goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: fatty fat fat on September 06, 2010, 06:10:54 PM

Title: if bryce is eligible....thomas as qb???
Post by: fatty fat fat on September 06, 2010, 06:10:54 PM
Would be fun to watch, at the very least.

damn, cat football has absolutely taken me by hold...once again.
Title: Re: if bryce is eligible....thomas as qb???
Post by: hemmy on September 06, 2010, 06:15:34 PM
would be good to have an all-black backfield, but DT doesn't have the greatest arm
Title: Re: if bryce is eligible....thomas as qb???
Post by: Perry on September 06, 2010, 06:15:57 PM
Harper at QB, Bryce and Daniel in the backfield. Georgia Tech runs something like that, right?



Wouldn't happen, though.
Title: Re: if bryce is eligible....thomas as qb???
Post by: Pete on September 06, 2010, 06:16:18 PM
V
Would be fun to watch, at the very least.

damn, cat football has absolutely taken me by hold...once again.

F3, in your expert opinion, does this mean that LHCBS brings the wishbone back to college football THIS season?
Title: Re: if bryce is eligible....thomas as qb???
Post by: Pete on September 06, 2010, 06:20:28 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fcommons%2F2%2F2b%2FWishbone_Formation.PNG&hash=0d304699bb37c7ceed4cba66f631bb51ac587c5b)
Title: Re: if bryce is eligible....thomas as qb???
Post by: TBL on September 06, 2010, 06:25:04 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fcommons%2F2%2F2b%2FWishbone_Formation.PNG&hash=0d304699bb37c7ceed4cba66f631bb51ac587c5b)

Ran the wishbone in junior high. Almost unstoppable if done correctly.


(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.yesfootball.com%2Ffig%2F43counter_1.gif&hash=c059f59cc0e7adfdd3493e83885729a6331f3862)
Title: Re: if bryce is eligible....thomas as qb???
Post by: doom on September 06, 2010, 06:29:04 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fcommons%2F2%2F2b%2FWishbone_Formation.PNG&hash=0d304699bb37c7ceed4cba66f631bb51ac587c5b)

Ran the wishbone in junior high. Almost unstoppable if done correctly. by Brown, Harper, Thomas!


(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.yesfootball.com%2Ffig%2F43counter_1.gif&hash=c059f59cc0e7adfdd3493e83885729a6331f3862)
Title: Re: if bryce is eligible....thomas as qb???
Post by: steve dave on September 06, 2010, 06:31:07 PM
Should send DT to Manhattan Christian to learn this new position/offense in a week's time
Title: Re: if bryce is eligible....thomas as qb???
Post by: chum1 on September 06, 2010, 06:33:30 PM
If we're throwing <15 times per game anyway, why not?
Title: Re: if bryce is eligible....thomas as qb???
Post by: TBL on September 06, 2010, 06:46:59 PM
Or maybe the veer? Hmmmm..............
Title: Re: if bryce is eligible....thomas as qb???
Post by: Pete on September 06, 2010, 06:54:13 PM
If we're throwing <15 times per game anyway, why not?

Exactly.  Harper/Quarles and Brod appear to be good blockers, there's our two WR spots.  Good full back that can run?  Check.  Thomas, Powel, Hubert, Thompson...weapons at RB..check.  Lamur, Thomas, Harper...weapons at QB...check.  Good run blocking offensive line...check.

X's and O's types, what am I missing here?

Title: Re: if bryce is eligible....thomas as qb???
Post by: Perry on September 06, 2010, 07:23:54 PM
If we're throwing <15 times per game anyway, why not?

Exactly.  Harper/Quarles and Brod appear to be good blockers, there's our two WR spots.  Good full back that can run?  Check.  Thomas, Powel, Hubert, Thompson...weapons at RB..check.  Lamur, Thomas, Harper...weapons at QB...check.  Good run blocking offensive line...check.

X's and O's types, what am I missing here?



Snyder is coaching?  :shy:
Title: Re: if bryce is eligible....thomas as qb???
Post by: Legit Elite on September 06, 2010, 07:58:26 PM
Should send DT to Manhattan Christian to learn this new position/offense in a week's time
LMAO :lol:
Title: Re: if bryce is eligible....thomas as qb???
Post by: yoga-like_abana on September 06, 2010, 08:17:45 PM
If we're throwing <15 times per game anyway, why not?

Good full back that can run?  Check. 
Run or run block?
I honestly don't ever remember him getting the ball last year.
Title: Re: if bryce is eligible....thomas as qb???
Post by: jtksu on September 06, 2010, 08:28:57 PM
Braden did have a decent amount of catches last year.  Not sure how many carries he had...
Title: Re: if bryce is eligible....thomas as qb???
Post by: _33 on September 06, 2010, 08:43:16 PM
Braden did have a decent amount of catches last year.  Not sure how many carries he had...

He had 4 catches.  Why does everyone insist on overrating this Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)?
Title: Re: if bryce is eligible....thomas as qb???
Post by: kso_FAN on September 06, 2010, 08:50:58 PM
Takes a ton of time to run option/veer football well.  Would be nearly impossible to put in and run well at this point, plus Snyder would never do it.
Title: Re: if bryce is eligible....thomas as qb???
Post by: jtksu on September 06, 2010, 08:53:35 PM
Why do you insist on hating that guy?  Dude was pretty damn good as a freshman and should only improve.  Unless this dude is doing your ex or something, I can't imagine why you're so insistant on hating on his skills.
Title: Re: if bryce is eligible....thomas as qb???
Post by: mcmwcat on September 06, 2010, 08:53:54 PM
Should send DT to Manhattan Christian to learn this new position/offense in a week's time

lol  :party:
Title: Re: if bryce is eligible....thomas as qb???
Post by: jtksu on September 06, 2010, 08:54:41 PM
The OL was pretty good last year as well, do you hate them?  DT was really goddamn good, do you really hate that guy?
Title: Re: if bryce is eligible....thomas as qb???
Post by: PoetWarrior on September 06, 2010, 10:41:33 PM
If we'd be willing to make Thomas QB, we should have already been willing to make Harper or Lamur QB.
Title: Re: if bryce is eligible....thomas as qb???
Post by: TBL on September 07, 2010, 10:32:24 PM
Should send DT to Manhattan Christian to learn this new position/offense in a week's time

lol  :party:


(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.darrenstraight.com%2Fblog%2Fimages%2F2009%2F07%2Fmsn_emoticon.png&hash=13cfa59160428211c9308a55a28d1bb061204819)
Title: Re: if bryce is eligible....thomas as qb???
Post by: nicname on September 08, 2010, 01:53:35 AM
Braden did have a decent amount of catches last year.  Not sure how many carries he had...

He had 4 catches.  Why does everyone insist on overrating this Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)?

Stick to making videos.  Posting is definitely not your forte.
Title: Re: if bryce is eligible....thomas as qb???
Post by: 1/64th on September 08, 2010, 07:30:39 AM
Braden did have a decent amount of catches last year.  Not sure how many carries he had...

He had 4 catches.  Why does everyone insist on overrating this Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)?

Stick to making videos.  Posting is definitely not your forte.

Hey guys who love our adorable white running/fullback, how many carries/catches did he have in the UCLA game?  Oh right, 0 carries for 0 yards.  Wow, he's an awesome running back.  OB must agree.   :facepalm: :flush: :rolleyes:
Title: Re: if bryce is eligible....thomas as qb???
Post by: hemmy on September 08, 2010, 07:48:25 AM
Hes a blocking fb, jfc.
Title: Re: if bryce is eligible....thomas as qb???
Post by: hatingfrancisco on September 08, 2010, 07:53:54 AM
Hes a blocking fb, jfc.

No crap, and a fairly decent one.

LFFIQ shown in this thread.
Title: Re: if bryce is eligible....thomas as qb???
Post by: nicname on September 08, 2010, 10:22:42 AM
Braden did have a decent amount of catches last year.  Not sure how many carries he had...

He had 4 catches.  Why does everyone insist on overrating this Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)?

Stick to making videos.  Posting is definitely not your forte.

Hey guys who love our adorable white running/fullback, how many carries/catches did he have in the UCLA game?  Oh right, 0 carries for 0 yards.  Wow, he's an awesome running back.  OB must agree.   :facepalm: :flush: :rolleyes:

Attention goEMAWtards(33 and 1/64)  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJufx93R5VE

focus on the plays at :14, :50, 1:53

he's good
Title: Re: if bryce is eligible....thomas as qb???
Post by: kso_FAN on September 08, 2010, 10:39:27 AM
Attention goEMAWtards(33 and 1/64)  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJufx93R5VE

focus on the plays at :14, :50, 1:53

he's good


The TD to Smith was a ridiculously well designed play. 

The motion of Smith behind the LG a) sold the power run to the left and b) completely caused his man to lose him in traffic.  His man then picked up the TE releasing into the endzone as Smith snuck through/behind our OL as Coffman booted to the right.  Smith did a good job getting a piece of the contain guy as well, which gave Coffman just enough time to get the ball off and still allowed Smith to be wide open in the flat for the score.  Plus we had the backside TE wide open in the back of the endzone even if UCLA had somehow been able to pick up Smith after his motion. 

Just a beautifully designed play.

And yes, for what he's asked to do Wilson is a really good player.
Title: Re: if bryce is eligible....thomas as qb???
Post by: jtksu on September 08, 2010, 02:03:16 PM
Nice back-handed compliment.  "For what he's asked to do."  Jeesh.
Title: Re: if bryce is eligible....thomas as qb???
Post by: WildcatPower on September 08, 2010, 02:05:25 PM
Yeah, I don't think Bryce will be eligible this year, unfortunately.

Arthur, on the other hand.....
Title: Re: if bryce is eligible....thomas as qb???
Post by: kso_FAN on September 08, 2010, 02:09:12 PM
Nice back-handed compliment.  "For what he's asked to do."  Jeesh.

 :confused:

I really like Wilson, he's a great fullback.  It's "what he's asked to do", ie. not carry the ball or catch passes, he plays well on special teams, etc.  And he makes Daniel Thomas even better.