goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: Dr Rick Daris on September 11, 2010, 10:01:38 PM

Title: help
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on September 11, 2010, 10:01:38 PM
In kc at this great wolf lodge place thing. didn't get to hear any of the game. did we win? how did queso do? Tia.
Title: Re: help
Post by: OK_Cat on September 11, 2010, 10:02:46 PM
http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=6101.0
Title: Re: help
Post by: Dugout DickStone on September 11, 2010, 10:18:50 PM
we won, queso sucked hard
Title: Re: help
Post by: Trim on September 11, 2010, 10:20:23 PM
How's the Lodge?
Title: Re: help
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on September 11, 2010, 10:22:13 PM
we won, queso sucked hard

Good news. Not great though. For some strange reason I really thought queso would throw for a few hundred with multiple touchdows and no turnovers. Really thought it would happen. Maybe next week.
Title: Re: help
Post by: felix rex on September 11, 2010, 10:25:04 PM
we won, queso sucked hard

Good news. Not great though. For some strange reason I really thought queso would throw for a few hundred with multiple touchdows and no turnovers. Really thought it would happen. Maybe next week.

I think his feet are too wide. It's like he's playing in snowshoes out there.
Title: Re: help
Post by: Dugout DickStone on September 11, 2010, 10:27:03 PM
we won, queso sucked hard

Good news. Not great though. For some strange reason I really thought queso would throw for a few hundred with multiple touchdows and no turnovers. Really thought it would happen. Maybe next week.

Oh, I didn't know your/his definition of good was a selfish, stat-centered, evaluation but more a team, overall success standard.   The passing offense was not great but I guess that's not important.

queso had some average stats I guess, I was more concerned with passing offense success, not throwing interceptions that get called back due to penalties, hitting open receivers, etc.  
Title: Re: help
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on September 11, 2010, 10:41:50 PM
we won, queso sucked hard

Good news. Not great though. For some stroange reason I really thought queso would throw for a few hundred with multiple touchdows and no turnovers. Really thought it would happen. Maybe next week.

Oh, I didn't know your/his definition of good was a selfish, stat-centered, evaluation but more a team, overall success standard.   The passing offense was not great but I guess that's not important.

queso had some average stats I guess, I was more concerned with passing offense success, not throwing interceptions that get called back due to penalties, hitting open receivers, etc.  

Just had a friend (non tard) relay that queso completed 70% of his passes and threw for almost three hundred yards and three touchdowns with positive rushing yards and only one sack while his backup (which 90% of kstate fans believe is better than him) only passed for ten yards with the same number of sacks but negative rushing yards. Was he lying to me?
Title: Re: help
Post by: CHONGS on September 11, 2010, 10:44:03 PM
we won, queso sucked hard

Good news. Not great though. For some stroange reason I really thought queso would throw for a few hundred with multiple touchdows and no turnovers. Really thought it would happen. Maybe next week.

Oh, I didn't know your/his definition of good was a selfish, stat-centered, evaluation but more a team, overall success standard.   The passing offense was not great but I guess that's not important.

queso had some average stats I guess, I was more concerned with passing offense success, not throwing interceptions that get called back due to penalties, hitting open receivers, etc. 

Just had a friend (non tard) relay that queso completed 70% of his passes and threw for almost three hundred yards and three touchdowns with positive rushing yards and only one sack while his backup (which 90% of kstate fans believe is better than him) only passed for ten yards with the same number of sacks but negative rushing yards. Was he lying to me?
He was not.  Not at all.  W/out Coff, KSU loses that game.
Title: Re: help
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on September 11, 2010, 10:44:15 PM
How's the Lodge?

Pretty decent. Above average, but not great. Basically carson coffman.
Title: Re: help
Post by: Dugout DickStone on September 11, 2010, 10:45:04 PM
we won, queso sucked hard

Good news. Not great though. For some stroange reason I really thought queso would throw for a few hundred with multiple touchdows and no turnovers. Really thought it would happen. Maybe next week.

Oh, I didn't know your/his definition of good was a selfish, stat-centered, evaluation but more a team, overall success standard.   The passing offense was not great but I guess that's not important.

queso had some average stats I guess, I was more concerned with passing offense success, not throwing interceptions that get called back due to penalties, hitting open receivers, etc.  

Just had a friend (non tard) relay that queso completed 70% of his passes and threw for almost three hundred yards and three touchdowns with positive rushing yards and only one sack while his backup (which 90% of kstate fans believe is better than him) only passed for ten yards with the same number of sacks but negative rushing yards. Was he lying to me?

Did he tell you queso threw some awful passes?  If not, he was lying to you.
Title: Re: help
Post by: felix rex on September 11, 2010, 10:46:58 PM
How's the Lodge?

Pretty decent. Above average, but not great. Basically carson coffman.

Well managed, eh? Also, if it could grow a beard, would it be an Amish-style chinstrap?
Title: Re: help
Post by: Trim on September 11, 2010, 10:48:47 PM
How's the Lodge?

Pretty decent. Above average, but not great. Basically carson coffman.

:cancellingreservationIhadthereforFarmageddonweekend:
Title: Re: help
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on September 11, 2010, 10:50:01 PM
we won, queso sucked hard

Good news. Not great though. For some stroange reason I really thought queso would throw for a few hundred with multiple touchdows and no turnovers. Really thought it would happen. Maybe next week.

Oh, I didn't know your/his definition of good was a selfish, stat-centered, evaluation but more a team, overall success standard.   The passing offense was not great but I guess that's not important.

queso had some average stats I guess, I was more concerned with passing offense success, not throwing interceptions that get called back due to penalties, hitting open receivers, etc. 

Just had a friend (non tard) relay that queso completed 70% of his passes and threw for almost three hundred yards and three touchdowns with positive rushing yards and only one sack while his backup (which 90% of kstate fans believe is better than him) only passed for ten yards with the same number of sacks but negative rushing yards. Was he lying to me?

Did he tell you queso threw some awful passes?  If not, he was lying to you.

Wait...are you talking about the passes that he was throwing away to avoid getting sacked? Tards hit him pretty hard for not doing this in week one you know? Really no way to win with you guys huh?
Title: Re: help
Post by: Pittcat on September 11, 2010, 11:01:20 PM

Just had a friend (non tard) relay that queso completed 70% of his passes and threw for almost three hundred yards and three touchdowns with positive rushing yards and only one sack while his backup (which 90% of kstate fans believe is better than him) only passed for ten yards with the same number of sacks but negative rushing yards. Was he lying to me?

I believe the term to use here is "BOOM, ROASTED!"
Title: Re: help
Post by: mcmwcat on September 11, 2010, 11:31:50 PM
i need some help too.  can anyone tell me how the receiving corps looked tonight?  tia
Title: Re: help
Post by: CHONGS on September 11, 2010, 11:33:56 PM
i need some help too.  can anyone tell me how the receiving corps looked tonight?  tia
Pensive