goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Basketball is hard => Topic started by: kso_FAN on December 29, 2017, 10:48:55 PM

Title: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: kso_FAN on December 29, 2017, 10:48:55 PM
Wade is a stud.

Kam is a stud.

Barry is good.

Sneed is good.

Wainright is good.

Mawein.... fouls a lot.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DSREhRIUMAAjVjq.jpg:large)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DSRH8VYV4AIlt1R.jpg:large)

BTW, this team has 4 games at 1.3 points per possession or better this year. No K-State team has had more than 3 games that efficient in any single season for the last 16 years.
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on December 29, 2017, 10:58:51 PM
Barry off the bounce = stud

I'm not sure mawein actually committed a real foul, maybe the lsst one.
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: wetwillie on December 29, 2017, 11:02:55 PM
i believe kam had 21 at the break and finished with 23, i didnt pay that close attention in the second half but they must have adjusted to not give him very many good looks.  Also our minutes are hilarious, we effectively played 6 guys.
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: kso_FAN on December 29, 2017, 11:07:12 PM
i believe kam had 21 at the break and finished with 23, i didnt pay that close attention in the second half but they must have adjusted to not give him very many good looks.  Also our minutes are hilarious, we effectively played 6 guys.

Yeah.

And the Diarra, Brown, Stokes, Patrick/Wainright, Wade line up was pretty great.
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: cfbandyman on December 29, 2017, 11:10:28 PM
Brown is amazing at attacking the rim.
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: pissclams on December 29, 2017, 11:16:00 PM
let’s hope that mose can shoot at an 81% clip all season
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: Powercat Posse on December 29, 2017, 11:17:17 PM
1) Iowa St started 14-18 FG (4-6 3pt). And led 39-33.
From then on they were 9-33 FG (0-9 3pt).

2) From that 39-33 deficit, Cats scored 58 in final 41 Possessions for the 91-75 win. 
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on December 29, 2017, 11:19:30 PM
They're so sad! :frown:
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: renocat on December 29, 2017, 11:23:31 PM
I was at a party, and didn't even get to listen.  Checked the score at halftime.  Just checked the final and box score.  ASU Cats showed up.

Claws has arrived.   I am most impressed with all of the non scoring stats, especially keeping fouls dowm.  How did the bigs do playing when Mawien got in foul.problems.  The box score shows Stockard did some work.  And Love?
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: BackPayne on December 29, 2017, 11:31:13 PM
Did not watch, drywalling our addition. I HATE DRYWALL!.

What was the main factor for ISU going from shooting great to "are they shooting blind-folded?"
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: MakeItRain on December 30, 2017, 12:33:48 AM
i believe kam had 21 at the break and finished with 23, i didnt pay that close attention in the second half but they must have adjusted to not give him very many good looks.  Also our minutes are hilarious, we effectively played 6 guys.

I didn't see much of an adjustment from Iowa State. Killa Kam missed his first couple of shots so he didn't take too many more, they were closing hard so he was able to dribble around the defenders and create for others. The foul trouble didn't help either.
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: stunted on December 30, 2017, 01:19:01 AM
i feel like our starters can beat anybody. how should we feel about the bench?

i hope this is the game where d-wade realizes that he's bigger than most people and is better at basketball than most people. he should be averaging at least 18/9 a game. also kam's spazzy style is fun to watch now that he's really good.
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: michigancat on December 30, 2017, 01:51:08 AM
Our bench really sucks

But a nice win! Go Claws!
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: The Big Train on December 30, 2017, 08:09:33 AM
i believe kam had 21 at the break and finished with 23, i didnt pay that close attention in the second half but they must have adjusted to not give him very many good looks.  Also our minutes are hilarious, we effectively played 6 guys.

Yeah.

And the Diarra, Brown, Stokes, Patrick/Wainright, Wade line up was pretty great.

:Chirp:
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: yoga-like_abana on December 30, 2017, 08:37:27 AM
Not a bad thread name was really hoping for something more like wadeing through the water


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: renocat on December 30, 2017, 09:33:58 AM
Fan when was the last time anyone scored 30+?  Seems like a long time.
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: manpow5 on December 30, 2017, 09:48:28 AM
Fan when was the last time anyone scored 30+?  Seems like a long time.

The announcers said the last time we had 3 players with 20+ was with Pullen, Clemente, and Kelly(??) In 2011.
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: michigancat on December 30, 2017, 09:55:04 AM
Fan when was the last time anyone scored 30+?  Seems like a long time.

The announcers said the last time we had 3 players with 20+ was with Pullen, Clemente, and Kelly(??) In 2011.
You either don't know who Curtis Kelly was or were surprised he scored twenty points in a game? C'mon, man.
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: michigancat on December 30, 2017, 09:55:40 AM
Also I'm pretty sure Marcus Foster scoring 34 as a freshman was the last time someone scored 30.
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: wetwillie on December 30, 2017, 10:16:54 AM
Also I'm pretty sure Marcus Foster scoring 34 as a freshman was the last time someone scored 30.


That's probably right. 2014 against UT.  Maybe Wade will go into the truly rarified air of the 40's  club.
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: manpow5 on December 30, 2017, 10:22:10 AM
Fan when was the last time anyone scored 30+?  Seems like a long time.

The announcers said the last time we had 3 players with 20+ was with Pullen, Clemente, and Kelly(??) In 2011.
You either don't know who Curtis Kelly was or were surprised he scored twenty points in a game? C'mon, man.


I couldn't remember if it was Kelly or someone else. Just remember it was Pullen and Clemente and someone else.
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: michigancat on December 30, 2017, 10:28:54 AM
Fan when was the last time anyone scored 30+?  Seems like a long time.

The announcers said the last time we had 3 players with 20+ was with Pullen, Clemente, and Kelly(??) In 2011.
You either don't know who Curtis Kelly was or were surprised he scored twenty points in a game? C'mon, man.


I couldn't remember if it was Kelly or someone else. Just remember it was Pullen and Clemente and someone else.
Ah that makes sense. :thumbs:
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: _33 on December 30, 2017, 01:17:15 PM
Den Clem did not play for the ksu cats in 2011.
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: 8manpick on December 30, 2017, 03:49:11 PM
It was DeCle, but it was 2010
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: renocat on December 30, 2017, 03:58:02 PM
When was last time someone scored 30+, and had 8 rebounds.
When was the last time we saw 2 20+ scores to boot in the same game.
And on the road.
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: kstate4life on December 30, 2017, 04:04:30 PM
Last time we had 3, 20+ scorers was THE Xavier game
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: mocat on December 30, 2017, 04:57:57 PM
Dang we scored 91, and only 4 came from the bench
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: catastrophe on December 30, 2017, 10:13:56 PM
This was a good win for the Cats.  The criticism of our bench in a 91 point game is ridiculous. That’s like saying, “yeah, he threw for 5 TDS, but our backup QB didn’t do crap!”
Title: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: catastrophe on December 30, 2017, 10:22:22 PM
Similar analogy: “Yeah it’s great he pitched a 1 hit complete game, but I can you believe our closer didn’t throw a single strike?”
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: wetwillie on December 30, 2017, 10:45:52 PM
we don't have a bench, you can't criticize something that doesn't exist.
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: mocat on December 30, 2017, 11:08:22 PM
This was a good win for the Cats.  The criticism of our bench in a 91 point game is ridiculous. That’s like saying, “yeah, he threw for 5 TDS, but our backup QB didn’t do crap!”
Who's criticizing it weirdo?
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: michigancat on December 31, 2017, 12:03:16 AM
This was a good win for the Cats.  The criticism of our bench in a 91 point game is ridiculous. That’s like saying, “yeah, he threw for 5 TDS, but our backup QB didn’t do crap!”
Yeah except the bench played 66 minutes. Playing that much I an average paced game and scoring only 4 points is pretty remarkable when you consider how efficient the offense was. It's almost like you'd have to make an effort to not score in that many minutes.

Also your analogies are incredibly stupid and our weak bench will cost us games this year, even if it didn't yesterday.
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: mocat on December 31, 2017, 01:53:37 AM
I'm just saying it's crazy weird.

For example, other scores this weekend (bench points in parentheses):

WVU 85 (28)
OSU 77 (16)
TTU 77 (42)
KU 92 (13)
UT 86 (17)
OU 90 (30)
TCU 89 (34)
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: pvegs on December 31, 2017, 04:44:42 AM
I'm just saying it's crazy weird.

For example, other scores this weekend (bench points in parentheses):

WVU 85 (28)
OSU 77 (16)
TTU 77 (42)
KU 92 (13)
UT 86 (17)
OU 90 (30)
TCU 89 (34)

Our win was awesome and fun, but don't those parentheticals just prove that our bench was trash compared to every other team? 
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: stunted on December 31, 2017, 04:57:39 AM
i did the math and according to my calculations the bench averages 17 points a game which isn't far off that list. scoring points is just one thing though, if they can dominate the play-hard chart that'd be great.
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: catastrophe on December 31, 2017, 08:21:55 AM
This was a good win for the Cats.  The criticism of our bench in a 91 point game is ridiculous. That’s like saying, “yeah, he threw for 5 TDS, but our backup QB didn’t do crap!”
Who's criticizing it weirdo?

See above and below your post.
Title: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: catastrophe on December 31, 2017, 08:27:42 AM
This was a good win for the Cats.  The criticism of our bench in a 91 point game is ridiculous. That’s like saying, “yeah, he threw for 5 TDS, but our backup QB didn’t do crap!”
Also your analogies are incredibly stupid and our weak bench will cost us games this year, even if it didn't yesterday.

What about it says our bench is weak? You’d be melting down just as hard if we stopped feeding guys who were making a high % of shots. Again, we’re not talking about a game we won because of amazing defense or a lucky day against ISU. We scored 90+ points.

Why is it all of the sudden bad coaching to say, these dudes are doing a great job offensively, let’s keep going back to them.

How about this analogy: pretty great that Jordy Nelson caught 5 TDs for 200 yards, but sucks our other WRs only caught 3 passes. That sure shows we are in trouble.
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: mocat on December 31, 2017, 08:52:56 AM
This was a good win for the Cats.  The criticism of our bench in a 91 point game is ridiculous. That’s like saying, “yeah, he threw for 5 TDS, but our backup QB didn’t do crap!”
Who's criticizing it weirdo?

See above and below your post.
Oh so you were just anticipating the criticism
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: chum1 on December 31, 2017, 09:34:47 AM
It's the WHO WILL _______ WHEN THE SENIORS GRADUATE!?!? time of year again.
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: wetwillie on December 31, 2017, 09:40:19 AM
I like that catastrophe is doubling down on his analogies. Can't wait to see if he pulls out a soccer analogy next.
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: michigancat on December 31, 2017, 09:52:54 AM
This was a good win for the Cats.  The criticism of our bench in a 91 point game is ridiculous. That’s like saying, “yeah, he threw for 5 TDS, but our backup QB didn’t do crap!”
Also your analogies are incredibly stupid and our weak bench will cost us games this year, even if it didn't yesterday.

What about it says our bench is weak? You’d be melting down just as hard if we stopped feeding guys who were making a high % of shots. Again, we’re not talking about a game we won because of amazing defense or a lucky day against ISU. We scored 90+ points.

Why is it all of the sudden bad coaching to say, these dudes are doing a great job offensively, let’s keep going back to them.

How about this analogy: pretty great that Jordy Nelson caught 5 TDs for 200 yards, but sucks our other WRs only caught 3 passes. That sure shows we are in trouble.

Are you really this dumb?
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: catastrophe on December 31, 2017, 11:03:19 AM
This was a good win for the Cats.  The criticism of our bench in a 91 point game is ridiculous. That’s like saying, “yeah, he threw for 5 TDS, but our backup QB didn’t do crap!”
Who's criticizing it weirdo?

See above and below your post.
Oh so you were just anticipating the criticism

I think there were some similar posts in other threads as well.
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: catastrophe on December 31, 2017, 11:04:02 AM
I like that catastrophe is doubling down on his analogies. Can't wait to see if he pulls out a soccer analogy next.

I’m not super proud of them tbh.
Title: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: catastrophe on December 31, 2017, 11:06:03 AM
This was a good win for the Cats.  The criticism of our bench in a 91 point game is ridiculous. That’s like saying, “yeah, he threw for 5 TDS, but our backup QB didn’t do crap!”
Also your analogies are incredibly stupid and our weak bench will cost us games this year, even if it didn't yesterday.

What about it says our bench is weak? You’d be melting down just as hard if we stopped feeding guys who were making a high % of shots. Again, we’re not talking about a game we won because of amazing defense or a lucky day against ISU. We scored 90+ points.

Why is it all of the sudden bad coaching to say, these dudes are doing a great job offensively, let’s keep going back to them.

How about this analogy: pretty great that Jordy Nelson caught 5 TDs for 200 yards, but sucks our other WRs only caught 3 passes. That sure shows we are in trouble.

Are you really this dumb?

Well I apparently so since I don’t give a crap how many points Joe Walkon scores when we put up 90. Guess I’m just the resident idiot of the South Carolina Gamecocks board. Maybe Brown should have been passing it more instead of driving into wide open lanes?
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: stunted on December 31, 2017, 02:56:41 PM
we'll be fine with the bench as long as nobody gets injured. even if we had an above average bench, if one of the stud 4 goes down, we're probably just as screwed at getting a deep run.
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: michigancat on December 31, 2017, 02:58:05 PM
we'll be fine with the bench as long as nobody gets injured. even if we had an above average bench, if one of the stud 4 goes down, we're probably just as screwed at getting a deep run.
The shitty bench makes the big four more likely to get injured
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: kso_FAN on December 31, 2017, 03:03:44 PM
Meh. Depth for us in basketball is probably similar to football. We need our main guys to stay healthy. I don't worry about guys getting "tired" either.
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: pissclams on December 31, 2017, 03:22:23 PM
i fully expect for us to shoot 55% this season which is exactly why I think this team is good
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: stunted on December 31, 2017, 04:08:37 PM
all the reaching to hate on this team is getting boring :zzz:
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: wetwillie on December 31, 2017, 04:15:02 PM
Meh. Depth for us in basketball is probably similar to football. We need our main guys to stay healthy. I don't worry about guys getting "tired" either.

seems incredibly unlikely to have all four guys be healthy the whole year, but i will give you that if they somehow do manage to avoid missing any time with one of the 4 guys to injury this team can be good. 
Title: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: kso_FAN on December 31, 2017, 05:48:33 PM
Meh. Depth for us in basketball is probably similar to football. We need our main guys to stay healthy. I don't worry about guys getting "tired" either.

seems incredibly unlikely to have all four guys be healthy the whole year, but i will give you that if they somehow do manage to avoid missing any time with one of the 4 guys to injury this team can be good.

How many teams can lose one of their top 2-4 players for a long time and be good? Maybe 1 or 2 in our league? If OU lost Young they would be done.
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: pissclams on December 31, 2017, 05:54:03 PM
lol you mean the poy young? ya that might make a mark if he were to go down
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: kso_FAN on December 31, 2017, 06:12:30 PM
lol you mean the poy young? ya that might make a mark if he were to go down

Nice indirect Mark Young reference...
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: catastrophe on December 31, 2017, 07:30:28 PM
There is a reason the committee explicitly considers injuries to key players during the season.
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: Kat Kid on December 31, 2017, 08:30:03 PM
this isn't football you idiots, injuries don't happen that much.
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: wetwillie on December 31, 2017, 08:32:10 PM
lol wut
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: pissclams on December 31, 2017, 09:50:37 PM
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180101/2cbd68f19d55b91660546afb99e89b19.jpg)
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: MakeItRain on January 01, 2018, 11:01:16 AM
lol wut

Do you watch basketball? Since I'm guessing it only extends to K-State games, think of the best 20 K-State players of the last decade, how many of them missed extended time with an injury? I got Bill Walker, anyone else?
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: wetwillie on January 01, 2018, 11:31:01 AM
DJamer missed an entire year
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: michigancat on January 01, 2018, 11:31:51 AM
lol wut

Do you watch basketball? Since I'm guessing it only extends to K-State games, think of the best 20 K-State players of the last decade, how many of them missed extended time with an injury? I got Bill Walker, anyone else?
Deathbite missed significant time as a freshman. Wade definitely had minutes reduced because of a foot injury last season. (Not sure if they are top twenty players, but this seems relevant).
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: MakeItRain on January 01, 2018, 11:39:42 AM
DJamer missed an entire year

lol wut

Do you watch basketball? Since I'm guessing it only extends to K-State games, think of the best 20 K-State players of the last decade, how many of them missed extended time with an injury? I got Bill Walker, anyone else?
Deathbite missed significant time as a freshman. Wade definitely had minutes reduced because of a foot injury last season. (Not sure if they are top twenty players, but this seems relevant).

Wade probably is, not sure about Killa Kam and DJamer as much as I love them. Anyway, it's a lot less likely that any of those dudes would get injured than it actually happening which was fan's point. I feel like I've been reading his point about depth every year for a decade, changed my mind about it a while ago.
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: kso_FAN on January 01, 2018, 01:05:11 PM
Sure, injuries are a risk, but depth in basketball is overrated. I wish we would have a big or two give us some capable minutes now and then, but I don't worry about the core 4 getting "tired" as the season goes along. I think Wainright and Diarra are solid, we just need Mawein and one other guy to show that they can play a little bit.
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: michigancat on January 01, 2018, 01:13:32 PM
Sure, injuries are a risk, but depth in basketball is overrated. I wish we would have a big or two give us some capable minutes now and then, but I don't worry about the core 4 getting "tired" as the season goes along. I think Wainright and Diarra are solid, we just need Mawein and one other guy to show that they can play a little bit.
There's also foul trouble
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on January 01, 2018, 01:14:16 PM
We got 66 minutes from our bench in a blowout win at Hilton. I'd say our bench is deep and fabulous.
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: kso_FAN on January 01, 2018, 01:15:32 PM
Sure, injuries are a risk, but depth in basketball is overrated. I wish we would have a big or two give us some capable minutes now and then, but I don't worry about the core 4 getting "tired" as the season goes along. I think Wainright and Diarra are solid, we just need Mawein and one other guy to show that they can play a little bit.
There's also foul trouble

That's a fair point.
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on January 01, 2018, 01:18:32 PM
You want to look at a crap shallow bench, look at ku.
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: cat97 on January 01, 2018, 01:26:17 PM
Sure, injuries are a risk, but depth in basketball is overrated. I wish we would have a big or two give us some capable minutes now and then, but I don't worry about the core 4 getting "tired" as the season goes along. I think Wainright and Diarra are solid, we just need Mawein and one other guy to show that they can play a little bit.
  I think Mawien has shown he can play a little.  Will the refs let him play a little?  Will we get the same calls against Konate pushing to establishh position that Mawien got against ISU.
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: Kat Kid on January 01, 2018, 01:58:11 PM
injuries are such a small part of college basketball you might as well just bitch about the refs like a normal person.
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on January 01, 2018, 02:37:11 PM
The atrocity that is cbb officiating is infinitely more impactful on the outcome of games than injuries
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: wetwillie on January 01, 2018, 02:43:32 PM
injuries are such a small part of college basketball you might as well just bitch about the refs like a normal person.

No one is bitching about injuries but don't let that stop you from continuing to rack up a long streak of shitty posts
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: #LIFE on January 01, 2018, 02:44:21 PM
The force is more impactful than anything else
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: Kat Kid on January 01, 2018, 03:12:17 PM
injuries are such a small part of college basketball you might as well just bitch about the refs like a normal person.

No one is bitching about injuries but don't let that stop you from continuing to rack up a long streak of shitty posts

(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/kEUxcNzl4Kk/maxresdefault.jpg)
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: renocat on January 01, 2018, 03:42:38 PM
Wade is draining everything in warm up
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: MakeItRain on January 06, 2018, 05:34:44 PM
this isn't football you idiots, injuries don't happen that much.

wetwillie can mush this right in our fat faces
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: wetwillie on January 06, 2018, 05:37:28 PM
Didn't get to watch, who got hurt and how bad?
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: kso_FAN on January 06, 2018, 05:48:13 PM
Didn't get to watch, who got hurt and how bad?

Stokes, no idea how bad.
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: michigancat on January 06, 2018, 06:26:50 PM
I will go on record that I don't think Stokes' high minutes contributed to an injury this early in the season.
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: Kat Kid on January 06, 2018, 06:27:12 PM
lol yeah. just cross post this to oscar-cuses thread.
Title: Re: What are you WADEing for?; ISU ADV
Post by: MakeItRain on January 06, 2018, 06:29:14 PM
I will go on record that I don't think Stokes' high minutes contributed to an injury this early in the season.

I think yourself, _FAN, and I understood the point that was actually being made but it devolved into basketball players don't get hurt at all.