goemaw.com
TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Basketball is hard => Topic started by: EllToPay on January 04, 2011, 07:46:39 AM
-
would kill for 2-2.
-
would kill for 2-2.
be honest, have you watched aTm play?
-
My predicto
W @MU
W @A&M
W BU
@KU we either win by 1 or we lose by 15
-
@MU and @KU are so long shot I can't even see them.
-
@MU and @KU are so long shot I can't even see them.
wrong sir
-
@MU and @KU are so long shot I can't even see them.
wrong sir
No, he's right.
-
@MU and @KU are so long shot I can't even see them.
wrong sir
No, he's right.
No, he's wrong.
-
Weird quarter there. Use the Haley method.
@OSU, CU, Tech, @MU
3-1
@aTm, BU, @KU, NU
2-2
@ISU, @CU, KU, OU
3-1
@NU, MU, @UT, ISU
3-1
-
Weird quarter there. Use the Haley method.
@OSU, CU, Tech, @MU
3-1
@aTm, BU, @KU, NU
2-2
@ISU, @CU, KU, OU
3-1
@NU, MU, @UT, ISU
3-1
Haley method is so much easier to comprehend, he's so smart! CHIEEEEEEFFFFFSSSS
I'm sticking to my my guns and say we beat BU. They have a three game stretch of KU, @OSU, @KSU. After they get worked by KU @home they will bounce back with a win @OSU then be demoralized when the enter the :doom:
-
Weird quarter there. Use the Haley method.
@OSU, CU, Tech, @MU
3-1
@aTm, BU, @KU, NU
2-2
@ISU, @CU, KU, OU
3-1
@NU, MU, @UT, ISU
3-1
TAKE THAT HALEY QUARTER OF CONFERENCE SEASON THING AND RUN! :cheese:
-
@MU and @KU are so long shot I can't even see them.
wrong sir
No, he's right.
No, he's wrong.
I'm most certainly right.
-
@MU and @KU are so long shot I can't even see them.
wrong sir
No, he's right.
No, he's wrong.
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chicagonow.com%2Fblogs%2Fcollective-unconscious-of-restless-fanatics%2Fwright.jpg&hash=32eca6fba46b7feb2cabd9d528f363af7544de3a)
-
We will murder them.
-
I think aTm and BU are good matchups in our favor. MU is going to destroy us twice. No idea about UKL because they haven't played anyone worth a sh*t, prolly a split.
-
like every other year we'll lose a close one in Columbia and lay down a merciless beating to them in Manhattan.
doesn't take a rocket scientist to see this. but i consistently overestimate the intelligence of most of our fans.
-
like every other year we'll lose a close one in Columbia and lay down a merciless beating to them in Manhattan.
yep, only death and taxes are more of a certain thing than KSU/Mizzou games.
As for Baylor and A&M, both of them look worse than us right now. Baylor can't even beat Gonzaga :lol:
-
Baylor is struggling with some of the same issues we are; missing an experienced PG and trying to figure out how to play with this year's pieces. They provide an interesting match-up for us b/c they do a great job not allowing Oboards, They force TOs, and they don't let opponents get to the FT line much; all things we need to handle better to win in the league.
aTm is slowing the game down to Doc-ish pace and is an undertalented team without a lot of depth. They have some of the same defensive strengths as Baylor. Plus they have some nice wins at home. It won't be easy to win there.
Missouri is solid and will present us match-up problems, but we also present them for them. If (IF) we can handle pressure, our bigs should be able to get their bigs in trouble and kill them on the boards. Then you have to slow down their jump shooting offense, which is tough, b/c they are a very good jump shooting team.
3-1 in the 4 games against those teams would be really, really good. 2-2 is probably more realistic.
-
2-2 sounds about right.
-
2-2
-
Use the Haley method.
@OSU, CU, Tech, @MU
3-1
@aTm, BU, @KU, NU
2-2
@ISU, @CU, KU, OU
3-1
@NU, MU, @UT, ISU
4-0
Finish strong.
-
Use the Haley method.
@OSU, CU, Tech, @MU
3-1
@aTm, BU, @KU, NU
2-2
@ISU, @CU, KU, OU
3-1
@NU, MU, @UT, ISU
4-0
Finish strong.
Not our M.O.
-
Use the Haley method.
@OSU, CU, Tech, @MU
3-1
@aTm, BU, @KU, NU
2-2
@ISU, @CU, KU, OU
3-1
@NU, MU, @UT, ISU
4-0
Finish strong.
Not our M.O.
Yea, the one time I'd have actually been content with KSU beating ISU... You guys really wanted McDermott to stay in the Big 12 didnt you??
-
baylor's zone is crap. their defensive numbers are a mirage built against lower-level teams that can't handle their length, no matter how porous their zone is.
they can still score though, as always. but @ ood, if kstate doesn't win, it would a surprise and a disappointment.
-
baylor's zone is cac. their defensive numbers are a mirage built against lower-level teams that can't handle their length, no matter how porous their zone is.
they can still score though, as always. but @ ood, if kstate doesn't win, it would a surprise and a disappointment.
Good points. The only 3 decent teams they played pretty much destroyed their defense.
-
Who misses who more: k@s and dens clems or Baylor and tweedy? Both are feeling impact of lack of pg play
-
cas method:
@OSU, CU, Tech, @MU, @aTm, BU, @KU, NU, @ISU, @CU, KU, OU, @NU, MU, @UT, ISU
16-0
-
Who misses who more: k@s and dens clems or Baylor and tweedy? Both are feeling impact of lack of pg play
i wonder if there was some rinseclamsinariver poster on baylorfans that rambled on and on all the time last year about hating carter.
-
there was, he and i met at the b12 tourney (POWER & LIGHT). he and i shared a laugh at how badly dens clems played at times.
of course, i 'member reading on ksufans that there was no such thing as a PG in today's game. so WHO THE eff KNOWS?