goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Other Sports (Tiger's Back) => Topic started by: OregonSmock on December 07, 2010, 02:59:42 PM

Title: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: OregonSmock on December 07, 2010, 02:59:42 PM
...if the Board of Governors approves the sale of the team.   


 :excited:
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: Cire on December 07, 2010, 03:03:37 PM
BITB
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: WillieWatanabe on December 07, 2010, 03:03:57 PM
wow, he's really going out on a limb there.
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: OregonSmock on December 07, 2010, 03:19:28 PM
BITB:  KU basketball will be most effected by an NBA franchise, since KU basketball is basically the third professional team in the KC metro.


 :ohno:
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: Pett on December 07, 2010, 03:54:00 PM
Man, that'd be great. I'd give up my Thunder allegiance for that. :love:
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: bakerman on December 07, 2010, 03:59:21 PM
CP3 in KC  :excited: :drool:
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: WillieWatanabe on December 07, 2010, 04:00:25 PM
The best part: The ridiculous new nickname. I hope they get rid of Hornets.
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: bakerman on December 07, 2010, 04:15:17 PM
What do you guys think they would go with?

Bring back Monarchs? (I know this was a baseball name)

Anything else Royalty related to keep the theme?
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: Dugout DickStone on December 07, 2010, 04:16:59 PM
What do you guys think they would go with?

Bring back Monarchs? (I know this was a baseball name)

Anything else Royalty related to keep the theme?

I suggest the Dobermans.   :emawkid:
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: jmlynch1 on December 07, 2010, 04:23:59 PM
I think they should go with Kings. eff em.
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: scottwildcat on December 07, 2010, 04:26:26 PM
i just want amazing uni's
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: WillieWatanabe on December 07, 2010, 04:27:24 PM
basketballers.
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: bakerman on December 07, 2010, 04:29:17 PM
I think they should go with Kings. eff em.

Was thinking we should do this. Just kick the Maloof Brothers in the nuts and tell them we're taking it back and there's nothing they can do about it.

Very intrigued by the Dobermans though...
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: Dirty Sanchez on December 07, 2010, 06:01:51 PM
The Queens to help take away some of the uk fanbase.
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: j rake on December 07, 2010, 06:02:45 PM
Kansas City Penguins.
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: OK_Cat on December 07, 2010, 06:35:05 PM
would not make sense at all, imo.  Too much flyover country between OKC and KC to support 2 teams in this region.
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: Stevesie60 on December 07, 2010, 07:26:57 PM
The Queens to help take away some of the uk fanbase.

 :lol:
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: Pete on December 07, 2010, 07:46:51 PM
If we get them, we MUST keep this promotion:

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.ticketmaster.com%2Ftm%2Fen-us%2Fimg%2Fmw%2Fimages%2Ff6%2F3f%2F237517p1.jpg&hash=adbebb6a54a6612a6dd01292be2e490e4cbb0cd6)
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: Sugar Dick on December 07, 2010, 08:54:54 PM
BITB:  KU basketball will be most effected by an NBA franchise, since KU basketball is basically the third professional team in the KC metro.


 :ohno:


Went to the Heat v. Thunder Exhibition game.  Have been to a couple uk games this year. 

One thing sort of stands out that makes BITB's statement unlikely to be true.  The noticeable dearth of black people at a uk game as compared to the overwhelming majority of black people at the NBA exhibition game (and it's surrounding festivities).  Unless, uk becomes less :opcat: and starts "lettin' dem boys" in AFH, uk has nothing to worry about.
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: WildcatNkilt on December 07, 2010, 10:23:13 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=5896852 (http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=5896852)

They are going to do all they can to keep it in New Orleans.
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: Pendergast on December 07, 2010, 10:24:35 PM
BITB:  KU basketball will be most effected by an NBA franchise, since KU basketball is basically the third professional team in the KC metro.


 :ohno:

Small influence, NBA fans and College BBall fans are two different breeds.
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: Pete on December 07, 2010, 10:54:58 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=5896852 (http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=5896852)

They are going to do all they can to keep it in New Orleans.

Good.  The only reason I want an NBA team is if we are forced to choose between NBA and NHL.  I'd rather have neither.  I have enjoyed ignoring the NBA, and I'd like to keep it that way.
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: wetwillie on December 07, 2010, 10:58:12 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=5896852 (http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=5896852)

They are going to do all they can to keep it in New Orleans.

Good.  The only reason I want an NBA team is if we are forced to choose between NBA and NHL.  I'd rather have neither.  I have enjoyed ignoring the NBA, and I'd like to keep it that way.

The NBA is all  :babywillie: o hai  and pete is all like gtfoomf  :bitchslap:
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: AbeFroman on December 08, 2010, 10:23:00 AM
BITB is forgetting the most important thing: money
Are there any super-rich people that want to run a sports team in Kansas City? Supposedly the CEO of Microsoft wants another in Seattle and Jerry Bruckheimer wants to put one in Vegas.
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: bakerman on December 08, 2010, 10:33:01 AM
BITB is forgetting the most important thing: money
Are there any super-rich people that want to run a sports team in Kansas City? Supposedly the CEO of Microsoft wants another in Seattle and Jerry Bruckheimer wants to put one in Vegas.

^This  :frown:

Said this morning they want local ownership and that's pretty unlikely in KC...
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: I_have_purplewood on December 08, 2010, 12:20:09 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=5896852 (http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=5896852)

They are going to do all they can to keep it in New Orleans.

Good.  The only reason I want an NBA team is if we are forced to choose between NBA and NHL.  I'd rather have neither.  I have enjoyed ignoring the NBA, and I'd like to keep it that way.

I concur.  NBA bball blows.  It would be an epic fail if it came back.  I just wish people would get behind our women's Rollerball team.  Fantastic atmosphere and very entertaining.
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: hemmy on December 08, 2010, 01:22:05 PM
:yawn: at the NBA haters. The quality of play in exponentially better than college bball
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: CNS on December 08, 2010, 03:08:57 PM
Who gives a eff about local ownership anyway?
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: CHONGS on December 08, 2010, 05:23:07 PM
Team name:
KC Smoke

Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: BigCat on December 08, 2010, 11:08:46 PM
KC Humidity? :dunno: Nickname The Humids? :ck: I kinda like it.

Tough telling what's going to happen with the Hornets. For those that don't keep up on it, the NBA is looking to contract, not expand. So a move would be a push at best, when in reality they would prefer (need) to let many of the small-market teams die. If they move anything to KC, it would likely be a stopgap measure. Additionally, while a team can survive in OKC because it's the only game in town, there is good data showing that the total personal income of the KC metro is well behind what it would take to support a third team, much less the teams they already have. Food for thought. But I hope they get a team, would be fun. :drool:
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: chunkles on December 08, 2010, 11:44:00 PM
KC Sprinters

or

KC Funk Fusion

or

KC Funk



Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: MakeItRain on December 09, 2010, 12:37:55 AM
CP3 in KC  :excited: :drool:

He'll be in new york or new jersey by the end of the year
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: Dirty Sanchez on December 09, 2010, 08:22:07 PM
How about "Sporting KC"?

Oh wait, that one's been taken.   :bang:
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: CNS on December 10, 2010, 09:36:48 AM
The KC Disappointment.   :dunno:

I want them here, but can only imagine them eventually being a team that I end up being very  :facepalm: about.  Similar to the Royals(only I don't want the royals here). 

I guess it really doesn't matter as long as they come up with a workable mascot and hire someone who doesn't mind jumping off of 30' ladders and dunking the ball at halftime.

Give me a flying goal-rilla, and I will pay to see him.

Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 10, 2010, 09:43:26 AM
A hockey team would be much better. KC would never be able to support an NBA team.
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: CNS on December 10, 2010, 10:40:32 AM
I would never go to a hockey game.  Never.

Give me free tix, and they go to waste.  Just no interest.

However, I will buy tix to see a few NBA games in a season, especially the second half of the season.

I don't have a feel for how the majority of KC would feel, but I know the above for certain.
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: OK_Cat on December 10, 2010, 10:41:54 AM
I would never go to a hockey game.  Never.

Give me free tix, and they go to waste.  Just no interest.

However, I will buy tix to see a few NBA games in a season, especially the second half of the season.

I don't have a feel for how the majority of KC would feel, but I know the above for certain.

yeah, hockey is horrible.

i'm sure it's like this for all nba teams, but the thunder has a season tix package that is for weekend games only....seems like a pretty good idea for out-of-towners.
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: WillieWatanabe on December 10, 2010, 10:44:24 AM
always heard that hockey is pretty cool to see live. But i think it would be cold. dunno, just grasping at straws here.
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 10, 2010, 10:51:06 AM
I would never go to a hockey game.  Never.

Give me free tix, and they go to waste.  Just no interest.

However, I will buy tix to see a few NBA games in a season, especially the second half of the season.

I don't have a feel for how the majority of KC would feel, but I know the above for certain.

Kansas City couldn't support the Kings. Why would the Hornets be any different?
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: WildcatNkilt on December 10, 2010, 11:09:19 AM
Hockey is kind of cool to see live.  That being said I still don't think I'd go to more than 1 game a year.  Hockey fans piss me off too cause they're all like "Hockey is the greatest sport ever, Canada is awesome, blah blah". 

I could see myself going to a few NBA games, especially if good teams like the Celtics or Lakers were in town.  Plus the chances of partying with Kobe, Lebron, etc in the Plaza go up a ton.  (I would never be able to identify a hockey player in public)
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: Saulbadguy on December 10, 2010, 11:58:45 AM
I would never go to a hockey game.  Never.

Give me free tix, and they go to waste.  Just no interest.

However, I will buy tix to see a few NBA games in a season, especially the second half of the season.

I don't have a feel for how the majority of KC would feel, but I know the above for certain.

Kansas City couldn't support the Kings. Why would the Hornets be any different?
:flush:
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: WildcatNkilt on December 10, 2010, 01:37:53 PM
I would never go to a hockey game.  Never.

Give me free tix, and they go to waste.  Just no interest.

However, I will buy tix to see a few NBA games in a season, especially the second half of the season.

I don't have a feel for how the majority of KC would feel, but I know the above for certain.

Kansas City couldn't support the Kings. Why would the Hornets be any different?

KC Metro area currently has a population slightly above 2 million.  That is almost a 10% increase since 1990, and most of which has been in the JoCo area (where the $$ at).  The Kings disbanded in 1985.

I think KC could easily support an NBA team.  OKC's metro population is almost 1 million below KC's. 

The problem is not being able to support the team with attendance, it's being able to find a local millionaire willing to buy and support the franchise.
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 10, 2010, 02:02:36 PM
I would never go to a hockey game.  Never.

Give me free tix, and they go to waste.  Just no interest.

However, I will buy tix to see a few NBA games in a season, especially the second half of the season.

I don't have a feel for how the majority of KC would feel, but I know the above for certain.

Kansas City couldn't support the Kings. Why would the Hornets be any different?

KC Metro area currently has a population slightly above 2 million.  That is almost a 10% increase since 1990, and most of which has been in the JoCo area (where the $$ at).  The Kings disbanded in 1985.

I think KC could easily support an NBA team.  OKC's metro population is almost 1 million below KC's. 

The problem is not being able to support the team with attendance, it's being able to find a local millionaire willing to buy and support the franchise.

OKC doesn't also have an NFL or MLB team, and it remains to be seen how well they will support the Thunder after the novelty of having an NBA team wears off. When the Kings were in KC, there were games with attendance below 4000.
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: WildcatNkilt on December 10, 2010, 08:40:12 PM
I would never go to a hockey game.  Never.

Give me free tix, and they go to waste.  Just no interest.

However, I will buy tix to see a few NBA games in a season, especially the second half of the season.

I don't have a feel for how the majority of KC would feel, but I know the above for certain.

Kansas City couldn't support the Kings. Why would the Hornets be any different?

KC Metro area currently has a population slightly above 2 million.  That is almost a 10% increase since 1990, and most of which has been in the JoCo area (where the $$ at).  The Kings disbanded in 1985.

I think KC could easily support an NBA team.  OKC's metro population is almost 1 million below KC's. 

The problem is not being able to support the team with attendance, it's being able to find a local millionaire willing to buy and support the franchise.

OKC doesn't also have an NFL or MLB team, and it remains to be seen how well they will support the Thunder after the novelty of having an NBA team wears off. When the Kings were in KC, there were games with attendance below 4000.

Sure, but also take into considering what Kemper had to offer at that time.  Many of the criticisms Arrowhead and Kauffman get is the location and the fact there is nothing to do around the stadiums (shopping, restaurants, etc).  Sprint Center and P&L have a lot more to offer than Kemper could ever dream of.  I'm not saying KC could sell out every bball game.  The Heat don't even sell out with Lebron, Wade, and Bosh. 

The concern for supporting a professional team isn't the problem.  If it was, the Spring Center would have never been built to it's current capacity.  The main problem (as it will continue to be for years to come) is finding a local buyer for an NBA or NHL franchise.   
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: Winters on December 11, 2010, 09:31:14 AM
CP3 in KC  :excited: :drool:
pfffffffft VLNBAIQ
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: CHONGS on December 11, 2010, 11:00:17 AM
KC Smoke.

yeah!

:woot:
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: BigCat on December 12, 2010, 12:46:54 PM
I would never go to a hockey game.  Never.

Give me free tix, and they go to waste.  Just no interest.

However, I will buy tix to see a few NBA games in a season, especially the second half of the season.

I don't have a feel for how the majority of KC would feel, but I know the above for certain.

Kansas City couldn't support the Kings. Why would the Hornets be any different?

KC Metro area currently has a population slightly above 2 million.  That is almost a 10% increase since 1990, and most of which has been in the JoCo area (where the $$ at).  The Kings disbanded in 1985.

I think KC could easily support an NBA team.  OKC's metro population is almost 1 million below KC's. 

The problem is not being able to support the team with attendance, it's being able to find a local millionaire willing to buy and support the franchise.

OKC doesn't also have an NFL or MLB team, and it remains to be seen how well they will support the Thunder after the novelty of having an NBA team wears off. When the Kings were in KC, there were games with attendance below 4000.

Sure, but also take into considering what Kemper had to offer at that time.  Many of the criticisms Arrowhead and Kauffman get is the location and the fact there is nothing to do around the stadiums (shopping, restaurants, etc).  Sprint Center and P&L have a lot more to offer than Kemper could ever dream of.  I'm not saying KC could sell out every bball game.  The Heat don't even sell out with Lebron, Wade, and Bosh. 

The concern for supporting a professional team isn't the problem.  If it was, the Spring Center would have never been built to it's current capacity.  The main problem (as it will continue to be for years to come) is finding a local buyer for an NBA or NHL franchise.   

If KC's ability (or lack thereof) to support another pro team wasn't a concern, there would already be a team in that arena. And it doesn't matter if it's a local buyer, anyone would do. Munis build Sprint Centers to say, "hey look at this sweet new arena we have ready to go, are you sure you don't want to re-think your firm refusal to bring a team here?"

Sprint Center was built with the hope that they might be able to lure a team. With the NBA struggling the way it is, if a team did come it would be a failure. And KC isn't a hockey market. Not enough fans and not enough money. NHL ticket prices are outrageous, as are NBA.

Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: Andy on December 12, 2010, 04:57:12 PM
nba tickets are like $10 right?  sign me up.
Title: sorry
Post by: pencat on December 12, 2010, 06:26:13 PM
But it will be seattle.

Actually suburban Bellevue in the new Microsoft Center built by steve balmer and others who have recently dumped hundreds of millions in microsoft stock.

Now that is a 50%+ bet.
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: EMAWmeister on December 16, 2010, 10:42:15 AM
KC Z-Mans.

Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: AbeFroman on December 16, 2010, 04:03:59 PM
KC Z-Mans.


Kansas City Fightin' Burnt Ends
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: CNS on December 16, 2010, 05:23:49 PM
KC NachosBellGrande
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: EMAWmeister on December 16, 2010, 09:04:08 PM
KC Z-Mans.


Kansas City Fightin' Burnt Ends

Kansas City Okies?  It makes as much sense as the Utah Jazz.
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: CrushNasty on December 16, 2010, 10:03:50 PM
Kansas City Masterpiece

Kansas City Fountains

Kansas City Tecca Ninas
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: Stevesie60 on December 16, 2010, 11:06:08 PM
Kansas City Masterpiece

Definitely this.
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: CHONGS on December 17, 2010, 01:13:48 PM
KC Smoke!
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: highway61 on December 18, 2010, 08:12:20 AM
...  (I would never be able to identify a hockey player in public)
Look for the guy with a mullet and missing teeth.  Thats probably him.
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: Havs on December 19, 2010, 11:31:54 AM
I don't know if basketball fans at KU, MU, and KSU know what they are getting themselves into here. The University of Minnesota had 6 National Titles, and dozens of Conference titles before the Vikings moved to town. Once the Vikings came to Minneapolis in 1961... zero National Titles and Zero Conference Titles. Once Kansas City becomes a Pro Basketball town, it could be bad news for the three of you. Minnesota was more of a football power at that time than Kansas is a basketball power. 6 titles>5 titles. Be careful what you wish for. Sprint Center does a lot better business with The Big 12 Tournament, and the Kansas City "Big 3" Universities playing games there than they would with an NBA team. Kansas City should go after a hockey team before they go after an NBA team.
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: OregonSmock on December 19, 2010, 02:15:32 PM
Kansas City Barbecue
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: theswo on December 19, 2010, 02:15:56 PM
shut up havs
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: CHONGS on December 19, 2010, 02:16:16 PM
KC Smoke :love:
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: CNS on December 19, 2010, 07:04:17 PM
KC Smoke :love:
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: PowercatPat on December 19, 2010, 09:22:35 PM
...  (I would never be able to identify a hockey player in public)
Look for the guy with a mullet and missing teeth.  Thats probably him.

This, and I was watching game 7 of the Stanley Cup last year and I noticed every player had an ugly looking beard, too.
Title: Re: Kietzman: Better than 50% Hornets to KC...
Post by: BigCat on December 19, 2010, 09:42:04 PM
Kansas City Fountains

KC Squirtz