or is it something noone wants to touch here.
or is it something noone wants to touch here.When I really start thinking about it, I pretty much touch it wherever I am.
it's a wide open league. ku, ksu, ut or bu, none of them would surprise me. a&m or mu would surprise me, but not a ton.
Quoteit's a wide open league. ku, ksu, ut or bu, none of them would surprise me. a&m or mu would surprise me, but not a ton.
:jerk:
or is it something noone wants to touch here.
this is not the appropriate place.
If you guys can replace the 30 pts Denis Clemente scored against ISU in Ames last year, you could be. Tell me how you are going to replace him though...
If you guys can replace the 30 pts Denis Clemente scored against ISU in Ames last year, you could be. Tell me how you are going to replace him though...
You would rather recruit like a top 5 than actually be a top 5?
You would rather recruit like a top 5 than actually be a top 5?
I think he's saying his excitement is tempered by the impression that it (the excellence) won't last due to mediocre recruiting.
Just seems like being a top 5 team would mean that you have been recruiting like a top 5 team...:dunno:
If you guys can replace the 30 pts Denis Clemente scored against ISU in Ames last year, you could be. Tell me how you are going to replace him though...
FWIW, we could play the games against ISU this season with three or four guys on the floor at all times and still win by double digits. Sorry, 'Havs.
Just seems like being a top 5 team would mean that you have been recruiting like a top 5 team...:dunno:
Means we were recruiting like a top 5 team 2 to 4 years ago.
Just seems like being a top 5 team would mean that you have been recruiting like a top 5 team...:dunno:
Means we were recruiting like a top 5 team 2 to 4 years ago.
We really only recruited like a top 5 team for one year. And only 2 of those guys are left.
Just seems like being a top 5 team would mean that you have been recruiting like a top 5 team...:dunno:
Means we were recruiting like a top 5 team 2 to 4 years ago.
We really only recruited like a top 5 team for one year. And only 2 of those guys are left.
Samuels counts imo
Just seems like being a top 5 team would mean that you have been recruiting like a top 5 team...:dunno:
Means we were recruiting like a top 5 team 2 to 4 years ago.
We really only recruited like a top 5 team for one year. And only 2 of those guys are left.
Samuels counts imo
Who are we counting here?
CK
JP
JS
WJ
RM
DS
That's five guys who were Rivals top 100 types, right?
Just seems like being a top 5 team would mean that you have been recruiting like a top 5 team...:dunno:
Means we were recruiting like a top 5 team 2 to 4 years ago.
We really only recruited like a top 5 team for one year. And only 2 of those guys are left.
Samuels counts imo
Who are we counting here?
CK
JP
JS
WJ
RM
DS
That's five guys who were Rivals top 100 types, right?
I was refering to _33 saying we only recruited top 5 for one season and only 2 of those guys are left. I mentioned Samuels should be the third as he was that class with Pullen and Sutton (though he was only eligable second semester and sat out).
Just seems like being a top 5 team would mean that you have been recruiting like a top 5 team...:dunno:
Means we were recruiting like a top 5 team 2 to 4 years ago.
We really only recruited like a top 5 team for one year. And only 2 of those guys are left.
Samuels counts imo
Who are we counting here?
CK
JP
JS
WJ
RM
DS
That's five guys who were Rivals top 100 types, right?
I was refering to _33 saying we only recruited top 5 for one season and only 2 of those guys are left. I mentioned Samuels should be the third as he was that class with Pullen and Sutton (though he was only eligable second semester and sat out).
Yeah forgot about him. Pretty sure JP and JS weren't even in the rivals top 150 let alone top 100. They had nothing to do with us recruiting like a top 5 team that year. They just turned out to be good.
Just seems like being a top 5 team would mean that you have been recruiting like a top 5 team...:dunno:
Means we were recruiting like a top 5 team 2 to 4 years ago.
We really only recruited like a top 5 team for one year. And only 2 of those guys are left.
Samuels counts imo
Who are we counting here?
CK
JP
JS
WJ
RM
DS
That's five guys who were Rivals top 100 types, right?
I was refering to _33 saying we only recruited top 5 for one season and only 2 of those guys are left. I mentioned Samuels should be the third as he was that class with Pullen and Sutton (though he was only eligable second semester and sat out).
Yeah forgot about him. Pretty sure JP and JS weren't even in the rivals top 150 let alone top 100. They had nothing to do with us recruiting like a top 5 team that year. They just turned out to be good.
What was the class with wally and rod ranked? Seems like it was pretty high. Also, don't guys that turn out to be good (even though they were not highly ranked) count as good recruiting? Or are the only good recruits the ones that were highly ranked in high school?
What was the class with wally and rod ranked? Seems like it was pretty high. Also, don't guys that turn out to be good (even though they were not highly ranked) count as good recruiting? Or are the only good recruits the ones that were highly ranked in high school?
Seems like Pullen is playing better than his rankings would have suggested.
I do. until I see otherwise, this should be a top 8 team.
feel free to get excited!
:ksu:
For some reason, I'd almost rather be a 2 than a 1.
for the record I would rather be a one seed, but then again I am not stupid
wow odd I agree as well, great minds think a like?for the record I would rather be a one seed, but then again I am not stupid
I gotta admit, I'm with chingon here. Take that with a grain of salt though because I'm pretty smart.
Seems like Pullen is playing better than his rankings would have suggested.
jt: shut up. thx.
Well, I'm a goddamn genius and I say I'm not sure how well our team would play with the pressure of a 1 seed. Since it doesn't really offer much of a strategic advantage, maybe a 2 seed would be better for the team KSU will have next year.
Well, I'm a goddamn genius and I say I'm not sure how well our team would play with the pressure of a 1 seed. Since it doesn't really offer much of a strategic advantage, maybe a 2 seed would be better for the team KSU will have next year.
Based on what? Our guys are battle tested.
Guess I just like that chip on their shoulders thing they have going on. Once you move up into that top echelon it's hard to keep that edge. Teams that are ranked that highly every year tend to go about things in a different way. I'm not saying we couldn't handle it, just kinda thinking out loud a bit.
Guess I just like that chip on their shoulders thing they have going on. Once you move up into that top echelon it's hard to keep that edge. Teams that are ranked that highly every year tend to go about things in a different way. I'm not saying we couldn't handle it, just kinda thinking out loud a bit.
you should worry more about recruiting.
Totally rightm. The staff better get off their asses and recruit some guys who can help us in 2010-11 or they better start looking for new jobs!! This thread is about this upcoming season, isn't it?
Totally rightm. The staff better get off their asses and recruit some guys who can help us in 2010-11 or they better start looking for new jobs!! This thread is about this upcoming season, isn't it?
i guess russell was right to shut you up earlier. my mistake.
K-State in the top 5 next year is an absolute joke, especially if the Sutton rumors are true. K-State will be lucky to finish 4th in the Big 12 without Clemente and Sutton.
K-State in the top 5 next year is an absolute joke, especially if the Sutton rumors are true. K-State will be lucky to finish 4th in the Big 12 without Clemente and Sutton.
I still think getting a 1 seed is a good thing :dunno:
I still think getting a 1 seed is a good thing :dunno:
New combo-fan hand sign!!!
I still think getting a 1 seed is a good thing :dunno:
New combo-fan hand sign!!!
It's just the BBQ Beef/Hot Dog sign with two Hot Dogs
K-State in the top 5 next year is an absolute joke, especially if the Sutton rumors are true. K-State will be lucky to finish 4th in the Big 12 without Clemente and Sutton.
Dude, you are having a terrible posting day. I would suggest that you just go hang up your clown suit and call it a day.
If you guys can replace the 30 pts Denis Clemente scored against ISU in Ames last year, you could be. Tell me how you are going to replace him though...
How many points did ISU lose off last years team?
And you lost McNEck
Ba-zing.
:surprised:For some reason, I'd almost rather be a 2 than a 1.
The reason is you're dumb.
If you guys can replace the 30 pts Denis Clemente scored against ISU in Ames last year, you could be. Tell me how you are going to replace him though...
How many points did ISU lose off last years team?
And you lost McNEck
Ba-zing.
McNeck is a negative. When you subtract a negative, its positive.
If you guys can replace the 30 pts Denis Clemente scored against ISU in Ames last year, you could be. Tell me how you are going to replace him though...
How many points did ISU lose off last years team?
And you lost McNEck
Ba-zing.
McNeck is a negative. When you subtract a negative, its positive.