goemaw.com

General Discussion => Essentially Flyertalk => Topic started by: bigDcat on November 15, 2010, 11:30:40 PM

Title: EPAW II
Post by: bigDcat on November 15, 2010, 11:30:40 PM
SHE GOT 'EM AGAIN!!

http://www.kstatecollegian.com/opinion/charity-groups-waste-time-on-less-efficient-causes-1.2405902 (http://www.kstatecollegian.com/opinion/charity-groups-waste-time-on-less-efficient-causes-1.2405902)
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: theswo on November 16, 2010, 12:05:55 AM
Mendenhall is clearly BITB
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: 'taterblast on November 16, 2010, 12:10:26 AM
tried to post a
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi44.tinypic.com%2Fve6r79.jpg%255Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fi44.tinypic.com%2Fve6r79.jpg&hash=0ad7e03dc65b7f351dd053e9353c6626b81b17c9)
in the comments but doesn't appear to be showing up.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: kazzu on November 16, 2010, 12:13:30 AM
<- loves Mendenhall. BITB.  :kstatriot:
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: Trim on November 16, 2010, 12:19:45 AM
tried to post a
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi44.tinypic.com%2Fve6r79.jpg%255Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fi44.tinypic.com%2Fve6r79.jpg&hash=0ad7e03dc65b7f351dd053e9353c6626b81b17c9)
in the comments but doesn't appear to be showing up.

Calls for doing one in real life.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: T42YS on November 16, 2010, 03:11:43 AM
she is one of the few redeeming qualities of the local student newpaper of the k-state university quatz
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: DQ12 on November 16, 2010, 03:25:10 AM
There is going to be an absolute crap storm when I tell my frat bros about this.  crap storm.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: Pete on November 16, 2010, 04:51:44 AM
There is going to be an absolute cac storm when I tell my frat bros about this.  cac storm.

The crack about the jean skirt and North Face jacker hurt.   :cry:

Too far Beth!
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: EllToPay on November 16, 2010, 08:23:56 AM
wow, what an article. as a frat guy myself, i can't help but agree :ck:
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: Brock Landers on November 16, 2010, 09:19:06 AM
"They all dress the same"

Do they Beth?  DO THEY?!?!?

Yeah, they pretty much all dress the same.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: jtksu on November 16, 2010, 09:40:51 AM
Seems racist.  :ck:
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: hemmy on November 16, 2010, 11:16:04 AM
There is going to be an absolute cac storm when I tell my frat bros about this.  cac storm.

The crack about the jean skirt and North Face jacker hurt.   :cry:

Too far Beth!

interesting how Pete (moderator) has the language censor on. what a dumbass.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: AbeFroman on November 16, 2010, 11:34:09 AM
She's kinda hot too. We should get her to post here.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: steve dave on November 16, 2010, 11:37:34 AM
She's kinda hot too. We should get her to post here.

prove it
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 16, 2010, 11:45:11 AM
There is going to be an absolute cac storm when I tell my frat bros about this.  cac storm.

The crack about the jean skirt and North Face jacker hurt.   :cry:

Too far Beth!

interesting how Pete (moderator) has the language censor on. what a dumbass.

Maybe Pete (moderator) just prefers to leave it on.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: felix rex on November 16, 2010, 11:58:05 AM
Quote
I'm a vegetarian, and I think Jesus probably was, too.

 :surprised:
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: Sugar Dick on November 16, 2010, 12:00:51 PM
Weird article.   :flush:  The first 80% is some passive aggressive rant against free speech from people she doesn't like (i.e., religion, fratsters, sororstitutes) the last 20% is some weird hypocritical point.

Raising money for charities is a resume builder, but writing for the school newspaper isn't?

Charity only has merit if it is focused on curing the problem she says causes the most pain and suffering worldwide, rather than any specific degenerative disease more likely to affect someone in the US than AIDS and malaria?

I'm going to go out on limb and guess this chick dresses like every other emo-creature who hates society and is disgusted at their own existence, while smoking Kamel Red-Lights sipping coffee at the non-corporate coffee house?  (i.e. black rimmed glasses, thrift store t-shirt, plaid skirt, black leggings, dark make-up, patches on jacket, etc.)

I hope for her sake she is hot, because there'd be no reason to pretend to listen to her otherwise.   :cheers:
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: jtksu on November 16, 2010, 12:01:20 PM
I'm guessing she doesn't know that Jesus was an alien?
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: WillieWatanabe on November 16, 2010, 12:05:49 PM
She's kinda hot too. We should get her to post here.

 :surprised:
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: DQ12 on November 16, 2010, 12:25:34 PM
Weird article.   :flush:  The first 80% is some passive aggressive rant against free speech from people she doesn't like (i.e., religion, fratsters, sororstitutes) the last 20% is some weird hypocritical point.

Raising money for charities is a resume builder, but writing for the school newspaper isn't?

Charity only has merit if it is focused on curing the problem she says causes the most pain and suffering worldwide, rather than any specific degenerative disease more likely to affect someone in the US than AIDS and malaria?

I'm going to go out on limb and guess this chick dresses like every other emo-creature who hates society and is disgusted at their own existence, while smoking Kamel Red-Lights sipping coffee at the non-corporate coffee house?  (i.e. black rimmed glasses, thrift store t-shirt, plaid skirt, black leggings, dark make-up, patches on jacket, etc.)

I hope for her sake she is hot, because there'd be no reason to pretend to listen to her otherwise.   :cheers:

REELED'EM IN AGAIN.

I bet her and the guys around the office are just rolling.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: bakerman on November 17, 2010, 01:17:58 PM
 (i.e. black rimmed glasses, thrift store t-shirt, plaid skirt, black leggings, dark make-up, patches on jacket, etc.)


 :drool: :love:
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: SkinnyBenny on November 17, 2010, 10:15:21 PM
Kinda didn't disagree.   :dunno:
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: CrushNasty on December 05, 2010, 06:33:46 PM
 :facepalm:

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdesmond.yfrog.com%2FHimg28%2Fscaled.php%3Ftn%3D0%26amp%3Bserver%3D28%26amp%3Bfilename%3Dd2w012.jpg%26amp%3Bxsize%3D640%26amp%3Bysize%3D640&hash=635ec1a9c22d5b450ae03de38f29cdf8db103c91)
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: ksudrew on December 05, 2010, 06:50:27 PM
SHE GOT 'EM AGAIN!!

http://www.kstatecollegian.com/opinion/charity-groups-waste-time-on-less-efficient-causes-1.2405902 (http://www.kstatecollegian.com/opinion/charity-groups-waste-time-on-less-efficient-causes-1.2405902)

"when I'm only interested in another delicious rack of Salsarita's nachos"  freudian?
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: pike on December 05, 2010, 07:32:53 PM
I got high with Beth once. Nice person but she's off the deep end for sure
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: DQ12 on December 06, 2010, 11:26:40 AM
BITB BUMB
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: DQ12 on December 06, 2010, 11:27:17 AM
BUMP*
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: EMAWmeister on December 06, 2010, 11:45:48 AM
Will be sad when she graduates.  :cry:
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: 'taterblast on December 06, 2010, 02:36:43 PM
class was a riot today.

frat guys were all  :fatty:.  frat girls were all  :angry:.

i was all  :popcorn:.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: Panjandrum on December 07, 2010, 01:45:10 PM
"They all dress the same"

Do they Beth?  DO THEY?!?!?

Yeah, they pretty much all dress the same.

There was once an entire industry dedicated to making puka shell necklaces that I assume was geared toward the fraternity demographic that bought roughly 94% of the product.

However, I may have just given away how old I really am.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: EMAWmeister on December 07, 2010, 11:45:42 PM
"They all dress the same"

Do they Beth?  DO THEY?!?!?

Yeah, they pretty much all dress the same.

There was once an entire industry dedicated to making puka shell necklaces that I assume was geared toward the fraternity demographic that bought roughly 94% of the product.

However, I may have just given
away how old I really am.

:facepalm:
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: bringonthecats on December 12, 2010, 05:53:04 PM
http://www.facebook.com/?sk=media#!/home.php?sk=group_133245330064055 (http://www.facebook.com/?sk=media#!/home.php?sk=group_133245330064055)
might be a member....
also, there's a group photo, for those debating her level of attractiveness.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: CHONGS on December 12, 2010, 06:13:28 PM
I am 100% on Beth's side here.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: chum1 on December 12, 2010, 06:21:00 PM
If someone creates a "Don't Remove Beth Mendthol" group, I will join.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: Trim on December 12, 2010, 06:34:16 PM
http://www.facebook.com/?sk=media#!/home.php?sk=group_133245330064055 (http://www.facebook.com/?sk=media#!/home.php?sk=group_133245330064055)
might be a member....
also, there's a group photo, for those debating her level of attractiveness.

The red circle and line on her face isn't helping.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: Pete on December 12, 2010, 08:01:16 PM
Beth is a very attractive young lady.  Also, I'll bet she does loads of freaky stuff in the sack.  Win-win is what I am saying.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: Trim on December 12, 2010, 08:04:04 PM
Beth is a very attractive young lady.  Also, I'll bet she does loads of freaky stuff in the sack.  Win-win is what I am saying.

Look at Pete toeing the line again (literally?!?).
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: WillieWatanabe on December 12, 2010, 08:12:08 PM
http://www.facebook.com/?sk=media#!/home.php?sk=group_133245330064055 (http://www.facebook.com/?sk=media#!/home.php?sk=group_133245330064055)
might be a member....
also, there's a group photo, for those debating her level of attractiveness.

:users:
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: Pete on December 12, 2010, 08:42:19 PM
Beth is a very attractive young lady.  Also, I'll bet she does loads of freaky stuff in the sack.  Win-win is what I am saying.

Look at Pete toeing the line again (literally?!?).

No, I'm just a fan.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: DQ12 on December 12, 2010, 08:46:16 PM
Beth is a very attractive young lady.  Also, I'll bet she does loads of freaky stuff in the sack.  Win-win is what I am saying.

Look at Pete toeing the line again (literally?!?).

No, I'm just a fan.
Me too.  I think she's just great.  People just freak out when some one challenges things they believe in. 
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: kstate16 on December 12, 2010, 08:47:19 PM
hmmm. she's a 'slampiece' if you ask me
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: reidrolled on December 12, 2010, 10:16:24 PM
Beth is a very attractive young lady.  Also, I'll bet she does loads of freaky stuff in the sack.  Win-win is what I am saying.

Look at Pete toeing the line again (literally?!?).

No, I'm just a fan.

I think her stuff is kinda funny. predictable.... but funny. PETE, go to the club orleans or something man! mendenhall is the epitome of "meh"
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: T42YS on December 13, 2010, 03:48:20 AM
The more trolling of butthurt greeks*, the better. Somebody get her an account here. She would troll the crap out of Chingon and Saul just on the site name alone :fatty:





*obviously excludes DLew and other elites
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: felix rex on December 13, 2010, 06:07:46 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F3.bp.blogspot.com%2F_H_9snR26Pxs%2FTI-2GvbXugI%2FAAAAAAAABew%2FI_mHDIXUyvY%2Fs400%2FMZ%2BPhoto&hash=7aa039046fae9556ddbb074ef092a18687a0a1b9)

Are those red highlights? Mee-yow.

Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: reidrolled on December 13, 2010, 07:10:21 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F3.bp.blogspot.com%2F_H_9snR26Pxs%2FTI-2GvbXugI%2FAAAAAAAABew%2FI_mHDIXUyvY%2Fs400%2FMZ%2BPhoto&hash=7aa039046fae9556ddbb074ef092a18687a0a1b9)

Are those red highlights? Mee-yow.



OPTICAL ILLUSION!!!!! DOESN'T COUNT!!!!!  shes still a "meh", rock of love highlights or not
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: EMAWmeister on December 13, 2010, 01:44:23 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F3.bp.blogspot.com%2F_H_9snR26Pxs%2FTI-2GvbXugI%2FAAAAAAAABew%2FI_mHDIXUyvY%2Fs400%2FMZ%2BPhoto&hash=7aa039046fae9556ddbb074ef092a18687a0a1b9)

Are those red highlights? Mee-yow.



OPTICAL ILLUSION!!!!! DOESN'T COUNT!!!!!  shes still a "meh", rock of love highlights or not
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.meh.ro%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2010%2F10%2Fmeh.ro5524.jpg&hash=12b044cdbd1572af233e5d0867e6bf64f5824d74)
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: Brock Landers on December 13, 2010, 03:02:43 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F3.bp.blogspot.com%2F_H_9snR26Pxs%2FTI-2GvbXugI%2FAAAAAAAABew%2FI_mHDIXUyvY%2Fs400%2FMZ%2BPhoto&hash=7aa039046fae9556ddbb074ef092a18687a0a1b9)

Are those red highlights? Mee-yow.



OPTICAL ILLUSION!!!!! DOESN'T COUNT!!!!!  shes still a "meh", rock of love highlights or not


Highlights like that are the equivalent of a hair tramp stamp.  I'd hit it.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: DQ12 on December 13, 2010, 03:17:44 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F3.bp.blogspot.com%2F_H_9snR26Pxs%2FTI-2GvbXugI%2FAAAAAAAABew%2FI_mHDIXUyvY%2Fs400%2FMZ%2BPhoto&hash=7aa039046fae9556ddbb074ef092a18687a0a1b9)

Are those red highlights? Mee-yow.



OPTICAL ILLUSION!!!!! DOESN'T COUNT!!!!!  shes still a "meh", rock of love highlights or not
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.meh.ro%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2010%2F10%2Fmeh.ro5524.jpg&hash=12b044cdbd1572af233e5d0867e6bf64f5824d74)


Ahem, reidrolled is a good looking cat.  I trust him on this one.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: bubbles4ksu on December 13, 2010, 03:37:23 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F3.bp.blogspot.com%2F_H_9snR26Pxs%2FTI-2GvbXugI%2FAAAAAAAABew%2FI_mHDIXUyvY%2Fs400%2FMZ%2BPhoto&hash=7aa039046fae9556ddbb074ef092a18687a0a1b9)

Are those red highlights? Mee-yow.



OPTICAL ILLUSION!!!!! DOESN'T COUNT!!!!!  shes still a "meh", rock of love highlights or not
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.meh.ro%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2010%2F10%2Fmeh.ro5524.jpg&hash=12b044cdbd1572af233e5d0867e6bf64f5824d74)


Ahem, reidrolled is a good looking cat.  I trust him on this one.

no denying reidrolled's fantastic looks. difficult to not trust.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: AbeFroman on December 13, 2010, 03:49:31 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F3.bp.blogspot.com%2F_H_9snR26Pxs%2FTI-2GvbXugI%2FAAAAAAAABew%2FI_mHDIXUyvY%2Fs400%2FMZ%2BPhoto&hash=7aa039046fae9556ddbb074ef092a18687a0a1b9)

Are those red highlights? Mee-yow.


Forget her, who's the guy?  :love:
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: Poster formerly known as jthutch on December 13, 2010, 03:57:55 PM
OT does anyone remember the writer at the collegian that also "danced" at Dr. Loves?  97/98?  Not that attractive but whateves.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: Scary Smart on December 13, 2010, 03:59:03 PM
http://www.facebook.com/?sk=media#!/home.php?sk=group_133245330064055 (http://www.facebook.com/?sk=media#!/home.php?sk=group_133245330064055)
might be a member....
also, there's a group photo, for those debating her level of attractiveness.

 :horrorsurprise:

The guy that created the group used to be the head of security or something at EMAW football and basketball games.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: Saulbadguy on December 13, 2010, 04:02:03 PM
She seems cool.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: chum1 on December 13, 2010, 04:03:23 PM
OT does anyone remember the writer at the collegian that also "danced" at Dr. Loves?  97/98?  Not that attractive but whateves.

Yeah, sort of knew her.  Coincidentally, facebook suggested I add her just last night.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: Pete on December 13, 2010, 04:12:35 PM
I think her stuff is kinda funny. predictable.... but funny. PETE, go to the club orleans or something man! mendenhall is the epitome of "meh"

Hey, on a superficial level I'll agree with you.  What I am trying to say here is that this talented young lady is putting out a very, very heavy vibe that she'd be completely down with whatever manner of bedroom schenannigan you could come up with. 

I could be wrong.  But, I think I have at least as much anecdotal evidence to support my claim as she has relied upon to make arguments in a good number of her Collegian contributions.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: Pete on December 13, 2010, 04:15:37 PM
OT does anyone remember the writer at the collegian that also "danced" at Dr. Loves?  97/98?  Not that attractive but whateves.

Yeah, sort of knew her.  Coincidentally, facebook suggested I add her just last night.

Is it just me, or does it seem like we are headed directly toward a "Girls of the Colllegian" calendar thing here?  Could work.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: DQ12 on December 13, 2010, 04:26:45 PM
OT does anyone remember the writer at the collegian that also "danced" at Dr. Loves?  97/98?  Not that attractive but whateves.

Yeah, sort of knew her.  Coincidentally, facebook suggested I add her just last night.

Is it just me, or does it seem like we are headed directly toward a "Girls of the Colllegian" calendar thing here?  Could work.

Time for goEMAW to scatter its seed.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: pissclams on December 13, 2010, 04:39:51 PM
girls of goEMAW has a great ring to it
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: Pete on December 13, 2010, 04:41:03 PM
girls of goEMAW has a great ring to it

Can we pull that off without being creepy?  :dunno:  Could be tough.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: WillieWatanabe on December 13, 2010, 05:13:33 PM
girls of goEMAW has a great ring to it

Can we pull that off without being creepy?  :dunno:  Could be tough.

well i believe there are only about 2 here that would be worth it :dunno:
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: EMAWgeddon on December 13, 2010, 05:19:17 PM
girls of goEMAW has a great ring to it

Can we pull that off without being creepy?  :dunno:  Could be tough.


No.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: EMAWmeister on December 13, 2010, 05:19:32 PM
girls of goEMAW has a great ring to it

Can we pull that off without being creepy?  :dunno:  Could be tough.

well i believe there are only about 2 here that would be worth it :dunno:

FYP
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: EMAWgeddon on December 13, 2010, 05:24:03 PM

Can we pull that off without being creepy?  :dunno:  Could be tough.
[/quote]


No.
[/quote]

Actually, I take that back. If you set it up under the guise of a sports reporting job I might totally go for it.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: hemmy on December 13, 2010, 06:14:26 PM
Who cares if we are creepy :dunno:
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: reidrolled on December 13, 2010, 06:20:19 PM
OT does anyone remember the writer at the collegian that also "danced" at Dr. Loves?  97/98?  Not that attractive but whateves.

Yeah, sort of knew her.  Coincidentally, facebook suggested I add her just last night.

Is it just me, or does it seem like we are headed directly toward a "Girls of the Colllegian" calendar thing here?  Could work.

Time for goEMAW to scatter its seed.

petes got dibs on scattering his seed on beth
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: MakeItRain on December 13, 2010, 10:22:46 PM
OT does anyone remember the writer at the collegian that also "danced" at Dr. Loves?  97/98?  Not that attractive but whateves.

Paige Goetz, she was pretty beat up as all Dr. Loves dancers were, goth chick, good writer
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: Trim on December 13, 2010, 10:33:37 PM
Actually, I take that back. If you set it up under the guise of a sports reporting job I might totally go for it.

"Now let's kick it over to 'E-Ged' and the goEMAW sports minute."
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on December 13, 2010, 11:11:06 PM
OT does anyone remember the writer at the collegian that also "danced" at Dr. Loves?  97/98?  Not that attractive but whateves.

Paige Goetz, she was pretty beat up as all Dr. Loves dancers were, goth chick, good writer

true daris story, i moved some freezers for love in the 93 flood. moved them from dr loves to his house in warner pk. got a couple of crisp twenties for about an hour and a half of work.

true daris story #2. love may or may not have let three friends and i in and drink for free for our high
school graduation gift.

true daris story #3. don't really care for mendenhall. she is trying too hard and taking pretty easy shots while doing so. jmo fellas.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: felix rex on December 14, 2010, 08:00:02 AM
EPAW was solid. The weird anti-milk rant was questionable, but decent in terms of an odd swipe against agricultural. Picking on greeks doesn't do much for me.

Things Beth should target:
NBAF
AA flights
Sandstorm
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on December 14, 2010, 08:03:25 AM
EPAW was solid. The weird anti-milk rant was questionable, but decent in terms of an odd swipe against agricultural. Picking on greeks doesn't do much for me.

Things Beth should target:
NBAF
AA flights
Sandstorm

greeks are just too easy of a target. part of me wonders how good of a job she could've done backing carsy this year. that was at least challenging.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: Trim on December 14, 2010, 08:14:12 AM
I want to see Beth vs. Potz-lov'rs/front-row'rs.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: pissclams on December 14, 2010, 08:38:13 AM
OT does anyone remember the writer at the collegian that also "danced" at Dr. Loves?  97/98?  Not that attractive but whateves.

Paige Goetz, she was pretty beat up as all Dr. Loves dancers were, goth chick, good writer

true daris story, i moved some freezers for love in the 93 flood. moved them from dr loves to his house in warner pk. got a couple of crisp twenties for about an hour and a half of work.

true daris story #2. love may or may not have let three friends and i in and drink for free for our high
school graduation gift.

true daris story #3. don't really care for mendenhall. she is trying to hard and taking pretty easy shots while doing so. jmo fellas.
hired a couple of love's dancers for a bachelor party.  wow.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: felix rex on December 14, 2010, 08:51:30 AM
I want to see Beth vs. Potz-lov'rs/front-row'rs.

Maybe with an accompanying editorial cartoon taking an edgy stance on tucking things into shorts.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: Poster formerly known as jthutch on December 14, 2010, 10:08:56 AM
OT does anyone remember the writer at the collegian that also "danced" at Dr. Loves?  97/98?  Not that attractive but whateves.

Paige Goetz, she was pretty beat up as all Dr. Loves dancers were, goth chick, good writer

Yep that's her, couldn't remember the name.  Remembered her writing about dancing at Dr. Loves.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: Dugout DickStone on December 14, 2010, 10:19:12 AM
OT does anyone remember the writer at the collegian that also "danced" at Dr. Loves?  97/98?  Not that attractive but whateves.

Paige Goetz, she was pretty beat up as all Dr. Loves dancers were, goth chick, good writer

Yep that's her, couldn't remember the name.  Remembered her writing about dancing at Dr. Loves.

