goemaw.com

General Discussion => The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit => Topic started by: star seed 7 on October 18, 2016, 07:44:04 PM

Title: Debate 3
Post by: star seed 7 on October 18, 2016, 07:44:04 PM
now featuring special guests: the benghazi mom and obama's half brother
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: CNS on October 18, 2016, 07:45:15 PM
I would probably vote for either, sight unseen, over Don

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: star seed 7 on October 18, 2016, 08:16:56 PM
rumblings of more guests to still be announced   :excited:
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Tobias on October 18, 2016, 08:20:18 PM
i hope o'keefe leaks them :drool:
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Phil Titola on October 18, 2016, 08:22:23 PM
he should put Scott Baio in the audience....
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 18, 2016, 09:34:26 PM
Probably all russian spies trying to control 'merica
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: puniraptor on October 19, 2016, 08:26:05 AM
prediction: donald j trump fakes the handshake and goes right for the snizz
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: renocat on October 19, 2016, 08:37:00 AM
prediction: donald j trump fakes the handshake and goes right for the snizz
I doubt that would make her flinch.  She would probably yell, "Stop that Bill."
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Mrs. Gooch on October 19, 2016, 09:35:16 AM
Facebook sponsored ad...

Quote from: Donald J. Trump
Before Mr. Trump takes the stage to face Hillary Clinton, he’ll be given a list of supporters who made a contribution just before the final debate. Donate $500, $250, $100 or even $35 today before 8pm to get your name on the list.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: yoga-like_abana on October 19, 2016, 09:56:56 AM
Facebook sponsored ad...

Quote from: Donald J. Trump
Before Mr. Trump takes the stage to face Hillary Clinton, he’ll be given a list of supporters who made a contribution just before the final debate. Donate $500, $250, $100 or even $35 today before 8pm to get your name on the list.
:love:
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 19, 2016, 12:30:28 PM
Oh look a row of Russian (Pakistani) Hackers!!  Welcome!! 
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: sys on October 19, 2016, 01:22:51 PM
this may be his last chance to get close enough to kill her.  since he can't win, it's the only way he can save face now.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 19, 2016, 01:27:53 PM
this may be his last chance to get close enough to kill her.  since he can't win, it's the only way he can save face now.

I don't think he is alpha enough to do it.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: stunted on October 19, 2016, 07:02:47 PM
rumblings of more guests to still be announced   :excited:

James O'Keefe!!!
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: star seed 7 on October 19, 2016, 07:06:37 PM
 :lol:
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Tobias on October 19, 2016, 07:09:48 PM
oh eff yes
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Phil Titola on October 19, 2016, 07:39:47 PM
he should put Scott Baio in the audience....

 :ROFL:
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: stunted on October 19, 2016, 07:55:57 PM
Anyone else got Dilbert's periscope going? :excited:
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: stunted on October 19, 2016, 08:17:26 PM
 :zzz:
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Panjandrum on October 19, 2016, 08:22:19 PM
This is starting out like the real life version of the debate that was in the fourth season of the West Wing.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: bones129 on October 19, 2016, 08:23:21 PM
And The Donald sniffs begin.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: star seed 7 on October 19, 2016, 08:23:42 PM
bad hombres  :lol:
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: CNS on October 19, 2016, 08:25:20 PM
Top 3 worst thing politicians do is the individual story about some person they claim they know to provide a story about that person's family and some policy.....

The worst

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Tobias on October 19, 2016, 08:29:40 PM
bad hombres  :lol:

so so good
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: puniraptor on October 19, 2016, 08:30:23 PM
OK he has said BIGLY multiple times now meaning greatly.

if he was smart, I would say it was an inside joke, but now I think he really thinks its a word
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: CNS on October 19, 2016, 08:30:27 PM
Russia!

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: bones129 on October 19, 2016, 08:30:29 PM
Looks like Donald put some color in his hair.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: star seed 7 on October 19, 2016, 08:31:30 PM
Looks like Donald put some color in his hair.

piss color
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Tobias on October 19, 2016, 08:31:50 PM
let's talk cyber!
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Phil Titola on October 19, 2016, 08:32:00 PM
Oh man, she got him heavy breathing

"YOU ARE THE PUPPET"
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: puniraptor on October 19, 2016, 08:32:18 PM
NO YOU ARE!
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: stunted on October 19, 2016, 08:32:37 PM
Russia  :curse:
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: CNS on October 19, 2016, 08:32:37 PM
Don is actually doing much better this time.  Actual prep?

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: bones129 on October 19, 2016, 08:32:48 PM
She's starting to burrow under his skin...
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Tobias on October 19, 2016, 08:33:25 PM
the wheels are coming off :excited:
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: CNS on October 19, 2016, 08:33:38 PM
She tries to dress like she is off of a Doctor Who epi that takes place in a future timeline or something.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: star seed 7 on October 19, 2016, 08:34:00 PM
90 minutes left  :driving:
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: SkinnyBenny on October 19, 2016, 08:35:44 PM
"NO PUPPET. NO PUPPET.

YOU'RE THE PUPPET. YOU'RE THE PUPPET."


Jesus Christ, this fat loser is a 70 year-old toddler. :lol:
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: stunted on October 19, 2016, 08:36:20 PM
Don is actually doing much better this time.  Actual prep?

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

I thought opposite but seems like he's got her flustered now.  :driving:
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: catastrophe on October 19, 2016, 08:36:41 PM
Holy crap you guys.  Trump is winning this debate. :sdeek:
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: stunted on October 19, 2016, 08:37:04 PM
"NO PUPPET. NO PUPPET.

YOU'RE THE PUPPET. YOU'RE THE PUPPET."


Jesus Christ, this fat loser is a 70 year-old toddler. :lol:

I'd love to have a who's a bigger puppet discussion at a later time
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Phil Titola on October 19, 2016, 08:38:22 PM
Holy crap you guys.  Trump is winning this debate. :sdeek:

"you are the puppet" isn't winning...seems his drugs keeping him calm at the beginning wore off.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Panjandrum on October 19, 2016, 08:38:36 PM
Holy crap you guys.  Trump is winning this debate. :sdeek:

Uhh...no?
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: CNS on October 19, 2016, 08:39:12 PM
I hope that the biggest jobs program since WW2 isn't WW3.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: catastrophe on October 19, 2016, 08:39:38 PM
Holy crap you guys.  Trump is winning this debate. :sdeek:

"you are the puppet" isn't winning...seems his drugs keeping him calm at the beginning wore off.

So the first person that says "you are the puppet" unprovoked is in control, but the second person is childish? :dunno:
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Tobias on October 19, 2016, 08:40:52 PM
very alpha move, yes
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: michigancat on October 19, 2016, 08:41:14 PM
lol at Donald going back go Japan and Saudi Arabia when asked about the economy :lol:
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Phil Titola on October 19, 2016, 08:41:35 PM
Yeah toddler responses typically aren't winning.

This guy just bounced backed to a prior topic instead of pimping his economic plan...
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Panjandrum on October 19, 2016, 08:42:18 PM
"We're going to deal with college tuition."

How, Einstein?
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: catastrophe on October 19, 2016, 08:42:45 PM
Holy crap you guys.  Trump is winning this debate. :sdeek:

Uhh...no?

I'm sure he'll run out of steam, but him calling her out on pivoting from immigration to Russia was very Christie vs. Rubio talking points-esque.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: CNS on October 19, 2016, 08:42:50 PM
He wants other countries to pay their nato bill as part of his economic plan.  Does that mean we will cut defense since other countries will be paying their share?

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: SkinnyBenny on October 19, 2016, 08:43:51 PM
Um, one of them interrupted yelling into the microphone and said it four rough ridin' times. That's literally a trait of children who haven't yet learned how to behave and have rational conversations. Go back and watch that entire response/exchange again. Try to make a case that they both look equally childish. Jfc, catastrophe.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: puniraptor on October 19, 2016, 08:45:17 PM
the only L for hill so far in this one is the brazil banking illuminati NWO speech.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Panjandrum on October 19, 2016, 08:45:35 PM
Holy crap you guys.  Trump is winning this debate. :sdeek:

Uhh...no?

I'm sure he'll run out of steam, but him calling her out on pivoting from immigration to Russia was very Christie vs. Rubio talking points-esque.

Good God, man, his rant ended up going all over the room like one of those dumb ass kids in the Family Circus.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: CNS on October 19, 2016, 08:45:47 PM
Hills presidency is already marred by unsightly lipstick teeth.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: catastrophe on October 19, 2016, 08:46:51 PM
Um, one of them interrupted yelling into the microphone and said it four rough ridin' times. That's literally a trait of children who haven't yet learned how to behave and have rational conversations. Go back and watch that entire response/exchange again. Try to make a case that they both look equally childish. Jfc, catastrophe.

FTR, I was referring to the entire debate at that point. It's a stupid and untopical comment from Clinton in the first place.  A stupid and abrasive response from Trump.  I don't think that moment shines well on either candidate.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: CNS on October 19, 2016, 08:48:36 PM
The ppl that dig dons talking point about us not making things any more won't be able to afford any of that stuff once we make it here again.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 19, 2016, 08:49:23 PM
Hillary Clinton is so absurdly full of crap.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: catastrophe on October 19, 2016, 08:49:39 PM
Hillary relying on her notes a lot.  Donald acting up unnecessarily again.  Both flailing.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Phil Titola on October 19, 2016, 08:49:43 PM
crocodile tears  :excited:
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: star seed 7 on October 19, 2016, 08:50:03 PM
jealous of india and china  :lol:
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: catastrophe on October 19, 2016, 08:51:02 PM
The ppl that dig dons talking point about us not making things any more won't be able to afford any of that stuff once we make it here again.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

A lot of those people don't have jobs, so if they get to work in a Nike shoe-making factory in Detroit, they'll at least be able to afford something.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: michigancat on October 19, 2016, 08:51:40 PM
she destroyed him with that thirty years bit :lol:
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: CNS on October 19, 2016, 08:52:19 PM
Posted this last time: podcast I heard a while back noted that 80% of jobs lost since NAFTA was signed have been lost to automation, not foreign labor.  We should outlaw robots and computers?

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 19, 2016, 08:53:08 PM
Her 30 years of experience is rough ridin' pathetic. It's all volunteer stuff any idiot can do. :lol:
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: CNS on October 19, 2016, 08:53:45 PM
But she should have changed a bunch.of laws and stuff!

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Panjandrum on October 19, 2016, 08:54:22 PM
Holy Christ, did he just say they paid people $1500 to start riots?

Huh?
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 19, 2016, 08:54:35 PM
Posted this last time: podcast I heard a while back noted that 80% of jobs lost since NAFTA was signed have been lost to automation, not foreign labor.  We should outlaw robots and computers?

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

So 20% lost to nafta per that report, thanks for clarifying.

 :rolleyes:
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: catastrophe on October 19, 2016, 08:55:18 PM
Fitness question - Trump already loses this round. He should just take a break and rest up for the next round.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: catastrophe on October 19, 2016, 08:56:36 PM
"America is great because America is good."

Put it on a hat, Hillary!
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: michigancat on October 19, 2016, 08:56:55 PM
Posted this last time: podcast I heard a while back noted that 80% of jobs lost since NAFTA was signed have been lost to automation, not foreign labor.  We should outlaw robots and computers?

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

So 20% lost to nafta per that report, thanks for clarifying.

 :rolleyes:
It wasn't all NAFTA and automation

#math
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: michigancat on October 19, 2016, 08:57:30 PM
"no one has more respect for women than me"

:lol:
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Skipper44 on October 19, 2016, 08:57:38 PM
The ppl that dig dons talking point about us not making things any more won't be able to afford any of that stuff once we make it here again.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
Don repping that tp is the worst thing for it but at least those ppl would be making something
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: catastrophe on October 19, 2016, 08:58:14 PM
"no one has more respect for women than me"

:lol:

*audible laughter from audience*
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 19, 2016, 08:58:55 PM
He just pant suited her on the emails.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: stunted on October 19, 2016, 08:59:46 PM
Holy Christ, did he just say they paid people $1500 to start riots?

Huh?

Yup. Check the #1 trending on YouTube
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: michigancat on October 19, 2016, 09:00:25 PM
James O'keefe's show on the Trump News Network is gonna be great
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: star seed 7 on October 19, 2016, 09:00:55 PM
James O'keefe's show on the Trump News Network is gonna be great

honestly can't wait
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Panjandrum on October 19, 2016, 09:01:16 PM
Holy Christ, did he just say they paid people $1500 to start riots?

Huh?

Yup. Check the #1 trending on YouTube

I get news from news sites.  Not YouTube.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: puniraptor on October 19, 2016, 09:02:10 PM
she dodging that false flag tape. confession?
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: catastrophe on October 19, 2016, 09:02:48 PM
 Moderator just called out Hillary for dodging the question and Trump jumps in and saves her from having to answer.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 19, 2016, 09:03:15 PM
Clinton Foundation  :ROFL:

Just humiliated
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: bones129 on October 19, 2016, 09:03:33 PM
Moderator just called out Hillary for dodging the question and Trump jumps in and saves her from having to answer.

He just can't help himself.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: stunted on October 19, 2016, 09:04:10 PM
Holy Christ, did he just say they paid people $1500 to start riots?

Huh?

Yup. Check the #1 trending on YouTube

I get news from news sites.  Not YouTube.

That explains it.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: catastrophe on October 19, 2016, 09:04:31 PM
Moderator: Yes, but Secretary Clinton, you're not answering...
Trump: I want to talk about the Trump Foundation
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: CNS on October 19, 2016, 09:04:41 PM
6' portrait vs $25M from saudis.  Pffft.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Phil Titola on October 19, 2016, 09:05:17 PM
Moderator just called out Hillary for dodging the question and Trump jumps in and saves her from having to answer.

He just won't let her lose.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: catastrophe on October 19, 2016, 09:06:01 PM
Annnnnnnnd meltdown.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: CNS on October 19, 2016, 09:06:29 PM
Tax returns won't effect anything.  I mean, given sexual assault barely moved the poll needle, some stupid and legal tax issues won't mean crap.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Tobias on October 19, 2016, 09:06:39 PM
ooh rigged talk :excited:
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: michigancat on October 19, 2016, 09:06:50 PM
she needs a better answer for the Saudi money thing

But Trump, man. :lol:
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Tobias on October 19, 2016, 09:07:05 PM
media :curse:
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: CNS on October 19, 2016, 09:07:29 PM
If it wasn't political, the Saudi answer is the same as his answer to his Chinese steel and his taxes

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: bones129 on October 19, 2016, 09:07:38 PM
OUR MINDS HAVE BEEN POISONED!!
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Phil Titola on October 19, 2016, 09:07:53 PM
He has too many lower teeth I think
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Panjandrum on October 19, 2016, 09:08:04 PM
Holy Christ, did he just say they paid people $1500 to start riots?

Huh?

Yup. Check the #1 trending on YouTube

I get news from news sites.  Not YouTube.

That explains it.

Adjust your tinfoil, stunz.  It's slipping to the left.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Panjandrum on October 19, 2016, 09:08:46 PM
Trump right now...

(https://i.makeagif.com/media/8-31-2015/EA3aJT.gif)
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: catastrophe on October 19, 2016, 09:09:01 PM
I've concluded Trump is incapable of acting presidential for more than 30 minutes at a time.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: CNS on October 19, 2016, 09:09:45 PM
He will rule via twitter, so that doesn't matter.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Phil Titola on October 19, 2016, 09:09:58 PM
I've concluded Trump is incapable of acting presidential for more than 30 minutes at a time.

Should be fine for America.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: michigancat on October 19, 2016, 09:10:18 PM
his best moment was the emmy conspiracy acknowledgement. was pretty great.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Phil Titola on October 19, 2016, 09:10:49 PM
Hillary just went Eric Stratton
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on October 19, 2016, 09:10:57 PM
OK he has said BIGLY multiple times now meaning greatly.

if he was smart, I would say it was an inside joke, but now I think he really thinks its a word

Bigly is an adverb, puni, and an actual proper word.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: catastrophe on October 19, 2016, 09:11:37 PM
These moderators chastising the audience for making noise really just highlights their reactions.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 19, 2016, 09:12:13 PM
It's okay to rig crap against #bern, and he should honorably concede
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: stunted on October 19, 2016, 09:13:41 PM
his best moment was the emmy conspiracy acknowledgement. was pretty great.

Well known pickup move. Agree and amplify. Neutralizes her crap test.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: catastrophe on October 19, 2016, 09:13:52 PM
OK he has said BIGLY multiple times now meaning greatly.

if he was smart, I would say it was an inside joke, but now I think he really thinks its a word

Bigly is an adverb, puni, and an actual proper word.

Confirmed:

Quote
Related forms [of "Big"]
biggish, adjective
bigly, adverb
Synonyms
1. huge, immense; bulky, massive; capacious, voluminous; extensive. See great. 4. consequential. 15. overflowing, flooded.

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/bigly?s=t

Trump knows words you don't.  :ROFL:
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 19, 2016, 09:14:15 PM
Hillary Clinton sucks so hard, just the worst kind of politician.

Too bad Trump didn't take the time to learn anything.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: puniraptor on October 19, 2016, 09:14:47 PM
OK he has said BIGLY multiple times now meaning greatly.

if he was smart, I would say it was an inside joke, but now I think he really thinks its a word

Bigly is an adverb, puni, and an actual proper word.

Confirmed:

Quote
Related forms [of "Big"]
biggish, adjective
bigly, adverb
Synonyms
1. huge, immense; bulky, massive; capacious, voluminous; extensive. See great. 4. consequential. 15. overflowing, flooded.

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/bigly?s=t

Trump knows words you don't.  :ROFL:

well that's awesome then

he has my vote
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: puniraptor on October 19, 2016, 09:15:23 PM
JK DICTIONARY DOT COM IS RIGGED, PUPPET
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: catastrophe on October 19, 2016, 09:15:58 PM
You can tell Trump stopped paying attention after the 30-45 minute mark and just decided he wanted to rant about crap.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: CNS on October 19, 2016, 09:17:40 PM
Google?














RIGGED!

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Phil Titola on October 19, 2016, 09:18:05 PM
YOU ARE UNFIT!
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Panjandrum on October 19, 2016, 09:18:21 PM
The, 'when we got Bin Laden while you were filming Celebrity Apprentice' was a kill shot.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: michigancat on October 19, 2016, 09:18:37 PM
"YOU are the one who's unfit"
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: michigancat on October 19, 2016, 09:18:47 PM
:lol:
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: catastrophe on October 19, 2016, 09:19:03 PM
You know who has bad judgment, Don? The guy who would rather hear himself talk than let Hillary hang herself up there.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: chum1 on October 19, 2016, 09:19:49 PM
Arguing with the moderator!
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Panjandrum on October 19, 2016, 09:20:44 PM
Trump: Have you seen it?  Have you seen it?  Have you seen it?
Wallace: Uh, yes?
Trump: Have you seen it?  Have you seen it?
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: michigancat on October 19, 2016, 09:20:58 PM
Arguing with the moderator!

it's so great
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: SkinnyBenny on October 19, 2016, 09:21:09 PM
Her 30 years of experience is rough ridin' pathetic. It's all volunteer stuff any idiot can do. :lol:

Yes, whichis why so many herp derps with guns were able to find and kill Bin Laden.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Phil Titola on October 19, 2016, 09:22:03 PM
"Lots of luck Hillary"

Did he just give her the POTUS?
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: chum1 on October 19, 2016, 09:22:20 PM
He's 3 for 3 on going off the rails at around 75 minutes in.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: steve dave on October 19, 2016, 09:22:34 PM
He quit
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Tobias on October 19, 2016, 09:23:24 PM
trim was right
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Phil Titola on October 19, 2016, 09:23:54 PM
He quit

he should.....grab....her....NAH
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: SkinnyBenny on October 19, 2016, 09:24:03 PM
You'd think in 30 years of business, Donald would've learned how to make his tie knot look halfway respectable instead of like complete garbage.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: SkinnyBenny on October 19, 2016, 09:24:35 PM
It seriously looks like it has an elbow
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 19, 2016, 09:25:03 PM
She went full psychobabble on syria
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Phil Titola on October 19, 2016, 09:25:25 PM
He just can't get out of his own way
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: SkinnyBenny on October 19, 2016, 09:25:38 PM
Donald's tie knot is fortune cookie shaped.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Phil Titola on October 19, 2016, 09:26:12 PM
Donald's tie knot is fortune cookie shaped.

clip*


* Made in China
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Panjandrum on October 19, 2016, 09:27:41 PM
The election was over the minute he said that he'd keep us in suspense on whether or not he'd accept the election.

This could end up looking like Bush/Dukakis.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: SkinnyBenny on October 19, 2016, 09:28:09 PM
If his tie knot were a clock, its hands would read 6:47.  :sdeek:
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 19, 2016, 09:28:24 PM
Listening to her talk about the economy or foreign policy is so rough ridin' funny.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Phil Titola on October 19, 2016, 09:28:59 PM
Does Don know how percents work?
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 19, 2016, 09:30:10 PM
Her and b.o. are for the middle class and against the rich, but nobody fucks the middle class harder.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: SkinnyBenny on October 19, 2016, 09:31:20 PM
Does Don know how percents work?

Of course he does. His tie knot is a pie graph showing right around 75%.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Phil Titola on October 19, 2016, 09:33:03 PM
'such a nasty woman'
 :driving:
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: chum1 on October 19, 2016, 09:33:20 PM
Sexist!
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 19, 2016, 09:37:57 PM
Why doesn't this guy moderate all the debates.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Phil Titola on October 19, 2016, 09:40:22 PM
Why doesn't this guy moderate all the debates.

He was good
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: stunted on October 19, 2016, 09:40:49 PM
Ivanka wins tonight as usual  :drool:
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Hurricane Cat on October 19, 2016, 09:40:59 PM
Donald might actually have had a shot at the presidency if he could have arranged six 30 minute debates.

or maybe one 20 minute debate.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: star seed 7 on October 19, 2016, 09:42:09 PM
Ivanka wins tonight as usual  :drool:

maybe she hasn't seen asian male genitals before bro
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Phil Titola on October 19, 2016, 09:42:46 PM
Why question the election process dude?  No blue blood likes that type of talk.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: SkinnyBenny on October 19, 2016, 09:49:01 PM
Why doesn't this guy moderate all the debates.

He was good

I liked him. :thumbs:
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on October 19, 2016, 09:50:11 PM
Why doesn't this guy moderate all the debates.

He was good

much more fair and balanced
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: renocat on October 19, 2016, 10:03:34 PM
Trump's final remarks will resonate with people who want change.  What scares me is his post debate tweets.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: _33 on October 19, 2016, 10:14:19 PM
In perhaps the biggest letdown of my life (rivaled only by the time I opened the new box of pop tarts to find that I had accidentally bought the un-frosted kind), I turned the channel to ABC to watch blackish and instead this appeared on my screen:

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic2.businessinsider.com%2Fimage%2F5808193f8d83b4b8628b5450-1424%2Fscreen%2520shot%25202016-10-19%2520at%25209.07.47%2520pm.png&hash=7339c7ab8e1f53f8af87a86c48c907d779e369ec)



Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Kat Kid on October 19, 2016, 10:16:46 PM
https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/status/788939737885048832
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: stunted on October 19, 2016, 10:20:10 PM
his girl thought she won, even the most alpha of alphas will bend a little for some hot tranny poon (peen?)

i know i have :fatty:
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 19, 2016, 10:24:02 PM
How crazy does someone have to be to pretend like these are "debates" under any sense of the word, and then pretend to score them. Like trying to calculate 3p% while watching batting practice.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: stunted on October 19, 2016, 10:28:46 PM
you shut it mate
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: MakeItRain on October 19, 2016, 10:35:40 PM
She is such a terrible debater, historically bad; yet here we are with her literally debating with an ADHD addled half man half chimpanzee without impulse control.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: DQ12 on October 19, 2016, 10:37:57 PM
well donald's obviously going to lose and probably in a landslide.  hopefully his dipshit ideas and style of campaign go by the wayside along with him.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Panjandrum on October 19, 2016, 10:38:59 PM
Watching post-debate focus groups on ESPN make me lose faith in humanity. 
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 19, 2016, 10:40:19 PM
She is such a terrible debater, historically bad; yet here we are with her literally debating with an ADHD addled half man half chimpanzee without impulse control.
:rolleyes: Wow!
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: MakeItRain on October 19, 2016, 10:41:50 PM
Buckle up folks
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: catastrophe on October 19, 2016, 10:48:20 PM
She is such a terrible debater, historically bad; yet here we are with her literally debating with an ADHD addled half man half chimpanzee without impulse control.

I think this is a pretty fair assessment of the debate.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Tobias on October 19, 2016, 10:50:48 PM
Buckle up folks

what were you saying about impulse control?
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 19, 2016, 10:53:01 PM
Watching post-debate focus groups on ESPN make me lose faith in humanity.

ESPN is doing debate stuff? They need to get the eff out of politics
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 19, 2016, 10:57:20 PM
ADHD: fair game!!!- MIR
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 19, 2016, 10:58:44 PM
"Champinzee"- MIR
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 19, 2016, 11:03:25 PM
"She"- MIR (smdh)
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: MakeItRain on October 19, 2016, 11:05:08 PM
Watching post-debate focus groups on ESPN make me lose faith in humanity.

ESPN is doing debate stuff? They need to get the eff out of politics

I was wondering if that was something that needed to be corrected, certainly he was wrong about what channel he was watching, right?
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: MakeItRain on October 19, 2016, 11:06:24 PM
"Champinzee"- MIR

Remove the quotes, I'm a much better speller than that.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 19, 2016, 11:08:39 PM
God bless you! Will pray! #stopthehate
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: sys on October 20, 2016, 06:16:55 AM
Why doesn't this guy moderate all the debates.

He was good

wallace is a genuine american badass.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: chum1 on October 20, 2016, 10:57:38 AM
Best part for me:

NO PUPPET! NO PUPPET! YOU'RE THE PUPPET! YOU'RE THE PUPPET!
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: CNS on October 20, 2016, 11:03:57 AM
Best part for me:

NO PUPPET! NO PUPPET! YOU'RE THE PUPPET! YOU'RE THE PUPPET!

/debate
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Emo EMAW on October 20, 2016, 11:06:42 AM
Posted this last time: podcast I heard a while back noted that 80% of jobs lost since NAFTA was signed have been lost to automation, not foreign labor.  We should outlaw robots and computers?

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

I think the other 20% is worth talking about. :dunno:
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: CNS on October 20, 2016, 11:13:23 AM
Posted this last time: podcast I heard a while back noted that 80% of jobs lost since NAFTA was signed have been lost to automation, not foreign labor.  We should outlaw robots and computers?

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

I think the other 20% is worth talking about. :dunno:

Agreed.  However, discussing them like its going to take Detroit and make it what it was is silly.  Also, I don't think that it is something that can be made a primary issue in a campaign.  I mean, we are talking about taking very low paying jobs away from mexico.  What do you do then, make them high paying jobs making those products much more expensive?  I mean, Pubs lost their crap over the burger guys wanting $15/hr yet we will give it to someone who presses a button on the side of a sneaker making machine?  Are we going to dictate to biz where they can make product?  None of that is conservative in nature. 

Its all bullshit that makes ppl that don't think in detail say "eff yes!" and think about the four wheeler they want to buy with all their shoe maker button pressing money that they will have under President Trump.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: yoga-like_abana on October 20, 2016, 11:43:18 AM
wacky, everything going alright for you?
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Emo EMAW on October 20, 2016, 11:44:49 AM
A lot of my product's high-value components come from Mexico or Canada even, because it's cheaper to make them there and ship them here.  Anecdotal, I know, and honestly I'm not sure of what the solution is, of it there is a good one.  But if those jobs were here they'd be good paying jobs.

I think one thing that is not considered often, is that these imported products are cheaper because these other countries don't have the safety and environmental regulations we have in this country.  So we pay less for the same widget we could have made ourselves, but it comes at a human cost (safety) of someone we don't care about because they live in a foreign country.  That's unfortunate.  And then there's the environmental cost.  I would even argue that the environmental cost is even higher because of the fossil fuels burned to get product here. 
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 20, 2016, 11:50:23 AM
A lot of my product's high-value components come from Mexico or Canada even, because it's cheaper to make them there and ship them here.  Anecdotal, I know, and honestly I'm not sure of what the solution is, of it there is a good one.  But if those jobs were here they'd be good paying jobs.

I think one thing that is not considered often, is that these imported products are cheaper because these other countries don't have the safety and environmental regulations we have in this country.  So we pay less for the same widget we could have made ourselves, but it comes at a human cost (safety) of someone we don't care about because they live in a foreign country.  That's unfortunate.  And then there's the environmental cost.  I would even argue that the environmental cost is even higher because of the fossil fuels burned to get product here.

If trade were restricted and those jobs were here, your product would be more expensive, which might put your job in jeopardy.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: CNS on October 20, 2016, 11:56:58 AM
I agree with you about the human and enviro cost.  Maybe they should extend our regulations so that any US biz has to ensure those regs are met as if they are being manufactured in the US.

That said, part of it is just plain old cheap labor due to living costs.

One of my manufacturers make all their components in MX as well.  MX is no dummy.  Many areas are forcing companies to provide all kinds of stuff as part of their starting up a plant.  For instance, they had to provide a certain standard of meals, child care, and even an onsite med clinic for use by all workers and their families.  Even given that, they still saved enough money to justify building a huge plant from scratch just across the boarder. 

Another of the manufacturers I use has a very similar story, but on a smaller scale.  However, the rest of his story is that he is not only saving a crap load of money, but the paint finish he provides is crazy superior to what he can do in his California plant because the material used was banned by our govt in the '60's, or something, according to him.  Our regulations don't prohibit a product having that finish, but prohibit the application of the finish to the product. 
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 20, 2016, 12:04:58 PM
Posted this last time: podcast I heard a while back noted that 80% of jobs lost since NAFTA was signed have been lost to automation, not foreign labor.  We should outlaw robots and computers?

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

I think the other 20% is worth talking about. :dunno:

Agreed.  However, discussing them like its going to take Detroit and make it what it was is silly.  Also, I don't think that it is something that can be made a primary issue in a campaign.  I mean, we are talking about taking very low paying jobs away from mexico.  What do you do then, make them high paying jobs making those products much more expensive?  I mean, Pubs lost their crap over the burger guys wanting $15/hr yet we will give it to someone who presses a button on the side of a sneaker making machine?  Are we going to dictate to biz where they can make product?  None of that is conservative in nature. 

Its all bullshit that makes ppl that don't think in detail say "eff yes!" and think about the four wheeler they want to buy with all their shoe maker button pressing money that they will have under President Trump.

Not an anti-free trade guy, but the vast majority of the jobs "created" during this so-called recovery are low paying part time jobs. That evident by the stagnant/declining wage growth. Obamacare and new flsa rules have contributed enormously to that problem, but also the lost of manf jobs overseas. When faced with a low paying job without benefits (e.g, waitresd) and a low paying steady 40 with benefits (e.g. rivet installer), the country stands to gain. Labor unions would have to have a come to jesus moment to get the jobs back to detroit, but the jobs could realistically be "decent paying" in smaller communities across the midwest and south.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: wetwillie on October 20, 2016, 12:05:42 PM
Canada has more lax regulations and lower costs of labor?  I find that hard to believe.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: CNS on October 20, 2016, 12:09:37 PM
What is "decent paying", though. 

I mean, there is a reason why immigrants risk everything to get to this country then are willing to work below min wage. 

I don't see how you can compete with that level of discrepancy and provide something any American will see as decent.   :dunno:
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Emo EMAW on October 20, 2016, 12:10:52 PM
Canada has more lax regulations and lower costs of labor?  I find that hard to believe.

I'm not sure why it is the way it is w.r.t. Canada, but we import a lot from them, stuff we used to do ourselves.

Anyway my comment on safety and environmental regulations apply to China and other places like that too.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: CNS on October 20, 2016, 12:17:33 PM
The problem with the enviro stuff is that there would be no way to ensure it's being followed without simply telling the companies that China has crap emissions and you can't produce there.  Then you land on another country with gray area type behavior.  Then you need a mechanism to monitor that gray area to make sure it doesn't shift to make it's manufacturing more attractive.  Then you need a body to address that. 

I don't see how we do this in an open market system. 

Conservative business owners are the real globalists.  To try to reconcile that with wanting to bring jobs back would require conservatives to adjust their platform.  Either consent to more regulation(similar to the above), or be told who you can do biz with by the govt(and not for security reasons).  It would basically be us imposing economic sanctions on certain countries without any security issue having come up.  It would be pretty cluster-eff'ey.

Pubs need to be discussing ways to create new types of jobs rather than bringing back jobs we have lost.  The problem with that is it quickly leads to addressing education, and no Pub wants to go down that road.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: meow meow on October 20, 2016, 12:21:15 PM
wacky, everything going alright for you?

he needs a sandwich
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Panjandrum on October 20, 2016, 12:26:51 PM
Watching post-debate focus groups on ESPN make me lose faith in humanity.

ESPN is doing debate stuff? They need to get the eff out of politics

I was wondering if that was something that needed to be corrected, certainly he was wrong about what channel he was watching, right?

It was CNN. Brain freeze.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 20, 2016, 12:37:37 PM
What is "decent paying", though. 

I mean, there is a reason why immigrants risk everything to get to this country then are willing to work below min wage. 

I don't see how you can compete with that level of discrepancy and provide something any American will see as decent.   :dunno:

$15 p/hr in dinkleberg, usa is decent paying enough to buy (finance) a house, used pickup and even a bass boat, and still have money left over for beer, smokes and beef. Particularly if mama works a couple night shifts.

When you factor in efficiencies, the value of skilled labor, and the cost of transporting manf goods, it's probably close from a cost standpoint.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: star seed 7 on October 20, 2016, 12:41:28 PM
31k a year is much harder to live on than you imagine
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: star seed 7 on October 20, 2016, 12:43:01 PM
Also shipping costs are much lower than you imagine
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: EMAWican on October 20, 2016, 12:44:19 PM
The environmental cost in the U.S. is ridic when compared to other countries. Environmental costs are a small reason why the jobs are leaving and probably not the main one, but I find it interesting.  I had a rather large manufacturing client who was fined into bankruptcy by the EPA for incomplete paperwork. Were they hurting the environment or people? No. They just didn't have some paper together like they should and weren't following the "law." I realize that this is a random example, but I don't know of any other country where a manufacturing company would close for the same infractions. Why would companies in the U.S. want to put up with that kind of stuff?
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Trim on October 20, 2016, 12:46:36 PM
trim was right

What happened when you posted this that made you come around?
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: CNS on October 20, 2016, 12:54:40 PM
Also shipping costs are much lower than you imagine

also, the cost of beef lately is much more than you imagine.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: star seed 7 on October 20, 2016, 12:55:16 PM
The environmental cost in the U.S. is ridic when compared to other countries. Environmental costs are a small reason why the jobs are leaving and probably not the main one, but I find it interesting.  I had a rather large manufacturing client who was fined into bankruptcy by the EPA for incomplete paperwork. Were they hurting the environment or people? No. They just didn't have some paper together like they should and weren't following the "law." I realize that this is a random example, but I don't know of any other country where a manufacturing company would close for the same infractions. Why would companies in the U.S. want to put up with that kind of stuff?

Sounds like it was run by idiots, not sure how you place the blame on the government when everyone else is able to fill out rough ridin' paperwork
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: CNS on October 20, 2016, 12:56:24 PM
The environmental cost in the U.S. is ridic when compared to other countries. Environmental costs are a small reason why the jobs are leaving and probably not the main one, but I find it interesting.  I had a rather large manufacturing client who was fined into bankruptcy by the EPA for incomplete paperwork. Were they hurting the environment or people? No. They just didn't have some paper together like they should and weren't following the "law." I realize that this is a random example, but I don't know of any other country where a manufacturing company would close for the same infractions. Why would companies in the U.S. want to put up with that kind of stuff?

Shitty implementation of "the right idea" is the problem.  We can't just eff off because some developing country somewhere else is ok with doing it.  That leads to a complete crap show. 
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: EMAWican on October 20, 2016, 12:59:38 PM
The environmental cost in the U.S. is ridic when compared to other countries. Environmental costs are a small reason why the jobs are leaving and probably not the main one, but I find it interesting.  I had a rather large manufacturing client who was fined into bankruptcy by the EPA for incomplete paperwork. Were they hurting the environment or people? No. They just didn't have some paper together like they should and weren't following the "law." I realize that this is a random example, but I don't know of any other country where a manufacturing company would close for the same infractions. Why would companies in the U.S. want to put up with that kind of stuff?

Sounds like it was run by idiots, not sure how you place the blame on the government when everyone else is able to fill out rough ridin' paperwork
Laws are only as good as enforcement. This company was the unlucky of the 0.0001% that got inspected and got caught. At the time we didn't know a single company that was complying with that law.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: star seed 7 on October 20, 2016, 01:01:18 PM
But everyone else was speeding too!!!
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: EMAWican on October 20, 2016, 01:02:34 PM
The environmental cost in the U.S. is ridic when compared to other countries. Environmental costs are a small reason why the jobs are leaving and probably not the main one, but I find it interesting.  I had a rather large manufacturing client who was fined into bankruptcy by the EPA for incomplete paperwork. Were they hurting the environment or people? No. They just didn't have some paper together like they should and weren't following the "law." I realize that this is a random example, but I don't know of any other country where a manufacturing company would close for the same infractions. Why would companies in the U.S. want to put up with that kind of stuff?

Shitty implementation of "the right idea" is the problem.  We can't just eff off because some developing country somewhere else is ok with doing it.  That leads to a complete crap show.
I'm not saying we should piss on environmental issues. You bet your ass that manufacturing companies relocate because labor and environmental compliance costs are so much lower.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: CNS on October 20, 2016, 01:03:33 PM
Well, yeah.  See my post a few posts up.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Tobias on October 20, 2016, 01:05:19 PM
trim was right

What happened when you posted this that made you come around?

it was more in response to steve dave's "he quit" comment than any personal change of heart or anything.  think that was right around his concession
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Canary on October 20, 2016, 01:07:06 PM
Best part for me:

NO PUPPET! NO PUPPET! YOU'RE THE PUPPET! YOU'RE THE PUPPET!
That was the point that has best defined Trump to me throughout the entire campaign.  I spent a part of my life working with young children; that point in the debate brought that experience back to me with me literally laughing out loud.  What would he do with other world leaders in meetings and conflict?
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: EMAWican on October 20, 2016, 01:15:12 PM
But everyone else was speeding too!!!

I'd equate it to a sign saying: "Speed Limit 45 MPH*"

*Refer to section 40.67.47.8.3333.6 part b for additional requirements**
**If you are in a 3 axle or more vehicle refer to ***
***Speed limit is 30.5679 MPH for 3+ axle vehicles, unless manufactured on or before August 30, 2015. Refer to section A.567.533.6.3 (c) (d) (1) (i) Compliance of this speed limit will be determined by taking the weighted average of travel speed over a period of consecutive rolling averages over a period not to exceed 15 second increments. Records of this determined travel speed shall be maintained and kept for a minimum of 5 years.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: CNS on October 20, 2016, 01:18:19 PM
Pretty much any world leader should want Don to win.  It would be the easiest thing in the world to flatter that ego and lead him.

I mean, you could just throw out  big nonsense words/phrases like Cyber Modulator, or Ergonomic Insulation Intensifier, then end with something about how you wouldn't dare dream of moving forward with out the approval of such an informed leader, who you secretly respect more than (insert other leader here) and yet we need to move fast to bigly ensure hydro-static acoustical ambivalence is optimal for us and not ISIS. 

Boom, he would agree to what you told him to agree to.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 20, 2016, 01:25:30 PM
Pretty much any world leader should want Don to win.  It would be the easiest thing in the world to flatter that ego and lead him.

I mean, you could just throw out  big nonsense words/phrases like Cyber Modulator, or Ergonomic Insulation Intensifier, then end with something about how you wouldn't dare dream of moving forward with out the approval of such an informed leader, who you secretly respect more than (insert other leader here) and yet we need to move fast to bigly ensure hydro-static acoustical ambivalence is optimal for us and not ISIS. 

Boom, he would agree to what you told him to agree to.

You would have to be very worried about the fallout of some other leader being a dick to him, though.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: CNS on October 20, 2016, 01:28:52 PM
I don't know.....I mean, he's only going to be there 4 yrs.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 20, 2016, 01:29:42 PM
I don't know.....I mean, he's only going to be there 4 yrs.

Never count out the incumbent in an election.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: catastrophe on October 20, 2016, 01:44:21 PM
I only see two scenarios where Hillary gets another 4 years (because she's obviously winning this thing):

1.  She gets us into a war with Russia (possible); or
2.  The Republican party continues to be a fragmented crap show (very possible).
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: star seed 7 on October 20, 2016, 01:49:36 PM
Give peace a chance Hillary
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Canary on October 20, 2016, 01:57:19 PM
I don't know.....I mean, he's only going to be there 4 yrs.
He will blame that on Hillary and Obama as well.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 20, 2016, 02:04:29 PM
31k a year is much harder to live on than you imagine

That's not what we're talking about libtard. Mailmen start at what, $26k, and that's considered a "decent" job in the lower-middle class category. Still better than barista part time money in the obamaconomy.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: steve dave on October 20, 2016, 02:06:09 PM
if I had the choice to be a mailman or barista I'd choose mailman. blue shorts and driving on the wrong side of the car like a whacko englishman  :love:
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 20, 2016, 02:07:44 PM
But everyone else was speeding too!!!

I'd equate it to a sign saying: "Speed Limit 45 MPH*"

*Refer to section 40.67.47.8.3333.6 part b for additional requirements**
**If you are in a 3 axle or more vehicle refer to ***
***Speed limit is 30.5679 MPH for 3+ axle vehicles, unless manufactured on or before August 30, 2015. Refer to section A.567.533.6.3 (c) (d) (1) (i) Compliance of this speed limit will be determined by taking the weighted average of travel speed over a period of consecutive rolling averages over a period not to exceed 15 second increments. Records of this determined travel speed shall be maintained and kept for a minimum of 5 years.

The EPA probably has the most arcane regulatory system imaginable. You don't need to explain that to the non-retards. It's a paperwork blackhole.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: CNS on October 20, 2016, 02:12:06 PM
as a barista, you could maintain an approximate $20k a yr coffee habit without a problem. 

It's basically like doubling your salary.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: sys on October 20, 2016, 05:45:17 PM
this may be his last chance to get close enough to kill her.  since he can't win, it's the only way he can save face now.

I don't think he is alpha enough to do it.


http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/clinton-probably-finished-off-trump-last-night/

looks to be too late now.  given his stated position that electing clinton will doom america, his inaction reveals himself to be a fraud or a craven.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: sys on October 20, 2016, 05:49:08 PM
i don't wish to be uncharitable.  possibly he was waiting until the end to deliver the deathblow, wishing to give himself a chance at a debating victory first, but when the fateful moment came he was undone by his lack of stamina.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: steve dave on October 20, 2016, 06:56:56 PM
Is this how that 3d chess works? seemed like she kinda sucked but you can't argue with the results

Quote
Trump’s meltdown wasn’t an accident. The Clinton campaign coolly analyzed his weaknesses and then sprung trap after trap to take advantage of them
......
We aren’t used to this kind of victory. We aren’t used to candidates winning not so much because of how they performed but because of how they pushed their opponent into performing. But the fact that we aren’t used to this kind of victory doesn’t make it any less impressive. Hillary Clinton has humbled Donald Trump, and she did it her way.

https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/788778465818476544

Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: star seed 7 on October 20, 2016, 07:16:06 PM
he got silverbacked
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: ednksu on October 20, 2016, 07:42:12 PM
And Trump knows he got silverbacked

http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/videos/a49810/trump-rip-paper-notes-debate/

https://twitter.com/TheFix/status/789090575249125376
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 20, 2016, 10:37:17 PM
Clinton taking credit for donald not preparing for a debate is about as genuine as clinton pumping her A+ foreign policy credentials, or her A+ economic plan which is basically the obamanomics anchor all over.
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: Dugout DickStone on October 23, 2016, 10:54:25 AM
As soon as the Russians got involved, he tanked.  Lol at Russia
Title: Re: Debate 3
Post by: CNS on October 23, 2016, 11:33:52 AM
Pretty much Putin's exact expectation/hope for a Don presidency

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk