goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: theswo on June 09, 2010, 11:45:14 PM

Title: USC
Post by: theswo on June 09, 2010, 11:45:14 PM
Two year postseason ban
Title: Re: USC
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on June 09, 2010, 11:46:44 PM
Wow. The Pac 16 West will be absolute dog crap for the next few years.
Title: Re: USC
Post by: sonofdaxjones on June 09, 2010, 11:48:32 PM
 :surprised:
Title: Re: USC
Post by: KSUTOMMY on June 10, 2010, 12:29:43 PM
Talk about a slap on the wrist... that's freaking weak.
Title: Re: USC
Post by: CNS on June 10, 2010, 12:40:35 PM
 :lol:-Pete Carrol
 :lol:-Reggie Bush
Title: Re: USC
Post by: Winters on June 10, 2010, 12:52:23 PM
:lol:-Pete Carrol

Genius!
Title: Re: USC
Post by: goldenticket on June 10, 2010, 01:17:47 PM
yeah and loss of scholarships (ive read between 17 and 20) and ive read that jrs and seniors can transfer to another school without having to sit out for a year. but searching around those things arent on an official site yet but the release is supposed to be today
Title: Re: USC
Post by: steve dave on June 10, 2010, 02:03:42 PM
Don't make this seem light fellas.  They kicked their ass.  Vacate 04 BCS title, all 05 season, 75 scholly limit for next 3 years (loss of 30 scholarships), no post season for 2 years.

 :surprised:
Title: Re: USC
Post by: steve dave on June 10, 2010, 02:10:16 PM
Do we have schollys to give?  We need to scoop up some of these suddenly not on scholarship borderline talented USC castoffs!
Title: Re: USC
Post by: steve dave on June 10, 2010, 02:12:08 PM
Assuming they don't take away schollys from current players (they will) they would have 10 of their pretty ridic. recruiting class come available.

 :surprised:

Quote
BFeldmanESPN    #USC 2010 class also would need a release. They're bound to NLI. If they start summer school, that would trigger "transfer release."


Not that any of them will want to play ball in the MtnWest with us  :embarrassed:
Title: Re: USC
Post by: bakerman on June 10, 2010, 02:12:21 PM
yeah and loss of scholarships (ive read between 17 and 20) and ive read that jrs and seniors can transfer to another school without having to sit out for a year. but searching around those things arent on an official site yet but the release is supposed to be today

Wow, if so, Hello resurgence of football at Washington. I would think they would run there since they were probably recruited by UW head coach while he was at USC.
Title: Re: USC
Post by: steve dave on June 10, 2010, 02:14:03 PM
yeah and loss of scholarships (ive read between 17 and 20) and ive read that jrs and seniors can transfer to another school without having to sit out for a year. but searching around those things arent on an official site yet but the release is supposed to be today

Wow, if so, Hello resurgence of football at Washington. I would think they would run there since they were probably recruited by UW head coach while he was at USC.

Doesn't sound like it

 :surprised:

Quote
BFeldmanESPN    That means if those players went to a different Pac-10 school, they could have to sit two years.
Title: Re: USC
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on June 10, 2010, 02:14:42 PM
Maybe we could get some juniors and seniors to transfer here. They wouldn't even have to play in the Mtn. West because they'll be graduated by 2012.
Title: Re: USC
Post by: bakerman on June 10, 2010, 02:18:21 PM
yeah and loss of scholarships (ive read between 17 and 20) and ive read that jrs and seniors can transfer to another school without having to sit out for a year. but searching around those things arent on an official site yet but the release is supposed to be today

Wow, if so, Hello resurgence of football at Washington. I would think they would run there since they were probably recruited by UW head coach while he was at USC.

Doesn't sound like it

 :surprised:

Quote
BFeldmanESPN    That means if those players went to a different Pac-10 school, they could have to sit two years.


 :surprised:
Title: Re: USC
Post by: CNS on June 10, 2010, 02:24:23 PM
Bill has done well getting transfers.

Any USC kids that chose USC over OB?
Title: Re: USC
Post by: steve dave on June 10, 2010, 02:26:05 PM
Remember about all the super good athletes that Carrol was going to send Bill's way because they were besties and junk/stuff!?

 :surprised:
Title: Re: USC
Post by: CNS on June 10, 2010, 02:27:49 PM
Remember about all the super good athletes that Carrol was going to send Bill's way because they were besties and junk/stuff!?

 :surprised:

Do the Seahawks have some good recruits that they don't have room for?   :dunno:
Title: Re: USC
Post by: bakerman on June 10, 2010, 02:28:41 PM
Younger Old Bill destroyed them with lesser athletes before. He should show the possible transfers that and just thell them, "Imagine what we could do with your talent."
Title: Re: USC
Post by: Do Work Son on June 10, 2010, 02:30:19 PM
Remember Marvin Simmons? USC transfer was a bust!
Title: Re: USC
Post by: steve dave on June 10, 2010, 02:30:31 PM
Remember about all the super good athletes that Carrol was going to send Bill's way because they were besties and junk/stuff!?

 :surprised:

Do the Seahawks have some good recruits that they don't have room for?   :dunno:

All the d00ds that would be transferring would be his d00ds!
Title: Re: USC
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on June 10, 2010, 02:31:32 PM
Yes OB and the gang could put together a presentation for the youngsters using newfangled technology like point power... power point?? Well, whatever it's called.
Title: Re: USC
Post by: CNS on June 10, 2010, 02:34:02 PM
Remember about all the super good athletes that Carrol was going to send Bill's way because they were besties and junk/stuff!?

 :surprised:

Do the Seahawks have some good recruits that they don't have room for?   :dunno:

All the d00ds that would be transferring would be his d00ds!

Problem is we prolly couldn't afford them.  Won't they go to whoever the next highest bidder was?  :dunno:
Title: Re: USC
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on June 10, 2010, 02:34:48 PM
Remember about all the super good athletes that Carrol was going to send Bill's way because they were besties and junk/stuff!?

 :surprised:

Do the Seahawks have some good recruits that they don't have room for?   :dunno:

All the d00ds that would be transferring would be his d00ds!

Problem is we prolly couldn't afford them.  Won't they go to whoever the next highest bidder was?  :dunno:

It's not like they have to give their under the table money back to USC. They've already been paid.
Title: Re: USC
Post by: MeatSauce on June 10, 2010, 02:38:20 PM
Could we trade a couple schollies per year for a  Pac10 invite? :dunno:
Title: Re: USC
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on December 01, 2016, 04:39:36 PM
 :frown:

http://m.tmz.com/#article/2016/12/01/joe-mcknight-murdered-road-rage-shooting/
Title: Re: USC
Post by: hemmy on December 01, 2016, 06:17:55 PM
Man, those tmz comments are aids
Title: Re: USC
Post by: MakeItRain on December 02, 2016, 09:57:42 AM
This is about to get very political. :frown:
Title: Re: USC
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on December 02, 2016, 10:01:54 AM
 :frown: