goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: pike on September 03, 2011, 10:48:09 PM

Title: SLamur and Zimmerman...or was it Hartman?
Post by: pike on September 03, 2011, 10:48:09 PM: Wyatt said they were injured or something. Can't remember exactly who since the broadcast was pathetic tonight (commercials cut into game time more than 5 times, one of them cut WAY into game time)

Anyone know their status?
Title: Re: SLamur and Zimmerman...or was it Hartman?
Post by: Tobias on September 03, 2011, 10:49:38 PM: hartman
Title: Re: SLamur and Zimmerman...or was it Hartman?
Post by: jtksu on September 03, 2011, 10:59:19 PM: Lamur was also out. I think Pearson took Hartman's place and the LB that to Lamur's place eludes me. It was certainly said enough times during the game but I'm a bit drunk here. Also- If we're getting hurt by FCS teams, it's going to be a long year.
Title: Re: SLamur and Zimmerman...or was it Hartman?
Post by: jtksu on September 03, 2011, 11:00:25 PM: I want to say Truman?
Title: Re: SLamur and Zimmerman...or was it Hartman?
Post by: DQ12 on September 03, 2011, 11:00:38 PM: Quote from: Tobias on September 03, 2011, 10:49:38 PM
hartman
Addition by subtraction imo.
Title: Re: SLamur and Zimmerman...or was it Hartman?
Post by: wetwillie on September 03, 2011, 11:05:50 PM: to the lfbiq eye it would appear pearson sucks less than hartman
Title: Re: SLamur and Zimmerman...or was it Hartman?
Post by: Tobias on September 03, 2011, 11:07:06 PM: my lfbiq certainly didn't scream for 2y
Title: Re: SLamur and Zimmerman...or was it Hartman?
Post by: jtksu on September 03, 2011, 11:31:33 PM: You have to get better everyday/game right?! Hopefully ELamur isn't hurt bad though, I think he could be pretty sweet for us this year.
Title: Re: SLamur and Zimmerman...or was it Hartman?
Post by: pike on September 03, 2011, 11:35:03 PM: Quote from: jtksu on September 03, 2011, 11:31:33 PM
You have to get better everyday/game right?! Hopefully ELamur isn't hurt bad though, I think he could be pretty sweet for us this year.

And yeah I meant ELamur

Silly me, too mind mumped by that pitiful excuse for a football game to care about names.
Title: Re: SLamur and Zimmerman...or was it Hartman?
Post by: jtksu on September 03, 2011, 11:38:39 PM: Weird thing is I had to go back and look to realize you had mumped up. I certainly didn't notice. Anyone else get a little geeked up when Stan talked abot SLamur putting on his helmet, right before half?
Title: Re: SLamur and Zimmerman...or was it Hartman?
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on September 04, 2011, 12:54:14 AM: Quote from: jtksu on September 03, 2011, 11:38:39 PM
Weird thing is I had to go back and look to realize you had mumped up. I certainly didn't notice. Anyone else get a little geeked up when Stan talked abot SLamur putting on his helmet, right before half?

No. The only thing I was thinking was "Please, Bill, burn Sams Redshirt."
Title: Re: SLamur and Zimmerman...or was it Hartman?
Post by: Lucas Scoopsalot on September 04, 2011, 02:05:20 AM: I just couldn't believe how bad the whole offense was :horrorsurprise:
Title: Re: SLamur and Zimmerman...or was it Hartman?
Post by: jtksu on September 04, 2011, 03:23:08 PM: I don't know how much difference a QB swap would have mattered. Seems like the oline was the glaring issue. :dunno: