goemaw.com

General Discussion => The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit => Topic started by: LickNeckey on October 15, 2010, 10:36:34 AM

Title: Religous Right?
Post by: LickNeckey on October 15, 2010, 10:36:34 AM
I understand that the republican right claims to be the true party of christianity and the moral compass of our nation.  However it seems to me that the right is also fundamentally opposed to most policies that Christ would seemingly support.  It seems to me that this Jesus fellow was all about helping the sick and the poor is soceity.  I think i read he railed against greed and even went as far as pomising the meek the earth.

So why is it that the heathen god hating lib's seemingly support the policies that reflect the teachings of christ and the party of religiosity does not?

thoughts?
Title: Re: Religous Right?
Post by: Dirty Sanchez on October 15, 2010, 11:23:55 AM
 :facepalm:
Title: Re: Religous Right?
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on October 15, 2010, 11:50:37 AM
Is LickNecky a BMW sock?
Title: Re: Religous Right?
Post by: mortons toe on October 15, 2010, 12:05:46 PM
I understand that the republican right claims to be the true party of christianity and the moral compass of our nation.  However it seems to me that the right is also fundamentally opposed to most policies that Christ would seemingly support.  It seems to me that this Jesus fellow was all about helping the sick and the poor is soceity.  I think i read he railed against greed and even went as far as pomising the meek the earth.

So why is it that the heathen god hating lib's seemingly support the policies that reflect the teachings of christ and the party of religiosity does not?

thoughts?

Last time I checked, the republican right supports entities such as the Red Cross, etc in a much greater fashion than the left... bye bye
Title: Re: Religous Right?
Post by: Jeffy on October 15, 2010, 12:23:47 PM
March 27, 2008
Conservatives More Liberal Givers
By George Will

WASHINGTON -- Residents of Austin, Texas, home of the state's government and flagship university, have very refined social consciences, if they do say so themselves, and they do say so, speaking via bumper stickers. Don R. Willett, a justice of the state Supreme Court, has commuted behind bumpers proclaiming "Better a Bleeding Heart Than None at All," "Practice Random Acts of Kindness and Senseless Beauty," "The Moral High Ground Is Built on Compassion," "Arms Are For Hugging," "Will Work (When the Jobs Come Back From India)," "Jesus Is a Liberal," "God Wants Spiritual Fruits, Not Religious Nuts," "The Road to Hell Is Paved With Republicans," "Republicans Are People Too -- Mean, Selfish, Greedy People" and so on. But Willett thinks Austin subverts a stereotype: "The belief that liberals care more about the poor may scratch a partisan or ideological itch, but the facts are hostile witnesses."

Sixteen months ago, Arthur C. Brooks, a professor at Syracuse University, published "Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism." The surprise is that liberals are markedly less charitable than conservatives.

If many conservatives are liberals who have been mugged by reality, Brooks, a registered independent, is, as a reviewer of his book said, a social scientist who has been mugged by data. They include these findings:

-- Although liberal families' incomes average 6 percent higher than those of conservative families, conservative-headed households give, on average, 30 percent more to charity than the average liberal-headed household ($1,600 per year vs. $1,227).

-- Conservatives also donate more time and give more blood.

-- Residents of the states that voted for John Kerry in 2004 gave smaller percentages of their incomes to charity than did residents of states that voted for George Bush.

-- Bush carried 24 of the 25 states where charitable giving was above average.

-- In the 10 reddest states, in which Bush got more than 60 percent majorities, the average percentage of personal income donated to charity was 3.5. Residents of the bluest states, which gave Bush less than 40 percent, donated just 1.9 percent.

-- People who reject the idea that "government has a responsibility to reduce income inequality" give an average of four times more than people who accept that proposition.


Brooks demonstrates a correlation between charitable behavior and "the values that lie beneath" liberal and conservative labels. Two influences on charitable behavior are religion and attitudes about the proper role of government.

The single biggest predictor of someone's altruism, Willett says, is religion. It increasingly correlates with conservative political affiliations because, as Brooks' book says, "the percentage of self-described Democrats who say they have 'no religion' has more than quadrupled since the early 1970s." America is largely divided between religious givers and secular nongivers, and the former are disproportionately conservative. One demonstration that religion is a strong determinant of charitable behavior is that the least charitable cohort is a relatively small one -- secular conservatives.

Reviewing Brooks' book in the Texas Review of Law & Politics, Justice Willett notes that Austin -- it voted 56 percent for Kerry while he was getting just 38 percent statewide -- is ranked by The Chronicle of Philanthropy as 48th out of America's 50 largest cities in per capita charitable giving. Brooks' data about disparities between liberals' and conservatives' charitable giving fit these facts: Democrats represent a majority of the wealthiest congressional districts, and half of America's richest households live in states where both senators are Democrats.

While conservatives tend to regard giving as a personal rather than governmental responsibility, some liberals consider private charity a retrograde phenomenon -- a poor palliative for an inadequate welfare state, and a distraction from achieving adequacy by force, by increasing taxes. Ralph Nader, running for president in 2000, said: "A society that has more justice is a society that needs less charity." Brooks, however, warns: "If support for a policy that does not exist ... substitutes for private charity, the needy are left worse off than before. It is one of the bitterest ironies of liberal politics today that political opinions are apparently taking the place of help for others."

In 2000, brows were furrowed in perplexity because Vice President Al Gore's charitable contributions, as a percentage of his income, were below the national average: He gave 0.2 percent of his family income, one-seventh of the average for donating households. But Gore "gave at the office." By using public office to give other peoples' money to government programs, he was being charitable, as liberals increasingly, and conveniently, understand that word.


 :bwpopcorn: :popcorn:
Title: Re: Religous Right?
Post by: LickNeckey on October 15, 2010, 02:42:31 PM
good post Jeffy i had not seen that study or Mr. Will's commentary

i am not saying that conservatives are bad people or are not charitable it just seems that there is a disconnect between practice and political ideology

most conversations i have with conservatives indicate a general disdain for those in poverty or in need of assistance reguardless of whether the assistance comes from a religous group or government
Title: Re: Religous Right?
Post by: Jeffy on October 15, 2010, 02:49:43 PM
good post Jeffy i had not seen that study or Mr. Will's commentary

i am not saying that conservatives are bad people or are not charitable it just seems that there is a disconnect between practice and political ideology

most conversations i have with conservatives indicate a general disdain for those in poverty or in need of assistance reguardless of whether the assistance comes from a religous group or government

Perhaps if people, particularly the government, would give more to worthwhile charities - feeding the poor, helping the homeless - there wouldn't be the need for them to force our money from our pockets.
Title: Re: Religous Right?
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 16, 2010, 01:51:48 PM
good post Jeffy i had not seen that study or Mr. Will's commentary

i am not saying that conservatives are bad people or are not charitable it just seems that there is a disconnect between practice and political ideology

most conversations i have with conservatives indicate a general disdain for those in poverty or in need of assistance reguardless of whether the assistance comes from a religous group or government

Perhaps if people, particularly the government, would give more to worthwhile charities - feeding the poor, helping the homeless - there wouldn't be the need for them to force our money from our pockets.

I thought that was what welfare is for.
Title: Re: Religous Right?
Post by: Jeffy on October 16, 2010, 11:29:55 PM
good post Jeffy i had not seen that study or Mr. Will's commentary

i am not saying that conservatives are bad people or are not charitable it just seems that there is a disconnect between practice and political ideology

most conversations i have with conservatives indicate a general disdain for those in poverty or in need of assistance reguardless of whether the assistance comes from a religous group or government

Perhaps if people would give more to worthwhile charities - feeding the poor, helping the homeless - there wouldn't be the need for them to force our money from our pockets.

I thought that was what welfare is for.

Hmmm.... must have changed thoughts mid-post..... Fixed.
Title: Re: Religous Right?
Post by: Dugout DickStone on October 17, 2010, 07:48:28 PM
good post Jeffy i had not seen that study or Mr. Will's commentary

i am not saying that conservatives are bad people or are not charitable it just seems that there is a disconnect between practice and political ideology

most conversations i have with conservatives indicate a general disdain for those in poverty or in need of assistance reguardless of whether the assistance comes from a religous group or government

so what your saying is liberals say one thing in public but do the opposite on private?
Title: Re: Religous Right?
Post by: fatty fat fat on October 17, 2010, 10:26:57 PM
Quote
so what your saying is liberals say one thing in public but do the opposite on private?

yes. 
Title: Re: Religous Right?
Post by: Dirty Sanchez on October 24, 2010, 08:30:16 AM
The parable of the talents, as told by Jesus.  Investment and earning a profit is rewardable and commendable.

Quote
13 “Therefore stay alert, because you do not know the day or the hour. 14 For it is like a man going on a journey, who summoned his slaves and entrusted his property to them. 15 To one he gave five talents, to another two, and to another one, each according to his ability. Then he went on his journey. 16 The one who had received five talents went off right away and put his money to work270 and gained five more. 17 In the same way, the one who had two gained two more. 18 But the one who had received one talent went out and dug a hole in the ground and hid his master’s money in it. 19 After a long time, the master of those slaves came and settled his accounts with them. 20 The one who had received the five talents came and brought five more, saying, ‘Sir, you entrusted me with five talents. See, I have gained five more.’ 21 His master answered, ‘Well done, good and faithful slave! You have been faithful in a few things. I will put you in charge of many things. Enter into the joy of your master.’ 22 The one with the two talents also came and said, ‘Sir, you entrusted two talents to me. See, I have gained two more.’ 23 His master answered, ‘Well done, good and faithful slave! You have been faithful with a few things. I will put you in charge of many things. Enter into the joy of your master.’ 24 Then the one who had received the one talent came and said, ‘Sir, I knew that you were a hard man, harvesting where you did not sow, and gathering where you did not scatter seed, 25 so I was afraid, and I went and hid your talent in the ground. See, you have what is yours.’ 26 But his master answered, ‘Evil and lazy slave! So you knew that I harvest where I didn’t sow and gather where I didn’t scatter? 27 Then you should have deposited my money with the bankers, and on my return I would have received my money back with interest! 28 Therefore take the talent from him and give it to the one who has ten. 29 For the one who has will be given more, and he will have more than enough. But the one who does not have, even what he has will be taken from him. 30 And throw that worthless slave into the outer darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth’” (Matthew 25:13-30). 271

"Thou shalt not steal"....an implication of private property rights.
Title: Re: Religous Right?
Post by: Kat Kid on October 24, 2010, 11:42:37 AM
The parable of the talents, as told by Jesus.  Investment and earning a profit is rewardable and commendable.

Quote
13 “Therefore stay alert, because you do not know the day or the hour. 14 For it is like a man going on a journey, who summoned his slaves and entrusted his property to them. 15 To one he gave five talents, to another two, and to another one, each according to his ability. Then he went on his journey. 16 The one who had received five talents went off right away and put his money to work270 and gained five more. 17 In the same way, the one who had two gained two more. 18 But the one who had received one talent went out and dug a hole in the ground and hid his master’s money in it. 19 After a long time, the master of those slaves came and settled his accounts with them. 20 The one who had received the five talents came and brought five more, saying, ‘Sir, you entrusted me with five talents. See, I have gained five more.’ 21 His master answered, ‘Well done, good and faithful slave! You have been faithful in a few things. I will put you in charge of many things. Enter into the joy of your master.’ 22 The one with the two talents also came and said, ‘Sir, you entrusted two talents to me. See, I have gained two more.’ 23 His master answered, ‘Well done, good and faithful slave! You have been faithful with a few things. I will put you in charge of many things. Enter into the joy of your master.’ 24 Then the one who had received the one talent came and said, ‘Sir, I knew that you were a hard man, harvesting where you did not sow, and gathering where you did not scatter seed, 25 so I was afraid, and I went and hid your talent in the ground. See, you have what is yours.’ 26 But his master answered, ‘Evil and lazy slave! So you knew that I harvest where I didn’t sow and gather where I didn’t scatter? 27 Then you should have deposited my money with the bankers, and on my return I would have received my money back with interest! 28 Therefore take the talent from him and give it to the one who has ten. 29 For the one who has will be given more, and he will have more than enough. But the one who does not have, even what he has will be taken from him. 30 And throw that worthless slave into the outer darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth’” (Matthew 25:13-30). 271

"Thou shalt not steal"....an implication of private property rights.

Good Slave!
Title: Re: Religous Right?
Post by: wetwillie on October 24, 2010, 11:55:40 AM
The parable of the talents, as told by Jesus.  Investment and earning a profit is rewardable and commendable.

Quote
13 “Therefore stay alert, because you do not know the day or the hour. 14 For it is like a man going on a journey, who summoned his slaves and entrusted his property to them. 15 To one he gave five talents, to another two, and to another one, each according to his ability. Then he went on his journey. 16 The one who had received five talents went off right away and put his money to work270 and gained five more. 17 In the same way, the one who had two gained two more. 18 But the one who had received one talent went out and dug a hole in the ground and hid his master’s money in it. 19 After a long time, the master of those slaves came and settled his accounts with them. 20 The one who had received the five talents came and brought five more, saying, ‘Sir, you entrusted me with five talents. See, I have gained five more.’ 21 His master answered, ‘Well done, good and faithful slave! You have been faithful in a few things. I will put you in charge of many things. Enter into the joy of your master.’ 22 The one with the two talents also came and said, ‘Sir, you entrusted two talents to me. See, I have gained two more.’ 23 His master answered, ‘Well done, good and faithful slave! You have been faithful with a few things. I will put you in charge of many things. Enter into the joy of your master.’ 24 Then the one who had received the one talent came and said, ‘Sir, I knew that you were a hard man, harvesting where you did not sow, and gathering where you did not scatter seed, 25 so I was afraid, and I went and hid your talent in the ground. See, you have what is yours.’ 26 But his master answered, ‘Evil and lazy slave! So you knew that I harvest where I didn’t sow and gather where I didn’t scatter? 27 Then you should have deposited my money with the bankers, and on my return I would have received my money back with interest! 28 Therefore take the talent from him and give it to the one who has ten. 29 For the one who has will be given more, and he will have more than enough. But the one who does not have, even what he has will be taken from him. 30 And throw that worthless slave into the outer darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth’” (Matthew 25:13-30). 271

"Thou shalt not steal"....an implication of private property rights.

Matthew 19:24
Title: Re: Religous Right?
Post by: Dirty Sanchez on October 24, 2010, 12:42:56 PM
The parable of the talents, as told by Jesus.  Investment and earning a profit is rewardable and commendable.

Quote
13 “Therefore stay alert, because you do not know the day or the hour. 14 For it is like a man going on a journey, who summoned his slaves and entrusted his property to them. 15 To one he gave five talents, to another two, and to another one, each according to his ability. Then he went on his journey. 16 The one who had received five talents went off right away and put his money to work270 and gained five more. 17 In the same way, the one who had two gained two more. 18 But the one who had received one talent went out and dug a hole in the ground and hid his master’s money in it. 19 After a long time, the master of those slaves came and settled his accounts with them. 20 The one who had received the five talents came and brought five more, saying, ‘Sir, you entrusted me with five talents. See, I have gained five more.’ 21 His master answered, ‘Well done, good and faithful slave! You have been faithful in a few things. I will put you in charge of many things. Enter into the joy of your master.’ 22 The one with the two talents also came and said, ‘Sir, you entrusted two talents to me. See, I have gained two more.’ 23 His master answered, ‘Well done, good and faithful slave! You have been faithful with a few things. I will put you in charge of many things. Enter into the joy of your master.’ 24 Then the one who had received the one talent came and said, ‘Sir, I knew that you were a hard man, harvesting where you did not sow, and gathering where you did not scatter seed, 25 so I was afraid, and I went and hid your talent in the ground. See, you have what is yours.’ 26 But his master answered, ‘Evil and lazy slave! So you knew that I harvest where I didn’t sow and gather where I didn’t scatter? 27 Then you should have deposited my money with the bankers, and on my return I would have received my money back with interest! 28 Therefore take the talent from him and give it to the one who has ten. 29 For the one who has will be given more, and he will have more than enough. But the one who does not have, even what he has will be taken from him. 30 And throw that worthless slave into the outer darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth’” (Matthew 25:13-30). 271

"Thou shalt not steal"....an implication of private property rights.

Good Slave!

Way to predictably read in a completely irrelevant conclusion.

btw, where are you, mr civil liberties, on commenting on Juan Williams?  You should be ranting!  Or are you proven a libocrite yet again?
Title: Re: Religous Right?
Post by: Kat Kid on October 24, 2010, 05:27:52 PM
The parable of the talents, as told by Jesus.  Investment and earning a profit is rewardable and commendable.

Quote
13 “Therefore stay alert, because you do not know the day or the hour. 14 For it is like a man going on a journey, who summoned his slaves and entrusted his property to them. 15 To one he gave five talents, to another two, and to another one, each according to his ability. Then he went on his journey. 16 The one who had received five talents went off right away and put his money to work270 and gained five more. 17 In the same way, the one who had two gained two more. 18 But the one who had received one talent went out and dug a hole in the ground and hid his master’s money in it. 19 After a long time, the master of those slaves came and settled his accounts with them. 20 The one who had received the five talents came and brought five more, saying, ‘Sir, you entrusted me with five talents. See, I have gained five more.’ 21 His master answered, ‘Well done, good and faithful slave! You have been faithful in a few things. I will put you in charge of many things. Enter into the joy of your master.’ 22 The one with the two talents also came and said, ‘Sir, you entrusted two talents to me. See, I have gained two more.’ 23 His master answered, ‘Well done, good and faithful slave! You have been faithful with a few things. I will put you in charge of many things. Enter into the joy of your master.’ 24 Then the one who had received the one talent came and said, ‘Sir, I knew that you were a hard man, harvesting where you did not sow, and gathering where you did not scatter seed, 25 so I was afraid, and I went and hid your talent in the ground. See, you have what is yours.’ 26 But his master answered, ‘Evil and lazy slave! So you knew that I harvest where I didn’t sow and gather where I didn’t scatter? 27 Then you should have deposited my money with the bankers, and on my return I would have received my money back with interest! 28 Therefore take the talent from him and give it to the one who has ten. 29 For the one who has will be given more, and he will have more than enough. But the one who does not have, even what he has will be taken from him. 30 And throw that worthless slave into the outer darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth’” (Matthew 25:13-30). 271

"Thou shalt not steal"....an implication of private property rights.

Good Slave!

Way to predictably read in a completely irrelevant conclusion.

btw, where are you, mr civil liberties, on commenting on Juan Williams?  You should be ranting!  Or are you proven a libocrite yet again?

civil liberties?  I don't think you understand how our country's laws work.
Title: Re: Religous Right?
Post by: Dirty Sanchez on October 24, 2010, 07:53:21 PM
The parable of the talents, as told by Jesus.  Investment and earning a profit is rewardable and commendable.

Quote
13 “Therefore stay alert, because you do not know the day or the hour. 14 For it is like a man going on a journey, who summoned his slaves and entrusted his property to them. 15 To one he gave five talents, to another two, and to another one, each according to his ability. Then he went on his journey. 16 The one who had received five talents went off right away and put his money to work270 and gained five more. 17 In the same way, the one who had two gained two more. 18 But the one who had received one talent went out and dug a hole in the ground and hid his master’s money in it. 19 After a long time, the master of those slaves came and settled his accounts with them. 20 The one who had received the five talents came and brought five more, saying, ‘Sir, you entrusted me with five talents. See, I have gained five more.’ 21 His master answered, ‘Well done, good and faithful slave! You have been faithful in a few things. I will put you in charge of many things. Enter into the joy of your master.’ 22 The one with the two talents also came and said, ‘Sir, you entrusted two talents to me. See, I have gained two more.’ 23 His master answered, ‘Well done, good and faithful slave! You have been faithful with a few things. I will put you in charge of many things. Enter into the joy of your master.’ 24 Then the one who had received the one talent came and said, ‘Sir, I knew that you were a hard man, harvesting where you did not sow, and gathering where you did not scatter seed, 25 so I was afraid, and I went and hid your talent in the ground. See, you have what is yours.’ 26 But his master answered, ‘Evil and lazy slave! So you knew that I harvest where I didn’t sow and gather where I didn’t scatter? 27 Then you should have deposited my money with the bankers, and on my return I would have received my money back with interest! 28 Therefore take the talent from him and give it to the one who has ten. 29 For the one who has will be given more, and he will have more than enough. But the one who does not have, even what he has will be taken from him. 30 And throw that worthless slave into the outer darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth’” (Matthew 25:13-30). 271

"Thou shalt not steal"....an implication of private property rights.

Good Slave!

Way to predictably read in a completely irrelevant conclusion.

btw, where are you, mr civil liberties, on commenting on Juan Williams?  You should be ranting!  Or are you proven a libocrite yet again?

civil liberties?  I don't think you understand how our country's laws work.

So we should use the law as a guide now, huh? You must be LOVING that Patriot Act then.
Title: Re: Religous Right?
Post by: Kat Kid on October 24, 2010, 08:23:01 PM
The parable of the talents, as told by Jesus.  Investment and earning a profit is rewardable and commendable.

Quote
13 “Therefore stay alert, because you do not know the day or the hour. 14 For it is like a man going on a journey, who summoned his slaves and entrusted his property to them. 15 To one he gave five talents, to another two, and to another one, each according to his ability. Then he went on his journey. 16 The one who had received five talents went off right away and put his money to work270 and gained five more. 17 In the same way, the one who had two gained two more. 18 But the one who had received one talent went out and dug a hole in the ground and hid his master’s money in it. 19 After a long time, the master of those slaves came and settled his accounts with them. 20 The one who had received the five talents came and brought five more, saying, ‘Sir, you entrusted me with five talents. See, I have gained five more.’ 21 His master answered, ‘Well done, good and faithful slave! You have been faithful in a few things. I will put you in charge of many things. Enter into the joy of your master.’ 22 The one with the two talents also came and said, ‘Sir, you entrusted two talents to me. See, I have gained two more.’ 23 His master answered, ‘Well done, good and faithful slave! You have been faithful with a few things. I will put you in charge of many things. Enter into the joy of your master.’ 24 Then the one who had received the one talent came and said, ‘Sir, I knew that you were a hard man, harvesting where you did not sow, and gathering where you did not scatter seed, 25 so I was afraid, and I went and hid your talent in the ground. See, you have what is yours.’ 26 But his master answered, ‘Evil and lazy slave! So you knew that I harvest where I didn’t sow and gather where I didn’t scatter? 27 Then you should have deposited my money with the bankers, and on my return I would have received my money back with interest! 28 Therefore take the talent from him and give it to the one who has ten. 29 For the one who has will be given more, and he will have more than enough. But the one who does not have, even what he has will be taken from him. 30 And throw that worthless slave into the outer darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth’” (Matthew 25:13-30). 271

"Thou shalt not steal"....an implication of private property rights.

Good Slave!

Way to predictably read in a completely irrelevant conclusion.

btw, where are you, mr civil liberties, on commenting on Juan Williams?  You should be ranting!  Or are you proven a libocrite yet again?

civil liberties?  I don't think you understand how our country's laws work.

So we should use the law as a guide now, huh? You must be LOVING that Patriot Act then.

I think the Patriot Act was ill-advised and possibly unconstitutional.  There is zero doubt that Clinton, Bush and Obama have all ignored even the Patriot Act's generous expansive view of governmental rights to search and seizure.

What Constitutional or civil liberty is being violated here?  I think that most of the major media companies do an exceedingly poor job of allowing dissenting voices on their airs, but I am not under the illusion that they are bound to do so by statute or our Constitution.  Do you think they are?