goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Basketball is hard => Topic started by: hemmy on November 18, 2010, 08:56:17 PM

Title: The box score
Post by: hemmy on November 18, 2010, 08:56:17 PM
 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

#3

 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: The box score
Post by: wetwillie on November 18, 2010, 09:03:59 PM
right on cue
Title: Re: The box score
Post by: kso_FAN on November 18, 2010, 10:31:23 PM
TOTAL FG% 2nd Half: 14-23 60.9%  :blindfold:

3-Pt. FG% 1st Half:  6-9  66.7%  :blank:

Fast break points-PC 6,KS 4.  :facepalm:

Rebounds-KS 33, PC 33.  :curse:

3-Pt. FG% 2nd Half:  2-12 16.7%  :frown:
Title: Re: The box score
Post by: bigDcat on November 18, 2010, 10:45:32 PM


Fast break points-PC 6,KS 4.  :facepalm:


Forced 18 turnovers. Gave up 4.  :confused:
Title: Re: The box score
Post by: kso_FAN on November 18, 2010, 10:46:31 PM


Fast break points-PC 6,KS 4.  :facepalm:


Forced 18 turnovers. Gave up 4.  :confused:

Yeah, and only 4 points in transition.
Title: Re: The box score
Post by: mcmwcat on November 18, 2010, 10:50:42 PM
even late in the game when they needed points, Presby was using the Neck's philosophy of dropping 5 back when the shot went up to prevent transition.  & we're def missing Clemente's skills in transition
Title: Re: The box score
Post by: kso_FAN on November 18, 2010, 10:51:42 PM
even late in the game when they needed points, Presby was using the Neck's philosophy of dropping 5 back when the shot went up to prevent transition.  & we're def missing Clemente's skills in transition

Well, and we were also dribbling the ball off our leg or whatever when we had good chances.  But yeah, they only had one guy hit the offensive glass. 
Title: Re: The box score
Post by: bigDcat on November 18, 2010, 10:51:51 PM
pullen sucks in transition.
Title: Re: The box score
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 18, 2010, 10:55:22 PM
even late in the game when they needed points, Presby was using the Neck's philosophy of dropping 5 back when the shot went up to prevent transition.  & we're def missing Clemente's skills in transition

And they still had as many rebounds as we did. :flush:
Title: Re: The box score
Post by: kso_FAN on November 18, 2010, 11:00:00 PM
Only had 2 games with a worse defensive eFG% (59%) last year.
Title: Re: The box score
Post by: kso_FAN on November 18, 2010, 11:23:20 PM
FTR was only 28.4%.  I'd like to see better than the 47.4% we shot them, but whatever.  A FTR of 40% or worse is much worse IMHO, and under 30% is terrible.
Title: Re: The box score
Post by: Pett on November 18, 2010, 11:25:58 PM
We're calling out the ranking, so might as well hate on our "team leader".

Quote
"He hasn't (been a leader) lately," Martin said of Pullen, who dished out four assists. "He was great for the first couple weeks, but he hasn't done it lately. I don't think I've heard Jacob say 'boo' in three or four days."
Title: Re: The box score
Post by: theswo on November 19, 2010, 12:04:05 AM
Damn it. Our ken pom ranking is going to tank
Title: Re: The box score
Post by: mcmwcat on November 19, 2010, 07:18:58 AM
FTR was only 28.4%.  I'd like to see better than the 47.4% we shot them, but whatever.  A FTR of 40% or worse is much worse IMHO, and under 30% is terrible.

junkyard quatz caught sleeping last night  :embarrassed:
Title: Re: The box score
Post by: pencat on November 19, 2010, 08:17:34 AM
pullen sucks in transition.

 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: