goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Basketball is hard => Topic started by: CrushNasty on December 22, 2010, 09:18:01 PM

Title: I would be willing to put a lot of money on Jamar...
Post by: CrushNasty on December 22, 2010, 09:18:01 PM
Being involved in the most "double foul" calls per minute played. OF ALL TIME. 

It happens a ridic amount of times w/ him.

It just makes me  :lol: everytime.


 :thumbsup:
Title: Re: I would be willing to put a lot of money on Jamar...
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 22, 2010, 09:28:34 PM
I have never seen a double foul called that I agree with.
Title: Re: I would be willing to put a lot of money on Jamar...
Post by: kso_FAN on December 22, 2010, 09:33:06 PM
I have never seen a double foul called that I agree with.

Most of the time an official just uses it as a bail out b/c they really didn't see what happened.
Title: Re: I would be willing to put a lot of money on Jamar...
Post by: MakeItRain on December 22, 2010, 11:06:46 PM
I pointed this out in chat, but the officials using replay to determine the parties of that double foul is a blatant misuse of the replay rule.  You can not use replay to see who commits a non-flagrant foul.  Jamar got screwed.
Title: Re: I would be willing to put a lot of money on Jamar...
Post by: Deez Nutz on December 23, 2010, 12:23:36 AM
Remember that one last year at ku and the guy literally had Jamar around his neck and threw him down on the floor?  That one was even worse than this one.
Title: Re: I would be willing to put a lot of money on Jamar...
Post by: kougar24 on December 23, 2010, 12:25:53 AM
John Higgins and crew effing something up? I refuse to believe that.
Title: Re: I would be willing to put a lot of money on Jamar...
Post by: slimz on December 23, 2010, 12:31:01 AM
I pointed this out in chat, but the officials using replay to determine the parties of that double foul is a blatant misuse of the replay rule.  You can not use replay to see who commits a non-flagrant foul.  Jamar got screwed.

It was as pathetic a display of officiating as I've seen by a college-level crew in a long time. The guy who made the call was standing over there by the table, clearly unsure of who the foul was on.  He just blew his whistle because some guy landed on the floor. HUGE officiating no-no...making the call when you don't actually see the foul occur. If you see the foul occur, then you keep looking down there until you've got the #.
Title: Re: I would be willing to put a lot of money on Jamar...
Post by: unleashthemob on December 23, 2010, 04:24:19 AM
Sorry, but this game had the whole Los Vegas feel to it...I mean like the 2 top players suspended hours before game and a suspect officiating crew, whole thing smelled....don't think we were ever meant to win this!
Title: Re: I would be willing to put a lot of money on Jamar...
Post by: KSUTOMMY on December 23, 2010, 07:59:20 AM
Remember that one last year at ku and the guy literally had Jamar around his neck and threw him down on the floor?  That one was even worse than this one.

Like it was yesterday, looking forward to this year - if were not up by 10 with a minute to go, we lose.
Title: Re: I would be willing to put a lot of money on Jamar...
Post by: Saulbadguy on December 23, 2010, 08:03:30 AM
I pointed this out in chat, but the officials using replay to determine the parties of that double foul is a blatant misuse of the replay rule.  You can not use replay to see who commits a non-flagrant foul.  Jamar got screwed.
Jamar wanted it called on him because he only had 1 foul, and Freddy would have gotten his 4th.
Title: Re: I would be willing to put a lot of money on Jamar...
Post by: kougar24 on December 23, 2010, 09:15:15 AM
I pointed this out in chat, but the officials using replay to determine the parties of that double foul is a blatant misuse of the replay rule.  You can not use replay to see who commits a non-flagrant foul.  Jamar got screwed.
Jamar wanted it called on him because he only had 1 foul, and Freddy would have gotten his 4th.

Please. If Freddy would have fouled out sooner we might have won the game.
Title: Re: I would be willing to put a lot of money on Jamar...
Post by: wetwillie on December 23, 2010, 09:20:55 AM
I pointed this out in chat, but the officials using replay to determine the parties of that double foul is a blatant misuse of the replay rule.  You can not use replay to see who commits a non-flagrant foul.  Jamar got screwed.
Jamar wanted it called on him because he only had 1 foul, and Freddy would have gotten his 4th.

Please. If Freddy would have fouled out sooner we might have won the game.

I have been eyeing a spot on the hate freddy bandwagon but the price seems too high, are you running any specials this week kougs?
Title: Re: I would be willing to put a lot of money on Jamar...
Post by: Saulbadguy on December 23, 2010, 10:04:43 AM
I pointed this out in chat, but the officials using replay to determine the parties of that double foul is a blatant misuse of the replay rule.  You can not use replay to see who commits a non-flagrant foul.  Jamar got screwed.
Jamar wanted it called on him because he only had 1 foul, and Freddy would have gotten his 4th.

Please. If Freddy would have fouled out sooner we might have won the game.
I was close enough to hear the conversation.