goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: EMAWmeister on December 13, 2010, 12:24:27 PM

Title: "Legends" and "Leaders"
Post by: EMAWmeister on December 13, 2010, 12:24:27 PM
GMAFB Big 10, you pretentious group of douche nozzles.   :bang:
Title: Re: "Legends" and "Leaders"
Post by: WildcatNkilt on December 13, 2010, 12:47:01 PM
LMAO


Quote
We've had plenty of leaders in the conference, that's for sure, but the emphasis here is to recognize the mission of using intercollegiate athletics and higher education to build future leaders.

 :barf:


Quote
The logo is a block "Big Ten" which includes an homage to the original 10 members with those numerals embedded in the last two letters of the word Big.
   :facepalm:

Quote
And, no, the conference never seriously considered putting a 12 in its logo or changing its well-known brand name to include the number of members today.

NU will always be "the other guy" in the conference. 
Title: Re: "Legends" and "Leaders"
Post by: j rake on December 13, 2010, 01:07:04 PM
Pictured here, Big 10 commish Jim Delany:

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Faboutbreakingup.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2010%2F01%2Fegg-on-face1-295x300.jpg&hash=688aeb04dec6dec340b617486d1c2e66e2e8c700)
Title: Re: "Legends" and "Leaders"
Post by: EMAWmeister on December 13, 2010, 01:28:32 PM
The Big 10 coach of the year will receive the "Hayes-Shembechler" trophy.  Are there two people since the beginning of time that hate each other as much as Bo and Woody?
Title: Re: "Legends" and "Leaders"
Post by: theKSU on December 13, 2010, 01:42:01 PM
I bet Tom Osborne is thrilled. 
Title: Re: "Legends" and "Leaders"
Post by: MadCat on December 13, 2010, 01:55:15 PM
Cannot believe the Big 10 is disregarding the history/tradition of the greatest fans of college football.
Title: Re: "Legends" and "Leaders"
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 13, 2010, 02:32:07 PM
It doesn't appear any of the awards the Big 10 will hand out reference any Cornhole "legends".

Title: Re: "Legends" and "Leaders"
Post by: AbeFroman on December 13, 2010, 02:37:40 PM

Quote
We've had plenty of leaders in the conference, that's for sure, but the emphasis here is to recognize the mission of using intercollegiate athletics and higher education to build future leaders.


Does higher education include teaching you that 12 =/= 10
Title: Re: "Legends" and "Leaders"
Post by: Ghost of Stan Parrish on December 13, 2010, 02:49:16 PM
Quote
The logo is a block "Big Ten" which includes an homage to the original 10 members with those numerals embedded in the last two letters of the word Big.
   

Why would you need the numerals 10 embedded in the letters as "an homage" when you are keeping the name as Big 10?

Whatever there, Big 10-10.
Title: Re: "Legends" and "Leaders"
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 13, 2010, 02:51:53 PM
Quote
The logo is a block "Big Ten" which includes an homage to the original 10 members with those numerals embedded in the last two letters of the word Big.
   

Why would you need the numerals 10 embedded in the letters as "an homage" when you are keeping the name as Big 10?

Whatever there, Big 10-10.

The Big 10 is just so embarrassed by Nebraska that they are even starting to question Penn State.
Title: Re: "Legends" and "Leaders"
Post by: MadCat on December 13, 2010, 03:03:33 PM
Quote
The logo is a block "Big Ten" which includes an homage to the original 10 members with those numerals embedded in the last two letters of the word Big.
   

Why would you need the numerals 10 embedded in the letters as "an homage" when you are keeping the name as Big 10?

Whatever there, Big 10-10.

They would have sounded smarter if they just called it a tautology.  What a bunch of academic n00bs (n010bs).
Title: Re: "Legends" and "Leaders"
Post by: WildcatNkilt on January 14, 2013, 04:27:21 PM
Bump

http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/8842536/big-ten-consider-renaming-legends-leaders-divisions-jim-delany-says (http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/8842536/big-ten-consider-renaming-legends-leaders-divisions-jim-delany-says)
Quote
Big Ten commissioner Jim Delany said his league will consider replacing the Legends and Leaders division names in 2014.

A decision could be made by June.

"It's on the table," Delany said.

In 2014, Maryland and Rutgers are scheduled to join the Big Ten. The league must decide what divisions the Terrapins and Scarlet Knights will join and if it will have any current teams change divisions.

The Legends Division consists of Iowa, Michigan, Michigan State, Minnesota, Nebraska and Northwestern; the Leaders Division is Indiana, Illinois, Ohio State, Penn State, Purdue and Wisconsin.

When deciding on division names in December 2010, Delany said the Big Ten "didn't have great options."

"We weren't going to go with 'Bo or Woody,' 'Black or Blue,' or 'Plains or Lakes,' " Delany said. "Obviously we got some acceptance [with Legends and Leaders], but not as much as we would have liked."

Delany said he was a "little surprised" by the backlash when the division names were announced.

"I'm not sure it was a national survey [of people who didn't like the names], but people who hit the 'send' button," Delany said. "I don't take umbrage to negative reaction. I don't necessarily change when I hear it. I think on the other hand, we said we would test-market it, and we have for a couple of years. We have the opportunity to look at it again. I'm sure we will. Whether or not we change or not is to be determined. I don't have any presumption that we'll change on it, but that doesn't mean we're not looking at it.

"I don't think when you try to build something, lead some organization, you don't want to be tone deaf. But it's not up for vote every week."

With Maryland leaving the ACC and Rutgers leaving the Big East, it gives the Big Ten a chance to revisit the division names and makeup of the divisions.

"We have the opportunity to look at the divisional structure, branding, rivalries and geography all again," Delany said. "Depending on what we do will probably influence exactly how we brand it.

"I honestly think building leaders and honoring legends is relevant whether it's a branding campaign or divisional names."

Delany said in the next three to four months, his league would look at the Big Ten's future bowl lineup, divisions, rivalries, branding and "a whole series of related issues."

"Whether or not we change division [names], I don't know," Delany said. "If [the divisions] are not geographic, we are not going to have geographic names."

A bigger question than the Big Ten's future division names is the Big Ten's future. Will the league stay at 14 members or is it looking to get to 16?

In November, Delany said the league was "inactive but alert" as far as future expansion. Delany explained that description last week.

"Someone said monitoring the landscape was a passive process, it wasn't descriptive," Delany said. "The fact of it is we were 'inactive' and 'not alert' for 22 years as we had 11 members, then we announced we were going to [expand] and that was a circus for months and months and upset a lot of people.

"We thought there was more risk in the status quo than in change, so we acted [by adding Maryland and Rutgers].

"The question is: Where are you?" Delany said. "We're 'inactive,' but is 'alert' different than 'monitoring the landscape?' I don't know, I can't make a qualitative difference. We study it and keep our eyes and ears attuned to what's happening in the real world. We're focusing on other things [than expansion] right now -- focusing on integrating Rutgers and Maryland into the league."
Title: Re: "Legends" and "Leaders"
Post by: MadCat on January 14, 2013, 04:59:04 PM
Rust Belt
Corn Belt
Title: Re: "Legends" and "Leaders"
Post by: CNS on January 14, 2013, 05:03:45 PM
Nebraska

Beat Nebraska
Title: Re: "Legends" and "Leaders"
Post by: Emo EMAW on January 14, 2013, 07:53:20 PM
Probationers
Probationers Soon
Title: "Legends" and "Leaders"
Post by: puniraptor on January 14, 2013, 07:56:07 PM
Violators
Perpetrators
Title: Re: "Legends" and "Leaders"
Post by: MadCat on January 14, 2013, 07:59:11 PM
Smart
Dumbraska
Title: Re: "Legends" and "Leaders"
Post by: Scary Smart on January 14, 2013, 08:45:26 PM
Slow
White
Title: Re: "Legends" and "Leaders"
Post by: The Big Train on January 14, 2013, 08:50:41 PM
Predators
Pretenders
Title: Re: "Legends" and "Leaders"
Post by: star seed 7 on January 14, 2013, 09:02:04 PM
used to be good
never was good
Title: Re: "Legends" and "Leaders"
Post by: Pittcat on January 15, 2013, 06:59:21 AM
Slow
White Not Fast

White works too, I guess.
Title: Re: "Legends" and "Leaders"
Post by: steve dave on January 15, 2013, 08:00:14 AM
stupid idiots who I hate that suck
puds
Title: Re: "Legends" and "Leaders"
Post by: bubbles4ksu on January 15, 2013, 08:22:32 AM
bball schools
wrestling schools
Title: Re: "Legends" and "Leaders"
Post by: bigwillie20 on January 15, 2013, 08:42:12 AM
Boy rapers
Girl rapers
Title: Re: "Legends" and "Leaders"
Post by: Mr Bread on January 17, 2013, 04:51:09 PM
stupid idiots who I hate that suck
puds

steves
daves
Title: Re: "Legends" and "Leaders"
Post by: EMAWesome on January 17, 2013, 05:06:27 PM
Hatfields
McCoys
Title: Re: "Legends" and "Leaders"
Post by: Mr Bread on January 17, 2013, 05:46:50 PM
Hoots
Dongs
Title: Re: "Legends" and "Leaders"
Post by: slobber on January 17, 2013, 07:51:23 PM
Former Lingerie Models
Muscular Women
Title: Re: "Legends" and "Leaders"
Post by: Katpappy on January 17, 2013, 08:02:06 PM
Bungholes
Taints
Title: Re: "Legends" and "Leaders"
Post by: MadCat on January 17, 2013, 08:25:26 PM
Hoots
Dongs
:lol:
Title: Re: "Legends" and "Leaders"
Post by: DQ12 on January 17, 2013, 08:28:50 PM
Friends of EMAW
Not friends of EMAW
Title: Re: "Legends" and "Leaders"
Post by: Emo EMAW on January 18, 2013, 09:10:08 AM
Iron Smelters
Boy Felters
Title: "Legends" and "Leaders"
Post by: felix rex on January 19, 2013, 09:06:08 AM
Hoots
Dongs

lol
Title: Re: "Legends" and "Leaders"
Post by: EMAWmeister on January 22, 2013, 02:10:01 PM
Mountain West divisions to be named "Mountain" and "West". I like it.
Title: Re: "Legends" and "Leaders"
Post by: TheHamburglar on January 22, 2013, 02:41:25 PM
Mountain West divisions to be named "Mountain" and "West". I like it.

 :thumbs: