goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Basketball is hard => Topic started by: kougar24 on December 04, 2010, 12:43:55 AM

Title: Bad Things & Good Things
Post by: kougar24 on December 04, 2010, 12:43:55 AM
Bad Things:

Good Things:
Title: Re: Bad Things & Good Things
Post by: jmlynch1 on December 04, 2010, 12:47:02 AM
Bad Things:
Love ya Stevie but that broadcast team might be the worst I can recall doing a KSU game. Maybe I'm just tired and cranky but holy balls that seemed brutal.
Title: Re: Bad Things & Good Things
Post by: jtksu on December 04, 2010, 12:47:43 AM
Sometimes it takes a ragtag group of mutants to remind us just how good we have it.  Could you imagine having to root for that motley crew WSU trots out their?  Cougars?  More like Ewwwgars.
Title: Re: Bad Things & Good Things
Post by: ednksu on December 04, 2010, 12:47:56 AM
agree with some of your post

help D was either amazing or absolute crap.  more often amazing though.  

frank said he didn't play kelly much because of his defensive rebounding, that would attribute to his lack on inclusion in the offense.
Title: Re: Bad Things & Good Things
Post by: bonercat on December 04, 2010, 12:49:23 AM
Bad things: The announcers every game this year will talk about Spradling being the pride of "Shawnee-Mission" KS similar to how much we had to hear about Darren Kent's golf swing every game.

Good Things: How much better our fanbase looks compared to that crap up there in Washington.
Title: Re: Bad Things & Good Things
Post by: asava on December 04, 2010, 12:51:21 AM
Bad Things:
Love ya Stevie but that broadcast team might be the worst I can recall doing a KSU game. Maybe I'm just tired and cranky but holy balls that seemed brutal.

completely agree.
Title: Re: Bad Things & Good Things
Post by: EMAWzified on December 04, 2010, 12:52:32 AM
Bad thing, Asprilla's knuckle ball bunnies.
Title: Re: Bad Things & Good Things
Post by: kougar24 on December 04, 2010, 12:56:40 AM
agree with some of your post

help D was either amazing or absolute cac.  more often amazing though. 

frank said he didn't play kelly much because of his defensive rebounding, that would attribute to his lack on inclusion in the offense.

Fair enough, I didn't hear the post game. But while Kelly was in the game, we still might have tried getting him the ball, you know, on occasion.
Title: Re: Bad Things & Good Things
Post by: AzCat on December 04, 2010, 12:57:50 AM
frank said he didn't play kelly much because of his defensive rebounding, that would attribute to his lack on inclusion in the offense.

Yes, if only Frank had played CK more than 31 minutes he might've been out there long enough to get involved in the offense.   :blank:
Title: Re: Bad Things & Good Things
Post by: kso_FAN on December 04, 2010, 12:59:50 AM
Kelly is simply not in good enough game shape to play 30 minutes of high energy Kelly at this point.
Title: Re: Bad Things & Good Things
Post by: jtksu on December 04, 2010, 01:01:26 AM
Yeah, dude was sucking some serious wind like 2 minutes into the game.  Also- it was mentioned somewhere around here that Kelly was telling Frank to get him the rough ridin' ball during a TO.
Title: Re: Bad Things & Good Things
Post by: kougar24 on December 04, 2010, 01:05:53 AM
Kelly is simply not in good enough game shape to play 30 minutes of high energy Kelly at this point.

That's your only comment in this thread? :sad:
Title: Re: Bad Things & Good Things
Post by: kso_FAN on December 04, 2010, 01:07:45 AM
Kelly is simply not in good enough game shape to play 30 minutes of high energy Kelly at this point.

That's your only comment in this thread? :sad:

Nothing much more to add/subtract.  Good job.
Title: Re: Bad Things & Good Things
Post by: kougar24 on December 04, 2010, 01:09:04 AM
Kelly is simply not in good enough game shape to play 30 minutes of high energy Kelly at this point.

That's your only comment in this thread? :sad:

Nothing much more to add/subtract.  Good job.

:gocho:
Title: Re: Bad Things & Good Things
Post by: kso_FAN on December 04, 2010, 01:10:03 AM
Loved the validation of Frank's FT talking point BTW. 
Title: Re: Bad Things & Good Things
Post by: kougar24 on December 04, 2010, 01:12:22 AM
Loved the validation of Frank's FT talking point BTW. 

You know Frank was chuckling on the inside as those four FTs went in to seal the deal.
Title: Re: Bad Things & Good Things
Post by: swish1 on December 04, 2010, 01:13:40 AM
Loved the validation of Frank's FT talking point BTW. 

You know Frank was chuckling on the inside as those four FTs went in to seal the deal.

just so happened to be the only 2 good FT shooters on the team though...  not that i disagree with his point because when it matters they should be the ones at the line...
Title: Re: Bad Things & Good Things
Post by: kougar24 on December 04, 2010, 01:15:25 AM
Loved the validation of Frank's FT talking point BTW. 

You know Frank was chuckling on the inside as those four FTs went in to seal the deal.

just so happened to be the only 2 good FT shooters on the team though...  not that i disagree with his point because when it matters they should be the ones at the line...

Pullen was only shooting like 60-some percent coming in to tonight's game. Also: Sprads was a true frosh playing his first college road game.

"Only 2 good FT shooters" is a relative term.
Title: Re: Bad Things & Good Things
Post by: swish1 on December 04, 2010, 01:16:59 AM
Loved the validation of Frank's FT talking point BTW. 

You know Frank was chuckling on the inside as those four FTs went in to seal the deal.

just so happened to be the only 2 good FT shooters on the team though...  not that i disagree with his point because when it matters they should be the ones at the line...

Pullen was only shooting like 60-some percent coming in to tonight's game. Also: Sprads was a true frosh playing his first college road game.

"Only 2 good FT shooters" is a relative term.

did pullen not prove himself enough for you last year?  and sprads is clearly a good FT shooter.  name a player on the team you would have rather had at the line than either of them?
Title: Re: Bad Things & Good Things
Post by: EMAWzified on December 04, 2010, 01:19:10 AM
Irving looked effing terrified when he bricked his. Samuels solid.
Title: Re: Bad Things & Good Things
Post by: MakeItRain on December 04, 2010, 01:22:31 AM
Kelly is simply not in good enough game shape to play 30 minutes of high energy Kelly at this point.

Carbon copy of last season, CK was the poster child of getting better as the season progressed
Title: Re: Bad Things & Good Things
Post by: kougar24 on December 04, 2010, 01:24:22 AM
Loved the validation of Frank's FT talking point BTW. 

You know Frank was chuckling on the inside as those four FTs went in to seal the deal.

just so happened to be the only 2 good FT shooters on the team though...  not that i disagree with his point because when it matters they should be the ones at the line...

Pullen was only shooting like 60-some percent coming in to tonight's game. Also: Sprads was a true frosh playing his first college road game.

"Only 2 good FT shooters" is a relative term.

did pullen not prove himself enough for you last year?  and sprads is clearly a good FT shooter.  name a player on the team you would have rather had at the line than either of them?

You missed my point entirely. That is why it's relative, because neither "should" have been automatic in that situation tonight due to the reasons I stated, but they hit them when it mattered most.

Which is why Frank was totally validated.
Title: Re: Bad Things & Good Things
Post by: swish1 on December 04, 2010, 01:27:38 AM
Loved the validation of Frank's FT talking point BTW. 

You know Frank was chuckling on the inside as those four FTs went in to seal the deal.

just so happened to be the only 2 good FT shooters on the team though...  not that i disagree with his point because when it matters they should be the ones at the line...

Pullen was only shooting like 60-some percent coming in to tonight's game. Also: Sprads was a true frosh playing his first college road game.

"Only 2 good FT shooters" is a relative term.

did pullen not prove himself enough for you last year?  and sprads is clearly a good FT shooter.  name a player on the team you would have rather had at the line than either of them?

You missed my point entirely. That is why it's relative, because neither "should" have been automatic in that situation tonight due to the reasons I stated, but they hit them when it mattered most.

Which is why Frank was totally validated.

where did i say either was automatic?  they "should" have been the two at the line.  they are the only two good free throw shooters on the team right now.  they came through.
Title: Re: Bad Things & Good Things
Post by: kougar24 on December 04, 2010, 01:29:26 AM
they came through.

EXACTLY, said Frank.
Title: Re: Bad Things & Good Things
Post by: swish1 on December 04, 2010, 01:33:03 AM
they came through.

EXACTLY, said Frank.

we arent disagreeing...
Title: Re: Bad Things & Good Things
Post by: slimz on December 04, 2010, 01:40:01 AM
Physioc was brutal.   :blindfold:
Title: Re: Bad Things & Good Things
Post by: EMAWzified on December 04, 2010, 01:44:04 AM
Remember when he called the Cats. Probably worse the wyattvision.