LSOC will neither confirm or deny the rumor that he hit it.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: cdwildcat on December 14, 2010, 08:58:37 PM
hmmm. she's a 'slampiece' if you ask me

greatest comment on goEMAW to date
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: bethmendenhall on December 19, 2010, 10:24:08 PM
well I'll give this thread a giant L.O.L.

got the link off someone's twitter post and honestly kind of pleased to see the sometimes-not-overwhelmingly-negative response. i do think its a little weird that you all are analyzing my appearance - the picture someone found is of me and my debate partner Derek at last year's National Debate Tournament. The red highlights happened on drunken bet, but I kept them for awhile.

How do you feel about everything you've said now that you know I'm reading it?

Anyway, I'm a nice person and pretty intelligent, but sometimes my message comes off poorly when constrained to 600 words and with no control over titles and editing. I do love K-State like crazy, and always will - don't forget that :)
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: CrushNasty on December 19, 2010, 10:26:49 PM
well I'll give this thread a giant L.O.L.

got the link off someone's twitter post and honestly kind of pleased to see the sometimes-not-overwhelmingly-negative response. i do think its a little weird that you all are analyzing my appearance - the picture someone found is of me and my debate partner Derek at last year's National Debate Tournament. The red highlights happened on drunken bet, but I kept them for awhile.

How do you feel about everything you've said now that you know I'm reading it?

Anyway, I'm a nice person and pretty intelligent, but sometimes my message comes off poorly when constrained to 600 words and with no control over titles and editing. I do love K-State like crazy, and always will - don't forget that :)

 :surprised:/ :goodbyecruelworld:
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: DQ12 on December 19, 2010, 10:49:22 PM
OMG Reidrolled is SO busted.  
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: MakeItRain on December 19, 2010, 11:16:05 PM
well I'll give this thread a giant L.O.L.

got the link off someone's twitter post and honestly kind of pleased to see the sometimes-not-overwhelmingly-negative response. i do think its a little weird that you all are analyzing my appearance - the picture someone found is of me and my debate partner Derek at last year's National Debate Tournament. The red highlights happened on drunken bet, but I kept them for awhile.

How do you feel about everything you've said now that you know I'm reading it?

Anyway, I'm a nice person and pretty intelligent, but sometimes my message comes off poorly when constrained to 600 words and with no control over titles and editing. I do love K-State like crazy, and always will - don't forget that :)

Merry motherfucking Christmas to me.  Thanks Beth
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: Pete on December 19, 2010, 11:46:29 PM
well I'll give this thread a giant L.O.L.

got the link off someone's twitter post and honestly kind of pleased to see the sometimes-not-overwhelmingly-negative response. i do think its a little weird that you all are analyzing my appearance - the picture someone found is of me and my debate partner Derek at last year's National Debate Tournament. The red highlights happened on drunken bet, but I kept them for awhile.

How do you feel about everything you've said now that you know I'm reading it?

Anyway, I'm a nice person and pretty intelligent, but sometimes my message comes off poorly when constrained to 600 words and with no control over titles and editing. I do love K-State like crazy, and always will - don't forget that :)

HOLY crap...this is bigger than when we got Jeff Martin or Will Spradlings Dad to post (less than Ma' Beazy, however).

I hope Beth sticks around and posts frequently......HUGE fan here.   :blush:
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: WillieWatanabe on December 19, 2010, 11:50:52 PM

Will Spradlings Dad to post


when did this happen?? username??
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: Cire on December 19, 2010, 11:51:55 PM
Keep up the good work Beth and keep posting here.  We need to reach the backwards ass rubes from western ks that post here.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: Pete on December 19, 2010, 11:53:00 PM

Will Spradlings Dad to post


when did this happen?? username??

It was at Fans, but he lurks....he lurks....
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: Trim on December 20, 2010, 12:10:14 AM
well I'll give this thread a giant L.O.L.

got the link off someone's twitter post and honestly kind of pleased to see the sometimes-not-overwhelmingly-negative response. i do think its a little weird that you all are analyzing my appearance - the picture someone found is of me and my debate partner Derek at last year's National Debate Tournament. The red highlights happened on drunken bet, but I kept them for awhile.

How do you feel about everything you've said now that you know I'm reading it?

Anyway, I'm a nice person and pretty intelligent, but sometimes my message comes off poorly when constrained to 600 words and with no control over titles and editing. I do love K-State like crazy, and always will - don't forget that :)

:gocho:
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: MakeItRain on December 20, 2010, 12:47:11 AM

Will Spradlings Dad to post


when did this happen?? username??

It was at Fans, but he lurks....he lurks....

 :ohno: I don't hate your son, I just think Martavious is better, its just because I'm a confirmed racist.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: 0.42 on December 20, 2010, 03:08:43 AM
I'm not sure who to thank for this, but whoever it is, your board cred just went through the rough ridin' roof
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: felix rex on December 20, 2010, 06:51:09 AM
well I'll give this thread a giant L.O.L.

got the link off someone's twitter post and honestly kind of pleased to see the sometimes-not-overwhelmingly-negative response. i do think its a little weird that you all are analyzing my appearance - the picture someone found is of me and my debate partner Derek at last year's National Debate Tournament. The red highlights happened on drunken bet, but I kept them for awhile.

How do you feel about everything you've said now that you know I'm reading it?

Anyway, I'm a nice person and pretty intelligent, but sometimes my message comes off poorly when constrained to 600 words and with no control over titles and editing. I do love K-State like crazy, and always will - don't forget that :)

EPAW, Beth.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: Trim on December 20, 2010, 08:36:00 AM
I'm not sure who to thank for this, but whoever it is, your board cred just went through the rough ridin' roof

MIR.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on December 20, 2010, 08:43:35 AM
crazy

Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: chum1 on December 20, 2010, 08:58:50 AM
How do you feel about everything you've said now that you know I'm reading it?

aroused.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: OK_Cat on December 20, 2010, 09:19:35 AM
hey beth,

you're kind of a $!#*, but you have a great goEMAW.com attitude towards society in general, so welcome.  (plus you're a girl, so half of the virgins on this board will qft all of your posts) 

quick question....how do you feel about dead people jokes?

just checking,

ok_cat
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: CNS on December 20, 2010, 09:34:03 AM
Immediate usage of the hard "c".

 :surprised: (only not)
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: reidrolled on December 20, 2010, 10:40:34 AM
I am SOOO going down for cyber-bullying!  :runaway:
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: Kat Kid on December 20, 2010, 11:57:15 AM
well I'll give this thread a giant L.O.L.

got the link off someone's twitter post and honestly kind of pleased to see the sometimes-not-overwhelmingly-negative response. i do think its a little weird that you all are analyzing my appearance - the picture someone found is of me and my debate partner Derek at last year's National Debate Tournament. The red highlights happened on drunken bet, but I kept them for awhile.

How do you feel about everything you've said now that you know I'm reading it?

Anyway, I'm a nice person and pretty intelligent, but sometimes my message comes off poorly when constrained to 600 words and with no control over titles and editing. I do love K-State like crazy, and always will - don't forget that :)

Outside of the creepers evaluating your appearance, how would you characterize the discourse on the site?  Also, would you consider writing a column about any of the topics mentioned?  Or perhaps about your growing internet clebrity?
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: pike on December 20, 2010, 12:09:46 PM
As I said earlier I got high with Beth and some others once. Beth u are a nice and friendly person, but never will you convince me to stop eating meat!
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: felix rex on December 20, 2010, 12:34:33 PM
As I said earlier I got high with Beth and some others once. Beth u are a nice and friendly person, but never will you convince me to stop eating meat!

What about drinking mucus-filled milk?
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: steve dave on December 20, 2010, 12:35:53 PM
Beth, did you notice our inclusiveness by adding "or vag" to the "shows that have you by the balls or vag" thread?  wow. 
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: chunkles on December 20, 2010, 12:47:02 PM
either she's never coming back OR she will and subsequently own the place.
she is winner of the universe in both scenarios guys. 
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: OK_Cat on December 20, 2010, 01:21:08 PM
Beth, did you notice our inclusiveness by adding "or vag" to the "shows that have you by the balls or vag" thread?  wow. 

excellent point.  too bad 'clams couldn't do the same in his BGE threads.   :comehere:
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: Kat Kid on December 20, 2010, 01:23:33 PM
either she's never coming back OR she will and subsequently own the place.
she is winner of the universe in both scenarios guys. 

This cannot be over emphasized!
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: AbeFroman on December 20, 2010, 02:26:20 PM
She's kinda hot too. We should get her to post here.

I'm going to take credit for starting the movement even if someone else linked her to here.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: WillieWatanabe on December 20, 2010, 02:47:04 PM
It literally feels like she has me by the balls right now. And I'm pretty sure there is nothing I can do about it.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: steve dave on December 20, 2010, 02:49:27 PM
Beth, would you be interested in having your own goEMAW.com blog? 
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: hemmy on December 20, 2010, 05:31:04 PM
Please don't include this site in the collegian.

We all know how it worked out for ksufans
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: 8manpick on October 24, 2012, 02:01:42 PM
Guys I need your help on this one.  My apartment is a 2 story house, my roommate and I have the basement apartment.  We don't really know the other guys in the house, other than saying hello if we happen to cross paths, I probably wouldn't recognize them if I saw them somewhere other than our house.  Anyway, I got home last night to see a pumpkin on the front porch carved with "EPAW."  I'm not sure whether it was done seriously, or in jest, but I would guess it is serious, and I don't like it. What should I do about this? Might try to get a picture tonight.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: yoga-like_abana on October 24, 2012, 02:05:44 PM
explain EMAW to him and if he doesn't "get it" gallagher the pumpkin.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: 'taterblast on October 24, 2012, 02:13:18 PM
blare the F14 EMAW song and Smashing Pumpkins songs back and forth on your stereo until they figure it out
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: 8manpick on October 24, 2012, 02:14:12 PM
blare the F14 EMAW song and Smashing Pumpkins songs back and forth on your stereo until they figure it out

I like it. :bill:
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: The1BigWillie on October 24, 2012, 02:19:19 PM
Take a picture.  Carve a new replacement pumpkin with EMAW.  Place new and improved EMAW pumpkin in EPAW pumpkins place.  Sit EPAW pumpkin next to EMAW pumpkin with butcher knife stuck into it.  Take another picture. 

Message Received.

Post Pictures.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: 8manpick on October 24, 2012, 02:21:07 PM
Take a picture.  Carve a new replacement pumpkin with EMAW.  Place new and improved EMAW pumpkin in EPAW pumpkins place.  Sit EPAW pumpkin next to EMAW pumpkin with butcher knife stuck into it.  Take another picture. 

Message Received.

Post Pictures.

god damnit, I love this idea, but it seems like a lot of work.  Will consider.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: Winters on October 24, 2012, 02:23:42 PM
Sneak inside their place and take a big poop on their bed.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: Bloodfart on October 24, 2012, 02:30:55 PM
Sneak inside their place and take a big poop on their bed.
:peek:
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: Saulbadguy on October 24, 2012, 02:40:49 PM
bake them a pumpkin pie
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: Mr Bread on October 24, 2012, 03:27:41 PM
Sneak inside their place and take a big poop on their bed.
:peek:

I like where winters' head is at, but the obvious choice if you're pooping on/in something is the 'kin.  Poop in the 'kin.  Winters'll get there, just needs some time to grow some fuzz on these beautiful baby peaches of his. 
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: puniraptor on October 24, 2012, 03:40:27 PM
carve an EMAPE response pumpkin
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: MakeItRain on October 24, 2012, 11:22:02 PM
Seems like a great tribute to EMAWgeddon's pony.  Use this as an icebreaker to have a chat and then you all can have real life convos about experiences at goEMAW.com
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: Institutional Control on October 25, 2012, 08:09:50 AM
Some chick posted EPAW on my Facebook page after the OU game. What's that mean?
Title: EPAW II
Post by: puniraptor on October 25, 2012, 08:17:27 AM
Some chick posted EPAW on my Facebook page after the OU game. What's that mean?

She likes you
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: Institutional Control on October 25, 2012, 08:26:45 AM
Some chick posted EPAW on my Facebook page after the OU game. What's that mean?

She likes you

Well, that's a given. Like most KSU men, I'm irresistible.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: jtksu on October 26, 2012, 06:05:46 PM
Take a picture.  Carve a new replacement pumpkin with EMAW.  Place new and improved EMAW pumpkin in EPAW pumpkins place.  Sit EPAW pumpkin next to EMAW pumpkin with butcher knife stuck into it.  Take another picture. 

Message Received.

Post Pictures.

god damnit, I love this idea, but it seems like a lot of work.  Will consider.

Damn right its to much work.  Just stick a regular pumpkin next to the EPAW lantern on, then stick a knife in it, with a note simplying  "You." Not sure if they'll get the right message or not but I bet they'll keep the their noses out of your business from now on.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: Trim on November 23, 2013, 01:02:50 AM
:sdeek:

http://www.kstatecollegian.com/2013/11/22/emaw-still-indicative-of-white-heterosexual-male-dominant-society/

http://www.kstatecollegian.com/2013/11/22/marching-formation-of-actively-used-emaw-phrase-should-return/
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep on November 23, 2013, 08:31:38 AM
oh, shes a senior studying womens studies?

 :Wha:
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: Trim on November 23, 2013, 08:40:06 AM
Maybe we should have a side goal of the Fatty Fund be establishing an EMAW education course that all freshmen have to go through as part of orientation.
Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: CNS on November 23, 2013, 07:26:14 PM
Pretty advanced philosophy course required to teach this, imo.  A lot of ppl just don't get it.

Sent from my KFTT using Tapatalk 2

Title: Re: EPAW II
Post by: CNS on November 23, 2013, 07:27:16 PM
Some real higher plane stuff

Sent from my KFTT using Tapatalk 2