goemaw.com
TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: Sugar Dick on June 14, 2010, 06:59:41 PM
-
I type this fully expecting the tide to turn by tomorrow and the conference to dissolve around 11am (Tuesday). Feel free to make your own
Who looks like the male genitals of the walk in the whole realignment thing:
Texas, this goes without saying, from beginning to end, they were the only ones that mattered. Now they're richer than ever and will soon have their own network. George Steinbrenner may as well be an honorary alumni.
Who looks hilariously pathetic in the whole realignment thing:
KU and MU. Seriously what kind of daddy issues did these low life whores endure as children? Making up rumors about which conferences wanted them, so they look important, when in reality no one ever wanted them. It's like the chick that blew the QB then told everyone at school they were going to prom together. . . .because she blew the QB. Ruining your reputation while exhibiting a complete disregard of any appearance self esteem/respect is never a good play. LoL at these losers.
Who looks like a puppetin the whole realignment thing:
OSU, TTech, OU. Love the whole we do what UT does. Not a bad play from a strategic standpoint, but that's about the only positive thing you can say.
Who looks the exact same as it did before in the whole realignment thing:
ISU, BU, KSU. Nobody knows what they were doing behind the scenes, nobody knows if anybody wanted them or if nobody wanted them at all. Good play strategically (in hindsight only) because of how it worked out, but also gives the appearance of weakness, or worse, apathy. At least they still have some cards hidden the next time this happens.
Who looks Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) in the whole realignment thing:
CU, NU: leaving the conference for more money only to find out if they stayed they'd get the same money. CU showed us they have absolutely no cash value and were irrelevant to the Big 12, well done morons you continue to diminish a once proud athletics program. NU left for a conference with a declining TV market (see Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania) and no room for long term growth, to make what could end up being the same money by staying put in a conference that, relatively speaking has some growth potential. At least they get to play their style of football against everyone else :dunno:
-
Who looks like a rough ridin' mad scientist genius in this whole thing:
Dan Beebe.
I mean, JFC.
-
Good thread, SD.
-
Who looks like they are exactly where they started in the whole realignment thing.
MWC from adding Boise, to dilusions of grandeur (you know you wanted us :blush:), to losing Utah
square one boys :bang:
-
Who looks drunk as a pope in this whole realignment thing? Nebraska, that's who. They hated the conference championship game. Now they have one and we don't. Also, they have to pay us more than $10,000,000. :babywillie:
-
Just keep sucking on Texas' hind tit.
-
I'll just keep posting complete crap
-
Nebraska looks like Santa Claus handing out wads of Cash.
-
Colorado looks like a broken slinky that was found under the bed. Dunno what that means but it seems fitting.
-
Who looks like the future frequent flyer miles king of college athletics.
Colorado. 883 miles away (by road) from their closest conference opponent.
-
Just keep sucking on Texas' hind tit.
I enjoy the taste of it.
Do you know what? I'll bet it tastes better than the Big Ten's bad person. You'll know what BOTH taste like soon enough, so be sure to come back here and let us know. TIA.