goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Basketball is hard => Topic started by: sonofdaxjones on February 01, 2010, 03:57:35 PM

Title: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 01, 2010, 03:57:35 PM
K-State's record at home in last 12 conference home games.

:flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush:
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: catsdo on February 01, 2010, 03:59:07 PM
Fire Martin!!!   :drool:
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: kougar24 on February 01, 2010, 04:02:03 PM
We were an NIT team last year. What's the point of this thread?
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: OregonSmock on February 01, 2010, 04:03:28 PM
The Octagon of Doom is obviously the best homecourt advantage in the country.
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: EllToPay on February 01, 2010, 04:08:58 PM
K-State's record at home in last 12 conference home games.

:flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush:

please come up with something that hasn't already been revealed by kietz. tia.
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: catsdo on February 01, 2010, 04:09:15 PM
Kougs I know it's hard for you . . . but 2 of those 5 losses have come  . . . this year.



I would also like to know the point of the thread.  Are you wanting us to cheer louder?  Or fire a coach? Or are you just trying to be a huge whiny bitch?
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: Mikeyis4dcats on February 01, 2010, 04:09:20 PM
Kougs I know it's hard for you . . . but 2 of those 5 losses have come  . . . this year.



if you want to talk about this year, leave last year out of it, otherwise compare the stats for both years.
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: catzacker on February 01, 2010, 04:19:31 PM
Kougs I know it's hard for you . . . but 2 of those 5 losses have come  . . . this year.



mike evans was such a senior leader that his senior year ('77-78) he allowed 2 home court losses in....Ahearn.  Remember how tough it was to play in Ahearn?  How could such a player let that happen.  And a legendary coach like Hartman?  JFC. 
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: Winters on February 01, 2010, 04:20:04 PM
The Octagon of Doom is obviously the best homecourt advantage in the country.
Cornell says AFH is...
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: OregonSmock on February 01, 2010, 04:23:48 PM
Winters... Cornell is good, and KU won.
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: Mikeyis4dcats on February 01, 2010, 04:26:42 PM
Winters... Cornell is good, and KU won.

Cornell is getting votes, but KU got bailed out on the game by the refs in the last minute. Fact.
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: catzacker on February 01, 2010, 04:28:16 PM
Haven't listened to Keitz in 2 weeks.

Don't care about 77-78 . . . except for the fact that K-State won the conference that year, the last time.

goEMAW . . . very powerespect like these days.

Sad . . . 

couple of things, we didn't win it in '77-78, we won it the year before.  And after the atrocity that is losing two f'ing home games in one year in '77-78, we lost another 2 the following year in '78-79....then in '79-80 we lost 3 home games....and that sh*tty coach that let that happen and those sh*tty players that let that happen, then went to the Elite 8 in '80-81.  You f'ing clown, stfu.
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: CHONGS on February 01, 2010, 04:28:53 PM
Bask in the glory fellas, dax is being coy and deliberately obtuse...that means this board is big time.
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: Cire on February 01, 2010, 04:31:29 PM
Allen Field Library.
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: Winters on February 01, 2010, 04:36:27 PM
Winters... Cornell is good, and KU won.
Not saying they suck...Saying KU has way too much talent to have a "close game" with them at home
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: FP TC etc. on February 01, 2010, 04:37:55 PM
You should bitch about Jake some more... since that went so well last time.  :users:
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: catsdo on February 01, 2010, 04:42:15 PM
Zacker letting his strawman pump his a$$ as per usual.

Plus, I'd just ask . . . what part of my posts  gives even the slightest hint that I am comparing arenas or eras of anything of the sort??

This should be fascinating.




What are you trying to do then?  You never explained what the point of this thread was.
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: catzacker on February 01, 2010, 04:42:51 PM
Zacker letting his strawman pump his a$$ as per usual.

Plus, I'd just ask . . . what part of my posts  gives even the slightest hint that I am comparing arenas or eras of anything of the sort??

This should be fascinating.

what was the point of the post? or was it just a PSA?
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: FP TC etc. on February 01, 2010, 04:43:30 PM
Zacker letting his strawman pump his a$$ as per usual.

Plus, I'd just ask . . . what part of my posts  gives even the slightest hint that I am comparing arenas or eras of anything of the sort??

This should be fascinating.




Are you just trolling? If so it's working... but I don't know why you'd do that to fellow Cat fans?

Ever since Jake started doing well again/Jake shattered your talking point, it seems like your posts have sucked more and more.
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: MakeItRain on February 01, 2010, 04:46:26 PM
K-State's record at home in last 12 conference home games.

:flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush: :flush:

Pretty arbitrary number no?  Is there something special about the last 12 that they should be separated from all of the conference home games in Frank martin's tenure?  He is 13-6 his first 2.5 years, with 3 of those losses coming to top 15 teams.  I will go ahead and play with numbers like you and your boy Kietz did and project the last 4 conference home lay-ups as wins, that will make Frank 17-6 his first 3 years.  Please find for me 5 coaches anywhere that has a better record their first 3 years as a head coach.  Hell I'll even let you find 5 coaches with a better home conference record the first 3 years at their current school.  Few, Self, Williams, maybe Dixon and Howland, anyone else?
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: hemmy on February 01, 2010, 04:47:07 PM
Record has much less to do with record/win streaks, than does quality of team.

The fans/atmosphere definitely were NOT the reason for home losses.
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: CHONGS on February 01, 2010, 04:47:45 PM
:lol:

classic dax right here, just owning this new-born board.  

He's running laps around you guys....

Way to reel them in dax :lol:
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: catsdo on February 01, 2010, 04:51:38 PM
Frank Martin = Only six losses in the OOD  :love:
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: kougar24 on February 01, 2010, 04:51:48 PM
Kougs I know it's hard for you . . . but 2 of those 5 losses have come  . . . this year.



Whoa, really? First, if you wanted to talk about this year, why include last year's losses?

Secondly, one of the two losses this year was to the #1 team in the country, in OT. Ooo, ouch, we suck. We're a mere 1-1 at home against #1 teams.

So really, your point is that our loss to OSU at home was a bad one. Halle-fracking-lujah, what would we do without you around here to drop such insightful nuggets?!
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: FP TC etc. on February 01, 2010, 04:56:08 PM
I talked about Jake for like . . . 2 games.   But lets revise history right . . . and completely forget that when I was talking about Jake, he was playing like $hit.  

Plus even the franking tards on KMAN right now are talking about how Clemente is hurting more than he's helping, even, amazingly enough recognizing that his defense blows.  

The point of this thread is . .  . we're $hitting all over our home court, and I thought under this current regime we'd be putting an end to that.   I guess not.

Let's see the last 12 CONFERENCE games, so let's review .  . . if you count last years conference home games, and this years conference home games to date . . . that equals . . . 12.  Yep, how completely f'ing random.   Fail Rain . . . Fail on every level.





Do you miss Ben or something? You do know he posts here too right?
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: blackknight on February 01, 2010, 04:57:05 PM
I talked about Jake for like . . . 2 games.   But lets revise history right . . . and completely forget that when I was talking about Jake, he was playing like $hit.  

Plus even the franking tards on KMAN right now are talking about how Clemente is hurting more than he's helping, even, amazingly enough recognizing that his defense blows.  

The point of this thread is . .  . we're $hitting all over our home court, and I thought under this current regime we'd be putting an end to that.   I guess not.

Let's see the last 12 CONFERENCE games, so let's review .  . . if you count last years conference home games, and this years conference home games to date . . . that equals . . . 12.  Yep, how completely f'ing random.   Fail Rain . . . Fail on every level.

heaven forbid our best player not show up for a game or two!!! it's not like beasley was EVER held to single digit scoring (xavier). These are college kids still learning to be consistent and adjust to being the go to guy. Sometimes good players have off games. Stick to arguing with your better half, in beamer, about corporate collegiate fiscal responsibility...or get banned from attending again, please.


Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: catzacker on February 01, 2010, 04:57:28 PM
I talked about Jake for like . . . 2 games.   But lets revise history right . . . and completely forget that when I was talking about Jake, he was playing like $hit.  

Plus even the franking tards on KMAN right now are talking about how Clemente is hurting more than he's helping, even, amazingly enough recognizing that his defense blows.  

The point of this thread is . .  . we're $hitting all over our home court, and I thought under this current regime we'd be putting an end to that.   I guess not.
Let's see the last 12 CONFERENCE games, so let's review .  . . if you count last years conference home games, and this years conference home games to date . . . that equals . . . 12.  Yep, how completely f'ing random.   Fail Rain . . . Fail on every level.


what "end"? we really haven't ever not done this on a consistent basis.  it's like you're holding frank to a mythical standard.  you know the team that doesn't lose at home in conference?  KU.  That's pretty much it.  MU's on a nice little run right now, but we'll see how they get through KU and UT.
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: MakeItRain on February 01, 2010, 04:58:11 PM
I talked about Jake for like . . . 2 games.   But lets revise history right . . . and completely forget that when I was talking about Jake, he was playing like $hit.  

Plus even the franking tards on KMAN right now are talking about how Clemente is hurting more than he's helping, even, amazingly enough recognizing that his defense blows.  

The point of this thread is . .  . we're $hitting all over our home court, and I thought under this current regime we'd be putting an end to that.   I guess not.

Let's see the last 12 CONFERENCE games, so let's review .  . . if you count last years conference home games, and this years conference home games to date . . . that equals . . . 12.  Yep, how completely f'ing random.   Fail Rain . . . Fail on every level.





You purposefully avoided my point, well done Dax well done.  I'm guessing you just threw out the first year because he went 7-1, I'm guessing you are forgetting that the remaining home games are against Nortards and Frank will finish this season 6-2 because it doesn't fit your point.  I am well aware of the record the last 12, please explain to me why last seasons 5-3 is more important than the previous seasons 6-2.

Also waiting for the answer to my question as to how many coaches first 3 year home conference record will match Franks.

thanks and I'll listen off the air
 
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: felix rex on February 01, 2010, 05:02:02 PM
I'd like to see us wear more headbands. How were we against the spread at home with 3+ white headbands on the court?
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: felix rex on February 01, 2010, 05:03:20 PM
Maybe we could convince Merriewether to not only wear a headband, but to also shave "DOOM" into the top of his head. Would be great for overhead camera shoots:
 :doom:
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: kougar24 on February 01, 2010, 05:03:38 PM
Oh thanks Kougs, I am on the phone with the conference office asking if they can put an * next to last Saturday's loss . . . should I request that for any others??

Zacker . . . so being better than .583 at home over the course of 1.5 conference seasons is a "mythical standard"??

What's Missouri's home court winning streak again??  

What would the asterisk be for?

Games we lost at home the last 2 years that we shouldn't have:

1. OSU

 :runaway:

Also: LOL at "1.5 conference seasons." WTF kind of interval is that, seriously?
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: FP TC etc. on February 01, 2010, 05:04:20 PM
I'd like to see us wear more headbands. How were we against the spread at home with 3+ white headbands on the court?

Remember in Franks first year you would see at least 4-5 headbands on our team  :love:
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: blackknight on February 01, 2010, 05:04:45 PM
Oh thanks Kougs, I am on the phone with the conference office asking if they can put an * next to last Saturday's loss . . . should I request that for any others??

Zacker . . . so being better than .583 at home over the course of 1.5 conference seasons is a "mythical standard"??

What's Missouri's home court winning streak again?? 








Do you mean after a season in which Mizzou went to the E8? Good point, I guess with a home win streak that was half as much as Mizzou's we should expect the Sweet 16?? Nope. Not Good Enough.
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 01, 2010, 05:05:32 PM
dax,

is there a point that you are trying to make? i certainly do not disagree w/ the fact that we are 7-5 over the last twelve home conference games fwiw.  :dunno:
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: michigancat on February 01, 2010, 05:06:56 PM
dax isn't even arguing anything, and he's reeling 'em in like crazy.  elite message boarding we're all witnessing here.
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: kougar24 on February 01, 2010, 05:07:18 PM
dax,

is there a point that you are trying to make? i certainly do not disagree w/ the fact that we are 7-5 over the last twelve home conference games fwiw.  :dunno:

Through deductive reasoning I've discovered that his point is that the OSU loss was a bad one.

HTH!
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: felix rex on February 01, 2010, 05:07:44 PM
I'd like to see us wear more headbands. How were we against the spread at home with 3+ white headbands on the court?

Remember in Franks first year you would see at least 4-5 headbands on our team  :love:

it was amazing.  :cheers: Love seeing players max out all possible accessories (minus brady dorkystar tshirts).

Can you imagine Pullen with a white headband AND the sleeve? Prolly worth 3 pts and .5 steals/game just on intimidation.
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 01, 2010, 05:09:43 PM
Agree we need more headbands.

Really enjoying the excuses here . . . I never expected a so called "rebel board" to be so satisfied with the status quo . . . It's almost like outing closeted Woolites.

Sad . . .



Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: FP TC etc. on February 01, 2010, 05:11:38 PM
dax isn't even arguing anything, and he's reeling 'em in like crazy.  elite message boarding we're all witnessing here.

why is it good to troll fellow emawrs?  :confused:

this is why we can't have nice things.
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: felix rex on February 01, 2010, 05:12:00 PM
Agree we need more headbands.

Really enjoying the excuses here . . . I never expected a so called "rebel board" to be so satisfied with the status quo . . . It's almost like outing closeted Woolites.

Sad . . .





Quote
I've been a fan of bad basketball before. I could be again.

 :blindfold:
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: kougar24 on February 01, 2010, 05:17:19 PM
Agree we need more headbands.

Really enjoying the excuses here . . . I never expected a so called "rebel board" to be so satisfied with the status quo . . . It's almost like outing closeted Woolites.

Sad . . .





Remind me again how a top 10 ranking--or, hell, even a winning conference home record--is "status quo" for K-State basketball...
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: steve dave on February 01, 2010, 05:19:49 PM
Interesting that Dax is taking on the same topic as Keitzman because I've always kind of considered the Dax the Keitzman of message boarding. 
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 01, 2010, 05:25:45 PM
Agree we need more headbands.

Really enjoying the excuses here . . . I never expected a so called "rebel board" to be so satisfied with the status quo . . . It's almost like outing closeted Woolites.

Sad . . .





Remind me again how a top 10 ranking--or, hell, even a winning conference home record--is "status quo" for K-State basketball...

Kougs . . . now imagine going .800 at home in conference play instead of .560. 
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: catzacker on February 01, 2010, 05:27:47 PM
Oh thanks Kougs, I am on the phone with the conference office asking if they can put an * next to last Saturday's loss . . . should I request that for any others??

Zacker . . . so being better than .583 at home over the course of 1.5 conference seasons is a "mythical standard"??

What's Missouri's home court winning streak again?? 

Frank's .700 at home in conference in his tenure.  That's decent.  If he wins the remaining 4 home games he'll be 77% at home in 3 years, again, pretty good.  
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: michigancat on February 01, 2010, 05:29:16 PM
Oh thanks Kougs, I am on the phone with the conference office asking if they can put an * next to last Saturday's loss . . . should I request that for any others??

Zacker . . . so being better than .583 at home over the course of 1.5 conference seasons is a "mythical standard"??

What's Missouri's home court winning streak again?? 

Frank's .700 at home in conference in his tenure.  That's decent.  If he wins the remaining 4 home games he'll be 77% at home in 3 years, again, pretty good. 

He's actually .750.
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 01, 2010, 05:30:25 PM
Agree Zacker . . . IF that happens please feel free to point it out.

But, we'll have to toss out Frank's first year, because honestly, we should have been 8 and 0 at home with Bill Walker and Beasley . . . but I won't push that too hard, because some of you will stroke out at the simple thought of such demands being placed on KSU B-ball.  

Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: Pete on February 01, 2010, 05:37:31 PM
The Octagon of Doom is obviously the best homecourt advantage in the country.

 :jerk:

Get Better.
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: Pete on February 01, 2010, 05:39:58 PM
Interesting that Dax is taking on the same topic as Keitzman because I've always kind of considered the Dax the Keitzman of message boarding. 

Several categories there...

Highest ratings

Most hated by KU fans

Most hated by PowerTards

Recipient of blowjobs from intern(s)

Nerdy baseball fan

Friends with Powercat Tony
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: Cire on February 01, 2010, 05:45:30 PM
dax just needs to get over using ku as the measuring stick for everything.
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: JMart on February 01, 2010, 05:46:12 PM
Kougs I know it's hard for you . . . but 2 of those 5 losses have come  . . . this year.



mike evans was such a senior leader that his senior year ('77-78) he allowed 2 home court losses in....Ahearn.  Remember how tough it was to play in Ahearn?  How could such a player let that happen.  And a legendary coach like Hartman?  JFC. 

Hey, bro, we met Hartman's granddaughter the other day. I'll let others fill you in on how that went...
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: steve dave on February 01, 2010, 05:48:57 PM
Kougs I know it's hard for you . . . but 2 of those 5 losses have come  . . . this year.



mike evans was such a senior leader that his senior year ('77-78) he allowed 2 home court losses in....Ahearn.  Remember how tough it was to play in Ahearn?  How could such a player let that happen.  And a legendary coach like Hartman?  JFC. 

Hey, bro, we met Hartman's granddaughter the other day. I'll let others fill you in on how that went...

Like, 8 handfuls
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: kso_FAN on February 01, 2010, 05:50:34 PM
dax is the dprocket of goEMAW.com.
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on February 01, 2010, 06:05:17 PM
The Octagon of Doom is obviously the best homecourt advantage in the country.

Sharon Collins thinks so. "Loudest place I ever played".
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: mcmwcat on February 01, 2010, 07:47:21 PM
Agree Zacker . . . IF that happens please feel free to point it out.

But, we'll have to toss out Frank's first year, because honestly, we should have been 8 and 0 at home with Bill Walker and Beasley . . . but I won't push that too hard, because some of you will stroke out at the simple thought of such demands being placed on KSU B-ball.  



then we should also throw out every game against nortards.  i mean those are games we were favored to win.  the only games in which we should judge our team are games where the katz are underdogs.
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 01, 2010, 07:54:07 PM
Agree Zacker . . . IF that happens please feel free to point it out.

But, we'll have to toss out Frank's first year, because honestly, we should have been 8 and 0 at home with Bill Walker and Beasley . . . but I won't push that too hard, because some of you will stroke out at the simple thought of such demands being placed on KSU B-ball.  



then we should also throw out every game against nortards.  i mean those are games we were favored to win.  the only games in which we should judge our team are games where the katz are underdogs.


i was going to post this earlier as well and then i said to myself "self, why even bother". actually kind of admire dax for taking the wrong side of an argument and trying to argue it. oh well.
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: mcmwcat on February 01, 2010, 08:00:06 PM
Agree Zacker . . . IF that happens please feel free to point it out.

But, we'll have to toss out Frank's first year, because honestly, we should have been 8 and 0 at home with Bill Walker and Beasley . . . but I won't push that too hard, because some of you will stroke out at the simple thought of such demands being placed on KSU B-ball.  



then we should also throw out every game against nortards.  i mean those are games we were favored to win.  the only games in which we should judge our team are games where the katz are underdogs.


i was going to post this earlier as well and then i said to myself "self, why even bother". actually kind of admire dax for taking the wrong side of an argument and trying to argue it. oh well.

i guess if you want to judge a coach or a team in games in which they are only underdogs that's fine with me.  that's a pretty high standard and i don't really mind it.

i'm waiting for someone to compile those numbers for both road and home games over the last 3 seasons.  would be cool to know.  TIA
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: EllToPay on February 01, 2010, 08:23:31 PM
Dax just marking his territory here, folks. Nothing to see.
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 01, 2010, 09:07:00 PM
Agree Zacker . . . IF that happens please feel free to point it out.

But, we'll have to toss out Frank's first year, because honestly, we should have been 8 and 0 at home with Bill Walker and Beasley . . . but I won't push that too hard, because some of you will stroke out at the simple thought of such demands being placed on KSU B-ball.  





then we should also throw out every game against nortards.  i mean those are games we were favored to win.  the only games in which we should judge our team are games where the katz are underdogs.


i was going to post this earlier as well and then i said to myself "self, why even bother". actually kind of admire dax for taking the wrong side of an argument and trying to argue it. oh well.

i guess if you want to judge a coach or a team in games in which they are only underdogs that's fine with me.  that's a pretty high standard and i don't really mind it.

i'm waiting for someone to compile those numbers for both road and home games over the last 3 seasons.  would be cool to know.  TIA

i don't even think it's a high standard. just a weird one. i think he lost focus and got a little sidetracked.
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: sys on February 01, 2010, 10:45:05 PM
so, after 2.5 seasons (conf only) it's perhaps fair to conclude that given the quality of his teams, martin has slightly underperformed expectations at home, and dramatically overperformed expectations on the road.  fascinating?  :dunno:
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: FP TC etc. on February 01, 2010, 10:50:57 PM
so, after 2.5 seasons (conf only) it's perhaps fair to conclude that given the quality of his teams, martin has slightly underperformed expectations at home, and dramatically overperformed expectations on the road.  fascinating?  :dunno:

What about last year? I wouldn't say the expectations were particularly high  :dunno:
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: sys on February 01, 2010, 10:58:59 PM
so, after 2.5 seasons (conf only) it's perhaps fair to conclude that given the quality of his teams, martin has slightly underperformed expectations at home, and dramatically overperformed expectations on the road.  fascinating?  :dunno:

What about last year? I wouldn't say the expectations were particularly high  :dunno:

i didn't mean pre-season expectations.  rather, expectations based on the team's final record. 
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: Trim on February 02, 2010, 12:32:47 AM


Hey, bro, we met Hartman's granddaughter the other day. I'll let others fill you in on how that went...

Like, 8 handfuls

BONNIE!!!   :driving:
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 02, 2010, 07:28:18 AM
 :peek:
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: kso_FAN on February 02, 2010, 08:57:16 AM
Frank Martin tale of the tape...

Overall:
60-28 (.681)
42-7 home (.856)
11-13 road (.458)
7-8 neutral (.467)

Non-conference:
37-10 (.787)
28-1 home (.966)
2-3 road (.400)
7-6 neutral (.538)

Big 12:
23-18 (.561)
14-6 home (.700)
9-10 road (.474)
0-2 neutral (.000)

RPI:
13-18 vs 1-50 (.419)
8-7 vs 51-100 (.533)
18-3 vs 101-200 (.857)
18-0 vs 200+ (1.000)
3-0 vs non D1 (1.000)

Currently the 4th winning-est coach (winning %-age) in K-State history.
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 02, 2010, 09:15:38 AM


Hey, bro, we met Hartman's granddaughter the other day. I'll let others fill you in on how that went...

Like, 8 handfuls

BONNIE!!!   :driving:

She has pretty much established a goEMAW friendly pak place for future generations.  She's with EMAW.
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: steve dave on February 02, 2010, 09:18:25 AM


Hey, bro, we met Hartman's granddaughter the other day. I'll let others fill you in on how that went...

Like, 8 handfuls

BONNIE!!!   :driving:

 :runaway:
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: EllToPay on February 02, 2010, 09:18:33 AM
:peek:

Doing God's work, dax.
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: chum1 on February 02, 2010, 09:24:16 AM
Why aren't we taking non-con games into consideration?   :dunno: 

OOD DOD
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: kso_FAN on February 02, 2010, 09:30:00 PM
Frank Martin tale of the tape...

Overall:
61-28 (.6815
42-7 home (.856)
12-13 road (..480)
7-8 neutral (.467)

Non-conference:
37-10 (.787)
28-1 home (.966)
2-3 road (.400)
7-6 neutral (.538)

Big 12:
24-18 (.571)
14-6 home (.700)
10-10 road (.500)
0-2 neutral (.000)

RPI:
13-18 vs 1-50 (.419)
8-7 vs 51-100 (.533)
19-3 vs 101-200 (.863)
18-0 vs 200+ (1.000)
3-0 vs non D1 (1.000)

Currently the 4th winning-est coach (winning %-age) in K-State history.

Updated.
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: CHONGS on March 08, 2011, 12:16:23 PM
Have a bumpdate _FAN?
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: kso_FAN on March 08, 2011, 12:30:21 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F03%2FFrank3-8-11.png&hash=d11f7795da7e4a93b9ec2ce5727fb7ee0d6ca0fe)
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on March 08, 2011, 12:34:39 PM
Man I was brilliant in this thread. 
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: CHONGS on March 08, 2011, 12:36:41 PM
Man I was brilliant in this thread. 
You were in your prime then, like Shaun Alexander 2001-2005.
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: FP TC etc. on March 08, 2011, 12:42:26 PM
You should bitch about Jake some more... since that went so well last time.  :users:

 :excited:
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: catzacker on March 08, 2011, 12:55:35 PM
god, I loved '09-'10 Wildcat basketball.
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: kougar24 on March 08, 2011, 01:45:20 PM
god, I loved '09-'10 Wildcat basketball.

All of America did, bro.
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: catzacker on March 08, 2011, 01:52:46 PM
god, I loved '09-'10 Wildcat basketball.

All of America did, bro.

yeah, I just wish I could love this team like that.
Title: Re: 7 and 5 . . .
Post by: Cackle on March 08, 2011, 04:56:51 PM
how can you not?  the schizophrenia and manic depressive disorder that this team seems to suffer from makes them all the more lovable for me  :ksu:  

plus we have Shane and 95  :love: