goemaw.com
General Discussion => The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit => Topic started by: renocat on February 23, 2017, 01:48:06 AM
-
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/fort-collins-judge-blocks-colorado-towns-ban-on-topless-women/
Certain things aren't meant to be free range. I don't want to see old saggy honkers blighting the visual panorama of downtown Hutchinson. What's next?
-
reno hates the free market
-
He needs big government to protect his children from boobies.
-
Reno fighting the good fight against Big Nipple
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Two points. No federal judge should prevent a community from setting its own standards for decency and public decorum. Secondly, some off in the head person's so called rights should not supersede the rights of the masses. Would you want to see Hillry going down the street swinging her old droopers in the breeze? Surely this would spurn suicides or a rash of self castration.
-
Two points. No federal judge should prevent a community from setting its own standards for decency and public decorum. Secondly, some off in the head person's so called rights should not supersede the rights of the masses. Would you want to see Hillry going down the street swinging her old droopers in the breeze? Surely this would spurn suicides or a rash of self castration.
Yeah Jim Crow was great
-
Claiming wagging whompers in the wind is on par with equal rights is demeaning to all minorities. The Topfree.and.Free the Nipple Movements contend if a man can go topless legally so can they. IMO this idea is barely connected to a person's civil rights. This federal judge ruling.this law is unconstitutional bcause women have the same right to go topless as a man is a boob.
-
Claiming wagging whompers in the wind is on par with equal rights is demeaning to all minorities. The Topfree.and.Free the Nipple Movements contend if a man can go topless legally so can they. IMO this idea is barely connected to a person's civil rights. This federal judge ruling.this law is unconstitutional bcause women have the same right to go topless as a man is a boob.
Claiming that hick ass towns should make their own rules on decorum is demeaning to smarter people
-
http://anonhq.com/united-states-federal-court-rules-females-free-display-breasts-public/
-
http://anonhq.com/united-states-federal-court-rules-females-free-display-breasts-public/
:dance:
-
:thumbs:
-
http://anonhq.com/united-states-federal-court-rules-females-free-display-breasts-public/
:dance:
U all know what Katdaddy's got to say about this, "Expose them if you got em." Also, some things are meant to be free. :Woot:
-
That's a catchy slogan, katdaddy :thumbs:
-
So now that a federal judge has ruled free range boobs are not sexual objects, I can go to Ft. Collins, sit on main street in a law chair, and tell some nice honker knowing that Ican't be arrested fo sexual harassment given I was commenting on asexual anatomical parts. So does this mean lefty women can't classify Trump as a.pervert anymore?
-
Might want to brush up on sexual harassment law.
-
So now that a federal judge has ruled free range boobs are not sexual objects, I can go to Ft. Collins, sit on main street in a law chair, and tell some nice honker knowing that Ican't be arrested fo sexual harassment given I was commenting on asexual anatomical parts. So does this mean lefty women can't classify Trump as a.pervert anymore?
Trump wasn't grabbing boobs*.
*I do not condone grabbing boobs.
-
So now that a federal judge has ruled free range boobs are not sexual objects, I can go to Ft. Collins, sit on main street in a law chair, and tell some nice honker knowing that Ican't be arrested fo sexual harassment given I was commenting on asexual anatomical parts. So does this mean lefty women can't classify Trump as a.pervert anymore?
Trump wasn't grabbing boobs*.
*I do not condone grabbing boobs.
Sorry Gooch
-
Trump wasn't grabbing boobs*.
*I do not condone non-consensually grabbing boobs.