goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: jtksu on November 13, 2010, 03:40:02 PM

Title: POS Cosh
Post by: jtksu on November 13, 2010, 03:40:02 PM: OMG!!! Cosh sucks and Vic rules!!! Lol!!! ROFL!!!
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: SkinnyBenny on November 13, 2010, 05:43:58 PM: kstatefans.com is that-a-way, sir...
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: jtksu on November 13, 2010, 05:47:52 PM: Is it anywhere near Minnesota?
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: Tobias on November 13, 2010, 05:50:35 PM: Beasley and Walker :love: :woot:
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: HeinBallz on November 13, 2010, 05:52:55 PM: what game this year has KSU held an opposing offense under 400 yards? :users:
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: ChiComCat on November 13, 2010, 05:54:37 PM: lol @ Vic. His total defense is only 58 spots in front of ours. Stupid son-of-a-bitch
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: SkinnyBenny on November 13, 2010, 06:17:14 PM: Quote from: Tobias on November 13, 2010, 05:50:35 PM
Beasley and Walker :love: :woot:

Guys! I was at that game! :ksu:
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: T42YS on November 13, 2010, 06:45:18 PM: Quote from: ChiCat on November 13, 2010, 05:54:37 PM
lol @ Vic. His total defense is only 58 spots in front of ours. Stupid son-of-a-bitch

<---------------------------------
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: jtksu on November 13, 2010, 07:36:37 PM: His beloved defense gave up 38 pts to freakin' Minnesota. That's like losing to Colorado or Kansas. How many pts did Cosh and Company give up to #17 Mizzou, in Columbia? How about Okie State? Texas? Cosh rules and Vic drools!!! Lol!! ROFL!!! LMAO!!!
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: T42YS on November 13, 2010, 07:47:20 PM: Quote from: jtksu on November 13, 2010, 07:36:37 PM
His beloved defense gave up 38 pts to freakin' Minnesota. That's like losing to Colorado or Kansas. How many pts did Cosh and Company give up to #17 Mizzou, in Columbia? How about Okie State? Texas? Cosh rules and Vic drools!!! Lol!! ROFL!!! LMAO!!!

Fans like you are why we can't have nice things.
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: Panjandrum on November 13, 2010, 07:47:43 PM: Quote from: jtksu on November 13, 2010, 03:40:02 PM
OMG!!! Cosh sucks and Vic rules!!! Lol!!! ROFL!!!

I assume your just doing whatever the hell it is you do, but yes, Cosh sucks.

I'm hoping he walked back to Manhattan from Columbia.
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: jtksu on November 13, 2010, 07:49:00 PM: I thought T42YS was a KU fan?
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: T42YS on November 13, 2010, 07:52:49 PM: Quote from: jtksu on November 13, 2010, 07:49:00 PM
I thought T42YS was a KU fan?

Hold on, lemme pull that joke out of the pantry.

WOW! This one's expiration date was a good three months ago!
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: jtksu on November 13, 2010, 07:58:08 PM: So, you were a KU fan until football season? Certainly has all the symptoms of a KU fan.
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: T42YS on November 13, 2010, 08:00:13 PM: Quote from: jtksu on November 13, 2010, 07:58:08 PM
So, you were a KU fan until football season? Certainly has all the symptoms of a KU fan.

Please stop deflecting from the fact that you are singlehandedly responsible for why Kansas State University can't have nice things.
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: ChiComCat on November 13, 2010, 08:08:50 PM: He gave up 31 points against a team that took its foot off the gas early in the 4th. Lets throw him a rough ridin' parade.
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: jtksu on November 13, 2010, 08:14:54 PM: I'm sure that your sudden change of colors and constant bitching about the program will get this thing going in the right direction!!
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: T42YS on November 13, 2010, 08:15:48 PM: Quote from: jtksu on November 13, 2010, 08:14:54 PM
I'm sure that your sudden change of colors and constant bitching about the program will get this thing going in the right direction!!

Yes, because your shitty posting is really going to change anyone's minds.
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: mcmwcat on November 13, 2010, 11:16:49 PM: regression :cry:
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: SkinnyBenny on November 14, 2010, 12:20:04 AM: JT. Try to convince us we wouldn't be better at defense with Vic. Can't wait to read it.
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: jtksu on November 14, 2010, 12:33:38 AM: How about Illinois giving up the same amoun of pts to Minnesota today as we gave up to Mizzou? Oh, and Illinois has better Jimmies than we have Joes. What was Vic's favorite thing to say about Jimmies and Joes? I can't remember because that supposed recruiting guru landed jackshit for recruits while he was here. "I have a 4* DT that will follow me anywhere." -Vic
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: swish1 on November 14, 2010, 02:40:20 AM: Quote from: jtksu on November 14, 2010, 12:33:38 AM
How about Illinois giving up the same amoun of pts to Minnesota today as we gave up to Mizzou? Oh, and Illinois has better Jimmies than we have Joes. What was Vic's favorite thing to say about Jimmies and Joes? I can't remember because that supposed recruiting guru landed jackcac for recruits while he was here. "I have a 4* DT that will follow me anywhere." -Vic

so Illinois = K-State?
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: jtksu on November 14, 2010, 04:04:13 AM: Wut?
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: ChiComCat on November 14, 2010, 08:19:58 AM: And clearly, working at a place for a year means you should be expected to land a crap-ton of recruits
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: catzacker on November 14, 2010, 09:16:17 AM: Total Defense: Illinois (38), KSU (104)
btw #1 - there are a 120 teams
btw #2 - Illinois was 91st in the country last year, KSU was 39th.
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: bubu54 on November 14, 2010, 10:36:20 AM: jt...keep up the good work....i'm with ya...the others seem to ignore the facts that don't fit their agenda...we aren't great but it isn't becasue we can't or haven't coached. weather they want to admit our talent at this point isn't up to speed or not they have proven over and over all they want to do it bitch...they look and act like they are joining the "kayne" tour....keep up the good work...
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: jtksu on November 14, 2010, 10:52:16 AM: Scoring defenses are #52 and #64. But they do play in the high flying Big 10...
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: doom on November 14, 2010, 11:00:11 AM: Quote from: catzacker on November 14, 2010, 09:16:17 AM
Total Defense: Illinois (38), KSU (104)
btw #1 - there are a 120 teams
btw #2 - Illinois was 91st in the country last year, KSU was 39th.

:eek: Wow Cosh blows.
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: ChiComCat on November 14, 2010, 11:02:23 AM: Quote from: jtksu on November 14, 2010, 10:52:16 AM
Scoring defenses are #52 and #64. But they do play in the high flying Big 10...

So, Vics scoring defense is better too? And your point is :dunno:

And the Big 10 is better than the Big 12 for the first time in a while. OSU, Iowa, Wisky, and maybe Mich St would win the Big 12.
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: jtksu on November 14, 2010, 11:06:31 AM: Yep. The Big 10 really has some hi flying offenses all right.
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: doom on November 14, 2010, 11:10:23 AM: Quote from: jtksu on November 14, 2010, 11:06:31 AM
Yep. The Big 10 really has some hi flying offenses all right.

What a Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) talking point you are holding onto for dear life.
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: jtksu on November 14, 2010, 03:04:51 PM: Doom- feel free to take note of Ching's finding concerning Def. efficiency. And then you may lick my taint.
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: Cire on November 14, 2010, 04:06:10 PM: There are lots of things about this team to draw a line and defend to the death. This is by far the most Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) of them.
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: Maccat on November 14, 2010, 04:12:43 PM: Idk whisky hung eighty on Indiana. I think they play in the Big Ten. :ck:
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: catzacker on November 14, 2010, 04:22:20 PM: Quote from: jtksu on November 14, 2010, 10:52:16 AM
Scoring defenses are #52 and #64. But they do play in the high flying Big 10...

Ill Scoring Defense last year ('09) - 96
KSU Scoring Defense Last year ('09)- 46

....KSU was 110th in scoring defense in '08. you tell me the difference?
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: jtksu on November 14, 2010, 04:54:14 PM: Yet our def. Efficiency has actually improved over last year's. How could that be? Vic is a god damn living legend!!
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: catzacker on November 20, 2010, 03:57:59 PM: :lol:
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: doom on November 20, 2010, 03:59:13 PM: Billy think you guys are fair weather fans. Shame on you! :nono:
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: CHONGS on November 20, 2010, 04:01:37 PM: gonna be fun to recalc DE after this game
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: wabash909 on November 20, 2010, 04:01:56 PM: Jtksu literally the biggest rough ridin' dumbass on this board. :lol:
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: jtksu on November 20, 2010, 04:07:29 PM: Illinois has given up 24 pts in the first half to the #74 offense in the country. NW averages 25.5 pts/g. Lol!!! Rofl!!! LMAO!!! OMG!!! Vic is the man!!!
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: ChiComCat on November 20, 2010, 04:09:38 PM: I'm more impressed that jt found the one stat that Cosh improved us in. Had to take a helluva lot of looking
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: wabash909 on November 20, 2010, 04:18:12 PM: Cosh. What a rough ridin' pussy.

Jesus Christ, jtksu. Could you look like more of a dumbass?
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: jtksu on November 20, 2010, 04:18:35 PM: Illinois- #52 scoring defense. KSU- #52. OMG!!! Vic is rough ridin' amazing!!! Lol!! ROFL!!!
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: Pexikan on November 20, 2010, 04:21:55 PM: Scoring defense :lol:
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: Pexikan on November 20, 2010, 04:22:39 PM: What about ACTUAL defense. Hmmm....
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: jtksu on November 20, 2010, 04:25:26 PM: Do the decide games by yardage now? I was under the impression they were decided by pts? :dunno:
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: ChiComCat on November 20, 2010, 04:27:59 PM: Quote from: jtksu on November 20, 2010, 04:18:35 PM
Illinois- #52 scoring defense. KSU- #52. OMG!!! Vic is rough ridin' amazing!!! Lol!! ROFL!!!

And last year we were better and they were worse. What changed?
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: PowercatPat on November 20, 2010, 04:33:56 PM: I likely won't watch one K-State football game next year if Cosh is our DC.
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: ChiComCat on November 20, 2010, 04:34:53 PM: I will not throw up either a combo or lynchmob sign until Cosh is gone. And you ahve my word as a gentleman on that
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: PandaXpanda on November 20, 2010, 04:35:21 PM: i would like cosh to lose his job.
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: Paul Moscow on November 20, 2010, 04:37:03 PM: Quote from: PowercatPat on November 20, 2010, 04:33:56 PM
I likely won't watch one K-State football game next year if Cosh is our DC.

I'll start now. When I go ahead and cancel my K-State All Access Pass here in a few minutes I'll be sure to be sure to type in the continued employment of Christopher Cosh as my reason.
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: T42YS on November 20, 2010, 04:37:39 PM: Quote from: jtksu on November 20, 2010, 04:25:26 PM
Do the decide games by yardage now? I was under the impression they were decided by pts? :dunno:

SHUT

THE

eff

UP
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: TheMadCatter on November 20, 2010, 04:37:46 PM: Quote from: ChiCat on November 20, 2010, 04:34:53 PM
I will not throw up either a combo or lynchmob sign until Cosh is gone. And you ahve my word as a gentleman on that

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Foi39.tinypic.com%2Frvhlrd.jpg&hash=b35e55581ae967eca97a8d793fbe786ab7c802b7)
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: jtksu on November 20, 2010, 04:38:32 PM: I would expect the decision to either fire or reassign Cosh to come sometime after next Sunday. No way that dude is still DC next year.
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: T42YS on November 20, 2010, 04:39:22 PM: Quote from: jtksu on November 20, 2010, 04:38:32 PM
I would expect the decision to either fire or reassign Cosh to come sometime after next Sunday. No way that dude is still DC next year.

thank you
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: Paul Moscow on November 20, 2010, 04:39:47 PM: Quote from: jtksu on November 20, 2010, 04:38:32 PM
I would expect the decision to either fire or reassign Cosh to come sometime after next Sunday. No way that dude is still DC next year.
:surprised:
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: EMAWzified on November 20, 2010, 04:40:35 PM: All JT is proving is that Vic sucked, too. It's not a defense for Cosh.
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: jtksu on November 20, 2010, 04:43:11 PM: I'm trying to remain calm but I am really scared about who could be his replacement. I really need a homerun hire and preferably one who could be our next HC. I'm afraid neither will be the case though. Maybe, if we get a guy like Leavitt, he will demand that he is able to bring in some of his own staff. Probably just wishful thinking.
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: mcmwcat on November 20, 2010, 04:45:43 PM: guys, jtksu is right. cosh should not be scapegoated. snyder should be the target
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: jtksu on November 20, 2010, 04:48:52 PM: Never said Cosh was good, just pointing out that Vic isn't much better. I don't want a DC that has his team in the 50's, I want to be back in the top-25. Vic was supposed to be some master recruiter and he has never really showed that ability, even at places like Clemson. Dude has had basically zero good/great recruits attributed to him. We need a hotshot recruiting DC. We need a Venables type of guy.
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: CHONGS on November 20, 2010, 04:50:19 PM: 2010 DE (UPDATED) = 28.6

DE in 2008 34.8
DE in 2009 27.7

:frown:
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: Fuktard on November 20, 2010, 05:05:56 PM: No idea what those rough ridin' numbers mean, but I don't need a rough ridin' "DE" to know that our defense is absolutely rough ridin' awful. We are dead last in the nation in yards per rush defense. Per game or scoring numbers are meaningless because of the way our offense shrinks the game. Cosh is rough ridin' horrendous...don't give me this "talent' bullshit argument...LAST IN THE NATION!
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: CHONGS on November 20, 2010, 05:09:21 PM: Quote from: Fuktard on November 20, 2010, 05:05:56 PM
No idea what those rough ridin' numbers mean, but I don't need a rough ridin' "DE" to know that our defense is absolutely rough ridin' awful. We are dead last in the nation in yards per rush defense. Per game or scoring numbers are meaningless because of the way our offense shrinks the game. Cosh is rough ridin' horrendous...don't give me this "talent' bullshit argument...LAST IN THE NATION!
:flush:
Those numbers are THE relevant stat when comparing defenses. They are normalized for pace.
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: Fuktard on November 20, 2010, 05:12:01 PM: I don't give a eff what they are nd I don't appreciate you trying to explain them to me...and please stop using big words like "normalized" becasue I don't know what that rough ridin' means either you pompous eff. No disrespect.
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: Trim on November 20, 2010, 05:13:14 PM: Quote from: Fuktard on November 20, 2010, 05:12:01 PM
I don't give a eff what they are nd I don't appreciate you trying to explain them to me...and please stop using big words like "normalized" becasue I don't know what that rough ridin' means either you pompous eff. No disrespect.

I bet chings didn't even go to K-State, using big words like normalized.
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: CHONGS on November 20, 2010, 05:14:00 PM: Quote from: Fuktard on November 20, 2010, 05:12:01 PM
I don't give a eff what they are nd I don't appreciate you trying to explain them to me...and please stop using big words like "normalized" becasue I don't know what that rough ridin' means either you pompous eff. No disrespect.
:lol: rock on bro
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: catzacker on November 20, 2010, 05:37:28 PM: Quote from: Chingon on November 20, 2010, 04:50:19 PM
2010 DE (UPDATED) = 28.6

DE in 2008 34.8
DE in 2009 27.7

:frown:

this may be a dumb question, but does DE take into consideration SOS? either way, fantastic job by Cosh this year. HE'S NOT AS BAD AS TIBS.
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: CHONGS on November 20, 2010, 05:41:29 PM: Quote from: catzacker on November 20, 2010, 05:37:28 PM
Quote from: Chingon on November 20, 2010, 04:50:19 PM
2010 DE (UPDATED) = 28.6

DE in 2008 34.8
DE in 2009 27.7

:frown:

this may be a dumb question, but does DE take into consideration SOS? either way, fantastic job by Cosh this year. HE'S NOT AS BAD AS TIBS.
If you looked at the ones from the CPI this year, they did take into account SOS. I was too lazy to adjust the previous years' DE for SOS. The #'s above are raw, but if I did account for SOS I imagine this year's DE would be worse, but still not as bad as 2008 :kugoalposts:
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: wabash909 on November 20, 2010, 06:33:17 PM: Vic. 114th ranked defense to 60th rated defense (in one year).

:flush:
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: SkinnyBenny on November 20, 2010, 07:12:05 PM: Quote from: jtksu on November 14, 2010, 04:54:14 PM
Yet our def. Efficiency has actually improved over last year's. How could that be? Vic is a god damn living legend!!

lolwut
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: jtksu on November 20, 2010, 07:20:09 PM: Should I type slower so you can catch up?
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 20, 2010, 07:22:23 PM: jt is really working the coaching staff glory hole tonight.
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: SkinnyBenny on November 20, 2010, 07:28:02 PM: Quote from: jtksu on November 20, 2010, 07:20:09 PM
Should I type slower so you can catch up?

You're right, Cosh is super good.
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 20, 2010, 07:45:49 PM: After today K-State will likely go to the 105th or 106th ranked total defense in the country.
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: wabash909 on November 20, 2010, 08:05:05 PM: Quote from: sonofdaxjones on November 20, 2010, 07:45:49 PM
After today K-State will likely go to the 105th or 106th ranked total defense in the country.

Impressive. And Tibs had the velvet rope ranked 114th in 08. Cosh still could eclipse that mark yet depending on how much ineptitude we can muster over the course of the next two weeks.

Did I mention we were 60th ranked last season?
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: ChiComCat on November 20, 2010, 08:52:43 PM: Illini Defense Gives Up 3 in Second Half
Vic laughs at dumbshit jtksu
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: jtksu on November 20, 2010, 09:06:33 PM: Kinda hard to imagine that you guys have lived this long. Guess natural selection is a myth. Also- Illinois had 559 total yards, 519 on the ground! Dude ran for like 330 yards. Ouch!
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 20, 2010, 09:15:33 PM: Pretty impressive jt . . .
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: KSU_foo on November 20, 2010, 09:25:23 PM: I think JT drank one of those 4Lokos or something. Dude's spazzing out.
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: wabash909 on November 20, 2010, 09:48:24 PM: Quote from: jtksu on November 20, 2010, 09:06:33 PM
Kinda hard to imagine that you guys have lived this long. Guess natural selection is a myth. Also- Illinois had 559 total yards, 519 on the ground! Dude ran for like 330 yards. Ouch!

The 60th ranked overall defense last year, jt! Can you believe it?!!!!
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: HazKat on November 22, 2010, 03:53:36 PM: Everybody give up on the Vic comparisons already. Pointless.
Everybody's talking about Leavitt as a replacement, but what about this guy?

http://gofrogs.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/mtt/bumpas_dick00.html (http://gofrogs.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/mtt/bumpas_dick00.html)
Spent time with Patterson at KSU. Name's Dick... plus, 'stache...
'Stache has to be good for at least 1 4* a year...
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: jtksu on November 22, 2010, 03:58:48 PM: Quote from: HazKat on November 22, 2010, 03:53:36 PM
Everybody give up on the Vic comparisons already. Pointless.
Everybody's talking about Leavitt as a replacement, but what about this guy?

http://gofrogs.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/mtt/bumpas_dick00.html (http://gofrogs.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/mtt/bumpas_dick00.html)
Spent time with Patterson at KSU. Name's Dick... plus, 'stache...
'Stache has to be good for at least 1 4* a year...

Dude looks like Capt. Kangaroo and his name is Dick. Likely a child molester.
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: MadCat on November 22, 2010, 04:01:50 PM: Quote from: jtksu on November 22, 2010, 03:58:48 PM
Quote from: HazKat on November 22, 2010, 03:53:36 PM
Everybody give up on the Vic comparisons already. Pointless.
Everybody's talking about Leavitt as a replacement, but what about this guy?

http://gofrogs.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/mtt/bumpas_dick00.html (http://gofrogs.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/mtt/bumpas_dick00.html)
Spent time with Patterson at KSU. Name's Dick... plus, 'stache...
'Stache has to be good for at least 1 4* a year...

Dude looks like Capt. Kangaroo and his name is Dick. Likely a child molester.

He prolly wears contacts so no one sees his child molester glasses.
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: HazKat on November 22, 2010, 04:39:07 PM: Dear Bill, please print the following, sign, and deliver to Chris Cosh. Please...

ATTN: Chris Cosh
From: LHC Bill Snyder
Dearest Chris,

I will begin this letter by first apologizing for not having enough time lately to properly supervise and coach you on the finer points of fielding a successful division 1 defense. My son recently brought it to my attention that we seem to be having some problems, both during practice and during games on Saturdays of having “players make plays.” Though you know how deeply I feel about improving morale and teaching young people how to be successful in both playing football and preparing for life after school, perhaps I have not made it totally clear that my focus is primarily on young people in our football program. Though I appreciate your dedicated and fairly routine attempts to get youngsters national recognition for having outstanding performances on the football field, I would be remise if I did not notify you that most of those players are playing for opposing teams. Though I have too little space in this document to list all of those youngsters names (like Taylor Martinez, Rodney Stewart, Blaine Gabbert, Austen Arnoud, Brandon Weedon, Kendall Hunter, Robert Griffin III, Ronnie Weaver and Jeff Godfrey) I’m sure if you go back and actually review film from some prior games, you can probably generate a fairly long list. Though I know you usually don’t review game footage, at this point I would recommend it so you can actually follow the point I’m trying to make.

(I would like to point out however, that you can feel free to be a more active participant in my Kansas Mentors Program.)

I just had John Currie in my office and we had a nice little chat about numbers and what they could possibly mean. As you know, I do not read the interwebs or have need for things like calculators, but John seems fairly enamored with them and seems convinced that having a Defense rated in the 100s throughout the season is actually a bad thing. Evidently, it’s supposed to be the other way around, with a lower number “better.” I’m all for getting a little bit better every day and I was under the impression that, since your numbers kept getting higher each week, you were doing better, but alas, that is not the case.

Though I feel you’re like family… (like a distant cousin that somehow shows up on Thanksgiving, eats all the food, clogs up your toilet and then slips away into the night) my hand is forced and I’m going to have to ask you to resign from your position as Defensive coordinator. We do need some extra help in the front office with things like shredding financial documents and the like so if you’d like to stay involved with K-State athletics, by all means feel free to do so.

I do hope you’ll stay around to watch your son get his chance at being an active participant on the practice field and be a good cheerleader as any father should. To help with those endeavors, please find the enclosed Powercat™ visors for you and your family. We look forward to seeing you (in the stands) in the future.
Thanks,
LHC Bill Snyder
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: pissclams on November 22, 2010, 05:03:26 PM: that's a long post
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: jtksu on November 22, 2010, 05:09:13 PM: Quote from: catzacker on November 14, 2010, 04:22:20 PM
Quote from: jtksu on November 14, 2010, 10:52:16 AM
Scoring defenses are #52 and #64. But they do play in the high flying Big 10...

Ill Scoring Defense last year ('09) - 96
KSU Scoring Defense Last year ('09)- 46

....KSU was 110th in scoring defense in '08. you tell me the difference?

You grew finally ball hair in '09? I don't know, what was the question?
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: sonofdaxjones on November 23, 2010, 05:52:58 AM: K-State Defensive Rankings:

109th in Total Defense Conference Rank 11th.

Rushing Defense 117th Conference Rank 12th

Passing Eff Defense 41st

Passing Defense 63rd

70th in Scoring Defense
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: MadCat on November 23, 2010, 09:31:56 AM: Can't wait to see what the flying worms do to us on their Senior Day. :barf:
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: wabash909 on November 27, 2010, 03:10:27 PM: Let's go ahead and hoist this effer back up!
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: jtksu on November 27, 2010, 03:31:27 PM: Just think, this all but guarantees that Cosh will be gone on Monday!
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: wabash909 on November 27, 2010, 03:34:12 PM: Quote from: jtksu on November 27, 2010, 03:31:27 PM
Just think, this all but guarantees that Cosh will be gone on Monday!

He should have never compromised the progam in the first place.

And no, I gaurantee you this eff won't be gone on Monday. I guarantee it.
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: PowercatPat on November 27, 2010, 04:14:53 PM: We're right back to where we were with Prince and Tibesar. This is embarrassing. I'd do almost anything to have Leavitt next year.
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: wabash909 on November 27, 2010, 05:38:26 PM: ESPN announcer:

"I watched the gametape on K-State and the one thing I don't see is that attacking defense".

:lol:
Title: Re: POS Cosh
Post by: Sugar Dick on November 27, 2010, 05:43:05 PM: Quote from: PowercatPat on November 27, 2010, 04:14:53 PM
We're right back to where we were with Prince and Tibesar. This is embarrassing. I'd do almost anything to have Leavitt next year.