goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Basketball is hard => Topic started by: CHONGS on December 13, 2010, 09:39:05 AM

Title: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: CHONGS on December 13, 2010, 09:39:05 AM
From theNewPhog.com

http://www.wavingthewheat.com/index.php/topic,2653.0.html

....the suspense.....

 :kugoalposts:

Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: Saulbadguy on December 13, 2010, 09:43:59 AM
 :surprised:
Quote
CLICK HERE! Horny Matches Adult Dating
Find Out For Yourself Why Even Ugly Guys Get Laid Here:
Are These Girls Hookers? NO!
They Are Real Horny Girls Who Need A Horny Partner!!!
CLICK HERE! Horny Matches Adult Dating

Myriad full-grown dating sites are also referred to as bonking dating websites. They gather it clear to visitors that the members are looking in the direction of a sympathetic in days of yore with no strings attached. We adjust our comet ratings by prepossessing into account the feedback we receive from visitors who have planned used these sites. We pay attention to to users and if we be subjected to what we deem to be too many argumentative reaction there a placement, then we purpose say so and we won't advise it. We do our best to give an unbiased exact rating of of age dating services. The the greater part of adult dating websites make available a free dating affliction so you can whack at the features elementary in the vanguard deciding if its worth paying repayment for the supernumerary features. We require that you send us your experiences with the adult or relations dating sites listed in this directory. These want cure us to make our rating scheme as precise as possible.
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: CHONGS on December 13, 2010, 09:46:28 AM
:surprised:
Quote
CLICK HERE! Horny Matches Adult Dating
Find Out For Yourself Why Even Ugly Guys Get Laid Here:
Are These Girls Hookers? NO!
They Are Real Horny Girls Who Need A Horny Partner!!!
CLICK HERE! Horny Matches Adult Dating

Myriad full-grown dating sites are also referred to as bonking dating websites. They gather it clear to visitors that the members are looking in the direction of a sympathetic in days of yore with no strings attached. We adjust our comet ratings by prepossessing into account the feedback we receive from visitors who have planned used these sites. We pay attention to to users and if we be subjected to what we deem to be too many argumentative reaction there a placement, then we purpose say so and we won't advise it. We do our best to give an unbiased exact rating of of age dating services. The the greater part of adult dating websites make available a free dating affliction so you can whack at the features elementary in the vanguard deciding if its worth paying repayment for the supernumerary features. We require that you send us your experiences with the adult or relations dating sites listed in this directory. These want cure us to make our rating scheme as precise as possible.
:horrorsurprise:
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: WillieWatanabe on December 13, 2010, 09:56:12 AM
Quote
National Titles
This category will include both NCAA titles and Helms titles that were not won in the same year.

:lol: :flush:
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: pissclams on December 13, 2010, 10:13:13 AM
it's not arrogance if its true!!!!
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: michigancat on December 13, 2010, 10:24:31 AM
That's freaking sweet.  I love how UNC's 1 national title lead has the same value as KU's 10 game all-time win lead.
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: pissclams on December 13, 2010, 10:34:41 AM
kentucky benefitted from a crappy sec.  had nothing to do with kentucky being really good all those years.
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: Saulbadguy on December 13, 2010, 10:44:28 AM
That's freaking sweet.  I love how UNC's 1 national title lead has the same value as KU's 10 game all-time win lead.
I figured the rebel board would lead to a rebel mindset...guess not.
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: pissclams on December 13, 2010, 10:49:56 AM
That's freaking sweet.  I love how UNC's 1 national title lead has the same value as KU's 10 game all-time win lead.
I figured the rebel board would lead to a rebel mindset...guess not.

it never really did.  the entire phog.net group think transferred to the new site with no problems.  the only difference between their two boards is that one allows them to swear and post pics of EDF and the other doesn't.
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: hemmy on December 13, 2010, 10:58:06 AM
Gem of a thread. My favorite is "Tradition"
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: GetVocalwithCurt on December 13, 2010, 11:00:00 AM
Loved when the guy said that kansas was responsible for the kentucky and unc programs because smith and rupp were assistants at ku. does that mean k-state is responsible for 10 NBA championships because of tex winter? :ck:
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: Kat Kid on December 13, 2010, 11:00:46 AM
That's freaking sweet.  I love how UNC's 1 national title lead has the same value as KU's 10 game all-time win lead.
I figured the rebel board would lead to a rebel mindset...guess not.

it never really did.  the entire phog.net group think transferred to the new site with no problems.  the only difference between their two boards is that one allows them to swear and post pics of EDF and the other doesn't.

"Home Court Advantage"
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: hemmy on December 13, 2010, 11:12:11 AM
Loved when the guy said that kansas was responsible for the kentucky and unc programs because smith and rupp were assistants at ku. does that mean k-state is responsible for 10 NBA championships because of tex winter? :ck:

Also, I think that makes us responsible for modern era OU football, KU's orange bowl, etc.
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: AbeFroman on December 13, 2010, 11:36:37 AM
That's freaking sweet.  I love how UNC's 1 national title lead has the same value as KU's 10 game all-time win lead.
Probably has to do with the fact that ku should have won the title in 2010, 2003, 1991, etc.
Clearly ku should have several more national titles than they really do, it's just fluke that they didn't win any of those tournaments.
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 13, 2010, 11:40:42 AM
Conference titles are worth just as much as national championships. That makes sense.
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: OregonSmock on December 13, 2010, 11:57:25 AM
Conference titles are worth just as much as national championships. That makes sense.



Actually, he went back and weighted everything, and the results stayed the same. 
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: WillieWatanabe on December 13, 2010, 12:01:42 PM
Conference titles are worth just as much as national championships. That makes sense.



Actually, he went back and weighted everything, and the results stayed the same. 

:lol:
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: GetVocalwithCurt on December 13, 2010, 12:05:17 PM
Loved when the guy said that kansas was responsible for the kentucky and unc programs because smith and rupp were assistants at ku. does that mean k-state is responsible for 10 NBA championships because of tex winter? :ck:

Also, I think that makes us responsible for modern era OU football, KU's orange bowl, etc.

Banner time?
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: AbeFroman on December 13, 2010, 12:08:51 PM
Loved when the guy said that kansas was responsible for the kentucky and unc programs because smith and rupp were assistants at ku. does that mean k-state is responsible for 10 NBA championships because of tex winter? :ck:

Also, I think that makes us responsible for modern era OU football, KU's orange bowl, etc.
God damn we are awesome. Probably the best school ever.  :gocho:
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: T42YS on December 13, 2010, 12:11:13 PM
Been meaning to troll that thread, but I keep getting distracted by chemhawk :emawkid:
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: EMAWzified on December 13, 2010, 12:22:44 PM
Quote
Probably has to do with the fact that ku should have won the title in 2010, 2003, 1991, etc.
Clearly ku should have several more national titles than they really do, it's just fluke that they didn't win any of those tournaments.
They got compensation Helms NCs for those years.
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: OregonSmock on December 13, 2010, 12:23:51 PM
The lack of any real discussion on this subject says all you need to know about K-State basketball.
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: Pete on December 13, 2010, 12:35:21 PM
The lack of any real discussion on this subject says all you need to know about K-State basketball.

 :jerk:
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: WillieWatanabe on December 13, 2010, 12:36:24 PM
The lack of any real discussion on this subject says all you need to know about K-State basketball.

:lol:
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: Saulbadguy on December 13, 2010, 12:45:02 PM
The University of Kansas needs to be docked several points for being on probation during, or around the same time it won its 3 National Titles.
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: OregonSmock on December 13, 2010, 12:46:01 PM
Quick... name another program besides KU basketball that hasn't had a "down" year in the past 20+ years.  
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: _33 on December 13, 2010, 12:53:21 PM
Quick... name another program besides KU basketball that hasn't had a "down" year in the past 20+ years.  

Quick... name several programs besides KU who have had multiple "down" years in the past 20 years but still have more than 1 national title in that span.
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: Ghost of Stan Parrish on December 13, 2010, 12:53:55 PM
Quick... name another program besides KU basketball that hasn't had a "down" year in the past 20+ years.  

You've convinced me.  KU is the Greatest All-Time Best Program.   :surprised:
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: deputy dawg on December 13, 2010, 12:54:30 PM
Does ku have a winning record against those other programs?  I was under the impression that ku had losing records to all of them.
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: Dugout DickStone on December 13, 2010, 12:57:20 PM
This is better than a husker thread
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: OregonSmock on December 13, 2010, 01:00:44 PM
Quick... name another program besides KU basketball that hasn't had a "down" year in the past 20+ years.  

Quick... name several programs besides KU who have had multiple "down" years in the past 20 years but still have more than 1 national title in that span.



KU has two national titles in the past 20+ years. 
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: _33 on December 13, 2010, 01:02:57 PM
Does ku have a winning record against those other programs?  I was under the impression that ku had losing records to all of them.

Kentucky owns the series record 19-6.  :horrorsurprise:

UCLA owns the series record 10-5.  :surprised:
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: Pete on December 13, 2010, 01:03:35 PM
Quick... name another program besides KU basketball that hasn't had a "down" year in the past 20+ years.  

Quick... name several programs besides KU who have had multiple "down" years in the past 20 years but still have more than 1 national title in that span.




KU has two national titles in the past 20+ years.  

FYI, every school that has more than one championship has two in the past 20+ years.  go cats.
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: OregonSmock on December 13, 2010, 01:09:30 PM
Quick... name another program besides KU basketball that hasn't had a "down" year in the past 20+ years.  

Quick... name several programs besides KU who have had multiple "down" years in the past 20 years but still have more than 1 national title in that span.




KU has two national titles in the past 20+ years.  

FYI, every school that has more than one championship has two in the past 20+ years.  go cats.




Do all of them have seven Final Fours? 
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: WillieWatanabe on December 13, 2010, 01:11:42 PM
This is better than a husker thread
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 13, 2010, 01:12:46 PM
Quick... name another program besides KU basketball that hasn't had a "down" year in the past 20+ years.  

Quick... name several programs besides KU who have had multiple "down" years in the past 20 years but still have more than 1 national title in that span.



KU has two national titles in the past 20+ years. 

Only 2?
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: _33 on December 13, 2010, 01:16:05 PM
Duke owns the series record 6-2.   :blank:
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: GetVocalwithCurt on December 13, 2010, 01:33:13 PM
Duke owns the series record 6-2.   :blank:

to be the best you just have to avoid playing the best when it matters.
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: pissclams on December 13, 2010, 01:36:06 PM
if ku isn't found to be the bluest of the blue bloods then it's the conference's fault for not being better and making ku stronger.
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: EMAWmeister on December 13, 2010, 01:53:24 PM
I love how anyone can even think that it isn't UCLA.
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: Poster formerly known as jthutch on December 13, 2010, 01:53:58 PM
Does ku have a winning record against those other programs?  I was under the impression that ku had losing records to all of them.

Yeah this should be put into account on there little chart thingy.  Also Tradition  :blah: :blah:  :lol: :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: OregonSmock on December 13, 2010, 02:26:07 PM
I love how anyone can even think that it isn't UCLA.



It's not UCLA. 
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: Saulbadguy on December 13, 2010, 02:29:39 PM
I mentioned KU to a Duke fan at the Sprint Center and he just laughed. 
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: Dirty Deeds on December 13, 2010, 02:34:29 PM
Need another category for D league All Stars.
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: bakerman on December 13, 2010, 02:39:37 PM
That whole thread reeks of desperation...  I'm betting Duke, NC, UK1 and UCLA don't go around throwing in as many different categories as it takes to make them look like the best program of all time....
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: nicname on December 13, 2010, 02:40:52 PM
There is no doubt that KU bball is really good and one of the top programs in history.  Still, I found it humorous that the OP basically "made up" the final two categories, placing KU in the 1 position in both of them and thus earning the most points.  

Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 13, 2010, 02:45:49 PM
kentucky benefitted from a crappy sec.  had nothing to do with kentucky being really good all those years.

I love seeing this talking point from Kansas fans when Kentucky has more national championships and less conference championships than them. It seems that maybe the argument should be applied to Kansas.
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: Poster formerly known as jthutch on December 13, 2010, 02:47:00 PM
There is no doubt that KU bball is really good and one of the top programs in history.  Still, I found it humorous that the OP basically "made up" the final two categories, placing KU in the 1 position in both of them and thus earning the most points.  



This, those catagories are too subjective and should be tossed out.  Or at least have a non biased observer make the call on Tradition and Home court advantage (I have a Canadian Friend who might make help).
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: OregonSmock on December 13, 2010, 02:52:14 PM
Need another category for D league All Stars.


Signed,

Denis Clemente

(and-soon-to-be Jacob Pullen)
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: Dugout DickStone on December 13, 2010, 02:57:18 PM
I mentioned KU to a Duke fan at the Sprint Center and he just laughed. 

Fact.  I tried to defend them....but no, when you bring up Helms titles, you have lost.  I was shamed
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: ChiComCat on December 13, 2010, 03:07:50 PM
I like how national titles and this "tradition" are weighted as the same

AND KU STILL CAME OUT AHEAD  :horrorsurprise:
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: Dirty Deeds on December 13, 2010, 03:18:56 PM
Need another category for D league All Stars.


Signed,

Denis Clemente

(and-soon-to-be Jacob Pullen)
We recruit D league players efftard.
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: sys on December 13, 2010, 03:27:35 PM
glad our fans aren't prone to spewing self-inflating pablum.  because we have a great deal we could annoy the rest of the big 12 with.  inventing the tutor, for example.

Quote
These kids get a ton of academic support to help them through school (KSU was an innovator in this area, and the rest of the nation has followed suit with their student-athletes).
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: FP TC etc. on December 13, 2010, 06:19:20 PM
Denis isn't in the d-league  :ck:
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: CrushNasty on December 13, 2010, 07:58:18 PM
Need another category for D league All Stars.


Signed,

Denis Clemente

(and-soon-to-be Jacob Pullen)

Missed where we were trying to be the bluest?

Also I had to research what a Helms title actually was.  :frown:
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: Saulbadguy on December 13, 2010, 09:15:45 PM
Need another category for D league All Stars.


Signed,

Denis Clemente

(and-soon-to-be Jacob Pullen)

Missed where we were trying to be the bluest?

Also I had to research what a Helms title actually was.  :frown:
It's a pretty LOLworthy day when you actually take the time to research what a Helms title actually is. 

person who reads what a Helms title is for the first time = :lol: :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: blowthewhistle on December 13, 2010, 11:54:27 PM
Beems, congrats on taking home the weighted titles of tradition and home court advantage
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: deputy dawg on December 14, 2010, 01:47:10 PM
You can safely ignore the entire analysis when UCLA comes in 4th using the out-of-your-ass scoring system.  11 national titles and 18 Final 4 appearances apparently aren't as strong as the subjective crap measured in that thread.  What a self-delusional joke.
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: OregonSmock on December 14, 2010, 02:08:51 PM
You can safely ignore the entire analysis when UCLA comes in 4th using the out-of-your-ass scoring system.  11 national titles and 18 Final 4 appearances apparently aren't as strong as the subjective crap measured in that thread.  What a self-delusional joke.



Spoken like someone who doesn't know sh*t about basketball.
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: felix rex on December 14, 2010, 02:14:33 PM
The University of Kansas needs to be docked several points for being on probation during, or around the same time it won its 3 National Titles.

Does being the only school to not be allowed to defend one of its titles fall under "Tradition"?
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: Saulbadguy on December 14, 2010, 02:16:28 PM
The University of Kansas needs to be docked several points for being on probation during, or around the same time it won its 3 National Titles.

Does being the only school to not be allowed to defend one of its titles fall under "Tradition"?
It falls under "haters", which fortunately for KU fans provides positive points.
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: pissclams on December 14, 2010, 02:18:19 PM
You can safely ignore the entire analysis when UCLA comes in 4th using the out-of-your-ass scoring system.  11 national titles and 18 Final 4 appearances apparently aren't as strong as the subjective crap measured in that thread.  What a self-delusional joke.



Spoken like someone who doesn't know sh*t about basketball.

this isn't a basketball thread, it's a let's make fun of the typical ku homer thread.  surely you can understand why we think it's hilarious that a bunch of ku bbs'rs have been pulling together a bunch of crap under the guise of analysis and then awarding themselves the bluest of the blue blood ranking.  

:dunno:
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: OregonSmock on December 14, 2010, 02:37:26 PM
You can safely ignore the entire analysis when UCLA comes in 4th using the out-of-your-ass scoring system.  11 national titles and 18 Final 4 appearances apparently aren't as strong as the subjective crap measured in that thread.  What a self-delusional joke.



Spoken like someone who doesn't know sh*t about basketball.

this isn't a basketball thread, it's a let's make fun of the typical ku homer thread.  surely you can understand why we think it's hilarious that a bunch of ku bbs'rs have been pulling together a bunch of crap under the guise of analysis and then awarding themselves the bluest of the blue blood ranking.  

:dunno:


ESPN ranked KU the 2nd-best program of all-time a couple years ago.  Obviously they're just biased.


 :jerk:
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: pissclams on December 14, 2010, 02:38:59 PM
You can safely ignore the entire analysis when UCLA comes in 4th using the out-of-your-ass scoring system.  11 national titles and 18 Final 4 appearances apparently aren't as strong as the subjective crap measured in that thread.  What a self-delusional joke.



Spoken like someone who doesn't know sh*t about basketball.

this isn't a basketball thread, it's a let's make fun of the typical ku homer thread.  surely you can understand why we think it's hilarious that a bunch of ku bbs'rs have been pulling together a bunch of crap under the guise of analysis and then awarding themselves the bluest of the blue blood ranking. 

:dunno:


ESPN ranked KU the 2nd-best program of all-time a couple years ago.  Obviously they're just biased.


 :jerk:
i guess the guys at waving the wheat know more than the guys at espn
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: OregonSmock on December 14, 2010, 02:49:01 PM
You can safely ignore the entire analysis when UCLA comes in 4th using the out-of-your-ass scoring system.  11 national titles and 18 Final 4 appearances apparently aren't as strong as the subjective crap measured in that thread.  What a self-delusional joke.



Spoken like someone who doesn't know sh*t about basketball.

this isn't a basketball thread, it's a let's make fun of the typical ku homer thread.  surely you can understand why we think it's hilarious that a bunch of ku bbs'rs have been pulling together a bunch of crap under the guise of analysis and then awarding themselves the bluest of the blue blood ranking. 

:dunno:


ESPN ranked KU the 2nd-best program of all-time a couple years ago.  Obviously they're just biased.


 :jerk:
i guess the guys at waving the wheat know more than the guys at espn



Yeah, it takes a real homer to bump a program from 2nd to 1st on an arbitrary "best of all-time" list. 
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: ChiComCat on December 14, 2010, 03:20:33 PM
You can safely ignore the entire analysis when UCLA comes in 4th using the out-of-your-ass scoring system.  11 national titles and 18 Final 4 appearances apparently aren't as strong as the subjective crap measured in that thread.  What a self-delusional joke.



Spoken like someone who doesn't know sh*t about basketball.

this isn't a basketball thread, it's a let's make fun of the typical ku homer thread.  surely you can understand why we think it's hilarious that a bunch of ku bbs'rs have been pulling together a bunch of crap under the guise of analysis and then awarding themselves the bluest of the blue blood ranking. 

:dunno:


ESPN ranked KU the 2nd-best program of all-time a couple years ago.  Obviously they're just biased.


 :jerk:
i guess the guys at waving the wheat know more than the guys at espn



Yeah, it takes a real homer to bump a program from 2nd to 1st on an arbitrary "best of all-time" list. 

It takes a real homer to arbitrarily claim the best tradition and that it is worth as much as someone who has won over twice as many titles
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: AbeFroman on December 14, 2010, 03:30:52 PM
You can safely ignore the entire analysis when UCLA comes in 4th using the out-of-your-ass scoring system.  11 national titles and 18 Final 4 appearances apparently aren't as strong as the subjective crap measured in that thread.  What a self-delusional joke.



Spoken like someone who doesn't know sh*t about basketball.

this isn't a basketball thread, it's a let's make fun of the typical ku homer thread.  surely you can understand why we think it's hilarious that a bunch of ku bbs'rs have been pulling together a bunch of crap under the guise of analysis and then awarding themselves the bluest of the blue blood ranking.  

:dunno:


ESPN ranked KU the 2nd-best program of all-time a couple years ago.  Obviously they're just biased.


 :jerk:
:surprised: :horrorsurprise:
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: pissclams on December 14, 2010, 03:31:53 PM
You can safely ignore the entire analysis when UCLA comes in 4th using the out-of-your-ass scoring system.  11 national titles and 18 Final 4 appearances apparently aren't as strong as the subjective crap measured in that thread.  What a self-delusional joke.



Spoken like someone who doesn't know sh*t about basketball.

this isn't a basketball thread, it's a let's make fun of the typical ku homer thread.  surely you can understand why we think it's hilarious that a bunch of ku bbs'rs have been pulling together a bunch of crap under the guise of analysis and then awarding themselves the bluest of the blue blood ranking. 

:dunno:


ESPN ranked KU the 2nd-best program of all-time a couple years ago.  Obviously they're just biased.


 :jerk:
i guess the guys at waving the wheat know more than the guys at espn



Yeah, it takes a real homer to bump a program from 2nd to 1st on an arbitrary "best of all-time" list. 

It takes a real homer to arbitrarily claim the best tradition and that it is worth as much as someone who has won over twice as many titles

that's pretty much where i was at, thanks chicat.  as always bitb.
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: bakerman on December 14, 2010, 03:35:05 PM
You can safely ignore the entire analysis when UCLA comes in 4th using the out-of-your-ass scoring system.  11 national titles and 18 Final 4 appearances apparently aren't as strong as the subjective crap measured in that thread.  What a self-delusional joke.



Spoken like someone who doesn't know sh*t about basketball.

this isn't a basketball thread, it's a let's make fun of the typical ku homer thread.  surely you can understand why we think it's hilarious that a bunch of ku bbs'rs have been pulling together a bunch of crap under the guise of analysis and then awarding themselves the bluest of the blue blood ranking. 

:dunno:


ESPN ranked KU the 2nd-best program of all-time a couple years ago.  Obviously they're just biased.


 :jerk:
i guess the guys at waving the wheat know more than the guys at espn



Yeah, it takes a real homer to bump a program from 2nd to 1st on an arbitrary "best of all-time" list. 

It takes a real homer to arbitrarily claim the best tradition and that it is worth as much as someone who has won over twice as many titles

that's pretty much where i was at, thanks chicat.  as always bitb.

You guys will just never get it.... Don't you understand that KU hired the guy who stole credit for inventing the game, thereby everyone who is ever a fan of KU will always know far more about basketball than anyone else ever will?
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: WillieWatanabe on December 14, 2010, 03:57:31 PM
You can safely ignore the entire analysis when UCLA comes in 4th using the out-of-your-ass scoring system.  11 national titles and 18 Final 4 appearances apparently aren't as strong as the subjective crap measured in that thread.  What a self-delusional joke.



Spoken like someone who doesn't know sh*t about basketball.

this isn't a basketball thread, it's a let's make fun of the typical ku homer thread.  surely you can understand why we think it's hilarious that a bunch of ku bbs'rs have been pulling together a bunch of crap under the guise of analysis and then awarding themselves the bluest of the blue blood ranking. 

:dunno:


ESPN ranked KU the 2nd-best program of all-time a couple years ago.  Obviously they're just biased.


 :jerk:
i guess the guys at waving the wheat know more than the guys at espn



Yeah, it takes a real homer to bump a program from 2nd to 1st on an arbitrary "best of all-time" list. 

It takes a real homer to bump them from 3rd to 2nd for no reason.

http://assets.espn.go.com/photo/2009/1004/cbe1.pdf
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: OregonSmock on December 14, 2010, 04:11:09 PM
You can safely ignore the entire analysis when UCLA comes in 4th using the out-of-your-ass scoring system.  11 national titles and 18 Final 4 appearances apparently aren't as strong as the subjective crap measured in that thread.  What a self-delusional joke.



Spoken like someone who doesn't know sh*t about basketball.

this isn't a basketball thread, it's a let's make fun of the typical ku homer thread.  surely you can understand why we think it's hilarious that a bunch of ku bbs'rs have been pulling together a bunch of crap under the guise of analysis and then awarding themselves the bluest of the blue blood ranking. 

:dunno:


ESPN ranked KU the 2nd-best program of all-time a couple years ago.  Obviously they're just biased.


 :jerk:
i guess the guys at waving the wheat know more than the guys at espn



Yeah, it takes a real homer to bump a program from 2nd to 1st on an arbitrary "best of all-time" list. 

It takes a real homer to arbitrarily claim the best tradition and that it is worth as much as someone who has won over twice as many titles

that's pretty much where i was at, thanks chicat.  as always bitb.



UCLA won 10 of 11 titles in a 12-year span.  They don't have the consistency that programs like KU, Kentucky, and UNC have. 
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: ChiComCat on December 14, 2010, 04:38:04 PM
Three consecutive final fours from 2006-08.  Pretty inconsistent
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: OregonSmock on December 14, 2010, 04:43:15 PM
Three consecutive final fours from 2006-08.  Pretty inconsistent


They didn't even make the NIT last year.
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: ChiComCat on December 14, 2010, 04:48:46 PM
Three consecutive final fours from 2006-08.  Pretty inconsistent


They didn't even make the NIT last year.

:horrorsurprise:  The 11 national titles are invalidated then.  Tear down the banners!!! 

Was there a category for at least making the NIT last year?  Are we sure its weighted enough?
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: OregonSmock on December 14, 2010, 04:54:26 PM
Three consecutive final fours from 2006-08.  Pretty inconsistent


They didn't even make the NIT last year.

:horrorsurprise:  The 11 national titles are invalidated then.  Tear down the banners!!! 

Was there a category for at least making the NIT last year?  Are we sure its weighted enough?



It's really not surprising that you're most impressed with the program that had a decade of dominance.  I'm sure they even made a DVD for it. 
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: Cartierfor3 on December 14, 2010, 04:58:36 PM

Quote
UCLA won 10 of 11 titles in a 12-year span.  They don't have the consistency that programs like KU, Kentucky, and UNC have. 


or the tradition
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: PowercatPat on December 14, 2010, 05:12:36 PM
I can't believe they think KU has the best bball program of all time. KU has 3 national championships, and helms titles do not count- KU fans are the only ones that count them. UCLA has almost 4 times as many national titles as KU. UCLA, UK, and UNC are all historically better than KU.
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: ben ji on December 14, 2010, 05:15:48 PM
Three consecutive final fours from 2006-08.  Pretty inconsistent


They didn't even make the NIT last year.

:horrorsurprise:  The 11 national titles are invalidated then.  Tear down the banners!!! 

Was there a category for at least making the NIT last year?  Are we sure its weighted enough?



It's really not surprising that you're most impressed with the program that had a decade of dominance.  I'm sure they even made a DVD for it. 

Burn
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: ChiComCat on December 14, 2010, 05:20:05 PM
Three consecutive final fours from 2006-08.  Pretty inconsistent


They didn't even make the NIT last year.

:horrorsurprise:  The 11 national titles are invalidated then.  Tear down the banners!!! 

Was there a category for at least making the NIT last year?  Are we sure its weighted enough?



It's really not surprising that you're most impressed with the program that had a decade of dominance.  I'm sure they even made a DVD for it. 

I'm impressed with a program that wins 11 NC no matter when they do it.  Its still 11 NCs.  But come up with your reason to discounts everyones accomplishments that are that much greater than your own.  Its entertaining.
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: Dugout DickStone on December 14, 2010, 05:21:08 PM
Three consecutive final fours from 2006-08.  Pretty inconsistent


They didn't even make the NIT last year.

Three consecutive final fours from 2006-08.  Pretty inconsistent

Ben is a basketball noob.
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: Dirty Deeds on December 14, 2010, 05:22:50 PM
Don't forget your Power Towel, Ben.  Will come in handy cleaning up the load you launch on your tummy tonight.
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: ChiComCat on December 14, 2010, 05:28:23 PM
I also like how Helms/real NCs in the same year dont count.  Good thing performing in the tourny proves nothing I guess :dunno:
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: 06wildcat on December 14, 2010, 05:33:38 PM
Quick... name another program besides KU basketball that hasn't had a "down" year in the past 20+ years.  

Quick... name several programs besides KU who have had multiple "down" years in the past 20 years but still have more than 1 national title in that span.


 


KU has two national titles in the past 20+ years.  

FYI, every school that has more than one championship has two in the past 20+ years.  go cats.




Do all of them have seven Final Fours?  

:facepalm:
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: Immaculate1 on December 14, 2010, 05:54:15 PM
The numbers don't lie. Kentucky is the best. The only thing KU has on Kentucky is that they handed them their worst loss ever.

Aside from that, I'd say KU and UNC are fighting for 3rd.

Duke isn't even in the all time top 5.
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: Immaculate1 on December 14, 2010, 05:58:22 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kentucky_basketball#Cumulative_All_Time_Statistics

That's all you really need to see....
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: Cire on December 14, 2010, 07:10:17 PM
What a bunch of homers
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: OregonSmock on December 14, 2010, 07:31:53 PM
The numbers don't lie. Kentucky is the best. The only thing KU has on Kentucky is that they handed them their worst loss ever.

Aside from that, I'd say KU and UNC are fighting for 3rd.

Duke isn't even in the all time top 5.



I mostly agree, but here's how I see it:


1.  Kentucky
2.  Kansas/UNC
4.  UCLA
5.  Duke
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: Stevesie60 on December 14, 2010, 07:40:08 PM
 :bait:
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: Trim on December 14, 2010, 09:40:49 PM
I'm going to make some calls in the upcoming weeks to see if we can bring together the goEMAW championship committee in for a special session to analyze this question.
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: ChiComCat on December 14, 2010, 09:51:38 PM
I'm going to make some calls in the upcoming weeks to see if we can bring together the goEMAW championship committee in for a special session to analyze this question.

Are you calling for a goEMAW BLUE-ribbon panel to decide the BLUEst of the BLUE bloods?
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: Trim on December 14, 2010, 10:03:56 PM
I'm going to make some calls in the upcoming weeks to see if we can bring together the goEMAW championship committee in for a special session to analyze this question.

Are you calling for a goEMAW BLUE-ribbon panel to decide the BLUEst of the BLUE bloods?

You know it.
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: Emo EMAW on March 07, 2014, 04:01:25 PM
http://www.foxnews.com/sports/2014/02/26/after-years-spent-on-life-support-term-mid-major-finally-dies-in-college/?intcmp=obnetwork

Quote
Mid-major had been on life support for nearly a decade as schools such as George Mason, VCU, Butler and Wichita State crashed the Final Four. What had been the bastion of blue bloods such as North Carolina, Kentucky and Duke was thrown open to schools with tiny enrollments and modest fan bases, yet enough talent to shake up the college basketball establishment.
Title: Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
Post by: eastcat on March 07, 2014, 11:51:00 PM
1. Kentucky
2. UCLA
3. Indiana
3. UNC
4. Duke
5. San Francisco/Cincinnati/NC State/oSu/UConn/KU