goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Jerome Tang Coaches Kansas State Basketball => Topic started by: Dugout DickStone on March 26, 2012, 02:01:33 PM

Title: BITB
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 26, 2012, 02:01:33 PM
Tell us how to feel and who to hate!
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: EllToPay on March 26, 2012, 02:03:03 PM
haven't been this excited for bitb in a long time.  :excited:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Pete on March 26, 2012, 02:04:13 PM
If my iphone locks up, I am going to go into cardiac arrest.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: CNS on March 26, 2012, 02:10:26 PM
danny: "not exactly working all angles to keep this from happening" talking bout currie taking swarts mom's call
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 26, 2012, 02:12:18 PM
KK is a big #teamcurrie
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: WildcatNkilt on March 26, 2012, 02:13:32 PM
Big game of chicken....that Currie will probably win even if Frank leaves.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 26, 2012, 02:16:43 PM
Playing the crying tapes from "Pay Frank" presser from 2010
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: EllToPay on March 26, 2012, 02:17:01 PM
omg, seriously the bitb.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Pete on March 26, 2012, 02:17:24 PM
So the talking point now is that this was a game of chicken...
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on March 26, 2012, 02:18:03 PM
That presser kills me now.  :cry:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: 0.42 on March 26, 2012, 02:18:21 PM
holy eff this is just a slaughterhouse
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: chunkles on March 26, 2012, 02:19:50 PM
think he played it just for the loyalty part
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: WildcatNkilt on March 26, 2012, 02:20:10 PM
So the talking point now is that this was a game of chicken...

That Frank wants to win so bad he is going to take a job he probably really doesn't want...but no other school is offering and he doesn't want Currie to win the game.

The whole "I'm not kidding I'll shoot him (when the gun in his hand is pointing at his own head) type of attitude."
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: 'taterblast on March 26, 2012, 02:20:20 PM
classic BITB move playing that long ass clip from frank's bonus presser
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: OK_Cat on March 26, 2012, 02:20:37 PM
i've honestly never listened to BITB before, listening now.  wow, love this guy.  killing him right now.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: kso_FAN on March 26, 2012, 02:21:48 PM
I can't listen, but these are the moments that make BITB the BITB. I'm sure I'll enjoy listening later.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 26, 2012, 02:23:06 PM
He is steve dav'ing Frank Martin.

Just made a push for Underwood as the coach.

 :horrorsurprise:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: CNS on March 26, 2012, 02:23:57 PM
Now talking upshaw and Danny saying "he(frank) had a grand plan"
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: EMAWzified on March 26, 2012, 02:24:25 PM
Best Tuck in the Business
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: CNS on March 26, 2012, 02:25:04 PM
Now mentioning that some think he is on the phone with Pearl.

This guy reads our board.  def.

Talking about the compliance over $200 jamar deal.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: sonofdaxjones on March 26, 2012, 02:26:35 PM
Just starting to take another big bite of that MichiganCat theory on Pearl and Currie building a file for the show case hearing.

Title: Re: BITB
Post by: michigancat on March 26, 2012, 02:27:20 PM
Now mentioning that some think he is on the phone with Pearl.

This guy reads our board.  def.

Talking about the compliance over $200 jamar deal.

YES! #PEARL4KSU!!!!!!
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: SdK on March 26, 2012, 02:28:16 PM
Now mentioning that some think he is on the phone with Pearl.

This guy reads our board.  def.

Talking about the compliance over $200 jamar deal.

Yeah, what the hell?
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: OregonSmock on March 26, 2012, 02:28:22 PM
Pearl would be a homerun hire.  God, I love BITB. 


 :love:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Paul Moscow on March 26, 2012, 02:30:13 PM
Someone tell @kellyinvegas to start tweeting at oscar.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: CNS on March 26, 2012, 02:31:22 PM
Someone tell @kellyinvegas to start tweeting at oscar.

Please.  oscar has three of her in a golf cart on some elite course right now.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Doberman_CATS!!! on March 26, 2012, 02:44:59 PM
Someone tell @kellyinvegas to start tweeting at oscar.

Please.  oscar has three of her in a golf cart on some elite course right now.

Couldn't hurt though..
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: 0.42 on March 26, 2012, 02:46:38 PM
some squawk saying we could do better than frank martin because we haven't put anyone in the nba.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: CNS on March 26, 2012, 03:06:08 PM
Butthurt Frank chose Katz to hold his text convo of "not done yet" rather than BITB.   :lol:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 26, 2012, 03:10:37 PM
Currie is telling Frank to piss off, calling his bluff.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 26, 2012, 03:19:34 PM
Curie just tossed Kellis and Cassidy out of the complex.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on March 26, 2012, 03:20:30 PM
Curie just tossed Kellis and Cassidy out of the complex.

I don't blame him.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: SPE_khat on March 26, 2012, 03:20:41 PM
Curie just tossed Kellis and Cassidy out of the complex.

escorted them away... wtf does he think he is?
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: CNS on March 26, 2012, 03:21:20 PM
"I'll put these notes with your open records request, now get the eff out"
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: kim carnes on March 26, 2012, 03:22:20 PM
If my iphone locks up, I am going to go into cardiac arrest.

I just LOL'd quietely at my desk after reading this.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 26, 2012, 04:31:03 PM
"Fame and fortune have really changed Frank Martin"

 :driving:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Bookcat on March 26, 2012, 04:37:20 PM
why didn't Keitz become a defense attorney?

He is so masterful at what he does.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: GoodForAnother on March 26, 2012, 04:39:42 PM
why didn't Keitz become a defense attorney?

He is so masterful at what he does.

laziness
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: DQ12 on March 26, 2012, 04:40:35 PM
"Fame and fortune have really changed Frank Martin"

 :driving:
Beautiful.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: michigancat on March 26, 2012, 04:41:25 PM
"Frank loves him some Frank"
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Pete on March 26, 2012, 04:41:45 PM
Is this Chings on the radio talking about a pro-bowler for the next coach? 
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Stevesie60 on March 26, 2012, 04:50:21 PM
Now saying that USC may not want him. This is Miami all over again. This could be even more embarrassing than the Miami thing.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: CNS on March 26, 2012, 04:54:16 PM
Now saying that USC may not want him. This is Miami all over again. This could be even more embarrassing than the Miami thing.

Oh my...


If this is a no go from their side, he will end up as Pearl's assistant coach at $160k/yr
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: stobblebobby on March 26, 2012, 04:57:13 PM
Now saying that USC may not want him. This is Miami all over again. This could be even more embarrassing than the Miami thing.

Oh my...


If this is a no go from their side, he will end up as Pearl's assistant coach at $160k/yr

WOW. KK tears him down, then insinuates that SC only reported they'd hired Frank because he asked to be hired, now they're "reviewing a contract proposal" as if this is all Frank BEGGING them to come there.

BITB
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 26, 2012, 05:00:10 PM
Now saying that USC may not want him. This is Miami all over again. This could be even more embarrassing than the Miami thing.

Source?
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Stevesie60 on March 26, 2012, 05:03:27 PM
Now saying that USC may not want him. This is Miami all over again. This could be even more embarrassing than the Miami thing.

Source?

BITB being BITB.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 26, 2012, 05:20:44 PM
Now saying that USC may not want him. This is Miami all over again. This could be even more embarrassing than the Miami thing.

Source?

BITB being BITB.

Can't even take a phone call without missing something today.   :curse:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: wabash909 on March 26, 2012, 09:30:26 PM
kkietz

Post #673
MyFanPage
Add Buddy
Ignore   
Burn it down   Reply

Based on the responses from national media types, Frank Martin is already torching K-State to make sure John Currie has no success in the future. This actually fits Frank's personality. He's loyal alright. Loyal until the moment he's against you and then its carpet bombing.

My longstanding opinion is the myth of not being able to recruit to Manhattan really started when Lon Kruger left. He was covering up a mess and needed a good reason why he left. This is different. Frank knows the stereotype and he also knows you can get players from 2000 miles away to play in front of a full house on a 20 degree night because it's fun.

If he's spreading ill will to national media about Currie AND about how hard the job is, he's doing his best to make sure the next coach isn't as successful as he was. What a shame. Six years ago he was a low paid assistant clinging to life in a hospital after years of toiling as an even lower paid coach. K-State made the reach of all time to hire him, allow him a chance to be a successful millionaire and a national celebrity. And because he can't work with ONE person, he leaves?

I have played sports with and worked with people that fit this profile. If they're on your team, you love them. If they're not, they're your worst nightmare. Frank is spoon feeding Katz and all the others a very easy story for them to repeat. How sad.

Posted on 3/26 9:01 PM | IP: Logged
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: kim carnes on March 26, 2012, 09:34:01 PM
kkietz

Post #673
MyFanPage
Add Buddy
Ignore   
Burn it down   Reply

Based on the responses from national media types, Frank Martin is already torching K-State to make sure John Currie has no success in the future. This actually fits Frank's personality. He's loyal alright. Loyal until the moment he's against you and then its carpet bombing.

My longstanding opinion is the myth of not being able to recruit to Manhattan really started when Lon Kruger left. He was covering up a mess and needed a good reason why he left. This is different. Frank knows the stereotype and he also knows you can get players from 2000 miles away to play in front of a full house on a 20 degree night because it's fun.

If he's spreading ill will to national media about Currie AND about how hard the job is, he's doing his best to make sure the next coach isn't as successful as he was. What a shame. Six years ago he was a low paid assistant clinging to life in a hospital after years of toiling as an even lower paid coach. K-State made the reach of all time to hire him, allow him a chance to be a successful millionaire and a national celebrity. And because he can't work with ONE person, he leaves?

I have played sports with and worked with people that fit this profile. If they're on your team, you love them. If they're not, they're your worst nightmare. Frank is spoon feeding Katz and all the others a very easy story for them to repeat. How sad.

Posted on 3/26 9:01 PM | IP: Logged

yep, that's Frank.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: sonofdaxjones on March 26, 2012, 09:36:12 PM
If that's true, that's disappointing, but not the least bit surprising.

Title: Re: BITB
Post by: kim carnes on March 26, 2012, 09:39:23 PM
If that's true, that's disappointing, but not the least bit surprising.

it is 100% true.  Frank is garbage.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Bill Clarahan on March 26, 2012, 09:40:14 PM
If that's true, that's disappointing, but not the least bit surprising.

Kill everyone in the building, then set it on fire
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: wabash909 on March 26, 2012, 10:24:01 PM
If that's true, that's disappointing, but not the least bit surprising.

it is 100% true.  Frank is garbage.

Currie and Frank are both garbage.



Title: Re: BITB
Post by: monumentcat on March 26, 2012, 10:32:22 PM
If that's true, that's disappointing, but not the least bit surprising.

it is 100% true.  Frank is garbage.

Currie and Frank are both garbage.

How the hell did we get here?  I'm just so sad.  Just 2 years ago we had the that glorious Xavier game and it seemed like the sky was the limit.  Now we will be starting over just because two people couldn't get along.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: MakeItRain on March 26, 2012, 10:42:40 PM
If that's true, that's disappointing, but not the least bit surprising.

Why?  If your former boss was a bitch, tell people your former boss was a bitch, its the American way.  You don't want people telling others you're a bitch, don't be a bitch.

Kietz's bullshit about Frank should be quiet because Currie gave him a chance is his tuck showing.Currie didn't make Frank a millionaire, Frank, his assistants, and his players made him a millionaire; Currie didn't do crap, he didn't even hire him.  If Currie didn't give Frank a new contract Frank would have made MORE money at Depaul or Oregon.  The loyalty tucks seem to forget that Frank gave K-State the old hometown discount.

eff John Currie
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: DQ12 on March 26, 2012, 10:53:07 PM
If that's true, that's disappointing, but not the least bit surprising.

Why?  If your former boss was a bitch, tell people your former boss was a bitch, its the American way.  You don't want people telling others you're a bitch, don't be a bitch.

Kietz's bullshit about Frank should be quiet because Currie gave him a chance is his tuck showing.Currie didn't make Frank a millionaire, Frank, his assistants, and his players made him a millionaire; Currie didn't do crap, he didn't even hire him.  If Currie didn't give Frank a new contract Frank would have made MORE money at Depaul or Oregon.  The loyalty tucks seem to forget that Frank gave K-State the old hometown discount.

eff John Currie
Laughing at Frank's "loyalty" song and dance is perfectly acceptable. He cried when he got his contract and we all thought "my God, he's going to be here forever."  It was part of his charm.  He talked about it every chance he got, and the first time he gets offered a job anywhere south of Chicago he's gone.

Come on.  I get that he's ditching Currie and he doesn't necessarily owe Currie anything, but the "loyalty" Frank champions at every turn, in this case, doesn't pertain only to Currie. 

In no way do I think this excuses Currie, but Frank isn't completely innocent in all of this.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: MakeItRain on March 26, 2012, 10:57:17 PM
He cried when he got his contract and we all thought "my God, he's going to be here forever." 

"We all" didn't think crap.  That's your fault homie, only you can think for you.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 26, 2012, 10:58:47 PM
If that's true, that's disappointing, but not the least bit surprising.

Why?  If your former boss was a bitch, tell people your former boss was a bitch, its the American way.  You don't want people telling others you're a bitch, don't be a bitch.

Kietz's bullshit about Frank should be quiet because Currie gave him a chance is his tuck showing.Currie didn't make Frank a millionaire, Frank, his assistants, and his players made him a millionaire; Currie didn't do crap, he didn't even hire him.  If Currie didn't give Frank a new contract Frank would have made MORE money at Depaul or Oregon.  The loyalty tucks seem to forget that Frank gave K-State the old hometown discount.

eff John Currie

I think trashing your former employer, when YOU decided to leave, is bush at best.

Title: Re: BITB
Post by: MakeItRain on March 26, 2012, 11:01:40 PM
If that's true, that's disappointing, but not the least bit surprising.

Why?  If your former boss was a bitch, tell people your former boss was a bitch, its the American way.  You don't want people telling others you're a bitch, don't be a bitch.

Kietz's bullshit about Frank should be quiet because Currie gave him a chance is his tuck showing.Currie didn't make Frank a millionaire, Frank, his assistants, and his players made him a millionaire; Currie didn't do crap, he didn't even hire him.  If Currie didn't give Frank a new contract Frank would have made MORE money at Depaul or Oregon.  The loyalty tucks seem to forget that Frank gave K-State the old hometown discount.

eff John Currie

I think trashing your former employer, when YOU decided to leave, is bush at best.

Not if you think you are leaving a hostile work environment.  If we believe the report that the last straw was the letter to the fans, I would tell people that my boss he was a lying bad person too.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: DQ12 on March 26, 2012, 11:09:11 PM
He cried when he got his contract and we all thought "my God, he's going to be here forever." 

"We all" didn't think crap.  That's your fault homie, only you can think for you.
"Forever" was an exaggeration.  So was "we all," I guess.

My point, though, is that after receiving his contract and his "loyalty" mantra that was repeated ad nauseum to the point that it was practically cliche around here, I think that it was more than reasonable to expect him to stay at least the term of his contract.  In hindsight, I think it's fair to question and to roll your eyes at the bullshit that Frank served to us the last 5 years.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: MakeItRain on March 26, 2012, 11:13:28 PM
He cried when he got his contract and we all thought "my God, he's going to be here forever." 

"We all" didn't think crap.  That's your fault homie, only you can think for you.
"Forever" was an exaggeration.  So was "we all," I guess.

My point, though, is that after receiving his contract and his "loyalty" mantra that was repeated ad nauseum to the point that it was practically cliche around here, I think that it was more than reasonable to expect him to stay at least the term of his contract.  In hindsight, I think it's fair to question and to roll your eyes at the bullshit that Frank served to us the last 5 years.

Sure its fair.  All I know is that people every single quit jobs for whatever reason, jobs that they once thought that they would have "forever."  Just because Frank is rich, doesn't mean that he shouldn't feel and behave like the rest of us, IMHO.  He's a basketball coach I don't hold his actions, morality, or decision making in any more regard than I do my mechanic.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: michigancat on March 26, 2012, 11:14:30 PM
If that's true, that's disappointing, but not the least bit surprising.

Why?  If your former boss was a bitch, tell people your former boss was a bitch, its the American way.  You don't want people telling others you're a bitch, don't be a bitch.

Kietz's bullshit about Frank should be quiet because Currie gave him a chance is his tuck showing.Currie didn't make Frank a millionaire, Frank, his assistants, and his players made him a millionaire; Currie didn't do crap, he didn't even hire him.  If Currie didn't give Frank a new contract Frank would have made MORE money at Depaul or Oregon.  The loyalty tucks seem to forget that Frank gave K-State the old hometown discount.

eff John Currie

I think trashing your former employer, when YOU decided to leave, is bush at best.

Not if you think you are leaving a hostile work environment.  If we believe the report that the last straw was the letter to the fans, I would tell people that my boss he was a lying bad person too.

oh jesus christ. frank wasn't being abused. If Currie's a liar, say he's a liar publicly and get him fired. In fact, he should have done that earlier (if Currie). Don't tell people you can't recruit to Manhattan - that hurts the entire university more than Currie.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: DQ12 on March 26, 2012, 11:21:47 PM
Sure its fair.  All I know is that people every single quit jobs for whatever reason, jobs that they once thought that they would have "forever."  Just because Frank is rich, doesn't mean that he shouldn't feel and behave like the rest of us, IMHO.  He's a basketball coach I don't hold his actions, morality, or decision making in any more regard than I do my mechanic.
I completely understand that college basketball coaches, and specifically Frank, have a right to do whatever they want, whenever they want, for whatever reason they want.  We as fans, though, are allowed to say that, in some circumstances, they're hypocritical assholes for doing so.

I think this is one of those circumstances. 
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: MakeItRain on March 26, 2012, 11:29:56 PM
If that's true, that's disappointing, but not the least bit surprising.

Why?  If your former boss was a bitch, tell people your former boss was a bitch, its the American way.  You don't want people telling others you're a bitch, don't be a bitch.

Kietz's bullshit about Frank should be quiet because Currie gave him a chance is his tuck showing.Currie didn't make Frank a millionaire, Frank, his assistants, and his players made him a millionaire; Currie didn't do crap, he didn't even hire him.  If Currie didn't give Frank a new contract Frank would have made MORE money at Depaul or Oregon.  The loyalty tucks seem to forget that Frank gave K-State the old hometown discount.

eff John Currie

I think trashing your former employer, when YOU decided to leave, is bush at best.

Not if you think you are leaving a hostile work environment.  If we believe the report that the last straw was the letter to the fans, I would tell people that my boss he was a lying bad person too.

oh jesus christ. frank wasn't being abused. If Currie's a liar, say he's a liar publicly and get him fired. In fact, he should have done that earlier (if Currie). Don't tell people you can't recruit to Manhattan - that hurts the entire university more than Currie.

I haven't made a statement of fact yet, I can't, that would make me a





wait for it











a hypocrite.



I don't know if the man thought.  I don't know if he's telling people you can't recruit to Manhattan.  It seems clear that he thinks that John Currie made his work environment unbearable, whether he thinks it's unbearable, abusive, or the actual work I used hostile, is a hair split.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 26, 2012, 11:31:49 PM
If that's true, that's disappointing, but not the least bit surprising.

Why?  If your former boss was a bitch, tell people your former boss was a bitch, its the American way.  You don't want people telling others you're a bitch, don't be a bitch.

Kietz's bullshit about Frank should be quiet because Currie gave him a chance is his tuck showing.Currie didn't make Frank a millionaire, Frank, his assistants, and his players made him a millionaire; Currie didn't do crap, he didn't even hire him.  If Currie didn't give Frank a new contract Frank would have made MORE money at Depaul or Oregon.  The loyalty tucks seem to forget that Frank gave K-State the old hometown discount.

eff John Currie

I think trashing your former employer, when YOU decided to leave, is bush at best.

Not if you think you are leaving a hostile work environment.  If we believe the report that the last straw was the letter to the fans, I would tell people that my boss he was a lying bad person too.

Would make you look bitter and pretty dumb for staying there for 5 years but WGAF I guess?
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: monumentcat on March 26, 2012, 11:32:15 PM
If that's true, that's disappointing, but not the least bit surprising.

Why?  If your former boss was a bitch, tell people your former boss was a bitch, its the American way.  You don't want people telling others you're a bitch, don't be a bitch.

Kietz's bullshit about Frank should be quiet because Currie gave him a chance is his tuck showing.Currie didn't make Frank a millionaire, Frank, his assistants, and his players made him a millionaire; Currie didn't do crap, he didn't even hire him.  If Currie didn't give Frank a new contract Frank would have made MORE money at Depaul or Oregon.  The loyalty tucks seem to forget that Frank gave K-State the old hometown discount.

eff John Currie

I think trashing your former employer, when YOU decided to leave, is bush at best.

Not if you think you are leaving a hostile work environment.  If we believe the report that the last straw was the letter to the fans, I would tell people that my boss he was a lying bad person too.

Seriously if all he is doing is trashing Currie, I don't have a problem with it. The whole world, by now,  knows that those two hate each other. Like you said, trashing your former boss is the American way.

Now if (big if, considering the Kietz source) he is trashing the K-State coaching job itself, by saying it is too hard to win here, then I do have a problem with that.  The K-State fans have done nothing but support and defend him. We have been nothing but loyal to him and his program. That would hurt. I hope that part is pure BS.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: kim carnes on March 26, 2012, 11:33:16 PM
If that's true, that's disappointing, but not the least bit surprising.

Why?  If your former boss was a bitch, tell people your former boss was a bitch, its the American way.  You don't want people telling others you're a bitch, don't be a bitch.

Kietz's bullshit about Frank should be quiet because Currie gave him a chance is his tuck showing.Currie didn't make Frank a millionaire, Frank, his assistants, and his players made him a millionaire; Currie didn't do crap, he didn't even hire him.  If Currie didn't give Frank a new contract Frank would have made MORE money at Depaul or Oregon.  The loyalty tucks seem to forget that Frank gave K-State the old hometown discount.

eff John Currie

Kansas State University made Frank a millionaire.  If it wasn't for Kstate, he would be an assistant coach at West rough ridin' Virginia.  eff Frank Martin.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: MakeItRain on March 26, 2012, 11:34:34 PM
If that's true, that's disappointing, but not the least bit surprising.

Why?  If your former boss was a bitch, tell people your former boss was a bitch, its the American way.  You don't want people telling others you're a bitch, don't be a bitch.

Kietz's bullshit about Frank should be quiet because Currie gave him a chance is his tuck showing.Currie didn't make Frank a millionaire, Frank, his assistants, and his players made him a millionaire; Currie didn't do crap, he didn't even hire him.  If Currie didn't give Frank a new contract Frank would have made MORE money at Depaul or Oregon.  The loyalty tucks seem to forget that Frank gave K-State the old hometown discount.

eff John Currie

I think trashing your former employer, when YOU decided to leave, is bush at best.

Not if you think you are leaving a hostile work environment.  If we believe the report that the last straw was the letter to the fans, I would tell people that my boss he was a lying bad person too.

Would make you look bitter and pretty dumb for staying there for 5 years but WGAF I guess?

 :dunno: Or loyal for putting up with it as long as I did
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: MakeItRain on March 26, 2012, 11:37:07 PM
If that's true, that's disappointing, but not the least bit surprising.

Why?  If your former boss was a bitch, tell people your former boss was a bitch, its the American way.  You don't want people telling others you're a bitch, don't be a bitch.

Kietz's bullshit about Frank should be quiet because Currie gave him a chance is his tuck showing.Currie didn't make Frank a millionaire, Frank, his assistants, and his players made him a millionaire; Currie didn't do crap, he didn't even hire him.  If Currie didn't give Frank a new contract Frank would have made MORE money at Depaul or Oregon.  The loyalty tucks seem to forget that Frank gave K-State the old hometown discount.

eff John Currie

Kansas State University made Frank a millionaire.  If it wasn't for Kstate, he would be an assistant coach at West rough ridin' Virginia.  eff Frank Martin.

Yeah K-State had nothing at all to gain by hiring Frank Martin.  Frank Martin, Brad Underwood, Jimmy Elgas, all the same huh?
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: kim carnes on March 26, 2012, 11:39:46 PM
If that's true, that's disappointing, but not the least bit surprising.

Why?  If your former boss was a bitch, tell people your former boss was a bitch, its the American way.  You don't want people telling others you're a bitch, don't be a bitch.

Kietz's bullshit about Frank should be quiet because Currie gave him a chance is his tuck showing.Currie didn't make Frank a millionaire, Frank, his assistants, and his players made him a millionaire; Currie didn't do crap, he didn't even hire him.  If Currie didn't give Frank a new contract Frank would have made MORE money at Depaul or Oregon.  The loyalty tucks seem to forget that Frank gave K-State the old hometown discount.

eff John Currie

Kansas State University made Frank a millionaire.  If it wasn't for Kstate, he would be an assistant coach at West rough ridin' Virginia.  eff Frank Martin.

Yeah K-State had nothing at all to gain by hiring Frank Martin.  Frank Martin, Brad Underwood, Jimmy Elgas, all the same huh?

FACT:  Frank Martin would be nothing without kstate and michael beasley.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: MakeItRain on March 26, 2012, 11:44:10 PM
Now if (big if, considering the Kietz source) he is trashing the K-State coaching job itself, by saying it is too hard to win here, then I do have a problem with that.  The K-State fans have done nothing but support and defend him. We have been nothing but loyal to him and his program. That would hurt. I hope that part is pure BS.

Wouldn't that make sense if you know he didn't win here :dunno:

Also in general fans of all schools/teams who get butthurt about someone saying "its hard to win there don't understand coaches and frankly all competitive and successful people.  I mean if you have a competitive bone in your body and someone tells you "you can't win there," I would hope you thought would be "yeah, YOU couldn't win there."  The only exception being if there is something very tangible holding you back from being competitive like an AD who won't financially support the program, horrible facilities, etc.  Unless you think K-State is in that boat, I wouldn't worry about someone saying its hard to win here.  Frank Martin would be the perfect example of that talking point being bullshit.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Stevesie60 on March 26, 2012, 11:44:55 PM
If that's true, that's disappointing, but not the least bit surprising.

Why?  If your former boss was a bitch, tell people your former boss was a bitch, its the American way.  You don't want people telling others you're a bitch, don't be a bitch.

Kietz's bullshit about Frank should be quiet because Currie gave him a chance is his tuck showing.Currie didn't make Frank a millionaire, Frank, his assistants, and his players made him a millionaire; Currie didn't do crap, he didn't even hire him.  If Currie didn't give Frank a new contract Frank would have made MORE money at Depaul or Oregon.  The loyalty tucks seem to forget that Frank gave K-State the old hometown discount.

eff John Currie

Kansas State University made Frank a millionaire.  If it wasn't for Kstate, he would be an assistant coach at West rough ridin' Virginia.  eff Frank Martin.

Yeah K-State had nothing at all to gain by hiring Frank Martin.  Frank Martin, Brad Underwood, Jimmy Elgas, all the same huh?

FACT:  Frank Martin would be nothing without kstate and michael beasley.

Oh shut up. We hired him to save our asses. We needed a big name recruit (or two) to keep fans interested. We had nothing but our own ass in mind when we hired him.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: MakeItRain on March 26, 2012, 11:46:25 PM
If that's true, that's disappointing, but not the least bit surprising.

Why?  If your former boss was a bitch, tell people your former boss was a bitch, its the American way.  You don't want people telling others you're a bitch, don't be a bitch.

Kietz's bullshit about Frank should be quiet because Currie gave him a chance is his tuck showing.Currie didn't make Frank a millionaire, Frank, his assistants, and his players made him a millionaire; Currie didn't do crap, he didn't even hire him.  If Currie didn't give Frank a new contract Frank would have made MORE money at Depaul or Oregon.  The loyalty tucks seem to forget that Frank gave K-State the old hometown discount.

eff John Currie

Kansas State University made Frank a millionaire.  If it wasn't for Kstate, he would be an assistant coach at West rough ridin' Virginia.  eff Frank Martin.

Yeah K-State had nothing at all to gain by hiring Frank Martin.  Frank Martin, Brad Underwood, Jimmy Elgas, all the same huh?

FACT:  Frank Martin would be nothing without kstate and michael beasley.

So Frank had something unique to offer K-State that made him a valuable commodity.  Thanks for agreeing :thumbsup: there is nothing I value more.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 26, 2012, 11:48:54 PM
If that's true, that's disappointing, but not the least bit surprising.

Why?  If your former boss was a bitch, tell people your former boss was a bitch, its the American way.  You don't want people telling others you're a bitch, don't be a bitch.

Kietz's bullshit about Frank should be quiet because Currie gave him a chance is his tuck showing.Currie didn't make Frank a millionaire, Frank, his assistants, and his players made him a millionaire; Currie didn't do crap, he didn't even hire him.  If Currie didn't give Frank a new contract Frank would have made MORE money at Depaul or Oregon.  The loyalty tucks seem to forget that Frank gave K-State the old hometown discount.

eff John Currie

I think trashing your former employer, when YOU decided to leave, is bush at best.

Not if you think you are leaving a hostile work environment.  If we believe the report that the last straw was the letter to the fans, I would tell people that my boss he was a lying bad person too.

Would make you look bitter and pretty dumb for staying there for 5 years but WGAF I guess?

 :dunno: Or loyal for putting up with it as long as I did

Well now you are covering up for a liar, who lied so bad you had to leave, but when he was giving you raises his lying was cool with you?  So loyal to the $$.  Nothing wrong with that at all.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: kim carnes on March 26, 2012, 11:49:13 PM
If that's true, that's disappointing, but not the least bit surprising.

Why?  If your former boss was a bitch, tell people your former boss was a bitch, its the American way.  You don't want people telling others you're a bitch, don't be a bitch.

Kietz's bullshit about Frank should be quiet because Currie gave him a chance is his tuck showing.Currie didn't make Frank a millionaire, Frank, his assistants, and his players made him a millionaire; Currie didn't do crap, he didn't even hire him.  If Currie didn't give Frank a new contract Frank would have made MORE money at Depaul or Oregon.  The loyalty tucks seem to forget that Frank gave K-State the old hometown discount.

eff John Currie

Kansas State University made Frank a millionaire.  If it wasn't for Kstate, he would be an assistant coach at West rough ridin' Virginia.  eff Frank Martin.

Yeah K-State had nothing at all to gain by hiring Frank Martin.  Frank Martin, Brad Underwood, Jimmy Elgas, all the same huh?

FACT:  Frank Martin would be nothing without kstate and michael beasley.

Oh shut up. We hired him to save our asses. We needed a big name recruit (or two) to keep fans interested. We had nothing but our own ass in mind when we hired him.

obviously we had ourselves in mind when we hired our new coach.  what school wouldn't have their own interest in mind when hiring a coach? 
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: MakeItRain on March 26, 2012, 11:57:26 PM
Well now you are covering up for a liar, who lied so bad you had to leave, but when he was giving you raises his lying was cool with you?  So loyal to the $$.  Nothing wrong with that at all.

Not covering up crap, trying to deal with it.  Are you suggesting that people should quit their jobs the second they discover their boss is a shithead?  That isn't very loyal.



BTW I told myself this afternoon that I would not talk about this, because politics and religion, I'm not changing anyone's mind and no one is changing mine.  We might as well be talking about abortion.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: monumentcat on March 27, 2012, 12:01:23 AM
Now if (big if, considering the Kietz source) he is trashing the K-State coaching job itself, by saying it is too hard to win here, then I do have a problem with that.  The K-State fans have done nothing but support and defend him. We have been nothing but loyal to him and his program. That would hurt. I hope that part is pure BS.

Wouldn't that make sense if you know he didn't win here :dunno:

Also in general fans of all schools/teams who get butthurt about someone saying "its hard to win there don't understand coaches and frankly all competitive and successful people.  I mean if you have a competitive bone in your body and someone tells you "you can't win there," I would hope you thought would be "yeah, YOU couldn't win there."  The only exception being if there is something very tangible holding you back from being competitive like an AD who won't financially support the program, horrible facilities, etc.  Unless you think K-State is in that boat, I wouldn't worry about someone saying its hard to win here.  Frank Martin would be the perfect example of that talking point being bullshit.
That's the thing, I don't have a problem with hearing it. Lord knows, we've heard it form Kruger to Altman to Asbury to Woolridge and it's always been a cop out.  I have a problem if (again big if) Frank is saying it, because he knows that is total bullshit.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: DQ12 on March 27, 2012, 12:02:25 AM
Well now you are covering up for a liar, who lied so bad you had to leave, but when he was giving you raises his lying was cool with you?  So loyal to the $$.  Nothing wrong with that at all.

Not covering up crap, trying to deal with it.  Are you suggesting that people should quit their jobs the second they discover their boss is a shithead?  That isn't very loyal.



BTW I told myself this afternoon that I would not talk about this, because politics and religion, I'm not changing anyone's mind and no one is changing mine.  We might as well be talking about abortion.
For the record, some of the stuff you've said tonight has made me readjust my position on the issue a bit.  Earlier I was genuinely mad at Frank and thought he was being a total child.

Now, I've recognized that, understandably, he's acting self-interestedly, but considering the "loyalty" and his holistic coaching style  makes him look a bit like a buffoon, in hindsight.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: MakeItRain on March 27, 2012, 12:03:34 AM
Now if (big if, considering the Kietz source) he is trashing the K-State coaching job itself, by saying it is too hard to win here, then I do have a problem with that.  The K-State fans have done nothing but support and defend him. We have been nothing but loyal to him and his program. That would hurt. I hope that part is pure BS.

Wouldn't that make sense if you know he didn't win here :dunno:

Also in general fans of all schools/teams who get butthurt about someone saying "its hard to win there don't understand coaches and frankly all competitive and successful people.  I mean if you have a competitive bone in your body and someone tells you "you can't win there," I would hope you thought would be "yeah, YOU couldn't win there."  The only exception being if there is something very tangible holding you back from being competitive like an AD who won't financially support the program, horrible facilities, etc.  Unless you think K-State is in that boat, I wouldn't worry about someone saying its hard to win here.  Frank Martin would be the perfect example of that talking point being bullshit.
That's the thing, I don't have a problem with hearing it. Lord knows, we've heard it form Kruger to Altman to Asbury to Woolridge and it's always been a cop out.  I have a problem if (again big if) Frank is saying it, because he knows that is total bullshit.

Nothing would make Frank look dumber, nothing.  He's a basketball coach he doesn't work for NASA, maybe he is saying this, he'd be a damn fool if he did.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: kim carnes on March 27, 2012, 12:04:54 AM
Well now you are covering up for a liar, who lied so bad you had to leave, but when he was giving you raises his lying was cool with you?  So loyal to the $$.  Nothing wrong with that at all.

Not covering up crap, trying to deal with it.  Are you suggesting that people should quit their jobs the second they discover their boss is a shithead?  That isn't very loyal.



BTW I told myself this afternoon that I would not talk about this, because politics and religion, I'm not changing anyone's mind and no one is changing mine.  We might as well be talking about abortion.
For the record, some of the stuff you've said tonight has made me readjust my position on the issue a bit.  Earlier I was genuinely mad at Frank and thought he was being a total child.

Now, I've recognized that, understandably, he's acting self-interestedly, but considering the "loyalty" and his holistic coaching style  makes him look a bit like a buffoon, in hindsight.

you're going to be a terrible lawyer.  FYI
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Trim on March 27, 2012, 12:07:00 AM
Sure its fair.  All I know is that people every single quit jobs for whatever reason, jobs that they once thought that they would have "forever."  Just because Frank is rich, doesn't mean that he shouldn't feel and behave like the rest of us, IMHO.  He's a basketball coach I don't hold his actions, morality, or decision making in any more regard than I do my mechanic.
I completely understand that college basketball coaches, and specifically Frank, have a right to do whatever they want, whenever they want, for whatever reason they want.  We as fans, though, are allowed to say that, in some circumstances, they're hypocritical assholes for doing so.

I think this is one of those circumstances. 

Would you feel differently if he'd simply quit and chilled for a little bit or done tv for a year rather than immediately taking a new job?
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Trim on March 27, 2012, 12:07:21 AM
Well now you are covering up for a liar, who lied so bad you had to leave, but when he was giving you raises his lying was cool with you?  So loyal to the $$.  Nothing wrong with that at all.

Not covering up crap, trying to deal with it.  Are you suggesting that people should quit their jobs the second they discover their boss is a shithead?  That isn't very loyal.



BTW I told myself this afternoon that I would not talk about this, because politics and religion, I'm not changing anyone's mind and no one is changing mine.  We might as well be talking about abortion.

#AbortJohnCurrie
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: MakeItRain on March 27, 2012, 12:07:27 AM
Well now you are covering up for a liar, who lied so bad you had to leave, but when he was giving you raises his lying was cool with you?  So loyal to the $$.  Nothing wrong with that at all.

Not covering up crap, trying to deal with it.  Are you suggesting that people should quit their jobs the second they discover their boss is a shithead?  That isn't very loyal.



BTW I told myself this afternoon that I would not talk about this, because politics and religion, I'm not changing anyone's mind and no one is changing mine.  We might as well be talking about abortion.
For the record, some of the stuff you've said tonight has made me readjust my position on the issue a bit.  Earlier I was genuinely mad at Frank and thought he was being a total child.

Now, I've recognized that, understandably, he's acting self-interestedly, but considering the "loyalty" and his holistic coaching style  makes him look a bit like a buffoon, in hindsight.

I've tried to look at this like Frank is a CPA or something, I may be totally wrong in taking this tact though.  I would say time will tell, but I don't think it will and it's likely that we're all correct.  I really hope tomorrow won't turn into a mud slinging session, it certainly won't serve Currie and Schultz well to do that, Frank has a job.  However, judging by the time we picked for our press conference I'm worried.

 :cry: realizing I'm using terms like us and our and knowing Frank isn't included anymore.
Title: ?
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 27, 2012, 12:08:35 AM
Well now you are covering up for a liar, who lied so bad you had to leave, but when he was giving you raises his lying was cool with you?  So loyal to the $$.  Nothing wrong with that at all.

Not covering up crap, trying to deal with it.  Are you suggesting that people should quit their jobs the second they discover their boss is a shithead?  That isn't very loyal.



BTW I told myself this afternoon that I would not talk about this, because politics and religion, I'm not changing anyone's mind and no one is changing mine.  We might as well be talking about abortion.

But maybe you are ACTUALLY being incredibly loyal to the school by exposing the liar who runs the AD?   :sdeek:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: MakeItRain on March 27, 2012, 12:09:40 AM
Well now you are covering up for a liar, who lied so bad you had to leave, but when he was giving you raises his lying was cool with you?  So loyal to the $$.  Nothing wrong with that at all.

Not covering up crap, trying to deal with it.  Are you suggesting that people should quit their jobs the second they discover their boss is a shithead?  That isn't very loyal.



BTW I told myself this afternoon that I would not talk about this, because politics and religion, I'm not changing anyone's mind and no one is changing mine.  We might as well be talking about abortion.

#AbortJohnCurrie

 :surprised:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: kim carnes on March 27, 2012, 12:10:20 AM
I hope we drag Frank's name through the mud tomorrow at the presser, but unlike Frank, Currie is professional, so that won't happen.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: DQ12 on March 27, 2012, 12:14:23 AM
you're going to be a terrible lawyer.  FYI
:rolleyes:

I think recognizing the merits in others' arguments is a healthy way to interact with people. 
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: EllToPay on March 28, 2012, 12:07:28 PM
Frank on with BITB today. Soren playing a clip now.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: EllToPay on March 28, 2012, 01:50:39 PM
Frank interview with BITB at 2:15. Son of BITB will not be an interviewer.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: OregonSmock on March 28, 2012, 02:25:00 PM
Frank on BITB right now. 
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: j-dub on March 28, 2012, 02:26:49 PM
Frank on BITB right now.

frank is lying scum. can't believe i ever loved him so dearly and blindly. :frown:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: PurplePride74 on March 28, 2012, 02:27:53 PM
Frank on BITB right now.

frank is lying scum. can't believe i ever loved him so dearly and blindly. :frown:

I'm gunna throw my radio through my office window!!!! :chainsaw: :curse: :chainsaw: :curse: :chainsaw: :curse:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Pete on March 28, 2012, 02:29:23 PM
I couldn't listen.   :flush:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: 0.42 on March 28, 2012, 02:30:35 PM
Non-answer after non-answer. Frank is lying his ass off.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Sandstone Outcropping on March 28, 2012, 02:30:54 PM
at work.. please post play-by-play
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Ira Hayes on March 28, 2012, 02:31:25 PM
Frank doesn't want to be called a liar.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: michigancat on March 28, 2012, 02:31:29 PM
Non-answer after non-answer. Frank is lying his ass off.

He says he won't negotiate during the season. EXCEPT FOR THE ONLY OTHER TIME HE NEGOTIATED A CONTRACT BEFORE THIS YEAR.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: JavaCat on March 28, 2012, 02:32:08 PM
"People always thing there is something wrong when people leave. I left for the challenge. Blah, blah, blah."
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Stupid Fitz on March 28, 2012, 02:32:19 PM
Non-answer after non-answer. Frank is lying his ass off.

 :flush:

what is he supposed to say at this point?
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: D-FRED-BROWN on March 28, 2012, 02:33:03 PM
good lord, at least Huggins didn't make an ass out of himself like Frank is right now... as much as Frank kisses Hugg's ass, you'd think that he'd at least try to act more like him in regards to leaving KSU  :flush:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: JavaCat on March 28, 2012, 02:33:12 PM
The Jamar situation bothered him, but it wasn't the reason he left. It was on his mind though. He'd have to be called a liar if he said otherwise. John did what he had to do.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: michigancat on March 28, 2012, 02:33:37 PM
Non-answer after non-answer. Frank is lying his ass off.

 :flush:

what is he supposed to say at this point?

The truth? At least when he says over and over where he's not a liar in the same interview.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on March 28, 2012, 02:34:02 PM
Also, bragged about all the great things he and huggs had done for Kstate. Said it was time to think about a move that was best for him and his family.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: OregonSmock on March 28, 2012, 02:34:45 PM
Man, I'm gonna miss this guy. 


 :cry:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: JavaCat on March 28, 2012, 02:36:27 PM
Says he has no idea how the Jamar receipt situation transpired.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: j-dub on March 28, 2012, 02:36:35 PM
bitb, regarding receipt: "does that happen anywhere else?" frank: "uhhh, ya know, uhh, i've never heard of it before, uhh ya know."

Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Sandstone Outcropping on March 28, 2012, 02:36:56 PM
Man, I'm gonna miss this guy. 


 :cry:

Hopefully we can find another coach who is a scarred shitless of AFH and Self as Frank was
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Stupid Fitz on March 28, 2012, 02:37:03 PM
Man, I'm gonna miss this guy. 


 :cry:

Now you are just being mean Beems.  I mean, telling us we should hire loser coaches is one thing, but rubbing the F4 in our faces is mean.   :frown:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: OregonSmock on March 28, 2012, 02:37:15 PM
Non-answer after non-answer. Frank is lying his ass off.



Not lying about anything.  Just admitted that the Jamar Samuels situation bothered him and that Currie is a total psycho.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: JavaCat on March 28, 2012, 02:37:52 PM
His decision to leave was not based on negative feelings. He's a positive guy.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: kougar24 on March 28, 2012, 02:38:31 PM
Non-answer after non-answer. Frank is lying his ass off.



Not lying about anything.  Just admitted that the Jamar Samuels situation bothered him and that Currie is a total psycho.

do tell...
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: j-dub on March 28, 2012, 02:38:45 PM
manbeck just outed frank as an terrible awful liary liar person
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: EllToPay on March 28, 2012, 02:39:05 PM
BITB throwing absolute softballs right now.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: michigancat on March 28, 2012, 02:39:41 PM
Non-answer after non-answer. Frank is lying his ass off.



Not lying about anything.  Just admitted that the Jamar Samuels situation bothered him and that Currie is a total psycho.

Um, he said he doesn't negotiate during the season even though his 2010 extension was signed before the Big 12 tournament started.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Skipper44 on March 28, 2012, 02:40:35 PM
BITB throwing absolute softballs right now.
yep, not his finest work
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Ira Hayes on March 28, 2012, 02:40:43 PM
Every day, as soon as the sun comes up, Frank wants to bring joy to all the people around him.  And when the sun came up on Monday he decided to bring joy to people in South Carolina.

Title: Re: BITB
Post by: j-dub on March 28, 2012, 02:41:30 PM
bitb and frank lobbying for undy now. frank: "brad is so much more prepared than i was.. :blah: :blah: :blah:"
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: PowercatPat on March 28, 2012, 02:41:35 PM
Wants Underwood to be the next coach.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: OregonSmock on March 28, 2012, 02:41:57 PM
Non-answer after non-answer. Frank is lying his ass off.



Not lying about anything.  Just admitted that the Jamar Samuels situation bothered him and that Currie is a total psycho.

Um, he said he doesn't negotiate during the season even though his 2010 extension was signed before the Big 12 tournament started.


Come on, Rusty.  You're coming off like some sort of jilted lover here.  Maybe Frank didn't negotiate - maybe his agent did.  Maybe Currie just slapped a new contract on the table and he signed it.  Seems like a pretty minor detail to get all worked up about.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Cartierfor3 on March 28, 2012, 02:42:20 PM
Hey Frank, your opinion of who should get the job you hated is irrelevant
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on March 28, 2012, 02:42:45 PM
bitb and frank lobbying for undy now. frank: "brad is so much more prepared than i was.. :blah: :blah: :blah:"
"Underwood has 16 years as a D1 assistant coach, is a kstater, and has head coaching experience".  :jerk:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: CNS on March 28, 2012, 02:43:01 PM
BITB throwing absolute softballs right now.
yep, not his finest work

Very intimidated, it seems.

Considering he will never again speak with Frank, it is pretty Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) he isn't going after him.  Equally Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) that he is actually rough ridin' caring about what he took on at USC.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Sandstone Outcropping on March 28, 2012, 02:43:43 PM
Every day, as soon as the sun comes up, Frank wants to bring joy to all the people around him.  And when the sun came up on Monday he decided to bring joy to people in South Carolina.
:thumbs: pure goEMAW gold.

No one uses such a small number of posts to kick such a large number of asses.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: michigancat on March 28, 2012, 02:43:51 PM
Non-answer after non-answer. Frank is lying his ass off.



Not lying about anything.  Just admitted that the Jamar Samuels situation bothered him and that Currie is a total psycho.

Um, he said he doesn't negotiate during the season even though his 2010 extension was signed before the Big 12 tournament started.


Come on, Rusty.  You're coming off like some sort of jilted lover here.  Maybe Frank didn't negotiate - maybe his agent did.  Maybe Currie just slapped a new contract on the table and he signed it.  Seems like a pretty minor detail to get all worked up about.

It's a pretty major detail when he refused to negotiate during the season this year on some bullshit principle.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: chum1 on March 28, 2012, 02:44:08 PM
grudge bombs
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: EllToPay on March 28, 2012, 02:44:17 PM
"We're all gonna be Frank Martin fans..."

jfc
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: j-dub on March 28, 2012, 02:44:31 PM
Non-answer after non-answer. Frank is lying his ass off.



Not lying about anything.  Just admitted that the Jamar Samuels situation bothered him and that Currie is a total psycho.

Um, he said he doesn't negotiate during the season even though his 2010 extension was signed before the Big 12 tournament started.


Come on, Rusty.  You're coming off like some sort of jilted lover here.  Maybe Frank didn't negotiate - maybe his agent did.  Maybe Currie just slapped a new contract on the table and he signed it.  Seems like a pretty minor detail to get all worked up about.

manbeck just outed frank as an terrible awful liary liar person

Quote
@Cole_Manbeck His contract extension at K-State in 2010 was signed during season. Day after Iowa State loss. Contract talks went on much of season
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: OregonSmock on March 28, 2012, 02:45:03 PM
Non-answer after non-answer. Frank is lying his ass off.



Not lying about anything.  Just admitted that the Jamar Samuels situation bothered him and that Currie is a total psycho.

Um, he said he doesn't negotiate during the season even though his 2010 extension was signed before the Big 12 tournament started.


Come on, Rusty.  You're coming off like some sort of jilted lover here.  Maybe Frank didn't negotiate - maybe his agent did.  Maybe Currie just slapped a new contract on the table and he signed it.  Seems like a pretty minor detail to get all worked up about.

It's a pretty major detail when he refused to negotiate during the season this year on some bullshit principle.


He didn't want to stay at K-State.  He was tired of getting his tie straightened by Currie. 
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Cartierfor3 on March 28, 2012, 02:45:43 PM
Tell me how Frank's ass tastes Kevin.  Good Grief. 
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: j-dub on March 28, 2012, 02:46:23 PM
go to hell frank.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: michigancat on March 28, 2012, 02:46:59 PM
He didn't want to stay at K-State.  He was tired of getting his tie straightened by Currie. 

I know. So don't lie about it and then say you're not a liar over and over and over.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: j-dub on March 28, 2012, 02:47:16 PM
bitb picked a fine time to turn all witb
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Ira Hayes on March 28, 2012, 02:47:33 PM
Every day, as soon as the sun comes up, Frank wants to bring joy to all the people around him.  And when the sun came up on Monday he decided to bring joy to people in South Carolina.
:thumbs: pure goEMAW gold.

No one uses such a small number of posts to kick such a large number of asses.

I didn't make that up.  I was paraphrasing Frank.  He said that.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on March 28, 2012, 02:47:52 PM
"I have to apologize to Kstate, you gave me my first opportunity, my son was born there, you're great ppl, yada yada, ect."-Frank (Dropped mic and  :clac: )
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: OregonSmock on March 28, 2012, 02:48:37 PM
He didn't want to stay at K-State.  He was tired of getting his tie straightened by Currie. 

I know. So don't lie about it and then say you're not a liar over and over and over.


He pretty much said that.  Just didn't explicitly drag Currie and K-State through the mud.  The guy loved the fans and the school... just hated Currie.


 :dunno:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: nicname on March 28, 2012, 02:52:44 PM
He sounded like he's been gone for 15 years talking about an old job.  It made me sad.  Good luck Frank, I don't hate you.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: JavaCat on March 28, 2012, 02:53:45 PM
He didn't hate Currie. He didn't leave because he had negative feelings. He left for a challenge. He's a honest man so you can't believe otherwise.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: WildcatNkilt on March 28, 2012, 02:53:59 PM
BITB throwing absolute softballs right now.
yep, not his finest work

Very intimidated, it seems.

Considering he will never again speak with Frank, it is pretty Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) he isn't going after him.  Equally Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) that he is actually rough ridin' caring about what he took on at USC.

He wants to keep the relationship so he can have him on the show again when Missouri matches up with USC next year.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Skipper44 on March 28, 2012, 02:55:51 PM
BITB throwing absolute softballs right now.
yep, not his finest work

Very intimidated, it seems.

Considering he will never again speak with Frank, it is pretty Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) he isn't going after him.  Equally Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) that he is actually rough ridin' caring about what he took on at USC.

He wants to keep the relationship so he can have him on the show again when Missouri matches up with USC next year.
I wanted a softball player mutiny question so Frank could laugh it out of the park
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: wabash909 on March 28, 2012, 02:58:21 PM
Wants Underwood to be the next coach.

Of course he does.

Title: Re: BITB
Post by: CNS on March 28, 2012, 02:59:35 PM
BITB throwing absolute softballs right now.
yep, not his finest work

Very intimidated, it seems.

Considering he will never again speak with Frank, it is pretty Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) he isn't going after him.  Equally Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) that he is actually rough ridin' caring about what he took on at USC.

He wants to keep the relationship so he can have him on the show again when Missouri matches up with USC next year.
I wanted a softball player mutiny question so Frank could laugh it out of the park

Yeah, KK pushed the mutiny point pretty hard.  pretty stupid he didn't press on it.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: WillieWatanabe on March 28, 2012, 03:16:51 PM
He sounded like he's been gone for 15 years talking about an old job.  It made me sad.  Good luck Frank, I don't hate you.

yeah, also i agree with Beams, i think.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: mocat on March 28, 2012, 03:22:18 PM
Every day, as soon as the sun comes up, Frank wants to bring joy to all the people around him.  And when the sun came up on Monday he decided to bring joy to people in South Carolina.
:thumbs: pure goEMAW gold.

No one uses such a small number of posts to kick such a large number of asses.

I didn't make that up.  I was paraphrasing Frank.  He said that.

Well it was still a fantastic post
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Sandstone Outcropping on March 28, 2012, 03:23:49 PM
Every day, as soon as the sun comes up, Frank wants to bring joy to all the people around him.  And when the sun came up on Monday he decided to bring joy to people in South Carolina.
:thumbs: pure goEMAW gold.

No one uses such a small number of posts to kick such a large number of asses.

I didn't make that up.  I was paraphrasing Frank.  He said that.

Well it was still a fantastic post
Incredible post. Thank you, Ira Hayes
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Cartierfor3 on March 28, 2012, 03:30:15 PM
Jack Harry is a Neil Diamond Tuck
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Gooch on March 28, 2012, 03:42:09 PM
He didn't hate Currie. He didn't leave because he had negative feelings. He left for a challenge. He's a honest man so you can't believe otherwise.
You can't be this stupid. I mean how did you even turn on the computer if you are?
Title: Re: Re: BITB
Post by: michigancat on March 28, 2012, 03:43:30 PM
He didn't hate Currie. He didn't leave because he had negative feelings. He left for a challenge. He's a honest man so you can't believe otherwise.
You can't be this stupid. I mean how did you even turn on the computer if you are?

Ummmmm
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: WillieWatanabe on March 28, 2012, 03:44:08 PM
He didn't hate Currie. He didn't leave because he had negative feelings. He left for a challenge. He's a honest man so you can't believe otherwise.
You can't be this stupid. I mean how did you even turn on the computer if you are?

Ummmmm

:lol:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: WildCatzPhreak on March 28, 2012, 03:44:27 PM
yeah Gooch you have been here long enough.  you should be able to filter this crap by now.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: chum1 on March 28, 2012, 03:57:17 PM
Did Frank say that the receipt was first found in the trash at Dillons and then later found again on the floor somewhere on campus?  If so, Currie is absolved.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Gooch on March 28, 2012, 04:06:30 PM
yeah Gooch you have been here long enough.  you should be able to filter this crap by now.
:facepalm: with all the blind rage I got going right now towards all the tucks I am way off my game.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 28, 2012, 04:10:52 PM
I have noticed the more people tell you they are loyal and the more they tell you they are honest, the less they are of either.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: michigancat on March 28, 2012, 04:11:45 PM
Did Frank say that the receipt was first found in the trash at Dillons and then later found again on the floor somewhere on campus?  If so, Currie is absolved.

Nick Wright asked him if he would have played Jamar. He avoided the question like a giant pussy.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: theKSU on March 28, 2012, 04:18:55 PM
It's like Frank sat around and thought of all the criticisms he was going to get and just said "I'm not x, y, and z" without anyone even accusing him of it.  He and BITB are peas in a pod with how thin skinned they are.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on March 28, 2012, 04:52:31 PM
I have noticed the more people tell you they are loyal and the more they tell you they are honest, the less they are of either.

Preachy people are always the worst. THE WORST.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Bill Clarahan on March 28, 2012, 04:54:13 PM
I have noticed the more people tell you they are loyal and the more they tell you they are honest, the less they are of either.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIY7eYmBqIE


Imagine Frank as Christopher Walken
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: chum1 on March 28, 2012, 04:58:17 PM
dudes.  administrators are politicians.  coaches are used car salesmen.  both completely full of crap.  try not to be surprised next time.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: DQ12 on March 28, 2012, 05:01:25 PM
dudes.  administrators are politicians.  coaches are used car salesmen.  both completely full of crap.  try not to be surprised next time.
Yep.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: kso_FAN on March 28, 2012, 05:03:12 PM
And our (former) used car salesman has a track record of being extremely reactionary and emotional. A lot. There was a time where I enjoyed it because he was "ours", not so much anymore I guess.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: michigancat on March 28, 2012, 05:04:36 PM
some used car salesmen are worse than others
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: bws on March 28, 2012, 05:10:27 PM
Really dislike Frank's repeated talking point (think ive heard it at least 3 times now) how he presided over the 5 most successful years in K-State history. How can you say that with no conference titles and no final 4's when we have like 20 and 4.

Small thing I know, but irritating.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on March 28, 2012, 05:37:00 PM
Really dislike Frank's repeated talking point (think ive heard it at least 3 times now) how he presided over the 5 most successful years in K-State history. How can you say that with no conference titles and no final 4's when we have like 20 and 4.

Small thing I know, but irritating.

Find 5 consecutive years that you would say were better.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: OregonSmock on March 28, 2012, 05:41:26 PM
some used car salesmen are worse than others


Frank is one of the good ones.  Don't be like Johnny Butthurt KU Fan after Roy left, Rusty.  Time heals all wounds. 
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: michigancat on March 28, 2012, 05:42:02 PM
Really dislike Frank's repeated talking point (think ive heard it at least 3 times now) how he presided over the 5 most successful years in K-State history. How can you say that with no conference titles and no final 4's when we have like 20 and 4.

Small thing I know, but irritating.

Find 5 consecutive years that you would say were better.

well, you could argue that 1957-1961 were better. (we won the big 8 4 years in a row.) but I doubt we won as many games as Frank won. They play a lot more games now.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: michigancat on March 28, 2012, 05:42:50 PM
some used car salesmen are worse than others


Frank is one of the good ones.  Don't be like Johnny Butthurt KU Fan after Roy left, Rusty.  Time heals all wounds. 

I knew he was going to leave. I think he made a bad decision that will cost him a lot of money/prestige in the long run, but I always knew he was going to leave.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: bws on March 28, 2012, 05:46:20 PM
Really dislike Frank's repeated talking point (think ive heard it at least 3 times now) how he presided over the 5 most successful years in K-State history. How can you say that with no conference titles and no final 4's when we have like 20 and 4.

Small thing I know, but irritating.

Find 5 consecutive years that you would say were better.

Take any year we won a conference title and add or subtract 4. There are 19 different times you could do that. All those were better.

Of course I like winning championships.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: 06wildcat on March 28, 2012, 06:17:25 PM
Meh... I'll give Frank a pass on the 5 best years, because for a good portion of our living fanbase the last 5 years have been the best ever for them.

Titles and Final Fours are great, would give a hell of a lot of money to have more of them, but there's a lot to be said for getting the program to the national stage in this era. Frank did that, and I'll be forever grateful. I pray the next coach is capable of doing the same.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: EMAWmeister on March 28, 2012, 07:27:01 PM
some used car salesmen are worse than others


Frank is one of the good ones.  Don't be like Johnny Butthurt KU Fan after Roy left, Rusty.  Time heals all wounds.

Little bit different scenarios.  It's ridiculous to be butthurt about Roy, because it's his alma mater and where his coaching career really took off. Plus he had turned the job down before.

Frank has no ties to South Carolina and jumped ship amidst this shitstorm. 

Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Cire on March 28, 2012, 07:44:23 PM
The roy butthurt was absurd
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: star seed 7 on March 28, 2012, 07:53:20 PM
ku fans hate dean smith more than roy because he wore a unc shirt to a ku game a few years ago.

it's not like it's a rational fanbase.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: JavaCat on March 28, 2012, 08:03:15 PM
some used car salesmen are worse than others


Frank is one of the good ones.  Don't be like Johnny Butthurt KU Fan after Roy left, Rusty.  Time heals all wounds.

Little bit different scenarios.  It's ridiculous to be butthurt about Roy, because it's his alma mater and where his coaching career really took off. Plus he had turned the job down before.

Frank has no ties to South Carolina and jumped ship amidst this shitstorm.

Not to mention it was where he was born and he took over a team on probation at KU when the other top candidates passed it up. If Frank would've gone to Miami last year I think people would have a completely different opinion.

As far as comparing these last 5 years to another 5 years, it's kind of hard due to the differences in eras and the fact that most of us didn't see it. I think it's hard to argue that Tex wasn't the most successful coach. Hartman had good years and a couple good 5 year runs, but crap was different back then. Hell, he went 11-3 in the conference a couple times and didn't make the tournament. Frank was successful though, I liked him even though he was frustrating at times, and I'd probably welcome him back. Like Gardner, maybe Frank will come back after Currie is gone and the "war" is over. Right now though it's hard to be real happy about the way he left.

I'd just like to see Honest Frank explain the real reasons for leaving. It's easy to be honest without being completely disparaging. He can voice his reasons without trashing Currie or KSU.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: MakeItRain on March 28, 2012, 11:38:43 PM
Did Frank say that the receipt was first found in the trash at Dillons and then later found again on the floor somewhere on campus?  If so, Currie is absolved.

Nick Wright asked him if he would have played Jamar. He avoided the question like a giant pussy.

you need to take a break


I understand many of you are freaking out because you're hurt. but JFC attempt to get a grip, my god.


I knew he was going to leave. I think he made a bad decision that will cost him a lot of money/prestige in the long run, but I always knew he was going to leave.

That is well reasoned and completely rational, why have the rest of your posts on the topic sound like they are from a divorcee who got taken for everything.  You seem to take this really personally.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: MakeItRain on March 28, 2012, 11:42:49 PM
dudes.  administrators are politicians.  coaches are used car salesmen.  both completely full of crap.  try not to be surprised next time.

You would think grown men wouldn't treat other grown men like how we thought of superman when we were 6.

Also for those who didn't hear it the Nick Wright interview was much better than Keitzman's.
Title: Re: Re: BITB
Post by: michigancat on March 28, 2012, 11:49:51 PM
Did Frank say that the receipt was first found in the trash at Dillons and then later found again on the floor somewhere on campus?  If so, Currie is absolved.

Nick Wright asked him if he would have played Jamar. He avoided the question like a giant pussy.

you need to take a break


I understand many of you are freaking out because you're hurt. but JFC attempt to get a grip, my god.


I knew he was going to leave. I think he made a bad decision that will cost him a lot of money/prestige in the long run, but I always knew he was going to leave.

That is well reasoned and completely rational, why have the rest of your posts on the topic sound like they are from a divorcee who got taken for everything.  You seem to take this really personally.

Oh eff off mir. I made fun of Frank's bullshit when he was our coach, I'm allowed to mock him a little when he leaves.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: EMAWmeister on March 28, 2012, 11:51:04 PM
dudes.  administrators are politicians.  coaches are used car salesmen.  both completely full of crap.  try not to be surprised next time.

You would think grown men wouldn't treat other grown men like how we thought of superman when we were 6.

Also for those who didn't hear it the Nick Wright interview was much better than Keitzman's.

You could tell that Nick wanted to ask the "hard hitting" questions, but the two are so buddy buddy that he wouldn't.  Off air I'm sure it'd have been completely different.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: MakeItRain on March 28, 2012, 11:51:59 PM
dudes.  administrators are politicians.  coaches are used car salesmen.  both completely full of crap.  try not to be surprised next time.

You would think grown men wouldn't treat other grown men like how we thought of superman when we were 6.

Also for those who didn't hear it the Nick Wright interview was much better than Keitzman's.

You could tell that Nick wanted to ask the "hard hitting" questions, but the two are so buddy buddy that he wouldn't.  Off air I'm sure it'd have been completely different.

what didn't he ask that you wanted to hear
Title: Re: Re: BITB
Post by: MakeItRain on March 28, 2012, 11:53:30 PM
Did Frank say that the receipt was first found in the trash at Dillons and then later found again on the floor somewhere on campus?  If so, Currie is absolved.

Nick Wright asked him if he would have played Jamar. He avoided the question like a giant pussy.

you need to take a break


I understand many of you are freaking out because you're hurt. but JFC attempt to get a grip, my god.


I knew he was going to leave. I think he made a bad decision that will cost him a lot of money/prestige in the long run, but I always knew he was going to leave.

That is well reasoned and completely rational, why have the rest of your posts on the topic sound like they are from a divorcee who got taken for everything.  You seem to take this really personally.

I'm allowed to mock him a little when he leaves.

you've went well beyond that, you seem legitimately hurt
Title: Re: Re: Re: BITB
Post by: michigancat on March 28, 2012, 11:58:53 PM
Did Frank say that the receipt was first found in the trash at Dillons and then later found again on the floor somewhere on campus?  If so, Currie is absolved.

Nick Wright asked him if he would have played Jamar. He avoided the question like a giant pussy.

you need to take a break


I understand many of you are freaking out because you're hurt. but JFC attempt to get a grip, my god.


I knew he was going to leave. I think he made a bad decision that will cost him a lot of money/prestige in the long run, but I always knew he was going to leave.

That is well reasoned and completely rational, why have the rest of your posts on the topic sound like they are from a divorcee who got taken for everything.  You seem to take this really personally.

I'm allowed to mock him a little when he leaves.

you've went well beyond that, you seem legitimately hurt

Well, you kind of suck at reading my mind.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: EMAWmeister on March 29, 2012, 12:01:13 AM
dudes.  administrators are politicians.  coaches are used car salesmen.  both completely full of crap.  try not to be surprised next time.

You would think grown men wouldn't treat other grown men like how we thought of superman when we were 6.

Also for those who didn't hear it the Nick Wright interview was much better than Keitzman's.

You could tell that Nick wanted to ask the "hard hitting" questions, but the two are so buddy buddy that he wouldn't.  Off air I'm sure it'd have been completely different.

what didn't he ask that you wanted to hear

Follow up questions more than anything. Don't get me wrong, it wasn't his fault that Frank wouldn't answer the questions.  Frank has an uncanny ability for dodging a question with a bullshit life lesson.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: MakeItRain on March 29, 2012, 12:06:20 AM
dudes.  administrators are politicians.  coaches are used car salesmen.  both completely full of crap.  try not to be surprised next time.

You would think grown men wouldn't treat other grown men like how we thought of superman when we were 6.

Also for those who didn't hear it the Nick Wright interview was much better than Keitzman's.

You could tell that Nick wanted to ask the "hard hitting" questions, but the two are so buddy buddy that he wouldn't.  Off air I'm sure it'd have been completely different.

what didn't he ask that you wanted to hear

Follow up questions more than anything. Don't get me wrong, it wasn't his fault that Frank wouldn't answer the questions.  Frank has an uncanny ability for dodging a question with a bullshit life lesson.

On Sunday and Monday Frank caught a lot of crap because he was going to hurt the program by airing dirty laundry.  He won't dump his personal crap onto the table for the world to see and thirsty simps are still mad, I just don't get it.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: michigancat on March 29, 2012, 12:44:27 AM
dudes.  administrators are politicians.  coaches are used car salesmen.  both completely full of crap.  try not to be surprised next time.

You would think grown men wouldn't treat other grown men like how we thought of superman when we were 6.

Also for those who didn't hear it the Nick Wright interview was much better than Keitzman's.

You could tell that Nick wanted to ask the "hard hitting" questions, but the two are so buddy buddy that he wouldn't.  Off air I'm sure it'd have been completely different.

what didn't he ask that you wanted to hear

Follow up questions more than anything. Don't get me wrong, it wasn't his fault that Frank wouldn't answer the questions.  Frank has an uncanny ability for dodging a question with a bullshit life lesson.

On Sunday and Monday Frank caught a lot of crap because he was going to hurt the program by airing dirty laundry.  He won't dump his personal crap onto the table for the world to see and thirsty simps are still mad, I just don't get it.

I want him to publicly air his dirty laundry and get curried fired instead of saying nice things about currie publicly while badmouthing currie and KSU privately to all his coaching buddies. Not realistic, but it's what I'd prefer.

And really, mocking frank for his "be a man" bullshit is more legitimate because he thumps that bible harder than most.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: DQ12 on March 29, 2012, 01:29:58 AM
And really, mocking frank for his "be a man" bullshit is more legitimate because he thumps that bible harder than most.
I think a lot of it has to do with us (at least subconsciously) rolling our eyes at it durring his tenure here, and now that he's crossed us, we can LOL at him like we've always kind of wanted to.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: catzacker on March 29, 2012, 06:06:19 AM
I want him to publicly air his dirty laundry and get curried fired instead of saying nice things about currie publicly while badmouthing currie and KSU privately to all his coaching buddies. Not realistic, but it's what I'd prefer.

And really, mocking frank for his "be a man" bullshit is more legitimate because he thumps that bible harder than most.

this. Either say it loud and proud or stfu.  he's effectively killing ksu basketball because he says really nice things on the outside and then runs currie (and effectively kansas state) into the f'ing ground by telling national writers and other coaches how f'ing awfull currie is. The final four will be a fantastic place for him to go and tell his story to nearly every coach he runs into.  "oh, man, loved ksu, but i can't work for john, he's just an overbearing prick blah blah blah".  and those coaches, rightly or wrongly, will believe this as the only side of it and that will be the knock on kansas state until currie is gone.  so excuse the sh*t out of me if I don't like a coach at another school who's trying to make my school look like dogsh*t and ruin any chance we might have of getting anyone halfway decent coach to come to ksu. 
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Cire on March 29, 2012, 06:10:37 AM
Currie must go
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: WillieWatanabe on March 29, 2012, 06:11:51 AM
I want him to publicly air his dirty laundry and get curried fired instead of saying nice things about currie publicly while badmouthing currie and KSU privately to all his coaching buddies. Not realistic, but it's what I'd prefer.

And really, mocking frank for his "be a man" bullshit is more legitimate because he thumps that bible harder than most.

this. Either say it loud and proud or stfu.  he's effectively killing ksu basketball because he says really nice things on the outside and then runs currie (and effectively kansas state) into the f'ing ground by telling national writers and other coaches how f'ing awfull currie is. The final four will be a fantastic place for him to go and tell his story to nearly every coach he runs into.  "oh, man, loved ksu, but i can't work for john, he's just an overbearing prick blah blah blah".  and those coaches, rightly or wrongly, will believe this as the only side of it and that will be the knock on kansas state until currie is gone.  so excuse the sh*t out of me if I don't like a coach at another school who's trying to make my school look like dogsh*t and ruin any chance we might have of getting anyone halfway decent coach to come to ksu. 

so you'd rather have him trash kstate publicly than privately? ooookkkkkaayyyyyy. HE'S STILL rough ridin' TRASHING US. jfc.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: catzacker on March 29, 2012, 06:56:41 AM
it would be better, on many levels, if he trashed us publicly.  wouldn't be the smartest thing for him to do, but for us, it would have been better.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: chum1 on March 29, 2012, 07:20:00 AM
dear fitz nation:  he's not trashing anyone privately.  and nothing he says is going to influence anyone.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: steve dave on March 29, 2012, 07:22:34 AM
he's not trashing anyone privately.  and nothing he says is going to influence anyone.

disagree. agree
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: MakeItRain on March 29, 2012, 07:29:51 AM
dear fitz nation:  he's not trashing anyone privately.  and nothing he says is going to influence anyone.

yes, love that he's trashing Kansas State privately is stated and treated as fact instead of theory
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: kso_FAN on March 29, 2012, 07:35:29 AM
The evidence shows that the person trashing K-State privately is HCBS.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: chum1 on March 29, 2012, 07:36:32 AM
i mean, he's not rough ridin' calling everyone in his contact list in an attempt to smear currie's name and ruin him professionally.

do you guys think he is privately telling underwood never to work for currie?
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: chum1 on March 29, 2012, 07:37:51 AM
dear fitz nation:  he's not trashing anyone privately.  and nothing he says is going to influence anyone.

yes, love that he's trashing Kansas State privately is stated and treated as fact instead of theory

HE IS A THUG FROM MIAMI!
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: fr@ck me on March 29, 2012, 08:08:30 AM
who care's if he is trashing us privately, coaches won't listen and here is why.

Think of it this way, Frank is your buddy who just broke up with a chick and he is telling you that she is crazier than bat crap but was a good lay.  She comes around smiles all seductively and the next thing you know you are banging the crap out of her and you don't care that she is nutty.

Coaches will bang the nutty bitch until a better one comes around.  amiright?
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: mcmwcat on March 29, 2012, 08:31:22 AM
and said slut has a brand new $18M house she is building.  with a $2M yearly allowance.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: catzacker on March 29, 2012, 10:01:32 AM
dear fitz nation:  he's not trashing anyone privately.  and nothing he says is going to influence anyone.

yes, love that he's trashing Kansas State privately is stated and treated as fact instead of theory

this is one of the many ways it would be better if he did it publicly.  so we wouldn't have to sift through the veil of naiveness that people would have about who those national writers are getting their info from.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: michigancat on March 29, 2012, 10:09:27 AM
You guys, DO NOT COMMENT ON ANYTHING UNLESS YOU ARE 100% SURE IT IS A FACT
Title: Re: Re: BITB
Post by: michigancat on March 29, 2012, 10:10:43 AM
dear fitz nation:  he's not trashing anyone privately.  and nothing he says is going to influence anyone.

yes, love that he's trashing Kansas State privately is stated and treated as fact instead of theory

this is one of the many ways it would be better if he did it publicly.  so we wouldn't have to sift through the veil of naiveness that people would have about who those national writers are getting their info from.

We could also maybe get Currie fired this way. (are we allowed to want that????)
Title: Re: Re: BITB
Post by: catzacker on March 29, 2012, 10:37:43 AM
dear fitz nation:  he's not trashing anyone privately.  and nothing he says is going to influence anyone.

yes, love that he's trashing Kansas State privately is stated and treated as fact instead of theory

this is one of the many ways it would be better if he did it publicly.  so we wouldn't have to sift through the veil of naiveness that people would have about who those national writers are getting their info from.

We could also maybe get Currie fired this way. (are we allowed to want that????)

yet again, another way him publicly flogging john currie would have benefited us.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: kso_FAN on March 29, 2012, 10:47:14 AM
Does anyone really think any amount of Frank publically complaining about Currie would've convinced Schulz to fire him?

Just checking.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: CNS on March 29, 2012, 10:49:01 AM
Does anyone really think any amount of Frank publically complaining about Currie would've convinced Schulz to fire him?

Just checking.

The biggest thing that could get currie fired now is if we wiff on a bunch of decent guys and land on offering Undy the job and he tells us to eff off.  Won't happen, but if Undy said no, it would send a pretty big signal, imo.

Note: this will never happen.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: ChiComCat on March 29, 2012, 10:50:06 AM
Does anyone really think any amount of Frank publically complaining about Currie would've convinced Schulz to fire him?

Just checking.

The biggest thing that could get currie fired now is if we wiff on a bunch of decent guys and land on offering Undy the job and he tells us to eff off.  Won't happen, but if Undy said no, it would send a pretty big signal, imo.

Note: this will never happen.

Would laugh my ass off if Undz turned the job down.  Then I would cry for what that means for our program
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: chum1 on March 29, 2012, 10:51:42 AM
dear fitz nation:  frank doesn't have a bunch of dirt on currie.
Title: Re: Re: BITB
Post by: MakeItRain on March 29, 2012, 10:52:56 AM
dear fitz nation:  he's not trashing anyone privately.  and nothing he says is going to influence anyone.

yes, love that he's trashing Kansas State privately is stated and treated as fact instead of theory

this is one of the many ways it would be better if he did it publicly.  so we wouldn't have to sift through the veil of naiveness that people would have about who those national writers are getting their info from.

We could also maybe get Currie fired this way. (are we allowed to want that????)

yet again, another way him publicly flogging john currie would have benefited us.

Zacker and rusty, when smart people become uncontrollably irrational.  Yes, Schultz would have fired Currie if Frank publicly called him a reactionary, control freakish dickbag.  You guys have lost your minds, the way you two are coping with fear is fascinating.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: kso_FAN on March 29, 2012, 10:55:04 AM
This hire can only help Currie and can do very little to hurt him IMO. ADs never get fired over one bad hire, especially when they've done the other stuff that Currie's done. Even more so since Currie is Schulz's hire. If this hire is a failure and Currie stays around, he'll get another shot to hire a coach, but he'll probably get his next big hire (football) before that would come around. A second bad hire would be bad for his career though.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Skipper44 on March 29, 2012, 11:02:48 AM
This hire can only help Currie and can do very little to hurt him IMO. ADs never get fired over one bad hire, especially when they've done the other stuff that Currie's done. Even more so since Currie is Schulz's hire. If this hire is a failure and Currie stays around, he'll get another shot to hire a coach, but he'll probably get his next big hire (football) before that would come around. A second bad hire would be bad for his career though.
I believe Snyder is going to have the loudest voice on the FB hire and only a great BB hire by Currie can change that. 
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: CNS on March 29, 2012, 11:03:36 AM
This hire can only help Currie and can do very little to hurt him IMO. ADs never get fired over one bad hire, especially when they've done the other stuff that Currie's done. Even more so since Currie is Schulz's hire. If this hire is a failure and Currie stays around, he'll get another shot to hire a coach, but he'll probably get his next big hire (football) before that would come around. A second bad hire would be bad for his career though.

If the second guy leaves and is successful at making it seem like it was due to an overly ambitions compliance dept or a overly controlling AD, that could be pretty bad for Currie.  Two strikes and all...
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Cire on March 29, 2012, 11:12:09 AM
Currie better hit a home run with this hire or he's fist effed for football.
Title: Re: Re: BITB
Post by: catzacker on March 29, 2012, 11:14:21 AM
Zacker and rusty, when smart people become uncontrollably irrational.  Yes, Schultz would have fired Currie if Frank publicly called him a reactionary, control freakish dickbag.  You guys have lost your minds, the way you two are coping with fear is fascinating.


I don’t follow how this is a coping mechanism.  I don’t think it’s irrational to think that if frank went public with everything (i.e. naming specifics about what went on, describing the “hell” that john put him through) that two things could have happened:

The specifics of what Frank speaks about aren’t believable and are petty:
-   Frank ends up looking like a crybaby (winner = ksu)

The specifics of what Frank speaks about are believable and aren’t petty:
-   John ends up looking like an overbearing jerk and liar so much so that he gets canned (winner = ksu)

And as I stated before, we wouldn’t have to play this game of “show me where frank said …” .  And naively believe that frank (or someone close to frank) aren’t/haven’t put stuff out there.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: wabash909 on March 29, 2012, 11:19:42 AM
A young AD typically would be given a little latitude on his first hire, if the head coach he was replacing was terminated for under performance or had left for a higher profile job.

When the most popular/winningest coach in 25 years gets the hell out of town for a demotion to a dogsh*t program like South Carolina over a reported personal conflict, you better hit a home run or you can start picking out For Sale signs.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: ChiComCat on March 29, 2012, 11:25:12 AM
Zacker and rusty, when smart people become uncontrollably irrational.  Yes, Schultz would have fired Currie if Frank publicly called him a reactionary, control freakish dickbag.  You guys have lost your minds, the way you two are coping with fear is fascinating.


I don’t follow how this is a coping mechanism.  I don’t think it’s irrational to think that if frank went public with everything (i.e. naming specifics about what went on, describing the “hell” that john put him through) that two things could have happened:

The specifics of what Frank speaks about aren’t believable and are petty:
-   Frank ends up looking like a crybaby (winner = ksu)

The specifics of what Frank speaks about are believable and aren’t petty:
-   John ends up looking like an overbearing jerk and liar so much so that he gets canned (winner = ksu)

And as I stated before, we wouldn’t have to play this game of “show me where frank said …” .  And naively believe that frank (or someone close to frank) aren’t/haven’t put stuff out there.


Currie/TeamSprads are the ones that are doing a much better job putting things out there
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: sys on March 29, 2012, 11:31:37 AM
teammir, notteambutthurtusuallygoodposters.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: kso_FAN on March 29, 2012, 11:32:34 AM
A young AD typically would be given a little latitude on his first hire, if the head coach he was replacing was terminated for under performance or had left for a higher profiled job.

When the most popular/winningest coach in 25 years gets the hell out of town for a demotion to a dogsh*t program like South Carolina over a reported personal conflict, you better hit a home run or you can start picking out For Sale signs.

I'd guess Schulz put 0% blame on Currie for Frank leaving.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: chum1 on March 29, 2012, 11:40:35 AM
fitz nation has to ask itself what dirty laundry grudge bombs frank is going to drop.  is it that currie cares a lot about compliance?  that he cares a lot about a projecting a certain sort of image?  what's this dirt that frank's got on currie?
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on March 29, 2012, 11:41:43 AM
fitz nation has to ask itself what dirty laundry grudge bombs frank is going to drop.  is it that currie cares a lot about compliance?  that he cares a lot about a projecting a certain sort of image?  what's this dirt that frank's got on currie?

I would imagine Fitz is going to make up a bunch of crap and drop it anonymously so that everyone assumes it came from the Frank camp. It's no secret that Currie and Fitz do not get along.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: MakeItRain on March 29, 2012, 11:46:04 AM
 

I don’t follow how this is a coping mechanism.  I don’t think it’s irrational to think that if frank went public with everything (i.e. naming specifics about what went on, describing the “hell” that john put him through) that two things could have happened:

The specifics of what Frank speaks about aren’t believable and are petty:
-   Frank ends up looking like a crybaby (winner = ksu)

The specifics of what Frank speaks about are believable and aren’t petty:
-   John ends up looking like an overbearing jerk and liar so much so that he gets canned (winner = ksu)

 You really don't think Currie's boss doesn't know he is a micro managing control freak?  He could possibly think that Currie completely bungled the Jamar situation and not even consider firing Currie.

This was a personality conflict.  What world do you live in where people get fired from 6 figure jobs because the people they supervise think that they are buttholes?  Frank left because he didn't like his boss, unless he is hiding proof of Currie embezzling money, no one has anything to gain by a former employee whining about his mean/weird boss.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: michigancat on March 29, 2012, 11:46:25 AM
fitz nation has to ask itself what dirty laundry grudge bombs frank is going to drop.  is it that currie cares a lot about compliance?  that he cares a lot about a projecting a certain sort of image?

Well, that would make Frank look like a complete dumbshit, which I would also enjoy. If that makes me a member of FitzNation, SO BE IT.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: catzacker on March 29, 2012, 11:48:16 AM

I don’t follow how this is a coping mechanism.  I don’t think it’s irrational to think that if frank went public with everything (i.e. naming specifics about what went on, describing the “hell” that john put him through) that two things could have happened:

The specifics of what Frank speaks about aren’t believable and are petty:
-   Frank ends up looking like a crybaby (winner = ksu)

The specifics of what Frank speaks about are believable and aren’t petty:
-   John ends up looking like an overbearing jerk and liar so much so that he gets canned (winner = ksu)

 You really don't think Currie's boss doesn't know he is a micro managing control freak?  He could possibly think that Currie completely bungled the Jamar situation and not even consider firing Currie.

This was a personality conflict.  What world do you live in where people get fired from 6 figure jobs because the people they supervise think that they are buttholes?  Frank left because he didn't like his boss, unless he is hiding proof of Currie embezzling money, no one has anything to gain by a former employee whining about his mean/weird boss.

the real world.

sincerely,

Al Bohl.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: puniraptor on March 29, 2012, 12:00:08 PM
fitz nation has to ask itself what dirty laundry grudge bombs frank is going to drop.  is it that currie cares a lot about compliance?  that he cares a lot about a projecting a certain sort of image?  what's this dirt that frank's got on currie?

I would imagine Fitz is going to make up a bunch of crap and drop it anonymously so that everyone assumes it came from the Frank camp. It's no secret that Currie and Fitz do not get along.

This probably has roots in that goEMAW nation opened currie's eyes to fitz's disgusting molesting ways, right?
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on March 29, 2012, 12:01:01 PM
fitz nation has to ask itself what dirty laundry grudge bombs frank is going to drop.  is it that currie cares a lot about compliance?  that he cares a lot about a projecting a certain sort of image?  what's this dirt that frank's got on currie?

I would imagine Fitz is going to make up a bunch of crap and drop it anonymously so that everyone assumes it came from the Frank camp. It's no secret that Currie and Fitz do not get along.

This probably has roots in that goEMAW nation opened currie's eyes to fitz's disgusting molesting ways, right?

I would think so.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: JKEYS on March 29, 2012, 12:01:07 PM

I don’t follow how this is a coping mechanism.  I don’t think it’s irrational to think that if frank went public with everything (i.e. naming specifics about what went on, describing the “hell” that john put him through) that two things could have happened:

The specifics of what Frank speaks about aren’t believable and are petty:
-   Frank ends up looking like a crybaby (winner = ksu)

The specifics of what Frank speaks about are believable and aren’t petty:
-   John ends up looking like an overbearing jerk and liar so much so that he gets canned (winner = ksu)

 You really don't think Currie's boss doesn't know he is a micro managing control freak?  He could possibly think that Currie completely bungled the Jamar situation and not even consider firing Currie.

This was a personality conflict.  What world do you live in where people get fired from 6 figure jobs because the people they supervise think that they are buttholes?  Frank left because he didn't like his boss, unless he is hiding proof of Currie embezzling money, no one has anything to gain by a former employee whining about his mean/weird boss.

the real world.

sincerely,

Al Bohl.

 :lol:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: MakeItRain on March 29, 2012, 12:07:33 PM

I don’t follow how this is a coping mechanism.  I don’t think it’s irrational to think that if frank went public with everything (i.e. naming specifics about what went on, describing the “hell” that john put him through) that two things could have happened:

The specifics of what Frank speaks about aren’t believable and are petty:
-   Frank ends up looking like a crybaby (winner = ksu)

The specifics of what Frank speaks about are believable and aren’t petty:
-   John ends up looking like an overbearing jerk and liar so much so that he gets canned (winner = ksu)

 You really don't think Currie's boss doesn't know he is a micro managing control freak?  He could possibly think that Currie completely bungled the Jamar situation and not even consider firing Currie.

This was a personality conflict.  What world do you live in where people get fired from 6 figure jobs because the people they supervise think that they are buttholes?  Frank left because he didn't like his boss, unless he is hiding proof of Currie embezzling money, no one has anything to gain by a former employee whining about his mean/weird boss.

the real world.

sincerely,

Al Bohl.

Interesting you mention him, he freaking embezzled money! http://www2.kusports.com/news/2003/apr/10/al_bohl_timeline/  (http://www2.kusports.com/news/2003/apr/10/al_bohl_timeline/)
 
Despite that on your happy days you don't think that Frank yields 1/10th the power that Ol' Roy does. lol, you're trying too hard.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: 114Hickory on March 29, 2012, 12:21:22 PM
This can't become like the Illinois search/debacle.  The image of the program is damaged by that.  Given, Illinois has other issues related to their AD, a controversial and not fully supported FB coach search, and the UP.  We have other issues that influence the process.  For the sake of the program, this search can't set us back.  So regardless of where everyone is with whose fault is this, who said what, why some things aren't being said, where a receipt was allegedly found, or whatever, we really need to be concerned with the process now and hope that the AD is aggressive in contacting a home-run and making sure he won't turn the option down.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Cire on March 29, 2012, 12:31:35 PM
A young AD typically would be given a little latitude on his first hire, if the head coach he was replacing was terminated for under performance or had left for a higher profiled job.

When the most popular/winningest coach in 25 years gets the hell out of town for a demotion to a dogsh*t program like South Carolina over a reported personal conflict, you better hit a home run or you can start picking out For Sale signs.

I'd guess Schulz put 0% blame on Currie for Frank leaving.

It was abundantly clear after the presser that Currie told Shulz the only reason frank left is because of the suspension and shulz doesn't really wgaf about anything else.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: michigancat on March 29, 2012, 12:34:06 PM
This can't become like the Illinois search/debacle.  The image of the program is damaged by that.  Given, Illinois has other issues related to their AD, a controversial and not fully supported FB coach search, and the UP.  We have other issues that influence the process.  For the sake of the program, this search can't set us back.  So regardless of where everyone is with whose fault is this, who said what, why some things aren't being said, where a receipt was allegedly found, or whatever, we really need to be concerned with the process now and hope that the AD is aggressive in contacting a home-run and making sure he won't turn the option down.

I have no idea what happened w/ the Illinois search other than they wanted smart and didn't get him and hired some smelly loser that the dumbass national writers love. BFD.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: catzacker on March 29, 2012, 12:53:10 PM

I don’t follow how this is a coping mechanism.  I don’t think it’s irrational to think that if frank went public with everything (i.e. naming specifics about what went on, describing the “hell” that john put him through) that two things could have happened:

The specifics of what Frank speaks about aren’t believable and are petty:
-   Frank ends up looking like a crybaby (winner = ksu)

The specifics of what Frank speaks about are believable and aren’t petty:
-   John ends up looking like an overbearing jerk and liar so much so that he gets canned (winner = ksu)

 You really don't think Currie's boss doesn't know he is a micro managing control freak?  He could possibly think that Currie completely bungled the Jamar situation and not even consider firing Currie.

This was a personality conflict.  What world do you live in where people get fired from 6 figure jobs because the people they supervise think that they are buttholes?  Frank left because he didn't like his boss, unless he is hiding proof of Currie embezzling money, no one has anything to gain by a former employee whining about his mean/weird boss.

the real world.

sincerely,

Al Bohl.

Interesting you mention him, he freaking embezzled money! http://www2.kusports.com/news/2003/apr/10/al_bohl_timeline/  (http://www2.kusports.com/news/2003/apr/10/al_bohl_timeline/)
 
Despite that on your happy days you don't think that Frank yields 1/10th the power that Ol' Roy does. lol, you're trying too hard.

Quote
•March 28, 2003 -- Prominent KU benefactor Dana Anderson, a friend of Williams and former member of the KU Athletics Corp. board of directors, makes known his feelings about the athletics department turmoil. "If there are irreconcilable differences between coach and Al Bohl -- and I don't have any animosity toward Al Bohl -- but if a choice needs to be made, it's not really much of a choice. Coach feels like he's being micromanaged, and if that's the case we need to eliminate the micromanagement. I don't want to negotiate or debate it. Let's just make the change."

U-G-L-Y you ain't got no alibi.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: MakeItRain on March 29, 2012, 12:55:40 PM
confused, what just happened there
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: catzacker on March 29, 2012, 01:12:37 PM
confused, what just happened there

•March 28, 2003 -- Prominent KU benefactor Dana Anderson, a friend of Williams and former member of the KU Athletics Corp. board of directors, makes known his feelings about the athletics department turmoil. "If there are irreconcilable differences between coach and Al Bohl -- and I don't have any animosity toward Al Bohl -- but if a choice needs to be made, it's not really much of a choice. Coach feels like he's being micromanaged, and if that's the case we need to eliminate the micromanagement. I don't want to negotiate or debate it. Let's just make the change."
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: ChiComCat on March 29, 2012, 01:13:30 PM
confused, what just happened there

•March 28, 2003 -- Prominent KU benefactor Dana Anderson, a friend of Williams and former member of the KU Athletics Corp. board of directors, makes known his feelings about the athletics department turmoil. "If there are irreconcilable differences between coach and Al Bohl -- and I don't have any animosity toward Al Bohl -- but if a choice needs to be made, it's not really much of a choice. Coach feels like he's being micromanaged, and if that's the case we need to eliminate the micromanagement. I don't want to negotiate or debate it. Let's just make the change."

EXACTLY HOW THAT crap SHOULD BE HANDLED
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: OregonSmock on March 29, 2012, 02:59:25 PM
BITB just responded to one of my tweets on air! 


 :surprised:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: sunny_cat on March 29, 2012, 03:03:29 PM
BITB just responded to one of my tweets on air! 


 :surprised:

You shouldn't call people names. It isn't nice.
 :nono:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: fr@ck me on March 29, 2012, 03:05:46 PM
confused, what just happened there

•March 28, 2003 -- Prominent KU benefactor Dana Anderson, a friend of Williams and former member of the KU Athletics Corp. board of directors, makes known his feelings about the athletics department turmoil. "If there are irreconcilable differences between coach and Al Bohl -- and I don't have any animosity toward Al Bohl -- but if a choice needs to be made, it's not really much of a choice. Coach feels like he's being micromanaged, and if that's the case we need to eliminate the micromanagement. I don't want to negotiate or debate it. Let's just make the change."

EXACTLY HOW THAT crap SHOULD BE HANDLED

worked well for KU, fired AD, then coach left and got a better coach.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: MakeItRain on March 29, 2012, 03:35:36 PM
confused, what just happened there

•March 28, 2003 -- Prominent KU benefactor Dana Anderson, a friend of Williams and former member of the KU Athletics Corp. board of directors, makes known his feelings about the athletics department turmoil. "If there are irreconcilable differences between coach and Al Bohl -- and I don't have any animosity toward Al Bohl -- but if a choice needs to be made, it's not really much of a choice. Coach feels like he's being micromanaged, and if that's the case we need to eliminate the micromanagement. I don't want to negotiate or debate it. Let's just make the change."

So if I'm understanding correctly you're pointing to that sole thing on the timeline as the reason he was fired?  Nothing about being accused of stealing $200,000, nothing about running an athletic department that got hammered by the NCAA, nothing about giving an extension to a losing coach after his first year, Bohl got fired solely because his basketball coach didn't like him.  Okay, run with that if it suits you.

Are we also ignoring that you're favorably comparing Frank Martin's influence to that of Roy Williams?
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Cartierfor3 on March 29, 2012, 03:40:10 PM
BITB just responded to one of my tweets on air! 


 :surprised:

So Blessed
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: OregonSmock on March 29, 2012, 03:57:24 PM
And a KUBoobs girl just favorited one of my tweets!


 :love:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: WillieWatanabe on March 29, 2012, 04:01:56 PM
And a KUBoobs girl just favorited one of my tweets!


 :love:

quite the day for the Beems.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: AbeFroman on March 29, 2012, 04:06:02 PM
Maybe she can be lucky #61 or whatever you're up to
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: WillieWatanabe on March 29, 2012, 04:14:17 PM
Currie came in and fixed the $hit sandwich that the athletic department handed Schulz from Day One.

He bought himself a bajillion dollars worth of equity with the new university president.

Thus, the university president IS NOT going to cut his young snakey AD loose over a Frank Martin deal.   

In addition, the university president probably wants West Stadium Centre more than the snakey AD does.   The university president see's the construction fencing going up around the West side of football stadium and knows that his tie tugging young AD is responsible for much of it.

Sorry kids, but ADJC is carrying around an AMEX Black Card with an unlimited credit line in the eyes of UPKS.   

However, if ADJC effs this up, and potentially costs UPKS his athletic complex Shangra-La . . . that Black Card may get snipped in half.



i enjoyed this post.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: TheCatFanSpeaks on March 29, 2012, 04:26:50 PM
And a KUBoobs girl just favorited one of my tweets!


 :love:

Congrats @beems34!
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: OregonSmock on March 29, 2012, 04:35:25 PM
And a KUBoobs girl just favorited one of my tweets!


 :love:

Congrats @beems34!


BITB?


 :surprised:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Panjandrum on March 29, 2012, 04:36:44 PM
Currie came in and fixed the $hit sandwich that the athletic department handed Schulz from Day One.

He bought himself a bajillion dollars worth of equity with the new university president.

Thus, the university president IS NOT going to cut his young snakey AD loose over a Frank Martin deal.   

In addition, the university president probably wants West Stadium Centre more than the snakey AD does.   The university president see's the construction fencing going up around the West side of football stadium and knows that his tie tugging young AD is responsible for much of it.

Sorry kids, but ADJC is carrying around an AMEX Black Card with an unlimited credit line in the eyes of UPKS.   

However, if ADJC effs this up, and potentially costs UPKS his athletic complex Shangra-La . . . that Black Card may get snipped in half.



i enjoyed this post.

 :thumbs:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: j-dub on March 29, 2012, 05:12:06 PM
And a KUBoobs girl just favorited one of my tweets!


 :love:

Congrats @beems34!


BITB?


 :surprised:

might as well call it a day beems. leave em wanting more. "alright!! that's it for me!"
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Dugout DickStone on June 25, 2012, 05:13:35 PM
Gottlieb on with him right now.  Praising KSU job
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Dugout DickStone on June 25, 2012, 05:16:43 PM
KSU was interested, he never heard from John Currie - "John Currie locked himself in a room and made his choice"
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: CNS on June 25, 2012, 05:17:32 PM
Kietz basically saying he would have worked out.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: j-dub on June 25, 2012, 05:28:00 PM
KSU was interested, he never heard from John Currie - "John Currie locked himself in a room and made his choice"

 :frown: i'm never gonna get over gottlieb. currie mushed 24/7 espn, sexy good smelling beautiful hearthrob doug gottlieb (& fam) for mother effing chicken nuggets and hugs. mother eff.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: CNS on June 25, 2012, 05:33:07 PM
KSU was interested, he never heard from John Currie - "John Currie locked himself in a room and made his choice"

 :frown: i'm never gonna get over gottlieb. currie mushed 24/7 espn, sexy good smelling beautiful hearthrob doug gottlieb (& fam) for mother effing chicken nuggets and hugs. mother eff.

Yep.  chicken nuggets will win 16 or so games this year, and Currie will do a "Mission Accomplished" level of celebration to let everyone know his hire worked.  Then Currie will be gone in with in 2 yrs.  I mean, realistically, he has to know 2yrs is the amt of time before ppl question chicken nuggets as well as  a solid guess at Bill's timeline. 
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Trim on June 25, 2012, 08:09:18 PM
I don't like Currie.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Dugout DickStone on June 26, 2012, 10:24:59 AM
Currie has hurt his value over the past 12 months.  He won't even get a lateral job.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: CNS on June 26, 2012, 10:42:42 AM
Currie has hurt his value over the past 12 months.  He won't even get a lateral job.

IF:
1. Bill keeps doing Billthings

and

2. the BTF and BSFS facilities finish on time and are what is expected

and

3. oscar doesn't blow up a year or two earlier than expected

He will be able to point to the huge facilities upgrades, our FB success, and his fundraising success.  Then all he has to do is make up some lies(or truths) about Frank that can't be outright disproven without causing a major stink.  Gotta think that would get him in at some mid level SEC, or other football oriented, school pretty easily.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Dugout DickStone on June 26, 2012, 11:05:35 AM
Currie has hurt his value over the past 12 months.  He won't even get a lateral job.

IF:
1. Bill keeps doing Billthings

and

2. the BTF and BSFS facilities finish on time and are what is expected

and

3. oscar doesn't blow up a year or two earlier than expected

He will be able to point to the huge facilities upgrades, our FB success, and his fundraising success.  Then all he has to do is make up some lies(or truths) about Frank that can't be outright disproven without causing a major stink.  Gotta think that would get him in at some mid level SEC, or other football oriented, school pretty easily.

Any Pres. from the SEC is going to immediately pick up the phone to ask Bill how was he with the football program.  Plus, Frank is IN the SEC now and will absolutely tell everyone about Currie.

I am not a facilities guru but I think a lot of schools are doing upgrading so that isn't such a huge feat.

We shall see but I think JC has done some damage to his rep and there are a TON of guys out there who have not.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: sonofdaxjones on June 26, 2012, 11:47:15 AM
I am changing my tune in line with Pete.

The Division One landscape is saying that if you're not doing major facilities projects than you're basically not doing your job as an AD. 

No points for Currie.

Title: Re: BITB
Post by: SkinnyBenny on June 26, 2012, 11:59:58 AM
I am torn between wanting John Currie to have a good reputation so he can GTFO and wanting him to have his reputation soiled so he never gets a good job anywhere else. I mean, I want him to leave, but also, eff that guy for mushing Pearl and then DG.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: CNS on June 26, 2012, 12:35:14 PM
I get the Call Bill thing, but you know Bill will give him a good enough of a review to get him out of KSU.

That said, you guys may be right.  I mean, he does have to carry budget flash cards in his pocket at all time since he has troubs remembering a few numbers that he works with daily.

Title: Re: BITB
Post by: 06wildcat on June 26, 2012, 12:40:17 PM
I am changing my tune in line with Pete.

The Division One landscape is saying that if you're not doing major facilities projects than you're basically not doing your job as an AD. 

No points for Currie.

Currie seems like the first AD that realized you can ask people for money more than once every 10 years. That's a big deal at K-State but not anywhere else.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Cire on June 26, 2012, 12:49:42 PM
I am torn between wanting John Currie to have a good reputation so he can GTFO and wanting him to have his reputation soiled so he never gets a good job anywhere else. I mean, I want him to leave, but also, eff that guy for mushing Pearl and then DG.

He can rot in MHJ
I am torn between wanting John Currie to have a good reputation so he can GTFO and wanting him to have his reputation soiled so he never gets a good job anywhere else. I mean, I want him to leave, but also, eff that guy for mushing Pearl and then DG.


He can rot in MHK, you know his wife hates it.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: steve dave on June 26, 2012, 12:49:41 PM
I get the Call Bill thing, but you know Bill will give him a good enough of a review to get him out of KSU.

grumblings Bill is working back channels to get him run the eff out of town.  like, Bill hates him more than Frank did.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Cire on June 26, 2012, 12:50:23 PM
Micro Managers cannot stand to be micro managed.  It's like the worst thing ever.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: steve dave on June 26, 2012, 12:50:55 PM
Micro Managers cannot stand to be micro managed.  It's like the worst thing ever.

agreed.  but it goes further than that.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: CNS on June 26, 2012, 12:53:38 PM
Micro Managers cannot stand to be micro managed.  It's like the worst thing ever.

agreed.  but it goes further than that.

I assume Currie kicked Sean out of the AD, which is why he became a coach, and Bill is pushing Currie out so that he can position Sean back in line for the AD.  :dunno: 
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Trim on June 26, 2012, 12:54:44 PM
If I moved to Manhattan, wouldn't Currie have to leave town?
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Dugout DickStone on June 26, 2012, 01:59:17 PM
eff that guy for mushing Pearl and then DG.

and JL
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Pete on June 26, 2012, 02:06:03 PM
Bill hates Currie, and basically wishes Currie was dead.  Common knowledge.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Dugout DickStone on June 26, 2012, 02:09:04 PM
I hope Bill punches Currie this football season.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on June 26, 2012, 02:23:02 PM
2. the BTF and BSFS facilities finish on time

I don't think that will happen.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: michigancat on June 26, 2012, 02:26:31 PM
Currie has hurt his value over the past 12 months.  He won't even get a lateral job.

IF:
1. Bill keeps doing Billthings

and

2. the BTF and BSFS facilities finish on time and are what is expected

and

3. oscar doesn't blow up a year or two earlier than expected

He will be able to point to the huge facilities upgrades, our FB success, and his fundraising success.  Then all he has to do is make up some lies(or truths) about Frank that can't be outright disproven without causing a major stink.  Gotta think that would get him in at some mid level SEC, or other football oriented, school pretty easily.

Any Pres. from the SEC is going to immediately pick up the phone to ask Bill how was he with the football program.  Plus, Frank is IN the SEC now and will absolutely tell everyone about Currie.

I am not a facilities guru but I think a lot of schools are doing upgrading so that isn't such a huge feat.

We shall see but I think JC has done some damage to his rep and there are a TON of guys out there who have not.

Thinking JC will get a better job is nothing more than good ole fashioned KSU butthurt. "oh, we're small, everyone will go somewhere better!" Idiots.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Dugout DickStone on June 26, 2012, 02:36:23 PM
Currie has hurt his value over the past 12 months.  He won't even get a lateral job.

IF:
1. Bill keeps doing Billthings

and

2. the BTF and BSFS facilities finish on time and are what is expected

and

3. oscar doesn't blow up a year or two earlier than expected

He will be able to point to the huge facilities upgrades, our FB success, and his fundraising success.  Then all he has to do is make up some lies(or truths) about Frank that can't be outright disproven without causing a major stink.  Gotta think that would get him in at some mid level SEC, or other football oriented, school pretty easily.

Any Pres. from the SEC is going to immediately pick up the phone to ask Bill how was he with the football program.  Plus, Frank is IN the SEC now and will absolutely tell everyone about Currie.

I am not a facilities guru but I think a lot of schools are doing upgrading so that isn't such a huge feat.

We shall see but I think JC has done some damage to his rep and there are a TON of guys out there who have not.

Thinking JC will get a better job is nothing more than good ole fashioned KSU butthurt. "oh, we're small, everyone will go somewhere better!" Idiots.

I said he won't.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: chum1 on June 26, 2012, 02:36:25 PM
seems like yesterday that everyone hated snyder and loved currie.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: michigancat on June 26, 2012, 02:37:15 PM
Currie has hurt his value over the past 12 months.  He won't even get a lateral job.

IF:
1. Bill keeps doing Billthings

and

2. the BTF and BSFS facilities finish on time and are what is expected

and

3. oscar doesn't blow up a year or two earlier than expected

He will be able to point to the huge facilities upgrades, our FB success, and his fundraising success.  Then all he has to do is make up some lies(or truths) about Frank that can't be outright disproven without causing a major stink.  Gotta think that would get him in at some mid level SEC, or other football oriented, school pretty easily.

Any Pres. from the SEC is going to immediately pick up the phone to ask Bill how was he with the football program.  Plus, Frank is IN the SEC now and will absolutely tell everyone about Currie.

I am not a facilities guru but I think a lot of schools are doing upgrading so that isn't such a huge feat.

We shall see but I think JC has done some damage to his rep and there are a TON of guys out there who have not.

Thinking JC will get a better job is nothing more than good ole fashioned KSU butthurt. "oh, we're small, everyone will go somewhere better!" Idiots.

I said he won't.

I know. I was agreeing.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: chum1 on June 26, 2012, 02:39:57 PM
last year:  currie will save us from snyder!
this year:  snyder will save us from currie!
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: 'taterblast on June 26, 2012, 02:42:39 PM
last year:  currie will save us from snyder!
this year:  snyder will save us from currie!

what will next year be?  :popcorn:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: steve dave on June 26, 2012, 02:49:32 PM
last year:  currie will save us from snyder!
this year:  snyder will save us from currie!

what will next year be?  :popcorn:

weber will save us from whitney
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: 'taterblast on June 26, 2012, 02:50:58 PM
last year:  currie will save us from snyder!
this year:  snyder will save us from currie!

what will next year be?  :popcorn:

weber will save us from whitney

 :horrorsurprise:
mind = blown
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: pissclams on June 26, 2012, 03:19:47 PM
last year:  currie will save us from snyder!
this year:  snyder will save us from currie!

tough to argue with this one
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: steve dave on June 26, 2012, 03:21:02 PM
last year:  currie will save us from snyder!
this year:  snyder will save us from currie!

tough to argue with this one

yeah, that's quite the pickle
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: CNS on June 26, 2012, 03:23:49 PM
Currie has hurt his value over the past 12 months.  He won't even get a lateral job.

IF:
1. Bill keeps doing Billthings

and

2. the BTF and BSFS facilities finish on time and are what is expected

and

3. oscar doesn't blow up a year or two earlier than expected

He will be able to point to the huge facilities upgrades, our FB success, and his fundraising success.  Then all he has to do is make up some lies(or truths) about Frank that can't be outright disproven without causing a major stink.  Gotta think that would get him in at some mid level SEC, or other football oriented, school pretty easily.

Any Pres. from the SEC is going to immediately pick up the phone to ask Bill how was he with the football program.  Plus, Frank is IN the SEC now and will absolutely tell everyone about Currie.

I am not a facilities guru but I think a lot of schools are doing upgrading so that isn't such a huge feat.

We shall see but I think JC has done some damage to his rep and there are a TON of guys out there who have not.

Thinking JC will get a better job is nothing more than good ole fashioned KSU butthurt. "oh, we're small, everyone will go somewhere better!" Idiots.

Thinking that a guy like Currie doesn't want a better job and isn't going to do what he can to get a better job could be viewed as idiotic too.  There are plenty of schools out there that have bigger Ath budgets than ours and this is Currie's first AD gig.  For the AD type, isn't the idea to keep moving up in the world?  By moving up, I mean as a career and job responsibility/power thing, not an overall how good is your school at football thing.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Cire on June 26, 2012, 08:59:07 PM
Currie wants a conference office job, or ncaa
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: steve dave on June 27, 2012, 07:13:45 AM
Currie wants a conference office job, or ncaa

would be a good fit
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: sonofdaxjones on June 27, 2012, 08:30:19 AM
Conference office/NCAA executive jobs might be some of the cushiest jobs in the country.

Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Dugout DickStone on June 27, 2012, 11:39:13 AM
Currie wants a conference office job, or ncaa

would be a good fit

He would eff us in the A if he got an NCAA job.  And Frank would be in deep crap.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: michigancat on June 27, 2012, 11:42:49 AM
Currie has hurt his value over the past 12 months.  He won't even get a lateral job.

IF:
1. Bill keeps doing Billthings

and

2. the BTF and BSFS facilities finish on time and are what is expected

and

3. oscar doesn't blow up a year or two earlier than expected

He will be able to point to the huge facilities upgrades, our FB success, and his fundraising success.  Then all he has to do is make up some lies(or truths) about Frank that can't be outright disproven without causing a major stink.  Gotta think that would get him in at some mid level SEC, or other football oriented, school pretty easily.

Any Pres. from the SEC is going to immediately pick up the phone to ask Bill how was he with the football program.  Plus, Frank is IN the SEC now and will absolutely tell everyone about Currie.

I am not a facilities guru but I think a lot of schools are doing upgrading so that isn't such a huge feat.

We shall see but I think JC has done some damage to his rep and there are a TON of guys out there who have not.

Thinking JC will get a better job is nothing more than good ole fashioned KSU butthurt. "oh, we're small, everyone will go somewhere better!" Idiots.

Thinking that a guy like Currie doesn't want a better job and isn't going to do what he can to get a better job could be viewed as idiotic too.  There are plenty of schools out there that have bigger Ath budgets than ours and this is Currie's first AD gig.  For the AD type, isn't the idea to keep moving up in the world?  By moving up, I mean as a career and job responsibility/power thing, not an overall how good is your school at football thing.

I'm sure he wants a better job, but he sucks. It's like worrying about Jim Wooldridge wanting a better job.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: AbeFroman on June 27, 2012, 12:34:44 PM
BITB was on my flight from kc > philly > nyc. US airways express :love:! No sign of skeetbag
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: michigancat on June 27, 2012, 01:12:10 PM
US airways express

woof. not very bitb-y
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on June 27, 2012, 02:17:49 PM
BITB:
Quote
Just checking into hotel with family and oscar weber is checking in next to me. Crazy. #K-statebasketball
:sdeek:

They're gonna bang!
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: AbeFroman on June 27, 2012, 02:22:41 PM
US airways express

woof. not very bitb-y

Haha yeah I know, but why not ride in a prop plane at least once in your life  :dunno:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on June 27, 2012, 02:22:50 PM
Also, is Abefroman & BITB there to take out Webber?  :horrorsurprise:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: AbeFroman on June 27, 2012, 02:32:41 PM
 :peek:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Trim on June 27, 2012, 02:34:55 PM
Also, is Abeforman & BITB there to take out Webber?  :horrorsurprise:

I think Gottlieb would still take the job.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: puniraptor on June 27, 2012, 03:39:22 PM
John Currie staged the on field marriage proposal as a publicity stunt. Bill was FURIOUS
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: steve dave on June 27, 2012, 03:41:24 PM
John Currie staged the on field marriage proposal as a publicity stunt. Bill was FURIOUS

man, that would be epic
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: sonofdaxjones on June 27, 2012, 03:48:28 PM
Whole Lee Crap . . . no way.

Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Trim on June 27, 2012, 03:49:44 PM
:lol:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Stevesie60 on June 27, 2012, 03:51:56 PM
John Currie staged the on field marriage proposal as a publicity stunt. Bill was FURIOUS

Is this really what BITB said?
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Dugout DickStone on June 27, 2012, 04:49:12 PM
 :sdeek:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: SkinnyBenny on June 27, 2012, 05:55:01 PM
John Currie staged the on field marriage proposal as a publicity stunt. Bill was FURIOUS

Is this really what BITB said?


Yes, we are really gonna need some more info on this.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Cire on June 27, 2012, 09:02:55 PM
did bitb say that?
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: puniraptor on June 27, 2012, 11:24:04 PM
ITK KNOWS IT. Also I got caught up in the currie stuff and forgot this was the BITB thread.  :comeatme:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: p1k3 on June 27, 2012, 11:56:41 PM
BITB just became BITU (universe)
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: steve dave on June 28, 2012, 07:27:39 AM
ITK KNOWS IT. Also I got caught up in the currie stuff and forgot this was the BITB thread.  :comeatme:

man oh man.  pm more details if you don't want to post. 
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: AbeFroman on June 29, 2012, 11:29:31 PM
Explains the odd look on snyd's face when the camera cut to . Can someone repost?
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: SkinnyBenny on July 02, 2012, 01:23:21 PM
SHEEE SAIDD YYYYES!!!!!! (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kDGUbIWzrdU)
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: puniraptor on July 02, 2012, 02:50:19 PM
lol. being itk is so bossly
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Ira Hayes on July 03, 2012, 01:55:24 PM
Look.  I like a lot of what LHC Bill Snyder has done at KSU...a whole lot of it.

But that was his own fault.  He's the one that put "Family" in the stadium name. It's Whitney's stadium too.

I'm on Currie's side here.  A guy who demands that a stadium be named after his whole family instead of just himself probably really loves his family and would be touched to see his daughter get engaged in such a special place...or maybe not.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: michigancat on July 03, 2012, 02:21:56 PM
did whitney snyder get engaged to a london cop or something? wtf? also lmao @ synds
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Ira Hayes on July 03, 2012, 02:27:06 PM
I think that's the Fireman's ROTC.

And one more helpful hint: If you get down on one knee and the chick starts to pull away and back up, re-tie your shoe and put that ring back in your pocket.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: OK_Cat on July 03, 2012, 02:29:46 PM
that video is amazing.  love that bill looks so annoyed by the best day in his daughters life  :lol:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Ira Hayes on July 03, 2012, 02:42:10 PM
I'd like to think that the first words out of his mouth into that headset were: "What the eff just happened?"

But it's more likely that he didn't even notice what was going on.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Cire on July 03, 2012, 09:41:40 PM
that video is amazing.  love that bill looks so annoyed by the best day in his daughters life  :lol:

Oh yea, he's got that effing pregame planned down to the second and that extra minute ruined his whole week.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Stevesie60 on July 03, 2012, 09:44:18 PM
that video is amazing.  love that bill looks so annoyed by the best day in his daughters life  :lol:

Oh yea, he's got that effing pregame planned down to the second and that extra minute ruined his whole week.

I'm pretty sure it was during a TV timeout.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Kat Kid on July 04, 2012, 09:50:04 AM
that video is amazing.  love that bill looks so annoyed by the best day in his daughters life  :lol:

Oh yea, he's got that effing pregame planned down to the second and that extra minute ruined his whole week.

I'm pretty sure it was during a TV timeout.

It was, which made it even more bizarre.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: steve dave on July 04, 2012, 09:56:11 AM
SHEEE SAIDD YYYYES!!!!!! (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kDGUbIWzrdU)

bwahaha, bill  :lol:

also, was that not the most kstate0 thing of all time?  we all just stood there looking at each other like, "did that just rough ridin' happen?"
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on July 04, 2012, 10:40:51 AM
i think i'd also like to get engaged down on the field during a game. anybody know who i need to talk to in order to make that happen?
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: _33 on July 04, 2012, 12:31:37 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdesmond.imageshack.us%2FHimg831%2Fscaled.php%3Fserver%3D831%26amp%3Bfilename%3Dbillwtf.gif%26amp%3Bres%3Dlanding&hash=1f52f08fe47936f759db5c6df5e61174e908a1cb)
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: steve dave on July 04, 2012, 12:32:41 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdesmond.imageshack.us%2FHimg831%2Fscaled.php%3Fserver%3D831%26amp%3Bfilename%3Dbillwtf.gif%26amp%3Bres%3Dlanding&hash=1f52f08fe47936f759db5c6df5e61174e908a1cb)

 :thumbs:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: SkinnyBenny on July 04, 2012, 01:13:37 PM
_33 is a credit to this great goEMAW nation of ours.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: sonofdaxjones on July 04, 2012, 03:48:15 PM
That was a clearly a, "Are you effing kidding me" look.

Title: Re: BITB
Post by: DQ12 on July 05, 2012, 02:14:09 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi4.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fy110%2FTHE_agnax%2FOBzDad.jpg&hash=dc85075aa30a58306709db0995f3bfdd71f8f977)
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Trim on July 05, 2012, 02:14:47 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi4.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fy110%2FTHE_agnax%2FOBzDad.jpg&hash=dc85075aa30a58306709db0995f3bfdd71f8f977)

:lol:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: steve dave on July 05, 2012, 02:17:00 PM
 :lol:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: chum1 on July 05, 2012, 02:48:06 PM
 :lol:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Dugout DickStone on July 05, 2012, 03:22:21 PM
Kietz calling for a banner at the Royals game.

Thanks for reading the board!
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Panjandrum on July 05, 2012, 04:08:55 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi4.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fy110%2FTHE_agnax%2FOBzDad.jpg&hash=dc85075aa30a58306709db0995f3bfdd71f8f977)

Holy God that's funny.

 :thumbs:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: j-dub on July 09, 2012, 08:39:42 PM
Congrats billy!! You blew it cano. - whb 810

No one knows their audience better than keitz. No one.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: mocat on February 11, 2014, 01:15:47 PM
Quote
Weber Answered All Questions Now
Feb 11, 2014 -- 11:30am
By Kevin Kietzman

oscar Weber has now answered every question at K-State.
 
Two years ago when athletic director John Currie announced Weber as the new coach at Kansas State, it was greeted with collective yawn by all things purple.  Boring hire, recycled coach that couldn't win at Illinois, can't recruit and too nice of a guy to win in today's college basketball is what the critics shouted.  I was yawning, too.
 
A little over a season and half into a tenure Weber says he hopes is his final destination and this coach has done everything they said he couldn't do.
 
"I don't have to hear whether you're gonna beat (KU) any more, we beat them," Weber told ESPN after K-State's 85-82 overtime win over Kansas Monday night.
 
There may be a day when beating Kansas at home in the regular season is not the highlight of the year at K-State, but for now, this one single win puts Weber in a whole new position as the coach in Manhattan.
 
Now that Weber has a win over KU and a remarkable 14-1 home record in Big 12 play, Weber is doing things no K-State coach has done since the days K-State ran side-by-side with their in-state rival.  Reagan was President if you can remember that far back.  This coach now has a conference co-championship under his belt and is headed to a second straight NCAA tournament thanks to big home wins over Texas and Kansas in the last three days.  And this year, nobody is saying Weber is doing it with former coach Frank Martin's players.
 
That brings us to recruiting.  Weber is truly the guy that tries to outwork everyone else in recruiting and he's found a sweet spot in Manhattan.  Yes, Manhattan.  I don't know when the stereotype will die that you can't recruit players to Manhattan, LHC Bill Snyder doesn't seem to have a huge problem, and look at the advantages Weber has recruiting players to K-State.
 
Tuesday morning, Holly Rowe of ESPN tweeted that she sees Weber at the Manhattan Airport at 5:00am after he slept for an hour or two.  The players are off the day after the game and Weber has an advantage most coaches do not.  He's five minutes from the airport and three or four hours from any recruit in America.  No driving, no staying in hotel if he doesn't want.  If he chooses to watch a game on the visit, he catches the first flight back in the morning and is back in his office by noon and getting ready for practice.  oscar Weber has the opportunity to visit more recruits, more often and in less time than pretty much anyone else in the Big 12.
 
That brings us to freshmen Marcus Foster, Westicles, Nigel Johnson and Jevon Thomas.  Foster is the best player on the team and popped for 20 in his first home game against the Jayhawks.  He scored 34 over Texas on Saturday. It's pretty inconceivable that this is Foster's best week ever at K-State, something tells me he's got a lot more big wins and big moments in his time at KSU.  Westicles is relied on to be a defensive stopper. Johnson was asked to handle the ball in the biggest game of his 18-year-old life and Thomas has been out the past two games after showing some really flashes as a speedy point guard.  These are Weber's guys.  All of them.  And they just beat KU's freshmen.  Apparantly recruiting is not going to be an issue and Weber has a pair of big men lined up for next year.
 
Weber has a shiny new practice facility at K-State that football money paid for and they proudly display a conference title banner in the place.  He's also got the rowdiest student section in the Big 12 at his home games and maybe, just maybe, growing alumni support.
 
The pieces are in place for a nice run at K-State and oscar Weber has now answered every possible question from media or his fans about what he can or cannot do at Kansas State.  If he's shown enough love, K-State may be able to keep this coach for a long time even if other schools come calling.  Weber wants to do things his way and that makes him a perfect fit for K-State.  It's time for K-State fans to embrace it.  What more could they possibly hope for?
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: scottwildcat on February 11, 2014, 01:16:39 PM
 :emawkid:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: kso_FAN on February 11, 2014, 01:18:23 PM
BITB indeed.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: pissclams on February 11, 2014, 01:19:00 PM
my guess is kevin conveniently takes a vacation day today to avoid talking about the game last night - OR- he leads into his show with a 45 minute segment with the racin' boys. 
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Brock Landers on February 11, 2014, 01:22:18 PM
my guess is kevin conveniently takes a vacation day today to avoid talking about the game last night - OR- he leads into his show with a 45 minute segment with the racin' boys.


Did you hear what Richard Petty said about Danica??!?  BITB will have them whipped into a frenzy.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: CNS on February 11, 2014, 01:23:47 PM
my guess is kevin conveniently takes a vacation day today to avoid talking about the game last night - OR- he leads into his show with a 45 minute segment with the racin' boys.

Nope, he will say something about how the stars aligned and KU was barely able to lose and only paid attention to the Cats for the last min of the regulation and how this is the worst Bill self D team in years.

Knock us as competition and knock them as undisciplined and soft.  Double troll and take phone calls. 

Will probably go further and talk about how Wiggins is crap until Bill threatens him, or something.

Title: Re: BITB
Post by: mocat on February 11, 2014, 01:24:20 PM
BITB indeed.

i agree with just about everything in there, except oscar's travel advantages were a little overblown
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Bqqkie Pimp on February 11, 2014, 01:30:23 PM
BITB indeed.

i agree with just about everything in there, except oscar's travel advantages were a little overblown

TCU, Tech and UT are likely a slight edge, but other than that I think it's accurate from a travel standpoint.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: michigancat on February 11, 2014, 01:33:24 PM
Tech has no edge in anything.

I won't share my thoughts on the freshmen because people will get mad at me right now.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: mocat on February 11, 2014, 01:34:28 PM
BITB indeed.

i agree with just about everything in there, except oscar's travel advantages were a little overblown

TCU, Tech and UT are likely a slight edge, but other than that I think it's accurate from a travel standpoint.

and OU. and, having an advantage over 50% of the conference is certainly different than "pretty much anyone else in the Big 12"
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: michigancat on February 11, 2014, 01:34:57 PM
OU in no way has a travel advantage
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: EllRobersonisInnocent on February 11, 2014, 01:35:36 PM
Tech has no edge in anything.

I won't share my thoughts on the freshmen because people will get mad at me right now.

I'd love to hear your thoughts. We're in the trust tree here, no judging.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: kso_FAN on February 11, 2014, 01:36:43 PM
Tech has no edge in anything.

I won't share my thoughts on the freshmen because people will get mad at me right now.

I'm sure you'll have a pretty realistic view of them.

IMHO finding players like this is how I've always wanted K-State to recruit. Get decent 3 star talent as much as possible that you can keep around and develop. It just happens that in this class oscar has two that are playing better than 3 star talent. Now, we'll need to get some 4 star talent as well to sustain success, but its hard at this point to complain much about oscar's recruiting. He took a flyer on Orris and corrected it and we'll see what happens with Jack, but otherwise I really like it and I think he's built a great base to sustain success with as long as he can continue to recruit other similar (and hopefully better) players.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: mocat on February 11, 2014, 01:38:06 PM
OU in no way has a travel advantage

well if they don't, who does? or is every school in the big 12 equal here?
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: CNS on February 11, 2014, 01:39:13 PM
I had actually forgotten that Jack was even on the team.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 11, 2014, 01:39:37 PM
oscar can absolutely leave his house thirty minutes before take off and still catch his flight and then be in either dallas or chicago in 1.5 hours. kstate has it pretty good. three daily to dallas and two daily to ord.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: slucat on February 11, 2014, 01:39:40 PM
BITB indeed.

i agree with just about everything in there, except oscar's travel advantages were a little overblown


TCU, Tech and UT are likely a slight edge, but other than that I think it's accurate from a travel standpoint.

and OU. and, having an advantage over 50% of the conference is certainly different than "pretty much anyone else in the Big 12"

Hugs has a direct flight to Dulles 3x/day 
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: michigancat on February 11, 2014, 01:41:08 PM
Tech has no edge in anything.

I won't share my thoughts on the freshmen because people will get mad at me right now.

I'm sure you'll have a pretty realistic view of them.

IMHO finding players like this is how I've always wanted K-State to recruit. Get decent 3 star talent as much as possible that you can keep around and develop. It just happens that in this class oscar has two that are playing better than 3 star talent. Now, we'll need to get some 4 star talent as well to sustain success, but its hard at this point to complain much about oscar's recruiting. He took a flyer on Orris and corrected it and we'll see what happens with Jack, but otherwise I really like it and I think he's built a great base to sustain success with as long as he can continue to recruit other similar (and hopefully better) players.

He only has one playing above 3 star talent. The rest look like a Wooldridge class.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: michigancat on February 11, 2014, 01:42:27 PM

OU in no way has a travel advantage

well if they don't, who does? or is every school in the big 12 equal here?

TCU, UT for sure because of many more directs. I guess OKC has a few but that's a pretty damn pud airport and it's a long way from Norman. Really, no one has a huge advantage or disadvantage looking strictly at travel for recruiting purposes..
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Emo EMAW on February 11, 2014, 01:43:17 PM
BITB indeed.

i agree with just about everything in there, except oscar's travel advantages were a little overblown


TCU, Tech and UT are likely a slight edge, but other than that I think it's accurate from a travel standpoint.

and OU. and, having an advantage over 50% of the conference is certainly different than "pretty much anyone else in the Big 12"

Hugs has a direct flight to Dulles 3x/day

Either you are or I am Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: mocat on February 11, 2014, 01:43:25 PM
oscar can absolutely leave his house thirty minutes before take off and still catch his flight and then be in either dallas or chicago in 1.5 hours. kstate has it pretty good. three daily to dallas and two daily to ord.

well, lon can leave his house 1 hour before take off and go from will rogers to any hub in the country in 1.5 hours, but that extra 30 minute drive i guess gives KSU the advantage for sure
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: kso_FAN on February 11, 2014, 01:43:34 PM
I had actually forgotten that Jack was even on the team.

I believe he's redshirting (medical) now.

Tech has no edge in anything.

I won't share my thoughts on the freshmen because people will get mad at me right now.

I'm sure you'll have a pretty realistic view of them.

IMHO finding players like this is how I've always wanted K-State to recruit. Get decent 3 star talent as much as possible that you can keep around and develop. It just happens that in this class oscar has two that are playing better than 3 star talent. Now, we'll need to get some 4 star talent as well to sustain success, but its hard at this point to complain much about oscar's recruiting. He took a flyer on Orris and corrected it and we'll see what happens with Jack, but otherwise I really like it and I think he's built a great base to sustain success with as long as he can continue to recruit other similar (and hopefully better) players.

He only has one playing above 3 star talent. The rest look like a Wooldridge class.


IMHO Westicles is playing at a pretty decent level, at least slightly above what you'd expect for a 3 star recruit.

And Foster is much, much better than a 3 star. He's consistently mentioned in ESPN's top 10 FR list.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: slucat on February 11, 2014, 01:43:52 PM
Tech has no edge in anything.

I won't share my thoughts on the freshmen because people will get mad at me right now.

I'm sure you'll have a pretty realistic view of them.

IMHO finding players like this is how I've always wanted K-State to recruit. Get decent 3 star talent as much as possible that you can keep around and develop. It just happens that in this class oscar has two that are playing better than 3 star talent. Now, we'll need to get some 4 star talent as well to sustain success, but its hard at this point to complain much about oscar's recruiting. He took a flyer on Orris and corrected it and we'll see what happens with Jack, but otherwise I really like it and I think he's built a great base to sustain success with as long as he can continue to recruit other similar (and hopefully better) players.

He only has one playing above 3 star talent. The rest look like a Wooldridge class.

If that is the case, then oscar is a heck of an x and o guy.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Gooch on February 11, 2014, 01:44:12 PM
Football $$$ did not pay for the BBTF.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: mocat on February 11, 2014, 01:44:59 PM

OU in no way has a travel advantage

well if they don't, who does? or is every school in the big 12 equal here?

TCU, UT for sure because of many more directs. I guess OKC has a few but that's a pretty damn pud airport and it's a long way from Norman. Really, no one has a huge advantage or disadvantage looking strictly at travel for recruiting purposes..

austin has more directs than okc? ok

and jesus christ man, it is 20 miles from the center of OU campus to will rogers. it is 30 miles from TCU to DFW
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: michigancat on February 11, 2014, 01:45:39 PM
Tech has no edge in anything.

I won't share my thoughts on the freshmen because people will get mad at me right now.

I'm sure you'll have a pretty realistic view of them.

IMHO finding players like this is how I've always wanted K-State to recruit. Get decent 3 star talent as much as possible that you can keep around and develop. It just happens that in this class oscar has two that are playing better than 3 star talent. Now, we'll need to get some 4 star talent as well to sustain success, but its hard at this point to complain much about oscar's recruiting. He took a flyer on Orris and corrected it and we'll see what happens with Jack, but otherwise I really like it and I think he's built a great base to sustain success with as long as he can continue to recruit other similar (and hopefully better) players.

He only has one playing above 3 star talent. The rest look like a Wooldridge class.


And I'll add that Foster is rough ridin' amazing. Easily better than any Frank recruit (sans Beasley and Walker, obvs.) Yeah I'll say it he's a better recruiting coup than Pullen.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: pissclams on February 11, 2014, 01:45:54 PM
Tech has no edge in anything.

I won't share my thoughts on the freshmen because people will get mad at me right now.

I'm sure you'll have a pretty realistic view of them.

IMHO finding players like this is how I've always wanted K-State to recruit. Get decent 3 star talent as much as possible that you can keep around and develop. It just happens that in this class oscar has two that are playing better than 3 star talent. Now, we'll need to get some 4 star talent as well to sustain success, but its hard at this point to complain much about oscar's recruiting. He took a flyer on Orris and corrected it and we'll see what happens with Jack, but otherwise I really like it and I think he's built a great base to sustain success with as long as he can continue to recruit other similar (and hopefully better) players.

He only has one playing above 3 star talent. The rest look like a Wooldridge class.

If that is the case, then oscar is a heck of an x and o guy.

ouch, that had to have stung (k)rusty's forehead
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: CNS on February 11, 2014, 01:46:27 PM
I had actually forgotten that Jack was even on the team.

I believe he's redshirting (medical) now.

Tech has no edge in anything.

I won't share my thoughts on the freshmen because people will get mad at me right now.

I'm sure you'll have a pretty realistic view of them.

IMHO finding players like this is how I've always wanted K-State to recruit. Get decent 3 star talent as much as possible that you can keep around and develop. It just happens that in this class oscar has two that are playing better than 3 star talent. Now, we'll need to get some 4 star talent as well to sustain success, but its hard at this point to complain much about oscar's recruiting. He took a flyer on Orris and corrected it and we'll see what happens with Jack, but otherwise I really like it and I think he's built a great base to sustain success with as long as he can continue to recruit other similar (and hopefully better) players.

He only has one playing above 3 star talent. The rest look like a Wooldridge class.


IMHO Westicles is playing at a pretty decent level, at least slightly above what you'd expect for a 3 star recruit.

And Foster is much, much better than a 3 star. He's consistently mentioned in ESPN's top 10 FR list.

Westicles is playing like what you would expect a three star soph/junior to play like but doing it as a frosh, imo.

Nigel is what I expect three star frosh to look like
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: michigancat on February 11, 2014, 01:50:17 PM

OU in no way has a travel advantage

well if they don't, who does? or is every school in the big 12 equal here?

TCU, UT for sure because of many more directs. I guess OKC has a few but that's a pretty damn pud airport and it's a long way from Norman. Really, no one has a huge advantage or disadvantage looking strictly at travel for recruiting purposes..

austin has more directs than okc? ok

and jesus christ man, it is 20 miles from the center of OU campus to will rogers. it is 30 miles from TCU to DFW

Jesus Christ STFU
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: mocat on February 11, 2014, 01:51:44 PM

OU in no way has a travel advantage

well if they don't, who does? or is every school in the big 12 equal here?

TCU, UT for sure because of many more directs. I guess OKC has a few but that's a pretty damn pud airport and it's a long way from Norman. Really, no one has a huge advantage or disadvantage looking strictly at travel for recruiting purposes..

austin has more directs than okc? ok

and jesus christ man, it is 20 miles from the center of OU campus to will rogers. it is 30 miles from TCU to DFW

Jesus Christ STFU

well don't go saying stupid stuff then
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: michigancat on February 11, 2014, 01:55:37 PM
IMHO Westicles is playing at a pretty decent level, at least slightly above what you'd expect for a 3 star recruit.

Would you say he's playing at a Nick Williams level?

(I wouldn't)
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Benja on February 11, 2014, 01:57:20 PM
Westicles is playing like what you would expect a three star soph/junior to play like but doing it as a frosh, imo.

Nigel is what I expect three star frosh to look like

They are people too, not just stars CNS. What if I called you a two star?
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: CNS on February 11, 2014, 01:58:35 PM
Westicles is playing like what you would expect a three star soph/junior to play like but doing it as a frosh, imo.

Nigel is what I expect three star frosh to look like

They are people too, not just stars CNS. What if I called you a two star?

I was a walk on you son of a bitch!
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Pete on February 11, 2014, 01:59:27 PM
GOD DAMN IT, IT'S ALMOST TIME FOR BITB, SHUT UP YOU GUYS!
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: TownieCat on February 11, 2014, 02:02:24 PM
IMHO Westicles is playing at a pretty decent level, at least slightly above what you'd expect for a 3 star recruit.

Would you say he's playing at a Nick Williams level?

(I wouldn't)

For Wes to play 24 mpg and avg 7/4/2 as a freshman is very decent. Better-than-Nick-Williams decent.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: kso_FAN on February 11, 2014, 02:03:26 PM
IMHO Westicles is playing at a pretty decent level, at least slightly above what you'd expect for a 3 star recruit.

Would you say he's playing at a Nick Williams level?

(I wouldn't)

With the internet, you probably shouldn't have gone there (http://statsheet.com/mcb/players/compare?add=nick-williams&i=1&nick-williams=2001-2002&p1=wesley-Westicles).
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: michigancat on February 11, 2014, 02:06:17 PM
IMHO Westicles is playing at a pretty decent level, at least slightly above what you'd expect for a 3 star recruit.

Would you say he's playing at a Nick Williams level?

(I wouldn't)

With the internet, you probably shouldn't have gone there (http://statsheet.com/mcb/players/compare?add=nick-williams&i=1&nick-williams=2001-2002&p1=wesley-Westicles).

I have no problem going there.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: kso_FAN on February 11, 2014, 02:08:15 PM
IMHO Westicles is playing at a pretty decent level, at least slightly above what you'd expect for a 3 star recruit.

Would you say he's playing at a Nick Williams level?

(I wouldn't)

With the internet, you probably shouldn't have gone there (http://statsheet.com/mcb/players/compare?add=nick-williams&i=1&nick-williams=2001-2002&p1=wesley-Westicles).

I have no problem going there.

Would you still say he's not playing at a Nick Williams level?
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Skipper44 on February 11, 2014, 02:08:38 PM
IMHO Westicles is playing at a pretty decent level, at least slightly above what you'd expect for a 3 star recruit.

Would you say he's playing at a Nick Williams level?

(I wouldn't)

With the internet, you probably shouldn't have gone there (http://statsheet.com/mcb/players/compare?add=nick-williams&i=1&nick-williams=2001-2002&p1=wesley-Westicles).
Also, Nick wasn't as DITRy as Westicles - IIRC he was a top 10 in Texas before getting kicked out high school or some such
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: michigancat on February 11, 2014, 02:09:22 PM
IMHO Westicles is playing at a pretty decent level, at least slightly above what you'd expect for a 3 star recruit.

Would you say he's playing at a Nick Williams level?

(I wouldn't)

With the internet, you probably shouldn't have gone there (http://statsheet.com/mcb/players/compare?add=nick-williams&i=1&nick-williams=2001-2002&p1=wesley-Westicles).

I have no problem going there.

Would you still say he's not playing at a Nick Williams level?

He's close.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: kso_FAN on February 11, 2014, 02:13:47 PM
IMHO Westicles is playing at a pretty decent level, at least slightly above what you'd expect for a 3 star recruit.

Would you say he's playing at a Nick Williams level?

(I wouldn't)

With the internet, you probably shouldn't have gone there (http://statsheet.com/mcb/players/compare?add=nick-williams&i=1&nick-williams=2001-2002&p1=wesley-Westicles).

I have no problem going there.

Would you still say he's not playing at a Nick Williams level?

He's close.

They look pretty even. Nick was more of a 2 though and Westicles is a 3, (and a much better rebounder and FT rater).
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: michigancat on February 11, 2014, 02:15:15 PM
OK, Wesley is the equivalent of a three-star Wooly recruit.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Skipper44 on February 11, 2014, 02:19:02 PM
OK, Wesley is the equivalent of a threefour-star Wooly recruit.
couldn't resist
http://statsheet.com/mcb/players/compare?add=cartier-martin&cartier-martin=2003-2004&i=1&p1=wesley-Westicles (http://statsheet.com/mcb/players/compare?add=cartier-martin&cartier-martin=2003-2004&i=1&p1=wesley-Westicles)
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: TownieCat on February 11, 2014, 02:20:47 PM
OK, Wesley is the equivalent of a threefour-star Wooly recruit.
couldn't resist
http://statsheet.com/mcb/players/compare?add=cartier-martin&cartier-martin=2003-2004&i=1&p1=wesley-Westicles (http://statsheet.com/mcb/players/compare?add=cartier-martin&cartier-martin=2003-2004&i=1&p1=wesley-Westicles)

 :Wha:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: kso_FAN on February 11, 2014, 02:25:32 PM
OK, Wesley is the equivalent of a threefour-star Wooly recruit.
couldn't resist
http://statsheet.com/mcb/players/compare?add=cartier-martin&cartier-martin=2003-2004&i=1&p1=wesley-Westicles (http://statsheet.com/mcb/players/compare?add=cartier-martin&cartier-martin=2003-2004&i=1&p1=wesley-Westicles)

 :surprised:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on February 11, 2014, 02:27:55 PM
Wesley is 6'9" now, not 6'7". :D
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: TownieCat on February 11, 2014, 02:30:13 PM
That was a tough segment for Kev to get thru. He has been forced to change the narrative about KU-K-State. A lot of backhanded compliments mixed in there.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Shooter Jones on February 11, 2014, 02:30:30 PM
didn't oscar say Wundy has grown like 2 inches since he got on campus? guys, what if he grows 2 more inches!?!?
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Shooter Jones on February 11, 2014, 02:31:06 PM
Wesley is 6'9" now, not 6'7". :D

oops, thanks Wacky
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: TownieCat on February 11, 2014, 02:32:26 PM
didn't oscar say Wundy has grown like 2 inches since he got on campus? guys, what if he grows 2 more inches!?!?

 :crossfingers:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on February 11, 2014, 02:33:14 PM
Wesley is 6'9" now, not 6'7". :D

oops, thanks Wacky
Anytime! He's grown those 2 inches since he got to campus.  :D
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: mocat on February 11, 2014, 02:34:19 PM
That was a tough segment for Kev to get thru. He has been forced to change the narrative about KU-K-State. A lot of backhanded compliments mixed in there.

recap/highlights?
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Benja on February 11, 2014, 02:35:36 PM
lol butthurt ku fan on completely embarrassing himself
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: kso_FAN on February 11, 2014, 02:36:00 PM
That was a tough segment for Kev to get thru. He has been forced to change the narrative about KU-K-State. A lot of backhanded compliments mixed in there.

recap/highlights?

Yes, I want a steve dave like recap of this thing.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: wiley on February 11, 2014, 02:37:14 PM
lol butthurt ku fan on completely embarrassing himself

the callers on 810 are awful.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Benja on February 11, 2014, 02:37:59 PM
Jesus BITB is mushing the hell out of ku butthurt
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: TownieCat on February 11, 2014, 02:38:32 PM
That was a tough segment for Kev to get thru. He has been forced to change the narrative about KU-K-State. A lot of backhanded compliments mixed in there.

recap/highlights?

A couple of things that stood out to me were his criticism of Self for not going to the full court press sooner. Thinks KU would've won by 10 if they had used it more. Also said it is "now a rivalry....in Manhattan".

Overall very complimentary of oscar and K-State, but his tone seems bitter.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on February 11, 2014, 02:38:50 PM
They're really lame and lol at BITB calling out that "Iowa" fan as being a KU fan.  :ROFL:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Benja on February 11, 2014, 02:41:07 PM
That was a tough segment for Kev to get thru. He has been forced to change the narrative about KU-K-State. A lot of backhanded compliments mixed in there.

recap/highlights?

A couple of things that stood out to me were his criticism of Self for not going to the full court press sooner. Thinks KU would've won by 10 if they had used it more. Also said it is "now a rivalry....in Manhattan".

Overall very complimentary of oscar and K-State, but his tone seems bitter.

He always sounds like that. They were real compliments. He speaks in a slightly defensive tone at times because he's constantly badgered by the strangest of sports fans.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: kso_FAN on February 11, 2014, 02:43:20 PM
That was a tough segment for Kev to get thru. He has been forced to change the narrative about KU-K-State. A lot of backhanded compliments mixed in there.

recap/highlights?

A couple of things that stood out to me were his criticism of Self for not going to the full court press sooner. Thinks KU would've won by 10 if they had used it more. Also said it is "now a rivalry....in Manhattan".

Overall very complimentary of oscar and K-State, but his tone seems bitter.

He always sounds like that. They were real compliments. He speaks in a slightly defensive tone at times because he's constantly badgered by the strangest of sports fans.

Yes, of course. I hope that Townie wasn't going with the gP angle that KK hates K-State.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: michigancat on February 11, 2014, 02:46:40 PM
really uncomfortable call about the n-word
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: TownieCat on February 11, 2014, 02:47:38 PM

Yes, of course. I hope that Townie wasn't going with the gP angle that KK hates K-State.

I don't think that he hates K-State, I think he hates admitting that oscar is having success. Several here can probably relate to that.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 11, 2014, 02:48:37 PM
really uncomfortable call about the n-word

Me and Leebo went to lunch and HE DIDN'T SAY ANYTHING RACSIT!!!!!!
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: steve dave on February 11, 2014, 02:49:00 PM
I think he hates admitting that oscar is having success.

he loves the crap out of that
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Fedor on February 11, 2014, 02:49:43 PM

Yes, of course. I hope that Townie wasn't going with the gP angle that KK hates K-State.

I don't think that he hates K-State, I think he hates admitting that oscar is having success. Several here can probably relate to that.
He's trying to mush the Weber haters.
He did refer to the KSU purple cats as a nice little team,tho.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: mocat on February 11, 2014, 02:53:22 PM
U2 bumper music tho
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 11, 2014, 02:54:31 PM
Anyone thinking of adopting that dog? BITB is a man who cares.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: OregonSmock on February 11, 2014, 02:55:11 PM
Is it time to give oscar a contract extension?


Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Cire on February 11, 2014, 02:57:51 PM
Is it time to give oscar a contract extension?




didn't he get one last year?
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Benja on February 11, 2014, 02:58:13 PM
I think he hates admitting that oscar is having success.

he loves the crap out of that

yeah that's pretty clear
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 11, 2014, 02:59:24 PM
Ted's call about softball for old grandpas  :love:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Pete on February 11, 2014, 03:03:55 PM

Ted's call about softball for old grandpas  :love:

"This is Ted, I call you once a year.. "
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Cire on February 11, 2014, 03:10:36 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lostlettermen.com%2Ffiles%2Fimages%2Fuploads%2Farticle%2Fksu_shirt.png&hash=8f75dd5d372353d116c23acd29b1cac9f7c61db8)

wait til they see this
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: mocat on February 11, 2014, 03:38:27 PM
BITB compared a homosexual player to a player who has 6 children with 6 different women in terms of a distraction to a team
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Pete on February 11, 2014, 03:47:42 PM

BITB compared a homosexual player to a player who has 6 children with 6 different women in terms of a distraction to a team

Ya, he got real close to suggesting some sort of a mutual moral sketchiness between the two situations, but sort of pulled out of it.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on February 11, 2014, 04:18:04 PM
That 70 year old that just called in.  :sdeek: "I just don't like that lifestyle!" Grandpa, was that you?
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: MakeItRain on February 11, 2014, 04:21:07 PM
BITB compared a homosexual player to a player who has 6 children with 6 different women in terms of a distraction to a team

He's legitimately a piece of crap (not crap). Yesterday he took several pages out of FSD's poor mistreated white man book yesterday. I heard him say race card at least 10 times yesterday, no exaggeration, when referring to Marcus Smart
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Dave Wooderson on February 11, 2014, 04:21:44 PM
What is gay football?

 :facepalm:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: MakeItRain on February 11, 2014, 04:22:38 PM
BITB indeed.

i agree with just about everything in there, except oscar's travel advantages were a little overblown


TCU, Tech and UT are likely a slight edge, but other than that I think it's accurate from a travel standpoint.

and OU. and, having an advantage over 50% of the conference is certainly different than "pretty much anyone else in the Big 12"

Hugs has a direct flight to Dulles 3x/day

What? From Morgantown? How is that possible when sports teams can't land there?
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: michigancat on February 11, 2014, 04:26:55 PM
BITB indeed.

i agree with just about everything in there, except oscar's travel advantages were a little overblown


TCU, Tech and UT are likely a slight edge, but other than that I think it's accurate from a travel standpoint.

and OU. and, having an advantage over 50% of the conference is certainly different than "pretty much anyone else in the Big 12"

Hugs has a direct flight to Dulles 3x/day

What? From Morgantown? How is that possible when sports teams can't land there?

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morgantown_Municipal_Airport

They may only be able to land tiny planes there (charters), and the flights probably don't have the capacity to handle an entire basketball team. Plus coming from the west, flying into Pittsburgh and driving is probably faster than flying through Dulles.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on February 11, 2014, 04:33:51 PM
Kietz is just slaying ppl today. Get them a body bag.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Fedor on February 11, 2014, 04:39:06 PM
Some dude called in and said that he was impartial and an Oregon fan, his point was that he was irritated that one and done talent is all anyone gives any credit to in the college game.  In passing he mentioned that he thought BITB was more favorable to KU and Keitz saw an opportunity and jumped on it with both feet.  He got all fake indignant and said he calls it like he sees it "KU final fours, national champ, nine s8 etc..."  Really laying it on thick...
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Skipper44 on February 11, 2014, 04:40:14 PM
that caller had to be a plant
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: EMAWzified on February 11, 2014, 04:55:42 PM
KK said anyone blasting the old fool because he cites the supposed word of god etched down of clay tablets in the bronze age as the basis as his bigotry is just as bigoted as the bigot.

That 70 year old that just called in.  :sdeek: "I just don't like that lifestyle!" Grandpa, was that you?
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: slucat on February 11, 2014, 05:10:15 PM
BITB indeed.

i agree with just about everything in there, except oscar's travel advantages were a little overblown


TCU, Tech and UT are likely a slight edge, but other than that I think it's accurate from a travel standpoint.

and OU. and, having an advantage over 50% of the conference is certainly different than "pretty much anyone else in the Big 12"

Hugs has a direct flight to Dulles 3x/day

What? From Morgantown? How is that possible when sports teams can't land there?

http://www.morgantownairport.com/

Commercial Flights

Commercial flights are operated out of Morgantown Municipal Airport (MGW) by Colgan Air, Inc. as “UNITED EXPRESS” to DULLES INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (IAD) daily. Three departure flights with four arrival flights Monday thru Friday, with two flights daily on Saturday and Sunday.  DULLES INTERNATIONAL provides daily connections to over 125 domestic destinations and over 30 international locations.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on March 04, 2014, 02:03:18 PM
He's going to trash us today.  :frown: I just know it!
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Fedor on March 04, 2014, 02:13:57 PM
He's going to trash us today.  :frown: I just know it!
Didn't Mizzou have a bad loss recently?

Here we go!!!
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Cire on March 04, 2014, 02:37:36 PM
I bet he's talking up the benching with 2 talking point.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: schreds21 on March 04, 2014, 03:11:20 PM
I bet he's talking up the benching with 2 talking point.
Soren spent 30 minutes on this during his show today.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: OregonSmock on March 06, 2014, 03:23:11 PM
BITB is melting down about Harbaugh.  So blessed.

 :love:  :love:  :love:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: williamthewildcat on March 06, 2014, 03:27:47 PM
BITB is melting down about Harbaugh.  So blessed.

 :love:  :love:  :love:

You're the 4th person on a message board that has said this. Details please.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: ZappaCat on March 06, 2014, 03:32:50 PM
BITB is melting down about Harbaugh.  So blessed.

 :love:  :love:  :love:

You're the 4th person on a message board that has said this. Details please.

He's Trolling KU fans. Quoting Bill Self saying he would never do anything to take away from Senior Night. Then pounding away at how Harbaugh took away from Senior Night.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: 'taterblast on March 06, 2014, 03:49:42 PM
omg i wish i could listen
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 06, 2014, 03:51:10 PM
He is whipping squawk ass
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on March 06, 2014, 03:51:40 PM
omg i wish i could listen
Me too.  :frown:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: EMAWzified on March 06, 2014, 05:12:47 PM
For those who didn' t listen, KK pointed out Self said it was a great big deal tradition at KU that senior night was all about the seniors and one-and-done freshmen need not think they were going to be recognized in any way to take the focus off the glorious seniors who this year are his son and one-year transfer Black. And then he did exactly that by allowing the Harbaugh at practice video to be shown.
Yawn, but of course it was stink bait for sqwawks
And speaking of yawn, the problem solving bit? WTF? White noise.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on March 06, 2014, 06:53:46 PM
I actually caught part of this. The best was when he got Jason King (who has been relegated to fawning over Ku sports from BR :lol: such a douche), and Jason pretended he didn't know what was going on and then said it was probably an accident the video got out.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Pete on May 30, 2014, 04:08:57 PM
Guys true story. Stan had a squirrel stuck in his roof, and Ron Buck came over and organized the effort to remove that rough ridin' squirrel.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: CNS on May 30, 2014, 04:18:00 PM
WTF is wrong with Stan that he calls a roofer about a squirrel prob?   :lol:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Pete on May 30, 2014, 04:26:05 PM

WTF is wrong with Stan that he calls a roofer about a squirrel prob?   :lol:

That Ron Buck sounds like one awesome son of bitch.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Cartierfor3 on May 30, 2014, 05:47:28 PM
Guys true story. Stan had a squirrel stuck in his roof, and Ron Buck came over and organized the effort to remove that rough ridin' squirrel.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

More interesting was this nugget:

BITB: "Stan you ever played air guitar in your whole life?"
Stan: "No, no Kevin, I never have"
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: star seed 7 on May 31, 2014, 02:18:38 AM
Guys true story. Stan had a squirrel stuck in his roof, and Ron Buck came over and organized the effort to remove that rough ridin' squirrel.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

More interesting was this nugget:

BITB: "Stan you ever played air guitar in your whole life?"
Stan: "No, no Kevin, I never have"

stan is a liar. a... rough ridin' liar
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Asteriskhead on May 31, 2014, 02:21:27 AM
Guys true story. Stan had a squirrel stuck in his roof, and Ron Buck came over and organized the effort to remove that rough ridin' squirrel.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

More interesting was this nugget:

BITB: "Stan you ever played air guitar in your whole life?"
Stan: "No, no Kevin, I never have"

stan is a liar. a... rough ridin' liar

I believe it.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: star seed 7 on May 31, 2014, 02:22:41 AM
Guys true story. Stan had a squirrel stuck in his roof, and Ron Buck came over and organized the effort to remove that rough ridin' squirrel.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

More interesting was this nugget:

BITB: "Stan you ever played air guitar in your whole life?"
Stan: "No, no Kevin, I never have"

stan is a liar. a... rough ridin' liar

I believe it.

i don't.  not for a minute.  not for a second.  not for a millisecond.  not for a nanosecond.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Asteriskhead on May 31, 2014, 02:25:44 AM
Guys true story. Stan had a squirrel stuck in his roof, and Ron Buck came over and organized the effort to remove that rough ridin' squirrel.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

More interesting was this nugget:

BITB: "Stan you ever played air guitar in your whole life?"
Stan: "No, no Kevin, I never have"

stan is a liar. a... rough ridin' liar

I believe it.

i don't.  not for a minute.  not for a second.  not for a millisecond.  not for a nanosecond.

okay, cool.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: star seed 7 on May 31, 2014, 02:28:43 AM
maybe stan had some ram overflow and he doesn't remember it or something, but there is no way a 40+ yr old man has never air guitared.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Asteriskhead on May 31, 2014, 02:36:13 AM
maybe stan had some ram overflow and he doesn't remember it or something, but there is no way a 40+ yr old man has never air guitared.

bullshit.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Asteriskhead on May 31, 2014, 02:37:17 AM
stan looks like a stick in the mud.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: star seed 7 on May 31, 2014, 02:38:52 AM
stan looks like a stick in the mud.

 :don'tcare:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: wabash909 on May 31, 2014, 06:49:47 AM
Playing air guitar doesn't compute with Stanbot.  This should surprise no one.

Title: Re: BITB
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on May 31, 2014, 10:47:03 AM
If it's not necessary Stanbot doesn't do it.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: j-dub on May 31, 2014, 10:52:50 AM
If it's not necessary Stanbot doesn't do it.

that's steve dave level efficiency  :surprised:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Emo EMAW on June 02, 2014, 10:09:10 AM

WTF is wrong with Stan that he calls a roofer about a squirrel prob?   :lol:

That Ron Buck sounds like one awesome son of bitch.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Can confirm.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: CNS on June 02, 2014, 04:22:51 PM
Squirrel whisperer, apparently 
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Pete on June 03, 2014, 08:57:20 PM

Squirrel whisperer, apparently

He's like a Nazi general, but for squirrels.  Sure, he'll round them up and "deal" with them, but don't expect him to get his hands dirty.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on January 12, 2015, 03:30:35 PM
For those of you Frank fans, he's on 810 right now. He's been on for awhile, so you can probably get it later on the site today. Have fun.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Cire on January 12, 2015, 05:36:08 PM
I bet he didn't have a take on fosters tude
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on January 12, 2015, 05:38:14 PM
I bet he didn't have a take on fosters tude
He never mentioned K-State, but he did talk about past players tho. BITB tried to make a case to Frank that the SEC might be better than the Big 12 this year.  :lol:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 12, 2015, 06:44:48 PM
Sadly for me, a huge Fightin Cocks fan. I fear another SEC loss or two, and Frank is going to come unhinged.

What's even more sad, is that just a few weeks ago on his call inn show, Frank sounded so happy.   

Title: Re: BITB
Post by: kso_FAN on January 12, 2015, 06:46:03 PM

Sadly for me, a huge Fightin Cocks fan. I fear another SEC loss or two, and Frank is going to come unhinged.

What's even more sad, is that just a few weeks ago on his call inn show, Frank sounded so happy.   

At least you didn't make some silly fulcrum post. Sheesh.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 12, 2015, 06:47:46 PM

Sadly for me, a huge Fightin Cocks fan. I fear another SEC loss or two, and Frank is going to come unhinged.

What's even more sad, is that just a few weeks ago on his call inn show, Frank sounded so happy.   

At least you didn't make some silly fulcrum post. Sheesh.

What's a fulcrum post?  Is that something you did?  Oh yeah . . . dumb.

Title: Re: BITB
Post by: renocat on January 12, 2015, 11:05:32 PM
Why does Kiets keep interviewing Martin?  Does he have some purple willie basketball boner for Martin?  I don't see him calling up ol' Roy alum of KU.   The past was good, but it is gone; flushed, spread on the field by the manure spreader of life.  Weber is our man and this team is starting to sky rocket.  I listened to 810 today,  and the only turd chucking at KSU came from Between The Lines.  If I stil had a dog I would have let him whizz on my radio and the voice of this pompous runt.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: wetwillie on January 12, 2015, 11:24:37 PM
Why does Kiets keep interviewing Martin?  Does he have some purple willie basketball boner for Martin?  I don't see him calling up ol' Roy alum of KU.   The past was good, but it is gone; flushed, spread on the field by the manure spreader of life.  Weber is our man and this team is starting to sky rocket.  I listened to 810 today,  and the only turd chucking at KSU came from Between The Lines.  If I stil had a dog I would have let him whizz on my radio and the voice of this pompous runt.

Most people have forgotten about Mizzou but they play in the same league as Frank and Keitz kinda covers Mizzou Sports
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: michigancat on January 13, 2015, 01:10:58 AM
Why does Kiets keep interviewing Martin?  Does he have some purple willie basketball boner for Martin?  I don't see him calling up ol' Roy alum of KU.   The past was good, but it is gone; flushed, spread on the field by the manure spreader of life.  Weber is our man and this team is starting to sky rocket.  I listened to 810 today,  and the only turd chucking at KSU came from Between The Lines.  If I stil had a dog I would have let him whizz on my radio and the voice of this pompous runt.

what happened to your dog?
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: deputy dawg on January 13, 2015, 07:31:27 AM
maybe stan had some ram overflow and he doesn't remember it or something, but there is no way a 40+ yr old man has never air guitared.

Stan is 50+
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: mocat on January 13, 2015, 08:08:52 AM
Yeah he's actually over 60
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Pete on January 13, 2015, 08:36:38 AM

Yeah he's actually over 60

No, he's probably about 53.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: pissclams on January 13, 2015, 08:41:40 AM
stan's enthusiasm for kansas state is unparalleled.  just kidding, there's a ton of people who love the cats because it's so great to be a cat.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Missouriscribe on January 13, 2015, 09:00:49 AM

Yeah he's actually over 60

No, he's probably about 53.
Talked with him during the World Series. He looked to be in his late 40s, though some of that may have been the your-team-in-the-world series glow
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: pissclams on January 13, 2015, 09:06:34 AM
well, let's see- he played in the shrine bowl in 1980 and graduated kats u in '84 so like pete said, he's ~53 go cats
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on January 13, 2015, 02:33:15 PM
Why does Kiets keep interviewing Martin?  Does he have some purple willie basketball boner for Martin?  I don't see him calling up ol' Roy alum of KU.   The past was good, but it is gone; flushed, spread on the field by the manure spreader of life.  Weber is our man and this team is starting to sky rocket.  I listened to 810 today,  and the only turd chucking at KSU came from Between The Lines.  If I stil had a dog I would have let him whizz on my radio and the voice of this pompous runt.
Kietz has a boyish crush on Frank. He always has. When he heard about the back and forth Frank and I had about 3 years ago on twitter, He reached out to Kietz, because I had 810 Varsity in my profile. 810 contacted me and told me to take it out of my profile and that I was on a suspension from doing $20 high school games for awhile.  :lol: Kietz backs his boys. They've reached out to me since, but I've said: "No, thanks". By the time you drive to the game, you eat up that $20 in gas anyways.  :lol: I've started to value my weekends more with age.  :)
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on January 13, 2015, 02:47:26 PM
This is #HotStove info i'm dishing out to you guys. Usually ppl have to pay premium for this type of stuff. YW!
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: meow meow on January 13, 2015, 03:06:02 PM
only wacky could have a #fanningbrag about a $20 gig he used to have, but pissed it away because he couldn't behave himself on twitter.  a damn shame.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on January 13, 2015, 04:22:40 PM
only wacky could have a #fanningbrag about a $20 gig he used to have, but pissed it away because he couldn't behave himself on twitter.  a damn shame.
It's good crap and funny as hell no matter how you swing it. I was never going to be the next "voice" of anything so i'm pretty meh about it. Also, gives you a little insight to how that station is ran, as I've done before for 610. You guys like sports. I assume you guys like these ITK little knick knacks.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: meow meow on January 13, 2015, 04:34:24 PM
Yeah, like knees, it's weird that a company doesn't want their employees, or people affiliated with them, being dumbasses on twitter when that person's profile clearly states that they are affiliated with said company. 
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on January 13, 2015, 04:39:32 PM
Yeah, like knees, it's weird that a company doesn't want their employees, or people affiliated with them, being dumbasses on twitter when that person's profile clearly states that they are affiliated with said company.
I don't think i'm the only dumbass on twitter affiliated to a company, but ok. I could see myself giving two shits if I was making a bunch of $ doing it, but lol at them thinking I give a damn about $20 a game (then them crawling back to me when they have a hard time staffing games). gE is full of dumbasses on twitter. Lighten up, M^2. JFC.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: SdK on January 13, 2015, 06:32:35 PM
The knees thing was hilarious when it first came about...not gEing I laughed so hard.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: KST8FAN on January 05, 2017, 11:35:51 AM
http://media.610sports.com/a/118004044/01-05-8a-replay-in-sports-lax-names-terez-paylor-top-10.htm?q=oscar+weber&seek=81.669 (http://media.610sports.com/a/118004044/01-05-8a-replay-in-sports-lax-names-terez-paylor-top-10.htm?q=oscar+weber&seek=81.669)

Go to 1:19 mark.  Which one of you did this?


Tom
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: TownieCat on January 05, 2017, 11:58:18 AM
 :ROFL:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: deputy dawg on January 05, 2017, 12:27:27 PM
http://media.610sports.com/a/118004044/01-05-8a-replay-in-sports-lax-names-terez-paylor-top-10.htm?q=oscar+weber&seek=81.669 (http://media.610sports.com/a/118004044/01-05-8a-replay-in-sports-lax-names-terez-paylor-top-10.htm?q=oscar+weber&seek=81.669)

Go to 1:19 mark.  Which one of you did this?


Tom
Awesome, wish I would have thought of that.  I really don't know anyone that can do a serviceable impression of Oscar, though.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: kso_FAN on January 05, 2017, 12:27:55 PM
That was great.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: #LIFE on January 05, 2017, 12:29:39 PM
 :lol: :lol: :lol:

I literally just fell off my chair at work  :ROFL:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: 'taterblast on January 05, 2017, 12:30:02 PM
holy crap that's incredible
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: scottwildcat on January 05, 2017, 12:37:24 PM
that is freaking amazing.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: mhkpasa on January 05, 2017, 12:59:04 PM
Pretty sure its Ben Heisler, the producer for The Drive
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: kso_FAN on January 05, 2017, 01:32:57 PM
Pretty sure its Ben Heisler, the producer for The Drive

I think so. I have heard him do a oscar impression before on the show.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: michigancat on January 05, 2017, 02:46:33 PM
wow that was much better than I thought it would be
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Gooch on January 05, 2017, 02:49:23 PM
#1 not near fast enough a good #oscar is much faster. #2 not a single run on sentence.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: EMAWzifried on January 05, 2017, 03:14:42 PM
On weekly conference call, Jamie Dixon in response to a St. Johns' question said TCU called for six travels against KU's 2 (both of Svi) in conference opener. Said traveling a point of emphasis with conference officials this year.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on January 05, 2017, 03:34:13 PM
keegan and danny both state that the non travelling call was the single worst call/non call they've seen in any sporting event ever. keegan said maybe the denkinger safe call from thirty years ago was similar.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: cfbandyman on January 05, 2017, 04:27:05 PM
:lol:

Weber Out...
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: 'taterblast on January 05, 2017, 04:39:28 PM
"rough ridin' hop scotch"

:lol:
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Cire on January 05, 2017, 05:20:21 PM
That was great. 


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Ptolemy on January 05, 2017, 05:22:47 PM
#1 not near fast enough a good #oscar is much faster. #2 not a single run on sentence.

The adult beverages slowed his brain down.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: IPA4Me on January 06, 2017, 12:54:23 PM
Fantastic. Thanks for sharing, Tom.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Shooter Jones on February 16, 2017, 02:36:09 PM
"BITB hinting that ADJC is ready to move on oscar Weber, but may be put on hold by UPRM. Says things are "wild" behind the scenes at KSU.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: michigancat on February 16, 2017, 02:37:00 PM
"BITB hinting that ADJC is ready to move on oscar Weber, but may be put on hold by UPRM. Says things are "wild" behind the scenes at KSU.
BITB!
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: ednksu on February 16, 2017, 03:05:38 PM
It true I think UPRM is looking too big picture.  I'm sure he is thinking any instability and seeing large checks to fire someone will look bad at a critical time in the budget process. 
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: BostonPancake on February 16, 2017, 03:24:39 PM
"BITB hinting that ADJC is ready to move on oscar Weber, but may be put on hold by UPRM. Says things are "wild" behind the scenes at KSU.



If true,  :curse: :curse: :curse:......let him do his job!!!!!!!  We don't need Wefaldv2.0
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Gooch on February 20, 2017, 04:37:03 PM
What was said this AM? I'm sure he went full shirt tuck on our guy TW. I'm sure the word classless was used at least 5 times. Maybe even a #family.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: star seed 7 on February 20, 2017, 04:38:12 PM
Bitb is afternoon drive bruh
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Gooch on February 20, 2017, 04:39:05 PM
Someone said he was on a morning show bitching or something.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on February 20, 2017, 04:39:30 PM
The only person who mentioned it was the morning show. They were making fun of him a bit and saying it was way over the top. Thought Weber looked good by giving him a high five. That was a bought it. They played the video via twitter on the air.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on February 20, 2017, 04:40:02 PM
It was around 7:30 this morning if that helps.
Title: BITB
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 20, 2017, 06:21:30 PM
It true I think UPRM is looking too big picture.  I'm sure he is thinking any instability and seeing large checks to fire someone will look bad at a critical time in the budget process.

Friend, that's perception only.  The AD is in the last year of getting any university support.   Now it's a pittance from SGA, next FY, $0. 
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: ednksu on February 20, 2017, 08:16:20 PM
It true I think UPRM is looking too big picture.  I'm sure he is thinking any instability and seeing large checks to fire someone will look bad at a critical time in the budget process.

Friend, that's perception only.  The AD is in the last year of getting any university support.   Now it's a pittance from SGA, next FY, $0.

I know they have been drawing down the general fund contribution to athletics.  The point I was making is that the legislature wont understand that nuance and if they did, they would argue that if we have so much money to break off a mediocre coach then we should have more then enough money to fund other other programs that are being smashed by the budget cuts, like the massive draw down in subscriptions for academic resources at Hale. 
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on February 20, 2017, 09:35:06 PM
AD =/ University General Fund
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: Trim on February 20, 2017, 10:10:13 PM
Post links to any media types talking about testy westy, bitb or otherwise.
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 21, 2017, 12:17:04 PM
It true I think UPRM is looking too big picture.  I'm sure he is thinking any instability and seeing large checks to fire someone will look bad at a critical time in the budget process.

Friend, that's perception only.  The AD is in the last year of getting any university support.   Now it's a pittance from SGA, next FY, $0.

I know they have been drawing down the general fund contribution to athletics.  The point I was making is that the legislature wont understand that nuance and if they did, they would argue that if we have so much money to break off a mediocre coach then we should have more then enough money to fund other other programs that are being smashed by the budget cuts, like the massive draw down in subscriptions for academic resources at Hale.

The regents and relevant legislators have had it explained to them on multiple occasions that Kstate athletics is at the end of receiving any funds from the academic/student governance side of Kstate and that Kstate athletics pumps nearly $10 million a year into the academic side in tuition and fees, as well as employing students. 

Plus, Kstate Athletics Inc would likely offer a multi year settlement pay out to Weber, just like most other schools do.  Unless of course the payout were relatively small. 
Title: Re: BITB
Post by: ednksu on February 21, 2017, 01:10:57 PM
It true I think UPRM is looking too big picture.  I'm sure he is thinking any instability and seeing large checks to fire someone will look bad at a critical time in the budget process.

Friend, that's perception only.  The AD is in the last year of getting any university support.   Now it's a pittance from SGA, next FY, $0.

I know they have been drawing down the general fund contribution to athletics.  The point I was making is that the legislature wont understand that nuance and if they did, they would argue that if we have so much money to break off a mediocre coach then we should have more then enough money to fund other other programs that are being smashed by the budget cuts, like the massive draw down in subscriptions for academic resources at Hale.

The regents and relevant legislators have had it explained to them on multiple occasions that Kstate athletics is at the end of receiving any funds from the academic/student governance side of Kstate and that Kstate athletics pumps nearly $10 million a year into the academic side in tuition and fees, as well as employing students. 

Plus, Kstate Athletics Inc would likely offer a multi year settlement pay out to Weber, just like most other schools do.  Unless of course the payout were relatively small.

I have no doubt that they have had these things explained to them multiple times and multiple ways.  But that doesn't stop them from making asinine decisions and claims.  Hell look at some of their (leg's) reactions to UPKS leaving and them taking random political swipes.  Similarly it reminds me of people bitching to Jim Calhoun about his salary and being the highest paid state employee while failing to realize the millions UConn basketball puts into the university systems and local economies.  I guess I'm saying just because you are factually right doesn't mean someone wont try and warp the optics to make a political point, and I think you and I can agree on that.