goemaw.com

General Discussion => The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit => Topic started by: steve dave on March 06, 2025, 04:37:47 PM

Title: Newsom
Post by: steve dave on March 06, 2025, 04:37:47 PM
He's running

https://x.com/ccadelago/status/1897633093265092810
Title: Re: Newsom
Post by: star seed 7 on March 06, 2025, 04:41:37 PM
Then goes on to praise the trump they/them ad. That was the most disgusting political ad I've ever seen. eff him.
Title: Re: Newsom
Post by: wetwillie on March 06, 2025, 04:50:43 PM
I don't think he has a snowballs chance in hell.
Title: Re: Newsom
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 06, 2025, 04:54:43 PM
Did the trump kid get his sloppies?
Title: Re: Newsom
Post by: michigancat on March 06, 2025, 05:51:19 PM
He's running

https://x.com/ccadelago/status/1897633093265092810

What a shitbag
Title: Re: Newsom
Post by: steve dave on March 06, 2025, 06:36:33 PM
MODS UNITE BEHIND G!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Newsom
Post by: CNS on March 06, 2025, 07:27:41 PM
Will we see Act 3 of Kim Guilfoyle?  Would really sell his new act. He could play to be what Don wants Don Jr to be.
Title: Re: Newsom
Post by: CNS on March 06, 2025, 07:31:02 PM
It’s going to be a stacked field with Newsom and Fetterman.  Will be interesting to see what Pete, Shapiro, and Wittmer do. Do they want to run in this environment or are they going to take the Sasse exit?
Title: Re: Newsom
Post by: michigancat on March 06, 2025, 08:23:39 PM
The thing is, gavin can't run on anti-trans rights because

A) he's been too friendly to gays in the past, Republicans will hammer him on that
B) no matter how far to the right or cruel he goes, Republicans will always be farther right and crueler

The alternative position is to actually stand up for marginalized groups (something national Dems didn't do AT ALL in 2024)
Title: Re: Newsom
Post by: michigancat on March 06, 2025, 08:24:11 PM
It’s going to be a stacked field with Newsom and Fetterman.  Will be interesting to see what Pete, Shapiro, and Wittmer do. Do they want to run in this environment or are they going to take the Sasse exit?

I want AOC to spice things up
Title: Re: Newsom
Post by: steve dave on March 06, 2025, 08:24:37 PM
Fetterman will be dead thank god


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Newsom
Post by: steve dave on March 06, 2025, 08:25:06 PM
It’s going to be a stacked field with Newsom and Fetterman.  Will be interesting to see what Pete, Shapiro, and Wittmer do. Do they want to run in this environment or are they going to take the Sasse exit?

I want AOC to spice things up
Get in losers, we’re going losing


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Newsom
Post by: steve dave on March 06, 2025, 08:25:41 PM
The thing is, gavin can't run on anti-trans rights because

A) he's been too friendly to gays in the past, Republicans will hammer him on that
B) no matter how far to the right or cruel he goes, Republicans will always be farther right and crueler

The alternative position is to actually stand up for marginalized groups (something national Dems didn't do AT ALL in 2024)
I don’t think he’s running on that dipshit


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Newsom
Post by: michigancat on March 06, 2025, 08:30:31 PM
The thing is, gavin can't run on anti-trans rights because

A) he's been too friendly to gays in the past, Republicans will hammer him on that
B) no matter how far to the right or cruel he goes, Republicans will always be farther right and crueler

The alternative position is to actually stand up for marginalized groups (something national Dems didn't do AT ALL in 2024)
I don’t think he’s running on that dipshit


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Regardless he will get mercilessly hammered by taking the "you know what I agree with Charlie Kirk" stance. From both sides! AOC and Barney Cotton will both murder him
Title: Re: Newsom
Post by: steve dave on March 06, 2025, 08:38:39 PM
Maybe polarize more bud. See if that gets you some dubs


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Newsom
Post by: michigancat on March 06, 2025, 08:44:19 PM
Maybe polarize more bud. See if that gets you some dubs


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think the path to victory is doubling down on the strategy that put Liz Cheney front and center. They just didn't do it hard enough last time!
Title: Re: Newsom
Post by: wetwillie on March 06, 2025, 08:55:38 PM
Gavin vs JD is pretty gross but I guess it is what it is
Title: Re: Newsom
Post by: steve dave on March 06, 2025, 09:23:31 PM
Maybe polarize more bud. See if that gets you some dubs


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think the path to victory is doubling down on the strategy that put Liz Cheney front and center. They just didn't do it hard enough last time!
You’ve isolated the problem, now fix it


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Newsom
Post by: michigancat on March 07, 2025, 09:40:44 AM
(https://i.imgflip.com/9mlkd8.jpg)
Title: Re: Newsom
Post by: star seed 7 on March 07, 2025, 10:02:33 AM
Lol
Title: Re: Newsom
Post by: Stupid Fitz on March 07, 2025, 10:11:22 AM
 :lol:

Also, how is it even possible that after seeing the Repub absolute shitshow since Trump 1 and now even moreso with Trump 2, the opposing party could still be this unpopular? Its remarkable. Obama's old shoe would sweep any current election and yet they are throwing out names like Newsome and Cuomo.
Title: Re: Newsom
Post by: cfbandyman on March 07, 2025, 10:19:12 AM
:lol:

Also, how is it even possible that after seeing the Repub absolute shitshow since Trump 1 and now even moreso with Trump 2, the opposing party could still be this unpopular? Its remarkable. Obama's old shoe would sweep any current election and yet they are throwing out names like Newsome and Cuomo.

It is remarkable. But they need to have a 2016 pub thunderdome to settle it, not a thumb on the scale 2016 like they did
Title: Re: Newsom
Post by: Institutional Control on March 07, 2025, 11:47:21 AM
The entire primary system is mumped up and stoopid.  In what world does it make sense to essentially pick a candidate before over the half the country has had a chance to vote on it? I realize that funding a national campaign if more expensive then just the first 10 states in the primary election cycle but you don't need to spend 3 months in Iowa talking to every single registered voter, we have platforms that can literally reach anyone in the country at any time.  Let everyone vote at the same rough ridin' time.
Title: Re: Newsom
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on March 07, 2025, 03:40:12 PM
The entire primary system is mumped up and stoopid.  In what world does it make sense to essentially pick a candidate before over the half the country has had a chance to vote on it? I realize that funding a national campaign if more expensive then just the first 10 states in the primary election cycle but you don't need to spend 3 months in Iowa talking to every single registered voter, we have platforms that can literally reach anyone in the country at any time.  Let everyone vote at the same rough ridin' time.

Both of these parties get enough money in donations to easily fund a national campaign.
Title: Re: Newsom
Post by: bucket on March 11, 2025, 09:44:37 PM
(https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:t46sqvutibvsmjgwn6r6izve/bafkreih7br24oejfa6uej6ybqgpfz2szkjatg4pliagswy3mopmunqudiq@jpeg)

Dude may not be smart