goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: nicname on December 30, 2010, 04:40:37 PM

Title: 33.5
Post by: nicname on December 30, 2010, 04:40:37 PM
KSU's PPG this season. 

Just pull the trigger Bill.  Fire Cosh and get a capable DC.  Two of your old buddies are out there looking for jobs right now. 
Title: Re: 33.5
Post by: Do Work Son on December 30, 2010, 04:58:28 PM
Fire Cosh and assign Sean at DC
Title: Re: 33.5
Post by: CNS on December 30, 2010, 04:59:41 PM
KSU's PPG this season. 

Just pull the trigger Bill.  Fire Cosh and get a capable DC.  Two of your old buddies are out there looking for jobs right now. 

I was going to go with 'cuse yds per carry today
Title: Re: 33.5
Post by: wes mantooth on December 30, 2010, 05:58:06 PM
Fire Cosh and assign Sean at DC

Would actually prefer Sean to Cosh at DC.  I know what Cosh can do.  Besides, Sean needs a little more on his resume so it won't look as stupid when he's named next HC.
Title: Re: 33.5
Post by: WillieWatanabe on December 30, 2010, 06:01:06 PM
Hilarious at the crap Coffman gets for leading the Offense this year. Bigger fish to fry.
Title: Re: 33.5
Post by: wes mantooth on December 30, 2010, 06:07:33 PM
Carfman played out of his mind given the conditions (field/no defense/etc).
Title: Re: 33.5
Post by: kso_FAN on December 30, 2010, 06:36:09 PM
KSU's PPG this season. 

Just pull the trigger Bill.  Fire Cosh and get a capable DC.  Two of your old buddies are out there looking for jobs right now. 

I was going to go with 'cuse yds per carry today

This.  We took the worst rushing yards per carry given up by a K-State defense (5.92), had a month to prep for a pedestrian Big East rushing offense (3.86), and allowed them to surpass it (6.0). 

Of all the things to be said about this game, this is the biggest.  JMHO.
Title: Re: 33.5
Post by: kso_FAN on January 01, 2011, 03:40:52 PM
Final season statistics: notable numbers.

31.5 points per game given up is the 6th worst in the last 40 years.
2007 allowed 30.8 and 2004 allowed 30.6.

5.93 yards per rush given up is the worst in the last 40 years.
The 2008 defense allowed 5.2 yards per carry.

6.39 yards per play given up is the 2nd worst in the last 40 years.
The 2008 defense allowed 6.21 yards per play, 2004 allowed 5.64, and 2007 allowed 5.48.

*Keep in mind, the only reason the last 40 years is the measure is because K-State didn't track total carries, passes, or plays before 1970.
Title: Re: 33.5
Post by: 0.42 on January 01, 2011, 03:47:15 PM
Final season statistics: notable numbers.

31.5 points per game given up is the 6th worst in the last 40 years.
2007 allowed 30.8 and 2004 allowed 30.6.

5.93 yards per rush given up is the worst in the last 40 years.
The 2008 defense allowed 5.2 yards per carry.

6.39 yards per play given up is the 2nd worst in the last 40 years.
The 2008 defense allowed 6.21 yards per play, 2004 allowed 5.64, and 2007 allowed 5.48.

*Keep in mind, the only reason the last 40 years is the measure is because K-State didn't track total carries, passes, or plays before 1970.

Waters calmed.
Title: Re: 33.5
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on January 01, 2011, 03:48:15 PM
Final season statistics: notable numbers.

31.5 points per game given up is the 6th worst in the last 40 years.
2007 allowed 30.8 and 2004 allowed 30.6.

5.93 yards per rush given up is the worst in the last 40 years.
The 2008 defense allowed 5.2 yards per carry.

6.39 yards per play given up is the 2nd worst in the last 40 years.
The 2008 defense allowed 6.21 yards per play, 2004 allowed 5.64, and 2007 allowed 5.48.

*Keep in mind, the only reason the last 40 years is the measure is because K-State didn't track total carries, passes, or plays before 1970.

who cares about any of that when we can just sit around and bitch about coffman? a good qb and cats were in the national title hunt. i'm convinced of it.
Title: Re: 33.5
Post by: ChiComCat on January 01, 2011, 03:51:55 PM
Final season statistics: notable numbers.

31.5 points per game given up is the 6th worst in the last 40 years.
2007 allowed 30.8 and 2004 allowed 30.6.

5.93 yards per rush given up is the worst in the last 40 years.
The 2008 defense allowed 5.2 yards per carry.

6.39 yards per play given up is the 2nd worst in the last 40 years.
The 2008 defense allowed 6.21 yards per play, 2004 allowed 5.64, and 2007 allowed 5.48.

*Keep in mind, the only reason the last 40 years is the measure is because K-State didn't track total carries, passes, or plays before 1970.

Pfffft, 1 out of 3.  Give Cosh another year and he'll get it together and own all those records
Title: Re: 33.5
Post by: ednksu on January 01, 2011, 04:02:48 PM
Could we get some offensive production stats please?
Title: Re: 33.5
Post by: kso_FAN on January 01, 2011, 05:17:07 PM
Could we get some offensive production stats please?

Notable numbers for offense.

4.68 rushing yards per carry is the 5th best in the last 62 years. (recorded stats for offense only go back to 1949)

40 rushing TDs is the 5th best in the last 62 years.

64.5 completion %-age is the best in the last 62 years.

8.0 yards per attempt is the 9th best in the last 62 years.

16 passing TDs is the 9th best in the last 62 years.

5.82 yards per play is the 5th best in the last 62 years.

.52 points per play is the 6th best in the last 62 years.

33.6 points per game is the 10th best in the last 62 years.

It would appear to me perhaps the worst defensive coaching job of the Snyder era, was supported by perhaps the best offensive coaching job of the Snyder era.  I mean Coffman had one of the Top 5 QB ratings of the all-time at K-State for a season, and that was after losing 2 of the top 3 WRs.
Title: Re: 33.5
Post by: WillieWatanabe on January 01, 2011, 05:18:40 PM
Could we get some offensive production stats please?

Notable numbers for offense.

4.68 rushing yards per carry is the 5th best in the last 62 years. (recorded stats for offense only go back to 1949)

40 rushing TDs is the 5th best in the last 62 years.

64.5 completion %-age is the best in the last 62 years.

8.0 yards per attempt is the 9th best in the last 62 years.

16 passing TDs is the 9th best in the last 62 years.

5.82 yards per play is the 5th best in the last 62 years.

.52 points per play is the 6th best in the last 62 years.

33.6 points per game is the 10th best in the last 62 years.

It would appear to me perhaps the worst defensive coaching job of the Snyder era, was supported by perhaps the best offensive coaching job of the Snyder era.  I mean Coffman had one of the Top 5 QB ratings of the all-time at K-State for a season, and that was after losing 2 of the top 3 WRs.

unfucking believable.
Title: Re: 33.5
Post by: catzacker on January 01, 2011, 05:19:31 PM
It would appear to me perhaps the worst defensive coaching job of the Snyder era, was supported by perhaps the best offensive coaching job of the Snyder era.  

more pushups in the offseason?  perhaps take the names off the back of the jersyes next year?
Title: Re: 33.5
Post by: sys on January 01, 2011, 05:22:26 PM
who cares about any of that when we can just sit around and bitch about coffman? a good qb and cats were in the national title hunt. i'm convinced of it.

i like coffman because he helped me realize that i know more about fball than all you 'tards that watch the games.
Title: Re: 33.5
Post by: Stevesie60 on January 01, 2011, 05:22:47 PM
Could we get some offensive production stats please?

I mean Coffman had one of the Top 5 QB ratings of the all-time at K-State for a season, and that was after losing 2 of the top 3 WRs.

 :lol: at the Coffman haters. No O-line and no receivers for the second half of the season.
Title: Re: 33.5
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on January 01, 2011, 05:23:40 PM
Could we get some offensive production stats please?


Coffman had one of the Top 5 QB ratings of the all-time at K-State for a season, and that was after losing 2 of the top 3 WRs.

that is what made the year carson had all the more incredible. i mean, the guy was throwing to absolute dog crap for the last half of the year and still put up numbers. thanks carson. i appreciated you.
Title: Re: 33.5
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on January 01, 2011, 05:28:26 PM
who cares about any of that when we can just sit around and bitch about coffman? a good qb and cats were in the national title hunt. i'm convinced of it.

i like coffman because he helped me realize that i know more about fball than all you 'tards that watch the games.

if you're saying that you didn't mind coffman then congrats. it was basically you, me and chingon. not surprising though given that the three of us are probably the most educated people on this godforsaken pile of crap website.
Title: Re: 33.5
Post by: wetwillie on January 01, 2011, 05:38:24 PM
Division 1-A Quarterback ratings:


Carson Coffman 143.1   #30   

Blaine Gabbart 126.0 # 73

Jake Locker 127.4 #69

2008(Starting NFL QB)  Josh Freeman 136.5


Let the haters hate CCQ
Title: Re: 33.5
Post by: Tobias on January 01, 2011, 05:44:13 PM
Division 1-A Quarterback ratings:


Carson Coffman 143.1   #30  

Blaine Gabbart 126.0 # 73

Jake Locker 127.4 #69


Let the haters hate CCQ


I fully endorse the Raiders drafting him.
Title: Re: 33.5
Post by: kso_FAN on January 01, 2011, 05:46:04 PM
In 2008 Freemaw's Pass Eff was 136.5 FWIW.
Title: Re: 33.5
Post by: WillieWatanabe on January 01, 2011, 05:55:36 PM
who cares about any of that when we can just sit around and bitch about coffman? a good qb and cats were in the national title hunt. i'm convinced of it.

i like coffman because he helped me realize that i know more about fball than all you 'tards that watch the games.

if you're saying that you didn't mind coffman then congrats. it was basically you, me and chingon. not surprising though given that the three of us are probably the most educated people on this godforsaken pile of crap website.

hey screw you. I've been defending Queso on BOTC lately, to no avail. May need to use these stats.
Title: Re: 33.5
Post by: sys on January 01, 2011, 05:56:50 PM
three of us are probably the most educated people on this godforsaken pile of crap website.

that's a great point.
Title: Re: 33.5
Post by: ew2x4 on January 01, 2011, 06:01:26 PM
fan, please tag currie in all your twitter posts about this. tia.
Title: Re: 33.5
Post by: ChiComCat on January 01, 2011, 06:02:28 PM
three of us are probably the most educated people on this godforsaken pile of crap website.

that's a great point.

Not saying I'm one of the more educated people, but I started some fantastic pro-CCQ threads in my day.  Really thought I was one of the people leading the charge on this.  Sad to see it will not be reflected that way in the history books
Title: Re: 33.5
Post by: sys on January 01, 2011, 06:17:53 PM
hey, that's great chicat.  would you prefer a banner or a plaque as recognition of your accomplishment?
Title: Re: 33.5
Post by: Tobias on January 01, 2011, 06:36:11 PM
hey, that's great chicat.  would you prefer a banner or a plaque as recognition of your accomplishment?

Thomas Robinson uni?!?!?!
Title: Re: 33.5
Post by: ChiComCat on January 01, 2011, 06:37:25 PM
hey, that's great chicat.  would you prefer a banner or a plaque as recognition of your accomplishment?

FINALLY.  Thanks sys.  I'm not picky tho :dunno:
Title: Re: 33.5
Post by: Trim on January 01, 2011, 06:45:37 PM
Are we going to be able to keep Dimel and Miller?  :ohno:
Title: Re: 33.5
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on January 01, 2011, 06:46:29 PM
three of us are probably the most educated people on this godforsaken pile of crap website.

that's a great point.

Not saying I'm one of the more educated people, but I started some fantastic pro-CCQ threads in my day.  Really thought I was one of the people leading the charge on this.  Sad to see it will not be reflected that way in the history books

you were a faithful foot soldier chicat. my recollections of you will always be fond ones. mizpah.
Title: Re: 33.5
Post by: Tobias on January 01, 2011, 07:18:16 PM
Kevin Smith and I just looked closely and figured out that wasn't a pic of a rat, RD.  'grats!
Title: Re: 33.5
Post by: KSUTOMMY on January 02, 2011, 08:31:21 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fblogtown.portlandmercury.com%2Fimages%2Fblogimages%2F2009%2F04%2F24%2F1240605367-eating_crow.jpg&hash=83f6e74d2fec79ff429293f97ded329de9016fab)

As mentioned in my earlier hatred of Queso - and per these stats, I will have the above. But puh-lease, let's not throw our backs out while trying to give ourselves fellacio, m-kay? Where's the stat on how many times Queso stood there and allowed himself to be sacked?
Title: Re: 33.5
Post by: 0.42 on January 02, 2011, 09:52:19 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fblogtown.portlandmercury.com%2Fimages%2Fblogimages%2F2009%2F04%2F24%2F1240605367-eating_crow.jpg&hash=83f6e74d2fec79ff429293f97ded329de9016fab)

As mentioned in my earlier hatred of Queso - and per these stats, I will have the above. But puh-lease, let's not throw our backs out while trying to give ourselves fellacio, m-kay? Where's the stat on how many times Queso stood there and allowed himself to be sacked?

This is essentially my position. If he had learned the basic concept of throwing the ball away when flushed out of the pocket, then he would've been much less frustrating to watch. He also cost us any real chance at comebacks against Missouri and Oklahoma State, although the defense probably would've mumped up any attempt at a comeback anyway.

But yes, defense was the true cancer this season, not CCQ.
Title: Re: 33.5
Post by: Panjandrum on January 02, 2011, 09:58:09 AM
who cares about any of that when we can just sit around and bitch about coffman? a good qb and cats were in the national title hunt. i'm convinced of it.

i like coffman because he helped me realize that i know more about fball than all you 'tards that watch the games.

if you're saying that you didn't mind coffman then congrats. it was basically you, me and chingon. not surprising though given that the three of us are probably the most educated people on this godforsaken pile of crap website.

hey screw you. I've been defending Queso on BOTC lately, to no avail. May need to use these stats.

To be fair, the person you're defending him to is so adamantly against him that there is no way to win that argument.  I like him a lot, but I've had to talk him down on the Coffman hate.

That said, I'm still very glad that I don't ever have to watch him play football at Kansas State University ever again.
Title: Re: 33.5
Post by: WillieWatanabe on January 02, 2011, 12:09:20 PM
who cares about any of that when we can just sit around and bitch about coffman? a good qb and cats were in the national title hunt. i'm convinced of it.

i like coffman because he helped me realize that i know more about fball than all you 'tards that watch the games.

if you're saying that you didn't mind coffman then congrats. it was basically you, me and chingon. not surprising though given that the three of us are probably the most educated people on this godforsaken pile of crap website.

hey screw you. I've been defending Queso on BOTC lately, to no avail. May need to use these stats.

To be fair, the person you're defending him to is so adamantly against him that there is no way to win that argument.  I like him a lot, but I've had to talk him down on the Coffman hate.

That said, I'm still very glad that I don't ever have to watch him play football at Kansas State University ever again.

yeah, I'll just leave it alone, but if something is brought up again, I'll link to _FAN's blogpost.
Title: Re: 33.5
Post by: Trim on January 02, 2011, 12:19:07 PM
The Coffman Era:

http://www.kstatesports.com/blog/2011/01/coffman-it-didnt-all-go-as-planned.html
Title: Re: 33.5
Post by: Skipper44 on January 02, 2011, 01:35:08 PM
Division 1-A Quarterback ratings:


Carson Coffman 143.1   #30   



2008(Starting NFL QB)  Josh Freeman 136.5



Ronny should have listened when the powertards said "put the white boy in"
Ronny should have listened the powertards and "put the white boy in"