goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: PoetWarrior on June 30, 2010, 07:35:00 AM

Title: Darious Thomas is ineligible
Post by: PoetWarrior on June 30, 2010, 07:35:00 AM
Kansas State football fans from Garden to Great Bend weep.
Title: Re: Darious Thomas is ineligible
Post by: steve dave on June 30, 2010, 07:37:35 AM
 :frown:
Title: Re: Darious Thomas is ineligible
Post by: WillieWatanabe on June 30, 2010, 07:39:48 AM
wut
Title: Re: Darious Thomas is ineligible
Post by: DQ12 on June 30, 2010, 09:34:58 AM
Is that the giant wide receiver who all the powertards were in love with because "he looked like James Terry, only taller"?
Title: Re: Darious Thomas is ineligible
Post by: steve dave on June 30, 2010, 09:36:43 AM
Is that the giant wide receiver who all the powertards were in love with because "he looked like James Terry, only taller"?

No, he was prolly going to be our best D-Back (super thin position where we will now almost certainly suck ass....though prolly not as bad as we will suck at LB)
Title: Re: Darious Thomas is ineligible
Post by: DQ12 on June 30, 2010, 10:36:40 AM
Is that the giant wide receiver who all the powertards were in love with because "he looked like James Terry, only taller"?

No, he was prolly going to be our best D-Back (super thin position where we will now almost certainly suck ass....though prolly not as bad as we will suck at LB)

That's right.  So who was that the giant wide receiver who all the powertards were in love with because "he looked like James Terry, only taller"?
Title: Re: Darious Thomas is ineligible
Post by: Pittcat on June 30, 2010, 10:37:41 AM
Is that the giant wide receiver who all the powertards were in love with because "he looked like James Terry, only taller"?

No, he was prolly going to be our best D-Back (super thin position where we will now almost certainly suck ass....though prolly not as bad as we will suck at LB)

That's right.  So who was that the giant wide receiver who all the powertards were in love with because "he looked like James Terry, only taller"?


Jade Cathey?  Or are you thinking of a player already on campus?
Title: Re: Darious Thomas is ineligible
Post by: jtksu on June 30, 2010, 10:45:18 AM
Darious Johnson.
Title: Re: Darious Thomas is ineligible
Post by: Dugout DickStone on June 30, 2010, 10:59:36 AM
How the eff can mu get a complete idiot like Mitchell, who literally hasn't gone to school for a few years, eligible but we can't?

JFC
Title: Re: Darious Thomas is ineligible
Post by: wabash909 on June 30, 2010, 11:48:23 AM
This all goes back to the cheating and why we need to do a lot more of it.

Title: Re: Darious Thomas is ineligible
Post by: Benja on June 30, 2010, 01:01:39 PM
Is that the giant wide receiver who all the powertards were in love with because "he looked like James Terry, only taller"?

No, he was prolly going to be our best D-Back (super thin position where we will now almost certainly suck ass....though prolly not as bad as we will suck at LB)

Yeah he's one of the few guys on defense that actually looked like he had some potential. Nice athlete from Cedar Hill and only a sophomore i think. And he isn't white, undersized, and slow. This sucks balls, especially since we're trying to play more 4-2-5.
Title: Re: Darious Thomas is ineligible
Post by: DQ12 on June 30, 2010, 01:28:19 PM
Darious Johnson.

Yep.  Sucks about Thomas though, as if our defense needed to get any weaker.  :flush:
Title: Re: Darious Thomas is ineligible
Post by: jtksu on June 30, 2010, 02:21:43 PM
Darious Johnson.

Yep.  Sucks about Thomas though, as if our defense needed to get any weaker.  :flush:

Yep.  really gotta hope that Pearson kids is good or we may be super mumped.
Title: Re: Darious Thomas is ineligible
Post by: PoetWarrior on June 03, 2011, 01:19:38 PM
MAYBE NOT ANYMORE, HOPEFULLY!!
Title: Re: Darious Thomas is ineligible
Post by: steve dave on June 03, 2011, 01:20:19 PM
 :emawkid:
Title: Re: Darious Thomas is ineligible
Post by: EllToPay on June 03, 2011, 01:22:57 PM
 :lynchmob:
Title: Re: Darious Thomas is ineligible
Post by: Benja on June 03, 2011, 01:26:01 PM
go cats
Title: Re: Darious Thomas is ineligible
Post by: CNS on June 03, 2011, 01:28:59 PM
LDariousIQ.

does this mean we aren't going to win the Big12 this year?
Title: Re: Darious Thomas is ineligible
Post by: WillieWatanabe on June 03, 2011, 01:32:30 PM
he better be good.
Title: Re: Darious Thomas is ineligible
Post by: Benja on June 03, 2011, 01:35:02 PM
LDariousIQ.

does this mean we aren't going to win the Big12 this year?

he's not suspended anymore, cns casey. so yes, we are going to win the rough ridin' big 12.
Title: Re: Darious Thomas is ineligible
Post by: sonofdaxjones on June 03, 2011, 01:40:53 PM
So we're cheating??

If so . . . oh yeah!!   :pbj: :pbj:
Title: Re: Darious Thomas is ineligible
Post by: yoga-like_abana on June 03, 2011, 01:54:46 PM
Thanks Pat, You and your purple SUV rough ridin' rock my socks off  :thumbs:
Title: Re: Darious Thomas is ineligible
Post by: CNS on June 03, 2011, 02:18:48 PM
LDariousIQ.

does this mean we aren't going to win the Big12 this year?

he's not suspended anymore, cns casey. so yes, we are going to win the rough ridin' big 12.

This is fantastic news.

However, I am assuming that PW will now make a vid about this great drama, ultimately leading to Darious' turning into a FP, TC, etc and leaving the team.
Title: Re: Darious Thomas is ineligible
Post by: Winters on June 03, 2011, 02:54:29 PM
 :excited:
Title: Re: Darious Thomas is ineligible
Post by: Bookcat on June 03, 2011, 04:09:31 PM
Prince would have never been able to do this. Sean Snyder won't either.
Title: Re: Darious Thomas is ineligible
Post by: CNS on June 03, 2011, 08:45:35 PM
Prince would have never been able to do this. Sean Snyder won't either.

So we won't win the Big 12 when Sean is our HC?