If the computers hold the same, we will be .0112 ahead of Oregon.  For reference, we already gained 2 spots in them on the Sagarin. 
Title: Re: Re: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SwiftCat on October 21, 2012, 03:27:16 PM
Unbelievable
http://m.usatoday.com/article/sports/1647187 (http://m.usatoday.com/article/sports/1647187)

Don't post mobile sites anymore. TIA.

Man it is super hard to find stuff to bitch about when we are this good

:thumbs:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: wetwillie on October 21, 2012, 07:38:10 PM
Jumped them ducks #3
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: AbeFroman on October 21, 2012, 07:38:25 PM
Told you dumbasses. #3
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: pvegs on October 21, 2012, 07:40:04 PM
herbstreit, stud, k-state enthusiast
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MeatSauce on October 21, 2012, 07:41:24 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.wl.uproxx.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F09%2FConneryFistPump.gif&hash=b9bf98f6a9c5e25a29a3b43ad253d07ce26d640d)
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on October 21, 2012, 07:45:20 PM
Geeez ESPN get off our nuts.  :blush:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kim carnes on October 21, 2012, 07:55:39 PM
Lol @ rece saying we've passed our 2 toughest games on the schedule.  WVU might lose 4 more game.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Super PurpleCat on October 21, 2012, 08:04:47 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FmAXlC.png&hash=d0190950f06954d3209ae61a0c4fdc3203949da6)

This is happening.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: mancattanite on October 21, 2012, 08:08:31 PM
I think we probably have the toughest schedule week in, week out for the rest of the year.  No slouches on our schedule. Everybody else in the top 5 has at least 2.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Katpappy on October 21, 2012, 08:16:59 PM
Told you dumbasses. #3
link?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Winters on October 21, 2012, 08:18:14 PM
This is the best part of my #life so far.  :bill:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 06wildcat on October 21, 2012, 08:22:14 PM
Very enjoyable that Clay Travis is in damage control mode...elevating Oregon to the NC game over unbeaten KSU  :lol:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on October 21, 2012, 08:31:58 PM
Very enjoyable that Clay Travis is in damage control mode...elevating Oregon to the NC game over unbeaten KSU  :lol:

Yep.  I like that guy (he's hilarious on the radio), but man, what a rough ridin' SEC homer.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Houcat on October 21, 2012, 08:35:08 PM
http://www.pollspeak.com/component/option,com_psreport/Itemid,3/lang,en/p,46/r,V/s,21/t1,42/t2,/v,51/w,9/ (http://www.pollspeak.com/component/option,com_psreport/Itemid,3/lang,en/p,46/r,V/s,21/t1,42/t2,/v,51/w,9/)

Here's the Notre Dame homer:
Pete DiPrimio
Fort Wayne News-Sentinel (Newspaper)
Fort Wayne, IN
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MadCat on October 21, 2012, 08:44:33 PM
The graphic for 3 is glorious.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 06wildcat on October 21, 2012, 08:46:22 PM
Very enjoyable that Clay Travis is in damage control mode...elevating Oregon to the NC game over unbeaten KSU  :lol:

Yep.  I like that guy (he's hilarious on the radio), but man, what a rough ridin' SEC homer.

He has his moments, but those moments never have anything to do with relevant analysis. He's the guy to see if you want to analyze creeper pics of female fans or a press conference on anal wine drinking.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ednksu on October 21, 2012, 08:48:12 PM
The graphic for 3 is glorious.
holy crap that is amazing

nice work which ever one of you did that
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Super PurpleCat on October 21, 2012, 09:03:36 PM
The graphic for 3 is glorious.

Is it tmi if I mention it just gave me an instant EMAWBONER?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: carls_farkley on October 21, 2012, 09:06:09 PM
Adam Rittenberg has some LFBIQ...stating we don't play a ranked team the rest of the year?? He's getting some crap in the comments, but how does someone like that even have a job writing on CFB?

But, still can't believe the love we are getting in the media, only one thing to say, #fattytakethewheel
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: AbeFroman on October 21, 2012, 09:11:19 PM
Adam Rittenberg has some LFBIQ...stating we don't play a ranked team the rest of the year?? He's getting some crap in the comments, but how does someone like that even have a job writing on CFB?

But, still can't believe the love we are getting in the media, only one thing to say, #fattytakethewheel


He's a big 10 writer, that's barely football.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: DQ12 on October 21, 2012, 09:15:20 PM
Tom Murphy from the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette is a saint, has us at 2.

Kyle Ringo from Boulder Colorado's Daily Camera has us at 5, OU at 13, Texas Tech at 19.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kim carnes on October 21, 2012, 09:34:33 PM
we need oregon to lose.  their computer numbers are going to go up a lot the rest of the season.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on October 21, 2012, 09:42:26 PM
Not really if they beat USC twice, USC will have 3 Ls.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 06wildcat on October 21, 2012, 09:45:39 PM
Oregon St. could very well end up in the 20s or unranked by season's end. They'll fall to 16-18 with one loss.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: michigancat on October 21, 2012, 09:47:48 PM
Oregon also has to play Colorado and Cal.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: CyberToothCat on October 21, 2012, 10:04:59 PM
Lol @ rece saying we've passed our 2 toughest games on the schedule.  WVU might lose 4 more game.

Yeah, did he not realize we play TT this weekend?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Ira Hayes on October 21, 2012, 10:10:15 PM
Oregon also has to play Colorado and Cal.

Opening line: Oregon -47 1/2 vs. Colorado.  :surprised:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 06wildcat on October 21, 2012, 10:29:25 PM
Oregon also has to play Colorado and Cal.

Opening line: Oregon -47 1/2 vs. Colorado.  :surprised:

 :horrorsurprise:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: p1k3 on October 21, 2012, 10:30:40 PM
Oregon fans are so butt hurt. My God
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: mancattanite on October 21, 2012, 10:37:44 PM
Oregon fans are so butt hurt. My God

They also don't seem to understand that margin of victory doesn't matter except to human voters...
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Super PurpleCat on October 21, 2012, 10:38:43 PM
I've got one Oregon fan on the ESPN board who is talking the Arizona win up so much he's prob turning red in the face.

He also said we'll lose to OU in the Big XII title game.

I give up, guys.   :dubious:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Farley Grudge on October 21, 2012, 10:39:20 PM
There might be a better thread to post it in, but in the 24 hour window after a big win I doubt anyone cares: How are people not taking the idea of Florida knocking off Bama in the SEC Championship Game more seriously? It wouldn't really affect us, but I'd rather play a head coach going to the NC for the first time than one going for their 19th.

Plus, we own Texas and Will can't shake that just by going back to Florida.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: p1k3 on October 21, 2012, 10:41:43 PM
I've got one Oregon fan on the ESPN board who is talking the Arizona win up so much he's prob turning red in the face.

He also said we'll lose to OU in the Big XII title game.

I give up, guys.   :dubious:

I actually read that in the comments. So dumb I had to stop reading
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on October 21, 2012, 10:42:12 PM
I've got one Oregon fan on the ESPN board who is talking the Arizona win up so much he's prob turning red in the face.

He also said we'll lose to OU in the Big XII title game.

I give up, guys.   :dubious:

LOL
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Barry McCockner on October 21, 2012, 10:42:35 PM
The graphic for 3 is glorious.

Is it tmi if I mention it just gave me an instant EMAWBONER?

Only tmi if you put it to bed.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kstatefan11 on October 22, 2012, 11:50:50 AM
The graphic for 3 is glorious.

Cannot wait to see Tuggle (or Stephen Johnson) up there!

Our roster is devoid of a #1. Good or bad sign?   :dunno:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: FuzzyWuzzy on October 22, 2012, 11:51:49 AM
Oregon fans are so butt hurt. My God

They also don't seem to understand that margin of victory doesn't matter except to human voters...

Chip Kelly for real didn't know this until yesterday. wtf
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 22, 2012, 11:54:41 AM
Oregon fans are so butt hurt. My God

They also don't seem to understand that margin of victory doesn't matter except to human voters...

Chip Kelly for real didn't know this until yesterday. wtf

That explains why he tries so hard to run up the score. We could have beaten WVU by 70 like Chip would have if he had a roster as talented as ours, but Bill put in the second team and let off the gas in the 4th qtr.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on October 22, 2012, 12:21:45 PM
The graphic for 3 is glorious.

Cannot wait to see Tuggle (or Stephen Johnson) up there!

Our roster is devoid of a #1. Good or bad sign?   :dunno:

I'm sure that after we claim #1 (when we beat Bama in the NC) we will just put up a picture of the crystal ball.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: p1k3 on October 22, 2012, 12:27:40 PM
The graphic for 3 is glorious.

Cannot wait to see Tuggle (or Stephen Johnson) up there!

Our roster is devoid of a #1. Good or bad sign?   :dunno:

I'm sure that after we claim #1 (when we beat Bama in the NC) we will just put up a picture of the crystal ball.

This. We won't jump them until then anyway
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Trim on October 22, 2012, 12:28:41 PM
Rainbow background.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: OK_Cat on October 22, 2012, 12:45:51 PM
probably luke'd, but Oregon will hurt their computer #'s if they beat USC twice.  So if it stays close between us (and judging by remaining schedule, it will) then they could start a "does beating usc hurt our program" thread at goEMAD and it would be true.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pittcat on October 22, 2012, 01:46:27 PM
Cats are in the drivers seat for the NC game fellas.  Soak it all in.  This team doesn't beat themselves, they take care of business like they should and they're playing for the Crystal.   :driving:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: wetwillie on October 27, 2012, 08:45:38 PM
Warm up the tuggle banner pic
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: BostonPancake on October 28, 2012, 07:43:59 AM
#1 in Sagarin!!

 :billdance:

Bama drops from 3rd to 7th.... :eek:

http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/fbt12.htm (http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/fbt12.htm)
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Houstoncat93 on October 28, 2012, 08:06:31 AM
#1 in Sagarin!!

 :billdance:

Bama drops from 3rd to 7th.... :eek:

http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/fbt12.htm (http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/fbt12.htm)

While Florida drops all the way to 3rd?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Houstoncat93 on October 28, 2012, 08:09:07 AM
...and ND went from 5 to 2. 
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: scottwildcat on October 28, 2012, 08:11:12 AM
...and ND went from 5 to 2. 

this...hey you respects how the eff is ND not going to jump us in the BCS if they are 2 in a bunch of computers and end up with a much higher voter score than us?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: THE_ED_FROM_VEGAS on October 28, 2012, 08:13:37 AM
HEER IS MY NEW RANKINGS AFTER WEEK 9

1   Oregon   188.645

2   Alabama   187.49

3   Kansas State   182.855

4   Notre Dame   172.24

5   Florida State   170.775

6   Ohio State   167.565

7   Florida   160.18

8   Louisiana State   159.55

9   Texas A&M   156.1

10   Mississippi State   155.65

11   Louisville   153.715
12   Clemson   153.405
13   Oklahoma   152.655
14   Georgia   152.37
15   Oregon State   151.025
16   Oklahoma State   149.955
17   Southern California   149.105
18   Louisiana Tech   147.43
19   South Carolina   146.52
20   Boise State   146.47
21   Texas Tech   145.325
22   Nebraska   144.985
23   Rutgers   144.835
24   Tulsa   144.18
25   Northern Illinois   143.99
26   Stanford   143.265
27   Texas   141.125
28   Toledo   139.73
29   Kent   138.85
30   UCLA   138.435
31   Ohio   138.43
32   Northwestern   137.975
33   Utah State   137.66
34   Arizona State   133.415
35   Cincinnati   132.615
36   Michigan   132.155
37   North Carolina   131.025
38   San Jose State   130.85
39   Central Florida   130.69
40   Louisiana-Monroe   130.66
41   Texas Christian   130.325
42   Wisconsin   129.945
43   West Virginia   128.795
44   Arizona   128.235
45   Penn State   127.285
46   Fresno State   126.97
47   Iowa State   126.325
48   Western Kentucky   126.03
49   Mississippi   123.21
50   San Diego State   120.04
51   Michigan State   119.895
52   Nevada   118.02
53   Duke   117.205
54   Bowling Green State   117.05
55   Brigham Young   116.71
56   Minnesota   116.625
57   North Carolina State   115.335
58   Ball State   115.13
59   Arkansas State   113.31
60   Navy   112.15
61   Air Force   111.65
62   Missouri   111.23
63   Vanderbilt   109.13
64   Louisiana-Lafayette   108.07
65   Middle Tennessee State   107.65
66   Virginia Tech   106.015
67   Pittsburgh   105.955
68   Iowa   105.335
69   Texas-San Antonio   104.42
70   Syracuse   103.815
71   Baylor   103.115
72   Washington   99.795
73   Maryland   99.685
74   Miami (Florida)   98.005
75   Southern Methodist   97.75
76   Troy   96.75
77   Indiana   95.825
78   Tennessee   95.51
79   East Carolina   94.72
80   Georgia Tech   93.465
81   Utah   92.945
82   Arkansas   92.72
83   Purdue   92.045
84   Wake Forest   91.845
85   Houston   91.12
86   California   90.195
87   New Mexico   87.42
88   Miami (Ohio)   85.77
89   Temple   85.325
90   Texas State   84.12
91   Connecticut   83.335
92   North Texas   80.88
93   Marshall   77.87
94   Western Michigan   75.78
95   South Florida   74.605
96   Rice   72.37
97   Washington State   71.605
98   Central Michigan   71.23
99   Boston College   70.175
100   Illinois   68.035
101   Virginia   66.605
102   Florida Atlantic   61.51
103   South Alabama   60.28
104   Kansas   59.275
105   Colorado State   58.58
106   Texas-El Paso   58.38
107   Auburn   57.86
108   Kentucky   57.21
109   Tulane   49.52
110   Alabama-Birmingham   49.44
111   Akron   48.9
112   Buffalo   48.83
113   Florida International   48.64
114   Army   48.46
115   Wyoming   48.33
116   Eastern Michigan   46.23
117   Nevada-Las Vegas   45.66
118   New Mexico State   45.39
119   Hawaii   41.75
120   Colorado   41.195
121   Memphis   37.8
122   Idaho   36.18
123   Southern Mississippi   26.9
124   Massachusetts   16.24


[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: doom on October 28, 2012, 08:20:51 AM
HEER IS MY NEW RANKINGS AFTER WEEK 9

1   Oregon   188.645

2   Alabama   187.49

3   Kansas State   182.855

4   Notre Dame   172.24


I don't like your stupid face!   :shakesfist:
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 28, 2012, 08:24:11 AM
Projected to remain at 2 in the BCS rankings. Nobody can catch us. ND and Oregon both play garbage schedules to end the year.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: mocat on October 28, 2012, 08:31:20 AM
Going to be fun this week to pretend to have to root for so many teams!

Go KSU!
Go Pitt!
Go Mizzou! LOL
Go Big Game Bobs!
Gole Miss!
Go horns!
Go frogs!
Go Baylor!
Go Trojans!
Geaux Tigers!
Go Bama too though! I really don't care who wins that game!
Go Sun Devils!
Go Bruins!
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on October 28, 2012, 08:49:38 AM
Quote
2012 BCS rankings projections, Week 10: Kansas State, Alabama now on title course, but big mess coming

Quote
That playoff the college football poobahs are bringing along will be here about two years too late. There's a pretty good chance that four teams with BCS ties (and that includes Notre Dame) will finish the regular season undefeated.

How good of a chance? Let's put it this way: Of the 18 remaining games that Alabama, Oregon, Kansas State and Notre Dame have yet to play, there are only four in which these teams won't be favored by double digits, and only one in which one of those teams might even be an underdog.

http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2012/10/28/3565572/bcs-standings-rankings-2012-kansas-state-notre-dame-oregon-georgia
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kso_FAN on October 28, 2012, 08:52:13 AM
Quote
2012 BCS rankings projections, Week 10: Kansas State, Alabama now on title course, but big mess coming

Quote
That playoff the college football poobahs are bringing along will be here about two years too late. There's a pretty good chance that four teams with BCS ties (and that includes Notre Dame) will finish the regular season undefeated.

How good of a chance? Let's put it this way: Of the 18 remaining games that Alabama, Oregon, Kansas State and Notre Dame have yet to play, there are only four in which these teams won't be favored by double digits, and only one in which one of those teams might even be an underdog.

http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2012/10/28/3565572/bcs-standings-rankings-2012-kansas-state-notre-dame-oregon-georgia

Quote
Kansas State - The Wildcats will be the heavy favorites in their four remaining games - home to Oklahoma State and Texas and visiting TCU and Baylor. Piloted by the current Heisman frontrunner Collin Klein, Kansas State also has the advantage of not having to play in a conference title game - but that same fact may very well hurt its cause in the final BCS standings.
My odds on running the table: 90 percent.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Rams on October 28, 2012, 08:52:23 AM
hey ed,

start a new thread and title it "I'm a rough ridin' window licker" and put your rankings there. tia. k. by.

Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: THE_ED_FROM_VEGAS on October 28, 2012, 08:53:38 AM
hey ed,

start a new thread and title it "I'm a rough ridin' window licker" and put your rankings there. tia. k. by.

YOU BIG BABY - STOP CRYING - HOMO !!!
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on October 28, 2012, 08:54:35 AM
Quote
Below are Jerry Palm's projected BCS Standings

Quote
1. Alabama
2. Kansas State
3. Notre Dame
4. Oregon

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/rankings/bcs
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: THE_ED_FROM_VEGAS on October 28, 2012, 08:55:09 AM
hey ed,

start a new thread and title it "I'm a rough ridin' window licker" and put your rankings there. tia. k. by.

AND BY THE WAY DICK NUT - I GOT KANSAS STATE AT 30-1 FOR 100 BUCKS SO I WANT THEM TO WIN - YOU MONKEY TURD !!!
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kslim on October 28, 2012, 08:56:54 AM
hey ed,

start a new thread and title it "I'm a rough ridin' window licker" and put your rankings there. tia. k. by.

YOU BIG BABY - STOP CRYING - HOMO !!!

please take your slurs somewhere else
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Super PurpleCat on October 28, 2012, 08:57:02 AM
 :thumbs: Monkey turds.   :lol:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on October 28, 2012, 09:11:43 AM
Ubs thinks we will be left out

Quote
Kansas State needs style points or losses by top-five teams. I didn't buy Notre Dame as a team good enough to run the table ... until last night. The Fighting Irish beat Oklahoma convincingly, and in the process won over a whole lot of voters. K-State did its dirty work early, beating the Sooners, West Virginia and then Texas Tech on Saturday. But in the final month of the season, the Wildcats might go without a matchup against a Top 25 team, while BCS challengers Notre Dame and Oregon go head-to-head with USC, and the Ducks also get a shot at Oregon State to close the season. The chances of K-State hanging on to the No. 2 spot if Notre Dame wins out are minimal at best. Oregon will be a nailbiter. It's unfair for the Wildcats, but somebody has to get left out if there are three or four undefeated teams. As it stands, K-State looks like the team that will get stuck on the outside looking in. That said, there's still a month of football left to be played -- nobody thought Oklahoma State would lose to Iowa State last year, or that West Virginia would lose to Pitt back in 2009. Anything can happen.

http://espn.go.com/blog/big12/post/_/id/58519/what-we-learned-in-the-big-12-week-9-5
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: scottwildcat on October 28, 2012, 09:19:31 AM
Ubs thinks we will be left out

Quote
Kansas State needs style points or losses by top-five teams. I didn't buy Notre Dame as a team good enough to run the table ... until last night. The Fighting Irish beat Oklahoma convincingly, and in the process won over a whole lot of voters. K-State did its dirty work early, beating the Sooners, West Virginia and then Texas Tech on Saturday. But in the final month of the season, the Wildcats might go without a matchup against a Top 25 team, while BCS challengers Notre Dame and Oregon go head-to-head with USC, and the Ducks also get a shot at Oregon State to close the season. The chances of K-State hanging on to the No. 2 spot if Notre Dame wins out are minimal at best. Oregon will be a nailbiter. It's unfair for the Wildcats, but somebody has to get left out if there are three or four undefeated teams. As it stands, K-State looks like the team that will get stuck on the outside looking in. That said, there's still a month of football left to be played -- nobody thought Oklahoma State would lose to Iowa State last year, or that West Virginia would lose to Pitt back in 2009. Anything can happen.

http://espn.go.com/blog/big12/post/_/id/58519/what-we-learned-in-the-big-12-week-9-5

someone will need to put me on  :goodbyecruelworld: when we go undefeated and get left out of the natty.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on October 28, 2012, 09:30:00 AM
Mark Schlabach with the typical SEC shtick...

http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/8563641/alabama-crimson-tide-easily-top-team-bcs-title-race-ncf

Quote
After watching No. 1 Alabama dismantle No. 11 Mississippi State 38-7 in front of a sellout crowd of 101,821 fans at Bryant-Denny Stadium on Saturday night, I can offer you an educated guess.

The argument over No. 2 doesn't even matter. You might as well blindfold me, force me to the ground, and let Nick Saban eff my face, because I am his dirty whore of a sex slave.  I would sooner gobble Nick Saban's balls than breath another gasp of air on this Earth.  I dream of Nick Saban leaving a steaming pile of disrespect on my chest on the 50 yard line of Bryant-Denny Stadium at halftime.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on October 28, 2012, 09:33:36 AM
Quote
John Hunt's AP ballot: Ducks slip to No. 3; Beavers to No. 12

Obviously a Oregon homer, but THIS is what we have to fear...


http://www.oregonlive.com/pac-12/index.ssf/2012/10/john_hunts_ap_ballot_ducks_slip_to_no_3_beavers_to.html

Quote
Notre Dame leaps Florida and Oregon with its win at Oklahoma. Yes, I know the Ducks were playing their cheerleaders by the third quarter against Colorado, but the Irish was very impressive against a very good team.

Kansas State nearly leaps the Ducks, too. K-State has beaten the better teams (Oklahoma, West Virginia, Texas Tech); Oregon has looked better beating teams (everyone). So the Ducks remain ahead of K-State at No. 3.

Oregon State falls to No. 12 after its loss at Washington. It was a slide more than a plummet, as there aren't too many quality one-loss teams.

Quote
The ballot ...

1. Alabama

2. Notre Dame

3. Oregon

4. Kansas State
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: THE_ED_FROM_VEGAS on October 28, 2012, 09:34:20 AM
hey ed,

start a new thread and title it "I'm a rough ridin' window licker" and put your rankings there. tia. k. by.

YOU BIG BABY - STOP CRYING - HOMO !!!

please take your slurs somewhere else

THAT KID CALLED ME A NAME FIRST SO eff YOU JERK OFF !!!
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: bigwillie20 on October 28, 2012, 09:36:56 AM
Ubs thinks we will be left out

Quote
Kansas State needs style points or losses by top-five teams. I didn't buy Notre Dame as a team good enough to run the table ... until last night. The Fighting Irish beat Oklahoma convincingly, and in the process won over a whole lot of voters. K-State did its dirty work early, beating the Sooners, West Virginia and then Texas Tech on Saturday. But in the final month of the season, the Wildcats might go without a matchup against a Top 25 team, while BCS challengers Notre Dame and Oregon go head-to-head with USC, and the Ducks also get a shot at Oregon State to close the season. The chances of K-State hanging on to the No. 2 spot if Notre Dame wins out are minimal at best. Oregon will be a nailbiter. It's unfair for the Wildcats, but somebody has to get left out if there are three or four undefeated teams. As it stands, K-State looks like the team that will get stuck on the outside looking in. That said, there's still a month of football left to be played -- nobody thought Oklahoma State would lose to Iowa State last year, or that West Virginia would lose to Pitt back in 2009. Anything can happen.

http://espn.go.com/blog/big12/post/_/id/58519/what-we-learned-in-the-big-12-week-9-5

someone will need to put me on  :goodbyecruelworld: when we go undefeated and get left out of the natty.

fatty's got this guys, enjoy the ride  :driving:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: BigCat on October 28, 2012, 09:48:32 AM
Quote
John Hunt's AP ballot: Ducks slip to No. 3; Beavers to No. 12

Obviously a Oregon homer, but THIS is what we have to fear...


http://www.oregonlive.com/pac-12/index.ssf/2012/10/john_hunts_ap_ballot_ducks_slip_to_no_3_beavers_to.html

Quote
Notre Dame leaps Florida and Oregon with its win at Oklahoma. Yes, I know the Ducks were playing their cheerleaders by the third quarter against Colorado, but the Irish was very impressive against a very good team.

Kansas State nearly leaps the Ducks, too. K-State has beaten the better teams (Oklahoma, West Virginia, Texas Tech); Oregon has looked better beating teams (everyone). So the Ducks remain ahead of K-State at No. 3.

Oregon State falls to No. 12 after its loss at Washington. It was a slide more than a plummet, as there aren't too many quality one-loss teams.

Quote
The ballot ...

1. Alabama

2. Notre Dame

3. Oregon

4. Kansas State

On Ubbs' twitter machine he (Ubb) was saying he thinks it is a mistake for the athletic department to not send voters hookers and info about KSU's accomplishments. Although he said it wasn't enough to get OSU over the hump last year, I agree -- we need to be pandering. Hard. It would be a shame to not be able to say we'd done everything imaginable to curry favor.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ednksu on October 28, 2012, 09:50:23 AM
Currie get to Currying :shakesfist: :shakesfist:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TBL on October 28, 2012, 09:51:45 AM
BCS Computer Rankings:

1. Sagarin - Alabama, ND, KSU, Florida
2. Anderson/Hester - Last week:  KSU, Florida, Oregon St, ND
3. Billingsley - Last week: Alabama, Oregon, ND, KSU
4. Colley - Last week:  Florida, ND, Oregon ST, Alabama, KSU
5. Massey - Last week:  Florida, ND, KSU, Oregon St
6. Wolfe - Last week: KSU, Florida, Alabama, Oregon St

Polls:

1. Harris - Last week: Alabama, Oregon, Florida, KSU, ND
2. USA/Coaches - Last week: Alabama, Oregon, Florida, KSU, ND

With ND jumping in the Sagarin from 5th to 2nd..... :curse: :curse:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 28, 2012, 09:54:38 AM
BCS Computer Rankings:

1. Sagarin - Alabama, ND, KSU, Florida
2. Anderson/Hester - Last week:  KSU, Florida, Oregon St, ND
3. Billingsley - Last week: Alabama, Oregon, ND, KSU
4. Colley - Last week:  Florida, ND, Oregon ST, Alabama, KSU
5. Massey - Last week:  Florida, ND, KSU, Oregon St
6. Wolfe - Last week: KSU, Florida, Alabama, Oregon St

Polls:

1. Harris - Last week: Alabama, Oregon, Florida, KSU, ND
2. USA/Coaches - Last week: Alabama, Oregon, Florida, KSU, ND

With ND jumping in the Sagarin from 5th to 2nd..... :curse: :curse:

I don't think you have the correct sagarin

Quote
Here is Sagarin's BCS Top 10: 1. Kansas State; 2. Notre Dame; 3. Florida; 4. LSU; 5. Oklahoma; 6. Georgia; 7. Alabama; 8. Oregon; 9. South Carolina; 10. Texas Tech.

Before you blow a fuse, remember those are his ratings that do not include margin of victory – as dictated by the BCS. In his preferred Predictor ratings, Sagarin's top five are:

Alabama
Notre Dame
Kansas State
Oregon
Oklahoma
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on October 28, 2012, 09:57:04 AM
They just ran their projection on ESPNU...had us second in their projected BCS.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 28, 2012, 09:57:31 AM
They just ran their projection on ESPNU...had us second in their projected BCS.

by a pretty good margin over #3 iirc
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on October 28, 2012, 09:58:14 AM
we really need voters in big12 territory to vote us up. you just rough ridin' know those sec bastards would do this.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Big Sam on October 28, 2012, 09:59:08 AM
BCS uses Sagarin's ELO-CHESS.

1. KSU
2. Notre Dame
3. Florida
4. LSU
5. OU
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 28, 2012, 09:59:36 AM
we really need voters in big12 territory to vote us up. you just rough ridin' know those sec bastards would do this.

luckily for us, the SEC no longer has anyone to vote up.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 28, 2012, 10:02:10 AM
this thread is so much fun every sunday you guys  :thumbs:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TBL on October 28, 2012, 10:03:41 AM
Welp....my bad   

 :ksu:
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: XocolateThundarr on October 28, 2012, 10:05:46 AM
Gonna be #2. Haters gonna hate. And by haters I mean Lou Holthssss.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: jmlynch1 on October 28, 2012, 10:07:23 AM
this thread is so much fun every sunday you guys  :thumbs:
CanConfirm
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on October 28, 2012, 10:09:58 AM
this thread is so much fun every sunday you guys  :thumbs:

what i'm saying is that we can't have some goon in ft worth voting nd 2nd and us 4th. we have to be 2nd in all of those jerkwads ballots. every single one of them.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kslim on October 28, 2012, 10:10:17 AM
this thread is so much fun every sunday you guys  :thumbs:

got it on a good tip the sugar loved our team and atmosphere yesterday, sorry for no pm
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 28, 2012, 10:12:23 AM
this thread is so much fun every sunday you guys  :thumbs:

what i'm saying is that we can't have some goon in ft worth voting nd 2nd and us 4th. we have to be 2nd in all of those jerkwads ballots. every single one of them.

absolutely, it wouldn't kill those fucks to throw us in at #1 actually
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on October 28, 2012, 10:16:59 AM
Meek has a vote :dubious:.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on October 28, 2012, 10:17:23 AM
this thread is so much fun every sunday you guys  :thumbs:

what i'm saying is that we can't have some goon in ft worth voting nd 2nd and us 4th. we have to be 2nd in all of those jerkwads ballots. every single one of them.


 
absolutely, it wouldn't kill those fucks to throw us in at #1 actually

yes. i mean, why not?!
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 28, 2012, 10:17:43 AM
Meek has a vote :dubious:.

in what, AP?  meaningless.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 28, 2012, 10:18:39 AM
we should really have the big 12 offices on the line to every one of our coaches with a vote.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Bookcat on October 28, 2012, 10:18:50 AM
BCS #2. Its going to be great.


Oregon will get jumped by ND.

Root hard for OU to win out.... I don't think Oregon will be even challenged by USC..and probalby beat Oregon State by 17.. The Trojans are awful. OSU is overrated in a turd conference.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on October 28, 2012, 10:20:58 AM
Meek has a vote :dubious:.

in what, AP?  meaningless.

Ya, I guess.  That stinks.  Who is on the Harris?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 28, 2012, 10:22:05 AM
Meek has a vote :dubious:.

in what, AP?  meaningless.

Ya, I guess.  That stinks.  Who is on the Harris?

I mean, he should vote us #1 anyway though obviously
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 28, 2012, 10:22:52 AM
Meek has a vote :dubious:.

in what, AP?  meaningless.

Ya, I guess.  That stinks.  Who is on the Harris?

MAX URICK !!!11!!!

http://www.harrisinteractive.com/vault/HI-News-Release-HICFP-Panelists-2012-10-04.pdf
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on October 28, 2012, 10:24:46 AM
2012 Harris Interactive College Football Poll Panel:
Aldridge, Denny Grosscup, Lee Plank, Doug
Anderson, Bob Herrmann, Mark Prater, Mike
Bailey, Eric Hicks, Tommy Preece, Steve
Bates, James Hogeboom, Gary Randle El, Antwaan
Batten, Sammy Horning, David Richter, Pat
Bestwick, Dick Housel, David Robinson, Earle
Biddle, Joe Husak, Todd Roda, Kenny
Bishop, Blaine  Joe, J.J. Sanders, Gary
Bowden, Tommy Johnson, Scott Schiller, Harvey
Braine, Dave Jones, Tony Schmidt, Terry R.
Brandt, Gil Jude, Adam Shea, Terry
Brooks, Rich Kassing, Don Sherrill, Jackie
Brown, Chip Kennedy, Laing Simpson, Corky
Buckner, Brentson Kerkhoff, Blair  Skinner, Reilly
Burget, Grant Kern, Mike Smigiel, Joe
Carlin, Chris King, Shaun Sparks, Adam
Carr, Lloyd Kramer, Roy Stabley, Fred
Cavagnaro, Charlie Kreckman, Nate Stevens, Patrick
Cavender, Pete Leach, Bobby  Strock, Don
Collins, Tony Lubick, Sonny Swilling, Pat
Condron, Bob Lude, Mike Thomas, Mel
Corrigan, Gene Luicci, Tom Thompson, Darrell
Crowley, Joe Mallory, John Toner, John
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on October 28, 2012, 10:26:18 AM
Kerkhoff, Blair

@BlairKerkhoff
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 28, 2012, 10:29:20 AM
pete, you didn't paste the second page of harris voters which prominently features a former KSU AD  :fatty:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Ira Hayes on October 28, 2012, 10:52:52 AM
One positive is that with the new Big 12 TV contract it financially benefits ESPN to promote us over Notre Dame.  ESPN definitely influences voters.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 28, 2012, 11:04:11 AM
#3 in coaches and closer to 2nd than 4th :thumbs:

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf/polls/coaches-poll/

Texas at 22, OSU at 24 still on our schedule  :thumbs:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SdK on October 28, 2012, 11:05:44 AM
The Big 12 voters need to start homering it up.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Gooch on October 28, 2012, 11:06:57 AM
One positive is that with the new Big 12 TV contract it financially benefits ESPN to promote us over Notre Dame.  ESPN definitely influences voters.
Apparently ESPN did not get this memo.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Ira Hayes on October 28, 2012, 11:08:59 AM
#3 in coaches and closer to 2nd than 4th :thumbs:

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf/polls/coaches-poll/

Texas at 22, OSU at 24 still on our schedule  :thumbs:

This is very good for us.   :excited:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on October 28, 2012, 11:09:10 AM
pete, you didn't paste the second page of harris voters which prominently features a former KSU AD  :fatty:

crap

Crum, Dick Marcum, Bob Trotman, Charlie
Curci, Fran Matthews, Loren Urick, Max
Dawkins, Pete  Mayes, Derrick Valdiserri, Roger
Deromedi, Herb McGee, Mike Van Note, Jeff
Dienhart, Mark McIlhenny, Lance  Vardell, Tommy
Dorsey, John Medhurst, Pete Vaught, Mike
Dunlevy, Bob Millis, Tim Vruggink, Jim
Ealey, Chuck Mizell, Eric Wagner, Bob
Ebling, Jack Morton, Craig Walden, Jim
Fehlberg, Rondo Myers, Gerald Walker, Jay
Gagliardi, Robert Novak, Joe Walters, John
Giannini, Richard Oakes, Jim White, Jack
Goin, Bob O'Brien, Denny Woodruff, Dwayne
Gottfried, Joe Paschall, David Wright, Rick
Griffith, Mike Pinkett, Allen Yoshida,

That one guy's name is Dick Crum.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 28, 2012, 11:10:53 AM
AP: 1 Alabama, 2 Oregon, 3 Kansas State, 4 Notre Dame 5 LSU 
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: michigancat on October 28, 2012, 11:12:51 AM
AP: 1 Alabama, 2 Oregon, 3 Kansas State, 4 Notre Dame 5 LSU 

MEDIA! :shakesfist:

oh wait
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Rams on October 28, 2012, 11:14:47 AM
#3 in coaches and closer to 2nd than 4th :thumbs:

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf/polls/coaches-poll/

Texas at 22, OSU at 24 still on our schedule  :thumbs:

This is very good for us.   :excited:

yeah but a lot of the big 12 teams in the top 25 still have to play each other and/or us and they already have 2 losses, so the likelihood is that a lot of them will finish out of the top 25
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 28, 2012, 11:18:19 AM
#3 in coaches and closer to 2nd than 4th :thumbs:

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf/polls/coaches-poll/

Texas at 22, OSU at 24 still on our schedule  :thumbs:

This is very good for us.   :excited:

yeah but a lot of the big 12 teams in the top 25 still have to play each other and/or us and they already have 2 losses, so the likelihood is that a lot of them will finish out of the top 25

sure, but when we play OSU they will be the 5th team we've played that were ranked before we destroyed them
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Ira Hayes on October 28, 2012, 11:18:24 AM
#3 in coaches and closer to 2nd than 4th :thumbs:

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf/polls/coaches-poll/

Texas at 22, OSU at 24 still on our schedule  :thumbs:

This is very good for us.   :excited:

yeah but a lot of the big 12 teams in the top 25 still have to play each other and/or us and they already have 2 losses, so the likelihood is that a lot of them will finish out of the top 25

We are ahead of ND by 59 points and ND doesn't have another game that is going to make enough coaches put them ahead of KSU. There are 59 voters in that poll.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 28, 2012, 11:19:10 AM
ND now plays a string of three consecutive complete dogshit teams. they also end their season on the 24th (against probably a 3 loss USC team) while we get to parade in front of the voters against Texas to end the season on 12/1. they are meaningless to us at this point. not a threat.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ChiComCat on October 28, 2012, 11:20:17 AM
If USC doesn't beat Oregon, they will have a minimum of 4 losses if ND beats them.  USC either helps us or they're a dogshit win for Oregon/ND
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 28, 2012, 11:21:12 AM
If USC doesn't beat Oregon, they will have a minimum of 4 losses if ND beats them.  USC either helps us or they're a dogshit win for Oregon/ND

yep. Oregon's signature win will be either shitty stanford or shitty oregon state.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: michigancat on October 28, 2012, 11:21:21 AM
ND now plays a string of three consecutive complete dogshit teams. they also end their season on the 24th while we get to parade in front of the voters against Texas to end the season. they are meaningless to us at this point.

yep. despite us being heavily favored in all our remaining games, they are all more difficult than really any of ND's games.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Domino on October 28, 2012, 11:22:13 AM
By the looks of it, Kansas State gets the most help if Texas can somehow teach their players on defense how to tackle and win out until getting demolished December 1st.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Rams on October 28, 2012, 11:22:42 AM
#3 in coaches and closer to 2nd than 4th :thumbs:

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf/polls/coaches-poll/

Texas at 22, OSU at 24 still on our schedule  :thumbs:

This is very good for us.   :excited:

yeah but a lot of the big 12 teams in the top 25 still have to play each other and/or us and they already have 2 losses, so the likelihood is that a lot of them will finish out of the top 25

sure, but when we play OSU they will be the 5th team we've played that were ranked before we destroyed them

yeah and texas could be number 6.  has any team ever beaten 6 ranked teams in 1 season?  my word.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 28, 2012, 11:24:21 AM
#3 in coaches and closer to 2nd than 4th :thumbs:

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf/polls/coaches-poll/

Texas at 22, OSU at 24 still on our schedule  :thumbs:

Last week we were 105 points ahead of ND, now we're 59  :bang:

Last week we were 77 behind Oregon, now 25 (Florida moving out of the way likely dramatically helped that)
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on October 28, 2012, 11:26:11 AM
ND now plays a string of three consecutive complete dogshit teams. they also end their season on the 24th (against probably a 3 loss USC team) while we get to parade in front of the voters against Texas to end the season. they are meaningless to us at this point.

11/03/12   vs. Pittsburgh, who is 4-4
11/10/12   at Boston College, who is 2-6 currently, and likely 2-7 when they play
11/17/12   vs. Wake Forest, who is 4-4 now, and likely 5-5 when they play
11/24/12   at USC, who is 6-2 now, but may be as bad as 7-4 when they play


Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Ira Hayes on October 28, 2012, 11:26:22 AM
Quote
Below are Jerry Palm's projected BCS Standings

Quote
1. Alabama
2. Kansas State
3. Notre Dame
4. Oregon

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/rankings/bcs

Ksu's lead in the coaches poll is actually double what Palm projected.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: GoodForAnother on October 28, 2012, 11:26:56 AM
hey, that's not bad guys
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 28, 2012, 11:29:21 AM
We are looking very good guys. We got this.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pittcat on October 28, 2012, 11:30:21 AM
Guys. Guys!!


This is happening!!!!!1! :ksu: :billdance: :ksu: :billdance:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on October 28, 2012, 11:35:51 AM
Now Jerry Palm reverses, has Oregon in.

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/bowls/predictions
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on October 28, 2012, 11:36:10 AM
looks like we really need florida to keep winning. them still being above oregon in so many computers is pretty helpful.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 28, 2012, 11:37:14 AM
looks like we really need florida to keep winning. them still being above oregon in so many computers is pretty helpful.

yeah, Sagarin's LOL formula helps a ton too
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on October 28, 2012, 11:39:47 AM
also, having all four stay undefeated might be a good thing for us? keeps oregon at four at best in the computers which is probably/maybe low enough to keep us above them combined. if nd loses then oregon could be 3 in computers and we'd be in trouble maybe?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kim carnes on October 28, 2012, 11:40:06 AM
looks like we really need florida to keep winning. them still being above oregon in so many computers is pretty helpful.

they play 2 pud out of conference teams, Mizzou (really pud lmao), and FSU.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Super PurpleCat on October 28, 2012, 11:40:57 AM
Last week we were 105 points ahead of ND, now we're 59  :bang:

They got a good win.  No need to get all poopyface. 
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ChiComCat on October 28, 2012, 11:41:11 AM
looks like we really need florida to keep winning. them still being above oregon in so many computers is pretty helpful.

they play 2 pud out of conference teams, Mizzou (really pud lmao), and FSU.

I'm not sure you understand conferences
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: michigancat on October 28, 2012, 11:42:11 AM
also, having all four stay undefeated might be a good thing for us? keeps oregon at four at best in the computers which is probably/maybe low enough to keep us above them combined. if nd loses then oregon could be 3 in computers and we'd be in trouble maybe?

so, it's kind of a three horse race, and I think ND vs. KSU vs. Oregon is far more beneficial to us than KSU vs. Oregon. ND may split off a lot of voters from Oregon (sexy chasers) and let us inch ahead with our steady, hard working midwestern voters sticking with us. Think about it.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: michigancat on October 28, 2012, 11:43:07 AM
looks like we really need florida to keep winning. them still being above oregon in so many computers is pretty helpful.

they play 2 pud out of conference teams, Mizzou (really pud lmao), and FSU.

I'm not sure you understand conferences

no, he does. FSU is listed as a non-pud OOC game.
Title: Re: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: mocat on October 28, 2012, 11:43:43 AM
looks like we really need florida to keep winning. them still being above oregon in so many computers is pretty helpful.

they play 2 pud out of conference teams, Mizzou (really pud lmao), and FSU.

I'm not sure you understand conferences
No he is correct. Look at the sched
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 28, 2012, 11:46:49 AM
this thread is the funnest of all threads
Title: Re: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Chico on October 28, 2012, 11:53:44 AM
looks like we really need florida to keep winning. them still being above oregon in so many computers is pretty helpful.

they play 2 pud out of conference teams, Mizzou (really pud lmao), and FSU.

I'm not sure you understand conferences
No he is correct. Look at the sched

waiting for three dumbasses to realize their mistake  :dubious:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Ira Hayes on October 28, 2012, 11:53:59 AM
Did anyone notice that KSU is only 25 points behind Oregon in the coaches poll?  The difference last week was 77.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: GoodForAnother on October 28, 2012, 11:54:45 AM
Now Jerry Palm reverses, has Oregon in.

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/bowls/predictions

he's just trying to bitb
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on October 28, 2012, 11:55:58 AM
If ND didn't jump us in the Coaches this week, then there's no way they jump us going forward. And their computer ratings are just going to keep dropping.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on October 28, 2012, 11:58:15 AM
Now Jerry Palm reverses, has Oregon in.

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/bowls/predictions

I don't think Palm "reversed". He still thinks we will be 2 in this weeks BCS, with Oregon at 4. This link is his projected bowls. He just thinks Oregon is going to catch us by the end of the year.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 28, 2012, 11:59:28 AM
Did anyone notice that KSU is only 25 points behind Oregon in the coaches poll?  The difference last week was 77.

because florida lost. they were 3 in the coaches and we were 4. we moved up a spot while oregon stayed put.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Ira Hayes on October 28, 2012, 12:02:32 PM
Did anyone notice that KSU is only 25 points behind Oregon in the coaches poll?  The difference last week was 77.

because florida lost. they were 3 in the coaches and we were 4. we moved up a spot while oregon stayed put.

Yeah, but 12 coaches flipped us ahead of Oregon. There are only 59 voters.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on October 28, 2012, 12:03:38 PM
Did anyone notice that KSU is only 25 points behind Oregon in the coaches poll?  The difference last week was 77.

because florida lost. they were 3 in the coaches and we were 4. we moved up a spot while oregon stayed put.

Yeah, but 12 coaches flipped us ahead of Oregon.

:drool:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: j-von on October 28, 2012, 12:05:12 PM
Did anyone notice that KSU is only 25 points behind Oregon in the coaches poll?  The difference last week was 77.

because florida lost. they were 3 in the coaches and we were 4. we moved up a spot while oregon stayed put.

Yeah, but 12 coaches flipped us ahead of Oregon. There are only 59 voters.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fneedlemeethaystack.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2010%2F05%2Fcollars.jpg&hash=6a52664a4756c001a7ceba31999154977bcd90d8)
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on October 28, 2012, 12:06:34 PM
this thread is the funnest of all threads

It really is SD, it really is.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on October 28, 2012, 12:08:14 PM
Now Jerry Palm reverses, has Oregon in.

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/bowls/predictions

I don't think Palm "reversed". He still thinks we will be 2 in this weeks BCS, with Oregon at 4. This link is his projected bowls. He just thinks Oregon is going to catch us by the end of the year.

i don't really see how they can if notre dame keeps winning and keeps them at best #4 in the computers.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ednksu on October 28, 2012, 12:09:24 PM
AP @ 3
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: jmlynch1 on October 28, 2012, 12:10:01 PM
Did anyone notice that KSU is only 25 points behind Oregon in the coaches poll?  The difference last week was 77.

because florida lost. they were 3 in the coaches and we were 4. we moved up a spot while oregon stayed put.

Yeah, but 12 coaches flipped us ahead of Oregon. There are only 59 voters.
That kind of scares me for the future. We need to look sexy as hell in our upcoming games.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Ira Hayes on October 28, 2012, 12:13:54 PM
I don't think my 12 flipped statement is right.

But basically:

42 coaches have 1. Bama 2. Oregon 3 KSU 4. ND
17 coaches have 1. Bama 2. KSU 3. Oregon 4. ND
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pittcat on October 28, 2012, 12:14:31 PM
Did anyone notice that KSU is only 25 points behind Oregon in the coaches poll?  The difference last week was 77.

because florida lost. they were 3 in the coaches and we were 4. we moved up a spot while oregon stayed put.

Yeah, but 12 coaches flipped us ahead of Oregon. There are only 59 voters.
That kind of scares me for the future. We need to look sexy as hell in our upcoming games.

We'll be alright. OSU doesn't look like complete dogshit. TCU and BAYLOR are on the road (perceived as tougher) and Texas is Texas. Would help if the 'horns win out until Dec 1st.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Fuktard on October 28, 2012, 12:56:41 PM
USC is 6-2.  They have beaten teams with a combined record of 16-32.  Their best win?  Washington (4-4).  They have lost to teams that are a combined 11-5.  And they are the BEST team ND has yet to play.   

ND will plummet in the computers as they continue to play cupcakes.  Our schedule is incredible compared to theirs (and on par with Oregon's).  I think we are in good shape.

Edit:  And we get a shot at yet ANOTHER top 25 team next week.  Our biggest concern should be winning out.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: bulzeye31 on October 28, 2012, 12:59:15 PM
USC is 6-2.  They have beaten teams with a combined record of 16-32.  Their best win?  Washington (4-4).  They have lost to teams that are a combined 11-5.  And they are the BEST team ND has yet to play.   

ND will plummet in the computers as they continue to play cupcakes.  Our schedule is incredible compared to theirs (and on par with Oregon's).  I think we are in good shape.

Edit:  And we get a shot at yet ANOTHER top 25 team next week.  Our biggest concern should be winning out.

I like you
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Barry McCockner on October 28, 2012, 02:11:12 PM
USC is 6-2.  They have beaten teams with a combined record of 16-32.  Their best win?  Washington (4-4).  They have lost to teams that are a combined 11-5.  And they are the BEST team ND has yet to play.   

ND will plummet in the computers as they continue to play cupcakes.  Our schedule is incredible compared to theirs (and on par with Oregon's).  I think we are in good shape.

Edit:  And we get a shot at yet ANOTHER top 25 team next week.  Our biggest concern should be winning out.

I like you

He's really had the right formula.  Set your expectations low with your screen name, then your solid posts look like homeruns.  Well done.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Fuktard on October 28, 2012, 02:43:55 PM
#3 in Harris and even got a first place vote.  I think we are in very good shape here guise. 

The only chance ND had of passing us in the BCS was this week....they are already behind us in the human polls and their computer rankings will only get worse.  From a computer standpoint, our remaining schedule matches pretty closely to Oregons.  I don't think they can make up much ground on us in the computers. 
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Phil Titola on October 28, 2012, 02:49:35 PM
My super advanced BCS calculating shows us expanding our lead against Oregon and ND didn't close the gap at all.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: hemmy on October 28, 2012, 02:59:28 PM
Still #1 in the UPS TPI http://scores.nbcsports.msnbc.com/cfb/tpi.asp
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Panjandrum on October 28, 2012, 03:03:15 PM
ND now plays a string of three consecutive complete dogshit teams. they also end their season on the 24th (against probably a 3 loss USC team) while we get to parade in front of the voters against Texas to end the season on 12/1. they are meaningless to us at this point. not a threat.

The other thing is that Oregon is going to completely devalue wins over USC (should Oregon win out).

Oregon is going to hurt themselves by beating USC, and Notre Dame would hurt themselves (and Oregon) by beating USC.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pittcat on October 28, 2012, 03:05:52 PM
ND now plays a string of three consecutive complete dogshit teams. they also end their season on the 24th (against probably a 3 loss USC team) while we get to parade in front of the voters against Texas to end the season on 12/1. they are meaningless to us at this point. not a threat.

The other thing is that Oregon is going to completely devalue wins over USC (should Oregon win out).

Oregon is going to hurt themselves by beating USC, and Notre Dame would hurt themselves (and Oregon) by beating USC.

 :love:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MadCat on October 28, 2012, 03:08:16 PM
Do I want USC to win or lose or does it matter?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ChiComCat on October 28, 2012, 03:09:46 PM
Do I want USC to win or lose or does it matter?

Win everytime they play Oregon or ND.  Lose every other game.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: GoodForAnother on October 28, 2012, 03:09:57 PM
Do I want USC to win or lose or does it matter?

we want them to win both, or lose both
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Panjandrum on October 28, 2012, 03:21:34 PM
One fun thing about this race...

Because ESPN is building it up to be this huge soap opera of, "Who's #2!?!?!" each week, and we're being mentioned with Notre Dame and Oregon, the spotlight will be on every single week.

It's all ABC or Big Fox from here on out, and this is going to do nothing but help Klein...and national perception.

Also, because we'd have the only game on 12/1 with BCS bowl implications on a college campus, my guess is that Gameday would be in Manhattan for Texas, and it would be on ABC at 7 PM.  The only other Conf. Champ game they own that day is the ACC, and that would most likely be played on ESPN at 6:45 PM CST because it doesn't have national title implications.

Quote
The 2012 Dr Pepper ACC Football Championship Game, which will be played on December 1 in Bank of America Stadium in Charlotte, N.C., will be nationally televised by either ABC, with an 8 p.m. kickoff, or ESPN at 7:45 p.m. It will be the fourth straight prime time exposure for the ACC title game which drew a sellout crowd of 73,675 fans last year and has averaged 73,027 fans in its two years in Charlotte.

Notre Dame ends their season on 11/24 against USC, the Pac-12 title game is Friday night on Fox, and the SEC title game will be on CBS at 3 PM and will end around when our game kicks off.  We would go up against the Big Ten title game head-to-head on Fox that night, and no one is going to give a **** about it because no one cares about a meaningless Nebraska vs. Wisconsin game.

The last big game of the year would be us, in prime time, on ABC with Brent and Herbie calling it while Chris, Lee, Desmond, and Pollack roam BSFS.

You can't ask for much more when you're trying to win a Heisman and impress voters for the BCS selection the following day.  Especially when the opponent is Texas.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Super PurpleCat on October 28, 2012, 03:23:10 PM
Panjandrum I just went all HighstepperCat reading that.  Bless you.

Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: j-dub on October 28, 2012, 03:25:34 PM
One fun thing about this race...

Because ESPN is building it up to be this huge soap opera of, "Who's #2!?!?!" each week, and we're being mentioned with Notre Dame and Oregon, the spotlight will be on every single week.

It's all ABC or Big Fox from here on out, and this is going to do nothing but help Klein...and national perception.

Also, because we'd have the only game on 12/1 with BCS bowl implications on a college campus, my guess is that Gameday would be in Manhattan for Texas, and it would be on ABC at 7 PM.  The only other Conf. Champ game they own that day is the ACC, and that would most likely be played on ESPN at 6:45 PM CST because it doesn't have national title implications.

Quote
The 2012 Dr Pepper ACC Football Championship Game, which will be played on December 1 in Bank of America Stadium in Charlotte, N.C., will be nationally televised by either ABC, with an 8 p.m. kickoff, or ESPN at 7:45 p.m. It will be the fourth straight prime time exposure for the ACC title game which drew a sellout crowd of 73,675 fans last year and has averaged 73,027 fans in its two years in Charlotte.

Notre Dame ends their season on 11/24 against USC, the Pac-12 title game is Friday night on Fox, and the SEC title game will be on CBS at 3 PM and will end around when our game kicks off.  We would go up against the Big Ten title game head-to-head on Fox that night, and no one is going to give a **** about it because no one cares about a meaningless Nebraska vs. Wisconsin game.

The last big game of the year would be us, in prime time, on ABC with Brent and Herbie calling it while Chris, Lee, Desmond, and Pollack roam BSFS.

You can't ask for much more when you're trying to win a Heisman and impress voters for the BCS selection the following day.  Especially when the opponent is Texas.

my goodness fatty
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: bobby_runs on October 28, 2012, 03:41:37 PM
One fun thing about this race...

Because ESPN is building it up to be this huge soap opera of, "Who's #2!?!?!" each week, and we're being mentioned with Notre Dame and Oregon, the spotlight will be on every single week.

It's all ABC or Big Fox from here on out, and this is going to do nothing but help Klein...and national perception.

Also, because we'd have the only game on 12/1 with BCS bowl implications on a college campus, my guess is that Gameday would be in Manhattan for Texas, and it would be on ABC at 7 PM.  The only other Conf. Champ game they own that day is the ACC, and that would most likely be played on ESPN at 6:45 PM CST because it doesn't have national title implications.

Quote
The 2012 Dr Pepper ACC Football Championship Game, which will be played on December 1 in Bank of America Stadium in Charlotte, N.C., will be nationally televised by either ABC, with an 8 p.m. kickoff, or ESPN at 7:45 p.m. It will be the fourth straight prime time exposure for the ACC title game which drew a sellout crowd of 73,675 fans last year and has averaged 73,027 fans in its two years in Charlotte.

Notre Dame ends their season on 11/24 against USC, the Pac-12 title game is Friday night on Fox, and the SEC title game will be on CBS at 3 PM and will end around when our game kicks off.  We would go up against the Big Ten title game head-to-head on Fox that night, and no one is going to give a **** about it because no one cares about a meaningless Nebraska vs. Wisconsin game.

The last big game of the year would be us, in prime time, on ABC with Brent and Herbie calling it while Chris, Lee, Desmond, and Pollack roam BSFS.

You can't ask for much more when you're trying to win a Heisman and impress voters for the BCS selection the following day.  Especially when the opponent is Texas.
Clean up on aisle 3.

 :billdance:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Fuktard on October 28, 2012, 03:46:50 PM
We made a HUGE jump on Oregon in both the USA and the Harris polls (the gap last week was 0.0532...the gap this week is 0.0205)

...when the BCS standings come out, there will be a CANYON between Oregon and the wild wild wildcats.

Even if the Domers pass us in the computer rankings this week (but I don't think they will), there is no way they will stay there given their crap hole remaining schedule. 
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Scary Smart on October 28, 2012, 03:54:58 PM
One fun thing about this race...

Because ESPN is building it up to be this huge soap opera of, "Who's #2!?!?!" each week, and we're being mentioned with Notre Dame and Oregon, the spotlight will be on every single week.

It's all ABC or Big Fox from here on out, and this is going to do nothing but help Klein...and national perception.

Also, because we'd have the only game on 12/1 with BCS bowl implications on a college campus, my guess is that Gameday would be in Manhattan for Texas, and it would be on ABC at 7 PM.  The only other Conf. Champ game they own that day is the ACC, and that would most likely be played on ESPN at 6:45 PM CST because it doesn't have national title implications.

Quote
The 2012 Dr Pepper ACC Football Championship Game, which will be played on December 1 in Bank of America Stadium in Charlotte, N.C., will be nationally televised by either ABC, with an 8 p.m. kickoff, or ESPN at 7:45 p.m. It will be the fourth straight prime time exposure for the ACC title game which drew a sellout crowd of 73,675 fans last year and has averaged 73,027 fans in its two years in Charlotte.

Notre Dame ends their season on 11/24 against USC, the Pac-12 title game is Friday night on Fox, and the SEC title game will be on CBS at 3 PM and will end around when our game kicks off.  We would go up against the Big Ten title game head-to-head on Fox that night, and no one is going to give a **** about it because no one cares about a meaningless Nebraska vs. Wisconsin game.

The last big game of the year would be us, in prime time, on ABC with Brent and Herbie calling it while Chris, Lee, Desmond, and Pollack roam BSFS.

You can't ask for much more when you're trying to win a Heisman and impress voters for the BCS selection the following day.  Especially when the opponent is Texas.

Wait, why can't Gameday broadcast from the SEC championship game? ESPN doesn't have the rights to LSU/Bama this weekend either but they're still going there.   :dunno:
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 28, 2012, 03:58:20 PM
Station has nothing to do with Gameday location despite what some say
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Panjandrum on October 28, 2012, 04:01:21 PM
Station has nothing to do with Gameday location despite what some say

It doesn't, but I think they'd rather be on campus.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: jmlynch1 on October 28, 2012, 04:02:51 PM
Station has nothing to do with Gameday location despite what some say

It doesn't, but I think they'd rather be on campus.
Weren't they in Jacksonville this week too? Hmmm.. blowing some holes in this theory
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kim carnes on October 28, 2012, 04:03:36 PM
Station has nothing to do with Gameday location despite what some say

It doesn't, but I think they'd rather be on campus.
Weren't they in Jacksonville this week too? Hmmm.. blowing some holes in this theory

they were at ou
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 28, 2012, 04:07:11 PM
They were at the SEC champy the last couple years weren't they?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: GoodForAnother on October 28, 2012, 04:10:24 PM
gameday would be good but I don't think UT is good enough
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: chum1 on October 28, 2012, 04:16:12 PM
What's the opposite of a conspiracy theory?  That's the Panj posting style.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Skipper44 on October 28, 2012, 04:16:50 PM
 :drink:
gameday would be good but I don't think UT is good enough
if UT wins out it is possible 10-2 @ 12-0 could be the best game of the day
:hookem:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: GoodForAnother on October 28, 2012, 04:18:23 PM
:drink:
gameday would be good but I don't think UT is good enough
if UT wins out it is possible 10-2 @ 12-0 could be the best game of the day
:hookem:

would be ideal
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on October 28, 2012, 04:23:44 PM
:drink:
gameday would be good but I don't think UT is good enough
if UT wins out it is possible 10-2 @ 12-0 could be the best game of the day
:hookem:

They won't beat Texas Tech.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Domino on October 28, 2012, 04:26:43 PM
Oregon State plays Stanford before Oregon can play either of them. Either way that game is a win/win

If OSU gets the L, then they'll drop almost out of the top 25, and then drop all the way after they lose to Oregon

If Stanford gets the L, it will make Stanford a 4 loss team after they lose to Oregon. Not only does it hurt Oregon, but Notre Dame as well.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: HerrSonntag on October 28, 2012, 04:39:39 PM
:drink:
gameday would be good but I don't think UT is good enough
if UT wins out it is possible 10-2 @ 12-0 could be the best game of the day
:hookem:

would be ideal

Would Texas have to rely on replacing half their team with mutant aliens processing superpowers in this fanciful scenario?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: jmlynch1 on October 28, 2012, 04:51:07 PM
Station has nothing to do with Gameday location despite what some say

It doesn't, but I think they'd rather be on campus.
Weren't they in Jacksonville this week too? Hmmm.. blowing some holes in this theory

they were at ou
Spoken like a true Panj apologist :jeffy:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: GoodForAnother on October 28, 2012, 05:02:21 PM
:drink:
gameday would be good but I don't think UT is good enough
if UT wins out it is possible 10-2 @ 12-0 could be the best game of the day
:hookem:

would be ideal

Would Texas have to rely on replacing half their team with mutant aliens processing superpowers in this fanciful scenario?

probably closer to 75% of the team
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TBL on October 28, 2012, 05:21:19 PM
What's the opposite of a conspiracy theory?  That's the Panj posting style.

Consulted with several experts on the subject. The consensus was a "Group Reach Around".
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Fuktard on October 28, 2012, 05:23:42 PM
Although I have no idea what the computers are going to say, I think it's pretty safe to say that ND will easily jump Oregon this week in the BCS (i predict they will be 3rd by a decent margin over Oregon).  If we stay the same in the computer polls (again, even though we played a damn good Tech team, who knows), it is numerically impossible for ND to pass us this week in the BCS.   I can't envision a scenario (other than us losing obviously) where either ND or Oregon will jump us by years end.   
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: BigCat on October 28, 2012, 05:26:24 PM
I can't envision a scenario (other than us losing obviously) where either ND or Oregon will jump us by years end.

Start envisioning. Then get over to shaggy bevo and get some pro tips on anus prep/butthurt, they are very nice and helpful people.
Title: First Place Votes
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 28, 2012, 05:58:52 PM
One voter in the Harris poll thinks we're #1. :lynchmob:

Also, #3 in the Harris


Don't care if already posted
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 28, 2012, 06:05:32 PM
How many ranked teams have we already beaten this year?  OU, WVU, TTech, ISU. soon to be OSU and UT

More than ND and UO combined by years end, prolly
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SwiftCat on October 28, 2012, 06:07:08 PM
This thread is the best. I've been away from bbs since Friday morning. This has all of the collective butthurt, meltdown and optimism that I've been looking for.
Title: Re: First Place Votes
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on October 28, 2012, 06:07:27 PM
One voter in the Harris poll thinks we're #1. :lynchmob:

Also, #3 in the Harris


Don't care if already posted

Are you a real "racist piece of crap"?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 28, 2012, 06:09:23 PM
How many ranked teams have we already beaten this year?  OU, WVU, TTech, ISU. soon to be OSU and UT

More than ND and UO combined by years end, prolly

Oregon does play 4 more ranked teams though (assuming whoever they play in the champy game is ranked)
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kslim on October 28, 2012, 06:09:57 PM
How many ranked teams have we already beaten this year?  OU, WVU, TTech, ISU. soon to be OSU and UT

More than ND and UO combined by years end, prolly
if we are talking end of the year and total ranked miami might creep into the equation

they play VT uva usf and duke. 8-4 would probably get them ranked

Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Fuktard on October 28, 2012, 06:11:16 PM
This thread is the best. I've been away from bbs since Friday morning. This has all of the collective butthurt, meltdown and optimism that I've been looking for.

The butthurt and meltdowns were premature...the Harris and Coaches poll have all but eliminated us being left out of the NC game.  The only way ND had a chance was to jump us in the human polls and the only way Oregon can jump us is if they add about 4 really good games to the end of their schedule.

Edit:  The only caveat to this is that I have no idea how an EXTRA game effects the computers.  Our schedule and Oregons schedule are very similar from here forward (Oregon's opp's have 2 more wins than our opp's)...but they do get that one additional game. 
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Super PurpleCat on October 28, 2012, 06:14:59 PM
This is happening.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Panjandrum on October 28, 2012, 06:27:33 PM
What's the opposite of a conspiracy theory?  That's the Panj posting style.

Consulted with several experts on the subject. The consensus was a "Group Reach Around".

Goddammit.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: AbeFroman on October 28, 2012, 06:29:51 PM
This is happening.



[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: sys on October 28, 2012, 06:42:05 PM
alabama being unanimous as the top team, despite the existence of 4 other high-major, undefeated teams is a pretty amazing example of group-think.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: AbeFroman on October 28, 2012, 06:43:17 PM
alabama being unanimous as the top team, despite the existence of 3 other high-major, undefeated teams is a pretty amazing example of group-think.

B-B-B-BUT SIX IN A ROW!

Typical SEC, coattailing off each other's successes
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: chum1 on October 28, 2012, 06:52:46 PM
Alabama's no more of a sure thing than anyone else.  From last week:

 Matt Hinton (@MattRHinton)Last six BCS champs spent a combined six weeks at No. 1
    in BCS poll. Only LSU in '07 was No. 1 going into regular
    season finale, and lost.

Matt Hinton (@MattRHinton)Of the last ten BCS champs, only one (USC in 2004) has spent more than two consecutive weeks at No. 1 at any point in the regular season

Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on October 28, 2012, 07:10:36 PM
Are you guys forgetting that they were at the ksu-ou dr. pepper in 2000?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Domino on October 28, 2012, 07:19:04 PM
How many ranked teams have we already beaten this year?  OU, WVU, TTech, ISU. soon to be OSU and UT

More than ND and UO combined by years end, prolly

Oregon does play 4 more ranked teams though (assuming whoever they play in the champy game is ranked)

But at least 1 of those 4 is dropping out of the rankings. I don't think anyone is giving the Cats credit for beating a "ranked" Iowa State team.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kslim on October 28, 2012, 07:23:26 PM
How many ranked teams have we already beaten this year?  OU, WVU, TTech, ISU. soon to be OSU and UT

More than ND and UO combined by years end, prolly

Oregon does play 4 more ranked teams though (assuming whoever they play in the champy game is ranked)

But at least 1 of those 4 is dropping out of the rankings. I don't think anyone is giving the Cats credit for beating a "ranked" Iowa State team.
every time its discussed you hear "kstate has beaten three ranked teams on the road" i think isu is counted and talked about but maybe we are listening to two different things
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: star seed 7 on October 28, 2012, 07:25:53 PM
this thread is so much fun every sunday you guys  :thumbs:

what i'm saying is that we can't have some goon in ft worth voting nd 2nd and us 4th. we have to be 2nd in all of those jerkwads ballots. every single one of them.

luckily, the sec hates ND more than the big12.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ew2x4 on October 28, 2012, 07:27:36 PM
BCS countdown in 3 minutes. Chat??
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 28, 2012, 07:31:33 PM
We will be 2, the only factor is by how much
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Fuktard on October 28, 2012, 07:33:44 PM
We will be 2, the only factor is by how much

It will be a lot.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on October 28, 2012, 07:34:01 PM
One fun thing about this race...

Because ESPN is building it up to be this huge soap opera of, "Who's #2!?!?!" each week, and we're being mentioned with Notre Dame and Oregon, the spotlight will be on every single week.

It's all ABC or Big Fox from here on out, and this is going to do nothing but help Klein...and national perception.

Also, because we'd have the only game on 12/1 with BCS bowl implications on a college campus, my guess is that Gameday would be in Manhattan for Texas, and it would be on ABC at 7 PM.  The only other Conf. Champ game they own that day is the ACC, and that would most likely be played on ESPN at 6:45 PM CST because it doesn't have national title implications.

Quote
The 2012 Dr Pepper ACC Football Championship Game, which will be played on December 1 in Bank of America Stadium in Charlotte, N.C., will be nationally televised by either ABC, with an 8 p.m. kickoff, or ESPN at 7:45 p.m. It will be the fourth straight prime time exposure for the ACC title game which drew a sellout crowd of 73,675 fans last year and has averaged 73,027 fans in its two years in Charlotte.

Notre Dame ends their season on 11/24 against USC, the Pac-12 title game is Friday night on Fox, and the SEC title game will be on CBS at 3 PM and will end around when our game kicks off.  We would go up against the Big Ten title game head-to-head on Fox that night, and no one is going to give a **** about it because no one cares about a meaningless Nebraska vs. Wisconsin game.

The last big game of the year would be us, in prime time, on ABC with Brent and Herbie calling it while Chris, Lee, Desmond, and Pollack roam BSFS.

You can't ask for much more when you're trying to win a Heisman and impress voters for the BCS selection the following day.  Especially when the opponent is Texas.

my goodness fatty

Brings a tear to my eye...
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: star seed 7 on October 28, 2012, 07:36:18 PM
boy, sec teams really jerk each other off...
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Katpappy on October 28, 2012, 07:36:46 PM
Mark Schlabach with the typical SEC shtick...

http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/8563641/alabama-crimson-tide-easily-top-team-bcs-title-race-ncf

Quote
After watching No. 1 Alabama dismantle No. 11 Mississippi State 38-7 in front of a sellout crowd of 101,821 fans at Bryant-Denny Stadium on Saturday night, I can offer you an educated guess.

The argument over No. 2 doesn't even matter. You might as well blindfold me, force me to the ground, and let Nick Saban eff my face, because I am his dirty whore of a sex slave.  I would sooner gobble Nick Saban's balls than breath another gasp of air on this Earth.  I dream of Nick Saban leaving a steaming pile of disrespect on my chest on the 50 yard line of Bryant-Denny Stadium at halftime.
Is this guy a TURD LICKING HOMO!    :horrorsurprise:
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 28, 2012, 07:37:09 PM
ND is a non factor, the KSU to Oregon gap at .26 is all that matters
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SPE_khat on October 28, 2012, 07:37:45 PM
KSU -.940

ND -.915
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kslim on October 28, 2012, 07:37:47 PM
ND is a non factor, the KSU to Oregon gap at .26 is all that matters

feels so rough ridin' good, just gotta keep winning
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: AbeFroman on October 28, 2012, 07:38:32 PM
So I'm guessing

KSU @ .94
ND @ .915
Ore @ .914

Is a very good advantage for us? WIN OUT AND WE'RE IN
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kim carnes on October 28, 2012, 07:39:49 PM
Jesse palmer wants me to fight him
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SPE_khat on October 28, 2012, 07:40:13 PM
There's that talking point from Palmer, "ND's win over OU was better, K-State got lucky with TO's  :barf:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: AbeFroman on October 28, 2012, 07:40:33 PM
Dumbass Palmer just said ND beat us this weekend  :facepalm:
How does this Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) have a job?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: j-dub on October 28, 2012, 07:40:45 PM
Jesse palmer wants me to fight him

i got next  :curse:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: star seed 7 on October 28, 2012, 07:40:48 PM
i don't think any of these people actually watched the nd-ou game...  just looked at the score.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: j-dub on October 28, 2012, 07:41:55 PM
palmer was a shitty career backup unconfident loser.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kslim on October 28, 2012, 07:42:09 PM
eff the other teams, we are #2 and should stay there the rest of the way if we win, computers love us and the big12
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Ira Hayes on October 28, 2012, 07:42:31 PM
There is a clear #2.  Big battle for #3.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Shacks on October 28, 2012, 07:42:56 PM
There's that talking point from Palmer, "ND's win over OU was better, K-State got lucky with TO's  :barf:

If these assholes want to bring margin of victory into this, I'm waiting on them to criticize Notre Dame for close wins against Michigan, Michigan State, Purdue, Stanford and BYU
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kim carnes on October 28, 2012, 07:43:05 PM
David Pollack  :love: :love: :love:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: j-dub on October 28, 2012, 07:43:22 PM
all this "fluky" bullshit talk is pissing me right off
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ednksu on October 28, 2012, 07:43:33 PM
where were you when you found out we were #2?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SPE_khat on October 28, 2012, 07:43:45 PM
Pollack makes me not want to punch Palmer as much
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: star seed 7 on October 28, 2012, 07:44:40 PM
David Pollack  :love: :love: :love:

also the most attractive man on espn.

i'm comfortable saying that.
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 28, 2012, 07:45:44 PM
I'm feeling very good about where we sit  right now
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on October 28, 2012, 07:47:00 PM
God our rankings are so effing glorious!  :dance:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Shacks on October 28, 2012, 07:47:23 PM
all this "fluky" bullshit talk is pissing me right off

It's only fluky if it benefits K-State.  Nothing fluky at all when OU turns it over against Notre Dame or the replay officials beat Stanford, that's just the luck of the Irish.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: chum1 on October 28, 2012, 07:47:52 PM
You know those guys on ESPN are paid to disagree with each other, right?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: wes mantooth on October 28, 2012, 07:48:28 PM
Why don't they bring up that the big 12 is easily the toughest conference top to bottom?  The only reason our remaining schedule appears to be getting easier is because someone has to lose these conference games.  Tcu was ranked a long time but their losses are just a product of a brutal league schedule. 
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Fuktard on October 28, 2012, 07:49:09 PM
Well here's what scares the crap out of me...Oregon actually jumped 2 places in 2 computer polls this week by beating a ONE win Colorado team. 
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 28, 2012, 07:52:14 PM
Well here's what scares the crap out of me...Oregon actually jumped 2 places in 2 computer polls this week by beating a ONE win Colorado team.

Didn't they just pass teams that lost?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MadCat on October 28, 2012, 07:52:32 PM
OkState is 24th....sorry if luked
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Shacks on October 28, 2012, 07:53:00 PM
Why don't they bring up that the big 12 is easily the toughest conference top to bottom?  The only reason our remaining schedule appears to be getting easier is because someone has to lose these conference games.  Tcu was ranked a long time but their losses are just a product of a brutal league schedule.

Yep, that's the same reason so many SEC teams are ranked.  They don't play each other.  Alabama is only going to play one out of Florida/South Carolina/Georgia (none if LSU beats Bama and wins the West).  If Georgia wins out, they win the East but will miss either Alabama or LSU.  Too bad the SEC's dick is firmly down ESPN's throat or else they might look behind the curtain and realize that maybe so many SEC teams are ranked because so many of them don't play each other due to an 8-conference game schedule despite having 14 teams.  Pretty easy for a conference to look good when you only play 2/7 teams from the other half as opposed to a round robin.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Phil Titola on October 28, 2012, 07:56:29 PM
Assuming the human polls basically stay how they are between us and the ducks, their computer ratings have to get up to .94 to jump us...I don't see the computers all of a sudden making Oregon 2 & 3's when they are at 4/4/5/5/8/5 currently.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on October 28, 2012, 07:58:38 PM
Brian Kelly seems like a POS human.  Like if a car filled with a bunch of kids wrecked in front of him and was clearly going to burst into flames in a few minutes he would just drive right on by because it's not his problem and after all he's the coach of ND and has a schedule to maintain.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pendergast on October 28, 2012, 08:00:04 PM
ESPN guy says we're a lock.  :billdance:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kim carnes on October 28, 2012, 08:01:11 PM
ND has no hope
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kslim on October 28, 2012, 08:02:50 PM
ND has no hope

playing pitt wake and bc and more than likely finishing with an unranked usc is the mother of all woof's if it wasnt ND they wouldnt even be in the discussion like louisville
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: wetwillie on October 28, 2012, 08:03:03 PM
does anyone have a pic of fatty flashing the number one after a big win or something?  We don't have a number one on the roster and I can't think of anything more fitting to be on the banner after the mad hatter takes out Alabama this weekend.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Fuktard on October 28, 2012, 08:07:46 PM
Well here's what scares the crap out of me...Oregon actually jumped 2 places in 2 computer polls this week by beating a ONE win Colorado team.

Didn't they just pass teams that lost?

Yes...mainly florida and oregon state.  I've gone back a looked and I still think we are in pretty good shape.  We can move up in a few computer polls given our schedule and oregon looks like they could pass us in only ONE or maybe two polls.  Either way, it will be difficult for them to overtake us....I could see our computer # being .99 or at worst .98 at the end of the year....at .98 that would mean oregon would need to average a ranking of 2.5 in the computer polls to pass us (assuming the harris and coaches poll stay the same).  That would mean they would need to pass either us or alabama in at least half of the computer polls (and they are well behind us/alabama in every poll currently).  I feel a little better.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on October 28, 2012, 08:11:50 PM
So basically from everything I've read and heard it's going to come down to style points and how well the teams left on Oregon's and Our schedule perform. If we can win more impressively than Oregon does then we might steal some more second place votes. If our remaining SOS can remain close with Oregon's (like it currently is) then they won't be able to make up enough ground in the computers to account for their loss of second place votes to us.  Going to be  :ohno: the rest of the season...As if this season wasn't already making me completely unproductive at work and school.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: mocat on October 28, 2012, 08:15:03 PM
I think we all need to take another minute to go back and thank nc state. Fsu is so effing amazing in the computers...flukiest loss of any team all season imo
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 28, 2012, 08:16:38 PM
Feels good man.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SPE_khat on October 28, 2012, 08:17:32 PM
Feels good man.

good feels
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Fuktard on October 28, 2012, 08:18:01 PM
I think we all need to take another minute to go back and thank nc state. Fsu is so effing amazing in the computers...flukiest loss of any team all season imo

Florida State has the second worst computer average of any team in the top 23...or are you being sarcastic...in which case disregard.
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 28, 2012, 08:20:38 PM
Style points don't matter unless people flip their votes in human polls. MOV is no longer a part in any computer poll iirc.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: star seed 7 on October 28, 2012, 08:22:08 PM
Brian Kelly seems like a POS human.  Like if a car filled with a bunch of kids wrecked in front of him and was clearly going to burst into flames in a few minutes he would just drive right on by because it's not his problem and after all he's the coach of ND and has a schedule to maintain.

he has a very bobby pitino aire about it.

both look like scumbag human beings.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on October 28, 2012, 08:23:24 PM
Style points don't matter unless people flip their votes in human polls. MOV is no longer a part in any computer poll iirc.

You are correct.  It only comes into play on the "efficiency" portion of the calculations.  If you score a bunch very quick (few plays) it will help you.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: GoodForAnother on October 28, 2012, 08:23:57 PM
Style points don't matter unless people flip their votes in human polls. MOV is no longer a part in any computer poll iirc.

yeah and voters won't switch unless a team loses, even if oregon beat USC by 1 and we beat OSU by 55 they probably wouldn't switch us. we should still curb stomp everyone just for good measure though.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: WillieWatanabe on October 28, 2012, 08:25:24 PM
i don't think any of these people actually watched the nd-ou game...  just looked at the score.

yeah.

KSU vs. OU - 5 min. to go 24-13
ND vs. OU - 5 min. to go 13-13
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ednksu on October 28, 2012, 08:26:06 PM
can people see the Coach's poll ballots?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Katpappy on October 28, 2012, 08:26:47 PM
Why don't they bring up that the big 12 is easily the toughest conference top to bottom?  The only reason our remaining schedule appears to be getting easier is because someone has to lose these conference games.  Tcu was ranked a long time but their losses are just a product of a brutal league schedule.
They have, it's just hard to understand them with their faces so far up the SEC ass.
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 28, 2012, 08:29:53 PM
can people see the Coach's poll ballots?

Not until the final one iirc
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 06wildcat on October 28, 2012, 08:31:07 PM
Ubben can't read schedules, still thinks ND is going to jump us.  :lol:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on October 28, 2012, 08:34:27 PM
I definitely think style points matter. If we had barely beaten WVU and TTU we would not be receiving any second place votes right now and ND might have jumped us. Coaches look at the box scores and make judgments based on them.
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: The1BigWillie on October 28, 2012, 08:34:39 PM
Super butthurt KU fan on Twitter says Notre Dame will pass us. I asked of this was because math? He get's all huffy and says no it's because they're Notre Dame. Is because ND really > because math?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on October 28, 2012, 08:35:23 PM
Ubben can't read schedules, still thinks ND is going to jump us.  :lol:

Ubben is not the brightest, or maybe just a really big ND fan.  :dunno:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Super PurpleCat on October 28, 2012, 08:35:42 PM
Super butthurt KU fan on Twitter says Notre Dame will pass us. I asked of this was because math? He get's all huffy and says no it's because they're Notre Dame. Is because ND really > because math?

Does he realize that the BCS was created to avoid that sort of name dropping bullshit?   :dubious:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kim carnes on October 28, 2012, 08:35:50 PM
Ubben can't read schedules, still thinks ND is going to jump us.  :lol:

yeah, he is a dumbass.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 06wildcat on October 28, 2012, 08:36:20 PM
Ubben can't read schedules, still thinks ND is going to jump us.  :lol:

Ubben is not the brightest, or maybe just a really big ND fan.  :dunno:

Super buthurt Mizzou fan.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Trim on October 28, 2012, 08:36:37 PM
Good to see mohawk emaw kid during the bcs show.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Super PurpleCat on October 28, 2012, 08:38:07 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FedA00.png&hash=96d72fab302bbb0803b7fe40fe11d202a3bc875f)

Can't tell if ESPN means the BCS race or the Heisman race here...

 :billdance:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: WillieWatanabe on October 28, 2012, 08:38:51 PM
still think we're going to need Oregon to slip up. but whatevs. im along for the ride.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Winters on October 28, 2012, 08:38:59 PM
They really make up for the lack of talk on ESPN with front page pictures on espn.go.com
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Winters on October 28, 2012, 08:39:21 PM
still think we're going to need Oregon to slip up. but whatevs. im along for the ride.
we do
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: michigancat on October 28, 2012, 08:39:29 PM
Well here's what scares the crap out of me...Oregon actually jumped 2 places in 2 computer polls this week by beating a ONE win Colorado team.

Didn't they just pass teams that lost?

Yes...mainly florida and oregon state.  I've gone back a looked and I still think we are in pretty good shape.  We can move up in a few computer polls given our schedule and oregon looks like they could pass us in only ONE or maybe two polls.  Either way, it will be difficult for them to overtake us....I could see our computer # being .99 or at worst .98 at the end of the year....at .98 that would mean oregon would need to average a ranking of 2.5 in the computer polls to pass us (assuming the harris and coaches poll stay the same).  That would mean they would need to pass either us or alabama in at least half of the computer polls (and they are well behind us/alabama in every poll currently).  I feel a little better.


Florida is still ahead of them in a lot of computer rankings. What worries me is UGA, UF, and LSU losing and Oregon passing them - they have quite a room to go up there, while it's virtually impossible for us to get much higher in the computers.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: EMAWmeister on October 28, 2012, 08:44:18 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FedA00.png&hash=96d72fab302bbb0803b7fe40fe11d202a3bc875f)

Can't tell if ESPN means the BCS race or the Heisman race here...

 :billdance:

Everett Golston is not Manti Teo
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on October 28, 2012, 08:49:25 PM
still think we're going to need Oregon to slip up. but whatevs. im along for the ride.

If Oregon doesn't slip up, it greatly helps us for ND to run the table too.  For KSU...4 undefeateds > 3 undefeateds if those 3 are Bama, KSU, and Oregon. 
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Super PurpleCat on October 28, 2012, 08:50:04 PM
Everett Golston is not Manti Teo

 :blush:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 28, 2012, 08:52:20 PM
If Alabama loses at LSU this weekend, none of this crap matters. We'll be in.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kim carnes on October 28, 2012, 08:53:30 PM
If Alabama loses at LSU this weekend, none of this crap matters. We'll be in.

LSU isn't going to score a touchdown
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MadCat on October 28, 2012, 08:53:50 PM
None of this matters.  #fattytakethewheel
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Winters on October 28, 2012, 08:54:12 PM
If Alabama loses at LSU this weekend, none of this crap matters. We'll be in.
Could you just imagine if #FightOn and #GeauxTigers win this weekend....I'm not going to get ahead of myself or anything though
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Super PurpleCat on October 28, 2012, 08:55:04 PM
None of this matters.  #fattytakethewheel
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: "storm"nut on October 28, 2012, 08:56:28 PM
I worry some about Alabama's Computer numbers rising and softening our computer numbers as well as ND's
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheProdigiousTalent on October 28, 2012, 09:00:21 PM
alabama being unanimous as the top team, despite the existence of 4 other high-major, undefeated teams is a pretty amazing example of group-think.
Exactly.  Their best wins are over crap, fringe top-25 teams (Michigan and MSU).  It's incredible.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on October 28, 2012, 09:00:34 PM
Bama still has (1-9) Western Carolina and (1-8) Auburn at home.  :gocho:
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: "storm"nut on October 28, 2012, 09:01:28 PM
Bama still has (1-9) Western Carolina and (1-8) Auburn at home.  :gocho:

Never mind, that helps
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Fuktard on October 28, 2012, 09:01:41 PM
still think we're going to need Oregon to slip up. but whatevs. im along for the ride.
we do

wrong.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: EMAWmeister on October 28, 2012, 09:02:21 PM
Bama still has (1-9) Western Carolina and (1-8) Auburn at home.  :gocho:

I will be wearing my Cam Newton jersey all day for the Iron Bowl
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Winters on October 28, 2012, 09:02:34 PM
still think we're going to need Oregon to slip up. but whatevs. im along for the ride.
we do

wrong.
:blah:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kslim on October 28, 2012, 09:03:47 PM
Quote
david breakneck ubben
The new BCS rankings are out, and here's how I see the Big 12 bowl picture shaking out at season's end:

BCS National Championship Game: Kansas State vs. BCS at-large

dude contradicts himself pretty rough ridin' bad
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MadCat on October 28, 2012, 09:06:54 PM
Quote
david breakneck ubben
The new BCS rankings are out, and here's how I see the Big 12 bowl picture shaking out at season's end:

BCS National Championship Game: Kansas State vs. BCS at-large

dude contradicts himself pretty rough ridin' bad
Better watch himself or he'll turn into Greg Swaim
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Ira Hayes on October 28, 2012, 09:14:30 PM
Well here's what scares the crap out of me...Oregon actually jumped 2 places in 2 computer polls this week by beating a ONE win Colorado team.

Didn't they just pass teams that lost?

Yes...mainly florida and oregon state.  I've gone back a looked and I still think we are in pretty good shape.  We can move up in a few computer polls given our schedule and oregon looks like they could pass us in only ONE or maybe two polls.  Either way, it will be difficult for them to overtake us....I could see our computer # being .99 or at worst .98 at the end of the year....at .98 that would mean oregon would need to average a ranking of 2.5 in the computer polls to pass us (assuming the harris and coaches poll stay the same).  That would mean they would need to pass either us or alabama in at least half of the computer polls (and they are well behind us/alabama in every poll currently).  I feel a little better.


Florida is still ahead of them in a lot of computer rankings. What worries me is UGA, UF, and LSU losing and Oregon passing them - they have quite a room to go up there, while it's virtually impossible for us to get much higher in the computers.

This doesn't happen. Remember that they count votes in the human polls for the BCS formula - not position.

So basically Oregon is ranked about 2.25 and KSU is ranked about 2.75 in both human polls right now. 1/2 position lead in both polls is equal to a 1 position in the computers.  We have a 4 position lead on Oregon in the computers right now which is why the lead is so large. There is no way Oregon passes us in any of the computers if we win out and it is very doubtful that anybody would drop us in the human polls.

This is locked up if we take care of business.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Fuktard on October 28, 2012, 09:19:26 PM
Don't be surprised if Florida stays ahead of Oregon in a few of the computer polls (they are currently ahead of them in 4 of the 6 polls).  FL has a solid next 4 games (Mizz, ULL, Jacksonville State, FSU), maybe better than Oregons.  That could be a dagger in Oregons chances.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kim carnes on October 28, 2012, 09:20:55 PM
Well here's what scares the crap out of me...Oregon actually jumped 2 places in 2 computer polls this week by beating a ONE win Colorado team.

Didn't they just pass teams that lost?

Yes...mainly florida and oregon state.  I've gone back a looked and I still think we are in pretty good shape.  We can move up in a few computer polls given our schedule and oregon looks like they could pass us in only ONE or maybe two polls.  Either way, it will be difficult for them to overtake us....I could see our computer # being .99 or at worst .98 at the end of the year....at .98 that would mean oregon would need to average a ranking of 2.5 in the computer polls to pass us (assuming the harris and coaches poll stay the same).  That would mean they would need to pass either us or alabama in at least half of the computer polls (and they are well behind us/alabama in every poll currently).  I feel a little better.


Florida is still ahead of them in a lot of computer rankings. What worries me is UGA, UF, and LSU losing and Oregon passing them - they have quite a room to go up there, while it's virtually impossible for us to get much higher in the computers.

This doesn't happen. Remember that they count votes in the human polls for the BCS formula - not position.

So basically Oregon is ranked about 2.25 and KSU is ranked about 2.75 in both human polls right now. 1/2 position lead in both polls is equal to a 1 position in the computers.  We have a 4 position lead on Oregon in the computers right now which is why the lead is so large. There is no way Oregon passes us in any of the computers if we win out and it is very doubtful that anybody would drop us in the human polls.

This is locked up if we take care of business.

they don't have to pass us in the computers to pass us in the bcs
Title: Re: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: michigancat on October 28, 2012, 09:27:09 PM
Well here's what scares the crap out of me...Oregon actually jumped 2 places in 2 computer polls this week by beating a ONE win Colorado team.

Didn't they just pass teams that lost?

Yes...mainly florida and oregon state.  I've gone back a looked and I still think we are in pretty good shape.  We can move up in a few computer polls given our schedule and oregon looks like they could pass us in only ONE or maybe two polls.  Either way, it will be difficult for them to overtake us....I could see our computer # being .99 or at worst .98 at the end of the year....at .98 that would mean oregon would need to average a ranking of 2.5 in the computer polls to pass us (assuming the harris and coaches poll stay the same).  That would mean they would need to pass either us or alabama in at least half of the computer polls (and they are well behind us/alabama in every poll currently).  I feel a little better.


Florida is still ahead of them in a lot of computer rankings. What worries me is UGA, UF, and LSU losing and Oregon passing them - they have quite a room to go up there, while it's virtually impossible for us to get much higher in the computers.

This doesn't happen. Remember that they count votes in the human polls for the BCS formula - not position.

So basically Oregon is ranked about 2.25 and KSU is ranked about 2.75 in both human polls right now. 1/2 position lead in both polls is equal to a 1 position in the computers.  We have a 4 position lead on Oregon in the computers right now which is why the lead is so large. There is no way Oregon passes us in any of the computers if we win out and it is very doubtful that anybody would drop us in the human polls.

This is locked up if we take care of business.

they don't have to pass us in the computers to pass us in the bcs

Yep, they just need to reduce the gap. The fact that our lead over Oregon is so large means that when teams ranked between us in the computers lose, they can easily make up a lot of ground. LSU losing to Bama and UF losing to fsu could reduce the gap for them sufficiently.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on October 28, 2012, 09:28:08 PM
Well here's what scares the crap out of me...Oregon actually jumped 2 places in 2 computer polls this week by beating a ONE win Colorado team.

Didn't they just pass teams that lost?

Yes...mainly florida and oregon state.  I've gone back a looked and I still think we are in pretty good shape.  We can move up in a few computer polls given our schedule and oregon looks like they could pass us in only ONE or maybe two polls.  Either way, it will be difficult for them to overtake us....I could see our computer # being .99 or at worst .98 at the end of the year....at .98 that would mean oregon would need to average a ranking of 2.5 in the computer polls to pass us (assuming the harris and coaches poll stay the same).  That would mean they would need to pass either us or alabama in at least half of the computer polls (and they are well behind us/alabama in every poll currently).  I feel a little better.


Florida is still ahead of them in a lot of computer rankings. What worries me is UGA, UF, and LSU losing and Oregon passing them - they have quite a room to go up there, while it's virtually impossible for us to get much higher in the computers.

This doesn't happen. Remember that they count votes in the human polls for the BCS formula - not position.

So basically Oregon is ranked about 2.25 and KSU is ranked about 2.75 in both human polls right now. 1/2 position lead in both polls is equal to a 1 position in the computers.  We have a 4 position lead on Oregon in the computers right now which is why the lead is so large. There is no way Oregon passes us in any of the computers if we win out and it is very doubtful that anybody would drop us in the human polls.

This is locked up if we take care of business.

they don't have to pass us in the computers to pass us in the bcs

True but they have to make a considerable advancement. Florida, UGA, ND, and LSU winning all hurt Oregon's chance to make that leap.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kslim on October 28, 2012, 09:29:04 PM
somebody tell me who to  :emawkid: for other than usc kthanxbye
Title: Re: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: michigancat on October 28, 2012, 09:30:14 PM
Well here's what scares the crap out of me...Oregon actually jumped 2 places in 2 computer polls this week by beating a ONE win Colorado team.

Didn't they just pass teams that lost?

Yes...mainly florida and oregon state.  I've gone back a looked and I still think we are in pretty good shape.  We can move up in a few computer polls given our schedule and oregon looks like they could pass us in only ONE or maybe two polls.  Either way, it will be difficult for them to overtake us....I could see our computer # being .99 or at worst .98 at the end of the year....at .98 that would mean oregon would need to average a ranking of 2.5 in the computer polls to pass us (assuming the harris and coaches poll stay the same).  That would mean they would need to pass either us or alabama in at least half of the computer polls (and they are well behind us/alabama in every poll currently).  I feel a little better.


Florida is still ahead of them in a lot of computer rankings. What worries me is UGA, UF, and LSU losing and Oregon passing them - they have quite a room to go up there, while it's virtually impossible for us to get much higher in the computers.

This doesn't happen. Remember that they count votes in the human polls for the BCS formula - not position.

So basically Oregon is ranked about 2.25 and KSU is ranked about 2.75 in both human polls right now. 1/2 position lead in both polls is equal to a 1 position in the computers.  We have a 4 position lead on Oregon in the computers right now which is why the lead is so large. There is no way Oregon passes us in any of the computers if we win out and it is very doubtful that anybody would drop us in the human polls.

This is locked up if we take care of business.

they don't have to pass us in the computers to pass us in the bcs

True but they have to make a considerable advancement. Florida, UGA, ND, and LSU winning all hurt Oregon's chance to make that leap.

LSU will lose, and UF will probably lose to FSU.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 28, 2012, 09:30:37 PM
Hopefully all 3 of these other posers lose so we get a shot at Louisville for the NC
Title: Re: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: michigancat on October 28, 2012, 09:31:34 PM
somebody tell me who to  :emawkid: for other than usc kthanxbye

LSU over Bama, OSU over Oregon, Pitt over ND.
Title: Re: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Ira Hayes on October 28, 2012, 09:40:58 PM
Well here's what scares the crap out of me...Oregon actually jumped 2 places in 2 computer polls this week by beating a ONE win Colorado team.

Didn't they just pass teams that lost?

Yes...mainly florida and oregon state.  I've gone back a looked and I still think we are in pretty good shape.  We can move up in a few computer polls given our schedule and oregon looks like they could pass us in only ONE or maybe two polls.  Either way, it will be difficult for them to overtake us....I could see our computer # being .99 or at worst .98 at the end of the year....at .98 that would mean oregon would need to average a ranking of 2.5 in the computer polls to pass us (assuming the harris and coaches poll stay the same).  That would mean they would need to pass either us or alabama in at least half of the computer polls (and they are well behind us/alabama in every poll currently).  I feel a little better.


Florida is still ahead of them in a lot of computer rankings. What worries me is UGA, UF, and LSU losing and Oregon passing them - they have quite a room to go up there, while it's virtually impossible for us to get much higher in the computers.

This doesn't happen. Remember that they count votes in the human polls for the BCS formula - not position.

So basically Oregon is ranked about 2.25 and KSU is ranked about 2.75 in both human polls right now. 1/2 position lead in both polls is equal to a 1 position in the computers.  We have a 4 position lead on Oregon in the computers right now which is why the lead is so large. There is no way Oregon passes us in any of the computers if we win out and it is very doubtful that anybody would drop us in the human polls.

This is locked up if we take care of business.

they don't have to pass us in the computers to pass us in the bcs

Yep, they just need to reduce the gap. The fact that our lead over Oregon is so large means that when teams ranked between us in the computers lose, they can easily make up a lot of ground. LSU losing to Bama and UF losing to fsu could reduce the gap for them sufficiently.

I just did the math.  If Oregon were one spot behind us in every single computer they would be at .9403 which is just barely ahead of our .9400.

But, more importantly, Alabama is one of the teams between KSU and Oregon in four of the six computers.

It is not happening.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on October 28, 2012, 09:41:18 PM
So holding the Harris and Coaches equal as of today Oregon needs to gain .08 on us in the computers in order to be ranked second.  :ohno:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on October 28, 2012, 09:51:24 PM
Not really sure what this means, other than ND is mumped, but I'll just post it anyway. 

Five of the Six computer polls have released their full rankings.  The average ranking of the remaining opponents for each team are:

Oregon - 29.25 (USC - 20.2, Cal - 74.0, Stanford - 12.8, Oregon St. - 10.0)
KSU - 36.85 (OSU - 27.5, TCU - 43.2, Baylor - 55.8, UT - 20.6)
ND - 71.1 (Pitt - 82.8, Wake - 74.4, BC - 107.0, USC - 20.2)

Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Rams on October 28, 2012, 09:53:20 PM
I'm so glad you all are worrying about this for me.  seems like a lot of work.

I'll be over here  :emawkid: :dance: :ksu: if anybody needs me.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on October 28, 2012, 10:00:08 PM
I'm so glad you all are worrying about this for me.  seems like a lot of work.

I'll be over here  :emawkid: :dance: :ksu: if anybody needs me.

At this point it's about 50/50 Worry/Fascination for me. Really interesting stuff for a CFB and KSU junkie like myself.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: michigancat on October 28, 2012, 10:01:39 PM
I just did the math.  If Oregon were one spot behind us in every single computer they would be at .9403 which is just barely ahead of our .9400.

But, more importantly, Alabama is one of the teams between KSU and Oregon in four of the six computers.

It is not happening.

I'm going to trust your math and just :gocho: so rough ridin' hard all day tomorrow.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Rams on October 28, 2012, 10:07:47 PM
I'm so glad you all are worrying about this for me.  seems like a lot of work.

I'll be over here  :emawkid: :dance: :ksu: if anybody needs me.

At this point it's about 50/50 Worry/Fascination for me. Really interesting stuff for a CFB and KSU junkie like myself.

oh I'm not judging anybody.  I love it.  I just don't have the patience/give-a-crap level to follow it that closely and go through all the variables.  this is turning into cigar thread 2.0 for me.  :thumbs:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Fuktard on October 28, 2012, 10:31:27 PM
LOL at Oregon for not scheduling a better non-con....what a bunch of pussies.  Gonna bite them in the ass.  Serves them right for not wanting to play anyone worth a crap.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Panjandrum on October 28, 2012, 10:54:51 PM
Not really sure what this means, other than ND is mumped, but I'll just post it anyway. 

Five of the Six computer polls have released their full rankings.  The average ranking of the remaining opponents for each team are:

Oregon - 29.25 (USC - 20.2, Cal - 74.0, Stanford - 12.8, Oregon St. - 10.0)
KSU - 36.85 (OSU - 27.5, TCU - 43.2, Baylor - 55.8, UT - 20.6)
ND - 71.1 (Pitt - 82.8, Wake - 74.4, BC - 107.0, USC - 20.2)

It means that if Oregon and ND win out, they hurt each other because they devalue their two of their best wins in Stanford and USC.

The more Oregon beats down USC, the more ND is screwed.  If Oregon beats down Stanford, ND is screwed.

If USC beats either or both of them, they're screwed.

Their schedules are intertwined.  Them winning out hurts each other.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: doom on October 28, 2012, 10:56:58 PM
Not really sure what this means, other than ND is mumped, but I'll just post it anyway. 

Five of the Six computer polls have released their full rankings.  The average ranking of the remaining opponents for each team are:

Oregon - 29.25 (USC - 20.2, Cal - 74.0, Stanford - 12.8, Oregon St. - 10.0)
KSU - 36.85 (OSU - 27.5, TCU - 43.2, Baylor - 55.8, UT - 20.6)
ND - 71.1 (Pitt - 82.8, Wake - 74.4, BC - 107.0, USC - 20.2)

It means that if Oregon and ND win out, they hurt each other because they devalue their two of their best wins in Stanford and USC.

The more Oregon beats down USC, the more ND is screwed.  If Oregon beats down Stanford, ND is screwed.

If USC beats either or both of them, they're screwed.

Their schedules are intertwined.  Them winning out hurts each other.

But if USC beats ND, and loses out to Oregon, that's bad for us, right?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Panjandrum on October 28, 2012, 11:05:47 PM
Not really sure what this means, other than ND is mumped, but I'll just post it anyway. 

Five of the Six computer polls have released their full rankings.  The average ranking of the remaining opponents for each team are:

Oregon - 29.25 (USC - 20.2, Cal - 74.0, Stanford - 12.8, Oregon St. - 10.0)
KSU - 36.85 (OSU - 27.5, TCU - 43.2, Baylor - 55.8, UT - 20.6)
ND - 71.1 (Pitt - 82.8, Wake - 74.4, BC - 107.0, USC - 20.2)

It means that if Oregon and ND win out, they hurt each other because they devalue their two of their best wins in Stanford and USC.

The more Oregon beats down USC, the more ND is screwed.  If Oregon beats down Stanford, ND is screwed.

If USC beats either or both of them, they're screwed.

Their schedules are intertwined.  Them winning out hurts each other.

But if USC beats ND, and loses out to Oregon, that's bad for us, right?

It will help Oregon, but a four-loss USC doesn't help anybody, especially Oregon.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on October 28, 2012, 11:09:08 PM
Not really sure what this means, other than ND is mumped, but I'll just post it anyway. 

Five of the Six computer polls have released their full rankings.  The average ranking of the remaining opponents for each team are:

Oregon - 29.25 (USC - 20.2, Cal - 74.0, Stanford - 12.8, Oregon St. - 10.0)
KSU - 36.85 (OSU - 27.5, TCU - 43.2, Baylor - 55.8, UT - 20.6)
ND - 71.1 (Pitt - 82.8, Wake - 74.4, BC - 107.0, USC - 20.2)

It means that if Oregon and ND win out, they hurt each other because they devalue their two of their best wins in Stanford and USC.

The more Oregon beats down USC, the more ND is screwed.  If Oregon beats down Stanford, ND is screwed.

If USC beats either or both of them, they're screwed.

Their schedules are intertwined.  Them winning out hurts each other.

But if USC beats ND, and loses out to Oregon, that's bad for us, right?

Yeah. We need USC to beat both or lose to both. If they beat ND and lose to Oregon we are mumped.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Bookcat on October 28, 2012, 11:25:25 PM
Not really sure what this means, other than ND is mumped, but I'll just post it anyway. 

Five of the Six computer polls have released their full rankings.  The average ranking of the remaining opponents for each team are:

Oregon - 29.25 (USC - 20.2, Cal - 74.0, Stanford - 12.8, Oregon St. - 10.0)
KSU - 36.85 (OSU - 27.5, TCU - 43.2, Baylor - 55.8, UT - 20.6)
ND - 71.1 (Pitt - 82.8, Wake - 74.4, BC - 107.0, USC - 20.2)

It means that if Oregon and ND win out, they hurt each other because they devalue their two of their best wins in Stanford and USC.

The more Oregon beats down USC, the more ND is screwed.  If Oregon beats down Stanford, ND is screwed.

If USC beats either or both of them, they're screwed.

Their schedules are intertwined.  Them winning out hurts each other.

But if USC beats ND, and loses out to Oregon, that's bad for us, right?

Yeah. We need USC to beat both or lose to both. If they beat ND and lose to Oregon we are mumped.

no, if Kstate loses...that would probably be the worst.... :bill:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Domino on October 28, 2012, 11:40:44 PM
Not really sure what this means, other than ND is mumped, but I'll just post it anyway. 

Five of the Six computer polls have released their full rankings.  The average ranking of the remaining opponents for each team are:

Oregon - 29.25 (USC - 20.2, Cal - 74.0, Stanford - 12.8, Oregon St. - 10.0)
KSU - 36.85 (OSU - 27.5, TCU - 43.2, Baylor - 55.8, UT - 20.6)
ND - 71.1 (Pitt - 82.8, Wake - 74.4, BC - 107.0, USC - 20.2)

Oregon's has to get worse though, since Stanford plays Oregon st.

Of course, KSU's will also take a hit.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 28, 2012, 11:55:56 PM
Not really sure what this means, other than ND is mumped, but I'll just post it anyway. 

Five of the Six computer polls have released their full rankings.  The average ranking of the remaining opponents for each team are:

Oregon - 29.25 (USC - 20.2, Cal - 74.0, Stanford - 12.8, Oregon St. - 10.0)
KSU - 36.85 (OSU - 27.5, TCU - 43.2, Baylor - 55.8, UT - 20.6)
ND - 71.1 (Pitt - 82.8, Wake - 74.4, BC - 107.0, USC - 20.2)

Oregon's has to get worse though, since Stanford plays Oregon st.

Of course, KSU's will also take a hit.

I don't think games between conference opponents really affect SOS at all. The loser will drop in the rankings, and the winner will go up.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 28, 2012, 11:56:54 PM
If Oregon is going to lose a game, I think it will be to Stanford, fwiw. Stanford sucks, but USC is pillowy-soft.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: star seed 7 on October 29, 2012, 12:00:39 AM
what if ou loses all their remaining games!  wouldn't hurt us because of conference loses, but ND would be screwed!!!

 :ksu:

i love what if games.

*oh, and it would be glorious because eff OU*
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: jtksu on October 29, 2012, 12:01:53 AM
If Oregon is going to lose a game, I think it will be to Stanford, fwiw. Stanford sucks, but USC is pillowy-soft.

True but USC is one of the few teams in the country that has the talent to match up with Oregon.  I don't see anyone not called KState or Bama beating them, FWIW.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Shacks on October 29, 2012, 12:15:03 AM
If Oregon is going to lose a game, I think it will be to Stanford, fwiw. Stanford sucks, but USC is pillowy-soft.

Stanford matches up horribly with Oregon, they do not have the defensive speed to hang with them and the game is in Eugene.  The Ducks will mercilessly slaughter them.

USC has a chance because they have the size and speed and talent to stop Oregon's offense but they have to play a smart, disciplined game.  Missed tackles or assignments kill you against the Ducks.  USC must control the clock when they're on offense so their lack of depth on defense doesn't hurt them late in the game.  Also helps that USC gets the Ducks at home, Oregon is a different team away from Autzen.  Plus, Oregon hasn't had to play a complete game yet this year.  Who knows how they will respond to having to play their starters all four quarters.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 29, 2012, 12:20:33 AM
If Oregon is going to lose a game, I think it will be to Stanford, fwiw. Stanford sucks, but USC is pillowy-soft.

Stanford matches up horribly with Oregon, they do not have the defensive speed to hang with them and the game is in Eugene.  The Ducks will mercilessly slaughter them.

USC has a chance because they have the size and speed and talent to stop Oregon's offense but they have to play a smart, disciplined game.  Missed tackles or assignments kill you against the Ducks.  USC must control the clock when they're on offense so their lack of depth on defense doesn't hurt them late in the game.  Also helps that USC gets the Ducks at home, Oregon is a different team away from Autzen.  Plus, Oregon hasn't had to play a complete game yet this year.  Who knows how they will respond to having to play their starters all four quarters.

I really don't think Oregon will lose either game. I think Stanford is better up front than USC, though.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Shacks on October 29, 2012, 01:06:39 AM
If Oregon is going to lose a game, I think it will be to Stanford, fwiw. Stanford sucks, but USC is pillowy-soft.

Stanford matches up horribly with Oregon, they do not have the defensive speed to hang with them and the game is in Eugene.  The Ducks will mercilessly slaughter them.

USC has a chance because they have the size and speed and talent to stop Oregon's offense but they have to play a smart, disciplined game.  Missed tackles or assignments kill you against the Ducks.  USC must control the clock when they're on offense so their lack of depth on defense doesn't hurt them late in the game.  Also helps that USC gets the Ducks at home, Oregon is a different team away from Autzen.  Plus, Oregon hasn't had to play a complete game yet this year.  Who knows how they will respond to having to play their starters all four quarters.

I really don't think Oregon will lose either game. I think Stanford is better up front than USC, though.

Oregon is the clear favorite in both matchups, I would be surprised if they lost either game.  I give USC a 30% chance of winning and Stanford a 5% chance.

USC has a very good defensive line - that unit was supposed to be a weakness coming into the season but it's been great at pressuring the QB and controlling the line of scrimmage.  Kiffin pulled a Snyder and found a Juco DITR with DE Morgan Breslin, the guy is a monster.  All of their linebackers are like the poor man's Arthur.  USC definitely has the talent and ability on defense to slow down Oregon, but they cannot continue committing stupid penalties.  Their defensive stat line in their last game (588 yards and 39 points in Arizona loss) is very misleading.   I watched that game on ESPN3 last night (USC is my second team, I'm from Southern California).  Turnovers kept putting their defense in a bad spot, and like I said, they have to be able to control the clock when they have the ball so their defense doesn't get worn down and they stay fresh.  Oregon's freshman QB Mariota has looked great this year, but he has yet to face any adversity.  Gonna be interesting to see what happens if USC's defensive line can rattle him early.

If USC makes stupid mistakes early or plays sloppy like they have so often, it could very easily be a big Oregon win.  However, I've watched all of USC's games this year and it really feels like Kiffin has been handcuffing his offense in preparation for the month of November, when they have their toughest stretch of games.  I expect to see big numbers from the Trojan offense, should be fun to see if their defense can step up to the challenge.
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: felix rex on October 29, 2012, 01:22:27 AM
The Trojans recruit specifically to beat Oregon. That's the talking point I'm pinning my hopes on.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: AbeFroman on October 29, 2012, 01:24:45 AM
Games like this is what Kiffin lives for. He doesn't care about Arizona. He wants to win games like these :crossfingers:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Shacks on October 29, 2012, 01:26:26 AM
The Trojans recruit specifically to beat Oregon. That's the talking point I'm pinning my hopes on.

Whenever one team starts to dominate a conference, the rest of the conference recruits specifically to beat them.  Happened with USC when Carroll was around, Nebraska when they had Osborne and it's starting to happen in the SEC with Alabama/Saban.
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: felix rex on October 29, 2012, 02:33:57 AM
Yep. USC recruits lots of safeties and turns them into linebackers. As a result, they match up with Oregon and get pushed around by Stanford. But maybe that means they also get pushed around  by ND?

Dammit I may need a new talking point.
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 29, 2012, 06:16:36 AM
what if ou loses all their remaining games!  wouldn't hurt us because of conference loses, but ND would be screwed!!!

 :ksu:

i love what if games.

*oh, and it would be glorious because eff OU*

ND is a non factor
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Stupid Fitz on October 29, 2012, 06:34:09 AM
what if ou loses all their remaining games!  wouldn't hurt us because of conference loses, but ND would be screwed!!!

 :ksu:

i love what if games.

*oh, and it would be glorious because eff OU*

ND is a non factor

Can you make me feel better about this because I think they are going to do everything they can to get ND in the game over our Kats. 
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on October 29, 2012, 06:44:51 AM
what if ou loses all their remaining games!  wouldn't hurt us because of conference loses, but ND would be screwed!!!

 :ksu:

i love what if games.

*oh, and it would be glorious because eff OU*

ND is a non factor

Can you make me feel better about this because I think they are going to do everything they can to get ND in the game over our Kats.


If they wanted ND in the championship game and were going to put them ahead of us through the polls, they would have done it after this past weekend. They didn't. They won't the next 3 weeks because ND plays crap teams. The only chance they get is when ND plays USC thanksgiving weekend, and it will take a large portion of voters in each poll to do it because NDs computer rankings are going to fall the next 3 weeks. 
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SlipperyPete on October 29, 2012, 07:25:04 AM
If they wanted ND in the championship game and were going to put them ahead of us through the polls, they would have done it after this past weekend. They didn't. They won't the next 3 weeks because ND plays crap teams. The only chance they get is when ND plays USC thanksgiving weekend, and it will take a large portion of voters in each poll to do it because NDs computer rankings are going to fall the next 3 weeks.
I think the problem is that they'll look at us like we have to earn our way in, while ND will have to earn their way out. I mean, everyone knows ND beat Stanford on a bullshit call, yet somehow it's our resume getting questioned because we didn't beat OU badly enough.

If we play like the last two weeks, we're good. But if we squeak one out ala Iowa St., and ND puts a thumping on one of their cupcakes, I expect tons of talk about moving them ahead.

First post, BTW. Gotta post a dancing Snyder just to say I did.  :billdance:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: star seed 7 on October 29, 2012, 07:28:15 AM
what if ou loses all their remaining games!  wouldn't hurt us because of conference loses, but ND would be screwed!!!

 :ksu:

i love what if games.

*oh, and it would be glorious because eff OU*

ND is a non factor

Just pud sd here not realizing that was more about eff ou than nd being a factor.    :dubious:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 29, 2012, 07:28:32 AM
If they wanted ND in the championship game and were going to put them ahead of us through the polls, they would have done it after this past weekend. They didn't. They won't the next 3 weeks because ND plays crap teams. The only chance they get is when ND plays USC thanksgiving weekend, and it will take a large portion of voters in each poll to do it because NDs computer rankings are going to fall the next 3 weeks.
I think the problem is that they'll look at us like we have to earn our way in, while ND will have to earn their way out. I mean, everyone knows ND beat Stanford on a bullshit call, yet somehow it's our resume getting questioned because we didn't beat OU badly enough.

If we play like the last two weeks, we're good. But if we squeak one out ala Iowa St., and ND puts a thumping on one of their cupcakes, I expect tons of talk about moving them ahead.

First post, BTW. Gotta post a dancing Snyder just to say I did.  :billdance:

JFC people. There is no possible way ND can pass us other than us losing a game. They are a complete non-factor other than we want them to beat USC so the Oregon USC win(s) are devalued. They are currently tied with us in computer rankings. After the next four games (if we both win out) we will have a sizeable lead on them in the computers.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 29, 2012, 07:32:54 AM
This guy "gets it"

http://bcsguru.blogspot.com/2012/10/odds-are-itll-be-bama-vs-k-state.html

Quote
Kansas State: The Wildcats are tied with Notre Dame atop the computer rankings and have made up considerable ground on Oregon in both polls. K-State will benefit from playing potentially two more ranked teams this season (Oklahoma State and Texas) and the absence of a Big 12 title game probably won't hurt too much. Ideally, the Wildcats will want the Irish to also finish undefeated, thus providing a buffer in the computer ratings to hold off Oregon. (75%)

the above is also why we want OU to win out, we need ND to stay ahead of Oregon in the computers.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 29, 2012, 07:46:51 AM
what if ou loses all their remaining games!  wouldn't hurt us because of conference loses, but ND would be screwed!!!

 :ksu:

i love what if games.

*oh, and it would be glorious because eff OU*

ND is a non factor

Just pud sd here not realizing that was more about eff ou than nd being a factor.    :dubious:

well, stud sd cares more about the purple cats than he does about your powerespect anti-OU agenda.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Saulbadguy on October 29, 2012, 07:49:08 AM
Fiesta Bowl vs Notre Dame would be a good consolation prize if we miss out on MNC, imo.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: star seed 7 on October 29, 2012, 07:54:08 AM
what if ou loses all their remaining games!  wouldn't hurt us because of conference loses, but ND would be screwed!!!

 :ksu:

i love what if games.

*oh, and it would be glorious because eff OU*

ND is a non factor

Just pud sd here not realizing that was more about eff ou than nd being a factor.    :dubious:

well, stud sd cares more about the purple cats than he does about your powerespect anti-OU agenda.

Non-stud and very pud sd doesn't realize a not serious post.

Anyway, we clearly want osu to lose all their games since they lost to ariz who lost to oregon.   Sheesh.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 29, 2012, 07:56:02 AM
what if ou loses all their remaining games!  wouldn't hurt us because of conference loses, but ND would be screwed!!!

 :ksu:

i love what if games.

*oh, and it would be glorious because eff OU*

ND is a non factor

Just pud sd here not realizing that was more about eff ou than nd being a factor.    :dubious:

well, stud sd cares more about the purple cats than he does about your powerespect anti-OU agenda.

Non-stud and very pud sd doesn't realize a not serious post.

Anyway, we clearly want osu to lose all their games since they lost to ariz who lost to oregon.   Sheesh.

so you went from anti-ND to anti-OU to not-serious....better just leave this thread to the rest of us
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: star seed 7 on October 29, 2012, 07:58:41 AM
Never go head to head with sd  :embarrassed:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 29, 2012, 08:00:11 AM
Never go head to head with sd  :embarrassed:

No, I was mean. We are friends!
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: "storm"nut on October 29, 2012, 08:23:07 AM
If they wanted ND in the championship game and were going to put them ahead of us through the polls, they would have done it after this past weekend. They didn't. They won't the next 3 weeks because ND plays crap teams. The only chance they get is when ND plays USC thanksgiving weekend, and it will take a large portion of voters in each poll to do it because NDs computer rankings are going to fall the next 3 weeks.
I think the problem is that they'll look at us like we have to earn our way in, while ND will have to earn their way out. I mean, everyone knows ND beat Stanford on a bullshit call, yet somehow it's our resume getting questioned because we didn't beat OU badly enough.

If we play like the last two weeks, we're good. But if we squeak one out ala Iowa St., and ND puts a thumping on one of their cupcakes, I expect tons of talk about moving them ahead.

First post, BTW. Gotta post a dancing Snyder just to say I did.  :billdance:

JFC people. There is no possible way ND can pass us other than us losing a game. They are a complete non-factor other than we want them to beat USC so the Oregon USC win(s) are devalued. They are currently tied with us in computer rankings. After the next four games (if we both win out) we will have a sizeable lead on them in the computers.

ND, Alabama, and Florida (with a little LSU mixed in) are our firewall in the computers. Oregon has to burn threw them to get to us.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kso_FAN on October 29, 2012, 08:39:41 AM
Fiesta Bowl vs Notre Dame would be a good consolation prize if we miss out on MNC, imo.

I agree completely.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: "storm"nut on October 29, 2012, 08:49:05 AM
Another wildcard is going to be Louisville. If they stay undefeated through out they could move ahead of Oregon in a few of the computer polls.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: CHONGS on October 29, 2012, 08:50:55 AM
can you believe this season?

so amazing and wonderful!
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: scottwildcat on October 29, 2012, 08:51:28 AM
Another wildcard is going to be Louisville. If they stay undefeated through out they could move ahead of Oregon in a few of the computer polls.

meh doubt it
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: "storm"nut on October 29, 2012, 08:56:27 AM
Another wildcard is going to be Louisville. If they stay undefeated through out they could move ahead of Oregon in a few of the computer polls.

meh doubt it

If you look at some of the teams that are in front of them in some of the rankings they have a good shot. Not say all of them but every one that does helps us in our computer margin against Oregon.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 29, 2012, 09:39:31 AM
http://espn.go.com/blog/ncfnation/post/_/id/69764/wildcats-irish

 :thumbs:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: CNS on October 29, 2012, 09:44:43 AM
Quote
The last thing Notre Dame would have to worry about was a seemingly good but not great Big 12 team led by a 70-something coach and a quarterback nicknamed after a Transformer. How could Kansas State -- owner of five winning seasons between 1935 and 1990 -- possibly win a beauty contest against Notre Dame?

What.

The.

eff?????
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: mocat on October 29, 2012, 09:45:30 AM
Quote
The last thing Notre Dame would have to worry about was a seemingly good but not great Big 12 team led by a 70-something coach and a quarterback nicknamed after a Transformer. How could Kansas State -- owner of five winning seasons between 1935 and 1990 -- possibly win a beauty contest against Notre Dame?

What.

The.

eff?????

that was the perception at the beginning of the season
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MadCat on October 29, 2012, 09:48:46 AM
Would like to see Bill scheme-slap that defense just for fun.  Might end up being another Iowa State though.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ednksu on October 29, 2012, 09:53:19 AM
How about ND, O, and Bama just lose out? :ksu:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 29, 2012, 09:54:22 AM
How about ND, O, and Bama just lose out? :ksu:

I still think that only 2 of the 4 win out
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Fuktard on October 29, 2012, 09:54:32 AM
This guy "gets it"

http://bcsguru.blogspot.com/2012/10/odds-are-itll-be-bama-vs-k-state.html

Quote
Kansas State: The Wildcats are tied with Notre Dame atop the computer rankings and have made up considerable ground on Oregon in both polls. K-State will benefit from playing potentially two more ranked teams this season (Oklahoma State and Texas) and the absence of a Big 12 title game probably won't hurt too much. Ideally, the Wildcats will want the Irish to also finish undefeated, thus providing a buffer in the computer ratings to hold off Oregon. (75%)

the above is also why we want OU to win out, we need ND to stay ahead of Oregon in the computers.

I've been thinking/worrying...something that MAY hurt us...again, no idea how these damn computers work, but if Bama would pass us up in some polls because of their title game, that would be bad.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MadCat on October 29, 2012, 09:57:22 AM
This guy "gets it"

http://bcsguru.blogspot.com/2012/10/odds-are-itll-be-bama-vs-k-state.html

Quote
Kansas State: The Wildcats are tied with Notre Dame atop the computer rankings and have made up considerable ground on Oregon in both polls. K-State will benefit from playing potentially two more ranked teams this season (Oklahoma State and Texas) and the absence of a Big 12 title game probably won't hurt too much. Ideally, the Wildcats will want the Irish to also finish undefeated, thus providing a buffer in the computer ratings to hold off Oregon. (75%)

the above is also why we want OU to win out, we need ND to stay ahead of Oregon in the computers.

I've been thinking/worrying...something that MAY hurt us...again, no idea how these damn computers work, but if Bama would pass us up in some polls because of their title game, that would be bad.

Probably.  Assuming everybody wins their remaining 4-5 games.  I'm curious whether this will actually convince the Big 12 to get the Dr. Pepper game back.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MadCat on October 29, 2012, 10:01:18 AM
http://espn.go.com/blog/ncfnation/post/_/id/69764/wildcats-irish

 :thumbs:

 :sdeek: http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=24041.msg648976#msg648976 (http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=24041.msg648976#msg648976)
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Institutional Control on October 29, 2012, 10:05:55 AM
http://www.outkickthecoverage.com/the-bcs-mess-pointspread-projections-for-the-8-national-title-contenders.php
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: The Whale on October 29, 2012, 10:42:00 AM
So what I got out of this thread is that we ought to be thanking Ron Prince for scheduling Miami -- replacing it with an early season game against a Missouri State type would have us on the outside looking in.

#RonP4AD
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on October 29, 2012, 10:57:10 AM
I'll admit I have no idea what the computer algorithms are, but I'm looking at some of the actual computer rankings and I have a hard time seeing Oregon move up in all of them to pass KSU, ND, and Bama.  Everyone knows they are behind us, but in some there have some decent sized gaps to make up in the individual computers rankings.

 

I'm sure they'll catch up in 2-3, but that is alot of ground to make up if they want to pass enough people in all 5 to catch up in the computers.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: michigancat on October 29, 2012, 11:11:06 AM
I'll admit I have no idea what the computer algorithms are, but I'm looking at some of the actual computer rankings and I have a hard time seeing Oregon move up in all of them to pass KSU, ND, and Bama.  Everyone knows they are behind us, but in some there have some decent sized gaps to make up in the individual computers rankings.

  • Sagarin: 1. KSU 99.78, 2. ND 97.30.....8. Oregon 90.78 (this is already Oregon's toss-out low)
  • Colley: 1. ND 1.01, 2. Bama .96, 3. KSU .95...5. Oregon .89
  • Wolfe: 1. KSU 9.96, 2. ND 9.85, 3. Bama 9.34...5. Oregon 8.83
  • Anderson: 1. KSU .843, 2. ND .838...3. Bama .814 4. Oregon .802
  • Billingsly: 1. Bama 320.4, 2. ND 320.2, 3. KSU 318.7.... 4. Oregon 306.9
 

I'm sure they'll catch up in 2-3, but that is alot of ground to make up if they want to pass enough people in all 5 to catch up in the computers.

They don't need to catch us in any of the computer rankings, they need to:

1) Pass Florida if they lose (they trail florida in 5 computers)
2) Pass LSU in one computer when they lose (if LSU doesn't lose this obv. takes care of itself).
3) Pick up some first place votes if Bama falters or having voters put them at #2 instead of KSU.

It can happen.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Blackcats on October 29, 2012, 11:16:55 AM
How about ND, O, and Bama just lose out? :ksu:

Read this as: How about ND and OBama lose out.  :lol:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Fuktard on October 29, 2012, 12:07:56 PM
I'll admit I have no idea what the computer algorithms are, but I'm looking at some of the actual computer rankings and I have a hard time seeing Oregon move up in all of them to pass KSU, ND, and Bama.  Everyone knows they are behind us, but in some there have some decent sized gaps to make up in the individual computers rankings.

  • Sagarin: 1. KSU 99.78, 2. ND 97.30.....8. Oregon 90.78 (this is already Oregon's toss-out low)
  • Colley: 1. ND 1.01, 2. Bama .96, 3. KSU .95...5. Oregon .89
  • Wolfe: 1. KSU 9.96, 2. ND 9.85, 3. Bama 9.34...5. Oregon 8.83
  • Anderson: 1. KSU .843, 2. ND .838...3. Bama .814 4. Oregon .802
  • Billingsly: 1. Bama 320.4, 2. ND 320.2, 3. KSU 318.7.... 4. Oregon 306.9
 

I'm sure they'll catch up in 2-3, but that is alot of ground to make up if they want to pass enough people in all 5 to catch up in the computers.

They don't need to catch us in any of the computer rankings, they need to:

1) Pass Florida if they lose (they trail florida in 5 computers)
2) Pass LSU in one computer when they lose (if LSU doesn't lose this obv. takes care of itself).
3) Pick up some first place votes if Bama falters or having voters put them at #2 instead of KSU.

It can happen.

Assuming the human polls stay the same (a wildcard at best) Oregon needs to be (on average) ONE spot lower than us in the computer polls.  This is AFTER they kick out the top and bottom ranking.  If they average one spot lower, they jump us.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SwiftCat on October 29, 2012, 01:08:26 PM
Human Polls won't stay the same. This weekend is really huge for us. If the Ducks look anything but dominant and we play well against OSU, I can see us further closing the gap to number 2. I am worried about the national perception that their remaining schedule is really that much better. It's good, but not great.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on October 29, 2012, 01:16:18 PM
Human Polls won't stay the same. This weekend is really huge for us. If the Ducks look anything but dominant and we play well against OSU, I can see us further closing the gap to number 2. I am worried about the national perception that their remaining schedule is really that much better. It's good, but not great.

The remaining schedule won't be take into account as a whole by the coaches. It will be a game by game analysis. So this week if they crush USC and we crush OSU they will probably take back some of our second place votes because USC has the perception of being a strong team even though their record is about the same as OSU's. The rest of the games will be about even depending on how high Stanford and Oregon State climb. So we just need USC to not get blown out basically.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: wiley on October 29, 2012, 01:20:17 PM
The talking heads that get the most air time have gone to comparative scoring either with us and ND on Oklahoma.  Then it was Arizona being blanked by oregon and beating USC.  We need to absolutely destroy teams on the scoreboard so we pass the "eye test" that so many love to talk about.  Oregon also has played...2 road games so far this season.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: michigancat on October 29, 2012, 01:29:48 PM
Human Polls won't stay the same. This weekend is really huge for us. If the Ducks look anything but dominant and we play well against OSU, I can see us further closing the gap to number 2. I am worried about the national perception that their remaining schedule is really that much better. It's good, but not great.

I'd worry more about Bama having a stinker at some point while Oregon continues to dominate. They won't pass Oregon, but they can maybe swap some voters, most likely on the Harris poll.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on October 29, 2012, 01:34:00 PM
Human Polls won't stay the same. This weekend is really huge for us. If the Ducks look anything but dominant and we play well against OSU, I can see us further closing the gap to number 2. I am worried about the national perception that their remaining schedule is really that much better. It's good, but not great.

I'd worry more about Bama having a stinker at some point while Oregon continues to dominate. They won't pass Oregon, but they can maybe swap some voters, most likely on the Harris poll.

Pffft. Bama plays @LSU before playing Auburn, Western Carolina and A&M at home. They don't need to win big @LSU to keep everyone on the "Alabama is easily #1" bandwagon. And they are going to blow everyone else out. Massey ratings has their chances to win at 96%, 100% and 100% for their last 3 games.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: jde512 on October 29, 2012, 01:37:57 PM
How about ND, O, and Bama just lose out? :ksu:

Read this as: How about ND and OBama lose out.  :lol:

I'll take that too!
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: qatzmanchu on October 29, 2012, 01:49:04 PM
Human Polls won't stay the same. This weekend is really huge for us. If the Ducks look anything but dominant and we play well against OSU, I can see us further closing the gap to number 2. I am worried about the national perception that their remaining schedule is really that much better. It's good, but not great.

I'd worry more about Bama having a stinker at some point while Oregon continues to dominate. They won't pass Oregon, but they can maybe swap some voters, most likely on the Harris poll.

Pffft. Bama plays @LSU before playing Auburn, Western Carolina and A&M at home. They don't need to win big @LSU to keep everyone on the "Alabama is easily #1" bandwagon. And they are going to blow everyone else out. Massey ratings has their chances to win at 96%, 100% and 100% for their last 3 games.

Man, could anyone argue against the Big 12 being the clear cut winner of conference expansion if somehow, someway that aTm could pull off the upset.

-We would have given the Pac Colorado to kill their SOS.
-We would have given the SEC aTm to get their one big win a year they are typically good for.
-We would have dropped our championship game in favor of the CTR on championship weekend.
-Oregon would be playing in a PAC title game against some pud team looking for their fifth loss of the year, which will further kill their SOS.
-Nebraska would be playing in a BIG title game that nobody would give a crap about.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: slobber on October 29, 2012, 01:52:27 PM

Man, could anyone argue against the Big 12 being the clear cut winner of conference expansion if somehow, someway that aTm could pull off the upset.

-We would have given the Pac Colorado to kill their SOS.
-We would have given the SEC aTm to get their one big win a year they are typically good for.
-We would have dropped our championship game in favor of the CTR on championship weekend.
-Oregon would be playing in a PAC title game against some pud team looking for their fifth loss of the year, which will further kill their SOS.
-Nebraska would be playing in a BIG title game that nobody would give a crap about.
I think this is a valid post and I approve of this message. :thumbs:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MakeItRain on October 29, 2012, 02:01:20 PM
This guy "gets it"

http://bcsguru.blogspot.com/2012/10/odds-are-itll-be-bama-vs-k-state.html

Quote
Kansas State: The Wildcats are tied with Notre Dame atop the computer rankings and have made up considerable ground on Oregon in both polls. K-State will benefit from playing potentially two more ranked teams this season (Oklahoma State and Texas) and the absence of a Big 12 title game probably won't hurt too much. Ideally, the Wildcats will want the Irish to also finish undefeated, thus providing a buffer in the computer ratings to hold off Oregon. (75%)

the above is also why we want OU to win out, we need ND to stay ahead of Oregon in the computers.

I've been thinking/worrying...something that MAY hurt us...again, no idea how these damn computers work, but if Bama would pass us up in some polls because of their title game, that would be bad.

Probably.  Assuming everybody wins their remaining 4-5 games.  I'm curious whether this will actually convince the Big 12 to get the Dr. Pepper game back.

9 conference games & a true round robin is more conducive to producing a top 2 team than having a conference season where you could conceivably miss playing a very good team and/or have to navigate a rematch.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: michigancat on October 29, 2012, 02:04:18 PM
Human Polls won't stay the same. This weekend is really huge for us. If the Ducks look anything but dominant and we play well against OSU, I can see us further closing the gap to number 2. I am worried about the national perception that their remaining schedule is really that much better. It's good, but not great.

I'd worry more about Bama having a stinker at some point while Oregon continues to dominate. They won't pass Oregon, but they can maybe swap some voters, most likely on the Harris poll.

Pffft. Bama plays @LSU before playing Auburn, Western Carolina and A&M at home. They don't need to win big @LSU to keep everyone on the "Alabama is easily #1" bandwagon. And they are going to blow everyone else out. Massey ratings has their chances to win at 96%, 100% and 100% for their last 3 games.

Very true, but a close Auburn game (WHICH COULD HAPPEN: http://scores.espn.go.com/ncf/recap?gameId=322660002) could sway some voters that want to ensure Oregon gets in, as Lynch or someone alluded to.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SleepFighter on October 29, 2012, 02:07:36 PM
I got super butthurt last year when I found out that Pinkel and Shaw had voted OSU 4 or 5 or whatever it was.  I can't imagine what I'll be like if I find out that somebody voted Oregon 1, and us behind some 1 loss SEC team or something.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: michigancat on October 29, 2012, 02:09:00 PM
I got super butthurt last year when I found out that Pinkel and Shaw had voted OSU 4 or 5 or whatever it was.  I can't imagine what I'll be like if I find out that somebody voted Oregon 1, and us behind some 1 loss SEC team or something.

Yeah, I forgot about Pac 12 coaches possibly pulling some crap like that. IMO it should all be up to computers that factor in margin of victory.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MadCat on October 29, 2012, 02:13:53 PM
This guy "gets it"

http://bcsguru.blogspot.com/2012/10/odds-are-itll-be-bama-vs-k-state.html

Quote
Kansas State: The Wildcats are tied with Notre Dame atop the computer rankings and have made up considerable ground on Oregon in both polls. K-State will benefit from playing potentially two more ranked teams this season (Oklahoma State and Texas) and the absence of a Big 12 title game probably won't hurt too much. Ideally, the Wildcats will want the Irish to also finish undefeated, thus providing a buffer in the computer ratings to hold off Oregon. (75%)

the above is also why we want OU to win out, we need ND to stay ahead of Oregon in the computers.

I've been thinking/worrying...something that MAY hurt us...again, no idea how these damn computers work, but if Bama would pass us up in some polls because of their title game, that would be bad.

Probably.  Assuming everybody wins their remaining 4-5 games.  I'm curious whether this will actually convince the Big 12 to get the Dr. Pepper game back.

9 conference games & a true round robin is more conducive to producing a top 2 team than having a conference season where you could conceivably miss playing a very good team and/or have to navigate a rematch.

I tend to agree with this, especially if the conference is / is seen as strong compared to other conferences.  If the undefeated Bama, ND, Oregon and KSU scenario plays out and K-State ends up being in the top 2, I imagine the Big 12 would forget about expansion for some time (at least until it "screws" another Big 12 team).
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SwiftCat on October 29, 2012, 11:23:49 PM
9 conference games & a true round robin is more conducive to producing a top 2 team than having a conference season where you could conceivably miss playing a very good team and/or have to navigate a rematch.

I think it takes a better team to win in the round robin Big 12, but I also think it hurts the conferences strength of schedule. Especially when there is so much parity in the conference.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SwiftCat on October 29, 2012, 11:30:44 PM
Didn't see this posted yet and I'm not going to double check, but this is pollspeak's poll (http://www.pollspeak.com/component/option,com_psreport/Itemid,3/lang,en/p,94/task,top25/). They take 10 polls, and then average out the rankings into one final shmorgishborg. 


Code: [Select]
Sport: College Football '12
Week 10: 10/29/2012
Rank Team          Average
1 Kansas State 2.2            
2 Alabama         2.3
3 Notre Dame      2.5
4 Oregon         4.4
5 Florida         6.1
5. LSU             6.1   
7. Georgia
8. South Carolina
9. Oregon State
10. Oklahoma
11. Stanford
12. Louisville
13. Texas Tech
14. Florida State
15. Mississippi State
16. Texas A&M
17. Clemson
18. Nebraska
19. West Virginia
20. USC
21. Arizona
22. Boise State
23. Texas
24. Oklahoma State
25. Toledo
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: bones129 on October 29, 2012, 11:45:57 PM
Didn't see this posted yet and I'm not going to double check, but this is pollspeak's poll (http://www.pollspeak.com/component/option,com_psreport/Itemid,3/lang,en/p,94/task,top25/). They take 10 polls, and then average out the rankings into one final shmorgishborg. 


Code: [Select]
Sport: College Football '12
Week 10: 10/29/2012
Rank Team          Average
1 Kansas State 2.2            
2 Alabama         2.3
3 Notre Dame      2.5
4 Oregon         4.4
5 Florida         6.1
5. LSU             6.1   
7. Georgia
8. South Carolina
9. Oregon State
10. Oklahoma
11. Stanford
12. Louisville
13. Texas Tech
14. Florida State
15. Mississippi State
16. Texas A&M
17. Clemson
18. Nebraska
19. West Virginia
20. USC
21. Arizona
22. Boise State
23. Texas
24. Oklahoma State
25. Toledo

I like this. Makes sense.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on October 30, 2012, 02:47:27 AM
Didn't see this posted yet and I'm not going to double check, but this is pollspeak's poll (http://www.pollspeak.com/component/option,com_psreport/Itemid,3/lang,en/p,94/task,top25/). They take 10 polls, and then average out the rankings into one final shmorgishborg. 


Code: [Select]
Sport: College Football '12
Week 10: 10/29/2012
Rank Team          Average
1 Kansas State 2.2            
2 Alabama         2.3
3 Notre Dame      2.5
4 Oregon         4.4
5 Florida         6.1
5. LSU             6.1   
7. Georgia
8. South Carolina
9. Oregon State
10. Oklahoma
11. Stanford
12. Louisville
13. Texas Tech
14. Florida State
15. Mississippi State
16. Texas A&M
17. Clemson
18. Nebraska
19. West Virginia
20. USC
21. Arizona
22. Boise State
23. Texas
24. Oklahoma State
25. Toledo

It's beautiful. :love:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pittcat on October 30, 2012, 08:06:38 AM
Didn't see this posted yet and I'm not going to double check, but this is pollspeak's poll (http://www.pollspeak.com/component/option,com_psreport/Itemid,3/lang,en/p,94/task,top25/). They take 10 polls, and then average out the rankings into one final shmorgishborg. 


Code: [Select]
Sport: College Football '12
Week 10: 10/29/2012
Rank Team          Average
1 Kansas State 2.2            
2 Alabama         2.3
3 Notre Dame      2.5
4 Oregon         4.4
5 Florida         6.1
5. LSU             6.1   
7. Georgia
8. South Carolina
9. Oregon State
10. Oklahoma
11. Stanford
12. Louisville
13. Texas Tech
14. Florida State
15. Mississippi State
16. Texas A&M
17. Clemson
18. Nebraska
19. West Virginia
20. USC
21. Arizona
22. Boise State
23. Texas
24. Oklahoma State
25. Toledo

Champs.  Banner will be hung.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: "storm"nut on October 30, 2012, 09:45:45 AM
I just did a list of our "Firewall" teams in the computers:

Alabama
Florida
Georgia
LSU
Notre Dame
Oklahoma

Only two play each other in the regular season

And either Georgia or Florida (Georgia if they win out) Play each other in the Championship game.

These teams need to win out. LSU beating Alabama will be the best scenario as it should keep Alabama a Firewall team and also get one undefeated team out of the way and setup a KSU VS Note Dame MNC.


Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: thebigcatbowski on October 30, 2012, 10:06:15 AM
I just did a list of our "Firewall" teams in the computers:

Alabama
Florida
Georgia
LSU
Notre Dame
Oklahoma

Only two play each other in the regular season

And either Georgia or Florida (Georgia if they win out) Play each other in the Championship game.

These teams need to win out. LSU beating Alabama will be the best scenario as it should keep Alabama a Firewall team and also get one undefeated team out of the way and setup a KSU VS Note Dame MNC.

That seems way more complicated than just rooting for Oregon and Notre Dame to lose.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: "storm"nut on October 30, 2012, 10:09:06 AM
I just did a list of our "Firewall" teams in the computers:

Alabama
Florida
Georgia
LSU
Notre Dame
Oklahoma

Only two play each other in the regular season

And either Georgia or Florida (Georgia if they win out) Play each other in the Championship game.

These teams need to win out. LSU beating Alabama will be the best scenario as it should keep Alabama a Firewall team and also get one undefeated team out of the way and setup a KSU VS Note Dame MNC.

That seems way more complicated than just rooting for Oregon and Notre Dame to lose.

FYP

Notre Dame losing hurts us a lot, unless Alabama or Oregon lose.

If Oregon loses I don't think enough human votes goes to ND to overtake us.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 30, 2012, 10:09:48 AM
I just did a list of our "Firewall" teams in the computers:

Alabama
Florida
Georgia
LSU
Notre Dame
Oklahoma

Only two play each other in the regular season

And either Georgia or Florida (Georgia if they win out) Play each other in the Championship game.

These teams need to win out. LSU beating Alabama will be the best scenario as it should keep Alabama a Firewall team and also get one undefeated team out of the way and setup a KSU VS Note Dame MNC.

good post stormnut
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: qatzmanchu on October 30, 2012, 11:41:39 AM
I just did a list of our "Firewall" teams in the computers:

Alabama
Florida
Georgia
LSU
Notre Dame
Oklahoma

Only two play each other in the regular season

And either Georgia or Florida (Georgia if they win out) Play each other in the Championship game.

These teams need to win out. LSU beating Alabama will be the best scenario as it should keep Alabama a Firewall team and also get one undefeated team out of the way and setup a KSU VS Note Dame MNC.

I am sooo torn on this. On one hand playing ND for a national title, it probably doesnt get any better then that on the field. But then I picture what may be with BBSing with Bama. You get a school and a conference coming after you. Probably get half our pigaggie friends, the paul finebaum show, all of the Bammers, mississippi folks beating down the walls just to tell us how great the Bama and by proxy the SECSEC is. Might have to upgrade the servers to handle an entire month of that.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Skipper44 on October 30, 2012, 11:48:24 AM
I got super butthurt last year when I found out that Pinkel and Shaw had voted OSU 4 or 5 or whatever it was.  I can't imagine what I'll be like if I find out that somebody voted Oregon 1, and us behind some 1 loss SEC team or something.
I lay awake at night worrying that Bama, UO, ND and the Cats are all undefeated and the final coaches poll has all the garbage coaches in the PAC putting KSU 4th and UO 2nd or 1st.  Replace in the above statement UO with ND and garbage PAC coaches with pud ACC coaches and I am ready to start looking for a bridge.  :ohno:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 30, 2012, 11:49:16 AM
Yeah, I don't know if it would get much better than getting goEMAW on feinbaum, "PAWL, DID YOU HEAR WHAT THEY WAS SAYING ABOUT US? ROLL DAMN TIDE PAWL!"
Title: Re: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: michigancat on October 30, 2012, 11:50:24 AM
Yeah, I don't know if it would get much better than getting goEMAW on feinbaum, "PAWL, DID YOU HEAR WHAT THEY WAS SAYING ABOUT US? ROLL DAMN TIDE PAWL!"

It wouldn't get any better. It would be glorious.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on October 30, 2012, 11:51:13 AM
I got super butthurt last year when I found out that Pinkel and Shaw had voted OSU 4 or 5 or whatever it was.  I can't imagine what I'll be like if I find out that somebody voted Oregon 1, and us behind some 1 loss SEC team or something.
I lay awake at night worrying that Bama, UO, ND and the Cats are all undefeated and the final coaches poll has all the garbage coaches in the PAC putting KSU 4th and UO 2nd or 1st.  Replace in the above statement UO with ND and garbage PAC coaches with pud ACC coaches and I am ready to start looking for a bridge.  :ohno:

2.9% chance of all 4 teams winning out.

And yes, dumboaggie trolling would easily top pigaggie and coalaggie.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: CNS on October 30, 2012, 11:52:40 AM
Yeah, I don't know if it would get much better than getting goEMAW on feinbaum, "PAWL, DID YOU HEAR WHAT THEY WAS SAYING ABOUT US? ROLL DAMN TIDE PAWL!"

We are going to need a bigger boat.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Super PurpleCat on October 30, 2012, 11:52:53 AM
And yes, dumboaggie trolling would easily top pigaggie and coalaggie.

Would prob get a solid week of HTTP 500 errors on this site.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: "storm"nut on October 30, 2012, 11:56:46 AM
Yes, having a SEC school as our opponent will make for some epic posting. EPIC
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 8manpick on October 30, 2012, 11:57:18 AM
http://insider.espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/8572232/why-kansas-state-wildcats-deserve-ranked-no-1-ncf

Someone with insider?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: XocolateThundarr on October 30, 2012, 11:57:27 AM
Yeah, I don't know if it would get much better than getting goEMAW on feinbaum, "PAWL, DID YOU HEAR WHAT THEY WAS SAYING ABOUT US? ROLL DAMN TIDE PAWL!"


 :pray:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: jde512 on October 30, 2012, 11:59:19 AM
Yeah, I don't know if it would get much better than getting goEMAW on feinbaum, "PAWL, DID YOU HEAR WHAT THEY WAS SAYING ABOUT US? ROLL DAMN TIDE PAWL!"

We are going to need a bigger boat.

THIS indeed!
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: OK_Cat on October 30, 2012, 12:01:06 PM
maybe i'm in the minority, but i think that trolling PopeAggies would be way more fun.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: CNS on October 30, 2012, 12:04:01 PM
As far as bbs'n goes, we cannot lose with Bama or ND. 
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: OK_Cat on October 30, 2012, 12:06:47 PM
think i'm going with PopeAggie.  AlterBoyAggie is too easy, and JesusAggie will be confusing with Baylor and TCU.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 8manpick on October 30, 2012, 12:07:08 PM
maybe i'm in the minority, but i think that trolling PopeAggies would be way more fun.

Yeah, the inbred, backwoods redneck angle has been just about played out after PigAggie, USM WhateverAggie and CoalAggie.  PopeAggie would be a nice change of pace.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: CNS on October 30, 2012, 12:07:56 PM
think i'm going with PopeAggie.  AlterBoyAggie is too easy, and JesusAggie will be confusing with Baylor and TCU.

PreistRapeCoverUpAggie

SexualAbuseAppologistAggie
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 8manpick on October 30, 2012, 12:08:26 PM
AlterBoyAggie is too easy

*Altar... they aren't really okay with the whole transgender thing.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: star seed 7 on October 30, 2012, 12:08:40 PM
i having a feeling that molesteraggie wouldn't really be that big of a bite.  this stuff works much better on people that think a message board is a blog.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: OK_Cat on October 30, 2012, 12:08:56 PM
think i'm going with PopeAggie.  AlterBoyAggie is too easy, and JesusAggie will be confusing with Baylor and TCU.

PreistRapeCoverUpAggie

SexualAbuseAppologistAggie

too long
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: OK_Cat on October 30, 2012, 12:09:25 PM
i having a feeling that molesteraggie wouldn't really be that big of a bite.  this stuff works much better on people that think a message board is a blog.

molesteraggie would be too confusing with penn state
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: puniraptor on October 30, 2012, 12:10:55 PM
They have over ONE BILLION fans. We are going to need some serious electroroids for the server.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: CNS on October 30, 2012, 12:12:17 PM
Would be amazing to get some out-of-country fans drug into this. 

I mean, a news station here and there is great, but this could be our chance to go multinational.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: OK_Cat on October 30, 2012, 12:14:20 PM
the biggest prize would be a statement from the Vatican.  aim high, friends.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: CNS on October 30, 2012, 12:15:43 PM
Does this blog even support Italian?  Do we have a translator, or will we need to partner up with Google? 

Obvs the Pope could bbs in English, but I don't know about others in Vatican City.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on October 30, 2012, 12:17:18 PM
If we play Notre Dame and decide to call them popeaggie, I'm just going to call them poopaggie. It's going to be hilarious.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: star seed 7 on October 30, 2012, 12:19:23 PM
hey, remember when everyone used to say we played like "the sisters of the poor" in the OOC, well... isn't the sisters of the poor like a catholic thing?

we could say like, notre dame is so soft it's like we are just playing the sisters of the poor again like back in the 90's!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Bookcat on October 30, 2012, 12:28:54 PM
hey, remember when everyone used to say we played like "the sisters of the poor" in the OOC, well... isn't the sisters of the poor like a catholic thing?

we could say like, notre dame is so soft it's like we are just playing the sisters of the poor again like back in the 90's!!!!!!!!!!

Northeast Dame
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: qatzmanchu on October 30, 2012, 12:39:05 PM
maybe i'm in the minority, but i think that trolling PopeAggies would be way more fun.

Yeah, the inbred, backwoods redneck angle has been just about played out after PigAggie, USM WhateverAggie and CoalAggie.  PopeAggie would be a nice change of pace.

Color me convinced.

I have a popeaggie friend that probably tucks his shirt into his underpants before bed. I think he would hyper ventilate when we bring light to the similarities of our two programs both historically and culturally.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: j-dub on October 30, 2012, 12:40:25 PM
as a catholic, can i just say that trolling popeaggies would be mind-blowingly incredible  :dance:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: yoEMAW on October 30, 2012, 12:40:56 PM
Does (insert opponent here) deserve to play our KSU cats in the MNC?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Institutional Control on October 30, 2012, 12:40:56 PM
as a catholic, can i just say that trolling popeaggies would be mind-blowingly incredible  :dance:

It would be an abortion.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: j-dub on October 30, 2012, 12:41:39 PM
as a catholic, can i just say that trolling popeaggies would be mind-blowingly incredible  :dance:

It would be an abortion.
:sdeek:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: qatzmanchu on October 30, 2012, 12:41:58 PM
as a catholic, can i just say that trolling popeaggies would be mind-blowingly incredible  :dance:

It would be an abortion.

A christmas miracle of an abortion
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: michigancat on October 30, 2012, 12:42:11 PM
I don't think you guys realize how crazy Bama fans are.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: CHONGS on October 30, 2012, 12:42:40 PM
ND is not an *aggie

not every team is a *aggie

if you are going to shamelessly steal from shaggybevo at least do it right.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: EMAWmeister on October 30, 2012, 12:43:38 PM
Coming from a Catholic, the whole priest abuse angle is kind of a lame insult anymore.  It's too played out.  Confusing them with BYU could be good.  Asking when all of their players take their missions, etc.  Also, logical fallacies in the bible would be good bait. I've toured the Basillica on their campus, and they take great pride in having relics.  A splinter from the true cross, bones and fingernails of old saints, etc.  And for whatever reason, ND fans are very proud of certain alumni like Regis Philbin and Dickie V.  A lot could be done with that.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: star seed 7 on October 30, 2012, 12:45:59 PM
i just have a feeling ND fans are collectively more intelligent than anything alabama has to offer.

alabama would be the motherload of all shitstorms.  would not be surprised if one of them drove here and shot up the campus or something.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: qatzmanchu on October 30, 2012, 12:46:22 PM
I don't think you guys realize how crazy Bama fans are.

Nobody is questioning the Bama fan crazyness. I would question, the originality of the typical inbred Bama fan vs. the uptightness of a typical non-inbred Domer. I am now convinced that the uptightness of the ND fans provide an oppurtunity that would be fun to explore.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: GoodForAnother on October 30, 2012, 12:46:38 PM
I don't think you guys realize how crazy Bama fans are.

yeah, Bama fans would be 10,000 times more fun to troll than ND fans
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: j-dub on October 30, 2012, 12:47:35 PM
Coming from a Catholic, the whole priest abuse angle is kind of a lame insult anymore.  It's too played out.  Confusing them with BYU could be good.  Asking when all of their players take their missions, etc.  Also, logical fallacies in the bible would be good bait. I've toured the Basillica on their campus, and they take great pride in having relics.  A splinter from the true cross, bones and fingernails of old saints, etc.  And for whatever reason, ND fans are very proud of certain alumni like Regis Philbin and Dickie V.  A lot could be done with that.

let's team up and create a master list  :crossfingers:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: XocolateThundarr on October 30, 2012, 12:47:39 PM
I don't think you guys realize how crazy Bama fans are.

This....you realize this after listening to Finebaum for 5 minutes.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 30, 2012, 12:49:05 PM
I don't think you guys realize how crazy Bama fans are.

This....you realize this after listening to Finebaum for 5 minutes.

PAWL!
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: GoodForAnother on October 30, 2012, 12:50:43 PM
PAWWWWWWWLLLL
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: yoEMAW on October 30, 2012, 12:52:38 PM
The thought of trolling one of our sister schools feels sort of icky.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Institutional Control on October 30, 2012, 12:53:06 PM
I don't think you guys realize how crazy Bama fans are.

What if they come to Manhattan and poison our trees?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Bookcat on October 30, 2012, 12:54:22 PM
Does playing Alabama as our National Title foe undermine the credibility of the BCS? Alabama hasn't earned #1.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: slobber on October 30, 2012, 12:54:42 PM
PAWWWWWWWLLLL
How will they say goEMAW? Will it be worse than GeeMaw?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: GoodForAnother on October 30, 2012, 12:55:09 PM
PAWWWWWWWLLLL
How will they say goEMAW? Will it be worse than GeeMaw?

go'muh
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: EMAWmeister on October 30, 2012, 01:13:42 PM
Coming from a Catholic, the whole priest abuse angle is kind of a lame insult anymore.  It's too played out.  Confusing them with BYU could be good.  Asking when all of their players take their missions, etc.  Also, logical fallacies in the bible would be good bait. I've toured the Basillica on their campus, and they take great pride in having relics.  A splinter from the true cross, bones and fingernails of old saints, etc.  And for whatever reason, ND fans are very proud of certain alumni like Regis Philbin and Dickie V.  A lot could be done with that.

let's team up and create a master list  :crossfingers:

YES! I can see it now. "IF ADAM AND EVE STARTED THE POPULATION THEN HOW DID THEY DO IT WITHOUT INCEST?!?!?!"
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ksucrcoop on October 30, 2012, 01:17:29 PM
i just have a feeling ND fans are collectively more intelligent than anything alabama has to offer.

alabama would be the motherload of all shitstorms.  would not be surprised if one of them drove here and shot up the campus or something.

I honestly believe 90-95% of ND fans did not go to ND. They are THE T-shirt U.
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Chico on October 30, 2012, 01:20:47 PM
We would have to record the Paul Finebaum show for four-five straight weeks to put in the Lodge listening studio.

I listen on a regular basis but its not the best radio unless they are melting down about something. He lets way too many idiot callers through and it drags down the show.  Even Paul is pretty dry as a host. I'm not sure why its such a hit.

If Alabama loses this weekend, can you imagine the national talking heads freaking out about an SEC team not getting in?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: EMAWmeister on October 30, 2012, 01:22:57 PM
i just have a feeling ND fans are collectively more intelligent than anything alabama has to offer.

alabama would be the motherload of all shitstorms.  would not be surprised if one of them drove here and shot up the campus or something.

I honestly believe 90-95% of ND fans did not go to ND. They are THE T-shirt U.

The actual ND students/alum would go apeshit by a thread talking about ND being our safety school.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on October 30, 2012, 01:23:15 PM
We would have to record the Paul Finebaum show for four-five straight weeks to put in the Lodge listening studio.

I listen on a regular basis but its not the best radio unless they are melting down about something. He lets way too many idiot callers through and it drags down the show.  Even Paul is pretty dry as a host. I'm not sure why its such a hit.

If Alabama loses this weekend, can you imagine the national talking heads freaking out about an SEC team not getting in?

Stop making me daydream about Alabama losing. Just going to hurt more.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: qatzmanchu on October 30, 2012, 01:24:21 PM
Who is to say that if Bama does lose, we couldnt have the best of both worlds?

Just cause Bama is not in the game doesnt mean we couldn't bait them about not being in the game.
Title: Re: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: CNS on October 30, 2012, 01:26:08 PM
Coming from a Catholic, the whole priest abuse angle is kind of a lame insult anymore.  It's too played out.  Confusing them with BYU could be good.  Asking when all of their players take their missions, etc.  Also, logical fallacies in the bible would be good bait. I've toured the Basillica on their campus, and they take great pride in having relics.  A splinter from the true cross, bones and fingernails of old saints, etc.  And for whatever reason, ND fans are very proud of certain alumni like Regis Philbin and Dickie V.  A lot could be done with that.

let's team up and create a master list  :crossfingers:

YES! I can see it now. "IF ADAM AND EVE STARTED THE POPULATION THEN HOW DID THEY DO IT WITHOUT INCEST?!?!?!"

Woof. I change my vote

Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2

Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ben ji on October 30, 2012, 01:29:58 PM
KSU has taken Football seriously for about 25 years and we still have just as many heisman winners as that trash school in birmingham. Alot less racists too.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: mocat on October 30, 2012, 01:33:17 PM
Trolling ND would be a monster let-down, FYI
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheCatFanSpeaks on October 30, 2012, 01:36:29 PM
Trolling ND would be a monster let-down, FYI
I'm beginning to think so.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MadCat on October 30, 2012, 01:40:26 PM
the biggest prize would be a statement from the Vatican.  aim high, friends.
Tell them that the body in Knute Rockne's grave is a sham; you are using the real skull as a salsa bowl during watch parties.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: OK_Cat on October 30, 2012, 01:41:29 PM
i'm not talking about other team's dead people anymore, just ours.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 0.42 on October 30, 2012, 01:42:36 PM
I don't think you guys realize how crazy Bama fans are.

Yeah, I might have to sit that one out. They're the type of people that'll come and yell at your boss at work with a printed list of your entire posting history. All while wearing an elephant hat.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 8manpick on October 30, 2012, 01:44:18 PM
i'm not talking about other team's dead people anymore, just ours.

I give it about a month and a half
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MadCat on October 30, 2012, 01:44:32 PM
i'm not talking about other team's dead people anymore, just ours.
k
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Trim on October 30, 2012, 01:45:42 PM
I don't think you guys realize how crazy Bama fans are.

Yeah, I might have to sit that one out. They're the type of people that'll come and yell at your boss at work with a printed list of your entire posting history. All while wearing an elephant hat.

We've been prepared for this.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 0.42 on October 30, 2012, 01:46:21 PM
 :sdeek:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Rams on October 30, 2012, 02:03:22 PM
Trolling ND would be a monster let-down, FYI

yeah.  I would assume most of their fans (certainly students and alumni) are smart enough to figure it out.  bama could get interesting though.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: XocolateThundarr on October 30, 2012, 02:03:27 PM
I don't think you guys realize how crazy Bama fans are.

Yeah, I might have to sit that one out. They're the type of people that'll come and yell at your boss at work with a printed list of your entire posting history. All while wearing an elephant hat.

My boss would tell them to GTFO. 
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: EMAWmeister on October 30, 2012, 02:09:55 PM
Trolling ND would be a monster let-down, FYI

yeah.  I would assume most of their fans (certainly students and alumni) are smart enough to figure it out.  bama could get interesting though.

I would love the tide invasion, but only if we come up with a new shtick. 
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: XocolateThundarr on October 30, 2012, 02:16:12 PM
Listening to these assholes on the radio just makes my head hurt (RE: Finebaum callers).  They have no idea about football outside of the SEC.....when you can understand what the eff they are saying.

 :dubious:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Trim on October 30, 2012, 02:42:34 PM
Trolling ND would be a monster let-down, FYI

yeah.  I would assume most of their fans (certainly students and alumni) are smart enough to figure it out.  bama could get interesting though.

I would love the tide invasion, but only if we come up with a new shtick. 

Part of the new shtick should be for EMAWs who are road-tripping to Miami to do some real-life PI/troll in Alabama (sp?) while passing through.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: jmlynch1 on October 30, 2012, 03:37:24 PM
Shut up MoCat. ND fans are just as dumb as every other fanbase. I would enjoy any of the remaining undefeateds.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on October 30, 2012, 03:39:00 PM
Shut up MoCat. ND fans are just as dumb as every other fanbase. I would enjoy any of the remaining undefeateds.

Oregon would be pretty boring imo. The cheapest for actual ticket purchase though prolly.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Ira Hayes on October 30, 2012, 03:42:33 PM
Personally, I prefer the meltdown afterward over the trolling before.  Definitely think we want to play the fanbase the cares the most. It is not close.

Bama.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: qatzmanchu on October 30, 2012, 03:51:13 PM
Personally, I prefer the meltdown afterward over the trolling before.  Definitely think we want to play the fanbase the cares the most. It is not close.

Bama.

IDK. To me Bama is that drunk bastard at the bar that kicked alot of asses and wants to kick some more, while ND is that high society prick that thinks he could kick everyone's ass cause of all the money his parents and grandparents made.

Now ask yourself whichof those two would be the most upset about taking an ass kicking. Bama will get up brush themselves off and move on to the next joker who walks into the bar, ND on the other hand, this could be a life altering event for their fanbase.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SdK on October 30, 2012, 03:54:38 PM
order, gaggie
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: CNS on October 30, 2012, 03:55:19 PM
Bama would be the best for long term bbs'n.  Beat ND, and half the nation thinks they could still beat you.  Beat Bama and everyone is amazed that someone did it.

Beat ND, and half the nation will be angry with you then will quickly move on to rowing or some crap because they are used to their school not being a good fb school.

Beat Bama and be labeled Giant Killer and be forever talked about anytime someone talks teams that are juggernauts and seem unbeatable.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Emo EMAW on October 30, 2012, 03:58:44 PM
If we troll Alabama it'll just be the same plan as the past but up the ante.  No more sophistication needed, maybe even less than usual.  Just blantant, point blank, in your face trolling.  It will be basically daring them not to respond, and southerners love dares.

If it's Notre Dame, we really have to take our game to the next level.  We'll have to go back and wipe out this thread, for example, and the last few pages of other threads where we trolled like the Deadliest Catch last season.  If we're not ready to do that, then I think we should just accept that up front instead of going through it half-assed.  You're either in, or you're out.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: qatzmanchu on October 30, 2012, 03:59:01 PM
Bama would be the best for long term bbs'n.  Beat ND, and half the nation thinks they could still beat you.  Beat Bama and everyone is amazed that someone did it.

Beat ND, and half the nation will be angry with you then will quickly move on to rowing or some crap because they are used to their school not being a good fb school.

Beat Bama and be labeled Giant Killer and be forever talked about anytime someone talks teams that are juggernauts and seem unbeatable.

Dammit, now im convinced it should be Bama.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: AbeFroman on October 30, 2012, 04:07:25 PM
Do you guys have any idea how many squawks use Notre Dame as their college football team?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: qatzmanchu on October 30, 2012, 04:09:57 PM
Do you guys have any idea how many squawks use Notre Dame as their college football team?

No, how many?

They would strike more as Bama, previously USC, previously Miami, previously Nebraska fans honestly.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MadCat on October 30, 2012, 04:11:15 PM
None.  Football season is an obstruction to basketball season.  :dunno:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Shacks on October 30, 2012, 04:15:21 PM
Do you guys have any idea how many squawks use Notre Dame as their college football team?

No, how many?

They would strike more as Bama, previously USC, previously Miami, previously Nebraska fans honestly.

Most Squawks I know who support a CFB team other than KU usually cheer for either Nebraska, OU or KSU.  They might have seemed pro-Notre Dame when Weis and Crist were in their honeymoon phase, but now they realize those guys suck just as badly in Lawrence as they did in South Bend.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: qatzmanchu on October 30, 2012, 04:18:36 PM
Do you guys have any idea how many squawks use Notre Dame as their college football team?

No, how many?

They would strike more as Bama, previously USC, previously Miami, previously Nebraska fans honestly.


Most Squawks I know who support a CFB team other than KU usually cheer for either Nebraska, OU or KSU.  They might have seemed pro-Notre Dame when Weis and Crist were in their honeymoon phase, but now they realize those guys suck just as badly in Lawrence as they did in South Bend.

I would be willing to hear the point that KU fans will come out of the wood work to tell us about all of the ND players that Charlie recruited and how its a matter of time till he has a similar monster rolling in Lawrence.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: CNS on October 30, 2012, 04:28:19 PM
Guys, shut up.  who gives a crap about who lil bro follows other than their own dog crap fb team?

Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Mikeyis4dcats on October 30, 2012, 04:33:01 PM
I so want to play Gump aggie

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fim.glogster.com%2Fmedia%2F2%2F3%2F75%2F23%2F3752399.jpg&hash=92faecef5c44217f65a954399ba6166647f6fc49)
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: chum1 on October 30, 2012, 04:33:36 PM
Well, if lots of sqwawkers like ND, then I would love for us to deliver an ass whoopin to ND.  Stupid beaks.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Ira Hayes on October 30, 2012, 04:40:39 PM
Personally, I prefer the meltdown afterward over the trolling before.  Definitely think we want to play the fanbase the cares the most. It is not close.

Bama.

IDK. To me Bama is that drunk bastard at the bar that kicked alot of asses and wants to kick some more, while ND is that high society prick that thinks he could kick everyone's ass cause of all the money his parents and grandparents made.

Now ask yourself whichof those two would be the most upset about taking an ass kicking. Bama will get up brush themselves off and move on to the next joker who walks into the bar, ND on the other hand, this could be a life altering event for their fanbase.

Bama will get up off the floor after his beating and say "Damn, you got a hell of a right hook.  Let me buy you a beer."

Notre Dame will try to act like it never happened.

How many times have we beaten Texas and heard: "That's the worst team we've ever had"
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on October 30, 2012, 05:15:43 PM
I can't wait to troll the undefeated team(s) we beat out in the polls to get into the NC.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on October 30, 2012, 05:43:04 PM
Whoa whoa whoa. When did this thread derail into some weird abortion of a thread? I haven't seen any mention of our glorious rankings or future glorious rankings in like 3 pages. Get your crap together goEMAW.  :facepalm:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Chico on October 30, 2012, 05:49:56 PM
I can't wait to troll the undefeated team(s) we beat out in the polls to get into the NC.

This.

The month of December is going to be beautiful.  It will likely bring the goEMAW servers to their knees as we take on two fan bases that didn't get in AND one fan base that we'll be playing AND an entire conference (minus pigaggie who should know what's going on) but it will still be one of the most fun times of our lifetimes.  :love: 

The O/U is set at 4 1/2 for the number of days it will take the university administration to create an internet commercial apologizing for our behavior.
Title: Re: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: mocat on October 30, 2012, 08:29:34 PM
Shut up MoCat. ND fans are just as dumb as every other fanbase. I would enjoy any of the remaining undefeateds.

I think it would be a let down because I don't think nd fans' lives depend on nd football the way that fans from a poor hillbilly state with absolutely nothing else going on depend on football. See: Arkansas, West Virginia. Alabama is like the motherload in this regard.
Title: Re: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: star seed 7 on October 30, 2012, 09:58:45 PM
Shut up MoCat. ND fans are just as dumb as every other fanbase. I would enjoy any of the remaining undefeateds.

I think it would be a let down because I don't think nd fans' lives depend on nd football the way that fans from a poor hillbilly state with absolutely nothing else going on depend on football. See: Arkansas, West Virginia. Alabama is like the motherload in this regard.

exactly.
Title: Re: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pittcat on October 31, 2012, 10:59:11 AM
Shut up MoCat. ND fans are just as dumb as every other fanbase. I would enjoy any of the remaining undefeateds.

I think it would be a let down because I don't think nd fans' lives depend on nd football the way that fans from a poor hillbilly state with absolutely nothing else going on depend on football. See: Arkansas, West Virginia. Alabama is like the motherload in this regard.

exactly.

Yep.  /debate

Now...BACK ON TOPIC!    The KSU Cats are, and always will be, No. 1 in my heart. #Fattytakethewheel
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on November 04, 2012, 08:14:12 AM
Dropped from 1 to 2 in the Sagarin.

Alabama jumped from 7 to 1.

Oregon went from 8 to 7, only passing OU.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: BackPayne on November 04, 2012, 08:16:11 AM
Dropped from 1 to 2 in the Sagarin.

Alabama jumped from 7 to 1.

Oregon went from 8 to 7, only passing OU.

How about ND?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: scottwildcat on November 04, 2012, 08:17:41 AM
so...we will probably be number two in the BCS again this week, Oregon will jump Notre Dame to 3 and our gap between us and Bama will widen, and our gap between us and #2 (Oregon) will get smaller. Let the butthurt and paranoia begin.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on November 04, 2012, 08:23:26 AM
Dropped from 1 to 2 in the Sagarin.

Alabama jumped from 7 to 1.

Oregon went from 8 to 7, only passing OU.

How about ND?

ND 3, Florida 4. If you look at the rankings, there is a clump from 1 to 4, then a gap, then a clump from 5 to 7.  This is already Oregon's low throw out, but looks like its going to continue to be unless Florida or ND loses.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: wabash909 on November 04, 2012, 08:48:41 AM
so...we will probably be number two in the BCS again this week, Oregon will jump Notre Dame to 3 and our gap between us and Bama will widen, and our gap between us and #2 (Oregon) will get smaller. Let the butthurt and paranoia begin.

Alabama isn't going to lose.

Oregon isn't going to lose and they have two Top 15 teams left on their schedule in Stanford and OSU. 

Been an amazing season, but there is virtually no way we finish ahead of them.


Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kslim on November 04, 2012, 08:51:41 AM
so...we will probably be number two in the BCS again this week, Oregon will jump Notre Dame to 3 and our gap between us and Bama will widen, and our gap between us and #2 (Oregon) will get smaller. Let the butthurt and paranoia begin.

Alabama isn't going to lose.

Oregon isn't going to lose and they have two Top 15 teams left on their schedule in Stanford and OSU. 

Been an amazing season, but there is virtually no way we finish ahead of them.

1 bama is beatable

b we also play a ranked team and will finish by playing 6 or 7 ranked teams. we win out and we are in
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ZmoneyKSU on November 04, 2012, 08:52:07 AM
so...we will probably be number two in the BCS again this week, Oregon will jump Notre Dame to 3 and our gap between us and Bama will widen, and our gap between us and #2 (Oregon) will get smaller. Let the butthurt and paranoia begin.

Alabama isn't going to lose.

Oregon isn't going to lose and they have two Top 15 teams left on their schedule in Stanford and OSU. 

Been an amazing season, but there is virtually no way we finish ahead of them.

We just have to root for a choke job by one of those teams and hope we avoid one, obviously.  Though Bama probably had their closet thing last night, then LSU out choked them.  Oregon, we have to hope their Freshman QB chokes in one of the remaining games.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Bill Clarahan on November 04, 2012, 08:53:25 AM
OSU will beat the ducks :emawkid:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on November 04, 2012, 08:54:58 AM
so...we will probably be number two in the BCS again this week, Oregon will jump Notre Dame to 3 and our gap between us and Bama will widen, and our gap between us and #2 (Oregon) will get smaller. Let the butthurt and paranoia begin.

Alabama isn't going to lose.

Oregon isn't going to lose and they have two Top 15 teams left on their schedule in Stanford and OSU. 

Been an amazing season, but there is virtually no way we finish ahead of them.

1 bama is beatable

b we also play a ranked team and will finish by playing 6 or 7 ranked teams. we win out and we are in

 :emawkid:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Domino on November 04, 2012, 09:27:58 AM
so...we will probably be number two in the BCS again this week, Oregon will jump Notre Dame to 3 and our gap between us and Bama will widen, and our gap between us and #2 (Oregon) will get smaller. Let the butthurt and paranoia begin.

Alabama isn't going to lose.

Oregon isn't going to lose and they have two Top 15 teams left on their schedule in Stanford and OSU. 

Been an amazing season, but there is virtually no way we finish ahead of them.

Those 2 teams play each other this week, meaning one of them knocks the other out, and when Oregon beats them, will drop the team to the fringe of top 25.

Also still hope Bevo can win against Farmaggie and Horned toads before their dismantling December 1st. Also since UCLA won, the Pac-12 Championship game no longer acts as a great a game for SOS as Oregon had hoped.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: j-dub on November 04, 2012, 10:15:09 AM
so...we will probably be number two in the BCS again this week, Oregon will jump Notre Dame to 3 and our gap between us and Bama will widen, and our gap between us and #2 (Oregon) will get smaller. Let the butthurt and paranoia begin.

Alabama isn't going to lose.

Oregon isn't going to lose and they have two Top 15 teams left on their schedule in Stanford and OSU. 

Been an amazing season, but there is virtually no way we finish ahead of them.

les miles calling a qb sneak on 4th and a long 1 sealed our fate last night. i wanted it all.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Trim on November 04, 2012, 10:16:08 AM
Normally these are alphabetic:

http://www.dickssportinggoods.com/category/index.jsp?categoryId=15504456
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: pissclams on November 04, 2012, 10:17:27 AM
Normally these are alphabetic:

http://www.dickssportinggoods.com/category/index.jsp?categoryId=15504456

lol, that's kind of cool.  deal with it.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Cartierfor3 on November 04, 2012, 10:17:46 AM
so...we will probably be number two in the BCS again this week, Oregon will jump Notre Dame to 3 and our gap between us and Bama will widen, and our gap between us and #2 (Oregon) will get smaller. Let the butthurt and paranoia begin.

Alabama isn't going to lose.

Oregon isn't going to lose and they have two Top 15 teams left on their schedule in Stanford and OSU. 

Been an amazing season, but there is virtually no way we finish ahead of them.

les miles calling a qb sneak on 4th and a long 1 sealed our fate last night. i wanted it all.

Dorks.  We are 9-0.  Lets wait until we either A) Lose or B) Get left out on Dec. 2nd before we throw a pitty party.  Good Grief.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Fuktard on November 04, 2012, 10:26:15 AM
Sagarins ratings should give everyone pause...Bama jumping from seventh to first is hard to understand nine games into the season.  Interestingly Missouri is ranked 29th in Sagarin despite being 1-5 in the SEC with their only win over a (basically) winless Kentucky team.  The computers are hard to figure out...it also appears that ND gained ground on KSU in Sagarin even though they beat a team ranked 87th (Pitt).

I doubt we gain any ground in the human polls but the first real team that Oregon plays puts up 51 points on them???
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: chum1 on November 04, 2012, 10:30:13 AM
Just for fun:  Average Sagarin ranking of KState's next three opponents is 27.67, Oregon's is 27.33.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pendergast on November 04, 2012, 10:37:57 AM
Alabama jumping so many spots is not surprising.  They were 7th with a terrible schedule, so beating #5 on the road is bound to be a huge boost.  ND gaining ground is a bit surprising but I don't believe it was anything more than a minuscule amount.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: AppleJack on November 04, 2012, 10:48:09 AM
I am afraid forthwith I will be the most butthurt and paranoid poster on this board, for that I apologize.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: pissclams on November 04, 2012, 10:55:12 AM
go cats
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: hemmy on November 04, 2012, 10:57:52 AM
go cats

agreed. I hope the cats keep winning.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on November 04, 2012, 11:02:40 AM
Just for fun:  Average Sagarin ranking of KState's next three opponents is 27.67, Oregon's is 27.33.

good pro-stat
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: hemmy on November 04, 2012, 11:07:55 AM
Just for fun:  Average Sagarin ranking of KState's next three opponents is 27.67, Oregon's is 27.33.

good pro-stat

It will look a lot different at the end of the year. Only hope is for Texas to be 9-2 when we play them, TCU and Baylor are pud.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: GoodForAnother on November 04, 2012, 11:09:25 AM
#3 in coaches

we went from 1366 to 1370 and oregon went from 1391 to 1399

now 29 back from oregon, was 25 last week
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: GoodForAnother on November 04, 2012, 11:10:13 AM
pretty good sized gap between the top 3 and ND at #4

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf/polls/coaches-poll/
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Houstoncat93 on November 04, 2012, 11:10:34 AM
Coach's is out.  Rankings are the same but the relevant changes to the vote total difference are.

Oregon increased their lead on us by a net 4 points

ND lost ground to us by 22 points

Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on November 04, 2012, 11:10:57 AM
COME ON COMPUTERS!
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pendergast on November 04, 2012, 11:11:14 AM
Just for fun:  Average Sagarin ranking of KState's next three opponents is 27.67, Oregon's is 27.33.

good pro-stat

It will look a lot different at the end of the year. Only hope is for Texas to be 9-2 when we play them, TCU and Baylor are pud.

OSU plays Stanford, putting that Oregon number in jeopardy.  Baylor plays @ OU, so they will fall a little.  If Baylor wins @OU and OSU loses?  Boom.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pendergast on November 04, 2012, 11:13:14 AM
4 points is in the weeds, no biggie.  THE marquee game they had left, and they gained 4 points.   OSU and Stanford are PUD teams.  :billdance:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Fuktard on November 04, 2012, 11:16:51 AM
will hurt us this week that 6 of the 8 teams we have beat lost this weekend.  obviously we will gain some of this back the next 3 games (all 3 teams we WILL play beat teams we HAVE played).

but seriously...how in the eff can you give up 51 points and get MORE votes...just how in the eff?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pendergast on November 04, 2012, 11:20:09 AM
will hurt us this week that 6 of the 8 teams we have beat lost this weekend.  obviously we will gain some of this back the next 3 games (all 3 teams we WILL play beat teams we HAVE played).

but seriously...how in the eff can you give up 51 points and get MORE votes...just how in the eff?

I think it's a good sign, if the fix was in, and everyone wanted to see Oregon in the champ game, they would have taken all of the available 2nd place votes, but they got ~66% of them, which is a lot, but symbolic of the fact there is not overwhelming belief the Ducks have to be in the game.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on November 04, 2012, 11:24:59 AM
AP: 3. K-State, 14. Oklahoma, 19-tie Texas, No. 25 Texas Tech.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: JohnCurrie is Weird/Gross on November 04, 2012, 11:26:23 AM
Schools Dropped Out
No. 19 West Virginia (5-3), No. 20 Texas Tech (6-3), No. 24 Oklahoma State (5-3).
 :sdeek:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on November 04, 2012, 11:32:54 AM
4 points is in the weeds, no biggie. 

This equates to them gaining .0009 in the bcs.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: GoodForAnother on November 04, 2012, 11:33:57 AM
what time does the harris come out?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on November 04, 2012, 11:35:22 AM
what time does the harris come out?

2-4ish
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pendergast on November 04, 2012, 11:36:52 AM
4 points is in the weeds, no biggie. 

This equates to them gaining .0009 in the bcs.

Yeah that was kinda my point.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Domino on November 04, 2012, 11:40:04 AM
4 points is in the weeds, no biggie.  THE marquee game they had left, and they gained 4 points.   OSU and Stanford are PUD teams.  :billdance:

Their marquee game left is whoever wins the Oregon State vs. Stanford game, since that winner will be arond #10 in the country.

This board should be rooting for Bevo to win their next 2, which they should do.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: eastcat on November 04, 2012, 11:40:44 AM
We're about to get a very famous screw job this year.  :dubious:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pendergast on November 04, 2012, 11:44:17 AM
4 points is in the weeds, no biggie.  THE marquee game they had left, and they gained 4 points.   OSU and Stanford are PUD teams.  :billdance:

Their marquee game left is whoever wins the Oregon State vs. Stanford game, since that winner will be arond #10 in the country.

This board should be rooting for Bevo to win their next 2, which they should do.

Their marquee game is against an upstart conference floor mat, or a team on their way down?  Woof.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on November 04, 2012, 11:53:21 AM
4 points is in the weeds, no biggie. 

This equates to them gaining .0009 in the bcs.

Yeah that was kinda my point.

Just backing up your point.  :dunno:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Fuktard on November 04, 2012, 12:47:33 PM
It's hard for me not to obsess about why USC is still even ranked when teams like Tech, WV and OSu (all with much better resumes) are not.  USC has beaten NO ONE...best win was a 10 point win over a 5-4 Washington team, and they got beat by a 5-4 Zona team that just lost 66-10 to UCLA.  What part of that resume deserves a top 25 ranking?  And they hang 51 on Oregon....supposedly the #2 team in the nation.   :shakesfist:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ChiComCat on November 04, 2012, 12:51:07 PM
It's hard for me not to obsess about why USC is still even ranked when teams like Tech, WV and OSu (all with much better resumes) are not.  USC has beaten NO ONE...best win was a 10 point win over a 5-4 Washington team, and they got beat by a 5-4 Zona team that just lost 66-10 to UCLA.  What part of that resume deserves a top 25 ranking?  And they hang 51 on Oregon....supposedly the #2 team in the nation.   :shakesfist:

Doesn't OSU share that loss with 'Zona
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Fuktard on November 04, 2012, 12:53:18 PM
It's hard for me not to obsess about why USC is still even ranked when teams like Tech, WV and OSu (all with much better resumes) are not.  USC has beaten NO ONE...best win was a 10 point win over a 5-4 Washington team, and they got beat by a 5-4 Zona team that just lost 66-10 to UCLA.  What part of that resume deserves a top 25 ranking?  And they hang 51 on Oregon....supposedly the #2 team in the nation.   :shakesfist:

Doesn't OSU share that loss with 'Zona

yes
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: yoEMAW on November 04, 2012, 01:58:51 PM
No. 1 in the ESPNU Fan rankings!  :emawkid:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Bookcat on November 04, 2012, 02:00:49 PM
We're about to get a very famous screw job this year.  :dubious:

I think 2004 Auburn might be the only thing to compare it to..but ya, just keep winning Kstate.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kslim on November 04, 2012, 02:14:39 PM
We're about to get a very famous screw job this year.  :dubious:

I think 2004 Auburn might be the only thing to compare it to..but ya, just keep winning Kstate.

okie state last year :dunno:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kim carnes on November 04, 2012, 02:18:01 PM
We're about to get a very famous screw job this year.  :dubious:

I think 2004 Auburn might be the only thing to compare it to..but ya, just keep winning Kstate.

okie state last year :dunno:


they didn't get screwed, they lost
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on November 04, 2012, 02:19:59 PM
nobody who ever lost to ISU at anything has ever gotten screwed
Title: Re: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: mocat on November 04, 2012, 02:20:22 PM
We're about to get a very famous screw job this year.  :dubious:

I think 2004 Auburn might be the only thing to compare it to..but ya, just keep winning Kstate.

okie state last year :dunno:


they didn't get screwed, they lost

Yeah losing to Iowa state screwed themselves, and in turn, screwed America by shoving that joke of a nc game down our throats
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on November 04, 2012, 02:26:16 PM
Lost 2 points to Oregon in the Harris over last week

http://www.harrisinteractive.com/vault/BCS_Nov_04_2012.pdf
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: GoodForAnother on November 04, 2012, 02:31:26 PM
losing two points in the harris poll is like charlie weis losing two ounces
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: "storm"nut on November 04, 2012, 02:33:05 PM
Lost 2 points to Oregon in the Harris over last week

http://www.harrisinteractive.com/vault/BCS_Nov_04_2012.pdf

Huge! I don't think the computers will give Oregon as big of a boost as people are thinking and with us staying close with Oregon in the Human polls I just don't see Oregon jumping us. Maybe if USC beats ND but I have to wonder how much that will help. ND's value as a firewall team may go away a little the next few weeks. Also Louisville will start showing up high in the computers as well of Georgia.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on November 04, 2012, 02:33:23 PM
losing two points in the harris poll is like charlie weis losing two ounces

yes, I was expecting more. pretty good polls/computers so far all things considered.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Mikeyis4dcats on November 04, 2012, 02:33:44 PM
we lost two POINTS or two VOTES?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: smith1051 on November 04, 2012, 02:34:16 PM
Oregon gained 10pts in Harris while we gained 8 so now trail by 71
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: "storm"nut on November 04, 2012, 02:35:23 PM
losing two points in the harris poll is like charlie weis losing two ounces

I don't think the human polls can do enough "fixing" with out it looking obvious to affect Oregon jumping to #2.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: smith1051 on November 04, 2012, 02:35:57 PM
ND lost 20pts
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: GoodForAnother on November 04, 2012, 02:37:16 PM
losing two points in the harris poll is like charlie weis losing two ounces

yes, I was expecting more. pretty good polls/computers so far all things considered.

man if we could've won by like 20-30 points yesterday (if klein doesn't go out, basically), we probably would've gained in the human polls
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Phil Titola on November 04, 2012, 02:38:40 PM
losing two points in the harris poll is like charlie weis losing two ounces

I don't think the human polls can do enough "fixing" with out it looking obvious to affect Oregon jumping to #2.

Agreed...the humans were not impressed from their "big win"....and they would have to get 2, 3, 3, 3 in computers to jump us...Pac12 garbage won't allow those computers to do that. (assuming human votes stay the same and our computers stay the same)
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on November 04, 2012, 02:42:12 PM
If #life plays next week, and we are sloppy, how much does that hurt our computers?  Do they stop loving us?  :ohno:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on November 04, 2012, 02:48:52 PM
UT plays ISU at home, has a bye week, plays TCU at home, then the CTR. What if they take advantage of that bye week bye starting to put in schemes for K-State? Then, with their Super Bowl a week away, they lose to TCU and drop a ton in the BCS? I will never forgive them. I will single handedly get Mack Brown fired.
Title: Re: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: michigancat on November 04, 2012, 02:52:23 PM
UT plays ISU at home, has a bye week, plays TCU at home, then the CTR. What if they take advantage of that bye week bye starting to put in schemes for K-State? Then, with their Super Bowl a week away, they lose to TCU and drop a ton in the BCS? I will never forgive them. I will single handedly get Mack Brown fired.

I really don't think it would matter at this point. It will be hard for us to move much without someone losing.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on November 04, 2012, 03:00:20 PM
Palm's projected BCS standings
KSU 0.9451   
Oregon 0.9233

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/rankings/bcs
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on November 04, 2012, 03:01:45 PM
I think we're going to know Nov 25th if we control our destiny. That will be the week ND plays USC, Oregon plays OSU and we are idle. It will basically be the only week when Oregon can jump us because they won't do it when we play Texas on the first and they play the CCG. If OSU loses the next two and Oregon has a close game against them and Stanford then I don't think they jump us. If OSU wins the next two and Oregon blows them out then they will probably jump us with us being idle.  So basically we know in 20 days if we go to the MNC.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Phil Titola on November 04, 2012, 03:02:43 PM
Palm's projected BCS standings
KSU 0.9451   
Oregon 0.9233

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/rankings/bcs

Confirmed with my expert numbers for k-state....he must have Oregon dropping in computers vs. last week...interesting.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on November 04, 2012, 03:02:58 PM
Palm's projected BCS standings
KSU 0.9451   
Oregon 0.9233

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/rankings/bcs

We gain some of what we lost back this week when we play TCU and they play bottom feeder Cal.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on November 04, 2012, 03:03:30 PM
Still #1 in the computers! :emawkid:
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: "storm"nut on November 04, 2012, 03:04:23 PM
Oregon will lose some computer support next week playing a piss poor Cal. ND will as well but should still stay ahead of Oregon in the computers. P.S. Georgia is now a Firewall them and LSU still is as well.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Mikeyis4dcats on November 04, 2012, 03:14:57 PM
Palm's projected BCS standings
KSU 0.9451   
Oregon 0.9233

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/rankings/bcs

how does that compare to Palm last week?   I can't find it on the CBS site...
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: smith1051 on November 04, 2012, 03:17:52 PM
Actual from last week

Bama 0.9759
KSU 0.9400
ND 0.9147
Oregon 0.9136


http://espn.go.com/college-football/bcs
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on November 04, 2012, 03:23:07 PM
Not that it matters but we gained four points on Oregon in the AP poll.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on November 04, 2012, 03:23:24 PM
So after Oregon won their super bowl and was "validated", Palm projects our lead over Oregon to shrink by 13.8%.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Phil Titola on November 04, 2012, 03:26:49 PM
So after Oregon won their super bowl and was "validated", Palm projects our lead over Oregon to shrink by 13.8%.

I'm going to need that out 3 decimal points to fully understand.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Mikeyis4dcats on November 04, 2012, 03:28:59 PM
So after Oregon won their super bowl and was "validated", Palm projects our lead over Oregon to shrink by 13.8%.

is that stat projection vs. projection or projection vs. actual?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SwiftCat on November 04, 2012, 03:30:04 PM
Oregons opponents need to keep losing. It'd be great if USC looked bad their next time out.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SleepFighter on November 04, 2012, 03:34:32 PM
If we keep winning, we're going to be fine.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on November 04, 2012, 03:36:43 PM
If we keep winning, we're going to be fine.

nope, need help
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: stunted on November 04, 2012, 03:40:04 PM
I'm sure by the end of the season, 3-4 other Big 12 teams will be top 25, with 8 in the top 50 or so.  Plus Miami.

Win and we are in.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on November 04, 2012, 03:51:38 PM
So after Oregon won their super bowl and was "validated", Palm projects our lead over Oregon to shrink by 13.8%.

is that stat projection vs. projection or projection vs. actual?

This is last week's actuals vs. this week's Palm's projections.  However, in Palm's projections are this week's actuals for the 2 human polls and the Sagarin.  It may also contain the actual for another computer, Palm claims it's an actual but it hasn't been published and they aren't supposed to publish it until Tuesday.  The projections in Palm's "projection" are 4 or 5 computers. 

It should also be noted, that in the computer that I'm not sure is an actual or projection, Oregon didn't move up. 
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: michigancat on November 04, 2012, 03:54:52 PM
According to this, computers can only use who won in their formulas. Not sure how accurate this is.

 http://www.bcscomp.com/faq.html
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on November 04, 2012, 03:56:20 PM
Oregons opponents need to keep losing. It'd be great if USC looked bad their next time out.

USC and UCLA play this week to see who gets to go to the PAC 12 Champoinship. Not sure if it matters. I guess I'd rather have USC go with the hopes that they have a better idea of what would beat them and are able to use it.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on November 04, 2012, 04:01:24 PM
the entire pac10 is just complete dogshit.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: jtksu on November 04, 2012, 04:02:13 PM
Oregons opponents need to keep losing. It'd be great if USC looked bad their next time out.

USC and UCLA play this week to see who gets to go to the PAC 12 Champoinship. Not sure if it matters. I guess I'd rather have USC go with the hopes that they have a better idea of what would beat them and are able to use it.

They definitely know how to beat Oregon now, just score 70 pts next time.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on November 04, 2012, 04:14:13 PM
So why are we trusting Jerry Palm with anything? Isn't this the pud who had Oregon in the Alamo Bowl like two weeks ago? Lmao.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SleepFighter on November 04, 2012, 04:14:55 PM
If we keep winning, we're going to be fine.

nope, need help
we'll see
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Cire on November 04, 2012, 04:23:48 PM
Need help, the bcs and TV want Oregon
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on November 04, 2012, 04:25:04 PM
Need help, the bcs and TV want Oregon

Absolutely. Anybody who thinks this means very little is kidding themselves.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on November 04, 2012, 04:27:31 PM
So why are we trusting Jerry Palm with anything? Isn't this the pud who had Oregon in the Alamo Bowl like two weeks ago? Lmao.

We've been over this.  2 weeks ago he thought:
1. USC would beat Oregon
2. OU would beat ND
3. Boise wouldn't lose again.

If those 3 things happened, OU, ND, Boise, & an SEC team would be the 4 at-large BCS teams and Oregon would have gone to the Alamo.  Don't get me wrong, Palm has said a ton of stupid stuff.  However thinking 2 weeks ago that those 3 things would happen and Oregon would go to the Alamo wasn't one of them.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on November 04, 2012, 04:29:31 PM
Pitt helped us by missing a chipshot to win
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Shacks on November 04, 2012, 04:34:34 PM
Oregons opponents need to keep losing. It'd be great if USC looked bad their next time out.

USC and UCLA play this week to see who gets to go to the PAC 12 Champoinship. Not sure if it matters. I guess I'd rather have USC go with the hopes that they have a better idea of what would beat them and are able to use it.

This week, USC plays ASU and UCLA plays Washington State.  They play each other on the 17th.  USC controls its destiny in their division, if they beat ASU and UCLA they win the South.  I'd like a rematch between them and Oregon because it would be more difficult for Oregon to beat USC again than it would be to beat UCLA once.  Rematches are inherently tougher for whoever won the first game.
Title: Re: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Rams on November 04, 2012, 04:35:46 PM
Need help, the bcs and TV want Oregon
well luckily tv doesn't get a vote. you can't change the computer formulas and if the coaches wanted to see oregon in the champy they'd be voting them in there already.
Title: Re: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: doom on November 04, 2012, 04:38:02 PM
Need help, the bcs and TV want Oregon
well luckily tv doesn't get a vote. you can't change the computer formulas and if the coaches wanted to see oregon in the champy they'd be voting them in there already.

The tv gets to influence voters. 
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: chum1 on November 04, 2012, 04:38:55 PM
I mean, we don't control our own destiny.  Only Alabama does.  But we're pretty damn close to controlling it and are certainly in a much, much stronger position than Oregon.  Things would have to get really crazy for us to go undefeated and get left out.  We've got enough cushion to withstand any BCS/TV shenanigans.  To leave us out, they would basically have to come out and say, "Okay, KState is #2, but we want Oregon in the title game." That crap won't fly with anyone.
Title: Re: Re: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Rams on November 04, 2012, 04:42:33 PM
Need help, the bcs and TV want Oregon
well luckily tv doesn't get a vote. you can't change the computer formulas and if the coaches wanted to see oregon in the champy they'd be voting them in there already.

The tv gets to influence voters.
the coaches? pfft. gtfoomf.
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: "storm"nut on November 04, 2012, 04:43:12 PM
Is the media just toying with Oregon fans just for rating? Kind of like the Heisman race. Every one knows Klein is going to win, baring a shitty performance but they keep bringing up names to keep college football fans interested. I think that the BCS experts have a good idea how the computers will look in 4 weeks and Oregon is still coming up short.
Title: Re: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SleepFighter on November 04, 2012, 04:43:56 PM
Need help, the bcs and TV want Oregon
well luckily tv doesn't get a vote. you can't change the computer formulas and if the coaches wanted to see oregon in the champy they'd be voting them in there already.

The tv gets to influence voters.

We haven't seen that influence amount to anything yet.  If we keep winning, especially by multiple scores, it's going to be hard for voters to pull the kind of Pinkelesque shenanigans that they would have to in order to make a meaningful difference.  It's all going to come down to the computers which are going to spit out whatever they're going to spit out.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Cire on November 04, 2012, 04:45:03 PM
I mean, we don't control our own destiny.  Only Alabama does.  But we're pretty damn close to controlling it and are certainly in a much, much stronger position than Oregon.  Things would have to get really crazy for us to go undefeated and get left out.  We've got enough cushion to withstand any BCS/TV shenanigans.  To leave us out, they would basically have to come out and say, "Okay, KState is #2, but we want Oregon in the title game." That crap won't fly with anyone.

I hope you are right
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 04, 2012, 04:49:48 PM
Is the media just toying with Oregon fans just for rating? Kind of like the Heisman race. Every one knows Klein is going to win, baring a shitty performance but they keep bringing up names to keep college football fans interested. I think that the BCS experts have a good idea how the computers will look in 4 weeks and Oregon is still coming up short.

I think "BCS expert" is an oxymoron, especially when it comes to the ones who get put on tv. None of those guys have any idea how the computers will look 4 weeks from now.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: chum1 on November 04, 2012, 04:58:33 PM
I mean, we don't control our own destiny.  Only Alabama does.  But we're pretty damn close to controlling it and are certainly in a much, much stronger position than Oregon.  Things would have to get really crazy for us to go undefeated and get left out.  We've got enough cushion to withstand any BCS/TV shenanigans.  To leave us out, they would basically have to come out and say, "Okay, KState is #2, but we want Oregon in the title game." That crap won't fly with anyone.

I hope you are right

Of course, all of that is assuming that the undefeateds don't lose, which isn't going to happen.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ednksu on November 04, 2012, 04:59:02 PM
Does BCS factor in opponent rank in some way?  I know margin of victory is out.  Are there any kind of points scored included?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Mikeyis4dcats on November 04, 2012, 05:09:49 PM
Does BCS factor in opponent rank in some way?  I know margin of victory is out.  Are there any kind of points scored included?

no, just W/L allegedly, but I don't see how they calculate anything with only that.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 06wildcat on November 04, 2012, 05:54:15 PM
Does BCS factor in opponent rank in some way?  I know margin of victory is out.  Are there any kind of points scored included?

no, just W/L allegedly, but I don't see how they calculate anything with only that.

Because while correct, the website Michigan linked was incomplete. He's talking specifically about MOV, which doesn't factor into the rankings so it is just win or lose in that sense. But SOS is also a part of the computers (and human polls too, hello Louisville).

There's a reason MOV isn't in the BCS and a prime example of it is ND vs. OU compared to KSU vs. OU. Plus unsportsmanlike stuff, too.
Title: Re: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: michigancat on November 04, 2012, 06:17:52 PM
Does BCS factor in opponent rank in some way?  I know margin of victory is out.  Are there any kind of points scored included?

no, just W/L allegedly, but I don't see how they calculate anything with only that.

Because while correct, the website Michigan linked was incomplete. He's talking specifically about MOV, which doesn't factor into the rankings so it is just win or lose in that sense. But SOS is also a part of the computers (and human polls too, hello Louisville).

There's a reason MOV isn't in the BCS and a prime example of it is ND vs. OU compared to KSU vs. OU. Plus unsportsmanlike stuff, too.

The link said they can't pull anything from a box score other than who won or lost.

Basically what all these polls are doing is calculating SOS different ways and determining who did best based on that.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Johnny Thunderbone on November 04, 2012, 07:28:04 PM
Turned on ESPN. BCS Countdown teaser came on during NFL Live. Heard "What? Alabama's not number 1?" At first I was  :emawkid:, but then I was  :dubious:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on November 04, 2012, 07:38:28 PM
.932  :runaway:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ednksu on November 04, 2012, 07:39:11 PM
zomg firewall worked for one more week!
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on November 04, 2012, 07:40:42 PM
How the eff is ND ahead of us in the computers?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on November 04, 2012, 07:41:12 PM
Please do not lose, Notre Dame!
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on November 04, 2012, 07:42:07 PM
Jesse Palmer is acting like he wants to go down on Chip Kelly. Thank Gawd for Pollack.
Title: Re: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ednksu on November 04, 2012, 07:44:04 PM
Does BCS factor in opponent rank in some way?  I know margin of victory is out.  Are there any kind of points scored included?

no, just W/L allegedly, but I don't see how they calculate anything with only that.

Because while correct, the website Michigan linked was incomplete. He's talking specifically about MOV, which doesn't factor into the rankings so it is just win or lose in that sense. But SOS is also a part of the computers (and human polls too, hello Louisville).

There's a reason MOV isn't in the BCS and a prime example of it is ND vs. OU compared to KSU vs. OU. Plus unsportsmanlike stuff, too.

The link said they can't pull anything from a box score other than who won or lost.

Basically what all these polls are doing is calculating SOS different ways and determining who did best based on that.
So to make sure I have my basics correct: SOS will include rankings at time they play, but will not be effected if they drop later?  Here is basically what I'm asking. We beat a #15 WVU or whatever they were.  At the end of the year when looking at rankings will it be shown that we beat a ranked team on week 7 in our SOS calculation or will it be an unranked team?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Mikeyis4dcats on November 04, 2012, 07:44:52 PM
Palm was way off.   But off almost the same on both of us.

Title: Re: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on November 04, 2012, 07:45:32 PM
Does BCS factor in opponent rank in some way?  I know margin of victory is out.  Are there any kind of points scored included?

no, just W/L allegedly, but I don't see how they calculate anything with only that.

Because while correct, the website Michigan linked was incomplete. He's talking specifically about MOV, which doesn't factor into the rankings so it is just win or lose in that sense. But SOS is also a part of the computers (and human polls too, hello Louisville).

There's a reason MOV isn't in the BCS and a prime example of it is ND vs. OU compared to KSU vs. OU. Plus unsportsmanlike stuff, too.

The link said they can't pull anything from a box score other than who won or lost.

Basically what all these polls are doing is calculating SOS different ways and determining who did best based on that.
So to make sure I have my basics correct: SOS will include rankings at time they play, but will not be effected if they drop later?  Here is basically what I'm asking. We beat a #15 WVU or whatever they were.  At the end of the year when looking at rankings will it be shown that we beat a ranked team on week 7 in our SOS calculation or will it be an unranked team?

unranked
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 04, 2012, 07:45:56 PM
How the eff is ND ahead of us in the computers?

wins against weak opponents that have wins against really weak opponents.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kim carnes on November 04, 2012, 07:46:07 PM
we're screwed.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MakeItRain on November 04, 2012, 07:46:16 PM
Holy crap, how in the hell is ND ahead of us in the computers when we were tied last week?  Good news is we're running right by those losers next week.  Better news, Johnny Football is going to shock the world!
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Mikeyis4dcats on November 04, 2012, 07:47:42 PM
looks like we all gave up position to Bama in computers, more than I expected
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ednksu on November 04, 2012, 07:49:04 PM
okay people explain the computers thing to me.  how does that happen?

also can we now root for every team to lose?  Last weeked we needed ND as a firewall and that hasn't helped us apparently.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 04, 2012, 07:50:57 PM
okay people explain the computers thing to me.  how does that happen?

also can we now root for every team to lose?  Last weeked we needed ND as a firewall and that hasn't helped us apparently.

do you see where ksu is 2 and oregon is 3?

maybe you didn't see that.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on November 04, 2012, 07:51:17 PM
Better news, Johnny Football is going to shock the world!

 :pray:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: hemmy on November 04, 2012, 07:51:28 PM
Oregon is jumping us, sorry fellas :frown: I've seen enough to call it.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on November 04, 2012, 07:51:38 PM
You know who is to blame for all of this? The LSU kicker. If he makes that, and they actually get to kick it off to Alabama, it's just us an Oregon right now, praying the other one loses so that we get to play the crappiest undefeated team that has ever existed: Notre Dame.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Mikeyis4dcats on November 04, 2012, 07:53:25 PM
okay people explain the computers thing to me.  how does that happen?

also can we now root for every team to lose?  Last weeked we needed ND as a firewall and that hasn't helped us apparently.

you don't understand how this works.   See all those 4s and 5s beside Oregon?  If ND loses, those become 3s and 4s.  And the gap narrows between KSU and Oregon

http://espn.go.com/college-football/bcs
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: CHONGS on November 04, 2012, 07:54:04 PM
okay people explain the computers thing to me.  how does that happen?

also can we now root for every team to lose?  Last weeked we needed ND as a firewall and that hasn't helped us apparently.
its like RPI for many of the computers.  playing the big 10 teams is helping ND a bit because they in turn feast on MAC teams.  its all about opponents opponents schedule.  I personally think its a stupid way to determine SOS ( and rewards a team for losing to "good teams" more so than beating average or below average teams).   
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: GoodForAnother on November 04, 2012, 07:54:48 PM
it is going to be ok
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Mikeyis4dcats on November 04, 2012, 07:55:03 PM
You know who is to blame for all of this? The LSU kicker. If he makes that, and they actually get to kick it off to Alabama, it's just us an Oregon right now, praying the other one loses so that we get to play the crappiest undefeated team that has ever existed: Notre Dame.

Les Miles is to blame.   Who fakes a FG with the lead, at the 29 yd line on 4th and rough ridin' 12?!?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: jaa1025 on November 04, 2012, 07:55:26 PM
We have a lot of room to improve our computer rankings now though so that's good. Just got to hope for ND to stay undefeated. I'm afraid though that after Bama's huge jump in the computer rankings after facing an overrated LSU team that Oregon might do the same thing after facing an overrated Oregon State and Stanford.

Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: j-dub on November 04, 2012, 07:55:44 PM
You know who is to blame for all of this? The LSU kicker. If he makes that, and they actually get to kick it off to Alabama, it's just us an Oregon right now, praying the other one loses so that we get to play the crappiest undefeated team that has ever existed: Notre Dame.

les miles fault. qb sneak on 4th and a long 1.. would have iced the game had they got the 1st. and he called an effing sneak needing more than a full yard. complete idiot.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: CHONGS on November 04, 2012, 07:56:56 PM
http://sebaseball.kislanko.com/PASOS/present.html
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Cartierfor3 on November 04, 2012, 07:57:09 PM
it is going to be ok

I hope so. 
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MakeItRain on November 04, 2012, 07:57:31 PM
It sounded to me that Brad Edwards thinks Oregon is fracked
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ednksu on November 04, 2012, 07:57:35 PM
8:46PM EST November 4. 2012 -

Rank   Team   USA    TODAY poll   Harris poll     Computer rank      BCS average
1   Alabama   1       1.000              1   .9972   1   .9900         .9957
2   K-State     3       .9288               3   .9266   3   .9400         .9318
3   Oregon     2       .9485              2   .9513   5   .8500         .9166
4   Notre        4       .8739              4   .8810   2   .9600                .9050
5   Georgia   5       .8258                 5   .8157   6   .8100         .8171
6      Florida   7       .7397              7   .7492   4   .8700         .7863
7   LSU          9       .6766              8   .6995   7   .7400         .7054
8   South Car   11       .5966             11   .5753   8   .6900         .6206
9   Louisville  10       .6373             10   .6348   13   .5400         .6040
10   Florida St   6       .7776              6   .7732   19   .2400         .5969
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 04, 2012, 07:57:49 PM
i just want to take a moment and say david pollock has a standing offer to come to my house and just chill and be buds and stuff.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on November 04, 2012, 07:57:53 PM
it is going to be ok

I hope so.

Hold me, guys.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ednksu on November 04, 2012, 07:58:54 PM
okay people explain the computers thing to me.  how does that happen?

also can we now root for every team to lose?  Last weeked we needed ND as a firewall and that hasn't helped us apparently.

do you see where ksu is 2 and oregon is 3?

maybe you didn't see that.
Please note the computer polls.  Very odd statistical information.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SPE_khat on November 04, 2012, 07:59:12 PM
"Oregon would have to climb to 3rd in at least half of the computer rankings, and that is pretty significant"
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: AppleJack on November 04, 2012, 08:00:18 PM
I hate (love) this.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on November 04, 2012, 08:00:26 PM
okay people explain the computers thing to me.  how does that happen?

also can we now root for every team to lose?  Last weeked we needed ND as a firewall and that hasn't helped us apparently.

For everyone wondering why ND jumped us:

The computers only take into account who you have played and weight each game equally.  Of the 8 teams ND played prior to yesterday, they went 5-2 this weekend.  Of the 8 teams KSU played prior to yesterday, they went 2-6 this weekend.  That's why the computer tie with ND was broken and they moved ahead of us. 

The good news for KSU, we still get to play 3 of those teams that caused 3 loses to our prior opponents.  The 3 teams remaining on our schedule just got stronger.  In order for that to happen, our previous schedule had to weaken...it's OK.  Over the course of the rest of the season our SOS will make it back up to where it was prior to this weekend.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ednksu on November 04, 2012, 08:01:06 PM
okay people explain the computers thing to me.  how does that happen?

also can we now root for every team to lose?  Last weeked we needed ND as a firewall and that hasn't helped us apparently.
its like RPI for many of the computers.  playing the big 10 teams is helping ND a bit because they in turn feast on MAC teams.  its all about opponents opponents schedule.  I personally think its a stupid way to determine SOS ( and rewards a team for losing to "good teams" more so than beating average or below average teams).
Makes sense to me, good explano. 
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: nicname on November 04, 2012, 08:01:51 PM
Better news, Johnny Football is going to shock the world!

 :pray:

Yes, scratch our backs for once cultaggie
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: AbeFroman on November 04, 2012, 08:02:03 PM
"Oregon would have to climb to 3rd in at least half of the computer rankings, and that is pretty significant"

I liked that guy, and his name was Brad  :sdeek:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: GoodForAnother on November 04, 2012, 08:02:19 PM
there's been a new #3 each week so that's cool
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on November 04, 2012, 08:02:45 PM
i just want to take a moment and say david pollock has a standing offer to come to my house and just chill and be buds and stuff.

Yeah. He seems like a really cool guy, and not just because he's EMAW.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ednksu on November 04, 2012, 08:03:25 PM
okay people explain the computers thing to me.  how does that happen?

also can we now root for every team to lose?  Last weeked we needed ND as a firewall and that hasn't helped us apparently.

For everyone wondering why ND jumped us:

The computers only take into account who you have played and weight each game equally.  Of the 8 teams ND played prior to yesterday, they went 5-2 this weekend.  Of the 8 teams KSU played prior to yesterday, they went 2-6 this weekend.  That's why the computer tie with ND was broken and they moved ahead of us. 

The good news for KSU, we still get to play 3 of those teams that caused 3 loses to our prior opponents.  The 3 teams remaining on our schedule just go stronger.  In order for that to happen, our previous schedule had to weaken...it's OK.
I'm very surprised ND's opp record had that good of a weekend. 

Florida State is just getting killed in the computers, 6 in person polls, 19 in the computers.  Talk about a conference KILLING your ranking. 
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 04, 2012, 08:03:34 PM
i also liked that they pointed out that some voters had ND lower than 4th.

very lulzy to the idiots that still think "the media" is somehow going to put ND in the title game.
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: "storm"nut on November 04, 2012, 08:04:01 PM
Alabama will fall in the computers after playing that fcs school and Auburn. Notre Damn has room to fall against Wake and BC. Baylor and TCU while not good are no BC Wake Auburn, or FCS school.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: CHONGS on November 04, 2012, 08:04:38 PM
okay people explain the computers thing to me.  how does that happen?

also can we now root for every team to lose?  Last weeked we needed ND as a firewall and that hasn't helped us apparently.
its like RPI for many of the computers.  playing the big 10 teams is helping ND a bit because they in turn feast on MAC teams.  its all about opponents opponents schedule.  I personally think its a stupid way to determine SOS ( and rewards a team for losing to "good teams" more so than beating average or below average teams).
Makes sense to me, good explano. 
yeah some tard on shaggybevo uses something very similar for his/her terrible "poll" (:lol: that s/he calls it a poll) and had ND higher based on that fact that ND opponent's opponents have won more games (they don't even take into account byes so that's how bad it is).
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on November 04, 2012, 08:06:44 PM
I'm a lot more confident now than I was earlier. Pollack and Herbie being impressed and saying we are a complete team makes me think the coaches also think this.  Brad also made it seem like Oregon doesn't have the upper hand now, which is great.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on November 04, 2012, 08:07:24 PM
okay people explain the computers thing to me.  how does that happen?

also can we now root for every team to lose?  Last weeked we needed ND as a firewall and that hasn't helped us apparently.

For everyone wondering why ND jumped us:

The computers only take into account who you have played and weight each game equally.  Of the 8 teams ND played prior to yesterday, they went 5-2 this weekend.  Of the 8 teams KSU played prior to yesterday, they went 2-6 this weekend.  That's why the computer tie with ND was broken and they moved ahead of us. 

The good news for KSU, we still get to play 3 of those teams that caused 3 loses to our prior opponents.  The 3 teams remaining on our schedule just go stronger.  In order for that to happen, our previous schedule had to weaken...it's OK.
I'm very surprised ND's opp record had that good of a weekend. 

Florida State is just getting killed in the computers, 6 in person polls, 19 in the computers.  Talk about a conference KILLING your ranking.

Navy, Mich, Miami, OU, and Stanford won.  Missouri St, UNT, KU, WVU, Tech, and ISU lost.  The good news is we still play the teams that beat WVU, Tech, and KU. 
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kso_FAN on November 04, 2012, 08:07:47 PM
okay people explain the computers thing to me.  how does that happen?

also can we now root for every team to lose?  Last weeked we needed ND as a firewall and that hasn't helped us apparently.
its like RPI for many of the computers.  playing the big 10 teams is helping ND a bit because they in turn feast on MAC teams.  its all about opponents opponents schedule.  I personally think its a stupid way to determine SOS ( and rewards a team for losing to "good teams" more so than beating average or below average teams).   

Yeah, its crazy. It sounds like the computers are a basically a variety of different ways to calculate something similar to the RPI and with football's limited schedule, there are going to be weird fluctuations on a weekly basis, even 3/4 of the way into the season.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Phil Titola on November 04, 2012, 08:08:21 PM
It sounded to me that Brad Edwards thinks Oregon is fracked

That's how I heard it too.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on November 04, 2012, 08:09:38 PM
FYI - The only changes in Oregon's computer rankings was they moved up from 8 to 7 in the Sagarin and 5 to 4 in the Anderson & Hester.  That's it.  In 4 computers they didn't pass anyone. 
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MakeItRain on November 04, 2012, 08:09:47 PM
Alabama will fall in the computers after playing that fcs school and Auburn. Notre Damn has room to fall against Wake and BC. Baylor and TCU while not good are no BC Wake Auburn, or FCS school.

FCS schools are not factored, its like a bye
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Phil Titola on November 04, 2012, 08:10:44 PM
FYI - The only changes in Oregon's computer rankings was they moved up from 8 to 7 in the Sagarin and 5 to 4 in the Anderson & Hester.  That's it.  In 4 computers they didn't pass anyone.

Yup.  Their big road win didn't do squat for them.
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: "storm"nut on November 04, 2012, 08:10:54 PM
Alabama will fall in the computers after playing that fcs school and Auburn. Notre Damn has room to fall against Wake and BC. Baylor and TCU while not good are no BC Wake Auburn, or FCS school.

FCS schools are not factored, its like a bye

Did not know that.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: bigwillie20 on November 04, 2012, 08:11:03 PM
Mack is going to let his bro Bill hang 70 on them the final game to impress the voters  :emawkid:
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on November 04, 2012, 08:11:03 PM
What is the updated average BCS ranking (or just computer ranking) of KSUs and Oregons remaining opponents?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 04, 2012, 08:12:44 PM
Alabama will fall in the computers after playing that fcs school and Auburn. Notre Damn has room to fall against Wake and BC. Baylor and TCU while not good are no BC Wake Auburn, or FCS school.

FCS schools are not factored, its like a bye

so playing mo st. is more beneficial than playing ku?

interesting...
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: AbeFroman on November 04, 2012, 08:14:09 PM
You know who is to blame for all of this? The LSU kicker. If he makes that, and they actually get to kick it off to Alabama, it's just us an Oregon right now, praying the other one loses so that we get to play the crappiest undefeated team that has ever existed: Notre Dame.

les miles fault. qb sneak on 4th and a long 1.. would have iced the game had they got the 1st. and he called an effing sneak needing more than a full yard. complete idiot.

This is very :jeffy: but is it possible Miles threw the game? He probably thought Bama would kill his pud team. Then lo and behold his players wanted to win and he's staring a 4th qtr lead in the face. We already know Miles, Saban and their cronies conspired to vote down Oklahoma State last season. Miles knew that beating Bama could shut the SEC out of the MNC. So why not do some of the worst play calling in the history of college football to give Bama a shot?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Trim on November 04, 2012, 08:14:29 PM
I don't think Alabama should be so universally recognized as #1.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ednksu on November 04, 2012, 08:14:44 PM
Alabama will fall in the computers after playing that fcs school and Auburn. Notre Damn has room to fall against Wake and BC. Baylor and TCU while not good are no BC Wake Auburn, or FCS school.

FCS schools are not factored, its like a bye
is it factored like a bye or some sort of weird less weight void?  Is it like doing an average where you divide by 12 where everyone gets a bye or divide by 11 since that 12th spot is an fcs team?  Not sure if that makes sense.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MakeItRain on November 04, 2012, 08:15:23 PM
Alabama will fall in the computers after playing that fcs school and Auburn. Notre Damn has room to fall against Wake and BC. Baylor and TCU while not good are no BC Wake Auburn, or FCS school.

FCS schools are not factored, its like a bye

so playing mo st. is more beneficial than playing ku?

interesting...

I guess that's one way to look at it, another way is that you have less games therefore I would assume less weight.  13 games carries more weight than 11.  At least they should :dunno: all I know is that I've heard more than once on this show that FCS games don't count in the computer numbers
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Cartierfor3 on November 04, 2012, 08:15:56 PM
You know who is to blame for all of this? The LSU kicker. If he makes that, and they actually get to kick it off to Alabama, it's just us an Oregon right now, praying the other one loses so that we get to play the crappiest undefeated team that has ever existed: Notre Dame.

les miles fault. qb sneak on 4th and a long 1.. would have iced the game had they got the 1st. and he called an effing sneak needing more than a full yard. complete idiot.

This is very :jeffy: but is it possible Miles threw the game? He probably thought Bama would kill his pud team. Then lo and behold his players wanted to win and he's staring a 4th qtr lead in the face. We already know Miles, Saban and their cronies conspired to vote down Oklahoma State last season. Miles knew that beating Bama could shut the SEC out of the MNC. So why not do some of the worst play calling in the history of college football to give Bama a shot?

stupid.  i'm assuming you've never watched a Les Miles coached game before. 
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: doom on November 04, 2012, 08:17:16 PM
Alabama will fall in the computers after playing that fcs school and Auburn. Notre Damn has room to fall against Wake and BC. Baylor and TCU while not good are no BC Wake Auburn, or FCS school.

FCS schools are not factored, its like a bye
is it factored like a bye or some sort of weird less weight void?  Is it like doing an average where you divide by 12 where everyone gets a bye or divide by 11 since that 12th spot is an fcs team?  Not sure if that makes sense.

But if you lost only the fcs game?  it wouldn't count other than in the human polls?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: goldenticket on November 04, 2012, 08:17:44 PM
say texas is able to win their next two and climb up the rankings. when we beat them would that be enough to hold off oregon?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on November 04, 2012, 08:17:54 PM
What is the updated average BCS ranking (or just computer ranking) of KSUs and Oregons remaining opponents?

Oregon - 31.0
KSU - 34.3
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: AbeFroman on November 04, 2012, 08:18:54 PM
You know who is to blame for all of this? The LSU kicker. If he makes that, and they actually get to kick it off to Alabama, it's just us an Oregon right now, praying the other one loses so that we get to play the crappiest undefeated team that has ever existed: Notre Dame.

les miles fault. qb sneak on 4th and a long 1.. would have iced the game had they got the 1st. and he called an effing sneak needing more than a full yard. complete idiot.

This is very :jeffy: but is it possible Miles threw the game? He probably thought Bama would kill his pud team. Then lo and behold his players wanted to win and he's staring a 4th qtr lead in the face. We already know Miles, Saban and their cronies conspired to vote down Oklahoma State last season. Miles knew that beating Bama could shut the SEC out of the MNC. So why not do some of the worst play calling in the history of college football to give Bama a shot?

stupid.  i'm assuming you've never watched a Les Miles coached game before.

That's the thing, he knew he could get away with it because of his track record.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Cartierfor3 on November 04, 2012, 08:19:14 PM
What is the updated average BCS ranking (or just computer ranking) of KSUs and Oregons remaining opponents?

Oregon - 31.0
KSU - 34.3

did you factor in PAC 12 'ship game?
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on November 04, 2012, 08:19:54 PM
What is the updated average BCS ranking (or just computer ranking) of KSUs and Oregons remaining opponents?

Oregon - 31.0
KSU - 34.3

:thumbs:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MakeItRain on November 04, 2012, 08:20:53 PM
Anyone else think the "one is the loneliest number" is catchy?  I find myself singing it all week in anticipation of Sunday night.
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on November 04, 2012, 08:20:56 PM
say texas is able to win their next two and climb up the rankings. when we beat them would that be enough to hold off oregon?

The thing is, by doing so they give two more losses to teams we have beaten. Should only factor into human polls.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SwiftCat on November 04, 2012, 08:21:10 PM
So basically a round robin conference schedule is devastating for a team in the BCS hunt. Our SOS was pretty much set after Non-Con play finished. The wins and losses will all be a wash, eventually coming out to 50-50 in conference play, no?

Mean while Alabama's opponents get to beat up on shitty teams.
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on November 04, 2012, 08:22:24 PM
The big 12 had a very good SOS going into conference play...so I don't think so
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kim carnes on November 04, 2012, 08:22:58 PM
Anyone else think the "one is the loneliest number" is catchy?  I find myself singing it all week in anticipation of Sunday night.

yes
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MakeItRain on November 04, 2012, 08:23:25 PM
What's Rece Davis' deal?  He's been leading the Klein helmet sticker parade for two seasons.  Is he afraid EMAW is going to punk his Cremson Tide?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 04, 2012, 08:24:15 PM
Anyone else think the "one is the loneliest number" is catchy?  I find myself singing it all week in anticipation of Sunday night.

was going to post this earlier.  love the song.

always reminds me of magnolia, which i also love though.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on November 04, 2012, 08:26:14 PM
What is the updated average BCS ranking (or just computer ranking) of KSUs and Oregons remaining opponents?

Oregon - 31.0
KSU - 34.3

did you factor in PAC 12 'ship game?

Nope - if you add in USC its 28.7, with UCLA it's 28.2.
Title: Re: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: CNS on November 04, 2012, 08:26:18 PM
I don't think Alabama should be so universally recognized as #1.

Would smash them.

Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2

Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: AbeFroman on November 04, 2012, 08:26:44 PM
say texas is able to win their next two and climb up the rankings. when we beat them would that be enough to hold off oregon?

The thing is, by doing so they give two more losses to teams we have beaten. Should only factor into human polls.

Well if Brad is correct and Oregon is going to have a ridiculous time trying to catch us in the computers, then all we need is a few tard voters fall in love with Texas for 3 more weeks to hold them off
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on November 04, 2012, 08:27:01 PM
The big 12 had a very good SOS going into conference play...so I don't think so

Ya, it's a zero sum game for the Big 12 once conference play starts, for computer purposes on win/loss of opponents.

That's why it's the efficiency stuff that's important to us going forward, right?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: doom on November 04, 2012, 08:27:08 PM
say texas is able to win their next two and climb up the rankings. when we beat them would that be enough to hold off oregon?

The thing is, by doing so they give two more losses to teams we have beaten. Should only factor into human polls.

which is important.  I'm not scared of the computers.  But I'm pleased to hear pollack and herbie starting to soften on oregan/bama being a lock for the title game.  gives me hope they might not think they can swing it.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Cartierfor3 on November 04, 2012, 08:28:47 PM
Couldn't there be a chance a bunch of voters want old man Snyder to get a shot at the crystal football?  It could happen right?  RIGHT???  MODS???????
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on November 04, 2012, 08:29:32 PM
Anyone else think the "one is the loneliest number" is catchy?  I find myself singing it all week in anticipation of Sunday night.

Yes. Exceptional re-make.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MakeItRain on November 04, 2012, 08:30:36 PM
Couldn't there be a chance a bunch of voters want old man Snyder to get a shot at the crystal football?  It could happen right?  RIGHT???  MODS???????

Chip Kelly is a dick & a lame, I would think coaches would be lining up to screw him.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on November 04, 2012, 08:31:29 PM
The big 12 had a very good SOS going into conference play...so I don't think so

Ya, it's a zero sum game for the Big 12 once conference play starts, for computer purposes on win/loss of opponents.

That's why it's the efficiency stuff that's important to us going forward, right?

I don't know if this is true.  Someone posted a link earlier that the computers are only allowed to look at wins/losses and home/away.  According to the link, they can't look at anything else in the box score and they are all just 6 different ways of using those 4 inputs (w/l/h/a).
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SwiftCat on November 04, 2012, 08:32:09 PM
The big 12 had a very good SOS going into conference play...so I don't think so

Ya, it's a zero sum game for the Big 12 once conference play starts, for computer purposes on win/loss of opponents.

That's why it's the efficiency stuff that's important to us going forward, right?

What do you mean efficiency?

To me, the most important aspects going forward are Oregon's opponents losing, and impressing the human polls on Dec. 1st. If we can manage to convince 1/3rd of the Harris/Coaches that we are the 2nd best team in the nation, it would go a long way.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on November 04, 2012, 08:36:38 PM


What do you mean efficiency?



The eff if I know.  Chings uses it, and I trust Chings, so I guess I just figured other smart computery things did to :dunno:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: CHONGS on November 04, 2012, 08:38:09 PM


What do you mean efficiency?



The eff if I know.  Chings uses it, and I trust Chings, so I guess I just figured other smart computery things did to :dunno:
:nerd:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Trim on November 04, 2012, 08:41:29 PM


What do you mean efficiency?



The eff if I know.  Chings uses it, and I trust Chings, so I guess I just figured other smart computery things did to :dunno:

:thumbs:

Not that you're right about it being a BCS factor, but I like you're reasoning.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: wes mantooth on November 04, 2012, 08:52:07 PM
David pollack at the end saying that emaw said they ain't losing,  :love:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: raquetcat on November 04, 2012, 08:55:40 PM
What is the updated average BCS ranking (or just computer ranking) of KSUs and Oregons remaining opponents?

Oregon - 31.0
KSU - 34.3

did you factor in PAC 12 'ship game?

Nope - if you add in USC its 28.7, with UCLA it's 28.2.

are you using a super secret website to calculate this or do you just have a bad ass excel sheet that you whipped up, either way I'm loving the numbers
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: BigCat on November 04, 2012, 08:57:49 PM
Yeah but guys Oregon SPARKLES in a game where they give up 51 points to a garbage USC team

 :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love:

http://espn.go.com/blog/ncfnation/post/_/id/70443/oregon-sparkles-as-it-takes-the-no-3-spot
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on November 04, 2012, 08:58:20 PM
What is the updated average BCS ranking (or just computer ranking) of KSUs and Oregons remaining opponents?

Oregon - 31.0
KSU - 34.3

did you factor in PAC 12 'ship game?

Nope - if you add in USC its 28.7, with UCLA it's 28.2.

are you using a super secret website to calculate this or do you just have a bad ass excel sheet that you whipped up, either way I'm loving the numbers

I have an excel spreadsheet.  However I used the wrong numbers.  The real numbers are:
KSU - 33.9
Oregon w/USC - 29.7
Oregon w/UCLA - 28.5
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Houcat on November 04, 2012, 08:58:47 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi15.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa380%2Fthujone%2FShame1-6.jpg&hash=c54f50ccebb425cc986b68cca05c451cb10714f7)
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi15.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa380%2Fthujone%2FShame3-6.jpg&hash=1934fdeca15710922b5fd0da5d7ec87842ebcdea)
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi15.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa380%2Fthujone%2FShame4-7.jpg&hash=5ec08ebb38b38f8d8e6d852b8402ffef32635e51)
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi15.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa380%2Fthujone%2FShame5-6.jpg&hash=e9d28ef3d31db5794df895861873f77301b5497c)
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi15.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa380%2Fthujone%2FShame6-6.jpg&hash=6a0ecfd54d91e65b7666e07c08d3029ec61db063)
http://www.shaggybevo.com/board/showthread.php/121219-CFB-Week-10-MS-SHAMEPAINT (http://www.shaggybevo.com/board/showthread.php/121219-CFB-Week-10-MS-SHAMEPAINT)
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Phil Titola on November 04, 2012, 09:02:52 PM
Insider math dude Edwards
Quote
Kansas State: The Wildcats need to win out, obviously, and a loss by either Alabama or Oregon would very likely land them in the title game. But if the Tide and Ducks win out, KSU needs Notre Dame to be undefeated as well, for the reasons I just described in the Oregon section. If the Wildcats hold no worse than second-place rankings in the computers, and the Ducks aren't better than fourth in at least half of them, the race for No. 2 in the BCS standings will be very, very close.

One last thing: The worse Oregon's opponent in the Pac-12 title game, the better it is for Kansas State. The Ducks won't get much of a boost for beating UCLA, as an example.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MakeItRain on November 04, 2012, 09:04:20 PM
That's a cute/funny ms paint, but do people really think ND is relevant in the title hunt without two teams losing?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 04, 2012, 09:05:04 PM
That's a cute/funny ms paint, but do people really think ND is relevant in the title hunt without two teams losing?

lots of LFBIQ people (aka phog.net) do.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: AbeFroman on November 04, 2012, 09:05:53 PM
I already had the worst time trying to convince everyone this weekend that ND winning is not only ok, but good.

3 more weeks of having to repeat myself is going to get old
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: joda on November 04, 2012, 09:08:17 PM
I already had the worst time trying to convince everyone this weekend that ND winning is not only ok, but good.

3 more weeks of having to repeat myself is going to get old

It will be extremely annoying when people are trying to cheer for USC to beat ND
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: AbeFroman on November 04, 2012, 09:10:15 PM
Maybe I'll go full tuck and buy a ND hat for "good luck"
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Rams on November 04, 2012, 09:14:07 PM
not that it's really relevant, but I'm pretty sure that if you asked every college football fan in the country what game they would most like to watch in the mnc if their team couldn't/can't get in, 99% would say 'bama v. oregon.  those two completely different styles of football going head to head would be fascinating to watch...especially in light of saban crying about hurry-up offenses.

if anything scares me, it's that.  that being said, coaches' votes are the only ones that matter and I don't think they're going to drastically change their votes if both stay undefeated. 
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 04, 2012, 09:15:12 PM
not that it's really relevant, but I'm pretty sure that if you asked every college football fan in the country what game they would most like to watch in the mnc if their team couldn't/can't get in, 99% would say 'bama v. oregon.  those two completely different styles of football going head to head would be fascinating to watch...especially in light of saban crying about hurry-up offenses.

if anything scares me, it's that.  that being said, coaches' votes are the only ones that matter and I don't think they're going to drastically change their votes if both stay undefeated.

valid.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ednksu on November 04, 2012, 09:16:05 PM
I already had the worst time trying to convince everyone this weekend that ND winning is not only ok, but good.

3 more weeks of having to repeat myself is going to get old
explain to me why ND winning is good at this point since they are no longer between K-State and Oregon as a firewall. 
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Cire on November 04, 2012, 09:16:41 PM
Hell, id love to see bama Oregon
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 04, 2012, 09:17:12 PM
I already had the worst time trying to convince everyone this weekend that ND winning is not only ok, but good.

3 more weeks of having to repeat myself is going to get old
explain to me why ND winning is good at this point since they are no longer between K-State and Oregon as a firewall.

They are in the computers. If ND loses, Oregon jumps to #2 immediately.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on November 04, 2012, 09:18:03 PM
Is there a bigger fan of ND at this point than goEMAW? I rough ridin' love those mouth breathing, potato farming repsects.  :ksu: <------but with a shamrock or whatever the eff the ND powercat is.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MakeItRain on November 04, 2012, 09:18:18 PM
I already had the worst time trying to convince everyone this weekend that ND winning is not only ok, but good.

3 more weeks of having to repeat myself is going to get old
explain to me why ND winning is good at this point since they are no longer between K-State and Oregon as a firewall.

They are  firewall in the computers, the polls at this point are a non-factor.  ND needs to stay in front in the computers, although I do wonder how many points on Oregon we'd gain in the polls.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ednksu on November 04, 2012, 09:18:31 PM
I already had the worst time trying to convince everyone this weekend that ND winning is not only ok, but good.

3 more weeks of having to repeat myself is going to get old
explain to me why ND winning is good at this point since they are no longer between K-State and Oregon as a firewall.

They are in the computers. If ND loses, Oregon jumps to #2 immediately.
Thank you, i remembered that as soon as I posted, I was focused on BCS rank instead of computer ranks.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Panjandrum on November 04, 2012, 09:19:05 PM
not that it's really relevant, but I'm pretty sure that if you asked every college football fan in the country what game they would most like to watch in the mnc if their team couldn't/can't get in, 99% would say 'bama v. oregon.  those two completely different styles of football going head to head would be fascinating to watch...especially in light of saban crying about hurry-up offenses.

if anything scares me, it's that.  that being said, coaches' votes are the only ones that matter and I don't think they're going to drastically change their votes if both stay undefeated.

valid.

A&M has run 732 plays this year.  Oregon has run 739.

If Saban has a problem with that kind of offense, we're going to see how they handle it next week.  My guess is that Bama does just fine, but I am interested to see how they handle an offense as fast paced and dynamic as A&M's.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: doom on November 04, 2012, 09:19:21 PM
I already had the worst time trying to convince everyone this weekend that ND winning is not only ok, but good.

3 more weeks of having to repeat myself is going to get old
explain to me why ND winning is good at this point since they are no longer between K-State and Oregon as a firewall.

also the only ooc loss left for usc to devalue them. 
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ednksu on November 04, 2012, 09:22:33 PM
does the computer delineate any kind of quasi conference when looking at ND or is it all noncom?  Does that matter in any poll?  I imagine only in people polls.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 04, 2012, 09:23:24 PM
not that it's really relevant, but I'm pretty sure that if you asked every college football fan in the country what game they would most like to watch in the mnc if their team couldn't/can't get in, 99% would say 'bama v. oregon.  those two completely different styles of football going head to head would be fascinating to watch...especially in light of saban crying about hurry-up offenses.

if anything scares me, it's that.  that being said, coaches' votes are the only ones that matter and I don't think they're going to drastically change their votes if both stay undefeated.

valid.

A&M has run 732 plays this year.  Oregon has run 739.

If Saban has a problem with that kind of offense, we're going to see how they handle it next week.  My guess is that Bama does just fine, but I am interested to see how they handle an offense as fast paced and dynamic as A&M's.

This is a very good point. I think Alabama will crush A&M just like they would crush Oregon.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on November 04, 2012, 09:23:52 PM
not that it's really relevant, but I'm pretty sure that if you asked every college football fan in the country what game they would most like to watch in the mnc if their team couldn't/can't get in, 99% would say 'bama v. oregon.  those two completely different styles of football going head to head would be fascinating to watch...especially in light of saban crying about hurry-up offenses.

if anything scares me, it's that.  that being said, coaches' votes are the only ones that matter and I don't think they're going to drastically change their votes if both stay undefeated.

valid.

A&M has run 732 plays this year.  Oregon has run 739.

If Saban has a problem with that kind of offense, we're going to see how they handle it next week.  My guess is that Bama does just fine, but I am interested to see how they handle an offense as fast paced and dynamic as A&M's.

Pan is good at this.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on November 04, 2012, 09:24:46 PM
It's common knowledge if ND wins out, it really holds back Oregon in the computers.  However, if ND loses it gets tricky.  I crunched some numbers .  Oregon is so far back in the Sagarin, this is going to be their throw away.  Out of the remaining 5 computers, Florida is ahead of them in 3.  The problem is, Florida's remaining schedule is crap in the computers with UL-L (comp average of 67.25), FCS Jacksonville St., and Florida State (comp average of 21). 

Hold the human polls as is, ND loses, and Oregon jumps Florida in all 3 other computers - Oregon passes us.
Hold the human polls as is, ND loses, and Oregon jumps Florida in 2 or less of the other computers - We stay ahead of Oregon. 

Here is the kicker - if ND loses, then Bama would be 1st in 5 of the 6 computers and we would be 1st in the other.  If we took back 1st in 1 other computer, and even if Oregon passed Florida to have 3rd in all the computers, we would still be ahead of Oregon

I know this is alot of what-ifs, but I did it just to show how close it would be if you take ND out of the equation.  The redistribution of small number of ND's 2nd and 3rd place votes in the human polls could swing it either way. 
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: chum1 on November 04, 2012, 09:26:49 PM
Yeah, Oregon doesn't automatically jump us if ND loses.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: doom on November 04, 2012, 09:27:06 PM
not that it's really relevant, but I'm pretty sure that if you asked every college football fan in the country what game they would most like to watch in the mnc if their team couldn't/can't get in, 99% would say 'bama v. oregon.  those two completely different styles of football going head to head would be fascinating to watch...especially in light of saban crying about hurry-up offenses.

if anything scares me, it's that.  that being said, coaches' votes are the only ones that matter and I don't think they're going to drastically change their votes if both stay undefeated.

valid.

A&M has run 732 plays this year.  Oregon has run 739.

If Saban has a problem with that kind of offense, we're going to see how they handle it next week.  My guess is that Bama does just fine, but I am interested to see how they handle an offense as fast paced and dynamic as A&M's.

This will be a huge talking pt if bama wins a close one. 
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Barry McCockner on November 04, 2012, 09:29:26 PM
I already had the worst time trying to convince everyone this weekend that ND winning is not only ok, but good.

3 more weeks of having to repeat myself is going to get old
explain to me why ND winning is good at this point since they are no longer between K-State and Oregon as a firewall.

They are  firewall in the computers, the polls at this point are a non-factor.  ND needs to stay in front in the computers, although I do wonder how many points on Oregon we'd gain in the polls.

Good question.  Oregon is has almost every 2nd place vote in the coaches, so assuming Bama wins out, they can't gain much there.  Apparently ND has a fair number of 3rds.  Seems logical to assume if they lose we'd pick up most of those.  Probably not enough to offset the computer numbers, though.  I suppose what would be the best would be ND continuing to look like crap while winning, although no one seems to be caring much.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Katpappy on November 04, 2012, 09:31:25 PM
If we keep winning, we're going to be fine.
:thumbsup:  That's what was said on the ESPN BCS Standings show tonight.  :emawkid:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Rams on November 04, 2012, 09:32:04 PM
not that it's really relevant, but I'm pretty sure that if you asked every college football fan in the country what game they would most like to watch in the mnc if their team couldn't/can't get in, 99% would say 'bama v. oregon.  those two completely different styles of football going head to head would be fascinating to watch...especially in light of saban crying about hurry-up offenses.

if anything scares me, it's that.  that being said, coaches' votes are the only ones that matter and I don't think they're going to drastically change their votes if both stay undefeated.

valid.

A&M has run 732 plays this year.  Oregon has run 739.

If Saban has a problem with that kind of offense, we're going to see how they handle it next week.  My guess is that Bama does just fine, but I am interested to see how they handle an offense as fast paced and dynamic as A&M's.
wow.  I haven't watched a&m at all this year.  I had no idea they were running that kind of hurry-up high-powered offense. I usually only have the time/patience to watch us and parts of other big 12 games.  I have to assume the sheer effectiveness of oregon's offense has something to do with them being that close to a&m though. I mean, if it only takes you 4 plays to go the length of the field, that's going to cut down on the number of plays you have to run.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: jmlynch1 on November 04, 2012, 09:40:22 PM
I already had the worst time trying to convince everyone this weekend that ND winning is not only ok, but good.

3 more weeks of having to repeat myself is going to get old
me 2
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 04, 2012, 09:41:13 PM
not that it's really relevant, but I'm pretty sure that if you asked every college football fan in the country what game they would most like to watch in the mnc if their team couldn't/can't get in, 99% would say 'bama v. oregon.  those two completely different styles of football going head to head would be fascinating to watch...especially in light of saban crying about hurry-up offenses.

if anything scares me, it's that.  that being said, coaches' votes are the only ones that matter and I don't think they're going to drastically change their votes if both stay undefeated.

valid.

A&M has run 732 plays this year.  Oregon has run 739.

If Saban has a problem with that kind of offense, we're going to see how they handle it next week.  My guess is that Bama does just fine, but I am interested to see how they handle an offense as fast paced and dynamic as A&M's.
wow.  I haven't watched a&m at all this year.  I had no idea they were running that kind of hurry-up high-powered offense. I usually only have the time/patience to watch us and parts of other big 12 games.  I have to assume the sheer effectiveness of oregon's offense has something to do with them being that close to a&m though. I mean, if it only takes you 4 plays to go the length of the field, that's going to cut down on the number of plays you have to run.

It takes Oregon more plays to move down the field than K-State, though. At least that was true a week or two ago. I've not seen the updated stats.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Rams on November 04, 2012, 09:48:29 PM
not that it's really relevant, but I'm pretty sure that if you asked every college football fan in the country what game they would most like to watch in the mnc if their team couldn't/can't get in, 99% would say 'bama v. oregon.  those two completely different styles of football going head to head would be fascinating to watch...especially in light of saban crying about hurry-up offenses.

if anything scares me, it's that.  that being said, coaches' votes are the only ones that matter and I don't think they're going to drastically change their votes if both stay undefeated.

valid.

A&M has run 732 plays this year.  Oregon has run 739.

If Saban has a problem with that kind of offense, we're going to see how they handle it next week.  My guess is that Bama does just fine, but I am interested to see how they handle an offense as fast paced and dynamic as A&M's.
wow.  I haven't watched a&m at all this year.  I had no idea they were running that kind of hurry-up high-powered offense. I usually only have the time/patience to watch us and parts of other big 12 games.  I have to assume the sheer effectiveness of oregon's offense has something to do with them being that close to a&m though. I mean, if it only takes you 4 plays to go the length of the field, that's going to cut down on the number of plays you have to run.

It takes Oregon more plays to move down the field than K-State, though. At least that was true a week or two ago. I've not seen the updated stats.

yeah but it's a lethal combination of both.  they're not the most efficient, but they're the fastest and still really rough ridin' efficient.  a&m is maybe just fast.  :dunno:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Fuktard on November 04, 2012, 09:49:56 PM
maybe luked but ND passed us in the Anderson Hester Poll.  Guess that beatdown of 4-5 Pitt did the trick.  :dunno:

Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Dual Ju on November 04, 2012, 09:52:32 PM
Is there a bigger fan of ND at this point than goEMAW? I rough ridin' love those mouth breathing, potato farming repsects.  :ksu: <------but with a shamrock or whatever the eff the ND powercat is.

As much as I despise ND in general, I'm (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi823.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fzz156%2Fksubrooks%2FSmileywithShamrocksign.gif&hash=ccac5abc010b612af0ec63987b2f0c43b72b0793)'ing right now.

:drink:<--Guinness
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Panjandrum on November 04, 2012, 09:57:34 PM
I already had the worst time trying to convince everyone this weekend that ND winning is not only ok, but good.

3 more weeks of having to repeat myself is going to get old
explain to me why ND winning is good at this point since they are no longer between K-State and Oregon as a firewall.

They are  firewall in the computers, the polls at this point are a non-factor.  ND needs to stay in front in the computers, although I do wonder how many points on Oregon we'd gain in the polls.

I'd like computer experts to weigh in on this, but it seems like LSU and South Carolina could jump Oregon in the computer rankings should they win out.  Emphasis on could.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Panjandrum on November 04, 2012, 10:14:49 PM
not that it's really relevant, but I'm pretty sure that if you asked every college football fan in the country what game they would most like to watch in the mnc if their team couldn't/can't get in, 99% would say 'bama v. oregon.  those two completely different styles of football going head to head would be fascinating to watch...especially in light of saban crying about hurry-up offenses.

if anything scares me, it's that.  that being said, coaches' votes are the only ones that matter and I don't think they're going to drastically change their votes if both stay undefeated.

valid.

A&M has run 732 plays this year.  Oregon has run 739.

If Saban has a problem with that kind of offense, we're going to see how they handle it next week.  My guess is that Bama does just fine, but I am interested to see how they handle an offense as fast paced and dynamic as A&M's.
wow.  I haven't watched a&m at all this year.  I had no idea they were running that kind of hurry-up high-powered offense. I usually only have the time/patience to watch us and parts of other big 12 games.  I have to assume the sheer effectiveness of oregon's offense has something to do with them being that close to a&m though. I mean, if it only takes you 4 plays to go the length of the field, that's going to cut down on the number of plays you have to run.

It takes Oregon more plays to move down the field than K-State, though. At least that was true a week or two ago. I've not seen the updated stats.

yeah but it's a lethal combination of both.  they're not the most efficient, but they're the fastest and still really rough ridin' efficient.  a&m is maybe just fast.  :dunno:

I've watched both a few times.

They both want to go fast and get as many plays as possible.  Oregon wants to run more (+103 attempts) and A&M wants to pass more (+96).  Actually, Oregon is a very run heavy team.  They're 4th in the nation in rush attempts and 1st in yards/carry.  A&M is top 30 in yards per pass attempt and top 20 in yards per completion.

A&M is incredibly dynamic because of Manzeil, and they've only lost two games this year to Florida and LSU, and that was by a combined 8 points.  You also have to take into consideration the fact that they're under a first year coach in a new conference.  What they've done is incredibly impressive given all of the change involved.

I don't think one man can beat Alabama, but the way the Tide acted after that win tells me they are on watch for an upset.  McCarron acted like he just won the Super Bowl.  A&M is too good, too dynamic, and I think they'll write this off as, "Hey, we beat Michigan, and A&M is like them," except that they're way better than Michigan, and Manzeil is better than Denard Robinson at this point.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MakeItRain on November 04, 2012, 10:17:56 PM
Wonder how many plays TT has ran, I couldn't believe how fast they played in the first half against us.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on November 04, 2012, 10:18:50 PM
maybe luked but ND passed us in the Anderson Hester Poll.  Guess that beatdown of 4-5 Pitt did the trick.  :dunno:

ND's previous opponents went 5-2 on Saturday. Ours went 2-6, with the 3 teams remaining on our schedule, who haven't been factored into the computers yet, all beating 3 teams we've already played. That will even out by the end of he season.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Katpappy on November 04, 2012, 10:29:58 PM
Wonder how many plays TT has ran, I couldn't believe how fast they played in the first half against us.
Didn't we just play one of the top offenses yesterday.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: smith1051 on November 04, 2012, 10:33:21 PM
Where is Fuktard?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Johnny Thunderbone on November 04, 2012, 10:52:35 PM
Is there a bigger fan of ND at this point than goEMAW? I rough ridin' love those mouth breathing, potato farming repsects.  :ksu: <------but with a shamrock or whatever the eff the ND powercat is.

As much as I despise ND in general, I'm (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi823.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fzz156%2Fksubrooks%2FSmileywithShamrocksign.gif&hash=ccac5abc010b612af0ec63987b2f0c43b72b0793)'ing right now.

:drink:<--Guinness

 :thumbs:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MakeItRain on November 04, 2012, 10:53:47 PM
Wonder how many plays TT has ran, I couldn't believe how fast they played in the first half against us.
Didn't we just play one of the top offenses yesterday.

katdaddy post

we're talking about number of plays ran
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on November 04, 2012, 11:40:19 PM
Is there a bigger fan of ND at this point than goEMAW? I rough ridin' love those mouth breathing, potato farming repsects.  :ksu: <------but with a shamrock or whatever the eff the ND powercat is.

As much as I despise ND in general, I'm (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi823.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fzz156%2Fksubrooks%2FSmileywithShamrocksign.gif&hash=ccac5abc010b612af0ec63987b2f0c43b72b0793)'ing right now.

:drink:<--Guinness

 :thumbs: Good stuff as always.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Panjandrum on November 05, 2012, 12:04:14 AM
Wonder how many plays TT has ran, I couldn't believe how fast they played in the first half against us.

690 for Tech. 640 for OSU.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MakeItRain on November 05, 2012, 12:35:49 AM
Wonder how many plays TT has ran, I couldn't believe how fast they played in the first half against us.

690 for Tech. 640 for OSU.

thank you, you get a much better sense for speed of play watching in person
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on November 05, 2012, 02:49:45 AM
You know what'd be really fun? If Oregon lost. Or Alabama. I'm not picky.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Cire on November 05, 2012, 05:55:09 AM
I'm not convinced that a one loss sec champ wouldn't still get in ahead of one of the UN defeateds
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 05, 2012, 06:00:33 AM
I'm not convinced that a one loss sec champ wouldn't still get in ahead of one of the UN defeateds

Black helicopters!

 :facepalm:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kso_FAN on November 05, 2012, 06:18:26 AM
Wonder how many plays TT has ran, I couldn't believe how fast they played in the first half against us.

690 for Tech. 640 for OSU.


OSU has only played 8 games though, Tech has played 9.

Offensive plays per game:

Oklahoma State   80.0
Baylor   79.9
West Virginia   78.0
Texas Tech   76.7
TCU   74.3
Kansas   73.9
Oklahoma   73.6
Iowa State   72.7
Texas   68.1
Kansas State   63.9
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: wes mantooth on November 05, 2012, 06:40:58 AM
Holy crap that's amazing _Fan
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on November 05, 2012, 07:02:40 AM
I'm not convinced that a one loss sec champ wouldn't still get in ahead of one of the UN defeateds

Black helicopters!

 :facepalm:

cire's not serious, he's a good BBS'er
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: felix rex on November 05, 2012, 07:07:41 AM
I'm not convinced that a one loss sec champ wouldn't still get in ahead of one of the UN defeateds

Black helicopters!

 :facepalm:

cire's not serious, he's a good BBS'er

He tends to fly under the radar and people forget he's OG.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kso_FAN on November 05, 2012, 07:44:59 AM
Another way to look at pace: Plays per minute of possession:

Name   
Baylor   3.2
Oklahoma State   2.9
West Virginia   2.7
Iowa State   2.6
Oklahoma   2.5
Texas Tech   2.5
Kansas   2.3
Texas   2.2
TCU   2.2
Kansas State   2.0
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: felix rex on November 05, 2012, 07:47:14 AM
Another way to look at pace: Plays per minute of possession:

Name   
Baylor   3.2
Oklahoma State   2.9
West Virginia   2.7
Iowa State   2.6
Oklahoma   2.5
Texas Tech   2.5
Kansas   2.3
Texas   2.2
TCU   2.2
Kansas State   2.0

Oh man. That's great.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ksucrcoop on November 05, 2012, 08:04:17 AM
Another way to look at pace: Plays per minute of possession:

Name   
Baylor   3.2
Oklahoma State   2.9
West Virginia   2.7
Iowa State   2.6
Oklahoma   2.5
Texas Tech   2.5
Kansas   2.3
Texas   2.2
TCU   2.2
Kansas State   2.0

hou man, can we we points per minute of possession. I have a feeling its going to be  :D
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: chum1 on November 05, 2012, 08:05:47 AM
Jesus.  Stop.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kso_FAN on November 05, 2012, 08:09:38 AM
hou man, can we we points per minute of possession. I have a feeling its going to be  :D

Name   
Baylor   1.8
Oklahoma State   1.5
West Virginia   1.4
Kansas State   1.4
Oklahoma   1.3
Texas   1.3
Texas Tech   1.2
TCU   1.0
Iowa State   0.9
Kansas   0.5
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: puniraptor on November 05, 2012, 10:35:41 AM
I really enjoy that people still flip out that we snap the ball with 1 sec on the playclock everytime when bill has been doing this the whole time
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SwiftCat on November 05, 2012, 10:42:05 AM
I really enjoy that people still flip out that we snap the ball with 1 sec on the playclock everytime when bill has been doing this the whole time

Collin.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 'taterblast on November 05, 2012, 10:48:32 AM
I really enjoy that people still flip out that we snap the ball with 1 sec on the playclock everytime when bill has been doing this the whole time

i yelled at a guy to shut up during the game on saturday because he was yelling hurry up and all that. i hadn't done that before saturday, and it felt good.
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: That_Guy on November 05, 2012, 10:52:10 AM
I think what I enjoyed most was that the student section was just completely packed an hour before kick-off. Like no room at all. Very enjoyable to see and be a part off. I yelled my face off all game.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: AbeFroman on November 05, 2012, 11:01:46 AM
Yeah our stupid fans need to quit counting down the clock.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 'taterblast on November 05, 2012, 11:05:41 AM
Yeah our stupid fans need to quit counting down the clock.

i'm split on whether counting down the clock is okay or not. it is possible that it somewhat helps. it's the screaming "hurry" and crap like that that pisses me off.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: bigwillie20 on November 05, 2012, 11:06:53 AM
Yeah our stupid fans need to quit counting down the clock.

Had this happen numerous times while watching games with people on TV this year.  I just turn and give them the  :dubious: for about 30 seconds
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: slimz on November 05, 2012, 11:08:18 AM
Another way to look at pace: Plays per minute of possession:

Name   
Baylor   3.2
Oklahoma State   2.9
West Virginia   2.7
Iowa State   2.6
Oklahoma   2.5
Texas Tech   2.5
Kansas   2.3
Texas   2.2
TCU   2.2
Kansas State   2.0

After our defensive 2nd half last night, I think the Baylor game may concern me most right now. Even with our TOP advantage, our defense seemed to be getting worn down and was giving up big chunks of yardage. Hopefully some of that was, as I suspect, due a bit to being flustered over Klein's injury and the new OSU QB.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 05, 2012, 11:09:58 AM
Another way to look at pace: Plays per minute of possession:

Name   
Baylor   3.2
Oklahoma State   2.9
West Virginia   2.7
Iowa State   2.6
Oklahoma   2.5
Texas Tech   2.5
Kansas   2.3
Texas   2.2
TCU   2.2
Kansas State   2.0

After our defensive 2nd half last night, I think the Baylor game may concern me most right now. Even with our TOP advantage, our defense seemed to be getting worn down and was giving up big chunks of yardage. Hopefully some of that was, as I suspect, due a bit to being flustered over Klein's injury and the new OSU QB.

Also, the offense stalled on a couple of drives giving the defense less rest than Klein typically gives them.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: AbeFroman on November 05, 2012, 11:12:56 AM
Yeah our stupid fans need to quit counting down the clock.

i'm split on whether counting down the clock is okay or not. it is possible that it somewhat helps. it's the screaming "hurry" and crap like that that pisses me off.

I will admit I enjoy watching the clock run down when I'm at the stadium knowing that the snap is coming, but shouting it is rough ridin' pointless.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 'taterblast on November 05, 2012, 11:14:33 AM
Yeah our stupid fans need to quit counting down the clock.

i'm split on whether counting down the clock is okay or not. it is possible that it somewhat helps. it's the screaming "hurry" and crap like that that pisses me off.

I will admit I enjoy watching the clock run down when I'm at the stadium knowing that the snap is coming, but shouting it is rough ridin' pointless.

tuckish? so be it. i guarantee you there has been at least one time where counting it down made our qb more aware of it than if it had been silent.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kso_FAN on November 05, 2012, 11:16:02 AM
Not at all concerned about Baylor, even after OSU.

Baylor is not nearly as physical as OSU, their defense is awful, and their home field advantage is non-existent.

Concern Level:
TCU
Texas




Baylor
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: AbeFroman on November 05, 2012, 11:18:10 AM
Yeah our stupid fans need to quit counting down the clock.

i'm split on whether counting down the clock is okay or not. it is possible that it somewhat helps. it's the screaming "hurry" and crap like that that pisses me off.

I will admit I enjoy watching the clock run down when I'm at the stadium knowing that the snap is coming, but shouting it is rough ridin' pointless.

tuckish? so be it. i guarantee you there has been at least one time where counting it down made our qb more aware of it than if it had been silent.

Yeah, maybe for someone like Queso or The Allen's, not Klein
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: DQ12 on November 05, 2012, 11:21:21 AM
Not at all concerned about Baylor, even after OSU.

Baylor is not nearly as physical as OSU, their defense is awful, and their home field advantage is non-existent.
I was in Waco for the game in '10.  That was probably their biggest game in forever (a win made them bowl eligible).

You could hear a pin drop when we were on offense.  A bunch of losery fans sitting in a losery stadium watching a losery football program.  We're going to beat them by 30+.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 'taterblast on November 05, 2012, 11:28:47 AM
Yeah, maybe for someone like Queso or The Allen's, not Klein

yeah, probly
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: chum1 on November 05, 2012, 11:57:09 AM
Nope.  No new posts about rankings in the rankings master thread.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: michigancat on November 05, 2012, 12:01:32 PM
screaming at someone for screaming to hurry up is where its at.

also, Kansas State is #2 in the BCS with 3 games to play. :eek:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ksucrcoop on November 05, 2012, 12:06:10 PM
Not at all concerned about Baylor, even after OSU.

Baylor is not nearly as physical as OSU, their defense is awful, and their home field advantage is non-existent.

Concern Level:
Oregon
TCU
Texas




Baylor
FYP
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: hemmy on November 05, 2012, 01:00:54 PM
Brad Edwards on CFB Daily: "Cats mostly like are f'd"
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ChiComCat on November 05, 2012, 01:03:07 PM
Not at all concerned about Baylor, even after OSU.

Baylor is not nearly as physical as OSU, their defense is awful, and their home field advantage is non-existent.

Concern Level:
TCU
Texas




Baylor

Rank the teams we've played so far on this scale so I know how concerned to be.  TIA
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 8manpick on November 05, 2012, 01:19:33 PM
Not at all concerned about Baylor, even after OSU.

Baylor is not nearly as physical as OSU, their defense is awful, and their home field advantage is non-existent.

Concern Level:
TCU
Texas




Baylor


Oklahoma
Texas Tech


Oklahoma State
Iowa State
Worst Virginia
Miami

Missouri State
North Texas


Kansas


Rank the teams we've played so far on this scale so I know how concerned to be.  TIA
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Mikeyis4dcats on November 05, 2012, 01:31:06 PM
Brad Edwards on CFB Daily: "Cats mostly like are f'd"

does this guy change his stance daily?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kso_FAN on November 05, 2012, 01:38:22 PM
Rank the teams we've played so far on this scale so I know how concerned to be.  TIA

I'd say something like this:

Oklahoma

Oklahoma State
Texas Tech
Texas

TCU
Iowa State
WVU
Baylor
Miami

Kansas
North Texas
Missouri State




Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on November 05, 2012, 01:46:44 PM
Rank the teams we've played so far on this scale so I know how concerned to be.  TIA

I'd say something like this:

Oklahoma

Oklahoma State
Texas Tech
Texas

TCU
Iowa State
WVU
Baylor
Miami

Kansas
North Texas
Missouri State

i'd probably give tcu on the road a slightly harder ranking.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 05, 2012, 01:48:36 PM
Rank the teams we've played so far on this scale so I know how concerned to be.  TIA

I'd say something like this:

Oklahoma

Oklahoma State
Texas Tech
Texas

TCU
Iowa State
WVU
Baylor
Miami

Kansas
North Texas
Missouri State

i'd probably give tcu on the road a slightly harder ranking.

I agree, and if Klein ends up not playing, I'd put that game just under OU.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Institutional Control on November 05, 2012, 01:50:18 PM
And North Texas above Kansas.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on November 05, 2012, 01:51:18 PM
Rank the teams we've played so far on this scale so I know how concerned to be.  TIA

I'd say something like this:

Oklahoma

Oklahoma State
Texas Tech
Texas

TCU
Iowa State
WVU
Baylor
Miami

Kansas
North Texas
Missouri State

i'd probably give tcu on the road a slightly harder ranking.

I agree, and if Klein ends up not playing, I'd put that game just under OU.

klein is playing
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kso_FAN on November 05, 2012, 01:51:54 PM
i'd probably give tcu on the road a slightly harder ranking.

Yeah, that's a good point. I go back and forth on them. I can see them being right in the Tech/OSU/UT group, but then I can see them sliding down to the top of the next tier. They seem more like an ISU type; good defense, young quarterback, ball control. And I'm not sold they are a lot better than ISU. UT would've been down in that group too, but their talent and their performance against Tech kind of got my attention.

Oklahoma

Oklahoma State
Texas Tech
TCU
Texas

Iowa State
WVU
Baylor
Miami

Kansas
North Texas
Missouri State
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on November 05, 2012, 01:55:15 PM
i just think playing on the road is kind of tough. like, i don't think tcu is probably as good as tech but i think playing tcu in ft worth is prob about as hard as playing tech in mhk. idk, i might put too much emphasis on home/away.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: EllToPay on November 05, 2012, 01:58:37 PM
i just think playing on the road is kind of tough. like, i don't think tcu is probably as good as tech but i think playing tcu in ft worth is prob about as hard as playing tech in mhk. idk, i might put too much emphasis on home/away.

smaller stadium, huge kstate contingent (close to 10k?). tcu hasn't had a prime time slot this year.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: EllToPay on November 05, 2012, 01:59:07 PM
i just think playing on the road is kind of tough. like, i don't think tcu is probably as good as tech but i think playing tcu in ft worth is prob about as hard as playing tech in mhk. idk, i might put too much emphasis on home/away.

smaller stadium, huge kstate contingent (close to 10k?). tcu hasn't had a prime time slot this year.

idk, maybe just wishful thinking?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 05, 2012, 02:00:06 PM
i just think playing on the road is kind of tough. like, i don't think tcu is probably as good as tech but i think playing tcu in ft worth is prob about as hard as playing tech in mhk. idk, i might put too much emphasis on home/away.

I think it makes a much bigger difference when you have a crappy to mediocre team. Good teams win games, regardless. Bad teams almost never win away from home.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: WillieWatanabe on November 05, 2012, 02:10:27 PM
I think Texas will be a tough game, a dog fight if you will.

/zacker'd
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: felix rex on November 05, 2012, 02:16:05 PM
I refuse to back off my stance from the last five years making fun of TCU. We are playing a Big East team with its back up QB. We will snyderball them to death Klein or no Klein.
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: felix rex on November 05, 2012, 02:16:41 PM
Oh, wait. They aren't even big east :lol:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SleepFighter on November 05, 2012, 02:20:49 PM
TCU is 3-3 in the league, hasn't played the two best teams or an upper half Texas squad, and one of the wins against a bottom half team came in OT.

 :comehere:
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: felix rex on November 05, 2012, 02:25:35 PM
Three TDs by halftime. Helmet taken away again early in third.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SleepFighter on November 05, 2012, 02:26:04 PM
Seems conservative.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: bigwillie20 on November 05, 2012, 02:34:23 PM
Three TDs by halftime. Helmet taken away again early in third.

I bet TLBL and Harp will go hide it from him when we go up 30 to play a joke on him  :D
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: EllToPay on November 05, 2012, 02:36:15 PM
Three TDs by halftime. Helmet taken away again early in third.

I bet TLBL and Harp will go hide it from him when we go up 30 to play a joke on him  :D

 :D
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pittcat on November 05, 2012, 02:58:59 PM
Three TDs by halftime. Helmet taken away again early in third.

I bet TLBL and Harp will go hide it from him when we go up 30 to play a joke on him  :D

 :D

:D :D :D :D :D
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: felix rex on November 05, 2012, 03:06:48 PM
Three TDs by halftime. Helmet taken away again early in third.

I bet TLBL and Harp will go hide it from him when we go up 30 to play a joke on him  :D

 :D

:D :D :D :D :D

Best gif ever?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on November 05, 2012, 03:18:27 PM
chris is going to stand in front of the spot that CK's helmet is and pretend to be watching the game and not move and collin will try to get around him but he'll just stand motionless looking at the game and TLBL will be busting up laughing histarically as CK trys to get to his helmet.
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: felix rex on November 05, 2012, 03:26:39 PM
chris is going to stand in front of the spot that CK's helmet is and pretend to be watching the game and not move and collin will try to get around him but he'll just stand motionless looking at the game and TLBL will be busting up laughing histarically as CK trys to get to his helmet.

#donation
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Belvis Noland on November 05, 2012, 03:52:01 PM

Oklahoma

Oklahoma State
Texas Tech
TCU
Texas

Iowa State
WVU
Baylor
Miami

Kansas
North Texas
Missouri State

I'd list ISU above TCU.  Same size stadium.  Flood Aggie superbowl.  Top 25 team.  ISU dick punched TCU in Fort Worth.  Every game I've watched, there've been about 35K in the stands.   
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: felix rex on November 05, 2012, 03:56:11 PM
I can see ISU dominating the MWC if they had a few more Texas recruits.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on November 05, 2012, 06:37:09 PM
Fun read, even if it's Bleacher Report:

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1395622-why-k-state-deserves-bcs-no-1-spot-in-front-of-alabama-oregon-notre-dame
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MakeItRain on November 05, 2012, 08:18:12 PM
When did bleacher report start hiring real journalists?  Lisa Horne used to write for Fox Sports.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: WillieWatanabe on November 05, 2012, 10:15:44 PM
When did bleacher report start hiring real journalists?  Lisa Horne used to write for Fox Sports.

they got tired of being a laughingstock. They hired several quality people. Their google trolling or w/e its called is a joke though.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: bobby_runs on November 07, 2012, 01:42:11 PM
Love catching up on this thread after every BCS show.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on November 07, 2012, 02:05:09 PM
Can someone with insider access please post this?  :crossfingers:

http://insider.espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/8599799/twelve-games-help-decide-bcs-title-game-participants-ncf (http://insider.espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/8599799/twelve-games-help-decide-bcs-title-game-participants-ncf)
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ew2x4 on November 07, 2012, 02:10:06 PM
Quote
With four undefeated teams on top and Oregon moving into the No. 3 spot in this week's BCS standings, the race for the BCS National Championship Game is hitting the home stretch.

The No. 1 Alabama Crimson Tide showed vulnerability Saturday at LSU, so nobody should be putting the Tide in the national title game just yet. But if Bama stays undefeated, the battle for the No. 2 spot could be compelling over the next four weeks.

Notre Dame is a long shot because of its position in the polls and remaining schedule. Looking at the point totals in the Harris and coaches' polls, simple math says the Irish are sitting at No. 4 on almost every ballot (worse than fourth by a few coaches), and their potential to move up is limited by having the weakest remaining schedule of the four contenders. But the Irish can still have a big impact on the race for No. 2 by affecting the computer rankings of Kansas State and Oregon.

Game results of past opponents and records of future opponents can have an influence on computers and voters. With that in mind, here are 12 games not involving the Wildcats and Ducks that could play a part in deciding which team ultimately gains the edge in the BCS standings:

12. Louisville Cardinals at Syracuse Orange (Nov. 10)
The impact would be minor, but little things can add up in the computers. Because USC beat Syracuse earlier in the season, a win by the Orange over undefeated Louisville would improve USC's schedule strength. And because Oregon and Notre Dame both play USC (the Ducks have already beaten the Trojans), this upset would give them a slight boost as well. Kansas State fans should be rooting for Louisville.

11. Michigan Wolverines at Ohio State Buckeyes (Nov. 24)
With Michigan being one of the better wins this season for Notre Dame and Alabama, those teams would both gain strength in the computers if the Wolverines go on the road and knock off what will be either an 11-0 or 10-1 Ohio State. Alabama will probably finish No. 1 in most of the computers if it wins out, so this isn't as big of a deal for the Tide as it is for the Irish. The truth of the matter is that it's hard to say whether Notre Dame being strengthened in the computers is good or bad for Kansas State. On one hand, it will make it more difficult for Oregon to jump Notre Dame. On the other hand, it might cause the Irish to finish ahead of the Wildcats in some ratings. Either way, it's sure to have an impact.

10. ACC Championship Game (Dec. 1)
If Miami can beat Virginia and Duke, it will win the ACC Coastal Division and could play an 11-1 Florida State in the conference title game. If that scenario plays out, an upset win by Miami over the highly ranked Seminoles would strengthen the computer profile of Kansas State and Notre Dame, since both beat the Hurricanes this season. Having a victory over another major-conference champion could help KSU with some voters in the résumé test against Oregon.

9. Stanford Cardinal at UCLA Bruins (Nov. 24)
On the surface, this looks like a game that Oregon would prefer to be won by Stanford, because the Ducks play the Cardinal (Nov. 17) and don't play the Bruins. But as of now, UCLA is the best possible opponent for Oregon in the Pac-12 Championship Game, and if the Bruins can get past USC, they should be 9-2 going into the Stanford game. Playing a 10-2 UCLA in the conference title game is the best-case scenario for the Ducks in the computers. Getting to play a team they haven't already beaten would probably make it the best-case scenario with the voters as well. Since Stanford is also a Notre Dame opponent, a win by the Bruins over the Cardinal would help Oregon gain on the Irish in the computers.

8. USC Trojans at UCLA Bruins (Nov. 17)
This game is significant for the same reason as the Stanford-UCLA game, because it gives Oregon a chance to play a 10-2 opponent in the Pac-12 title game.

But it's even more important to the BCS race, because a win by USC would set up the possibility that the Trojans could capture the Pac-12 South but lose to Notre Dame the following week, leaving the Ducks with a four-loss opponent in the conference championship game -- an opponent they already scored 62 points against on the road. And a USC win over UCLA would help Notre Dame's schedule strength.

7. Iowa State Cyclones at Texas Longhorns (Nov. 10)
6. TCU Horned Frogs at Texas Longhorns (Nov. 22)
It would have been hard to imagine after Texas' 63-21 loss to Oklahoma on Oct. 13, but if the Longhorns win these two games, they will be 9-2 going into the regular-season finale at Kansas State. The Wildcats are hurt by not having a conference championship game, like Oregon does, to get one extra game against a quality opponent.

But if Texas has only two losses when it plays K-State, the Wildcats would at least have the advantage of playing a higher-ranked opponent than Oregon on the season's final weekend. The Pac-12 title game is on Friday night, so KSU has the opportunity to make the closing argument of the national championship race on Saturday, Dec. 1. That makes these two games crucial for Kansas State to maximize the computer and poll impact of a win over Texas.

5. Oregon State Beavers at Stanford Cardinal (Nov. 10)
Oregon still has to play both of these teams, so the result of this game will have minimal influence on the computer rankings for the Ducks. But there's no question that an Oregon State win would put the Beavers in great position to be 10-1 going into The Civil War on Nov. 24, with only a home game against struggling Cal in between. OSU entering the Oregon game with only one loss would almost certainly make it a top-10 matchup, which is probably Oregon's only chance to get a top-10 win in the regular season. This could be a big deal if enough voters are comparing résumés -- and, therefore, best wins -- among the contending teams. Plus, it would give Oregon the opportunity to beat a top-10 team on a day that Kansas State doesn't play, which could be valuable to the Ducks in the polls. As is the case with the Stanford-UCLA game, the result Oregon needs would also hurt Notre Dame in the computers.

4. Oklahoma Sooners at West Virginia Mountaineers (Nov. 17)
3. Oklahoma State at Oklahoma (Nov. 24)
2. Oklahoma at TCU (Dec. 1)
Apologies to Baylor for assuming the Bears will lose in Norman this weekend, but I'm not making any assumptions on these other three games. All, however, are important to the Sooners winning out and finishing with a 10-2 record and a top-10 ranking. This would ensure both Kansas State and Notre Dame of having a win of higher quality than anything Oregon will have on its résumé. Even if Oregon State finishes 10-2, it won't be ranked as high as Oklahoma. That will be of value to the Wildcats and Irish in some computers, and it will be a consideration of some voters, especially since both teams won in Norman.

1. Notre Dame Fighting Irish at USC (Nov. 24)
As mentioned earlier, if USC has already won the Pac-12 South but loses this game to Notre Dame, it weakens the potential for Oregon's closing argument on Nov. 30. But this game sits at the top of the list because of the impact a USC win would likely have on the BCS race. Assuming Kansas State doesn't get much closer to Oregon in the polls, the Wildcats need to maintain a comfortable margin over the Ducks in the computers to have any chance of holding them off for the No. 2 spot.

That would be accomplished predominantly by having Notre Dame sit as a buffer team between Kansas State and Oregon in several computer ratings. A Notre Dame loss would allow the Ducks to rise another spot in every computer and gain enough ground on KSU in that part of the formula to take over second in the BCS standings. Barring a loss by Alabama or Oregon, Notre Dame falling to USC would more than likely end any chance Kansas State has of reaching this season's national championship game.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on November 07, 2012, 02:12:43 PM
Quote
With four undefeated teams on top and Oregon moving into the No. 3 spot in this week's BCS standings, the race for the BCS National Championship Game is hitting the home stretch.

The No. 1 Alabama Crimson Tide showed vulnerability Saturday at LSU, so nobody should be putting the Tide in the national title game just yet. But if Bama stays undefeated, the battle for the No. 2 spot could be compelling over the next four weeks.

Notre Dame is a long shot because of its position in the polls and remaining schedule. Looking at the point totals in the Harris and coaches' polls, simple math says the Irish are sitting at No. 4 on almost every ballot (worse than fourth by a few coaches), and their potential to move up is limited by having the weakest remaining schedule of the four contenders. But the Irish can still have a big impact on the race for No. 2 by affecting the computer rankings of Kansas State and Oregon.

Game results of past opponents and records of future opponents can have an influence on computers and voters. With that in mind, here are 12 games not involving the Wildcats and Ducks that could play a part in deciding which team ultimately gains the edge in the BCS standings:

12. Louisville Cardinals at Syracuse Orange (Nov. 10)
The impact would be minor, but little things can add up in the computers. Because USC beat Syracuse earlier in the season, a win by the Orange over undefeated Louisville would improve USC's schedule strength. And because Oregon and Notre Dame both play USC (the Ducks have already beaten the Trojans), this upset would give them a slight boost as well. Kansas State fans should be rooting for Louisville.

11. Michigan Wolverines at Ohio State Buckeyes (Nov. 24)
With Michigan being one of the better wins this season for Notre Dame and Alabama, those teams would both gain strength in the computers if the Wolverines go on the road and knock off what will be either an 11-0 or 10-1 Ohio State. Alabama will probably finish No. 1 in most of the computers if it wins out, so this isn't as big of a deal for the Tide as it is for the Irish. The truth of the matter is that it's hard to say whether Notre Dame being strengthened in the computers is good or bad for Kansas State. On one hand, it will make it more difficult for Oregon to jump Notre Dame. On the other hand, it might cause the Irish to finish ahead of the Wildcats in some ratings. Either way, it's sure to have an impact.

10. ACC Championship Game (Dec. 1)
If Miami can beat Virginia and Duke, it will win the ACC Coastal Division and could play an 11-1 Florida State in the conference title game. If that scenario plays out, an upset win by Miami over the highly ranked Seminoles would strengthen the computer profile of Kansas State and Notre Dame, since both beat the Hurricanes this season. Having a victory over another major-conference champion could help KSU with some voters in the résumé test against Oregon.

9. Stanford Cardinal at UCLA Bruins (Nov. 24)
On the surface, this looks like a game that Oregon would prefer to be won by Stanford, because the Ducks play the Cardinal (Nov. 17) and don't play the Bruins. But as of now, UCLA is the best possible opponent for Oregon in the Pac-12 Championship Game, and if the Bruins can get past USC, they should be 9-2 going into the Stanford game. Playing a 10-2 UCLA in the conference title game is the best-case scenario for the Ducks in the computers. Getting to play a team they haven't already beaten would probably make it the best-case scenario with the voters as well. Since Stanford is also a Notre Dame opponent, a win by the Bruins over the Cardinal would help Oregon gain on the Irish in the computers.

8. USC Trojans at UCLA Bruins (Nov. 17)
This game is significant for the same reason as the Stanford-UCLA game, because it gives Oregon a chance to play a 10-2 opponent in the Pac-12 title game.

But it's even more important to the BCS race, because a win by USC would set up the possibility that the Trojans could capture the Pac-12 South but lose to Notre Dame the following week, leaving the Ducks with a four-loss opponent in the conference championship game -- an opponent they already scored 62 points against on the road. And a USC win over UCLA would help Notre Dame's schedule strength.

7. Iowa State Cyclones at Texas Longhorns (Nov. 10)
6. TCU Horned Frogs at Texas Longhorns (Nov. 22)
It would have been hard to imagine after Texas' 63-21 loss to Oklahoma on Oct. 13, but if the Longhorns win these two games, they will be 9-2 going into the regular-season finale at Kansas State. The Wildcats are hurt by not having a conference championship game, like Oregon does, to get one extra game against a quality opponent.

But if Texas has only two losses when it plays K-State, the Wildcats would at least have the advantage of playing a higher-ranked opponent than Oregon on the season's final weekend. The Pac-12 title game is on Friday night, so KSU has the opportunity to make the closing argument of the national championship race on Saturday, Dec. 1. That makes these two games crucial for Kansas State to maximize the computer and poll impact of a win over Texas.

5. Oregon State Beavers at Stanford Cardinal (Nov. 10)
Oregon still has to play both of these teams, so the result of this game will have minimal influence on the computer rankings for the Ducks. But there's no question that an Oregon State win would put the Beavers in great position to be 10-1 going into The Civil War on Nov. 24, with only a home game against struggling Cal in between. OSU entering the Oregon game with only one loss would almost certainly make it a top-10 matchup, which is probably Oregon's only chance to get a top-10 win in the regular season. This could be a big deal if enough voters are comparing résumés -- and, therefore, best wins -- among the contending teams. Plus, it would give Oregon the opportunity to beat a top-10 team on a day that Kansas State doesn't play, which could be valuable to the Ducks in the polls. As is the case with the Stanford-UCLA game, the result Oregon needs would also hurt Notre Dame in the computers.

4. Oklahoma Sooners at West Virginia Mountaineers (Nov. 17)
3. Oklahoma State at Oklahoma (Nov. 24)
2. Oklahoma at TCU (Dec. 1)
Apologies to Baylor for assuming the Bears will lose in Norman this weekend, but I'm not making any assumptions on these other three games. All, however, are important to the Sooners winning out and finishing with a 10-2 record and a top-10 ranking. This would ensure both Kansas State and Notre Dame of having a win of higher quality than anything Oregon will have on its résumé. Even if Oregon State finishes 10-2, it won't be ranked as high as Oklahoma. That will be of value to the Wildcats and Irish in some computers, and it will be a consideration of some voters, especially since both teams won in Norman.

1. Notre Dame Fighting Irish at USC (Nov. 24)
As mentioned earlier, if USC has already won the Pac-12 South but loses this game to Notre Dame, it weakens the potential for Oregon's closing argument on Nov. 30. But this game sits at the top of the list because of the impact a USC win would likely have on the BCS race. Assuming Kansas State doesn't get much closer to Oregon in the polls, the Wildcats need to maintain a comfortable margin over the Ducks in the computers to have any chance of holding them off for the No. 2 spot.

That would be accomplished predominantly by having Notre Dame sit as a buffer team between Kansas State and Oregon in several computer ratings. A Notre Dame loss would allow the Ducks to rise another spot in every computer and gain enough ground on KSU in that part of the formula to take over second in the BCS standings. Barring a loss by Alabama or Oregon, Notre Dame falling to USC would more than likely end any chance Kansas State has of reaching this season's national championship game.

 :D
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on November 07, 2012, 02:14:21 PM
Oh man how crazy/awesome is it that we will actually have to give a crap about a Big East game!? So elite.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on November 07, 2012, 02:20:20 PM
I'm really worried about the ND/USC game. 
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 07, 2012, 02:32:52 PM
I'm really worried about the ND/USC game.

Yeah, USC owns the Irish. More likely than not, Oregon or Alabama will drop a game and it won't come down to this one.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on November 07, 2012, 02:34:33 PM
We will probably know if we control our own destiny (outside of poll hyjinx) the sunday after that ND v. USC game. man that's going to be a scary day.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kso_FAN on November 07, 2012, 02:35:55 PM
You will probably know if we control our own destiny (outside of poll hyjinx) the sunday after that ND v. USC game. man that's going to be a scary day.

Yeah, I'll probably even be a bit zacked up that day.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 'taterblast on November 07, 2012, 02:37:45 PM
Notre Dame is going to beat USC and I won't like it
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Emo EMAW on November 07, 2012, 02:39:03 PM
Notre Dame is going to beat USC and I won't like it

But that's what we want right?  :runaway:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 'taterblast on November 07, 2012, 02:41:58 PM
crap. USC is going to beat Notre Dame and I won't like it.

my brain is confused and hates the BCS!  :runaway:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on November 07, 2012, 02:42:16 PM
 :sdeek:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 'taterblast on November 07, 2012, 02:43:47 PM
i'll tell you guys one thing, i will certainly have Beaver Fever in a few weeks  :fatty:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: pissclams on November 07, 2012, 02:49:53 PM
that's good emawblast, i currently have full bore buck fever
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 'taterblast on November 07, 2012, 02:51:38 PM
that's good emawblast, i currently have full bore buck fever

 :confused: :runaway:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Institutional Control on November 07, 2012, 02:58:57 PM
i'll tell you guys one thing, i will certainly have Beaver Fever in a few weeks  :fatty:

Take that perverted crap over to killerfrogs.com .
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: mocat on November 07, 2012, 03:17:21 PM
i'll tell you guys one thing, i will certainly have Beaver Fever in a few weeks  :fatty:

Take that perverted crap over to killerfrogs.com .

Which is more tucky? Making a double entendre about a vagina, or having a zero tolerance policy when it comes to double entendres about vaginas? Serious question.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on November 07, 2012, 03:44:51 PM
We will probably know if we control our own destiny (outside of poll hyjinx) the sunday after that ND v. USC game. man that's going to be a scary day.

I'm already more nervous for the Nov 25th CFB BCS show than I am for all of our remaining games combined.  :ohno:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: RightMeow on November 07, 2012, 07:11:40 PM
Guise.  Oregon will lose.  Their defense is ass.  If Notre Dame doesn't lose, it'll be because of games like last weekend where they barely squeak it out.  We are going elephant hunting in Miami. 

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fthepinksmoke.com%2Fimages%2Ftremors.jpg&hash=301c8f5b9a48d38ff183a622853760abadbc1948)

Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: BostonPancake on November 11, 2012, 07:32:32 AM
Grrr.....still #2 in Sagarin.  ND jumped us!   WTF??!!??

http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/fbt12.htm (http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/fbt12.htm)
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Frankenklein on November 11, 2012, 07:38:09 AM
Grrr.....still #2 in Sagarin.  ND jumped us!   WTF??!!??

http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/fbt12.htm (http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/fbt12.htm)
eff
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Chico on November 11, 2012, 08:38:18 AM
Grrr.....still #2 in Sagarin.  ND jumped us!   WTF??!!??

http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/fbt12.htm (http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/fbt12.htm)

We're only behind ND by 0.24.  We're ahead of #3 Florida by 4.06 and #5 Oregon by 5.12.   
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kslim on November 11, 2012, 08:44:23 AM
but we should be #2 in the human polls right? so a #1 bcs is basically a lock
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: The1BigWillie on November 11, 2012, 08:45:08 AM
How the eff?!?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: gokatgo on November 11, 2012, 08:52:06 AM
Syracuse  :dunno:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on November 11, 2012, 08:53:22 AM
meh, 3 spots ahead of Oregon still. will take.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: bobby_runs on November 11, 2012, 08:58:23 AM
Who from our schedule legitimately has a chance of being ranked at the end of the season?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kslim on November 11, 2012, 09:00:07 AM
Who from our schedule legitimately has a chance of being ranked at the end of the season?

texas
texas tech
osu
ou
miami



slim slim chance tcu
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: THE_ED_FROM_VEGAS on November 11, 2012, 09:02:31 AM
THE ED'S SUPER DELUXE COLLEGE FOOTBALL RANKINGS

1   Oregon   190.22

2   Kansas State   181.035

3   Alabama   173.62

4   Notre Dame   172.27

5   Ohio State   171.53

6   Florida State   170.275

7   Florida   165.84

8   Georgia   162.7

9   Texas A&M   161.68

10   Clemson   161.515

11   Oklahoma   157.285

12   Stanford   154.69

13   Louisiana State   153.23

14   South Carolina   153.08

15   Louisiana Tech   152.215

16   Northern Illinois   151.82

17   Nebraska   150.54

18   UCLA   150.36

19   Rutgers   148.765

20   Texas   148.055

21   Oregon State   144.94

22   Southern California   144.66

23   Kent   144.3

24   Utah State   143.425

25   Louisville   143.105

26   San Jose State   142.965
27   Oklahoma State   142.615
28   Michigan   141.11
29   Cincinnati   139.875
30   Boise State   139.645
31   Wisconsin   139.03
32   Tulsa   137.825
33   Texas Tech   137.775
34   Central Florida   137.425
35   Fresno State   135.165
36   Mississippi State   133.2
37   Ohio   133.11
38   Toledo   132.34
39   Northwestern   131.11
40   San Diego State   127.565
41   Arkansas State   126.69
42   Penn State   126.01
43   Texas Christian   125.865
44   Brigham Young   125.73
45   Vanderbilt   125.02
46   Arizona   124.14
47   Bowling Green State   122.57
48   North Carolina   122.335
49   Ball State   120.92
50   Arizona State   117
51   Washington   116.71
52   Middle Tennessee State   115
53   Minnesota   114.87
54   Michigan State   114.75
55   Missouri   114.34
56   North Carolina State   113.875
57   Louisiana-Monroe   112.56
58   Navy   111.34
59   Western Kentucky   111.32
60   West Virginia   111.115
61   Georgia Tech   110.635
62   Mississippi   110.06
63   Duke   109.655
64   Iowa State   109.425
65   Nevada   109.025
66   Louisiana-Lafayette   108.7
67   Baylor   106.925
68   Syracuse   105.285
69   Miami (Florida)   102.755
70   East Carolina   101.525
71   Texas-San Antonio   101.025
72   Tennessee   100.96
73   Utah   100.34
74   Troy   100.09
75   Southern Methodist   98.185
76   Iowa   96.58
77   Arkansas   96.01
78   Virginia Tech   95.945
79   Air Force   95.425
80   Indiana   94.5
81   Pittsburgh   94.375
82   Wake Forest   94.285
83   Purdue   93.51
84   Virginia   87.455
85   Connecticut   87.305
86   North Texas   86.48
87   Maryland   85.855
88   South Florida   85.065
89   California   83.19
90   Marshall   82.115
91   Western Michigan   81.91
92   Rice   80.585
93   Miami (Ohio)   78.9
94   Houston   77.845
95   New Mexico   76.865
96   Central Michigan   76.03
97   Temple   72.465
98   Buffalo   72.01
99   Texas State   71.935
100   Florida Atlantic   71.51
101   Auburn   70.79
102   Alabama-Birmingham   70.655
103   Wyoming   70.265
104   Colorado State   67.655
105   Boston College   66.775
106   Washington State   66.47
107   Illinois   63.6
108   Florida International   61.97
109   Army   59.88
110   South Alabama   58.39
111   Texas-El Paso   56.955
112   Kansas   56.885
113   Kentucky   56.35
114   Nevada-Las Vegas   55.835
115   Memphis   50.565
116   Akron   49.05
117   Tulane   48.285
118   Eastern Michigan   45.76
119   Colorado   40.22
120   New Mexico State   39.375
121   Hawaii   35.375
122   Idaho   34.255
123   Massachusetts   29.54
124   Southern Mississippi   28.475


[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: wetwillie on November 11, 2012, 09:19:27 AM
eff YOU ED
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: THE_ED_FROM_VEGAS on November 11, 2012, 09:21:37 AM
eff YOU ED

THAT ISN'T CALLED FOR --- WHY YOU CUSSIN ME OUT ???
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: yoEMAW on November 11, 2012, 09:23:26 AM
Just can't bring yourself to do it, can you, Ed? What do we have to do? Win them all?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: THE_ED_FROM_VEGAS on November 11, 2012, 10:20:30 AM
Just can't bring yourself to do it, can you, Ed? What do we have to do? Win them all?

LISSEN NICKEL NUTS - I GOT KANSAS STATE AT 30-1 FOR 100 TO WIN IT ALL - BUT I DONT CONTROL WHAT THE DICE SAYS -- THE NUMBERS GET PUT IN AND THEY SAY WHAT THEY SAY -- I DONT CHEET FOR NO ONE !!!
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on November 11, 2012, 10:22:58 AM
I checked The Ed's IP address and did some mod stuff and confirmed he cheets for oregon
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MakeItRain on November 11, 2012, 10:30:15 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nk6y6p3ZI80 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nk6y6p3ZI80)

I bought it!
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SlipperyPete on November 11, 2012, 10:35:42 AM
Quote
Dennis Dodd ?@dennisdoddcbs

Breaking from Sagarin: Notre Dame No. 1, Alabama No. 9, Kansas No. 1 in sked strength.

Assuming he means Kansas State. But I'm not seeing that. Am I stupid or him?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: THE_ED_FROM_VEGAS on November 11, 2012, 10:39:39 AM
I checked The Ed's IP address and did some mod stuff and confirmed he cheets for oregon

JESUS CHRIST - THAT AINT TRUE --- I DON'T CHEAT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: BostonPancake on November 11, 2012, 10:39:58 AM
Quote
Dennis Dodd ?@dennisdoddcbs

Breaking from Sagarin: Notre Dame No. 1, Alabama No. 9, Kansas No. 1 in sked strength.

Assuming he means Kansas State. But I'm not seeing that. Am I stupid or him?

Nope, he means KU.  They have the #1 SOS.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: smith1051 on November 11, 2012, 10:41:01 AM
I checked The Ed's IP address and did some mod stuff and confirmed he cheets for oregon

JESUS CHRIST - THAT AINT TRUE --- I DON'T CHEAT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Not our fault.  Just what the IP says
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SlipperyPete on November 11, 2012, 10:42:57 AM
Quote
Dennis Dodd ?@dennisdoddcbs

Breaking from Sagarin: Notre Dame No. 1, Alabama No. 9, Kansas No. 1 in sked strength.

Assuming he means Kansas State. But I'm not seeing that. Am I stupid or him?

Nope, he means KU.  They have the #1 SOS.
So it was me. Figures.  :facepalm:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MadCat on November 11, 2012, 10:44:29 AM
Strange that Miz grad points out ku's SOS.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on November 11, 2012, 10:48:34 AM
I checked The Ed's IP address and did some mod stuff and confirmed he cheets for oregon

JESUS CHRIST - THAT AINT TRUE --- I DON'T CHEAT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I'm just messing with you The Ed, I have no idea how to use computers to do stuff
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Cartierfor3 on November 11, 2012, 10:51:02 AM
2 in the AP
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Cartierfor3 on November 11, 2012, 10:51:47 AM
Quote
D. Scott Fritchen
@DScottFritchen
K-State moves to No. 2 in the AP poll, tying its highest-ever ranking in that poll. #kstate
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: hemmy on November 11, 2012, 10:56:06 AM
Sagarin:

1. ND
2. KSU
5. Oregon
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on November 11, 2012, 10:56:43 AM
CBSSports.com ?@CBSSports
Projected BCS Rankings: 1. Oregon 2. Kansas State 3. Notre Dame. 4 through 10 all SEC except No. 9 FSU: http://cbsprt.co/BCS

 :dubious:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MakeItRain on November 11, 2012, 10:58:13 AM
CBSSports.com ?@CBSSports
Projected BCS Rankings: 1. Oregon 2. Kansas State 3. Notre Dame. 4 through 10 all SEC except No. 9 FSU: http://cbsprt.co/BCS

 :dubious:

jerry palm causes...
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: smith1051 on November 11, 2012, 10:58:21 AM
CBSSports.com ?@CBSSports
Projected BCS Rankings: 1. Oregon 2. Kansas State 3. Notre Dame. 4 through 10 all SEC except No. 9 FSU: http://cbsprt.co/BCS

 :dubious:

Link shows something different   :excited:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Chico on November 11, 2012, 10:59:05 AM
CBSSports.com ?@CBSSports
Projected BCS Rankings: 1. Oregon 2. Kansas State 3. Notre Dame. 4 through 10 all SEC except No. 9 FSU: http://cbsprt.co/BCS

 :dubious:

Whoever tweeted that failed to click the link
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: EllRobersonisInnocent on November 11, 2012, 11:16:43 AM
14 first place votes and a comfortable lead on ND, I'll take it
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ednksu on November 11, 2012, 11:16:56 AM
Quote
D. Scott Fritchen
@DScottFritchen
K-State moves to No. 2 in the AP poll, tying its highest-ever ranking in that poll. #kstate

Kellis Robinett ?@KellisRobinett
K-State moves up to No. 2 (and receives 14 first-pace votes) in latest AP poll. Oregon goes to No.1. Notre Dame third and Alabama fourth.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ednksu on November 11, 2012, 11:23:01 AM
Kellis Robinett ?@KellisRobinett
K-State also moves to No. 2 in USA Today poll and gets 14 first-place votes. Rest of top 5: 1 Oregon, 3 Notre Dame, 4 Georgia, 5 Alabama.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on November 11, 2012, 11:23:52 AM
anyone know if we gained or lost ground on Oregon in the coaches?

1,475   -1,399 this week
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 11, 2012, 11:30:54 AM
we were 19 down last week (i think).
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on November 11, 2012, 11:31:32 AM
we were 19 down last week.

damn, so 76 now  :frown:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 11, 2012, 11:34:00 AM
sorry sd, we were 29 down, i counted wrong.

but still  :frown:

1   Alabama (59)   9-0   1475   1
2   Oregon   9-0   1399   2
3   Kansas State   9-0   1370   3
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on November 11, 2012, 11:34:21 AM
sorry sd, we were 29 down, i counted wrong.

but still  :frown:

still
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 11, 2012, 11:35:37 AM
we were up 81 on ND, what is it now?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Duncan on November 11, 2012, 11:38:05 AM
We are down 32 this week right?

Oregon - 1460 (44 #1, 15 #2)
KSU - 1428 (14 #1, 43 #2, 2 #3)

I might have done the math wrong. . .

Quote
The Ducks received 44 of 59 first-place votes and were picked second on all the others after improving to 10-0 with a win at California.

Kansas State moved into the No. 2 spot in the coaches poll and figures to be well positioned for a top-two BCS ranking thanks to its standing in the computer formulas. The Wildcats, also 10-0, received 14 of the remaining 15 No. 1 votes and were voted second on all but two of the remaining 45 ballots.

Notre Dame claimed the last No.1 vote and checks in at No.3, but the Fighting Irish probably would be on the outside of the top two unless more upsets occur over the final weeks. Still, it is the first time Notre Dame got a No. 1 vote since Septemberf 2006, and the Irish are no lower than No. 5 on any ballot.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on November 11, 2012, 11:38:50 AM
we were up 81 on ND, what is it now?

69
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: smith1051 on November 11, 2012, 11:39:29 AM
we were up 81 on ND, what is it now?

We were up by 67 and now we are 69
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 11, 2012, 11:40:10 AM
oh man, looks like someone needs to check sd for sketti brains.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: POWL on November 11, 2012, 11:41:12 AM
 :fatty:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on November 11, 2012, 11:41:34 AM
oh man, looks like someone needs to check sd for sketti brains.

what are you talking about
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: star seed 7 on November 11, 2012, 11:43:30 AM
oh man, looks like someone needs to check sd for sketti brains.

what are you talking about

1475 is all 59 first place votes aka alabama last week.
1399 was what oregon got last week.
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on November 11, 2012, 02:16:31 PM
oh man, looks like someone needs to check sd for sketti brains.

what are you talking about

1475 is all 59 first place votes aka alabama last week.
1399 was what oregon got last week.

You are an idiot
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: old dog on November 11, 2012, 02:19:17 PM
we were up 81 on ND, what is it now?
Maintained 81 point lead
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: hemmy on November 11, 2012, 02:25:05 PM
who cares about ap poll, stfu you guys
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: old dog on November 11, 2012, 02:27:03 PM
That's the Coaches Poll, which is 1/3 of the BCS Poll
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: bobby_runs on November 11, 2012, 02:29:34 PM
Who from our schedule legitimately has a chance of being ranked at the end of the season?

texas
texas tech
osu
ou
miami



slim slim chance tcu
Thank you for that.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: hemmy on November 11, 2012, 02:31:12 PM
That's the Coaches Poll, which is 1/3 of the BCS Poll

Not you, the people above.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on November 11, 2012, 02:38:21 PM
What about the Harris Poll you assholes?? What about the gawd damn Harris Poll??  :runaway:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kcnut on November 11, 2012, 02:48:13 PM
Here's the harris poll.  http://www.harrisinteractive.com/vault/BCS_Nov_11_2012.pdf
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Cartierfor3 on November 11, 2012, 02:50:16 PM
Here's the harris poll.  http://www.harrisinteractive.com/vault/BCS_Nov_11_2012.pdf

Someone gave Alabama a #1 vote after a home loss.   :facepalm:
Title: Re: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: michigancat on November 11, 2012, 02:54:12 PM
Here's the harris poll.  http://www.harrisinteractive.com/vault/BCS_Nov_11_2012.pdf

The gap between KSU and Oregon is half the gap between us and Notre Dame.

:cool:
Title: Re: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: michigancat on November 11, 2012, 02:57:36 PM
Here's the harris poll.  http://www.harrisinteractive.com/vault/BCS_Nov_11_2012.pdf

Someone gave Alabama a #1 vote after a home loss.   :facepalm:

Yeah, that's pretty hilarious.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: old dog on November 11, 2012, 03:23:59 PM
Gained one point against Oregon from last week and moved nine more ahead of ND
Title: Re: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 11, 2012, 06:16:38 PM
Here's the harris poll.  http://www.harrisinteractive.com/vault/BCS_Nov_11_2012.pdf

Someone gave Alabama a #1 vote after a home loss.   :facepalm:

Yeah, that's pretty hilarious.

Just imagine the intense butthurt that bullshit like this is going to cause when we get our 4 team playoff.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 114Hickory on November 11, 2012, 07:28:17 PM
Notre Dame will Notre Dame:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/college/chi-notre-dame-football-kelly-votes-team-no-1-in-coaches-poll-20121111,0,656490.story (http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/college/chi-notre-dame-football-kelly-votes-team-no-1-in-coaches-poll-20121111,0,656490.story)
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Doberman_CATS!!! on November 11, 2012, 07:32:37 PM
I'm ready to be the loneliest number  :billdance:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on November 11, 2012, 07:34:29 PM
I'm ready to be the loneliest number  :billdance:

That song now gives me chills.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on November 11, 2012, 07:36:41 PM
The helmets behind Kirk go Oregon, KSU, ND, Bama, LSU.
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on November 11, 2012, 07:37:12 PM
We are #1
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on November 11, 2012, 07:37:55 PM
.017 buffer
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kim carnes on November 11, 2012, 07:38:20 PM
 :D
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kitten_mittons on November 11, 2012, 07:38:21 PM
Crushing these losers.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ednksu on November 11, 2012, 07:39:12 PM
excellent #1 pic!
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kso_FAN on November 11, 2012, 07:39:28 PM
:popscollar:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Chico on November 11, 2012, 07:39:50 PM
 :excited: I'm high stepping around my living room
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on November 11, 2012, 07:39:58 PM
If UT wins next week, we have the highest ranked remaining opponent.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kcnut on November 11, 2012, 07:40:03 PM
#1 KSU YES! YES! YES!
[/color][/font][/size]
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: BackPayne on November 11, 2012, 07:40:42 PM
Fantastic tribute to fatty! :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on November 11, 2012, 07:41:16 PM
LOL at pud SEC teams being ranked in the top 10. Seriously, the complete and utter bias towards the SEC is ridiculously embarrassing for CFB.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on November 11, 2012, 07:41:54 PM
Guys, I don't want to play Oregon.   :sdeek:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: buttsbuttsbutts on November 11, 2012, 07:42:04 PM
 :love: :fatty: :love: :lynchmob: :bill: :ksu: :emawkid: :cheers: :billdance: :kstatriot: :bracketmouse: < except with crystal trophy

 :D

Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kim carnes on November 11, 2012, 07:42:31 PM
If UT wins next week, we have the highest ranked remaining opponent.

that sucks for us. 
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep on November 11, 2012, 07:43:23 PM
If UT wins next week, we have the highest ranked remaining opponent.

that sucks for us.

Shut up idiot
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Doberman_CATS!!! on November 11, 2012, 07:44:31 PM
Rece Davis is making me angry  :chainsaw:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Stupid Fitz on November 11, 2012, 07:44:51 PM
.017 buffer

Is this good?  :dunno:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: PowercatPat on November 11, 2012, 07:45:00 PM
Guys, I don't want to play Oregon.   :sdeek:

Would rather play Oregon than Bama.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MadCat on November 11, 2012, 07:45:50 PM
.017 buffer

Is this good?  :dunno:
better than negative.  :gocho:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ew2x4 on November 11, 2012, 07:45:58 PM
http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/8621600/bcs-standings-kansas-state-wildcats-new-no-1-alabama-crimson-tide-fall-4th

Beautiful headline. Soak it in fellas.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: WillieWatanabe on November 11, 2012, 07:46:02 PM
Just soak it up fellas.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kitten_mittons on November 11, 2012, 07:46:13 PM
I want to play the team that will have the least amount of excuses when we beat them.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: wetwillie on November 11, 2012, 07:46:27 PM
ND refuses to join BCS conference as full member, gets mumped by BCS, all is right in the world
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on November 11, 2012, 07:47:19 PM
I'll reserve my judgment of Oregon until after the next two weeks. I want to see what they do against teams that can actually play defense.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: goldenticket on November 11, 2012, 07:48:22 PM
Just soak it up fellas.

 :ksu:

thanks fatty!
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kso_FAN on November 11, 2012, 07:49:09 PM
Guys, we control our own destiny to play for THE NATIONAL TITLE OF COLLEGE FOOTBALL. It doesn't matter who we play, they will be good.

#1.

Amazing.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: j-dub on November 11, 2012, 07:51:03 PM
We have never been more blessed
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Not Sure on November 11, 2012, 07:53:23 PM
Guys, we control our own destiny to win play for THE NATIONAL TITLE OF COLLEGE FOOTBALL. It doesn't matter who we play, they will be good.

#1.

Amazing.

fyp
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MadCat on November 11, 2012, 07:55:37 PM
New rule: being king of the hill, we get to award bonus points to our opponent of choice.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: pissclams on November 11, 2012, 07:55:55 PM
WE'RE NUMBER ONE!!
WE'RE NUMBER ONE!!

WE'RE NUMBER ONE!!
WE'RE NUMBER ONE!!

WE'RE NUMBER ONE!!
WE'RE NUMBER ONE!!

WE'RE NUMBER ONE!!
WE'RE NUMBER ONE!!

WE'RE NUMBER ONE!!
WE'RE NUMBER ONE!!


WE'RE NUMBER ONE!!
WE'RE NUMBER ONE!!

WE'RE NUMBER ONE!!
WE'RE NUMBER ONE!!

WE'RE NUMBER ONE!!
WE'RE NUMBER ONE!!

WE'RE NUMBER ONE!!
WE'RE NUMBER ONE!!

WE'RE NUMBER ONE!!
WE'RE NUMBER ONE!!

WE'RE NUMBER ONE!!
WE'RE NUMBER ONE!!

WE'RE NUMBER ONE!!
WE'RE NUMBER ONE!!

WE'RE NUMBER ONE!!
WE'RE NUMBER ONE!!
WE'RE NUMBER ONE!!
WE'RE NUMBER ONE!!
WE'RE NUMBER ONE!!
WE'RE NUMBER ONE!!
WE'RE NUMBER ONE!!
WE'RE NUMBER ONE!!
WE'RE NUMBER ONE!!
WE'RE NUMBER ONE!!
WE'RE NUMBER ONE!!
WE'RE NUMBER ONE!!
WE'RE NUMBER ONE!!
WE'RE NUMBER ONE!!
WE'RE NUMBER ONE!!

Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: PowercatPat on November 11, 2012, 07:57:19 PM
OT here but why does Brad Edwards have a two loss A&M team in a BCS bowl over two teams that beat A&M in College Station and are ranked higher? Doesn't make any sense to me.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: AppleJack on November 11, 2012, 07:58:05 PM
pissclams, how are you? did you type that once and then use the copy and paste feature? or did you type them all out?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Teddy_Westside on November 11, 2012, 07:58:55 PM
I can't even count the number of teams ahead of us with my fingers
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Duncan on November 11, 2012, 07:59:28 PM
OT here but why does Brad Edwards have a two loss A&M team in a BCS bowl over two one loss teams that beat A&M in College Station? Doesn't make any sense to me.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fabovethecrowd.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2010%2F04%2Fmoney-in-tv.png&hash=bc303078611dccdd7c0ac2ba1b8073363d20ddad)
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MadCat on November 11, 2012, 08:00:12 PM
I can't even count the number of teams ahead of us with my fingers
i can't with my dick.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: AbeFroman on November 11, 2012, 08:00:15 PM
I can't even count the number of teams ahead of us with my fingers

Neither can mathematics. That's why imaginary numbers were invented.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on November 11, 2012, 08:00:20 PM
OT here but why does Brad Edwards have a two loss A&M team in a BCS bowl over two one loss teams that beat A&M in College Station? Doesn't make any sense to me.

Because he thinks he has a source inside the Fiesta.  He said this when saying the Fiesta would take OU over ND.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: pissclams on November 11, 2012, 08:01:34 PM
pissclams, how are you? did you type that once and then use the copy and paste feature? or did you type them all out?

WE'RE NUMBER ONE!!
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: PowercatPat on November 11, 2012, 08:04:03 PM
OT here but why does Brad Edwards have a two loss A&M team in a BCS bowl over two one loss teams that beat A&M in College Station? Doesn't make any sense to me.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fabovethecrowd.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2010%2F04%2Fmoney-in-tv.png&hash=bc303078611dccdd7c0ac2ba1b8073363d20ddad)

I think LSU would bring in more money than A&M and UF.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kso_FAN on November 11, 2012, 08:04:30 PM
Go here now... http://espn.go.com/college-football/
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ChiComCat on November 11, 2012, 08:05:18 PM
OT here but why does Brad Edwards have a two loss A&M team in a BCS bowl over two teams that beat A&M in College Station and are ranked higher? Doesn't make any sense to me.

Because those games are all exhibitions that don't rough ridin' matter for anything
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on November 11, 2012, 08:14:16 PM
Felt so good to look up at the top of the board and see this....thank you very much to Chings.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi10.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa107%2Fbig12north%2FNumberOne.png&hash=e8e492ac2648700f1860f358998ee6035be680a1)
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: mcmwcat on November 11, 2012, 08:15:45 PM
OT here but why does Brad Edwards have a two loss A&M team in a BCS bowl over two teams that beat A&M in College Station and are ranked higher? Doesn't make any sense to me.

he had 4 Big12 teams in the BCS  :thumbs:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Katpappy on November 11, 2012, 08:20:48 PM
Go here now... http://espn.go.com/college-football/
And the chicken crap media telling everyone that we backed out of playing Oregan.   :lol:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Duncan on November 11, 2012, 08:23:14 PM
OT here but why does Brad Edwards have a two loss A&M team in a BCS bowl over two one loss teams that beat A&M in College Station? Doesn't make any sense to me.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fabovethecrowd.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2010%2F04%2Fmoney-in-tv.png&hash=bc303078611dccdd7c0ac2ba1b8073363d20ddad)



I think LSU would bring in more money than A&M and UF.

Probably. aTm is the hot team though.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: The Whale on November 11, 2012, 08:26:25 PM
Quote from: Jerry Palm
"These teams are in their order and the only way that order changes is if somebody gets beat," said Jerry Palm, of CBS Sports and collegebcs.com.

 :excited:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: J on November 11, 2012, 08:29:15 PM
1
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: goldenticket on November 11, 2012, 08:30:08 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F25.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_mdcs2cpHTr1rwop3eo1_1280.png&hash=102c1f648a032e1fe2a1b3506b286141967eda80)
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on November 11, 2012, 08:41:43 PM
Hey guys, Jakesie here, let's talk importance of maintaining #1 through the rest of the regular season. We shouldn't care, but we probably care. It's fun to be #1. Anyways, with that in mind, I noticed that we were #2 in the computers, and Oregon was #4. As long as we stay in front of them, should we be able to maintain the #1 spot (assuming human polls stay the same)?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 11, 2012, 08:50:30 PM
Hey guys, Jakesie here, let's talk importance of maintaining #1 through the rest of the regular season. We shouldn't care, but we probably care. It's fun to be #1. Anyways, with that in mind, I noticed that we were #2 in the computers, and Oregon was #4. As long as we stay in front of them, should we be able to maintain the #1 spot (assuming human polls stay the same)?

I think we need to stay at least 2 spots ahead of them.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Spaces on November 11, 2012, 08:50:58 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freesportsbet.com%2Fimages%2Fchat_icons%2Fcool2.gif&hash=d087b1ad60e7ebb4f41dac4bb1b98e2e0389d61f)
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: DQ12 on November 11, 2012, 08:54:36 PM
STUD:
Quote
The Wildcats are the 16th team in college football to ascend to No. 1 overall in the BCS, and by now, it's got to feel so, so good.

We're so damn elite.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Super PurpleCat on November 11, 2012, 08:59:19 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FrBQCe.jpg&hash=b929f4699cc614804bf5b45b6eb9d3f23ba61be2)
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Dual Ju on November 11, 2012, 09:55:23 PM
THIS (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi823.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fzz156%2Fksubrooks%2Fhighstepper.gif&hash=5dac2c7b4913831a081c33416c17600edc802561)S HAPPENING!!!


(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi823.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fzz156%2Fksubrooks%2Fmouseheisman-1.gif&hash=3e8bcdae247d1dd1bdc41197f59dea7d9e38b90c)
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: AppleJack on November 11, 2012, 09:55:53 PM
 :love:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Cartierfor3 on November 11, 2012, 09:57:18 PM
STUD:
Quote
The Wildcats are the 16th team in college football to ascend to No. 1 overall in the BCS, and by now, it's got to feel so, so good.

We're so damn elite.

What a strange trip its been since the dark days of conference Armageddon
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: michigancat on November 11, 2012, 10:06:49 PM
STUD:
Quote
The Wildcats are the 16th team in college football to ascend to No. 1 overall in the BCS, and by now, it's got to feel so, so good.

We're so damn elite.

What a strange trip its been since the dark days of conference Armageddon

I haven't THOUGHT A BIT about confy armageddy. MY GOD HOW FAR WE'VE COME. :love: :love: :love:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kso_FAN on November 11, 2012, 10:10:06 PM
THIS (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi823.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fzz156%2Fksubrooks%2Fhighstepper.gif&hash=5dac2c7b4913831a081c33416c17600edc802561)S HAPPENING!!!


(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi823.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fzz156%2Fksubrooks%2Fmouseheisman-1.gif&hash=3e8bcdae247d1dd1bdc41197f59dea7d9e38b90c)

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F11%2Fwhomovedmybig12title.gif&hash=c07c9d60eca789084d2dd430bd27461bcf49cda0)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F11%2Fwhomovedmbcstitle.gif&hash=f1eda89ee6b9fc998cbea81edf8dabeb4b5a304b)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F11%2Fwhomovedmybig12title.gif&hash=c07c9d60eca789084d2dd430bd27461bcf49cda0)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F11%2Fwhomovedmbcstitle.gif&hash=f1eda89ee6b9fc998cbea81edf8dabeb4b5a304b)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F11%2Fwhomovedmybig12title.gif&hash=c07c9d60eca789084d2dd430bd27461bcf49cda0)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F11%2Fwhomovedmbcstitle.gif&hash=f1eda89ee6b9fc998cbea81edf8dabeb4b5a304b)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F11%2Fwhomovedmybig12title.gif&hash=c07c9d60eca789084d2dd430bd27461bcf49cda0)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F11%2Fwhomovedmbcstitle.gif&hash=f1eda89ee6b9fc998cbea81edf8dabeb4b5a304b)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F11%2Fwhomovedmybig12title.gif&hash=c07c9d60eca789084d2dd430bd27461bcf49cda0)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F11%2Fwhomovedmbcstitle.gif&hash=f1eda89ee6b9fc998cbea81edf8dabeb4b5a304b)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F11%2Fwhomovedmybig12title.gif&hash=c07c9d60eca789084d2dd430bd27461bcf49cda0)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F11%2Fwhomovedmbcstitle.gif&hash=f1eda89ee6b9fc998cbea81edf8dabeb4b5a304b)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F11%2Fwhomovedmybig12title.gif&hash=c07c9d60eca789084d2dd430bd27461bcf49cda0)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F11%2Fwhomovedmbcstitle.gif&hash=f1eda89ee6b9fc998cbea81edf8dabeb4b5a304b)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F11%2Fwhomovedmybig12title.gif&hash=c07c9d60eca789084d2dd430bd27461bcf49cda0)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F11%2Fwhomovedmbcstitle.gif&hash=f1eda89ee6b9fc998cbea81edf8dabeb4b5a304b)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F11%2Fwhomovedmybig12title.gif&hash=c07c9d60eca789084d2dd430bd27461bcf49cda0)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F11%2Fwhomovedmbcstitle.gif&hash=f1eda89ee6b9fc998cbea81edf8dabeb4b5a304b)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F11%2Fwhomovedmybig12title.gif&hash=c07c9d60eca789084d2dd430bd27461bcf49cda0)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F11%2Fwhomovedmbcstitle.gif&hash=f1eda89ee6b9fc998cbea81edf8dabeb4b5a304b)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F11%2Fwhomovedmybig12title.gif&hash=c07c9d60eca789084d2dd430bd27461bcf49cda0)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F11%2Fwhomovedmbcstitle.gif&hash=f1eda89ee6b9fc998cbea81edf8dabeb4b5a304b)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F11%2Fwhomovedmybig12title.gif&hash=c07c9d60eca789084d2dd430bd27461bcf49cda0)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F11%2Fwhomovedmbcstitle.gif&hash=f1eda89ee6b9fc998cbea81edf8dabeb4b5a304b)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F11%2Fwhomovedmybig12title.gif&hash=c07c9d60eca789084d2dd430bd27461bcf49cda0)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F11%2Fwhomovedmbcstitle.gif&hash=f1eda89ee6b9fc998cbea81edf8dabeb4b5a304b)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F11%2Fwhomovedmybig12title.gif&hash=c07c9d60eca789084d2dd430bd27461bcf49cda0)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F11%2Fwhomovedmbcstitle.gif&hash=f1eda89ee6b9fc998cbea81edf8dabeb4b5a304b)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F11%2Fwhomovedmybig12title.gif&hash=c07c9d60eca789084d2dd430bd27461bcf49cda0)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F11%2Fwhomovedmbcstitle.gif&hash=f1eda89ee6b9fc998cbea81edf8dabeb4b5a304b)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F11%2Fwhomovedmybig12title.gif&hash=c07c9d60eca789084d2dd430bd27461bcf49cda0)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F11%2Fwhomovedmbcstitle.gif&hash=f1eda89ee6b9fc998cbea81edf8dabeb4b5a304b)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F11%2Fwhomovedmybig12title.gif&hash=c07c9d60eca789084d2dd430bd27461bcf49cda0)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F11%2Fwhomovedmbcstitle.gif&hash=f1eda89ee6b9fc998cbea81edf8dabeb4b5a304b)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F11%2Fwhomovedmybig12title.gif&hash=c07c9d60eca789084d2dd430bd27461bcf49cda0)(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F11%2Fwhomovedmbcstitle.gif&hash=f1eda89ee6b9fc998cbea81edf8dabeb4b5a304b)
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on November 11, 2012, 10:14:46 PM
I love you guys.  I want you all to know that.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: j-dub on November 11, 2012, 10:22:17 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F11%2Fwhomovedmbcstitle.gif&hash=f1eda89ee6b9fc998cbea81edf8dabeb4b5a304b)
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SwiftCat on November 11, 2012, 11:40:51 PM
STUD:
Quote
The Wildcats are the 16th team in college football to ascend to No. 1 overall in the BCS, and by now, it's got to feel so, so good.

We're so damn elite.

This is crazy. 16 teams fellas. And your cats are one of them.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Panjandrum on November 11, 2012, 11:44:50 PM
I sat down with my son tonight and watched the show.  Even though he's only two, I told him that this was a special moment because this is the first, and maybe, last time he was ever going to see this.

 :kstatriot:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: bobby_runs on November 12, 2012, 01:30:05 AM
Only being a fan since 2008 I can't even begin to imagine how MUCH older fans of K-State are feeling after tonight.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kso_FAN on November 12, 2012, 07:53:23 AM
Only being a fan since 2008 I can't even begin to imagine how MUCH older fans of K-State are feeling after tonight.

I'm not really old, but one of my earliest memories of K-State football is listening to the infamous 17-17 tie with KU almost 25 years ago to the day (Nov 7th, 1987).

Now no team in college football is higher than the Cats and we're 8 quarters away from playing for the national title.

Its pretty great.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Super PurpleCat on November 12, 2012, 07:54:54 AM
Only being a fan since 2008 I can't even begin to imagine how MUCH older fans of K-State are feeling after tonight.

Feels good.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on November 12, 2012, 08:02:23 AM
Now no team in college football is higher than the Cats and we're 48 quarters away from playing for the national title.

FYP. But yes _fan, it feels good. SO GOOD.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kso_FAN on November 12, 2012, 08:04:32 AM
Now no team in college football is higher than the Cats and we're 48 quarters away from playing for the national title.

FYP. But yes _fan, it feels good. SO GOOD.

Man, thanks for the fix.

Doesn't take away from the feely goodness.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: "storm"nut on November 12, 2012, 08:07:08 AM
Now no team in college football is higher than the Cats and we're 48 quarters away from playing for the national title.

FYP. But yes _fan, it feels good. SO GOOD.

Man, thanks for the fix.

Doesn't take away from the feely goodness.

If we get past Baylor Saturday, the entire student section should throw Quarters at the Texas bench at the end of each quarter. Would be epic!
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Super PurpleCat on November 12, 2012, 08:09:47 AM
I want to hear the WE OWN TEXAS chant again.  This time on primetime TV.
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: felix rex on November 12, 2012, 08:19:59 AM
Remember how awesome it was when Andre Coleman did the espn "da da DA da da DA" to the sideline camera?

My dad installed a NASA-sized satellite just so we could watch that game.

Also, I am YouTube hunting for that for the rest of the evening.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ksucrcoop on November 12, 2012, 08:24:23 AM
Remember how awesome it was when Andre Coleman did the espn "da da DA da da DA" to the sideline camera?

My dad installed a NASA-sized satellite just so we could watch that game.

Also, I am YouTube hunting for that for the rest of the evening.

for some reason I think Mcdonald's jingle when i see that, cause I am loving all of this :gocho:
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: felix rex on November 12, 2012, 08:26:33 AM
I think it was a thing at the time. Seemed so cool. We did for an entire summer after that.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Doberman_CATS!!! on November 12, 2012, 08:34:53 AM
darren rovell ?@darrenrovell
Kansas State opened at 200/1 to win the BCS National Championship. They are now at 7/5 at the Las Vegas Hotel (via @golfodds)

 :gocho:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on November 12, 2012, 08:38:20 AM
7/5

 :horrorsurprise:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: The1BigWillie on November 12, 2012, 08:42:30 AM
I can hear heads exploding all over tuckland trying to figure out if 7/5 is better than 200/1.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Spaces on November 12, 2012, 08:46:20 AM
7/5

 :horrorsurprise:
  :horrorsurprise:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Rams on November 12, 2012, 08:46:37 AM
7/5

 :horrorsurprise:
jesus christ.  I mean I'm not surprised we're favorites (ok kind of surprised) but 7/5 is rough ridin' insanity.  vegas basically just crowned us.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: "storm"nut on November 12, 2012, 08:48:45 AM
I can hear heads exploding all over tuckland trying to figure out if 7/5 is better than 200/1.

Imagine if Bill totally put down a Million dollars at the beginning of the season. Imagine the end of Dodgeball but with a bigger treasure chest.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MadCat on November 12, 2012, 08:55:46 AM
Remember when we were picked 6th out of 10 Big XII teams?  Good times
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Spaces on November 12, 2012, 09:01:01 AM
7/5

 :horrorsurprise:
jesus christ.  I mean I'm not surprised we're favorites (ok kind of surprised) but 7/5 is rough ridin' insanity.  vegas basically just crowned us.
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freesmileys.org%2Fsmileys%2Fsmiley-happy093.gif&hash=79a94e472590d947bfc483d86e9e5bcfbffaa2db)
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MakeItRain on November 12, 2012, 11:55:28 AM
I want to hear the WE OWN TEXAS chant again.  This time on primetime TV.

its bigger than this
we're bigger than this
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on November 12, 2012, 11:57:06 AM
darren rovell ?@darrenrovell
Kansas State opened at 200/1 to win the BCS National Championship. They are now at 7/5 at the Las Vegas Hotel (via @golfodds)

 :gocho:

Damn, I only have them at 100/1
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: michigancat on November 12, 2012, 11:57:48 AM
7:5????

:sdeek:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: OK_Cat on November 12, 2012, 12:16:45 PM
I want to hear the WE OWN TEXAS chant again.  This time on primetime TV.

its bigger than this
we're bigger than this

I might be in the minority, but I think that a win in the CTR to secure the BCS deserves a field-storming.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 8manpick on November 12, 2012, 12:18:26 PM
darren rovell ?@darrenrovell
Kansas State opened at 200/1 to win the BCS National Championship. They are now at 7/5 at the Las Vegas Hotel (via @golfodds)

 :gocho:

Damn, I only have them at 100/1

Same :frown:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on November 12, 2012, 12:19:00 PM
I want to hear the WE OWN TEXAS chant again.  This time on primetime TV.

its bigger than this
we're bigger than this

I might be in the minority, but I think that a win in the CTR to secure the BCS deserves a field-storming.

Depends.  Will they give us the Dr. Pepper trophy at midfield?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: bigwillie20 on November 12, 2012, 12:25:28 PM
I want to hear the WE OWN TEXAS chant again.  This time on primetime TV.

its bigger than this
we're bigger than this

I might be in the minority, but I think that a win in the CTR to secure the BCS deserves a field-storming.

Depends.  Will they give us the Dr. Pepper trophy at midfield?

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fbigtennetworks.files.wordpress.com%2F2011%2F12%2Fpepper.jpg%3Fw%3D640%26amp%3Bh%3D480&hash=e9a1a0d7e3e2ddbe56ef7ddfe4b278311113a0a2)
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: steve dave on November 12, 2012, 12:26:12 PM
A certain elite level poster put down this towards fatty4ksu...so...
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fj0hU3.png&hash=4a12bf55541af7327306afe905383b345e4e1522)
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 'taterblast on November 12, 2012, 12:26:57 PM
whoa
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 8manpick on November 12, 2012, 12:33:37 PM
that is awesome #fattytakethewheel
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ben ji on November 12, 2012, 12:33:50 PM
ben ji's lil bro made about $2,000 last year betting on the cats to cover. Started during the Miami game and just kept adding to it, IIRC he only lost on the OU game....

This year he had $400 on us to win the big12 at 12-1 and $250 on us to win the natty at 32-1....
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on November 12, 2012, 12:37:52 PM
Whoever shows up with the $10,000 bet on KSU at 200-1 should be investigated for having a rough ridin' time machine.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: EllRobersonisInnocent on November 12, 2012, 12:42:48 PM
I'm liking my Klein 65-1 to win the Heisman. I about crapped my pants preseason when Crist was 25-1, I lol'd
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 8manpick on November 12, 2012, 12:46:59 PM
ben ji's lil bro made about $2,000 last year betting on the cats to cover. Started during the Miami game and just kept adding to it, IIRC he only lost on the OU game....

This year he had $400 on us to win the big12 at 12-1 and $250 on us to win the natty at 32-1....

KSU is 8-1-1 ATS this year.  Unbelievable.  Hopefully he is doing it again this year.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: ben ji on November 12, 2012, 12:47:58 PM
Apparently KSU has covered the spread 85% of the time in the past 2 years.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: slobber on November 12, 2012, 03:59:07 PM
Apparently KSU has covered the spread 85% of the time in the past 2 years.
The '90's were great. People who were hardcore gamblers would walk up you if you were wearing purple cats gear and they'd say something like, "I've made a lot of money off you guys." They wouldn't know crap about the team, but they knew Snyder always covered.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 06wildcat on November 12, 2012, 04:20:51 PM
It would be interesting to see how much money is put on K-State games. Of course, K-State benefits from weak lines every year, which certainly helps.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Cartierfor3 on November 14, 2012, 12:56:13 PM
This kinda stuff never gets old.  Not sorry if luked because its an article about how great K-State football is. 

http://espn.go.com/blog/statsinfo/post/_/id/55553/10-numbers-to-know-about-kansas-state (http://espn.go.com/blog/statsinfo/post/_/id/55553/10-numbers-to-know-about-kansas-state)
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: slimz on November 17, 2012, 10:41:38 PM
Another way to look at pace: Plays per minute of possession:

Name   
Baylor   3.2
Oklahoma State   2.9
West Virginia   2.7
Iowa State   2.6
Oklahoma   2.5
Texas Tech   2.5
Kansas   2.3
Texas   2.2
TCU   2.2
Kansas State   2.0

After our defensive 2nd half last night, I think the Baylor game may concern me most right now. Even with our TOP advantage, our defense seemed to be getting worn down and was giving up big chunks of yardage. Hopefully some of that was, as I suspect, due a bit to being flustered over Klein's injury and the new OSU QB.

Welp.
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: "storm"nut on November 17, 2012, 10:44:27 PM
That one week at #1 was the greatest week of all time.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Mikeyis4dcats on November 17, 2012, 10:57:17 PM
That one week at #1 was the greatest week of all time.

tonight ruined that week.  I'd rather remember the weeks at #2.
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: "storm"nut on November 17, 2012, 11:00:54 PM
That one week at #1 was the greatest week of all time.

tonight ruined that week.  I'd rather remember the weeks at #2.

Not for me.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Phil Titola on November 18, 2012, 11:08:41 AM
8th in coaches.  :dunno:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: mcmwcat on November 18, 2012, 11:11:54 AM
8th in coaches.  :dunno:

welp
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on November 18, 2012, 11:13:13 AM
Jesus, they dropped us below 2 loss teams?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Houstoncat93 on November 18, 2012, 11:16:24 AM
Jesus, they dropped us below 2 loss teams?

Yes, getting your ass kicked by Baylor is worth at least 2 losses
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: p1k3 on November 18, 2012, 11:47:22 AM
Jesus, they dropped us below 2 loss teams?

Yes, getting your ass kicked by Baylor is worth at least 2 losses

may as well be worth 10 losses in my book
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: williewest on November 18, 2012, 11:50:33 AM
#7 in AP
#8 in Coaches
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: chum1 on November 18, 2012, 11:57:59 AM
Well, that sucks.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Scary Smart on November 18, 2012, 12:06:41 PM
Correct me if I'm wrong, but does our ranking only matter at this point in case there is some huge tiebreaker for the Big 12 title and the highest BCS ranking represents the conference in a BCS bowl? And if we beat Texas our ranking won't really matter at all?
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kso_FAN on November 18, 2012, 12:09:37 PM
Another way to look at pace: Plays per minute of possession:

Name   
Baylor   3.2
Oklahoma State   2.9
West Virginia   2.7
Iowa State   2.6
Oklahoma   2.5
Texas Tech   2.5
Kansas   2.3
Texas   2.2
TCU   2.2
Kansas State   2.0

After our defensive 2nd half last night, I think the Baylor game may concern me most right now. Even with our TOP advantage, our defense seemed to be getting worn down and was giving up big chunks of yardage. Hopefully some of that was, as I suspect, due a bit to being flustered over Klein's injury and the new OSU QB.

Welp.

You called it. I suppose I let optimism and over confidence get in the way.
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kso_FAN on November 18, 2012, 12:12:52 PM
#7 in AP
#8 in Coaches

I have to be honest, if I was voting I would've had a tough time keeping us in the top 10 after that terrible display of football.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Farley Grudge on November 18, 2012, 12:16:32 PM
#7 in AP
#8 in Coaches

I have to be honest, if I was voting I would've had a tough time keeping us in the top 10 after that terrible display of football.

Yep.  I was mildly surprised to see that we only fell that far.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: TheHamburglar on November 18, 2012, 12:22:58 PM
Correct me if I'm wrong, but does our ranking only matter at this point in case there is some huge tiebreaker for the Big 12 title and the highest BCS ranking represents the conference in a BCS bowl? And if we beat Texas our ranking won't really matter at all?

No,  I can't find any scenario where the BCS would factor into the tie breaker.  There are other tie-breakers that would figure out who gets the Fiesta Bowl bid before it got to BCS standings.  They all include ties for 7-2 between a combo of KSU, UT, OU, and OSU, including all 4 finishing 7-2.  In all of them UT wins the tiebreakers. 

Also, if we beat UT our rankings don't matter.  We get the bid over OU if we both finish 8-1.

Edit: I did think of 1 scenario where the BCS does play in.  Its if OU beats OSU then loses to TCU. 
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: catzacker on November 18, 2012, 12:23:49 PM
Oh, jfc.  We are a top 10 team.  We win against texas and we are OSU from last year.   Buck the F up.  It was a shitty game, but we are still good.  If bill /the team handles it right, we will be ok.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: michigancat on November 18, 2012, 12:24:41 PM
Oh, jfc.  We are a top 10 team.  We win against texas and we are OSU from last year.   Buck the F up.  It was a shitty game, but we are still good.  If bill /the team handles it right, we will be ok.

:emawkid:
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kso_FAN on November 18, 2012, 12:47:31 PM
Oh, jfc.  We are a top 10 team.  We win against texas and we are OSU from last year.   Buck the F up.  It was a shitty game, but we are still good.  If bill /the team handles it right, we will be ok.

Good post.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on November 18, 2012, 12:52:12 PM
Based on player's tweets, and a bye week, we'll be fine for December 1st.
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on November 18, 2012, 01:31:51 PM
Post the tweets here.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kim carnes on November 18, 2012, 01:41:01 PM
Oh, jfc.  We are a top 10 team.  We win against texas and we are OSU from last year.   Buck the F up.  It was a shitty game, but we are still good.  If bill /the team handles it right, we will be ok.

Our offense has looked like crap for the past month.  It is far from a given that we are a top 10 team and that we will beat Texas. 
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pete on November 18, 2012, 01:51:07 PM
Oh, jfc.  We are a top 10 team.  We win against texas and we are OSU from last year.   Buck the F up.  It was a shitty game, but we are still good.  If bill /the team handles it right, we will be ok.

Our offense has looked like crap for the past month.  It is far from a given that we are a top 10 team and that we will beat Texas.

It has only been bad since Klein's concussion. He is concust, and is playing like crap.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Shacks on November 18, 2012, 01:57:24 PM
Oh, jfc.  We are a top 10 team.  We win against texas and we are OSU from last year.   Buck the F up.  It was a shitty game, but we are still good.  If bill /the team handles it right, we will be ok.

Our offense has looked like crap for the past month.  It is far from a given that we are a top 10 team and that we will beat Texas.

It has only been bad since Klein's concussion. He is concust, and is playing like crap.

To be fair, he isn't the only offensive player playing like crap and the coaches mumped up last night just as badly as the players
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on November 18, 2012, 02:18:57 PM
Yeah. Pease was embarrassing. Tremaine was embarrassing.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MakeItRain on November 18, 2012, 02:28:03 PM
Yeah. Pease was embarrassing. Tremaine was embarrassing.

quite dramatic
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on November 18, 2012, 02:40:56 PM
eff off
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MakeItRain on November 18, 2012, 05:41:09 PM
I'm still going to watch the BCS ranking show at 7:30
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 0.42 on November 18, 2012, 05:48:34 PM
Oh, jfc.  We are a top 10 team.  We win against texas and we are OSU from last year.   Buck the F up.  It was a shitty game, but we are still good.  If bill /the team handles it right, we will be ok.

Man, what the eff has happened to this place?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Shacks on November 18, 2012, 05:49:18 PM
I'm still going to watch the BCS ranking show at 7:30

I'm not.  Once they get past revealing the rankings, half the show will be about how the SEC can now backdoor its way into another title game and the other half will be about how Kansas State and Oregon choked.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Phil Titola on November 18, 2012, 05:50:42 PM
One is the loneliest number....
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: hemmy on November 18, 2012, 06:17:48 PM
Oh, jfc.  We are a top 10 team.  We win against texas and we are OSU from last year.   Buck the F up.  It was a shitty game, but we are still good.  If bill /the team handles it right, we will be ok.

Man, what the eff has happened to this place?

lol ya what a crazy turn of events.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on November 18, 2012, 07:31:11 PM
Oh, jfc.  We are a top 10 team.  We win against texas and we are OSU from last year.   Buck the F up.  It was a shitty game, but we are still good.  If bill /the team handles it right, we will be ok.

Man, what the eff has happened to this place?

:lol:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MakeItRain on November 18, 2012, 07:38:11 PM
Cats at 6, way behind Oregon

Free Shoes U still at 10, lol

Down to 4 Big 12 teams ranked.

ND doesn't have a perfect score
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MakeItRain on November 18, 2012, 07:45:17 PM
4th in the computers, despite that horrawful loss

David Pollack still loves his Cats, he said we are not out yet and mentioned that LSU was 7th at this point the last time they won the 'ship.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MadCat on November 18, 2012, 07:53:32 PM
I'm not going to get my hopes up but weird crap can still happen.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MakeItRain on November 18, 2012, 08:00:18 PM
I'm not going to get my hopes up but weird crap can still happen.

Here's the path to #2

ND loses to USC
Oregon loses to OSU
Florida loses to FSU
FSU loses in the ACC Championship

we could reach #1 if Alabama and/or Georgia lose to the shitty teams they play this week and then which ever loses this week wins next week in the SEC Championship.

I think the first three are very possible, the FSU, Alabama, and Georgia scenarios, lol
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Phil Titola on November 18, 2012, 08:08:30 PM
I'm not going to get my hopes up but weird crap can still happen.

Here's the path to #2

ND loses to USC
Oregon loses to OSU
Florida loses to FSU
FSU loses in the ACC Championship


FSU have to lose in the Championship?  Not so sure that would have to happen....
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Cartierfor3 on November 18, 2012, 08:09:05 PM
6 in the BCS is still pretty glorious you guys
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kim carnes on November 18, 2012, 08:12:05 PM
FSU doesn't have to lose
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: catzacker on November 18, 2012, 08:15:54 PM
What is the scenario where we win a big 12 championship, giving bill the same amount of conference championships as mack brown?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Trim on November 18, 2012, 08:28:20 PM
I'm not going to get my hopes up but weird crap can still happen.

Here's the path to #2

ND loses to USC
Oregon loses to OSU
Florida loses to FSU
FSU loses in the ACC Championship

we could reach #1 if Alabama and/or Georgia lose to the shitty teams they play this week and then which ever loses this week wins next week in the SEC Championship.

I think the first three are very possible, the FSU, Alabama, and Georgia scenarios, lol


Let's do it!  :ksu:

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fus.123rf.com%2F400wm%2F400%2F400%2Fboarding1now%2Fboarding1now1207%2Fboarding1now120700104%2F14467165-fort-lauderdale-florida--may-10-2012-an-airtran-boeing-717-approaches-fort-lauderdale-airport-in-flo.jpg&hash=140c301ccd6bb24f2cd7abd763cc2f8be9dabd61)

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.starwoodhotels.com%2Fpub%2Fmedia%2F1522%2Fwho1522ex.78487_md.jpg&hash=7f9d910c59dd5dae1c6d6b5b594ab1d9640a7dd2)
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: CNS on November 18, 2012, 08:43:13 PM
Barkley out for nd game per kiffin.

Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2

Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MakeItRain on November 18, 2012, 08:46:55 PM
I'm not going to get my hopes up but weird crap can still happen.

Here's the path to #2

ND loses to USC
Oregon loses to OSU
Florida loses to FSU
FSU loses in the ACC Championship


FSU have to lose in the Championship?  Not so sure that would have to happen....

We'll see, they are crap in the computers, but when they beat Florida they're going to get a gigantic boost in the polls & the computers
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: CNS on November 18, 2012, 08:50:09 PM
Clay travis just tweeted that nd had only played one offense in the FBS top 50 this season

Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MakeItRain on November 18, 2012, 08:59:32 PM
Clay travis just tweeted that nd had only played one offense in the FBS top 50 this season

Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2

Clay Travis is the poster boy for why people hate the SEC
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: goldenticket on November 18, 2012, 09:02:44 PM
6 in the BCS is still pretty glorious you guys

this is true. as long as we beat texas and go to the fiesta ill be happy. if we could actually win the bowl game that would be great. but if we lose to texas then i will be down
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MakeItRain on November 18, 2012, 09:05:43 PM
I haven't cared about winning a bowl game since 2000, is that weird?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: goldenticket on November 18, 2012, 09:10:15 PM
i do wish we were better in bowl games but its not a major deal most of the time. this year i want to make up for the baylor loss well not make up but finish strong and get a little respect back
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MakeItRain on November 18, 2012, 09:14:29 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wvmetronews.com%2Fimages%2Fpics7%2FB12Media1.jpg&hash=e08c88f3b66abf54087bf01c387135391613396d)

This will make up for it just fine.  I feel like we are well beyond caring about these exhibition games.  Already won the Holiday, Cotton, & Fiesta, they were fun, nothing better than the first time, IMO of course.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Panjandrum on November 18, 2012, 09:17:28 PM
I'm only coming back to this thread because of MiR.
Title: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: felix rex on November 18, 2012, 09:50:14 PM
I haven't cared about winning a bowl game since 2000, is that weird?

I don't think so. Unless you're in the title game, bowls are just gravy.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 06wildcat on November 18, 2012, 10:22:13 PM
I haven't cared about winning a bowl game since 2000, is that weird?

I don't think so. Unless you're in the title game, bowls are just gravy.

Gravy boats?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: michigancat on November 18, 2012, 10:24:09 PM
I haven't cared about winning a bowl game since 2000, is that weird?

I don't think so. Unless you're in the title game, bowls are just gravy.

yeah. Winning a Dr. Pepper far surpasses winning any Gravy Boat sans the BCS championship.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: cfbandyman on December 02, 2012, 11:42:26 AM
Georgia, a two loss team, is still ranked ahead of us in the coaches poll  :dubious:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MadCat on December 02, 2012, 11:47:31 AM
Ban the poll, delete the coaches
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: wetwillie on December 02, 2012, 12:04:39 PM
#1 in the Big 12, eff the rest.  This is OUR TIME.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: catzacker on December 02, 2012, 12:12:11 PM
Georgia, a two loss team, is still ranked ahead of us in the coaches poll  :dubious:

Hey, Georgia is a good team.  They played 3 FBS teams in the regular season with a winning record. 

And Alabama, I mean, talk about earning it.  They played 5 teams in the regular season with a winning record.

And eff me if SC didn't piss all over Alabama's mark and played 6 teams in the regular season with a winning record.  I mean, at one point, they played 3 teams in a row that ended up with winning records.

Meanwhile, little ol' ksu played 8 rough ridin' teams with a winning record, and finished off the year with 6 in a row.

SEC SEC SEC

Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kim carnes on December 02, 2012, 12:20:42 PM
Georgia, a two loss team, is still ranked ahead of us in the coaches poll  :dubious:

Hey, Georgia is a good team.  They played 3 FBS teams in the regular season with a winning record. 

And Alabama, I mean, talk about earning it.  They played 5 teams in the regular season with a winning record.

And eff me if SC didn't piss all over Alabama's mark and played 6 teams in the regular season with a winning record.  I mean, at one point, they played 3 teams in a row that ended up with winning records.

Meanwhile, little ol' ksu played 8 rough ridin' teams with a winning record, and finished off the year with 6 in a row.

SEC SEC SEC

Do you think we would beat Georgia?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: DQ12 on December 02, 2012, 12:23:15 PM
Georgia, a two loss team, is still ranked ahead of us in the coaches poll  :dubious:

Hey, Georgia is a good team.  They played 3 FBS teams in the regular season with a winning record. 

And Alabama, I mean, talk about earning it.  They played 5 teams in the regular season with a winning record.

And eff me if SC didn't piss all over Alabama's mark and played 6 teams in the regular season with a winning record.  I mean, at one point, they played 3 teams in a row that ended up with winning records.

Meanwhile, little ol' ksu played 8 rough ridin' teams with a winning record, and finished off the year with 6 in a row.

SEC SEC SEC

Do you think we would beat Georgia?
Maybe.  You shouldn't get a prize for almost beating a one-loss team. 

Georgia is 1-2 against the 3 ranked opponents they've played this season.  That's not fair.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Pendergast on December 02, 2012, 12:29:11 PM
Georgia, a two loss team, is still ranked ahead of us in the coaches poll  :dubious:

Hey, Georgia is a good team.  They played 3 FBS teams in the regular season with a winning record. 

And Alabama, I mean, talk about earning it.  They played 5 teams in the regular season with a winning record.

And eff me if SC didn't piss all over Alabama's mark and played 6 teams in the regular season with a winning record.  I mean, at one point, they played 3 teams in a row that ended up with winning records.

Meanwhile, little ol' ksu played 8 rough ridin' teams with a winning record, and finished off the year with 6 in a row.

SEC SEC SEC

Do you think we would beat Georgia?

KSU -7
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: catzacker on December 02, 2012, 01:28:41 PM
Georgia, a two loss team, is still ranked ahead of us in the coaches poll  :dubious:

Hey, Georgia is a good team.  They played 3 FBS teams in the regular season with a winning record. 

And Alabama, I mean, talk about earning it.  They played 5 teams in the regular season with a winning record.

And eff me if SC didn't piss all over Alabama's mark and played 6 teams in the regular season with a winning record.  I mean, at one point, they played 3 teams in a row that ended up with winning records.

Meanwhile, little ol' ksu played 8 rough ridin' teams with a winning record, and finished off the year with 6 in a row.

SEC SEC SEC

Do you think we would beat Georgia?

Yes.  We would run all over them.  And I think we could match up with them on defense.  Look, the SEC is marginally better than the big 12.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kso_FAN on December 02, 2012, 02:30:35 PM
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/sports/college/football/coaches-poll12

I take back a couple of the bad things I said about Rhoads.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: michigancat on December 02, 2012, 02:37:55 PM
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/sports/college/football/coaches-poll12

I take back a couple of the bad things I said about Rhoads.

James Franklin had Bama, Florida, Georgia 1, 2, 3. Jesus Christ.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kim carnes on December 02, 2012, 02:38:45 PM
Georgia, a two loss team, is still ranked ahead of us in the coaches poll  :dubious:

Hey, Georgia is a good team.  They played 3 FBS teams in the regular season with a winning record. 

And Alabama, I mean, talk about earning it.  They played 5 teams in the regular season with a winning record.

And eff me if SC didn't piss all over Alabama's mark and played 6 teams in the regular season with a winning record.  I mean, at one point, they played 3 teams in a row that ended up with winning records.

Meanwhile, little ol' ksu played 8 rough ridin' teams with a winning record, and finished off the year with 6 in a row.

SEC SEC SEC

Do you think we would beat Georgia?

Yes.  We would run all over them.  And I think we could match up with them on defense.  Look, the SEC is marginally better than the big 12.

you have to be kidding, we can't run all over any one.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: michigancat on December 02, 2012, 02:41:32 PM
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/sports/college/football/coaches-poll12

I take back a couple of the bad things I said about Rhoads.

James Franklin had Bama, Florida, Georgia 1, 2, 3. Jesus Christ.

Also, Brett Beilema confused Oklahoma and Oklahoma State - OU was unranked and OSU was #11. :lol:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kso_FAN on December 02, 2012, 02:43:13 PM
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/sports/college/football/coaches-poll12

I take back a couple of the bad things I said about Rhoads.

James Franklin had Bama, Florida, Georgia 1, 2, 3. Jesus Christ.

Also, Brett Beilema confused Oklahoma and Oklahoma State - OU was unranked and OSU was #11. :lol:

COACHES SHOULD VOTE BECAUSE THEY KNOW THE GAME BETTER THAN ANYONE!
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: kim carnes on December 02, 2012, 02:43:26 PM
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/sports/college/football/coaches-poll12

I take back a couple of the bad things I said about Rhoads.

James Franklin had Bama, Florida, Georgia 1, 2, 3. Jesus Christ.

Also, Brett Beilema confused Oklahoma and Oklahoma State - OU was unranked and OSU was #11. :lol:

jfc, this is why the coaches poll is dumb.  the people voting don't give an eff
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Phil Titola on December 02, 2012, 02:45:28 PM
James Franklin little butthurt at K-State still?  JFC.

Joker Phillips has us 11th?  WTF, how does that dude get a ballot?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: MadCat on December 02, 2012, 02:46:10 PM
SEC must die.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 0.42 on December 02, 2012, 02:48:02 PM
tuberville clearly still loyal to the SEC :shakesfist:
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Ira Hayes on December 02, 2012, 02:52:03 PM
Stoops put NIU at #24.

James Franklin: 1. Bama, 2. Georgia, 3. Florida, 5. LSU, 7. A&M, 8. S. Carolina, 9. Kansas State, 16. Vanderbilt, 21. Mississippi State.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: EMAWzified on December 02, 2012, 02:53:07 PM
Tubervill's a dick. Thankfully, he won't be around this league much longer
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: DQ12 on December 02, 2012, 03:05:50 PM
Holgy had Oregon at 8.

This is really interesting.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: 8manpick on December 02, 2012, 03:11:37 PM
Coaches poll is an absolute joke.
Title: James Franklin and Joker Phillips...
Post by: BMWWcat on December 02, 2012, 03:22:43 PM
Had us ranked #9 and #11.

What a couple of tools... :jerk:
Title: James Franklin and Joker Phillips...
Post by: SkinnyBenny on December 02, 2012, 03:24:28 PM
LUKEcat
Title: Re: James Franklin and Joker Phillips...
Post by: BMWWcat on December 02, 2012, 03:25:46 PM
dammit...I totally did luke this.   :facepalm:

just looked in the "Post our glorious rankings" thread.

don't have my head in the game today...
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on December 02, 2012, 04:15:09 PM
Holgy had Oregon at 8.

This is really interesting.

BOSS
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: jtksu on December 02, 2012, 05:18:34 PM
Holgy had Oregon at 8.

This is really interesting.

BOSS

Holgy also referred to the schematic disadvantage the WVU coaching staff would face against KU.  He's like Pirate Jr, and i love him.
Title: Re: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: CNS on December 02, 2012, 05:21:33 PM
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/sports/college/football/coaches-poll12

I take back a couple of the bad things I said about Rhoads.

James Franklin had Bama, Florida, Georgia 1, 2, 3. Jesus Christ.

Party line

Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2

Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Domino on December 02, 2012, 05:23:43 PM
I feel like that Bielema fiasco should be the lead story in college football news ATM, or am I wrong?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Phil Titola on December 02, 2012, 05:29:11 PM
I feel like that Bielema fiasco should be the lead story in college football news ATM, or am I wrong?

USA effed up, he voted OU not OSU.
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Domino on December 02, 2012, 05:42:47 PM
I feel like that Bielema fiasco should be the lead story in college football news ATM, or am I wrong?

USA effed up, he voted OU not OSU.

Do the coaches really fill those out, or do they leave it to some second-rung coach on the staff?
Title: Re: Post our glorious rankings in this thread
Post by: Ira Hayes on December 03, 2012, 12:21:36 PM
Gee, we're number 5.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=Vs2AhDqqSYE#t=791s